Regarding Provost. Deans gave the provost an overall rating mean of 4.16 (±0.08). The
evaluations by the chairs and other mid-level administrators gave 4.19 (±0.03). The general faculty
scored the provost as 3.85 (±0.01).
The chairs-level group gave the provost ratings of 4.0 or higher on 12 questions out of 16, while
the deans-level group scored 11 questions at that high level and the faculty gave 4 questions out
of 16 questions at that high level. For promoting research, scholarship and teaching the provost
earned ratings well above 4.0 from all three populations.
The only issue of comparative weakness is “Has a clear strategic plan and allocates resources
consistently with that plan” (3.80 by the deans, 3.97 by chairs and 3.73 by the general faculty).
Summative charts appear below for each evaluating group.
Mean Evaluation Scores of the Provost by Deans
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
Mean Evaluation Scores of the Provost by Chairs & Assoc/Asst Deans
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
Mean Evaluation Scores of the Provost by Faculty
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
Question data for the Provost by evaluator:
Provost by Deans
1. Research &
Scholarship
8
6
4
2
0
2.Teaching
Excellence
8
6
4
2
0
8
6
4
2
0
123 45
7. Supports Fac
Devel
8
6
4
2
0
1 234 5
8. Promotion &
Tenure
8
6
4
2
0
12345
12345
13. Financial
Mgmt
14. Open and
Transparent
8
6
4
2
0
12345
3. Institinl. &
Public service
8
6
4
2
0
12345
Response 56%
4. Represents
8
6
4
2
0
8
6
4
2
0
10. Inspires
Confidence
8
6
4
2
0
12345
15. Effective
Staff
8
6
4
2
0
12345
8
6
4
2
0
12345
123 45
9. Promotes
Diversity
5 .Responsive
Fac Interest
11. Fair and
Rigorous
8
6
4
2
0
12345
16. Promotes
cooperation
ALL Questions
12345
8
6
4
2
0
12345
12345
8
6
4
2
0
6. Seeks Fac
Input
160
128
96
64
32
0
12345
12345
12. Strategic
Plan
8
6
4
2
0
12345
Provost by Chairs and Assoc. /Asst. Deans
1. Research &
Scholarship
40
30
20
10
0
2.Teaching
Excellence
40
30
20
10
0
40
30
20
10
0
12345
12345
7. Supports Fac
devel
8. Promotion &
Tenure
40
30
20
10
0
40
30
20
10
0
12345
13. Financial
Mgmt
40
30
20
10
0
12345
12345
15. Effective
Staff
40
30
20
10
0
12345
11. Fair and
rigorous
12345
12. Strategic
plan
40
30
20
10
0
12345
12345
16. Promotes
cooperation
ALL Questions
12345
6. Seeks Fac
input
40
30
20
10
0
40
30
20
10
0
40
30
20
10
0
12345
5 .Responsive
Fac Interest
10. Inspires
Confidence
40
30
20
10
0
40
30
20
10
0
12345
40
30
20
10
0
9. Promotes
Diversity
12345
14. Open and
transparent
4. Represents
12345
40
30
20
10
0
40
30
20
10
0
12345
3. Institinl. &
Public service
43% Response
500
400
300
200
100
0
12345
12345
Provost by Faculty
1. Research &
Scholarship
160
120
80
40
0
28% Response
2.Teaching
Excellence
160
120
80
40
0
160
120
80
40
0
12345
12345
7. Supports Fac
devel
8. Promotion &
Tenure
160
120
80
40
0
160
120
80
40
0
12345
13. Financial
Mgmt
160
120
80
40
0
40
0
9. Promotes
Diversity
12345
10. Inspires
Confidence
160
120
80
40
0
12345
15. Effective
Staff
12345
11. Fair and
rigorous
12345
12. Strategic
plan
160
120
80
40
0
12345
12345
16. Promotes
cooperation
ALL Questions
2000
1500
1000
500
0
12345
6. Seeks Fac
input
160
120
80
40
0
160
120
80
40
0
160
120
80
40
0
12345
5 .Responsive
Fac Interest
160
120
80
40
0
80
160
120
80
40
0
12345
160
12345
12345
14. Open and
transparent
4. Represents
120
160
120
80
40
0
160
120
80
40
0
12345
3. Institinl. &
Public service
12345
12345