Measuring the Financial Soundness of US Firms, 1926-2012 Discussion Simon Gilchrist

advertisement

Measuring the Financial Soundness of US Firms, 1926-2012

Discussion

Simon Gilchrist

Boston Univerity and NBER

Bank of Portugal

June 12th, 2015

Overview

Use inverse of equity volatility as a proxy for default risk.

Useful approximation in a structural model.

Available over long time series.

Main Findings:

DI systematically related to credit spreads and default rates.

Extreme events: 1933, 1938, 2008.

Great Recession:

Volatility not leverage.

Banks and non-financials look very similar.

Broad conclusions:

Financial factors do not in general cause business cycles.

Idiosyncratic volatility not risk – “uncertainty” rather than

”endogenous volatility”.

Discussion

Distance to Insolvency vs Distance to Default:

DD t

= ln ( V t

/D t

) − µ t

+ 0 .

5 σ

2 t

σ t

Distance to Insolvency vs Excess Bond Premium

EBP – movements in credit spreads not due to default risk.

Interpretation

Distance to Insolvency (1973-2012)

1970m1 1980m1 1990m1 date

DI

2000m1

EBP

2010m1

Distance to Default: (1973-2012)

1970m1 1980m1 1990m1 date

DD_CRISP

2000m1

DD_GZ

2010m1

Leverage vs Volatility (1973-2012)

1970m1 1980m1 1990m1 date

E_V_GZ

2000m1 sigma_GZ

2010m1

Constant Leverage (1973-2012)

1970m1 1980m1

DD_GZ

1990m1 date

2000m1

DD_GZ_Constant

2010m1

Distance to Insolvency vs Distance to Default (1973-2012)

2

DI

4

DD_CRISP

Fitted values

6 8

Information Content: Forecasting one year ahead log Y t +12

− log Y t

= α o

+ α

1

X t

+ P

6 j =0 b j log Y t − j

+ ε t log IP t +12

− log IP t

U E t +12

− U E t

EBP t

-3.85

(0.53)

DD t

DI

R

2 t

0.83

(0.09)

0.74

(0.20)

-0.15

(0.04)

2.65

(1.02)

-0.25

(0.21)

0.30

0.24

0.23

0.49

0.40

0.38

VAR Impulse: Distance to Insolvency

Distance-to-insolvency

5

0

-5

-10

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

-15

Excess bond premium

Percentage points

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

-0.05

Industrial production

Percent

0.2

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

-0.6

Unemployment rate

Percent

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

-0.1

2-year treasury yield

Percent

0.1

0.0

-0.1

-0.2

-0.3

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

10-year treasury yield

Percent

0.10

0.05

0.00

-0.05

-0.10

-0.15

-0.20

-0.25

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

VAR Impulse: EBP

Distance-to-insolvency

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

2

1

0

-1

-2

-3

-4

Excess bond premium

Percentage points

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

Industrial production

Percent

0.2

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

-0.8

-1.0

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

Unemployment rate

Percent

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

2-year treasury yield

Percent

0.1

0.0

-0.1

-0.2

-0.3

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

10-year treasury yield

Percent

0.10

0.05

0.00

-0.05

-0.10

-0.15

-0.20

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

Interpretation of results

Large bank/broker-dealers take losses.

Intermediary asset pricing – liquidity dries up.

Some markets shut down (asset-backed CP)

Some markets become less liquid and more volatile

Bond markets

Equity markets

Bond markets provide better signals:

FI’s are specialists in bond market.

Bonds reflect downside rather than upside risk.

Liquidity premiums lead to greater financing costs – declines in investment and output.

Download