:
«
,
•
*
'
'
-
-
'
^
N
,
' .
•.
•.••'•
•
'
-
•
•
•
• V - ' : v ' : -
" ^
••
•
•
;
' . ; - '
'•••
; '
• • • • -
-
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OP
THE vTUNxOR COiJISGE DXS'JCRICT OP
ST. LOUIS « ST. LOUIS COUHTY, MISSOURI
MpJflpAY^.OCJTOBER 22^.1962
•
A meeting of t h e Board of T r u s t e e s of The J u n i o r C o l l e g e D i s t r i c t
of S t . Louis - S t . Louis County, M i s s o u r i was h e l d on Monday, October
22,
1962 i n t h e new C e n t r a l Office of t h e D i s t r i c t a t 4386 I d n d e l l
Boulevard, S t . Louis 6 , M i s s o u r i .
Board P r e s i d e n t Williamson c a l l e d t h e meeting t o o r d e r a t 1:00 pm
Th
f o l l o w i n g members of t h e Board of T r u s t e e s were p r e s e n t :
A
>.j
Mrs. Joseph C Bastian
" 1 ••>,, ,.
Messrs* Lester C. Geil
Morris Glaser
Guy S. Ruffin
P. Wm. McCalpin
Gerald V. Williamson
Also present at the meeting were President Joseph P. Cosand,
Vice-President John E. Tirrell, Vice-President James w* Hobson, VicePresident Robert C. Jones, of the Junior College, and Mr* Bruce E.
Woodruff of the firm of Armstrong, Teasdale, Roos, Kramer & Vaughan,
counsel for the District.
Mr. Williamson suggested that since the Agenda was quite crowded,
and the members of the Board of Trustees v\*re limited as to time, th
minutes of the previous meeting be dispensed with until the next s ssion of the Board* The Board members agreed to this.
Mr* McCalpin, Treasurer, submitted the Treasurer's Report. Each
Board member received a mimeographed copy* The report is as follows:
(o e n xt page)
Octobar 22, 1962
W
REPORT OF JEJffi, J^ASURER
Since the las'c report of the undersigned to this Board, the following income has been received:
City of St. Louis
H rchants' taxes
Manufacturers' taxes
$6,443,80
2,518.10
$8,961.90
The balance in the several bank accounts of the District as of
noon this date, was as follows:
Mercantile Trust Company
$35,406.49
Manchester Bank of St. Louis
1,140.96
Pursuant to the resolution adopted on October 8, 1962, The Junior
College District on October 11, 1962, purchased $80,000.00 face valu
United States Treasury bills to mature February 28, 1963, at a price
of 98.953556 to yield 2,77% to maturity. The net amount paid for said
bills was $79,162.84.
Respectfully submitted,
P. Wra. McCalpin, Treasurer"
1
P
Mr. Geil moved that the Treasurer's Report be accepted as submitted.
The motion was seconded by Mrs. Bastian, and upon the vote,
the motion was carried unanimously.
Board President Williamson stated that inasmuch as the gentlemen
from the McDonnell Automation Center had been waiting for the Board
for quite some time, he would like to invite them into the Board room
to present their automation proposal. Consequently, Mr. C. T. Salisbury, Manager of Marketing Services, and Mr. D. G. Hogan, Marketing
Representative, appeared before the Board.
Mr. Salisbury advised Mr.
Williamson that the report from the McDonnell Automation Center had
been revised, in accordance with the discussion which took plac
th
Executive Session on October 16, 1962. Th
«• 2 —
at
changes occur on Page
< V-;-'--'' "'.'' ' - • ' ' . • '
•.
. .
'
"
I'J'.--.''• '
4 of the report. The following paragraph has keen inserted on that
^$W
pages
"Billing will be rendered monthly to cover work performed in the
preceding month. Terms are thirty days net from date of invoice or,
at the option of The Junior College District of St. Louis - St. Louis
County, all invoices may he paid upon completion of the project anticipated to be in February, 1963".
The reports were circulated among the members of the Board.
Mr. McCalpin moved that the proposal of the McDonnell Automation
Center be accepted, and that the Board authorize the President to
accept the proposal.
Mr.
Geil seconded the motion.
