March 28, 2013
12 Noon, Room 1506
Meeting started at 12:06 and ended at 1:03; attendees per sign-in sheet
1. Meeting Minutes from March 14, 2013 distributed
2. Special Reports
Chair and Co-chair roles: Doug outlined his expanded role at both colleges and the district
and also shared some of the history of the Chabot facility committee and the current operation
of the LPC committee with the result that he will be stepping down as Co-Chair (He will remain
as a resource and attend, or assign a designee, to the committee). Discussion followed with
questions regarding the role of the chair…mainly so a new chair can realize the work plan. Chair
organizes the meetings with transparency befitting a shared governance process, and provides
committee input to PRBC and the president. The committee will deliberate for several weeks
concerning the impact and options. Tom Clark noted that with his added duties it might be an
ideal time for someone else to fulfill his committee role also.
New State Funded Projects, IPPs: Doug went over the background information concerning
IPPs (Initial Project Proposals that colleges submit to the State with the intent to compete for
Final Project Proposal (FPP) status that places the project in the State funded list as funds
become available. (Note: this is how we arrived at state funds for buildings 1700/1800. 1600
currently on the FPP list)
The committee should review college projects with intent to recommend no more than two for
IPP submission in June of this year. Considerations include:
1.
2.
Projects identified through the college-wide process of updating the Facility Master Plan
Projects that favor adding space that is not “over cap” (Currently lab space is at or below
cap; lecture is over cap.
3. Cannot be a revenue generating facility
4. Projects that have had significant recent renovation funding may be less competitive.
(Example: minor renovation in 2100 might not impact an IPP for a new 2100)
Chabot College
Facilities and Sustainability Committee Minutes
Page 2
Committee recommendations and strategies are related to further recommendations related to
re-prioritization and perhaps the timing of additional bond funding. Discussions ranged through
biology needs, Library, student study space, student center, and more.
Proposed $18.9million Measure B Budget re-prioritization: Ran out of time to discuss
Other:
Mark asked concerning the status of B-100. Doug reported that the after reviewing the latest
cost estimates he can report that the project is within budget. Rebecca asked to clarify minutes
from 3/14 to reflect that HVAC improvements “would be great” as an immediate fix to one of
numerous problems but they still would need a new building.
Chabot College