ETNA

advertisement
ETNA
Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis.
Volume 19, pp. 84-93, 2005.
Copyright  2005, Kent State University.
ISSN 1068-9613.
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
LOCALIZED POLYNOMIAL BASES ON THE SPHERE
NOEMÍ LAÍN FERNÁNDEZ
Abstract. The subject of many areas of investigation, such as meteorology or crystallography, is the reconstruction of a continuous signal on the -sphere from scattered data. A classical approximation method is polynomial
interpolation. Let denote the space of polynomials of degree at most on the unit sphere . As it is
well known, the so-called spherical harmonics form an orthonormal basis of the space . Since these functions
exhibit a poor localization behavior, it is natural to ask for better localized bases. Given "!$# %& ,
we consider the spherical polynomials
0
+ 3 465
' )( +*-, . /0
+7 8:9 ( ;)<=>*?
0
0
21
where 9 denotes the Legendre polynomial of degree 3 normalized according to the condition 9 ( 5*2.@5 . In this
paper, we present systems of ( A4%5* points on that yield localized polynomial bases of the above form.
Key words. fundamental systems, localization, matrix condition, reproducing kernel.
AMS subject classifications. 41A05, 65D05, 15A12.
FUTWV denote the unit sphere em1. Introduction. Let BDC%EGFIHKJMLINPOQESR+JPR
C
NXO2^kml^noeqp gji
bedded in the Euclidean space NXO and let YZE\[ ])^_`bac[ ])^d_fehgji
kmrs$tulwv>xyr&n)^zr;s$tulwrst{n)^zv>xyr&l|e be its parameterization in spherical coordinates k}lj^;noe . Corresponding to the surface element ~o€km‚e , we have the ƒ{C‚kmBDC;e -inner product and norm
„m…
…
^†b‡uEˆFŠ‰y‹
k}‚e †Œkm‚e;~o€k}‚e
#
Cz 
…
F ‰ Ž ‰ Žcr;s$t{l
kYkml^noe;e †ŒkYk}lj^;noee)~olw~on)^
R
…
R C EˆF
„m…
^
…
‡+‘
Furthermore, let Harm’=k"N“O|e denote the space of harmonic homogeneous polynomials of
degree ” in three variables. Restricting these functions to B“C , we obtain the so-called spherical
‹
harmonics
of order ” . Throughout this paper, we will focus on the space •-–%EˆF—H ˜š™ # E›˜hL
œ
–-k"NXOye+V of spherical polynomials of degree at most  . It can be shown that
ž –
Ž Harm’ kmB C e+^
(1.1)
• – F
’ Ÿ
where this direct sum decomposition has to be understood in the sense that any spherical
polynomial of degree at most  is the restriction of a harmonic polynomial of degree less
or equal toŽ  to the sphere. Since dim Harm ’ kmBDCe¡F¢d‚”“£¤T , it follows that ¥
EˆF dim
–
• – F§¦ ’Ÿ kdW”y£¨T e©F—kmª£¨T«e;C . An ƒwC‚k"BfC;e -orthonormal basis of • – that is not localized on
the sphere is given by
®
¬w­€®
®{¶
d‚”)£°T
¼
±
˜Œ’ ² ² kmv³xor&l&e-´ µ
^X·¸F—gA”=^³‘K‘³‘>^z”=^X”F¹]2^³‘K‘³‘>^uº»^
(1.2)
’ kYkml^noe;euEˆFq¯
_
Received November 30, 2002. Accepted for publication May 10, 2003. Communicated by R. Alvarez-Nodarse.
Supported
by the DFG Graduiertenkolleg 357 Effiziente Algorithmen und Mehrskalenmethoden.
GSF – National Research Center for Environment and Health Institute of Biomathematics and Biometry,
Neuherberg, Germany. E-mail:noemi.lain@gsf.de.
84
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
Localized polynomial bases on the sphere
F IG . 1.1. Spherical harmonic
where
˜ ’
®
kmÊ;eEˆFÌË
85
½A¾P¿ÁÀwm 1 (à ?Ä>*}Å and reproducing kernel Æ m1 ( «?=< * with X. (mÇ 5+?È«?È>*}É .
k"”g¡·»e+Í
k"”2£Î·»e+ÍϛÐÑ
C
®
®
k=TugÒÊ C e
C
~ ®
˜D’;kmÊ;e+^Ô·¸FÕ])^K‘³‘³‘³^”=^DÊwLÖ[g×T‚^³T³`^
~ Ê
Ó
Ñ
denote the associated Legendre functions and ˜“’ stands for the Legendre polynomial of degree
” normalized according to the condition ˜“’=k=T e{FcT . From now on, this basis will be referred
to as the basis of spherical harmonics.
®
A way of constructing better
localized bases is by means of the reproducing kernel of
EÙ·UFÚT‚^K‘³‘³‘³^zdW”X£hTo^”ÛFÜ])^³‘K‘³‘>^“V be an arbitrary
the underlying space. Let H«Ø ’
ƒÓCokmBfCe -orthonormal basis of • – . It is straightforward to check that the reproducing kernel of
Harm’ kmBPC;e is given by
®
®
’ ß
Cà
†Ý’;k}&^Þ&euEˆF ®
Ø ’ km‚e=Ø ’ kmÞ&e>^
&^;Þ%L@B C ‘
Ÿ Ð
Combining now the direct sum decomposition
of • – in (1.1) and the addition theorem for
Ð
Harm’kmBPC;e (see Müller [4], page 10), one comes up with the following result.
L EMMA 1.1. The unique reproducing kernel of •j– is given by
à –
à – d‚”&£¹T
á
Ž
Ž
– km&^;Þ)e{EGF
±
(1.3)
† ’ k}&^Þ)eÓF
˜ ’ k}ÝâKÞ&e©FªEy㠖 km›âKÞ)e+^
&^;ÞÛL»B C ‘
_
’ Ÿ
’ Ÿ
á
It should be observed that –-k}&^;Þ)eÓFÕゖfk}ÓâÞ)e , as a zonal function, only depends on the
Euclidean product of the vectors  and Þ . Therefore, it is invariant with respect to rotations,
i.e., transformations of the group ä©åæk"çoe .
­ ®
1.1. Scaling Functions. In contrast to the spherical harmonics ’ introduced in (1.2),
á
the function –-k}&^³âˆe»EuBDC»gjièNZk}°LqBDC;e defined in (1.3) is the spherical polynomial
with minimal ƒwC‚k"BfCe -norm among all spherical polynomials of degree at most  that attain
the same value at the prescribed point  . The following lemma establishes this localization
property.
L EMMA 1.2. Let L@BDC . Then
é á
é
é
– km&^³âˆe éé
é
(1.4)
é á – km&^;‚e é F°êæs$tÝHyR>˜šRE‚˜cL»•–^2˜Œkm‚eÓFëT‚V©‘
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
86
N. Laı́n Fernández
The proof is a direct consequence of applying Cauchy-Schwarz’s inequality and the addition theorem (see Laı́n Fernández [2]).
Our aim is to study the problem of characterizing sets of points HK V Ÿ
BDC
á
µ µ
–
– k} ^Kâ e+V Ÿ
such that the functions H«ñ
EˆF
constitute a basis of the space • – . The
µ
µ
–
Ðìˆíˆíˆí ì îðï
functions ñ ^Xk}òXFëT‚^K‘³‘K‘>^¥e will be calledµ scaling functions. The linear independence
of the
µ
ìˆíˆíˆan
í ì î ¥óaŒ¥ matrix. Given HK V Ÿ
scaling functions is reflected in the regularity Ðof
BDC ,
µ µ
we can construct the­ interpolation
matrix
Ž
Ž
Ž
Ž
­
­
­
Ž
Ž
Ž
Ð+ìˆíˆíˆí ì î—ï
ú³û
õö ­ŒŽ ø
æ
­
ø
æ
­
ø
­šø
û
ö
m
k

