1 History. The origin of Nuclear Physics The emergence of particle physics: the Standard Model and Hadrons CERN LHC Highlights 7 Units: [Length, Mass and Energy] (+ Thomson) S-­‐Relativity – Relativistic kinematics (App. B ) (+ Thomson) 2 Relativity and Antiparticles (Schrödinger, Klein-­‐Gordon, Dirac) 4 Interactions and Feynman Diagrams. 3 Space-­‐Time Symmetries and Conservation Laws. Parity Charge Conjugation Time Reversal (Angular momentum and Spin) 5 Particle Exchange: Forces and Potentials. Range of forces, The Yukawa potential 6 Observable Quantities Amplitudes, Cross-­‐sections, Decay rates of unstable particles 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 1 ¡ Interactions § Electron neutrino collides with neutron to produce electron and proton e− + p → e− + p ; π − + p → π − + p § Elastic scattering § Transfer i-­‐f à particle-­‐antiparticle § Inelastic scattering ν e + n → e− + p π +π → p + p + − E min ≥ ( m p + m p ) c π− + p → n+π0 π− + p → p+π− +π+ +π− § Nuclear physics § Decays a + A → a + A* ; A* → A + γ n → p + e − + ν e ; (Z,N) →(Z −1,N +1) + e + + ν e Free neutron 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada Bound proton p →n + e + + ν e 2 2 ¡ ¡ ¡ Interactions are due to exchange of particles Feynman diagrams +mathematical rules and associated techniques to calculate quantum mechanical probabilities for given reactions to occur EM – photon exchange: electric charge conserved at each vertex e +e →e +e − − − − + forbidden vertex: e → e + γ − e+ + e+ → e+ + e+ Time arrow ¡ ¡ Particles (à) – Antiparticles (ß) Spin-­‐1/2 fermions as solid lines; Photons as wiggly lines 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 3 ¡ The Standard Model interaction vertices ¡ a+b à c+d: time ordered processes From Thomson 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 4 ¡ Weak interactions ¡ Neutrino electron scattering ν e + e− → ν e + e− Strong interactions quark-­‐quark scattering q+q→q+q gluon-exchange 0 Z exchange ¡ Muon decay µ − → e− + ν e + ν µ − W exchange 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 5 ¡ ¡ Involving hadrons à Weak nuclear force à strong nuclear force n → p + e− + ν e ± W exchange ¡ ¡ n+ p→n+ p π exchange Which reactions are allowed and which are forbidden? Conservation laws: § Electric charge, Color charge, Lepton number, Spin, … § Other properties, Parity, Charge conjugation, time reversal, … 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 6 ¡ Symmetries and invariance properties of underlying interactions § play important role in physics § often lead to universal conservation laws ▪ (Space) translational invariance à momentum conservation ▪ (Time) translational invariance à energy conservation ▪ Rotational invariance à angular momentum conservation § § Gauge invariance restricts form of fundamental interactions Discrete symmetries ▪ Parity, Charge conjugation, Time reversal à very useful for classification and when we want to know whether a process is allowed