AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Claudia S. Ingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Rangeland Ecology and Management presented on December 17, 2008. Title: Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and English ivy (Hedera helix) Response to High Intensity-Short Duration Goat Browsing Abstract approved: _______________________________________ Michael M. Borman The goal of this dissertation is to examine the effectiveness of high intensity-short duration goat browsing for the control of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and English ivy (Hedera helix), two widespread noxious weeds in the Pacific Northwest. The effects of goat browsing on Himalayan blackberry vigor, as quantified by densities of different age class stems, are compared to mowing and goat browsing followed by mowing over a period of three years. Although total stem density and node density declined, primocane density increased after all types of treatment. This indicates that the population was still vigorous. Recruitment of new plants was reflected by an increase in seedling density. Changes in percent cover of vegetation functional groups were also examined. All three treatments produced a decline in Himalayan blackberry cover and an increase in perennial grass cover, though differences among treatment types were not significant. Perennial forb cover increased as a result of all treatment types. English ivy was successfully controlled by goat browsing as quantified by percent cover. Two years of browsing reduced percent cover more than one year of browsing. Both levels of browsing produced results that were significantly different when compared to the untreated control indicating that repeated high intensity-short duration browsing is justified for control of this invasive plant species. Differences in response of these two invasive, creeping perennials are attributed to differences in species growth rates, location of meristematic tissue in stolons vs. rhizomes and shade conditions at the research sites. ©Copyright by Claudia S. Ingham December 17, 2008 All Rights Reserved Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and English ivy (Hedera helix) Response to High Intensity-Short Duration Goat Browsing by Claudia S. Ingham A DISSERTATION submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Presented December 17, 2008 Commencement June 2009 Doctor of Philosophy dissertation of Claudia S. Ingham presented on December 17, 2008. APPROVED: _______________________________________________ Major Professor, representing Rangeland Ecology and Management _______________________________________________ Head of the Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management _______________________________________________ Dean of the Graduate School I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request. _______________________________________________ Claudia S. Ingham, Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank the many people who supported my dream of earning a PhD. Words of encouragement and many hours of shared labor inspired me to begin the journey and to continue at every step along the way. Initially, Dr. William C. Krueger listened to my ideas and facilitated appointment of my major professor, Dr. Michael M. Borman. Dr. Borman scouted the research sites at the Hawley Land & Cattle Co. and in Wilsonville with me. Bill and Sharon Hoyt hosted me on their ranch in Divide, Oregon and introduced me to their work for the City of Wilsonville. The Hoyts spent many hours moving goats on and off the experimental plots at two research sites as well as mowing at their ranch. Dr. Jennifer Kling had significant influence on the design and approach to statistical analysis. Dr. Steven Radosevich listened patiently to a litany of questions about response variables and data collection and always showed interest in the research. His kindness and enthusiasm will always be remembered. Len Rummel and Kim Townsend spent countless hours in the spring of 2006 helping me set-up plots in ‘nasty’ blackberry thickets and then helped me count and measure stem diameters in the fall of that year. Len continued to help me drive posts and set-up wire exclosures when I added a research site that was two and a half hour drive from the original site. Linda Rummel helped in the field in 2006 and kept many of us nourished throughout the years. Lennie Rummel, Nicole Graham and Miriam Lynah also assisted in plot set-up under very challenging weather conditions. Loren Rummel worked through the entire 2008 field season and knows the whole process like no one else. Ruth Ingham, Kim Townsend and Lara Kossiakoff assisted with species composition data collection. Julie Knurowski provided an invaluable review of species identification and insight into invasive plants and their geographic ranges. Bethany Vogeney counted and measured thousands of blackberry canes with me in the summer of 2007 and was a terrific employee. My husband, Conan Schleicher, supported me as I continued my education. He managed our household while I spent many months away from home to take classes in Corvallis and then to conduct my field work in Divide. His was a continuous commitment over three years which cannot be overstated. CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTHORS Dr. Michael Borman discussed hypothesis formation, advised on research design and data collection methods as well as reviewing the format, contents and consistency of presentation of the entire thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………. 1.1 The Challenge of Invasive Plants ………………... 1.2 Invasive Plants and Invasion Defined …………… 1.3 Invasiveness and the Potential for Invasion .......... 1.3.1 Plant characteristics ……………………….. 1.3.2 Ecosystem characteristics …………………. 1.4 Two Invasive Creeping Perennials of the Pacific Northwest……………………………................… 1.4.1 Physiology and ecology of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) …………… 1.4.2 Physiology and ecology of English ivy (Hedera helix) ..…………………….......... 1.5 Domestic Livestock and Their Influence on Plant Communities …………………………... 1.5.1 Grazing as disturbance ……………………. 1.5.2 Targeted grazing and goat browsing for invasive plant control ……………………. 1.6 Developing a Model for Predicting Plant Community Change ………………………... 1.7 Objectives ……………………………………….. 2 HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY (RUBUS ARMENIACUS) RESPONSE TO HIGH INTENSITY-SHORT DURATION GOAT BROWSING AND MOWING … 2.1 Abstract …………………………………………... 2.2 Introduction …………………………………........ 2.3 Materials and Methods …………………………... 2.3.1 Site and plot description .….......................... 2.3.2 Treatments ……...……………………........ 2.3.3 Application of treatments …………………. 2.3.4 Above ground biomass ..………………….. 2.3.5 Stem density .……………………………… 2.3.6 Statistical model and analysis ……………... 2.4 Results and Discussion …………………………... 2.4.1 Above ground biomass ……………………. 2.4.2 Stem density ……….…………………….... 2.4.2.1 Total stem and floricane density. …….. 2.4.2.2 Seedling density ……………………… 2.4.2.3 Primocane density .…………………... 2.4.2.4 Node density …………………………. page 1 1 3 4 4 7 8 9 12 16 17 18 20 21 23 23 24 27 27 28 29 30 30 31 33 33 35 35 38 41 43 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) page 2.4.3 Implications…...........……………………… 2.5 Acknowledgements …………………………........ 2.6 Literature Cited …………………………………... 47 50 50 3 FUNCTIONAL GROUP AND SPECIES CHANGE IN HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY (RUBUS ARMENIACUS)- AND EVERGREEN BLACKBERRY (RUBUS LACINIATUS)- INVADED PASTURE FOLLOWING GOAT BROWSING AND MOWING ..………………………………………….... 3.1 Abstract ………………………………………….. 3.2 Introduction ……………………………………... 3.3 Materials and Methods ………………………….. 3.3.1 Site description and study design ……….. 3.3.2 Treatments ..…..…………………………. 3.3.3 Species composition and functional groups ..………………………………….. 3.3.4 Statistical model and analysis …………... 3.4 Results …………………………………………... 3.5 Discussion ……………………………………….. 3.6 Acknowledgements ……………………………... 3.7 References ………………………………………. 4 ENGLISH IVY (HEDERA HELIX) RESPONSE TO HIGH INTENSITY-SHORT DURATION GOAT BROWSING ………………………………………….. 4.1 Abstract ………………………………………….. 4.2 Introduction ……………………………………... 4.3 Materials and Methods ………………………….. 4.3.1 Site description and study design …………. 4.3.2 Browsing treatment and levels ……………. 4.3.3 Percent foliar cover ...……………………... 4.3.4 Statistical model and analysis …………….. 4.4 Results and Discussion …………………………. 4.5 Acknowledgements ……………………………... 4.6 Literature Cited …………………………………. 53 53 55 59 59 60 61 62 63 70 74 75 79 79 80 82 82 84 85 86 87 91 91 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) page 5 SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND INSIGHTS FOR FUTURE MANAGEMENT ………………………….. 5.1 English ivy Control with Goat Browsing ….…….. 5.2 Himalayan blackberry Control with Goat Browsing …..……………………………………. 5.3 General Considerations for Invasive Plant Management Using Goat Browsing ..……………. 94 BIBLIOGRAPHY …………………………………………… 102 94 96 99 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 2.1 Mean Above Ground Biomass in 2008..……… 33 2.2 Population Demographic by Treatment ....…… 46 3.1 Mean % Cover Rubus for All Treatments …… 66 3.2 Change in Perennial Grass % Cover by Treatment …………………………………...... 68 Change in Perennial Forb % Cover by Treatment …………………………………….. 69 Mean English ivy % Cover Before and After Browsing Treatments ………………………… 87 3.3 4.1 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1 Treatment Descriptions ………………. 29 2.2 Mean Stem and Node Densities (per m2) by Treatment ………………...…... 35 Mean Stem and Node Densities (per m2) in Summer 2008 ..………………... 37 Seedling Density Pairwise Comparisons for All Treatments .…... 39 Primocane Density Pairwise Comparisons for All Treatments ……... 42 Node Density Pairwise Comparisons for All Treatments ……………………. 44 3.1 Species Inventory for Fall 2006 ...….… 63 3.2 Species by Functional Group….……… 64 4.1 Browsing Levels Comparison and Confidence Levels ................................ 87 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and English ivy (Hedera helix) Response to High Intensity-Short Duration Goat Browsing 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Challenge of Invasive Plants The ecological and economic importance of invasive plants has captured the attention of scientists and land managers for generations. Charles Darwin (1937) commented on the hundreds of square miles made impenetrable by stands of cardoon (Cynara cardunculus) in Chile and the Banda Oriental of contemporary Uruguay and Brazil as he traveled the world aboard the Beagle. According to Randall (1996), it was not until the publication of The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants (Elton, 1958), however, that concerns about the effects of thousands of organisms from different parts of the world were brought to the forefront of ecology. Many believe that invasion by non-native organisms is responsible for greater losses of diversity worldwide than other causes except for habitat loss and land use by humans (Pimm and Gilpin, 1989). The estimated economic cost of invasive organisms to American agriculture, ranching, and fisheries is in the billions of dollars annually (Hill, 2003). Simply stated, weeds are plants growing in places that humans do not want them but invasive plants are those weeds that have the potential to spread beyond their point of introduction (Radosevich et al., 2007) and challenge the 2 growth of other species or change ecological function. Although native plants can be invasive, non-natives are the cause of the most damaging invasions (Randall, 1996). Despite control efforts, weeds are estimated to cause a 10% reduction in world-wide crop and pasture production (Sindel, 2000) and they upset the natural balance of ecosystems on all continents but Antarctica (Usher, 1988). Hobbs and Huenneke (1992, p. 325) assert that “control of non-native plants has become one of the most expensive and urgent tasks of managers in several U.S. national parks, in island preserves such as the Galapagos, and elsewhere”. A recent U.S. Forest Service survey in Oregon revealed that non-native plants comprised 20 percent of the cover in one out of ten forested plots with Himalayan blackberry being the most prevalent exotic species (Rapp, 2005). Plant invasions cause concern because invading species can alter ecosystem processes by displacing native species, by providing support for other non-native animals, fungi or microbes, and hybridization can occur which alters gene pools (Randall, 1996). Changes in ecological function and economic losses drive managers to try to reduce the prevalence of weeds but the removal of a weed produces feedback in a plant community that increases the probability of invasion by new weeds (Radosevich et al., 2007). Thus, careful consideration of site characteristics, physiology of the target weed, and plant response to control measures is critical. Ideally the tools employed to control weeds will reduce their vigor by manipulating the relative growth and 3 reproduction of the target species (Sheley et al., 1996) while having relatively little impact on desirable species in the same plant community. 1.2 Invasive Plants and Invasion Defined Invasive plants are weeds that demonstrate exceptional vigor and become established, naturalized, and spread to new habitats without further human intervention (Randall, 1997). It is important to note that invasive taxa can spread where they are not native but they are a subset of naturalized taxa (Rejmánek, 2000). Although non-native species are introduced to new environments constantly through trade and human interest in new crops, including ornamental plants, only a small sub-set of those plants become weeds. Remarkably, weeds account for less that 0.1% of flowering plants worldwide (Radosevich et al., 2007). Many invasive plants have vegetative growth rates that exceed those of native congeners and other species in the invaded community. Invasive plants must produce reproductive offspring and have the potential to spread and sustain a population without human intervention (Richardson et al., 2000). In some cases, the invasive species becomes dominant in a plant community. Dominance can be measured by percent cover (area occupied by one species as a percentage of total area) or by density (number of plants per area). During the colonization phase of an invasion process the number of individuals in a population or the individuals per area increases (Cousens and 4 Mortimer, 1995). If, after taking into account deaths, this number is greater than unity, as is the case during colonization, the population is expanding (Radosevich et al., 2007). Invasive species have population growth rates of greater than one until naturalization (Cousens and Mortimer, 1995) has occurred at which time all niches are exploited and neither area, nor density, changes. For some invasive species, this state of naturalization describes the population dynamic behind what we qualitatively see as a monoculture. The primary species considered in this dissertation, Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and English ivy (Hedera helix), have likely reached the naturalization stage of invasion in many parts of their alien Pacific Northwest range. In other locales, they may have just been introduced or are experiencing colonization which likely is the time that managers become aware of their presence. 1.3 Invasiveness and the Potential for Invasion 1.3.1 Plant characteristics Whether an invasive plant is exotic or native, we need to understand its physiology and ecology in order to design effective strategies for control or to prevent future invasions (Baruch and Goldstein, 1999). Even low-density weeds can pose challenges due to their extensive root systems or canopies. Additionally, the presence of secondary compounds or morphologic 5 characteristics affect consumption of a plant by herbivores. For example, the presence of thorns can limit access to an area thereby limiting control methods. Many theories attempt to predict invasiveness based on characteristics of the plant itself. These include seed dispersal characteristics (Harper, 1977), growth analysis (Hunt, 1982), life-history characteristics (Sakai et al., 2001), hybridization and polyploidy (Radosevich et al., 2007) among many others. Williamson and Fitter (1996) report a number of characteristics of invading plants derived from a review of the Ecological Flora Database and other research. Abundant species make better invaders, though there are exceptions. Williamson (1989) suggests that seed production may underlay the observation of abundance. This author also notes that invasive species are generally large, tall, and taller than wide as well as having large leaves but postulates that these characteristics may be a sociological artifact; gardener’s preference for large and showy plants. While this may hold true for the flora examined in Britain, the annual grass invaders of the semi-arid west of North America, notably cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), red brome (Bromus rubens) and medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae), have very different physiological characteristics but are still serious pests. Their invasiveness is closely linked to disturbance regimes including grazing and fire (Whisenant, 1990). These species are also phenotypically plastic (Whisenant, 1990) including the ability to grow in many types of soil (Stubbendieck et al., 2003). They are also prolific seed producers (Pellant, 1990). 6 The plant strategy scheme of Grime (1977, 1979) using C, S and R classifications for species is useful to describe the behavior of a phenotype in many locations. The R, or ruderal, label for plants which respond vigorously to disturbance, have short life spans, and make large reproductive effort is of particular interest to those studying annuals that are invasive. Hardy perennials which resist control efforts and dominate the plant community of which they are a part seem best categorized as C, competitive, plants in Grime’s scheme. While these descriptors are useful to compare plants they do not account for the underlying mechanisms that make a plant species invasive. Simply being a congener of an invasive species does not predict invasiveness (Mack, 1996) though specific genes within the genotype may ultimately explain why some plants are better invaders while others are not. Sakai et al. (2001) provide ample justification to investigate life-history and resource allocation as predictors of invasiveness. They suggest that integrating population biology and weed science can lead to the identification of life history stages at which management will be most effective. The use of growth analysis is a powerful tool to explain why some species are invasive while other, even closely related, species are not. Hunt (1982) provides an exhaustive exploration of plant growth analysis. In brief, the virtues of using metrics such as R (absolute or specific growth rate), E or NAR (unit leaf rate), LAR (leaf area ratios) or RGR (relative growth rate) allow the researcher to compare invasive plants to those they dominate in a plant 7 community. With this functional approach, the underlying mechanisms of why invasive species are successful, or competitive in the terminology of Grime (1977, 1979), can be elucidated. There are plants which invade despite lower relative levels of seed production and dispersal, lower growth rates, and shorter life spans than species in the invaded plant community. In these cases, perhaps the mechanisms for success lie in broader multi-factor interactions among plants, animals and microbes in the ecosystem. 