This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site. Copyright 2009, The Johns Hopkins University and Nan Astone. All rights reserved. Use of these materials permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided “AS IS”; no representations or warranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independently review all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible for obtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed. Urban Demography Nan Astone, PhD Johns Hopkins University Objectives of This Lecture Define main measures used by urban demographers Examine global trends Consider recent research by demographers concerned with urban health 3 Section A Definitions and Trends Urban Population Is Growing Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2006). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2005 Revision. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/200. 5 Urban or City Population Population of urban areas within countries Common metric for categorizing cities − 10 million or more (megacities) − 5–10 million − 1–5 million − 500,000 to 1 million − Less than 500,000 6 City Size by Region and Year 7 Megacities over Time 1950 (2) 1. New York–Newark 2. Tokyo 1975 (3) 1. Tokyo 2. New York–Newark 3. Mexico City 8 Megacities over Time 2000 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. (18) Tokyo Mexico City New York–Newark São Paulo Mumbai Shanghai Calcutta Delhi Buenos Aires LA–Long Beach–Santa Ana Osaka Jakarta Rio de Janeiro Cairo Dhaka Moscow Karachi Manila 2005 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. (20) Tokyo Mexico City New York–Newark São Paulo Mumbai Delhi Shanghai Calcutta Jakarta Buenos Aires Dhaka LA–Long Beach–Santa Ana Karachi Rio de Janeiro Osaka Cairo Lagos Beijing Manila Moscow 9 Urbanization Characteristic of a nation or region Percent of a population (e.g., a country) that lives in urban areas 10 World Urbanization Percentage of the population living in urban areas, 2005 Map source: United Nations. 11 Urbanization by Region Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2006). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2005 Revision. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/200. 12 Urban Growth Characteristic of a city or of a number of cities aggregated together Growth rate of the urban population 13 Worldwide Urban Growth Average annual rate of change of the urban population, 2000–2005 Map source: United Nations. 14 Urban Growth in the Six Biggest Cities (as of 2005) Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2006). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2005 Revision. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/200. 15 Section B Health and the City Recent Research Recent research by urban demographers interested in health − NRC reading − Cities Transformed X Huge volume devoted to urban demography X Two chapters on health 17 Is City Life Good for Your Health? Chapter 7: “Mortality and Morbidity: Is City Life Good for Your Health?” − What is “urban health”? − Are urban/rural health differentials a matter of kind (totally different health profiles) or degree (levels of cause-specific morbidity and mortality)? − Are the determinants of health different for city dwellers than for rural dwellers, or are the levels of universal determinants of health simply different for urban and rural dwellers? 18 Unique Determinants of Urban Health Dependence on cash Informal social networks are weaker Higher levels of parental participation in the formal sector Higher intake of fat and sweets/lower levels of physical activity Sanitation Environmental toxins Limits on social mobility 19 Unique Determinants of Urban Health Dependence on cash Informal social networks are weaker Higher levels of parental participation in the formal sector Higher intake of fat and sweets/lower levels of physical activity Sanitation Environmental toxins Limits on social mobility 20 Unique Determinants of Urban Health Dependence on cash Informal social networks are weaker Higher levels of parental participation in the formal sector Higher intake of fat and sweets/lower levels of physical activity Sanitation Environmental toxins Limits on social mobility 21 Unique Determinants of Urban Health Dependence on cash Informal social networks are weaker Higher levels of parental participation in the formal sector Higher intake of fat and sweets/lower levels of physical activity Sanitation Environmental toxins Limits on social mobility 22 Unique Determinants of Urban Health Dependence on cash Informal social networks are weaker Higher levels of parental participation in the formal sector Higher intake of fat and sweets/lower levels of physical activity Sanitation Environmental toxins Limits on social mobility 23 Unique Determinants of Urban Health Dependence on cash Informal social networks are weaker Higher levels of parental participation in the formal sector Higher intake of fat and sweets/lower levels of physical activity Sanitation Environmental toxins Limits on social mobility 24 Unique Determinants of Urban Health Dependence on cash Informal social networks are weaker Higher levels of parental participation in the formal sector Higher intake of fat and sweets/lower levels of physical activity Sanitation Environmental toxins Limits on social mobility 25 Unique Determinants of Urban Health Dependence on cash Informal social networks are weaker Higher levels of parental participation in the formal sector Higher intake of fat and sweets/lower levels of physical activity Sanitation Environmental toxins Limits on social mobility 26 Particular Issues Injuries Mental health Emerging chronic disease New infectious disease (HIV/AIDS) 27 The Urban Penalty In historical Europe, morbidity and mortality were much higher in cities, despite the fact that urban dwellers (as individuals) were richer Over time, the rural advantage eroded because … − Investments in infrastructure − NGO action leading to political will − Knowledge − Income Contemporary LDCs did not have an urban penalty because of knowledge Question: Is an urban penalty emerging? 