Undergraduate Program Data Analysis Report
Program Name: SEDU English
Date: 04/09/2014
Contact Person: Heather-Lee Baron
Directions:
1. Review the program assessment data located in D2L.
2. List the 6 to 8 assessments for each program in the box provided for Program
Assessments. Examine the data collection for each program. Be sure to review both the
fall and spring data collection. Answer the following questions for each program
assessment placing the information in the appropriate column:
o What does the data indicate for your program?
o What areas of concern if any do you have regarding this assessment?
o What recommendations do you have regarding any revisions for this assessment?
o What program changes if any does this data suggest?
3. Save the template as a Word document and submit it to the NCATE Assessment
Committee via a D2L dropbox provided in the Accreditation-NCATE link by April 9th .
Undergraduate Unit Data
Program
Assessment
Praxis II
Grades
Portfolio
Assessment
Data Analysis
Recommendations
There is a 94% pass rate
for those students took
the English Language
Lit Comp Content
Knowledge (0041)
exam.
All students must
receive a “C” grade or
higher in all of the
courses required for the
program of study.
These are the courses
that align with the
NCATE/CAEP
standards.
Based on the scores
received by the English
candidates, all
Purposefully share this
information with the English
Department, offer TestTaking Workshops/tutoring
and continue our
collaborative efforts.
Continue to require students
to earn a “C” grade or higher
in all courses in the program
of study that align with the
NCTE/CAEP standards.
Continue the collaboration
between SEDU 484:
Instructional Techniques for
Implementation
Date
Fall 2012
Continue
Spring 2013
Modifications
Spring 2014
Fall 2012
Continue
Spring 2013
Spring 2014
Fall 2012
Modifications
Spring 2013
candidates have met the
NCTE standards and are
proficient in their field.
PDE 430
Instructional
Techniques
Unit Plan
The Spring 2013 data
shows that out of 13
English candidates 77%
scored “exemplary” or
“superior” in the area of
Planning and
Preparation and 15.4%
scored “satisfactory”
and 7.7% scored
“unsatisfactory”.
The remaining areas are
as follows: Classroom
Environment= 84.6%,
7.7% and 7.7%.
Instructional Delivery=
84.7%, 0% and 15.4%.
Professionalism=
61.5%, 23.1% and
15.4%.
There were a total of 9
students who completed
the English Unit Plan in
Spring 2014. All 9
students scored “Target”
or “Acceptable” on all
of the NCTE Standards
assessed using this tool,
except one student who
scored “developing” on
the first set of standards.
Teaching English and SPED
370: Adapt. & Accom.
Inclusive Clsrm. During the
students’ “Block” classes.
This appears to have made a
difference b/c all 6 English
candidates earned a ‘Target’
on their Portfolio.
This must be brought to the
attention of the instructors of
SEDU 465: Instructional
Techniques for the Teaching
of English so that all of these
areas are thoroughly
addressed and continue using
the PDE 430 form and have
all instructors assess
consistently.
Spring 2014
Continue teaching unit
planning, analyzing the
results, and modify teaching
practices based on the data.
Model aligning assessments
with lesson objectives for the
teacher candidates and
provide practice before
assigning the Unit Plan.
Fall 2012
Continue
Spring 2013
Spring 2014
Fall 2012
Continue
Spring 2013
Modifications
Spring 2014