Impacts of Car Fuel Efficiency Improvement on Health through Reducing Air Pollutants Qing Shi July 10th, 2013 Dept. Economics UNC Greensboro Contents Air Pollutants Health Impacts of air pollutants Fuel economy of automobiles Mandates on fuel efficiency of automobiles Research interests Data and preliminary results Air Pollutants and EPA Monitoring There are numerous air pollutants from natural and human activities Natural disaster (volcano, fire, etc) Transportation, construction, power plants, manufacturing, etc. * Automobile fuel combustion US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitors six principle air pollutants Ozone, Particulate Matter, Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, Lead Ambient air concentration and Emission Physical monitors (instruments) on geographic locations National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS – Clean Air Act 1990) EPA Air Quality System (AQS) (data and analytic applications) Air Pollutants from Automobiles (Transportation) Emission (from Fuel Combustion) Carbon Dioxide (CO2) --- Global Warming (catastrophic, abrupt climate change, increase spread of tropical disease), indirect health impacts Water(H2O) --- Help form hydrocarbons (HC), generate PM2.5 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Particulate Matter (PM) --- secondary from mixture above and other Lead (tinny from automobiles in US and EU, mainly from Aviation) Non-emission (worn particles of tire tread and brake linings) Heavy metals cadmium (Cd), chrome (Cr), nickel(Ni), lead (Pb) and arsenic (As), Contribute to PM10 (~67%) Impacts of air pollutants on health US EPA • Respiratory (air way) inflammation, irritation, allergic reactions • Cough, breath difficulty, damage to lung or air way • Increase symptoms of asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis, etc • Adverse effects on nervous system • Developmental damage to youth • Organ damage (heavy metals) • Genetic mutation and carcinogenesis (long term exposure) • Death (toxic air pollutants) Pollutant Main source Health impact Carbon Monoxide (CO) Emitted from combustion • processes (mobile source • mainly, > 90%) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Emissions from cars, trucks and buses, power plants, and off-road equipment • Adverse respiratory effects including airway inflammation and increases respiratory symptoms (asthma, emphysema and bronchitis) Originate from natural processes, human activities, car emissions, and construction • Irritation of the airways, coughing, and difficulty breathing. Reduced lung function, Aggravated asthma, Chronic bronchitis • Irregular heartbeat, Nonfatal heart attacks • Some cancers • Hits people with lung disease, children, older adults, active outdoorers Reduce lung function and increase respiratory symptoms (asthma, bronchitis, emphysema), and infections Trigger a variety of health problems including chest pain, coughing, throat irritation, and congestion Particulate Matter (PM) • • PM2.5 (2.5mm) PM10 (10 mm) Ozone (O3, ground level) Chemical reactions between oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) Harmful health effects by reducing oxygen delivery through blood, may cause myocardial ischemia Death at extreme level (Form Ozone) • • Sulfur Dioxide(SO2) Fossil fuel combustion at Adverse respiratory effects including bronchoconstriction and power plants (73%) and increased asthma symptoms other industrial facilities (Form PM) (20%) Lead (Pb) Near lead smelters Air plane piston-engine • Adversely affect the nervous system, kidney function, immune system, reproductive and developmental systems and the cardiovascular system • Developmental deficits in youth Efforts in Reducing Mobile Source Air Pollutants Emission Reduce toxic contents (Unleaded fuel) Raise Emission standards