Division of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences Program Review: Dean’s Report – 2013 Architecture – Administration of Justice – Anthropology – Art – Art History – Digital Media – Early Childhood Development – Economics – Ethnic Studies – Geography – History – Humanities/Religious Studies/Philosophy – Interior Design – Mass Communications: Radio & TV – Mass Communications: Journalism – Music – Music Recording & Technology – PACE – Photography – Political Science – Theater - Sociology 11 December, 2013 It is important to understand, first and foremost, that the number, diversity and nuanced complexity of programs within this division is extreme. The unique program reviews from each discipline contain a far greater amount of important detail regarding specific ways to maintain quality and promote student success. As such, this document will serve as a summary merely on the broadest of levels, highlighting only the most pressing needs and accomplishments of the division from the perspective of the interim dean. It is not intended to be an exhaustive accounting of the intricacies of the entirety of the division; this would require a far greater scope. Some of the most noteworthy accomplishments of the Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences division the recent year include: The successful creation and approval of 9 new AA-T Transfer degrees, most in the college. The successful restructuring of entire rubrics in the arts to accommodate the new, state-mandated policies on repeatability. Over 100 concerts, performances, gallery shows, and public lectures, both on and off campus. The beginning of a process of working with the California State Bar Association to be one of the first community colleges in California to pilot a 2+2+2 pathway to law school for minority & underserved students. Exceptional success in transferring students to some of the most highly regarded programs in Architecture, Political Science, Administration of Justice, Economics, and several other programs. The return of the main offices of the state-wide Early Childhood Mentoring Program to the Chabot campus. The completion of an extensive campaign to select, commission, and install a number of works of Public Art, which currently beautify our campus. Ongoing work in scheduling, curriculum and enrollment management to work towards rectifying offerings that have not allowed students to progress through programs within a reasonable time period. Hiring of several new, highly qualified adjunct instructors with exceptional professional and academic backgrounds, including two former Chabot students. The opening of a remodeled 1200 building, which has doubled the number of our music practice rooms, updated and refreshed our performance and rehearsal spaces, and added a 2300 square foot music technology lab and recording studio. Division of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences Program Review: Dean’s Report – 2013 Architecture – Administration of Justice – Anthropology – Art – Art History – Digital Media – Early Childhood Development – Economics – Ethnic Studies – Geography – History – Humanities/Religious Studies/Philosophy – Interior Design – Mass Communications: Radio & TV – Mass Communications: Journalism – Music – Music Recording & Technology – PACE – Photography – Political Science – Theater - Sociology In general terms, the Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences division continues to do exceptional work in and out of the classroom. Our student success rates are, from a campus perspective, very high, and we continue to be the WSCH/FTEF engine that drives the campus. Further, we act as a primary interface with the community through our Law & Democracy Program, Public Lecture Series, Art Gallery and on-campus public art, our 24/7/365 on-air KRCH Radio, The Spectator, and numerous public performances featuring our students performing with nationally-acclaimed artists. We have done these things despite considerable instability in and around our institutional organizational structure and changing leadership personnel. This is a testament to the high level of commitment and dedication to our students which our faculty and classified professionals demonstrate on a daily basis. In particular, both of our administrative assistants, Catherine Powell and Cheryl Sannebeck have been exceptionally dedicated, highly effective and selfless. Truly, we could not function as a division without them. They are our MVP’s. All of that said, the division has several critical, ongoing needs that must be met to sustain the high level of success we currently provide and to take us forward in doing an even better job at serving the strategic mission of the campus. To try and itemize them within the scope of this document would be a disservice to the programs, and also to the process of meeting those needs. Therefore, I will speak to them only in the broadest of terms. This summary is no substitute for the unique and pressing needs included within the Program Review documents of the individual disciplines. Further work needs to be done in determining appropriate levels of FTEF support for programs that are on the edge of meeting basic completion needs. These include, but are not limited to, Photography, Ethnic Studies, Interior Design, and Art. Several areas of the division are staffed by either one, two, or in some cases no full-time faculty. More work needs to be done to address these needs, either through hiring of more full-time faculty, or increased internal support. Despite the many positive aspects of the 1200 Building remodel, there are a number of unfinished and/or unsatisfactory structural and technological items that currently impede adequate pedagogical function. There are several budget needs that go beyond the year-to-year request cycles currently in place. These include, but are not limited to, annual budget support for: o Equipment/instrument/facilities repair and upkeep o Software subscriptions and update purchases o Adequate staffing of lab monitors in DIGM, MURT, MCOM, & GEOG o Funding for the publication of our school newspaper. Division of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences Program Review: Dean’s Report – 2013 Architecture – Administration of Justice – Anthropology – Art – Art History – Digital Media – Early Childhood Development – Economics – Ethnic Studies – Geography – History – Humanities/Religious Studies/Philosophy – Interior Design – Mass Communications: Radio & TV – Mass Communications: Journalism – Music – Music Recording & Technology – PACE – Photography – Political Science – Theater - Sociology The entire Social Science division has included in their Program Reviews a request for a 50-station mobile Chromebook (laptop) lab that can be shared among the instructors and courses within the division. I fully support this request. Over the past several years, the arts in particular have endured disproportionately high levels of budgetary cuts, primarily in terms of FTEF and staffing. We need to work to try to replace or restructure these losses—on an institutional level—if we as a campus are to adequately include the arts as part of our educational offerings. The ECD Lab School has experienced perhaps the most significant financial cuts over the past several years in the entire district. Although it remains one of the most well-run and highly respected institutions on our campus, largely due to the impressive leadership of Director Vanessa Cormier, the ECD Lab School is in dire need of increased financial support, specifically in terms of staffing. Lastly, I would like to address the organizational restructuring that has occurred. A dean’s summary of any level of integrity would simply be incomplete without addressing this item. Two years ago, the division of Social Sciences and the School of the Arts were two separate divisions, with two separate deans. Due to circumstantial budget and personnel situations, the two divisions were “temporarily” combined and assigned to one (interim) dean. The understanding was that this was to be done on an experimental basis, and revisited at the appropriate time. Over the course of the last 12 months, I have said repeatedly that the scope of the combined job is simply too big to be handled effectively. I have provided compelling evidence to support this, and I have been unwavering in my assertion that one manager for this volume of students and programs (twice as many as any other division on campus) is not effective or sustainable. The sheer number and diversity of students and programs is overwhelming for a single manager, clearly does not support the strategic mission of the college, and will do disservice to the students, programs, faculty and staff if continued. Respectfully submitted, Eric Schultz, D.M.A. Interim Dean, Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences Chabot College