e
m
k

e
m
k

e
³
‘
³
‘
‘
m
k

e
ö ­ Ž
û
­ Ž C
­ Ž O
­ Ž
ö
k} e
k} e
k} e
‘³‘³‘
k} e ûû
ö ­
C
O
­
­
­
ö
û
kmÐ  Ð e
kmÐ  e
kmÐ  e
‘³‘³‘
kmÐ  î e
ö
û
î
Ð km e Ð
Ð km C e
Ð km O e
Ð
ö
û
‘³‘³‘
km e
ö
û
C
O
ô
Ð
î
Ð
Ð
Ð
Ð
ö
û L»ý
..­ Ðø
..­ Ðø
. . ..­ Ðø
– EˆF ö ..­ Ðø
(1.5)
‘
û
.
.Ð
.Ð
.Ð î
ö÷ . Ð – Ð
û
–
–
–
îbþ&î
km e
km e
km e
–
–
– km O eù‘³‘³‘
–
C
..­
..­
..­
. . ..­
ü
. .
.
.
.
Ð
î
–
–
–
–
‘³‘³‘
– k} e
– k} C e
– k} O e
– k} e
By virtue of the addition
theorem, one can directly see that the symmetric
positive semidefiî
ô ô Ð
nite matrix ÿ – EGF
– – has the entries
­ ø ®
­ ®
à –
à ’
„á
á
á
Ž ® ø
– k}ނ^;Þ+ewF
– k}Þo^³âˆe+^ – kmÞ ^Kâ e‡-‘
ÿ – k^ eÓF
k}ÞKe ’ kmÞ>e©F
’
’ Ÿ
Ÿ ’
Therefore, the matrix ÿ– is the Gram matrix of the scaling functions and will be positive
definite, in particular
regular, if and only if the scaling functions
are linearly independent. As
ô
ô
det ÿ – F ™ det – ™ C , we can study the regularity of either – or ÿ – in order to determine
whether the scaling functions constitute a basis of • – or not. Since the regularity or singularity
ô
of the matrix – is independent of the basis of • – on hand, we will assume from now on that
the underlying basis is the basis (1.2) of spherical harmonics.
D EFINITION 1.3. A set of points HK V Ÿ
BDC for which the interpolation matrix
ô
µ µ
–
– is nonsingular or equivalently the associated scaling functions H«ñ V Ÿ
constitute a
µ µ
+
Ð
ˆ
ì
ˆ
í
ˆ
í
í
ì
î
ï
basis of • – , is called a fundamental system for • – .
Ðìˆíˆíˆí ì î
2. Construction of fundamental
systems.
With
growing
 , the analysis of the regularô
ity of the interpolation matrices – becomes a very difficult task in general, so we have to
restrict our analysis to specific choices of point constellations.
A possible way of constructing fundamental systems for • – is due to v. Golitschek and
Light [6] and Sünderman [5]. The key idea of their construction is to locate the ¥ nodes on
w£6T parallel circles, such that the ã th k"ãšF°]2^³‘K‘³‘>^fe circle contains doã£6T points.
Another description of specific sets of points, which admit unique polynomial interpolation, is given by Xu [7, 8]. In his construction, the fundamental systems arise from relating
an interpolation problem on the
unit disc to an interpolation
problem on the unit sphere:
one starts with k}6£§T e>km%£ d‚e d points lying on [  d`z£@T concentric circles inside the unit
disc, such that one of the circles is the unit circle B itself and each circle contains £ T
equidistantly distributed nodes. Finally, the points areÐ projected onto the northern and southern hemispheres of BDC , yielding thereby a symmetric distribution of ¥ points on the sphere.
Unfortunately, this construction only works in the case of even polynomial degree  .
Here and from now on, we will assume that  is an odd natural number and consider accordingly that the kmw£6T«e;C nodes are distributed on w£6T parallel circles, where each of them
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
87
Localized polynomial bases on the sphere
T

