Reporting Medical Group and Physician Performance Performance Accountability in

advertisement
Performance Accountability in
California Market -- The Promise
Reporting Medical Group and
Physician Performance
ƒ Foster improvements in care and service
ƒ Incentive payments: HMOs pay medical groups
ƒ Public accountability: State and private purchasers
Patient Experience & Clinical Results
ƒ Dampen premium cost trend
ƒ Purchaser: high-value provider networks savings
ƒ Consumer: meaningful ‘product’ choices
June 2006
Ted von Glahn
Director of Consumer Engagement
Pacific Business Group on Health
2
Pay for Performance Spurs Statewide
Reporting
Distinguish best/worse performers
(20 Top Performing CA Medical Groups)
Patient survey reporting
ƒ Group-level samples for 180 medical groups
ƒ Doctor samples for 3,100+ MDs (27 medical groups)
• Common survey & integrated sampling process for
group, site and clinicians
Clinical reporting
ƒ Reportable results for ~ 180 medical groups
ƒ Data source: mix of group self-report and HMO data
3
California Office of Patient Advocate
4
Greater Performance Variation w/ Medical
Groups (Source: IHA and HEDIS 2005)
Reporting Performance – California
Medical Groups (2006)
Patient Survey Measures
Patient-Doctor Interactions
Patient Access
Coordinated Patient Care
Helpful Office Staff
Health Promotion
Global Rating of Doctor &
Care
Clinical Measures
Asthma Medications (3)
Cancer Screening (2)
Chlamydia Screening
Immunizations
Heart Care (2)
Diabetes Care (2)
Child Infections
5
Pacific Business Group on Health
HMOs
~ 90th Percentile
~ 25th Percentile
Medical Groups
Cervical Cancer Cervical Cancer
Screening
Screening
85%
80%
80%
62%
6
1
Greater Performance Variation w/ Medical
Groups (Source: IHA and HEDIS 2005)
Greater Performance Variation w/ Medical
Groups (Source: PAS Patient Survey; CAHPS Member Survey 2005)
HMOs
Medical Groups
HMOs
Medical Groups
Cholesterol
Control
(LDL <130)
73%
~ 90th Percentile
Doctor/Care
Access
78
Doctor/Care
Access
67
~ 90th Percentile
Cholesterol
Control
(LDL <130)
79%
~ 25th Percentile
73
56
~ 25th Percentile
68%
53%
7
8
Chronic Care Health: Dovetail Plan
and Medical Group Efforts
The Promise – Is it Working?
Modest Positive Signals
ƒ Increasing number of participating medical groups
ƒ Overall, small gains in performance results
Range of CA HMO Performance (2005)
ƒ 56%-77% patients’ high blood pressure controlled
ƒ 65%-77% patients getting asthma medications
ƒ 60%-72% patients’ cholesterol controlled (diabetes)
Questions
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Medical Group Patient Survey Results (2006)
ƒ 42% chronically ill patients report providers gave them written list of
things to do to manage health condition
ƒ 61% chronically ill patients report providers ask whether hard to do
things you need to do each day (home/work)
9
Pacific Business Group on Health
10
Reporting: Methods Development
Patient Experience Summary Indicator
ƒ Construct roll-up/summary indicator
Summary indicator constructed of 4 survey
composites has medical group reliability 91%
ƒ Medical group reliability 91%
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ Establish performance cutpoint to delineate
grades
ƒ 99th percentile to set ‘excellent’ grade
ƒ Handle uncertainty through misclassification
error adjustment
Pacific Business Group on Health
Patient-Doctor Interactions
Coordinated Patient care
Patient Access
Helpful Office Staff
Indicator represents “objective” patient-reported
care and service experiences
ƒ Half to one point buffer yields <5% error rate
11
Clinical indicator gains -- better reporting or better care?
Compression of patient survey results at group level
Document evidence of effective improvement tactics
Are lowest performers improving?
Is within-group variation decreasing?
12
2
Summarize Performance: Roll-up of Clinical
and Patient Experience Results
Patient Experience: Performance Cutpoints
ƒ Judging excellence (99th PCT) in delineating grades
ƒ Distinguishing real performance differences
13
14
Patient Experience: Minimizing Medical
Group Misclassification Error
Challenges – Physician Performance
Accountability
9 Construct physician-level clinical quality index
ƒ medical group clinical measurement not a promising path
9 Construct physician-level resource efficiency index to
craft an affordable health plan product
ƒ Reduced premium product will foster demand for public reporting of
physician performance
9 Need compelling cost savings and quality assurance to
offset employee backlash from adopting high-value
network products that constrain employee’ doctor choice
15
Pacific Business Group on Health
16
3
Download