1.3.2 Ecosystem characteristics Ecologists have developed a number of theories which attempt to predict why some ecosystems are more prone to invasion than others. Although all communities are invasible, most invasible communities have low average levels of plant cover, are subject to frequent disturbance, or are close to sources of alien plants (Crawley, 1987). Radosevich et al. (2007) concur that the vulnerability to invasion varies among communities but emphasize that disturbed habitats and agro-ecosystems, a sociological descriptor, are more susceptible than plant systems that spend a long period at late successional phases. Disturbance, a mechanism which limits plant biomass by causing its destruction (Grime, 1977), is frequently a precursor to the spread of weedy plants. Numerous other factors within an ecosystem are also hypothesized to 8 play a role. These include the availability of seed dispersers, availability of safe sites and absence of natural enemies (predators, competitors, disease agents). A commonly cited hypothesis to explain the varied degree of invasion across ecosystems is that more diverse systems are less invasible. Levine and D’Antonio (1999) add clarity to this idea by stating that diversity does not render a community completely resistant to invasion but it influences the probability that a propagule will be successful in that community. In contrast, an analysis of 184 sites throughout the world found that communities richer in native species had more, not fewer, exotics (Lonsdale, 1999). Harper (1977) focused on the availability of safe sites as a primary predictor of seedling success with four components including stimuli for breaking seed dormancy, conditions supporting germination, resource availability for growth, and the absence of hazards. In effect, the safe site construct combines aspects of environment and plant biology to predict plant propagule success. 1.4 Two Invasive Creeping Perennials of the Pacific Northwest The research in this dissertation focuses primarily on Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus Focke) and English ivy (Hedera helix L.) for very specific reasons. Himalayan blackberry is the most widespread and economically disruptive of all the noxious weed species in western Oregon (Wilson et al., 9 2006). English ivy dominates large areas of forested land by displacing native vegetation and becoming intertwined with shrubs which makes its removal very challenging (Oregon Department of Agriculture, 2008). Though their life histories and specific physiology vary, they are both highly successful invaders due in large part to their creeping vegetative growth and seed dispersal by birds (Butaye et al., 2001; Tirmenstein, 1989). 1.4.1 Physiology and ecology of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) Himalayan blackberry is an invasive shrub in Family Rosaceae, native to Asia and introduced to North America via England (Pojar & MacKinnon, 1994; Mathews, 1992). It is increasingly a problem in high rainfall areas of the Pacific Northwest. In a survey of riparian sites along 145 km of the Willamette River in Oregon, Fierke and Kauffman (2006) found that 89% of 28 sites had Himalayan blackberry present. They conclude that the native thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus) or salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) might be displaced over time due to the ability of Himalayan blackberry to form homogeneous cover and inhibit the germination and establishment of native species. Himalayan blackberry typically grows at low densities possessing one crown with many canes (Radosevich, personal communication) that produce large canopies which then shade an area of large circumference around the 10 plant. Like other cane fruit, it reproduces by seed and grows vegetatively through ‘daughter plants’ at cane tips, rhizomes, and from severed pieces of canes and roots (Amor, 1974b; Kigel and Koller, 1985). The ability of Himalayan blackberry to refoliate after disturbance, and to grow at rates faster than other native shrubs in the plant communities it invades, places it in the stress-tolerant competitor scheme in Grime’s C-S-R model. In a comparison of four Rubus species, McDowell (2002b) found that the non-natives, Himalayan blackberry and evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus), have higher photosynthetic capacities than two natives, black raspberry (Rubus leucodermis) and trailing blackberry (Rubus ursinus), which allows the invasive species to fix significantly more carbon. Additionally, the higher average maximum photosynthetic rate (A max) of the two non-native invasive species is maintained throughout the year. The non-natives also had a larger pool of available carbon which may be translocated to perennial roots following cane senescence and stored for future cane production. The leaves of Himalayan blackberry remain on the canes longer than non-invasive species thus allowing them a longer period of carbon gain than congeners (McDowell, 2002b). Himalayan blackberry is like other plants which have rapid rates of vegetative growth, especially after top removal. It is a colonizer in disturbed forests because it tends to allocate a large portion of its resources to stems and branches (Radosevich et al., 2007). This can easily be observed in the large 11 thickets of Himalayan blackberry that can climb into tree canopies and compete with those trees for incident light. Bud dormancy, which can be induced by herbicides, complicates control of this and other rhizomatous weeds (Amor, 1974b). It is possible to prevent the establishment of new daughter plants by mowing or by herbicide treatment (Bruzzese and Lane, 1996) but the effect is variable. Amor (1974b) reports that an herbicide trial in Victoria, Australia resulted in thickets of Rubus fruticosus (re-classified as R. armeniacus) which produce more suckers when sprayed with 2,4,5-T than thickets left unsprayed (Amor 1974a). Plant age is a major source of the variable response to herbicide (Amor, 1974b). Factors other than the ecology of a species can contribute to its persistence as a weed. Cane fruit production is a thriving industry in western Oregon and, although Himalayan blackberry is not commercially cultivated for fruit, it frequently grows in association with evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus) which is commercially important in Oregon (Oregon Raspberry and Blackberry Commission, 2008). Control methods that may be effective against Himalayan blackberry are of concern to this sector of the horticulture industry due to the potential impacts on other species in the Rubus genus. Recent confirmation of Phragmidium violaceum, a fungal foliar pathogen, in both Himalayan and evergreen blackberry in Oregon (Aime and Rossman, 2007) is a concern to this producer group. Phragmidium violaceum was intentionally released in Australia as a control agent (Sindel, 2000) under the 12 Commonwealth Biological Control Act of 1984. The act allows for the release of a biological control agent to control invasive species and protects people who release a biological control agent from legal action as a result of unintended effects of that agent. The quantity and size of thorns on Himalayan blackberry protect it from herbivory by many grazing animals. Sites invaded by this blackberry are likely to increase in shrub cover or density as herbivory is limited (Edwards and Gilman, 1987). 1.4.2 Physiology and ecology of English ivy (Hedera helix) English ivy (Hedera helix) is a temperate liana in Family Araliaceae which has been raised for centuries as a ground cover. It was introduced to North America from Europe in the colonial era (Clarke et al., 2006). It is now naturalized in the mid-Atlantic and Western United States (Randall, 1996). Recent sampling of invasive populations in British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon revealed that 83% of 58 populations were actually Hedera hibernica (Kirchner) Bean rather than Hedera helix L. (Clarke et al. 2006). Hedera helix is used in this dissertation because invasive populations are managed as H. helix. This is also how naturalists and horticulturalists refer to this naturalized plant. English ivy is classified as a B list noxious weed in Oregon (ODA Plant Division, 2008), yet some cultivars may still be sold until December 13 2009. English ivy is a serious pest of forests in and around urban areas in the Pacific Northwest. It poses challenges where trees have been cut and the resultant open canopy allows new source populations to arise from seed dispersal by bird endozoochory. In 1999, more than 55,000 hours of mostly volunteer labor were expended to remove this plant from parks and open spaces in the Portland metropolitan area (Anonymous, 2000). English ivy grows by vegetative structures including long stems which produce stolons. Prolific stoloniferous growth and subsequent clonal growth contribute to its invasiveness with densities of 10,000 plants/acre (Reichard, 2007). The vine climbs with the aid of aerial roots and as it reaches higher light intensities in forest canopies leaves become ovate (Okerman, 2006). The plant is then referred to as an adult or mature individual. Vertical forms of the plant partition new dry matter preferentially to increase leaf laminar area at the “expense” of shoot axis dry weight (Frey and Frick, 1987). In Grime’s C-S-R classification system (1977, 1979), English ivy can be classified as both competitive and stress tolerant species. It is competitive because it produces a canopy of fast-growing leaves that exclude other species in plant communities. Cordero et al. (1985) found that juvenile plants had a plastochron (time per production of leaf) of 4.23 days whether grown under short or long day conditions. Short days promoted vegetative growth and long days initiated flower production in mature plants. 14 The stress tolerant classification is appropriate because English ivy is tolerant of Mediterranean drought and deep shade though it can become stressed by extreme conditions Sack (2004). Specifically, English ivy is more tolerant of drought under 3% rather than 30% daylight conditions (Sack, 2004). Oberhuber and Bauer (1991) observed loss of chlorophyll in east and southfacing leaves exposed to strong light and severe frost during winter. They note that all leaves showed remarkable recovery and returned to pre-stress photosynthetic levels within seven days after the stress. These researchers conclude that adult ivy leaves possess an enormous capacity to repair lightinduced damage to the photosynthetic apparatus. Seed dispersal by bird endozoochory is common. In forest plantations with a history of logging in Belgium, many forest patches contain English ivy dispersed by bird endozoochory (Butaye et al., 2001). Patches with English ivy had significant (.001 ≤ p < .01) reductions in species richness, with an average of 5 fewer species, compared to those with other species. Laskurain et al. (2004) examined seedling dynamics in a temperate forest in southern Spain with similar climatic conditions to the Pacific Northwest (165cm annual precipitation, mean annual temperatures of 11°C, 43° N latitude) and found that 98% of emergent seedlings survived to six months and 96% of those survived to one year. High seed survival and seedling establishment were attributed to the heavier weight of English ivy seeds compared to the heath and Rubus species and the species’ drought and shade tolerance (Laskurain et al., 15 2004). The dominant eigenvalue or finite rate of increase, for English ivy is 1.28 (calculated from Laskurain et al., 2004). It is likely that the eigenvalue declines as the density of this plant increases because the primary means of expansion is by vegetative growth. Most dispersed seed falls into the ivy ground cover below the host trees where germination is limited. The availability of shrubs or trees to climb and the amount of incident light throughout the year have substantial effects on rates of sexual reproduction. Published research focuses on vegetative growth or the effect of English ivy on wildlife abundance and density rather than population dynamics of the ivy itself. English ivy forms dense ground cover which prevents emergence of herbaceous plants. However, it did not alter the presence of seeds of other species in a secondary Piedmont forest in Georgia (Biggerstaff & Beck, 2006). Species richness and Shannon-Weaver indices for sites with and without ivy were not significantly different. Additionally, no evidence for allelopathy was found as seeds of numerous others species germinated equally well in pots with and without ivy (Biggerstaff & Beck, 2006). Moore (2004) notes that English ivy biomass doubled and stem length increased by 137% when CO2 levels were raised from 365 ppm to 660ppm in a forested site in Switzerland. Zotz et al. (2006) report similar results when CO2 levels were raised to 500 and 650 ppm and total biomass of new shoots increased by more than 80% and leaf biomass increased 100%. Zotz et al. 16 (2006) conclude that English ivy lianas will reach the canopy more quickly as carbon dioxide levels rise and thus compete more with the foliage of host trees. English ivy is tolerant of pre-emergent herbicides (Derr, 1992) but will respond to glyphosate application in the early spring if applied at 1.4 kg/ha (2.7 lbs/ac) (Reichard, 2007). The addition of surfactants aids in penetration of the waxy leaves by herbicides (Soll, 2005) but neighbor plants are also affected. The most effective control measure for this plant is hand-pulling (Reichard, 2007). 1.5 Domestic Livestock and Their Influence on Plant Communities Humans have interacted with grazing animals, primarily as a source of food, for centuries. The earliest known domesticated herbivores are sheep believed to have been domesticated in the Zagros Mountains of northern Iraq about 10,700 years ago (Reed, 1980). Since that time humans have herded livestock of many species and transported them to new continents. This migration has altered relationships between plants and animals by changing the pressure from disturbance that plants experience from herbivory. European immigration to the Americas and Australia led to large herds of domesticated cattle, sheep and other classes of livestock in locales where they had not previously existed. In the United States, the concept of rangelands was born and scientists endeavored to quantify the effects of domestic livestock on plant communities. Dyksterhuis (1948, 1949) used the terms decreaser, 17 increaser and invader to describe trends in plant species response to grazing. Dyksterhuis noted that invaders were not present in climax communities, following the convention of Clements (1936), but were present in disturbed areas such as mounds of burrowing animals. He also observed that overgrazing with domestic livestock could produce areas where invaders occupy entire landscapes. Vesk and Westoby (2001) attempted to categorize 829 species on Australian rangelands as increasers, decreasers or neutral under grazing but analyses were challenged in a number of ways. For example, 505 of the species occurred at only one geographical location, weather differentially affected plant growth, plants known to be palatable may not have been selected when other more desirable food sources were available, and the intensity of grazing was variable. Despite these challenges, efforts to quantify response undertaken by these researchers provide a backdrop for the application of targeted grazing. 1.5.1 Grazing as disturbance Archer and Stokes (2000) have fined-tuned the widely accepted definition of disturbance by elaborating that disturbance regimes are the sums of types, frequencies and intensities of disturbance through time in a landscape. Grazing management seeks to maximize livestock production but all wild and domestic herbivores selectively utilize plant species in any ecosystem (Briske 18 and Heitschmidt, 1991) which leads to differential growth following the grazing disturbance. Additionally, the season of disturbance can modify the intensity of the disturbance, the availability of propagules, and conditions which favor establishment of one species over another (Noble and Slatyer, 1980). Frequency, magnitude, season of tissue removal, plant parts lost, resource availability for re-growth, and stage in the plant life cycle all influence plant response to herbivory (Archer and Smeins, 1991). If plants are unable to survive under a disturbance regime, and niches become available to invaders, plant species composition will change. Archer et al. (1988) and D’Antonio and Vitousek (1992) discuss the transitions that occur when ‘keystone species’ establish and initiate positive feedbacks that redirect plant succession. If plant composition on a landscape is substantially altered, the underlying ecological processes will also change. Targeted grazing is a management tool that seeks to alter these trends and stop the feedback so that, with integrated pest management (IPM) techniques, restoration may be possible. 1.5.2 Targeted grazing and goat browsing for invasive plant control The application of specific livestock at a determined season, duration, and intensity to accomplish defined vegetation or landscape goals is known as targeted grazing (Frost and Launchbaugh, 2003). Targeted grazing has the potential to reduce plant vigor and ultimately contribute to weed management. 19 The use of livestock to manage certain types of vegetation is not new but close adjustment of timing, duration, and intensity of the herbivory and quantification of the plant response are newer in management applications. Because plant community composition reflects its history of herbivory, plant species which are intolerant of a change in herbivore regimen will be eliminated (Edwards and Gilman, 1987). An industry based on the pairing of plant with herbivore is receiving closer scrutiny as managers seek alternatives to chemical and mechanical control methods. Livestock vary in the way they consume vegetation. In particular, goats are browsers and well suited for managing woody plants because they consume more browse than cattle or sheep (Campbell and Taylor, 2006). They have been used for brush control and weed management throughout the western United States for generations (Scifres, 1980). Because goats tend to avoid clover, and show a greater preference for fibrous plants than do sheep and cattle (Hodgson, 1990), they are often chosen to improve pasture quality. Use of goats to control invasive plants in a forested understory can be more complicated if desirable species are also shrubs or trees. Thus Scifres (1980) warns that techniques must be designed specifically to the situation. Because precipitation in western Oregon falls primarily between October and May, most browsing for weed control is done June through September. This timing avoids soil compaction and the creation of depressions from stock hooves (pugs) which favor seedling establishment by creating safe sites 20 (Harper, 1965). To be most effective against the target plant species, browsing is timed with the onset of flowering when plants are believed to be most vulnerable. For Himalayan blackberry, primocane and shoot growth are greatest in spring and summer and fortunately this coincides with the best timing to protect soil resources. The portions of English ivy plants consumed by goats are vegetative so there is potentially more flexibility in timing application of browsing treatment on this species. The flowers and fruits of this ivy exist primarily in sunlit portions of tree canopies so hand-pulling to remove vines from trees will always be necessary to control English ivy. Duration is an important component to consider in a targeted grazing plan. Scifres (1980) claims short-term, high stocking rates are more effective than grazing on a year-long basis but this is likely to vary depending on the vital attributes (Noble and Slatyer, 1980) of the target species. 1.6 Developing a Model for Predicting Plant Community Change In order to form meaningful generalizations, or models, of how plants will respond to disturbance Lavorel et al. (1997) propose that we fine tune the C-SR plant strategy scheme of Grime (1977, 1979) to include morphology and regeneration strategy. One might also include plant demographic traits which contribute to the success of individual species. However, a study of 18 herbaceous species found that contributions of growth, fecundity, and survival to finite rates of population increase (λ) had no significant correlation with 21 CSR status (Silvertown et al., 1992). Rejmánek (2000) advocates the use of habitat specific predictions to guide management of the most troubling invasive species whether to prevent new introductions or to control species that are already problematic. Edwards and Gillman (1987) believe the best way to study the role of herbivory is to perturb the system by introducing, removing, or somehow controlling herbivore activity. The work of these ecologists points to the need for sophisticated constructs (White and Gunstone, 1992) to group plants so that one can predict plant response to changes, including disturbance through herbivory. 