Board President Williamson stated that the proposal was opeit for
discussion. Dr. Cosand said that inasmuch as Mr. James u. Hobson
would be working very closely with the men from McDonnell, he would be
interested to learn of his reaction to fheir informal meeting, h Id
before the Board Meeting. Mr. Hobson said that he v?ould, of course,
b
very pleased to work with the McDonnell men. He added that they
had had a very informative, interesting discussion, in the short time
they were together, and he recommends their program whole-heartedly.
Mr.
John E. Tirrell, Vice-President in charge of Instructional
Services, added that he, personally, felt that the Board of Trustees
could look upon this as an investment over the next five years, rather
than an immediate recommendation.
Dr.
Cosand stated that an operation of this type, started in the
arly stages of the formation of The Junior College District, was a
very unique und rtaking,, The University of Missouri, for instance, is
just now delving into data processing.
"" 3 •*
Vice-President Tirrell added
that tho services would be useful, later on,-in teaching/ End in. .the
area of testing.
Mr. Williamson called for a vote on the proposal which was presented by the McDonnell.Automation Center. It was passed, unanimously
by the Board of Trustees.
Mr. Salisbury stated that McDonnell is looking forward to the
association with the Junior College. The fact that it is a unique
undertaking makes it doubly attractive. Mr. Williamson, as Board
President, and Mrs. Bastian, as Secretary of the Board, signed the
report of the McDonnell Automation Center.
It was sealed with the
official Seal of The Junior College District of St. Louis - St. Louis
County, Missouri.
Board President Williamson then asked the Board of Trustees to
consider the employment of Dr. Glynn Clark, as Director of the first
college campus as recommended by President Cosand. A general discussion followed concerning this recommendation.
Whereupon, on motion by Mr. Ruff in and seconded by Mrs. Bastian,
the following resolution was proposed:
RESOLVED, That Dr. Glynn Clark be elected to the position of
Director of the first college campus, said employment to become effective Noveraber 5, 1962, at an annual salary rate of
$14,500 for 11 months' services during the fiscal year July 1,
1962 to June 30, 1963t said salary to be prorated on the basis
of services rendered for the remainder of the current fiscal
year in accordance with the salary range for Campus Director
which is hereby established as $14,000 to $16,000 per annum
with increments of $500.00 per year.
FURTHER RESOLVED, That Dr. Clark and the District execut
a contract on a form provided by the District, said contract
to be signed by the President and Dr. Clark, and filed with
the District's records.
Voting for the resolution were Board members Williamson, Glaser,
Ruffin and Bastian. Voting against the resolution w re Board members
McCalpin and Gail.
Board Preaident Williamson stated that upon the
«• 4 —
vote the resolution carried 4 to 2. President Cosand to advise Dr.
Clark of his appointment.
Board President Williamson then asked the Board of Trustees to
consider the employment of Mr. Vincent E. Freeman, as Registrar of the
District and as recommended by President Cosand.
A general discussion
followed concerning this recommendation.
Whereupon, on motion by Mr. Geil, seconded by Mrs. Bastian and
upon a unanimous vote of all the members of the Board, it was:
RESOLVED: That Mr. Vincent E. Freeman be elected to the position of Registrar of The Junior College District; said employment to become effective Thursday, November 15, 1962, at an
annual salary in accordance with Step 4, Classification II of
the salary schedule previously adopted by the Board, together
with an additional remuneration of 75% of said Registrar's
monthly salary for each of two extra months' services to be
rendered to the District, or total working period of 11 months
during the fiscal year; said total remuneration will, therefore, be $9,545.00 for an eleven month period and shall be
prorated on the basis of services rendered for the remainder
of the fiscal year.
FURTHER RESOLVED, That Mr. Freeman and the District shall
execute a contract on a form provided by the District; said
contract to be signed by the President and Mr. Freeman and
filed with the District's records.
Board President Williamson asked President Cosand to advise Mr.
Freeman of his appointment.
Board President Williamson then asked the Board Members if there
were any matters to be brought before the Board on points no. 3 (Curriculum and Instruction) and no. 4 (College Facilities).
none, and so Mr. Williamson moved on to point no. 5.1:
Reports.
There were
Purchase order
5.11 Printing of brochures for prospective students.
President
Cosand asked the Board for authority to go ahead with the proposed
printing.
