Perspectives on the Liberal Arts and Sciences Course Proposal General Education Advisory Committee Queens College, City University of New York I. Course Information Course Title: Credits: Political Science 102: Contemporary Political Controversies 3 Prerequisites: None PS102 X Existing course, course number: New course Department: Department Contact: Political Science Joe Rollins Area of Knowledge and Inquiry (select one) Context of Experience (select only if the course emphasizes one of the following) Reading Literature (RL) Appreciating and Participating in the Arts (AP) Extended Requirements (select only if the course meets one of the following) Pre-Industrial Society (PI) United States (US) X Abstract or Quantitative European Traditions (ET) Culture and Values (CV) X Analyzing Social Structures (SS) Reasoning (QR) X World Cultures (WC) Natural Science (NS) The following information is useful to the subcommittee to estimate the college's progress toward the goal of offering enough sections and seats in each Perspectives category. How often does the department anticipate the course will be offered? Please also estimate the anticipated number of sections and number of seats per section. X Every semester Every Fall or Other: January 2008 number of sections: Every Spring number of sections: number of sections: number of seats per section: 4 number of seats per section: 55 number of seats per section: Page 1 of 5 Course Description Please include a course description. If the course will include variable topics or be taught in various forms, please provide as many descriptions of specific sections as possible. Political Science 102: Contemporary Political Controversies is a variable topics course, one that encompasses many different subjects. Each iteration of the course is designed to introduce students to the methods and concepts of Political Science as a discipline by using contemporary political conflicts as a lens of analysis. Below are brief descriptions of three examples: Sexual Politics This course examines the politics of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender communities in the United States, globally, and throughout history. Readings and lectures proceed historically, beginning with a discussion of how sexuality has evolved in the Western imagination; this analysis begins in the late-Nineteenth Century and moves into the present. During the second section of the semester the class considers the ways that researchers have framed questions and employed different methodologies in order to study sexual behavior and sexual minority communities from different academic perspectives. Here, students are introduced to behaviorist, quantitative literatures from psychology, ethnographic research from sociology, and scientific studies from biology. The final section of the course contextualizes this research, considers its influence on domestic politics, and then briefly expands the analysis to touch upon the globalization of Western sexual identities. The Shock of the New This course takes as its center one of the most vexing questions of late-modernity: What does it take to shock us? Auschwitz, Hiroshima, Stalin, Rwanda, Watergate and 9/11, were all horrors that shocked the conscience, and yet, each was the result of scientific accomplishments, technical achievements and cultural evolution that were intended to improve the quality of life for all people on the planet. Although a small minority of the Earth’s population enjoys a standard of living higher than ever before in human history, many people still suffer from disease, hunger, political oppression, and ecological disaster. This course explores these issues, asks what it has meant to “become modern” and grapples with the social and economic transformations that have become part of “normal” life. Making Peace This course considers the relationship between identity, the state, and violence in various locations around the globe. Students are introduced to the ways that “legitimate” conflict (i.e., war) differs from “illegitimate” conflict (i.e., terrorism) and how these variations are related to identity categories such as race, ethnicity, religion, and nationality. The semester begins by providing students with a theoretical framework with which to understand basic political constructs like power, diplomacy, state-building, and conflict resolution. The second section of the course introduces students to ongoing political problems from around the globe: the Middle East, Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Rwanda. Readings and lectures during this section of the course are largely historical and factual. The final section of the course emphasizes discussion and analysis. Here, students are called upon to synthesize the knowledge gained across the semester and to apply theoretical concepts to real-world problems. January 2008 Page 2 of 5 II. Criteria for Perspectives Courses Justification Please describe how the course will address criteria for Perspectives on the Liberal Arts and Sciences courses. Be sure to include an explanation of the course’s specific learning goals for students to make a connection between these and the general criteria for Perspectives courses. Each of these courses (as well as others being developed under the 102 rubric) employs a three-pronged approach to introduce students to the methods and issues of interest to Political Scientists and thus the ways that the discipline produces knowledge. All sections begin by introducing students to basic theoretical concepts (e.g., as outlined above, power, nation-building, conflict resolution, postmodernism, etc.), then provides them with data (i.e., historical, fact-based, materials) and concludes by requiring students to synthesize and re-contextualize these for themselves. Despite variation in subject matter, these courses allow our students to enroll in courses dealing with subjects that may spark their individual interests (Sexuality, Modernity/Technology/Culture, Conflict and Terrorism) at the same time that it allows faculty to provide them with an introduction to the theories, methodologies, and analytic approaches commonly utilized within the discipline. In each iteration