1.7 Objectives This dissertation includes three studies. Chapters 2 and 3 address the response of Himalayan blackberry to high intensity-short duration goat browsing, mowing, and a combination of these two methods for three levels of treatment. Himalayan blackberry vigor is examined in Chapter 2 and questions addressed include: Is stem density altered under the treatment types? How is the population dynamic of the blackberry population (including seedlings, primocanes, floricanes, and nodes) altered? Which treatment provides the most effective control of Himalayan blackberry? Chapter 3 includes the invasive evergreen blackberry because it grows in association with Himalayan blackberry and functions similarly in the ecosystems it invades. Specific research questions include: How does plant composition change under each of 22 the treatments? Are species and functional group changes different among the treatments? How will these changes affect restoration? In Chapter 4, the efficacy of high intensity-short duration goat browsing is examined for the control of English ivy. Specifically: Does goat browsing reduce the percent cover of English ivy? Is there a difference in plant response for one vs. two years of the treatment? Does species composition in the plant community change? 23 2 HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY (RUBUS ARMENIACUS) RESPONSE TO HIGH INTENSITY-SHORT DURATION GOAT BROWSING AND MOWING 2.1 Abstract Throughout the Pacific Northwest, Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) is a noxious invader which dominates sites with its persistent canopy and large underground crowns. The resultant shading and occupation of root space inhibit the growth of desired species in pasture, forest and agronomic settings where this non-native blackberry species is present. Control is complicated by vigorous re-growth after mechanical control and variable response to herbicides. Recent interest in the use of domestic livestock to control invasive plants through targeted grazing methods has led land managers to use a variety of long and short term methods to control unwanted species through disturbance by herbivory. This study examines the efficacy of high intensity-short duration goat browsing, mowing and a combination of the two methods to control Himalayan blackberry. Experimental plots were monitored from spring 2006 through fall 2008. Residual above ground biomass in June 2008 was significantly less in plots mowed in two years than in untreated plots. Mean total stem density increased after two annual repetitions of goat browsing, mowing and goat browsing followed by mowing but was not significantly different among the 24 treatment types. Mean total stem density then declined from 2007 to 2008 after a mowing treatment was applied to all experimental plots. Fluctuations in densities of seedlings, primocanes, floricanes and nodes are discussed. Nomenclature: Himalayan blackberry, Rubus armeniacus Focke Key Words: Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus Focke); plant vigor, seedlings, primocanes, floricanes, nodes, biomass, high intensity-short duration browsing, goats, mowing. 2.2 Introduction Disturbance is frequently a precursor to the presence and spread of weedy plants (Rejmánek, 1989). Common sources of disturbance in pasture plant communities are cultural methods such as soil tillage, seeding with forage species and subsequent grazing by one class of livestock. Where cattle have been the predominant herbivore, grasses are disturbed by repeated grazing while forbs and shrubs are not consumed to the same degree. To control an invasive species through alteration of the grazing regime, both the type and intensity of disturbance are changed (Archer and Stokes, 2000). Disturbance can be an opportunity to alter species composition in a plant community to a more desired state (Westoby et al., 1989). 25 Response to disturbance is determined by attributes of the component plant species (Hobbs and Huenneke, 1992) and the resource environment in which those species exist. However, it has been noted that basal meristem monocots respond differently than dicot herbs and woody plants (Hawkes and Sullivan, 2001). In this study, patches in a pasture dominated by Himalayan blackberry were browsed by goats (defoliation and consumption of young canes) or mowed (removal of most aboveground biomass) to determine the resulting vigor of the target species and possible emergence of new plant species. Changes in species composition, the functional groups of those species, and implications for restoration are discussed in Chapter 3. Control of Himalayan blackberry is complicated by a number of factors. The maximum relative growth rate of 0.104 g/g/day for primocanes is more like herbaceous than woody plants (Amor, 1974a). Plants that have rapid rates of vegetative growth, especially after top removal, are often colonizers in disturbed forests (Radosevich et al., 2007) and adjacent pasture plant communities. Survival of daughter plants which originate from adventitious buds on roots is often higher than that of seedlings (Amor, 1974a). Bud dormancy, which can be induced by herbicides, also complicates control of this and other rhizomatous weeds (Amor, 1974b). Although Bruzzese and Lane (1996) reported that establishment of new ramets can be prevented by mowing or by herbicide treatment, Amor (1974a) found that thickets of Rubus fruticosus produced more suckers when sprayed with 2,4,5- 26 T than thickets left unsprayed. Amor (1974b) notes that plant age is a major source of variation in response of this species to herbicide. Thus the age of the Himalayan blackberry ramets in this study will likely be a factor in their response to control methods. All organisms are subject to controllers and resources in their environments (Bazzaz, 1987). While altering resources in this pasture plant community beyond the increase in available nutrients from decomposing cane litter is not practical, we can influence vegetative and reproductive growth with browsing or mowing which impose substantial disturbance. Both methods are expected to reduce individual aboveground biomass while also stimulating re-growth that may draw on root reserves and ultimately cause a decline in vigor of the target species. Managers seek to drive plant community dynamics by manipulating relative growth and reproduction of plant species (Sheley et al., 1996). The application of high intensity-short duration goat browsing damages the Himalayan blackberry with a kind and level of disturbance that limits net primary production of the plant in the long term (Hendrickson and Olson, 2006). This control method may be particularly effective in a degraded plant community with a monoculture that resists herbivory by the usual grazing species, cattle. Changing the type of disturbance from grazing to browsing, intensity from low to high, and timing from long to short duration is a substantial shift in disturbance regime (Archer and Stokes, 2000). It is 27 expected that changes in plant cover, density and other measures of vigor, will be observed. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of high intensityshort duration goat browsing, mowing and a combination of goat browsing and mowing on the vigor of Himalayan blackberry. Stem density of various ages of stems (including seedlings, primocanes and floricanes), total stem density, node density and biomass per area were the response variables measured. The methods chosen were based on control protocols used by commercial graziers. 2.3 Materials and Methods 2.3.1 Site and plot description This study was conducted south of Cottage Grove, Oregon in the Willamette Valley from May 2006 through August 2008. The research plots were located in a north aspect pasture on Nekia silty clay loam soils with 30 to 50 percent slopes at 100 to 135 meters (330 to 445 feet) elevation (Soil Data Mart, 2008). The pasture was planted with subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) and tall fescue (Schedonorus phoenix) in the mid-1970s after excavation and installation of a natural gas pipeline. Since that time, neither pasture improvement, nor weed management, has been undertaken. The site has been grazed by cattle since the early 1900s but was not grazed by goats prior to this study. 28 Location of the plots was determined by visual estimate of dense (95100%) Himalayan blackberry cover. Using a completely randomized design (CRD), treatments were randomly assigned to each of the plots. There were four replicates of each of the seven treatments for a total of 28 plots. Each plot was 36 m2 in area with a 2m buffer extending out from the perimeter of each plot to ensure that no interactions occurred between plots. The buffer also allowed for the installation of temporary electric fencing to confine the goats to the browsed plots. Because many plots had Himalayan blackberry canopies that were 2 meters tall in the spring of 2006 metal t-posts capped with white PVC pipe were used to delineate the four corners of each plot. 2.3.2 Treatments The different treatments (Table 2.1) included browsing, mowing and browsing plus mowing at three levels; 0, 1 or 2 years. Four untreated plots served as controls and were neither browsed nor mowed. To obtain a final assessment of above ground biomass all plots were mowed in late June 2008 (Section 2.3.5). In effect, the biomass harvest conducted in 2008 produced new treatment types and so the 2008 stem density data are compared separately to the 2006 and 2007 data. 29 Table 2.1 Treatment Descriptions Year Treatment 1g Treatment 2g Treatment 1m Treatment 2m Treatment 1gm Treatment 2gm Treatment c 2006 not treated browsed not treated mowed not treated browsed & mowed not treated 2007 browsed browsed mowed mowed browsed & mowed browsed & mowed not treated 2008 mowed mowed mowed mowed mowed mowed mowed 1g = goat browsing in one year, 2g = goat browsing in two years, 1m = mowing in one year 2m = mowing in two years, 1gm = goat browsing & mowing in one year 2gm = goat browsing & mowing in two years, c = control (untreated) 2.3.3 Application of treatments Mowing was conducted in July of 2006 and 2007 after the onset of flowering of the Himalayan blackberry. A Bobcat® single blade deck mower was used to cut the canes to approximately 5-10cm from the soil surface. Temporary electric fencing was installed around each plot prior to browsing. Goat does and their kids were herded onto the appropriate plots and allowed to browse for approximately one day. This resulted in a stocking rate equivalent to 988 head/hectare (400 head/acre). Animals were removed from the plots when plants were defoliated, young canes eaten, and the herd showed little interest in continued browsing. For the browsing followed by mowing 30 treatment (Table 2.1), goat browsing was applied as described above and those same plots were mowed within one week after the animals were removed. 2.3.4 Above ground biomass In late June 2008 all plots were mowed from the upper to lower edge with one pass of a 1.5m (5ft) wide Bobcat® mower. This produced a sampled area of 1.5m x 6m (9m2). The cane from this area was raked, non-blackberry debris removed, and left for 3 days to air dry. Each pile was turned and allowed to dry for an additional four hours and weighed to determine the biomass of the cane debris from each plot. 2.3.5 Stem density In late August and September of 2006-2008, five to seven weeks following each treatment (Table 2.1), each plot was sampled for stem density. A grid of 1m2 sub-plots numbered from left to right and top to bottom was used to delineate the sub-plots and orange-topped wooden stakes marked the four corners of each sub-plot. Nine sub-plots were randomly selected and stem density determined. This resulted in 25% (9 of 36 m2) of each plot being sampled. The response variables included density of seedlings, primocanes, floricanes, total stems and nodes. Seedlings are plants that have sprouted from seed in the current year, primocanes are new canes which have germinated from a crown in the current growing season, and floricanes are canes one year 31 or older. Total canes were calculated as the sum of seedlings, primocanes, and floricanes. Nodes are defined as a group of canes which grow from the same area on a crown. Nodes were determined by brushing away soil from the crown or grasping an individual cane to determine how it moved relative to other nearby canes. If a cane was attached to the crown near other canes all the canes were counted as part of the same node. 2.3.6 Statistical model and analysis Differences in residual above ground biomass were compared using the following model: Уij = ų + χi + єij Уij = residual biomass/m2 in 2008, i = treatment (1…7) j = replicate (plot 1, 2, 3, 4) ų = over-all mean biomass/m2 χi = effect of treatment on biomass /m2 єij = random variation of ith trt, jth plot that adds variability to the value of Уij, єij N(0, δ2 ), єij and єi’j’ are independent. The SAS 9.1.3 Statistical Package (2003) was used to analyze the data. Tukey’s HSD was used to make pairwise comparisons for all treatments for the response variable of biomass/m2. 32 The following General Linear Model (GLM) was fit to the stem density data: Уij = ų + χi + єij Уij = observed change in stem density from 2006 to 2007 (or 2007 to 2008) i = trt type (browsing once, browsing twice, mowing once, mowing twice, browsing plus mowing once, browsing plus mowing twice) j = replicate (plot 1, 2, 3, 4) Ų = over-all mean of change in blackberry stems/ m2 χi = difference in stem density for the ith treatment type relative to the overall mean єij = random variation of ith trt, jth plot that adds variability to the value of Уij, єij N(0, δ2 ), єij and єi’j’ are independent Changes in stem density from 2007 to 2008 are for plots treated once or twice with the three treatments followed by mowing in 2008 (Table 2.2). The SAS 9.1.3 Statistical Package (2003) was used to analyze the data. Tukey’s HSD Test was used to make pairwise comparisons for all treatments for the response variables of biomass/m2, seedlings/m2, primocanes/m2, floricanes/m2, total stems/m2 and nodes/m2. This test was also used to compare mean treatment biomass results. 33 2.4 Results and Discussion 2.4.1 Above ground biomass Residual above ground biomass was examined in June 2008 to asses the robustness of Himalayan blackberry plants. The abilities to form ramets and rapidly capture nutrients to grow new leaves (Grime and Hodgson, 1987) are characteristics of competitive species thus biomass harvest provides the benefit of gauging vigor using an indirect measure of relative growth rate. Mean aboveground biomass ranged from 409 g/m2 for plots mowed twice to 1018 g/m2 for untreated plots (Figure 2.1). Figure 2.1 Mean Aboveground Biomass in 2008 1400 1200 g/m2 1000 1007 1018 950 775 800 835 812 600 409 400 200 0 Treatment goats 1 yr goats 2 yrs goats & mow 1 yr goats & mow 2 yrs mow 1 yr mow 2 yrs untreated Error bars = 1 SE 34 Mean residual biomass for plots mowed in two years was significantly less than untreated plots, 409 g/ m2 compared to 1018 g/ m2 at the 90% confidence level. Mean residual biomass for plots mowed in two years was also significantly less than plots browsed by goats for one year, and plots browsed by goats for two years at the 80% confidence level. This result was expected as the mowing created a high level of disturbance, particularly compared to plots that remained untreated. Removal of Himalayan blackberry above ground biomass by goat browsing, mowing or a combination of the two was an attempt to direct the plant community by reducing the vigor of the target plant. Hobbs and Huenneke (1992) suggest that mowing allows the persistence of less competitive species which would be desirable particularly if these included grasses of high palatability to livestock. The change in grazing regime (Hobbs & Huenneke, 1992) from low intensity by cattle, which primarily select grasses in their diet, to high intensity-short duration browsing by goats which consume parts of woody plants, did reduce Himalayan blackberry biomass. However, repeated mowing is more effective than goat browsing to achieve the goal of reducing above ground biomass. 2.4.2 Stem Density Himalayan blackberry responds to disturbance in many ways including growing primocanes, tip-rooting, sprouting new branches from floricanes, 35 sprouting from stem remnants and growing new ramets from adventitious roots (Amor, 1974a). Thus control of this species can be difficult and repetition of control methods may be necessary as was done in this study. Stem densities by treatment, after two years of the study, are presented in Table 2.2. Table 2.2 Mean Stem and Node Densities (per m2) by Treatment Goat Browsing x 1 * Goat Browsing x 2 ** Goat Browsing and Mowing x 1 * Goat Browsing and Mowing x 2 ** Mowing x 1 * Mowing x 2 ** Seedlings Primocanes Floricanes Total Canes Nodes 0.1 3.8 0.2 1.2 32.8 46.9 33.1 51.9 10.6 18.5 0.2 3.0 31.1 33.5 16.2 10.6 0.1 21.2 7.8 4.5 3.1 45.4 32.6 41.0 63.7 37.2 65.3 30.5 15.5 34.9 * Means for pooled data from plots treated once, data collected in 2006 and in 2007 ** Means for plots treated twice, data collected in 2007 2.4.2.1 Total stem and floricane density Total stem density increased from 2006 to 2007 in plots of all treatment types by an average of 21 stems/m2 (CL = 8.2, 34.3, df = 1, p < 0.08). However, the decline of 10 stems/m2 from 2007 to 2008 was not statistically significant. Two years of mowing produced 32 more stems/m2 than one year of treatment with goat browsing (CL = 3.2, 61.1, df = 6, p = 0.003) at the 95% confidence level. As well, two years of mowing produced 32 more stems/m2 36 than one year of treatment with goat browsing followed by mowing (CL = 2.8, 60.8, df = 6, p = 0.003) at the 95% confidence level. Mowing in two years also resulted in greater density than mowing in one year with 28 more total stems/m2 (CL = 2.0, 54.1, df = 6, p = 0.003) at the 90% confidence level. Two years of goat browsing followed by mowing also produced an increase in total stem density with 30 more canes than plots treated once the same treatment (CL = 1.2, 59.2, df = 6, p = 0.003) and 31 more canes than plots treated once with goat browsing (CL = 1.6, 60.0, df = 6, p = 0.003), both results reported at the 95% confidence level. Mowing stimulates the growth of new primocanes and allows for seedlings to germinate so the increase in density is expected. It is possible that plants disturbed twice in one season show a reduction in density. Examining the population demographic of that density change will provide a more thorough understanding of how the Himalayan blackberry responds. Although a high degree of disturbance was imposed, the ability of Himalayan blackberry to re-sprout from its crowns allowed it to compensate for the removal of above ground biomass. It is possible from the 2008 data (Table 2.3) that a downward trend in total stem density was beginning but continued monitoring in subsequent years would be necessary to confirm this trajectory. 37 Table 2.3 Mean Stem and Node Densities (per m2) in Summer 2008 Goat Browsing x 1 Goat Browsing x 2 Goat Browsing and Mowing x 1 Goat Browsing and Mowing x 2 Mowing x 1 Mowing x 2 Untreated Seedlings Primocanes Floricanes Total Canes Nodes 0.3 0.3 9.5 13.4 24.8 25.8 34.6 39.4 12.3 15.3 11.1 10.8 20.3 42.3 24.6 1.1 1.2 8.9 0.3 9.6 8.5 11.0 9.6 29.6 24.8 28.5 31.1 40.3 34.4 48.4 41.0 15.6 14.0 25.2 15.1 Note: All data above determined five to seven weeks after mowing in 2008 per Table 2.1. Mean floricane density increased for all treatments from 2006 to 2007 by 12 floricanes/m2 (CL = 1.0, 22.4, df = 6, p = 0.59) at the 80% confidence level. Changes in floricane density from 2007 to 2008 were highly variable and the low level of statistical certainty inherent in the 2006 to 2007 change point to the need to examine density of other phenological stages of Himalayan blackberry. This approach is also validated by manner in which Himalayan blackberry responds to disturbance. 