Antecedent Precipitation Trumps Drought in Causing Southeast Arizona Wildfires

advertisement

Antecedent Precipitation Trumps

Drought in Causing Southeast

Arizona Wildfires

Andrew C. Comrie & Michael A. Crimmins

University of Arizona

December 17, 2004

Challenges to Mountain Water Resources and Ecosystems

American Geophysical Union, Annual Meeting

San Francisco, CA

Research Objectives

• Identify relationships between antecedent climate and wildfire statistics at a seasonal resolution

– Diagnose importance of warm/cool season fine fuels

• Develop predictive models based on antecedent climate conditions at critical lags

• Identify mechanistic links between climate variability, ecosystem dynamics and wildfire across southeast

Arizona

• Bottom line, given that AMJ fire season is always hot and dry:

– Role of drought v. wet periods for SE AZ wildfire?

Arizona CD7

Methods

• Identify critical variables/lags for current & antecedent climate-fuel relationships

– Correlation analyses between lagged climate variables and seasonal wildfire data (aggregated

April-May-June; total acres burned & total number of fires)

– Climate variables screened by significance of correlations and principal components analysis

– Regression modeling based on screened variables

• Wildfire data grouped into ‘high elevation’ and

‘low-elevation’ subsets

Wildfire Data

• Multi-agency wildfire data referenced by lat-lon coordinates and merged with digital elevation model

(~10% of events with no lat/lon reference)

• Fire events split into high elevation and low elevation datasets to separate fine vs. heavy fuel fire-climate relationships

– 1350m (4400’), high:48% / low:52%

– 1500m (4900’), 27% / 73%

– 1700m (5500’), 16% / 84%

• Breakpoints guided by Whittaker and Niering 1965

Elevation Gradients

1700 m

1500 m

1350 m

From: Whittaker, R.H. and Niering, W.A., 1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains,

Arizona: A Gradient Analysis of the South Slope. Ecology, 46(4): 429-452.

Arizona CD7

Reanalysis Grid

Point

Climate Data

Synoptic Scale Forcing

NCEP Variables

700zw = 700mb zonal wind

700mw = 700mb meridional wind

700om = 700mb omega

700rh = 700mb relative humidity

700sh = 700mb specific humidity

300gh = 300mb geopotential height

700gh = 700mb geopotential height

850gh = 850mb geopotential height

Surface Environmental Conditions

Arizona Climate Div. #7

Temp_anom = temperature anomaly

PHDI = Palmer Hydrological Drought Index

PMDI = Palmer Meteorological Drought Index

Z_index = Palmer Z-index

PPT_anom = precipitation anomaly

PDSI = Palmer Drought Severity Index

Surface Variable Subset

Arizona Climate Div. #7

Temp_anom = temperature anomaly

Z_index = Palmer Z-index

PPT_anom = precipitation anomaly

PDSI = Palmer Drought Severity Index

Screened Variables

•Significant Correlations (>95%) at any lag

•Subjected to PCA to reduce collinearity

•Combinations of lagged variables systematically regressed with wildfire data

0.2

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

-0.8

-1.0

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

-0.8

-1.0

Results Example: Upper Elevation (>1500m) TNF

Z-Index PDSI

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

-0.8

-1.0

Seasons

CD7 Precipitation Anomaly

Seasons

CD7 Temperature Anomaly

0.2

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

-0.8

-1.0

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

Seasons Seasons

April-May-June Total Upper Elevation Wildfires in AZ Climate Division #7: 1973-2001

35

30

25

20

15

Model

1 (Constant)

Unstandardized

Coefficients

B

.774

TANOM0

PANOM15

7.897E-02

.298

Std. Error

.037

.018

.054

a.

Dependent Variable: H2_CT

Standardi zed

Coefficien ts

Beta

.478

.615

t

21.046

4.301

5.538

Sig.

.000

.000

.000

R 2 =0.750 R 2 cv

=0.705

•Wet at lag 15 (JAS-3)

•Fine fuel production still important

•Short-term drying now important

10

5

0

Dec-73 Dec-76 Dec-79 Dec-82 Dec-85

Observed

Dec-88

Date

Predicted (cv)

Dec-91

Predicted

Dec-94 Dec-97 Dec-00

Regression Model Summary

Model

Upper Elevation

Total Area

Burned (TAB)

Upper Elevation

Total Number of

Fires (TNF)

Lower Elevation

TAB

Lower Elevation

TNF

Variables

R 2 (crossvalidation)

Precip(JAS, –3 yrs),

PDSI(DJFM, –1 yr)

0.431 (0.354)

Temp(AMJ, 0 yr),

Precip(JAS, -3 yrs)

Temp(AMJ, 0 yr),

Precip(DJFM, 0 yr)

Temp(AMJ, 0 yr), Z-

Index(DJFM, 0 yr),

Precip(DJFM, -1 yr)

0.750 (0.705)

0.505 (0.397)

0.354 (0.285)

Santa Rita Experimental Range Monitoring Data and Southeast Arizona Climate/Wildfires

180

160

140

120

1982-1983 El Nino

100

80

0

-2

60

40

20 -8

0

D ec

-5

3

D ec

-5

5

D ec

-5

7

D ec

-5

9

D ec

-6

1

D ec

-6

3

E. Lehmanniana

D ec

-6

5

D ec

-6

7

D ec

-6

9

Native Spp

D ec

-7

1

D ec

-7

3

D ec

-7

5

D ec

-7

7

Low Elev. AMJ Fire Counts

D ec

-7

9

D ec

-8

1

D ec

-8

3

CD7 PDSI

D ec

-8

5

D ec

-8

7

D ec

-8

9

D ec

-9

1

D ec

-9

3

12 per. Mov. Avg. (CD7 PDSI)

D ec

-9

5

D ec

-9

7

D ec

-9

9

-10

-4

DRY

-6

8

6

WET

4

2

Conclusions

• Fuels-limited: antecedent precipitation controls total area burned

– climate important in regulating high & low elevation (fine) fuel production

• Surprisingly, no significant negative correlations between precipitation and seasonal wildfire statistics were found at any seasonal lag

– i.e., Drought conditions were not associated with higher area burned or a greater number of fires

• Larger low elevation fires were actually associated with wet antecedent conditions until just before the fire season

• Larger high elevation fires were associated with wet conditions during seasons up to 3 years before the fire season

• Caveats:

– Study decades were unusually wet; wildfire-drought relationships?

– Linear predictive models in a non-linear world?

– Climate can only explain part of overall wildfire variability

• Just published

– Crimmins, M. A. and Comrie, A.C., 2004: Interactions between antecedent climate and wildfire variability across southeast Arizona. International

Journal of Wildland Fire 13, 455-466.

Download