or not … ¡ Symmetries are so important that even broken ones are useful ¡ Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, CP-­‐violation, … 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 7 ¡ Same formalism as spin (and isospin – see chapter 3) # # yp − zp & % L̂x = ŷp̂z − ẑp̂y z y % ( ! ! ! % L = r × p = % zpx − xpz ( ⇒ L̂ = % L̂y = ẑp̂x − x̂p̂z % ( %% L̂ = x̂p̂ − ŷp̂ % xpy − ypx ( y x $ ' $ z . & 0 ( 0 ( ( with / 0 (( 0 ' 1 & ( ( L̂2 = L̂x2 + L̂y2 + L̂z2 ⇒ ' ( ( ) & ( L̂+ = L̂x + iL̂y ( with ' L̂− = L̂x − iL̂y ( ( ) 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada * L̂ , L̂ , = i"L̂ z + x y* L̂ , L̂ , = i"L̂ x + y z* L̂ , L̂ , = i"L̂ y + z x- " L̂2 , L̂ $ = 0 x% # " L̂2 , L̂ $ = 0 y% # " L̂2 , L̂ $ = 0 z% # " L̂2 , L̂ $ = 0 ±% # " L̂ , L̂ $ = ± L̂ ± # z ±% L̂2 = L̂− L̂+ + L̂z + L̂z2 8 ¡ Pictorial representation of the 2l+1 states of l=2 L̂z , L̂2 → common eigenstates l, m L̂z l, m = m l, m −l ≤ m = −l, −l +1,..., +l −1, +l L̂2 l, m = l(l +1) l, m L̂+ l, m = l(l +1) − m(+1) l, m +1 L̂− l, m = l(l +1) − m(−1) l, m −1 ¡ Coupling of 2 am / spins § Clebsh-­‐Gordon coefficients From Thomson ! ! ! %l = l + l 1 2 ' l1, m1 ⊕ l2 , m2 → l, m & l1 − l2 ≤ l ≤ l1 + l2 ' ( m = m1 + m2 l, m = ∑ C(m , m ;l, m) l , m 1 2 1 1 l2 , m2 m1,m2 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 9 ¡ Coupling of ½X½, 1X½ § Spin multiplicity: 2l+1 § Symmetric, anti-­‐symmetric and mixed configurations 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 1 2 1 × : 2 ⊗ 2 = 3⊕ 1 2 1 1× : 3 ⊗ 2 = 4 ⊕ 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 × × : 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 = 4S ⊕ 2 MS ⊕2 MA 2 10 ¡ Particles ¡ § ½ integer spin (1/2, 3/2, …), Dirac-­‐ statistics à fermions § Integer spin (1,2,…), Bose-­‐Einstein statistics à bosons ¡ ¡ § § I ψ(1,2)=±ψ(1,2) è ψ(2,1)=±ψ(1,2) Total WF product of 2 functions ▪ describes orbital motion of particle wrt to the other à spherical harmonics Ylm(θ,φ) à (-­‐1)L § Spin function β § I(1,2)à(2,1) Eigen values: I2=1 ; I=±1 § Bosons must be symmetric § Fermions must be anti-­‐symmetric § Spatial function α Statistics fix symmetry properties of WF for a pair of identical particles wrt their exchange § I ψ(1,2)=ψ(2,1) è I2 ψ(1,2)=ψ(1,2) Under exchange, WF for 2 identical ¡ ▪ Symmetric if the 2 spins are parallel ▪ Anti-­‐symmetric if anti-­‐parallel § Identical bosons must have both α and β sym or anti-­‐symmetric § Identical fermions must have α sym and β anti-­‐symmetric or vice-­‐ versa From Braibant 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 11 ¡ ! ! r !P̂! → −r Behavior of a state under a spatial reflection § P reverses spatial coordinates r and p § Application on wave function ¡ Parity applied twice § Eigenvalue equation ¡ ¡ ! P̂ ! ! P̂ ! t !! → t ' = t ; p !! → − p; J ! ! →J ! ! P̂ ψ (r,t) ≡ P ψ (−r,t) P̂ ! ! ! P̂ 2ψ (r,t) = PP̂ψ (−r,t) = P 2ψ (r,t)⇒ P = ±1 P̂ψ = Pψ = ±1ψ A particle at rest (p=o) is eigenstate of parity with eigenvalue P=±1 (intrinsic