Behavioural Manifestation of Discipline:

advertisement
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 5 No 27
December 2014
Behavioural Manifestation of Discipline:
A Case Study in Secondary Schools in Heidelberg Gauteng Province
Joyce Phikisile Dhlamini
School for Educational Leadership and Development, North-West University, South Africa
Joyce.Dhlamini@nwu.ac.za
Doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n27p839
Abstract
Learner behaviour has become a major problem in most secondary schools in South Africa. A new political dispensation in
South Africa in 1994 brought drastic changes and challenges to the education system. The abolition of corporal punishment in
1996 necessitated a shift towards alternative discipline methods. The establishment of the South African School’s Act 84 of
1996 (SASA), Constitution of the Republic of South Africa of 1996, new policies in the Department of Education, all brought
uncertainty to most schools. This study has anchored the intuitionism theory as a template to discuss acceptable and nonacceptable behaviours in SA schools. Discipline is problematic to parents, teachers and learners in secondary schools in East
Rand District. This paper investigated the problems and challenges emerging from indiscipline of learners and recommends
ways in which parents and schools could collaboratively manage indiscipline in schools. The study explored policies, codes of
conduct, and other documents relevant to discipline of learners. A qualitative research design was employed and data was
collected through semi-structured interviews. Three focus group interviews with 81 respondents were engaged in the data
collection. Finally recommendations were handed to the participating schools.
Keywords: Learner discipline, behaviour, Code of Conduct, (SASA), policy, involvement.
1. Introduction and Background
Evidence is emerging that there are differences in behaviour between today’s youth and those of ten years ago. The
reason might be the development and transformation in the political system of the country. The establishment of the
South African School’s Act no 84 of 1996 (SASA), which highlighted the rights and the responsibilities of learners in
school, and the introduction of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa of 1996, the introduction of the new
Department of Education policy, all brought uncertainty to educators, parents and learners. This transformation required a
gradual change in the Department of Education, especially in schools, to ensure the proper maintenance of discipline
(RSA, 1996a; RSA 1996b). Ndebula (2003) asserts that learners were becoming apathetic, impatient, self-centred,
overwhelming and harder to motivate, thus resulting in disciplinary problems at schools.
De Beer (2012) reported in a survey of more than 1000 grade 10 learners in a school in Johannesburg. The most
traumatic event witnessed was violence, followed by robbery and mugging and witnessing a family member being injured
and killed. The survey showed that 43% of boys and 23% of girls had been robbed or mugged. The abuse of alcohol and
drugs by learners has negatively impacted on school discipline. In May 2013, a fourteen year old school boy brutally killed
four members of his family (Daily Sun news-paper, 28 May 2013). It is thus important to take note of conclusive findings
of studies, particularly in South Africa, which have made it clear that violence in schools has an undesirable impact on
discipline, Rosen (2005) defines discipline as training that develops self-control, character, orderliness or efficiency, strict
control to enforce obedience, treatment that controls or punishes and a system of rules. It is interesting to note that the
definitions of the term suggest that discipline can have quite different implications for schools. The component of the
definition that relates to teaching seems much more positive than the components that include the negative expressions
such as punishment and strict control.
In qualitative research enquiry based on the discipline of learners in Heidelberg secondary schools in the East
Rand, Gauteng province, a problem stood out after focus groups interviews were conducted. The misconception of SASA
(1996b) and other school policies by learners in many schools focusing on their rights whilst neglecting their
responsibilities has contributed to the school indiscipline. Negligence and non-involvement from the side of the parents in
as far as the school work and active participation in school programmes was concerned had a negative impact. Fragile
family structure was discovered to have a negative impact in maintaining discipline. Certainly social habits such as
courtesy, punctuality, proper language, and cleanliness should be learned and emphasised in the home and are not the
839
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 5 No 27
December 2014
primary responsibility of the school (Rosen 2005). The fact of the matter is, however, that a great number of learners
come to school without the so called social graces.
