Report to the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission
2007–2008
1.
Title:
Green Bean Breeding and Evaluation
2.
Project Leaders:
James R. Myers, Horticulture
3.
Cooperator:
Brian Yorgey, Food Science and Technology
4.
Project Status:
Terminating 30 June, 2008
5.
Project Funding:
$39,378
$8,698
$48,076
breeding
processing
total
Breeding funds were used for a major portion of the support of a vegetable breeding technician, student labor, supplies, and research farm expenses. Processing
funds were used for processing samples of experimental beans, laboratory analysis, and for student labor.
6.
7.
Objectives:
1.
Breed Bush Blue Lake green bean varieties with high economic yield and
improved plant architecture.
2.
Improve pod characteristics including straightness, color, smoothness, texture, flavor and quality retention, and combine with delayed seed size development.
3.
Incorporate white mold resistance and improve root rot tolerance.
4.
Map genes for resistance to white mold to facilitate marker aided selection.
Report of Progress:
Varietal Development: The program continued with screening and selection in crosses
among elite lines and commercial cultivars of green bean for varietal development. Advanced lines were grown at the Hermiston Research and Extension Center and were
screened for heat tolerance and general adaptation to growing conditions east of the Cascades. Much of our current focus is on incorporating white mold resistance into a BBL
background. Additional selections from OSU x OSU crosses were advanced and increased for replicated trials. Advanced lines were screened in replicated white mold field
nurseries. An interspecific backcross inbred population with white mold resistance from
scarlet runner bean was screened in a field nursery. Seed increase, roguing, and sub-line
maintenance of the most promising lines was continued. In general, the growing season
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
in 2007 was more “normal” than past years, with a higher degree of cloud cover and
moisture than the past two years. Growing conditions were excellent but the increased
precipitation during the season and reduced solar insolation caused higher levels of white
mold in our trials.
Yield Trials: We retained our current nursery structure of preliminary trials and a single
advanced trial consisting mostly of commercial varieties for trial along with the most
promising OSU lines. The two preliminary trials were planted May 18 and June 1, and
the commercial yield trial, partially funded by seed companies, was planted June 21. Entries from one preliminary trial and those paid for by sponsoring seed companies in the
commercial trial were processed at the OSU Pilot Plant for subsequent product evaluation.
Both preliminary trials had good growing conditions and showed reasonable
yields (Tables 1 & 2, 6 & 7) although the May 18 trial had a high level of white mold infection. We were able to obtain data on white mold incidence and severity in this trial
(Table 5). A number of full- and small-sieve lines in the May 18 trial showed high yields
(Tables 1 & 2) and 11 full sieve lines out-performed OR91G. We are particularly interested in the 6400 and 6500 series lines as these show better BBL characteristics than the
6200 and 6300 series, and some may have improved white mold resistance. Nearly all
6200 and 6300 series lines have been dropped from the program although we are using
some in crosses to incorporate their resistance into a better BBL background. The 6200
and 6300 series lines have resistance from NY6020 and Ascher DR whereas the 6400 series derives resistance from B7354-6-2-2. The latter line has a lower level of resistance,
but does contribute a measurable effect, and is very compatible with our BBL material in
general. Grading room evaluation and notes suggest that few of the 6200 and 6300 series
are directly useable, but that the 6400 and 6500 series material holds good promise (Tables 3 & 4, 8 & 9). Much
Five year average for selected OSU Minuette crosses and
of this material is being
check lines
tested for the first year, and
will need additional testing
Adjusted T/A
to verify performance and
Overall
quality.
z
z
y
Line
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
AV
OR 91G
OR 54
5630
5613
5669
6137
6174
6175
6185
6189
12.5
13.4
13.8
9.3
16.0
12.9
11.0
11.4
9.9
10.5
12.6
16.4
14.7
5.0
12.5
8.8
8.1
11.2
8.1
12.4
3.8
9.2
10.8
5.1
8.5
13.7
9.5
10.1
6.0
8.6
12.1
10.7
12.9
5.7
10.4
10.5
7.3
7.7
8.7
11.0
12.0
9.4
9.3
10.0
9.9
12.1
12.8
6.3
11.6
11.4
8.8
10.1
8.3
10.2
LSD0.05
2.8
3.9
2.9
3.0
2.3
2.5
10.6
11.0
8.1
z
Average of 2 trials; all other years are from 1 trial only.
Several
Minuette
derived lines continue to
perform well. Most promising in the full sieve class
is OSU 6189, while OSU
6174 and OSU 6175 are 4to 5sieve lines of interest.
Five year average yield performance is shown in the
text table (left).
While
OSU 6137 will on occasion
have very high yields, its
long term average is not
y
5613, 6175 and 6185 were not included in overall average LSD
calculation.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
much different from OR91G. It does have darker green pod color and pods set high on
the plant. With average pod set it stands well, but lodges with heavy set. OSU 6189 is
very close to a BBL type but with significantly darker pod color and better growth habit.
It is also interesting in that it shows more uniform growth habit across environments compared to other lines. Both are full sieve types. OSU 6174 and OSU 6175 are both 4 to 5sieve types with upright growth habit, and pod characteristics similar to the BBL type.
In the June 1 trial, a nearly identical set of the 50 full sieve, 25 small sieve, and 6
checks were planted (Tables 6-9). Even though there was no white mold in this trial,
yields were generally lower. Sixteen full sieve lines outperformed OR 91G. Taking into
account yield and quality in the two trials, lines that performed the best were OSU 6471
and OSU 6501. It will take another year or so to identify the very best lines from this
crossing series.
Commercial Green Bean Trial: The commercial trial consisted of 14 entries from four
seed companies, 4 checks, and 6 OSU experimental lines (Tables 10-12). Savannah,
from Harris Moran, was included as a small sieve check. The trial grew under near ideal
conditions, which produced very lush growth. As a result, white mold became an issue
towards the end of the harvest period, and may have reduced yields on late harvested entries. Overall production and $/A value was high (Tables 10 & 11, Figures 1 & 2). White
mold incidence and severity were estimated in the commercial trial (Table 13). Disease
pressure was very high and only six lines showed significantly lower levels than the most
susceptible lines. Pierroton had only 30% incidence and a severity rating of 4.5, and
should be investigated further as to whether its apparent resistance is physiological or architectural.
Hermiston Trial: Advanced lines were planted in a single rep observation trial at the
Hermiston Research and Extension Center (Table 14). Approximately 190 lines were
planted May 16, including Sahara (Harris Moran) as a heat tolerant check. Lines were
evaluated at approximately harvest maturity for growth habit, pod quality (heat damage)
and estimated yield. None of the seed for planting of these lines was treated with fungicide except for the Sahara commercial check. Most of the normal seed types showed
good stand establishment, but the persistent chlorophyll types showed poor stands, and in
many cases, failed to establish any stand at all. The single exception was OSU 6551
which showed only slight reduction in stand (Table 14). The trial proved useful in identifying lines that were particularly susceptible to heat damage. A few possible curly top
virus infected plants were observed, but to date, this disease has not been a problem at
this location.
Breeding for White and Gray Mold Resistance: In many ways, this was the ultimate
white mold year; a good thing for screening for resistance, but not without its drawbacks.
Disease pressure was extremely high in the early and late trials, and was severe enough to
generally overwhelm partial resistance. The white mold data obtained from the first yield
trial allowed us to examine the relationship between disease and yield parameters in a
more rigorous manner than we have been able to do in the past. White mold incidence
was significantly and positively correlated with days to harvest (text table below), but not
with stand or yield. White mold severity was not correlated with any yield parameter.
OSU 6241, an extensively tested line with moderate levels of white mold resistance de2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
rived from NY6020, showed 62% incidence with low severity (Table 5). The 95% confidence interval about disease incidence for OSU 6241 was a rather large at 31 – 91%. The
only line that showed significantly lower disease incidence was Savannah, mainly due to
reduced levels of disease in the third and fourth reps. Savannah does show field resistance in our trials, but is susceptible when subjected to the greenhouse straw tests.
A white mold
Correlation among white mold disease and yield factors for green
trial was grown at the
bean lines planted in a trial May 18.
Vegetable Research
WM
Days to
% 1-4
Farm (Table 15). As
y
x
Severity Harvest Stand
sieve
T/A
with other trials this
WM % Infectz
year, plant growth
ed
0.39***
0.40***
0.00 ns
-0.35**
0.03 ns
z
was lush and disease
WM Severity
0.17 ns
-0.15 ns -0.14 ns
-0.18 ns
Days to Harpressure was high
vest
-0.06 ns -0.51***
0.28*
with even our checks
y
Stand
0.059 ns
0.34**
with partial resistance
% 1-4 sieve
-0.52***
showing high levels
z
of disease. Ranking
WM incidence rated as percent of plants infected in harvested area
y
of checks was similar
and severity rated on a scale of 1-6, 1=light, 6=heavy. Percent of full
x
stand. Yield in tons/A.
to that observed in
past years. We were particularly surprised to find a number of 6500 series lines among
those showing partial resistance because these were derived from crosses between parents
that were not known to have resistance (Table 15). Most, but not all of these lines had
reduced stands, suggesting that their reduced canopy cover produced less than optimal
conditions for disease. White mold incidence and growth habit were negatively correlated in the 2007 trial, indicating that architectural type probably influenced microenvironment and thereby severity of white mold infection (text table, below). Interestingly,
higher yield and upright habit were positively correlated, and yield and white mold score
were negatively correlated, suggesting that disease had an effect on yield, and this was
influenced by growth habit. In a comparison of lines over eight years (Table 16), 2007
shows very different ranking from that of other years – perhaps an effect of the severity of
the season. Ranking of lines tested in the past two years is shown in Table 17.
Molecular mapping to transfer resistance from Phaseolus coccineus to P. vulCorrelations among white mold and yield
garis: The best source of resistance to
variables for a white mold field screening
trial, Corvallis, 2007.
white mold resides in the related bean species, P. coccineus or scarlet runner bean.
We have been developing backcrossYield
Upright Habit
inbred populations as a means of transferring resistance while regaining the snap
White Mold Scores
-0.20***
-0.60***
bean type as rapidly as possible. We are
furthest along with the cross 91G x PI
Yield
0.17***
255956. The population was tested in the
***statistically significant at p<0.0001.
field in 2006 and in three straw tests in the
greenhouse, and in an oxalate test (oxalate tolerance is related to white mold resistance).
The population was again tested in 2007 (Table 18). Nine lines were not significantly
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
different from G122, our resistant check (six lines show similar levels to G122 in 2006).
Analysis over two years shows 10 lines similar in performance to G122 (Table 19).
These lines are genetically approximately 90% common bean and 10% scarlet runner
bean, and as such, will require another cycle of recombination to move resistance into a
completely adapted background. While they resemble BBL snap bean lines, they do
show unusual traits such as an inclination to outcross. Such traits will need to be selected
against. We will be testing these lines in our processing trials for the first time next year.
8.
Summary:
We continued to emphasize breeding for white mold resistance in 2007. As such, we focused on preliminary yield and quality trials where we could evaluate larger numbers of
lines. Two preliminary trials were conducted, and an advanced trial of commercial entries was evaluated. OSU 6400 and 6500 series lines look very good for yield and processing quality, and some have partial white mold resistance. White mold pressure was
severe in all but the mid season trial and we were able to obtain useful data on most of
our breeding material. To date, we have identified some lines that are fairly close to a
BBL type with partial resistance to white mold, but additional refinement is required.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 1. Performance of preliminary full sieve green bean lines, May 18 planting, Corvallis, 2007.
y
Percent Sieve Size
Line
Days to
Harvest
Est.