Fuel consumption Pricing/Taxation on fuel --- (fuel is relatively inelastic ? ) Fuel efficient cars* --- reducing unit travel fuel consumption Alternative fuel --- Ethanol, biodiesel, Hybrid cars Crude Oil Price and Vehicle Usage 350 300 250 Per Capita Miles (kMiles) 200 Nominal Price ($/Barrel) 150 [1] [2] Inflation Adjusted Price ($/Barrel) 100 [3] 1.00000 -0.91257 <.0001 -0.89279 <.0001 -0.91257 <.0001 1.00000 0.99727 <.0001 -0.89279 <.0001 0.99727 <.0001 1.00000 2004 2006 50 0 1994 1996 1998 2000 Data sources: [1] US DOT Highway Statistics [2] US DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics 2002 2008 2010 2012 Importance of Fuel Efficient Automobiles American depend heavily on cars in daily activities US has more cars than any country else in the world 0.797 car p.c, 2010 World Bank data Largest crude oil consumer 18.55 m. Barrels (29% more than Europe, 81% more than China), 2012 US EIA Data Oil is non-recyclable natural resource Driving emits pollutants (Dusts, CO, NO2) and CO2 Pollutants hurt human health CO2 contributes global warming Mandates on Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Fuel efficient car benefits less fuel expenditure --- primary goal less emission (pollutants to the air) due to reducing fuel consumption better environment and health outcome Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Enact in 1975 to reduce the consumption of oil through vehicle fuel efficiency Set 27.5 MPG for passenger cars and 20.7 fro light trucks from 1985 ~32 MPG 25 MPG Weaken in Reagan and Bush Administration strengthen in Clinton and Bush Administration from 2012 Improvements in Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Average US Light Duty Vehicle Fuel Efficiency MPG 30.0 20.0 One-the-Road Passenger Cars 10.0 On-the-road Light Trucks New Passenger Cars New Light Trucks 0.0 1978 1986 1994 2002 2010 Year Data source: US DOT NTS Motivations of Research Does more and more fuel efficient cars on the road make less pollutants? Will this have good health benefits? Can we quantify analytically? Policy advice? Can we establish the following causal links? More efficient cars Less Fuel consumption Less air pollutants Better Health Outcome Approaches Fuel efficiency improvement over time (MPG measurement) Air pollutant reduction over time (Air quality measurements) Medical service reduction over time (respiratory disease claims from elders ) Challenge How to attribute the reduction of air pollutants to improvement of car fuel efficiency How to attribute reduction of medical claims to reductions of pollutants Research Aims 1. Proportion of fuel efficient cars over time in the state (or county if possible) level (US) through vehicle registrations data and determine Improvement of car fuel efficiency 2. Air quality improvement over time and the association between fuel and air quality improvements 3. Heath outcome improvement: chronicle respiratory disease (eg. asthma) among elders, state (county) level number of medical claims and causal relationship 4. Cost-benefit analysis and policy implications Econometric model and Estimation Framework Panel Data Models (state/county, year) 1. Air Pollution on Fuel efficiency πππ = π(ππΉππ + π½πππ ) + ππ + πππ 2. Health outcome and Pollution π»ππ = β(πΏπππ + π½πππ ) + ππ + πππ Where F is the measure of fuel efficiency, X is other economic factor, environmental factor and state level demographics, economy condition to control for, P is the pollutant measure, H is the health outcome measure, g(.) is a transformation function that models either linear or non-linear regression, h(.) is a transformation function Data All data are state (aggregate level)/year panel data Ranging from 1995 ~ 2011, annual 50 States + 1 Districts Vehicle registration Data (US DOT Highway Statistics) numbers