v>xyr&l


_
Ðì Ð
C

ìÐ
d
O
ìÐ



C
O C
ì
ì


Ðì
C
ì
Ð+ì
C O
ì




O
Ð+ì
C C

C
Ð
]
–WCzß 
]
O
O O
ì


O
ì
ìÐ
ì
ì
ì
]
_
d_
F IG . 2.1. Case Ò
. and Ö
.q5 : distribution of the points in a local-coordinates-grid: the points are
g×T
_
distributed equidistantly on four symmetric latitudinal circles.
bears u£ðT equidistantly distributed points. Moreover, the latitudinal circles are symmetric
with respect to the equator and the points on them exhibit a rotational symmetry with respect
to the axis that joins the north and south poles. However, as the next lemma shows, a distribution with km%£§T«e;C points lying simultaneously on {£»T meridians and on u£@T latitudes,
does not yield a fundamental system for • – .
L EMMA 2.1. Let  L be an odd positive integer. Furthermore, denote with
n óEGF
d_fã k} £QT«e@kãIFZT‚^K‘³‘³‘³^;š£ T«e and l LSkm])^_feðk ÌF
T‚^K‘³‘K‘>^;š£°T e pairwise different longitudinal and latitudinal angles, respectively. Then the system of points
HYkml ^;n e+V Ÿ
–‚ß does not constitute a fundamental system for •– .
­ matrix ô – .
The proof follows directly from constructing the associated interpolation
–Wß
ì Ð+ìˆíˆíˆí ì Ð
­ ø is straightforward
C and
It
to check that the rows corresponding to the functions ’
–Wß
C , k"”fF—kmŒ£¹T«e d)^³‘³‘K‘>^;fe are linearly dependent.
Ð Ñ
’
In Ðview
of
the
preceding
lemma
we
have
to
consider
different
longitudes
on
the
chosen
Ñ
circles HykmJ ^;J ^;J ebL BfC€EJ Fcv³xor&
l WVª!k »F To^³‘³‘K‘>^;u£@T e in order to obtain fundamenC
O
O
tal systems. Based on this idea, the following theorem establishes a possible construction
Ð
principle for fundamental systems when  is odd.

