Universality of Flux Creep in Superconductors with Arbitrary Shape and...

advertisement
VOLUME 76, NUMBER 21
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
20 MAY 1996
Universality of Flux Creep in Superconductors with Arbitrary Shape and Current-Voltage Law
Ernst Helmut Brandt
Max Planck Institute für Metallforschung, Institut für Physik, D-70506 Stuttgart, Germany
(Received 12 January 1996)
The nonlinear and nonlocal diffusion equation for the relaxing current density Jsr, td in long
superconductors of arbitrary cross section in a constant perpendicular magnetic field Ba is solved
exactly by separation of variables in the electric field Esr, td ­ fsrdgstd. This solution includes the
limiting cases of longitudinal and transverse geometries and applies to the current-voltage laws E ~ J n
ranging from Ohmic (n ­ 1) to Bean-like (n ! `) behavior. The electric field profile fsrd weakly
depends on n and becomes universal for n exceeding ø5. At large times t one finds E ~ 1yt nysn21d
and J ~ 1yt 1ysn21d for n . 1, and E ~ J ~ exps2tyt0 d for n ­ 1. The contour lines of the creeping
Esr, td coincide with the field lines of Bsr, td in the remanent state Ba ­ 0. [S0031-9007(96)00286-4]
PACS numbers: 74.60.Ge, 74.25.Ha
Type-II superconductors, in particular the high-Tc superconductors, in general are not ideal conductors of electric current when put into a magnetic field Ba . Nonzero
resistivity appears when the Abrikosov vortices induced
by Ba depin due to a current density J exceeding a critical value Jc , or by thermal activation occurring also
at J , Jc . The resulting motion of vortices generates
an electric field E ­ By, where B is the flux density
and y the drift velocity. A superconductor may thus
be characterized by its current-voltage law EsJd, which
in general is nonlinear and strongly depends on Ba and
on the temperature T . This EsJd characteristic is most
sensitively extracted from magnetization measurements,
e.g., by slowly increasing or decreasing Ba std and then
keeping it at a constant (or zero) value at times t $
0. During such creep experiments, the magnetic moment caused by persistent currents relaxes with an approximately logarithmic time law when EsJd is strongly
nonlinear, and exponentially when EsJd ­ rJ is linear
(Ohmic).
Recently, Gurevich and co-workers have shown that
in both longitudinal [1,2] and transverse [2,3] geometries, corresponding to zero and unity demagnetizing factors, respectively, the relaxing electric field Esr, td is
universal if EsJd is sufficiently nonlinear. This means
that after some transient time t1 , Esr, td ­ fsrdgstd separates into a universal profile fsrd and a time dependence
gstd ~ 1yst1 1 td ø 1yt. The relaxingRcurrent density
1
Jsr, td and magnetic moment mstd ­ 2 r 3 Jsr, tdd 3 r
are then obtained by inserting this general electric field
into the material law J ­ JsEd. This separation was
found to be exact if one has ≠Ey≠J ­ EyJ1 with constant J1 , corresponding to an exponential law EsJd ­
Ec expfsJ 2 Jc dyJ1 g, and if E depends only on one spatial coordinate. This applies to slabs [1,2] or cylinders
[4] in parallel field, and to thin strips or circular disks in
perpendicular field [2,3]. The same universality of creep,
and the existence in transverse geometry of “neutral lines”
along which the flux-density Bsr, td stays constant during
creep, was recently demonstrated by magneto-optic obser4030
0031-9007y96y76(21)y4030(4)$10.00
vation and by computation to occur also in thin specimens
of square shape [5].
