Chapter9 ¡ ¡ Selectede+e-processes § e+,e-fundamentalparticles § Finalstatesmucheasierto analysethanhadronhadroncolliders ⎧e+e− → l +l − ; l = e, µ, τ ⎪ + − ⎪e e → ν lν l + − e e → f f ⎨ + − ⎪e e → q q → 2 − jets ⎪ + − ⎩e e → q qg → 3 − jets § Studythevariousprocesses ▪ Feynmandiagram ▪ Interactionresponsible ▪ Relativecrosssection ⎧e+e− → γγ ⎪ + − ⎪e e → γ Z + − e e → G G ' ⎨ + − ⎪e e → ZZ ⎪ + − + − ⎩e e → W W ¡ EM(γ)process § 2vertices,1/q2à ¡ pureweak(Z0)process § Relevantathighenergies(Z-peak) q 2 = p 2 = s = (2Ee )2 2 dσ + − α EM + − e e →γ → µ µ ) = 1+ cos2 θ ) ( ( dΩ 4s 2 4πα EM (!c)2 86.8 + − + − σ (e e → γ → µ µ ) = = nb 3s s[GeV 2 ] 2 4πα EM (!c)2 2 σ ( e e → γ → qq ) = ⋅ Qq 3s + − ¡ PureEM(γ)process § 2vertices,1/q2à 2 2πα em (!c)2 ! s $ σT = ln # 2 & s " me % ¡ Varioushadronresonances § ρ,ω (u-ubar,d-dbar), φ (s-sbar), J/ψ (c-cbar), Υ (b-bbar), …, Ζ σ ( e+e− → hadrons) § Continuum R = R0 ≡ σ ( e+e− → hadrons) σ ( e+ e− → µ +µ − ) ∑σ (e e + − = n → qn qn ) σ ( e+ e− → µ +µ − ) Nf = N C ∑Qn2 n=1 σ (e e + − R = R0 ≡ σ ee → hadrons ) ∑ ( = σ ( e+ e− → µ +µ − ) + − n → qn qn ) σ ( e+ e− → µ +µ − ) Nf = N c ∑Qn2 n=1 )" 2 %2 " 1 %2 " 1 %2 , u, d, s ⇒ R = N c +$ + ' + $ − ' + $ − ' . = 2 +*# 3 & # 3 & # 3 & .)" 2 %2 " 1 %2 " 1 %2 " 2 %2 , 10 u, d, s, c ⇒ R = N c +$ + ' + $ − ' + $ − ' + $ + ' . = +*# 3 & # 3 & # 3 & # 3 & .- 3 )" 2 %2 " 1 %2 " 1 %2 " 2 %2 " 1 %2 , 11 u, d, s, c, b ⇒ R = N c +$ + ' + $ − ' + $ − ' + $ + ' + $ − ' . = +*# 3 & # 3 & # 3 & # 3 & # 3 & .- 3 & αs ) 2 + 3 − jets ⇒ R = R0 (1+ + ' π* σ (e e R= σ (e e + − σ (e e ∑ ) → hadrons = + − + − f → µ +µ − ) → qf qf ) σ (e+ e− → µ + µ − ) Nq = N c ∑ e2f f =1 )" 2 %2 " 1 %2 " 1 %2 , ⇒ R = 3+$ + ' + $ − ' + $ − ' . = 2 +*# 3 & # 3 & # 3 & .)" 2 %2 " 1 %2 " 1 %2 " 2 %2 , 10 u, d, s, c ⇒ R = 3+$ + ' + $ − ' + $ − ' + $ + ' . = +*# 3 & # 3 & # 3 & # 3 & .- 3 u, d, s u, d, s, c, b )" 2 %2 " 1 %2 " 1 %2 " 2 %2 " 1 %2 , 11 ⇒ R = 3+$ + ' + $ − ' + $ − ' + $ + ' + $ − ' . = +*# 3 & # 3 & # 3 & # 3 & # 3 & .- 3 14/04/16 Question: Evaluate αs at 40 GeV (from figure) 8 ¡ Let’sillustratesomeQCDdiscussions e+e− → J / ψ + X → e+e− / µ +µ − / hadrons + X § StaticpotentialbetweenHeavyquarkandantiquark § Boundstates:CharmoniumandBottomonium (analogywithpositronium) ¡ CharmoniumJ/ψdiscoveryatBNLandSLAC p + N → J/ψ + X → e + e − + X 14/04/16 F.Ould-Saada 9 J PC (J / ψ ) = J PC (γ ) = 1−− ¡ J/ψ decays § § ¡ Mainlytohadrons88% Alsotoleptons12% Hadronicdecayà CrosssectionBW formula(0.07mb) § TobeaddedtotheEM contributionat3GeV (20nb) § Resonance~4ordersof magnitude* continuum! § σ e+e− →J /ψ →hadrons = π ! 