SDAG Notes
Tuesday, October 30
1. Survey work
a. Survey was deployed Friday and preliminary analyses was done for 161 responses. If we
are concerned about the response rate, IR recommends extending and sending out a
reminder email and then revising reports if needed, but it looks like we have a reliable
response. We will continue review and write up analyses for report at Assessment
Thursday meeting – will extend for two hours so we can complete. SDAG will assist.
Preliminary results of survey are matching preliminary results of focus group – going
well.
b. Reviewed methodology and scripts for focus groups – made slight changes and did first
group yesterday - next one today at noon – final logistics:
Day:
Monday, October 29
Time:
12:00 Noon
Locations:
FM 209 and the Veterans Resource Center
Staffing:
FM 209 – Sheila (Lead/Moderator), Barry, Kintay or Heidi
VCR – Cheryl (Lead/Moderator), Crystal
Other:
Lisa will get her class started and then split up the class so that a little
more than half remain in FM209. She will then take the smaller group over to the VCR.
Crystal and Cheryl will wait for them to arrive and then organize the group.
Day:
Time:
Locations:
Staffing:
Tuesday, October 30
12:00 Noon
PE 201 (the two classrooms upstairs in the PE building)
Room 1 - Sheila (Lead/Moderator), Davita, Barry
Room 2 – Lisa (Lead/Moderator), Cheryl, Kintay or Heidi
Other:
Bob will get the class started and then turn it over to Lisa and Sheila
who will split the group in two. If there are less than 15 students then keep them in the
same group.
c. The professional development survey for the advisors is also up now and will be
reported out by the end of the week.
2. Program Review updates – all are completed and are being sent to the PRC with a division summary
and resource request rankings.
3. Assessment Thursday – once the survey work is completed we will schedule more sessions that are
related to improving methodology and further improvements based on analyses.
4. Accreditation – updating the SDAG site – need everyones notes.
5. Other – the reporting field “Student Level Assessment” for how many students met expectations
should be left blank – Paul is working on a solution to this problem.