In the present Letter I show that the exact solution of
the creep problem by separation of variables of Esr, td
is possible for a much more general geometry including
specimens of finite thickness and arbitrary cross section
in a perpendicular field, and for all current-voltage laws
EsJd ~ J n , or, more precisely,
(1)
EsJd ­ Ec jJyJc jn sgnJ ,
yielding JsEd ­ Jc jEyEc j1yn sgnE. This power law is
observed in numerous experiments and was considered
elsewhere in connection with creep [2,6] and flux penetration and ac susceptibility [4,7–10]. It corresponds
to a logarithmic current dependence of the activation
energy UsJd ­ Uc lnsJc yJd, which inserted into an Arrhenius law yields EsJd ­ Ec exps2UykT d ­ Ec sJyJc dn
with n ­ Uc ykT ¿ 1; it contains only two parameters
Ec yJcn and n; and it interpolates from Ohmic behavior
(n ­ 1) over typical creep behavior (n ­ 10, . . . , 20) to
“hard” superconductors with Bean-like behavior (n ! `).
A power law avoids the unphysical behavior at J ­ 0 exhibited by the exponential law originally used in Refs. [1–
3] to achieve separation of variables in the creep problem.
Consider the rather general geometry of a long (along
z) superconductor of arbitrary cross section S in a perpendicular field Ba directed along y, e.g., a rectangular bar
filling the volume jxj # a, j yj # b, jzj , `, cf. Fig. 1.
The current density Jsx, yd, electric field Esx, yd, and vector potential Asx, yd then point along z and the magnetic
induction Bsx, yd ­ = 3 A is in the x-y plane. Throughout this Letter I shall assume B ­ m0 H, i.e., disregard
the finite value of the lower critical field Bc1 . This approximation is excellent when everywhere inside the superconductor one has B . 2Bc1 . From J ­ = 3 H ­
m21
0 = 3 s= 3 Ad one then gets for our geometry J ­
2
2m21
0 = A, which has the solution
Z
d 2 r 0 Qsr, r 0 dJsr 0 d 2 xBa ,
Asrd ­ 2m0
S
Qsr, r 0 d ­ s1y2pd lnjr 2 r 0 j .
© 1996 The American Physical Society
(2)
VOLUME 76, NUMBER 21
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
20 MAY 1996
µ
t
Esr, td ­ Ec fn srd
t1 1 t
FIG. 1. The field lines of the induction B during penetration
of perpendicular flux into long bars with side ratios bya ­ 2
(left) and bya ­ 0.4 (right) in the Bean limit (n ­ 51) for
applied fields Ba ­ 0.3, 0.7 (Ba ­ 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, in units
m0 Jc a. The field of full penetration is Bp ­ 0.96 (0.87, 0.72,
0.49, 0.33) for bya ­ 4 (2, 1, 0.4, 0.2). The dashed rectangle
marks the specimen boundary. The bold line (composed of
the merging contour lines jJjyJc ­ 0.5, . . . , 0.3) shows the
penetrating flux front inside which J ­ 0 and B ­ 0.
Here and in the following r denotes sx, yd and the
integration is over the specimen cross section S. The
Ù ­ ≠By≠t ­ 2= 3 E in this geometry
induction law B
reduces to AÙ ­ 2E. Combining this with Eq. (2) and
with the material law E ­ EsJd or J ­ JsEd, one obtains
the equation of motion for Esr, td,
Z
≠
Ù a . (3)
d 2 r 0 Qsr, r 0 d JfEsr 0 , tdg 1 x B
Esr, td ­ m0
≠t
S
Figure 1 shows the magnetic field lines in and around
a rectangular superconductor during flux penetration obtained from a similar integral equation for A.
Ù a ­ 0,
In creep experiments one has Ba ­ const; thus B
and Eq. (3) simplifies to
Z
Ù 0 , td ≠J .
Esr, td ­ m0 d 2 r 0 Qsr, r 0 dEsr
(4)
≠E
This integral equation describes the nonlinear and nonlocal diffusion of Esr, td during flux creep. For the
power law EsJd (1), one has ≠Jy≠E ­ 1ys≠Ey≠Jd ­
sJc yhEd sEyEc d1yh , yielding
m 0 Jc Z 2 0
Ù 0 , tdE s1ynd21 . (4a)
d r Qsr, r 0 dEsr
Esr, td ­
1yn
nEc
Remarkably, this nonlinear integral equation can be
solved exactly by the ansatz E ­ fsrdgstd, yielding
∂nysn21d
.