Sieve
Size
Stand
1
2
3
4
5
6
%1-4
Sieve
Av
Tons/Acre
Av Adj
x
Tons/Acre
91G
OR 54
5630
5669
6137
6185
6189
6241
6279
6286
6436
6439
6440
6443
6445
6455
6463
6467
6469
6471
6474
6475
6477
6478
6479
6481
6484
6485
6489
6490
6493
6494
6497
6498
6501
6502
6504
6505
6506
6509
6510
73
73
70
70
70
70
73
69
70
68
70
73
73
70
70
73
73
74
74
73
75
73
74
75
70
73
75
74
73
73
73
73
73
75
73
74
73
70
73
70
74
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
full
full
full
full
5
5
full
5
5
full
full
5
full
full
5
5
full
5
5
full
full
full
5
5
140
140
123
140
140
138
136
92
140
140
140
140
140
140
124
89
140
140
140
112
140
140
140
126
134
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
126
140
140
140
117
128
140
2.1
6.5
2.6
3.8
3.1
5.0
8.0
8.1
9.0
8.8
7.9
5.7
3.2
11.3
11.2
8.1
4.7
5.4
5.0
5.2
6.4
5.6
3.7
2.4
8.4
4.7
6.1
2.2
5.4
6.3
3.8
4.1
4.9
1.0
3.2
2.9
3.1
4.1
4.0
5.4
6.7
6.4
7.4
7.8
9.4
15.6
9.9
8.8
8.1
12.4
12.7
13.9
11.3
14.7
11.3
14.0
8.1
9.3
8.0
10.1
10.3
9.6
7.5
9.3
4.8
12.6
8.5
10.1
4.4
8.9
10.2
7.6
9.0
7.8
7.6
8.1
5.1
7.1
9.6
7.0
8.6
6.7
12.8
12.0
14.8
20.8
31.3
17.8
15.0
17.7
18.0
17.6
20.8
16.0
22.1
17.4
18.7
15.2
14.0
12.5
16.0
19.0
16.8
16.8
15.0
16.7
23.2
17.9
16.2
15.4
17.9
19.5
16.2
17.2
16.5
15.2
16.9
12.5
13.3
15.1
14.0
14.0
11.8
34.0
33.3
57.4
47.2
41.7
34.7
30.1
33.9
33.7
41.2
42.6
37.7
35.8
40.9
38.3
33.3
35.5
25.9
42.0
43.1
36.8
36.4
41.1
40.5
44.2
45.3
35.4
41.8
40.2
36.7
38.1
43.4
39.8
36.2
39.5
36.8
41.8
35.6
32.0
43.0
42.9
40.4
37.0
17.4
18.9
7.3
27.7
31.0
30.6
24.7
16.7
14.9
28.3
23.2
18.3
16.8
31.3
35.5
36.6
25.2
20.7
27.2
30.8
29.9
33.3
11.6
22.6
31.3
34.1
27.7
25.8
33.3
26.2
29.1
40.0
30.6
41.2
32.7
32.9
40.0
25.8
30.3
4.3
3.7
0.0
0.0
1.0
5.0
7.1
1.6
2.2
2.9
0.0
0.9
1.1
0.9
0.9
4.0
0.9
11.6
1.7
1.7
3.2
2.8
0.9
2.4
0.0
0.9
1.0
2.2
0.0
1.6
1.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
1.6
1.5
2.0
2.7
3.0
3.2
1.7
55.3
59.3
82.6
81.1
91.7
67.3
61.9
67.7
73.0
80.4
85.1
70.8
75.8
80.9
82.2
64.6
63.6
51.8
73.1
77.6
69.6
66.4
69.2
64.3
88.4
76.4
67.7
63.7
72.3
72.7
65.7
73.8
68.9
60.0
67.7
57.4
65.3
64.4
57.0
71.0
68.1
8.9
10.2
10.6
9.7
8.9
9.2
9.8
5.7
8.4
9.5
9.7
9.7
8.3
10.8
9.8
8.2
10.0
9.7
10.6
10.3
11.2
9.7
10.2
8.4
8.9
9.7
9.0
9.0
10.4
11.1
9.9
11.2
9.5
9.7
11.4
12.4
8.9
6.6
9.0
8.5
10.6
9.3
11.1
14.1
12.7
12.6
10.8
11.0
6.8
10.4
12.3
13.2
11.7
10.4
14.1
13.0
9.4
11.4
9.9
13.1
13.1
13.5
11.2
12.1
9.6
12.2
12.2
10.7
10.3
12.7
13.7
11.5
13.9
11.3
10.6
13.4
13.3
10.2
7.5
9.7
10.3
12.5
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 1. Performance of preliminary full sieve green bean lines, May 18 planting, Corvallis, 2007 (cont.)
z
y
Percent Sieve Size
Line
Days to
Harvest
Est.
Sieve
Size
Stand
1
2
3
4
5
6
%1-4
Sieve
Av
Tons/Acre
Av Adj
x
Tons/Acre
6511
6512
6513
6515
6516
6517
6518
6522
6525
6527
6528
6529
6530
73
70
75
73
74
69
74
69
70
73
75
74
73
full
full
full
full
5
5
full
5
full
full
full
5
full
132
129
132
126
110
136
140
114
140
119
136
140
140
5.8
10.5
7.3
3.7
4.3
3.8
5.9
10.8
3.5
3.4
6.3
5.8
3.2
9.3
8.6
9.8
6.4
8.6
5.8
20.6
10.8
8.0
8.5
10.4
6.7
6.4
20.9
18.1
19.5
11.9
15.1
13.5
29.4
17.6
17.7
14.4
18.8
13.3
14.9
44.2
39.0
46.3
39.4
51.6
47.1
38.2
40.5
46.9
41.5
45.8
36.7
33.0
18.6
22.9
17.1
37.6
19.4
26.9
5.9
18.9
23.0
32.2
18.8
35.0
37.2
1.2
1.0
0.0
0.9
1.1
2.9
0.0
1.4
0.9
0.0
0.0
2.5
5.3
80.2
76.2
82.9
61.5
79.6
70.2
94.1
79.7
76.1
67.8
81.3
62.5
57.4
7.7
9.6
7.0
9.5
8.3
9.6
6.2
6.9
10.4
10.8
8.9
11.3
8.8
10.1
12.1
9.3
10.6
10.7
11.5
8.9
8.9
13.0
12.7
11.6
12.8
9.4
3.1
3.7
LSD 0.05
z
Mean of 2 replications; subplots of 5' were harvested from 20' plots in rows 30" apart.
y
Percent calculated as % of total of 1-6 sieve beans.
Tons/Acre adjusted to 50% 1-4 sieve.
x
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 2. Performance of preliminary small sieve green bean lines, May 18 planting, Corvallis, 2007.
y
Percent Sieve Size
Line
Days to
Harvest
Est.
Sieve
Size
Stand
1
2
3
4
5
6
%1-4 Sieve
Av
Tons/Acre
6174
6312-1
6329
6340
6342
6347
6348
6441
6442
6447
6449
6451
6452
6454
6456
6457
6464
6468
6482
6487
6496
6507
6519
6523
6526
Medinah
Savannah
73
70
69
69
68
69
68
69
73
70
69
69
69
73
69
73
69
70
73
69
73
74
73
70
73
73
73
4-5
4-5
4
4-5
4
4
4
4-5
4-5
3
3
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
4
4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4-5
3
2-3
4
136
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
139
107
140
89
132
134
125
140
140
140
140
119
115
104
140
8.0
7.3
5.6
8.3
6.7
6.5
8.5
14.6
6.0
16.7
15.9
10.5
7.3
6.5
7.8
4.7
14.3
11.8
10.5
8.0
4.9
3.6
12.1
5.2
11.9
11.3
2.4
9.8
15.9
14.4
11.9
13.5
14.3
17.0
17.7
10.4
33.3
36.4
14.0
9.8
12.9
9.8
9.3
18.6
21.6
17.5
14.0
7.8
7.2
22.4
11.7
16.9
60.4
12.1
16.1
25.6
27.8
20.2
25.8
24.7
24.5
24.0
16.4
46.3
43.2
24.6
23.2
17.7
20.6
14.0
22.9
29.4
26.3
20.0
16.5
20.7
34.5
28.6
30.5
28.3
40.3
39.3
40.2
46.7
50.0
43.8
46.8
45.7
37.5
32.8
3.7
4.5
43.9
51.2
43.5
53.9
35.5
41.4
35.3
35.1
40.0
39.8
58.6
27.6
35.1
35.6
0.0
43.5
25.9
11.0
5.6
9.5
10.1
7.8
4.3
6.3
32.1
0.0
0.0
7.0
8.5
19.4
7.8
35.5
2.9
2.0
10.5
18.0
29.1
9.9
3.4
18.2
5.1
0.0
1.6
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
73.2
89.0
94.4
90.5
89.9
92.2
95.7
93.8
65.7
100.0
100.0
93.0
91.5
80.6
92.2
63.6
97.1
98.0
89.5
82.0
68.9
90.1
96.6
80.5
94.9
100.0
98.4
10.0
7.7
8.3
8.3
7.0
7.0
9.8
8.8
12.3
5.1
4.1
5.4
7.2
5.8
9.4
5.9
6.5
5.0
5.1
9.5
9.1
10.1
5.0
7.1
5.2
5.0
10.9
LSD 0.05
2.4
z
Mean of 2 replications; subplots of 5' were harvested from 20' plots in rows 30" apart.
y
Percent calculated as % of total of 1-6 sieve beans.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 3. Notes on preliminary full sieve green bean lines, May 18 planting, Corvallis, 2007.
Line
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
y
Section
Pod
Smoothx
ness
Pod
w
Color
91G
OR 54
5630
5669
16.0
15.0
15.5
15.0
4
4
5
6
round
round
round
round
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
6137
6185
6189
17.0
16.5
16.0
8
4
5
round
round
round
6
6
6
8
9
8
6241
12.0
5
round
7
6
6279
6286
6436
6439
6440
14.0
13.0
16.0
15.5
15.0
7
5
6
7
8
oval
round
round
round
round
4
6
6
7
8
2
5
5
5
7
6443
6445
6455
6463
6467
6469
6471
6474
6475
6477
6478
6479
6481
6484
6485
6489
6490
6493
6494
6497
6498
6501
6502
6504
16.5
15.0
17.0
15.5
15.5
15.0
14.5
17.5
16.0
14.0
15.0
14.0
14.4
15.0
15.0
14.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
13.0
15.0
15.5
14.5
15.5
7
5
1
6
4
7
7
5
5
5
7
6
6
6
5
6
4
8
5
3
6
6
6
6
round
round
heart
round
round
round
round
round
round
heart
round
round
round
heart
round
round
round
round
round
round
round
round
heart
round
6
5
9
5
7
5
6
3
5
7
7
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
5
4
7
7
5
7
5
4
3
6
5
6
4
5
5
6
6
6
6
5
6
5
4
5
5
5
6
5
5
6
Notes
v
Split set with 5 sv getting quite seedy
Getting seedy without sizing up
Probably prime in 2 days
Probably prime in 2 days
Very long, dark green, shiny bean; at least half
ovals so does not grade properly
Seed development just beginning in 5 & 6 sv
Moderate seed development
Very short 5 sv pods with seed development beginning; 3 & 4 sv pods look good
High fiber (shows at tip after going through
grader); color too light
Short, mostly curved pods; prime today
Fairly smooth straight bean
Long smooth pods; nice appearance
Very attractive dark green, straight, smooth pods
Very long straight attractive bean; probably prime
in 2 days
Contains ovals; split set
Long curly light pods
Getting seedy without sizing up
Long, slender, curved pods
Getting quite seedy
Seed development beginning
Classic BBL type with long pods
Seed development beginning
Seed development beginning
Getting quite seedy
Probably prime in 2 days
Getting seedy without sizing up
Getting quite seedy
Seed development beginning
Getting seedy without sizing up
Curved pods; color too light
Straight smooth pods
Contains oval mix
Rough pods with many blanks.
