Wyoming big sagebrush: efforts towards development of target plants for restoration Anthony S. Davis Center for Forest Nursery and Seedling Research, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho Kayla R. Herriman Center for Forest Nursery and Seedling Research, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho R. Kasten Dumroese USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, Idaho The “target seedling concept” • Targeting specific physiological and morphological characteristics that can be quantitatively linked with outplanting success “One Size Fits All” Does not apply to all outplanting projects With plant materials, quality is “fitness for purpose” • Quality must be defined at the outplanting site • Establishment – Key to restoration success – On some sites, direct seeding fails • Limiting conditions for germination – Wyoming big sagebrush has generally good survival once established – For other native plants, container seedlings tend to have higher establishment success • Largely unexplored for sagebrush Seedlings Initial cost can be high Can produce seed 3 to 5 years following outplanting Container type can influence seedling performance following outplanting Can allow for additional practices Study Objectives • Level of cold hardiness at end of growing season and start of outplanting season • Effect of container type on seedling morphology and performance following outplanting • Influence of field fertilization on performance following outplanting Plant Materials • Grown in Moscow, Idaho – Three container types (Styroblock™ ) • 112/105 ml, 415B (15.0 cm deep, 3.6 cm across) • 60/250 ml, 515A (15.2 cm deep, 5.1 cm across) • 45/340 ml, 615A (15.2 cm deep, 6.0 cm across) – Outplanted March 14 and 15, 2008 in Southern Idaho Site Description • Two field sites – Orchard – Mountain Home • Tilled • Untilled Orchard Mountain Home Experimental Design • At each site • Replicated 4 times – 3 container types × 2 field fertilization factorial • Container types (105, 250, and 340) • Fertilizer rates (0 or 7.5 g plant-1) – 10-12-12 Slow release fertilizer • Planted at 1 m spacing Environmental Data • Nursery – Chilling hours • Outplanting – Temperature – Precipitation – Soil moisture Cold Hardiness (Electrolyte leakage) • Conducted on 5 dates • Expose tissue samples to range of temperatures – -10°C, -20°C, -30°C, and -40°C, or a control 2°C – After thawing, measure initial EL on sections of leaves • Autoclave samples (125°C) – Attains total cell death, facilitating electrolyte release – Re-measure EL • Calculate % damage Initial EL ( Autoclave EL ) × 100 = % damage – Multiple regression used to calculate LT50 Morphology • All seedlings – Height – Root-collar diameter • Subsample – Root and shoot volume – Root and shoot dry mass Nursery Results • Low number of chilling hours • Container type did not affect cold hardiness • Container type influenced seedling size – Larger container = larger seedling Cold hardiness • Chilling hours tracked beginning September 1 • 26 October moved to hardening Chilling Hours Sample Date 5°C 10°C 5‐Nov 65 237 19‐Nov 125 499 5‐Dec 393 866 20‐Dec 677 1217 Cold hardiness Influence of container size 20 3.5 A Height Root-collar diameter a b Height (cm) 15 2.5 c 2.0 C 10 1.5 1.0 5 0.5 0 0.0 105 250 Container size (mL) 340 Root-collar diameter (mm) 3.0 B Field results • Results were different across sites – Tilling influenced environmental conditions • High mortality at Orchard (~15% survival) – Browse damage Soil Moisture Tilled Untilled 0.24 0.22 3 3-1 Volumetric soil water content (m m ) 0.26 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0 50 100 150 Days after planting 200 250 Mountain Home – Untilled Survival: 59% Container type: (340) 60% (250) 61% (105) 57% Field fertilization*: Unfertilized 64% Fertilized 55% Untilled Height Untilled Root-collar Diameter Untilled Volume Untilled Height and Root-collar Diameter A Untilled Volume Summary • Container type… Field fertilizer… Positively influenced: – Positively influenced: •Height •Root-collar diameter •Root volume •Dry mass – No influence: •Survival •Shoot volume •Gas exchange Root-collar diameter Shoot volume Shoot dry mass Negatively influenced: Survival Root volume No influence: Height Root dry mass Mountain Home – Tilled Survival: 38% Container type*: (340) 44% (250) 43% (105) 28% Field fertilization*: Unfertilized 44% Fertilized 33% Tilled Height Tilled Root-collar Diameter Tilled Volume Summary • Container type… Field fertilizer… Negatively influenced: – Positively influenced: •Survival •Height •Root-collar diameter •Root volume •Dry mass – No influence: •Shoot volume •Gas exchange Survival No influence: Height Root-collar diameter Volume Dry mass Gas exchange Outplanting… • Survival was greater at the untilled site – Container volume may not be a factor on moister sites • Field fertilization reduced survival • Seedlings grown in larger containers were larger at the end of the growing season Target plants… • Link seedling status to outplanting conditions • Cold hardiness was high in November and lower in March – Stress resistance • Container type is an important variable – Can produce larger plants in larger containers – Strong relationship between plant size and field performance Conclusion • Field fertilization can improve growth, but did not benefit establishment due to increased mortality – Formulation – Rate – Application Future Directions Nursery Managers Cold-hardiness Effect of pruning in the nursery Container type Land Managers Need to compare direct seeding and planting Compare cost per established plant Improve ability to meet objectives Identifying suitable method of field fertilization Acknowledgements • Funding – Great Basin Native Plant Selection and Increase Project – University of Idaho Center for Forest Nursery and Seedling Research • • • • • • • Annette Brusven Debbie Dumroese Heather Gang Rob Keefe Kiana Mhus Sue Morrison Jeremy Pinto • • • • • • • Don Regan Nathan Robertson Amy Ross-Davis Nancy Shaw Karen Sjoquist Eva Strand Maggie Ward www.nativeplantnetwork.org Celebrating 100 Years of Nursery Production at the University of Idaho • 14 – 16 July 2009 – Intermountain Container Seedling Growers’ Association – Intertribal Nursery Council – Western Forest and Conservation Nursery Association • Presentations, tours, and workshops