Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Dr. J.L Hoepffner Clinique St Augustin,

advertisement

Laparoscopic Radical

Prostatectomy

Dr. J.L Hoepffner

Clinique St Augustin,

Bordeaux

FRANCE

History

 Schuessler ‘94

 Raboy ‘97

 Gaston ‘97

 Guillonneau ‘98

 2006: 50% prostatectomies laparoscopic

LAPAROSCOPIC APROACH

 TRANSFORMATION of the

PROSTATECTOMY :

– Mini invasive Surgery

Easier exposition, Magnification of the vision

Définition anatomic plans

Précision of the gestual , Miniaturisation of the sutures

Bloodless

Post-operative more simple

LAPAROSCOPIC APROACH

 IMPROVEMENT OPEN SURGERY

 SAFETY ONCOLOGIC

 REDUCTION OF FUNCTIONAL

SEQUELLA

LAPAROSCOPIC APROACH

 LIMITS AND DISAVANTAGES :

– Quality of the vision

– Steadiness of the instrument

– Difficulty of the access ,

– Limit of the angular dissection

– Discomfort of the surgeon

LAPAROSCOPIC APROACH

 NEW LIMITS FOR A DISSECTION

PRESERVATIVE AND ATRAUMATIC

OF THE PROSTATE

 NEW LIMITS FOR PROGRESS IN

ERECTILE PRESERVATION

ROBOT ASSISTED:

ONE ANSWER ?

 QUALITE OF OPERATIVE VISION +++

 PRECISION OF THE ANATOMIC

DEFINITION

 REDUCTION TRAUMATIC DISSECTION

 DISAPPAERANCE OF THE LIMITS OF

THE DISSECTION

 COMFORT AND LOGICAL ERGONOMY

FOR THE SURGEON

ROBOT ASSISTED :

A TECHNICAL ADVANTAGE?

DEMONSTRATION :

 Bladder neck dissection

 Bundle preservation

 Suturing

Opératoring Indications

 Curative

 T1 – T2

 T3 ?

 Gleason score / age

 Nerve Sparing ?

 Alternative : EBRT – brachytherapy

Pre-operative Status

 Cardiovasculary exam

 Respiratory Fonction

 Hemostasis blood test

 No autologus transfusion

 8-10 weeks after biopsies

Pré-opératorive State

 Obesity not exclude

 No bowel préparation

 No specific contre-indications to the laparoscopic surgery

Technique

 Patient in Trendelenburg position

 One surgeon, one assistant

 5 trocars: 1 x 10 mm , 4 x 5mm

 Video column between the legs

 Laparoscope 0°

Laparoscopic Instruments

•Needle driver

•Monopolaire

•Bipolaire

•Grasp

•Thin grasp

LAPAROSCOPIC APROACH

LAPAROSCOPIC APROACH

THE ROBOT

Trocards Placement

Optic Ports

Assistent Ports

Robot Ports

The ‘Da Vinci’ Sytem

THE ROBOT

THE ROBOT

THE ROBOT

Laparoscopic Bladder Neck

Dissection

Bladder Neck Robotic

Dissection

Seminales Vesicules

Laparoscopic Dissection

Right Bundle Laparoscopic

Dissection

Intrafasciale Robotic Dissection

Apex Laparoscopic Dissection

Apex Robotic Dissection (1)

Apex Robotic Dissection(2)

DVC Suture

(running suture)

Urétro-Vésicale Laparoscopic

Anastomosis

(running suture)

Anastomose Robotique urétro-vésicale

(running suture)

Laparoscopic Data

 3000 patients

 Study of 1574 files

 Mean Psa 6,72

 Mean Gleason score 6,27

 Age 61,9 years old

Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):344-52

OUR DATA

 OPERATIVE TIME 120 MN

 HOSPITALISATION 5.7 JOURS

 0 CONVERSION in 7 years

OUR DATA

COMPLICATIONS

HAEMORRHAGES 1.3%

ANASTOMOSIS FISTULA 0.3%

RECTAL INJURY 0.5%

URETERAL INJURY one case

ANASTOMOTIC STENOSIS <1%

EVENTRATION <1%

OUR DATA

 PATHOLOGICAL RESULTS 1293

PT2A 10.2%

PT2B.C 57.8%

PT3A 28.2%

PT3B 3.8%

MARGINS

TOTAL 22%

T2 14%

T3 36%

FUNCTIONAL RESULTS

 CONTINENCE

 ERECTION : THE CHALLENGE

– better result ?

