Today’s lecture FE 537 Finish (quickly) section on “the main questions that this course will address”? Grading, readings, project and other class business Lecture road map Begin first module of the class Review of streamflow generation mechanisms Oregon State University FE 537 This course addresses 3 basic questions Where does water go when it rains? How long does it reside in the catchment? What flowpath does the water take to the stream? Kevin McGuire Oregon State University FE 537 Oregon State University Our class holy grail FE 537 Field experiments and model construction .... following Uhlenbrook et al. (2002) WRR Oregon State University FE 537 “Accurate prediction of the headwater hydrograph implies adequate modeling of sources, flowpaths and residence time of water and solutes.” Hewlett and Troendle (1975, p. 21) Oregon State University FE 537 Grading, readings, project and other class business Oregon State University FE 537 Course Structure Powerpoint lectures Interactive question and answer as much as possible Please interrupt and ask questions whenever something is unclear or you would like to add a comment—this will add greatly to the learning experience for everyone! Oregon State University FE 537 Virtual lectures….if you ever suffer from insomnia Oregon State University FE 537 Oregon State University Good basic material FE 537 Oregon State University Advanced material FE 537 Oregon State University Journals you should consult FE 537 A good book to consult if you are new to the area Oregon State University The Tarboton web module FE 537 Oregon State University for those without a hydro background The new Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences FE 537 Oregon State University FE 537 Oregon State University Course Text FE 537 Benchmark Papers Horton, RE, 1933, The role of infiltration in the hydrological cycle, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 14, 446-460.** Horton, RE, 1936, Maximum groundwater levels, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 17(2), 344-357. Hoover, MD and Hursh, CR, 1943, Influence of topography and soil-depth on runoff from forest land, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 24, 693-697 Cappus, P, 1960, Bassin versant expérimental d’Alrance: études des lois de l’écoulement. Application au calcul et à la prévision des débits. La Houille Blanche A. 493-520. Tsukamoto, Y., 1961, An experiment on subsurface flow, J. Japanese Soc. Forestry, 45, 186-190. Hewlett, JD and Hibbert, AR, 1963, Moisture and energy conditions within a sloping soil mass during drainage, J. Geophys. Res., 68, 1081-1087. ** Whipkey, RZ, 1965, Subsurface stormflow from forested slopes, Bull. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol., 10, 74-85 ** Betson, R P, 1964, What is watershed runoff? J. Geophys. Res. 69(8), 1541-1552. Gregory, K J and Walling, D E, 1968, The variation of drainage density within a catchment, Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol., 13(2), 61-68. Hewlett, J D and Hibbert, A R, 1967, Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to repcipitation in humid areas, in W E Sopper and H W Lull (Eds.), International Symposium on Forest Hydrology, Pergammon: Oxford. pp275-290 ** Oregon State University FE 537 Benchmark Papers Ragan, RM, 1968, An experimental investigation of partial area contributions, Intern. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Pubn. 76, 241-251. Patric, J H and Swanston, D N, 1968, Hydrology of a slide-prone glacial till soil in Southeast Alaska, J. Forestry, 66, 62-66. Kirkby, M J, 1969, Infiltration, throughflow and overland flow, in R J Chorley (Ed), Water Earth amd Man, Methuen: London. Pinder, G F and Jones, J F, 1969, Determination of the groundwater component of peak discharge from the chemistry of total runoff, Water Resources Research, 5(2), 438-445. Dunne and Black, RD, 1970, Partial area contributions to storm runoff in a small New England watershed, Water Resourc. Res., 6, 1296-1311. ** Osborne, H B and Renard, K G, 1970, Thunderstorm runoff on the Walnut Gulch experimental watershed, Arizona, USA, Proc. IASHUnesco Symposium on the results of research on representative and experimental basins, Wellington, NZ, 1970, 455 – 464 Weyman, DR, 1970, Throughflow on hillslopes and its relation to the stream hydrograph, Bull. Intern. Assoc. Sci. Hyudrol., 15, 25-33. Jones, JAA, 1971, Soil piping and stream channel initiation, Water Resour. Res., 7, 602-610 Trafford, B D and Rycroft, D W, 1973, Observations on the soilwater regimes in a drained clay soil, J. Soil Sci., 