parity) Examples of WF with § Positive parity: cos x § Negative parity: sin x § Undefined parity: sin x + cos x 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada ¡ ¡ ¡ Parity – multiplicative QN § P(ψ1ψ2)=P1.P2 SI, EM invariant under Parity WI violates Parity (maximally) 12 ! ψ nlm (r) = Rnl (r)Yl m (θ , φ ) n, l, m : principal, orbital, magnetic QNs x = r sin θ cos φ ! r → r # y = r sin θ sin φ " θ → π − θ # φ → π +φ z = r cosθ $ Yl m : spherical harmonics , Pl m : Legendre polynomials Yl m (θ , φ ) = (2l +1)(l − m)! m Pl (cosθ )eimφ 4π (l + m)! Y00 = 1 4π Y10 = 3 cosθ 4π Y1±1 = ∓ 3 sin θ e ∓iφ 8π "$ P̂Yl m (θ , φ ) = (−1)l Yl m (θ , φ ) # P̂ Pl m (cosθ ) = (−1)l+m Pl m (cosθ )$% ! ! ! ⇒ P̂ ψlmn (r) = Pψlmn (−r) = P(−1)l ψlmn (r) P̂ eimφ = (−1)m eimφ 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 13 ¡ Invariance under parity of Dirac equation à P(e e ) = −1 ¡ ¡ Convention: P=+1 for leptons and quarks and P=-­‐1 for anti-­‐fermions Parity of photon: -­‐1 Intrinsic parities of hadrons follow structure in terms of quarks + orbital l between constituent quarks: l ¡ + − P( f f ) = −1 P(−1) ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ 05/02/14 Meson = quark-­‐antiquark: P=(-­‐1)(-­‐1)l=(-­‐1)l+1 Pion (l=0): P=-­‐1 Proton (uud,l=0): P=+1 neutron (udd,l=0): P=+1 F. Ould-Saada 14 ¡ ¡ Operation changing particle à antiparticle Multiplicative QN conserved in SI, EM – not in WI ¡ Distinguish cases where § (a) Particle = antiparticle: γ, π0 à ▪ # % n Ĉ nγ = (−1) nγ % $ ⇒ Cπ 0 = +1 0 % π → γγ % Cγ = −1 & Ĉ γ = − γ Ĉ a, ψ a = Ca a, ψ a Ĉ π 0 = + π 0 Ca = ±1 : C − parity / γγγ C − invariance π0 → EM fields produced by moving electric charges, which change sign under C, so Cγ=-­‐1 § (b) Particle diff. antiparticle: π+àπ-­‐, nà anti-n π 0 → γγγ −8 < 3×10 π 0 → γγ – only linear combinations are relevant Ĉ b, ψ b = Cb b, ψ b Ĉ π + = π − 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 15 ¡ (b) mesons (spin-­‐less): π+à π-­‐ § Interchanging position of particles ! reverses Ĉ π +π − ; L = (−1)L π +π − ; L relative position in WF à (-­‐1)L ¡ (b) fermions – anti-­‐fermions § Interchanging positions à (-­‐1)L Ĉ f f ; L, S = (−1)L+S f f ; L, S § Interchange fermion-­‐antifermion à (-­‐1) § Interchanging spins à (-­‐1)S+1 ↑1↑ 2 1 ↑ 1 ↓ 2+ ↓ 1 ↑ 2 2 ↓1↓ 2 ) 1 ↑ 1 ↓ 2− ↓ 1 ↑ 2 2 ) ( ¡ (b) mesons with spin: 0,1,2 S z = +1 ( Sz = 0 S z = −1 Sz = 0 ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎬ S = 1 ⎪ ⎪⎭ S =0 Ĉ π +π − ; L, S = (−1)L+S m + m − ; L, S 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 16 ¡ (Classical) Poisson’s equation: ! ! ! ) 1 ! ∇⋅ E ( r ,t) = ρ ( r ,t) : P − invariant + ! ! ! ! ε0 * ⇒ E ( r ,t) →− E (− r ,t) § Electric field E ! P !