Smooth pods
Getting seedy without sizing up
Curved pods
Seed development beginning
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 3. Notes on preliminary full sieve green bean lines, May 18 planting, Corvallis, 2007 (cont).
Line
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
y
Section
Pod
Smoothx
ness
Pod
w
Color
6505
6506
14.0
15.5
4
7
round
round
5
7
9
9
6509
6510
16.5
15.0
6
7
round
heart
7
8
8
8
6511
16.6
7
round
7
8
6512
6513
16.0
16.3
6
7
heart
round
5
7
5-8
7
6515
6516
16.0
15.0
8
7
round
round
8
7
9
6
6517
6518
14.0
13.5
5
4
cb
round
7
7
7
7
6522
17.0
5
cb
5
7
6525
6527
15.0
14.0
5
7
round
round
8
5
7
8
6528
6529
6530
16.0
14.5
16.0
6
7
6
cb
cb
cb
8
6
7
6
8
5
v
Notes
Seems to contain both long smooth and
short bumpy beans; contains ovals; short
bumpy 5 sv quite seedy; long smooth 5 sv
not at all but long smooth beans may be
lighter color
Nice looking; extreme green color
Very long pods, quite straight for length;
ends get chewed up in grader because
beans are so long; prime today; makes
very few 6 sv
Very attractive pods
Very long, slender, elegant dark green
pods
Color variable--about half 91G color and
about half much darker; probably prime in
2 days
Seed development beginning
Very nice, uniformly extreme green,
straight pods
Getting seedy without sizing up
Has a shiny mix which is straighter but
lighter color
Extreme green type
Very long pods with good color; contains a
lighter shorter mix; probably prime tomorrow
Very smooth pods; probably prime tomorrow
Straight, dark green pods
Very tall plants which seems to be standing well
Attractive pods
Similar to 91G in appearance
z
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 straightest
Cross section: cb = crease-back
x
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 smoothest
w
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 darkest
v
BBL=bush blue lake; sv=sieve
y
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 4. Notes on preliminary small sieve green bean lines, May 18 planting, Corvallis, 2007.
Line
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
y
Section
Pod
Smoothx
ness
Pod
w
Color
6174
6312-1
6329
6340
15.0
13.0
13.5
14.0
5
4
5
5
round
heart
round
round
7
5
7
5
8
5
6
6
6342
6347
6348
13.0
12.5
14.0
7
3
5
heart
heart
round
5
6
6
5
5
4
6441
6442
6447
6449
14.0
16.0
12.0
12.0
3
5
6
7
round
round
heart
heart
5
7
7
6
5
5
4
3
6451
6452
14.0
12.0
1
6
round
round
4
5
2
4
Notes
v
Minimal seed dev
Split set; some 4 sv seedy, some not at all
Prime today
Probably prime tomorrow
Prime today; short but attractive; straight; may
have oval tendency
Seed development beginning
Consistent moderate curve; prime today
Badly split set; looks very much like a smaller sv
91G
Oval tendency; contains flats
Prime today
Color too light; slightly bumpy; prime today
Very curved with hooks; color too light; probably
prime in 2 days
Color may be too light; prime today
6454
13.0
7
heart
7
4
6456
6457
6464
6468
6482
15.0
14.0
12.0
14.0
13.0
5
7
5
5
7
round
oval
heart
oval
round
5
5
6
5
7
5
1
5
2
7
6487
6496
6507
6519
15.0
15.0
15.0
13.0
4
6
4
5
round
heart
round
round
5
5
5
7
5
5
6
7
Either split set or a mix--some 4 sv very long &
seedy while others short and not seedy; also contains flats
Looks like a smaller sv 91G: possibly straighter;
somewhat split set
Oval; color too light
Prime today
Color too light; strong oval tend; prime today
Very dark green interior
appearance similar to 91G, possibly straighter;
prime today
Some very long beans; probably prime tomorrow
Moderate seed development
Moderate seed development
?
7
3
7
Mix (about half and half) of a 4 sv, dark colored,
smooth, straight, short bean, and a 5 sv, too light,
curved, longer bean
Little seed development
Seed development beginning in 3 sv
Moderate seed development
6523
6526
Medinah
Savannah
?
12.0
12.5
15.0
?
6
8
9
?
round
round
round
?
7
7
8
z
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 straightest
Cross section: cb = crease-back
x
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 smoothest
w
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 darkest
v
sv=sieve
y
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 5. White mold incidence and severity in green bean lines, May 18 planting,
z
Corvallis, 2007 .
Line
91G
OR 54
5630
5669
6137
6174
6185
6189
6241
6279
6286
6312-1
6329
6340
6342
6347
6348
6436
6439
6440
6441
6442
6443
6445
6447
6449
6451
6452
6454
6455
6456
6457
6463
6464
6467
6468
6469
6471
6474
6475
6477
6478
6479
6481
Sieve
Size
full
full
full
full
full
4-5
full
full
full
full
5
4-5
4
4-5
4
4
4
5
5
5
4-5
4-5
5
5
3
3
4-5
4-5
4-5
5
4
4
full
4
full
4
full
full
full
5
5
full
5
5
Total No. Plants
Rep
Rep 1
2
38
39
26
45
41
49
36
37
35
38
38
35
38
41
39
41
43
37
34
32
40
35
35
31
32
49
41
31
39
40
30
48
44
31
37
33
33
33
31
33
44
27
38
40
36
40
30
50
36
58
34
36
32
32
36
42
31
29
32
28
37
35
29
34
46
49
40
34
51
42
36
39
35
44
42
23
31
40
26
32
38
39
40
32
35
34
37
40
% Infected
Rep
Rep 1
2
79
90
96
93
83
41
97
73
89
53
82
74
79
85
95
85
72
59
79
91
73
89
74
94
75
51
83
81
69
90
50
83
86
65
89
58
100
100
94
100
93
100
100
83
56
95
80
76
89
90
76
64
78
63
72
62
97
76
88
56
73
94
69
97
89
78
53
85
92
98
100
54
100
93
98
83
97
78
100
97
95
95
100
66
51
100
97
88
Average
% Infected
85
95
62
85
71
78
82
90
66
85
81
84
63
82
80
67
76
74
100
97
97
92
76
78
90
70
71
67
87
72
84
83
84
69
95
77
97
91
88
99
95
83
76
93
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Severity
light to moderate
moderate
light
moderate
light
light
moderate
light
light
moderate
moderate
moderate
light
light
moderate
light
light
light
moderate
heavy
moderate
light to moderate
light
light
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
light to severe
moderate
moderate
light
light
light to severe
moderate
moderate
moderate to severe
light
moderate
light to moderate
moderate
light to moderate
moderate
Table 5. White mold incidence and severity in green bean lines, May 18 planting,
z
Corvallis, 2007 (cont) .
Line
6482
6484
6485
6487
6489
6490
6493
6494
6496
6497
6498
6501
6502
6504
6505
6506
6507
6509
6510
6511
6512
6513
6515
6516
6517
6518
6519
6522
6523
6525
6526
6527
6528
6529
6530
Medinah
Savannah
LSD 0.05
Sieve
Size
4
full
full
4-5
5
full
full
5
4-5
5
full
5
5
full
full
full
4
5
5
full
full
full
full
5
5
full
4
5
4-5
full
3
full
full
5
full
2-3
4
Total No. Plants
Rep
Rep 1
2
24
32
43
29
36
28
43
35
44
37
38
31
38
39
39
48
35
29
33
25
39
29
43
47
41
46
42
39
38
43
37
25
31
46
33
41
28
32
31
41
35
34
40
35
34
30
31
40
35
41
40
42
34
25
28
30
27
24
29
39
36
30
40
32
40
38
33
41
38
43
36
31
33
41
% Infected
Rep
Rep 1
2
92
97
65
100
97
96
79
63
93
62
92
90
89
79
90
98
60
100
97
100
100
93
91
96
95
96
98
95
66
100
97
64
81
76
82
93
57
84
84
80
89
74
100
97
97
100
87
100
89
63
83
90
100
100
86
100
52
92
90
51
67
100
98
100
100
82
76
71
95
74
97
100
13
7
Average
% Infected
95
83
97
71
78
91
84
94
80
99
97
94
96
97
83
81
79
88
71
82
82
99
99
94
76
87
100
93
72
71
84
99
91
74
85
99
10
29
z
Severity
light to moderate
light to moderate
light to severe
light to moderate
light to moderate
light to moderate
light
light
light to severe
light to moderate
moderate to severe
moderate
moderate
light to moderate
moderate
light to moderate
light
light
moderate
light
moderate
moderate
light to severe
moderate
moderate
light to moderate
moderate
moderate
light to moderate
light
light to severe
light to moderate
light
light to moderate
light
moderate
light
Trial had lush, vigorous growth with high incidence of white mold, severely affecting yield in
some cases. Percent infected based on actual counts at time of harvest.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 6. Performance of preliminary full sieve green bean lines, June 1 planting, Corvallis, 2007.
y
Percent Sieve Size
Line
Days to
Harvest
Est.
