B
2006
Book of Trends
B
Book of Trends
Office of Planning, Assessment and Information Resource Management
Phone (216) 687-5324
Gitanjali Kaul
Vice Provost for PAIRM
Eric Brown
Senior Report Developer
Debra Sudy
Administrative Coordinator
Office of Institutional Research and Analysis
Phone (216) 687-4700
www.csuohio.edu/iraa
Jeffrey Chen
Director
Hasina Khanom
Research Analyst
James Geither
Research Analyst
Gerald Moran
Senior Analyst and Systems Developer
2006
Book of Trends 2006
http://www.csuohio.edu/iraa/bot/bookoftrends.html
The Book of Trends 2006 represents the continuing commitment of the Office of Institutional Research,
Assessment & Analysis (IRAA) to present updated information about Cleveland State University (CSU). A variety
of tables and charts provide trend information over a five-year period as well as some key attributes and
characteristics of the University for the current academic year.
Two major procedural changes have been made in the Book of Trends 2006.
1. The Student information presented in the Book of Trends 2006 is based on the End of Semester
Census files specified by the Ohio Board of Regents (OBOR) unless specifically noted from a different
data source. However, data presented in the Book of Trends 2005 were based on the Census Date 15th
day (http://www.csuohio.edu/iraa/cfdef for detailed explanation). Therefore, please refrain comparing
Book of Trends 2006 data with that of 2005.
2. Students exclusively enrolled in English as a Second Language, Study Abroad or other 0 hour courses are
included in the Book of Trends 2006. In the Book of Trends 2005, these types of students were excluded.
Again, please refrain comparing Book of Trends 2006 data with that of 2005.
The purpose of this publication is to provide the readers with frequently requested statistical information used
in planning, reporting, and assessment. In order to serve the campus community more efficiently, we welcome
suggestions and comments. Please direct questions and/or suggestions to 216-687-4700. The entire Book of
Trends is available on line via IRAA website (http://www.csuohio.edu/iraa/bot/bookoftrends.html).
We would like to take this opportunity to thank all members of the campus community for their contributions
to this publication.
Office of Institutional Research and Analysis
TTable of Contents
Page
1
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5
University Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Board of Trustees 2005 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Distinguished Alumni Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
President’s Medal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS AND TRENDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-24
Table 2.1: Cleveland State University Enrollment by Level, Fall 1965 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table 2.2: Enrollment by College, Level and Load, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Table 2.3: Full-Time Enrollment by Race and Gender, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 2.4: Total Enrollment by Race and Gender, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 2.5: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Entrance Status, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 2.6: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Entrance Status, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 2.7: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by Academic Load, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 2.8: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by Academic Load, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 2.9: New Fall Enrollment by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 2.10: Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 2.11: Total Enrollment, Fall Enrollment by Academic Level: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 2.12: FTE Generated Internally and Externally by College, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 2.13: Fall Enrollment Trend by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 2.14: Fall Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 2.15: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Table 2.16: Enrollment by Age Category Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Table 2.17: Enrollment by Level and Country of Residence Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 2.18: Enrollment by State Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 2.19: Enrollment by Ohio County Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Map of 2005 Enrollment by Ohio County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Table 2.20: Spring Enrollment Trends by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table 2.21: Spring Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trends by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table 2.22: Summer Enrollment Trends by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Table 2.23: Summer Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trends by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Table 2.24: Annualized Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Table 2.25: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Table 2.26: Main Campus Enrollment Select Ohio Four Year Institutions, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1a
Page
3
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25-66
Table 3.1-10 Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27-40
Table 3.1:
College of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27-28
Table 3.2:
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29-30
Table 3.3:
College of Education and Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31-32
Table 3.4:
College of Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33-34
Table 3.5:
College of Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35-36
Table 3.6:
College of Urban Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Table 3.7:
College of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Table 3.8:
University Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Table 3.9:
Undergraduate Non-Degree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Table 3.10:
Graduate Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Table 3.11:
Dual Major Headcount Enrollment by College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41-42
Table 3.12-19 Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43-50
4
1b
Table 3.12:
College of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Table 3.13:
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Table 3.14:
College of Education and Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Table 3.15:
College of Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Table 3.16:
College of Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Table 3.17:
College of Urban Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Table 3.18:
College of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Table 3.19:
University Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Table 3.20:
CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51-53
Table 3.21:
CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54-56
Table 3.22:
CSU Graduate and Law Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57-59
Table 3.23:
Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Load: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Table 3.24:
Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College and Load: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Table 3.25:
West Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Table 3.26:
East Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Table 3.27:
CSU Off-Campus Location in Cleveland: Fall Semester Student Credit Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Division of Continuing Education, Enrollment by Program Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64-66
RESEARCH
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67-85
Table 4.1:
Research Awards and Expenditures, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Table 4.2:
Research Awards by Source, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70-71
Table 4.3:
Research Expenditures by Source, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72-73
Table 4.4:
Research Expenditures Reported by OBOR at Ohio Public Universities, Fiscal Year 1988 – 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . 74
Table 4.5:
Total R&D Expenditures at Universities and Colleges, Fiscal Year 1999 – 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Table 4.6:
Indirect Cost (IDC) Recovery and Total Research Expenditures by Year, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . 76
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Page
Table 4.7: Established Full-Time Faculty Research Development Program, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Table 4.8: Fiscal Year 2005 Proposal Submission Awards by Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
Table 4.9: Proposal Submissions and Awards, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Table 4.10: Ohio Board of Regents Biennial Research Challenge Distributions, Fiscal Years 2000 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Table 4.11: Intellectual Property: Patents and Disclosures, Fiscal Years 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Table 4.12: Cleveland State University Signature Research Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
Table 4.13: Total Student Credit Hours Taken by Graduate Level Students at Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions: Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Table 4.14: Cleveland State University Graduate Student Support from Externally Funded Research,
Fiscal Years 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Table 4.15: Cleveland State University Centers and Institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
Table 4.16: Past Recipients of Distinguished Faculty Awards by Award Type 1986 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
5
RETENTION AND GRADUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87-102
Table 5.1:
Fall to Fall Student Return Rate, Enrolled Fall 2000 – 2004 /Returned Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Table 5.2:
Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by Race and Gender, Enrolled Fall
2000 – 2004 /Returned Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Table 5.3:
Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by College, Enrolled Fall
2000 – 2004 /Returned Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Table 5.4:
Three-Year Mobility of Undergraduate Students Enrolled Spring Term 2004 by Institution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Table 5.5:
Attended, Graduated and Retained Fall to Fall Student Tracking (IPEDS Cohort) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Table 5.6:
Attended, Graduated and Retained Fall to Fall Student Tracking (Transfer Cohort) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Table 5.7:
Fall to Fall Undergraduate First-Year Full-Time Degree-Seeking Cohort Graduation
and Retention Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Table 5.8 -14: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94-100
6
Table 5.8:
University Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
Table 5.9:
College of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94-95
Table 5.10:
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Table 5.11:
College of Education and Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Table 5.12:
College of Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Table 5.13:
College of Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
Table 5.14:
College of Urban Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Table 5.15:
College of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Table 5.16:
Annual Degrees Awarded by Race and Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101-102
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103-122
Table 6.1: Characteristics of Inaugural Class of Honors Students, Fall 2004 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Table 6.2: Scholarship Aid for Honors Students in Fiscal Year 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Table 6.3: ACT Composite Score by College and Gender, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1c
Page
Table 6.4:
ACT Composite Score by College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
Table 6.5:
Cumulative GPA by College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
Table 6.6:
Top 15 Majors by Academic Level, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
Table 6.7:
Top 15 Programs with Highest Minority Student Enrollment by Academic Level, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
Table 6.8:
Top 15 Programs with Highest Female Student Enrollment by Academic Level, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
Table 6.9:
Delaware Study Benchmarks: Student Credit Hours and FTE Students Taught per FTE Faculty for
Tenured and Tenure-Track Full-Time Faculty, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109-110
Table 6.10: Fall Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111-112
Table 6.11: Spring Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113-114
Table 6.12: Summer Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115-116
Table 6.13: Fall Undergraduate Student FTE by College and Class Time, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
Table 6.14: Fall Graduate and Law Student FTE by College and Class Time, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
Table 6.15: 5-Year Trends in Interactive Video and Telecourse Instructional Delivery:
Student Credit Hours Generated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
Table 6.16: 5-Year Trends in Web Based Instructional Delivery Student Credit Hours Generated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119-120
Table 6.17: Cleveland State University Main Library Collections 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Table 6.18: Cleveland State University Main Library Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
Table 6.19: Cleveland State University Law Library Collections 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
Table 6.20: Cleveland State University Law Library Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
7
FACULTY AND STAFF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123-136
Table 7.1: Full-Time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
Table 7.2: Full- Time Employee by Gender, Race and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6
(EEO6) Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126-127
Table 7.3: Full-Time Employee by Gender, Race, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128-129
Table 7.4: Full-time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
Table 7.5: Part-Time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
Table 7.6: Total Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
Table 7.7: Full-Time Faculty by Rank, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Table 7.8: Full-Time Faculty by Gender, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Table 7.9: Full-time Faculty by Highest Degree, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Table 7.10: Women and Minorities as a Percent of Tenured/Tenured-Track Faculty Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
Table 7.11: Percentage of Full-Time Faculty to Full-Time Employees, Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions,
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
Table 7.12: Rate of Annual Student FTE to Number of Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty, Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
Table 7.13: Student FTE to Full-Time Staff Ratio Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
Table 7.14: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hours (SCH) Generated by Part-Time
Faculty, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134-136
1d
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Page
8
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS & OFFICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137-162
Admissions Office: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139-144
Table 8.1:
New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by College, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Table 8.2:
New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by College, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
Table 8.3:
New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by Race, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
Table 8.4:
New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by Race, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
Table 8.5:
New Graduate and Law Application Trends for New Degree-Seeking Students
by College, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Table 8.6:
New Graduate and Law Application Trends for New Degree-Seeking Students
by Race, Fall 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
Office of Advancement: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145-146
Table 8.7:
CSU Foundation: 5 Year Giving History by College/Division . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145-146
Table 8.8:
CSU Foundation: Endowed Scholarship, Donors & Giving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Athletics Department: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Table 8.9:
Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University Enrollment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Table 8.10: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University 4, 5 or 6 Year Graduation Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Finance: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148-151
Table 8.11: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Changes, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2005 . . . . . . 148-149
Table 8.12: Public Service Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures, Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Table 8.13: Benefit Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Instructional Expenditures Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Table 8.14: Scholarship and Fellowship Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
Financial Aid: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152-157
Table 8.15: Financial aid Awards to Undergraduate Students by Full-Time/Part-Time Status:
Average Aid Package and Academic Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
Table 8.16: Financial Aid Awards Fall Cohort, Full-time, First-Time, Degree-Seeking
Undergraduate Students . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
Table 8.17: Financial Aid Awards to Fall Term Undergraduate Students . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
Table 8.18: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Full-Time/Part-Time Status
& Average Aid Package . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1e
Page
Table 8.19: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid, Fall 2001 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . 154
Table 8.20: Law Student Financial Aid Awards by Full-Time/Part-Time Status and
Average Aid Package . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
Table 8.21: Law Students Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid, Fall 2001 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
Table 8.22: Undergraduate Cost of Attendance (COA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Table 8.23: Annualized Full-Time Undergraduate In-State Tuition and Fees for Selected
Main Campuses of Ohio, 4 Years Institutions, 2004-2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Table 8.24: Award of Financial Aid at Ohio’s Public and Private Title IV Postsecondary
Institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
Center for International Services and Programs (CISP): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158-161
Table 8.25: Enrollment by Country or Region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
Table 8.26: CSU Fulbright Scholar Awards 1973 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
Table 8.27: Cleveland State University International Academic Initiatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
Table 8.28: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring)
and Program Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
Table 8.29: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring)
and College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
Table 8.30: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring)
and Course Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
Table 8.31: Key International Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
Office of Space Management: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
Table 8.32: Cleveland State University Fall 2005 Building Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
Accreditations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
List of Acronyms & Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
1f
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
1
Introduction
I
Introduction
University Administration
Michael Schwartz
President
Mary Jane Saunders
Interim Provost
John J. Boyle III
Vice President for Business Affairs and Finance
Michael Droney
Vice President for Information Services
Ned Hill
Vice President for Economic Development
Njeri Nuru-Holm
Vice President for Student Affairs and Minority Affairs
William Spiker
Vice President for University Advancement and Executive Director, CSU Foundation
Sonali B. Wilson
University Legal Counsel
Mary Jane Saunders
Interim Provost
Charles Alexander
Dean, Fenn College of Engineering
Barbara Hanniford
Dean, Continuing Education
James McLoughlin
Dean, College of Education and Human Services
Geoffrey S. Mearns
Dean, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
Gregory M. Sadlek
Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Mark S. Rosentraub
Dean, Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
Bette Bonder
Interim Dean, College of Science
Robert F. Scherer
Dean, Nance College of Business Administration
Gitanjali Kaul
Vice Provost for Planning, Assessment and Information Resource Management
Vijaya Konangi
Vice Provost for Academic Affairs and Faculty Relations
Edward Mills
Vice Provost for Enrollment Services
Mark A. Tumeo
Vice Provost for Research and Dean of Graduate Studies
INTRODUCTION
3
Board of Trustees 2005 – 2006
Trustee
Term
Timothy J. Cosgrove
Chairman
October 1997 – May 2007
Trevor O. Jones
Vice Chairman
February 2001 – May 2011
Ronald E. Weinberg
Treasurer
August 2001 – May 2014
Michael L. Climaco
January 1997 – May 2006
Sally Florkiewicz
June 1998 – May 2012
Carl D. Glickman
June 1999 – May 2008
Samuel H. Miller
May 1999 – May 2013
Vir K. Sondhi
June 2000 – May 2009
Ernest L. Wilkerson
December 2005 – May 2010
Sheldon Gelman
Faculty Representative
September 2005 – September 2006
Edward G. Thomas
Faculty Representative
July 2003 – June 2006
Katherine Cheng Li
Student Representative
May 2004 – May 2006
Brendan Healy
Student Representative
May 2005 – May 2007
Sonali B. Wilson
Secretary
Back Row (left to right): Student Representative Brendan Healy; Faculty Representative Sheldon Gelman; Trustee Michael L. Climaco; Trustee Ernest
L. Wilkerson, Jr.; Treasurer Ronald E. Weinberg; Trustee Vir K. Sondhi; Faculty Representative Edward G. Thomas; Board Secretary Sonali B. Wilson;
and Student Representative Katherine Cheng Li.
Front Row (left to right): Trustee Carl D. Glickman; Chairman Timothy J. Cosgrove; President Michael Schwartz; Vice Chairman Trevor O. Jones;
and Trustee Sally D. Florkiewicz. (Trustee Samuel H. Miller is not pictured).
4
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Distinguished Alumni Award
Annually, outstanding graduates of Cleveland State University are honored for their service, leadership and career
achievements with a Distinguished Alumni Award.
2005 Honorees
2006 Honorees
Mary Grimm
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Sheryl King Benford
George B. Davis Award
William J. Hunt
College of Science
Mayor Frank G. Jackson
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban
Affairs
Charlene Mancuso
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
Edward A. Bernetich
College of Education and Human Services
Cynthia Moore-Hardy
College of Business Administration
James MacMillan
Fenn College of Engineering
Dr. Benjamin J. Kearney
College of Education and Human Services
Justice Terrence O’Donnell Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
James A. Thomas
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
Dr. Ralph DiFranco
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
P. Kelly Tompkins
George B. Davis Award for Service to the
University
Dr. Michael Centanni
College of Science
Edson R. “Ted” Arneault
Nance College of Business Administration
President’s Medal
The most prestigious non-academic recognition that Cleveland State University can confer, the President’s Medal, is awarded
to individuals, groups or entities whose commitment and dedication to the University are beyond question. The medal is conferred
only when the honoree has made continuing and /or extraordinary contributions, or has provided exemplary and ongoing services that
have directly and tangibly advanced the best interests and mission of Cleveland State University. The first President's Medal was presented in
November 2004.
Recipients
President’s Medal
2006
Jamie Ireland
2005
Dr. Julian Earls
2004
Babs Glickman
Maria Miller
Delos M. (Toby)
Cosgrove
INTRODUCTION
5
C
Campus Enrollment Characteristics & Trends
Campus Enrollment
Characteristics
& Trends
2
Table 2.1: Cleveland State University Enrollment by Level
Fall 1965 – 2005
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Total
Year
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Total
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
6,026
7,853
8,431
8,836
9,442
10,734
11,257
11,758
11,986
12,895
13,278
13,401
13,896
13,143
13,154
14,330
14,167
14,177
14,195
13,426
N/A
N/A
184
248
1,220
1,171
1,760
2,045
2,212
2,300
2,568
2,808
2,851
3,125
3,242
3,751
3,883
3,715
3,768
3,589
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
775
742
772
909
1,003
1,066
1,128
1,138
1,168
1,164
1,184
1,169
1,090
1,052
979
1,018
6,026
7,853
8,615
9,084
11,437
12,647
13,789
14,712
15,201
16,261
16,974
17,347
17,915
17,432
17,580
19,250
19,140
18,944
18,942
18,033
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
12,502
13,220
13,236
12,971
13,409
13,825
13,531
12,716
11,966
11,341
10,698
10,728
10,675
11,215
10,453
10,222
10,433
10,363
10,269
9,847
9,605
3,347
4,005
3,945
3,850
4,115
4,331
4,500
4,504
4,240
4,251
4,065
3,905
4,154
4,244
4,480
4,425
4,480
4,819
5,163
5,107
5,197
917
1,016
1,006
1,000
1,011
1,064
1,060
979
931
912
908
889
906
867
749
759
833
816
814
752
748
16,766
18,241
18,187
17,821
18,535
19,220
19,091
18,199
17,137
16,504
15,671
15,522
15,735
16,326
15,682
15,406
15,746
15,998
16,246
15,706
15,550
Note: CSU switched from quarter to semester terms in 1998.
Figure 2.1:
Highlights
■ Total CSU Enrollment was
highest between 1980–81
and 1990–91.
■ Undergraduate enrollment
peaked in 1980 and continued to drop except for
a slight increase between
1989 and 1991.
■ Graduate enrollment
continues to grow except
for a slight decrease in
1987, 1988 and 1996.
■ College of Law enrollment
has been capped in recent
years to decrease class size.
Cleveland State University Enrollment Trend
Fall 1965 – 2005
25,000
20,000
Enrollment
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Year
15,000
10,000
9
5,000
65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20
Table 2.2: Enrollment by College, Level and Load
10
Fall 2005
Undergraduate
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
Full-Time Part-Time
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other
Total
Graduate & Law
Undergraduate Undergraduate
Total
% of Total
1,216
2,058
892
459
1,174
138
576
644
415
178
351
107
1,792
2,702
1,307
637
1,525
245
528
81
470
289
998
370
6
6,552
23
3,053
29
9,605
19%
28%
14%
7%
16%
3%
0%
10%
4%
100%
Total
Full-Time
Part-Time
Graduate &
Law Total
Graduate &
Law % of Total
356
239
240
100
276
79
436
827
316
1,742
307
243
264
312
1,183
555
1,982
407
519
343
748
20%
9%
33%
7%
9%
6%
13%
2
205
1
4,217
207
1
5,945
3%
1,728
Figure 2.2a: Enrollment by Level
100%
Full-Time
Part-Time Total
1,572
2,297
1,132
559
1,450
217
436
528
81
2
6
8,280
1,403
960
2,157
485
594
371
312
470
289
205
24
7,270
Figure 2.2b: Enrollment by Load and Level
Fall 2005
Fall 2005
5%
27%
42%
36%
11%
59%
20%
Undergraduate
Graduate
Undergraduate Full-time
Graduate & Law Full-time
Law
Note: Undergraduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 12 hours.
Graduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 9 hours.
Law full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 13 hours.
Undergraduate Part-time
Graduate & Law Part-time
Note: 1Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second language,
Military Science, special program and Study Abroad.
Highlights
■ Colleges with the highest enrollment are the College of Education and the College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences
with 21% and College of Business with 19%.
■ At the undergraduate level, CLASS (28%) and College of Business (19%) had the highest enrollment in Fall 2005.
■ At the graduate level, College of Education (33%) and College of Business (20%) had the highest enrollment in Fall 2005.
■ Full-time Students: 79% of the students are enrolled at the undergraduate level and 21% are at the graduate level.
■ Part-time Students: 42% of the students are enrolled at the undergraduate level and 58% are at the graduate level.
2,975
3,257
3,289
1,044
2,044
588
748
998
370
207
30
15,550
% of Total
19%
21%
21%
7%
13%
4%
5%
6%
2%
1%
100%
Table 2.3: Full-Time Enrollment by Race and Gender
Fall 2005
Full-Time Students
Undergraduate
Graduate
First Professional
Total Full-Time
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific
Islander
Native American
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
2,035
250
182
2,467
2,091
401
172
2,664
447
34
5
486
948
132
6
1,086
93
3
7
103
106
14
3
123
112
9
6
127
97
19
9
125
6
2
2
10
Female
12
2
2
16
Non-Resident
Alien
Unknown
Grand
Total
Total
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
112
145
2
259
56
126
5
187
218
67
18
303
219
88
17
324
3,023
510
222
3,755
3,529
782
214
4,525
6,552
1,292
436
8,280
Table 2.4: Total Enrollment by Race and Gender
Fall 2005
Total Students
White
Undergraduate
Graduate
First Professional
Grand Total
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific
Islander
Native American
Non-Resident
Alien
Total
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
2,891
1,061
306
4,258
3,106
1,887
281
5,274
626
152
17
795
1,344
630
28
2,002
119
20
12
151
153
66
6
225
146
41
10
197
145
56
15
216
10
3
2
15
20
4
2
26
132
380
5
517
78
229
7
314
411
255
32
698
424
413
25
862
4,335
1,912
384
6,631
5,270
3,285
364
8,919
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Figure 2.4a: Total Enrollment by Race
Figure 2.4b: Total Enrollment by Gender
Fall 2005
3%
(NA)
Unknown
0.3%
(AS)
5%
(NR)
Fall 2005
10.0%
(UK)
43%
62%
(WH)
2%
(HIS)
18.0%
(BLK)
57%
White (WH)
Asian or Pacific Islander (AS)
Black (BLK)
Native American (NA)
Hispanic (HIS)
Non-Resident Alien (NR)
Unknown (UK)
Male
Female
Note: Undergraduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 12 hours.
Graduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 9 hours.
Law full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 13 hours.
11
■ Black students have the highest percentage of females enrolled and Non-Resident Aliens have the highest percentage of males.
Grand
Total
9,605
5,197
748
15,550
12
Table 2.5: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Entrance Status: 5-Year Trend
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Freshmen
College
2001
2002
|
Business
174 183
CLASS
387 377
Education
63
75
Engineering
72
46
Science
14
22
Urban Affairs
6
9
University Studies
384 300
Undergraduate Non-Degree
1
Other1
University
1,100 1,013
Transfers
Other Undergraduate
2003 2004 2005
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
173
373
62
65
26
12
279
174
246
74
55
197
19
221
251
547
152
59
62
45
54
276
566
115
61
43
29
42
237
562
115
62
58
32
30
225
333
125
56
194
20
13
215
266
180
52
190
29
73
1
990
986 1,000
72 13 14 10
6
185 80 84 12 29
75 61 75 67 51
23
4
9
6
6
8
6 23 48
7
9
5
3
4
175 351 416 320 183
22 11 24 192 178
25
565 533 628 636 530
170
243
106
54
200
6
221
1,170 1,132 1,096
966 1,006
Total Percent Change
New Undergraduate Total
2001
2002
2003
497 472 424
1,119 1,023 1,019
290 251 252
154 107 131
82
73
90
58
47
49
613 693 725
22
12
24
2004 2005
1 Year
5 Year
409
591
266
120
414
42
554
192
-4%
-9%
27%
-7%
6%
-7%
-14%
-7%
-21%
-52%
16%
-27%
434%
-33%
-22%
714%
-2%
-11%
391
538
337
112
438
39
477
179
25
2,835 2,678 2,714 2,588 2,536
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 2.6: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Entrance Status: 5-Year Trend
Masters/Law
1
Doctoral
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2001
2002
2003
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies*
Other1
University
196
58
135
62
38
23
209
185
72
143
85
57
30
206
294
114
243
108
95
43
262
239
122
216
79
89
42
237
2
231
141
156
71
90
33
232
1
1
14
5
2
7
4
1
3
3
2
4
9
8
778 1,159 1,026
954
721
19
10
35
Other Graduate
2004
1
8
13
3
25
New Graduate and Law Total
2005
1 Year
5 Year
331
190
312
90
140
72
243
140
1
1,073 1,118 1,875 1,529 1,519
-11%
18%
-23%
-13%
0%
-23%
1,456%
17%
60%
20%
29%
204%
29%
13%
509%
-1%
42%
2005
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
2001
2002
2003
2004
5
87 63 163 133 95
61 54 119 39 49
120 135 297 189 153
6
8 11 16 14
1
4
3 38 35
29 46 49 49 38
6
5 14
7 11
23 15 25
7 140
1
333 330 681 478 536
284
119
260
70
46
56
215
23
249
126
279
96
64
78
211
15
471
233
544
128
106
92
276
25
372
161
406
103
140
94
244
9
3
5
15
1
29
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
Notes: *The significant increases in Fall 2005 in Graduate Studies enrollment includes 125 students in the graduate visiting (GSTVS) category.
Total Percent Change
Table 2.7: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by Academic Load: 5-Year Trend
% Change in
Full-Time
Full-Time
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Business
350
366
344
CLASS
817
797
821
Education
196
181
177
Engineering
111
89
107
Science
64
59
75
Urban Affairs
25
26
36
University Studies
430
383
361
Undergraduate Non-Degree
2
1
5
Other1
Total New Undergraduate 1,995 1,902 1,926
343
514
197
95
349
33
237
59
321
459
263
89
366
27
276
33
6
1,840
1,827
1-Year
% Change in
Part-Time
Part-Time
5-Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1-Year
5-Year
-6%
-8%
-11% -44%
34%
34%
-6% -20%
5% 472%
-18%
8%
16% -36%
-44% 1,550%
147
302
94
43
18
33
183
20
106
227
70
18
14
21
310
10
80
198
75
24
15
13
364
19
66
77
69
25
65
9
317
133
6%
3%
7%
-8%
11%
33%
-37%
10%
-52%
-74%
-21%
-47%
300%
-64%
10%
630%
840
776
788
761
70
79
74
23
72
12
201
146
19
696
-9%
-17%
1%
-8%
Table 2.8: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by Academic Load: 5-Year Trend
% Change in
Full-Time
Full-Time
College
% Change in
Part-Time
Part-Time
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1-Year
5-Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Business
99
CLASS
39
Education
54
Engineering
39
Science
33
Urban Affairs
19
Law
148
Graduate Studies
5
Other1
Total New Graduate & Law 436
98
52
62
30
47
14
158
3
201
83
131
28
67
39
188
1
122
79
114
21
86
27
163
2
120
94
76
23
89
24
159
2
-2%
19%
-33%
10%
3%
-11%
-2%
0%
21%
141%
41%
-41%
170%
26%
7%
-60%
185
80
206
31
13
37
67
18
151
74
217
66
18
64
53
12
270
150
413
100
39
53
88
24
250
82
292
82
54
67
81
7
464
738
614
587
-4%
35%
637
655
1,137
915
211
-16% 14%
96
17% 20%
236
-19% 15%
67
-18% 116%
51
-6% 292%
48
-28% 30%
84
4% 25%
138 1,871% 667%
1
932
2% 46%
1-Year 5-Year
Table 2.9: New Fall Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1-Year
5-Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other1
Total New Students
781
1238
550
224
128
114
215
613
22
23
721
1150
530
203
138
125
211
693
11
15
895
1252
796
259
196
141
276
725
24
25
781
752
672
223
554
136
244
554
192
9
-8%
-3%
-3%
-9%
4%
-18%
-14%
-7%
1,456%
-8%
-41%
18%
-10%
352%
-3%
13%
-22%
714%
509%
3,908
3,797
4,589
4,117
722
728
649
202
578
111
243
477
179
140
26
4,055
-2%
4%
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2005 enrollment in College of Science is due to introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science).
Undergraduate Non-Degree and Graduate Studies fluctuations are due to reclassification of Academic Plan.
Undergraduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 12 hours.
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a
Graduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 9 hours.
second language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
Law full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 13 hours.
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
13
14
Table 2.10: Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 2.10a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
2001
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Law
Total
3,506
1,747
2,016
3,238
4,452
322
834
16,115
%
22%
11%
13%
20%
28%
2%
5%
100%
2002
%
2003
3,171
1,757
2,042
3,435
4,636
305
817
16,163
20%
11%
13%
21%
29%
2%
5%
100%
3,057
1,630
1,995
3,618
4,903
359
815
16,377
%
2004
19%
10%
12%
22%
30%
2%
5%
100%
%
2,993
1,447
1,930
3,500
4,911
348
752
15,881
19%
9%
12%
22%
31%
2%
5%
100%
2005
%
2,751
1,438
1,810
3,606
4,836
361
748
15,550
18%
9%
12%
23%
31%
2%
5%
100%
1 Year
5 Year
-8%
-1%
-6%
3%
-2%
4%
-1%
-2%
-22%
-18%
-10%
11%
9%
12%
-10%
-4%
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 2.10b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
2001
Developmental
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Law (500-900)
Total
4,294
74,007
46,502
26,480
2,299
10,492
164,074
%
3%
45%
28%
16%
1%
6%
100%
2002
%
2003
4,189
73,704
47,439
28,881
2,250
10,910
167,373
3%
44%
28%
17%
1%
7%
100%
4,316
69,864
49,076
31,285
2,584
10,526
167,651
%
2004
3%
42%
29%
19%
2%
6%
100%
Figure 2.10a: Enrollment by Class Standing
%
4,174
66,045
48,380
31,915
2,188
9,466
162,168
3%
41%
30%
20%
1%
6%
100%
2005
4,144
63,426
48,279
30,003
2,405
9,302
157,559
%
1 Year
5 Year
3%
40%
31%
19%
2%
6%
100%
-1%
-4%
0%
-6%
10%
-2%
-3%
-3%
-14%
4%
13%
5%
-11%
-4%
Figure 2.10b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
5,000
80,000
4,500
70,000
4,000
60,000
3,500
3,000
50,000
2,500
40,000
2,000
30,000
1,500
20,000
1,000
10,000
500
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2001
Juniors
2002
Seniors
2003
Masters
2004
Doctoral
2005
Law
Developmental
Lower
2001
Upper
2002
Masters
2003
Doctoral
2004
2005
Law
Table 2.11: Total Enrollment
Fall Enrollment by Academic Level: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Academic Level
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Bachelors
Masters
Doctoral
Law
University Total
10,507
4,452
322
834
16,115
10,405
4,636
305
817
16,163
10,300
4,903
359
815
16,377
9,870
4,911
348
752
15,881
9,605
4,836
361
748
15,550
-3%
-2%
4%
-1%
-2%
-9%
9%
12%
-10%
-4%
Table 2.12: FTE Generated Internally and Externally by College
Fall 2005
College Offering Course
Student’s College
Business
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Business
1,265.6
CLASS
45.7
Education
11.7
Engineering
21.2
Science
28
Urban Affairs
7.7
Law
5.2
University Studies
22.8
Undergraduate Non-Degree
16.5
Graduate Studies
2.5
Other1
0.8
FTE Generated by College Offering Course 1,427.7
FTE Generated Internally
1,265.6
% Internal
89%
FTE Generated Externally
162.1
% External
11%
1
CLASS
Education
405.9
1,858.9
226.9
73.3
371.9
48.5
1.1
336.5
69.2
4.4
3.5
3,400.1
1,858.9
55%
1,541.2
45%
12.6
113.9
1,249.3
2
47.6
3.1
1.3
11.7
8.3
26.8
1,476.6
1,249.3
85%
227.3
15%
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second language,
Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
Engineering
2.8
0.7
494
15.7
3.4
2.8
519.4
494
95%
25.4
5%
Science Urban Affairs
227.7
416.9
217.4
113.5
1,057.8
22.8
1.1
137.3
67.1
4.1
3.1
2,268.9
1,057.8
47%
1,211.1
53%
36
60.3
15.1
9.1
28.7
249.4
8.5
19.7
8.2
1.5
436.5
249.4
57%
187.1
43%
Law
0.2
0.4
0.6
1
614.4
3.5
620.1
614.4
99%
5.7
1%
University
Studies
46.1
79.5
26.6
4.1
45.4
4.6
114.5
0.8
321.5
114.5
36%
207
64%
FTE by
Student
College
1,996.9
2,575.8
1,746.9
717.5
1,595.8
337.1
631.8
649.4
172.9
39.4
7.5
10,470.9
6,903.9
66%
3,567.0
34%
15
Table 2.13: Fall Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
2001
College
Enrollment
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other1
Total Enrollment
2002
2003
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
3,372
4,054
150
2,938
1,036
1,010
608
834
1,499
177
437
21%
25%
1%
18%
6%
6%
4%
5%
9%
1%
3%
3,286
4,173
160
3,107
1,038
1,035
670
817
1,529
88
260
20%
26%
1%
19%
6%
6%
4%
5%
9%
1%
2%
3,226
4,171
144
3,387
1,101
1,148
639
815
1,512
78
156
16,115
100%
16,163
100%
16,377
2004
%
2005
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
20%
25%
1%
21%
7%
7%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
3,249
3,109
75
3,460
1,103
1,922
638
752
1,229
256
88
20%
20%
2,975
3,257
22%
7%
12%
4%
5%
8%
2%
1%
100%
15,881
100%
3,289
1,044
2,044
588
748
998
370
207
30
15,550
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
19%
21%
0%
21%
7%
13%
4%
5%
6%
2%
1%
-8%
5%
-100%
-5%
-5%
6%
-8%
-1%
-19%
45%
135%
-12%
-20%
-100%
12%
1%
102%
-3%
-10%
-33%
109%
-53%
100%
-2%
-4%
Table 2.14: Fall Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend
2001
College
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Graduate Studies
Honors
Other1
Total SCH
2002
2003
2004
2005
Percent Change
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
24,553
53,923
600
20,370
7,436
33,488
7,058
10,492
5,793
15%
33%
14%
33%
1%
13%
4%
21%
4%
7%
3%
22,807
53,912
847
23,636
7,611
34,802
7,438
10,526
5,841
3
14%
32%
1%
14%
5%
21%
4%
6%
3%
22,352
51,340
14%
32%
21,415
51,001
12%
5%
20%
4%
6%
4%
23,926
54,493
1,048
21,681
7,480
34,339
7,421
10,910
5,783
6
15%
5%
21%
4%
6%
3%
361
164,074
.2%
100%
286
167,373
.2%
100%
228
167,651
.1%
100%
24,560
7,812
34,016
6,668
9,466
5,619
3
40
292
162,168
22,149
7,791
34,034
6,548
9,302
4,823
4
110
382
157,559
.2%
100%
1-Year
5-Year
14%
32%
-4%
-1%
14%
5%
22%
4%
6%
3%
-10%
-13%
-5%
-100%
9%
5%
2%
-7%
-11%
-17%
-2%
-2%
-14%
33%
175%
31%
-3%
.2%
100%
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2005 enrollment in College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science)
Undergraduate Non-Degree and Graduate Studies fluctuations are due to procedural changes.
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
Figure 2.13 & 2.14: Fall Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15) Trend
Fall 2001 – 2005
Enrollment
FTE (SCH/15)
15,000
15,000
10,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
2001
2002
2003
Enrollment
2004
2005
FTE
Highlights
■ During the period 2001 – 2005 enrollment and SCH in the College of Education and Human Services and the College of
Science have grown significantly. However, increase in Student Credit Hours in both the colleges was less significant.
