Buildings, Infrastructure & Land: Toward a Capital Vision University Council October 20, 2011 www.usask.ca Major Capital Project Planning Process & Project Governance Model www.usask.ca Mind Map - Capital Vision www.usask.ca Capital Vision • Create an overarching, principle-based document to manage all U of S owned urban lands • Provide framework for considering decisions pertaining to strategic directions • Create structure for a long-range development plan, defined by precincts www.usask.ca Categories of Development •Infrastructure •Buildings •Land Development www.usask.ca Infrastructure: www.usask.ca Buildings: 1999 to 2005 www.usask.ca Buildings: 2006 to current www.usask.ca Future Buildings • Beef Cattle Research & Teaching Unit • Cyclotron • Dairy Research Facility • Gordon Oakes Red-Bear Student Centre • RenewUS – Potential Scope: • Arts, Biology, Murray Building, Physics • Infrastructure Renewal (utilities, municipal, ICT and eMAP) • Children’s Hospital of Saskatchewan at RUH www.usask.ca RenewUS: Context Nearing the end of an historic decade ~$1B capital expansion, with some renewal Growing deferred maintenance backlog in existing buildings and infrastructure Mixed success in securing funding for deferred maintenance and infrastructure • • Positives: e.g., KIP rooftops; Health Sciences A and B Wings; Place Riel; Marquis Hall; Feedwater Expansion Negatives: decline in grant amidst construction inflation; DM funding bottom quartile vs. peer universities www.usask.ca Peer funding comparison www.usask.ca Source: APPA Facility Performance Indicators Report (2009-10); FMD analysis Sustaining Capital Grant (SCG) Flat/declining funding amidst doubling of construction costs www.usask.ca In search of “Best Practices”: Case Studies Institutional priority Major campaigns ($100M-$1B; 5 to 20+ years) Multiple funding sources Comprehensive building renovation with programmatic renewal vs. priority systems Tackle DM, but continue to invest in regular maintenance www.usask.ca www.usask.ca Source: FMD ReCAPP database Notes: Facility Condition Index (FCI) is deferred maintenance relative to current replacement value. FCI figures are based on assessments completed between 2001 and 2006, escalated to reflect an estimate of current market costs. RenewUS After a decade of growth, renew our focus on the core campus Stem – or reverse - the DM tide $250M+ over 5 years Multiple funding sources (gov’t, donors, students, university) Focus on high priority academic programs and buildings, and critical infrastructure www.usask.ca Land Development: www.usask.ca