and categories of vehicle Miles travels (by functional system and kind of vehicle) Fuel Sales/Consumption Gasoline, Gasohol, Diesel US GDP data (US BEA) Per capita, total, manufacturing, non-agriculture .. Air quality Data (EPA AQS) NO2, CO, PM2.5, … Fuel efficiency MPG = miles travel/fuel volume aMPG (all fuel combined) gMPG(gasoline and gasohol) Preliminary results Fuel Efficiency and Air Quality Change Fuel Efficiency and Air Quality Change Over Time (US Aggregate) 80 Source Data: Fuel Efficiency -- US DOT, derived Air quality -- US EPA 70 60 50 40 30 MPG Carbon Monoxide 20 Nitrogen Dioxide 10 PM2.5 0 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Note: Scales of y-axis does not necessary reflect the absolute values 2010 2012 Preliminary results Summary Statistics of Data Variable Year State Miles per Gallon (MPG) N 17 (1995 ~2011) 50 816 Mean Std 16.43001 1.54603 Carbon Monoxide Nitrogen Dioxide PM2.5 GDP (Million Dollars) 773 766 631 720 5.073998 49.48683 28.83216 245267.4 3.229526 17.91408 7.081231 285936.6 Manufacturing GDP (Million Dollars) 718 30468.24 33553.24 Non-Agriculture GDP (Million Dollars) 718 243426.7 283673.9 Per Capita GDP (Thousand Dollars) 720 39201.54 7240.724 Trucks % Farm Trucks% Truck Trailors% Pickups% Vans% SUV% 816 689 816 816 816 816 43.99354 1.668049 0.857585 19.22714 7.985282 11.42 8.624289 2.538825 0.5653424 6.405132 3.194305 4.472487 Source Data: Fuel Efficiency -- US DOT, Air quality -- US EPA Preliminary results Model Estimates Simple Fixed Effect Panel Data Models yst= X st β + α s + ε st Where s represents individual state, and t represents year X: MPG, GDP, and other regressors A statistically significant negative coefficient on MPG variable indicates improvement in fuel efficiency improves air quality (by decreasing the pollutant) (Note: Alaska, Hawaii and District of Columbia are excluded from the model) Fixed Effect Model Estimates I . (no year effect) Table 1. CO on All Fuels MPG Predictor MPG, all fuel Carbon Monoxide, Second Highest 1-hour Measurement -0.570**** (0.1288) -0.558**** (0.1172) -0.376** (0.1170) -0.047 (0.1341) GDP, non-agriculture (billion dollars, chained 2005) GDP, per capita (thousands dollars, chained 2005) %truck, all %bus %truck/tractor -0.451**** (0.0420) -0.296**** (0.0478) -0.302* (0.1181) -0.028 (0.1340) -0.023**** (0.0028) -0.014**** (0.0030) -0.009* (0.0044) -0.141* (0.0592) -0.180**** (0.0290) -3.482* (1.7218) -0.499**** (0.1218) -0.217**** (0.0279) -2.178 (2.0262) -4.236* (1.7498) -3.107 (2.0325) 0.600 (0.3443) 0.016 (0.1312) 0.483 (0.3403) -0.008 (0.1318) %pickup 0.398**** (0.0592) 0.406**** (0.0587) %van -0.321**** (0.0389) -0.335**** (0.0396) %suv -0.297**** (0.0363) -0.316**** (0.0336) %farm trurk Note: * Significant at 0.05; ** Significant at 0.01 ; *** Significant at 0.001; **** Significant at 0.0001 Fixed Effect Model Estimates Table 2. NO2 on All Fuels MPG Predictor MPG, all fuel Nitrogen Dioxide, the 98th percentile of the daily max 1-hour measurements -3.035**** (0.6641) -3.090**** (0.6459) -2.007** (0.6483) -1.177 (0.7721) GDP, non-agriculture (billion dollars, chained 2005) GDP, per capita (thousands dollars, chained 2005) %truck, all %bus -1.230**** (0.2164) -0.469 (0.2439) -2.766**** (0.6441) -1.893** (0.6387) -1.357 (0.7634) -0.091**** (0.0148) -0.051**** (0.0160) -0.038 (0.0247) -0.099 (0.3100) -0.985**** (0.1606) -21.494* (9.7097) -0.926**** (0.1533) -24.988* (11.8145) -22.521* (9.6640) -26.574* (11.8300) %truck/tractor 0.828 (2.0088) 0.637 (1.9562) %farm trurk -0.509 (0.7517) -0.544 (0.7526) %pickup 1.270**** (0.3412) 1.173*** (0.3368) %van -1.384**** (0.2258) -1.251**** (0.2346) %suv -0.959**** (0.2094) -0.844**** (0.1972) Note: * Significant at 0.05; ** Significant at 0.01 ; *** Significant at 0.001; **** Significant at 0.0001 Fixed Effect Model Estimates