Institutional Effectiveness Achievement Report
Management and Marketing: MS Management 2014­2015 Institutional Effectiveness Achievements Report
Unit Head: Jill Austin
Reports to: College of Business
Mission:
Use of Prior Results : This is a new degree program ­­ first assessment this academic year.
Student Learning Outcome:
CRITICAL ANALYSIS ­ STRATEGIC
DECISION MAKING SKILLS ­ Students will
demonstrate the ability to analyze data and
generate potential alternatives to
organizational problems.
Measure 1:
Rubric used in MGMT 6100
Person(s)
Responsible:
faculty
teaching
course
Completion
Date:
06/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Proficient or better = 68.4 % Marginal
= 31.6 % Not acceptable = 0 Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
Provide
detailed
handout to
students that
indicates
expectations
for achieving
these skills. Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Set a
benchmark
of 70 % of
students to
score
proficient or
excellent.
Review rubric
and adjust as
necessary.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Use of Prior Results : This is a new degree program ­­ first assessment this academic year.
Student Learning Outcome:
MANAGERIAL SKILLS ­ PLANNING SKILLS
­ Students will demonstrate expertise in
developing and using project management
tools for planning, implementing, and
assessing projects related to their discipline
of study.
Measure 1:
rubric in MGMT 6200 course
Person(s)
Responsible:
faculty
teaching the
course
Completion
Date:
06/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Proficient or excellent = 87.5 %
Marginal = 12.5 % Not acceptable = 0
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
Set a
benchmark
of 88 % of
students to
score
proficient or
excellent.
Review rubric
and adjust as
necessary.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Use of Prior Results : This is a new degree program ­­ first assessment this academic year.
Student Learning Outcome:
MANAGERIAL SKILLS ­ HRM ­ Students will
demonstrate knowledge of core
competencies in human resource
management.
Measure 1:
Rubric in MGMT 6680 course
Person(s)
Responsible:
faculty
teaching
course
Completion
Date:
06/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Knowledge about labor laws 75 %
meet expectation or better Legal
Knowledge 97 % meet expectation or
better HR Research Ability 100 %
meet expectation or better
Future Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project, etc.):
Develop a list of
competencies
to be provided
to students in
the class to
assist them in
understanding
the breadth of
legal and human
resource
management
requirements
that are needed.
Future Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Evaluate rubric
and adjust it
based on
results from
study in 2015 of
three categories
of
knowledge/skills
needed. Set
benchmark.
Future Actions
:Describe any
additional
resources
needed (Leave
blank if no
additional
resources are
needed.):
Use of Prior Results : This is a new degree program ­­ first assessment this academic year.
Student Learning Outcome:
COMMMUNICATIONS ­ Students will
demonstrate effective written communications
skills for their managerial work.
Measure 1:
Rubric in MGMT 6790 (capstone course)
Person(s)
Responsible:
faculty
teaching the
class
Completion
Date:
06/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Not enough students graduating from
program yet to make assessment
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Refine rubric.
First use of
rubric in
2015­2016 to
assess
results due
to new
program just
having
graduates in
the program
who will take
the course
required for
this
assessment
Set
benchmark.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Use of Prior Results : This is a new degree program ­­ first assessment this academic year.
Student Learning Outcome:
CRITICAL ANALYSIS ­ ETHICAL DECISION
MAKING SKILLS ­ Students will apply
Measure 1:
rubric in MGMT 6750 course
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
faculty
Proficient = 81.8 % Excellent 8.2 %
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
relevant ethical concepts to making
organizational decisions.
teaching
course
Completion
Date:
06/30/2015
Proficient or better = 100%
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
Spend
additional
time in class
on
discussion
and
application of
the decision
making
process.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Set a
benchmark
of 95 %
score
proficient or
excellent.
Review rubric
and adjust as
necessary.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Use of Prior Results : This is a new degree program ­­ first assessment this academic year.
Student Learning Outcome:
MANAGERIAL SKILLS ­ DISCIPLINE
SKILLS ­ Students will demonstrate
knowledge and apply management skills
required for the discipline.
Measure 1:
Rubric in not­for­profit management (MGMT
6400, 6790)
Person(s)
Responsible:
faculty
teaching
course
Completion
Date:
06/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Partial results: MGMT 6750
Meet/exceet expectations = 87.5 %
Unacceptable = 12.5 % Analysis for
MGMT 6790 when adequate students
are in graduating semester.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Benchmark
set at 88 %
for NFP
class
assessment.
Benchmark
to be set for
leadership
next
academic
year due to
small number
of students.
Benchmark
set at 80 %
for Supply
Chain
assessment
Review rubric
and make
adjustments.
The rubric
will be used
in spring
2016 to
assess
students
completing
the M.S.
(MGMT 6790
class).
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Rubric for organizational leadership (MGMT
6740, 6790)
Person(s)
Responsible:
faculty
teaching
class
Completion
Date:
06/30/2015
Measure 3:
Rubric for supply chain management (MGMT
6730, 6790)
Person(s)
Responsible:
faculty
teaching
course
Completion
Date:
06/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : This is a new degree program ­­ first assessment this academic year.
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Partial Results: MGMT 6740 Marginal = 50 % Proficient = 50 %
Analysis for MGMT 6790 when
adequate students are in graduating
semester.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
proficient = 75 % marginal = 12. 5 %
not acceptable = 12. 5 %
Student Learning Outcome:
COMMUNICATIONS ­ Students will
demonstrate effective oral communicatioan
skills for their managerial work
Measure 1:
rubric in MGMT 6790 (capstone course)
Person(s)
Responsible:
faculty
teaching
course
Completion
Date:
06/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Now enough students graduating from
program yet to make assessment
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Refine rubric.
First use of
rubric to
assess
results in
2015 – 2016
due to new
program just
having
graduates in
the program
who will take
the course
required for
this
assessment
Set
benchmark. Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Report Date: Wed Aug 12 2015
16:58:54 CDT
Close