(5)
If we choose t ­ m0 Jc Sy4psn 2 1dEc we obtain fh srd
from
4p Z 2 0
d r Qsr, r 0 dfn sr 0 d1yn .
(6)
fn srd ­ 2
S
This nonlinear integral equation is easily
by iterR solved
sm11d
smd1yn
­ 2s4pySd Qfn
starting
ating the relation fn
s0d
s1d
s2d
with fn ­ 1. The resulting series fn , fn , . . . , converges rapidly if n . 1. For m ¿ 1 one has approxism11d
smd
srd ø fn srd s1 1 cynm d with c ø 1. For
mately fn
n ¿ 1 (practically for n $ 5) the shape fn srd of the electric field becomes a universal function which depends
only on the specimen shape but not on the exponent n,
2Z 2 0
fn$5 srd ø f` srd ­ 2
d r lnjr 2 r 0 j .
(7)
S S
In the Ohmic case n ­ 1, the ansatz (5) makes no
sense since the exponent nysn 2 1d diverges. For this
special case the integral Eq. (4) is linear since the factor
≠Jy≠E ­ s ­ 1yr is the constant Ohmic conductivity.
This linear integral equation is solved by the ansatz
Esr, td ­ E0 f0 srd exps2tyt0 d ,
(8)
yielding the relaxation time t0 ­ m0 sSyL, where L and
f0 srd are the lowest eigenvalue and eigenfunction of the
linear integral equation
2L Z 2 0
f0 srd ­ 2
d r lnjr 2 r 0 jf0 sr 0 d .
(9)
S S
From (1) and (5) the current density becomes
∂1ysn21d
µ
t
1yn
sgnfn srd .
Jsr, td ­ Jc j fn srdj
t1 1 t
(10)
For n ¿ 1, t ¿ t1 the time factor in (10) equals 1 2
1
n21 lnstytd and one has jJj ø Jc everywhere.
The magnetization along y per unit length along z is
Z
Mstd ­ ŷmstdyLz ­
xJsx, y, td dx dy .
(11)
S
1
1R
In (11) the prefactor 2 of mstd ­ 2 r 3 Jsr, tdd 3 r was
compensated by the contribution to m of the U-turning
currents at the far away ends of the bar at z ­ 6Lz y2 ¿
a, b. The resulting factor of 2 in M was sometimes
missed in previous work on slabs.
These results apply to arbitrary specimen cross section
S. For the realistic rectangular cross section 2a # x #
a, 2b # y # b, S ­ 4ab, with Ba along y, the symmetry Jsx, yd ­ 2Js2x, yd ­ Jsx, 2yd (and same symmetry for E and A) allows one to restrict the integration to
the quarter 0 # x # a, 0 # y # b by using the symmetric kernel
Qsym sr, r 0 d ­
2 d sx 2 1 y 2 d
sx 2 1 y2
1
2
1
,
ln 2
2
2 d sx 2 1 y 2 d
4p sx1
1 y2
1
1
(12)
4031
VOLUME 76, NUMBER 21
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
20 MAY 1996
with x6 ­ x 6 x 0 , y6 ­ y 6 y 0 . One now has in (5)
(13)
t ­ m0 Jc abyfpsn 2 1dEc g ,
Z a dx 0 Z b dy 0 sx 2 1 y 2 d sx 2 1 y 2 d
2
1
1
ln 1
fn sx, yd ­
2 1 y 2 d sx 2 1 y 2 d
a 0 b
sx2
0
1
2
2
(14)
3 fn sx 0 , y 0 d1yn .
Before discussing the rectangular cross section I first
show that in the limits of longitudinal (b ¿ a) and transverse (b ø a) geometry the above expressions reduce to
known and new results. In both limits, the functions J,
E, A, Bx , and By depend only on x. One may thus put
y ­ 0 writing,
Rae.g., Esx, yd ø Esx, 0d ­ Esxd, and one
gets M ­ 4b 0 xJsxd dx.