Educators lack motivation. There is a laissez-faire situation that prevails in schools due to lack of efficiency of the
School Management Team (SMT). Teachers forget performing their contractual obligations of ensuring effective teaching
and learning. The school is the most likely institution to fill the gap of appropriate training in social skills. The school
disciplinarian has the responsibility of leadership in ensuring that all members of the school staff play a role in the
reinforcement of appropriate disciplinary and behavioural habits (Reeve 2009). Poor academic performance in these
secondary schools reflects a lack of discipline. Although there might be several contributory factors towards this, the high
involvement of the Teachers’ unions, who ultimately control the functioning of the schools, has a negative impact on
positive discipline (Jankowski 2002).
2.
Problem Statement
A Medical Research Council survey of 2010 indicated that at least 9% of learners in that survey carried weapons such as
guns, knives, pangas or sticks to school. About 15% of learners had been threatened or injured at school, of which 19%
had been injured in fights and 40% reported to have been bullied (Rottcher 2006). There is an apparent link between a
drop in the academic performance of learners in some secondary schools in Heidelberg and the salient observations
made in the Medical Research Survey of 2010. Learners no longer respect their teachers. Are the parents working in
collaboration with teachers in helping with the behaviour of their children?
3.
Theoretical Framework
Intuitionism theory has been engaged in this research. The intuitionism theory avers that there is a fundamental principle
of right and wrong, and that there is authoritative virtue of self-evident truths. In school discipline, one can therefore speak
of an act of wrong and right behaviour of learners based on the tenets of intuitionism. In this research it was decided to
follow a combined approach that embraces tenets of intuitionism, a judicial conception of the principles of good or
acceptable conduct and of contractarianism. Teachers and learners all have an intuitive understanding of what good or
acceptable behaviour entails. Educators and learners work within a legal framework, (school policy) and educators,
learners and parents are parties to a social contract. Based on the above, teachers, learners and parents have some
understanding of what is morally good conduct (Smit 2004).
Every person is entitled to the fundamental human rights enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa. Everyone is also bound by them (Malherbe 2004). On the other hand, the SASA (RSA 1996b) outlines the
learners’ rights and responsibilities. Consequently as learners have rights, they are also bound to abide by their
responsibilities. The implication for education is that teachers, learners and parents are entitled to the protection of and
advantages offered by these rights. (Smit 2004). On the other hand, these rights are not meant to be separated from
responsibilities because that results in behavioural problems of learners in secondary schools where this research was
conducted. Learners lacked good moral behaviour and could not differentiate between what is good and what is bad.
Operational Education Management (OEM) in the Western Cape Education Department (2013) suggested that
discipline is necessary for the functioning of a school. Indiscipline not only disrupts teaching and learning but can also
endanger other learners and educators. School discipline has certain objectives. Amongst them it is to ensure safety of
staff and learners (Gaustand 1998). Pretorius (2007) says that such safety might probably be lacking in many schools as
there is evidence of violence in many schools. Ledwaba (2011:4) says that learners are killing each other at schools: they
even kill educators. There is no more respect for each other. It is not any longer creating an environment conducive to
learning and teaching in schools.
The Department of Education and Children’s Services (DECS) is accountable to the community, through the
Minister for Education and Children’s Services for managing learner behaviour in schools. They are also responsible for
creating safe, orderly, productive and successful learning communities (DoE 2007). Potgieter (2005) asserts that good
school discipline is an important feature of effective schools. Learners learn best in an orderly and safe environment.
Discipline is therefore one of the most important management functions in a school that requires the principal, the
teachers and parents to maintain order and proper discipline that allows for effective teaching and learning.
Section 29 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa states that everyone has a right to basic education in
the official language of his/her choice in public institutions (RSA 1996a). It is important for schools and educators to
realise that they are entitled to limit the learner’s right to education, should the conduct of the learner infringe upon the
right to education of other learners. For such behaviour, the correct disciplinary measures have to be taken to discipline
840
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 5 No 27
December 2014
such a learner.
This ‘article focuses on problems of discipline that are faced by secondary schools in the East Rand, Gauteng, in
South Africa. It endeavours to put forward recommendations in order to assist those secondary schools to maintain
discipline. It is important that the schools compile a discipline policy that outlines the required behaviour in the school in
line with the South African schools Act of 1996. In South Africa, directors, district directors, principals and school based
staff, including teachers, are accountable to the Chief Executive, Department for Education and Children’s Services, for
implementing the School Discipline Policy (DECS 2007) The research conducted by the Department of Education
indicates the importance of school’s discipline policy that should be fairly and consistently applied by all educators in
handling disruptive behaviour.
