r\
~
Hydra
Québec
Hydro-Québec
Requête
Engagement
R-3401-98
52 :
Fournir la citation de la décision PJM à laquelle il a été référée par Dr. Ren
Orans lors son témoignage.
RE-52 Les extraits
suivantes.
Original:
2001-05-17
pertinents
sont
fournis
HOT
dans
-10,
les pages
Document
(En
4.2
liasse)
fY.cess
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
FERC Electric Tariff
Fourth Revised Volume No.1
"la rl~
Original Sheet No.74
Allocation of Curtailments:
The Transmission Provider shall, on a nondiscriminatory basis, Curtail the transaction(s) that effectively relieve the
constraint. However, to the extent practicable and consistent with Good Utility
Practice, any Curtailment win be shared by each RTO and Network Customer in
proportion to their respective Load Ratio Shares. The Transmission Provider
shan not direct the Network Customer to Curtail schedules to an extent greater
than the Transmission Provider would Curtail the schedules of an RTO under
similar circumstances.
Load Shedding: To the extent that a system contingency exists on the
Transmission Provider's Transmission System and the Transmission Provider
determines that it is necessary for the RTOs and the Network Customer to shed
load, the Network Customer and the RTOs shall shed load in accordance with
previously established procedures under the Network Operating Agreement.
System Reliability: Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Tariff, the
Transmission Provider reserves the right, consistent with Good Utility Practice
and on a not unduly discriminatory basis, to Curtail Network Integration
Transmission Service without liability on the Transmission Provider' s part for the
purpose of making necessary adjustments to, changes in, or repairs on its lines,
substations and facilities, and in cases where the continuance ofNetwork
Integration Transmission Service would endanger persons or property. ln the
event of any adverse condition( s) or disturbance( s) on the Transmission
Provider's Transmission System or on any other system(s) directly or indirectly
interconnected with the Transmission Provider's Transmission System, the
Transmission Provider, consistent with Good Utility Practice, also may Curtail
Network Integration Transmission Service in order to (i) limit the extent or
damage of the adverse condition(s) or disturbance(s), (ii) prevent damage to
generating or transmission facilities, or (iii) expedite restoration of service. The
Transmission Provider will give the Network Customer as much advance notice
as is practicable in the event of such Curtailment. Any Curtailment ofNetwork
Integration Transmission Service will be not unduly discriminatory relative to an
RTO's use of the Transmission System on behalfof its Native Load Customers.
The Transmission Provider shall specify the rate treatment and all related terms
and conditions applicable in the event that the Network Customer fails to respond
to established Load Shedding and Curtailment procedures.
Rates and Charges
The Network Customer shall pay the Transmission Provider for any Direct Assignment
Facilities, Ancillary Services, PJM Administrative Service, Mid-Atlantic Area Council Charge,
and applicable study costs, consistent with Commission policy, along with the following:
Issued Dy
IssuedOn:
Richard A. Drom
Vice President, Genera1 Counse1
February 28,2001
Effective: March 1,2001
~
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
FERC Electric Tariff
Fourth Revised Volume No.
34.1
Original Sheet No.75
Monthly Demand Charge: (a) The Network Customer shall paya monthly
Demand Charge for Network Load and Non-Zone Network Load, which shall be
determined as follows:
Sum ofMDCZ for all Zones plus the MDCNZ for Non-Zone
Network Load
MDCZ
=
SUffi ofDDCZ
DDCZ
=
DCPZ X RTZ/365
MDCNZ
=
SUffi of DDCNZ for each day of the calendar month for Non-Zone
Network Load
DDCNZ
=
DCPNZ X RTNZ/365
for each clay of the calenclar month for the Zone
Where:
is the monthly demand charge
MDCZ
is the monthly demand charge for a Zone
DDCZ
is the daily demand charge for a Zone
DCPZ
1
~
is ~e.dail l~ad of the Network Customerlocatedwithïn a Zone
comc!dentWlth the annualpeak of tne Zone p us any curtal e oad
coïncidentwith the annualpeak of the Zone
is the ~atefor Network Integration TransmissionService from
Attachment H for the Zone in which the Network Load is located,
statedin dollars per megawattper year
MDCNZ
is the monthly demand charge for Non-Zone Network Load
DDCNZ
is the daily demand charge for Non-Zone Network Load
DCPNZ
is the daily transmissionresponsibility for Non-Zone Network
Load
RTNZ
is the rate for Network Integration Transmission Service for Non.