T HEOREM
2.2. Let  be an odd integer
and let #
] " l "—l "¤‘³‘³$
‘ "—l –Wß
"
ø
C
C
C
and l –‚ß
ÝEGF¹_ÛgÒ
l k PFT‚^K‘³‘K‘>^KkmŒ£°T«e d‚e denote symmetric latitudinal angles. Then the
C
Ð
Ð Ñ
set of points %Ùk &“e{EˆFëHK' ªEGF§Ykml W^n e+(
^ o^zãŒF—T‚^K‘³‘³‘³^;š£°T‚V , where
¬
ì
if is odd,
–‚ Czß ø ^
n F
ß )
*
C –‚ß
 ^
if is even,
Ð
Ð
Ð
with & LÖk"])^d‚e , constitutes a fundamental system
for • – .
Proof. In order to establish the linear independence of the scaling functions correspondô
ing to the point set %Ù+k &Pe , we have to study the regularity of the interpolation matrix – in
(1.5). The trick of the proof is to reduce our kmw£6T«eC -dimensional problem to w£6T problems
of dimension £@T . Using the structure of the spherical harmonics
as functions of separated
ô
variables, we can convert our original interpolation
matrix – into an equivalent block diag®
onal one consisting of š£°T blocks ,
k}·¸FÕ])^K‘³‘³‘³^;fe of dimension kmš£¹T«eaÖk}š£¹T«e by
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
88
N. Laı́n Fernández
regular transformations.
Multiplying
from the left hand side by a proper permutation matrix ô
the rows of – so that the matrix
attains the form
®
Ž
õö
ú³û
õö
ú³û
®
ö
û
ö
E /
· 2Õ] mod kmŒ£¹T«e>^P$
” 3 ™ ·Î™ ûû L%ý
/
1
ö÷ .
û
ö÷ 0 ’
E /
· 2—T mod kmŒ£¹T«e>^P$
” 3 ™ ·Î™
’
L%ý
.
0
EˆF
..
.
®
.
ü
ü
.Ð
.
L»ý
–
E ·/2¹ mod k}š£¹T«e+^“”$3ë™ ·Î™
’
0
® .
, we can reorder
Ð
–Wß
– ß
W
Ð þ)î
– ß Ð þ)î
W
‘
­ ®
Ð þ)î
Here, 0 ’ denotes the row vector containing the evaluation of
harmonic ’ at
® the spherical
–Wß
the nodes HK' |^(o^zãŒF—T‚^³‘K‘³‘>^Ý£ÎTWV . Within the matrices
%
L
ý
km·¸F¹]2^³‘K‘³‘>^fe
®
.
the functions – each
of
them
determines
one
row
of
–
are
ordered
in
the
following
way
Ð
)
þ
î
­ ®
­ ®
­ ® ø ø
­ .® ø ø
­ ® ø ø
ì ­ ®®
®
ø– ®
ø– ®
–
^
^ –Wß
^ӑK‘³‘³^ –
‘
ß ^‘³‘K‘³^ – ^ –Wß
C
Ð
Ð
Ð
Ð the distributionÐ of the points on the parallel
Furthermore, bearing in mind
circles lF°l k ªF
®
T‚^K‘³‘K‘>^;%£ëT«e , we can split the k}%£ŠT ea ¥ -dimensional matrices .
k}· Fc])^³‘K‘³‘>^fe into
š£°T square matrices of dimension k}w£6T«ewaÖk}w£6T e
®
®
®
®
–‚ß
C ^³‘K‘³‘>^
q
F
k
^
e>^
·QF¹]2^³‘³‘K‘>^;X^
. .
.
.
®
Ð
Ð
–‚ß
–Wß
where . L ý
contains the information relative to the points lying on the th
latitudinal circle. Ð þ
Ð
Moreover, let 4 EG6
F 5798Dk"d_-ò k}6£ŠT e;e and consider the km6£ŠT«eaªkm6£ŠT«e -dimensional
Fourier matrix : –Wß with entries
ø
ø ø ø
ø
ø
<
<
>=
=
T
T
# ?CFA E @
Ð
BD
;
4
F ;
´
:u–Wß
!k o^zã)euEˆF
‘
(2.1)
Œ£¹T
š£¹T
Ð
Ð
Ð
Ð
Ð
Multiplication from the right hand side by the ¥ aª¥ -dimensional block diagonal matrix
:§EˆF
diag +k :u–Wß G^ :u–Wß ^³‘K‘³‘KG^ :u–Wß e yields
Ž
Ž
Ž
õö
ú û
–Wß
Ð
Ð
Ð : –‚ß
û
ö
C
: –Wß
³
‘
³
‘
‘
: –Wß
û
ö÷ .
.
. –Wß
:u–‚ß
C :u–Wß
‘³‘³‘ .
ô
Ð :u–Wß
. Ð
.
Ð
Ð
– : F
H
‘
(2.2)
.. Ð
..
Ð ..
Ð ...
ü
.
Ð
Ð
Ð
Ð . Ð
ЖWß .
Ð
C– :u–Wß
‘³‘³‘ . –
:u–Wß
– :u–Wß
.
.
®
Ð
Ð
:u–Wß
Let us now focus our attention on the Ð k}Ö£hT«eDa6kmÐ Ò£hT e -dimensionalÐ matrices .
and compute their entries. Since the longitudinal angles of the points on hand vary from
latitude to latitude, it is necessary to examine the cases of odd and
even separately. Also theÐ
®
structure of the functions involved in each of the matrices .
recommends the distinction
­ ®
of two cases. On the one hand, we study
the entries of the bgš·Õ£ÒT first rows, i.e., the
®
