ETNA

advertisement
ETNA
Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis.
Volume 27, pp. 94-112, 2007.
Copyright  2007, Kent State University.
ISSN 1068-9613.
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
PICK FUNCTIONS RELATED TO ENTIRE FUNCTIONS
HAVING NEGATIVE ZEROS
HENRIK L. PEDERSEN
Abstract. For any sequence satisfying and representation of the function
.!"$#&%('*),+
0/
21
%('
Const we find the Stieltjes
where ) denotes the canonical product of genus 1 having .3 as its zero set.
We also find conditions on the zeros (e.g. 425 1 768:9 for ;8 ) in order that the function
#&%('<),+ .- 6 #&%('<),+ 8 !"
=/
%('
be a Pick function. We find the corresponding representation in terms of a positive density on the negative axis. We
thereby generalize earlier results about the > -function. We also show that another related function is a Pick function.
Key words. pick function, canonical product, integral representation
AMS subject classifications. 30E20, 30D15, 30E15, 33B15
as
1. Introduction. The ? -dimensional volume @*A of the unit ball in B
A
can be expressed
F AHGJI
KLMN
?POQHRTS
@CAED
K
where is Euler’s gamma function. In [3] the asymptotic behaviour
of the ?VUXWZY!? ’th root
M
of @CA was studied (the limit as ? tends to infinity is seen to be O[ \ , by applying Stirlings
formula). This initiated an investigation of monotonicity properties of the function
] L_^
R`D
UaWHY
^
K`L_^bNcM
^
UaWHY
^edgf
R
S
S
see [2], [1, Kapitel 2], [7] and [4]. In [5] we proved that a holomorphic extension of
cut plane
h
DjiEkPlPmon
f
S
l
]
to the
S
is a Pick function. We also found the corresponding integral representation in terms of a
positive density on the negative axis.
The proof consisted in applying a Phragmén-Lindelöf argument to the harmonic function
pbqrtsvu UaWHY
K`L p NwM
p!x
W Y
Z
dfƒ‚
R
p
y
in the upper half-plane z{D}| p~ i€ s,p
. In order to do so it was necessary to
investigate the growth at infinity and the boundary behaviour on the real line of this harmonic
function. These investigations depended heavily on the functional equation
KL p NwM
R!D
„
p KL p
R
Received April 25, 2003. Accepted for publication June 8, 2003. Recommended by F. Marcellán.
Department of Mathematics and Physics, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Thorvaldsensvej
40, DK-1871, Denmark (henrikp@dina.kvl.dk, http://www.matfys.kvl.dk/˜henrikp/). This
work was supported by the Carlsberg Foundation.
94
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
95
PICK FUNCTIONS RELATED TO ENTIRE FUNCTIONS
K
of the -function.
K
In this paper we generalize the results about the -function to a class of entire functions
having negative zeros.
K
The reciprocal of the -function is an entire function having negative zeros. Indeed, the
K
Weierstrass factorization of the -function states that
M
KL p NwM
where
have
Š
R
Ž
LMN
RŒ
(’‘
L‹Š p
Dw…‡†‰ˆ
p
L
O“=R‰…‡†‰ˆ
p
m
O“=R
S
is Euler’s constant. If ”’• denotes the infinite product on the right hand side then we
UaWHY
K`L p NjM
L p
R–D—mUXWZY`”P•
Š p
R’m
D˜mUaWHY!”3•
Lp
R
N
p
UaWHY`”P•
LM
R(™
Therefore it seems natural to consider functions of the form
L p
mUaWHY`”
N
R
p x
!
p
WZY
p
LM
UaWHY`”
R
S
where ” denotes an infinite
product having negative zeros.
‚
We recall that if |š  is any sequence of complex numbers ( ›D
converges then
Ž
pŸqr
Œ
(P‘
LM
p
m
f
) such that œ
 € š  €ž I
Lp
Oš  RT….†‰ˆ
Oš  R
defines an entire function. It is commonly denoted the canonical product of genus 1 associated
‚
with the sequence |š  , or having
zeros at š  . (The genus is defined as the smallest integer
‘
f
¡


such that œ
converges.)
€ š €ž*¢Z
‚
Throughout this paper |£  denotes a sequence satisfying
¤¥£ ‘§¦
(1.1)
£ I ¦
™.™™
and
(1.2)
for all
L_¨
?
¨2d¥f
R ¦
Const
¨
S
‚
. Here ? is the counting function associated with the sequence |£  :
Lܬ
?
¨H‚
R,Dc©ª|“«€£ Ÿ¦
™
We shall consider the canonical product ” of genus 1 having zeros at m¬£  , “ ¡
function is defined because of (1.2). Since all its zeros are negative we may define
UXWZY`”
L p
R!D
h
­
Œ
(P‘
x
WZY
LMN
p
O£  R’m
p
O£ 
M
. This
S
for p®~
. (Here x WHY denotes the principal logarithm, defined in terms of the principal
L
argument ¯¬°Y ). This is the unique branch of the logarithm of ” p R that is real on the positive
axis. Its imaginary part is given as
±
°JY!”
L p
R!D
­
¯¬°Y
Œ
 P‘
(
LMNwL_^bNo²´³
RO£  R7m
³
O£ 
S
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
96
HENRIK L. PEDERSEN
h
^2No²´³
~
.
for p D
We recall that a Pick function is a holomorphic function µ in the upper half-plane z with
L p
s
¡ f
µ
R
for pª~ z . Pick functions are extended by reflection to holomorphic functions in
i¶k,B and they have the following integral representation
(1.3)
L p
µ
p N
R!Dc£
Ng·
š
M
u
Œ
¸
¸
p

m
m
L¸
¸ I NwM y—¹Zº
R
S
Œ
f
where £ ¡ , š ~ B and º is a non-negative Borel measure on B satisfying
·
Œ

See e.g. [6]. It is known that
£D»¾Ua¿ ¼X½
µ
L‹²À³
RJO
L_²À³
R
L¸
R
¹Hº
¸ I NwM
Œ
s
L_²
šDwÁƒµ
S
¤jnw™
R
D¾.UX¿ ¼X½
º
S
L ¸ N¶²À³
µ
F
•(Ã
R ¹
¸
S
Œ
h
where the last limit is in the vague topology, and finally that µ has a holomorphic extension
L
f
to if and only if ÄJÅ=ˆ=ˆ º RƒÆÇlCmon
l.
S
We describe our main results.
‚
M
T HEOREM 1.1. If |£  satisfies (1.1) and € “bmÈ£  € ¦ Const for “ ¡ , we have
mUaWHY`”
p`x
p
WZY
where
É
^
ÉeL_^
~¶Ë
R
^
~¶Ë
LM
UXWZY`”
M
m
p
R N
ÉeL ¸
•
·
¸