5.12 Electric Typewriter.
President Cosand advised the Board
that there was no advantage in leasing an electric typewriter, and
asked the Board for permission to buy another IBM Electric Typewriter
17* Portfolio -"11 type.
- 5 -
=
u,.
•
V""
"
•
;
/
^P
-
.
.
-
.
•
•
•
•
'
,111,
. . .
•
•
'
'
•
•
•
'
.
„
•
-
.
, ,
-
.
•
•
'v-
/
//
,
. A . V
• / ' M
• - " ' . _
,
-
.
:
•
:
.
:
,
,
-
5.13 Pitney Bowaa Stamp Machine. President Cosand told the Board
that it was the consensus of opinion that we were ready for a Pitn y
Bowes stamp machine. In informal conversation, he told the Board that
we would be permitted to use one on a trial basis to see if it were
pertinent to our needs*
5.14 Additional office furniture aa needed to furnish the second
floor offices.
President Cosand told the Board that it would be necessary to
purchase the additional office furniture around November 1.
Board President Williamson asked for a motion \*ith respect to
these purchase order reports. Mr. McCalpin moved that the President
be authorized to proceed with these purchases, Mr. Ruffin seconded
the motion, and upon the vote, the motion was unanimously approved.
5.2
Board President Williamson asked for a motion with respect
to the payment of claims —
the payment of personnel. The Executive
Secretary, Mrs. Dolores Tygard, asked for permission to change the
social security figure for October, from §36.11 to $34.72. Mr.
Williamson granted this approval. Mr. McCalpin moved that the claims
be paid, and Mrs. Bastian seconded it. It was approved unanimously.
5.3
Board President Williamson moved to the next order of busi-
ness, tlie Payment of Claims. Mr. McCalpin moved that the Board approve the payment of claims which are listed on pages 7-A and 7-B. Mr.
Glaser seconded the motion. Discussion followed: Mr, McCalpin raised
a question on item 5.4, which reads as follows:
"Payment of Claims (Special Fund)* Expense account allowanc
for authorized attendance at CJCA Conference in Fresno, California, and visits to ten junior college campuses in California.
($250.00 each) for Board Members Mrs. Joseph C. Bastian and
Mr. Guy S. Ruffin.
It was the feeling of Mr. McCalpin that this should rightly come
from the Incid ntal Fund, rather than.the Special Fund. Mr. McCalpin
9t
also felt it would be advisable to apply for air travel credit cards
for the District.
The Board members agreed to thin. The motion to approve the payment of claims was passed unanimously.
5.2 Payment of Claims
5.21 Payment of Personnel:
Alma Dougherty, Administrative Secretary
Julia Bishop, Administrative Secretary
386.00
Dolores Tygard, Executive Secretary
339.17
Joseph P. Cosand, President
•
$386.00
1,750.00
Joseph P. Cosand, retirement annuity
333.33
Social security for September
16.96
Social security for October
:[•
34.72
Quality Employment Office
223.00
Armstrong, Teasdale, Roos, Kramer
and Vaughan
Public School Retirement Fund of Missouri
10/1/62 to 10/31/62
1,506.50
50.40
5.22 Payment of Claims, for Applicants (Special Fund)
James !7. Hobson
$55-70
Richard E. White
73.96
Gayle Simmons
107.60
Sheraton-Jefferson Hotel
5.3
42.32
Payment? of, Cftftfans (Incidental F u n d )
immm
x$m
SPST
1 . Blue D o t Messenger Serv.
Messages
$
2. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Book
3. Color-Art Prtg. & Staty.Co. Inv. 29688 Stationery Items
m ? -
4.75
5.40
305.80
,
VENDOR
ITEMS
,
COST
4. SW Bell Telephone Co.
Telephone Service
5. IBM Corporation
Ribbons
24.00
6. Dictaphone
Dictabelt Records
10.46
7. A.B. Dick Products Co.
In v. 53992 «*• Correction fluid
Stationery $ 5.96
Inv. 54627 « Stationery
Ink
Protective Covers
46.73
Inv. 55046 - Mimeograph 415.00
Inv* 55249 - Polders,
Paper
56.10
Inv. 55066 - Stencils
Ink
22.92
Inv. 55550 - Stencils
5^40
$
64.28
552.11
8. Keller Sign Company, Inc.
Sign
9. Vandervoort's
Merchandise
95.00
3.50
10. Acme Storage & Moving Co.
Drayage (10/1/62)
11. Werreraeyer Prtg. Company
Merchandise
135.00
12. S. G. Adams
15276 - Pencils, Copy Notebooks, Pens
$ 6.40
15279 - Staplers, Removers,
Paper, Pads, Envps.