2 2J +1 Γ ee Γ h (2s1 +1) (2s2 +1) ( E − Mc 2 )2 +Γ 2 / 4 $ Γ ee Γ h & = ≅ 1.197) 2 * = 0.07mb 2 2 $ & % Γ ' 4 %( E − M ) +Γ / 4' 3π ! 2 Γ ee Γ h M = 3097MeV, J = 1 ; ! = "c / pc ≅ 197MeV fm / 2 × 3097MeV ≅ 0.127 fm ¡ WhyisJ/ψresonancesomuchnarrowerthanotherhadronicresonances(~10’s MeV)? J / ψ (3097) ≡ cc QNs : n = 1, 2S+1LJ = 3S1 J / ψ → hadrons (88%) but ΓJ /ψ ~ 90keV !! / DD : M J /ψ < 2M D J /ψ → ¡ ¡ Lowestorder decaytohadrons diagramisnot allowed 14/04/16 F.Ould-Saada Higher orders allowedbut contribute muchless! 11 J PC ( J /ψ ) = 1− − C − parity = − 3 ⇒ ggg ⇒ (α s ) § g-exchangeànosuppression butm<2mDànotpossible § 3-gluonexchangeàsuppression ànarrowwidth J / ψ (3097) → ηc (2980) + γ Charmoniumspectroscopy 14/04/16 F.Ould-Saada ψ (3686) → ηc (2980) + γ ψ (3686) → χ ci + γ i = 1, 3 m > 2mD ⇒ decay to open charm ⇒ decay width ~MeV 12 ¡ Upsilon(9880)discovery § FermilabE288experiment § Ledermanetal.1977 p + Be → ϒ + X → µ +µ − + X ϒ ≡ bb ; mb ≈ 4.3GeV ¡ Energylevelsfor(a)positroniumand(b)charmonium. § Scaleonordinateis[eV]in(a)and[MeV]in(b) ¡ Atomicphysics–Coulombpotential § Vem=-αEM/r § En=-α2EMmec2/4n2 4 αs + Kr 3 r cc ⇒ α s ≈ 0.3 VQCD (r) = − n 2S+1LS 11 S0 → orthopositronium - C=+1 → 2γ K ≈ 1GeV / fm 13 S1 → parapositronium - C=-1 → 3γ ⎧ α ⎪ − s ;r ≤ 0.1 fm ⇒ Asymptotic Freedom V (r) = ⎨ r ⎪ +K ⋅ r ;r ≥ 1 fm ⇒ Confinement ⎩ & a(!c) ( − ( r V (r) = ' ( + b⋅r () !c • Similaritiesàflavorindependence! 14/04/16 F.Ould-Saada r ≤ 0.1 fm ⇒ Asymptotic Freedom r ≥ 1 fm ⇒ Confinement αs b ⋅ r + r !c cc + bb ⇒ a ≈ 0.48 , b ≈ 0.18 GeV 2 V (r) = − 15 9.5Thetau-leptonτ e+e− → e+e− ; e+e− → µ +µ − (coplanar) Conservationofleptonflavor allowsleptonicandotherreactions ¡ e+e− → π + π − (coplanar) e+e− → π + π − π 0 (acoplanar) ¡ Forbids ¡ Ifheavyleptonexists,itwouldleadtoacoplanare+µ-ore-µ+pairs e+ e− → e+µ − , µ + e− e+e− → τ + τ − τ + → e +υeυτ ; τ − → µ −υµυτ ¡ Apparentviolationofleptonflavors § Compensated by the presence of neutrinos 14/04/16 F. Ould-Saada 16 Thetau-leptonτ ¡ Taudiscovery,Perletal.,1975 § SPEAR (e+ e– collider @ 8 GeV) Most recently discovered SM fermion • First reported by DONUT experiment at Fermilab in 2000 16/04/16 F. Ould-Saada 17 ¡ ReadSection9.6inthebook § Wesawmostofthestuffintermsofparticleinteractions inmedia,particleidentificationinvariousdetectors… § Therewillbeasession–partofassignmentII–whereyou wouldbeanalysingATLASmasterclassdata § Inthenextslidesweconcentrateonquarksandgluons andtheirmanifestationasjetsofhadronsindetectors e +e − →qq → jet − jet e+ e− → €qq → hadrons 2m q ≤ ¡ ¡ s , pq = s 2 Quarksnotseenasfreeparticles Quarkandantiquarkhadroniseandappear asafluxinanarrowsolidanglewiththe shapeofajet § Typicalmomentaofhadrons~0.5-1GeV § Openingangleof“jet”ofhadronsà pT 0.5 1 ≈ = p s /2 s s = 30GeV ⇒ φ ~ few ° § 14/04/16 Atlowenergies,hadronsdistributedoverallsolidangle:nojetstructure 19 JADE detector at PETRA e+e- collider 14/04/16 20 e + e − → qq → jet + jet dσ z 2α 2 2 = 1+ cos θ) ( dΩ s ! jet ! q = ∑ hi i Quarkisspin½ pointlikeparticle Absolute value because quark and antiquark jets cannot be differentiated 14/04/16 21 e+ e − → qq g → 3 − jets ¡ Attypicale+e–energiesof30-100GeV,a thirdjetappearsinthedetectorin~αs≈ 10%ofthetime ¡ “Hard”gluonhadronisestoajetina similarwayasthequarkandantiquark Guon and quark jets are in general similar ¡ JADE detector at PETRA e+e- collider § Classify jet energies: E1< E2<E3 § Gluon=jet 3 in ~70% of the cases 14/04/16 22 e+ e − → qq g → 3 − jets ¡ Defineandplotangle φ definedas § Transform to jet1-jet2 c.o.m system and compute angle φ between direction of pair and jet3 § distribution depends on spin of gluon TASSO at PETRA Gluonisspin1 JP=1– 14/04/16 23 • Quarksandgluonshavecolor, whilehadrons(the asymptoticstates)are colorless. • Theprocessof “hadronization”occursat energyscaleswhereQCDis strong~Λsothat perturbationtheorycannotbe used. • Thismakesdirect experimentalQCDpredictions difficult. calorimeter jet CH § ¡ EventGeneratorsmaybe § partonlevel: ▪ PartonDistributionfunctions ▪ Hardinteractionmatrixelement § andmayalsohandle: ▪ Initialstateradiation ▪ Finalstateradiation ▪ Underlyingevent ▪ Hadronisationanddecays SeparateprogramsforDetectorSimulation § GEANT–mostcommonlyused γ EM π K q g Time ¡ expecttoreproduceboththeaveragebehaviorand fluctuationsofrealdata FH hadrons particle jet ¡ A“MonteCarlo”isaFortranorC++programthat generatesevents Eventsvaryfromonetothenext(random numbers) parton jet ¡ • p • q