NORTHERN MOUNTAIN HYDROLOGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE

advertisement
NORTHERN MOUNTAIN
HYDROLOGY AND CLIMATE
CHANGE
JR Janowicz, M Allchin, SK Carey, RJ Granger, NR
Hedstrom, JW Pomeroy, WL Quinton, O Semanova
IP3 Final Meeting – Saskatoon, SK – September 7 – 9, 2011
IP3 - OBJECTIVES
• PROCESS
– Summarize work carried out at Wolf Creek
• PARMERTIZATION
– Discuss recent modelling initiatives
• PREDICTION
– Document changes in Yukon hydrologic
response to climate warming over the last 3
decades
WOLF CREEK - PROCESS
•Established 1992 for Hydrologic Model
Development / Calibration Purposes
•Variable snow storage,
redistribution, melt
•Cold soils affecting ET
•Frozen soil infiltration
•Variable permafrost distribution
•Thick organic layers affecting
runoff
•Seasonality of energy inputs
•Poorly defined drainage areas
WOLF CREEK - PROCESS
•IP3 – (CFCAS)
Funding (other
funding)
•Developed into an
Integrated Study of
Hydrometeorological
Processes and Climate
Research
PROCESS STUDIES
Snowpack Accumulation,
Redistribution and Melt is Variable
•Blowing snow transports 80
% from alpine
•Forest sublimation accounts
for 60 % of snowfall
250
•Snowmelt is 300 % faster in
the alpine than forest
225
200
SWE (mm)
175
Shrub Tundra
Alpine
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
1994
1995
1996
1998
1999
2000
2001
Shrub Tundra
87
111
134
139
179
216
168
Alpine
65
77
35
74
83
29
PROCESS STUDIES
Evapotranspiration is 150 % Higher in Forest
Compared to Alpine
Cumulative Net Shortwave MJ
400
Tall Buried
350
Short
300
Tall
250
Sub Tall
200
Sub Tall Buried
150
100
50
0
18-Apr
23-Apr
28-Apr
03-May
08-May
13-May
PARAMERIAZATION
Hydrometeorological Process Algorithms
Developed / Advanced / Tested
•Blowing snow
Wsp  0.6 (1  S I ) z w
•Sublimation
•Interception
2.92
1.64  273.15  TI 
INF  C S 0 (1  S I ) 

 273.15 
0.45
t00.44
•Radiation
•Evapotranspiration
•Infiltration
•Snowmelt
•Runoff
PREDICTION
COLD REGIONS HYDROLOGICAL MODEL
(CRHM)
Basin
Climate Data
Basin
Data
COLD REGIONS
HYDROLOGICAL MODEL
Sunshine Hours:
Calsun
HRU Climate
Data:Obs
Interception:
Intcp
Shortwave Radiaiton:
Global
SunMax
QdroD
Net
Radiation:Netall
net snow
QdroD
net snow
SunMax
Snow
Transport:
PBSM
Albedo:
Snow
Albedo
Cumnet
Net
Radiation:Net_rn
SWE
net rain
Sublimation:
BrushSubl
meltflag
Evaporation:
Evap
SWE
intercp evap
Snowmelt:
Ebsm
SWE
OR
snowmelt
Frostdepth
Summer
Infiltration:
GreenAmpt
Infiltration:
Fozen
OR
Infiltration:
Crack
Snowmelt:
Kevin
runoff
inflow
OR
Runoff:
Srunoff
infil
Routing:
Route
snowinfil
Soil Moisture:
Smbal
evap
outflow
basinflow
basingw
soil gw
soil ssr
Kstorage
Lag
whereto
order
ANVIL RANGE MINING CORPORATION
FARO MINE COMPLEX
•SRK Consulting
Ltd
•Deloite & Touche
•Could we
Transfer Wolf
Creek Findings to
Faro Waste Rock
Dumps to Develop
a Water Balance?
INVESTIGATION OF ANVIL RANGE MINING
CORPORATION (FARO) WASTE DUMP
WATER BALANCE
Objective: Estimate Waste Rock Dump Recharge
Determining Contaminant Seepage
– Co-Investigators: Raoul Granger & Newell Hedstrom
(NWRI)
• 4 Year Study
– Year 1: Develop Water Balance using Transposed Met
Data
– Year 2: Develop Water Balance using Site
Meteorological Data
– Year 3: Develop Estimates for Ave, Dry, Wet Scenario
– Year 4: Apply Previous Work to Trial Covers
Met Stations
Snow Surveys
Infiltration
Studies
% Passing
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01
V3
V2
V 1A1
V 5F
V 1R
0.1
1
10
100
% Passing
Sieve Size (mm)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01
G3
G2
G MS
G 2A1
G 1A1
0.1
1
Sieve Size (mm)
10
100
Material
Characterization
RESULTS
180
Evaporation (mm)
CUMULATIVE EVAPORATION
160
140
Flat
120
North
100
South
80
East
West
60
Bubble
40
20
0
5/8/05
100
5/28/05
6/17/05
7/7/05
7/27/05
8/16/05
9/5/05
9/25/05
CUMULATIVE RUNOFF
90
Runoff (mm)
80
Flat
70
North
60
South
50
East
40
West
30
Bubble
20
10
0
8/1/04
11/9/04
2/17/05
5/28/05
9/5/05
12/14/05
•Infiltration
45-55%
precipitation
•Surface
runoff 15%
precipitation
Evaporation
30-40%
precipitation
YUKON RIVER UPSCALING
•Environment Canada
•USGS
•Yukon Water Resources
•University of Saskatchewan
*
Yukon River at Eagle,
345 000 km2
Wolf Creek
Research Basin,
195 km2
•State Hydrologistical Institute –
St Petersburg
Granger
*
watershed,
8 km2
RUNOFF MODELLING - GRANGER
WATERSHED – 1999 -2001
1999
NS
2000
1999
0.93
2000
0.73
2001
0.79
2001
WOLF CREEK – CLIMATE
WARMING LINKAGES