Sieve
Size
Stand
1
2
3
4
5
6
%1-4
Sieve
Av
Tons/Acre
Av Adj
x
Tons/Acre
91G
OR 54
5630
5669
6137
6185
6189
6241
6279
6286
6436
6439
6440
6443
6445
6455
6463
6467
6469
6471
6474
6475
6477
6478
6479
6481
6484
6485
6489
6490
6493
6494
6497
6498
6501
6502
6504
6505
6512
6516
6518
61
62
62
62
65
62
62
62
62
60
62
62
62
62
62
65
65
65
66
66
65
62
65
66
65
65
66
67
65
66
67
65
65
65
66
65
65
62
65
62
67
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
full
full
full
full
5
5
full
5
5
full
full
5
full
full
5
5
full
5
5
full
full
full
5
full
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
97
100
100
100
94
88
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
95
100
100
100
100
91
100
84
43
89
95
3.9
1.6
5.5
2.3
1.8
5.2
2.2
1.8
6.9
3.6
3.7
2.2
3.9
2.8
2.3
4.4
4.5
3.3
2.7
2.9
3.9
6.1
2.5
1.6
3.4
1.4
3.7
2.2
4.2
4.0
3.3
3.5
1.8
3.3
1.5
3.8
2.8
2.4
1.1
5.1
4.1
4.9
4.0
4.4
8.0
1.8
4.2
9.7
3.6
8.0
8.4
9.9
8.8
9.8
7.4
9.3
5.5
4.5
3.3
4.5
2.9
6.8
17.1
5.0
3.1
5.1
4.2
3.0
2.9
5.0
4.0
3.3
4.4
5.3
4.9
3.7
5.7
2.8
7.3
4.4
5.1
5.5
5.8
7.9
11.0
14.8
5.4
7.3
11.8
10.9
12.6
12.0
19.8
16.5
17.6
13.9
20.9
14.3
10.7
9.8
7.3
8.8
12.6
24.4
16.0
7.9
12.7
13.4
11.1
6.5
13.3
8.8
6.7
14.9
16.7
14.8
9.7
15.2
3.8
12.2
6.7
12.7
11.0
23.3
32.5
39.6
27.3
27.7
21.9
28.0
30.9
27.6
33.7
35.8
35.2
34.3
34.3
33.7
48.4
33.0
30.1
41.8
40.9
38.8
34.1
47.9
44.1
44.1
45.8
39.3
31.9
45.8
40.0
31.3
50.9
50.9
45.9
38.8
45.7
20.8
36.6
28.9
44.3
35.6
47.6
38.9
38.5
39.8
47.3
42.7
34.4
41.8
28.7
36.1
28.4
35.2
33.3
35.2
29.1
27.5
36.6
42.3
39.1
37.2
31.1
15.9
26.1
38.6
32.2
31.0
37.0
49.3
26.7
40.0
50.7
24.6
23.7
27.0
40.3
25.7
54.7
35.4
45.6
31.6
37.0
14.6
15.1
1.1
8.0
16.1
18.8
14.0
10.9
16.1
6.0
2.5
2.2
1.0
6.5
4.7
0.0
10.7
11.4
4.5
7.3
6.8
2.4
2.5
4.7
2.5
4.2
5.9
7.2
5.0
3.2
4.7
1.8
1.8
4.1
6.0
3.8
15.1
6.1
13.3
1.3
6.8
37.9
46.0
60.4
52.3
36.6
38.5
51.6
47.3
55.2
57.8
69.1
62.6
65.7
58.3
66.3
72.5
52.7
46.3
56.4
55.5
62.1
81.7
71.4
56.7
65.3
64.8
57.0
43.5
68.3
56.8
44.7
73.7
74.6
68.9
53.7
70.5
30.2
58.5
41.1
67.1
56.2
9.0
11.3
8.9
8.4
10.8
8.7
8.7
5.7
8.2
7.4
8.0
8.3
9.7
9.6
8.2
8.4
9.6
10.6
9.9
12.4
9.4
7.5
10.9
11.5
10.4
11.9
12.4
12.9
10.4
11.3
13.7
10.2
10.4
10.8
11.7
9.4
9.5
7.6
9.0
6.9
6.5
8.0
10.9
9.8
8.5
9.4
7.7
8.9
5.6
8.6
8.0
9.5
9.3
11.3
10.3
9.5
10.3
9.9
10.2
10.5
13.1
10.5
9.9
13.2
12.3
12.0
13.7
13.2
12.1
12.2
12.1
13.0
12.6
12.9
12.8
12.1
11.4
7.6
8.3
8.2
8.0
6.9
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 6. Performance of preliminary full sieve green bean lines, June 1 planting, Corvallis, 2007 (cont).
y
Percent Sieve Size
Line
Days to
Harvest
Est.
Sieve
Size
Stand
1
2
3
4
5
6
%1-4
Sieve
Av
Tons/Acre
Av Adj
x
Tons/Acre
6525
6528
6529
62
67
65
full
full
5
100
100
93
4.7
1.7
1.3
7.1
1.7
5.1
16.5
5.2
12.7
38.8
26.1
53.2
30.6
60.9
25.3
2.4
4.3
2.5
67.1
34.8
72.2
7.3
9.8
7.3
8.6
8.4
8.9
2.4
2.6
LSD 0.05
z
Mean of 2 replications; subplots of 5' were harvested from 20' plots in rows 30" apart.
Percent calculated as % of total of 1-6 sieve beans.
x
Tons/Acre adjusted to 50% 1-4 sieve.
y
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 7. Performance of preliminary small sieve green bean lines, June 1 planting, Corvallis, 2007.
y
Percent Sieve Size
Line
Days to
Harvest
Est.
Sieve
Size
Stand
1
2
3
4
5
6
%1-4 Sieve
Av
Tons/Acre
6174
6312-1
6329
6340
6342
6347
6348
6441
6442
6447
6449
6451
6452
6454
6456
6457
6468
6487
6496
Savannah
62
62
60
62
60
62
60
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
65
62
62
65
65
4-5
4-5
4
4-5
4
4
4
4-5
4-5
3
3
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
4-5
4-5
4
100
100
89
100
99
100
100
87
100
100
100
100
94
88
100
78
100
100
100
100
9.7
4.0
6.8
6.2
7.2
4.5
6.8
7.4
5.6
6.6
11.9
4.9
2.5
3.3
5.1
3.3
7.5
3.1
0.9
1.4
14.5
7.0
13.6
7.4
17.4
6.8
10.2
11.6
11.1
16.4
20.3
8.2
5.1
6.6
5.1
6.6
23.9
19.6
4.3
10.0
21.0
15.0
20.3
14.8
20.3
15.9
18.2
18.9
18.9
52.5
42.4
19.7
12.7
11.5
11.1
19.7
28.4
13.4
14.7
45.7
35.5
30.0
39.0
30.9
40.6
37.5
39.8
32.6
37.8
24.6
25.4
45.9
43.0
47.5
45.5
55.7
32.8
29.9
46.6
42.9
19.4
37.0
20.3
30.9
14.5
31.8
23.9
25.3
24.4
0.0
0.0
19.7
32.9
29.5
31.3
14.8
7.5
25.8
28.4
0.0
0.0
7.0
0.0
9.9
0.0
3.4
1.1
4.2
2.2
0.0
0.0
1.6
3.8
1.6
2.0
0.0
0.0
8.2
5.2
0.0
80.6
56.0
79.7
59.3
85.5
64.8
75.0
70.5
73.3
100.0
100.0
78.7
63.3
68.9
66.7
85.2
92.5
66.0
66.4
100.0
6.1
9.5
5.2
7.3
6.6
7.7
9.1
8.5
8.2
5.7
5.5
5.6
6.8
6.2
10.4
5.9
6.0
7.3
10.8
6.6
LSD 0.05
2.9
z
Mean of 2 replications; subplots of 5' were harvested from 20' plots in rows 30" apart.
Percent calculated as % of total of 1-6 sieve beans.
y
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 8. Notes on preliminary full sieve green bean lines, June 1 planting, Corvallis, 2007 .
Flavor
Line
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straighty
ness
91G
OR 54
5630
5669
6137
6185
17.5
15.0
15.0
14.0
15.0
15.5
6
5
5
7
7
6
6189
6241
6279
15.5
11.5
16.0
7
7
7
6286
6436
6439
6440
6443
6445
15.0
15.0
14.0
15.5
15.0
14.5
6
7
6
7
5
5
6455
6463
6467
6469
6471
6474
6475
6477
6478
6479
6481
6484
14.5
15.0
16.0
16.0
14.0
16.5
15.0
15.0
15.0
14.0
14.5
15.0
6485
15.0
u
Pod
Cross
x
Section
round to
cb
round
round
round
round
round
Pod
Smoothw
ness
Pod
v
Color
Sweetness
Astringency
7
5
5
5
5
4
6
5
5
5
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
3
7
7
7
7
5
7
6
4
5
7
6
5
3
7
7
7
5
3
7
6
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
5
7
7
7
7
3
3
7
7
7
6
Moderate seed development
Segregating ovals; getting seedy
Getting seedy
Getting seedy
Getting seedy
Segregating strings; moderate seed development
5
7
5
7
6
5
5
6
7
7
6
5
round
round
round
heartround
round
round
round
heart
round
oval to
round
round
round
round
round
round
round
round
round
round
round
round
5 and 6 sv are seedy and getting cb
Segregating for immature white seeds
Segregating for strings
Moderate seed development
Holding well at 37% 1-4 sv
Holding well; pods are bumpy but not particularly seedy
Best of Minuette crosses; BBL pods but extreme green; segregating strings
Very short pods
Segregating strings; moderate seed development
6
5
5
8
7
6
5
7
7
6
7
6
5
5
5
6
6
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
7
7
7
7
5
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
9
7
7
7
3
5
7
7
5
7
8
7
6
round
5
5
5
7
Tough texture; getting seedy without sizing up
Getting seedy
Getting seedy
Smooth pods but tough texture; large seeds
Seedy and bumpy in 6 sv
Getting seedy
Contains oval off type; getting seedy without sizing up
Mixed seed development; may be a mix
Straight beans; uniform size; moderately seedy
V. seedy 6 sv, Seedy 4 & 5 sv; very nice appearance.
Very attractive pod; getting seedy
Very seedy and bumpy in 6 sv
Contains light colored off-type; mixed seed development; may be a
mix
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
t
z
Table 8. Notes on preliminary full sieve green bean lines, June 1 planting, Corvallis, 2007 (cont).
Flavor
u
Line
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straighty
ness
Pod
Cross
x
Section
Pod
Smoothw
ness
Pod
v
Color
Sweetness
Astringency
6489
15.0
7
round
7
5
7
8
Very attractive pod; getting seedy
6490
16.0
8
round
7
6
5
8
6493
6494
6497
15.0
14.0
14.5
5
6
5
round
round
round
6
4
6
5
5
5
8
7
7
6
7
7
Long straight pods but 6 sv getting seedy and bumpy
High yielding and generally high quality bean, but does contain some
short junky pods in this trial
Getting seedy and bumpy
Getting seedy
6498
6501
6502
6504
6505
15.5
14.0
13.5
12.0
15.5
7
5
6
4
7
round
round
round
round
round
6
5
5
5
7
5
7
5
7
7
7
7
7
3
7
7
7
7
9
9
Tough texture; segregating for light colored off-type; getting seedy
Getting seedy in 4 & 5 sv; 5 sv very bumpy
Getting quite seedy
Short pods; holding well; pc type
Pc type pods uniformly colored; moderate seed development in 6 sv
6512
6516
6518
6525
6528
16.0
15.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
5
5
6
7
4
round
round
round
round
round
5
8
7
7
7
6
5
7
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
7
7
8
5
7
Difficult to pick--pods do not detach easily; segregating for strings,
particularly apparent in 6 sv
Pc appearance but pods normal color; getting seedy
Pc type pods uniformly colored; moderate seed development
Very attractive pods; moderate seed development
Holding well
6529
14.5
5
oval to
round
7
8
5
7
Pc type with very nice color; pods a bit short; getting seedy
z
Notes
t
There was no white mold in this trial. Plant vigor was generally reduced due to many years of beans in this field. There were germination problems,
y
sometimes severe, especially in the persistent color (pc) types; some of these lines were discarded in this trial due to very poor stands. Scores based on
x
w
v
a 1-9 scale with 9 straightest. Cross section: cb = crease-back. Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 smoothest. Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9
u
t
darkest. Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 strongest. BBL=bush blue lake; sv=sieve; pc=persistent color.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 9. Notes on preliminary small sieve green bean lines, June 1 planting, Corvallis, 2007 .