Social and physical environments play an integral part in providing guidance to behavioural patterns of learners in
schools. Behaviour can be affected by socio-economic status, poverty situation and violence within the community, family
composition, health status, and guidance and counselling. Greenberg, Weissberg, Utne O`Brien Zins, Fredericks &
Resnik (2003) agree that a sense of belonging and connectedness has been identified as contributing to improved
academic achievement. An unsafe environment at school is an indicator of disciplinary problems that schools are now
facing. Some schools are faced with serious learner misconduct and educators have to deal with disruptive behaviour of
learners Potgieter, Visser, van Der Bank, Mothatha & Squelch (2001) assert that good school discipline is an important
feature of effective teaching and learning. Learners learn best in an orderly and safe environment. Discipline is therefore
one of the most important management functions in a school that requires the principals and educators to maintain order
and proper discipline at school for effective teaching and learning.
3.1
The nature of discipline in schools
According to Potgieter (2005) discipline implies control without which there would be anarchy and chaos and learning
would not take place effectively. Therefore, the school has the responsibility of controlling its learners to ensure effective
teaching and learning. With the help of the South African Schools Act of 1996, schools have to compile rules and
regulations for the learners to be adopted by the School Governing Body as the Code of Conduct for the school. Schools
should make discipline a priority, because no matter how effective the teacher or the teaching strategy is, without
discipline, no effective learning will take place at that school (Department of Education 2000).
It has remained a challenge to many countries on how to provide the right kind and method of discipline in schools
that will create a climate that is conducive for effective teaching and learning in schools. It might not be sufficient to look
at the problem from the educator’s angle, or looking at it from the learner’s point of view only. Parents also play an
integral part in maintaining discipline in schools. Subsequently, a collaborative effort of all stakeholders in education
should be considered. Jankowski (2002) explains that before the implementation of any new curriculum, discipline in
schools took some form of correction or punishment in response to errant behaviour. Learners sat in neat rows in their
classrooms, while their educators stood in front of them, teaching. Learners were expected to respect their teachers
and:any form of disruptions were dealt with severely through corporal punishment.
Opposed to the above cited setting, the New Curriculum Statement (NCS) requires teachers to arrange the
classroom setting in a manner which is conducive for learning. If the lesson requires group work, learners should sit in
groups to allow participation in discussions. This arrangement varies according to the requirements of the lesson.
According to the Department of Education (2001) transformation of the country and the new era in political development
indicate that there is a need to change the perceptions of discipline in schools.
3.2
Models of discipline
Discipline refers to behaviour directed from within and not to compliance with demands made by others. Discipline does
not require punishment as it is a behaviour that does not need to be motivated by fear and all the regimentation
associated with most school procedures (Holdstock 2000).Educators who ensure good discipline at school are those who
are guided by an explicit approach to teaching and who use specific strategies that fit the approach. They are the guiding
model, which includes (TIRO) Trust, Intention, Respect and Optimism (Purkey and Straham 1999). This model is
viewed as necessary for maintaining discipline because it brings cohesion between teachers and learners. Teachers who
apply such a guiding education model demonstrate their trust in learners, by consistently providing opportunities for them
to make decisions and create guideline for monitoring their own behaviour.
TIRO can assist to brighten the teachers’ darkest moments of handling ill-disciplined learners, and make it all
worthwhile. Ideally, the teacher experiences minimum disciplinary problems in the school, because they work together in
841
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
Vol 5 No 27
December 2014
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
trust and respect with the learners (Purkey and Straham 1999:9). With reference to this model, consistency in purpose
and direction is important even when it is difficult to do so and to treat learners as they could be, not just as they are.
Respect is another strategy which is manifested by the educator in everything she/he does, including respect for
oneself and others, personally and professionally. Educators need to constantly encourage learners to view themselves
as valuable, able, and responsible members of the community. Consequently, learners discover the importance of
behaving well at school (Holdstock 2000).
4.
Research Method
A qualitative research design was used to collect data for this study. This study used interview schedules with open
ended questions that allow probing to enable respondents to be more relaxed in answering questions on the discipline of
learners in their schools (Leedy & Ormrod 2010; De Vos 2011). Qualitative data was collected from three secondary
schools in Heidelberg, East Rand.