­ ® ø ø e , and, on the other hand, we
rows corresponding to the functions
ß I @k JF ]2^³‘³‘K‘>^;»gÎø ·»
*
®
–
analyze the remaining · rows relative to the functions –Wß
ß I +k JÛF¹])^³‘K‘³‘>^· g T«e .
*
Ð
Ð
(I) Let be odd.
a) For TLKMNK¨%gÒ·h£°T , we obtain
O
.
®
:u–Wß
P
Ð
kQ^R eÓF
;
–‚à ß ­ ® ® ø
T
 £°T Ÿ Ð
Û
Ð
Ð
ß
ËYcË|l
d _fã
^
š£°TÏAÏ
ø
4
Ð
ø
Ð
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
89
Localized polynomial bases on the sphere
®
á
F
(2.3)
where
(2.4)
á
®
F
®
® ø
˜
á
®
˜
kmv³xor2l«e
ß
®
® ø Ð
ß
kmv³xor2l«eF4
®
–‚à ß
4
Ÿ Ð
ø
Ð
–Wà ß
Ð
Ð
denotes the constant
®
á
duk}· g Tw£UeD£°T
±
EˆT
F S
^
_ðk}Û£¹T«e
ø
ß
ø
Ÿ Ð
ß
>
®Ð ø
4
ß
^
Ð
Ð
ÝF—T‚^K‘³‘K‘>^;%g¡·¤£°To‘
g 2£»T«V
e 2c] mod k}{£»T«e . However,
Note that the sum in (2.3) is nonzero if and only if km·°N
since · L H«]2^³‘³‘K‘>^;“V and ÛL HoTo^³‘K‘³‘+^;u£@T‚V , this implies that ©F·¨£»T . Accordingly, we
®
®
®
obtain
® ø
á
®
O
P
kmŒ£¹T«e ˜
^ if ›F ·¤£°To^
ß kmv³xor&l«eF4
:u–Wß
k ^ e©X
F W
.
]2^
otherwise ‘
Ð
b) Similarly, ifÐ @gÒ·h£¨dNKMNK¨š£°T , then ø ®
®
á –Wø ß
®
O
P
kmÛ£°T e C ˜ kmv>xyr)l F
e 4
^ if F¹·h£¹T‚^
: –Wß
k ^ eÓX
F W
.
]2^
otherwise ‘
Ð
Ð
Ð
(II) Now let be even.
T KMNK¨%g¡·Ù£°T , it holds
a) For L
ø
ø
–Wà ß ­€® ® ø
®
O
P
T
k"d2k"ãg T«eM
£ &Pe=_
;
: –Wß
k ^ e©F
l ‚^
4
ß ËYcË|
.
š£°T
ÏAÏ
w£6T Ÿ Ð
Ð
Ð
®
®
®
® ø
ø ®
ø
Ð
–Wà ß
Ð
® ø
á
)
ß
ß
ß
>
Ð
C
F
˜
l «e
4
ß kmv³xor&
Ð
Ÿ
Ñ
Ð
®
® Ð
®
ø ®
ø –Wß
® ø
®
ø
à
á
)
ß ß
F
˜
e 4 Ð C
4
^
(2.5)
ß kmv³xor&l F
Ð
®
Ÿ
Ñ
Ð
Ð
á
Ð
is
nonzero
if and only if
where was already introduced in (2.4). Again, the sum in (2.5)
Ð
F°·Ù£¹T . Accordingly, it follows that
®
®
® ø
á
®
O
P
kmÛ£°T e
˜
l «F
e 4ZY\# [ ^ if F¹·h£¹T‚^
ß kmv³xor&
W
: –Wß
k ^ eÓF
.
]2^
otherwise ‘
Ð
Ð
b) In a similar way, if 6gÒ·h£¨dNK]ZK¨šø £¹
® T , then
ø
øß
á
W
–
)
®
O
P
kmÛ£°T e
˜ kmv³xor2
l «_
e 4 Y# [ ´
 µ ^ if F¹·h£¹T‚^
C
:u–Wß
k ^ eÓ^
F
W
.
otherwise ‘
]2^
Ð
®
Ð
Ð these calculations, we realize that each of the matrices : –Wß possesses
In view of
.
only one nonzero column, namely the k}·¹£¡T«e st one. Moreover, bearing in mind the structure
Ð multiply
of the matrix in (2.2), we observe that we can obtain a block diagonal matrix if we
from the right hand side by the following permutation matrix
EGF/`ba
^ca –Wß
^da
C
–Wß
ß
^³‘K‘³‘>^(a – –Wß
ß
^ca
^Ga –Wß
^da
– ß ß
W
C
O
C
C
C
C
‘K‘³Ð ‘K^Ga – W
– ß ß ^³‘KБ³‘K^dÐ a –‚ß ^ca –Wß Ð ^ca Ð Ž –Wß ³^ ‘K‘³‘>^ca –‚ß Ð #fe ‘
C
C
O
ô
– :gÐ Thereby,
the product
attains theÐ form diag
k
,
^, Ð ³^ ‘K‘³‘³^, – e , Ð where the matrix
®
Ð
C
–Wß
–Wß
,
L%ý
k}·óF°])^K‘³‘K‘>^;fe has the following entries:
Ð
Ð
Ð þ
Ð
-
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
90
h
N. Laı́n Fernández
If TLK]ZK
,
®
®
®
® ø
á ®
kmŒ£¹T«e ˜ ® ® ø
á
kmŒ£¹T«e ˜
®
6gÒ·h£¹T , then
k^@|e©F
W
ß
ß
kmv³xor2lKeF4
kmv³xor2
l KF
e 4
Y\# [
^
^
if odd ^
if even ‘
Ð
ø ®
If %g¡·¤£\dZKZK¨Û£°T , then
®
Ð
ø
á –‚ß ® ø
®
kmŒ£¹T«e C ˜ ø
k"v>xyr&l«e94
^ ø
if odd ^
á ‚
,
Qk ^i|eÓX
F W
– ß
)
if even.
kmŒ£¹T«e C ˜ Ð
k"v>xyr&l«e94 Y# [ ´
 µ^
Ð
Ð
Ž
Summarizing, we have obtained a simpler representation
of the ¥ëau¥ -dimensional maÐ
ô
trix – as the block diagonal matrix diag +k , ^ , ^³‘K‘³‘³^ , – e via multiplication by regular
ô
matrices. Hence, we have reduced the study of the regularity
of – to the analysis of the
®
regularity of each of the lower dimensional matricesÐ ,
k}·°F6])^³‘K‘³‘K^;fe .