16
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
6%
-4%
Table 2.15: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level
Fall 2005
Registered Credit
Hours
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24+
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Enrollment Cumulative %
Enrollment Cumulative %
Enrollment Cumulative %
78
48
253
616
96
297
365
574
221
262
243
1,447
970
826
937
1,465
441
254
140
47
9
9
2
5
9,605
TOTAL
1%
1%
4%
10%
11%
14%
18%
24%
27%
29%
32%
47%
57%
66%
75%
91%
95%
98%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
449
261
625
674
135
760
342
659
516
157
100
219
59
63
130
43
5
9%
14%
26%
39%
41%
56%
62%
75%
85%
88%
90%
94%
95%
97%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
All
1
7
4
1
16
21
28
100
36
30
68
69
60
225
49
24
5
2
1
1%
2%
2%
4%
7%
10%
24%
29%
33%
42%
51%
59%
89%
96%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
1
748
5,197
Enrollment Cumulative %
528
309
885
1,294
232
1,073
728
1,261
837
455
373
1,734
1,098
949
1,292
1,557
470
259
142
48
9
9
2
6
15,550
3%
5%
11%
19%
21%
28%
32%
41%
46%
49%
51%
62%
69%
76%
84%
94%
97%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Figure 2.15: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level
Fall 2005
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0-3
4-7
8-11
Undergraduate
12-15
Graduate
16-19
20+
Law
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
17
Table 2.16: Enrollment by Age Category
Fall 2005
College
Gender
Business
Female
Male
Total
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
18-19
20-21
22-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-49
50-64
1
2
3
104
120
224
155
229
384
281
421
702
319
442
761
142
200
342
95
155
250
106
114
220
39
49
88
1
28.1
27.8
27.9
Female
Male
Total
2
5
7
191
145
336
294
205
499
468
343
811
439
259
698
172
115
287
125
78
203
193
73
266
103
41
144
4
2
6
28.3
26.8
27.7
Female
Male
Total
2
2
116
32
148
121
39
160
398
86
484
610
175
785
358
140
498
270
90
360
428
112
540
243
63
306
2
1
3
Female
Male
Total
2
2
11
69
80
21
109
130
71
259
330
50
211
261
11
90
101
18
42
60
9
52
61
1
18
19
Female
Male
Total
5
2
7
199
93
292
234
103
337
332
155
487
255
161
416
129
73
202
77
47
124
81
42
123
33
21
54
Female
Male
Total
1
5
5
10
19
10
29
38
42
80
76
66
142
42
41
83
41
28
69
67
39
106
43
22
65
3
2
5
129
101
230
132
170
302
46
59
105
28
31
59
21
15
36
5
6
11
122
127
249
62
79
141
42
52
94
39
29
68
28
10
38
10
7
17
11
5
16
32
26
58
103
85
188
1
1
34.2
32.7
33.5
3
4
7
28
23
51
45
38
83
40
38
78
10
23
33
18
14
32
29
23
52
16
14
30
2
1
3
1
1
31.4
31.2
31.3
10
1
11
29
7
36
22
6
28
19
12
31
42
10
52
37
8
45
2
1
2
1
2
Law
Female
Male
Total
University Studies
Female
Male
Total
Under 18
1
80
48
128
Undergraduate
Non-Degree
Female
Male
Total
Graduate Studies
Female
Male
Total
1
1
Female
Male
Total
1
1
2
4
4
3
1
4
3
4
7
5
3
8
2
2
1
3
Female
Male
Total
92
61
153
751
599
1,350
940
800
1,740
1,817
1,502
3,319
1,994
1,561
3,555
962
757
1,719
703
505
1,208
Other
1
University
65 and
Over
Unknown Average
Age
1
3
3
26.3
26.7
26.6
26.2
27.1
26.5
2
2
3
34.8
33.1
34.1
3
28.1
28.3
28.2
987
485
1,472
552
268
820
117
91
208
4
2
6
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
Figure 2.16: Enrollment by Age Category Fall 2005
8%
(35-39)
Median Age
University:
Undergraduate:
Graduate:
Law:
26
23
31
26
9%
(40-49)
1%
(65 and over)
1%
(under 18)
9%
(18-19)
11%
(20-21)
11%
(30-34)
21%
(22-24)
24%
(25-29)
Under 18
18
18-19
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
20-21
|
22-24
25-29
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
30-34
35-39
40.4
38.5
40
26.7
22.9
24.9
1
5%
(50-64)
32.9
33
32.9
40-49
50-64
65 and Over
30.1
28.7
29.5
Table 2.17: Enrollment by Level and Country of Residence
Fall 2005
Resident Type
Undergraduate
Undergraduate in %
Graduate
Graduate in %
Law
Law in %
Total
Ohio Resident
Non-Ohio Resident
Non-Resident Alien
9,220
175
210
96%
2%
2%
4,517
71
609
87%
1%
12%
673
63
12
90%
8%
2%
14,410
309
831
Total
9,605
100%
5,197
100%
748
100%
15,550
Table 2.18: Enrollment by State
Table 2.19: Enrollment by Ohio County
Fall 2005
State
Fall 2005
Number of
Students
County
Number of
Students
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Ohio (Resident of Ohio excluding Non-Resident Alien) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,375
Cuyahoga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11,514
Ohio (Non-Ohio Resident) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,092
Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Lorain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705
Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Medina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Summit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Geauga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Portage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Ashtabula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
Georgia, Maryland, Tennessee, Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Erie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Florida, Indiana, North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Trumbull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Alabama, District of Columbia, Illinois, West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Mahoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Arizona, Connecticut, Hawaii, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine
Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska,New Mexico
Oregon, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Virginia, Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Stark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Non-Resident Alien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 831
Total States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,550
Huron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Lucas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Richland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Tuscarawas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Jefferson, Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Ashland, Butler, Columbiana, Hancock, Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Allen, Clermont, Defiance, Fairfield, Greene, Hamilton
Knox, Morgan, Ottawa, Ross, Sandusky, Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Other Unknown Counties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 776
19
Note: Comparisons by residence groupings may not match due to the criteria used to assign residency status
in CSU’s information systems.
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,550
Map of 2005 Enrollment by Ohio County:
Williams
Defiance
1
Lucas
10
Fulton
Ottawa
1
Putnam
Medina
351
Crawford Richland Ashland
2
6
Wayne
8
Hancock
2
Wyandot
Allen
1
Hardin
Mercer
Lorain
705
Marion
3
Auglaize
Darke
Union
Clark
Preble Montgomery
2
Butler
2
Hamilton
1
Licking
Miami
Warren
1
Greene
1
Madison
Fayette
Franklin
12
Pickaway
Muskingum
Fairfield
1
Pike
Brown
Adams
Vinton
Gallia
Lawrence
20
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Columbiana
2
Athens
Jefferson
3
Harrison
Guernsey
1
Washington
Meigs
Jackson
Scioto
Mahoning
38
Carroll
Morgan
1
Highland
Clermont
1
Stark
38
Noble
Perry
Hocking
Clinton
Ross
1
Portage
102
Coshocton
Delaware
2
Champaign
Trumbull
48
Tuscarawas
6
Knox
1
Logan
Shelby
Summit
346
Holmes
Morrow
Ashtabula
74
Geauga
302
Cuyahoga
11,514
Huron
18
Seneca
Paulding
Van Wert
Erie
72
Sandusky
1
Wood
4
Henry
1,092
Lake
Belmont
Monroe
Table 2.20: Spring Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
2002
College
2003
Enrollment
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other1
Total Enrollment
%
2004
2005
Enrollment
%
3,279
4,164
158
3,006
1,037
1,008
635
784
1,422
146
406
20%
26%
1%
19%
6%
6%
4%
5%
9%
1%
3%
3,081
3,986
153
3,284
1,038
1,114
658
779
1,364
72
197
20%
25%
1%
21%
7%
7%
4%
5%
9%
Enrollment
1%
3,073 19%
4,067 26%
125 1%
3,532 22%
1,070 7%
1,155 7%
608 4%
756 5%
1,247 8%
84 1%
129 1%
%
16,045
100%
15,726
100%
15,846 100%
2006
Percent Change
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
3,090
3,220
66
3,772
1,064
1,918
631
714
1,025
327
121
14
15,962
19%
20%
.4%
24%
7%
12%
4%
4%
6%
2%
1%
2,792
3,205
18%
21%
-10%
3,343
1,013
1,953
594
698
841
409
298
21
15,167
22%
7%
13%
4%
5%
6%
3%
2%
100%
-100%
-11%
-5%
2%
-6%
-2%
-18%
25%
146%
50%
-5%
100%
5 Year
-15%
-23%
-100%
11%
-2%
94%
-6%
-11%
-41%
180%
-27%
-5%
1
Note: Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
Table 2.21: Spring Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trend by College: 5-Year Trend
2002
College
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Graduate Studies
Honors
Other1
Total SCH
2003
SCH
%
24,221
54,881
1,246
21,104
7,765
31,832
7,146
9,806
3,504
15%
34%
1%
13%
5%
20%
4%
6%
2%
318
161,823
.2%
100%
SCH
2004
2005
2006
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
22,587
54,048
1,228
22,854
7,500
32,132
6,962
10,079
3,411
14%
34%
1%
14%
5%
20%
4%
6%
2%
22,718
52,196
981
24,539
7,767
32,441
6,577
9,418
3,293
6
14%
33%
1%
15%
5%
20%
4%
6%
2%
21,642
50,487
14%
32%
16%
5%
20%
5%
6%
2%
334
161,135
.2%
100%
361
160,297
.2%
100%
25,202
7,782
31,835
7,215
8,805
2,718
5
43
488
156,222
3%
100%
SCH
Percent Change
%
1-Year
20,690
48,745
14%
32%
-4%
-3%
22,875
7,462
32,076
7,083
8,786
2,379
12
105
431
150,644
15%
5%
21%
5%
6%
2%
-9%
-4%
1%
-2%
-12%
140%
144%
-12%
-4%
.3%
100%
5-Year
-15%
-11%
-100%
8%
-4%
1%
-1%
-10%
-32%
36%
-7%
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
Figure 2.20 & 2.21: Spring Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15) Trends
Enrollment
FTE (SCH/15)
15,000
15,000
10,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
2002
2003
2004
Enrollment
2005
2006
FTE
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
21
Table 2.22: Summer Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
2001
College
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other1
Total Enrollment
2002
2003
2004
2005
Percent Change
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
1,994
1,889
51
2,392
431
575
312
322
343
144
927
21%
20%
1%
26%
5%
6%
3%
3%
4%
2%
10%
1,796
1,762
74
2,744
392
571
367
337
725
53
625
19%
19%
1%
29%
4%
6%
4%
4%
8%
1%
7%
1,713
1,571
53
2,774
316
563
338
337
771
32
147
20%
18%
2%
32%
4%
7%
4%
4%
9%
0%
2%
1,708
1,405
34
2,973
254
572
263
286
761
69
89
20%
17%
0%
35%
3%
7%
3%
3%
9%
1%
1%
19%
15%
0%
33%
3%
9%
3%
4%
2%
8%
3%
9,380
100%
9,446
100%
8,615
100%
8,414
100%
1,591
1,227
16
2,702
269
767
287
290
177
652
264
14
8,256
1 Year
5 Year
-7% -20%
-13% -35%
-53% -69%
-9% 13%
6% -38%
34% 33%
9%
-8%
1% -10%
-77% -48%
845% 353%
197% -72%
100%
-2%
-12%
Table 2.23: Summer Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trend by College: 5-Year Trend
2001
College
SCH
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Graduate Studies
Other1
Total SCH
2002
%
SCH
12,819
14,139
22%
24%
14,212
1,458
10,967
2,725
1,242
429
24%
3%
19%
5%
2%
1%
258
58,249
.4%
100%
11,075
14,083
193
15,865
1,173
12,138
2,983
1,300
442
1
113
59,366
2003
%
19%
24%
.3%
27%
2%
20%
5%
2%
1%
.2%
100%
SCH
11,102
12,907
59
15,128
896
10,080
2,734
1,298
373
2
58
54,637
2004
%
20%
24%
.1%
28%
2%
18%
5%
2%
1%
.1%
100%
2005
SCH
10,910
11,402
24
15,958
625
10,020
2,275
1,111
312
7
91
52,735
%
SCH
Percent Change
%
1-Year
5-Year
-10%
3%
-100%
-8%
-8%
2%
9%
2%
1%
-14%
-3%
-3%
-23%
-17%
21%
22%
9,816
11,705
19%
23%
30%
1%
19%
4%
2%
1%
14,639
575
10,258
2,487
1,130
316
6
88
51,020
29%
1%
20%
5%
2%
1%
.2%
100%
.2%
100%
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
Figure 2.22 & 2. 23: Summer Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15) Trends
FTE (SCH/15)
Enrollment
10,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
0
2002
2003
2004
Enrollment
22
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
2005
FTE (SCH/15)
2006
3%
-61%
-6%
-9%
-9%
-26%
-66%
-12%
Table 2.24: Annualized Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trends
2001–02
College
Business
CLASS
First College
2002–03
SCH
%
61,593
16%
2003–04
SCH
2004–05
SCH
%
57,588
15%
56,627
15%
54,904
15%
122,943
32% 122,624
32%
119,015
31%
113,229
31%
1,848
2,489
1,887
SCH
2005–06
%
%
SCH
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
51,921
14%
-5%
-16%
111,451
31%
-2%
-9%
24
-100% -100%
Education
55,685
14%
60,400
15%
63,303
17%
65,720
18%
59,663
17%
-9%
7%
Engineering
16,659
4%
16,153
4%
16,274
4%
16,219
4%
15,828
4%
-2%
-5%
Science
76,287
20%
78,609
20%
77,323
20%
75,871
20%
76,368
21%
1%
Urban Affairs
16,929
4%
17,386
4%
16,749
4%
16,158
4%
16,118
4%
Law
21,540
6%
22,289
6%
21,242
6%
19,382
5%
19,218
5%
-1%
-11%
9,726
3%
9,636
2%
9,507
2%
8,649
2%
7,518
2%
-13%
-23%
University Studies
Graduate Studies
7
11
Honors
Other1
937
.2%
-5%
15
22
47%
83
215
159%
733
.2%
647
.2%
871
.2%
901
.2%
3%
-4%
100%
382,585
100%
371,125
100%
359,223
100%
-3%
-6%
Total Annualized SCH
384,145
100% 387,874
Annualized FTE
(Annualized SCH/30)
12,805
12,929
12,753
12,371
11,974
-3%
-6%
Unduplicated Enrollment
22,840
22,447
21,979
21,901
21,141
-3%
-7%
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
Figure 2.24: Annualized FTE (SCH/30) and Unduplicated Enrollment Trends
Annualized FTE
(Annualized SCH/30)
Unduplicated
Enrollment
15,000
25,000
10,000
15,000
5,000
5,000
2001–02
2002–03
2003–04
FTE
2004–05
2005–06
Unduplicated Enrollment
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
23
Table 2.25: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions
Fall 2001 – 2005
Campus Type
Community College
Technical College
University Branch Campus
University Main Campus
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
64,161
23,861
43,075
247,843
69,106
25,092
45,322
252,650
70,742
25,775
46,567
254,529
72,279
26,723
46,343
254,281
71,531
27,417
45,851
253,225
Percent Change
1 Year
5 Year
-1.0%
2.6%
-1.1%
-0.4%
11.5%
14.9%
6.4%
2.2%
Figure 2.25: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions
Fall 2001 – 2005
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
01 – 02
% Change
02 – 03
% Change
Community College
University Branch Campus
03 – 04
% Change
04 – 05
% Change
Technical College
University Main Campus
Table 2.26: Main Campus Enrollment
Select Ohio Four Year Institutions
Fall 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Institution
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
22,718
18,900
27,132
16,107
23,026
16,754
49,285
20,288
20,201
12,341
22,907
18,898
26,725
16,162
23,674
17,486
50,659
20,548
21,043
12,739
22,650
18,646
26,904
16,377
24,410
17,411
51,677
20,452
20,740
12,878
22,314
19,043
27,064
15,881
24,494
17,590
51,723
20,143
19,675
13,166
22,961
19,091
27,908
15,530
23,874
16,574
51,333
20,461
19,354
12,920
2.9%
0.3%
3.1%
-2.2%
-2.5%
-5.8%
-0.8%
1.6%
-1.6%
-1.9%
1.1%
1.0%
2.9%
-3.6%
3.7%
-1.1%
4.2%
0.9%
-4.2%
4.7%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Student Enrollment query – run date: May 1, 2006
Note: Enrollment includes all flexibly scheduled courses not as of the 15th day (census date).
24
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Enrollment
Characteristics of
Students in
CSU Colleges
Enrollment Characteristics of Students in CSU Colleges
E
3
Table 3.1: College of Business: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Accounting
Computer & Information Science
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Other Business
Description
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Accounting
Computer and Information Science
Computer Science
Information Systems
Finance
Management
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Accelerated Bachelors of Business Administration
Business Certificate
Business Economics
Business Education
General Business
International Business
Pre-Business Administration
Undecided Business
Total
Masters
Accounting
AMBA
Business Administration
Computer & Information Science
EMBA
Finance
Health Care Administration
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Other Business
Total
Financial Accounting & Audit
Tax Program
Accelerated Business Administration
Business Administration
Computer and Information Science
Executive Business Administration
Finance
Urban Real Estate Development & Finance
Health Care Administration
MBA-Health Care
Public Health
Management & Labor Relations
Data-Driven Marketing Planning Certificate
Marketing
Graduate Business
Pre Accelerated MBA
Pre Accelerated MPH
Pre Executive MBA
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
136
129
24
84
99
2
95
97
29
108
108
24
74
93
1
87
108
27
147
90
22
73
94
127
83
15
49
96
165
85
23
52
98
30%
2%
53%
6%
2%
21%
-34%
-4%
-38%
-1%
84
97
22
75
69
18
96
98
30
2
28%
42%
67%
1%
1%
3%
1
11
1
3
1
6
18
19
34
79%
209%
2
140
1,266
1,959
13
119
977
1,792
550%
-15%
-23%
-9%
-32%
-16%
69
7
52
569
171
11
5
61
9
61
510
147
9
4
-12%
29%
17%
-10%
-14%
-18%
-20%
-26%
60
24
58
2
1
206
3
5
49
32
67
1
-18%
33%
16%
-50%
32%
52%
37%
172
2
-17%
-33%
-3%
6
1,130
-9%
-4%
1,433
2,144
1,431
2,068
1,283
1,930
82
75
50
498
221
39
5
1
37
21
49
57
490
197
36
5
1
4
36
23
54
2
178
6
198
1,183
1,182
70
4
65
544
187
28
6
1
1
42
16
64
1
3
195
2
6
7
1,242
1,243
1 Year
5 Year
22%
2%
-33%
-77%
-20%
27
(Continued on next page)
28
Table 3.1: College of Business: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Department/Program
Doctoral
Business Administration
Description
2001
Accounting
Business Administration
Computer and Information Science
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
37
5
1
2
2002
1
31
3
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
45
3,372
2004
43
1
2
39
4
4
54
3,226
2005
1 Year
5 Year
2
1
36
3
5
150%
-3%
-40%
400%
3
3
47
3,249
3
5
53
2,975
0%
67%
13%
-8%
18%
-12%
-8%
1
|
Total
Total Business
2003
36
3,286
College of Business
BACHELORS DEGREES
■ Enrollments have increased in all of the major fields of study in business. Overall headcount was down among students classified as “undecided” or pre-business
(usually students in the first two years of college) which may be attributed to increased competition in the area and strong articulation agreements for business degree
completion programs with area community colleges.
■ Accounting continues to be the most popular major, showing a 30% increase from 2004 and a steady 21% growth over the past five years. This growth trend may be
explained by the strong demand in all sectors of the economy for accountants and the Accounting Department’s solid record of preparing students for the CPA
examination (CSU ranked 8th nationally among first-time candidates with advanced degrees who took the CPA examination in 2005).
■ Majors with historically low enrollments (OMS, IST, and Business Economics) have shown dramatic gains because of improved advising and program
information efforts.
■ Marketing recovery from its enrollment decline in 2004 may be attributed to improvements instituted in its curriculum and stronger focus on student services.
■ CIS enrollments have stabilized and may improve with an upturn in the economy.
■ Management and Labor Relations and Finance continue to show steady enrollments over the 5-year period.
MASTERS DEGREES
■ Some specialized programs (MPH, MLRHR, HCA-MBA) and the Accelerated MBA program have maintained a sustained level of growth.
■ Enrollment declines in graduate business programs may be attributed to a flat prospect pool in NE Ohio, increased competition from new entrants (with many being
proprietary, for-profit colleges) and improved job prospects for graduates of baccalaureate programs.
■ Enrollments in off-campus sites remain strong.
■ A steady decline continued in MCIS enrollments but the pattern is expected to reverse because of improved job placements for CIS graduates, an early indicator of an
upturn in the region’s economy.
DOCTORAL DEGREES
■ Slight decline in student credit hours may be explained by curriculum changes (e.g., elimination of a minor) and staggered admission to majors within the DBA
program (students are accepted only every three years).
■ The DBA program is currently accepting new students in only selected business disciplines because of limited faculty resources and growth of various master’s
degree programs.
