A Scorecard for Tobacco Dependence-Treatments in State Medicaid Programs Sara McMenamin, PhD Helen Halpin, PhD Matthew Ingram UC Berkeley June 27, 2010 Background g • Tobacco use accounts for nearly half a million deaths each year year. • Smoking rates are 50% higher among Medicaid enrollees • Tobacco dependence is treatable, yet access to comprehensi comprehensive e therapies is ins insufficient fficient Research Goals • To document coverage for tobaccodependence p treatments in Medicaid programs • To document barriers to covered tobaccodependence treatments p a scorecard comparing p g coverage g • To develop and access to tobacco-dependence treatments 2008 PHS Guideline Medication Recommendations • M Medications di ti th thatt are effective ff ti smoking ki cessation treatments: Ni Nicotine ti replacement l t th therapy ((gum, patch, t h iinhaler, h l lozenge, spray) Bupropion (brand name Zyban) Varenicline (brand name Chantix) • Combination therapies: Nicotine patch + nicotine gum Nicotine patch + nicotine spray Nicotine patch + nicotine inhaler patch + bupropion p p SR Nicotine p 2008 PHS Guideline Counseling Recommendations • Effective counseling formats that should b used be d iin smoking ki cessation ti interventions: Proactive telephone counseling Group counseling Individual face-to-face counseling • Both counseling o n eling and nd medi medication tion should ho ld be provided to patients trying to quit smoking. 2008 PHS Guideline Benefit Design Recommendations • Remove barriers to tobacco dependence treatment benefits: No copayments No limitations on utilization Duration Number of courses P i authorization Prior th i ti requirements i t Making medication conditional on counseling Dollar caps p Methods • Collecting data since 1998 • Internet ssurvey r e of all 51 Medicaid programs • Developed 2 scores: Coverage g Access • Created an overall score Methods: Coverage g Score • Components of the Coverage Score NRT Coverage Co erage Chantix/Varenicline coverage Bupropion/Zyban coverage Individual and Group counseling coverage Combination therapies coverage • Score ranges from 0 to 5 Methods: Access Score • Components of the Access Score: No requirement for copayments for TDTs Unrestricted duration of use No p prior authorization requirements q No stepped-care requirements No counseling requirements for pharmacotherapy coverage • Score ranges from 0 to 5 Results: Coverage g Score • Mean Coverage Score = 3.0 28 co cover er ffullll NRT 43 cover Chantix/Varenicline 39 cover Bupropion/Zyban 10 cover Individual and Group counseling 33 cover combination therapy Results: Access Score • Mean Access Score = 2.1 34 require copayments for TDTs 32 restrict duration of use 27 have h prior i authorization th i ti requirements i t 8 use stepped-care requirements 16 require counseling to access pharmacotherapy coverage Distribution of Coverage and Access Scores 16 16 14 16 13 12 10 10 9 9 8 8 6 6 6 4 4 3 2 2 0 Score Coverage Score Access Score Distribution of Total Score 10 9 9 8 8 8 7 6 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 3 4 5 6 7 Total Score (Coverage + Access) 8 9 10 Medicaid Programs with the Highest and Lowest Lo est Scores • Highest Scorers New Mexico (10) New Jersey (9) P Pennsylvania l i (9) Minnesota (8) N New H Hampshire hi (8) Oregon (8) W hi t DC (8) Washington • Lowest Scorers Alabama (0) Connecticut (0) G Georgia i (0) Kentucky (0) Mi Missouri i (0) Tennessee (0) Summary of Findings • Coverage for counseling continues to lag behind coverage for pharmacotherapy • Barriers to treatment persist even where progress p g has been made on coverage g • Requiring co-payments is the most common barrier used byy Medicaid p programs g to limit access to TDTs program g scored 10 stars,, while • Onlyy 1 Medicaid p 6 offer no coverage for TDTs. Policy Implications of H l h Care Health C Reform R f • All USPSTF A and B level recommended TDTs must be covered by all Medicaid programs as of Jan 1, 2013 • Additional provision for pregnant Medicaid smokers • Reforms do not address use of access barriers • Monitoring of implementation of health care reform by state Medicaid programs will be crucial to assess: Compliance with coverage Continued use of access barriers