In order to face this problem, we will make use of some properties of the calculus of
determinants.
Note
ø ® also that it is enough® to restrict our analysis to the cases · F6]2^³‘³‘K‘³^«k}š£
is equivalent to® ,
for ·¹F»])^³‘K‘³‘+^«k}Û£ÕT«e d . Indeed, the latter one is
T«e d , since , –Wß
a permuted and scaled version of ,
.
®
Ð constants appearing in the entries of each of the matrices ,
k}·èF
Extracting the
])^K‘³‘K‘>^Kkm £ T«e d‚e , first rowwise, then columnwise, and introducing the notation J EGF
v>xyr&l !k F To^³‘³‘K‘>^;š£¹T«e , we obtainø ®
®
®
– l ß
–Wl ß
®
á
á ?A
–‚ß
ø ®
C m ´  µ ´ Y[ # a
Fqk}š£¹T«e
det ,
Zm
n
Ð
Ð
ß
Ÿ–
Ð j Ÿ®
k
j
C
®
®
®
®
®
o
o
®
®
®
Ð
o
o
˜ ® k}J e
˜ ® kmJ e
‘³‘K‘
˜ ® kmJ –Wß e
o
o
C
o
o
‚
–
ß
˜
}
k
J
e
˜
}
k
J
e
³
‘
K
‘
‘
˜
}
k
J
e
ß
ß
ß
o
o
C
Ð
Ð
o
o
.
.
.
.
® ..
® ..
® ..
..
o
o
Ð
Ð Ð
Ð
Ð
o
o
o
o
˜ – ø k}® J e
˜ – kmJ ø e ®
‘³‘K‘
˜ – kmJ ø–Wß ® e
o
o
ø
ø
C
o
o
®
®
®
ø
ø
ø
–Wß
–‚ß
–Wß
o
o
)
)
(2.6)
a o ˜ –Wß ø ® Ð k}J e ´ ø  µ ˜ –Wß ø ® kmJ C e ‘³‘K‘Ì´ ø  µ ˜ –Wß ø ® Ð kmJ –Wß e o ‘
o
o
®
®
®
ø
ø
ø
o
o
–Wß Ð
–‚ß
–Wß
)
)
o ˜ –Wß Ð
k}J Ð e ´
 µ ˜ –Wß Ð Ð
kmJ e ‘³‘K‘Ì´
 µ ˜ –Wß Ð Ð
kmJ –Wß Ð e o
C
o
o
C
C
C
o
o
Ð .
Ð
Ð.
o
o
.
.
Ð
Ð
..
..
..
..
o
o
ø ®
ø
ø ®
ø
ø ®
o
o
o
o
)
–‚ß
)
–Wß
o ˜ –Wß
k}J e ´
 µ˜ –
kmJ e ‘³‘K‘Ì´ ø  µ ˜ –
kmJ –Wß e o
–
C
)
Ð
Ð
Ð appears in the even
Note that in the lower
half
 µ only
Ð of the above matrix, the factor ´
Ð
)
columns. For the sake of symmetry, let us multiply the last · rows by ´  µ C . Thereby, it
®
®
remains to show that
the determinant ® ®
Ñ
®
®
o
o
®
®
®
o
o
‚
–
ß
˜
}
k
J
e
˜
}
k
J
e
K
‘
³
‘
‘
˜
}
k
J
e
®
®
®
o
o
C
o
o
W
–
ß
˜
}
k
J
e
˜
m
k
J
e
K
‘
³
‘
‘
˜
}
k
J
e
ß
ß
ß
o
o
C
Ð
Ð
.
.
.
o
o
.
® ..
® ..
® ..
..
o
o
Ð
Ð
Ð
Ð
Ð
o
o
o
o
˜ – k}J ø ® e
˜ – k}J ø e ®
‘K‘³‘
˜ – k}J –‚ø ß ® e
ø
ø
o
o
C
®
®
®
ø
ø
ø
o
o
?A
–Wß
?A
–Wß
?A
–‚ß
o
Ðø ® kmJ e ´ ø Y # ˜ –‚ß ø ® k}J e ‘K‘³‘Ì´ ø Y # ˜ –Wß ø ® Ð kmJ–Wß e oo
(2.7)
o ´ Y # ˜ –Wß
C
o
o
o
o
?A
?A
?A
–Wß Ð ø ®
–Wß Ð ø ®
–‚ß Ð ø ®
o p
´ Y # ˜ –Wß Ð
kmJ Ð e ´ Y # ˜ –‚ß Ð
k}J e ‘K‘³‘Ì´ Y # ˜ –Wß Ð
kmJ –Wß Ð e o
C
o
o
C
C
C
o
o
Ð
Ð
..Ð
.
.
o
o
..
Ð
Ð
..
..
o
o
.
.
ø ®
ø
ø ®
ø
ø ®
o
o
o
o
?A
?A
?A
W
–
ß
W
–
ß
‚
–
ß
o
´ Y # ˜ –
p
kmJ e ´ Y # ˜ –
k}J e ‘K‘³‘Ì´ Y # ˜ –
kmJ –Wß e o
C
Ð
Ð
Ð
Ð
Ð
h
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
91
Localized polynomial bases on the sphere
is nonzero. Exploiting the parity of the associated Legendre
functions,
we can transform the
®sr
r
, where is the km@£ŠT ejakm6£ŠT«e above matrix by elementary row operations into q
dimensional diagonal matrix ®
®
®
r
and q
®
O
F
diag k=TugÒJ C e
is given by
õö
ö
ö
ö
J
ö
ö
ö
ö
ö
ö
ö
^«k=TugÒJ C e
C
^³‘³‘K‘>^Kk;Tug¡J C–Wß
Ð
e
Ð
T
JC
..ø Ð ®
.
– Ð
J
T
ø
–
C
JjC
..ø C ®
.
‘³‘³‘
‘³‘³‘
‘³‘³‘
..
.
‘³‘³‘
‘³‘³‘
‘³‘³‘Ú´
..
.
P
L@N
–Wß
Ð þ
–Wß
^
Ð
ú û
T
J–Wß
JC–Wß
..ø ® Ð
.
– Ð
J –‚ß
?A
´vu Y # k=TugÒJC–Wß ewt
?A
Ð
Y#
J –Wß k;TAgÒJC–Wß ie t
Ð
® ø ...
ü
Ð
Ð
?A
Y#
J –Wß k;Tug¡Jj–W
C ß ie t
û
û
û
û
û
û
û
û
û
û
û
C
û
´ Y # k=TugÒJC eit
=k TugÒJC eit
Y #
ö
û
C
ö÷
û
?A
?A
Ð
´ Y # J k;Tug¡JjC ewt
´ Y # J k;Tug¡JjC ewt
u
C
C
Ð
® ø ...
® ø ...
ø
Ð
Ð
?A
?A
´ Y # J
k;TAg¡JjC we t
´ Y # J
k=TugÒJC ewt
‘³‘³‘ ´vu
C
C
Ð Ð
Ð
Ð
Ð
with xÖFhkm¡Ð £qT«e dæg ·Ð . Consequently, in order to conclude the proof
of Theorem
2.2,
®
it remains to establish
the
regularity
of
the
-dimensional
matrices
}
k

