http://www.redwoods.edu/programreview/13-14Templates.asp Instructional Program Review Template for Academic Year 2013-2014 (fields will expand as you type) Please provide a concise response to all questions, and include relevant details in direct support of your responses. Bulleted lists may be used to clearly organize information. Section 1 - Program Information 1.0 Name of Program: Date: 1.1 Program Review Authors (include names and campus locations): 1.2 Dean’s Signature: Date: 1.3 Individual Program Information # of Degrees offered: # of Certificates offered: 1.3.1 State briefly how the program functions support the college mission: 1.3.2 State briefly program highlights/accomplishments: Section 2 - Data Analysis 2.1 Enrollment & Fill Rate Enrollment ☐ Fill Rate ☐ PROC-8 Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Enrollments & fill rates Comment if checked: Comment if checked: 10/3/2013 Page 1 2.2 Program Majors Enrollment ☐ Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Enrollments & fill rates Comment if checked: Comment if checked: Fill Rate ☐ 2.3 Success & Retention Success ☐ Retention ☐ 2.4 Persistence ☐ Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Success & Retention Comment if checked: Comment if checked: Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Persistence of Concentrators Comment: 2.5 Completers Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Persistence of Concentrators Comment: ☐ 2.6 Program Completers ☐ PROC-8 Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Completions & Transfers Comment: 10/3/2013 Page 2 Student Equity Group Data 2.7 Enrollments Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp by group Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group next to Enrollments & fill rates Comment: 2.8 Success & Retention Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp by group Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group next to success & retention Comment: 2.9 Completers by group Faculty Information 2.10 Faculty Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group next to persistence Comment: Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Faculty (FT/PT) & FTES/FTEF Comment: CTE/Occupational programs The following Labor Market section should be completed by all CTE/Occupational programs. Only CTE/Occupational programs need to complete this section (2.9). 2.9 Labor Market Data Refer to the California Employment Development Division: http://www.edd.ca.gov/ www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov Provide a narrative that addresses the following: PROC-8 10/3/2013 Page 3 a. Documentation of labor market demand b. Non-duplication of other training programs in the region c. Effectiveness as measured by student employment and program completions. Narrative: Summary of Section 2 Overall, what did you learn from the data provided in this section? Be sure to indicate if your discoveries apply to the entire district, or if they vary by site. Section 3 – Critical Reflection of Assessment Activities Curriculum & Assessment Data What courses, if any are not on track with regard to a 2-year assessment cycle? Explain if this is a consequence of how often the course is offered or other mitigating factors such as outcome updates that may have changed the assessment cycle. # of course SLO reports submitted during 2012-2013. Reports submitted in 2012-13 up to the Sept 15, 2013 deadline were included in 2012-2013. # of degree/cert (PLO) reports submitted during 2012-2013. Reports submitted in 2012-13 up to the Sept 15, 2013 deadline were included in 2012-2013. % of Course Outlines of Record up to date. Includes approvals through spring 2013. Explain any mitigating circumstances. Indicate if you have submitted updated Course Outlines of Record this fall. If there is no plan for updating outdated curriculum, when will you inactivate? View curriculum status: click here or go to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Curriculum Status Did the Program Advisory Committee Meet in the last year? Y/N Click here to view the Program Advisory Committee webpage PROC-8 10/3/2013 Page 4 3.1 What changes have been made to the program based on assessment findings? You may include results from your closing the loop reports that map to your program. 