28 Urban Child Health Urban residence is associated with child survival, and city size does not matter Urban poor children have much lower survival than urban non-poor children, and sometimes have lower survival than rural children (still a minority) Less stunting in urban areas, and, generally, city size doesn’t matter (except in Latin America) Wasting is less clear, although urban children generally fare better No “clear and compelling” evidence of urban penalty emerging, but area where much research is needed 29 Urban Child Health Urban residence is associated with child survival, and city size does not matter Urban poor children have much lower survival than urban non-poor children, and sometimes have lower survival than rural children (still a minority) Less stunting in urban areas, and, generally, city size doesn’t matter (except in Latin America) Wasting is less clear, although urban children generally fare better No “clear and compelling” evidence of urban penalty emerging, but area where much research is needed 30 Section C Residential Segregation in Urban Areas Objectives of This Lecture At the end of this lecture and the accompanying readings a student will be able to: − Define residential segregation − Identify the five usual measures of residential segregation − Describe recent trends in residential segregation by ethnicity in the U.S. − Identify areas of public health research where the concept of residential segregation might be useful 32 Residential Segregation Tendency for groups to cluster geographically in cities and metropolitan areas − Ethnicity − Social class 33 Originally Studied by Immigration Scholars For the first half of the twentieth century, immigrant groups were residentially segregated in the U.S. Major hypothesis: residential segregation of immigrants is in large part due to … − Concentration in particular occupations − Poverty and low socioeconomic status − Ability to participate in cultural organizations − Discrimination 34 Process of Assimilation As immigrants and their children … − Shift cultural orientations − Expand into different occupations − Get richer … Segregation will lesson substantially, but not completely disappear 35 How to Measure Residential Segregation Requires some sub-unit into which cities or metropolitan areas can be divided − U.S. census tract 36 How to Measure Residential Segregation Five dimensions − Evenness − Exposure − Clustering − Concentration − Centralization 37 Evenness The degree to which groups (e.g., ethnic groups) are evenly spread across the city “How many people would have to move in order to make each census tract have the same distribution as the city as a whole?” 38 Evenness in “Selected” Metropolitan Areas Evenness in “selected” metropolitan areas by year and ethnicity (European American comparison) 39 Exposure Inverse of the probability that a person of one ethnic group shares a census tract with a person of a particular other ethnic group 40 Exposure in “Selected” Metropolitan Areas Exposure in “selected” metropolitan areas by year and ethnicity (European American comparison) 41 Clustering The degree to which census tracts with a large percentage of a particular ethnic group are contiguous 42 Clustering in “Selected” Metropolitan Areas Clustering in “selected” metropolitan areas by year and ethnicity (European American comparison) 43 Centralization Closeness of the census tracts with a large percentage of a particular ethnic group to the central business district of the city 44 Centralization in “Selected” Metropolitan Areas Centralization in “selected” metropolitan areas by year and ethnicity (European American comparison) 45 Concentration The proportion of geographic space occupied by census tracts with a large percentage of a particular ethnic group 46 Concentration in “Selected” Metropolitan Areas Concentration in “selected” metropolitan areas by year and ethnicity (European American comparison) 47 Basic Trends African Americans down a little bit on every measure All others stable or up, somewhat different for different measures 48 Ethnic Differences Now 49 Can Measure Segregation by Social Class or Income Relatively little research on this, compared to ethnicity − What studies there are show that social class segregation has increased a little over the last part of the 20th century − In particular, has increased among ethnic minorities 50 Spatial Concentration of Poverty Combination of unrelenting ethnic segregation and slightly increasing social class segregation Neighborhoods in many American cities where a very large majority of the population is poor − Neighborhood effects on health 51 Residential Segregation in Public Health Research Very prominent theme in recent public health research Very old models − Only use evenness X Think about a city that was completely even, which was 80 percent African American (that is, all tracts are also 80 percent African American and 20 percent non-African American) X Now think about a city that is (overall) 50 percent African American and that is somewhat uneven X Could the exposure measure of segregation be higher in the “more segregated” city than the “less segregated” city? 52