m¬£ (ÌP‘
S
m¬£  l
and “ ¡
M
m¬£ ‘
m
p
R
¹
¸
S
Œ
L‹^
N
^
mUaWHY§€ ”
R€
“ UaWHY§€ €
,
^ LJL
^
N
I
F I
€ € UXWZYʀ € R
R
R`D
and
ÉeL‹^
for
MN
D
is defined as
(1.4)
for
Lp
R`D
L_^
m UXWZYʀ ”
Ç
R €
.
^ LJL
^
I N F I
€ € UXWZYʀ € R
R
f
l.
L
L
S
Theorem 1.1 fournishes the Stieltjes representation of UaWHY`” p RJO p–x WHY p R on a half-line.
The representing real-valued measure has density w.r.t. Lebesgue measure on the negative
line and has a point mass at 1.
We could equally well have given the representation of
mUXWZY`”
L p
R
p x
!
N
p
WHY
p
UXWZY`”
LM
R
in terms of a density on the negative half-line (there is no support of the measure on the
positive half-line, since the function has a removable singularity at 1). In this general setup
there is no particular reason for this density to be positive. However, when ”ÍDΔ!• is the
K
canonical product in the Weierstrass factorization of the -function above, the corresponding
density is positive. This leads to the question of finding conditions on the distribution of the
zeros in order that the corresponding density be positive, or, what amounts to the same, that
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
PICK FUNCTIONS RELATED TO ENTIRE FUNCTIONS
97
the function above is a Pick function. Our second result (Theorem 1.2) gives such a condition
and is a generalization of the main result of [5].
‚
NjM
M
T HEOREM 1.2. If |£  satisfies (1.1) and if “ ¦ £ Ï¦ “
for “ ¡
then
Ð Lp
L p
mUXWZY`”
R–Ñ
R
p x
`
N
p
p
WZY
LM
UXWZY`”
R
is a Pick function. It has the representation
Ð Lp
•
·
MN
R–D

^
¹
~ÓË
for
m¬£ ‡ÌP‘
S
m¬£  l
L‹^
mUaWHY€ ”
R`D
€
^
~ÓË
m¬£ ‘
M
and “ ¡
¹
for
L_^
L‹^
^
€
R€
LJL
N
R
m
¸
p ¹
S
Œ
where the positive density ¹ is defined as
(1.5)
L¸
¹
¸
LM b
^ N
^
UaWHY`”
R
“UaWHY§€ €
^
N
I
F I
Ò
UXWZYʀ € R
R
and
R`D
L‹^
N
LM ^
mÇUXWZY€ ”
R.€
UXWZY”
R
^ LJL
^
I N F I
€ € UXWZYʀ € R
R
f
l.
We notice that Theorem 1.2 can be generalized, by shifting the zeros to the left; see
Theorem 5.7.
In terms of the counting function associated with the zeros, the positivity of the density
¹ can be expressed more compactly as
S
UXWZY§€ ”
^
L‹^
R.€mÈUXWZY`”
f
LM
R
^
¦
?
L
m
^
RTUXWZYʀ
L_^
^
€
S
for ¤
. This gives an upper bound on € ”
R.€ on the negative axis. We shall describe the
^
L‹^
asymptotic behaviour of the maximum of UXWZY§€ ”
R.€ as tends to m§n .
To prove our main results we shall use a Phragmén-Lindelöf argument, and need to find
K
new arguments (avoiding the functional equation of the -function) in order to investigate the
growth at infinity and the boundary behaviour on the real line.
2. Growth estimates. Throughout this section ” denotes the canonical product of genus
‚
1 having negative zeros m¬£  , where |£  satisfies (1.1) and (1.2). We shall estimate the
growth of the holomorphic function
p2qr
UXWZY`”
p!x
L p
WHY
p
R
in the upper half-plane. To do this we need some preliminary results about the growth of the
canonical product ” in the half-plane.
‚
L EMMA 2.1. Suppose that |£  satisfies (1.1) and (1.2). Then
UaWHYʀ ”
L p
R.€ ¦
Const € p :€ UXWZY€ p €
for all large values of € p € .
The proof is relatively straight forward. We have included it here for the readers conveL
L
nience and also in order to illustrate the use of ” p R” m p R .
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
98
HENRIK L. PEDERSEN
Proof. We get, by partial integration,
Lp
UaWHY`”
·
R!D
L x
Œ
•
p ·
Dm
LMN
WZY
L¸
?
Œ
•
p
R
¸
¸
O
p
R’m
M
u
¸
O
L¸
R ¹ ?
M
¸ N
m
¸
R
¸
p ye¹
S
so that
Lp
UXWZY§€ ”
^ ·
R.€D˜m
Œ
•
N§³ I ·
^
f
¡
R
¸
M
u
L¸
?
Œ
•
If
L¸
?
L‹^N
¸
¸ I N¶³ I ye¹
R
M
R
¸
^bN
L‹^bN
m
¸
¸
¸ I N¶³ I ¹
R
¸
™
then
^bN
L‹^bN
¸
M
¦
¸ I N¶³ I
R
^N
M
¦
¸
¸
S
so that the first term in the relation above comes out negative. Hence, by the assumption (1.2),
L p
UXWZYʀ ”
R€ ¦
€
³
€
·
•
L¸
?
Œ
R
¸
³
€ €
¸
¸ I No³ IC¹
R
L_^bN
Const € p Ԁ ™
¦
We conclude that € ”ª€ is of finite exponential growth in the right half-plane. To estimate the
growth in the left half-plane we use the identity
Lp
”
It is easily seen that
p
m
] Lp
R–D
Ž
p I
u M
Œ
 P‘
(
R7Ñ
m
™
I y
£ 
is an entire function of finite exponential type. We thus get
L
UaWHY§€ ”
L p
]
L
R”
p
m
L
_L ^
R €
.
Const € p € mÈUXWZY§€ ” p .R € ¦ Const € p € mUXWZYʀ ”
R€ ¦
L‹^
¡
S
R€
€”
R.€ . Therefore, a lower bound on € ”ª€ in the right half-plane will give
since also € ”
us an upper bound on € ”ª€ in the left half-plane; we thus consider
(2.1)
for
^
L_^
¡
mUXWZY!”
f
d¥f
. We find, with Õ
^ ·
•
Œ
?
L¸
¸
R
R`D
Œ
•
M
¸
?
L¸
¸
R
u
M
M
m
¸
^bN
¸ ye¹
¸
m
^N
¸ y
¹
¸ ¦
^
Ö
Const UaWHY
¦
p
^ ·
Const
D
p
Œ
M
u
M
^N
m
¸
LMN¶^
OÕZR
p
Const € €:UXWZY€ €
S
for € € large. The lemma is proved.
We also need an estimate of ± °JY!‚ ” .
L EMMA 2.2. Suppose that |£  satisfies (1.1) and (1.2). Then
€
±
S
smaller than £ ‘ ,
M
u
^Ê·
°JY!”
L p
R€ ¦
N
Const € p € UaWHY§€ p € Const
¸ y
¹
¸
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
99
PICK FUNCTIONS RELATED TO ENTIRE FUNCTIONS
h
.
for all p~
Proof. We may assume that p D
±
(2.2)
L‹^bNo²À³
°JY”
^bNo²À³
±
R’m
~
L_²´³
°Y`”
. We have
z
·Ø×
R–D
•
±
^
Ù
Ù
L‹²À³
L ¸ No²´³
°Y`”
R ¹
¸
™
L‹^ŸNÓ²À³
±
We shall now find estimates of ± °Y!”
R and of Ú
J° Y”
R . From these estimates the
_L ^ÛNg²À³
± Ú ×
relation above can be used to find estimates of °`
Y ”
R in z . A simple computation
shows that
±
^
Ù
L_^bNo²´³
°JY!”
³
·
R!D˜m
LÝ܃N¶^
Œ
•
I No³ IC¹ ?
R
LÝÜ
R(™
Ù
We also find that
€
±
L_²´³
°Y`”
³
R€ ¦
L‹³ÏNjM
Const UXWZY
R(™
This relation is straight forward to verify, e.g. by using partial integration.
^
f
Suppose first that ¡ . Then, by (2.2),
±
€
L‹^bNo²À³
°Y!”
R.€ ¦
±
€
L_²´³
°Y`”
•
LÝ܃N
Œ
•
Ng·
Const € p :€ UXWZY€ p €
¦
³
NÞ·Ø× ·
R€
•
×
·
Œ
L´Ü,N
•
Ü I N¶³ I0¹ ?
•
LÝÜ
¸ I N¶³ I ¹
R
³
No^ ·
Const € p :€ UXWZY€ p €
Œ
¦
¸ I No³ I ¹ ?
R
³
L´Ü
¸
R ¹
¸
L´Ü
¹ ?
R
R‡™
Here, by integration by parts,
³
^Ê·
Œ
•
^
Suppose next that
€
±
LÝÜ
Ü I N¶³ I ¹ ?
°Y`”
f
¤
L‹^bNo²À³
R`DcQ
^Ê·
Œ
•
LÝÜ
?
³
Ü I
Ü ¦
Ü I No³ I Ü I No³ I ¹
R
Ü
^
Const ™
. In this situation,
R.€ ¦
€
±
L‹²À³
°Y!”
³
 × ·
·
N
R.€
•
LÝÜ
Œ
•
¸ I No³ I0¹ ?
R
m
L´Ü
¸
R ¹
S
and we turn to estimate the double integral on the right hand side. We write it as
³
 × ·
·
•
•
Œ
L´Ü
m
¸ I No³ IC¹ ?
R
LÝÜ
R ¹
¸
 × ·
·
D
•
³
L´Ü
•
 × ·
·
N
ÌP‘
 ×
N ³ I=¹ ?
¸ I Ø
R
³
m
L´Ü
Œ P
Ì ‘
m
 ×
•
LÝÜ
¸
R ¹
LÝÜ
¸ I N¶³ IC¹ ?
R
¸
R ¹
S
and we estimate these integrals separately. We find
 × ·
·
•
•
 ×
ÌP‘
³
L´Ü
m
¸ I No³ IC¹ ?
R
LÝÜ
R ¹
ÌP‘
 ×
·
¸
D
•
D
 ×
·
¦
F
ÌP‘
•
?
L
m
 ×
·
•
·
^bNw M
³
L´Ü
LÝÜ
Œ
ŒR ¦
m
¸ I No³ IC¹
R
³
N ³ I ¹
¸ I ¶
R
^
Const ™
m
¸
¸
¹ ?
¹ ?
L´Ü
LÝÜ
R
R
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
100
HENRIK L. PEDERSEN
¸ ~ÞË f
The second integral is more delicate to estimate: first of all, if
integration,
·
³
Œ ÌP‘ LÝÜ
m
 ×
LÝÜ
¸ I No³ IC¹ ?
R
L
R!D—m?
·
N
?
Œ P
Ì ‘
 ×
S
, we get by partial
l
³
^2NjM
m
^
m
R L ¸ No^
LÝÜ
Ü
R
L´Ü
Q
LJLÝÜ
m
m
M
I N¶³ I
Ü ³
¸ Ü
m
R
¸ I N¶³ I C
I ¹
R
R
S
R
so that
 × ·
·
•
³
Œ ÌP‘
 ×
L´Ü
LÝÜ
¸ I No³ I ¹ ?
R
m
 × ·
·
¸ ¦
R ¹
Œ ÌP‘
 ×
•
LÝÜ
?
R
Ü
LJLÝÜ
LÝÜ
Q
Ü ³
¸ Ü ¸
R
o
N
³ I I ¹ ¹ ™
¸ I
R
R
m
m
This integral we write again as
·
 × ·
Œ P
Ì ‘
•
 ×
Ü qr
Ü ÝL Ü
¸
O
m
R
L´Ü
?
Ü
R
Ü
Ü
¸ LÝÜ
m
L´Ü
Q
m
and, using that
is decreasing for
that this integral is bounded by
¦
D
D
ÜÏd
¸
Ü
¸ I No³ I0¹
R
¹
¸
S
and the assumed bound on ?
^2NjM
m
Q
b
^
NjM
¸ LÝÜ
¸
Œ ̒‘
m
m
m
R
•
 ×
^2NwM
·
·  ×
m
^bNwM
LÝÜ
Const
¸
Œ
m
m
m
•