of the course, students will learn about the distinctive place Political Science occupies within the liberal arts and society in general; to wit, they will see that all social conflict is ultimately a matter of concern for government and the state, as well as other non-governmental actors and institutions. Whether the emphasis of such exploration is electoral, juridical, budgetary, or regards policymaking, each variation on PS102 will distinguish itself from other liberal arts courses by emphasizing the role of states, politicians, and other institutional actors in social and cultural life. The subject matter for all iterations of PS102 requires students to learn about the history of a conflict, its place (and consequently theirs) in a global community, and the social structures that shape how these conflicts change, remain static, or may be resolved. Although different faculty will bring different skills and interests to the course, all rely on either abstract reasoning (e.g., the logic of conflict resolution, game theory, problem solving and diplomacy) or quantitative analyses (e.g., statistical evaluations of sexual behavior). As should be apparent from the descriptions above, each version of the course is global and comparative, emphasizes difference and diversity, engages students in active inquiry, and locates its subject matter in the temporal flow of world history. Criteria Checklist Please be sure that your justification addresses all three criteria 1-3, below. For criteria 4-8, please check all that apply and discuss these in your justification. A Perspectives course must: 1. Be designed to introduce students to how a particular discipline creates knowledge and understanding. 2. Position the discipline(s) within the liberal arts and the larger society. 3. Address the goals defined for the particular Area(s) of Knowledge the course is designed to fulfill. In addition, a Perspectives course will, where appropriate to its discipline(s) and subject matter: X 4. Be global or comparative in approach. X 5. Consider diversity and the nature and construction of forms of difference. X 6. Engage students in active inquiry. X 7. Reveal the existence and importance of change over time. 8. Use primary documents and materials. January 2008 Page 3 of 5 III. Course Materials, Assignments, and Activities Please provide an annotated list of course readings and descriptions of major assignments or exams for the course, as well as distinctive student activities that will engage students in working toward the course goals discussed in the course description and/or justification. Please include the author and title for each reading or text, along with a short description providing information about how the reading will contribute to course goals. See attached syllabi. IV. Assessment Perspectives courses must be recertified every five years, and we are seeking ideas for how to best carry out this assessment. What forms of evidence that the course is meeting its goals as a Perspectives course would be appropriate to collect for this course during the next five years? How would you prefer assessment to be conducted? How might evidence of effective teaching and student learning be collected and evaluated? Assessment is part of the Political Science Department’s overall strategy for measuring our success. As part of our ongoing commitment to maintaining high teaching standards, we regularly collect samples of written work from our students so that we may track their development across not only the span of a student’s undergraduate education, but across student cohorts by using a time-series sampling design. Findings from this project allow the department’s Curriculum Committee to monitor the progress and development of our undergraduate majors, as well as stay to stay abreast of our success as teachers. Papers assigned for this class will be part of that overall program. January 2008 Page 4 of 5 V. Administration What process will your department develop to oversee this course, suggest and approve changes, and conduct assessment? Who will be in charge of this process? Also indicate whether the course will be primarily taught by full-time or adjunct faculty, or by a combination of the two types of instructor. For a description of the processes already in place, please see above at IV. Administration of the assessment project is overseen by the Department’s Curriculum Committee. Syllabi for all courses taught in the Department are collected and made available for review by new, incoming instructors. All new instructors will be required to meet with members of the Curriculum Committee whose research and teaching are within their subfield in advance of the semester when a PLAS course will be taught. At these meetings, the interdisciplinary, pedagogic, and cultural goals of PLAS will be spelled out in detail so that new teachers may incorporate those requirements into their syllabi. Before syllabi are sent to Reprogrpahics for mass production several weeks in advance of the semester, new instructors will be asked to submit them to the Department Curriculum Committee for vetting and approval. The course is taught by a combination of full-time and adjunct faculty. VI. Syllabus Please attach a sample syllabus (or set of syllabi, for courses on variable topics or courses that will be taught in variable formats). Some resources to guide syllabus construction: The Provost's page outlining guidelines for syllabi: http://qcpages.qc.cuny.edu/provost/Cur_stud/Syllabus expectations.htm Sample syllabi for W courses, from Writing Across the Curriculum: http://qcpages.qc.cuny.edu/writing/wsyllabi.htm Goals for Student Writing at Queens College: http://qcpages.qc.cuny.edu/writing/Goals.htm Harvard’s Bok Center for Teaching and Learning, suggestions for syllabus planning: http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k1985&pageid=icb.page29695 Lehman College’s Gen Ed Syllabi Project: http://www.lehman.edu/lehman/programs/generaledu/gened_syllabi_project.html Submit this completed form and a sample syllabus (or set of syllabi) by email to Eva Fernández (eva.fernandez@qc.cuny.edu), Director, Center for Teaching and Learning. January 2008 Page 5 of 5