Upper-division Writing Requirement Review Form Society and Conservation/

advertisement
Upper-division Writing Requirement Review Form (2/14)
I. General Education Review – Upper-division Writing Requirement
Dept/Program
Subject
Society and
Conservation/
PTRM
Course # (i.e. ANTY
455) or sequence
PTRM 482
Course(s) Title
Wilderness and Protected Area Management
Description of the requirement if it is not a single course.
II. Endorsement/Approvals
Complete the form and obtain signatures before submitting to Faculty Senate Office.
Please type / print name Signature
Instructor
Bill Borrie
Phone / Email
Program Chair
4286
bill.borrie@
umontana.edu
Keith Bosak
Dean
James Burchfield
Date
III. Type of request
New
Renew X
Reason for new course, change
or deletion
One-time Only
Change
Remove
IV Overview of the Course Purpose/ Description
Examination of the origin, evolution, and application of the park concept at state, federal, and
international levels. Evaluation of legislation, philosophy, and policy leading to consideration
of goals, objectives, and strategies for park management.
V Learning Outcomes: Provide examples of how the course will support students in
achieving each learning outcome.
Identify and pursue
sophisticated questions for
academic inquiry
√ Yes
If yes, how will student learning be supported?
Students pursue advanced topics, issues, and controversies of
wilderness and park management. This course is designed as a
theoretical capstone for our majors in the Recreation Resource
Management option.
 No
If no, course may not be eligible
Find, evaluate, analyze, and
synthesize information
effectively and ethically from
diverse sources (see:
http://www.lib.umt.edu/libraryinformation-literacytables#Table2) Subject liaison
librarians are available to
assist you embed information
literacy into your course:
http://www.lib.umt.edu/node/115
#instructors
√ Yes
If yes, how will student learning be supported?
Students read, discuss and work with journal articles, monographs,
chapters of books, and other diverse texts. Each is discussed in terms
of the authority and standing of the author, the publication outlet and
intended audience, style, as well as potential sources of bias. Takehome exam questions lead students into considering differing
viewpoints and contradictory opinions in order to provide application
to a current issue. Authors and publication outlets are chosen to
familiarize students with prominent opinions, journals, and
organizations in the field.
The importance of citing and quoting research sources, along with the
challenges of plagiarism, are stressed.
Manage multiple perspectives
as appropriate
 No
If no, course may not be eligible
√ Yes
If yes, how will student learning be supported?
This course considers diverse viewpoints and stances on recent
controversies and issues. Students are encouraged to weigh different
arguments and perspectives, developing their own professional ethic
and approach. In recent years, senior undergraduate and graduate
students from several majors have enrolled, including from outside the
College of Forestry & Conservation.
Recognize the purposes and
needs of discipline-specific
audiences and adopt the
academic voice necessary for
the chosen discipline
Use multiple drafts, revision,
and editing in conducting
inquiry and preparing written
work
 No
If no, course may not be eligible
√ Yes
If yes, how will student learning be supported?
Source material features a variety of professional voices, from
exposition, rhetoric, bureaucratic and academic styles to authors
writing for a popular audience. Class discussion includes
appropriateness and effectiveness of different styles for different
audiences.
 No
If no, course may not be eligible
√ Yes
If yes, how will student learning be supported?
Students prepare outlines, conduct peer reviews of their colleagues
work, receive feedback on both content and writing, and are allowed
the opportunity to revise and resubmit their written work.
 No
If no, course may not be eligible
Follow the conventions of
citation, documentation, and
formal presentation
appropriate to that discipline
√ Yes
If yes, how will student learning be supported?
Instruction is given on topics such as adherence to the Publication
Manual of the APA, use of non-gender specific language, and the
assessment of origin of reference citations.
 No
If no, course may not be eligible
VI. Writing Course Requirements
Enrollment is capped at 25
students.
If not, list maximum course
enrollment. Explain how
outcomes will be adequately
met for this number of
students. Justify the request
for variance.
Briefly explain how students
are provided with tools and
strategies for effective writing
and editing in the major.
Which written assignment(s)
includes revision in response
to instructor’s feedback?
Yes, capped at 25 students.
Students are instructed in the value and use of outlines, peer reviews,
and editing of examination answers.
Mid-term exam receives peer review, as well as instructor feedback on
content, organization, and writing skills, and can be revised as part of
final exam.
VII. Writing Assignments: Please describe course assignments. Students should be required
to individually compose at least 20 pages of writing for assessment. At least 50% of the course grade
should be based on students’ performance on writing assignments. Quality of content and writing are
integral parts of the grade on any writing assignment.
Formal Graded Assignments
Short response essays (3 pages of writing, 20% of course grade), midterm exam (8 pages of writing, 25% of course grade), final exam (16
pages of writing, 35% of course grade).
Informal Ungraded
Assignments
Paste or attach a sample writing assignment, including instructions for students.
See syllabus
VIII. Syllabus: Paste syllabus below or attach and send digital copy with form.
The syllabus must include the list of Writing Course learning outcomes above.
Digital syllabus provided separately.
Download