+ vs charge ρ !P ! ! P ! r →− r ⇒ ρ ( r ,t) →ρ(−r ,t) ; ∇ →− ∇, density ! ) ! ! ! ! ∂A ! ! i( k!r! −Et ) ¡ EM field A E = (−∇φ ) − ‚ A( r ,t) = Nε ( k )e + ∂ t *Pγ = −1 § Parity: Pγ=-­‐1; C-­‐ ! ! P ! ! ! ! P ! ! + !P ! parity: Cγ=-­‐1 r →− r ⇒ A( r ,t) →Pγ A(−r ,t) ; E ( r ,t) →Pγ E (−r ,t) , ¡ π0=q-­‐qbar C ! ! C ! ! ) q →− q ⇒ A( r ,t) →Cγ A( r ,t) + § Pπ0=-­‐1 *Cγ = −1 C C ! ! C ! ! § JPC =0-­‐+ ! ! q →− q ⇒ E ( r ,t) →− E ( r ,t); φ ( r ,t) →− φ ( r ,t) +, 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 17 ¡ ¡ Symmetry of SI & EM à Invariance under transformation but violated in WI No conserved quantum number associated to time reversal (neglect WI), unlike P and C ! ! T ! ! T ! ! T t !! → t ' = −t ; r ! ! → r ; p !! → − p; J ! ! →−J 2 ! 2 T ! 2 ' ! If system invariant under T, probability ψ (r,t) ! ! → ψ (r,t) = ψ (r,−t) ! ! ! ! ∂ψ (r, t) i" = H (r, p)ψ (r, t): SE not invariant under T ∂t !! !! ( p⋅r −Et ) ( p⋅r −Et ) i −i ! ! ! Ψ(r,t) = e " ⇒ T ψ (r,t) = ψ ' (r,t) = e " T 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 18 If we introduce operator T̂ by analogy with P̂ ! ! ! ! : ψ (r,t) !T! →ψ ' (r,t) = ψ * (r,−t) ≡ T̂ ψ (r,t) ! ! ! ! ∂ψ * (r, t) Then SE invariant! − i" = H (r, p)ψ * (r, t) ∂t ! ! ! * ! ∂ψ * (r, −t) t → −t ⇒ i" = H (r, p)ψ (r, −t) Same form as for Ψ ∂t ! ψ (r,t) = e !! ( p⋅r −Et ) i " ! * ! T̂ ψ (r,t) = ψ (r,−t) = e ¡ !! ( p⋅r +Et ) −i " =e !! (− p⋅r −Et ) i " Time-­‐reversed WF describes a particle with momentum -­‐p 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 19 ¡ Quantum Mechanics operators corresponding to physical observables must be Linear Oˆ (α1ψ1 + α 2ψ 2 ) = α1 Oˆ ψ1 + α 2 Oˆ ψ 2 § to ensure superposition principle holds ¡ and Hermitian ( ) ( ∫ dx (Oˆ ψ ) ψ = ∫ dxψ (Oˆ ψ ) * § eigenvalues (observed values ) are real 1 2 * 1 ) 2 ! ! ! T Ψ(r ,t) # # → Ψ* ( r , − t) ≡ TˆΨ(r ,t) Tˆ (α1ψ1 + α 2ψ 2 ) = α *1 Tˆψ€1 + α *2 Tˆψ 2 ≠ α1 Tˆψ1 + α 2 Tˆψ 2 ( ) ( ) ∫ dx€(Tˆψ ) ψ ≠ ∫ dxψ (Tˆψ ) * 1 ¡ ¡ € 2 * 1 ( ) ( ) 2 Time reversal operator does not correspond to a physical observable No observable conserved as a consequence of T invariance 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 20 ¡ ¡ But T-­‐invariance leads to a relation between process and its time-­‐ reversed Reactions and time-­‐reversed counter parts are related ! ! ! ! a ( pa , ma ) + b( pb , mb ) → c( pc , mc ) + d ( pd , md ) ⎫ ! ! ! ! ⎬ c(− pc ,−mc ) + d (− pd ,−md ) → a (− pa ,−ma ) + b(− pb ,−mb )⎭ ¡ Reactions proceed with equal rates if WI neglected § mi: magnetic quantum number 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 21 Time reversal & Parity ¡ Combination of T & P § Same rate of reactions if P and T invariance hold (neglect WI!) ! ! ! ! a ( pa , ma ) + b ( pb , mb ) → c ( pc , mc ) + d ( pd , md ) ⇓T ! ! ! ! c (− pc , −mc ) + d (− pd , −md ) → a (− pa , −ma ) + b (− pb , −mb ) ⇓ P̂ ! ! ! ! c ( pc , −mc ) + d ( pd , −md ) → a ( pa , −ma ) + ( pb , −mb ) § If averaged over all possible spin projections ¡ Principle of detailed balance § Confirmed experimentally in a variety of Strong and EM processes mi = −si , −si +1,... si (i = a, b, c, d) ! ! ! ! i ≡ a ( pa ) + b ( pb ) ↔ c ( pc ) + d ( pd ) ≡ f 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 22 ¡ If P or T is