Energy Efficiency Financing in the Residential Sector Margaret Walls Resources for the Future RFF First Wednesday Panel, October 5, 2011 Outline • The residential EE financing marketplace today ▫ Surveying the landscape ▫ Some results from RFF auditor/contractor survey • Why is the market so small? • Answering these questions in a vacuum: ▫ The need for detailed data and analysis Availability of Financing in Residential Sector • Some private activity but very limited (mostly as partners with govt/utilities) • Government and utility programs: ▫ 223 residential programs Money from ARRA, utility ratepayer funds, RGGI (in Northeast), state funds, local bonds Revolving loan funds, LLRs, interest rate buydowns, PACE, on-bill financing Utilities, state govt, local govt, non-profits, private lenders – many programs have multiple parties involved Results from Selected Programs Program Name Lender SMUD 142,000 $447.4 Viewtech 21,423 $188.9 1998 - 2011 5,800 Keystone HELP AFC First (PA) 7,434 $58.0 2006 - 2010 5,900 910 $10.1 2010 - 2011 1,350 SMUD SoCalGas Home Energy Upgrade Financing CT Home Energy Solutions AFC First Loan Value Loan Period (millions) Customer base (thousands) No. of Loans 1977 - 2011 594 Results from Selected Programs (cont.) Findings from a subset of 33 programs ▫ >241,000 loans; $1.2 billion w/o SMUD, 99,000 loans; $743 million ▫ Some of these programs have been around a long time (>20 yrs) ▫ Average loan size = $4,900 Results from Selected Programs (cont.) Participation rates: <1% of eligible consumers Default rates low, by most accounts • Keystone HELP: 0.6% ▫ 84% of loans are to people with FICO > 700 ▫ 1.51% default rate for FICOs 650-699 The RFF Energy Auditor Survey: Availability of Financing 41% act as a gateway to financing 9% offer financing themselves 7% do both 68% said the interest rate was “below market” The RFF Energy Auditor Survey: How Do Homeowners Pay for Retrofits? The RFF Energy Auditor Survey: How to Get More Homeowners to Retrofit A Laundry List of Issues • • • • • • • • • Small loans not profitable Unsecured so risky Nonstandard so can’t get institutional investors Need secondary market in order to scale up, leverage private funds Need better marketing to homeowners Contractor problems (training, communication) Many programs too burdensome for homeowners (high transaction costs) Reactive consumers Mortgage markets Solving Problems in a Vacuum • Need systematic evaluation of existing programs ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ Participation Retrofit and investment choices made Loan performance (delinquencies, defaults) Energy consumption before and after and in comparison to control group Even the most basic information is hard to get, much less raw data for analysis Benefits, Costs and Market Failures • Empirical analysis of savings can ▫ improve future predictions ▫ provide better estimates of CO2 reductions ▫ enable targeting for better cost-effectiveness • Measuring cost is important ▫ Using public dollars cost-effectively Ultimately need to understand nature of market failure to better target EE policy Audit paper available at www.rff.org/ccep Forthcoming white paper on financing Contact walls@rff.org or palmer@rff.org