Table 3. PM2.5 on All Fuels MPG Predictor MPG, all fuel PM2.5, the 98th percentile of the daily average measurements -1.288**** (0.2758) -1.269**** (0.2656) -0.658** (0.2504) 0.064 (0.2829) GDP, non-agriculture (billion dollars, chained 2005) GDP, per capita (thousands dollars, chained 2005) %truck, all %bus %truck/tractor %farm trurk -0.588**** (0.0867) -0.091 (0.0924) -0.659** (0.2458) -0.034 (0.2827) -0.051**** (0.0062) -0.025**** (0.0063) -0.006 (0.0094) 0.099 (0.1118) -0.656**** (0.0622) -6.909 (3.7757) -1.138**** (0.2603) -0.581**** (0.0586) -0.908 (4.3413) -0.111 (0.7318) 0.017 (0.2816) -6.970 (3.7287) -0.444 (4.3515) 0.011 (0.7125) 0.020 (0.2824) %pickup 0.754**** (0.1262) 0.709**** (0.1246) %van -0.690**** (0.0817) -0.623**** (0.0845) %suv -0.701**** (0.0756) -0.638 (0.0711) Note: * Significant at 0.05; ** Significant at 0.01 ; *** Significant at 0.001; **** Significant at 0.0001 Fixed Effect Model Estimates II . (with year effect) Table 4. CO on All Fuels MPG Predictor MPG, all fuel Carbon Monoxide, Second Highest 1-hour Measurement 0.031 (0.1099) -0.003 (0.1128) 0.022 (0.1123) 0.013 (0.1353) GDP GDP, manufacturing GDP, non-agriculture GDP, per capita -0.074 (0.0559) -0.080 (0.0555) %truck, all 0.093** (0.0353) %bus -2.276 (1.5857) 0.024 (0.1107) 0.051 (0.1102) 0.032 (0.1345) -0.002 (0.0028) -0.003 (0.0028) -0.005 (0.0045) -0.104 (0.0721) 0.093** (0.0355) -2.656 (1.9975) -2.358 (1.6000) -3.368 (1.9908) %truck/tractor 0.796* (0.3579) 0.720* (0.3519) %farm trurk 0.007 (0.1281) -0.009 (0.1285) %pickup 0.211** (0.0744) 0.197** (0.0740) %van -0.061 (0.0896) -0.055 (0.0903) %suv -0.181** (0.0645) -0.176** (0.0644) Note: * Significant at 0.05; ** Significant at 0.01 ; *** Significant at 0.001; **** Significant at 0.0001 Fixed Effect Model Estimates II . (with year effect) Table 5. NO2 on All Fuels MPG Predictor MPG, all fuel Nitrogen Dioxide, the 98th percentile of the daily max 1-hour measurements -1.016 (0.6466) -0.854 (0.6692) -0.779 (0.6704) -0.605 (0.7864) -1.111 (0.6499) -1.023 (0.6510) -1.048 (0.7742) -0.023 (0.0168) -0.025 (0.0168) -0.021 (0.0256) GDP GDP, manufacturing GDP, non-agriculture GDP, per capita 0.283 (0.3021) 0.264 (0.3020) %truck, all -0.055 (0.2216) %bus -17.945 (9.7532) 0.515 (0.3739) -0.055 (0.2217) -27.609* (11.7196) -18.713 (9.8204) -25.674* (11.7260) %truck/tractor -0.713 (2.1568) 0.082 (2.0803) %farm trurk -0.609 (0.7395) -0.612 (0.7434) %pickup 0.160 (0.4395) 0.245 (0.4363) %van -0.933 (0.5118) -0.903 (0.5165) %suv 0.313 (0.4055) 0.254 (0.4038) Note: * Significant at 0.05; ** Significant at 0.01 ; *** Significant at 0.001; **** Significant at 0.0001 Fixed Effect Model Estimates II . (with year effect) Table 6. PM2.5 on All Fuels MPG Predictor MPG, all fuel PM2.5, the 98th percentile of the daily average measurements 0.117 (0.2258) 0.287 (0.2316) 0.280 (0.2323) 0.478 (0.2538) 0.058 (0.2261) 0.059 (0.2267) 0.299 (0.2538) -0.013* (0.0059) -0.013* (0.0060) 0.002 (0.0086) GDP GDP, manufacturing GDP, non-agriculture GDP, per capita 0.303** (0.1032) 0.295** (0.1032) %truck, all -0.104 (0.0735) %bus -3.959 (3.3520) 0.344** (0.1201) -0.102 (0.0737) -3.447 (3.8044) -4.329 (3.3803) -1.614 (3.8289) %truck/tractor 0.377 (0.6790) 0.853 (0.6623) %farm trurk -0.039 (0.2445) -0.023 (0.2473) %pickup -0.013 (0.1410) 0.043 (0.1412) %van 0.232 (0.1709) 0.225 (0.1736) %suv -0.173 (0.1226) -0.215 (0.1229) Note: * Significant at 0.05; ** Significant at 0.01 ; *** Significant at 0.001; **** Significant at 0.0001 Preliminary Results 1. Improvement in Fuel Efficiency 2. Improvement in Air Quality 3. Association between Fuel Efficiency and Air Quality Future Direction 1. Causal Links 2. Categorize cars by type, average age of cars 3. County level registration 4. County Level Air quality, control for population 5. Medical data and relationship