conserved, Hamiltonian of interaction must not contain terms that change sign after the operation § Magnetic dipole moments allowed § Not electric DM! µΕn≠0 would imply èP and T violated § Longitudinal polarization only through WI From Braibant 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 23 ¡ Although C & P violated in weak interactions (100%) § CP violated in some weak processes (~0.1 %) § T violated in some weak processes (~0.1%) § there is a general result ¡ CPT theorem: “Any Quantum Theory that (i) obeys the postulates of Special Relativity, (ii) admits a state with minimum energy and (iii) respects causality is invariant under CPT” § Causality of physical events requires that the fields obey commutation or anti-­‐ commutation relations, implying the correct statistics according to the spin of particles: § Fermi-­‐Dirac statistics for fermions and Bose-­‐Einstein statistics for bosons ¡ CPT invariance predicts that particles and antiparticles must have exactly same masses and lifetimes, opposite magnetic moments, … 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 24 ¡ Consequences of CPT invariance § Particle & antiparticle have same mass, lifetime, opposite magnetic moments, … § Particle in state |a> =|m,τ, …> [CPT, H ] = 0!# "⇒ 2 (CPT ) = 1 #$ qp mp qp mp τ µ+ τ µ− 2 a H a = a H (CPT ) a = a CPT H CPT a a H a = a H a ⇒ ma = ma < 0.99999999991± 00000000009 , < 1.00002 ± 0.00008 , "#m + − m − $% e e < 8⋅10 −9 me "µ + − µ − $ # e e % < (−0.5 ± 2.1) ⋅10 −12 µe From Braibant 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 25 ¡ 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada From Braibant 26 ¡ Charge conserved at each vertex of a Feynman graph § Other quantum numbers also conserved – depending on interaction (strong, weak, EM) § During exchange, Energy E and momentum p cannot be conserved simultaneously ¡ Consider § A+BàA+B mediated by X-­‐particle exchange ¡ In center of mass system of particle A ! ! ! A M A c , 0 → A ( E A , pA c ) + X ( E X , − pA c ) ( 2 ) #E ! & ! PA = % A , pA ( ⇒ PA2 = E A2 / c 2 − pA2 = M A2 c 2 $ c ' ! p = pA ⇒ E A = p 2 c 2 + M A2 c 4 ; E X = p 2 c 2 + M X2 c 4 &( → 2 pc for p → ∞ 2 ΔE = E X + E A − M A c 2 ' ⇒ ΔE ≥ M c for any p X 2 () → M X c for p → 0 ¡ 06/02/14 Momentum conserved è E not conserved F. Ould-Saada 27 ¡ But according to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle § Energy can be violated during a short laps of time ΔE ≠ 0 within τ ≤ ! ! ⇒r≤R≡ ≡ range ΔE mX c EM: mγ = 0 ⇒ Rγ = ∞ WI: mW ,Z ≈ 80, 90GeV ⇒ R W ,Z ≈ 2 ×10 −18 m SI : mπ ≈ 100MeV ⇒ R ≈ (1− 2) ×10 −15 m 06/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 28 ¡ Limit MA large § regard B as scattered by static potential created by A ¡ Klein-­‐Gordon equation (spin neglected and X with spin-­‐0) ! ! ! ∂ 2φ ( r , t ) 2 2 2 2 4 −" = − " c ∇ φ ( r , t ) + M c φ ( r , t) X ∂t 2 2 § Static solution obeys: ¡ ! M X2 c 2 ! ∇ φ (r , t ) = φ (r ) 2 " 2 Electrostatic potential § Coulomb potential ¡ Massive X § Yukawa Potential § Range R, coupling constant g M X = 0, R = ∞ ⇒V (r) = −eφ (r) = − α r ! g 2 e−r/R e−r/R M X ≠ 0, R ≡ ⇒V (r) = − = −α X M Xc 4π r r § MX very large, zero-­‐range interaction 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 29 ¡ Yukawa (1935) formulated a theory of strong interactions between nucleons inside nuclei § In analogy with QED – exchange of massless γ, potential V~1/r § Strong forces – maximum range ~1fm, exchange boson must be heavy ~150 MeV § so change QED potential such that it it quickly vanishes with distance due to exchange of massive particles ¡ Hunting after a meson (me<mπ<mp) opened § 3 charge states to accommodate pp, pn, nn interactions 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 30 ¡ Feynman diagrams à process probability by a set of mathematical rules (Feynman rules), derived from underlying quantum field theory N = Observation Experiment Fermi’s Golden Rule L Luminosity Accelerator . σ Cross-section Theory 2 M (i1, i2 → f1, f2 ,..., fn ) % d3pf ( dσ = '∏ *(2π )4 δ 4 3 4 ( p1 ⋅ p2 )2 − m12 ⋅ m22 '& n (2π ) 2E f *) (∑ p −∑ p ) S i f M: matrix element calculable with Feynman diagrams 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 31 ¡ More about Quantum Field Theory, Calculation of amplitudes of Feynman graphs, cross sections, … § In follow-­‐up courses § FYS4170 (Quantum filed theory), FYS4560 (Elementary particle physics) 06/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 32 ¡ ¡ Use non-­‐relativistic (NR) QM to derive propagator of X Assume small coupling g 2 << 4 π!c ¡ Interaction is a small perturbation on a “free” particle (plane wave) ¡ ¡ Lowest order (LO) perturbation theory (PT) ¡ M for scattering € B+Aà B+A by potential V Potential theory – A: static source, B: scatters without loss of energy (Ei=Ef,) ¡ Transition amplitude iàf – Yukawa potential ! ! M if = ∫ φi*V (r )φi d 3r ; φi, f = e ! ! ipi, f ⋅r " g 2 e−r/R V (r) = − 4π r 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada ! ! ! M (q) = ∫ d 3r V (r )e ! ! ! q ⋅ r =| q | r cosθ !! iq⋅r ! " ! ! q ≡ pi − p f ! d 3r = r 2 sin θ dθ dr dφ !2 −g 2 " 2 ⇒ M (q ) = ! 2 | q | +M X2 c 2 do the calculation problem 1.12 33 ¡ Amplitude derived in rest frame of A ¡ ¡ Recoil neglected ¡ !2 −g 2 " 2 M (q ) = ! 2 | q | +M X2 c 2 At high energies, ¡ A recoil non negligible ! ! q 2 ≡ (E f − Ei )2 / c 2 − (q f − qi )2 explicitly Lorentz invariant (Ei=Ef) g2!2 M (q ) = 2 q − M X2 c 2 2 propagator ¡ This is an amplitude for exchange of 1 particle ¡ 05/02/14 Higher orders might be important F. Ould-Saada 34 g2!2 M (q ) = 2 q − M X2 c 2 ¡ Amplitude ¡ Zero-­‐range approximation: amplitude reduces to a constant 2 " R = ! / M X c << λ ⇒ q 2 << M X2 c 2 ⇒ M(q 2 ) = −G 2 G 1% g ( 4 πα X = ≡ dim:1/ E 2 ] ' * [ 2 3 2 (!c) !c & M X c ) ( M X c 2 ) Resulting point interaction between A and B characterized by single dimensional coupling constant G, not g and Mx separately € ¡ Fermi “effective” coupling constant GF −5 −2 = 