p Hard Perturbative scattering: Modelling of the soft underlying event Multiple perturbative scattering. Usually calculated at leading order in QCD, electroweak theory or some BSM model. Perturbative Decays calculated QCD,State EW or Initial andinFinal parton showers resum the Finally the unstable hadrons are some theory. largeBSM QCD logs. of the Non-perturbative modelling decayed. hadronization process. ¡ 3contributions: § § § ¡ PurelyEM Interferenceγ-Z Purelyweak–dominantattheZmass StartfromBreit-Wignerformulagiveninchapter1(resonance) § Hadroniccross-section@LEP@mZ § WidthΓff e+ e− → Z → f f Γ ee Γ ff / 4 Γ ee Γ ff 4π 2 j +1 12π σ (s) = 2 = 2 s 2 2 qi ( 2s1 +1) ( 2s2 +1) ( E − M Z ) +Γ Z / 4 mZ ( s − M Z2 )2 + s 2 Γ 2Z / mZ2 qi2 = ( s / 2)2 ; s1 = s2 = 1 / 2; j = 1; E = s 12π Γ ee Γ ff s = m ⇒ σ ≡ σ (s = m ) = 2 mZ Γ 2Z 2 Z 17/04/16 0 2 Z F.Ould-Saada 27 ¡ ¡ TotalmaximumcrosssectionrelatedtoZmass andtotalandpartialZwidths FiniteZwidthrelatedtothenumberof accessiblespeciesoffermionsthatcoupletoZ § WidthΓffproportionaltoGFandMZ3 § afandvf:axial-vectorandvectorcouplingsof fermionstotheZ;NC=1forland3forq ¡ Experimentalmeasurements: σ 0 ≡ σ (s = mZ2 ) = 12π Γee Γ ff mZ2 Γ2Z GF mZ3 2 2 f Γ ff = a f + v f ) N C = 330 ( a 2f + v 2f ) N Cf MeV ( 6 2π Γνν ≈ 0.066 * 3 = 20%; Γ ll ≈ 0.03* 3 = 9% Γh ≡ Γuu + Γdd + Γss + Γcc + Γbb Γll ≡ Γee = Γµµ = Γττ (lepton universality) Γinvis = Nν Γνν = ΓZ − Γh − 3Γll ΓZ ≡ Γh + 3Γll + Nν Γνν = Γvis + Γinvis ≅ 2.5GeV ⇒ Nν = 18/04/16 F.Ould-Saada Γinvis ( Γνν )SM 28 ¡ Someofthese measurementslead tosomevariables enteringthe determinationofthe numberofneutrino species ¡ è 14/04/16 F.Ould-Saada 29 σ 0had = 12π Γ ee Γ h 12π Γ ee Γ h = 40.2 nb ⇒ Γ = Z mZ2 Γ 2Z mZ2 σ 0had Γ ff σ 0f = Γ ee σ e0 ¡ R ; R l0 ≡ Γh ; l = e, µ, τ Γ ll MeasurepeakcrosssectionsandR0l 0 invis Γ invis Γ Z − Γ h − 3Γ ll 12π Rl0 ≡ = = − R l0 − 3 2 0 Γ ll Γ ll mZ σ had 0 R l0, σ 0had , mZ ⇒ Rinvis = 5.943± 0.016 % Γνν ( Γ invis 0 Rinvis ≡ = Nν ' * = (1.99125 ± 0.00083)Nν Γ ll Γ & ll )SM ⇒ Nν = 2.984 ± 0.008 ¡ AfittoallLEPdata(16MZ’s)leadsto: Nν=2.9835±0.0083 F.Ould-Saada 14/04/16 30 Weakgaugebosonself-couplings e+e− → ZZ e+e− → W +W − 14/04/16 F.Ould-Saada 31 ¡ 14/04/16 F.Ould-Saada 32 ¡ Wbosonmass e+e− → W +W − → qq 'q''q ''' e+e− → W +W − → qq 'lν l § Checkthatthehadronic andsemi-leptonic channelsrepresent46% and44%respectively