4.1
Population and sample
The population included all three (N=3) secondary schools in Heidelberg, in Gauteng province South Africa. The findings
are therefore valid to these secondary schools in the East Rand. The population for this article comprises (N=103)
educators, (N=3400) learners and thirty six (N=36) School Governing Body members from three secondary schools.
Therefore, a sample for this article was constituted as follows:
Biographical data of learners
Variables
Gender
Age
Grade
School A
Males 9
Females 9
9 = 15 -16 years
9 = 17 - 18 years
10 = 09
11 = 09
12 = 09
School B
Males 9
Females 9
9 = 15 - 16 years
9 = 17 - 17 years
10 = 09
11 = 09
12 =09
School C
Males 9
Females 9
9 = 15 - 16 years
9 = 17 - 18 years
10 = 09
11 = 09
12 09
There were three principals (N=03), one from each secondary school, nine (N=9) experienced educators, three (N=3)
from each secondary school making a total of (N=12). There were fifty-four learners (N=54), eighteen (N=18) from each
secondary school including members of the Representative Council of Learners (RCLs). Fifteen (N=15) parents, SGBs
five from each secondary school. The sample gave a total of 81 respondents. There were two focus groups of learners
per school that were conducted. Each group had nine respondents. Three focus groups of educators, one in a school
comprising the principal and five educators. Lastly, three focus groups of parents, with five parents in a group. All
interviews were conducted in each of the secondary school.
4.2
Interviews
Interview schedule was used to guide the interviewer on questions that were relevant to the research on discipline of
learners in the secondary schools. Such a schedule was used to ensure that all relevant topics covered during interviews
(De Vos 2011). The interview allowed the researcher to examine fundamental questions about the way discipline was
maintained in the three secondary schools. Interviews for educators and the principal were conducted in the principals’
office, during the scheduled time in all three schools. Particular attention was paid to data bearing on the question of the
discipline of learners in secondary schools in Heidelberg, Gauteng province, South Africa.
4.3
Focus group interviews
Focus group interview was used to collect data from all respondents. There were nine focus groups, three from each
school that were conducted. These focus groups were conducted in the respondents’ school including the parents. Semistructured method was employed. During each process, the interview guide was used to develop the discussion among
the respondents. This method of interviewing accommodated a minimum number of respondents (Creswell 2012).
842
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 5 No 27
December 2014
A brief set of field notes during the session as validation of the taped comments was made. Respondents were
informed about the recording device during the interview session. Key sites were also recorded during these sessions
(White 2005). The same questions were asked in all three schools. Additional probing questions were phrased carefully
so as not to be leading, thereby invalidating data, and were based on remarks made by the respondents. To ensure
maximum participation, respondents were allowed to discuss issues in question with each other. Holloway and Wheeler
(2000) point out that, focus groups are characterised by the interaction between participants from which the researcher
discovers how they feel about a specific issue
5.
Findings and Discussions
Verbatim transcription of views and information gleaned from documents, books and articles about discipline of learners
in schools were used to analyse data for this article.
5.1
The general behaviour of learners.
•
•
•
•
•
•
5.2
The school rules, policies and code of conduct
•
•
•
•
5.3
Educators observed problems of recurring late coming of learners to school which affected teaching time .The
timetable was not fully adhered to.
The political status of South Africa led to a radical transformation within the department of Education and this
paradigm shift had an impact on the control system of learners in schools. This led to the establishment of the
SASA Act of 1996 which was not comprehensively understood by learners, teachers as well as parents.
Learners were bunking lessons, and were staying outside their classes, making a lot of disruptive noise that
would disturb other classes during their learning.
The social background of learners, moral values and norms of the community of Heidelberg does not motivate,
support, and promote good behaviour of learners.
Substance abuse by learners had a major influence on the discipline challenges of learners in the classroom;
some of them stayed outside their classrooms and refused to do their work
Neatness of the school and cleanliness of their classrooms were a big problem as other classrooms were
dirty.
Non-implementation of the school code of conduct in some schools was a problem. In one school, the school
code of conduct does not exist, although according to SASA it is compulsory for each school to draft its own
school policy from the guidelines provided by DoE. Its absence raised problems for the learners to know their
rights and responsibilities as well as school rules.