^2NwM
·  ×
m
¸ Œ
^bNwM
Const
¸ ¹
m
m
•
L ^bNjM
L ^bNjM
Const m
RTUXWZY m
R(™
·
Const
³
¸ I
R
¸ I No³ I ÝL Ü
R
m
m
 × ·
³
I No³ I0¹
Q
Ü
¸ I N¶³ I0¹
R
R
, we see
¸
¹
³
LÝÜ
Ü
¹
¸
The lemma follows by combining all these estimates.
‚
P ROPOSITION 2.3. If |£  satisfies (1.1) and (1.2) there exist a constant ß
¨ ‚
quence | A tending to infinity such that
à
à
and a se-
à
à
à
à
h
UaWHY`”
p!x
à
Lp
WZY
p
R
à
¦
ß
¨
for all p~
of absolute value A and all ? .
Proof. A classical result, going back to Littlewood, see [8], states that for some sequence
¨
r
A
n ,
ã ä¼aã á‰
Òâ åæ UXWZY§€ ”
L p
R.€
¡
m
Const ã äJÄ ã Å=3ˆ å æ UaWHY§€ ”
L p
R€ž™
Therefore, by Lemma 2.1,
€:UXWZYʀ ”
for all p satisfying € p € D
¨
A
L p
R€a€ ¦
Const € p :€ UXWZY€ p €
and all ? . The proposition now follows from Lemma 2.2.
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
101
PICK FUNCTIONS RELATED TO ENTIRE FUNCTIONS
‚
3. An auxiliary Pick function. In this section we suppose that the sequence |£  satisfies (1.1) and also
€ £  m¶“Ò€ ¦
(3.1)
Const ™
This is equivalent to
(3.2)
Lܬ
€?
¨
R–m
€ ¦
Const ™
The main result of this section is the following theorem.
‚
T HEOREM 3.1. For any given sequence |£  satisfying (1.1) and (3.1) there exists a
LM
¦
real constant ç
UXWZY”
R such that
ÐZè L p
Lp
mÇUXWZY”
p!x
R!D
N
R
p
WHY
p
ç
is a Pick function.
d
LM
R EMARK 3.2. If ç
UaWHY`”
R then the function in the theorem above is certainly not
LM
a Pick function (its imaginary part tends to m§n as p tends to 1). Thus ç˜D®UXWZY”
R yields
LM
the strongest result. In many cases the constant ç should be taken smaller than UXWZY`”
R in
ÐZè
order that
be a Pick function. As an example, consider
”
Lp
R!D
LM,N
p
L
RT….†Tˆ
Ž
LMN
R’é Œ
(Òê
p
m
p
L
OZ“=RT….†Tˆ
p
m
OZ“=R
S
M
which has zeros at m
më m¬ì ™.™™ . In this case, computer experiments indicate that there
^
M
L‹^
^
LM
d
^
S
S
are points ~cË më m S l such
that
UXWZY§€ ”
R.€Tm
UaWHY`”
R
UXWZYʀ € . This implies (see the
S
proof of Theorem 3.1 below) that the imaginary part of
L p
mUXWZY`”
N
R
p x
`
p
p
WZY
LM
UXWZY`”
R
in the upper half plane has some negative boundary values and hence
that the function cannot
NØM
be a Pick function. However, in í 5 we show that if “ ¦ £  ¦ “
then we may take ç equal
LM
R .
to UaWHY`”
To prove the theorem we need some lemmas.
‚
L EMMA 3.3. For the canonical product ” of genus 1 associated with a sequence |£ 
¦
‘
satisfying (1.1) and (3.1) we have (with Õ
£ )
L¸
€mÈUaWHY`”
for
LMN
UaWHY
¸
¸
OÕR€ ¦
Const ™
¸ dÞf
.
Proof. From (2.1) we have (with Õ ¦ £ ‘ )
mUaWHY`”
for
¸
R7m
¸ dgf
L¸
R!D
¸ ·
Ö
Œ
?
€mÈUXWZY”
R’m
¸
UXWZY
LM,N
Ü
R
M
u
M
ÜÛm
Ü,N
Ü
¸ ye¹
S
à
à
. Therefore, and by (3.2),
L¸
L´Ü
à
à
¸
à
à
à mÇUXWZY!”
à
OÕZR.€D
L¸
à
D
à
¸ ·
Ö
Œ
u ?
R7m
¸ ·
LÝÜ
Ü
R
m
u
Œ
Ö
M
y
M
u
Ü
m
ÜN
M
܍m
à
M
¸ y
M
ÜN
¸ ye¹
à
¹
Ü
Ü
à
à
à
à
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
102
HENRIK L. PEDERSEN
¦
¦
M
¸ ·
Const
Ü
Œ
Ü I LÝÜN
Ü,N
m
¸
Ö
¸
¦
M
Œ
Ö
¸ ·
Const
M
u
Ü
¸
¹
R
¸ y
¹
Ü
Ü
Const ™
The lemma is proved.
‚
L EMMA 3.4. For any given sequence |£  satisfying (1.1) and (3.1) there exists a real
L_^
^ ¦ f
^
f
constant ç such that UXWZYʀ ”
for all ~ÓË m¬£ ‘ l and
R.€mÈç
L_^
UXWZYʀ ”
^
R.€ZmÓç
^
¦
“,UaWHY§€
S
^
€
M
for all ~ÓË m¬£ ‡ÌP‘ m¬£  l and all “ ¡ .
^ S
f
f
L‹^
M
R ¦
Proof. For ~jË m¬£ ‘ l we have ¦ ”
, so the first
assertion of the lemma is
f
S
evidently true. Given any bounded interval of the form Ë m¬î
l , it is possible to choose ç
f
S
such that the asserted inequalities hold on any interval Ë m¬£ (ÌP‘ m¬£  l`Æ Ë m¬î
l . Hence we
^ ¦
M
^ ~ÓË
^
¸
S
S
¡ M
may assume that
m . If “
and
m¬£ (̒‘ m¬£  l , we put D˜m
and find
L‹^
mUaWHY§€ ”
^
R€mÓç
DwUXWZY§€
S
] L¸
L¸
R€mUXWZY,”
N
R
ç
¸
™
] L
LM
I
p I
m
O £  R is (as used before) an entire function of exponential type.
Here, p RVDðï (’‘
Œ
Hence, by Lemma 3.3,
L‹^
mUXWZY§€ ”
^
R.€mÓç
¸ N
¦
LM,N
¸
¸
Const
UaWHY
O ÕZR
¦ Const ¸ N ¸ aU WHY ¸ N ç ¸ ™
N
¸
ç
¸ ~ Ë 
We get, for Ó
£
£ (ÌP‘ l ,
S
L‹^
¸
UXWZY
¸
¸ ¦
m¶“UaWHY