Flavor
u
Line
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straighty
ness
Pod
Cross
x
Section
Pod
Smoothw
ness
Pod
v
Color
Sweetness
Astringency
6174
6312-1
6329
15.0
15.5
13.0
7
4
7
7
6
7
5
5
5
7
7
3
5
7
7
6340
6342
6347
6348
15.0
14.0
10.5
14.0
5
7
7
7
5
7
1
7
5
5
4
5
5
3
5
5
5
7
7
5
6441
6442
15.5
15.0
5
7
5
7
5
5
7
5
5
7
Getting seedy
Moderate seed development
6447
13.5
8
8
6
5
5
6449
12.5
8
8
4
1
9
6451
6452
6454
6456
6457
15.5
14.5
15.0
15.0
12.0
5
6
5
4
8
7
5
6
4
8
1
5
5
5
4
7
7
5
7
7
5
7
7
7
7
6468
6487
6496
14.0
15.0
15.5
8
5
6
round
round
round
heart to
round
round
round
round
heart to
round
round
heart to
round
heart to
round
oval to
round
round
round
round
round
oval to
round
round
round
Notes
Nice smooth straight BBL bean; moderate
seed development
Getting seedy; 3 sv junky
Moderate seed development
Moderate seed development in 5 sv and beginning in 4 sv
Getting seedy
Short junky pods with many blanks
Moderate seed development
8
6
6
3
6
5
7
5
7
5
7
7
Savannah
13.5
9
round
8
7
5
7
Straight fillet type pods
Bitter flavor; color too light; no seed development in 3 sv
Very long slender pods but light colored; discard
Moderate seed development
Getting seedy
Getting seedy
Moderate seed development
Very smooth, straight pods but probably high
fiber; color too light; 4 sv getting seedy
Getting seedy
Getting seedy
Very straight, shiny pods; getting seedy; not
very productive in field under stress conditions
z
t
There was no white mold in this trial. Plant vigor was generally reduced due to many years of beans in this field. There were
germination problems, sometimes severe, especially in the persistent color (pc) types; some of these lines were discarded in this
y
x
w
trial due to very poor stands. Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 straightest; Cross section: cb = crease-back; Scores based
v
u
on a 1-9 scale with 9 smoothest; Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 darkest; Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 strongest;
t
BBL=bush blue lake; sv=sieve; pc=persistent color.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 10. Performance of commercial green bean varieties, June 21 planting, Corvallis, 2007.
z
Percent Sieve Size
Variety
91G
Source
OSU
AV
Stand
150
OR 54
OSU
150
full sieve
5630
OSU
150
full sieve
6137
OSU
150
full sieve
6185
OSU
150
full sieve
6189
6338
OSU
OSU
150
150
full sieve
full sieve
PLS 2196
Pureline
148
full sieve
Huntington
Syngenta
150
full sieve
6436
OSU
150
5 sieve
6445
OSU
150
5 sieve
Seminis
150
5 sieve
SB 4359
Syngenta
150
4-5 sieve
PLS 2195
Pureline
118
4-5 sieve
08120693
Intended
Use
full sieve
Days
62
64
64
67
64
67
64
67
62
64
64
64
67
62
64
67
62
64
67
64
67
63
65
67
64
67
57
59
61
61
63
65
1
5.1
2.8
6.9
3.6
5.1
3.3
4.7
3.9
5.2
5.3
4.0
5.1
2.6
8.3
5.7
3.2
7.3
6.3
3.9
9.4
4.3
9.4
7.4
3.7
6.3
4.2
6.9
4.7
2.9
4.4
7.7
4.5
2
5.5
3.7
9.9
5.9
6.2
4.9
6.8
4.5
7.9
7.1
6.0
5.8
4.3
10.8
9.9
7.5
13.2
10.0
5.0
10.2
6.5
12.3
9.3
5.8
10.6
6.1
9.7
7.6
4.1
15.3
11.2
8.0
3
9.0
8.8
17.6
11.4
13.0
11.4
14.9
7.3
12.7
11.2
10.0
9.8
9.1
16.7
17.5
16.7
20.1
14.6
10.8
17.6
13.4
19.2
15.3
11.9
24.9
16.4
18.3
11.8
8.3
21.2
20.1
16.4
4
20.8
20.9
35.1
31.8
37.3
35.0
33.6
24.7
25.8
24.1
25.2
24.6
28.4
35.3
37.3
39.8
32.0
28.9
27.0
37.1
33.6
37.4
35.2
31.3
43.9
44.8
46.3
44.1
28.6
36.5
34.9
36.3
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
5
42.4
42.8
23.7
40.5
32.8
39.0
31.9
45.5
34.5
35.9
38.8
40.6
43.5
23.5
22.2
29.0
26.5
36.0
47.1
22.9
37.5
19.2
30.1
42.4
14.3
24.2
18.3
30.8
49.0
20.4
23.1
29.4
Tons/Acre Sieve Size
6
17.3
20.9
6.9
6.8
5.6
6.5
8.1
14.0
14.0
16.5
16.0
14.1
12.1
5.4
7.5
3.8
0.9
4.2
6.2
2.9
4.7
2.5
2.8
4.9
0.0
4.2
0.6
0.9
7.1
2.2
3.0
5.5
1-4
40.4
36.3
69.5
52.7
61.6
54.5
60.0
40.4
51.5
47.6
45.2
45.3
44.4
71.1
70.3
67.2
72.6
59.8
46.7
74.3
57.8
78.3
67.1
52.7
85.7
71.5
81.1
68.2
44.0
77.4
74.0
65.2
1
0.57
0.26
0.78
0.35
0.39
0.17
0.48
0.30
0.52
0.39
0.44
0.61
0.26
0.74
0.52
0.26
0.70
0.65
0.44
1.00
0.44
0.83
0.70
0.39
0.52
0.30
0.52
0.44
0.30
0.26
0.57
0.39
2
0.61
0.35
1.13
0.57
0.48
0.26
0.70
0.35
0.78
0.52
0.65
0.70
0.44
0.96
0.91
0.61
1.26
1.04
0.57
1.09
0.65
1.09
0.87
0.61
0.87
0.44
0.74
0.70
0.44
0.91
0.83
0.70
3
1.00
0.83
2.00
1.09
1.00
0.61
1.52
0.57
1.26
0.83
1.09
1.17
0.91
1.48
1.61
1.35
1.91
1.52
1.22
1.87
1.35
1.70
1.44
1.26
2.04
1.17
1.39
1.09
0.87
1.26
1.48
1.44
4
2.31
1.96
4.00
3.05
2.87
1.87
3.44
1.91
2.57
1.78
2.74
2.96
2.87
3.13
3.44
3.22
3.05
3.00
3.05
3.96
3.39
3.31
3.31
3.31
3.61
3.22
3.52
4.05
3.00
2.18
2.57
3.18
5
4.70
4.00
2.70
3.87
2.52
2.09
3.26
3.52
3.44
2.65
4.22
4.87
4.39
2.09
2.04
2.35
2.52
3.74
5.31
2.44
3.78
1.70
2.83
4.48
1.17
1.74
1.39
2.83
5.13
1.22
1.70
2.57
6
1.91
1.96
0.78
0.65
0.44
0.35
0.83
1.09
1.39
1.22
1.74
1.70
1.22
0.48
0.70
0.30
0.09
0.44
0.70
0.30
0.48
0.22
0.26
0.52
0.00
0.30
0.04
0.09
0.74
0.13
0.22
0.48
Graded
y
Total
11.09
9.35
11.40
9.57
7.70
5.35
10.22
7.74
9.96
7.40
10.88
12.01
10.09
8.87
9.22
8.09
9.53
10.40
11.27
10.66
10.09
8.83
9.40
10.57
8.22
7.18
7.61
9.18
10.48
5.96
7.35
8.74
x
$/Acre
1861
1510*
2419*
1786
1542*
1013
2022*
1300
1841*
1323
1905*
2105*
1755
1906
1969
1690
2068
2054
2000
2341*
1962
1994
1961*
1972
1950*
1546
1811
2070*
2120
1396
1698*
1946
Table 10. Performance of commercial green bean varieties, June 21 planting, Corvallis, 2007 (cont.).
z
Percent Sieve Size
AV
Stand
150
Intended
Use
4 sieve
Variety
BSC 833
Source
Brotherton
BSC 8577
Brotherton
150
4 sieve
Savannah
Harris
Moran
150
4 sieve
SWB 1A
Pureline
146
2-3
sieve
Banga
Seminis
150
2 sieve
Redon
Syngenta
148
2 sieve
Pierroton
Syngenta
150
2 sieve
BSC 8707
BrotherTon
150
2 sieve
Days
61
63
65
61
63
65
62
64
67
62
64
67
62
64
67
63
65
67
60
62
64
62
64
67
1
9.7
10.6
4.8
8.4
4.7
4.9
12.7
11.0
5.7
18.8
16.4
13.3
22.7
15.6
16.0
35.3
36.6
32.4
45.4
38.8
36.9
41.9
42.1
32.6
2
24.1
25.5
19.9
18.4
14.6
15.1
30.3
25.6
13.2
67.1
69.6
69.4
74.0
79.2
82.5
64.7
63.4
67.0
54.6
61.2
63.1
58.1
57.9
66.7
3
45.6
39.1
43.0
28.5
29.5
34.7
37.6
43.0
48.1
14.1
14.0
17.3
3.3
5.2
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
z
4
19.5
24.2
31.2
41.0
44.5
38.7
18.8
19.8
30.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
1.0
0.6
1.1
3.8
6.7
6.7
0.6
0.6
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Tons/Acre Sieve Size
6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1-4
99.0
99.4
98.9
96.2
93.3
93.3
99.4
99.4
97.6
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
1
0.83
0.74
0.39
0.87
0.52
0.48
0.91
0.83
0.52
1.39
1.22
1.13
1.78
1.31
1.35
2.61
2.91
2.61
3.61
3.39
3.44
2.35
2.57
2.00
2
2.04
1.78
1.61
1.91
1.61
1.48
2.18
1.91
1.22
4.96
5.18
5.92
5.83
6.61
6.96
4.79
5.05
5.39
4.35
5.35
5.87
3.26
3.52
4.09
3
3.87
2.74
3.48
2.96
3.26
3.39
2.70
3.22
4.44
1.04
1.04
1.48
0.26
0.44
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
4
1.65
1.70
2.52
4.26
4.92
3.78
1.35
1.48
2.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
0.09
0.04
0.09
0.39
0.74
0.65
0.04
0.04
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Graded
y
Total
8.48
7.00
8.09
10.40
11.05
9.79
7.18
7.48
9.22
7.40
7.44
8.53
7.87
8.35
8.44
7.40
7.96
8.05
7.96
8.74
9.31
5.61
6.09
6.13
Percent calculated as % of total of 1-6 sieve beans.
Total tons/acre of the graded beans, including sieve sizes 1-6. Values will be lower than those reported in Table 11 because some beans are lost in the grading
process. Analysis of variance (Table 11) was calculated using the harvest marked with *.
x
$/acre for full sieve and 5 sieve beans based on $259/ton for 1-4 sieve and $106/ton for 5-6 sieve; for 4 and 4-5 sieve beans based on $256/ton for 1-4 sieve
and $160/ton for 5-6 sieve; for 2-3 sieve beans based on $286/ton for 1-3 sieve and $0/ton for 4-6 sieve, and for 2 sieve beans based on $286/ton for 1-2 sieve
and $0/ton for 3-6 sieve.
y
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
x
$/Acre
2163
1789
2063*
2624
2758*
2443
1833
1911
2340*
2115
2127*
2438
2177
2264*
2376
2115
2277*
2289
2277
2501*
2662
1605
1742*
1742
Table 11. Statistical comparison of yields and dollar return of commercial green
z
bean lines, Corvallis, 2007 .