24(3), 380-391 Beasley, RS, 1976, Contribution of subsurface flow from the upper slopes of forested watersheds to channel flow, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 40, 955-957. Oregon State University Benchmark Papers FE 537 Yair, A and Lavee, H, 1976, Runoff generative processes and runoff yield from arid talus mantled slopes, Earth Surface Processes, 1, 235-247. Harr, RD, 1977, Water flux in soil and subsoil on a steep forested slope, J. Hydrol., 33,37-58. Anderson, MG and Burt, TP, 1978, The role of topography in controlling throughflow generation, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 3, 331-344 Bonell, M and Gilmour, DA, 1978, The development of overland flow in a tropical rainforest catchment, J. Hydrol., 39, 365-382 Lynch, J A, Corbett, ES and Sopper, WE, 1979, The effects of antecedent soil moisture on stormflow volumes and timing, Proc. 3rd Intl. Symp. in Hydrology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. Mosley, M P, 1979, Streamflow generation in a forested watershed, New Zealand, Water Resources Research, 15(4), 795-806. Sklash, MG and Farvolden, RN, 1979, The role of groundwater in storm runoff, J. Hydrol., 43, 45-65. ** Sharma, M L, Gander, G A and Hunt, S G, 1980, Spatial variability of infiltration in a watershed, J. Hydrol, 45, 101-122. Huff, DD, O’Neill, RV, Emmanuel, WR, Elwood, J W and Newbold, JD, 1982, Flow variability and hillslope hydrology, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 7, 91-94 Hjelmfelt, AT and Burwell, R T, 1984, Spatial variability of runoff, J. Irrig. Drain. Div. ASCE, 110, 46-54 Gillham, RW, 1984, The effect of the capillary fringe on water table response, J. Hydrology, 67, 307-324. ** Oregon State University FE 537 and…one of the most important papers of all time: Evaporation Rainfall Ec Cs Esrz Rtf Zi=0 Rsrz ai Zi<0 Rdr Rs Zi>0 qi Saturated Contributing Areas at SRZi SUZi Qv 0 Zi PMAC 2 Qsat 4 6 8 Oregon State University Qb 10 12 What do I expect? FE 537 Read general introduction tonite (!) and the 15 papers by the end of next week (or at least the first half by Tuesday Oct 14th and 2nd half by Oct 16). Know the authors, the titles and the main contributions Know why these are benchmark papers Remember the key points, key figures and key concepts Be able to articulate what the transofrmative science was in each paper and how it contributed to new advances in hillslope and watershed hydrology Know how they build upon and relate to each other But that’s crazy……I can’t read that many, that fast!? Oregon State University Schedule FE 537 Oct 7: Virtual lecture: Keith Beven (author of your text) Oct 9: Lab 1 by Luisa Hopp Nov 6: Virtual Lecture: by me. Quiz (lecture material and Benchmark Papers) Nov 11: Lab 2 by Taka Sayama Dec 3: Project reports due before Thanksgiving break Final Exam: in last scheduled class Grading: 1/3 grade Quiz/Exam; 1/3 grade Project 1/3 Grade Labs (adjustments up based on participation in class) Oregon State University The project FE 537 A big part of the course Example projects Stages 1-page proposal Write-up as a mock journal article Why I think that the project is so important? Oregon State University FE 537 Lecture road map Oregon State University FE 537 Lecture Schedule Wrap-up, Lab/project discussion, mid-term 1 week 2 weeks 2 weeks 1 week Introduction, Runoff overview, field trip Oregon State University 3 weeks Uhlenbrook, McDonnell and Leibundgut, 2001 Flow of information FE 537 Review of streamflow generation mechanisms Overview of the 15 benchmark papers and how they shape our current understanding Current major questions in the field Plot: How does water move to depth? Hillslope: How does water move laterally? Watershed: What water forms the watershed hydrograph? How do these processes scale? Oregon State University FE 537 How does water infiltrate to depth in the soil profile? Oregon State University Photo: Markus Weiler UBC FE 537 How does water move laterally? Oregon State University FE 537 How do different parts of the watershed contribute to flow in the stream (during and between events? F F Photo: Ross Woods, NIWA Oregon State University How do these processes scale? FE 537 MACK (580 ha) WS08 (21 ha) WS03 (101 ha) HI15 WS02 (60 ha) HJ Andrews (LOOK – 6200 ha) PRIMET WS10 (10 ha) Photographed by Al Levno Date: 7/91 Oregon State University WS09 (9 ha) FE 537 Summary Oregon State University FE 537 This lecture What are the main questions that this course will address? Introductions Grading, readings, project and other class business Lecture road map Oregon State University