KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY Department of Special Education

advertisement

KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY

Department of Special Education

SPU 300 Reading, Writing, and Teaching Literary Braille, Nemeth Mathematics Code, and

Other Braille Codes

COURSE DESCRIPTION

This course provides knowledge and skills in Nemeth braille, grade 3 braille, and extended experiences in reading and writing grade 2 braille. This course includes the use of slate and stylus in preparing drills, assignments, and in taking notes. Advanced methods of teaching braille are emphasized. Braille music and foreign language braille is introduced. Other forms of computer braille are introduced and used in assignments. 3 s.h. 4 c.h. Prerequisite: SPU 200.

RATIONALE

This course is designed to prepare students to approach the concept of a visual disability and individuals with a visual disability in a systematic and reflective manner. The course is intended to translate theory into practice and to provide applicable information for dealing with exceptional learners in diverse and multicultural settings. SPU 300 is designed to inform the student about the body of research literature that is available on braille, including educational, ethical, and political issues.

A mastery of braille is necessary for the teacher to communicate effectively with the blind and low vision student. A knowledge of the system of Nemeth braille and the skills to use the system are needed to enable the student to relate to math and science. Grade 3 braille is an individualized form of braille used at advance levels and is necessary for students to know as they progress in the educational environment. Braille music provides a tactile means of reading music.

Foreign language braille is necessary for instruction and the preparation of materials for students in foreign language classes. With the advent of access technology,computer braille systems are necessary for students in accessing printed material, reading braille, and writing braille.

OBJECTIVES

The term “visual impairment” includes students with and without additional disabilities. At the completion of the course the teacher candidate will demonstrate:

1.

2.

Advanced skills in reading and writing uncontracted (grade 1), contracted

(grade 2), and grade 3 literary braille.

Knowledge and strategies of the correct use of the slate and stylus.

3.

4.

5.

6.

The ability to identify errors, correct errors, and inkprint materials at an advanced level.

Advanced knowledge of braille textbook format.

Advanced knowledge of computer braille.

Basic knowledge of braille music.

1

7.

8.

Understanding of foreign language braille.

Knowledge of advanced strategies and the ability to teach the literary braille code to children with visual impairment who are blind or have low vision, including those who are culturally diverse.

9. Knowledge of and strategies for prepaing students with progressive eye

conditions to achieve a positive transition to alternative skills, including braille

reading and writing.

10. Knowledge of, strategies and skills in adapting, and modifying materials in

11.

12.

13.

14. braille, accessible print and other formats.

Strategies and skills in the use of the braillewriter, slate and stylus, and computer technology to produce Braille materials.

Skills in the selection and use of technologies to accomplish instructional objectives for individuals with visual impairment.

Skills in preparing, obtaining, and organizing special materials to implement instructional goals for students with visual impairment.

Strategies and skills in teaching the Braille writer, slate and stylus, and computer technology for braille to children with visual impairment who are blind or have low vision, including those who are culturally diverse.

15. Tramscribe, proofread, and interline braille materials in uncontracted and contracted braille and Nemeth braille code with and without errors.

16. Skills in formatting math textbooks and worksheets using the Nemeth braille code.

17. The ability to teach the Nemeth braille code to children with visual impairment who are blind or have low vision, including those who are culturally diverse.

18. The ability to teach computer braille to children with visual impairment who are blind or have low vision, including those who are culturally diverse.

19. The ability to teach the music and foreign language braille code to children with visual impairment who are blind or have low vision, including those who are culturally diverse.

20. The ability to critically discuss issues and trends in special education and the field of visual impairment and the unique characteristics of students with visual impairments, including students with multiple disabilities or deafblindness, from diverse multicultural settings and the influence of the characteristics and experiences on educational assessment, diagnosis, placement, instructional planning, and management.

ASSESSMENT

Assessment of each student’s level of accomplishment with reference to course objectives will be based upon a subset of the following:

1. Explain the parts and the functions of the slate and stylus during role playing sessions as a teacher introducing the slate and stylus to a student with visual impairment.

2

5.

6.

4.

2.

3.

Demonstrate advanced knowledge of braille textbook format, computer braille, braille music, and foreign language braille be creating worksheets and learning materials using the braille codes.

Create braille and print twin vision children’s books, edit other students work for braille and formatting errors using contracted and uncontracted braille.

Demonstrate knowledge of the Nemeth Code for Math and Science in reading and writing braille in homework, formatting and production of text book material, worksheets, and in-class tests.

Role play a teacher for students with visual impairment introducing other forms of communication used by persons with visual impairment, including multiple disabilities.

In case studies, successfully create effective educational interventions for students, including diverse cultural background, psychosocial implications, and varying additional disabilities in the instruction of literary braille, computer braille, foreign language braille, and the Nemeth Code.

COURSE OUTLINE

I. Introduction

A. The use and care of the slate and stylus

B. Grade 3 braille

II. Writing and Reading Braille

A. Writing the literary braille code, grades 1, 2, and 3

1. Slate and stylus

2. Perkins Braille Writer

B. Advanced reading and inkprinting the braille literary code, grades 1, 2, and 3

C. Advanced textbook formatting

III. Writing, Reading, and Inkprinting the Nemeth Code

A.

B.

Introduction to the Nemeth code

Use of the Nemeth code for math

IV. Braille Music Code

V. Foreign Language Code

VI. Advanced Braille Instruction for Students with Visual Impairment

A.

B.

Introduction of braille to advantageously blinded students

Correct use of the slate and stylus

C. Introduction and use of Nemeth Code for math instruction

D. Introduction and instruction of the braille music code

E. Introduction and instruction of the braille foreign language code

F. Multicultural considerations for braille instruction

3

VII. Computer Braille

A. Use of braille translation programs in the production of braille

1. Braille Edit Express for Apple/Macintosh systems

2. Mega Dots for IBM systems

3. Other translation programs on the market

VIII. Trends, Issues, and Related Research

A.