Line
91G
OR 54
5630
6137
6185
6189
6338
PLS 2196
Huntington
6436
6445
08120693
SB 4359
PLS 2195
BSC 833
BSC 8577
Savannah
SWB 1A
Banga
Redon
Pierroton
BSC 8707
BSC 8047
LSD 0.05
y
Intended Use
T/A Unadjusted
T/A Adjusted
$/A
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
5 sieve
5 sieve
5 sieve
4-5 sieve
4-5 sieve
4 sieve
4 sieve
4 sieve
2-3 sieve
2 sieve
2 sieve
2 sieve
2 sieve
Italian
11.6
11.5
8.2
10.6
10.4
11.5
12.4
9.3
11.0
11.0
9.9
8.7
9.8
7.9
8.4
11.6
9.7
7.8
8.7
8.4
9.1
6.4
8.5
2.0
10.5
13.8
9.2
11.6
10.6
11.0
11.8
11.1
12.1
13.6
11.6
11.8
9.8
7.9
8.4
11.6
9.7
7.8
8.7
8.4
9.1
6.4
8.5
2.1
1949
2477
1637
2091
1930
2019
2180
1979
2174
2417
2061
2063
2207
1829
2152
2899
2461
2239
2359
2389
2600
1829
1780
449
z
Based on one selected harvest for each variety (marked with * on Table 10), which was
usually the harvest closest to optimal based on that variety's intended use (50% 1-4 sieve
for full sieve), although in many cases in this trial an earlier harvest was used if yields
subsequently dropped significantly due to white mold infection. Yields are field yields of 16 sieve beans.
y
Full sieve and 5 sieve beans were adjusted to 50% 1-4 sieve; all others were unadjusted.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 12. Notes on June 21 commercial bean trial, Corvallis, Oregon, 2007.
Flavor
w
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
Section
Pod
Smoothy
ness
Pod
x
Color
Sweetness
Astringency
Beaniness
Perfuminess
91G
16.0
4
round
5
5
5
5
7
1
OR 54
15.5
5
round
5
5
7
7
7
1
5630
15.5
4
round
5
5
7
7
5
1
6137
14.0
5
round
4
7
7
5
5
1
6185
17.0
7
round
7
7
3
5
7
1
6189
6338
15.0
16.0
6
5
round
round
4
5
5
5
7
5
7
7
5
5
1
1
PLS 2196
16.5
7
round
7
7
5
3
7
1
Huntington
14.5
6
heart to
round
7
4
7
7
5
1
6436
16.0
6
round
6
6
3
5
5
1
6445
15.5
5
round
5
5
5
7
7
1
Line
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
v
Notes
Prime today with only
moderate seed development
Getting seedy without
sizing up
Variable pod color; getting seedy without sizing up
Large dark green BBL
pods, shiny; prime today
Prime today with only
moderate seed development; very attractive
pods but two-tone in
color; seems particularly susceptible to
white mold
Very large typical BBL
type; beginning to get
seedy and bumpy
Getting seedy
Pleasant flavor, moderately seedy
Very nice BBL with excellent flavor; lighter
color than 91G; little
seed development
Attractive BBL type;
moderate seed development
Moderate seed development
Table 12. Notes on June 21 commercial bean trial, Corvallis, Oregon, 2007 (cont.).
Flavor
w
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
Section
Pod
Smoothy
ness
Pod
x
Color
Sweetness
Astringency
Beaniness
Perfuminess
08120693
15.0
7
heart to
round
8
7
1
3
5
3
SB 4359
15.0
8
9
7
3
5
5
5
PLS 2195
15.0
7
8
6
3
3
5
1
BSC 833
14.0
6
BSC 8577
Savannah
13.0
14.0
SWB 1A
12.0
Line
round
heart to
round
7
4
1
5
5
1
7
9
round
heart to
round
round
7
8
4
6
4
3
7
5
6
5
1
3
8
round
8
4
7
7
5
1
Banga
12.5
8
round
7
4
1
9
7
3
Redon
Pierroton
13.0
11.5
6
8
round
round
8
8
4
5
5
3
8
7
5
5
1
1
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
v
Notes
Attractive dark green pc
type; getting seedy; severe
white mold infection
Very concentrated set of 4 &
5 sv beans; does not produce 6 sv; susceptible to
white mold; may be high
fiber
Crunchy; moderate seed
development
Tough; very beany flavor but
not sweet; big tall plants in
field with severe white mold
developing
Nice flavor; produces very
few 5 sv pods
Moderate seed development
BBL flavor; moderate seed
development
Tough pods with very strong
flavor; moderate seed development in 2 & 3 sv pods
Moderate seed development
in 2 sv, none in 1 sv
Moderate seed development
Table 12. Notes on June 21 commercial bean trial, Corvallis, Oregon, 2007 (cont.).
Flavor
Line
BSC 8707
BSC 8047
z
w
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
Section
Pod
Smoothy
ness
Pod
x
Color
Sweetness
Astringency
Beaniness
Perfuminess
Notes
13.0
7
round
7
5
3
3
5
5
Tough pods; seed development beginning in 2 sv
1
Tough pods with very strong
flavor; moderate seed development in 2 & 3 sv pods
16.5
7
romano
4
3
y
5
5
7
x
v
w
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 straightest. Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 smoothest. Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 darkest. Scores
v
based on a 1-9 scale with 9 strongest. Notes taken on prime harvest date; this trial had lush vigorous growth with heavy white mold infection, which reduced yields as trial progressed. sv = sieve; BBL = bush blue lake; pc = persistent color
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 13. White mold incidence and severity in green bean lines, commercial trial, Corvallis, 2007 .
Line
Sieve
Size
Rep
1
Rep
2
Rep
3
91G
OR 54
5630
6137
6185
6189
6338
PLS 2196
Huntington
6436
6445
08120693
SB 4359
PLS 2195
BSC 833
BSC 8577
Savannah
SWB 1A
Banga
Redon
Pierroton
BSC 8707
BSC 8047
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
5
5
5
4-5
4-5
4
4
4
2-3
2
2
2
2
Italian
50
50
90
100
100
100
100
60
100
100
50
100
100
70
30
70
100
10*
20
100
50
40
100
30
60
100
100
100
100
100
100
20
90
50
100
60
50
80
20
100
100
50
20
10
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
80
100
30
100
100
100
100
80
80
50
20
100
20
40
10
50
100
% Infected
Rep Rep
4
5
80
100
100
100
100
50
80
20*
100
100
50
100
100
50
30
100
0
50
100
100
50
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
50
100
100
100
30*
50
100
100
50
70
30
50
100
100
Rep
6
100
30
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
30
100
100
10
100
100
LSD 0.05
Average
Rep
1
Rep
2
Rep
3
77
73
98
100
100
92
93
80
75
82
75
100
93
63
62
73
70
57
60
65
30
73
100
7
7
6
8
8
8
5
6
8
6
7
8
7
3
5
7
5
3
4
8
5
5
8
6
5
8
7
7
7
8
6
6
8
7
5
7
6
5
3
6
6
5
5
5
5
8
9
8
8
7
8
7
7
6
5
8
7
8
9
6
5
4
3
9
5
5
5
4
8
31
z
Severity
Rep Rep
4
5
6
9
9
9
9
7
8
3
9
6
5
5
9
6
4
7
1
5
8
7
5
5
7
9
8
9
8
9
7
8
7
7
6
7
9
7
3
5
7
6
5
7
3
5
9
7
Rep
6
Average
9
4
8
8
9
9
6
8
6
6
8
9
8
7
8
6
3
7
6
9
2
7
9
7.7
6.8
8.0
7.8
8.3
7.5
7.0
6.0
6.8
6.7
6.8
7.3
7.8
5.2
5.3
5.7
4.0
5.8
5.8
6.2
4.5
5.8
7.8
1.7
This trial had lush, vigorous growth with heavy white mold infection. Percent infected measured by visual inspection, not by
actual counts.
*Poor stand made these plots hard to evaluate.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 14. OSU snap bean notes, Hermiston, Oregon, 2007
Growth
y
Habit
Sieve
Size
Pod
y
Quality
Yield
Sahara
91G
OR 54
5163
5256
5402
5446-1
5613
5620
5630
5635
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
7
5
5
4
full
full
full
full
full
4
3
full
full
full
7
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
7
7
7
5
7
7
7
7
7
3
5
8
6
7
5651
5669
5835
5977
5989
5996
5998
6002-6-2
6002-6-15
6002-6-21
6002-15
6002-30
6100-1
6100-11
6137
7
5
7
5
7
7
6
6
6
4
5
3
6
1
5
full
full
4
4
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
full
3
5
5
5
7
7
5
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
7
5
5
3
3
7
7
5
5
5
5
3
5
3
7
7
Entry
y
6154
6172
6174
9
7
8
4
full
5
7
7
7
5
5
6
6185
6186
8
8
full
4
5
5
7
5
6189
6193-31
6193-33
6
9
9
full
5
5
7
7
7
5
5
3
6229
6235
6241
6257
5
1
3
7
full
full
5
5
5
5
3
1
5
3
3
5
Notes
x
50% reduction in stand
50% buckskin on 8/10
slightly later than 91G
50% buckskin on 8/10
50% buckskin on 8/10
slightly later than 91G
tall plant but floppy; pods have
many blanks
slightly reduced stand
early; slightly reduced stand
slightly reduced stand
slightly reduced stand; non-pc
stand OK; pc--extreme green
Non-pc
late; extreme green
most susceptible to wind damage
15% stand reduction
bumpy pods; 75% stand reduction
short bush; more BBL than
Minuette type
tall plant; late; pale green foliage
late
high fiber pods
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 14. OSU snap bean notes, Hermiston, Oregon, 2007 (cont.)
Growth
y
Habit
Sieve
Size
Pod Qualiy
ty
Yield
6259
6279
6284
6286
6290
6312-1
6312-8
6312-11
6312-18
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
5
full
full
5
5
4
4
1
1
5
3
3
3
3
1
3
5
5
7
5
3
3
3
1
3
6312-20
6329
6338
6340
6342
6347
6348
6393
6406
6409
6410
6411
6412
5
7
3
5
3
3
5
7
3
6
1
3
7
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
full
5
5
full
full
5
5
3
5
1
3
3
5
7
7
5
3
5
5
7
5
5
5
5
5
3
7
3
3
7
7
Entry
6413
6416
6423
6424
6426
6428
6429
6430
6433
6436
6439
6440
6441
6442
6443
6445
6447
6449
y
7
7
3
5
4
3
7
3
3
6
6
full
3
5
3
4
5
5
4
4
5
full
7
7
7
7
7
1
7
7
7
3
4
7
7
7
5
5
5
3
5
7
5
7
6
7
7
6
4
5
5
5
5
full
4
5
5
7
5
3
9
7
5
7
7
7
7
7
x
Notes
high fiber pods; very early; 50%
stand reduction
hooked pods
some hooked pods
slight stand reduction
early; slightly reduced stand
early; slightly reduced stand
early
medium early; more robust plant
than sister lines
normal stand
slight stand reduction
late
10% stand reduction
large, leggy, floppy plants
90% stand reduction
slight stand reduction
long smooth pods with slight
curve; slight stand reduction; CTV
susceptible?
late
slight stand reduction
blanks in pods
95% stand reduction
50% stand reduction
bumpy pods with blanks
late
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 14. OSU snap bean notes, Hermiston, Oregon, 2007 (cont.)