•Climate Change Issues
Priority
•Strong GY Support
• 2007 /2009 Major Flooding
•Linked to Climate
Change
•Wolf Creek Climate Change
Research (Process, CRHM
Modelling)
CLIMATE WARMING IMPACTS
PERMAFROST REGIME TRENDS
18
Discharge (m 3/s)
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Klondike R ab Bonanza Cr
0.12
0.10
Discharge (m3/s)
Winter Low Flows
16
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
Rengleng R at Dempster Hwy
2010
CLIMATE WARMING IMPACTS
ON HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE
Mean Annual Maximum Flow – Peel River above Canyon Creek
8000
Discharge (m 3/s)
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
RIVER ICE REGIME TRENDS
Freeze-up Dates (Julian Day)
Freeze-up Timing
400
380
360
340
320
300
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
Yukon River at Whitehorse (1902-1993)
•Freeze-up timing delayed approximately 30 days since
1902
RIVER ICE REGIME TRENDS
Break-up Dates (Julian Day)
Break-up Timing
150
140
130
120
110
1890
1910
1930
1950
1970
1990
Yukon River at Dawson (1896-2011)
•Break-up Timing Advanced 6 days per century
2010
RIVER ICE REGIME TRENDS
2002/03 Mid-Winter Klondike
River Ice Jam and Flooding
Dawson City Winter
Temperatures 1902 - 2005
Klondike River Ice Jam - 2003
Degree Days Frost ( o c)
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
2002/03 warmest winter
2020
RIVER ICE REGIME TRENDS
Break-up Severity
Break-up Elevation (m)
321
320
319
318
317
316
315
314
313
1880
Dawson - 1979
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
2020
Yukon River at Dawson Annual
Maximum Break-up Elevation
(1896 - 2011)
CLIMATE WARMING IMPACTS
ON HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE
Increasing Peak Flows Due to
Melting Glaciers
Atlin River nr Atlin
Discharge (m 3/s)
350
300
250
200
150
100
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
CLIMATE WARMING IMPACTS
ON HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE
MARSH LAKE ANNUAL
MAXIMUM STAGE 1950 – 2011
4.5
Stage (m)
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
CLIMATE WARMING IMPACTS
ON HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE
Mean Annual Maximum Discharge
Takhini River near Whitehorse
550
500
Discharge (m3 /s)
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
CLIMATE WARMING IMPACTS
ON HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE
Mean Annual Maximum Discharge
White River at Alaska Highway
1600
Discharge (m3 /s)
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
CLIMATE WARMING IMPACTS
ON HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE
Mean Annual Maximum Flow – Donjek River below White River
Hydrometric
Station Locations
and Permafrost
Zones
WATERSHED PARAMETERS
Drainage Area
Record
Glacier
Area
(km2)
Period
(%)
(oC)
Atlin River nr Atlin
6810
1950-08
12.7
-0.6
Wann River nr Atlin
269
1956-93
19.7
-0.5
Fantail R at Outlet Fantail Lk
717
1956-93
33.2
-2.0
Lindeman Creek nr Bennett
240
1954-93
14.6
-1.7
Marsh Lake nr Whitehorse
19400
1950-09
8.3
-1.5
Takhini R nr Whitehorse
6930
1949-08
5.1
-3.0
Duke River nr Mouth
631
1981-08
9.5
-4.9
Kluane R at Mouth Kluane Lk
4950
1952-95
6.0
-5.7
Donjek River bl Kluane R
12400
1979-94
21.8
-8.3
White R at Alaska Hwy
6240
1975-08
38.6
-8.7
Tatshenshini R at Dalton Post
1750
1989-08
7.0
-2.5
Alsek R ab Bates R
16200
1975-08
21.0
-3.5
Alsek R nr Yakatat
28000
1993-08
31.9
-2.4
Station Name
Mean Annual
Temp
CONCLUSIONS
PERMAFROST DEGRADING
•Permafrost
Degrading?
•Greater
Groundwater
Contributions
to Baseflow
•Some Peak
Flows
Decreasing
SUMMARY
• RIVER ICE TRENDS
• Freeze-up Timing Delayed
30 Days
• Break-up Timing
Advanced 6-day/century
•More Frequent Occurrence Mid-winter
Break-up
•Greater Frequency Ice Jam Flooding
•Greater Severity Ice Jam Flooding
CONCLUSIONS
GLACIERS MELTING
•Peak Flows
not Consistant
•Peak Flows
Increasing /
Decreasing
CONCLUSIONS
GLACIERS MELTING
Glacierized Regions –
Little Permafrost
•Peak Flows Increasing Due to
Glacier Melt
Glacierized Regions –
Greater Permafrost
•Peak Flows Decreasing Due to
Longer Pathways to Stream
Channel
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
• Robert Stillwell, Jessica Boucher, Colin
Abbot Carried out Hydrometeorological
Data Analyses
• Holly Goulding - Teleconnections
• IP3 – CFCAS (Canadian Foundation
Climate and Atmospheric Sciences)
Provided Travel / Field Work Funding
THANK YOU!
Download