^
¸ ¦
€ £ (ÌP‘ m¶“Ò€UaWHY
¸ N
¸ N
Const UXWZY
¸
¸
S
¦ Const
so that mUXWZY§€ ”
R.ۖmǍ
ç
“UXWZY . From this relation we see that it is possible
^ ~ÓË
L‹^
^ ¦
^
to choose ç such that mUXWZY§€ ”
m¬£ (ÌP‘ m¬£  l . This
R.€mªç
“UaWHY§€ € for all “ and all
S
completes the proof.
Proof of of Theorem 3.1. We consider the harmonic function
L p
@
Lp
u mÇUXWZY”
px
s
R!D
¸ ~
for all
have
B
. Indeed, if
¸ dcf
Ð L p
where
ö
M
is holomorphic at p D
@
M
¸
and D ›
L p
then @
Lp
Lp
in z . We claim that
r
R
LM
y
f
¡
R
çjmÈUaWHY`”
M
p
m
R!D
f
¡
p
ç
p
WHY
in the upper half-plane. Our goal is to show that @
¼X½Þ
¼Xá‰
ä Ua¿«
ôâ õ @
òÀó ä.
N
R
@
L¸
R NØö’L p
f
R
R¬D
S
as pªr
. Thus,
L
R7D˜m
çwmUXWZY`”
M I
p
€ m
€
LM
RJR
³
N
s ö’L p
R
S
¸
. for p near 1 we
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
103
PICK FUNCTIONS RELATED TO ENTIRE FUNCTIONS
L
f
LM
R ). Since mUXWZY!”
(and is 0 if çcDjUXWZY`”
so Ua¼X½g¼aá‰â ä ¿ ‘ @ p R ¡
holomorphic in a neighbourhood of the origin) has a zero there,
L p
€@
as pŸr
f
Const
R.€ ¦
€
x
p
WZY
L
¸
within z . If ~ m¬£ (ÌP‘ m¬£  R for some “ ¡
S
@
Lp
rtsvu mUXWZY€ ”
¸ L
R,m
F
¸ LJL
D
L¸
²
F
R.€m
“
¸ No² F
UaWHYʀ €
R
m
¸ I N
UXWZYʀ € R
L
FÒI
f
R
M
N
ç
ç
p
(which is actually
,
y
L¸
L
N
¸
mUXWZY€ ”
¸
R
f
r
m
€
Lp
N
R.€
ç
¸ N
¸
“,UXWZY§€ € R
f
(and a similar estimate holds for “ED
and ~ m¬£ ‘ R ). From the lemma above we see that
L
¸
these expressions are non-negative. If D÷m¬£  for Ssome “ then one sees that @ p R r n .
Our claim is verified.
The function m@ is a harmonic function in the upper half-plane, which has, as we have
just verified, non-positive boundary values on the real line. It is (by Proposition 2.3) bounded
from above by some fixed constant on some semicircles, whose radii tend to infinity. The
ordinary maximum principle yields that m@ is bounded from above in all of the upper halfplane, and hence, by applying an extended maximum principle, that m@ is non-positive in
the upper half-plane (see e.g. [9, p. 23]). The theorem is proved.
4. Integral representation. We shall find an integral representation of functions of the
form
mUaWHY!”
px
p
WZY
pŸqr
Lp
R
S
‚
where ” is the usual canonical product associated with the sequence |Hm¬£  satisfying (1.1)
and (3.1). We shall do this by using the Pick functions described in Theorem 3.1. We choose
LM
ç ¦ UXWZY”
R such that
ÐZè L p
Lp
mÇUXWZY”
p!x
R!D
WHY
R
N
p
ç
p
is a Pick function. We shall find the integral representation of ÐTè as expressed in (1.3). We
have
L
L
L EMMA 4.1. We have, with @ è p R!D s`ÐZè p R ,
M
F @
è L ¸ No²
O?3R ¹
¸
m
r
A
¹
è L ¸
¸ NcL
R ¹
UXWZY”
LM
R–mÈçÊRÀÕ ‘
L¸
in the vague topology. Here Õ ‘ is the point mass at 1 and ¹ è is defined as ¹ è R D
¸ ¡ f
,
¹
for
¸ ~ÈË
m¬£ (ÌP‘
S
m¬£  l
è L¸
and “ ¡
M
¹
f
¸ ~ Ë
for È
m¬£ ‘
l.
S
mUaWHY€ ”
¸ LJL
RDm
L ¸
R.€
¸
N
UXWZYV€ € R
ç
¸ N
I N
F I
¸
“,UXWZY§€ €
R
and
è L¸
R`D˜m
L¸
N
¸
mUaWHY€ ”
R.€
ç
L
L
N
¸
¸ I
F I
UXWZYʀ € R
R S
–
S
f
for
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
104
HENRIK L. PEDERSEN
Proof. A computation shows that
(4.1)
€
p!x
p I è L p
€ @
R!D
WHY
L_^
Lp
N ³ ±
o
Lp
p
aU WHYʀ ”
R.€
° Y!”
R R‰¯°JY
NbL_³
Lp
^ ±
L p
p
UXWZY§€ ”
R.
€ m
J° Y”
R RTUXWZY§€ €
p I
p
m¬çb€ € ¯¬°Y
™
L
Here we notice that ± °Y!” p R is bounded on compact subsets of the upper half-plane (Lemma 2.2)
L p
L
~
UaWHY§€ ”
R€ involves only logarithmic singularities. If ø
᪗ B!R has its support in
and that
M
Ë
m”
OQl it thus follows that
S
‘ GI
·
L¸
ø
L ¸ N¶²
R‰UaWHY§€ ”
¸
O?3R€ ¹
*ú
‘ GI
·
r
A
m
L¸
ø
L¸
RTUXWZYV€ ”
¸
R.€ ¹
<ú
S
and that
‘ GJI
·
L¸
ø
±
R
L ¸ No²
°Y`”
<ú
¸
O?3R ¹
r
m
‘ GI
·
A
L¸
ø
R
±
L¸
°JY`”
<ú
¸
R ¹
™
By (4.1) we see that
M
‘ GI
·
F
ø
L¸
è L ¸ No²
R@
O?3R ¹
¸
<ú
r
m
‘ GI
·
A
L¸
ø
<ú
R ¹
è L¸
R ¹
¸
S
where ¹ è is given as in the statement of the lemma. (We notice that the origin does not
L
represent any difficulty since, as noted before, @ è p R ¦ Const OC€ x WZY p € for p near zero.)
MN
ËM
ûl , then
If ø has its support in mÈû
M
F
S
‘ÌÒü
·
‘