1.166 × 10 GeV (!c) 3 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada [dim1/ E ] 2 35 α ¡ ¡ Lowest order in PT ∝α2 Higher Orders in PT § More complicated, multi-­‐ particle exchange diagrams ∝α 4 ¡ Number of vertices à order n § Amplitude proportional to factor ( α) § Probability proportional to factor αn € 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada n α ≈ 1 / 137 ⇒ α 4 << α 2 36 ¡ Next step, relate amplitude to measurable quantities – cross-­‐section for scattering experiment § b+t à c+d § A beam (of cross section area S) – density (cm-­‐3) of particles nb hits target (nt particles per unit volume, thickness t, density ρ, (N particles in total) § Beam particle velocity in rest frame of target: vi § Beam flux: J = nb vi [cm −3 ][cm ⋅ s −1 ] § Beam intensity: I = JS [cm −2 ⋅ s −1 ][cm 2 ] § Luminosity L ≡ JN [cm −2 s −1 ] contains dependencies on densities and geometries of beam & target § Reaction rate Wr = Lσ r [cm −2 s −1 ][cm 2 ] § Cross section for reaction r : σr (dimension of area, Lorentz invariant) § Target composition: atomic mass MA 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada Wr = JNσ r = N σ r I / S = I σ r nt t nt = ρ NA ⇒ Wr = I σ r ( ρ t)N A / M A MA 37 Rate = L . σ ¡ Total cross section: sum over all reactions r Luminosity σ tot ≡ ∑σ r r dσ r (θ , ϕ ) dWr ≡ JN dΩ dΩ ¡ ¡ Differential cross-­‐ section Measured rate for the particles to be emitted into an element of solid angle dΩ in the direction (θ,φ) 2π 1 σ r = ∫ dφ ∫ d cosθ 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 0 −1 dσ r (θ , φ ) dΩ 38 ¡ Cross sections: § Formulae in terms of amplitudes describing scattering of non-­‐relativistic spin-­‐less particle from a potential § Consider a single beam particle interacting with single target particle – whole confined in volume V -­‐ Incident flux J and luminosity L=JN, rate dWr à ¡ In QM, transition rate given in PT by Born approximation (Golden rule) § § ρ(Ef) =dN/dEf : density of states factor nber of possible states with E between Ef and Ef+d Ef J = n b v i = v i /V N = 1 ⇒ dW r = 2π dW r = ! € ψi = 1 e V v i dσr (θ , φ ) dΩ V dΩ " * " 2 ∫ d r ψ f V (r )ψ i ρ(E f ) 3 & q" i . r" ) (i + ' ! * ψf = 1 e V " " & q f .r ) (( i ++ ' ! * § In terms of Mif 05/02/14 2 2π dWr = € 2 M if ρ (E f ) !V F. Ould-Saada 39 ¡ ! * 3! ψ V ( r ) ψ d r ∫ f i V depends on density of states * 3! dn is number of accessible states in the ρ = ψ *ψ ⇒ ψ ψ d r= ∫V Transition rate ¡ ¡ M if = energy range EàE+dE ¡ Fermi’s golden rule (δ insures energy conservation) ¡ ψ = Ae ! ! $ p. r −Et ' &i ) % " ( a a 0 0 ∫ ∫ ∫ a * ψ ψ dx dy dz = 1 0 ⇒ A 2 = 1 / a3 = 1 / V Particle in a box of volume a3 Normalisation àboundary conditions ¡ à components of momentum quantised ¡ 3 ψ (x + a, y, z) = ψ (x, y, z),...! % ( " 2π ! 