Ù
£
T
“
e
»
a
k
}
Ò

¤
£
«
T
e
q
k}·¸FÕ])^K‘³‘K‘>^KkmŒ£¹T«e d‚e .
®
As it is shown
in
Theorem
2.7
of
Laı́n
Fernández
[1],
all
these
matrices
q
k}· F
])^K‘³‘³‘³^Kk}š£¹T«e d‚e are regular, which completes the proof.
ô
2.1. Conditions of the matrices – . According to Lemma 2.1, the point distribution
described in Theorem 2.2 does not yield a fundamental system for • – when &×F6] or &ÝF%d . In
order to understand better the influence of the parameter & on the stability of the interpolation
ô
problem, let us now study the asymptotic behavior of the condition number cond
k &“e when
& approximates the extremal values ] or d . On account of the symmetric distribution of the
ô
ô
Ð assume
points in Theorem 2.2, we have that cond – +k &PeoF cond – kdAy
g &Pe . Hence, we will
without loss of generality that & LÖkm]2^³T>` .
L EMMA 2.3. Let  FT and let HK ^; ^; ^; ‚V
BDC be a fundamental system of the form
C O
described in Theorem 2.2. Then
Ð
ï
ô
z{|
êæst-H v>xoc
t }
k &“e{~
E &ÎLÒk"])^KT>`V F—T‚^
ö
ö
?A
J
ø´
J
?A
;
ô
Ð
and cond
latitude v³xor&l FqT
k=T«e|FÒT if and only if the underlying
ç is the positive zero
of the Legendre polynomial ˜ . Moreover,
C
ø
Ð
Ð
O
P
ô
as &¡iM]2‘
v>xoc
t }
k &PeÓFÕå &
+
Ð
Ð
ô
Proof. In order to estimate the condition number of the matrix
k+&Pe in dependence
on the shift & , let us compute
the
eigenvalues
of
the
Gram
matrix
ÿ
+&Pe . For the sake of
k
Ð
simplicity, let AEˆFðv>xorKk &D_ doe and €EGF»v³xorCl . It is straightforward to check
that the matrix
Ð
ÿ k &“e attains the form
Ð
÷
õ
ú
7
'‚
‚
‚
‚
‚
Ð
5jƒ
4 …( „( Ç 5‚ * Ç ‚ * 5jƒ
4 …( „( ‚ 5 Ç * Ç ‚ *
Ç
'‚
7
T
5jƒ
4 …( „( 5 7 Ç * Ç * 5jƒ
4 …( „'( ‚ Ç 5* Ç * ü
‚ Ç
‚
‚
‚
±
‘
5j4† („W( Ç 5‚ * Ç ‚ *S5j4† („W( ‚ 5 Ç * Ç ‚ *
_
'‚
7Ç 5j†
4 ( „W( 5 Ç * Ç *S5j†
4 ( „W( Ç 5* Ç *
Ç ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
92
N. Laı́n Fernández
7
35
10
Legendre nodes
Tschebyscheff nodes
equidistant nodes
n=1
n=3
n=5
n=7
6
10
30
5
10
4
10
log cond2α
Condition
25
20
3
10
15
2
10
10
5
0.5
1
10
0
1
angle shift
10
−5
10
1.5
α
−4
−3
10
−2
10
10
−1
10
0
10
log α
F IG . 2.2. On the left hand side: Condition number of ‡ in dependence of the shift for different latitudinal
heights. Note that because of the symmetry of the sphere, cond ‡
( )*K. cond ‡ ( Ç )* . The minimal condition
number is achieved for “.×5 . On the right hand side: log-log plot of cond ‡› ( )* , when tends to È .
Since this matrix is block circulant with circulant blocks, one can compute its eigenvalues via
diagonalization by Fourier matrices
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
± ˆ
k &eÓF
+
^
k |ewFëT«
+
d € ^
k &eӊ
+
F ‰k bg T«e³+k €g T«e>^ y+k |e©F—‹
g ‰2k;TÓU
£ &e>@k €g¨T e+‘
C
O
Ð
Considering
now
the cases €UK
and €Œ
separately, it can be seen that the quotient
ˆcŽf’ “
ˆcŽf‘
ˆ
O
O
its
minimum
kÿ k &“e;e
kÿ k+&Pee attains
Ð
Ð at the intersection point of the lines O k+&e
ˆ
and o+k |e , i.e. at the point “F6] or equivalently &¡F—T .
Ð
Accordingly,
for &ÝÐ FT , the Gram matrix ÿ k=T e possesses the eigenvalues
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
±
F
^
F ‰2k=Tw£\v>xyr2dl e>^ Ð
”
F—gAç2k=g×TÓ£\v>xyr2dl
e>‘
C
O
Ð
Ð
ì
Ð only if v³xor&l F
It is; now straightforward
to prove that the matrix
has equal
eigenvalues if and
T
ç . For this value of l , the condition number of the matrix is equal to one and the scaling
Ð
functions form an orthogonal basis of • .
ø
Ð
Having computed
the eigenvalues of ÿ +k &Pe , we can immediately
conclude that
O
P
Ð
^ & iÚ] by analyzing
–
cond • +k &Pe Fqå &
the cases v>xyrC-l KhT ç and v>xyr;Cfl ŒhT ç
Ð
separately.
Ð
Ð
Ð
ÐO ; P
At this point it should be mentioned that for the special value of l F z{ v³v³xor T
ç ,
the points constituting the set %Ùk;T«e , i.e.
Ð

