This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site. Copyright 2012, The Johns Hopkins University and Arik Marcell. All rights reserved. Use of these materials permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided “AS IS”; no representations or warranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independently review all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible for obtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed. Class 4 – Primary prevention among youth interventionscurricula + other approaches 380.720 – Masculinity, Sexual Behavior & Health, 2012 Qtr 2 Approaches to work with men Gender neutral Gender aware Gender sensitive • Take into account gender-specific ways a male may experience health problems & illness differently than a female & has capability to effectively communicate with a young man Gender transformative • Work to change societal gender relations (& male culture) such as helping a young man redefine need to be sexually promiscuous to prove his manhood & promoting healthy sexuality Rao Gupta G. Gender, Sexuality and HIV/AIDS: The What, the WHY and the How. SIECUS Report 2001;29(5). 1 Improving sexual/reproductive health among teenage & young adult men in Baltimore? • What would be your approach? • Needs assessment? • Best bets given reading? Decisions • • • • Who ? What? Where? Partners? Target populations: Who? • • • • Teenage & young adult men? Teenage & young adult women? Couples Adults? Which ones? 2 What? Considerations for intervention design • Theory as basis for behavior change – which to use? • Benefit of addressing gender role(s) vs. masculinity? • What SRH content to cover? - Should care seeking be included? • Benefit of including social marketing/media campaign? • Does matching on gender & race/ethnicity matter? Questions for discussion Outcomes • What outcomes to focus on? - Attitudes; Behaviors; Intentions; Biological vs. selfreport • How would outcomes of interest be different if audience with mixed sexual experience vs. not? • What groups are not well addressed? - GBQT; Special health care needs Questions for discussion Follow-Up • How long to monitor outcomes? - Is 3- ; 9-; 12-month long enough? Cost Considerations • What would be considered a cost-effective program? 3 Formal sex education by topic • Most teens receive formal sex education in school/ community before age 18 Proportion of teens receiving any formal instruction about birth control declined… Source: Lindberg LD, Changes in formal sex education: 1995–2002, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006, 38(4):182–189. …while proportion receiving information only about abstinence increased Source: Lindberg LD, Changes in formal sex education: 1995–2002, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006, 38(4):182–189. 4 Similarly, number of teens receiving information about both abstinence & contraception declined % of teens receiving information about both abstinence & contraception Source: Lindberg LD, Changes in formal sex education: 1995–2002, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006, 38(4):182–189. Many male teens do not receive sex education before 1st sex % who have sex before getting education on various topics 100 80 62 60 53 45 42 34 40 30 20 0 How to put How to say on a condom no to sex STIs Birth control AIDS prevention Any Source: Abma JC et al., Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2002, Vital and Health Statistics, 2004, Series 23, No. 24. Parent sex education by gender & topic • Parents talk to 2 of 3 sons (vs. 4 of 5 daughters) about 1 of 6 sex education topics • Parents more likely to talk… - Females >> males about: * Saying no to sex * Birth control * * * * - Males >> females about condoms 5 Many male youth do not talk to their parents either Adolescent report of discussions of STDs & birth control methods with parents in 1988, 1995 & 2002 Weighted percentages Birth control STDs STDs & birth control None 1988 1995 2002 1988 1995 2002 1988 1995 2002 1988 1995 2002 Female 58e 66ce 52ae 50e 68c 57a 42 58ce 44ae 34 24ce 35a Male 43 41 32ab 6