Table 3.2: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Economics
English
First College
History
Interdisciplinary
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Modern Languages
Music
Philosophy
Political Science/IR
Religious Studies
Social Work
Sociology
Other CLASS
Total
Description
Anthropology
Art
Computer Graphics
Graphic Design
Communication
Drama
Economics
English
First College
History
Social Studies
Classical and Medieval Studies
Liberal Studies
Linguistics
Women's Studies
French
Spanish
Music
Pre-Music
Philosophy
International Relations
Political Science
Religious Studies
Social Service
Social Work
Social Science
Sociology
Pre-Education
Pre-Social Work
Undecided
Undecided CLASS
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
34
153
1
1
333
18
28
121
150
72
27
1
66
38
143
36
148
33
149
32
161
-3%
8%
-6%
5%
1
354
20
28
164
41
89
27
1
27
5
4
12
24
84
5
24
50
89
14
0%
18%
122%
22%
11%
-45%
27%
-18%
0%
-36%
-17%
100%
100%
60%
12%
0%
6%
11%
0%
36%
-73%
24%
0%
0%
-59%
33%
300%
60%
65%
33%
16%
22%
40%
26%
0%
16%
75%
167
4
172
142
27
57
877
2,702
-3%
-60%
21%
-41%
2%
-50%
22%
-13%
0%
-60%
-28%
3
3
15
51
317
17
29
125
160
70
27
1
64
5
2
3
16
44
335
10
29
130
144
92
34
68
4
1
5
20
52
1
301
9
23
148
75
70
33
1
42
6
2
6
15
75
19
50
77
8
1
164
8
141
11
43
72
7
17
43
77
17
18
43
73
10
126
9
147
135
12
158
172
10
142
241
2,203
3,748
2,336
3,812
2,175
3,742
1,003
2,701
(Continued on next page)
29
30
Table 3.2: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Department/Program
Masters
Art
Communication
Economics
English
|
History
Modern Languages
Music
Philosophy
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Social Work
Sociology
Other CLASS
Total
CLASS TOTAL
Description
Art
Communication
Economics
English
Master of Fine Arts-Creative Writing
History
Spanish
Music
Advanced Study in Bioethics
Philosophy
Social Work
Sociology
Graduate CLASS
Undecided CLASS
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
1
35
7
67
3
30
12
66
8
22
12
69
7
29
15
64
-29%
38%
-13%
14%
400%
14%
86%
9%
31
6
27
33
12
34
31
11
46
6%
9%
28%
6%
100%
119%
21
100
24
137
25
127
32
147
36
13
45
1
13
146
32
176
16
167
29
5
40
13
73
8
33
12
59
1
16
183
32
0%
10%
10%
-24%
83%
33%
456
521
573
68
483
80
555
18%
15%
22%
4,204
4,333
4,315
3,184
3,257
2%
-23%
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS
■ Undergraduate enrollments have remained steady or increased in most programs. Several programs, including Communications, Modern Languages, English, Music, and
Sociology, have seen significant increases in both 1-year and 5-year trends.
■ Enrollment trends in the College as a whole are affected by the inclusion of “undecided” majors prior to the split of the College of Arts & Sciences into its current
configuration of the Colleges of Science and Liberal Arts & Social Sciences. Since the eventual program choice of these students cannot be determined, their inclusion in
CLASS figures provides a distorted picture of enrollment trends overall.
■ Programs that reported a decline in enrollment include First College, which has been discontinued; and Liberal Studies, which was temporarily suspended pending a revision
of the program. Admission to the program was reopened in Spring 2005. Inclusion of enrollment figures for these programs affects statistics for the College as a whole.
■ Declines in Anthropology reflect shifts in program orientation and the departure of key faculty.
■ The Social Science major, administered by Sociology, combining coursework from four departments (Sociology, Political Science, Economics, and Psychology) has become
less attractive to students interested in a more focused major. The split of the departments involved into two colleges, with Psychology now part of the College of Science, is
also a disincentive.
■ Pre-Education was introduced in 2004 and enrollment trends have not stabilized.
GRADUATE PROGRAMS
■ Enrollment in graduate programs in the College have increased, showing steady gains of 15% compared to the previous year, and 22% over 5 years.
■ Areas where graduate enrollments have declined include Philosophy, which has shifted some faculty resources to the Advanced Study of Bioethics, a relatively new program
where enrollments are projected to increase.
■ Art and Economics have also shown short-term declines in enrollment; both are relatively small programs where a drop in enrollment of one or two students results in a
significant percentage change.
Table 3.3: College of Education & Human Services: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Health And Physical Education
Nursing
Teachers Education
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Other Education
Description
Physical Education
Pre-Educ & Human Serv (Educ)
Pre-Education
Nursing Basic
Nursing Basic:Undeclared
Nursing RN
Nursing RN: Undeclared
Pre-Nursing
Early Childhood Education
Elementary Education
Middle Childhood Education
Mild/Moderate Educational Need
Special Education
Education
Mathematics
Pre-Educ & Human Serv (Nurs)
Teacher Certification
Undecided Education
Total
Masters
CASAL
Health And Physical Education
Nursing
Teachers Education
31
Adult Learning and Development
Community Agency Counseling
Counseling and Pupil Personnel Administration
Education Administration
Education Specialist
Educational Administration
School Counseling
Supervision
Community Health Education
Exercise Science
Health and Physical Education
Physical Education
Sports Management and Exercise Science
Nursing
Curriculum & Instruction
Middle Child Math Education
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
52
57
73
61
-23%
-10%
132
11
62
2
137
6
58
167
4
47
162
1
55
47
61
85
163
1%
23%
54
-2%
-13%
315
64
121
381
7
169
390
15
205
90
14
2
118
19
46
228
10
150
79
30
8
-28%
0%
-28%
229%
-69%
-11%
-28%
-84%
24%
87
60
4
318
10
208
24
97
9
105
239
1,254
95
328
1,344
92
282
1,412
63
409
1,417
28
47
271
1,307
-25%
-34%
-8%
-55%
13%
4%
46
55
5
14
11
90
62
14
26
17
1
37
4
8
609
59
60
7
9
13
96
78
10
22
22
5
27
6
6
673
83
39
9
19
4
111
114
15
22
25
100
36
5
20
5
101
115
10
18
15
1
27
9
8
758
97
46
1
12
3
88
92
8
21
18
-3%
28%
-80%
-40%
-40%
-13%
-20%
-20%
17%
20%
111%
-16%
-80%
-14%
-73%
-2%
48%
-43%
-19%
6%
31
4
12
709
3
15%
-56%
50%
-6%
-16%
0%
50%
16%
18
11
4
773
-66%
-87%
(Continued on next page)
32
Table 3.3: College of Education & Human Services: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Department/Program
Other Education
Description
Education
Graduate Education
Graduate Education Licensure
Total
Doctoral
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Total
Education Total
Urban Ed: Administration
Counseling
Learning
Policy
2001
113
477
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
22
531
77
1,877
18
607
93
1,946
30
572
141
1,888
67%
-6%
52%
-3%
-73%
20%
1,589
54
487
37
1,671
31
28
24
12
95
27
28
26
11
92
22
26
38
12
98
21
27
37
12
97
16
29
39
10
94
-24%
7%
5%
-17%
-3%
-48%
4%
63%
-17%
-1%
2,938
3,107
3,387
3,460
3,289
-5%
12%
19%
College of Education and Human Services
BACHELORS DEGREE PROGRAMS
Fluctuating market demands for teachers and a lagging economy have contributed to the 7.8% decline in 2005 enrollment. Recent layoffs of practicing teachers and limited job
opportunities have combined to make B.S. Ed. and teacher certification programs less appealing.
COEHS has eliminated its B.S. Ed. program in elementary education owing to the Ohio Department of Education’s eradication of elementary teacher credentialing for grades 1–8
which occurred with the shift from certification to licensure. Hence, the 84% 5-year decline in elementary education and concomitant growth in the middle childhood program.
The decline in early childhood is attributable to a cap placed on that program's enrollment in AY 2003-04. In part, the cap was instituted to compensate for the
existing regional oversupply of early childhood teachers.
Conversely, in response to increased market demands from local schools and health care facilities, specially tailored programs in special education and the Basic Nursing Program
have been instituted to help alleviate critical shortages in these areas.
Declines in post-baccalaureate “teacher certification” programs can partially be explained by revisions in several Curriculum & Instruction M.Ed. programs that now allow for
initial teacher licensure in special education, early childhood education, and secondary education.
MASTERS DEGREE PROGRAMS
As noted above, the prospect of obtaining both a master's degree and initial teacher licensure has ultimately proven more popular than that of only securing a teaching license
as a post-baccalaureate student. Hence, with the addition of initial licensure provisions, enrollment in our M.Ed. Program in Curriculum and Instruction has increased by 16%
over the past 5 years.
Targeted recruitment efforts have paid dividends as reflected by 5-year growth in the M.Ed. Program in Adult Learning and Development. Likewise, as regional demands for K-12
teachers have declined in some fields, students are exploring alternative career paths such as adult education.
Recent changes in licensure requirements now allow individuals to pursue careers as school counselors without having first taught for at least 2 years. Hence, the School
Counseling Program has become a viable option for college graduates with baccalaureate degrees in fields other than education. This may account for increased interest and
5-year growth in this program.
DOCTORAL PROGRAM
While interest in the various available tracks within the doctoral program has fluctuated over time, overall enrollment has remained relatively flat. This is attributable to the cap
on admission which has been in place since the program’s inception.
Table 3.4: College of Engineering: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Other Engineering
Description
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Computer Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Electronic Engineering Technology
Electronic Technology
Industrial Engineering Technology
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
58
90
36
221
33
1
1
38
46
200
54
68
50
186
29
1
1
30
31
176
51
79
58
161
29
1
2
42
26
147
53
79
58
143
21
50
85
75
132
24
-6%
8%
29%
-8%
14%
-14%
-6%
108%
-40%
-27%
2
35
21
132
28
19
147
-20%
-10%
11%
-26%
-59%
-27%
Pre-Engineering
Undecided Engineering
8
38
770
9
33
668
24
50
670
33
73
650
32
45
637
-3%
-38%
-2%
300%
18%
-17%
35
20
1
8
46
51
20
4
14
87
58
23
3
17
143
57
32
4
16
148
40
36
2
14
138
1
-30%
13%
-50%
-13%
-7%
14%
80%
100%
75%
200%
44
28
22
204
45
63
21
305
2
33
63
17
359
1
33
64
35
390
34
51
26
342
3%
-20%
-26%
-12%
-23%
82%
18%
68%
3
23
9
7
21
8
14
13
9
15
8
6
65
21
8
7
72
24
8
7
1
14
7
4
65
33%
14%
-22%
0%
-30%
17%
100%
3%
700%
-65%
-22%
12
10
5
62
18
7
9
1
20
6
2
63
1,036
1,038
1,101
1,103
1,044
-5%
1%
Total
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Masters
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Other Engineering
Total
Doctoral
Doctor of Engineering
Total
Engineering Total
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Engineering Mechanics
Environmental Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Software Engineering
Software Engineering Certificate
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Graduate Engineering
Applied Biomedical Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Doctor of Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
17%
-30%
-20%
5%
33
34
College of Engineering
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
BACHELORS
■ The increase in Computer Engineering majors follows the market trends in that area.
■ Civil and Environmental Engineering also experienced a healthy 8% positive growth in the last year.
■ Mechanical Engineering enrollment has rebounded, showing a healthy 11% gain; again reflecting the market demands.
|
MASTERS AND DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
■ Most graduate programs showed a decline due to a drop in the number of applicants. A notable exception was the Applied Biomedical Engineering program
which continues to successfully draw very qualified students. Our partnership with the Cleveland Clinic Foundation has been most helpful and, mutually
beneficial to both institutions.
■ The “Other Engineering” category as a whole takes account of non-degree students who take a course or two during the academic year.
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 3.5: College of Science: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Other Science
Description
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Biology
Biology-Medical Technology
Environmental Science
Geological Science
Chemistry
Pre Pharmacy
Health Science
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Pre-Health Science
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Pre-Dentistry
Pre-Engineering
Pre-Medicine
Pre-Nursing
Pre-Physical Therapy
Undecided Science
Total
Masters
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Interdisciplinary
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Other Science
Total
Doctoral
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Total
35
Science Total
Biology
Environmental Science
Chemistry
Health Science
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Culture, Com and Health Care
Mathematics
Physics
Diversity Professional
Psychology
Psychology Specialist
Speech Pathology and Audiology
Undecided Science
Regulatory Biology
Clinical Bioanalytical-Chemistry
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
154
13
6
14
39
21
143
15
6
16
41
35
41
8
1
49
14
248
32
158
9
15
12
40
73
20
1
209
20
27
11
43
68
91
5
32%
122%
80%
-8%
8%
-7%
355%
400%
36%
54%
350%
-21%
10%
224%
64
15
2
46
14
265
23
156
7
12
14
51
53
4
15
4
2
59
17
269
37
2
61
14
239
27
200%
7%
0%
40%
19%
200%
41%
0%
26%
39%
555
1,381
6
65
14
335
32
2
57
9
66
3
461
1,524
23
15
9
41
52
34
1
23
19
20
74
9
35
59
414
-30%
36%
-40%
-9%
53%
-23%
0%
0%
12%
-29%
-14%
-31%
0%
-3%
-7%
44%
275%
-67%
37%
74
81
-92%
-23%
-19%
-17%
10%
676
649
700
16
4
27
30
22
9
17
52
22
43
13
5
12
94
8
36
20
11
26
43
8
42
1
14
9
27
78
15
29
19
10
32
87
10
37
265
323
360
33
11
15
45
34
44
1
23
17
28
86
13
35
61
446
37
32
69
32
30
62
40
46
86
42
51
93
50
55
105
19%
8%
13%
35%
72%
52%
1,010
1,034
1,146
1,920
2,043
6%
102%
20
125%
70%
77%
280%
67%
-21%
13%
-3%
56%
36
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Science
GROWTH OF COLLEGE OF SCIENCE
There is an overall growth rate for the College of Science of 6% from year 2004 and a five year growth rate of 102%. This reflects the excellent job
opportunities in health-related fields. Faster than average growth rates are projected through 2014 by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.bls.gov) for physical
therapy, occupational therapy, physicians assistants (Health Sciences Dept), psychologists (Psychology Dept.), medical technologists (Biology Dept.),
pharmacists (pre-pharmacy program in Chemistry), physicians (Biology and Chemistry), and medical scientists (graduate programs in Biology, Chemistry, and
Physics). Most all these health-related programs show positive 1 year and 5 year growth in majors.
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
HEALTH SCIENCES PROGRAMS
Health Sciences undergraduate and graduate masters programs are expected to continue to grow significantly because of the 2006 articulation agreement
with CCC (with 20 CCC health sciences programs feeding students into the undergraduate BSHS program); and the proposed CSU-CCC MSHS program with
concentration in Physician Assisting Scientist (to begin in Fall 2007), leading to an expected significant increase in the number of Masters in Health Sciences
students. This program is expected to also increase undergraduate Health Sciences majors, as a Bachelors degree is required for admission. The Masters
programs in PT and OT will each maintain a stable base of 50 to 60 students (the student number data for PT is in error, as both PT and OT programs are
admitting 25-30 students per year for a 2 year program).
BIOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS
The spiked increases in 2005 for the two largest COS programs Biology (+32%) and Psychology (+40%) are curious. These programs have been
consistently flat for 4 years (biology majors have been necessarily flat because of the limits of lab space and teaching assistants to teach in the undergraduate
labs). Some of this increase may be a result of the university’s concerted effort of having students declare a major earlier and more conveniently on-line.
However, there is still 20% growth that is not accounted for in these departments, as there is only a 17% decline in the undecided science category from 2004 to
2005. Therefore there is probably a 20% increase in these programs.
DOCTORAL BIOLOGY, DOCTORAL CHEMISTRY AND MASTERS IN MEDICAL PHYSICS
These solid growth graduate programs are nationally/internationally visible programs that partner with the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. The steady growth in
the doctoral programs are due to success of faculty in securing external funding to support graduate students. The high numbers of graduate students in these
doctoral programs is also supported by CCF faculty appointed in the programs supporting students through grants.
UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE MATHEMATICS PROGRAMS
Recent steady growth in these programs is attributed to the Math department’s collaboration with the College of Education in delivering a program in math education.
Table 3.6: College of Urban Affairs: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Urban Studies
Other Urban Affairs
Description
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Studies
Public Safety Management
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
Pre-Urban Affairs
Undecided Urban Affairs
Urban Affairs Certificate
Total
Masters
Urban Studies
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Other Urban Affairs
Environmental Studies
Environmental Studies and Law
Non-Profit Management
Public Administration (MPA)
Urban Economic Development
Urban Geographic Information Systems
Urban Planning & Law
Urban Planning and Design
Urban Real Estate Development & Finance
Urban Studies
Graduate Urban Affairs
Local Urban Management Cert
Total
Doctoral
Urban Studies
Urban Affairs Total
Urban Studies
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
4
18
20
29
97
2
16
20
44
97
2
9
36
49
102
1
12
28
43
109
71
68
239
247
57
1
256
14
16
1
3
160
6
152
1
1 Year
5 Year
0%
-25%
25%
-2%
-19%
-75%
-50%
75%
45%
-9%
84
1
9
35
42
88
2
69
-18%
-3%
277
246
-11%
3%
12
12
14
17%
0%
3
154
1
6
138
2
1
6
135
3
1
0%
-2%
50%
0%
0%
-11%
-17%
-67%
-11%
-11%
15%
-75%
-37%
1%
-7%
-7%
4%
-8%
-7%
-3%
39
8
27
67
4
4
34
6
26
111
4
53
8
19
82
54
6
19
76
314
365
336
314
45
2
17
68
1
292
55
608
59
671
49
641
49
640
51
589
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
37
■ The College’s focus on international partnership programs with the University of Botswana and Chung-Ang University in Seoul, South Korea enrich student experience
and the College environment.
■ The College has maintained its #2 US News & World Report ranking in the graduate specialty in City Management and Urban Policy.
■ Undergraduate program degrees in Public Safety Management and Urban Services Administration have contributed to the 3% increase in 5-year undergraduate enrollment.
■ Beginning in Fall 2006, the College will offer courses in executive Public Administration at Lakeland Community College.
■ The College offers two new graduate certificate programs in Local and Urban Management and Research Administration.
■ The Master of Science in Urban Studies curriculum has been revised to reflect current trends in the discipline.
■ The suspension of the TOPS (Training Opportunities for Program Staff) program by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services in 2003 contributed to the decline
in MPA program enrollment, as TOPS participants graduated and were not replaced by new cohorts.
0%
38
Table 3.7: College of Law: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department/Program
Law
Description
Law
Law and Environmental Studies
Law and Urban Planning
Master of Laws
Law Total
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
833
812
1
2
2
817
809
1
1
4
815
744
1
4
3
752
733
4
6
5
748
-1%
300%
50%
67%
-1%
-12%
1
834
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
■ The College of Law has instituted a class-reduction program that will result in lower class sizes. In conjunction with the class reduction program, last year’s entering
class was the strongest in the history of the law school. Law School Admission Test scores and undergraduate grade point averages were higher than any other year
in the previous decade.
■ The College of Law now has more than a half million volumes in its collection.
■ More than half of the law school’s faculty have advanced degrees other than their law degrees.
■ The law school conducts a faculty exchange program with Westminster University College of Law in London and co-sponsors a student summer law institute in
St. Petersburg, Russia.
■ Graduates of the law school practice in 49 states, three territories, the District of Columbia and in the countries of Europe, Asia, Africa, and Central America.
■ In 2005 the American Bar Association Student Division gave The Gavel, Cleveland-Marshall’s student newspaper, its award as the best law school newspaper in
the country.