Erasers, Rulers 74.88
15280 - Cards, folders
labels
53.56
15312 - Staplers
7.88
14156 - Chairs, upholstering
110.00
16190 •* Rubber Stamp
1.92
16165 - Pens
4.41
16179 - Piles, Guides
6.48
16248 - Envps. trays,posts7.44
15934 - Binder, Bookends 19.06
16496 - Staplers,Staples 9.40
16413 - Staplers, Shears,
Pens, Piles
12.32
17072 - Rubber bands,
labels, rulers, 15.89
dictionary
17073 - Clock, Guides __2&tI2.
$
358.36
Bulletin, Croft
165.00
Inv.
13. Croft Educational Services
44.35
14. P rsonal Expenses
Joseph P. Cosand
1. Automobile
$21.86
2. Meals for Applicants 10.25
3« Board Luncheons
JL2.f„pp
$
44.11
15. Dolores Tygard (Postage)
50.00
5.4 Payment, of Claims (Special Fund)
Expense account allowance for authorized attendance
at CJCA Conference in Fresno, California, and visits
to tea junior college campuses in California. ($250.00
each) Board Members: Mrs. Joseph Bastian;
Mr. Guy Ruffin
500.00
President Cosand told the Board that over fifteen letters had
been mailed to directors and presidents of California colleges, and
these gentlemen had indicated that they were most anxious to have Mr.
Ruffin and Mrs. Bastian visit their campuses, so that they could show
them the physical and technical aspects of the different colleges.
Board President Williamson moved to the next point on the Agenda
no. 6:
6.1.
Student Personnel Services. He asked the Board to consid r
Scholarships and Loans:
Mr. Williamson asked the Board members if they felt they had had
sufficient time to consider the framework of the plan outlined on the
supplemental report, or did they prefer to take this up at the next
meeting•
Mr. McCalpin raised a point concerning the word, "tuition", in
the phrase, "Scholarship and Tuition Aid, Loan Basis". He felt there
was a distinction in terminology*
A discussion ensued
among Mr.
McCalpin, Mrs. Bastian, and Mr. Glaser, regarding the selection of the
individual recipients of the scholarships which will eventually be
offered to The Junior College District. Dr. Cosand added the point
that it is the privilege of the donor to "define" the scholarship, but
it is the perogative of the Board of Trustees and the faculty members
- 9 -
^ '
J)
/
/
to "select" the donor,. He added that he, p rsonally, f It it would
be wiser to discourage tight definitions in the wording
of the actual
scholarships*
Board President Williamson added that it was his intention to
merely set up a framework for the people who would be sending in
scholarships. Ee suggested that the Board review the situation at the
next Board meeting, to be held on November 12, 1962.
Board President Williamson then moved on to point 6.2 Admission
Standards.
He moved that the Board consider the Admission Standards recommended by President Cosand on the supplemental report. A discussion
followed, led by Mr. McCalpin. He indicated that it would be advisable to use the correct corporate name in the wording of the Admission
Standards. It had been noted as "Junior College District for St.
Louis - St. Louis County" when it was, correctly, "The Junior College
District of St. Louis - St. Louis County, Missouri". Mr. McCalpin
went over the Admission Standards, point by point, with all of the
Board Members entering into the discussion. The following is the
corrected form of admission standards, as discussed in the meeting of
the Board of Trustees:
"6 STUDEWT PERSONNEL SERVICES
6.2 Admission standards
The President recommends that the Board of Trustees consider the
adoption of the following admission standards for students applying
for admission to any one of the campuses to be established by The
Junior College District of St. Louis - St. Louis County, Missouri.
- 10-
1. Students residing in The Junior College District shall be
admitted provided they have completed a:-: approved high school course
\
or the equivalent thereof as determined by Sue Junior College District
2.