38 2.4.2.2 Seedling density Mean seedling density for all treatments increased from 2006 to 2007 by 6 seedlings/m2 (CL = 0.2, 11.6, df = 6, p < 0.0001). Changes in seedling density were highly variable from 2007 to 2008 with a mean of 6 fewer seedlings/m2, though the results were not statistically significant. However, the biological significance of this result is that seedling numbers increased initially and then declined to essentially the same level that existed after one year of treatment. Seedling survival can be attributed to many factors but the presence of other species and the shade they create are important factors. These factors are discussed in Chapter 3. Plots mowed twice were most different from other treatments. Table 2.4 shows a comparison treatment means at the 95% confidence level. 39 Table 2.4 Seedling Density Pairwise Comparisons for All Treatments Treatment Comparison Difference Between Means 2m - 2gm 2m - 2g 2m - c 2m - 1gm 2m - 1m 2m - 1g 2gm - 2g 2gm - c 2gm - 1gm 2gm - 1m 2gm - 1g 2g - c 2g - 1gm 2g - 1m 2g - 1g c - 1gm c - 1m c - 1g 1gm - 1m 1gm - 1g 1m - 1g 10.6 17.4 20.9 21.1 21.1 21.1 6.8 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.5 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.8 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 Simultaneous 95% Confidence Limits -3.9 2.8 6.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 -7.8 -4.3 -2.2 -2.1 -2.1 -11.1 -9.0 -8.9 -8.9 -12.4 -12.4 -12.3 -10.3 -10.2 -10.3 25.2 32.0 35.5 33.7 33.7 33.8 21.4 24.8 23.1 23.1 23.2 18.1 16.3 16.3 16.4 12.8 12.9 13.0 10.4 10.4 10.4 * * * * * 1g = goat browsing in one year, 2g = goat browsing in two years, 1m = mowing in one year, 2m = mowing in two years 1gm = goat browsing & mowing in one year, 2gm = goat browsing & mowing in two years c = control (untreated) * = significant at 95% confidence level Mowing in two years clearly produces conditions which favor seedling germination. In contrast, goats defoliate the Himalayan blackberry and readily 40 consume the berries at the same time which may contribute to the decline in seedling density. The lack of statistical significance between the plots mowed twice and those browsed and then mowed twice is due to the range of resultant data. More replicates of this treatment would assist researchers in confirming the strength of the trend toward an increase in seedling density with mowing. If left undisturbed the Himalayan blackberry would likely have relatively constant seed rain which contributes to its ability to disperse to new sites (Lambrecht-McDowell and Radosevich, 2005). This potential is not expressed near the parent plant due to shading from the dense canopy. Once the canopy is reduced the seedlings are able to germinate further challenging restoration of the site (Radosevich et al., 2007). Himalayan blackberry produces significantly (p< 0.0001) more fruits/cane than the native trailing blackberry (Rubus ursinus), 720.3 ± 123.9 vs. 23.5 ± 4.4 (McDowell, 2002a) which illustrates its reproductive potential. Annual control measures could limit the seed bank in the long term because canes must be two years or older to flower but invasion potential is strongly influenced by vegetative re-growth. 41 2.4.2.3 Primocane density Mean primocane density for all treatments accelerated over the three years of the study with an increase of 3 primocanes/m2 (CL = 1.5, 4.8, df = 1, p = .0003) from 2006 to 2007 to an increase of 6 primocanes/m2 (CL = 2.9, 8.0, df = 1, p = .0003) at the 95% confidence level from 2007 to 2008. These results indicate that the Himalayan blackberry plant population is vigorous and becoming younger. Comparisons between treatments are important because they will reveal which treatments are most effective at suppressing vegetative growth of primocanes (Table 2.5). 42 Table 2.5 Primocane Density Pairwise Comparisons for All Treatments Trt Comparison Difference Between Means c - 2gm c - 1m c - 2m c - 1gm c - 2g c - 1g 2gm - 1m 2gm - 2m 2gm - 1gm 2gm - 2g 2gm - 1g 1gm - 1m 1gm - 2m 1gm - 2g 1gm - 1g 2m - 1m 2m - 2g 2m - 1g 1m - 2g 1m - 1g 2g - 1g 1.8 5.0 6.5 6.6 8.4 9.3 3.3 4.7 4.8 6.6 7.5 -1.5 -0.1 1.8 2.7 -1.4 1.9 2.8 3.3 4.2 0.9 Simultaneous 95% Confidence Limits -2.5 1.3 2.2 2.9 4.1 5.6 -0.4 0.4 1.1 2.3 3.8 -4.5 -3.8 -1.9 -0.3 -5.1 -2.4 -0.9 -0.4 1.2 -2.8 6.1 8.8 10.8 10.3 12.7 13.1 7.0 9.0 8.5 10.9 11.2 1.6 3.6 5.5 5.8 2.4 6.3 6.6 7.0 7.3 4.7 * * * * * * * * * * 1g = goat browsing in one year, 2g = goat browsing in two years 1m = mowing in one year, 2m = mowing in two years 1gm = goat browsing & mowing in one year, 2gm = goat browsing & mowing in two years c = control (untreated) * = significant at the 95% confidence level Increases in primocane density for control plots, relative to most other treatments, are likely an artifact due to the mowing conducted in June 2008 to obtain biomass measurements. Sampling primocanes in plots that had not been treated at all would have provided more useful information but this was not possible due to the dense thickets. 43 It is noteworthy that two years of goat browsing followed by mowing produced significant increases in primocane density (Table 2.5). Plots treated in this manner experienced two disturbances per year and thus primocane growth was stimulated. This result differs from mowing where all floricanes are damaged. Although some floricanes persist, re-growth of more primocanes in plots treated with mowing was expected. Destruction of floricanes is a stimulus for the sprouting of new primocanes which are associated with regeneration buds on perennating structures, rhizomes or roots (Kigel and Koller, 1985). The over-all trend in the pasture toward an increase in primocane density indicates that the Himalayan blackberry plants are not dying but are allocating resources differently by sprouting new primocanes after the destruction of above ground biomass. An increase in primocane density after three years of the study indicates that the blackberry ramets are adjusting to the treatment by re-growth of many young canes rather than elongation of existing floricanes. 2.4.2.4 Node density Changes in node density may indicate what is happening to underground meristematic tissue in the crowns. This tissue is a vital source of vegetative regrowth (Amor, 1974a) particularly under the treatments investigated. Mean node density increased for all treatments from 2006 to 2007 by 12 nodes/m2 (CL = 6.5, 17.5, df = 1, p < 0.001) at the 95% confidence level. 44 From 2007 to 2008, the trend was reversed with a decline of 8 nodes/m2 (CL = -14.8, -0.3, df = 1, p < 0.01) at the 90% confidence level. The trend in node density for mowing in two years is similar to the trend in seedling density for the same treatment (Table 2.6). Table 2.6 Node Density Pairwise Comparisons for All Treatments Treatment Comparison Difference Between Simultaneous 95% Means Confidence Limits 2m - 2gm 2m - 2g 2m - 1gm 2m - 1m 2m - c 2m - 1g 2gm - 2g 2gm - 1gm 2gm - 1m 2gm - c 2gm - 1g 2g - 1gm 2g - 1m 2g - c 2g - 1g 1gm - 1m 1gm - c 1gm - 1g 1m - c 1m - 1g c - 1g 4.3 16.3 18.7 19.4 19.7 24.3 12.0 14.3 15.1 15.4 19.9 2.3 3.1 3.4 7.9 0.7 1.1 5.6 0.3 4.9 4.6 -9.7 2.3 6.5 7.2 5.6 12.1 -2.1 2.2 2.9 1.3 7.8 -9.9 -9.1 -10.7 -4.2 -9.2 -11.1 -4.3 -11.9 -5.1 -7.6 18.4 30.4 * 30.9 * 31.6 * 33.8 * 36.5 * 26.1 26.5 * 27.3 * 29.5 * 32.1 * 14.5 15.2 17.5 20.1 10.7 13.2 15.6 12.5 14.8 16.7 1g = goat browsing in one year, 2g = goat browsing in two years, 1m = mowing in one year, 2m = mowing in two years 1gm = goat browsing & mowing in one year, 2gm = goat browsing & mowing in two years c = control (untreated) * = significant at 95% confidence level 45 Two years of mowing produced substantial increases in node density compared to five of six other treatments; ranging from 16-24 more nodes/m2. Two years of goat browsing followed by mowing produced significant increases in node density as well (Table 2.6). In the case of mowing or browsing followed by mowing, mowing close the soil surface is the stimulus for vegetative growth from rhizomes or crowns. One cannot be certain that these node measurements are correlated with below ground competition. This uncertainty is important to investigate as Aerts et al. (1991) and Wilson (1988) found that below ground competition has a greater effect on the balance between species than above ground competition. Figure 2.2 summarizes the change in the population demographic of Himalayan blackberry under the different treatments. 46 Figure 2.2 Population Demographic By Treatment Density (stems/m2) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Br o Br ow sin g x1 Br ow ws sin in g g x2 & Br M ow ow sin in g g x1 & M ow in g x2 M ow in g x1 M ow in g x2 U nt re at ed 0 Seedlings Treatment Primocanes Floricanes Total Canes Examination of population data reveals patterns which are a critical part of prediction as well as description in ecology (Weiner, 1995). Though primocanes and floricanes are portions of ramets, and the seedlings are clearly new genets in the population, there is value to this approach for examining the growth of clonal organisms, or modular growth vs. new genets (Harper, 1980). Clearly, the blackberry is phenotypically plastic and changes in both vegetative and reproductive growth are responses to changes in grazing or mowing. 47 2.4.3 Implications Many landowners report that pastures are improved by goat browsing, including reducing Himalayan blackberry dominance. Effective control of a target species includes matching the herbivore with the target plant by palatability and browsing at a frequency and intensity that will be most detrimental (Olson and Launchbaugh, 2006). Thus summer browsing of Himalayan blackberry should be maintained for two reasons. First, browsing after the onset of flowering will damage the plant by removing stems that contain stored energy and nutrients (Hendrickson and Olson, 2006). Second, mid-summer treatments occur when soil is at its driest of the year. However, repeated browsing, or more continuous browsing through the summer season, would likely yield greater benefit than short duration browsing. Goat browsing may hold potential for Himalayan blackberry control if it is applied repeatedly in the same growing season (Hendrickson and Olson, 2006) and for more than two years. Goats select the highly palatable primocane regrowth which could ultimately prevent flowering and consume important storage and meristematic tissue of the plants. The greatest benefit in using short term-high intensity goat browsing would likely be use of the animals after mowing. In this sequence, reversed from that investigated, mowing would remove most of the above ground biomass, stimulate the growth of primocanes which in turn would be consumed by the goats because they are 48 highly palatable. When goat browsing is applied to unmowed plots substantial biomass, primarily floricanes, is left standing. Despite a uniform soil series and adequate soil moisture for growth of the Himalayan blackberry, large variation in the data collected make quantifying change due to goat browsing and mowing difficult. It was not possible to assess density prior to treatment since initial biomass measurements would have necessitated destructive sampling. If pre-treatment data for density or biomass were available, differences among treatments may have been quantifiable. The short period of three years is also inadequate to fully examine the impact of a change in herbivory regime on a long-lived, competitive perennial such as Himalayan blackberry. Harper (1980) challenged ecologists’ assumption that organisms are peculiarly fitted to their environment. Harper’s idea has validity for native plants that have evolved in an ecosystem over many generations. However, the fact that many exotic invasive plants, including Himalayan blackberry, thrive in alien habitats contradicts the theory. Like other invasive plants, this exotic species has exploited many niches to the point of becoming naturalized (Cousens and Mortimer, 1995) throughout the Pacific Northwest. Himalayan blackberry is highly successful in its alien environment and is therefore fit to exploit resources for maximum growth. If its relatively large underground root mass confers the advantage that the native dwarf bramble 49 (Rubus lasiococcus) has for survival in drier sites (Antos, 1988), managers will be further challenged to control invasions by this species. Control of Himalayan blackberry is essential because it forms monocultures which reduce species richness and functional diversity indicating alteration of ecological function (Whisenant, 1999). In the case of the pasture, Himalayan blackberry presence limits productivity of grasses which are the primary forage for cattle. The thickets of Himalayan blackberry also alter patterns of use by herbivores of the areas which do contain palatable vegetation. The control methods employed in this study may have nudged this plant community along a pathway toward more desirable vegetation. There certainly has not been a change to new stable state (Bestelmeyer at. al., 2003), however, because the underground meristematic tissue has not been sufficiently stressed. The shift in the population dynamic toward younger individual plants within the study indicates that, although the canopy has been removed, re-invasion is likely. 50 2.5 Acknowledgements Funding for this research was provided in part by a grant from NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). The author thanks B. and S. Hoyt of the Hawley Land and Cattle Co. for hosting the research on their ranch, for herding the goats for browsing treatments and for mowing at the research site. L. Rummel and K. Townsend assisted with installation of the plots. B. Vogeney, K. Townsend, L. Rummel, L. G. Rummel, and L. R. Rummel assisted with stem counts and diameter measurements. 2.6 Literature Cited Aerts, R., R. G. A. Boot and P. J. M. van der Aart. 1991. The relation between above- and belowground biomass allocation patterns and competitive ability. Oecologia 87: 551-559 Amor, R. L. 1974(a). Ecology and control of blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) II: Reproduction. Weed Research 14: 231-238. Amor, R. L. 1974(b). Ecology and control of blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) III: Response of R. procerus to mechanical removal of top growth and to foliage applied herbicides. Weed Research 14: 239-243. Antos, J. A. 1988. Underground morphology and habitat relationships of three pairs of forest herbs. American Journal of Botany 75(1): 106-113. Archer, A. and C. Stokes. 2000. Stress, disturbance and change in rangelands. Pages 17-38 in: O. Arnolds and S. Archer, eds., Rangeland Desertification. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press. Bazzaz, F. A. 1987. Experimental studies on the evolution of niche in successional plant populations. Pages 245-272 in: A.J. Gray, M.J. 51 Crawley and P.J. Edwards, eds. Colonization, Succession and Stability. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Bestelmeyer, B. T., J. R. Brown, K. M. Havstad, R. Alexander, G. Chavez and J. E. Herrick. 2003. Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands. Journal of Range Management 56: 114-126. Bruzzese, E. and M. Lane. 1996. The Blackberry Management Handbook. East Melbourne, Australia: Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. 50 p. Cousens, R. and M. Mortimer. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. New York: Cambridge University Press. 332 p. Grime, J. P. and J. G. Hodgson. 1987. Botanical contributions to contemporary ecological theory. Pages 283-296 in: I. H. Rorison, J. P. Grime, R. Hunt, G.A.F. Hendry, D. H. Lewis, eds. Frontiers of Comparative Plant Ecology. New Phytologist 106. Harper, J. L. 1980. Plant demography and ecological theory. Oikos 35: 244253. Hawkes, C. V. and J. J. Sullivan. 2001. The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 82(7): 2045-2058. Hendrickson, J. and B. Olson. 2006. Understanding Plant Response to Grazing. Pages 32-39 in K. Launchbaugh, ed., Targeted Grazing: A natural approach to vegetation management and landscape enhancement. Centennial, CO: American Sheep Industry Association. Hobbs, R. J. and L. F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6(3): 324-337. Kigel, J. and D. Koller. 1985. Asexual reproduction of weeds. Pages 65-100 in S. O. Duke, Weed Physiology (vol 1): Reproduction and Ecophysiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Lambrecht-McDowell, S. and S. Radosevich. 2005. Population demographics and trade-offs to reproduction of an invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus. Biological Invasions 7:281-295. McDowell, S. L. 2002a. Life-history and Physiological Trade-offs to Reproduction of Invasive and Noninvasive Rubus. PhD. Dissertation. Oregon State University. 52 McDowell, S.C.L. 2002b. Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 89(9): 1431-1438. Olson, B. and K. Launchbaugh. 2006. Managing herbaceous broadleaf weeds with targeted grazing. Pages 58-67 in K. Launchbaugh, ed., Targeted Grazing: A natural approach to vegetation management and landscape enhancement. Centennial, CO: American Sheep Industry Association. Radosevich, S. R., J. S. Holt and C. M. Ghersa. 2007. Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants: Relationship to Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley-Interscience. Rejmánek, M. 1989. Invasibility of plant communities. Pages 369-388 in J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. F. Kruger, M. Rejmánek and M. Williamson, eds. Biological Invasions: a global perspective. Chichester, England: Wiley. SAS 9.1.3 Service Pack 4. 2003. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC. Sheley, R., T. J. Svejcar and B. M. Maxwell. 1996. A theoretical framework for developing successional weed management strategies on rangeland. Weed Technology 10: 766-773. Soil Data Mart. 2008. Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/Survey.aspx?County=OR039. Accessed October 7, 2008 Weiner, J. 1995. On the practice of ecology. Journal of Ecology 83: 153-158. Westoby, M., B. Walker and I. Noy-Meir. 1989. Range management on the basis of a model which does not seek to establish equilibrium. Journal of Arid Environments 17: 235-239. Wilson, J. B. 1988. Shoot competition and root competition. Journal of Applied Ecology 25: 279-296. 