Interactive Effects of Air Pollution and Climate Change on Forests Andrzej Bytnerowicz US Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Riverside Fire Laboratory Air pollution is an integral part of climate change Many of traditional air pollutants and greenhouse gases not only have common sources, but may also interact in the atmosphere causing a variety of environmental impacts on local, regional and global scales. Problem - tropospheric ozone Although peak concentrations of ozone have been drastically reduced, background O3 concentrations have been continuously increasing since the 1880s It is predicted that by 2050 about 50% of global forests may be affected by potentially phytotoxic ozone concentrations of >60 ppb (Fowler et al, 1999) CASTNET - Annual Mean O3 Concentrations (ppb) for 2002 Southern California ozone 2005 seasonal average Biomass burning can significantly increase ambient O3 concentrations Ozone is produced by reactions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), e.g., from wildland fires. Resulting O3 concentrations depend on distance from the fire, fuel N content, temperature, solar radiation, wind conditions, contribution of VOCs and NOx from other sources, and many other factors. Examples of contribution of biomass burning to elevated O3 concentrations Elevated ambient O3 concentrations occur down wind from biomass fires (S. Atlantic savanna fires in Brazil; SE Asia – forest fires in Indonesia; Canada – local forest fires) Contribution of biomass burning to the global tropospheric O3 concentrations is ~10% (Trentman et al., 2003) McNally fire caused increases of ambient O3 and PM2.5 levels in Sierra Nevada, summer 2002 “Wildland Fires and Air Pollution” Elsevier Series “Developments in Environmental Science”, in press Editors: Andrzej Bytnerowicz, Michael Arbaugh, Christian Andersen and Al Riebau Section I - General Information and Emissions Section II - Ambient Air Quality, Visibility and Human Health – Regional Perspectives Section III - Ecological Impacts of Forest Fires and Air Pollution Section IV - Management Issues Section V - Concluding Section Problem - nitrogen deposition Elevated concentrations of reactive nitrogenous compounds (Nr) lead to the above-normal levels of N deposition in forests and other ecosystems. Chronic deposition of N may lead to N saturation in forests and other ecosystems manifested in many different ways (growth changes, species composition shifts, increased emission of N2O and NO, deteriorated water quality, etc.) Alpine biota in a warmer, CO2- rich World (Christian Körner, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, Switzerland) Warming will directly affect trees, and thus the high altitude tree limit Warming will affect low structure vegetation largely via snow cover duration Elevated CO2 does not lead to higher productivity in alpine vegetation Nitrogen deposition, at rates close to the current values, induces major transformation of alpine vegetation Scientific knowledge gaps While wet N deposition is well characterized, contribution of dry N deposition (gaseous NH3 and HNO3 & particulate matter) is poorly understood This is especially important for arid and semi-arid ecosystems where up to 90% of N may be deposited in a dry form (e.g., California and the Mediterranean area). Interactive effects of air pollution and climate change on ecosystems Generally, climate change can alter the effects of air pollution, and vice versa, air pollution may modify responses of ecosystems to specific climate change impacts. Examples: (1) impacts of O3 on plants can be modified by rising temperatures (increased length of physiological activity & extended effective O3 exposure) (2) climate change effects on ecosystem vitality, soil processes or species composition can be altered by increased N or heavy metal deposition Extreme events happen and should be studied carefully! Catastrophic fires in southern California in 2003 and 2007 (a consequence of overstocking caused by very effective fire prevention program, long-lasting drought, chronic air pollution exposures and bark beetle infestation) Catastrophic wind-throw in the Slovak Tatra Mountains in November 2004 (result of chronic high N + S deposition, elevated O3 concentrations and climatic variability in Norway spruce monocultures) What research can be done? Experiments at different scales (branch, seedling, mature tree) needed to better understand mechanisms of the effects of single factors or simple interactions Long-term, large scale experiments such as the FACE studies or gradient air pollution studies (Wisconsin, San Bernardino Mountains) which are essential for better understanding of complex interactions between air pollution and climate change Experimental Approach: The Aspen FACE User Facility Control CO2+O3 O3 CO2 CO2 CO2+O3 Control CO2+O3 O3 CO2 Full Factorial, 3 reps: C, +CO2, +O3, +CO2+O3 CO2: 360 and 537 ppm The Aspen FACE experiment is examining the impacts of interacting elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3 on O3 northern forest ecosystem structure and function. O3: 38 and 51 ppb Growing season (daytime) fumigation from bud break to leaf drop (1998-present) Control Impacts of Elevated CO2 and O3 on Volume Growth from 5 Aspen Clones in the Aspen FACE Experiment 16 25 Clone 216 Clone 42E 20 12 15 8 Stem volume index (dm3) 10 4 5 0 8 0 16 Clone 259 6 12 4 8 2 4 0 35 Clone 271 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Clone 8L 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year Control +CO2 +O3 +CO2+O3 Year From: Karnosky et al. 2005. Plant Cell Environ. 28:965-981. IUFRO conference “Adaptation of Forests and Forest Management to Climate Change with Emphasis on Forest Health” Umea, Sweden August 25-28, 2008 Session “Integrated effects of climate change, air pollution, pests and pathogens on forest health – current status and projections for future” Effects of concurrent elevated CO2 and O3 on leaf gas exchange characteristics Nancy Grulke, Elena Paoletti, Bob Heath, Angela Nunn USDA Forest Service, Riverside, CA IPP CNR, Florence, Italy Botany Department, UC Riverside, CA Dept. of Ecology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany DUKE FACE site, loblolly pine Holm oak at CO2 springs CASIROZ site, European beech Designed a new gas exchange system that concurrently measures H2O, O3, & CO2 flux 21X Data Logger O2 TANK TANKED AIR Tair O3 GENERATOR EXHAUST Tleaf PAR Vent, small MFC HUMIDIFIER REF O3 MON MFR REF H20 & CO2 IRGA 3-25 sccm FRIDGE MFC HOC leaf flux 6400 Licor ~320 sccm Vent, small SAMP O3 MON MFR SAMP H20 & CO2 IRGA 120 sccm HC leaf flux HC system: H2O, CO2 flux EXHAUST (6400 Licor) (Grulke, Paoletti, Heath 2006 Env Poll 146:640) •Two innovations: –Low flow (120 sscm), fast response (20 s) O3 monitor –Cooled air prior to cuvette (reduces inaccuracies in gs measurements inherent in in-cuvette peltier cooling systems Examination of stomatal behavior with concurrent O3 exposure: (1) Does O3 exposure modify foliar water use efficiency under ambient and elevated CO2? (2) Does O3 reduce stomatal responsiveness to dynamic light conditions under ambient or elevated CO2? Two species/ecosystems: -Holm oak in natural CO2 springs + moderately high O3 generated and transported from Pisa, Italy -Loblolly pine at the Duke FACE site, elevated CO2 + short term elevated O3 Conclusions Elevated O3 reduced water use efficiency under both ambient and 1.5x CO2 due changes in both net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance Both elevated CO2 and O3 decreased stomatal responsiveness to abrupt changes in light level Current modeling efforts use steady state response curves to parameterize, which overestimate C sequestration in natural field conditions Current modeling efforts use low to moderate levels of O3 exposure: global background O3 levels are very close to exceeding moderate levels used. By 2020, we will exceed current modeling predictive capabilities… Potential impacts of climate change on bird populations and habitats in southern California Principal Investigators: Jenny Rechel, Ph.D Shyh Chen, Ph.D Forest Fire Laboratory Riverside, CA Background Study area: the San Jacinto Mountains, San Bernardino National Forest A ‘mountain island’ habitat Elevation gradients (915 m to 2,652m) Over 10 years of bird surveys and associated vegetation data on 84 perm. plots Questions related to Climate Change: What are the effects of climate change on species ranges? Which species will most likely be affected negatively or positively due to climate changes? Following climate change, there will be elevational shifts in vegetation and what will the consequences be for birds, especially those relegated to the remnant patches of conifer forests? Thank you!!!