In the transverse limit (strip with thickness 2b ø
a), the reduced one-dimensional kernel is Qtrans sx, x 0 d ­
2bQsym sx, 0, x 0 , 0d ­ sbypd lnfjx 2 x 0 jysx 1 x 0 dg. This
kernel was used in calculations of creep [3,10], flux
penetration [9], and nonlinear [10] and linear [11,12] ac
response of superconducting strips. In the creep solution
(5) one now has t (13) and the shape fn sxd is determined
by
Ç
Ç
1 Z a 0
x 1 x0
fn sxd ­
dx ln
(15)
fn sx 0 d1yn .
a 0
x 2 x0
For n ¿ 1 this reproduces the E of Ref. [3],
µ
∂
a1x
x a2 2 x 2
m0 Jc ab 1
ln
1
ln
.
Esx, td ­
psn 2 1d t
a2x
a
x2
(16)
In the longitudinal limit (slab Rwith b ¿ a), the reduced
`
kernel is Qlong sx, x 0 d ­ 2 0 dy 0 Qsym sx, 0, x 0 , y 0 d ­
1
0
0
0
(the
min2 sjx 2 x j 2 jx 1 x jd ­ 2Minsx, x d
0
imum value of x, x ), which has the property
00
­ dsx 2 x 0 d. One now has in (5) t from
Qlong
(13) and fn sxd from
p Z a 0
fn sxd ­
dx Minsx, x 0 dfn sx 0 d1yn ,
(17)
ab 0
0 # x # a, fs2xd ­ 2fsxd. For large exponents n ¿
1 this reproduces the result of Gurevich [1,2],
m0 Jc xs2a 2 jxjd
Esx, td ­
.
(18)
n21
2t
The unphysical dependence of t (13) and fn sxd (17),
but not of Esx, td (18), on the specimen length 2b may
be removed by redefining t and fn , multiplying the
integrals in (14) and (17) by a factor 1 1 pby4a, and
dividing t (13) by the same factor. This definition leaves
the transverse limit unchanged but replaces the prefactor
pyab in (17) by p 2 y4a2 . The integral equation (17)
is equivalent to a differential equation with boundary
conditions,
fn s0d ­ fn0 sad ­ 0 , (19)
fn00 sxd ­ 2k 2 fn sxd1yn ,
where k ­ py2a in our new definition of t. The
solutions of (19) in the Ohmic (n ­ 1) and Bean (n ­ `)
limits look very similar, f1 sxd ­ const 3 sinspxy2ad
and f` sxd ­ sp 2 y8a2 dxs2a 2 jxjd, cf. Fig. 2.
4032
FIG. 2. Profiles of the electric field E ~ fn sxd and current
density J ~ fn sxd1yn during creep in longitudinal (17) and
transverse (15) geometries for exponents n ­ 1, 2, 5, and `.
Creep profiles fn sxd obtained from (14) and (17)
are depicted in Fig. 2 for exponents n ­ 1, 2, 5, and `.
Notice that the fn sxd only weakly depend on n but are
qualitatively different for the two geometries: In the
longitudinal limit the fn sxd are maximum at the boundary
x ­ a, whereas the transverse fn sxd exhibit a maximum
inside the specimen,
e.g., at x ­ 0.735a for n ­ 1 [11]
p
and x ­ ay 2 ­ 0.707a for n ! ` [3].