53 3. FUNCTIONAL GROUP AND SPECIES CHANGE IN HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY (RUBUS ARMENIACUS) AND EVERGREEN BLACKBERRY (RUBUS LACINIATUS)-INVADED PASTURE FOLLOWING GOAT BROWSING AND MOWING 3.1 Abstract Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus Focke) is a non-native shrub which has invaded sites throughout the Pacific Northwest since its introduction to North America. Its persistent canopy and large underground crowns create a competitive environment which prevents desirable species from germinating and/or establishing. Evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus Willd.), an exotic plant introduced from Europe, grows in association with Himalayan blackberry and control efforts frequently target both species. Control of Himalayan blackberry is affected by vigorous vegetative re-growth after mechanical control and variable response to chemical methods. Recent interest in goat browsing to control these and other invasive plants has led to a variety of long- and short-term methods to control unwanted plants through disturbance by herbivory. This study examines changes in plant functional group percent cover in a perennial grass pasture invaded by Himalayan blackberry and evergreen blackberry in the southern Willamette Valley of Oregon. The appearance of species, and their functional group membership, following three treatment 54 protocols were evaluated as indicators of the need for active vs. passive restoration. Changes in the percent cover of Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, annual grasses, perennial grasses, annual forbs and perennial forbs were examined after two annual treatments with; 1) high intensity-short duration goat browsing, 2) mowing and 3) high intensity-short duration goat browsing followed by mowing. These data were assessed to examine trends in re-vegetation of the pasture. All treatments caused a significant decline in percent cover of the invasive blackberries (p < 0.0001) but differences among treatments were not detected. All treatments produced increases in perennial grass cover but differences among treatments were not different. All treatments also resulted in increases in the percent cover of perennial forb. Plots treated with goat browsing followed by mowing showed significant increases relative to other treatments (p = 0.008). Changes in percent cover of other functional groups were not different with browsing or mowing treatments. The presence of individual species within the perennial grass and perennial forb groups and their potential influence on restoration are discussed. Key Words: Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus Focke), evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus Willd.), functional group change, perennial pasture, high intensity-short duration browsing, goats, mowing, restoration 55 3.2 Introduction Himalayan blackberry is an invasive shrub, native to Asia and introduced to North America via England (Mathews, 1992; Pojar and MacKinnon, 1994). This species is increasingly problematic in high rainfall areas of the Pacific Northwest where its prolific growth in pastures, forests and riparian areas suppresses the growth of other plants. Himalayan blackberry and evergreen blackberry grow in association. Both have escaped from horticultural production (Gilkey and Dennis, 1980). They are considered together in this study although Himalayan blackberry is the predominant pest species at the study site. In Oregon, Himalayan blackberry is designated as a “B” noxious weed (Oregon Department of Agriculture, 2006) and was the most prevalent exotic species in forested plots recently surveyed by the U.S. Forest Service (Rapp, 2005). Another survey of riparian sites along 145 km (87 mi) of the Willamette River revealed that 89% of 28 sites had Himalayan blackberry present (Fierke and Kauffman, 2006). Rapid dry matter production, rapid stem extension and leaf production of many shrubs and trees, including members of the Rubus genus, pose challenges to forest regeneration in northwestern North America (Radosevich et al., 2007) and influence invasion of pastures. Physiological traits of Himalayan blackberry which contribute to its success include fitness homeostasis (Hoffman and Parsons, 1991), high leaf 56 area ratio and a short juvenile period (Rejmanek, 2000). Himalayan blackberry reproduces by seed and grows vegetatively by clones at cane tips, sprouting of adventitious roots on lateral roots (rhizomes) and regeneration from severed pieces of canes and roots (Amor, 1974). Resource use also contributes to species function within ecosystems (Hobbs, 1992). McDowell (2002) reports that non-native Rubus species, including Himalayan blackberry, have higher photosynthetic capacities than native Rubus species which allows the non-native species to fix significantly more carbon than the native species. However, Himalayan blackberry is a poor functional replacement for a diverse native plant understory in open forests or meadows (Soll, 2004). Its ability to form homogeneous cover, inhibit germination, and reduce the establishment of native species can initiate alternative successional pathways (Fierke and Kauffman, 2006) on invaded sites. In order to design successful control strategies, consideration of how a species functions in its environment is critical. In addition, site specific knowledge allows managers to adjust management to enhance desirable species survival and choose species that will fill the niche vacated when the target species cover or density is reduced. Species inventories, and subsequent functional group classifications, should assist in meeting these goals. Westoby et al. (1989) emphasize that priority in competition is a mechanism influencing the presence of alternate stable states. In the case of 57 invaded pastures, the abundance of blackberry propagules after treatment carries the risk that only competitive plants (Grime, 1977) will survive in the long-term. In pastures where forage production is an obvious goal, managers need to consider how grasses function when undertaking weed control efforts. Control efforts stimulate feedback within the plant community which increases the probability of invasion by new weeds (Radosevich et al., 2007). If a target plant is suppressed but not eliminated and ecological processes are not altered by physical or biological changes to the site, reinvasion and/or invasion by another undesirable species is likely (Sheley and KruegerMangold, 2003). Challenges to traditional control methods have led managers to seek alternatives such as the use of biological agents. For example, blackberries are so problematic in Australia that the Commonwealth Biological Control Act of 1984 was invoked to allow release of a biological control agent (Sindel, 2000). Commercial berry production is an important part of Oregon’s agricultural economy, however, and an intentional release of a biocontrol agent in Oregon is unlikely. Phragmidium violaceum is a fungal pathogen of many species of Rubus and this pathogen now infects both Himalayan and evergreen blackberry in Oregon (Aime and Rossman, 2007). The presence of Phragmidium violaceum may influence management of these pest plants in the future but it was not a factor in this study. 58 Himalayan blackberry, with morphological features like thorns that prevent herbivory (Bruzzese and Lane, 1996), is especially challenging in cattle pastures. This dilemma enhances the competitive capacity of Himalayan blackberry to dominate an area and spread to adjacent land (Sindel, 2000). Goats are a viable management alternative due to their preference for browse and prehensile tongues which allow efficient consumption of young stems and leaves (Campbell and Taylor, 2006). Plant community response to high intensity-short duration goat browsing, mowing and a combination of the two treatment methods are examined in this study. It was conducted from 2006 to 2008 in the southern Willamette Valley of Oregon. If plant functional group diversity rebounds after treatment it is possible that augmenting such diversity will assist restoration because the change reflects ecosystem processes (Pokorny et al., 2005). However, strict interpretation of plant community health by the presence of numerous functional groups ignores the risks created by individual invasive species presence. To avoid the potential for invasion with a different plant, careful monitoring of the site to indentify emergent species and their evaluation based on biological and ecological characteristics should lead to more successful management of plant communities along a desired trajectory (Bestelmeyer et al., 2003). Applied functional types (Woodward et al., 1997) may emerge as the best approach for evaluating responses of Himalayan blackberry to herbivory and mechanical methods. Species composition within functional 59 groups could then be used to design other control efforts or the addition of desirable species propagules. 3.3 Materials and Methods 3.3.1 Site description and study design This study was conducted south of Cottage Grove in Oregon’s Willamette Valley from May 2006 through September 2008. The research site was located in a north aspect pasture with Nekia silty clay loam soil with 30 to 50 percent slopes at elevations of 100 to 135 meters (330 to 445 feet). The annual mean daily temperature is 17.2˚C (63.0˚). December is the coldest and wettest month with a daily average temperature of 4.2˚C (39.8˚F) and 211mm (8.29 in) of precipitation. July is the driest month with only 16mm (0.64 in) of rainfall and August is the warmest month with average temperatures of 19.1˚C (66.4˚F) (National Climate Data Center, 2008). The pasture has been grazed by cattle since the early 1900s but was not grazed by goats prior to this study. A portion of the pasture was planted with subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) and tall fescue (Schedonorus phoenix) in the mid-1970s, after excavation and installation of a natural gas pipeline. Since that time, neither pasture improvement nor weed management has been undertaken. Location of the research plots was based on a visual estimate of 95-100% cover and a height of at least 1m of Himalayan blackberry in the spring of 60 2006. Using a completely randomized design, treatments were assigned to each of the plots. 3.3.2 Treatments The three treatments included browsing, mowing and browsing plus mowing for two years. Each treatment had four replicates. Thus, three treatments with four replicates of each meant that 12 plots were considered in the analyses. Each plot was 36 m2 area with a 2m buffer extending out from the perimeter of each plot to ensure that no interactions occurred between plots. The buffer also allowed for the installation of temporary electric fencing to confine goats to browsed plots. The mowing treatment was applied in July of 2006 and 2007 after the onset of flowering of the Himalayan blackberry. A Bobcat® single blade deck mower was used to cut the canes to 5-10 cm from the soil surface. For the browsing treatment, temporary electric fencing was installed around each plot. Goat does and their kids were then herded onto the appropriate plots and allowed to browse the area for approximately one day. This stocking rate was equivalent to 988 head/hectare (400 head/acre). Animals were removed from the plots after plants were defoliated and younger canes eaten resulting in the herd showing little interest in continued browsing at that location. For the third treatment type, browsing and mowing, goat browsing was applied as 61 described above but the same plots were mowed within one week of browsing. 3.3.3 Species composition and functional groups In June of 2007 and 2008 plant species composition was recorded for nine randomly-selected 1m2 sub-plots. Metal t-posts delineated the four corners of each plot and wooden stakes marked the corners of the sub-plots. A grid numbered from left to right and top to bottom was used to delineate the 36 1m2 sub-plots. All species present and their percent cover were recorded. After data collection in June 2007, functional groups were determined based on the functional characteristics of the species present. The eight functional groups were: 1) invasive non-native Rubus shrubs including Himalayan blackberry and evergreen blackberry, 2) other shrubs and trees, 3) annual grasses, 4) perennial grasses, 5) annual and biennial forbs, 6) perennial forbs, 7) ferns and 8) mosses. Additionally, cane litter and bare ground were recorded. 62 3.3.4 Statistical model and analysis The following General Linear Model (GLM) was fit to the data to test differences among treatments in changing the percent cover of plant functional groups. Уij = ų + αi + єij Уij = change in % cover of a functional group from 2007 to 2008 i = trt type (browsing in 2 years, mowing in 2 years, browsing followed by mowing in 2 years) j = plot (replicate 1, 2, 3, 4) Ų = grand mean of % change in functional group percent cover αi = difference in functional group % cover for the ith treatment relative to the grand mean єij = random variation of ith trt, jth plot that adds variability to the value of Уij, єij N(0, δ2 ), єij and єi’j’ are independent. The primary predictor was treatment; goat browsing, mowing or goat browsing followed by mowing. The Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons was used to compare percent change among the three treatment types for the different plant functional groups. The SAS 9.1.3 Statistical Package was used for all data analyses. 63 3.4 Results The species inventory for the fall of 2006 (Table 3.1) includes all species present after one application of the three treatments. Other than the invasive blackberries, species included two native shrubs, four native fern and fern-like species and the perennial forb, Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Table 3.1 Species Inventory for Fall 2006 Rubus armeniacus (Himalayan blackberry) Rubus laciniatus (evergreen blackberry) Prunus emarginata (cherry) Rosa nutkana (wild rose) Cirsium arvense var. horridum (Canada thistle) Blechnum spicant (deer fern) Equisetum telmateia subsp. braunii (giant horsetail) Polystichum munitum (sword fern) Pteridium aquilinum subsp. pubescens (bracken fern) All species present in June of 2008, after two applications of treatments, are organized by functional group and listed in Table 3.2. Increases in species diversity are particularly evident in the perennial grasses, annual forbs and perennial forbs. 64 Table 3.2 Species by Functional Group Scientific Name Common Name Status and Growth N = native or I = introduced r = rhizome or s = stolon Invasive shrubs Rubus armeniacus Rubus laciniatus Himalayan blackberry evergreen blackberry I, r I Shrubs & Trees Prunus emarginata Rosa nutkana Rubus ursinus Symphoricarpos mollis Acer macrophyllum Pseudotsuga menziesii wild cherry nootka rose trailing blackberry creeping snowberry bigleaf maple Douglas fir N N, r N N, r N N Annual Grasses Cynosurus echinatus dogtail chess I Perennial Grasses Agrostis spp. Briza minor Dactylis glomerata Elymus glaucus Holcus lanatus Phleum pratense Poa pratensis Schedonorus phoenix bent grass little quaking grass orchardgrass wild rye velvet grass timothy Kentucky bluegrass tall fescue N I I N I I I I Ferns Blechnum spicant Pteridium aquilinum subsp. pubescens Polystichum munitum Equisetum telmateia subsp. braunii deer fern bracken fern sword fern giant horsetail N N N N 65 Table 3.2 Species by Functional Group (cont.) Scientific Name Common Name Status and Growth N = native or I = introduced r = rhizome or s = stolon Annual (and Biennial) Forbs Brassica nigra Cirsium vulgare Daucus carota Dipsacus sylvestris Epilobium spp. Galium aparine Geranium dissectum Geranium molle Medicago polymorpha Myosotis arvensis Nemophila parviflora Parentucellia viscosa Solanum spp. Sonchus oleraceus Stellaria media Perennial Forbs Cirsium arvense var. horridum Heracleum maximum Hypericum perforatum Leucanthemum vulgare Lomatium spp. Hypochaeris radicata Ranunculus occidentalis var. occidentalis Ranunculs repens Rumex crispus Senecio jacobaea Taraxacum officinale Tellima grandiflora Trifolium pratense Trifolium repens Urtica dioica subsp. gracilis Vancouveria hexandra Veronica spp. Vicia spp. black mustard bull thistle Queen Anne's lace common teasel willow herbs cleavers cutleaf geranium dove's-foot geranium bur clover common forget-me-not small –flowered nemophila yellow glandweed nightshade common sow thistle common chickweed Canada thistle cow parsnip St. John's-wort ox-eye daisy lomatium false dandelion Western buttercup creeping buttercup curly-leaved dock tansy ragwort common dandelion fringecup red clover white clover American nettle inside out flower speedwell Vetch I I I I N N I I I I N I I I I I, r N I I ? I N I, s I I I N, r I I N N, r ? ? 66 Results of the analysis of percent cover of the various functional groups are reported at the 95% (α = .05) confidence level. The mean percent cover of invasive Rubus species for all three treatments declined significantly from approximately 95% in 2006 to 24% (CL = 18.9, 29.2, df = 2, p < 0.0001) in 2007. Mean percent cover of invasive Rubus species was 46% (CL = 31.8, 59.1, df = 2, p < 0.0001) in 2008 which was a significant increase from the previous year (Figure 3.1). Figure 3.1 Mean % Cover Rubus for All Treatments 110 100 90 % Cover Rubus 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2006 Error Bars = 1 SE 2007 2008 67 Differences among responses to the three treatments were highly variable yet plots mowed twice did show a decline of 28% (CL = -54, - 1, df = 5, p = .09, α = .95) Himalayan blackberry cover relative to plots treated once with mowing. In 2007, the percent cover of Rubus in twice mowed plots was only 26% compared to 55% Rubus cover in plots mowed once. All changes in cover for functional groups other than the invasive Rubus were examined from 2007 to 2008, but not 2006 to 2007 because non-Rubus groups were not evident in the tall, dense Himalayan blackberry thickets present in spring 2006. No annual grasses were identified in 2007 but the presence of the annual dogtail chess (Cynosurus echinatus) in 2008 is discussed in Section 3.5. Perennial grass cover increased for all treatments but the level of increase from year to year was not statistically different among treatments (Figure 3.2). 68 40 Figure 3.2 Change in Perennial Grass % Cover by Treatment 35 30 % Cover 25 20 2007 2008 15 10 5 0 Goat Brow sing x 2 Goats & Mow ing x 2 Mow ing x 2 Error Bars = 1 SE Species present in the perennial grass functional group and their potential to compete with the invasive blackberries are discussed in Section 3.5. Changes in annual forb percent cover were not significant among the three treatment types. All treatments applied in two years resulted in an increase in percent cover of perennial forbs (Figure 3.3). Goat browsing and mowing in two years showed the most dramatic increase. This change was significantly greater than the other two treatments at the 95% confidence level (p = .008). Species composition of this functional group is discussed in Section 3.5 69 Figure 3.3 Change in Perennial Forb % Cover by Treatment 30 % Cover 25 20 15 10 5 0 Goat Browsing x Goat Browsing 2 + Mowing x 2 Treatment Mowing x 2 2007 2008 Error Bars = 1SE The shrub and tree group (not including the invasive species of Rubus) and the fern and moss group had low abundance and thus were not evaluated using a General Linear Model. Changes in the percent cover of bare ground were not significant among the three treatments. 70 3.5 Discussion Conditions favoring exotic plant invasion were likely present for decades prior to the start of this study in 2006. Although excavation for and installation of a pipeline in the mid-1970s was followed by seeding of tall fescue and subterranean clover, a disturbance of this magnitude (Grime, 1977) likely created safe sites for propagules of many ruderal species. Because all vegetation was removed in the short term, the availability of limiting resources was altered which increased vulnerability to invasion (Davis et al., 2000). There was obviously a good fit between Himalayan blackberry propagules and niches in this particular habitat (Alpert et al., 2000) as seeds were dispersed by birds, and to a lesser extent by deer, and cattle (personal observation) that consumed the berries. Once a source population was established, satellites appeared in the vicinity progressing to the point where thickets were present on a landscape scale as is common throughout the Pacific Northwest. Continuous cattle grazing in the pasture produced frequent and intense disturbance (Archer and Stokes, 2000) that allowed Himalayan blackberry to further colonize (Cousens and Mortimer, 1995) because grasses are the primary plant functional group consumed by cattle. The stresses of low water availability and low nutrient levels do not appear to be large factors at this site. Ferns are present in many of the plots and the growth of agronomic grass 71 species, including orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata), timothy (Phleum pretense) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), is vigorous. The removal of the Himalayan blackberry canopy by mowing or goat browsing can produce immediate benefits for other species as light becomes available. With the increase in light reaching the soil surface, particularly in the far-red wave lengths, seeds are stimulated to germinate (Radosevich et al., 2007). This was evident in this study wherein all three treatments resulted in reduced blackberry canopy and the appearance of species not present in the spring of 2006. The total number of species present changed from nine in 2006, to 25 in 2007, and 46 in 2008. Three functional groups were evident in 2006 which increased to seven in 2008. Though functional group diversity has been confirmed as a factor in resistance to invasion (Pokorny et al., 2005), degraded landscapes may behave in different ways and close attention to the characteristics of species that emerge is critical for directing succession (Wright et al., 2006). Canada thistle was the dominant species within the perennial forbs. Its abundance confirms movement along a trajectory toward invasion by another weed when ecological processes are not addressed (Sheley and KruegerMangold, 2003). Management must address control of this species or it will simply replace the invasive blackberries. If not addressed, Canada thistle will function like the blackberries with its rhizomatous growth, prolific seed production and resistance to herbivory by cattle. 