400%
-10%
Table 3.8: University Studies: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
University Studies
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
University Studies Total
Description
University Studies
Pre-Business Administration
Pre-College of Engineering
Pre-Educ & Human Serv (Educ)
Pre-Educ & Human Serv (Nurs)
Pre-Liberal Arts & Social Sci
Pre-Science
Pre-Social Work
Pre-Urban Affairs
Project 60
PSEOP
SYAP
Undergraduate Nondegree
Undergraduate Visiting
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
1,095
919
789
594
-39%
-67%
184
154
181
185
201
272
21%
-39%
33%
8%
66
239
5
1,529
204
215
2
290
12
1,512
361
57
16
36
19
56
33
6
3
244
166
1
15
998
-67%
-19%
-33%
1,499
116
46
1,229
University Studies
39
UNIVERSITY STUDIES
The University Studies is the entry point for all newly admitted students who are admitted to Cleveland State University on a provisional basis. These students do not meet
the minimum requirement for admission to one of the degree-granting colleges based on high school GPA and ACT/SAT scores. While in University Studies, these students
receive support service including academic advising, career exploration, skill development and are enrolled in courses that are tailored to fit their needs.
University Studies also provide specific academic advising and support services to all newly admitted freshmen students from all colleges and freshmen transfer student
from all colleges. The departments comprising University Studies include The Advising Center, TRIO Student Support Services and the Department of Collegiate Instruction.
THE ADVISING CENTER
The Advising Center offers a user-friendly environment and a staff of professional advisors who provide ongoing assistance in the areas of academic requirements and
course selection, major and career exploration, petition assistance, graduation applications and a list of other services.
TRIO STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES
TRIO Student Support Services is a federally funded program that is staffed by a team of professional advisors who provide support in the areas of academic advising,
academic skills sessions, career planning, cultural enrichment opportunities, financial aid guidance, peer mentoring and tutorial services.
DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE INSTRUCTION
The Department of Collegiate Instruction offers courses in the areas of English (ENG 085) and Mathematics (MTH 087, MTH 088). All courses are graded on a pass/fail
basis, but students receive parenthetical letter grades; S(A), S(B), S(C), U(D), U(F). The letter grades in parentheses are not computed in the student's grade-point
averages. These courses are not applied toward a degree, yet may be prerequisites for some students to achieve academic success.
UNDERGRADUATE MAJOR IN UNIVERSITY STUDIES
This is a catch-all category for non-degree or undecided students, and for student who are offered pre-major advising for admission to the colleges of Science, Liberal
Arts and Social Science, Education and Human Services, Engineering, Urban Affairs and Business Administration. These categories do not denote acceptance in a program,
only a desire on a student’s part to pursue a field. A decline in this category reflects improvement in campus admission and advising procedures.
40
Table 3.9: Undergraduate Non-Degree: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department/Program
Description
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Other Non-Degree
Undergraduate Non-Degree Total
Cross Registration Undergraduate
Nondegree Post-baccalaureate
Transient
Nondegree
Visiting
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
20
19
18
18
44%
30%
157
69
60
238
21%
83%
177
88
78
256
26
6
35
288
15
370
45%
109%
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 3.10: Graduate Studies: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Graduate Nondegree
Description
Transient
Nondegree
Visiting
Graduate Studies Total
2001
2002
2003
2004
436
1
437
260
156
88
260
156
88
2005
4
77
126
207
1 Year
5 Year
-13%
-82%
135%
-53%
Table 3.10.a: Other: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Description
ESL Intensive Language Program
Undergraduate Special Degree
Graduate Special Degree
Other Total
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
21
8
1
30
1 Year
5 Year
Table 3.11: Dual Major Enrollment by College and Academic Level
Fall 2005
Department/Program
College of Business
Accounting
Business Administration
Computer & Information Science
Finance
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Other Business
Total Business
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Interdisciplinary
Philosophy
Political Science/IR
Social Work
Sociology
Other CLASS
Total CLASS
Major
Accounting
Financial Accounting & Audit
Tax Program
Business Administration
Comp & Info Science
Information Systems
Finance
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
International Business
Anthropology
Art
Arts Management
Communication
Economics
English
Social Studies
Liberal Studies
Linguistics
Philosophy
International Relations
Political Science
Social Work
Social Science
Sociology
Personally Designed Major
Undergraduate
Graduate
1
1
1
3
2
1
3
1
1
5
14
5
2
3
1
8
2
1
17
1
2
1
4
5
2
1
4
1
54
1
2
Total
1
1
1
3
2
1
3
1
1
5
19
2
3
1
8
2
1
17
1
2
1
4
5
2
1
5
1
56
(Continued on next page)
41
42
Table 3.11: Dual Major Enrollment by College and Academic Level
Fall 2005
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department/Program
College of Education and Human Services
CASAL
Nursing
Teachers Education
Major
Supervision
Basic Nursing
Curriculum & Instruction
Mild/Moderate Educational Need
Special Education
Total College of Education and Human Services
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
College of Engineering
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Total College of Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Computer Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
College of Science
Chemistry
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Total College of Science
Chemistry
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
College of Urban Affairs
Urban Studies
University Total
Undergraduate
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
4
1
1
1
3
1
2
2
3
2
13
20
1
1
2
96
Total
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
3
Urban Services Administration
Graduate
2
4
2
13
21
2
11
107
Table 3.12: College of Business
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.12a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
463
361
516
804
1,183
45
3,372
14%
11%
15%
24%
35%
1%
100%
412
323
502
831
1,182
36
3,286
13%
10%
15%
25%
36%
1%
100%
360
290
469
811
1,242
54
3,226
11%
9%
15%
25%
38%
2%
100%
421
285
454
799
1,243
47
3,249
13%
9%
14%
25%
38%
1%
100%
355
295
388
754
1,130
53
2,975
12%
10%
13%
25%
38%
2%
100%
-16%
4%
-15%
-6%
-9%
13%
-8%
-23%
-18%
-25%
-6%
-4%
18%
-12%
Table 3.12b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Course Level
2001
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
6,172
10,118
8,131
132
24,553
%
25%
41%
33%
1%
100%
2002
%
2003
5,775
9,963
8,105
83
23,926
24%
42%
34%
0%
100%
4,693
9,600
8,318
196
22,807
%
21%
42%
36%
1%
100%
Figure 3.12a: Enrollment by Class Standing
2004
4,453
9,304
8,416
179
22,352
%
20%
42%
38%
1%
100%
2005
4,190
9,090
7,953
182
21,415
%
1 Year
5 Year
20%
42%
37%
1%
100%
-6%
-2%
-6%
2%
-4%
-32%
-10%
-2%
38%
-13%
Figure 3.12b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
1,400
12,000
1,200
10,000
1,000
8,000
800
6,000
600
4,000
400
2,000
200
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2001
Juniors
2002
Seniors
2003
Masters
2004
2005
Doctoral
Lower Division
(100-299)
Upper Division
(300-499)
2001
2002
Masters
(500-699)
2003
2004
Doctoral
(700-899)
2005
43
44
Table 3.13: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences (Excluding First College)
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Table 3.13a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Total
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
1,133
728
745
992
456
4,054
28%
18%
18%
24%
11%
100%
971
803
799
1,079
521
4,173
23%
19%
19%
26%
12%
100%
899
763
797
1,139
573
4,171
22%
18%
19%
27%
14%
100%
541
508
614
963
483
3,109
17%
16%
20%
31%
16%
100%
497
467
648
1,090
555
3,257
15%
14%
20%
33%
17%
100%
-8%
-8%
6%
13%
15%
5%
-56%
-36%
-13%
10%
22%
-20%
|
Table 3.13b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Percent Change
Course Level
2001
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
35,614
14,898
3,405
6
53,923
%
66%
28%
6%
0%
100%
2002
%
2003
35,625
14,983
3,885
0
54,493
65%
27%
7%
0%
100%
33,611
15,775
4,503
23
53,912
%
62%
29%
8%
0%
100%
Figure 3.13a: Enrollment by Class Standing
1,200
2004
32,241
14,693
4,402
4
51,340
%
63%
29%
9%
0%
100%
2005
31,035
15,357
4,577
32
51,001
%
1 Year
5 Year
61%
30%
9%
0%
100%
-4
5
4
700
-1
-13%
3%
34%
433%
-5%
Figure 3.13b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
40,000
35,000
1,000
30,000
800
25,000
600
20,000
15,000
400
10,000
200
5,000
0
0
First Year
Sophomore
2001
Juniors
2002
2003
Seniors
2004
Masters
2005
Lower Division
(100-299)
Masters
(500-699)
Upper Division
(300-499)
2001
2002
2003
2004
Doctoral
(700-899)
2005
Table 3.14: College of Education and Human Services
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.14a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
233
182
273
566
1,589
95
2,938
8%
6%
9%
19%
54%
3%
100%
240
202
270
632
1,671
92
3,107
8%
7%
9%
20%
54%
3%
100%
219
193
278
722
1,877
98
3,387
6%
6%
8%
21%
55%
3%
100%
212
169
276
760
1,946
97
3,460
6%
5%
8%
22%
56%
3%
100%
234
172
213
688
1,894
88
3,289
7%
5%
6%
21%
58%
3%
100%
10%
2%
-23%
-9%
-3%
-9%
-5%
0%
-5%
22%
-22%
19%
-7%
12%
Table 3.14b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
2001
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
2,153
8,587
8,766
864
20,370
%
11%
42%
43%
4%
100%
2002
%
2003
2,388
9,195
9,360
738
21,681
11%
42%
43%
3%
100%
2,320
10,125
10,291
900
23,636
%
2004
10%
43%
44%
4%
100%
Figure 3.14a: Enrollment by Class Standing
%
2,194
10,960
10,765
641
24,560
2005
9%
45%
44%
3%
100%
2,123
9,722
9,610
694
22,149
%
1 Year
5 Year
9%
40%
39%
3%
100%
-3%
-11%
-11%
8%
-10%
-1%
13%
10%
-20%
9%
Figure 3.14b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
12,000
2,500
10,000
2,000
8,000
1,500
6,000
1,000
4,000
500
2,000
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2001
Juniors
2002
Seniors
2003
Masters
2004
2005
Doctoral
Lower Division
(100-299)
Masters
(500-699)
Upper Division
(300-499)
2001
2002
2003
2004
Doctoral
(700-899)
2005
45
46
Table 3.15: College of Engineering
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.15a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
147
120
146
357
207
59
1,036
14%
12%
14%
34%
20%
6%
100%
93
107
144
324
312
58
1,038
9%
10%
14%
31%
30%
6%
100%
102
90
145
333
359
72
1,101
9%
8%
13%
30%
33%
7%
100%
94
103
135
318
390
63
1,103
9%
9%
12%
29%
35%
6%
100%
96
81
132
328
343
64
1,044
9%
8%
13%
31%
33%
6%
100%
2%
-21%
-2%
3%
-12%
2%
-5%
-35%
-33%
-10%
-8%
66%
8%
1%
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 3.15b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
% of Total
1 Year
5 Year
1,484
4,295
1,310
347
7,436
20%
58%
18%
5%
100%
1,234
3,773
2,057
416
7,480
16%
50%
28%
6%
100%
1,372
3,538
2,276
425
7,611
18%
46%
30%
6%
100%
1,414
3,805
2,197
396
7,812
18%
49%
28%
5%
100%
1,515
4,012
1,863
401
7,791
19%
51%
24%
5%
100%
7%
5%
-15%
1%
0%
2%
-7%
42%
16%
5%
Figure 3.15a: Enrollment by Class Standing
Figure 3.15b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
y
450
5,000
400
4,500
4,000
350
3,500
300
3,000
250
2,500
200
2,000
150
1,500
100
1,000
50
500
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2001
Juniors
2002
Seniors
2003
Masters
2004
2005
Doctoral
Lower Division
(100-299)
Upper Division
(300-499)
2001
2002
Masters
(500-699)
2003
2004
Doctoral
(700-899)
2005
Table 3.16: College of Science
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.16a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
46
98
189
343
266
68
1,010
5%
10%
19%
34%
26%
7%
100%
47
78
164
361
325
60
1,035
5%
8%
16%
35%
31%
6%
100%
50
110
172
370
360
86
1,148
4%
10%
15%
32%
31%
7%
100%
379
230
337
437
447
92
1,922
20%
12%
18%
23%
23%
5%
100%
353
289
325
558
414
105
2,044
17%
14%
16%
27%
20%
5%
100%
-7%
-26%
-4%
28%
-7%
14%
6%
667%
195%
72%
63%
56%
54%
102%
Table 3.16b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
2001
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
23,521
6,823
2,583
561
33,488
%
70%
20%
8%
2%
100%
2002
%
2003
23,630
7,015
3,109
585
34,339
69%
20%
9%
2%
100%
23,005
7,493
3,620
684
34,802
%
66%
22%
10%
2%
100%
Figure 3.16a: Enrollment by Class Standing
2004
%
22,115
7,454
3,803
644
34,016
2005
65%
22%
11%
2%
100%
21.482
8,162
3,803
790
34,237
%
1 Year
5 Year
63%
24%
11%
2%
100%
-3%
9%
0%
23%
1%
-9%
20%
47%
41%
2%
Figure 3.16b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
25,000
600
500
20,000
400
15,000
300
10,000
200
5,000
100
0
First Year
Sophomores
2001
Juniors
2002
Seniors
2003
Masters
2004
2005
Doctoral
0
Lower
(100-299)
Upper
(300-499)
2001
2002
Masters
(500-699)
2003
47
* The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in College of Science is due to introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science)
2004
Doctoral
(700-899)
2005
48
Table 3.17: College of Urban Affairs
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.17a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
34
30
85
90
314
55
608
6%
5%
14%
15%
52%
9%
100%
30
32
68
116
365
59
670
4%
5%
10%
17%
54%
9%
100%
26
27
73
128
336
49
639
4%
4%
11%
20%
53%
8%
100%
35
30
75
135
314
49
638
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
5%
5%
12%
21%
49%
8%
100%
26
35
64
120
292
51
588
4%
6%
11%
20%
50%
9%
100%
-26%
17%
-15%
-11%
-7%
4%
-8%
-24%
17%
-25%
33%
-7%
-7%
-3%
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 3.17b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-699)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
2001
%
2002
%
2003
2,845
1,539
2,285
389
7,058
40%
22%
32%
6%
100%
2,745
1,889
2,359
428
7,421
37%
25%
32%
6%
100%
2,810
1,998
2,274
356
7,438
38%
27%
31%
5%
100%
Figure 3.17a: Enrollment by Class Standing
2004
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
1,886
2,129
2,329
324
6,668
28%
32%
35%
5%
100%
1,985
1,909
2,329
306
6,529
30%
29%
36%
5%
100%
5%
-10%
0%
-6%
-2%
-30%
24%
2%
-21%
-7%
Figure 3.17b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
400
3,000
350
2,500
300
2,000
250
200
1,500
150
1,000
100
500
50
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2001
Juniors
2002
Seniors
2003
Masters
2004
2005
Doctoral
Lower
Upper
2001
2002
Masters
2003
2004
Doctoral
2005
Table 3.18: College of Law
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.18a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
Law
Total
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
834
834
100%
100%
817
817
100%
100%
815
815
100%
100%
752
752
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
100%
100%
748
748
100%
100%
-1%
-1%
-10%
-10%
Table 3.18b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
2001
Law
Total
10,492
10,492
%
100%
100%
2002
%
2003
10,910
10,910
100%
100%
10,526
10,526
%
2004
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
100%
100%
9,466
9,466
100%
100%
9,302
9,302
100%
100%
-2%
-2%
-11%
-11%
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Figure 3.18a: Enrollment by Class Standing
Figure 3.18b: Student Enrollment by Course Level
860
11,500
840
11,000
820
10,500
800
10,000
780
9,500
760
9,000
740
8,500
720
700
8,000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Law
Note: The significant drop in Fall 2004 enrollment is due to new selective admission criteria introduced in Fall 2004
2001
2002
2003
Law
2004
2005
49
50
Table 3.19: University Studies
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Table 3.19 a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Total
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
1,286
158
29
26
1,499
86%
11%
2%
2%
100%
1,280
169
37
43
1,529
84%
11%
2%
3%
100%
1,310
125
26
51
1,512
87%
8%
2%
3%
100%
1,072
99
23
35
1,229
87%
8%
2%
3%
100%
853
83
29
33
998
85%
8%
3%
3%
100%
-20%
-16%
26%
-6%
-19%
-34%
-47%
0%
27%
-33%
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 3.19b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
2001
%
2002
Developmental
Lower
Total
4,219
1,574
5,793
73%
27%
100%
4,153
1,630
5,783
%
72%
28%
100%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
1 Year
5 Year
4,246
1,595
5,841
73%
27%
100%
4,030
1,589
5,619
72%
28%
100%
3,943
880
4,823
82%
18%
100%
-2%
-45%
-14%
-7%
-44%
-17%
Figure 3.19a: Enrollment by Class Standing
Figure 3.19b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
4,500
1,600
4,000
1,400
3,500
1,200
3,000
1,000
2,500
800
2,000
600
1,500
400
1,000
500
200
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2001
2002
Juniors
2003
2004
Seniors
2005
University Studies enrollment includes students enrolled in Project 60, PSEOP, SYAP, Undecided Non-Degree and regular University Studies Students.