Absence of alternative measures regarding corporal punishment which teachers could use as a source of
discipline for learners when need arises.
Difficulty and negligence of teachers to implement suggestions for disciplinary procedures as stipulated in
circular 74 of 2007 and notice 2591 of 2001.
Learners who do not wear their school uniform were giving teachers problems because they could not
distinguish between leaners and gangsters that unlawfully enter school premises. The area had a problem of
gangsterism.
Factors that influence discipline and rights of learners
•
•
•
•
Poverty has stricken many families in Heidelberg, Gauteng, especially in the township. A majority of learners
go to school on empty stomachs and they experience difficulty in concentrating in class, and they play truancy.
There are families that are headed by young learners as their parents are deceased. These learners were tired
at school because of the parental responsibilities that they performed every day.
Teachers were faced with disrespectful learners who would not listen to them and sometimes refused to do
their school and home work. The lack of moral development of learners from home had an impact in discipline.
There was evidence of a laissez-faire atmosphere in some schools; some learners do what they want, and
there was no action taken against them. Some teachers do not cooperate with the principal, the SMT, and the
843
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
•
5.4
•
•
Vol 5 No 27
December 2014
SGB an indication of the lack of teamwork in the schools.
High rate of pregnancy in the schools was a problem because some teachers and other learners could not
cope with pregnant girls. These girls were frequently absent from school and did not want to cooperate with
others.
Some teachers come to school without any lesson prepared, and secondary school learners would observe
that and complain. Some teachers arrived late in class and some completely missed lessons. They also failed
to react to ill-disciplined learners or condoned miscreant behaviour.
Some schools were not properly and safely secured. There was no proper fencing and in some instances the
school fence had holes where gangsters and hooligans would come through and disturb the school at any
time.
Gangsterism was a big issue in two schools. Some leaners are involved in gangs in the township, and they
brought their gang issues into the schools which resulted in ‘clashes amongst the learners and subsequent
disruption in the school. This observation was supported by the Medical Research Council survey which
indicated that at least 9% of learners in that survey carried weapons such as guns, knives, pangas or sticks to
school. Other related incidents related to threats, physical injuries and bullying. Violence has taken a scene in
one of the schools and has resulted in learners fighting each other. Burglary and stealing of valuable school
properties and facilities was rife in the three secondary schools at Heidelberg. This caused a draw back for the
schools in trying to provide Learning, Teaching, and Support Materials for effective teaching and learning.
Leadership (SGB) and management (SMT) influence on discipline
•
•
•
6.
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
The effects of discipline in these schools
•
5.5
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
Poor communication channels between learners and teachers and amongst teachers themselves. Some
learners wanted the morning assembly to be reinstated at school on daily bases. They said it was one of the
effective forums where they could communicate messages, events, and other school news.
Misinterpretation and misunderstanding of rights and responsibilities of learners by them and no one was
assisting with that.
Lack of authority from the principal and teachers in guiding the learners. Learners were saying that the
principal must be firm in taking decisions. SGB does not play any role in availing and assisting in the
maintenance of order in the school. Some teachers were showing no interest in their responsibilities and the
education of the African child.
Recommendations
Recommendations that could assist teachers, learners, SMT and parents and all other stakeholders is to have an intuitive
understanding and the insight of what is good or acceptable behaviour and the way of good conduct. They should try to
condemn the bad or unacceptable behaviour for effective discipline at their school. This is an effort that could be
achieved through collaboration of the SMTs, educators, learners and the parents. The following recommendations are
made to all the stakeholders in this research:
6.1
Recommendations to principals
Principals should ensure that the School Code of Conduct is drawn up by all the interested parties in the school, and to
make sure that it is respected in the school in order to maintain order and good behaviour of learners. They should
administer and organise teaching and learning activities at the school in accordance with the mission statement of the
school which was developed by the SGB and all stakeholders (RSA 1996 b; RSA 1998). Principals should be aware of all
the activities that are happening at the school in all times. They should form network of communication with the
community and the parents of learners for the benefit of the school. It should be their priority to consider that discipline in
the school comes first, and make use of the counselling services for the learners with severe behavioural problems.