72 The cane litter and bare ground categories represent unfilled niches which can provide safe sites (Harper, 1977). In essence, the area occupied by these two categories represents opportunities for seed germination and establishment of recorded species or species not currently present. With removal of the Himalayan blackberry canopy, the abundance and characteristics of the safe sites within the seedbed are altered (Whisenant, 1999). The bare ground present in the plots was most often due to burrowing rodents with no vegetation present even when upper layers of soil were moved with a hand tool. Because blackberry plants are not necessarily killed by the treatments, the occupation of soil space by large crowns remains a concern for the establishment of individual plants of desirable species. The emergence of orchardgrass in the plots after treatment is of interest because the establishment of competitive grasses may reduce encroachment by noxious weeds (Sheley et al., 2002). According to the ranch owners, orchardgrass was not intentionally seeded but its presence is not unusual. This perennial grass is frequently seeded in pastures and in wildland re-seedings (Stubbendieck et al., 2003). It was probably transported to the pasture by wind, wildlife or possibly the browsing goats. It is the dominant grass in the perennial grass functional group. Its shade tolerance (Stubbendieck et al., 2003) and temperature dependent flowering (Evans, 1958) may allow it to persist despite the competitive environment with Himalayan blackberry and Canada thistle. 73 Orchardgrass is not rhizomatous but its presence is likely supported by the available nitrogen from the blackberry cane litter. Borman et al. (1991) identified the need for perennial grass species to suppress introduced and undesirable annual grasses in southwest Oregon. Although the research site here is not plagued by annual grasses, it is in a climatic transition zone and the presence of dogtail chess points to the need for competitive grass species for restoration. In addition to early and continued growth into winter, as identified by Borman (1989) and Borman et al. (1990), grasses seeded in this pasture should have rapid root elongation and rhizomatous growth to occupy root space. Although many analyses reveal the limited utility of a priori classification systems for functional groups (Wright et al., 2006), the post hoc grouping of emergent species still uses assumptions common to traditional ecological groupings. These include plant longevity (annual vs. perennial) and growth form (shrub, forb, grass). This classification is slightly improved by consideration of individual species and their invasion potential as is done in this dissertation. Managers seek predictability of plant community response. Spatial replication of experiments like this one may allow development of needed habitat specific predictions (Rejmánek, 2000) by evaluating emergent species at a site. Assessing the availability of desired species propagules to fill niches vacated by the target of control and resources at that site are also important. 74 Perhaps a quantification of nutrient availability and propagule survival due to micro-topography would reveal differences that could further inform management practices. Without attention to the trajectory of the plant community, including functional group and characteristics of member species, one cannot be certain that changes will occur which support new and desirable stable plant communities. 3.6 Acknowledgements Funding for this research was provided in part by a grant from NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). The author thanks B. and S. Hoyt of the Hawley Land and Cattle Co. for hosting the research on their ranch in Cottage Grove, Oregon and for herding the goats for browsing treatments and for mowing at the research site. L. Rummel and K. Townsend assisted with installation of the plots. B. Vogeney, K. Towns9end, L. Rummel, L. Kossiakoff and R. Ingham assisted with species composition data collection. J. Knurowski, Botanist at the BLM Roseburg District Office, verified species identification. 75 3.7 References Aime, M.C. and A. Y. Rossman. 2007. First report of the rust Phragmidium violaceum on Pennsylvania blackberry in California. Plant Disease. 91: 1517. Alpert, P., E. Bone and C. Holzapfel. 2000. Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3: 52-66. Amor, R.L. 1974. Ecology and control of blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) III: Response of R. procerus to mechanical removal of top growth and to foliage applied herbicides. Weed Research. vol. 14: 239-243. Archer, A. and C. Stokes. 2000. Stress, disturbance and change in rangelands. Pages in: O. Arnolds and S. Archer, Rangeland Desertification. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press. Bestelmeyer, B. T., J. R. Brown, K. M. Havstad, R. Alexander, G. Chavez and J. E. Herrick. 2003. Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands. Journal of Range Management 56: 114-126. Borman, M. M. 1989. Growth characteristics and site potentials of perennial grass species. PhD Thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis. Borman, M. M., W. C. Krueger and D. E. Johnson. 1990. Growth patterns of perennial grasses in the annual grassland type of Southwest Oregon. Agronomy Journal Nov.-Dec. 1990. Borman, M. M., W. C. Krueger and D. E. Johnson. 1991. Effects of established perennial grasses on yields of associated annual weeds. Journal of Range Management 44(4): 318-322. Bruzzese, E. and M. Lane. 1996. The Blackberry Management Handbook. East Melbourne, Australia: Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. 50 p. Campbell, E. and C. A. Taylor. 2006. Targeted grazing to manage weedy brush and trees. Pages 77-87 in K. Launchbaugh, ed., Targeted Grazing: A natural approach to vegetation management and landscape enhancement. Centennial, CO: American Sheep Industry Association Cousens, R. and M. Mortimer. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge University Press, New York. 76 Davis, M. A., J. P. Grime and K. Thompson. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities; a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88: 528-534. Evans, M. W. 1958. Growth and development in certain economic grasses. Agronomy Series No. 147. Wooster, OH: Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station. 112 p. Fierke, M.K. and J.B. Kauffman. 2006. Invasive species influence riparian plant diversity along a successional gradient, Willamette River, Oregon. Natural Areas Journal 26: 376-392. Gilkey, H. M. and L. R. Dennis. 1980. Handbook of Northwestern Plants. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 507 p. Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. The American Naturalist. vol. 111(982): 1169-1194. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York. 892 p. Hobbs, R. J. and L. F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6(3): 324-337. Hoffman, A. A. and P. A. Parsons. 1991. Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mathews, D. 1992. Cascade-Olympic Natural History. Hong Kong: Everbest Printing, McDowell, S. C. L. 2002. Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 89(9): 1431-1438. National Climate Data Center. 2008. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/online/ccd. Accessed: October 15, 2008. Oregon Department of Agriculture Plant Division. 2008. http://www.oregon.gov/ODA/PLANT/603_052_1200.shtml. Accessed: September 30, 2008. 77 Pojar, J. and A. MacKinnon (eds). 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Lone Pine Publishing, Vancouver. Pokorny, M. L., R. L. Sheley, C. A. Zabinski, R. E. Engel, T. J. Svejcar and J. J. Borkowski. 2005. Plant functional group diversity as a mechanism for invasion resistance. Restoration Ecology 13(3): 448-459. Radosevich, S.R., J.S. Holt and C.M. Ghersa. 2007. Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants: Relationship to Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley-Interscience. Rapp, V. 2005. Invasive Plants in 21st Century Landscapes. Pacific Northwest Research Station. USDA Forest Service: Portland. Rejmánek, M. 2000. Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25: 497-506. SAS 9.1.3 Service Pack 4. 2003. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC. Sheley, R. L. and J. Krueger-Mangold. 2003. Principles for restoring invasive plant-infested rangeland. Weed Science 51: 260-265. Sheley, R., M. Manoukian and G. Marks. 2002. Preventing Noxious Weed Invasion, MT199517 AG8/2002. Montana State University Extension Service: Bozeman, MT. Sindel, B. M. 2000. Weeds and their Impact. In: Australian Weed Management Systems. R.G. and F.J. Richardson. Meredith, Victoria, Australia. Soil Data Mart. 2008. Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/Survey.aspx?County=OR039 Accessed September 25, 2008. Soll, J. 2004. Controlling Himalayan Blackberry in the Pacific Northwest. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/moredocs/rubarm01.pdf Accessed January 15, 2008 Stubbendieck, J.; Hatch, S. L. and L. M. Landholt. 2003. North American Wildland Plants. 6th ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 501 p. 78 Westoby, M., B. Walker and I. Noy-Meir. 1989. Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal of Range Management 42(4): 266-274. Whisenant, S. G. 1999. Repairing Damaged Wildlands: A Process-Oriented, Landscape-Scale Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 312 pp. Woodward, F. I., T. M. Smith and H. H. Shugart. 1997. Defining plant functional types: the end view. in: F. I. Woodward, T. M. Smith, H. H. Shugart, eds., Plant Functional Types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge University Press, 359 p. Wright, J. P., S. Naeem, A. Hector, C. Lehman, P. B. Reich, B. Schmid and D. Tilman. 2006. Conventional functional classification schemes underestimate the relationship with ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 9: 111-120. 79 4. ENGLISH IVY (HEDERA HELIX) RESPONSE TO HIGH INTENSITY-SHORT DURATION GOAT BROWSING 4.1 Abstract English ivy (Hedera helix) is an exotic liana which invades disturbed forest sites in North America and Europe. It forms dense monocultures on the forest floor as well as climbing trees as a vine. This study evaluates the effectiveness of high intensity-short duration goat browsing to control English ivy in an old field site in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Species composition and percent cover were determined in August 2006 prior to the first browsing treatment. Experimental plots were monitored before and after treatment in 2006 and 2007 and a final assessment was made in July 2008. The effects of browsing were evaluated using comparison of multiple means statistical methods. Plots browsed once or twice showed a significant decline in percent cover of English ivy compared to untreated plots. The difference between levels of browsing was also significant indicating that the repetition of browsing for a second year is warranted. Change in species composition was minimal with the appearance of sword fern and removal of Himalaya blackberry occurring over the three years of the study. Nomenclature: English ivy, Hedera helix L., goats 80 Key words: English ivy, goats, high intensity-short duration browsing, old field plant community, mixed conifer-broadleaf tree canopy, invasive species control 4.2 Introduction English ivy (Hedera helix) is a temperate liana native to Eurasia which was introduced to North America in the colonial era as a ground cover. It is now naturalized in both the Eastern and Western United States (Reichard, 2007). Invasion of forest fragments and disturbed forests by English ivy is a problem in the Mid-Atlantic and Pacific Northwest of the United States (Randall, 1996) as well as in Europe (Butaye et al., 2001 and Laskurain et al., 2004). English ivy is classified as a B list noxious weed in Oregon (ODA Plant Division, 2008) because it is of economic importance but is only regionally abundant, specifically west of the Cascade Mountains. Sampling of invasive populations in British Columbia, Washington and Oregon revealed that 83% of 58 populations were actually Hedera hibernica (Kirchner) Bean rather than Hedera helix (Clarke et al. 2006). Though the specific epithet of most of Oregon’s English ivy is not known, these invasive plants are referred to as English ivy (Hedera helix) by horticulturalists and naturalists. Control of English ivy is challenging in forests where trees have been cut and the open canopy allows new source populations to arise from bird endozoochory (Butaye et al., 2001). High seed survival and seedling 81 establishment have been attributed to the heavier weight of Hedera helix seeds compared to native species as well as drought and shade tolerance (Laskurain et al., 2004). A study of seedling dynamics in southern Spain, with similar climatic conditions to the Pacific Northwest (165 cm annual precipitation, mean annual temperatures of 11°C at 43° N latitude), revealed that 98% of emergent seedlings survive to six months and 96% of those survive to one year (Laskurain et al., 2004). Zotz et al. (2006) assert that ivy suppresses regeneration of native herbs and tree seedlings. Growth is primarily vegetative, including stolons and subsequent clonal production, which contribute to its invasiveness with densities up to 25,000 plants/ha (10,000 plants/ac) (USDA Plants Database, 2008). Forest patches with a history of logging and plantation where H. helix was present had significant (.001 ≤ p ≥ .01) reductions in species richness (Butaye et al., 2001). Several methods have been used to control English ivy including herbicide application, mechanical methods and livestock browsing. Dicamba, glyphosate, glycine, triclopyr amine, acetic acid and 2,4-D amine were tested as control agents by Derr (1993). He finds that only glyphosate reduced new shoot growth and that English ivy is tolerant of pre-emergent herbicides (Derr, 1992). Spring application of glyphosate at a rate of 3.1 kg/ha (2.7 lbs/ac) can control the juvenile growth form of this species (Reichard, 2007). However, Spring is generally when rainfall is high and desirable herbaceous plants are also vulnerable. The waxy leaves of English ivy also challenge the practicality 82 of herbicide use but Soll (2005) found that addition of surfactant aids penetration. To control vines, a much higher rate and two applications of glyphosate at 4.5 kg/ha (4 lb/ac) are needed (Soll, 2005). Although chemical control methods have been widely used, there are locations where their use is not practical due to susceptibility of desirable species and public sensitivity to the use of herbicides. Mechanical methods, including hand-pulling, are also used. In 1999, more than 55,000 hours of mostly volunteer labor was expended to remove this plant from parks and open spaces in the Portland metropolitan area (Anonymous, 2000). The objective of this research was to determine the efficacy of high intensity-short duration goat browsing for the control of juvenile, ground cover, English ivy. Specifically, this study examines the claim of commercial graziers that two years of high intensity-short duration goat browsing will control English ivy in Willamette Valley old field plant communities. 4.3 Materials and Methods 4.3.1 Site description and study design The research site is located in Memorial Park in Wilsonville, Oregon north of the Willamette River. The plant community is an old field with a dense mixed conifer-broadleaf tree canopy. Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Western red cedar (Thuja plicata) and Bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) are 83 the most abundant tree species. Historically, this vegetation was logged and cleared for agricultural uses including nut orchards. Currently English ivy is the dominant plant species at ground level. Herbaceous species in the research area include waterleaf (Hydrophyllum tenuipes), western trillium (Trillium ovatum), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). All shrubs present are members of Family Rosaceae including the non-native Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and two native brambles, thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus) and trailing blackberry (Rubus ursinus). Rainfall in the area averages 991mm/yr (39 in/yr) with July being the driest month. July is also the warmest month with average high and low temperatures of 27ºC (80ºF) and 12ºC (53ºF), respectively. December is the coldest month when average high temperatures reach 8ºC (46ºF) and average lows are 1ºC (33ºF) (National Weather Service, 2008). The soils primarily Chehalis silt loam with a small strip of Cloquato silt loam on the southern boundary, closest to the Willamette River (Soil Survey Staff, 2008). This study was initiated during the summer of 2006. It is a completely randomized design (CRD) with 32 1m2 plots located under forest canopy where English ivy was the dominant plant species. English ivy was removed from the trunks of some trees by clipping and hand-pulling but no control of the ground cover has been undertaken in the research area. 84 4.3.2 Browsing treatment and levels Treatment consisted of browsing by experienced doe-kid pairs for one day during the last week of August 2006 and 2007. Does had prior experience eating English ivy. This is important because the presence of Hederin, a saponin secondary plant compound, in the English ivy tissue suppresses intake by livestock (Cheeke, 1998). Experience ingesting secondary compounds early in life can increase intake later in life (Distel and Provenza, 1991), however, and training is important to ensure that the animals consumed English ivy in this study. The stocking rate was approximately 100 goats/1,000 m2 (400 goats/ac). Goats were herded into the research area in the morning and kept there by temporary electric fencing until most of the English ivy plants were defoliated and the goats ceased to consume the vegetation. Behavioral indicators of satiety were animals laying down to ruminate and walking within the enclosure without browsing. The goats were not returned to the plots until the following year. Plots treated twice were browsed in 2006 and 2007 and those treated once were browsed only in 2007. Unbrowsed plots were excluded from browsing by 1.2m (4ft) high wire mesh fencing for the duration of the study. The unbrowsed plots serve as controls, or treatment level 0. Treatments were randomly assigned to each of the 32 plots. Eleven plots were treated with high intensity-short duration goat browsing in two consecutive years (2006 and 85 2007), 11 plots were treated with browsing by goats for one year (2007) and 10 plots were not browsed. Each m2 plot was separated from other plots and walking paths of the park by at least 75 cm. This separation provided a buffer and reduced the possibility that interactions occurred between the plots. Wooden stakes marked the four corners of each plot. 4.3.3 Percent foliar cover Percent foliar cover of all plant species was determined by visual estimate using a m2 quadrat frame placed at a height of 5-20 cm above ground level. Bare ground and detritus were also estimated. Pre-treatment data were recorded two weeks prior to treatment in August 2006 and four weeks prior to treatment in 2007. Post-treatment data were recorded two weeks after treatment in September 2006 and 2007 and again in July 2008. The last data set, from July 2008, represents re-growth over an 11-month period from the time of the last browsing treatment. 86 4.3.4 Statistical model and analysis The following General Linear Model (GLM) was fit to the data to test the effectiveness of goat browsing as a control method for English ivy Уij = ų + αi + βχij + εij Уij = percent change in English ivy cover from 2006 to 2008 for the ith treatment, jth plot ų = grand mean of English ivy percent cover in 2008 αi = effect of treatment group i β = relationship between baseline % cover of English ivy and treatment χij = over-all mean of H. helix cover in 2006 prior to start of study εij = error term ~ normal (0, σ2) The primary predictor was treatment with goat browsing at three levels: 0, 1 and 2 years. A term for baseline English ivy, βχij , was included because mean percent cover English ivy differed significantly by treatment level (F = 9.15, p = .0002) prior to the start of the study. The Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons was used to compare percent change among the three levels of treatment. All analyses were performed using the SAS 9.1.3 Statistical Package. 