ICPIC 2015 - Abstract Submission
Topic area: 4. Special issues in infection control
Topic: 4a. Hand hygiene
ICPIC15-ABS-1542
MEASURING ALCOHOL-BASED HAND RUB VOLUME USED BY HEALTHCARE WORKERS IN PRACTICE
Rachel A. Leslie* 1, Curtis J. Donskey2, 3, Trina F. Zabarsky3, Albert E. Parker4, David R. Macinga1, Ojan Assadian5
1Research and Development, GOJO Industries, 2Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, 3Cleveland Veterans Affairs
Medical Center, 4Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, United States, 5University of Huddersfield,
United Kingdom
Preferred Presentation Method: Oral or Poster Communication
I want to apply for a travel fellowship: No
I am submitting my abstract for the ICPIC Clip award: No
Introduction: Recent hand hygiene (HH) research has focused largely on adherence to defined HH indications specified
in global and national guidelines. Research focused on quality of HH events has been limited. A critical variable impacting
the quality of hand disinfection is the volume of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) applied during a single HH event (i.e.
application volume or AV). It may be assumed that healthcare workers (HCWs) use AVs recommended by
manufacturers; however, HCWs typically are able to control AV. Manufacturer recommendations for AV of ABHR vary
based on local requirements with typical recommendations varying from 1 mL to 5 mL. To date, little data exists on actual
ABHR AVs used in clinical practice.
Objectives: Determine the mean AVs of an ABHR used by HCWs during routine clinical practice.
Methods: Personal carriage bottles (125 mL) with lids engineered to count each ABHR use were used by 19 HCWs from
five wards over three shifts in an acute care hospital. The bottles contained the WHO ethanol formulation. The mass of
each bottle was measured before and after each shift and the number of uses was recorded after each shift. The total
volume of ABHR used by each HCW during a shift was calculated by dividing the total mass used by the density of the
product (0.8607 g/mL). The mean AV was determined by dividing the total volume by the number of ABHR uses
recorded. Data was analyzed by ANOVA with nested random effects.
Results: The mean AV of ABHR used by each HCW per shift ranged from 0.27 mL to 1.61 mL per use. The overall mean
AV was 0.73 mL (±0.364 SD). The mean AVs were statistically significantly different among the five wards that
participated (p = 0.0118). The number of HH events from personal carriage bottle per HCW over a shift ranged from 2 to
78 with a mean number of 22 (median 18).
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that ABHR AVs used by HCWs are lower than manufacturer recommended
volumes. Such practices may have a negative impact on ABHR effectiveness in clinical practice. More extensive studies
are needed to understand whether the tendency to use AVs below recommended volumes is widespread, the factors
influencing volume preference, and the impact of such practices on antimicrobial product effectiveness.
Disclosure of Interest: None Declared