mW = 80.376 ± 0.033 GeV ΓW = 2.196 ± 0.083 GeV 18/04/16 F.Ould-Saada 33 ¡ CompareQEDvsQCD ¡ ¡ EMInfiniterangeèαEMincreasewithenergy/decreaseswithdistance Stronginteractionsaremicroscopic § AsymptoticfreedomèαSdecreasewithenergy/increaseswith distance § Colourconfinementèshortrange~fm(~GeV) α s (mZ ) = 0.1199 ± 0.0052 α s (206 GeV ) = 0.1079 ± 0.0014 18/04/16 F.Ould-Saada 34 ¡ Singleelectronsemitandreabsorbphotons continuously(a)–quantumfluctuations– § orphotonmaybeabsorbedbyanotherelectronnearby àscattering(b) ¡ Higherorders § Initialelectronemitsphotonsand(indirectly)e+e-pairs –seaorvirtuale+e-àvacuumpolarisationeffects § Productionofvirtuale+e-pairsleadstoashielding effectsuchthatαQED isaltered Coulomb potential :φeff = α eff α eff (r)!c r ! % ' = α ≈ 1 /137 for r >> rC ≡ me c & ' r ≤ rC ⇒ α decreases ( 14/04/16 F.Ould-Saada α em (µ ) = α (µ 0 ) ( " µ %+ 2 1− α ( µ )ln * $ '0 3 π # µ 0 &, ) 35 α s (µ ) = α s (µ 0 ) "µ% α s (µ 0 ) 1+ (33− 2N f ) ln $ µ ' 6π # 0& µ 2 >> 1GeV 2 N f < 17 ⇒ Asymtotic Freedom ¡ Gluonself-couplingèanti-screening α em (µ ) = 14/04/16 α (µ 0 ) ( " µ %+ 2 *1− α (µ 0 )ln $ '# µ 0 &, ) 3π F.Ould-Saada 36 ¡ αsmeasurements 14/04/16 F.Ould-Saada α s (M Z ) = 0.118 ± 0.002 37 s ≤ 208GeV e+e− → H 0 Z 0 H → bb ¡ ¡ ¡ CandidateHiggseventcollectedbyDELPHIin 2000,compatiblewiththeassociated productionofaZbosonandHiggsbosonof mass113GeV. Adifferentpairingofthejetscouldleadtoan interpretationcompatiblewiththeproduction oftwoZbosons Otherproductionmechanisms 14/04/16 ⇒ MF.H Ould-Saada > 114GeV / c 2 Z,Hà 4 b-jets? 38 ¡ Hcoupling § Tofermionsf proportionaltomf § TobosonsV proportionaltomV2 17/04/16 FYS4560 - F. Ould-Saada 39 ¡ 125GeV…a rathergood compromise § ≥5decay channels accessible atLHC 17/04/16 Higgs and more - F. Ould-Saada 40 ¡ 125GeV…arathergoodcompromise § 4/5productionprocesses § ≥5decaychannels 17/04/16 Higgs and more - F. Ould-Saada 41 Hàγγ 42 HàZZ*àl+l-l+l- § Understandingof“background”isimportant ú Mostofwhichisduetoimportantphysicsatthe Higgs and more - F. Ould-Saada heartofthegaugestructure/symmetryof electroweakinteraction ú Higgsshowedupbetween2relativelybusy regions! 17/04/16 43 HàWW*àlνlν § Understandingofbackgroundiscrucial ú ú Higgsandmore-F.Ould-Saada Mostofwhichisduetoimportantphysics attheheartofthegaugestructure/ symmetryofelectroweakinteraction 17/04/16 44