Containment Technologies: Applying the Hierarchy

advertisement

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Containment Technologies:

Applying the Hierarchy

Beth Brock, Consultant Engineer

Eli Lilly and Company

Learning Objective

Identify containment technologies and their position on the “containment hierarchy.”

Substitution or Elimination

Product modifications

Process modifications

Process equipment modifications

Localized containment

Facility provisions

Procedural controls

Administrative controls

2

1

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Substitution or Elimination

• Always involves early discussions with development!

• Substitution of less hazardous chemicals, or even a less hazardous phase or concentration of the chemical (e.g., liquid vs. solid).

3

Product Modification

• Also involves early discussions with development!

• Particle size

• Delivery method

• Packaging choices

4

2

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Product Modification – Particle Size

Before discussion with formulation chemist.

After discussion with

Formulation chemist.

Particle Size Settling Velocity (still air)

0.01µm

0.1µm

0.3µm

3.5 inches/week

3.5 feet/week

2.5 feet/day

1.0µm

5. µm

10. µm

50. µm

100. µm

200. µm

1,000. µm

10. inches/hour

4. inches/minute

1.2 feet/minute

6. inches/second

1.3 feet/second

4. feet/second

20. feet/second

5

Process Modification

• Also involves early discussions with development! (there’s a theme here…)

• Technology platform selection

• Choose technologies more suited to

CLOSED processing (e.g., roller compaction versus high shear wet granulation).

• Eliminate riskier steps if possible (e.g., milling, sieving) – are they absolutely necessary?

6

3

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Process Modification (Technology Choice)

7

Process Modification (better?)

Low containment.

8

High containment.

4

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Process Equipment Modification

• BEST: Purchase equipment made to be operated in a fully contained and closed manner.

• Retrofit equipment or attach components such as split butterfly valves, etc.

• Don’t forget sampling, cleaning, and maintenance!

9

Process Equipment Modification

Fette Tablet Press

10

Milling

5

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Process Equipment Modification:

Discharge glovebox – Agitated Filter Dryer

11

Local Containment Provisions

AFTER you’ve done all you can with the equipment itself . . .

• Enclose the process in an isolator, glovebox, glovebag, etc.

• Don’t forget ergonomics!

6

12

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Local Containment Provisions

Barrier-based (glovebox, glovebag)

13

Local Containment Provisions

Air-based

7

14

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Glovebox examples

15

Charging & Discharging Solutions

8

16

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Dispensing Systems

Pack-Off Isolator

17

9

18

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Glovebags and Flexible Enclosures

19

Drum transfer system

10

20

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Glovebag solution for filter change

Piping penetrations through specially designed flange connection.

Special grooved ring for attaching glovebag.

Bag-in and bag-out sleeves for clean/dirty filters.

21

“Closed” Restricted Access Barrier

System (RABS) serves dual purposes

11

22

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Walk-in unidirectional flow booth

Add screens or other barriers to provide more protection.

Very technique dependent.

23

Real time Data: unidirectional flow booth

12

24

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Facility Containment Provisions

• Architectural layout

• Product, material, and personnel flows

• Pressure zones

• Dust collection systems

• Facility cleaning provisions, cleanability of surfaces

• Gown/degown areas, showers, etc.

25

Facility Provisions

Airlock

Traffic flows:

• people

• product

• equipment

• waste

Architectural separations

Support areas:

•degowning

•decontamination

•clean storage

HVAC & filtration

Emergency exit

26

13

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Facility Provisions

Air locks | Area housing bag house / dust collector

27

Dust Collector

Engineering Control Capabilities and

Estimated Cost Ranges

Engineering Control

Walk-in fume hood, set in place (no utilities)

Laminar flow booth, horizontal (installed & started up)

Downflow booth (installed & started up)

Downflow booth w/ screen

Flexible intermediate bulk container (FIBC)

Split butterfly valve (SBV), 316 stainless

Continuous liner: system installed (sized for180 lit drum)

/

300 mm liner, consumable cost

Single chamber glovebox

SBV w/ purge capability, 316 SS

Glovebox isolator around continuous liner

Glovebox w/ Rapid Transfer Port (RTP)

Multi-chamber glovebox w/ RTP or enhanced SBV

28

Capability

(µg/m 3 )

< 5000

< 500

< 100

< 25

< 20

< 10

< 10

< 1

< 0.5

< 0.1

< 0.05

< 0.01

Estimated

Cost

$30k-40k

$75k – 300k

$300k – 400k

$300k – 430k

$75-150

$12k – 16k

$7k / $250

$75k-200k

$55k – 60k

$90k / 220k

$90k / 210k

$150k – 250k

14

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Procedural and Administrative Controls

• Proper procedures required for ALL containment solutions!

• Administrative Controls

• Reduce the containment challenge (e.g., by reducing quantities in area).

• Restrict access to areas or set time limits on tasks.

• Personal Protective Equipment

• Alone, is the LAST RESORT!

• May be required in addition to other containment provisions.

29

Recap

What technologies can you see here?

What hierarchy tiers are apparent, and what others are likely in use?

15

30

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Conclusions

• Many options available.

• Do a RISK ASSESSMENT to determine your most likely areas of concern – concentrate on them first.

Involve the operators!

• Work from the “inside out” – start with the product/material, then the primary equipment, then on to the room/facility.

• Consider cleaning, maintenance, and sampling when designing and selecting your system!

• DOCUMENT YOUR RATIONALE AND DESIGN

DECISIONS! Inspectors will look for this . . .

31

Questions?

16

32

ISPE Great Lakes Chapter Meeting

28-29 April 2010

Kalamazoo, Michigan USA

Thank You!

Beth Brock, Consultant Engineer

Eli Lilly and Company

Lilly Corporate Center, DC 5611

Indianapolis, IN 46285

(317) 276-6870 bethbrock@lilly.com

17

Download