Developmental
2001
Lower Division
2002
2003
2004
2005
Table 3.20: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend
2001
College
Business
CLASS
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
First College
Education
Engineering
Race
51
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
2002
2003
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
1,999
412
52
153
6
426
324
3,372
2,534
799
112
82
12
72
443
4,054
90
39
1
2
1
59%
12%
2%
5%
0%
13%
10%
100%
63%
20%
3%
2%
0%
2%
11%
100%
60%
26%
1%
1%
1%
0%
11%
100%
69%
18%
2%
1%
0%
1%
9%
100%
58%
6%
2%
3%
0%
20%
11%
100%
1,950
423
64
174
10
382
283
3,286
2,612
878
125
86
8
55
409
4,173
92
40
2
2
1
59%
13%
2%
5%
0%
12%
9%
100%
63%
21%
3%
2%
0%
1%
10%
100%
58%
25%
1%
1%
1%
0%
14%
100%
69%
19%
2%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
52%
6%
2%
3%
0%
28%
9%
100%
1,946
417
74
156
9
350
274
3,226
2,591
920
134
71
10
65
380
4,171
78
38
2
4
2
17
150
2,020
542
68
24
7
26
251
2,938
604
58
25
31
1
205
112
1,036
23
160
2,132
583
75
29
7
29
252
3,107
539
66
20
26
2
292
93
1,038
20
144
2,327
632
87
28
9
31
273
3,387
572
71
17
38
1
321
81
1,101
2004
%
60%
13%
2%
5%
0%
11%
8%
100%
62%
22%
3%
2%
0%
2%
9%
100%
54%
26%
1%
3%
1%
0%
14%
100%
69%
19%
3%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
52%
6%
2%
3%
0%
29%
7%
100%
Enrollment
1,985
440
74
129
6
336
279
3,249
1,927
689
90
42
11
48
302
3,109
36
28
1
3
1
6
75
2,394
575
75
26
5
26
359
3,460
568
63
15
47
1
325
84
1,103
2005
%
61%
14%
2%
4%
0%
10%
9%
100%
62%
22%
3%
1%
0%
2%
10%
100%
48%
37%
1%
4%
1%
0%
8%
100%
69%
17%
2%
1%
0%
1%
10%
100%
51%
6%
1%
4%
0%
29%
8%
100%
Enrollment
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
1,797
416
53
114
7
292
296
2,975
1,973
784
95
52
14
55
284
3,257
60%
14%
2%
4%
0%
10%
10%
100%
61%
24%
3%
2%
0%
2%
9%
100%
-9%
-5%
-28%
-12%
17%
-13%
6%
-8%
2%
14%
6%
24%
27%
15%
-6%
5%
-10%
1%
2%
-25%
17%
-31%
-9%
-12%
-22%
-2%
-15%
-37%
17%
-24%
-36%
-20%
2,260
577
79
27
4
32
310
3,289
534
70
17
48
3
295
77
1,044
69%
18%
2%
1%
0%
1%
9%
100%
51%
7%
2%
5%
0%
28%
7%
100%
-6%
0%
5%
4%
-20%
23%
-14%
-5%
-6%
11%
13%
2%
200%
-9%
-8%
-5%
12%
6%
16%
13%
-43%
23%
24%
12%
-12%
21%
-32%
55%
200%
44%
-31%
1%
(Continued on next page)
52
(Continued from previous page)
Table 3.20: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend
2001
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
Race
2002
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
2003
%
Enrollment
2004
%
Enrollment
2005
%
Enrollment
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
656
149
20
26
3
61
95
1,010
65%
15%
2%
3%
0%
6%
9%
100%
681
133
24
30
2
71
93
1,034
66%
13%
2%
3%
0%
7%
9%
100%
761
142
27
35
3
81
97
1,146
66%
12%
2%
3%
0%
7%
8%
100%
1,203
330
46
72
1
98
170
1,920
63%
17%
2%
4%
0%
5%
9%
100%
1,321
338
58
85
5
99
137
2,043
65%
17%
3%
4%
0%
5%
7%
100%
10%
2%
26%
18%
400%
1%
-19%
6%
102%
127%
190%
227%
67%
62%
44%
102%
Urban Affairs
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
325
184
19
4
2
13
61
608
53%
30%
3%
1%
0%
2%
10%
100%
363
210
20
7
361
182
17
6
356
189
11
5
1
20
58
640
55%
30%
2%
1%
0%
3%
9%
100%
-4%
-8%
-5%
50%
25
58
589
53%
29%
3%
1%
0%
4%
10%
100%
-12%
-11%
64%
20%
21
54
641
56%
28%
3%
1%
0%
3%
8%
100%
313
169
18
6
16
55
671
54%
31%
3%
1%
0%
2%
8%
100%
25%
0%
-8%
92%
-5%
-3%
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
704
56
17
14
1
10
32
834
84%
7%
2%
2%
0%
1%
4%
100%
693
48
22
21
2
9
22
817
85%
6%
3%
3%
0%
1%
3%
100%
704
44
20
22
2
9
14
815
86%
5%
2%
3%
0%
1%
2%
100%
607
48
24
27
2
10
34
752
81%
6%
3%
4%
0%
1%
5%
100%
587
45
18
25
4
12
57
748
78%
6%
2%
3%
1%
2%
8%
100%
-3%
-6%
-25%
-7%
100%
20%
68%
-1%
-17%
-20%
6%
79%
300%
20%
78%
-10%
University Studies White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
718
472
58
54
4
7
186
1,499
48%
31%
4%
4%
0%
0%
12%
100%
733
462
58
59
2
9
206
1,529
48%
30%
4%
4%
0%
1%
13%
100%
708
450
48
47
3
9
247
1,512
47%
30%
3%
3%
0%
1%
16%
100%
508
365
30
34
7
2
283
1,229
41%
30%
2%
3%
1%
0%
23%
100%
415
333
29
36
4
1
180
998
42%
33%
3%
4%
0%
0%
18%
100%
-18%
-9%
-3%
6%
-43%
-50%
-36%
-19%
-42%
-29%
-50%
-33%
0%
-86%
-3%
-33%
|
Science
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Law
(Continued on next page)
(Continued from previous page)
Table 3.20: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend
2001
College
Undergraduate
Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other 1
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
University
Race
Enrollment
White
112
Black
20
Hispanic
1
Asian or Pacific Islander
4
Native American
1
Non-Resident Alien
4
Unknown
35
Total
177
White
233
Black
111
Hispanic
11
Asian or Pacific Islander
3
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
6
Unknown
73
Total
437
White
Black
Asian or Pacific Islander
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
9,995
Black
2,842
Hispanic
384
Asian or Pacific Islander
397
Native American
38
Non-Resident Alien
830
Unknown
1,629
Total
16,115
2002
%
63%
11%
1%
2%
1%
2%
20%
100%
53%
25%
3%
1%
0%
1%
17%
100%
62%
18%
2%
2%
0%
5%
10%
100%
Enrollment
42
14
2003
%
Enrollment
36
13
1
7
1
2004
%
4
1
1
26
88
127
80
10
3
1
3
36
260
48%
16%
0%
5%
1%
1%
30%
100%
49%
31%
4%
1%
0%
1%
14%
100%
1
27
156
46%
17%
1%
9%
1%
0%
26%
100%
51%
28%
3%
1%
0%
1%
17%
100%
9,964
2,937
420
441
36
867
1,498
16,163
62%
18%
3%
3%
0%
5%
9%
100%
10,163
2,953
431
415
40
888
1,487
16,377
62%
18%
3%
3%
0%
5%
9%
100%
20
78
79
44
4
1
Enrollment
148
28
6
9
2005
%
1
9
88
58%
11%
2%
4%
0%
3%
22%
100%
59%
24%
3%
2%
0%
1%
10%
100%
9,784
2,776
375
396
35
874
1,641
15,881
62%
17%
2%
2%
0%
6%
10%
100%
8
57
256
52
21
3
2
Enrollment
241
33
7
15
5
69
370
86
29
2
3
1
86
207
5
3
2
14
6
30
9,532
2,797
376
413
41
831
1,560
15,550
Percent Change
%
65%
9%
2%
4%
0%
1%
19%
100%
42%
14%
1%
1%
0%
0%
42%
100%
17%
10%
7%
47%
20%
100%
61%
18%
2%
3%
0%
5%
10%
100%
1 Year
5 Year
63%
18%
17%
67%
21%
45%
65%
38%
-33%
50%
115%
65%
600%
275%
-100%
25%
97%
109%
-63%
-74%
-82%
0%
0%
856%
135%
-83%
18%
-53%
-3%
1%
0%
4%
17%
-5%
-5%
-2%
-5%
-2%
-2%
4%
8%
0%
-4%
-4%
5-Year Change Highlights
53
■ In the College of Business, Hispanic (2%), Black (1%) and Native American (17%) enrollment has increased between 2001 and 2005.Between 2004 and 2005 enrollment in all racial categories
decreased except for Native American.
■ In the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, Black (14%), Asian or Pacific Islander(24%)and Non-Resident Alien (15%) enrollment increased significantly between 2004 and 2005.
■ In COEHS enrollment in all racial categories increased or remained the same between 2001-2005 and 2004-2005 except Native American.
■ In the College of Engineering, Black (21%), Asian (55%) and Non-Resident Alien (44%)enrollment increased between 2001-2005. Between 2004 and 2005 almost all racial categories experienced a
healthy positive growth in enrollment except Non-resident Alien.
■ In the College of Science, the highest growth is in Asian, Hispanic and Black enrollment. Overall the enrollment has increased in every racial category. (*The significant increase in Fall 2004 and 2005
enrollment in the College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science), PENGR (Pre Engineering), PNUR (Pre Nursing), CSPBUND (College
of Science Undecided) and other new codes.
■ College of Urban Affairs has experienced a significant growth in Non-Resident Alien and Asian enrollment between 2001-2005 and in Hispanic (64%) in the last year. Overall the College has experienced
a (3%) negative growth.
■ In the College of Law, Asian (79%) and Non-Resident Alien (20%) and Hispanic (6%) enrollment increased significantly between 2001 and 2004.
■ At the University level, enrollment has decreased between 2% to 5% except for Asian, Native American and Non-Resident Alien.
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a foreign language, Military Science, Special Program and Study Abroad.
54
Table 3.21: CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
2001
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
Business
|
CLASS
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
First College
Education
Race
Enrollment
White
1,332
Black
304
Hispanic
41
Asian or Pacific Islander
107
Native American
4
Non-Resident Alien
121
Unknown
235
Total
2,144
White
2,257
Black
713
Hispanic
102
Asian or Pacific Islander
74
Native American
9
Non-Resident Alien
58
Unknown
385
Total
3,598
2002
%
62%
14%
2%
5%
6%
11%
100%
1,289
304
45
124
7
103
196
2,068
2%
11%
100%
2,276
788
112
71
6
43
356
3,652
90
39
1
2
1
60%
26%
1%
1%
1%
17
150
White
863
Black
202
Hispanic
37
Asian or Pacific Islander
15
Native American
5
Non-Resident Alien
12
Unknown
120
Total
1,254
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
63%
20%
3%
2%
Enrollment
2003
%
62%
15%
2%
6%
5%
9%
100%
1,215
314
54
96
5
84
162
1,930
1%
10%
100%
2,222
816
121
63
8
46
322
3,598
92
40
2
2
1
58%
25%
1%
1%
1%
11%
100%
23
160
69%
16%
3%
1%
957
196
37
17
4
10
123
1,344
1%
10%
100%
62%
22%
3%
2%
Enrollment
2004
%
63%
16%
3%
5%
4%
8%
100%
1,264
347
56
72
3
81
136
1,959
%
65%
18%
3%
4%
4%
7%
100%
1%
9%
100%
1,633
580
85
37
11
32
248
2,626
1%
9%
100%
78
38
2
4
2
54%
26%
1%
3%
1%
36
28
1
3
1
48%
37%
1%
4%
1%
14%
100%
20
144
14%
100%
6
75
8%
100%
71%
15%
3%
1%
1,023
216
31
16
2
13
111
1,412
72%
15%
2%
1%
1,046
194
38
15
1
14
109
1,417
74%
14%
3%
1%
1%
9%
100%
62%
23%
3%
2%
Enrollment
2005
1%
8%
100%
62%
22%
3%
1%
1%
8%
100%
Enrollment
1,167
322
40
72
4
79
108
1,792
1,648
664
84
45
13
37
211
2,702
969
187
38
14
3
16
80
1,307
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
65%
18%
2%
4%
-8%
-7%
-29%
0%
33%
-2%
-21%
-9%
-12%
6%
-2%
-33%
0%
-35%
-54%
-16%
1%
14%
-1%
22%
18%
16%
-15%
3%
-27%
-7%
-18%
-39%
44%
-36%
-45%
-25%
-7%
-4%
0%
-7%
200%
14%
-27%
-8%
12%
-7%
3%
-7%
-40%
33%
-33%
4%
4%
6%
100%
61%
25%
3%
2%
1%
8%
100%
74%
14%
3%
1%
1%
6%
100%
(Continued on next page)
(Continued from previous page)
Table 3.21: CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
2001
College
Race
Enrollment
2002
2003
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
2004
%
Enrollment
2005
%
Enrollment
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Engineering
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
531
50
21
26
1
48
93
770
69%
6%
3%
3%
0%
6%
12%
100%
460
58
15
19
2
39
75
668
69%
9%
2%
3%
0%
6%
11%
100%
473
63
14
24
1
32
63
670
71%
9%
2%
4%
0%
5%
9%
100%
461
53
13
28
1
30
64
650
71%
8%
2%
4%
0%
5%
10%
100%
430
58
16
34
2
35
62
637
68%
9%
3%
5%
0%
5%
10%
100%
-7%
9%
23%
21%
100%
17%
-3%
-2%
-19%
16%
-24%
31%
100%
-27%
-33%
-17%
Science
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
426
122
16
24
3
11
74
676
63%
18%
2%
4%
0%
2%
11%
100%
417
100
16
25
2
17
72
649
64%
15%
2%
4%
0%
3%
11%
100%
465
103
18
26
2
17
69
700
66%
15%
3%
4%
0%
2%
10%
100%
857
268
40
64
1
20
131
1,381
62%
19%
3%
5%
0%
1%
9%
100%
988
285
50
72
4
22
103
1,524
65%
19%
3%
5%
0%
1%
7%
100%
15%
6%
25%
13%
300%
10%
-21%
10%
132%
134%
213%
200%
33%
100%
39%
126%
Urban Affairs
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
125
77
6
1
1
128
90
7
1
6%
10%
33%
0%
1
17
246
54%
35%
3%
0%
0%
0%
7%
100%
-13%
-10%
14%
-50%
20
277
56%
34%
3%
1%
0%
0%
7%
100%
134
85
8
1
26
256
55%
31%
3%
0%
0%
0%
10%
100%
154
94
7
2
21
247
52%
37%
3%
0%
0%
0%
9%
100%
142
80
7
1
29
239
52%
32%
3%
0%
0%
0%
12%
100%
-15%
-11%
-41%
3%
University Studies White
718
Black
472
Hispanic
58
Asian or Pacific Islander
54
Native American
4
Non-Resident Alien
7
Unknown
186
Total
1,499
48%
31%
4%
4%
0%
0%
12%
100%
733
462
58
59
2
9
206
1,529
48%
30%
4%
4%
0%
1%
13%
100%
708
450
48
47
3
9
247
1,512
47%
30%
3%
3%
0%
1%
16%
100%
508
365
30
34
7
2
283
1,229
41%
30%
2%
3%
1%
0%
23%
100%
415
333
29
36
4
1
180
998
42%
33%
3%
4%
0%
0%
18%
100%
-18%
-9%
-3%
6%
-43%
-50%
-36%
-19%
-42%
-29%
-50%
-33%
0%
-86%
-3%
-33%
(Continued on next page)
55
56
Table 3.21: CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
2001
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
Race
Undergraduate
Non-Degree
Enrollment
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
112
20
1
4
1
4
35
177
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Other 1
White
Black
Asian or Pacific Islander
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
University
White
6,454
Black
1,999
Hispanic
283
Asian or Pacific Islander
307
Native American
29
Non-Resident Alien
261
Unknown
1,174
Total
10,507
2002
%
63%
11%
1%
2%
1%
2%
20%
100%
61%
19%
3%
3%
0%
2%
11%
100%
Enrollment
42
14
4
1
1
26
88
6,394
2,052
292
322
25
222
1,098
10,405
2003
%
48%
16%
0%
5%
1%
1%
30%
100%
61%
20%
3%
3%
0%
2%
11%
100%
Enrollment
36
13
1
7
1
20
78
6,362
2,093
296
284
24
201
1,040
10,300
2004
%
46%
17%
1%
9%
1%
0%
26%
100%
62%
20%
3%
3%
0%
2%
10%
100%
Enrollment
148
28
6
9
8
57
256
6,107
1,957
276
264
25
187
1,054
9,870
2005
%
58%
11%
2%
4%
0%
3%
22%
100%
62%
20%
3%
3%
0%
2%
11%
100%
Enrollment
241
33
7
15
Percent Change
%
5
69
370
65%
9%
2%
4%
0%
1%
19%
100%
5
3
2
14
5
29
17%
10%
7%
48%
17%
100%
5,997
1,970
272
291
30
210
835
9,605
62%
21%
3%
3%
0%
2%
9%
100%
1 Year
5 Year
63%
18%
17%
67%
21%
45%
115%
65%
600%
275%
-100%
25%
97%
109%
-2%
1%
-1%
10%
20%
12%
-21%
-3%
-7%
-1%
-4%
-5%
3%
-20%
-29%
-9%
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science). Undergraduate NonDegree fluctuations are due to reclassfication of Acacademic Plan.
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a foreign language, Military Science, Special Program and Study Abroad.
Table 3.22: CSU Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
2001
College
Race
Enrollment
2002
2003
2004
2005
Percent Change
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Business
White
667
Black
108
Hispanic
11
Asian or Pacific Islander
46
Native American
2
Non-Resident Alien
305
Unknown
89
Total
1,228
54%
9%
1%
4%
0%
25%
7%
100%
661
119
19
50
3
279
87
1,218
54%
10%
2%
4%
0%
23%
7%
100%
731
103
20
60
4
266
112
1,296
56%
8%
2%
5%
0%
21%
9%
100%
721
93
18
57
3
255
143
1,290
56%
7%
1%
4%
0%
20%
11%
100%
630
94
13
42
3
213
188
1,183
53%
8%
1%
4%
0%
18%
16%
100%
-13%
1%
-28%
-26%
0%
-16%
31%
-8%
-6%
-13%
18%
-9%
50%
-30%
111%
-4%
CLASS
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
277
86
10
8
3
14
58
456
61%
19%
2%
2%
1%
3%
13%
100%
336
90
13
15
2
12
53
521
64%
17%
2%
3%
0%
2%
10%
100%
369
104
13
8
2
19
58
573
64%
18%
2%
1%
0%
3%
10%
100%
294
109
5
5
325
120
11
7
1
18
73
555
59%
22%
2%
1%
0%
3%
13%
100%
11%
10%
120%
40%
16
54
483
61%
23%
1%
1%
0%
3%
11%
100%
13%
35%
15%
17%
40%
10%
-13%
-67%
29%
26%
22%
Education
White
1,157
Black
340
Hispanic
31
Asian or Pacific Islander
9
Native American
2
Non-Resident Alien
14
Unknown
131
Total
1,684
69%
20%
2%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
1,175
387
38
12
3
19
129
1,763
67%
22%
2%
1%
0%
1%
7%
100%
1,304
416
56
12
7
18
162
1,975
66%
21%
3%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
1,348
381
37
11
4
12
250
2,043
66%
19%
2%
1%
0%
1%
12%
100%
1,291
390
41
13
1
16
230
1,982
65%
20%
2%
1%
0%
1%
12%
100%
-4%
2%
11%
18%
-75%
33%
-8%
-3%
12%
15%
32%
44%
-50%
14%
76%
18%
Engineering
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
27%
3%
2%
2%
0%
59%
7%
100%
79
8
5
7
21%
2%
1%
2%
0%
68%
5%
100%
99
8
3
14
23%
2%
1%
3%
0%
67%
4%
100%
107
10
2
19
24%
2%
0%
4%
0%
65%
4%
100%
104
12
1
14
1
260
15
407
26%
3%
0%
3%
0%
64%
4%
100%
-3%
20%
-50%
-26%
42%
50%
-75%
180%
-12%
-25%
-10%
66%
-21%
53%
73
8
4
5
157
19
266
253
18
370
289
18
431
295
20
453
(Continued on next page)
57
58
Table 3.22: CSU Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
2001
|
College
Race
Science
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
50
21
334
69%
8%
1%
1%
0%
15%
6%
100%
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
200
107
13
3
1
13
32
369
54%
29%
4%
1%
0%
4%
9%
100%
Law
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
704
56
17
14
1
10
32
834
Graduate Studies
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
233
111
11
3
Urban Affairs
Enrollment
2002
230
27
4
2
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
6
73
437
%
Enrollment
264
33
8
5
2003
%
Enrollment
2004
%
69%
9%
2%
1%
0%
14%
5%
100%
296
39
9
9
1
64
28
446
66%
9%
2%
2%
0%
14%
6%
100%
219
102
10
5
16
34
424
55%
28%
3%
1%
0%
4%
8%
100%
84%
7%
2%
2%
0%
1%
4%
100%
693
48
22
21
2
9
22
817
53%
25%
3%
1%
0%
1%
17%
100%
127
80
10
3
1
3
36
260
54
21
385
235
120
13
6
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
-4%
-15%
33%
63%
45%
96%
100%
550%
-1%
-13%
-4%
54%
62%
55%
78
39
539
64%
12%
1%
1%
0%
14%
7%
100%
333
53
8
13
1
77
34
519
64%
10%
2%
3%
0%
15%
7%
100%
202
95
4
3
1
20
38
363
56%
26%
1%
1%
0%
6%
10%
100%
179
84
10
5
-11%
-21%
-23%
67%
24
41
343
52%
24%
3%
1%
0%
7%
12%
100%
-11%
-12%
150%
67%
21
28
385
57%
26%
3%
1%
0%
5%
7%
100%
20%
8%
-6%
85%
28%
-7%
85%
6%
3%
3%
0%
1%
3%
100%
704
44
20
22
2
9
14
815
86%
5%
2%
3%
0%
1%
2%
100%
607
48
24
27
2
10
34
752
81%
6%
3%
4%
0%
1%
5%
100%
587
45
18
25
4
12
57
748
78%
6%
2%
3%
1%
2%
8%
100%
-3%
-6%
-25%
-7%
100%
20%
68%
-1%
-17%
-20%
6%
79%
300%
20%
78%
-10%
49%
31%
4%
1%
0%
1%
14%
100%
79
44
4
1
51%
28%
3%
1%
0%
1%
17%
100%
52
21
3
2
59%
24%
3%
2%
0%
1%
10%
100%
86
29
2
3
42%
14%
1%
1%
0%
0%
42%
100%
65%
38%
-33%
50%
-63%
-74%
-82%
0%
0%
856%
135%
-83%
18%
-53%
1
27
156
346
62
6
8
2005
1
9
88
1
86
207
(Continued on next page)
Table 3.22: CSU Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
2001
College
Graduate and
Law Total
Race
Enrollment
White
3,541
Black
843
Hispanic
101
Asian or Pacific Islander
90
Native American
9
Non-Resident Alien
569
Unknown
455
Total
5,608
2002
2003
2004
2005
Percent Change
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
63%
15%
2%
2%
0%
10%
8%
100%
3,570
885
128
119
11
645
400
5,758
62%
15%
2%
2%
0%
11%
7%
100%
3,801
860
135
131
16
687
447
6,077
63%
14%
2%
2%
0%
11%
7%
100%
3,677
819
99
132
10
687
587
6,011
61%
14%
2%
2%
0%
11%
10%
100%
3,535
827
104
122
11
621
725
5,945
59%
14%
2%
2%
0%
10%
12%
100%
-4%
1%
5%
-8%
10%
-10%
24%
-1%
0%
-2%
3%
36%
22%
9%
59%
6%
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science).