Entry
Growth
y
Habit
Sieve
Size
Pod Qualiy
ty
Yield
6451
6452
6453
6454
6455
6456
5
7
7
7
4
3
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
5
3
5
5
7
5
5
5
7
7
6457
6463
6464
6467
6468
6469
6471
6474
6475
6477
6478
5
5
6
3
8
6
5
7
5
3
6
full
5
4
5
5
5
full
full
full
5
full
3
5
5
3
5
5
5
6
5
7
3
5
7
5
5
5
5
7
5
5
7
5
6479
6480
6481
6484
6485
5
6
6
5
5
full
5
5
5
full
1
5
5
3
4
3
5
7
5
7
6487
6489
6490
6493
6494
6495
6496
6497
6498
6500
6501
6502
6
3
7
6
5
6
3
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
full
5
full
full
full
full
full
5
5
5
5
5
7
5
7
3
3
5
5
7
7
5
5
5
5
5
7
5
7
7
5
7
80% stand reduction
50% stand reduction
50% stand reduction
6551
3
full
7
7
pc type; only slight stand reduction
y
Notes
x
poor pod set
heliotropoic leaves; blanks in pods
early
30% stand reduction
20% stand reduction
BBL habit
blanks in pods
junky; blanks; one purple pod offtype
slight stand reduction
virus (not CTV); segregating for
extreme green pods
z
Planted May 15. Notes taken August 10. Most of the persistant chlorophyll (pc) types
(about 75 lines) had very poor or no germination and were not included in the table.
y
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9=best.
x
pc=persistent chlorophyll; BBL=bush blue lake; CTV=curly top virus.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2007
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
Entry
NY1-6020-4
6570
L192
I9365-31
6561
G122
6562
PI207130-2-4
NY1-6020-5
6587
6569
M0192
M0061
M0113
Medinah
M0156
6464
6576
Ex Rico
NY5972
6235
6557
6574
FR266
6560
6554
PI290990-4-1
6571
Stand
White
Mold
x
Index
84
61
100
100
83
100
75
100
100
91
76
100
100
99
93
100
100
84
100
98
100
94
98
100
75
94
100
71
6.3
6.9
7.4
8.1
9.8
11.0
11.2
11.3
12.2
13.7
14.0
14.6
14.8
15.6
15.8
16.1
16.2
17.6
17.8
17.9
18.2
18.2
18.4
18.6
18.8
19.3
19.6
19.6
y
G
122
M0162
91G
White
Mold
w
Incidence
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
6.3
6.9
7.4
8.1
7.5
7.3
8.0
7.5
8.1
9.1
7.8
8.1
7.4
7.8
6.3
7.0
8.1
9.8
8.9
7.8
9.1
9.1
8.0
8.1
7.5
8.4
8.5
9.8
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
White
Mold
v
Severity
Maturity
Lodging
Estimated
Yield
t
Potential
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.8
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.3
2.0
1.8
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.3
2.5
2.3
2.3
2.0
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
late
medium
medium
medium late
medium early
medium early
medium
medium
medium
early
medium
medium
medium
medium early
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
early
medium
1.4
1.3
1.3
2.3
1.4
1.1
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.6
1.4
1.6
1.4
2.6
1.9
1.5
1.8
1.1
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.5
2.5
2.1
1.4
1.9
2.3
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.4
2.3
2.7
2.3
2.0
2.1
2.3
1.5
1.9
2.5
1.8
1.9
1.9
2.4
2.5
1.5
2.4
2.1
1.4
2.1
u
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2007 (cont.)
z
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
Entry
6589
NYBS6637
6581
6556
6559
6592
NY2-5984-1
M0207A
6586
6572
6582
6564
M0107A
6393
6555
6591
M0107B
6580
6595
6573
6577
6482
6449
NYBS6643
6452
6590
Savannah
Stand
White
Mold
x
Index
50
100
88
88
78
64
100
100
71
55
69
93
100
100
90
70
100
58
90
89
60
100
100
100
98
64
100
20.2
20.3
20.3
20.7
21.6
22.5
22.5
23.0
23.5
23.8
23.8
25.0
25.2
25.5
26.0
26.0
26.3
26.6
27.0
27.7
27.7
28.1
28.2
28.5
29.7
29.7
29.8
y
G
122
M0162
91G
White
Mold
w
Incidence
White
Mold
v
Severity
Maturity
Lodging
Estimated
Yield
t
Potential
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
8.8
8.1
8.1
9.0
9.4
9.8
9.8
10.0
9.4
9.5
6.8
10.0
8.4
9.1
9.3
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.0
9.9
9.9
8.5
9.4
9.5
9.9
9.9
8.5
2.3
2.5
2.5
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.5
2.5
3.5
2.5
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
3.0
2.8
2.8
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.5
medium
medium
medium
medium late
medium
medium
late
medium early
medium
medium
medium
medium late
medium
medium early
medium
medium
medium late
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium late
medium
1.3
1.8
1.4
1.8
1.9
1.9
1.4
2.0
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.5
1.7
1.6
1.9
1.5
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.4
1.8
1.4
1.9
1.6
1.8
2.3
1.6
1.6
2.4
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.5
2.8
2.8
2.1
2.5
1.6
2.2
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.5
2.0
2.5
2.1
2.0
1.6
2.0
1.6
2.3
2.6
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2007 (cont.)
z
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
Entry
6189
6584
6568
M0196
6485
M0070
6567
6453
6588
M0169
6579
M0098
6575
6578
6594
M0082
6137
H9658-9
M0146
M0162
M0048
6487
6463
6468
6436
6451
6284
y
Stand
65
44
54
93
100
100
95
100
66
99
25
100
93
68
85
100
100
100
100
100
99
100
100
98
98
99
100
White
Mold
x
Index
30.0
30.1
30.8
31.0
31.4
32.3
32.9
33.0
33.0
33.0
34.0
34.3
35.0
35.0
35.0
38.0
38.3
39.2
39.6
39.6
41.3
41.8
41.9
43.0
43.2
44.1
44.6
G
122
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
M0162
91G
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
White
Mold
w
Incidence
9.1
7.0
8.8
10.0
9.5
9.8
9.4
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.8
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
8.9
9.8
9.9
9.9
9.6
8.9
9.3
10.0
9.6
9.8
9.9
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
White
Mold
v
Severity
3.3
4.3
3.5
3.1
3.3
3.3
3.5
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.8
4.3
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.3
4.7
4.5
4.3
4.5
4.5
4.5
Maturity
medium
medium
late
early
medium early
early
medium
medium early
medium
early
medium
early
medium
medium
medium
early
medium
early
early
early
medium
medium
medium early
medium
medium early
early
early
u
Lodging
2.3
1.9
1.9
1.8
2.1
1.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
2.0
2.6
1.8
1.5
1.2
1.4
1.9
2.4
1.4
2.0
1.5
1.8
1.7
2.4
2.0
1.6
1.8
1.9
Estimated
Yield
t
Potential
2.0
1.6
2.6
2.0
2.3
1.8
2.1
2.5
2.0
1.8
2.0
2.3
2.1
2.2
2.4
1.8
2.3
2.6
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.5
2.4
1.9
2.1
1.8
2.4
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2007 (cont.)
z
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
Entry
6312-8
6475
6259
6474
6447
6490
6493
6467
M0163
6479
6566
M0175
6174
6478
M0059
6342
6440
6471
6241
6445
6443
6456
6469
6484
6498
M0179
6501
Stand
White
Mold
x
Index
G 122
100
100
98
96
100
93
98
100
100
94
100
100
98
98
100
100
100
98
100
91
100
93
96
98
100
100
95
44.6
44.6
45.0
45.0
45.5
47.0
47.0
47.5
47.5
48.0
48.0
48.0
49.5
50.0
50.4
51.9
51.9
53.0
54.5
54.5
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
57.4
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
y
M0162
91G
White
Mold
w
Incidence
White
Mold
v
Severity
Maturity
Lodging
Estimated
Yield
t
Potential
9.9
9.3
10.0
10.0
9.1
9.8
9.8
9.5
9.9
10.0
10.0
8.0
9.9
10.0
9.5
9.8
9.8
10.0
9.9
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.9
4.5
4.8
4.5
4.5
5.0
4.8
4.8
5.0
4.8
4.8
4.8
6.0
5.0
5.0
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.8
medium early
early
early
medium early
early
medium
medium
medium
early
early
medium
early
medium
medium early
early
medium early
medium early
medium
medium early
early
early
medium early
medium early
early
medium early
medium early
early
2.5
2.3
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.6
1.8
2.8
2.0
2.4
1.8
2.4
2.8
2.4
2.4
2.6
1.9
2.4
2.6
2.3
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
2.3
2.0
2.3
2.4
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.1
2.3
1.8
1.9
2.5
1.9
2.3
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.9
2.3
1.8
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.6
1.8
1.9
1.3
1.9
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2007 (cont.)
z
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
Entry
6290
6455
6495
M0157
6329
6481
91G
M0161
6257
6454
6457
6477
6489
6502
OR54
6442
6439
6340
M0056
M0160
5669
6348
6441
6494
6497
5630
5613
y
Stand
100
100
99
100
98
100
100
100
99
95
96
100
99
100
100
94
98
100
100
100
100
99
100
95
94
100
98
White
Mold
x
Index
58.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
62.4
63.0
63.0
63.0
63.0
63.0
63.0
63.0
63.7
64.4
65.0
65.0
65.0
68.0
68.0
68.0
68.0
68.6
69.3
70.0
G 122
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
M0162
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
91G
White Mold
w
Incidence
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.8
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.8
9.9
10.0
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
White
Mold
v
Severity
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.8
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
7.0
7.0
7.0
Maturity
early
medium early
medium early
medium early
early
early
medium early
early
early
early
early
early
medium early
early
medium early
medium
medium early
medium early
medium early
early
early
early
medium early
early
early
medium
medium
u
Lodging
2.5
2.1
2.1
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.8
2.9
1.9
2.1
2.0
2.6
2.3
2.6
2.4
2.1
2.0
2.8
2.6
3.0
2.6
2.8
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.5
1.9
Estimated
Yield
t
Potential
2.1
2.0
2.0
1.4
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.4
1.6
1.6
2.0
2.0
1.8
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.0
1.6
1.9
1.3
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.9
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2007 (cont.)
z
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
Entry
6496
M0155
6286
6312-1
6338
6347
Stand
White
Mold
x
Index
G 122
M0162
100
100
98
100
90
100
70.0
70.0
73.0
73.0
83.0
83.0
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
y
91G
White Mold
w
Incidence
White
Mold
v
Severity
Maturity
Lodging
Estimated
Yield
t
Potential
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
7.0
7.0
7.3
7.3
8.3
8.3
medium
early
early
early
early
early
2.4
2.9
2.3
2.8
2.5
3.0
1.6
1.4
1.8
2.1
2.0
1.9
z
u
Planted June 29.
Visual assessment in percent with 100 = perfect stand.
x
Based on LS means; index = incidence x severity; ** indicates significantly better than this check (p<0.05); ^ indicates significantly worse than this check (p<0.05).
w
Scores based on a 1-10 scale with 1 = low incidence, no symptoms observed and 10 = high incidence, all plants in plot infected.
v
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 = severe infection.
u
Scores based on a 1-3 scale with 1 = upright and 3 = prostrate.
t
Scores based on a 1-3 scale with 3 = good yield potential.
y
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 16. Comparison of white mold field averages, eight years combined, Corvallis, 2007.