Students not residing in The Junior College District may be
admitted provided they are in the upper two-thirds of their high
school graduating class, and if they score above the 33rd percentile
in the college entrance examinations to be used by The Junior College
District of St. Louis - St. Louis County, Missouri.
3. All entering students shall be required to take such
ntrance
tests as may be required by The Junior College District. These tests
will be used in counseling students concerning enrollment in th
various programs and classes offered by The Junior College District,
and may in certain instances determine which courses and programs a
student may take.
4. All entering students whose test scores place them in th
lower third, based upon national norms, shall be admitted on academic
probation and shall be limited to not more thaxjj twelve college credits
in their first semester. Probationary students failing to achieve a
grade average of "c" at the end of the £ir*t semester are subject to
dismissal, but may be retained under such conditions as may be approved by the Scholastic Standards Committee of The Junior Colleg .
5. Any student whose cumulative average is less than "C" at the
end of any semester shall be placed on academic probation for th
fol-
lowing semester and may be subject to dismissal if his average is not
raised to a "C" at the end of the probationary semester. Any student
whose average is below M C M at the end of a probationary semester will
be allowed to register for further course work only under such conditions as may be imposed by th
Scholastic Standards Committ o.
- 11 -
6. Any student on academic probation from another college, or
dismissed for academic reasona from another college, shall be admitt d
only with the express approval of the Vice President in charge of
Instructional Services and shall ie on probation for his first semester at The Junior College.
7.
Students dismissed from The Junior College for academic
reasons may petition the Scholastic Standards Committee, or the Vice
President in charge of Instructional Services, for a reconsideration
following an absence of at least one semester from The Junior College.
If any reconsideration is granted, the student would be admitted only
en academic probation. Ir. any case, no student would be given reconsideration v/ho had been dismissed for academic reasons more than once.
8. No diploma or certificate of completion, or any other award
for academic achievement, shall be granted to any student achieving
less than a "Cu average in the educational program for which the diploma, certificate of completion, or award is granted."
A further point was raised by Mr. Ruffin when he indicated that
the word "dismissal11 in point no. 4 is perhaps a bit harsh, and the
word, "withdraw" might be substituted as a more tactful phrase in
dealing with the student. It was the consensus of opinion, however,
that the word, "withdraw" might prove to be ambiguous, and it would
be well to use the original word, "dismissal".
Mr. McCalpin also raised the point that itrins no. 5 and no. 8
are not necessarily constituted as "admission" standards, but are mor
correctly "academic" standards. Perhaps they would belong with grading technioues and procedures,
£k
It was the general opinion, however, that these points would
remain in the original docum nt.
Board President Williamson asked for a motion from th Board of
• W&
Trustees, concerning the admission standards of The Junior College
District of St. Louis - Gt. Louis County! Missouri• Mr. McCalpin
moved that the Board adopt the standards, as amended. Mrs. Bastian
seconded the motion. It was approved unanimously.
Board President Williamson then asked President Cosand if h
would bring the Board up to date on the results of his meeting with
high school principals concerning temporary locations.
Presid nt
Cosand showed the Board an architectural drawing of one high school,
and showed them how various class rooms and study halls could be
partitioned, or made into areas suitable for the technical needs of
the college. He said that the school authorities were extremely cooperative, and if the Board were interested he felt it would be appropriate to call a meeting with appropriate officials with respect
to negotiation .
A general discussion developed, with respect to the advantag s
and disadvantages of location.
Dr. Cosand also asked the Board how they would feel about two
campuses; one in the southern part of the city, and one in the
northern part of the city «— both campuses to be under the guidance
of a single campus director.
Board President Williamson asked President Cosand to pursu th
matter and to report to the Board at its next regular meeting.
President Cosand presented copies of a resolution regarding the
formation of a Coordinating Council for Higher Education. He asked
the Board Members to read the resolution, and he asked Board President
Williamson to present it at the next regular meeting in November.
President Cosand had an appointment to speak befor a group of
*
- 13 -
*
•
ducators in St, Louis, and he asked the Board to excuse him.