ü
L¸
ø
R@
è L ¸ N¶²
¸
O?3R ¹
r
m
A
L
m
ç¥mUXWZY,”
LM
RRø
LM
R(™
This follows from the (already used) fact that
L
Ð Lp
ö
LM
çjmÈUaWHY`”
M
p
m
R–D
RR NÞö’L p
R
S
M
p
where is holomorphic near D
. The lemma is proved.
We have thus found the integral representation
ÐZè L p
R!D
•
·
u

NbL Œ
UXWZY”
M
¸
m
LM
¸
m
p
¸ I NjM ye¹
R–mÈçÊR
u
è L ¸
M
M
M
m
p
m
¸
R ¹
Noý è p N¶þ è
y
Q
S
where
ý è
Ð è L‹²À³
D»¾.UX¿ ¼a½
RJO
L‹²À³
f
R7D
S
Œ
and
þ è
DcÁ
ÐZè L_²
R!D
F
Q
UXWZY§€ ”
L‹²
R.€Ô™
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
105
PICK FUNCTIONS RELATED TO ENTIRE FUNCTIONS
f
On the other hand, we know that çÊO x WZY p is a Pick function (since ç¤
x
M
m
WHY
•
·
D
p

This gives us
M
u
¸
M
¸
m
¸ I NwM y
m
p
L
¸ I N
UaWHY§€ € R
¸ N
F I§¹
) and that
M
M
M
m
p
m
Q
™
Œ
mUXWZY`”
p!x
p
WHY
L p
ÐZè L p
R
D
(4.2)
R’m
•
·
D

N
ç
x
M
u
¸
¸
R
M
u
ÉÿL ¸
¸ I NwM y
m
p
m
LM
Œ
XU WZY”
p
WHY
M
M
m
p
m
N
y
Q
R ¹
F
Q
¸
L_²
UaWHY§€ ”
R.€
S
É
where is given in (1.4).
É
Concerning the growth of
L EMMA 4.2.
we note:
•
·
€

¸ ÉeL ¸
R€ ¸
¤wnj™
¸ I NwM ¹
Œ
] L
LM
I
p I
Proof.] We shall again bring in the function p RD ï ‡P‘
m
O £  R . We have earlier
used that is of exponential type and now we shall also useŒ that
·
(4.3)
UXWZY
Œ

]
Ì
] L ¸
€
R.€ ¸
¤¥nw™
¸ I NwM
¹
Œ
This relation follows since is of polynomial
growth on the real line (see e.g. [10]; one may
also use estimates similar to those in í 5). It is known (see e.g. [9, p. 50]) that the exponential
growth together with (4.3) implies
·
(4.4)
] L¸
€:UXWZYʀ
R.€X€ ¸
¤wnj™
¸ I NwM
¹
Œ

¸ ~ Ë
Œ
m¬£ (ÌP‘ m¬£  l ,
We find, for Ó
S
L¸
N
mUaWHY€ ”
R.€
L ¸ I NwM L L
¸
R XU WZYʀ
] L
mUXWZY€
L ¸ I NwM LL
¸
R UXWZYʀ
¸ ÉÿL ¸
€ €
R
¸ I NwMvD
D
f
Hence (with £•§D

€R
R€
I N
F I
R
L ¸ N
L ¸
UaWHY`”
m R
“UXWZY m R
L ¸ I NwM JL L
¸ I N F I ™
R UXZ
W Y§€ € R
R
N
R
),
•
·
€R
¸
¸
“,UXWZY§€ €
I N F I
€
¸ ÉÿL ¸
R.€ ¸ ¦
¸ I NwM ¹
Œ
] L ¸
€:UXWZYʀ
R.€X€
L
¸ I NwM
•
·

N
­Œ
Œ
  •
‡
Ã
·
M
¸
I N FÒI ¹
UaWHYʀ € R
L¸ N
¸
€:UXWZY`”
R
“ UaWHY €
,
¸
L ¸ I NjM LL
¸ I N F I ¹ ™
R UaWHY R
R
¸
] L¸
The integral involving €UaWHY§€
R.€X€ is, by (4.4), finite. It therefore suffices to estimate the
infinite sum in the last line of the relation above. To do this we use Lemma 3.3, from which
¸
we get (for large )
€UaWHY`”
L¸
R
N
“UXWZY
¸
€ ¦
Const
¸
S
¸ ~ÓË 
£
S
£ (ÌP‘ l
S
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
106
HENRIK L. PEDERSEN
where the constant does not depend on “ . The infinite sum of integrals is therefore bounded
from above by a constant times the finite integral
·
I
¸
¹
¸ I ™
UXWZY R
¸ L
Œ
The lemma is proved.
This lemma makes it possible for us to split the integral in (4.2) into a sum of two and
we thus get
mUXWZY!”
p`x
p
WZY
Lp
R
ÉeL ¸
•
·
D
¸

R
¸ N
p ¹
Ï
m
LM
UXWZY”
M
m
R N
p
ß
S
Œ
for some constant ß . We may identify ß by noting that
×
¸