White Mold Field Score Averages
z
z
z
z
z
Overall
z
z
y
Entry
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
AV
L192
NYBS6637
PI207130-2-4
PI290990-4-1
NY5972
NY2-5984-1
NY1-6020-5
G122
M0162
NY1-6020-4
NYBS6643
H9658-9
FR 266
Ex Rico
5630
5613
OR 54
91G
1.5
1.3
1.5
2.5
1.3
2.0
2.8
2.0
1.0
3.0
1.8
2.0
3.8
5.0
5.3
6.8
7.5
7.8
1.1
1.8
2.4
2.3
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.1
2.6
1.6
2.1
2.3
4.1
7.3
6.5
6.8
8.3
2.5
3.8
4.0
3.0
3.3
3.3
4.5
4.0
3.3
4.8
4.3
4.5
6.0
7.0
8.8
9.0
9.0
8.3
1.3
1.7
3.0
2.0
2.7
2.3
1.7
2.0
3.3
2.3
1.0
4.3
1.7
4.3
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.2
4.0
2.3
2.8
2.0
3.8
3.0
2.3
5.8
2.8
3.5
6.5
3.0
6.8
7.3
9.3
10.0
10.0
9.8
2.5
2.5
1.8
3.0
2.5
1.5
2.5
2.5
3.3
2.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
5.3
5.8
6.3
7.8
6.8
2.3
3.1
1.7
1.8
2.8
2.5
2.8
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.8
3.0
3.3
5.0
6.3
5.8
7.0
6.8
7.4
8.1
7.5
8.5
7.8
9.8
8.1
7.3
9.9
6.3
9.5
9.8
8.1
8.9
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
2.8
3.0
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.7
3.9
4.4
5.9
7.3
7.5
8.0
8.1
Grand AV
LSD @ .05
3.3
3.1
5.2
3.3
5.3
3.5
1.0
5.5
1.3
8.7
1.9
4.7
1.0
z
White mold scores: 1-10, 1 = low incidence, no symptoms observed, 10 = high incidence, all plants in plot infected.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 17. Comparison of white mold field averages, two years combined,
Corvallis, 2007.
Entry
PI207130-2-4
NY1-6020-4
G122
L192
PI290990-4-1
NY5972
NY1-6020-5
NYBS6637
FR 266
NY2-5984-1
M0162
6235
Savannah
H9658-9
NYBS6643
6464
6453
6447
Ex Rico
6457
6393
6475
6487
6290
6259
6474
6436
6348
5613
6467
6312-8
6439
6443
6441
6338
6329
6257
6493
6490
6440
6284
2006
2007
Overall
AV
1.7
3.0
2.0
2.3
1.8
2.8
2.8
3.1
3.3
2.5
2.5
3.5
4.3
3.0
3.8
5.5
3.8
4.8
5.0
4.0
5.5
5.8
6.3
5.3
5.3
5.5
6.1
5.8
5.8
6.3
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
7.5
6.3
7.3
7.4
8.5
7.8
8.1
8.1
8.1
9.8
9.9
9.1
8.5
9.8
9.5
8.1
10.0
9.1
8.9
10.0
9.4
9.3
8.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.6
10.0
10.0
9.5
9.9
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.9
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.8
5.1
5.3
5.4
5.6
5.7
6.2
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.4
6.6
6.8
6.9
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.5
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 17. Comparison of white mold field averages, two years combined,
Corvallis, 2007 (cont).
2006
2007
Overall
AV
5630
6312-1
6497
6479
6478
6454
6445
6498
6484
6286
6241
6347
6340
6477
91G
6501
Ore 54
6495
6481
6.3
6.3
6.5
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
9.9
10.0
9.8
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
8.1
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.4
8.4
8.4
8.4
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
Grand AV
LSD @ .05
5.5
1.3
42.8
1.9
7.4
1.6
Entry
z
White mold scores: 1-10, 1 = low incidence, no symptoms observed, 10 = high
incidence, all plants in plot infected.
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 18. LS means for a 91G x PI255956 BC2F6 population from a field white mold disease screening trial, Corvallis, 2007.
Comparison to Checks
Line
Stand
White
Mold
x
Index
G122
WMGx25 20-3
WMGx25 6-9
WMGx25 15-2
WMGx25 13-14
WMGx25 48-3
WMGx25 48-5
WMGx25 43-4
WMGx25 20-2
WMGx25 3-15
WMGx25 7-2
WMGx25 2-6
M0162
WMGx25 11-1
WMGx25 18-1
WMGx25 4-6
WMGx25 6-3
WMGx25 41-2
WMGx25 29-9
WMGx25 50-4
WMGx25 45-1
WMGx25 23-8
WMGx25 13-11
WMGx25 17-4
WMGx25 31-6
WMGx25 41-7
WMGx25 42-1
WMGx25 12-2
WMGx25 21-1
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
100
98
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
98
100
100
100
99
96
100
98
100
100
98
11.0
20.0
21.0
21.3
25.0
27.2
27.5
31.9
33.3
34.7
38.0
38.4
39.6
41.7
42.1
42.8
44.0
44.6
45.0
45.0
45.6
47.0
47.5
47.5
47.5
49.5
51.2
52.0
52.5
y
G122
MO162
**
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
OR
91G
White
Mold
w
Incidence
White
Mold
v
Severity
Maturity
Lodging
Estimated
Yield
t
Potential
7.3
8.0
8.4
7.1
9.1
9.9
10.0
9.8
9.5
9.9
9.5
9.6
9.9
9.8
9.9
9.5
8.8
9.9
10.0
10.0
9.6
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.9
9.3
9.9
10.0
1.5
2.5
2.5
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
3.3
3.5
3.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.3
4.3
4.5
5.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.8
4.7
4.8
4.8
4.8
5.0
5.5
5.3
5.3
medium
late
medium
medium
early
early
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium early
early
early
early
medium
medium
medium
early
medium
medium
medium early
medium late
early
medium
early
medium early
early
medium early
medium
1.5
1.5
2.1
1.9
1.6
2.0
1.9
2.0
1.6
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.1
2.3
2.0
1.8
2.1
2.4
2.1
1.9
2.1
2.0
2.4
2.0
2.4
2.0
2.5
2.1
2.0
2
1.6
2.3
1.8
1.5
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.9
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.1
1.6
1.9
1.9
2
1.6
1.8
1.6
2.1
1.9
2.4
1.6
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Table 18. LS means for a 91G x PI255956 BC2F6 population from a field white mold disease screening trial, Corvallis,
z
2007 (cont).
Comparison to Checks
Line
Stand
White
Mold
x
Index
WMGx25 41-11
WMGx25 8-1
OR 91G
WMGx25 42-3
WMGx25 7-15
WMGx25 47-4
WMGx25 45-2
WMGx25 24-1
WMGx25 28-4
WMGx25 44-3
WMGx25 25-3
WMGx25 12-3
WMGx25 42-5
WMGx25 49-5
WMGx25 1-7
WMGx25 10-15
WMGx25 28-1
WMGx25 17-6
WMGx25 24-7
WMGx25 40-6
WMGx25 9-10
WMGx25 27-3
WMGx25 9-16
WMGx25 50-3
WMGx25 3-18
98
100
100
100
100
99
100
98
99
100
100
100
100
100
100
95
100
93
98
94
100
94
100
100
95
55.0
56.4
57.5
57.5
57.5
58.8
59.4
60.0
60.0
60.0
62.0
62.5
62.5
62.5
66.7
67.5
67.5
68.2
72.5
72.5
73.5
75.0
75.0
77.5
80.0
y
G122
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
MO162
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
OR
91G
White
Mold
w
Incidence
White
Mold
v
Severity
Maturity
Lodging
Estimated
Yield
t
Potential
^
10.0
9.4
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.8
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.8
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.8
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
5.5
6.0
5.8
5.8
5.8
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.2
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
7.3
7.3
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.8
8.0
medium early
early
medium early
early
medium early
early
medium early
medium early
early
medium early
late
early
early
medium early
early
early
early
early
early
early
early
early
medium early
early
early
2.8
2.3
2.8
2.3
2.0
2.4
2.4
2.8
2.6
1.8
2.0
2.5
2.9
2.8
2.5
2.6
2.5
2.8
2.8
2.6
2.9
2.5
2.4
2.5
2.9
1.9
2
1.8
1.9
1.6
2.1
1.3
1.8
2.3
1.8
1.8
1.6
2.3
2.1
2.3
1.6
1.6
2
1.9
1.6
2.1
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.9
z
y
u
Planted June 29. 91G x PI 255956 is a Phaseolus vulgaris x Phaseolus coccineus interspecific cross. Scores based on a scale of
1-10 where 1 is highly resistant. ** indicates significantly better than this check (p<0.05); ^ indicates significantly worse than this
check (p<0.05).
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 19. Comparison of white mold field averages, two years combined,
z
for a 91G x PI255956 BC2F6 population, Corvallis, 2007 .
Overall
AV
G122
4.8
WMGx25 20-3
5.6
WMGx25 6-9
6.0
WMGx25 18-1
6.0
WMGx25 13-14
6.1
WMGx25 6-3
6.2
WMGx25 20-2
6.3
M0162
6.3
WMGx25 44-3
6.8
WMGx25 48-5
6.8
WMGx25 45-1
6.8
WMGx25 21-1
7.0
WMGx25 29-9
7.1
WMGx25 41-2
7.2
WMGx25 41-7
7.3
WMGx25 12-3
7.3
WMGx25 3-15
7.5
WMGx25 7-2
7.5
WMGx25 17-4
7.6
WMGx25 43-4
7.7
WMGx25 47-4
7.7
WMGx25 31-6
7.8
WMGx25 9-10
7.8
WMGx25 42-1
7.9
WMGx25 11-1
8.0
WMGx25 8-1
8.0
WMGx25 45-2
8.0
WMGx25 1-7
8.0
WMGx25 48-3
8.0
WMGx25 25-3
8.0
WMGx25 49-5
8.0
WMGx25 41-11
8.2
WMGx25 27-3
8.2
WMGx25 3-18
8.2
WMGx25 12-2
8.2
WMGx25 9-16
8.2
WMGx25 42-3
8.3
WMGx25 4-6
8.4
OR 91G
8.5
WMGx25 7-15
8.5
WMGx25 24-7
8.5
WMGx25 50-3
8.5
WMGx25 28-1
8.6
WMGx25 24-1
8.6
WMGx25 40-6
8.7
WMGx25 17-6
8.8
WMGx25 28-4
9.0
WMGx25 42-5
9.0
WMGx25 10-15
9.1
LSD @ .05
2.0
z
White mold scores: 1-10, 1 = low incidence, no symptoms observed, 10 = high
incidence, all plants in plot infected.
Entry
2006
2.3
3.1
3.5
2.1
3.0
3.5
3.1
2.7
3.5
3.6
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.5
4.6
4.6
5.0
5.5
5.1
5.5
5.6
5.5
5.8
6.5
6.1
6.5
6.0
6.1
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.5
6.4
6.5
7.3
6.9
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.5
8.0
8.0
8.1
2007
7.3
8.0
8.4
9.9
9.1
8.8
9.5
9.9
10.0
10.0
9.6
10.0
10.0
9.9
9.9
10.0
9.9
9.5
10.0
9.8
9.8
10.0
9.8
9.3
9.8
9.4
9.9
9.8
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.9
10.0
10.0
9.5
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Figure 1. Commercial Bean $/A 2007 - Full Sieve Varieties
3000
2500
2477
2417
2180
2174
2091
2063
2061
2019
1979
1949
6189
PLS 2196
91G
$/A
2000
1500
1000
500
0
OR 54
6436
6338
Huntington
6137
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
08120693
6445
Figure 2. Commercial Bean $/A 2007 - Small Sieve Varieties
3500
3000
2899
2600
2461
2500
2431
2389
2207
2359
2239
2152
2000
1829
$/A
1829
1500
1000
500
4-5 sieve
2007-2008 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
2 to 3 sieve
BSC 8707
SWB 1A
Banga
Redon
Pierroton
PLS 2195
BSC 833
SB 4359
08120695
Savannah
BSC 8577
0