Better complete recovery?

– reduce the delay of recovery ?

– OBLIGATION of an EVALUATION

How can we improve functional result ?

?

!

Better knowledge of the prostate anatomy

Principles of preservation

High incision of pelvic fascia

From Eichelberg C,

European urology, 2006

During radical prostatectomy, innervation of the trigone, neobladder neck, and posterior urethra may become disrupted, because the surgical procedure involves anatomic dissection around the prostate, posterior aspects of the bladder base, and seminal vesicles.

afferent innervation of the trigone posterior urethra may lead to alterations in posterior urethral sensation indirectly contribute to outlet

UROLOGY 55: 820–824, 2000.

The percentage continence rates at a4 weeks and 12 months after surgery.

Level of Evidence 1b

96,3%

85,7%

62,7%

45%

From Peter Albers

BJU Int 1 0 0 , 10 5 0 – 10 5 4, 2007

Antegrade dissection

Traction on Seminal vesicles

Injury to the nerves

From Stolzemburg

European Urology 51 ( 2 0 0 7 ) 629–639

Detrusor apron

Detrusor apron (arrowheads) in Masson trichrome-stained sagittal section through adult cadaveric prostate. Detrusor apron ends in tuft (arrow) that is transected end of pubovesical (puboprostatic) ligament. Tuft contains fibrous tissue (blue) and smooth muscle fibers (red) that curve and course anteriorly to the large venous sinus. s, sphincter; u, urethra; P-pz, prostate-peripheral zone; Bu, bulb of penis; R, rectum.

Inset, magnified tuft. Note, smooth muscle fibers beneath leftmost arrowhead stained poorly.

From Robert P. Myers

UROLOGY 59: 472– 479, 2002

FUNCTIONAL RESULTS

 QUESTIONNAIRE ICS CONTINENCE

NO PADS AT 6 MONTHS 87%

FUNCTIONAL RESULTS

AUTOQUESTIONNAIRE IEFF 5 FOR

THE SEXUALITY

57% AT ONE AYEAR

LAPAROSCOPY

REVOLUTION IN THE SURGICALTECHNIQUE

RESULTS THE SAME THAN OPEN

GREAT DEVELOPPEMENT

LAPAROSCOPY

DIFFICULTY OF THE FIRST CASES

LEARNING CURVE

PUBLICITY OF A NEW TECHNIQUE

LAPAROSCOPY

THE ROBOT ?

ROBOTIC DATA

 230 PATIENTS 2005

 2 CONVERSIONS IN CLASSICAL LAP

 TRANSFUSION 2%

 OPERATVE TIME 150MN

Positive Margins

Laparoscopy

30,75

69,25

81,50 %

18,49%

Sexuality

80 ,3%

58,5 %

41,5 %

19,7 %

Continence

Laparoscopy at 1 Year

95 %

Robotic at 4 months

92,40 %

7,60 %

5%

ROBOTIC DATA

HOSPITALISATION 4.6 DAYS

FOR 100CAS

CONTINENCE AT 3 MONTHS 72%

ERECTION +- viagra 66.9%

CONCLUSIONS

 ROBOTIC ASSISTED :

………..MAKE EASIER THE RADICAL

PROSTATECTOMY

 Quality of the vision

 Miniaturization of the dissection

 Preservation of the anatomical structures

…….IMPROVE FUNCTIONNALS RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

 ROBOTIC ASSISTED

………THE LIMITS :

– ECONOMIC COST

– TIME IN THE THEATER MORE LONGER

– LEARNING CURVE

CONCLUSIONS

ROBOTIC ASSISTED :

 A HIGH LEVEL OF OPERATIVE

QUALITY

 EXCELLENT FOR RADICAL

PROSTATECTOMY

 LOGICAL AFTER OR AT THE SAME

TIME FOR A LAP CENTER

CONCLUSIONS

 Radical prostatectomy: treatment of choice

 Laparoscopic prostatectomy: excellent approach

 Robotic prostatectomy: The future or the present??

But…

…we are still far away from the comprehension of the prostate’s anatomy, and we are confident that the robotic technique will give us a great help……

Download