B.

C.

Legal issues in braille assessment and instruction

Advanced disability specific skills instruction

Disability specific research

INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES

Ashcroft, S. C., Henderson, F., Sanford, L., & Koenig, A. J. (1991 ). New programmed instruction in braille . Nashville: Scalars Publishing.

Barraga, N. C. (1976). Visual handicaps and learning . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing

Company, Inc.

Cates, D. L., & Sowell, V. M. (1989). Using computers to improve braille reading speed: A review of the literature. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness,83 , 361-364.

Corn A. L., & Erin, J. N.. (2010). Foundations of low vision: Clinical and functional and functional perspective second edition.

New York: American Foundation for the Blind.

Craig, R. (1989). Learning the nemeth braille code: A manual for teachers . Louisville:

American Printing House for the Blind.

Crespo, S. E. (1989). The braille system in Latin America. Journal of Visual Impairment and

Blindness, 83, 317-318.

D’Andrea, F.M,, Holbrook, M.C. & Emerson, R.W. (2007). Acquisition of literacy skills by young children who are blind: Results from the ABC Braille study. Journal of Visual

Impairment and Blindness, 103 .

Ely, R. (1989). Writing, computers, and visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment and

Blindness, 83 , 248-252.

Ferrell, K. (1992). Reach out and teach: Meeting the training needs of parents of visually and multiply handicapped young children.

New York: American Foundation for the Blind.

Gashell, J. (1988). Nation convention calls for braille literacy. Future Reflections, Fall 31-32.

Goodman, S. A., & Whittenstein, S.H. (Eds.) (2003). Collaborative Assessment: Working with students who are blind or visually impaired, including those with additional disabilities.

New York: American Foundation for the Blind.

Gosche, B. Schwartz, A, & Wells-jensen, S (2007). A congnitive approach to brailling errors.

Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 101 , 296-302.

Holbrook, M.C., Koenigh, Rex, E.J. (2010). Instruction of literacy skills to children and youths with low vision. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.

Hannan, C.K. (2007). Exploring assessment procedures in specialized school for the blind.

Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness,101, 211-224 .

4

Huebner, K. M., Pricket, J. G., Welch, T. R., & Joffee, E. (1995). Hand in hand: Essentials of communication and orientation and mobility for your students who are deaf-blind . New

York: American Foundation for the Blind.

Kapperman G., & Stricken, J. (1998). The braillewriter as a calculation tool. RE:view, 30 ,

65-84.

Knowlton, M., & Berger, K. (1999). Competencies required of braille teachers. RE:view, 30,

147-151.

Koenig, A. J., & Holbrook M. C. (1989). Determining the readiness medium for students with visual impairments: A diagnostic teaching approach. Journal of Visual Impairment and

Blindness, 83 , 296-302.

Koenig, A. J., & Holbrook M. C. (1991). Determining the reading medium for visually impaired students via diagnostic teaching. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 85 , 61-68.

Koenig, A. J., & Holbrook M. C. (1992). Teaching braille reading to students with low vision.

Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 86 , 44-47.

Krolick, B. (1975). How to read braille music . Champaign: Stripes Publishing.

Leigh, S. A., & Barclay, L. A. (2000). High school braille readers: Achieving academic success. RE:view, 32, 123-131.

Lueck, A. H. (1999). Setting curricular priorities for students with visual impairments.

RE:view, 31 , 51-54.

Mack, C. (1989). The impact of technology on braille literacy. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 83 , 314.

Ratanasit, D., & Moore, M. M. ( 2005). Representing graphical user interfaces with sound: A review of approaches. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 99, 69-84.

Rex, E. J. (1989). Issues related to literacy of legally blind learners. Journal of Visual

Impairment and Blindness, 83 , 290-293.

Rex, E. J. (1992). A Review: New programmed instruction in braille. Journal of Visual

Impairment and Blindness, 86 , 239-240.

Rex, E. J., Koenig, A. J., Wormsley, D. P., & Baker, R. L. (1994). Foundations of braille literacy . New York: American Foundation for the Blind.

Sacks, S. A., & Silberman, R.K. (1998). Education students with have visual impairments with other disabilities . Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Schroeder, F. K. (1989). Literacy: The key to opportunity. Journal of Visual Impairment and

Blindness, 83 , 290-293.

Spungin, S. J. (1990). Braille literacy: Issues for blind persons, families, professionals, and producers of braille . New York: American Foundation for the Blind.

Stephen, O. (1989). Braille - Implications for living. Journal of Visual Impairment and

Blindness, 83 , 288-289.

Suvak, P. A. (1999). What do they really do? Activities of teachers of students with visual impairments. RE:view, 30 , 181-19.

Swenson, A. M. (1989). Using an integrated literacy curriculum with beginning braille readers.

Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 83 , 366-368.

Whittle, J. (1993). Building braille reading speed: Some helpful suggestions, The Braille

Monitor , May, 720-723.

5

Wormsley, D.P. (2011). A theoretical rationale for using the individualized meaning-centered approach to Braille literacy education with studdtns who have mild to moderate cognitive disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 105 .

Wormsley, D. P. (2004). Braille literacy: A functional approach.

New York: American

Foundation for the Blind.

Wormsley, D. P. & A’Andrea, M. F. (1997).

Instructional strategies for braille literacy . New

York: American Foundation for the Blind.

Zook, R. (1993). Reading the literature. The Braille Monitor , January, 706-709.

Revised 6/2012

6

Download