Adverse Selection Economics 302 - Microeconomic Theory II: Strategic Behavior

advertisement
Adverse Selection
Economics 302 - Microeconomic Theory II: Strategic Behavior
Instructor: Songzi Du
compiled by Shih En Lu
Simon Fraser University
March 3, 2016
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
1 / 13
Objectives
1
Know what adverse selection is
2
Know how adverse selection can make a market unravel and result in
inefficiency
3
Know how to model adverse selection with game theory
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
2 / 13
Asymmetric Information
When one side of the market knows more than the other.
This week: hidden characteristics (e.g. product, insurance, ability,
willingness to pay).
Next week: hidden actions (e.g. employment, insurance).
Often means that the socially optimal outcome cannot be
achieved.
Just like market power, this is a form of market inefficiency.
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
3 / 13
Hidden Characteristic
This week, we study hidden characteristics: what happens when
one side of the market lacks “payoff” information (such as quality of
the good and the valuation of the customer), while the other side of
the market possess such information (seller knows the quality of the
good that he sells, customer knows his valuation for the good that he
wants to buy).
Private information possessed by a player is called the type of the
player.
Today’s example: buyer doesn’t know the quality of a car, and
therefore doesn’t know his utility from buying the car.
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
4 / 13
Adverse Selection
Hidden characteristic can lead to adverse selection: the market
attracts exactly the agents on the informed side that are bad for the
uninformed side.
Today’s example: owners of bad cars are the ones that want to sell
the most.
We will show that adverse selection can make some markets fail
completely and disappear!
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
5 / 13
Used Car Market
For simplicity, suppose the sellers and the buyers are both risk-neutral.
Good cars are worth $10,000 to buyers and $7,000 to sellers.
Bad cars are worth $3,000 to buyers and $1,000 to sellers.
Half the cars are good and half are bad.
What is the efficient allocation of cars?
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
6 / 13
Used Car Market: Complete Information
Good cars are worth $10,000 to buyers and $7,000 to sellers.
Bad cars are worth $3,000 to buyers and $1,000 to sellers.
Half the cars are good and half are bad.
Suppose both sides observe car quality.
What happens? At what prices?
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
7 / 13
Used Car Market: Incomplete, but Symmetric Information
Good cars are worth $10,000 to buyers and $7,000 to sellers.
Bad cars are worth $3,000 to buyers and $1,000 to sellers.
Half the cars are good and half are bad.
Suppose neither side observes car quality.
What happens? At what price?
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
8 / 13
Used Car Market: Asymmetric Information (I)
Alternative name: lemons market (Akerlof, 1970).
Good cars are worth $10,000 to buyers and $7,000 to sellers.
Bad cars are worth $3,000 to buyers and $1,000 to sellers.
Half the cars are good and half are bad.
Suppose only sellers observe car quality (because the seller owns the
car).
If both good and bad cars are on the market, how much are buyers
willing to pay?
What would sellers do at that price?
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
9 / 13
Used Car Market: Asymmetric Information (II)
Buyers are unwilling to pay a lot because some cars are of low quality.
But then sellers with good cars are unwilling to sell. So only sellers
with bad cars are left.
This is adverse selection: the market attracts exactly the sellers that
are bad for the buyers.
As a result, the market for good cars unravels and disappears.
Loss of efficiency: the surplus from trading good cars vanishes.
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
10 / 13
Conclusion
When buyers don’t know the quality of a product, they might not be
willing to pay enough to cover high-quality sellers’ costs.
High-quality sellers will then exit the market, reducing the average
product quality and further decreasing buyers’ willingness to pay.
Vicious cycle leads to low quality.
If buyers’ value for low quality goods is too low, market could even
disappear completely.
Ways around problem: signaling (warrantees), reputation, regulation,
liability laws, etc.
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
11 / 13
Used Car Game: seller proposes
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
12 / 13
Used Car Game: buyer proposes
ECON 302 (SFU)
Lecture 7
March 3, 2016
13 / 13
Download