Water Quality and Weather Monitoring Research at Alabama A&M University Teferi D. Tsegaye

advertisement

Water Quality and Weather Monitoring

Research at Alabama A&M University

By

Teferi D. Tsegaye

Associate Professor/Assistant Director of

HSCaRS

Huntsville, AL Holiday Inn

June 9 ,2006

Objectives

 To develop a flood and drought forecasting tools for local, regional and continental scale Using USDA-

NRCS-SCAN data.

 To archive and provide near-real time data (tabular and graphical data) through the internet to end-users.

 To provide decision making tools for environmental managers.

USDA-NRCS Soil Climate Analysis Network

ALMNet was established by

Alabama A&M University in 2002

ALMNet

&

SCAN Stations

 Equipped with state-of-the-art in situ sensors that continuously record

Precipitation

Relative humidity

Soil heat flux

Soil moisture

Solar radiation

 Temperature (air & soil) and

 Wind (speed and direction)

 Depth of water table (selected sites)

Selected Field Sites

Morgan County (Stanley Farm)

Marshall County

(Hodge farm)

Madison County

(Bragg farm)

Limestone County

(Newby farm)

ALMNet Sites

Field Instruments and

Installation

Eddy Covariance Measurement of Energy Flux (CO

2 and Water Vapor) at AAMU in Hazel Green, AL

Mr. Maheteme Gebremedhin (Doctoral Graduate Student)

Advisor (Dr. Teferi Tsegaye)

Soils

Cumberland Plateau

 Ap--0 to 7 inches; brown fine sandy loam

 BE--7 to 11 inches; strong brown fine sandy loam;

 Bt--11 to 30 inches; strong brown sandy clay loam

 BC--30 to 42 inches; strong brown fine sandy loam;

 Cr--42 to 60 inches; yellowish brown and strong brown, level bedded, massive, weathered, sandstone bedrock.

Nauvoo Series

Tennessee Valley

 Ap--0 to 7 inches; dark reddish brown silt loam

 Bt1--7 to 20 inches; dark reddish brown silty clay loam

 Bt2--20 to 72 inches; dusky red clay

 Bt3--72 to 120 inches; dusky red clay, few fragments of chert

Decatur Series

Bodine Series

Highland Rim

Ap--0 to 5 inches; dark grayish brown gravelly silt loam

E--5 to 10 inches; pale brown gravelly silt loam

Bt1--10 to 28 inches; yellowish brown very gravelly silt loam, 50 percent fragments of chert

Bt2--28 to 60 inches; yellowish brown very gravelly silt loam with red and pale brown mottles,

50 percent fragments of chert

Data Collected

Distribution of Soil Moisture (%) at 5 cm

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

113 133 153

HARTSELLE

173 193

HODGES

213 233

Julian day

(2002)

253

HYTOP

273

NEWBY

293 313

WTARS

333

Distribution of Soil Temperature ( 0 C) at 5 cm

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

113 133 153 173

HARTSELLE

193 213 233 253

Julian day

(2002)

HODGES HYTOP

273

NEWBY

293 313

WTARS

333

The data is accessible through the Internet.

• Data may be viewed on the Internet at:

 http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/scan/Alabama/alabama.html

• Graphical results are available at:

 http://wx.aamu.edu/ALMNET.html

Water Quality Research

Introduction

Knowledge of the quality of North Alabama’s rivers and streams is important because of the impact that it has on human and aquatic health.

Integrated use of in-stream water quality data and modeling will likely improve the assessment and management of streams at the watershed scale.

Introduction

Cont’d

•Historically, North Alabama has been plagued with environmental problems.

•According to the EPA Toxics Release Inventory,

Alabama is the sixth most polluted state in the nation.

•Four of Alabama’s river systems are rated in the top ten most threatened rivers in the country.

Introduction

 A large number of water bodies in North Alabama fail to attain water quality standards due to the presence of one or more pollutants.

 Currently, there is a lack of water quality data to adequately address the status of water quality in North Alabama.

 Even though significant progress has been achieved in stemming pollution from point sources, major challenges remain from non-point sources.

 These challenges call for a focused effort to identify polluted waters for the purpose of developing TMDLs (Total Maximum Daily Loads) and implementing more effective BMPs (best management practices).

Introduction

Cont’d

According to the Alabama Department of Environmental Management

(ADEM) agriculture causes about 40% of the non-point source pollution (NPS) problems in Alabama.

