✯ ✯ 2003 National Health Policy ✯Conference January 22-23, 2003 J.W. Marriott Washington, D.C. Organizing to Confront Terrorism: State Perspective Patricia Quinlisk, MD, MPH Medical Director/State Epidemiologist Iowa Department of Public Health Prior to Fall of 2001 • Limited preparedness for terrorism (primarily for biological terrorism) • Adding potential BT diseases to reportable diseases list • Limited educational opportunities • Limited federal funding, little or no state funding After 9/11 and Anthrax • Became priority • Federal funding increased substantially • First public health infrastructure funding in decades • Dual purpose - BT and other diseases (emerging diseases, food safety, etc) • HRSA monies for hospital/medical CDC Grant • Purpose: “to upgrade state and local public health jurisdictions: preparedness for and response to bioterrorism, other outbreaks of infectious diseases, and other public health threats and emergencies.” Future: CDC Grant • Expect this to be long term process, Congress discussing 5-10 year funding • CDC: will remain constant for a couple years, but then may decrease State Public Health Issues •Public health is a new partner in homeland security and national defense –Public health’s role in preparedness and response not well understood by traditional responders –Unfamiliar role for public health –Public health still forgotten at times Issues: State Public Health • Used to dealing with assessing risk vs. benefits to health • But now getting conflicting risk information • Medical and public health professionals asked to accept risk of vaccine, but feel at times “out of the loop” and “not trusted” Financial Issues • First time for PH infrastructure $$ • Given grant-mandated core capacities to insure preparedness • Today priority given to smallpox, so money taken from core capacities/ non-terrorism programs to cover • Changing multi-use purpose to single agent preparedness BIOTERRORISM? • Town of about 10,000 • Rural America • Event occurred around election time • Hundreds became ill • Religious group involved • Low mortality organism BIOTERRORISM OR NOT? • • • • • • • • • • rural town - 10,000 - Dalles, OR religious group involved - Rajneeshi low mortality organism - Salmonella Many exposed ~1000 Many people ill ~ 700 YES • • • • • • • • • • rural town - 10,000 - Oskaloosa, IA religious group involved - Knights of Columbus low mortality organism - Salmonella (plus) Many exposed ~ 1000 Many people ill ~500 NO Other Issues with Smallpox • Coverage for liability, workman’s comp, adverse events, family spread • Concerns about funding phase one, how to cover phase two and three? • Concerns about “venturing into the unknown” too quickly Personnel Issues • Personnel shortages, nurses • CDC grant to hire epidemiologists, but not enough new epidemiologists • Need experienced, motivated people, but salaries low – non-competitive • Education outreach to medical community necessary but difficult • Often media front person; need training, assistance by experts Risk Communication Problems • In late May/early June of 2001, three students developed meningitis, two died • Prophylactic antibiotics recommended for 3,000 fellow-students, per national guidelines • Physician calls press conference at local hospital, states that anyone in contact to any student at any of the schools need antibiotics, estimated 40,000 people • Conflicting messages from “experts” Community/Media Response • “37,000 line up for drugs” headline • School officials cancel graduation, close schools, cancel sports events • Downtown becomes deserted • People state they are afraid to take children to grocery stores, Wal-Mart, to touch pens, eat out, etc. • Rumors of National Guard quarantine More Community/Media Response • “On the heels of three local cases of meningococcal disease comes the true epidemic - one of fear and panic”, stated local newspaper • Local media notes that panic was fueled by lack of central system for spreading of information to the public Bottom Line • Public Health; a new partner needing development in this new era • Need good communications • All sides need to understand each other’s roles and trust each other • Need to sustain Public Health infrastructure: personnel, systems, response capacity, training