The contour lines of the creeping Esx, y, td inside
and outside rectangular bars with aspect ratios bya ­
2, 1, and 0.2 are depicted in Fig. 3 for the Bean limit
n ¿ 1. These contour lines of E are also the field lines
of the induction Bsx, y, td in the remanent state. Namely,
for n ¿ 1 one gets from (2) and (12) the vector potential
Z aZ b
Qsym sr, r 0 ddy 0 dx 0 2 xBa ,
Asx, yd ø 2m0 Jc
0
0
(20)
because one has J ø Jc sgnx during creep. The lines
A ­ const are the field lines of B 5 = 3 sẑAd. For
Ba ­ 0 these lines coincide with the contour lines of E ­
Ù since during creep the time dependence separates,
2A,
Esr, td ­ fsrdgstd, Eq. (5). For nonzero applied field Ba ,
the lines E ­ const are still as depicted in Fig. 3. The
field lines of B for Ba near the penetration field Bp look
VOLUME 76, NUMBER 21
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
20 MAY 1996
and induction B ' z, during flux creep is presented
for nonlinear conductors with constitutive laws E ~ J n
and B ­ m0 H and with rectangular cross section 2a 3
2b in a perpedicular field Ba k y. The obtained twodimensional universal profiles of E during creep (Fig. 3)
explain how the one-dimensional profiles Esx, td of the
two limiting geometries b ¿ a and b ø a (Fig. 2)
come about. In particular, the maximum of Esx, td in
transverse geometry, corresponding to a maximum in
the nearly constant J ­ Jc sEyEc d1yn ø Jc and in the
energy dissipation EJ ~ E 111yn ~ J n11 , is related to the
maximum of the vector potential A k z (2) caused by
this current and depicted in Fig. 3. This theory is easily
extended to circular disks or cylinders with finite height
by modifying the kernel Qsr, r 0 d.
The origin of the well known sign reversal of the
perpendicular component By at the surfaces y ­ 6b near
the edges x ­ 6a, occurring in the remanent state and
leading to a neutral line on which B ­ Ba stays constant
during creep [3,5], becomes clear from the magnetic field
lines in Fig. 3, which coincide with the contour lines of
E and A during creep. Interesting further effects [13] are
expected at positions with small B if a more general BsHd
with finite Bc1 is accounted for. Work in this direction is
under way.
FIG. 3. The contour lines of the electric field E ­ 2AÙ
during creep in long rectangular superconductors with side
ratios bya ­ 2, 1, and 0.2 (from top) for n ­ 51 and arbitrary
constant applied field Ba . These lines coincide with the
magnetic field lines in the fully saturated remanent state Ba ­
0. Bottom: 3D plot of E (and of A) for bya ­ 0.2.
similar as depicted in Fig. 1, bottom row; they are nearly
parallel lines slightly inflated inside the specimen.
All these analytical results are confirmed by computations of creep from Eq. (4): During constant ramp rate
BÙ a fi 0 one has E ­ x BÙ a in the fully penetrated state.
When Ba is held constant, the straight E profile starts to
curve down near the edge and, after a short transition time
t1 , it reaches the universal profiles depicted in Figs. 2 and
3. During creep the shapes of E, J, and B practically do
not change over many decades of the creep time t, but
their amplitudes decrease according to Eqs. (5) and (10).
In particular, for n ¿ 1 and t ¿ t1 one has E ~ 1yt and
1
M ~ J ~ stytd1ysn21d ø 1 2 n21 lnstytd.
In conclusion, the exact solution for the electric field
Esx, y, td k z, and thus for the current density J k z
[1] A. Gurevich and H. Küpfer, Phys. Rev. B 48, 6477 (1993).
[2] A. Gurevich, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 9, 1045 (1995).
[3] A. Gurevich and E. H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 178
(1994).
[4] E. H. Brandt, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 1465 (1995).
[5] Th. Schuster, H. Kuhn, and E. H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B 51,
697 (1995).
[6] V. M. Vinokur, M. V. Feigel’man, and V. B. Geshkenbein,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 915 (1991).
[7] J. Rhyner, Physica (Amsterdam) 212C, 292 (1993).
[8] J. Gilchrist and C. J. van der Beek, Physica (Amsterdam)
231C, 147 (1994).
[9] Th. Schuster et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1424 (1994);
Phys. Rev. B 50, 16 684 (1994); E. H. Brandt, Physica
(Amsterdam) 235C– 240C, 2939 (1994).
[10] A. Gurevich and E. H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 1723
(1996).
[11] E. H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2821 (1993); 49, 9024
(1994); Phys. Rev. B 50, 4034 (1994); 50, 13 833 (1994).
[12] A. T. Dorsey, Phys. Rev. B 51, 15 329 (1995).
[13] M. V. Indenbom, Th. Schuster, H. Kuhn, H. Kronmüller,
T. W. Li, and A. A. Menovsky, Phys. Rev. B 51, 15 484
(1995).
4033
Download