The principal together with the SMT could apply Data Management System (DMS). This would appear quite a
straight forward step. Essentially fields need to be developed for the data entry, such as student information, infraction,
844
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 5 No 27
December 2014
referring teacher and action taken. These data are entered into a spread-sheet and reports can be gleaned in many
ways. Greenberg et al (2003) pointed out that many schools are not sufficiently coordinated to attend to the factors that
maximise the measurable programme outcomes. Carnine (2002) concluded that until education becomes the kind of
profession that reveres evidence, we should not be surprised to find its experts dispensing unproven methods, endlessly
flitting from one fad to another. In developing a data management system for a proactive school-wide discipline plan, the
following components are crucial (De Klerk & Rens 2003).
• Defining the role of SMTs. The leadership team should determine a kind of data management system to be
used in an individual school. Options include self-generated programme. Designate someone the responsibility
to enter data on the regular basis. Data entry should be monitored.
• Purposes of an effective DMS. The key to an effective proactive school-wide discipline plan is the systematic
use of data. Tracking the progress whether is the plan working. The plan would be considered working if there
is reduction in the school’s office referrals. Data received should serve to monitor disciplinary actions to ensure
equity and could be used to develop a School Improvement Plan (SIP). This is the most concern of the
Department of Education (DoE) through district offices to assist school in the development of the SIP.
• Guidelines in developing DMS. The system needs to be set up so the entry person can input the information
with relative ease. The data entry must be up to date so that current reports can be readily accessible. The
school must develop a confidentiality protocol and ensures that it is followed. It should be easy to generate
reports from the data.
6.2
Recommendations to the teachers
Commitment, involvement and dedication of teachers towards their daily and contractual responsibilities are essential
elements to receive the top priority from the teachers. Time management should start with the teachers first so that
learners would realise the importance of managing time. Teachers should refrain from sending learners to shops and or
outside school premises during school hours (RSA 1996b).
Preparedness and willingness of teachers to guide and teach learners at all times at school should be a
prerogative effort. Formation of teamwork amongst teachers, SMTs, RCLs and SGBs is necessary for the promotion of
effective teaching and learning (Potgieter 2005). Teachers should inculcate a good and acceptable behaviour in learners
and combat all what is known as undesirable behaviour of learners. If learners are found using bad language, dishonest,
rudeness, provocative behaviour, using insults language, disrespecting teachers, carrying weapons and similar
misconduct. Such learners should be made aware of the seriousness of the conduct. Teachers must communicate
favourable expectations to the learners. The more positive the learners’ perception of the teachers’ feelings towards
him/her, the better the classroom behaviour and discipline will be (Lewis 2001; Jankowski 2002)
6.3
Recommendations for learners
Learners should respect other fellow learners and their teachers. Those who have huge responsibilities of heading the
family should ask for assistance from neighbours and from social services and must also report their situation at school..
It is heavy for a chid to take the responsibility of parenthood and heading the family. All learners should take the
responsibility of being a learner and know that “bad and unacceptable” behaviour is not allowed at school. Example of
bad and acceptable behaviour is rudeness, absenteeism, disruptive behaviour untidiness, disrespect of everyone is not
acceptable. Each child has a right and a responsibility to perform (RSA 1996a; RSA 1996b).
Learners should be prepared to learn and arrive on time for school to begin with the activities including effective
teaching and learning. Those learners who use drugs, alcohol and other substance abuse should refrain from them
instead ask for assistance from the school to stop taking them. The SMT should request for assistance from the social
services to provide them with programmes for learner support.
7.
Conclusion
This article has investigated the disciplinary problems that are facing teachers in three secondary schools in Heidelberg.
It has discovered that discipline of learners in schools should receive first priority in each school. If the school is unable to
maintain discipline among its learners, that might result in ineffective teaching and learning. Educational authorities,
District officials, and parents are not supporting teachers and learners in areas pertaining to discipline, although in most
cases they have an intuitive understanding and an insight into “what good and acceptable” conduct of behaviour entails.
845
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 5 No 27
December 2014
This effort would bring a collaborative effort of ‘all the parties who are interested in education. Therefore, they should do
their best to assist and root out what is known as “bad and unacceptable” behaviour of learners in schools.
References
Colvin, G. 2007. Developing a proactive school-wide discipline plan. California: Sage Publication company.
