Denise Scott MM, BA, RN-BC Manager HIT Consulting Masspro Should physicians be reimbursed for the medical care/advice they currently provide outside of a visit if it: • Improves patient access to care • Reduces office visit utilization • Allows for better management of patients with chronic conditions while • Increasing patient and provider satisfaction? 2 Secure electronic communication improves access to service and improves efficiency and communication, therefore Secure electronic communication is probably a useful tool to use in medicine. 3 Is there a role for electronic visits in the management of the Medicare population? Will the Medicare population use the technology? Does payment for electronic visits incentivize use by physicians? Is there a cost savings or cost neutrality in reimbursing physicians for e-Visits ? Does communicating via secure messaging improve patient and physician satisfaction? 4 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) ◦ Yael Harris PhD. - Project Officer Abt Associates – Contractor Masspro – Technical Assistance Private payers Regence Providence Health Plan Anthem Kryptiq –Secure messaging technology 5 Pilot project in two diverse delivery areas Providence Health & Services Portland, Oregon Large metropolitan healthcare delivery system Eastern Maine Healthcare System Bangor, Maine Large rural healthcare delivery system 6 Recruitment of 50 primary care providers for intervention and 50 control practices with similar demographics in each state ◦ Intervention sites were to adopt secure messaging technology within first year of the pilot ◦ Control sites were to refrain from adopting secure messaging technology for the duration of pilot 7 Baseline surveys –patient and physician satisfaction Original intent - analyze claims data of Medicare patients using the technology HITECH Act Qualitative study from audited charts of Medicare patients Additional analysis by sites 8 Refinement of definition Physician payment Rate of adoption Rate of implementation Registration process Physician acceptance Geography 9 1) Must be an established patient 2) Patient presents with a clinical problem 3) Complaint reviewed within the context of the medical chart 4) A change in plan, reaffirmation of current plan or a new plan is communicated Physician to respond within 1 business day 10 E-Visits – 80% of 99212 ◦ 20% audit with denial or reduction possible ◦ Partial payment if e-visit was followed within 72 hours by an office visit - $15.00 reduction ◦ Amount paid to physicians varied by site Secure Messaging – $5.00 per member per year ◦ Rx refill, appointment request, referral request, return lab results, questions 11 Analyze 20 different data elements abstracted from a 20% random sampling of all submitted claims Use patterns Potential impact on delivery of care Potential impact on clinical outcomes 12 • • • • • • Usage by age/gender Usage beyond office hours of physician Response time to messages Number of exchanges to deliver plan of care Usage by patients with chronic disease and co-morbidities Treatment recommendations 13 Total e-Visit Distribution by Age Group 16% 13% 8% 35% 28% < 65 65-69 70-74 75-79 >80 e-Visits by Those Over 80 Age 80 83 84 85 87 88 89 90 94 97 # of e-Visits 1 3 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 e-Visit Usage by Gender Male Female 55.1% 44.9% 14 Time Patient Wrote Initial e-Mail 12 MN – 9AM 18% 9AM - 12 noon 15% 12 noon– 5PM 5PM-12MN 22% 45% e-Mail Sent During and After Office Hours Outside of In Office Office hours Hours 59% 41% 15 Response Times to Initial e-Mails More than 24 Hours 16% Less than 24 Hours Less Than 12 Hours 61.70% Less Than 6 Hours 45% Less Than 3 Hours 34.30% 84% 16 Number of e-Mail Exchanges to Communicate Plan 73% 23% 1 2 4% >2 Patient-Physician e-Mail Exchanges 17 Number of e-Mail Exchanges to Communicate Plan e-Visits for Existing Problems e-Visits for New Problems 79% 58% 39% 3% 17% 1 2 3% >2 Patient-Physician e-Mail Exchanges 18 e-Visit Distribution by Chronic Disease (n=71) Arthritis 6 *Other Hyperlipidemia 11 19 Diabetes 20 Hypertension 40 *Other includes: Stroke, Depression, Celiac Disease, Asthma, Alcoholic Hepatitis 19 Days of the Week Initial e-Mail was Written 6% 20% 13% 23% 21% 17% Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday/Sunday e-Visit Initiated By Patient/Physician/Proxy Proxy 5% Physician 16% Patient 79% 20 Type of Plan Communicated by e-Visit 71% 49% 29% 22% Change in Plan New Plan Reaffirmation of Current Reaffirmation Plan or Change of Current Plan 21 Patient Referrals as Part of Plan Request Follow-up 4% Part of Plan 19% after Consult 4% Not Part of Plan 73% Prescriptions as Part of the Plan 42.1% 26.2% 31.8% Prescriptions Prescriptions No Prescriptions Ordered Changed ordered or changed 22 Medicare population will use technology Access is improved Majority of users were those with existing chronic (expensive) conditions Physician adoption varies greatly Payment incentivizes use Patient and physician satisfaction - TBD 23 Potential for improved management of those with chronic disease – lowering healthcare costs Improved access with PCP shortage and increase of insured lives Reimbursement for care currently being routinely provided by PCPs via the phone 24 Adoption of secure messaging in a small clinic setting – the cost-benefit ratio of implementation to: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Improve access and communication Improve efficiency Improve management of care Improve satisfaction Improve outcomes Lower health care costs 25 Contact information dscott@masspro.org 781-419-2896 26