87 4.4 Results and Discussion High intensity-short duration goat browsing applied in the summer for one or two years reduced the percent cover of English ivy. The mean percent change in percent cover of English ivy for plots treated twice with goat browsing was 95% (CI = -1.33, -0.90, df = 2, p < 0.0001) from 2006 to 2008. Change in English ivy percent cover for plots treated only once was 71% (CI = -1.14, -.70, df =2, 10, p = 0.029) over the same period. Unbrowsed plots increased by a mean of 13% (CI = .70, 1.33, df= 2, p < 0.0001) in English ivy cover from 2006 to 2008. Changes presented in Figure 4.1 use absolute values of percent cover in 2006 and 2008. Fig. 4.1 Mean English Ivy % Cover Before and After Browsing Treatments 100 90 80 Percent Cover 70 60 77 50 40 82 75 70 30 23 20 10 4 0 0 years 1 year 2 years Browsing Level Error Bars = 1 SE 2006 2008 88 Whether or not the second application of browsing produces a significant result to warrant its time and expense is also of interest. Plots treated twice were significantly different from those treated only once with 20% less English ivy cover (CI = -0.41, 0.01, df = 2, p < 0.03). Multiple comparisons are presented in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 Browsing Level Comparisons and Confidence Levels Browsing Levels compared Difference between Means 1&0 1&2 2&0 -0.89 0.22 -1.12 Simultaneous Confidence Limits -1.16 0.02 -1.38 -0.63 0.42 -0.85 Confidence Level 0.01 0.05 0.01 The success of goat browsing to control English ivy is due to several factors including plant physiology and growth rates, environmental conditions and livestock feeding preferences. English ivy grows vegetatively by producing stolons and this meristematic tissue is clearly vulnerable to the disturbance of goat browsing. English ivy does not have particularly high relative growth rates with 0.199 ± 0.019 for the horizontal (ground cover) form and 0.162 ± 0.013 for the vertical (tree-climbing vines) (Frey & Frick, 1987). Thus, repeated removal of aboveground biomass should be an effective control strategy. Despite the relatively low rainfall prior to the browsing treatment in 89 late August, the ivy would be actively growing because it tolerates low soil matric pressure under low light conditions (Sack, 2004). The goats had prior experience with the target species and readily consumed it despite the secondary compound, hederin. Additionally, use of the goats at a time when plants are fast growing yet soil is relatively dry means that plants are less subject to the indirect affects of compaction (Heitschmidt, 1990). This is important to maintain soil function. The primary objectives of this study were to examine the efficacy of goat browsing to control English ivy and to examine the differences between levels of the browsing treatment. For the land manager, however, the goal of moving the plant community toward a set of more desirable, native species is also of interest. It is noteworthy that only three herbaceous species (waterleaf, trillium and stinging nettle) were present in the research area prior to treatment. In 2008, these same herbaceous species were present. The only new species to appear was sword fern which emerged in only one of the plots. The only species present in 2006 which did not persist into the summer of 2008 was Himalayan blackberry. This may be due to goats’ browsing preference for this shrub because this same herd is used in commercial browsing to control Himalayan blackberry. Future control efforts with browsing might include the provision of a dietary source of tannins to the goats because pairing them with saponins increases intake of saponins (Rogosic et al., 2006), the secondary compound present in English ivy. 90 The monoculture stands of English ivy at Memorial Park exist under a dense tree canopy where sunlight reaches the herbaceous layer intermittently. During the summer growing season sunlight reaches the forest floor for only a few hours each day. This shade likely inhibits germination and emergence of other species (Radosevich et al., 2007) which may be present in the seed bank. English ivy is well-adapted to shade (Schnitzler & Heuzé, 2006), however, and as long as seed and stolon propagules remain the English ivy will persist and re-invade the area. Removal of some tree canopy might allow species in the seed bank to emerge and compete with the English ivy because a ten-fold increase in irradiance causes a decline in ivy growth (Sack, 2004). Fortunately, there is no evidence of allelopathy from English ivy (Biggerstaff and Beck, 2006) as seeds of numerous other species germinated equally well in pots with and without ivy. Continued monitoring of the site would reveal the extent to which active restoration, including the transplantation of desired plants, is needed to meet land manager goals. 91 4.5 Acknowledgements Funding for this research was provided in part by a grant from NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). Goat browsing services were provided by the Hawley Land and Cattle Co. of Cottage Grove, Oregon as part of an invasive plant control project within Memorial Park at Wilsonville, Oregon. Kerry Rappold, Natural Resources Program Manager for the City of Wilsonville, supported research activities at the research site. The author thanks Leonard Rummel for assistance with plot installation and grazing exclosure construction and Nina Schleicher for assistance with statistical modeling. 4.6 Literature Cited Anonymous. 2000. “Wanted: Dead English ivy!” Environmental Services, City of Portland. Biggerstaff, M. S. and C. W. Beck. 2006. Effects of English ivy (Hedera helix) on seed bank formation and germination. American Midland Naturalist 157: 250-257. Butaye, J., H. Jacquemyn and M. Hermy. 2001. Differential colonization causing non-random forest plant community structure in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Ecography 24: 369-380. Cheeke, P. R. 1998. Natural Toxicants in Feeds, Forages, and Poisonous Plants. 2nd ed. Interstate Publishers Inc. Danville, IL. 479 p. 92 Clarke, M. M., S. H. Reichard and C. W. Hamilton. 2006. Prevalence of different horticultural taxa of ivy (Hedera spp., Araliaceae) in invading populations. Biological Invasions 8: 149-157. Derr, J. F. 1992. Weed control in nursery crops. Pages 105-116 in: Pest Management Guide for Horticultural and Forest Crops. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Cooperative Extension Pub. 456-017 Derr, J. F. 1993. English ivy (Hedera helix) response to post emergence herbicides. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 11(2): 45-48. Distel, R. A. and F. D. Provenza. 1991. Experience early in life affects voluntary intake of blackbrush by goats. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17(2): 431-450. Frey, D. and H. Frick. 1987. Altered partitioning of new dry matter in Hedera helix L. (Araliaceae) induced by altered orientation. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 114(4): 407-411. Heitschmidt, R. K. 1990. The role of livestock and other herbivores in improving rangeland vegetation. Rangelands 12(2): 112-115. Laskurain, N.A., A. Escudero, J.M. Olano and J. Loidi. 2004. Seedling dynamics of shrubs in a fully closed temperate forest: greater than expected. Ecography 27:650-658. National Weather Service. 2008. http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/pqr/climate/pdx_clisummary.php Oberhuber, W. and H. Bauer. 1991. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis under natural conditions in ivy (Hedera helix L.) growing in an understory of deciduous trees. Planta 185: 545-553. Oregon Department of Agriculture Plant Division. 2008. http://oregon.gov/ODA/PLANT/WEEDS/profile_englishivy.shtml Accessed November 19, 2008 Radosevich, S.R., J.S. Holt and C.M. Ghersa. 2007. Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants: Relationship to Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley-Interscience. Randall, J. M. 1996. Weed control for the preservation of biological diversity. Weed Technology 10: 370-383. 93 Reichard, S. 2007. Hedera helix. University of California, Davis. http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/datastore/detailreport.cfm?usernumber=55&survey number=182. Accessed October 20, 2007. Rogosic, J., R.E. Estell, D. Skobic, A.Martinovic and S. Maric. 2006. Role of species diversity and secondary compound complementarity on diet selection of Mediterranean shrubs by goats. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32:1279-1287. Sack, L. 2004. Response of temperate woody seedlings to shade and drought: Do trade-offs limit potential niche differentiation? Oikos 107: 110-127. SAS 9.1.3 Service Pack 4. 2003. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC. Schnitzler, A. and P. Heuzé. 2006. Ivy (Hedera helix L.) dynamics in riverine forests: Effects of river regulation and forest disturbance. Forest Ecology and Management 236: 12-17 Soil Survey Staff. 2008. Official Soil Series Descriptions. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html Soll, J. 2005. Controlling English ivy (Hedera helix) in the Pacific Northwest. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/moredocs//hedhe102.pdf. Zotz, G., N. Cueni and C. KÖrner. 2006. In situ growth stimulation of a temperate zone liana (Hedera helix) in elevated CO2. Functional Ecology 20: 763-769. 94 5 SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND INSIGHTS FOR FUTURE MANAGEMENT This dissertation examined the effectiveness of high intensity-short duration goat browsing to control Himalayan blackberry and English ivy in the Pacific Northwest. The conditions at each site and the characteristics of the target plants themselves were factors in the varied responses to control. 5.1 English ivy Control with Goat Browsing Substantial reductions in percent cover of English ivy were observed after one repetition of goat browsing. A further reduction after a second application of the goat browsing was also statistically significant. The success of this treatment is due to the manner in which goats browse including defoliating the plants, consuming large portions of the stems, and pulling up the shallow roots (Stein and Fosket, 1969). English ivy is a stoloniferous plant and is therefore highly susceptible to the disturbance of the high intensity browsing. Despite the presence of the secondary plant compound Hederin, the herd readily consumed the plant. In many instances, the presence of secondary compounds in a particular plant species will suppress intake or make that plant entirely unpalatable. To ensure that animals will consume such plant species, managers have at least two options. First, animals can be introduced to plant species which contain toxins with conspecifics who will teach them to eat the plants. For example, 95 the herd used for this research had prior experience with English ivy. Each year the does of the does-kid pairs were chosen because they had eaten the plant in the previous year. In this way, target plant consumption is increased by using animals whose herd mates teach them to consume the target plant. Second, the provision of a high protein feed prior to browsing the target plant will increase intake. Managers could feed a protein supplement early in the day before releasing animals onto the infested plant community and thereby increase efficacy of treatment for plants which contain secondary compounds. Although English ivy cover in the forested site was reduced by the goat browsing, a lack of plant species recruitment indicates that new species are not supported in the ecosystem. The extensive shade at the site probably prevented the establishment of other competitive, non-native species which are abundant in adjacent areas of the park. The shade probably prevented recruitment of desirable native species as well. If managers want a diverse and native plant community, further manipulation is needed which may require removal of large dominant trees (Parker, 2000) to reduce shade and allow early successional species to establish. If propagules of desired species are not present they must be introduced through active restoration. Propagules could be seeded or planted after managers determine that ecological processes of soil stability, hydrology and nutrient cycling are functioning (Whisenant, 1999) and are stable. 96 5.2 Himalayan blackberry Control with Goat Browsing Control of Himalayan blackberry produced mixed results. Mowing in two years was more effective at reducing above ground Himalayan blackberry biomass than goat browsing. This result was expected as mowing removes all canes just above the soil surface while browsing is a selective behavior exhibited by goats. This result does not mean that goats are not a useful tool for control of shrubs such as Himalayan blackberry, however. Though the biomass was reduced in the short term, the underlying potential for re-growth, and its component population demographic, is critical to understanding how the species responds and how future treatments might yield more reliable results. The age of Himalayan blackberry plants that remain after treatment is an important indicator of what will occur in the years following treatment, and thus the limited duration of this study. Total cane density increased after one year of treatment but then declined from 2007 to 2008. In particular, plots mowed for two years increased in Himalayan blackberry density relative to other treatments, especially goat browsing for one or two years. This result confirms the need to closely examine components of growth that allow this species to maintain its vigor despite substantial control efforts. At this pasture research site, there is little shade inhibition of the Himalayan blackberry but the canopy of the blackberry itself produces shade inhibition of grasses and forbs. Removal of the Himalayan blackberry canopy 97 by the various disturbance treatments changed light conditions at the soil surface and a release from dormancy (Radosevich et al., 2007) necessary for germination and establishment of plant species. The number of species present increased from nine in 2006, to 25 in 2007, and finally to 46 in 2008. The membership of these species in functional groups is important to ecological function and because the primary goal for the site is to host forage species. Each of the treatments; goat browsing, mowing, and goat browsing followed by mowing, reduced the cover of Himalayan blackberry and increased the cover of perennial grasses. These are positive outcomes. None of the treatments was significantly different from another, however, so the added expense of goat browsing followed by mowing in the same plots is difficult to justify solely based on reduction of Himalayan blackberry cover and perennial grass emergence. Perennial forb cover increased significantly in all plots treated for two years. However, only plots treated with goat browsing followed by mowing were significantly different from the other treatments applied for two years. This may indicate that seeds of perennial forbs respond positively to higher levels of mechanical soil disturbance which is a by-product of movement of the goat herd and mowing machinery. Some species in the perennial forb functional group have the potential to become as problematic as blackberry if not addressed. In particular, Canada thistle is a rhizomatous forb which has the potential to displace early seral 98 vegetation (Radosevich et al., 2007) and is less palatable to cattle than the Himalayan blackberry particularly after its spines develop. One application of browsing to both Himalayan blackberry and Canada thistle can reduce seed production but rhizomatous plants are often more difficult to suppress (Hendrickson and Olson, 2006). Greater reductions in Himalayan blackberry stem density likely would be achieved by repeated browsing within one season or for multiple seasons to deplete root reserves as has been observed for Canada thistle control (Wilson et al., 2006). Additionally, repeated treatment in one growing season is justified because the critical time for survival of ramets is during active growth immediately following new shoot initiation (Radosevich et al., 2007). The defoliation of goat browsing would stimulate this shoot initiation. A second browsing would then result in disturbance of the re-growth thus stressing the plants. Examination of cane density provides some indication of trends. New ramets, in the form of primocanes, increased from 2006-2008 indicating that the population was becoming younger. Total stem density and node density declined, however, so it is possible that exhaustion of carbohydrate reserves in crowns was beginning in the last year of the study. Close timing of browsing treatments with times when carbohydrate reserves are lowest in the roots might ultimately ‘exhaust’ the plants (Davis et al., 1975). Considering the response in biomass and the population dynamics of Himalayan blackberry under these treatment protocols, future research should 99 be directed to the application of mowing first followed by goat browsing (the reverse sequence to what was examined in this dissertation). The advantages to this approach are many. First, the canopy will be removed by the most effective means available. This will allow for germination of species in the seed bank, desired and undesired. After monitoring of emergent species, one can direct further management efforts to promote or suppress those new species. Second, continued control of the Himalayan blackberry at life stages, seedling and primocane, when it is most palatable to goats can be undertaken. If problematic species emerge, such as Canada thistle, goat browsing will address that concern as well. Third, it is likely that grasses and other forbs will emerge that are selected as a smaller portion of the goat diet. Properly timed goat browsing can protect the desired species as they establish and target the palatable undesired species at the same time. 5.3 General Considerations for Invasive Plant Management Using Goat Browsing If the target of control is naturalized (Cousens and Mortimer, 1995), a situation wherein individual plants have occupied all the niches and density will not increase; it is possible to conclude that a threshold has been crossed from one state to another (Westoby et al., 1989). In the case of the English ivy, the percent cover was reduced indicating that the plant community can more easily be moved along a trajectory toward a more desirable state 100 (Bestelmeyer et al., 2003) than a Himalayan blackberry-infested plant community. The removal of one weed species often produces ideal conditions for another invader (Hobbs and Humphries, 1995). The existence of patches of each of the target species in areas adjacent to both research sites necessitates that management address the target species on a broader scale. Little is known about the survival of seeds through the digestion process for most plant species being targeted for control (Frost and Launchbaugh, 2003). However, we do know that fewer viable seeds are recovered from domestic herbivores with longer rates of gut passage (Lacey et al., 1992). Once more is known about passage time and seed survival through the digestion process, there is potential for goats to be used to increase the immigration of seeds of desired species (Archer and Pyke, 1991). This could be a complementary practice for active restoration of degraded sites. Of course, monitoring must be an integral part of any management plan so that one is fully aware of all species present and this information can be used to adjust management to reflect the iterative nature of successional management (Sheley et al., 2006). The successful use of goats for vegetation management relies on a thorough knowledge of the biology and phenology of the target plant species, its susceptibility to browsing disturbance, and its palatability to goats. If managers are willing to plan for timing, intensity and repeated application of 101 this tool with adjustments based of careful quantitative monitoring of outcomes, we may be able to devise predictive models for vegetation response. It is possible to harvest the potential of goat browsing as part of an integrated pest management plan when the plant community is known both quantitatively and qualitatively and response to various control methods is incorporated into management actions. 