V;ym
Board President Williamson asked the Board i£ there were any
further business to be brought before the Board. There was not, and
Mr. McCalpin made a motion that the meeting be adjourned. Mr. Glaser
seconded the motion, and it was unanimously approved at 3:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Mrs. Joseph C. Bastian, Secretary
Board of Trustees
Junior College District
- 14 -
^
16 October 1962
Dr. Joseph P. Cosand
Junior College District of St. LouisS t . Louis County
4386 Lindell Boulevard
St. Louis 8, Missouri
i
Dear Dr. Cosand:
The following outlines the sccpe of the services which the McDonnell
-
Automation Center proposes to furnish relative to the establishment of
i
i
over-all operating procedures
or the Junior College District of St. Louis-
St. Loui i County.
S^J\
As detoi mined by our preliminary d . ' s c u s s i o n s , we recommend our s e r v i c e s
be used to evaluate the over- dl systems requirements of the District and
to design the n e c e s s a r y data I undling master p l a n .
We will a l s o , as a
part of our proposed effort, develop recommendations for implementing
the operating procedures to be e s t a b l i s h e d ,
implementation v/ill evolve
in s t a g e s based on the expected growth of the d i s t r i c t .
|
Our recommen-
dations will include a plan indicating when the use of data processing
f
t
equipment will become a d v a n t a g e o u s .
}••
I
The bro.id areas of consideration to be evaluated are:
(1) General Aeoount-
iny-~the financial and property accounting <.n\d controls lor all funds;
(2) Student Accounting—the pi ocas sing and record keeping n e c e s s a r y to
|
regulate and lecoid student emu teacher a c t i v i t i e s ; and (3) General
Administration—the records a quired tor the over-all regulation, direction
•
IflVIUlUN
O F fiU'UONIVliU.
SUHOtiAfiT
©
Dr. Joseph P. Cosand
Page 2
junior College District of St. LouisSt. Louis County
16 October 19G2
and control ot the District as predicated by the policies ai.d practices
specified by the District admi listration.
The following are some of the
functions included in the above categories:
Gen:;ral Accounting:
t General Ledger,. Appropriation Control,
i utigetary Control, Cost Distribution, Payroll
Receipt Accounting, Voucher System,
lurchasing, Inventory Control, Equipment
Mid Property Records, Lunchroom Accounting,
\J/
i nd Contract Control.
Stuc ent Accounting:
1 eyistration, Student Scheduling, Grade
i .cportiny, Student Recoids, and Attendance
u ccounting,
General /yU'riinistration:
i ersonnol Administration, Custodial and
Maintenance, Health, Welfare, Research,
Gurriculum, State and federal Reports.
All systems and procedures ck veloped will be designed to eifectivcly and
economically meet lim data lu sidling M\<.\ c.-'ntiol requirements of the- junior
College DtsuicL.
They will al '.o be designed to facilitate conversion to
automated implement u lion .
i:
iliwiiiHiniiiiiinHiinini
'iiiitHWiiMUfliyiMiii^T.MiiPiiKi'fiifli^ih. ^
IIIII
«JMBMBHBBWIB«^^
--••..'
»
¥
©
Dr. ]ose ,h P. Cosund
Page 3
,
Junior Gallege District of St. L o u i s St, Louis County
16 October 1962
It is understood that Automation Center personnel will work in cioso
eoordinaaon with the D i s t r i c t ' s Vice Presidents in charge of Instruction
and Business Administration ar.d other persons who may be d e s i g n a t e d .
The District will constantly be advised as to the Automation C e n t e r ' s
progress.
As each phase or drea i s completed, it will be made available
to the District for detail design and implementation.
On comp.etion of our s t u d y , a formal report will be submitted containing
our findings and c o n c l u s i o n s .
This report will c o n s i s t of:
O
1.
Our findings relative to the over-all requirements of mo D i s t r i c t .
2.
A total systems design incorporating the requirements a b o v e .
3.
A detail presentation of each specific area a n a l y z e d , including
logical work flow diagrams and report data requirements.
(The
more detailed t a s k s :. ucii as preparation of specific report
formats and writing of specific job descriptions will be
considered the r e s p o n s i b i l i t y of the Junior College District and
outside the scope of our proposed
4.
services.)
Recommendations for effective immediate implementation and
iuture conversion to automated t e c h n i q u e s .