Graduate Non-Degree fluctuations are due to reclassification of Academic Plan.
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
59
60
Table 3.23: Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College, Load: 5 Year Trend
UNDERGRADUATE FULL-TIME:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Other 1
Total
1,355
2,567
833
480
455
103
983
38
1,410
2,744
936
435
456
131
874
14
1,313
2,777
953
437
505
154
794
14
1,371
2,065
977
459
1,051
162
570
66
-11%
0%
-9%
0%
12%
-15%
-7%
23%
-10%
-20%
7%
-4%
158%
34%
-46%
113%
6,814
7,000
6,947
6,721
1,216
2,058
892
459
1,174
138
528
81
6
6,552
-3%
-4%
UNDERGRADUATE PART-TIME:
Percent Change
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Other 1
Total
789
1,181
421
290
221
136
516
139
658
1,068
408
233
194
115
655
74
617
965
459
233
197
100
718
64
588
636
440
191
332
113
659
190
-2%
1%
-6%
-7%
6%
-5%
-29%
52%
-27%
-45%
-1%
-39%
59%
-21%
-9%
108%
3,693
3,405
3,353
3,149
576
644
415
178
351
107
470
289
23
3,053
-3%
-17%
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a foreign language, Military Science, Special Program and Study Abroad.
(Continued on next page)
Table 3.24: Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College, Load: 5 Year Trend
GRADUATE & LAW FULL-TIME:
Percent Change
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies
Total
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
321
164
224
121
186
95
474
22
1,607
370
186
276
137
229
94
508
13
1,813
433
205
308
123
254
100
497
4
1,924
395
225
318
101
294
92
466
6
1,897
356
239
240
100
276
79
436
2
1,728
-10%
6%
-25%
-1%
-6%
-14%
-6%
-67%
-9%
11%
46%
7%
-17%
48%
-17%
-8%
-91%
8%
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
GRADUATE & LAW PART-TIME:
Percent Change
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies
Total
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
907
292
1,460
145
148
274
360
415
4,001
848
335
1,487
233
156
330
309
247
3,945
863
368
1,667
308
192
285
318
152
4,153
895
258
1,725
352
245
271
286
82
4,114
827
316
1,742
307
243
264
312
206
4,217
-8%
22%
1%
-13%
-1%
-3%
9%
151%
3%
-9%
8%
19%
112%
64%
-4%
-13%
-50%
5%
Undergraduate Full-time Load: Student registered for a minimum of 12 hours
Graduate Full-time Load: Student registered for a minimum of 9 hours
Law Full-time Load: Student registered for a minimum of 13 hours
The definition of Full-time and Part-time load at the Graduate and Law level has been changed. Reports published prior to Fall 2005 will be affected.
61
EEast and West Centers
The opening of Cleveland State University West Center in August 2003 and East Center in August 2004 established
a suburban presence for the University’s thriving downtown campus. Both these Centers reach out to part-time students
with a special appeal to busy adults. Academic offerings include programs for educators (teachers and administrators),
business and public service professionals seeking to complete their university degree, traditional college-age students
and high school students in post-secondary educational option programs. Program offerings include a variety of undergraduate courses and Masters degree programs. Continuing education courses include several professional certificate
programs for health care professionals, public safety personnel and other professionals, as well as courses for noncredit
students with a focus on job and career interests.
Table 3.25: West Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semesters
West Center
Undergraduate
Graduate/Law
Total
College
2003
2004
2005
2003
2004
2005
2003
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
132
269
197
276
18
306
374
24
195
120
616
27
562
87
708
18
546
4
67
148
405
558
852
28
986
94
1,469
327
389
616
27
4
28
1,391
540
4
1,090
2004
759
363
726
18
67
94
2,027
2005
852
374
564
0
148
4
1,942
West Center Serves the Following Cleveland Suburbs:
■ Avon
■ Avon Lake
■ Bay Village
■ Berea
■ Brookpark
■ Elyria
■ Fairview Park
■ Lakewood
■ Lorain
■ North Olmsted
■ North Ridgeville
■ Olmsted Falls
■ Rocky River
■ Sheffield
■ Sheffield Lake
■ Sheffield Township
■ Westlake
West Center
■ This campus was opened in Fall 2003 with the prospect of drawing in sufficient annual enrollment to generate 3,000 student
credit hours (SCH). This expectation was far exceeded. The West Center academic year credit hours that include Fall, Spring,
and Summer (not shown here) have exceeded 5,000 SCH. This robust growth is indicative of CSU’s adopting entrepreneurial
strategies in meeting the educational needs of the Cleveland area residents.
62
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 3.26: East Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semesters
East Center
Undergraduate
Graduate
Total
College
2004
2005
2004
2005
2004
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
48
164
177
192
195
237
420
530
8
243
164
420
121
55
12
436
333
2005
414
192
530
8
55
20
1,219
121
8
783
615
948
East Center Serves the Following Cleveland Suburbs:
■ Aurora
■ Bainbridge
■ Beachwood
■ Bedford
■ Chagrin Falls
■ Gates Mills
■ Hudson
■ Hunting Valley
■ Macedonia
■ Maple Heights
■ Mayfield Heights
■ Moreland Hills
■ North Randall
■ Northfield
■ Oakwood
■ Orange
■ Solon
■ Twinsburg
■ Warrensville Heights
■ Woodmere
East Center
■ Launching the CSU East Center in Fall 2004 included an assumption that the Center would generate 2,500 credit hours in an
academic year. The East Center academic year student credit hours (include Fall 04, Spring 05, and Summer 05) have
exceeded 3,500.
Table 3.27: CSU Off-Campus Locations in Cleveland: Fall Student Credit Hours
Other Locations*
Undergraduate
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Other
Total
2001
2002
587
90
337
80
476
168
240
164
1,321
2003
132
521
196
49
220
128
821 1,246
Graduate/Law
2004
Total
2005
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2001
2002
2003
67
51
263
2
32
827
28
21
271
367
164
171
12
27
837 1,466
329
36
460
357
45
598
816
132
1,032
906
15
487
12
918
66
726
28
329
623
550
357
382
678
140
230
154
130
476
308
240
394
948
653
1,228
49
220
282
16
200
965 1,230 2,134 1,550 1,954
2,286 2,051
2004
2005
973
969
278
68
519 1,553
40
49
271
367
294
187
12
227
3,380 2,387 3,420
* Top 10 locations for fall 2005 include: Progressive, Cleveland Clinic, Lorain County Community College, Lakeland Community College, Metrohealth, WVIZ, Moen, Urban Design Center,
St. Joseph Academy, NEORSD Environmental Service Center.
*CSU Top 10 Off-Campus Locations in Greater Cleveland Area:
■ Cleveland Clinic Foundation
■ Lakeland Community College
■ Lorain County Community College
■
■
■
■
Magnificat High School
MetroHealth
Moen, Inc.
WVIZ
■ Orange High School
■ Progressive Insurance
■ St. Joseph Academy
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
63
Division of Continuing Education:
DDivision of Continuing Education
The Division of Continuing Education is the major educational outreach arm of Cleveland State,
educating thousands of adults each year in this region and beyond. Many Division programs satisfy certification and
licensing requirements. Others enable professionals to increase their job skills, train for new technologies, and build
communication and leadership abilities. All of the Division's programs help individuals and organizations enhance their
abilities and improve productivity.
The Division offers noncredit seminars, workshops, and other noncredit programs in several major program areas.
■ Business and Management, including Test Preparation (GRE, GMAT, and LSAT)
■ Computers and Information Technology, including Engineering and Construction and Landscape Horticulture
■ Center for Emergency Preparedness, including Hazardous Materials
■ Nursing and Health/Human Services
Enrollment trends for the previous five fiscal years (FY 2000-FY 2005) are shown below.
Figure 3.20: Division of Continuing Education
Enrollment by Program Area FY 2000 – 2005
12,000
71
127
10,000
8,000
86
1,182
1,442
0
2,255
4,139
4,459
3,531
1,555
1,634
2,427
5,085
2,801
2,266
2,622
1,348
1,887
1,698
1,272
1,168
1,104
8,794
FY 2000
10,290
FY 2001
10,588
FY 2002
8,458
FY 2003
9,439
FY 2004
9,578
FY 2005
Business & Management
64
2,099
1,473
3,556
4,000
2,000
261
19
4,033
6,000
79
1,468
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Computer/Engineering
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
HAZMAT
Nursing/Health Sciences
Other
Figure 3.21: Total Student Training Hours
Spring 2002 – Fall 2005
100,000
91,360
90,000
80,000
78,598
69,076
70,000
58,694
60,000
54,661
50,000
57,413
54,429
45,142
40,000
30,000
20,198
20,000
13,522
19,014
11,651
10,000
0
Spring
Summer
2002
2003
Fall
2004
2005
The graph below displays the number of courses offered in FY 2002 – FY 2005. The Center for Emergency Preparedness
offered the greatest number, followed by Computer and Technical Programs, Nursing and Health/Human Services, and
Business and Management.
Figure 3.22: Courses Offered by Program Area
Summer 2002 – Spring 2005
500
450
431
400
350
250
200
306
291
300
259
285
223
211
163
150
164
159
140
117
127
117
197
134
100
50
0
Computer Technical
Business & Management
2002
2003
Emergency Preparedness
2004
Nursing & Health Sciences
2005
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
65
Division of Continuing Education
■ The Division was named a Center for Public Health Preparedness, thanks to a major grant from the Centers for Disease
Control. Grant funding is supporting training throughout Ohio on bioterrorism, hazardous materials, and other public
health and safety topics.
■ Programs offered at the East and West Centers attracted over 1,100 enrollments in FY 2005.
■ The English as a Second Language Program has continued to grow. The Intensive English Language Program, begun in
2004, attracted students from Asia, South America, Europe, and Africa. Workplace ESL programs were conducted at
two local companies.
■ The Division delivered 109 custom training programs for client organizations in FY 2005. The largest contract was
with the City of Cleveland’s Department of Public Utilities, to administer its technology training program. Another large
training contract was with the Cleveland Fire Department, for whom the Division provided Hazmat Refresher Training
to over 300 people.
■ In addition to serving as the site for hundreds of Divisional offerings, the Cole Center for Continuing Education hosted
over 160 other University and external functions in FY 2005.
■ The Division’s online programs are strong, as the graph below shows. The online Patient Advocacy Certificate Program
continues to draw participants from Hawaii to Maine.
Figure 3.23: Total Distance Learning Students
Spring 2002 – Fall 2005
250
200
Total Students
200
150
116
100
83
73
77
60
50
39
22
0
Spring
Summer
2002
66
2
0
0
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2003
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Fall
2004
2005
111
4
Research
R
Research
RResearch
Cleveland State University
is a young, Doctoral Research urban institution which has seen an impressive
rise in research awards in recent years. In FY 2005, research awards totaled over $30 million, setting the stage for the
target of $50 million for the Research Extensive status in the future. The major drivers for this growth have been
Cleveland State University’s faculty and infrastructure, strategic location in the heart of Ohio’s bio-technology corridor,
and significant increases in graduate student enrollment. While CSU is not a research university, the current steady
growth in funded research on campus clearly demonstrates the institutional priorities of promoting an intellectual
university community engaged in discovery of knowledge and artistic works.
Table 4.1: Research Awards and Expenditures
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Source
2001
Awards
Expenditures
Economic Impact*
$22,824,701
$21,916,006
$29,805,768
2002
2003
$25,104,137
$22,118,648
$30,081,361
$22,658,237
$19,117,358
$25,999,607
2004
$35,758,804
$25,922,289
$35,254,313
2005
$31,202,726
$25,665,877
$34,905,592
1 Year
5 Year
-13%
-1%
-1%
37%
17%
17%
Figure 4.1: Research Awards and Expenditures
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
$36M
$34M
$32M
Dollars
$30M
$28M
$26M
$24M
$22M
$20M
$18M
FY 2001
FY 2002
FY 2003
Awards
FY 2004
FY 2005
Expenditures
*Using CSU report of 1.36 per $ spent.
Highlights
■ Selected examples of projects that have been funded in recent years include the establishment of an Engineering Research Facility
funded by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration; a University Transportation Center focusing on
work zone safety funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation; and NASA and industrial funding focusing on power systems and
power electronics.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
RESEARCH
69
Table 4.2: Research Awards by Source
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Source
2001
Federal grants
State grants
Local grants
Private grants
State Appropriations
Advanced Manufacturing Center *
Total
$7,122,870
$4,022,408
$513,546
$1,868,017
$5,663,300
$3,634,560
$22,824,701
2002
$8,178,459
$3,179,255
$428,814
$3,746,149
$7,431,970
$2,139,490
$25,104,137
2003
$8,931,599
$4,385,077
$548,695
$3,861,248
$4,931,618
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
$20,715,659
$5,557,372
$2,024,769
$2,803,662
$4,657,342
$20,612,586
$3,809,529
$368,983
$2,170,075
$4,241,553
0%
-31%
-82%
-23%
-9%
189%
-5%
-28%
16%
-25%
$22,658,237 $35,758,804
$31,202,726
-13%
37%
Figure 4.2a: Research Awards by Source Only
Fiscal Year 2005
State
Appropriations
14%
Private Grants
7%
Local Grants
1%
State Grants
12%
Federal Grants
66%
70
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Figure 4.2b: Research Awards by Source and Year
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
$22.1M
Dollars
$15.1M
$10.1M
$5.1M
$100K
FY 2002
FY 2001
Federal Grants
State Grants
FY 2003
Local Grants
FY 2004
Private Grants
FY 2005
State Appropriations
Notes:
Appropriation: An authorization granted by the General Assembly to make budgetary expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes.
Grant: A financial assistance mechanism whereby money and/or direct assistance is provided to carry out approved activities.
*The Advanced Manufacturing Center was formally dissolved at the end of FY 2002. Income is reported through the appropriate funding sources in subsequent fiscal years.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
Highlights
■ Competition for scarce research dollars within the State of Ohio has increased in recent years, as state research funding
continues to decline. However, Cleveland State University grant seekers have risen to the challenge. Despite the decreasing state
support, overall funding for the University remained constant in FY 05. Although Federal funding was flat at approximately
$20 million in FY 05 as compared to FY 04, that figure represents over double the federal funding received in FY 03. FY 06
funding continues the upward trend, with $30 plus million in external funding expected.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
RESEARCH
71
Table 4.3: Research Expenditures by Source
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Source
2001
Federal grants
State grants
Local grants
Private grants
State Appropriations
Advanced Manufacturing Center *
Total
$5,635,856
$4,787,633
$547,074
$1,671,457
$4,783,986
$4,490,000
$21,916,006
2002
$7,593,407
$4,369,507
$480,001
$1,804,745
$4,060,989
$3,810,000
$22,118,648
2003
2004
$8,289,995 $15,510,461
$4,136,851
$3,270,587
$543,423
$380,215
$2,567,685
$3,901,735
$3,579,404
$2,859,291
N/A
N/A
$19,117,358 $25,922,289
2005
$14,891,157
$3,967,160
$684,898
$2,226,833
$3,895,829
N/A
$25,665,877
1 Year
5 Year
-4%
21%
80%
-43%
36%
164%
-17%
25%
33%
-19%
-1%
17%
*The Advanced Manufacturing Center was formally dissolved at the end of FY 2002. Income is reported through the appropriate funding sources in subsequent fiscal years.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
Figure 4.3a: Fiscal Year 2005 Research
Expenditures by Source
State
Appropriations
15%
Private Grants
9%
Local Grants
3%
State Grants
15%
Federal Grants
58%
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
72
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Figure 4.3b: Research Expenditures by Source and Year
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
p
$16.5M
Dollars
$10.5M
$5.5M
$200K
FY 2001
FY 2002
Federal Grants
State Grants
FY 2003
Local Grants
FY 2004
Private Grants
FY 2005
State Appropriations
Notes: Appropriation: An authorization granted by the General Assembly to make budgetary expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes.
Grant: A financial assistance mechanism whereby money and/or direct assistance is provided to carry out approved activities.
*The Advanced Manufacturing Center was formally dissolved at the end of FY 2002. Income is reported through the appropriate funding sources in subsequent fiscal years.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
RESEARCH
73
Table 4.4: Research Expenditures Reported by OBOR*
at Ohio Public Universities
Fiscal Year 1988 – 2003
Total R&D Expenditures
Thousands of Constant 2003 Dollars
Institution
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
1988
1993
1998
2003
$4,939
$11,528
$7,994
$3,449
$243,091
$17,075
$11,182
$95,065
$6,041
$377
$4,382
$12,523
$15,425
$6,284
$282,903
$19,739
$22,429
$118,179
$10,783
$220
$3,819
$12,621
$14,287
$7,586
$339,452
$24,170
$18,380
$179,786
$12,960
$1,011
$7,336
$14,112
$14,549
$13,727
$496,438
$37,527
$27,953
$255,083
$24,123
$1,398
*Ohio Board of Regents
Highlights
■ Tracing Cleveland State University’s 5-year record of research awards and dollars in the context of other Ohio institutions is of
interest on two accounts. First, such trends provide an understanding of the overall scope of such activity on campus, and
second, they provide a comparative magnitude of growth in funding. Recent increases in sponsored research programs point to
a campus focused on supporting the core instructional mission of the University with research activities, and one that is making
significant contributions to the economic and social development of Cleveland and Northeast Ohio.