Œ
so that (by Lemma 3.3),
ÉeL ¸
•
·
Ua¿ ¼X½
R
^
m
¸
¹
D
×
mUXWZY!”
^
^
UXWZY
×
UX¿ ¼a½
^
R
f
D
S
Œ
Œ
ßD
LM
UXWZY”
M
m
UX¿ ¼a½
L_^
R
M
D
™
Œ
‚
We conclude: If the sequence |£  satisfies (1.1) and (3.1) we have the representation
mUaWHY!”
p!x
p
WZY
Lp
R
D
ÉÿL ¸
•
·
¸
p ¹
m

¸ N
R
LM
UXWZY`”
M
m
p
h
R NwM
p~
S
S
Œ
‚
É
of the canonical product ” of genus 1 associated with the sequence |m¬£  . The density
defined in (1.4).
We have proved Theorem 1.1.
is
5. Zero distribution and positivity of density. In this section we prove Theorem 1.2:
LM
‚
We show that Theorem 3.1 holds with çcDjUXWZY`”
R provided that the sequence |£  satisfies
~¶Ë
£ 
“
(5.1)
NwM
“
S
l
“
S
M
¡
™
We begin our investigation by finding estimates of the function
] L p
Ž
on the real line. For this we need
à any “ ¡ Q ,
L EMMA 5.1. For
à
à
à
Proof. àà For “ ¡
à
à
LF ^
ļXá
R
M
F ^
Q
and
L F ^
ÄJ¼aá
R
M
F ^
M
m
^ I
^
à
^ I
m
à
à
OZ“
“ “ à
à S à
à
à
à
I
D
à
¦
I
NwM
~¶Ë à
OZ“
à
M
u M
Œ
 P‘
(
R–D
l
p I
m
M
I y
£ 
M
OQ
^ ~ Ë
M
“2m
“ l
for ^ ¶
w
N
S M S
~ Ë
“ “
´l ™
for ¶
S
à
,
LF ^
ļXá
F ^
à
m
m
à
F
F
“
“=R
à
“
^’L‹^N
I
“=R
¦
“
L
“
“
I
N
“=R
¦
Q
M
™
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
For àà “ ¡
à
^
and
LF ^
ÄJ¼Xá
R
M
F ^
à
~ÓË
“Ÿm
M
^ I
m
. If “EDwQ
since “ ¡
O“
M
“ l àà ,
à S à
à
L F ^
à
à
ļXá
D
I
F ^
à
à
à
à
F
m
F
m
à
“=R
“
^PL‹^N
“
à
we should check
that
à
à
I
¦
“=R
L
M
“bm
“
I
L
M
R QH“Ïm
M
¦
R
S
à
à
LF ^
ļXá
R
M
F ^
à
^
107
PICK FUNCTIONS RELATED TO ENTIRE FUNCTIONS
à
M
m
à
^ I
M
M
¦
O
for ~wË Ql . This inequality does hold, but we do not give a detailed argument here. The
S
lemma follows.
] L‹^
‚
M
R€ ¦
P ROPOSITION ] 5.2. Suppose that |£  satisfies (5.1). For any “ ¡ Q , €
for
^ ~¶Ë  ‘
L‹^
M
^ ~¶Ë
¦

£
“l and €
R.€
OZQ for
“ £ l.
^
 S
S
Proof. Suppose that ~ÓË £ àà  ‘ £  làà , “ ¡ Q . Since

à
à
M
for D
S
for ¡
™™.™
S
M
“2m
S
M
à
m
I
£
à
D
à
I
M
m
à
à
à
à
€
I
£
^ I
M ¦
m
à
, and
^ I à
M
m
£
Ž 
Ԑ’‘
R€HD

D
£
^ I
M
¦
I
à
à
à
à
à
à
à
à
à
^ I à
M
m
à
‘ à
^ I à
à
Ž 
M
m
à
I
Ôà ’‘
à
LF ^
à
ÄJ¼aá
R
M
F ^
à
à
à
Ž
I àà é a
3Œ 
à
£
à
NwM R I
L
m
‘ à
¦
m
à

] L‹^
^ I
M
D
I
, we get
“
^ I
^ I à
Ž
M
m
O“
m
à
à
à
M
I
£
à
é Œ
a3
M
^ I
^ I à
L
àm
à
à
à
à
à
^ I
N M
w
à
I
R
à
™
I
Thus the proposition follows from the lemma
above.
‚
P ROPOSITION 5.3. Suppose that |£  satisfies (5.1). We have
mUaWHY!”
for
¸ dÞf
L¸
R
N
¸
UaWHY`”
LM
·
R!D
Œ
•
LÝÜ
?
M
Ü
R
L´Ü,N
¸
L´Ü,NwM
R
¹
R
Ü
é
¸ L¸
M
m
R
S
and in particular
L¸
mUXWZY`”
N
R
¸
UXWZY!”
LM
R ¦
K`L ¸ NwM
UaWHY
R
S
M
¸
for ¡ .
Proof. A computation, based on (2.1), yields the identity in the lemma. The counting
L´Ü
function ? R is, by the assumption on the £  ’s, bounded from
above by the counting function
¸ ¡ M
? • corresponding to the case of £  Dv“ . Thus, when
,
·
•
Œ
?
LÝÜ
Ü
R
M
LÝÜN
¸
R
L´Ü,NwM
R
¹
Ü
é
¸ L¸
m
M
R ¦
·
•
Œ
? •
D˜mÇUXWZY”3•
L´Ü
Ü
L¸
M
R
R
L´ÜN
N
¸
¸
R
LÝ܃NwM
UaWHY`”3•
LM
R
R
¹
S
Ü
é
¸ L¸
m
M
R
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
108
HENRIK L. PEDERSEN
M
mQ ™™.™ . But then we know that
where ” • denotes the canonical product with zeros m
L¸ N ¸
LM
K`L ¸ NwM
S
S
mUaWHY!” •
R
UXWZY`” •
R`DjUaWHY
R . The proposition follows.
^ ~ÓË
¡ M
(