Major type of agriculture = row crop

-cotton

-corn

-soybean

Two major sources of agricultural pollution

-eroded sediment

-animal wastes

Streams and Rivers in Northern Alabama

• In 2002, the USGS found that concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in water samples obtained from Flint

River generally exceeded thresholds indicating eutropic potential.

• Input of dissolved and suspended chemicals from the

Flint River during storms influences water quality in the reach of the Tennessee River from which the City of Huntsville,

Alabama, withdraws about 40% of its drinking water .

Streams and Rivers in Northern Alabama

Past Research (1999-2005)

 Integration of Remote Sensing and Geographic

Information System with a hydrology model to assess water quality in northern Alabama, (Tadesse and

Tsegaye, 2001).

 Assessment of non-point pollution sources in northern

Alabama using Geographic Information System and

Global Positioning System technologies, (Sheppard and

Tsegaye, 2002).

 A soil nutrient and water quality assessment for eight counties in central Alabama, (Long and Tsegaye, 2003).

 Assessment of Water Quality in the Flint River and

Flint Creek Watersheds for Future TMDL

Development, (Abdi and Tsegaye 2005).

Current Water Resource Related

Research at AAMU

YSI 6600 EDS - Extended

Deployment System

YSI 650 MDS Multi-parameter

Display System

FRV1MAR.DAT

12.20

11.30

10.40

9.50

8.60

7.70

15:41

1358.0

1061.4

764.8

468.2

171.6

-125.0

15:41

25.0

22.0

19.0

16.0

13.0

10.0

15:41

03/14/03

10:42

10:42

10:42

03/18/03

05:42

05:42

00:43

00:43

05:42 00:43

03/22/03

DateTime(M/D/Y)

03/26/03

19:44

19:44

19:44

03/29/03

388.0

285.4

182.8

80.2

-22.4

14:45

04/02/03

0.208

0.160

0.112

0.064

0.016

14:45

8.38

7.70

7.02

6.34

5.66

14:45

Spatio-temporal variability of nutrients in streams of

Flint River, Flint Creek, Indian Creek, Huntsville Spring

Branch, and Sipsey Fork Watersheds

Ms. Karnita Golson-Garner (Research Associate and

Doctoral graduate Student)

Advisor (Dr. Teferi Tsegaye)

Laboratory Analysis

BOD & Fecal Coliform

Heavy Metals & Phosphorus

TSS

Spatio-temporal variability of Heavy Metals in streams of Flint River, Flint Creek, Indian Creek,

Huntsville Spring Branch, and Sipsey Fork

Watersheds

Ms. Karnita Golson-Garner and

Mr. Dirk Spencer

(Research Associates)

Spatio-temporal variability of Organo-Chlorine and

Organo-Nitrogen Pesticides in streams of Flint River,

Flint Creek, Indian Creek, Huntsville Spring Branch, and Sipsey Fork Watersheds

Mr. Paul Okweye (Doctoral Graduate Student)

Advisor (Dr. Teferi Tsegaye)

Bio-assessment of aquatic organisms as indicators of water quality in streams of Flint River, Flint Creek,

Indian Creek, Huntsville Spring Branch, and Sipsey

Fork Watersheds

Dr. Rufina Ward

Ms. Allison Bohlman (Research Associate)

Beck’s Biotic Index

Three Classes of Pollution Tolerance or Sensitivity

Class 1: Macroinvertebrates Intolerant to Pollution

Ephemeroptera :

Mayfly

Plecoptera : Stonefly Trichoptera : Caddisfly www.epa.gov

Coleoptera : Water

Penny www.epa.gov

Coleoptera : Riffle

Beetle www.cals.ncsu.edu

Megaloptera : Hellgrammite

Beck’s Biotic Index

 2. Facultative Macroinvertebrates: Can Tolerate Some Pollution

Odonata : Dragonfly &

Damselfly

Diptera : Black Fly

Gastropoda :

Gilled Snail

Beck’s Biotic Index

 3. Tolerant Macroinvertebrates to Pollution

Diptera : Midges, Crane Fly, & Rat Tailed Maggots

Hirudinea : Leech

Gastropoda : Air

Breathing Snail

Screening Aerobic and anaerobic coliforms

µ-Trac 4200 Microbiological Analyzer

This compact impedance analyzer is user friendly and easy to operate, even by non-experts. The concept of 21 measuring places each one separately programmable in a dry block thermostat and administrated by a laptop computer is unchallenged in performance and possibilities. The µ-Trac reveals its strengths wherever microbiology is being performed on an absolutely minimum budget. The availability of pre-filled measurement cells eliminates the whole media preparation process. All hygiene-relevant microbiological parameters of production plants can be covered by this tiny genius in the simplest possible way.