3.2 (Optional) Describe assessment findings/observations that may require further research or institutional support. Summary of Section 3 Provide any additional explanations for items described in section 3. Section – 4 Evaluation of Previous Plans 4.1 Describe plans/actions identified in the last program review and their current status. What measurable outcomes were achieved due to actions completed. Action plans may encompass several years; an update on the current status, or whether the plan was discarded and why. Click here to view completed program reviews from last year. Actions Taken PROC-8 Current Status 10/3/2013 Impact of Action (describe all relevant data used to evaluate the impact) Page 5 4.2 (If applicable) Describe how funds provided in support of the plan(s) contributed to program improvement: Section – 5 Planning Click here to link to Institutional Planning Documents 5.1 Program Plans Based on data analysis, student learning outcomes and program indicators, assessment and review, and your critical reflections, describe the actions to be taken for the 2013-2014 academic year. Use as many rows as you have actions, and add additional rows if you have more than 5 actions. Please number all rows that you add. Please be specific. This section and section 6 should include a detailed justification so that the resource prioritization committees understand your needs and their importance. * Not all actions in this program plan section may require resources, but all resource requests must be linked to this section. 5.1 Program Plans Action # Action to be taken: List the specific action to be taken in enough detail so that someone outside of your area can understand. Relationship to Institutional Plans Include the specific plan and action item relevant to your action to be taken. For example: Annual Plan 20132014 Theme: Persistence; or Goal 1: Student Success: EP.1.6.2 Develop a plan for narrowing the achievement gap for underrepresented student populations. Expected Impact on Program/Student Learning Describe the expected impact in a way that someone outside the program can understand. The impact should be measurable. 1 2 3 PROC-8 10/3/2013 Page 6 Relationship to Assessment Include all assessment results that indicate that this action will yield the desired impact on the program. If the assessment has yet to be conducted, explain when and how it will be conducted. Resources Needed (Y/N) A yes here requires a corresponding request in the next section. 4 5 6 5.2 Provide any additional information, brief definitions, descriptions, comments, or explanations, if necessary. Section 6 - Resource Requests 6.0 Planning Related, Operational, and Personnel Resource Requests. Requests must be accompanied by an action plan in the above section. Requests should include estimated costs. Submit a support ticket if you do not know the estimated costs. If you are requesting personnel resources, you must also include the “Request for Faculty or Staffing” forms, located at inside.redwoods.edu/program review. Submit one form for each request. Additional Instructions: Put down the full amount you are requesting in the “Amount” column. Put down the annual amount of any ongoing or recurring costs in the “Annual Recurring” column. For example, a personnel request for a permanent position might show an Amount of $30,000 and an Annual Recurring Cost of $30,000. A request for equipment might show an Amount of $5,000 and an Annual Recurring cost of $200. A professional development request might show an Amount of $800 and a recurring cost of $0. If you have a grant or some other source of funding, include in the “Request” column a brief description of the source of funds and the dollar amount that is expected to be covered by the other source and if the other source covers any of the annual recurring costs. Note in the “Request” column if this is a repeat request, and how many times you have submitted this request. The item number must match the corresponding action # from section 5. Add rows as necessary. Type of Request (Check One) Action # use # above PROC-8 Request Describe your request here in a way that someone outside the program can understand. 10/3/2013 Planning To be reviewed by Prioritization Committees of the Budget Planning Committee Operational Personnel Professional Development To be reviewed and grouped by Associate Deans. To be reviewed by Faculty Prioritization Committee. To be reviewed by the Professional Development Committee Page 7 $ Amount $ Annual Recurring Costs Contact Person (Name, email, phone) Section 7-Author Feedback Provide any constructive feedback about how this template or datasets could be improved. How much do you agree with the following statements? (mark your choice with an x ) Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly Neutral Agree Agree Disagree Disagree This year’s program review was valuable [] [] [] [] [] in planning for the ongoing improvement of my program. Analysis of the program review data was useful in assessing my program. [] [] [] [] [] Section 8- PRC Response by section (completed by PRC after reviewing the program review) 8.0 The response will be forwarded to the author and the supervising Director and Vice President: S.1. Program Information: S.2. Data Analysis: S.3. Critical Reflection of Assessment Activities: S.4. Evaluation of Previous Plans: S.5. Planning: S.6. Resource Requests: PROC-8 10/3/2013 Page 8