Undergraduate Program Data Analysis Report
Program Name: SEDU English
Date: 04/18/2013
Contact Person: Heather-Lee Baron
Directions:
1. Review the program assessment data located in D2L.
2. List the 6 to 8 assessments for each program in the box provided for Program
Assessments. Examine the data collection for each program. Be sure to review both the
fall and spring data collection. Answer the following questions for each program
assessment placing the information in the appropriate column:
o What does the data indicate for your program?
o What areas of concern if any do you have regarding this assessment?
o What recommendations do you have regarding any revisions for this assessment?
o What program changes if any does this data suggest?
3. Save the template as a Word document and submit it to the NCATE Assessment
Committee via a D2L dropbox provided in the Accreditation-NCATE link by April 9th .
Undergraduate Unit Data
Program
Assessment
Praxis II
Grades
Portfolio
Assessment
Data Analysis
Recommendations
Implementation
Date
Spring 2013
There is a 100% pass rate for
those students who completed
the program. All of them
scoring at/above the national
average.
Purposefully share this
information with the
English Department and
continue our collaborative
efforts.
All students must receive a “C”
grade or higher in all of the
courses required for the
program of study. It is these
courses that align with the
NCTE standards.
Continue to require
students to earn a “C”
grade or higher in all
courses in the program of
study that align with the
NCTE standards.
Fall 2012
Continue Spring
2013
Based on the scores received
by the English candidates, all
candidates have met the NCTE
standards and are proficient in
their field.
Although all candidates
met NCTE standards with
a proficient score there
was a trend of lower
scores in the area of
Fall 2012
Modifications
Spring 2013
PDE 430
Instructional
Techniques
Unit Plan
Most of the 21 teacher
candidates scored 2s and 3s on
a 3 point scale. Only two
students scored 1’s. There did
not appear to be any correlation
between low scores and a
particular area of assessment
(planning & preparation,
classroom environment,
instructional delivery, and
professionalism), rather if a
student scored low in one area
he/she also scored low in other
areas.
The average score for the
lesson plans within the Unit
Plan was 47.58/50. Not one
student received an overall
grade below an ‘A’. The
section of planning that
appeared to be the most
challenging for the students
was aligning the assessments
with the objectives.
Learning Differences.
Based on this finding
there will be more
collaboration between
SEDU 484: Instructional
Techniques for Teaching
English and SPED 370:
Adapt. & Accom.
Inclusive Clsrm. During
the students’ “Block”
classes.
Continue using the PDE
430 form and to have all
instructors assess
consistently.
Continue teaching unit
planning, analyzing the
results, and modify
teaching practices based
on the data. Model
aligning assessments with
lesson objectives for the
teacher candidates and
provide practice before
assigning the Unit Plan.
Fall 2012
Continue Spring
2013
Fall 2012
Continue
Spring 2013