Zone Network Load from Attachrnent H-ll, stated in dollars per
megawatt per year
Issued By:
Issued On'
Richard A. Drom
Vice President, Genera1 Counse1
February 28,2001
Effective: March 1, 2001
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
FERC Electric Tariff
Fourth Revised Volume No.1
Original Sheet No.76
The zonaI daiIy Ioad of the Network Customer shaII be the suffi of the Network
Customer's individuaI whoIesaIe and retaiI customer Network Loads at the time
of the annuaI peak of the Zone in which thë ioad is Iocated. For o
Network Load, the daiIy transmission responsibiIity of the Network Customer
shaII be the SUffi of the Network Customer's Network Load at the border of the
PJM ControI Area at the time of the annuaI peak of the PJM Control Area.
Network Load at the time of the annual peak of the Zone shall include any
curtailed load. Curtailed load is any mandatory load reduction as a result ofPJM
and/or local control center directions to reduce Ioad due to a systeffi emergency
condition.
The annua1peaks for purposes of the above ca1cu1ationsha11be detennined from
the twe1ve month period ending October 31 of the ca1endaryear preceding the
ca1endaryear in which the bi11ing month occurs. For new Network Load that was
not connected to the Transmission System during such entire twe1ve month
period, the Transmission Provider in coordination with the affected RTOs and
e1ectric distribution companies sha11detennine the appropriate peak 1oad
responsibi1ity to be used unti1 the annua1peaks are detennined for the next twe1ve
month period ending October 31,
The annual peak of the Zone pursuant to this section of the Tariff is defined to
have occurred at the hour for which the SUffiof the recorded peak and any
curtailed load at that same load is the highest.
(b)
Nothing herein shan entitle any RTO or Network Customer to establish a zone
that is smaner than or a portion of a Zone set forth in Attachment J.
[Reserved]
[Reserved]
Redispatch Charge: The Network Customer and each RTO shall pay any
redispatch costs as set forth in Attachment K.
Stranded Cost Recovery: Any RTO may seek to recover stranded costs from
the Network Customer pursuant to this Tariff in accordance with the terms,
conditions and procedures set forth in FERC Order No.888. However, the RTO
must separately file any proposai to recover stranded costs under Section 205 of
the FederaI Power Act.
35
Operating Arrangements
Operation under The Network Operating Agreement: The Network Customer
shall plan, construct, operate and maintain its facilities in accordance with Good
Utility Practice and in conformance with the Network Operating Agreement.
Issued By
IssuedOn:
Richard A. Drom
Vice President, Genera1 Counse1
February 28,2001
Effective:
March
1, 2001
FERC RIMS DOC 1802834
,25=1
Otc;'er(\ss~
tJoè~
Docket
No.
2-5-"
OA97-261-000,
~
\~)
-15
Al.
their
network
resources
equal
to their
load for which
they
receive
FTRs, in order
to be protected
from congestion
charges.
Any other
use of the transmission
system by a firm
customer
will
be subject
to congestion
charges
during
a period
of constrained
transmission
capacity,
~,
when a firm
point-to-point
customer
uses secondary
receipt
and delivery
points,
when a network
customer
or RTO schedules
energy
from a non-network
resource,
and
when a network
customer
or RTO schedules
energy
from a network
resource
for which
it did not nominate
FTRs. !2/
Supporting
Companies
have also
filed
changes
to the PJM
Transmission
Tariff
that
are intended
to facilitate
use of the
Tariff
in a retail
choice
environment.
~/
In this
regard,
the
PJM Transmission
Tariff
contains
modifications
ta accommodate
a
change to the demand charge
calculation
for network
service
from
a twelve-month
rolling
average
load ratio
share
calculation
ta a
stated
rate
per MW-year applied
to the actual
loads
of the
network
customer
in a month;
this
change is designed
to be more
responsive
to changes
in load responsibility.
~/
A.
Pro
Forma
Tariff
Chang:es
To
R.AflAct.