P
Ì
‘

m£
m£ l we have
L EMMA 5.4. Let “
. For
L‹^
UaWHY§€ ”
¸
Proof. If D—m
^
~¶Ë 
£
L_^
UXWZYV€ ”
£ (ÌP‘ l
S
^
R€m
S
^
R€m
LM
UXWZY`”
R ¦
^
“UaWHY§€
€ž™
,
] L ¸
L¸ N ¸
R!DjUXWZYʀ
R.€mÈUXWZY`”
R
XU WZY`”
]
L
N
K
L
¸
¸ NjM
¦ UXWZYʀ
R €
.
UXWZY
R
S
LM
UaWHY`”
LM
R
by the lemma above. It is therefore enough to show that
UXWZY§€
] L¸
N
R€
K`L ¸ NwM
M
UXWZY
R ¦
¸
“UaWHY
S
N M
¥
NjM
¸
¸ ¦
£ 2¦
£ ‡ÌP‘
] L ¸
S
f
Ë
for “ ¡ . Suppose first that ~ÓË £  “
by Proposition
lÒÆ
“ “
l . Then UaWHY§€
R.€ ¦
NwM
K`L ¸ S NwM ¦
¸ ~ÈË
S ¸
¡ M
5.2, so we should verify that UXWZY
for
. This last
R
“`UXWZY
“ “
l and all “
K
S
inequality follows e.g. by induction from the functional equation for the -function:
UXWZY
K`L ¸ N
QZR–DwUaWHY
K`L ¸ NwM
¸ ~ Ë
Suppose next that È
“
5.2, so that
NÇM
S
UXWZYʀ
R
N
L ¸ NjM
UXWZY
Ë
£ (ÌP‘ l3Æ
] L¸
R.€
N
R ¦
NÇM
“
“
S
KL ¸ NjM
UaWHY
¸ N
“,UXWZY
N
] L¸
. Here, UaWHYʀ
Ql
R ¦
L ¸ NwM
UaWHY
KL ¸ NjM
UXWZY
L
R ¦
R€ ¦
“
NwM
mUXWZYQ
RTUXWZY
L ¸ NjM
R(™
by Proposition
R7mÈUaWHYQ‰™
NjM
N
K`L ¸ w
N M
M
¸
¸
¡ M
We now claim that UaWHY
R mUXWZYQ ¦ –
“ UaWHY
for ~ÓË “
“
Ql and “
. If һD
K`L ¸ ¦
N
j
M
¸ Ó
S
~ Ë
the inequality is true (UaWHY
, we note that
R
UXWZY,Q for
Q
l ). To go from “ to “
S
K`L ¸ N
K`L ¸ NwM N
L ¸ NjM
UaWHY
QZR’mÈUXWZY,Q ¦ UaWHY
R
UXWZY
R’mUXWZY,Q
N
L
j
N
M
L NjM
L ¸ w
N M
¸
¦ “UaWHY ¸
¦
UXWZY
R
“
RTUaWHY
R‡™
,
The lemma is proved.
We can now give the proof of Theorem 1.2 (the promised generalization of [5, Theorem
1.2]):
LM
Lemma 5.4 shows that Theorem 3.1 holds with çÍD÷UaWHY`”
R . Then Lemma 4.1 and
Lemma 4.2 yield the desired representation
mUXWZY`”
L p
R
p x
!
N
p
UXWZY`”
p
WHY
LM
R
•
·
D
¸

L¸
¹
m
R
pŸ¹
¸ NwM
Œ
S
where the density (defined in (1.5)) is non-negative.
By differentiating under the integral sign, we find the following corollary.
M
C OROLLARY 5.5. We have, for ? ¡ ,
A L p R–D
]
L
m
M
R
A ÌP‘
· • Œ
¹
L´ÜN
?
L
m
p
Ü
R
Ü
R
Ì ‘ ¹
A P
where
] L p
R!D
mUaWHY`”
Lp
R
p x
!
N
p
WZY
p
UaWHY`”
LM
R
S
S
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
109
PICK FUNCTIONS RELATED TO ENTIRE FUNCTIONS
‚
product associated with a sequence |m¬£  satisfying (1.1) and (5.1).
and ” is the canonical
]
f
In particular, is completely monotone on l n Ë .
L_^
S
R.€
R EMARK 5.6. One may describe the asymptotic behaviour of the maximum of UXWZYʀ ”
on the negative line for a canonical product ” having negative zeros. As an example we shall
study
L‹^
ÄÅ=ˆÒ|UXWZY€ ”
^
R€m
LM
UXWZY`”
^
RҀ
~¶Ë
m¬£ 
m¬£ 
S

‘ l ‚
‚
^ ~¶Ë 
¸
as “ tends to infinity. Here |£  satisfies (5.1). We have (with D—m
£
L‹^
UXWZY§€ ”
^
R.€m
LM
UXWZY,”
] L¸
R!DjUaWHY§€
L¸
R.€mUXWZY”
R
N
¸
UaWHY`”
LM

‘
S
£  l
)
R(™
K`L ¸ N®M
R . To
From the proof of Lemma 5.4 we know that this is bounded from above by] aU WHY
find a lower bound on the supremum above, we need a lower bound on € € . Such a lower
¸ ~¶Ë  ‘
à
à
à
£ àà
£  l ):
bound can be found by using the inequalities
(for
à
à
à
à
à
M
¡
à
à
à
à
à
“2mÓQ
M
m
¡
“
NwM
L
] L¸
N
£ 
¡
M
à
à
à
£
à
à
à
¡
S
à
à
à
à
NjM
m
à
¸
à
¸
à
¸ à
M
m
S
à
à
à
à
LM
F L¸
m
ÄJ¼aá
m¶“=R “
F L¸
mӓCR
à
¡
R€
£ 
S
à
à
à
m
NjM
à
. One obtains
We now put š  D
à
à
M
à
à
à
, and
€
£
S
à
à
à
¸

¸
MN
¡
à
¦
à
à
,
à
for
MN
à
M ¦
à
à
£
for
for
à
¸
‘ RJOZQ

¸
O£  R
M
LM
¸ I
m
m
¸
à
O£ 

‘ R à
™
and note that
~¶Ë 
š 
£

‘
Ë
S
£  l
M
“bm
OQ
S
NwM
“
OZQlÀ™
Therefore
ÄJÅ=ˆ |T€
] L¸
R€.€
¸ ~¶Ë 
£
L¸
N
¸

‘
S
‚ ¡
£  l
¡
€
LM
à
] L 
š .
R €
à
à
à
à
LF Ü à L 
I
ÄJ¼aá
R
£
mÈ£  ‘ R

™
F Ü
“
à
à
Const ã (ã ¼Xቑ â
GI
K`L ¸ N
¸
¡
R
UXWZY`”
R
UaWHY
QHR’m
UXWZYQ for
Furthermore, mUXWZY`”
in Proposition 5.3) and we thus obtain, for a suitable constant ß ,
UXWZY
KL
“
NwM
R,m¥“,UaWHYQÊm
UaWHY“
¦ ÄÅ=ˆÒ|UXWZY§€ ” L‹^ R.€m
¦ UaWHY K`L “ N QHR(™
N
(by an argument as
N
£  È
m £  ‘ R
ß