102 BIBLIOGRAPHY Aerts, R., R. G. A. Boot and P. J. M. van der Aart. 1991. The relation between above- and belowground biomass allocation patterns and competitive ability. Oecologia 87: 551-559 Aime, M., C., Rossman, A. Y. 2007. First report of the rust Phragmidium violaceum on Pennsylvania blackberry in California. Plant Disease 91: 1517. Alpert, P., E. Bone and C. Holzapfel. 2000. Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3: 52-66. Amor, R. L. 1974a. Ecology and control of blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) II: Reproduction. Weed Research. 14: 231-238. Amor, R. L. 1974b. Ecology and control of blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) III: Response of R. procerus to mechanical removal of top growth and to foliage applied herbicides. Weed Research. vol. 14: 239-243. Anonymous. 2000. “Wanted: Dead English ivy!” brochure. Environmental Services, City of Portland. Antos, J. A. 1988. Underground morphology and habitat relationships of three pairs of forest herbs. American Journal of Botany 75(1): 106-113. Archer, S. and D. A. Pyke. 1991. Plant-animal interaction affecting plant establishment and persistence on revegetated rangeland. Journal of Range Management 44(6): 558-565. Archer, C., C. J. Scifres, C. R. Bassham, and R. Maggio. 1988. Autogenic succession in a sub-tropical savanna: conversion of grassland to thorn woodland. Ecological Monographs 58: 111-127. Archer, S. and F. E. Smeins. 1991. Ecosystem-Level processes. Pages 109139 in R. K. Heitschmidt and J. W. Stuth, eds. Grazing Management: An Ecological Perspective. Portland, OR: Timber Press. Archer, S. and C. Stokes. 2000. Stress, disturbance and change in rangeland ecosystems. Pages 17-38 in O. Arnolds and S. Archer, eds. Rangeland Desertification. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 103 Baruch, Z. and G. Goldstein. 1999. Leaf construction cost, nutrient concentration, and net CO2 assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii. Oecologia 121:183-192. Bazzaz, F. A. 1987. Experimental studies on the evolution of niche in successional plant populations. Pages 245-272 in A.J. Gray, M.J. Crawley and P.J. Edwards, eds. Colonization, Succession and Stability. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Bestelmeyer, B. T., J. R. Brown, K. M. Havstad, R. Alexander, G. Chavez and J. E. Herrick. 2003. Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands. Journal of Range Management 56: 114-126. Biggerstaff, M. S. and C. W. Beck. 2006. Effects of English ivy (Hedera helix) on seed bank formation and germination. American Midland Naturalist 157: 250-257. Borman, M. M. 1989. Growth characteristics and site potentials of perennial grass species. PhD Thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis. Borman, M. M., W. C. Krueger and D. E. Johnson. 1990. Growth patterns of perennial grasses in the annual grassland type of Southwest Oregon. Agronomy Journal Nov.-Dec. 1990. Borman, M. M., W. C. Krueger and D. E. Johnson. 1991. Effects of established perennial grasses on yields of associated annual weeds. Journal of Range Management 44(4): 318-322. Briske, D. D. and R. K. Heitschmidt. 1991. An Ecological Perspective in R. K. Heitschmidt and J. W. Stuth, eds. Grazing Management: An Ecological Perspective. Portland, OR: Timber Press. Bruzzese, E. and M. Lane. 1996. The Blackberry Management Handbook. East Melbourne, Australia: Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. 50 p. Butaye, J., H. Jacquemyn and M. Hermy. 2001. Differential colonization causing non-random forest plant community structure in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Ecography 24: 369-380. 104 Campbell, E. and C. A. Taylor. 2006. Targeted grazing to manage weedy brush and trees. Pages 77-87 in K. Launchbaugh, ed., Targeted Grazing: A natural approach to vegetation management and landscape enhancement. Centennial, CO: American Sheep Industry Association. Cheeke, P. R. 1998. Natural Toxicants in Feeds, Forages, and Poisonous Plants. 2nd ed. . Danville, IL: Interstate Publishers Inc. 479 p. Clarke, M. M., S. H. Reichard and C. W. Hamilton. 2006. Prevalence of different horticultural taxa of ivy (Hedera spp., Araliaceae) in invading populations. Biological Invasions 8: 149-157. Clements, F. E. 1936. Nature and structure of the climax. Journal of Ecology XXIV: 253-284. Cordero, R. E., J. R. Murray and W. P. Hackett. 1985. Plastochron indices for juvenile and mature forms of Hedera Helix L. (Araliaceae). American Journal of Botany 72(2): 324-327. Cousens, R. and M. Mortimer. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. New York: Cambridge University Press. 332 p. Crawley, M. J. 1987. What makes a community invasible? Pages 429-454 in: A. J. Gray., M. J. Crawley and P. J. Edwards, eds. Colonization, Succession and Stability. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications. D’Antonio, C. M., and P. M. Vitousek. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:63-87. Davis, G. G., L. E. Bartel and C. W. Cook. 1975. Control of Gambel oak sprouts by goats. Journal of Range Management 28(3): 216-218. Davis, M. A., J. P. Grime and K. Thompson. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities; a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88: 528-534. Darwin, C. 1937. The Voyage of the Beagle. New York: P. F. Collier & Son Corporation. 524 p. Derr, J. F. 1992. Weed control in nursery crops. Pages 105-116 in: Pest Management Guide for Horticultural and Forest Crops. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Cooperative Extension Pub. 456-017 105 Derr, J. F. 1993. English Ivy (Hedera helix) Response to post emergence herbicides. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 11(2): 45-48. Distel, R. A. and F. D. Provenza. 1991. Experience early in life affects voluntary intake of blackbrush by goats. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17(2): 431-450. Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1948. The vegetation of the Western Cross Timbers. Ecological Monographs 18: 325-376. Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1949. Condition and management of range land based on quantitative ecology. Journal of Range Management 2: 104-115. Edwards, P. J. and M. P. Gillman. 1987. Herbivores and Plant Succession. Pages 295-314 in: A. J. Gray, M. J. Crawley and P. J. Edwards, eds. Colonization, Succession and Stability. Oxford: England Blackwell Scientific Publications. Elton, C. S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Plants and Animals. London, England: Methuen and Co., Ltd. Evans, M. W. 1958. Growth and development in certain economic grasses. Agronomy Series No. 147. Wooster, OH: Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station. 112 p. Fierke, M. K. and J. B. Kauffman. 2006. Invasive species influence riparian plant diversity along a successional gradient, Willamette River, Oregon. Natural Areas Journal 26: 376-392. Frey, D. and H. Frick. 1987. Altered Partitioning of New Dry Matter in Hedera helix L. (Araliaceae) Induced by Altered Orientation. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 114(4): 407-411. Frost, R. A. and K. Launchbaugh. 2003. Prescription grazing for rangeland weed management.: a new look at an old tool. Rangelands 25(6): 43- 47. Gilkey, H. M. and L. R. Dennis. 1980. Handbook of Northwestern Plants. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 507 p. Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111: 1169-1194. 106 Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Chichester England: Wiley. Grime, J. P. and J. G. Hodgson. 1987. Botanical contributions to contemporary ecological theory. Pages 283-296 in: I. H. Rorison, J. P. Grime, R. Hunt, G.A.F. Hendry, D. H. Lewis, eds. Frontiers of Comparative Plant Ecology. New Phytologist 106. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York. 892 p. Harper, J. L. 1980. Plant demography and ecological theory. Oikos 35: 244253. Harper, J. L., J. T. Williams and G. R. Sagar. 1965. The behavior of seeds in soil. I: The heterogeneity of soil surfaces and its role in determining establishment of plants from seed. Journal of Ecology 53(2): 273-286. Hawkes, C. V. and J. J. Sullivan. 2001. The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 82(7): 2045-2058. Heitschmidt, R. K. 1990. The role of livestock and other herbivores in improving rangeland vegetation. Rangelands 12(2); 112-115. Hendrickson, J. and B. Olson. 2006. Understanding Plant Response to Grazing. Pages 32-39 in K. Launchbaugh, ed., Targeted Grazing: A natural approach to vegetation management and landscape enhancement. Centennial, CO: American Sheep Industry Association. Hill, B. T., 2003. Invasive species: federal efforts and state perspectives on challenges and national leadership. Washington, DC. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Water, Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate (June 17, 2003). Hobbs, R. J. and S. E. Humphries. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conservation Biology 9(4): 761-770. Hobbs, R. J. and L. F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6(3): 324-337. Hodgson, J. 1990. Grazing Management: Science into Practice. Essex, England: Longman Scientific & Technical. 203 p. 107 Hoffman, A. A. and P. A. Parsons. 1991. Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hunt, R. 1982. Plant Growth Curves: The Functional Approach to Plant Growth Analysis. Baltimore: University Park Press. 248 p. Kigel, J and D. Koller. 1985. Asexual reproduction of weeds. Pages 65-100 in S. O. Duke, Weed Physiology (vol 1): Reproduction and Ecophysiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Lacey, J. R., R. Wallander and K. Olson-Rutz. 1992. Recovery, geminability, and viability and leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) seeds ingested by sheep and goats. Weed Technology 6: 599-602. Lambrecht-McDowell, S. and S. Radosevich. 2005. Population dynamics and trade-offs to reproduction of an invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus. Biological Invasions 7: 281-295. Laskurain, N. A., A. Escudero, J. M. Olano and J. Loidi. 2004. Seedling dynamics of shrubs in a fully closed temperate forest: greater than expected. Ecography 27: 650-658. Lavorel, S., S. McIntyre, J. Landsberg and T.D.A. Forbes. 1997. Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 474-478. Levine, J. M. and C. M. D’Antonio. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invisibility. Oikos 87(1): 15-26. Lonsdale, W. M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80(5): 1522-1536. Mack, R. N. 1996. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biological Conservation 78:107-121. Mathews, D. 1992. Cascade-Olympic Natural History. Hong Kong: Everbest Printing. 528 p. McDowell, S. L. 2002a. Life-history and Physiological Trade-offs to Reproduction of Invasive and Noninvasive Rubus. PhD. Dissertation. Oregon State University. 108 McDowell, S. C. L. 2002b. Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 89(9): 1431-1438. National Climate Data Center. 2008. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/online/ccd. Accessed: October 15, 2008. Moore, P. D. 2004. Plant ecology: favoured aliens for the future. Nature 427: 594. National Weather Service. 2008. http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/pqr/climate/pdx_clisummary.php Accessed October 1, 2008 Noble, I. R. and R. O. Slatyer. 1980. The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43: 5-21. Okerman, A. 2000. Combating the “Ivy Desert”: The Invasion of Hedera helix (English ivy) in the Pacific Northwest United States. http://horticulture.coafes.umn.edu/vd/h5015/00papers/okerman.htm. Accessed October 23, 2007. Olson, B. and K. Launchbaugh. 2006. Managing herbaceous broadleaf weeds with targeted grazing. Pages 58-67 in K. Launchbaugh, ed., Targeted Grazing: A natural approach to vegetation management and landscape enhancement. Centennial, CO: American Sheep Industry Association. Oregon Department of Agriculture Plant Division. 2006. http://Oregon.gov/ODA/PLANT/docs/pdf/weed_quarantine2005.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2006. Oregon Department of Agriculture Plant Division. 2008. http://oregon.gov/ODA/PLANT/WEEDS/profile_englishivy.shtml Accessed November 19, 2008. Oregon Raspberry and Blackberry Commission. 2008. http://www.oregonberries.com. Accessed November 17, 2007 Parker, I. M. 2000. Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: A matrix model approach. Ecological Applications 10(3): 726-743. 109 Pellant, M. 1990. The Cheatgrass-Wildfire Cycle-Are there any Solutions? in: Proceedings- Symposium on Cheatgrass Invasion, Shrub Die-off, and other Aspects of Shrub Biology and Management. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-276. Pimm, S. L. and M. E. Gilpin. 1989. Theoretical issues in conservation biology. Pp. 287-305 in: J. Roughgarden, R. M. May and S.A. Levin (eds.) Perspectives in Ecological Theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Pojar, J. and A. MacKinnon (eds). 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Vancouver, B.C.: Lone Pine Publishing. Pokorny, M. L., R. L. Sheley, C. A. Zabinski, R. E. Engel, T. J. Svejcar and J. J. Borkowski. 2005. Plant functional group diversity as a mechanism for invasion resistance. Restoration Ecology 13(3): 448-459 Radosevich, S. R., J. S. Holt and C. M. Ghersa. 2007. Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants: Relationship to Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience. Randall, J. M. 1996. Weed control for the preservation of biological diversity. Weed Technology 10: 370-383. Randall, J. M. 1997. Defining weeds of natural areas. Pp. 18-25. in: J. O. Luken and J. W. Thieret, eds. Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. New York: Springer-Verlag. Rapp, V. 2005. Invasive Plants in 21st Century Landscapes. Pacific Northwest Research Station: Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service. Reed, C. 1980. The beginnings of animal domestication. Pages 3-20 in H. H. Cole, ed. Animal Agriculture: The Biology, Husbandry, and Use of Domestic Animals, 2nd ed. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co. Reichard, S. 2007. Hedera helix. University of California, Davis. http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/datastore/detailreport.cfm?usernumber=55&survey number=182. Accessed October 20, 2007. Rejmánek, M. 1989. Invasibility of plant communities. Pages 369-388 in J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. F. Kruger, M. Rejmánek and M. Williamson, eds. Biological Invasions: a global perspective. Chichester, England: Wiley. 110 Rejmánek, M. 2000. Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Australian Ecology 25: 497-506. Richardson, D. M., P. PyŠek, M. Rejmánek, M. G. Barbour, F. D. Panetta, C. J. West. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and distributions 6: 93-107. Rogosic, J., R. E. Estell, D. Skobic, A.Martinovic and S. Maric. 2006. Role of species diversity and secondary compound complementarity on diet selection of Mediterranean shrubs by goats. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32:1279-1287. SAS 9.1.3 Service Pack 4. 2003. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC. Sack, L. 2004. Response of temperate woody seedlings to shade and drought: Do trade-offs limit potential niche differentiation? Oikos 107: 110-127. Sakai, A. K., F. W. Allendorf, J. S. Holt, D. M. Lodge, J. Molofsky, K. A. With, S. Baughman, R. J. Cabin, J. E. Cohen, N. C. Ellstrand, D. E. McCauley, P. O’Neil, I. M. Parker, J. N. Thompson and S. G. Weller. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 305-332. Schnitzler, A. and P. Heuzé. 2006. Ivy (Hedera helix L.) dynamics in riverine forests: Effects of river regulation and forest disturbance. Forest Ecology and Management 236: 12-17 Scifres, C. J. 1980. Brush Management: Principles and Practices for Texas and the Southwest. College Station: Texas A&M University Press. 360 p. Sheley, R. L. and J. Krueger-Mangold. 2003. Principles for restoring invasive plant-infested rangeland. Weed Science 51: 260-265. Sheley, R. L., J. M. Mangold and J. L. Anderson. 2006. Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland. Ecological Monogrpahs 76(3): 365-379. Sheley, R., M. Manoukian and G. Marks. 2002. Preventing Noxious Weed Invasion, MT199517 AG8/2002. Montana State University Extension Service: Bozeman, MT. 111 Sheley, R., T. J. Svejcar and B. M. Maxwell. 1996. A theoretical framework for developing successional weed management strategies on rangeland. Weed Technology 10: 766-773. Silvertown, J, M. Franco and K. McConway. 1992. A demographic interpretation of Grime’s triangle. Functional Ecology 6: 130-136. Sindel, B. M. 2000. Weeds and their impact. R.G. and F.J. Richardson (eds.) Australian Weed Management Systems. Meredith, Australia. Soil Data Mart. 2008. Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/Survey.aspx?County=OR039 Accessed October 7, 2008. Soil Survey Staff. 2008. Official Soil Series Descriptions. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html Soll, J. 2004. Controlling Himalayan Blackberry in the Pacific Northwest. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/moredocs/rubarm01.pdf Accessed January 15, 2008 Soll, J. 2005. Controlling English ivy (Hedera helix) in the Pacific Northwest. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/moredocs//hedhe102.pdf. Accessed November 10, 2007. Stein, O. L. and E. B. Fosket. 1969. Comparative Developmental Anatomy of Shoots of Juvenile and Adult Hedera helix. American Journal of Botany 56(5): 546-551. Stubbendieck, J., S. L. Hatch and L. M. Landholt. 2003. North American Wildland Plants: A Field Guide. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 501 p. Tirmenstein, D. 1989. Rubus discolor. in: Fire Effects Information System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer), http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ Accessed November 20, 2008. USDA Plants Database. 2008. Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=HEHE Accessed October 21, 2008. 112 Usher, M. B. 1988. Biological invasions of nature reserves: a search for generalizations. Biological Conservation 44: 119-135. Vesk, P. A. and M. Westoby. 2001. Predicting plant species’ responses to grazing. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 897-909. Weiner, J. 1995. On the practice of ecology. Journal of Ecology 83: 153-158. Westoby, M., B. Walker and I. Noy-Meir. 1989. Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal of Range Management 42(4): 266-274. Whisenant, S. G. 1990. Changing Fire Frequencies on Idaho’s Snake River Plains: Ecological and Management Implications. in: ProceedingsSymposium on Cheatgrass Invasion, Shrub Die-off, and other Aspects of Shrub Biology and Management. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT276. Whisenant, S. G. 1999. Repairing Damaged Wildlands: A Process-Oriented, Landscape-Scale Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 312 p. White, R. and R. Gunstone. 1992. Probing Understanding. London: The Falmer Press. Williamson, M. H. and A. Fitter. 1996. The characters of successful invaders. Biological Conservation 78: 163-170. Williamson, M. 1989. Mathematical models of invasion. Pages 329-350 in: J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek and M. Williamson, eds. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Chichester, England: Wiley. Wilson, J. B. 1988. Shoot competition and root competition. Journal of Applied Ecology 25: 279-296. Wilson, L., J. Davison and E. Smith. 2006. Grazing and browsing guidelines for invasive rangeland weeds. Pages 142-166 in: K. Launchbaugh, ed., Targeted Grazing: A natural approach to vegetation management and landscape enhancement. Centennial, CO: American Sheep Industry Association. 113 Woodward, F. I., T. M. Smith and H. H. Shugart. 1997. Defining plant functional types: the end view. in: F. I. Woodward, T. M. Smith, H. H. Shugart, eds., Plant Functional Types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge University Press. 359 p. Wright, J. P., S. Naeem, A. Hector, C. Lehman, P. B. Reich, B. Schmid and D. Tilman. 2006. Conventional functional classification schemes underestimate the relationship with ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 9: 111-120. Zotz, G., N. Cueni and C. KÖrner. 2006. In situ growth stimulation of a temperate zone liana (Hedera helix) in elevated CO2. Functional Ecology 20: 763-769.