R.Agional
SArvice
The PJM Transmission
Tariff
contains
changes
to the ~
forma
taritt
in order
to apply
the provisions
to a regional
transmission
service
that
allows
network
resources
and loads
to
be integrated
over eight
utility
systems.
As such,
Supporting
Companies
propose
that
a single
transmission
service
rate
will
be
assessed
for each firm
reservation,
no mat ter
how many of the
eight
utility
transmission
systerns
are involved
in providing
the
transmission
service.
.i.2./
For example,
if a network
customer
with
a 1000 MW load had
twelve
100 MW generating
units,
it would select
the 10
network
resources
which
it expects
would be most vulnerable
to congestion.
The corresponding
FTRs would
shelter
the
customer
from congestion
charges
provided
it uses those
units
for
sales
to its
reserved
points
of delivery.
If the
network
customer
used the other
two generating
units
or
relied
on a resource
other
than ite
network
resources,
it
would be subject
to congestion
charges
in a constrained
situation.
~
Attachment
K
ta
the
PJM
Transmission
Tariff.
The stated
rate
for netwark
service
is intended
to pravide
greater
rate
certainty
ta suppliers
and customers
than
exists
under
the load ratio
share approach,
because
the
ultimate
transmission
rate
for a supplier
under
the load
ratio
share method will
change depending
not only
on
variations
in the loads
served
by a particular
supplier
but
on the loads
served
by athers.
http:/ /rimsweb 1.ferc.fed.us/rims.q?rp2-PrintNPick
2001-05-16
FERC RIMS DOC 1802834
Docket
No.
OA97-261-QQO,
~
al.
-16
The PJM Transmission
Tariff
aIso
contains
changes
to the
point-to-point
rate
design
in ScheduIes
7 and 8.
Supporting
Companies
are proposing
one point-to-point
rate
for deIivery
points
at the border
of the control
area and separate
point-topoint
rates
for deIivery
points
in each zone.
Supporting
Cornpanies
state
that
this
change does not affect
the avaiIabiIity
of pool-wide
transmission
service
at a single,
non-pancaked
rate.
They state
further
that,
by making
this
change,
alI
suppIiers
cornpeting
for
the same loads
within
a zone would
have the same
transmission
rate,
whether
they take point-to-point
or network
service.
Certain
protestors
argue that
the proposed
changes
violate
Order
No.888
by eliminating
network
integration
service
or by
changing
the terms
and conditions
for that
service.
~/
These
protestors
focus
on one aspect
of Supporting
Companies'
changes
to the nature
of the service
--the
fact
that
network
resources
equal
to network
load are selected
and assigned
corresponding
receipt
and delivery
point
MW reservations
called
FTRs.
COImniBBion
R~B~nnBe
Supporting
Companies I proposed
changes
to the ~
forma
tariff
are reasonable
in the context
of the new transmission
services
that
will
be provided
by PJM.
Notwithstanding
the
arguments
of certain
protestors,
the PJM Transmission
Tariff
does
not eliminate
network
service.
The PJM Transmission
Tariff
adopts
the terme and conditions
of network
service
directly
from
the ~
forma tariff.
Consistent
with
the ~
forma
tariff,
a
network
customer
will
paya
firm
transmission
rate
based on its
portion
of the total
system
loads
and may schedule
energy
from
any network
resource
to serve
those
loads.
The fact
that
FTRs are assigned
to all
firm
service
customers
based on specific
receipt
and delivery
point
reservations
does not change the nature
of network
services
under
the PJM Transmission
Tariff.
FTRs serve
a limited
function
of
allowing
a transmission
service
customer
to protect
against
incurring
transmission
congestion
costs,
and do not transform
network
service
into
point-to-point
service.
It is important
to
note
that
the ~
forma tarif!
was designed
to replicate
the
network
integration
service
each utility
had historically
provided
itself
within
the confines
of its
individual
service
area.
By allowing
transmission
service
customers
to integrate
resources
across
eight
utility
systems,
the PJM Transmission
Tariff
will
permit
customers
to obtain
a transmission
service
li/
aaa, ~,
DEMEC at
and EC97-38-000)
.
19
(Filed
http:/ /rimsweb l.ferc.fed. us/rims.qJrp2-rrintNPick
in
Docket
Nos.
ER97-3189-000
2001-05-16