2 π ! (2π !)3 3 ⇒ d p = dpx dpy dpz = ' " ⇒ ( px , py , pz ) = (nx , ny , nz ) * = & ) a a V eipx x = eipx ( x+a),... # 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 40 ¡ Numbers of states dn within pàp+dp Momentum space volume with thickness dp divided by average volume occupied by a single state ¡ dn is number of accessible states in the energy range EàE+dE ¡ Fermi’s golden rule (δ insures energy conservation) ¡ ! (2π !)3 2 2 d p = dpx dpy dpz = p dpsin θ dθ dφ = p dpdΩ = V p 2 dpdΩ dn dn dp dn 1 dn = ⇒ ρ (E) = = = 3 (2π !) / V dE dp dE dp v 3 V p2 ρ (E) = dΩ (2π !)3 v 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 41 ¡ Non-­‐relativistically Similar result relativistically (see below) ¡ " dq f m 1 = = $$ q 2f "2 2 dE f q f v f dσ 1 = M(q ) #⇒ € 2 4 vi dσ r (θ , φ ) $ dΩ 4π ! vi v f dWr = dΩ$ % V dΩ ¡ dq f V 2 ρ(E f ) = dΩ 3 qf (2π!) dE f Relativistic kinematics for a+b!c+d ¡ In cms qf=|qc|=|qd| Vf,i: relative velocities c-­‐d and a-­‐b E f = Ec + Ed = q 2f c 2 + mc2 c 4 + q 2f c 2 + md2 c 4 ⇒ ! dq ! pc 2 ! ! 1 v= ; pc = − pd in cms ⇒ f = E dE f v f 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada "1 dE f 1 % = q f c2 $ + ' dq f # Ec E d & 42 ¡ Generalisation of cross-­‐ section formula ¡ ¡ include spins à spin multiplicity factors In general: ¡ ¡ q 2f dσ 1 "2 2 = M( q ) 2 4 dΩ 4 π ! v iv f un-­‐polarized initial particles à average over initial spins and sum over final spins gi = (2sa +1)(2sb +1) ; g f = (2sc +1)(2sd +1) € 2 gf q 2f dσ = M fi 2 4 dΩ 4 π ! v iv f M fi 2 "2 2 ≡ M(q ) Amplitude is pin-­‐average of the squared matrix element € 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada !2 −g 2 " 2 M (q ) = ! 2 | q | +M X2 c 2 g2!2 M (q ) = 2 q − M X2 c 2 2 43 Lifetime (at rest) τ , or natural decay width Γ= h/τ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ measure of rate of the decay reaction Partial width Γf for specific final state f Total decay width and Branching ratio Γ = ∑ Γf Bf ≡ Γf / Γ f Breit-­‐Wigner energy distribution (no spin) à resonant state at W=M ¡ include spins à spin multiplicity factors N f (W ) ∝ ¡ ¡ Γf (W − M )2 c4 +Γ2 / 4 M: mass of decaying state W: invariant mass of decay products FWHM 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 44 ¡ Cross-­‐section for reaction iàf via resonance ¡ E: total energy of the system σ fi (W ) ∝ ΓiΓf 2 2 ( E − Mc ) +Γ2 /4 ¡ €Resonant state with spin j ¡ Initial particle spin (s1, s2) ¡ In practice kinematical and angular ΓiΓ f π !2 2 j +1 σ = fi momentum effects distort formula from qi2 ( 2s1 +1) ( 2s2 +1) E − Mc 2 2 +Γ 2 / 4 its perfectly symmetric shape ( ¡ ) Example of resonance formation à 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 45 § π-­‐ p cross section § § § § § § centre of mass energy 1.2-­‐2.4 GeV 2 (+2) enhancements on top of non-­‐resonant contributions Resonance widths Γ~100MeV Interactions times τ~10-­‐23s à Strong interaction à Consistent with time taken for a relativistic pion to transit the dimension of a proton 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 46 ¡ Pages 29-­‐30 § 1.1,1.2,1.3, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11, 1.12,1.13,1.14,1.15 05/02/14 F. Ould-Saada 47