Cont’d

Impedence & Water Sampling

 Preliminary Trends

• High Growth Rates

 Exponential Growth Curves

• Coliform Presence Positive over 95% in all samples

• Visual Confirmation:

Purple Yellow

Source Tracking and DNA-Fingerprinting of pathogenic and non-pathogenic organisms in streams of Flint River, Flint Creek, Indian Creek, Huntsville

Spring Branch, and Sipsey Fork Watersheds

Dr. Leonard Williams

800 bp

500bp

100 bp

Figure 1. Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of isolates detected from selected water samples.

Figure 2. Dendrogram based on UPGMA cluster analysis of 10 different RAPD obtained in this study.

Field Monitoring and Maintenance and

Calibration of Water Quality Instruments

Mr. Dirk Spencer (Research Associate)

Water Quality Modeling

Using

AQUATOX

Dr. Teferi Tsegaye

Overview: What is AQUATOX?

Simulation model that links pollutants to aquatic life

Integrates fate & ecological effects

• fate & bioaccumulation of organics

• food web & ecotoxicological effects

• nutrient & eutrophication effects

• Predicts effects of multiple stressors

• nutrients, organic toxicants temperature, suspended sediment, flow etc…

Why to use AQUATOX Model?

Managers need to know:

• Which of several stressors is causing the impairment?

Will proposed pollution control strategy lead to restoration of desirable aquatic community, as well as to improved chemical water quality?

Will there be any unintended consequences?

How long will recovery take?

AQUATOX Simulates Ecological Processes &

Effects within a Volume of Water Over Time

Run a Simulation and Examine Output

Output Window

Main Study Window

Run a Simulation and Examine Output

Study Site

HC is, a tributary to the Flint River.

Hester Creek

Land Use for the Flint River Watershed

It is primarily agricultural and forested land in northern Alabama and south-central Tennessee (U.S.

Geological Survey, 2002).

Urban and residential land represent a small (less than 1%), but growing part of land use in the watershed, as residential growth from the City of

Huntsville continues to spread.

• The Flint River is an important recreational and scenic resource.

• Local agencies are conducting riparian restoration projects to protect and enhance habitat for the diverse aquatic life along the Flint River.

• Among the several threatened species of fish and aquatic invertebrates found in the basin are the slackwater darter , Tuscumbia darter , and southern cave fish .

Results and Discussion

Daily Stream Flow

Hester Creek,1999-2003

0.45

Observed and Model Predicted Total Soluble

Phosphorous (mg/l)

Hester Creek,1999-2003

0.3

0.15

0

Jan-99 May-99 Sep-99 Jan-00 May-00 Sep-00 Jan-01 May-01 Sep-01 Jan-02 May-02 Sep-02 Jan-03

Observed_SOLTP Predicted_SOLTP

Observed and Model Predicted Total Ammonia-N

Hester Creek, 1999-2003

1.6

1.2

0.8

0.4

0

Jan-99 May-99 Sep-99 Jan-00 May-00 Sep-00 Jan-01 May-01 Sep-01 Jan-02 May-02 Sep-02 Jan-03

Observed_NH3-N Predicted_NH3-N

Temporal Variability of Fish Types, Population, and

Stream Flow

Hester Creek, 1999-2003

20

18

16

14

12

160000

120000

10

8

6

4

80000

40000

2

0

Jan-99 Jul-99 Jan-00 Jul-00 Jan-01 Jul-01 Jan-02 Jul-02 Jan-03

0

DOY

Shiner Bluegill Smallmouth Ba2_ Water Vol

Conclusion

 AQUATOX can be used as tools for assessment of nutrient and sediment pollution. However, the

AQUATOX model has large number of parameters that need to be adjusted for model.

 Measured data on discharge and other water quality parameters including NH3-N, TP, and TSS at multiple points in the watershed is critical for AQUATOX calibrations.

Cont’d

 Dynamics of fish, types, and population varies over time due to change temperature, stream flow and availability of food.

 The accuracy of the input parameters is critical for accurate model predictions.

 It has great potential to estimate recovery time for fish or invertebrates after reducing pollutant loads.

Acknowledgements

-School Of Agriculture and Environmental Science (AAMU)

-USDA-NRCS-SCAN

-USDA-CSREES

-Southern Region Water Quality Program

-Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station

-U.S. Geological Survey

-Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and

-All Collaborating Research Investigators and Students

Thank you

Download