^
LM
^ ~ÓË
‚

UXWZY,”
R3€
m £
¬
m £  ‘ l
¬

S
Q7UXWZY
L
¸ dvM
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
110
HENRIK L. PEDERSEN
Let us end this section by finding ways of weakening the assumption (5.1). As indicated
in Remark 3.2, removal of some zeros of ” may destroy the Pick property of
Lp
mUXWZY!”
N
R
p x
`
p
p
WZY
UaWHY`”
LM
R
™
It is possible to obtain the following result, dealing with the case of the zeros being shifted to
the left.
M
N
M
N
M
T HEOREM 5.7. Let £ ¡
and suppose that £  ~jË £
һm
£
“l for “eD
Q ™.™.™ .
S
S S
Then
L p
mÇUXWZY!”
p2qr
N
R
p x
!
p
WHY
LM
UXWZY”
p
R
‚
is a Pick function. Here ” denotes the canonical product of genus 1 having zeros at |m¬£  .
Proof. The proof follows the same lines as the proof of Theorem 1.2 and is based on the
inequalities
L‹^
UXWZY§€ ”
for
^
~ÓË
First
M
¡
m¬£ (ÌP‘
m¬£  l and “
¸
S
of all, for ~ÓË £  à £
àS
à
à
Ž
] L¸
M
Œ
€
R.€D
aP‘
KL
I
£‰R
¦
^
R.€m
m
£
K`L ¸
R ¦
“,UXWZY§€
^
€
. We shall briefly indicate how to verify these inequalities.
M
N
NcM
Ë N
£
“2m
£
“
l,
(ÌP‘ l3à Æ
à
à
¸ I à
LM
UXWZY”
S
I
à
à
à
L ¸
mÓ£‰R
K L¸ N
`
£‰R
m¶£‰R
à
à
à
I
F L¸
ļXá
m £‰R
Ó
M
F L¸
m
mÈ£‰R
à
M
L¸
à
I
mÈ£‰R
O“
I
™
This estimate can be deduced in the same way as the estimate in Proposition 5.2 and using
the identity
Ž
¸ I
u M
Œ
Ԑ •
m
L
£
M
¸
Secondly, from Proposition 5.3, for ¡
L¸
mUXWZY!”
where ”
L
has its zeros at m
mUXWZY`”
L¸
R
N
R
N
£
N
¸
¸
“bm
UXWZY`”
R
LM
S
D
KL ¸ N
£‰R
I
£‰R
K`L
m
¸ N
£‰R
™
,
LM
UXWZY`”
M
KL
RI y
N
“
R ¦
¡
L ¸
mÇUXWZY!”
M
R
N
¸
LM
UXWZY`”
R
S
. The relation
R!DjUXWZY
M
K`L ¸ N
K`L
£TR–mUXWZY
KL
£‰R7m
¸
UaWHY`£
N
£TR is an entire function with zeros at
follows either by computation by noting that O p
L N
M
¡ M
m £
“,m
R “
and of order (at most) 1. Thus, by Hadamards factorization theorem, it is
L
N
KL
N
LM
S Lp
p
RT…‡†‰ˆ ç
R , where one finds çcDwUXWZY
£‰R and
DwUaWHY`£
UXWZY`”
R .
of the form ”
L
N
M
N
c
N
M
¸ ~ÓË 
Ë
Now, suppose that
£
£ (ÌP‘ l Æ
£
“2m
£
“
l‹R . We find
UaWHY§€ ”
L_^
R€m
^
UXWZY`”
S
LM
R ¦
¦
S
] L¸
K`L
N
¸
£‰R’mUXWZY
£‰R7m
aU WHY`£
UXWZY§€
R €
K`L
N
KL ¸
NwM
¸
UaWHY
£TR–m
UXWZY`£
XU WZY
m £
Ó
R
N
L¸
N
L¸
UXWZY
mÈ£‰R
R
S
UaWHY
K`L ¸ N
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
111
PICK FUNCTIONS RELATED TO ENTIRE FUNCTIONS
*L ¸
f
N
M
*L ¸
N
¸
N
N
¸
NcM
¦
¦ £
¦ £
RD
“Em
“ and
R¬D mUaWHYQ for £
“ ¦
“
for £
where
Ü
¸
mǣ we see that the desired inqualities are verified if
according to Lemma 5.1. If we put D
KL
UXWZY
for “bm
M ¦
Ü ¦
UaWHY
Ü
K`L
£‰R7m
LÝ܃N
N
£‰RTUXWZY`£
K`LÝ܃NwM
UXWZY
N
R
Ü ¦
“UaWHY
mÓUaWHYQ
¦
UaWHY
L´ÜN
£TR
and
“
L´Ü,N
£ R–m
T
N—M
.
LÝܬN
N
£‰RTUaWHY`£
KLÝ܃NjM
UXWZY
N
R
Ü
UXWZY
“UXWZY
LÝÜN
KL
S
£‰R
S
M
¡
To verify these inequalities we use that UXWZY
,
£‰R ¦ £UaWHY`£ for £
Ü
Ü
K
¡ f
¡
,
and the inequalities for used in the proof of Lemma 5.4.
UXWZY£
£‰R
UaWHY
The theorem is proved.N
M
M
¡ M
“m
“
If we take £  D
for some ¡
then we obtain the following corollary.
S
¡ M
C OROLLARY 5.8. For any
, the function
for “ ¦
¦
“
UXWZY
«R7mÈp!x UaWHY K`p L « R’m
K`L p N
UXWZY
pŸqr
p
UXWZY
WHY
is a Pick function.
M
¡ M
R EMARK 5.9. It should be noted that e.g. the assumption € £  m¥“Ò€ ¦
OZQ , for “
¨ÊN
M

is not sufficient to produce a Pick function. Even for arithmetic sequences £ D
,
“m
¨bd¥f
where
is close to zero the result need not be a Pick function.
A convergent sum of Pick functions is again a Pick function. As a consequence we
mention the following result, the moral being “the more zeros the better”.
‚
C OROLLARY 5.10. Let |”  be a sequence of
products of genus 1 and sup canonical
 N
‚
M
~¶Ë  N
¡ M

£
£
m
£
l , for
, where
and
pose that ” is associated with |Hm¬£

 ¡ M
S
L
I
R 
¤¥n
some numbers £
. If œ (’‘ œ aP‘ £
then
Œ Œ
Lp
R!D
L p
mUXWZY!”
p2qr
is a Pick function,
where ”
 ‚
with |m£
.
L
‡P‘ ”  p R
ï
N
R
p x
!
p
p
WHY
LM
UXWZY”
R
is the canonical product of genus 1 associated
Œ
6. A related Pick function. We note the following generalization of [5, Theorem 5.1].
The proof is exactly the same and we shall not repeat it here.
f
I
P ROPOSITION 6.1. If ¤jš ‘§¦ š I ¦ ™™.™ and œ (’‘ š   ¤jn then
pbqr
m
UaWHY!”
Lp
R
p
­
u
Œ
 P‘
‡
D
Œ
M
x
š 
LM,N
WHY
m
p
Oš  R
p
y
is a Pick function and it has the integral representation
m
UXWZY!”
Lp
p
R
Dvš

where
šD
and is defined as
L ¸ R`D f
L ¸ R`D
•
·
N
¸
for ¡
m“
¸
­
Œ
(’‘
u
mš ‘
M
u
¸
¸
p
m
L¸R ¹ ¸ S
¸ I NjM y
m
Œ
M
š 
m
±
"!$#
°
±
á
u
M
y¬y
š 
and
¸
for ~ Àl mš (̒‘ mš  Ë E
“ D
S
S
M
S
Q
S
™™.™‡™
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
112
HENRIK L. PEDERSEN
REFERENCES
[1] H. A LZER , Ungleichungen für die Gamma- und Polygammafunktionen, Habilitationsschrift, Bayrischen
Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, 1999.
[2] G. D. A NDERSON AND S.-L. Q IU , A monotonicity property of the gamma function, Proc. Amer. Math.
Soc., 125 (1997), pp. 3355–3362.
[3] G. D. A NDERSON , M. K. VAMANAMURTHY, AND M. V UORINEN , Special functions of quasiconformal
theory, Expo. Math., 7 (1989), pp. 97–136.
[4] C. B ERG AND H. L. P EDERSEN , A completely monotone function related to the Gamma function, J. Comp.
Appl. Math., 133 (2001), pp. 219–231.
[5] C. B ERG AND H. L. P EDERSEN , Pick functions related to the Gamma function, Rocky Mountain J. Math.,
32 (2002), pp. 507–525
[6] W. F. D ONOGHUE , J R ., Monotone Matrix Functions and Analytic Continuation, Springer, BerlinHeidelberg-New York, 1974.
[7] Á. E LBERT AND A. L AFORGIA , On some properties of the gamma function, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 128
(2000), pp. 2667–2673.
[8] W. K. H AYMAN , Subharmonic Functions, Volume 2, Academic Press, 1989.
[9] P. K OOSIS , The Logarithmic Integral, I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
[10] N. L EVINSON , On a problem of polya, Amer. J. Math., 58 (1936), pp. 791–798.
Download