, f
•
The estimated charges lor our s e r v i c e s ate $JU, 0U0.00 b a s e d u n a total
;
,
iK-;--
of 3<i5 n a n - d a y s oi. olfort to complete the total system requires'.,ant
..
.„,.,._„„_„
, ,.
„._.„.„,.,. .,...„„•,, . , , ' ,
.,
...„,
„„.,>„„
„
,„.„,
,„..,
,,.„.,..,,„-„,.,.:..,„„..,„.,.„. „ ,,;;.
;•
.•
; z^\
' .Vey
Dr. Joseph P. Cosand
Junior C o l l e g e D i s t r i c t of S t . e o u i s St L o u i s C o u n t y
e v a l u a t i o n and d e s i g n .
baye '
16 O c t o b e r 10GX
The c s a r g e s w i l l bo i.'illed to you at it;:' iai.es
specified below:
.L'.i_:2llLJ>:z} -?,:-M-ir D a y
Project Coordinator
S 12 0 , 0 0
Senior Systems Analyst
$ 100.00
Systems Analyst
3
80.00
B i l l i n g will bo r e n d e r e d m o n t h l y t o c o v e r work p e r i o u n e a in t h e p r e c e d i n g
month.
„._
Terms are t h i r t y d a y s n e t train d a t e o i i n v o i c e o:\ at t h e o p t i o n of
t h e Jun.or G o l l e y o D i s t r i c t of St. L o u i s - S t „ L o u i s Count..', a l l i n v o i c e s may
(J
bo p a i a upon c o m p l e t i o n of tii • p r o j e c t a n t i c i p a t e d to be iii i e o i u a r y iObo..
The soi v i c e s of t h e IvicDonncT
A u t o m a t i o n (Center s t a t e d :n i h i s p r o p o s a l
offer Lin: Junior C o l l e g e D i s t r i :t of S t . L a u i s - S t . Lotus C c u m y t h e
o p p o r t u n i t y to c o m m e n c e o p e r a t i o n s w i i h o b j e c t i v e - , s y s t e m a t i c and
complex- operating piocedurot .
w i l l no
D e v e l o p i n g a l o t a l s y s t e m at t h i s t i m e
o n l y aid i n i t i a l l y in e s t a b l i s h i n g o p e r a t i o n s but will a l s o p r o m o t e
the d e s i i e d o b j e c t i v e oi lapiu g r o w l s .
The M c D o n n e l l Automation C e n t e r i s u n i q u e in o i l e n u g a c o n s u l t i n g
s e r v i c e p r e d i c a t e d on c e t i e n s T ' o p r a c t i c a l e x p e r i e n c e in s y s t e m s d e s i g n
and a u t a u a t i o n t e c h n i q u e s .
Our e x p e i i o n e e t r a n s c e n d s bath t h e >neas
ei g e n e al s y s i o i u s d e v e i o p m o it tmd s p e c r u e soho..'l a d m a n . . I : . stson ,
Stalling
<iuei e p e t ..itiiig o n e eT t i l e i a i a e s t
J U S ! . a l l . i i J o U S oi. e x . . p : e o X . X ? i;..;
*
/^\
^
Dr. Joseph P. Cosand
Junior College District of St. L o u i s St. Louis County
Puge !>
lu Ootoboi Hi02
and computer facilities in the United S t a t e s , we ore constantly aware of the
l a t e s t equipment c a p a b i l i t i e s and application t e c h n i q u e s .
Our clients
receive the benefits of this practical experience in the solution of their
specific systems and data processing problems,.
We urge your immediate approval of this p r o p o s a l .
This effort would be a
major undertaking under any circumstances; the anticipated completion r a t e
of 1 February 1963 makes it advisable that we begin as quickly as p o s s i b l e .
It has been most enjoyable working with you. We appreciate your interest
XJ/
in our s e r v i c e s and your efforts towards making t h i s proposal possible,.
We are looking forward to serving you.
Very truly y o u r s ,
MCDONNELL AUTOMATION CENTER
D . G „ Hoy a n , Marketing Representative
L. O . Zuefle, Manager Systems Services
C . T, SaLisbuiy, Manager oi bLukafiuq
-•'
ACCEPTS D:
junior C!-jli»:*jif JJl.'UiicL of Jit. ioui;;*-;ii. I.uuiii Uouui.y