F
g ¯
j
Ðì Ð

C
F
j
]2^ ¯
d
^]2^
ç
ç
d
^³g
T
;
^
;

m
ç
F
¯
C
j
Ðì
T
ç
m
^

C C
F
d
ç
^]2^
j
])^Kg ¯
;
d
ç
T
ç
^Kg
^
m
;
T
ç
m
^
ìÐ
ì
are the vertices of a regular tetrahedron inscribed in the sphere.
Motivated by the results obtained for the case  FóT , it is natural to ask whether it
is possible to make similar assertions for higher values of  . Unfortunately, so far it was
only possible to conduct numerical experiments, which indeed support the conjecture that for
ETNA
Kent State University
etna@mcs.kent.edu
Localized polynomial bases on the sphere
ø
ø
93
ô
 3 d the condition number cond –k+&Pe behaves like åæk+&
]
e , resp. åæk;k"d€gU&“e
e , when
the shift & approximates the singular values ] or d .
Ð
Ð
On the right hand side of Figure 2.2, we display the behavior of the condition number
ô
cond – k &“e for small values of & and for the odd values of  between T and — . In order
ô
to bring out the asymptotic behavior of cond – k &“e , we have used logarithmic scales in the
plot. According to our expectation, we obtain a straight line with slope equal to g×T . It can
also be observed that with increasing  the intersection of the graph with the ˜ -axis moves
upwards. In the numerical tests, we have chosen equidistantly distributed latitudinal angles
for our calculations. Remember that the considered fundamental systems in Theorem 2.2
allowed arbitrary heights of the latitudinal circles.
ô
k &“e for the
On the left hand
side of Figure 2.2, we illustrate the behavior of cond
O
values of &qL [T d&^ç d` . Note that for 6F§T the minimal condition number is attained at
&ÝFT , which corresponds to Lemma 2.3.
On account of Lemma 2.3, for ÖFcT orthogonality of the scaling functions could be
achieved by considering the zeros of the Legendre polynomial of the next higher degree as
latitudes. Motivated by this fact, we now choose as heights for our parallel circles the zeros of
orthogonal polynomials of degree four. In particular we consider the zeros of Legendre and
Tschebyscheff polynomials of the first kind. This choice fits into the approach pursued by Fischer and Prestin [3], where polynomial wavelets on the interval were studied and orthogonality of the scaling functions was achieved by employing the zeros of the underlying orthogonal
ô
polynomials as nodes. As we might have expected, the condition number of the matrix
k &Pe
+
O
improves when we choose the zeros of the Legendre polynomials as heights of the
latitudinal
circles. The choice of equidistantly distributed heights ™¡FQv³xorkzk"doã€g T«e&_ k"dAk}æ£ÕT e;e;e
yields similar condition numbers to the case of the Legendre nodes.
REFERENCES
[1] N. L A ÍN F ERN ÁNDEZ , Polynomial Bases on the Sphere, PhD thesis, in preparation.
[2] N. L A ÍN F ERN ÁNDEZ , Polynomial Bases on the Sphere, in Proceedings IDoMAT, 2001, Int. Dortmund
Meeting in Approximation Theory, Witten-Bommerholz, Birkhäuser, 2001.
[3] B. F ISCHER AND J. P RESTIN , Wavelets based on orthogonal polynomials, Math. Comp, 66 (1997), pp. 1593–
1618.
[4] C. M ÜLLER , Spherical Harmonics, Springer, Berlin, 1966.
[5] B. S ÜNDERMANN , Projektionen auf Polynomräumen in mehreren Veränderlichen, PhD thesis, Diss. Dortmund, 1983.
[6] M. V. G OLITSCHEK AND W. L IGHT , Interpolation by Polynomials and Radial Basis Functions on Spheres,
Constr. Approx., 17 (2001), pp. 1–18.
[7] Y. X U , Polynomial interpolation on the unit sphere, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., to appear.
[8] Y. X U , Polynomial interpolation on the unit sphere and on the unit ball, Adv. in Com. Math., to appear.
Download