REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Meeting of the Institutional Effectiveness Committee
Monday, February 6
9:00-11:00
Boardroom
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Notes of January 26th
3. Action Items
3.1 Institutional Effectiveness Scorecard
4. Discussion Items
4.1 Reflection on accreditation
4.2 Draft Planning Model
5. Director‟s Report Out
6. Agenda items for future meetings
6.1 February 22nd 10-noon in the Boardroom
6.1.1 Detailed model with narrative
6.1.2 Process and timeline of annual assessment of the planning
6.1.2.1 five themes and survey monkey
6.2 March 7th 9-11 in the Boardroom
7. Adjournment
1
Current Institutional Effectiveness Measures
College of the Redwoods – Institutional Effectiveness Measures
Effectiveness
Indicators
Retention
Persistence
Outcome Measures
2008/09
2009/10
Course Retention/Participation Rates
Term Retention Rates
By Cohort Group
Full-Time Retention Rates
By Cohort Group
By Ethnic Group
Fall to Spring
Fall to Fall (from previous Fall)
79%
94%
77%
94%
2010/11
Estimated
74%
96%
2011/12
Target
77%
96%
84%
83%
81%
Click + sign to expand data set
Click + sign to expand data set
63%
66%
61%
48%
45%
44%
83%
68%
50%
Average # of Terms to Degree
Access
Revenue
Per 320 Report
Success
Satisfaction/Perception
Productivity
Full-Time during first term
Part-Time during first term
College Preparedness Rates
English
Math
Basic Skills Progression
English
Math
Section Cancellation Rates
District Student to Advisor Ratio
Eureka
Mendocino
Del Norte
District Student to Counselor Ratio
Eureka
Mendocino
Del Norte
Financial Aid Participation Rates
High School Enrollment Yield
Student Headcount
By Ethnic Group
FTES (Total)
FTES (Resident)
Annual Budget Reserve (311 Report)
ARCC Rates Data
Student Progress & Achievement
Basic Skills Improvement
Course Success Rates (participating students)
Student Achievement
Degree/Transfer
Degree/No Transfer
Certificate
Transfer w/o CR Completion
No Transfer or CR Completion
% of Courses with SLO's
Average Grades Awarded
Transfers to 4-Year Institutions
Total Transfers
Total Completions
6.60
8.05
7.10
8.57
7.53
7.89
27%
24%
25%
27%
27%
30%
34.0%
37.0%
15%
37.0%
38.0%
14%
2127 : 1
N/A
1119 : 1
1179 : 1
N/A
N/A
Data forthcoming
Data forthcoming
6%
6%
1005 : 1
N/A
N/A
6380 : 1
3538 : 1
3015 : 1
1094 : 1
960 : 1
780 : 1
N/A
1240 : 1
1300 : 1
53%
56%
59%
27%
33%
Data forthcoming
10197
10763
9150
Click + sign to expand data set
5468
5767
5460.32
5271
5060
5201
5.1%
12.3%
6.3%
57%
8720
5204
4972
54.9%
47.4%
56.2%
52.4%
52.5%
55.9%
88%
89%
90%
498
602
591
4%
5%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
3%
13%
10%
7%
80%
80%
88%
100%
Data forthcoming
2.43
2.51
Click + sign to expand data set
538
646
648
551
529
600
Data
590
forthcoming
By Ethnic Group
Click + sign to expand data set
By Cohort Group
Click + sign to expand data set
Licensure Exam Pass Rates
Data forthcoming
Job Placement Rates
Data forthcoming
Student Satisfaction--instructional
Data forthcoming
Student Satisfaction--services
Data forthcoming
Fill Rates
64%
72%
79%
80%
Physical Fill Rate (Room Capacity)
47%
48%
57%
60%
Efficiency Rate: FTES / FTEF
33.71
34.64
34.89
37.04
Cost per FTES
$ 2,125.71 $ 2,032.85 $ 2,064.18 $ 2,000.37
FTES/Calculated Sections
2.7
2.81
2.79
2.94
2
52.7%
49.2%
89%
597
5%
2%
2%
19%
73%
N/A
2.46
27%
23%
Current Integrated Planning Model
3
2011-2012 IEC Work plan (subject to change depending upon planning issues identified)
Planning Item
Date of Completion
1.
Redistribute the annual year-end report to the
college community.
Summer 2011
Responsible
Person
IEC
2.
Assign a coordinator responsible for coordinating
the institutional effectiveness and integrated
planning process.
Refine the integrated planning model that describes
an ongoing, institution wide process of planning
and assessment for the purpose of continuous
improvement and linking planning to mission.
Summer 2011
President
January 2012
IEC and
Planning
Coordinator
Redistribute the annual report summarizing the
analysis of the effectiveness of the college‟s
planning processes. This report will guide all
College units in planning the subsequent year„s
work.
Review previous work IEC and planning committee
work, develop timeline for future actions and
update the planning narrative as needed for use in
the planning cycle.
Create a venue for dialog among appropriate groups
and individuals to provide feedback on the
integrated planning process and deploy quantitative
and qualitative measures to assess the planning
process and committees.
Clarify what issues are Integrated Planning issues
and what issues are not along with who and how
these issues will be addressed. (e.g., emergency
requests, new programs, grants, community
education, business training, projector bulbs repairs,
changes).
Distribute the final 2011-12 annual report on
Institutional Effectiveness district-wide that
documents and quantifies progress made on each of
the college‟s measures.
September-October
2011
IEC and
Planning
Coordinator
January 2012
IEC
March 2012
IEC and
Planning
Coordinator
April 2012
IEC
August 2012
Convocation
IEC and
Planning
Coordinator
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
4
Status
Complete
Report was discussed with the
AMD group in summer 2011
Complete
Roxanne Metz filled position.
In progress
IEC subcommittee formed to
develop a draft revised model for
presentation to full IEC on
January 25. Subcommittee is
Roxanne Metz (lead), Cheryl
Tucker, Julie Peterson, Pat
Girczyc, and Jeff Cummings.
Complete.
Resent to “all” college
community on September 20 and
included in the Accreditation
addendum.