Creswell, JW. 2012. Educational Research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. 4th edition. London: Gage Publications.
De Kerk, J. and Rens, J 2003. The role of values in school discipline. Koers, 68: pp 253-371.
Dlomo, V. 2013. Another brutal killing. (Daily sun newspaper) 28 May 2013.
Darch, CB. And Kame`ennui, EJ. 2003. Instructional classroom management: A proactive approach to behaviour management, 2nd
edition. Columbus, OH: Allyn & Bacon.
De Beer, J. 2012. Violence in schools. (The Citizen Newspaper) 22 May 2012.
Department of Education. 2000. Teacher empowerment through curriculum development. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Department of Education. 2001. Education and decentralisation, an African experience and comparative analyses. Pretoria: Government
Printers.
Department of Education. 2007. Policy Brief on Education Laws Amendment to the South African schools’ Act, Act 84 of 1996. Pretoria:
Government Printers.
Department of Education 2013. Operational Education Management: Western Cape Province department of Education. Western Cape:
Government Printers.
De Vos, J. 2011 Research at grass roots, a primer for the caring professionals. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Gaustad, J 1998. School discipline. Journal on schools respond to gangs and violence 78 (4). 48-54.
Greenberg, MT. Wiessberg, RP. Utne O`Brien, M. Zins, JE. Fredericks, L. Resnik, H. 2003. Enhancing school-based prevention and
youth development through coordinated social emotional and academic learning, American psychologist. 58, 466 - 474.
Holdstock, TL. 2000. Violence in schools. People and violence in schools in South Africa. Vol 6. Number 4. Pages 341-373.
Holloway, JC. And Wheeler, D. 2000. Qualitative research for nurses. Great Britain: Blackwell Science.
Jankowski, D. 2002. Community building: A positive approach to discipline in schools. Journal community building at the demonstration
elementary and secondary schools. 20 (2). 1-6.
Kauffman, J.M. Mostert, M.P. Trent, S.C. & Hallahan, D.P. 2000. Managing classroom behaviour: A reflective case-based approach.
Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Ledwaba, L. 2006. Discipline in today’s schools. (Sunday Times news-paper) 5 April 2011. P page 4.
Leedy, PD. and Ormrod, JE, 2010. Practical Research: planning and design. 9 th edition. London: Gage Publications.
Lewis, TJ. And Sugai, G. 1999. Effective behaviour support: A systems approach to proactive school wide management. 31 (6). 1-24.
Malherbe, R. 2004 A constitutional perspective on the rights and duties of learners and educators, A conference paper of the South
African Education Law and Policy Association. September 2004.
Operational Education Management. 2013. Discipline in Schools. Western Cape Department of Education. Pretoria: Government
Printers.
Potgieter, JM. Visser, JP. van der Bank, AJ. Mothatha, MS. and Squelch, JM. (2001) Understanding the South African schools. Pretoria:
Government printers.
Purkey, WW. And Strahan, DB. 1999. Positive discipline. A pocket of ideas. Columbus: National middle school association. (537
Alaska)
Reeve, J. 2009. Understanding Motivation and Emotion. Fifth edition. United States of America. University of Iowa.
Republic of South Africa 1996(a). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act no. 108 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Press
Republic of South Africa. 1996 (b). South African Schools Act No. 84 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Press.
Republic of South Africa. 1998. Guidelines for the consideration of School Governing Bodies in adopting a Code of Conduct for learners.
Pretoria: Government printers.
Rosen, L. 2005. School discipline: Best practices for administrators. Second edition. California: Sage Publishing Company.
Rottcher, WH. 2006. A study of leisure pursuits of learners in grade 10, 11, &12. University of Kwa Zulu Natal. M.Ed.
Simon Westein, C. 2003. Secondary classroom management: Lessons from research and practice 2ndedition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Smit, M. 2004. Balancing the rights in Education: The application of the general limitation article to specific fundamental rights.
September 2004
Sprick, R. Garrison. & Howard, L. 2000. A proactive and positive approach to classroom management. Eugene, OR: Pacific Northwest.
Walker, H. Colvin, G. & Ramsey, E., 2000. Antisocial behaviour in school: Strategies and best Practices. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/
Cole.
White, JC. 2005. Research: A practical Guide. Pretoria: Intuthuko.
846
Download