Source: Performance Report for Ohio’s Colleges and Universities, 2005: Institutional Outcomes Measures, Ohio Board of Regents
74
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
National Science Foundation Rankings
N
of Cleveland State University and Other Selected Schools
NSF rankings are of primary significance for major research institutions. Cleveland State University, although not
designated as a major research institution continues to build a foundation in cross-disciplinary research, focusing on high
level support for graduate education, and a commitment to engaging the private sector in building research partnerships.
As a university emerging in the field of sponsored research, it seeks to strategically invest scarce research dollars and prized
faculty resources in targeted areas to maximize the impact for the university.
Table 4.5: Total R&D Expenditures at Universities and Colleges
Ranked by Fiscal Year 2003 Total R&D Expenditures:
Fiscal Year 1999 – 2003
(Dollars in Thousands)
Institution
University of Akron
University of Toledo
Portland State University
Kent State University
Cleveland State University
University of Missouri-St. Louis
Bowling Green State University
Ranking
193
207
215
236
238
248
289
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
$16,279
$11,819
$13,940
$11,083
$ 11,893e
$10,294
$3,454
$19,495
$13,694
$16,494
$10,817
$10,214
$9,898
$3,454e
$22,266
$16,278
$16,838
$11,316
$12,986
$10,084
$5,028
$28,080
$24,825
$17,683
$12,868
$13,855
$11,519
$5,327
$27,953
$24,123
$21,433
$14,549
$14,112
$12,819
$7,336
Note: eEstimated
Highlights
■ Cleveland State University is ranked among other academically rigorous universities within the state and across the country.
CSU expects to continually improve in rank based on continuing efforts to expand research development initiatives.
Source: National Science Foundation/Division of Science Resources Statistics, Survey of Research and Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges,
Fiscal Year 2003.
RESEARCH
75
IIndirect Cost Recovery
Indirect cost recovery is defined as the agreed upon revenue received from a sponsoring agency to pay a grant
or contract’s share to reimburse the university for the indirect costs it incurs. Indirect costs are real costs. Indirect cost
calculations are based upon such items as space, utilities, security, maintenance, custodial, payroll, purchasing, accounting,
personnel and many other expenses associated with project administration and implementation.
Indirect costs recovered at Cleveland State University (CSU) become part of the general fund budget for the entire university.
Half of all indirect costs returned on sponsored programs remain in the university’s general fund. This money is set aside
for covering administrative expenses for sponsored program administration. It is also used to cover costs of facilities,
depreciation on buildings and equipment, operation and maintenance of facilities, and library expenses. The other half
of the indirect costs recovered are distributed as follows: 5% to project director, 15% to project director’s department,
10% to relevant dean’s office, and 20% to the Vice Provost for Research.
Table 4.6: Indirect Cost (IDC) Recovery and Total Research Expenditures by Year
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Research Activities
Total Research Expenditures
Total Indirect Cost Recovered
Total CSU Income
% IDC of Total Research Expenditures
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
$12,642,020
$1,425,100
$14,067,120
11%
$14,247,660
$1,442,908
$15,690,568
10%
$19,117,358
$1,493,286
$20,610,644
8%
$25,922,289
$1,940,223
$27,862,512
8%
$25,665,877
$1,969,170
$27,635,047
8%
-1%
1%
-1%
103%
38%
96%
Highlights
■ At CSU, indirect costs recovered are used for internal incentive programs such as the Faculty Research Development Program
(FRD), and are used to stimulate and enhance research at all levels. As federal funding grows, so does the indirect cost recovery,
and federal government provides the bulk of the indirect costs recovered by CSU.
Source: CSU Controller’s Office and CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
76
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
to Promote Growth
LLeveraginginInvestments
Research Programs
The Faculty Research Development Program (FRD) is Cleveland State University’s program for
providing seed grant money to support key research areas. Grants under the FRD program are intended for high quality
projects leading to scholarship and creative expression that will likely increase the university’s ability to attract external funding.
FRD funds cannot be used for developing instructional materials or for supporting work leading to any academic degree for
the applicant. The University Research Council (URC) considers grants under the FRD Program as active investments in the
university’s faculty, students, and basic research effectiveness.
Table 4.7: Faculty Research Development Program
(FRD) Combined Investments and Awards
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2005
Department
CSU
Investment
External
Funding
Attracted
Return on
Investment
per CSU $1.00
Biology, Geology and Environmental Science (BGES)
Chemical and Biomedical Engineering (CHE)
Chemistry (CHEM)
Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)
Health Sciences (HSC)
Urban Studies (URB)
Total
$34,816
$69,400
$129,680
$22,749
$8,490
$6,143
$271,278
$753,791
$749,515
$3,428,135
$183,564
$254,406
$54,733
$5,424,144
$21.65
$10.79
$26.44
$8.07
$29.97
$8.91
$19.99
Highlights
■ This table demonstrates successful leveraging of internal funding to attract external funding. Seed funding investments in
key departments have yielded $20 for each $1 invested by the University. These strategic investments have also
allowed university signature programs to grow beyond their initial investments.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
RESEARCH
77
EExpansion of Externally Funded Research
Several factors
have contributed to the expansion of externally funded research at Cleveland State University.
A university-wide hiring strategy has been implemented in recent years requiring most new faculty to pursue external
grants as a part of their regular workload. Additionally, many promotion and tenure committees across campus have
raised their research expectations and are placing considerable weight on grant funded projects. As faculty hires continue
to rise, particularly in the Colleges of Science, Education and Human Services, and Engineering, so too will the number of
scholars seeking and receiving external funding.
Table 4.8: Fiscal Year 2005 Proposal Submission Awards by Source
Awards
Proposals
Submitted
7/01/04 through 6/30/05
Award Sources
Government Sources
Federal
State
Local
Total Government Sources
Non-Government Sources
Corporate Contracts
Foundation and Non-Profit
Total Non-Government Sources
Sponsored Programs Total
Amount
Number
Number
Success
Rate*
$20,612,586
$3,809,529
$368,983
$24,791,098
122
28
14
164
168
41
20
229
73%
68%
70%
72%
$832,763
$1,337,312
$2,170,075
35
24
59
14
93
107
250%
26%
55%
$26,961,173
223
336
66%
Note: *Success rate is based on proposals submitted in FY 2005 and prior years.
78
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 4.9: Proposal Submission and Grant Awards
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Proposals and Grant Awards
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Proposals submitted
Grant awards
Success Rate*
359
205
57%
361
236
65%
376
224
60%
358
261
73%
336
223
66%
Figure 4.9: Proposal Submission and Grant Awards
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
400
300
200
100
0
FY 2001
FY 2002
FY 2003
Proposals Submitted
FY 2004
FY 2005
Grant Awards
Note: *Success rate is based on proposals submitted in FY 2005 and prior years.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
RESEARCH
79
OOhio Research Challenge
Since 1985 the Ohio Board of Regents has administered a program that directly rewards Ohio universities for their
success in securing external funding for research. The objectives of this program include improving the quality of basic
research programs at Ohio universities, increasing the state’s share of nationally contested research funds, and providing
seed money for the state’s economic growth. Institutional allocations are made annually by the Regents and the money is
used by campuses as unrestricted funds for research.
Table 4.10: Ohio Board of Regents Biennial Research Challenge Distributions
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2005
Percent Change
Institution
2000 & 2001
2002 & 2003
2004 & 2005
2 Year
4 Year
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio University
Ohio State University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Total
$ 539,869
$ 151,917
$ 1,443,797
$
746,078
$ 1,850,027
$ 17,139,839
$ 1,262,016
$ 7,612,135
$ 993,484
$ 138,659
$31,877,821
$
$ 498,016
$ 192,538
$ 1,067,278
$ 578,209
$ 1,645,864
$ 14,455,250
$ 1,082,717
$ 6,147,083
$ 987,954
$ 196,425
$26,851,334
-1%
-4%
-8%
-9%
5%
-11%
-4%
-7%
2%
28%
-8%
-8%
27%
-26%
-23%
-11%
-16%
-14%
-19%
-1%
42%
-16%
501,849
$200,165
$ 1,166,098
$ 632,476
$ 1,569,960
$ 16,202,541
$ 1,129,869
$ 6,584,391
$ 964,152
$ 153,982
$29,105,483
Highlights
■ Research Challenge is set on an incremental formula with a rolling average based on the percentage of the entire state’s external
funding. The mechanism for Cleveland State University (CSU) to increase its Research Challenge funding is to attract more
federal dollars. Based on a formula of rolling averages for allocation, CSU has increased the overall percentage of dollars
received from the Research Challenge program. The increase is small but significant in terms of the fact that the university is
moving its “margin” against such high research volume institutions as Ohio State and the University of Cincinnati.
■ The Research Challenge program does not take into account any Ohio institution’s awards or expenditures stemming from state,
local and foundation funding. CSU has successfully attracted awards from state and local agencies that have augmented the
size and scope of overall research activity on campus. While CSU research dollars raised from state and local sources are of no
consequence in attracting a higher proportion of the Ohio Research Challenge funds to campus, such extramural funding
does account for the increase in the university’s NSF rankings.
Source: Ohio Board of Regents, April 2005 Summary of Biennial Distributions at www.regents.state.oh.us/rsch/rschsupport.html#research
80
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
IIntellectual Property
Contemporary universities
committed to teaching, research, service, and dissemination of knowledge
increasingly find themselves in a position of having created knowledge or materials with commercial value. Creation
of such knowledge or materials, also referred to as intellectual property, is a much coveted outcome of any vibrant research
program. Activities that result in the creation of intellectual property raise the reputation of the university and involved
researchers. They also create rich educational opportunities for students participating in such programs. Universities may
gain significant revenue through commercialized trademarks.
Table 4.11: Intellectual Property: Patents and Disclosures
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Source
Disclosures
Patents Filed
Provisional Patent Applications Filed
Licenses Approved
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
8
2
0
1
9
4
1
0
7
2
0
0
12
3
0
1
11
0
17
0
1 Year
5 Year
-8%
-100%
38%
-100%
-100%
-100%
Notes: The following definitions are from the US Patent and Trademark Office (www.uspto.gov).
Disclosure: Description of an invention in a patent or patent application.
Patent: Granting of a property right to the inventor, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Licenses approved: The patent law provides for the transfer or sale of a patent, or of an application for patent, by an instrument in writing. Such an instrument is referred
to as an assignment of license.
Highlights
■ The development of intellectual property at Cleveland State University (CSU) is a very recent development. Trend information for
such activity in the past five years demonstrates the benefits of increased overall research activity on campus. The accumulation
of intellectual property on campus is expected to grow in future years. CSU has a small cadre of extremely productive research
faculty who have produced a respectable portfolio of patents. With the addition of CSU’s Technology Transfer Officer position in
2005, CSU looks forward to an increase in disclosures, licenses and spin-off companies in the future..
■ Currently, the primary generators of intellectual property at CSU include Dr. Majid Rashidi in Mechnical Engineering,
Dr. Zhiqiang Gao and his research team in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dr. Michael Kalafatis, Department of
Chemistry and Dr. Baochuan Guo, Department of Chemistry. New faculty hires in the FY 2006-2007 academic year hold
promise for the generation of additional intellectual property, as many of them have already-established research
agendas and many will bring federal research grants with them to CSU.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
RESEARCH
81
Table 4.12: Cleveland State University Signature Research Programs
Signature Programs
College
Departments
Project Description
Instruments, Controls and
Electronics (ICE)
Engineering
Electrical and
Computer
Engineering
Business
Computer and
Information Science
This high-tech growth area provides the support for many emerging
industries, from biotechnology to aeronautics. At Cleveland State,
a strong cadre of faculty has emerged as leaders in the ICE-area of
advanced controls and robotics. They have developed processes to fly
unmanned vehicles that have the ability to communicate and perform
tasks. They have also significantly advanced the field of digital controls
and communications, enabling distant control systems – such as those
found in space – to function at a highly reliable level. In the next two years,
the College of Engineering expects to increase the number of
faculty with expertise in ICE.
Urban
Urban Affairs
Business
Dean’s Office
Science
Biochemistry
Economic Development
Molecular Medicine
Faculty are involved in various research activities such as the Regional
Economic Indicators Project, identifying employment sub-centers highlighting occupational clusters, and examining Northeast Ohio migration
patterns. These activities are intended to help increase the standard of
living and wealth of Northeast Ohio and in the process make CSU an expert in
economic development, research, teaching, and service outreach.
Cleveland State was recently awarded a prestigious federal award from the
U.S. Department of Education. The “Graduate Assistantships in Areas of
National Need” program will respond to many needs in the life sciences
industry, helping to fill a shortage of appropriately trained scientists in
interdisciplinary areas.
Through various research efforts, faculty at Cleveland State are working on
topics such as the treatment and prevention of thrombosis that could lead
to stroke or heart attack; prospective therapy for autoimmune diseases
including, multiple sclerosis, lupus, type I diabetes, and Crohn’s disease;
and treatment for muscular dystrophies and atrophies, metabolic deficiencies, acute myocardial infarction, and chronic end-stage heart failure.
Biology
Electronic Power
Engineering
Industrial and
Cleveland State has built a strong cadre of experts and supporting
Manufacturing Engineering programs in power systems and power electronics. With NASA-Glenn
Research Center support, eleven research teams (four power researchers
and seven researchers in related technologies) have worked on electric
power issues in relation to space.
Dean’s Office
Chemical and Biomedical
Engineering,
Mechanical Engineering
Power Beaming: a use of high energy density photocells developed at
NASA Glenn to receive and convert laser power.
Advanced Distributed Power Systems: modify themselves to make sure
that the power supply is uninterrupted even though a device may be failing.
Stirling Engines: drive electrical generators through the use of nuclear
energy. Engineer in the Computer: help maintain power systems on long
distance space missions.
Flywheels: breakthroughs in glass fiber technology have led to high speed
flywheels; VIKSAT: an electric-powered satellite system that was developed
for space use.
Patents and Disclosures: On accompanying Excel spreadsheet.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
Highlights
■ Over the last few years, the four areas of excellence described above, developed through faculty efforts, show promise of
moving Cleveland State University into the regional and national spotlight.
82
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
GGrowth in Graduate Education
Graduate Education at Cleveland State
has seen unprecedented growth in recent years. There were
approximately 5,000 students pursuing graduate and post-graduate programs at the University in 2005. Graduate student
credit hours have increased 13% in the past five years. Such growth in graduate programs has implications for strengthening
the quality of these offerings and seizing opportunities for supporting educational goals of students by creating new and
tailored program offerings. Further, growth in graduate programs at CSU points to numerous future student and faculty
research opportunities. Institutional investments in graduate education are closely linked with strategies for promoting
sponsored research, which lead to an increased opportunity for the contributions of graduate, doctoral and post-doctoral
students as well.
Table 4.13: Percentage of Total Student Credit Hours Taken by Graduate Level Students at
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only: Fall Terms 2001 – 2005
Institution
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Grad SCH
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
9%
18%
9%
5%
15%
9%
10%
17%
10%
5%
10%
19%
9%
5%
16%
10%
10%
17%
10%
5%
10%
21%
9%
5%
16%
9%
10%
18%
9%
5%
10%
21%
10%
5%
16%
9%
10%
18%
9%
5%
9%
21%
10%
5%
16%
9%
10%
16%
9%
5%
26,461
32,744
39,204
14,297
128,238
35,941
25,810
66,542
22,353
7,505
Note: Graduate students included the following ranks: DS (Doctoral student), MS (Masters student), ND, NG and NM (Non degree-seeking graduate students).
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Course Enrollment query – rundate: May 23, 2005.
Table 4.14: Cleveland State University Graduate Student Support
from Externally Funded Research, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Source
Business
Education
Engineering
Liberal Arts/Social Science
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
2001
2002
$0
$39,682
$276,448
$41,108
$56,170
$314,528
$727,936
$0
$87,482
$429,134
$27,275
$41,798
$310,286
$895,976
2003
$38,411
$67,411
$507,650
$37,560
$85,052
$278,742
$1,014,826
2004
$34,471
$45,497
$492,153
$51,423
$110,152
$181,252
$914,948
2005
$22,932
$77,904
$527,754
$66,015
$267,146
$295,143
$1,256,894
1 Year
5 Year
-33%
71%
7%
28%
143%
63%
37%
--96%
91%
61%
376%
-6%
73%
Note: Extramural support: Funding from any source external to Cleveland State University.
Highlights
■ For the past 5 years Cleveland State University has continued to offer the largest proportion of graduate student credit hours
of any Ohio institution. This trend continues to grow and clearly outlines CSU’s future priorities in response to the region’s
growing demands for graduate education.
Source: CSU College of Graduate Studies
RESEARCH
83
Table 4.15: Cleveland State University Centers and Institutions
Name
Established
Website
Advanced Control Technologies, Center for (CACT)
Advanced Engineering Research Laboratory
Advancement of Women in Public Service,
Ohio Center for the
African American Cultural Center
Applied Control Research Laboratory (see CACT)
Arts and Innovation, Center for
Bioethics Center
Biomedical and Health Institute
Communication Research Center
DNA Analysis Facility
Economic Development, Center for
Election Integrity, Center for
Emergency Preparedness, Center for
Environmental Institute
Global Business Center
Great Lakes Environmental Finance Center
Greater Cleveland Educational Development Center
Healing Across Cultures, Center for
Health Equity, The Center for
Housing Research & Policy, Center for
International Service and Programs, Center for (CISP)
K‘inal Winik Cultural Center
Ohio’s Energy Efficiency Practitioners Network
Labor Management Relations Center
Library Computer Learning Center
Mass Spectrometry Facility, Cleveland State
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban
Affairs Research Centers
Modeling Integrated Metabolic Systems, Center for
Neighborhood Development, Center for
Nonprofit Policy and Practice, Center for
Ohio’s Energy Efficiency Practitioners Network
Poetry Center
Poverty Studies, Center for
Public Management, Center for
Real Estate Research Center
Rotating Machinery Dynamics and Control
Ruth Ratner Miller Center for Greater Cleveland’s Future
Sacred Landmarks, Center for
Social Science Research Center
Transportation Center
Urban Child Research Center
University Center for Teaching and Learning
Unger International Center for Local Government Leadership
Urban School Collaboration, Center for
Writing Center, The
1995
1999
http://cact.csuohio.edu/
http://academic.csuohio.edu/aerl
2001
N/A
1995
2005
2002
2002
1976
2001
1986
2005
N/A
1995
N/A
1995
N/A
N/A
2005
1982
2003
N/A
2002
1978
N/A
1997
http://urban.csuohio.edu/womenscenter/outreach.htm
http://www.csuohio.edu/blackstudies/afam.html
http://academic.csuohio.edu/cact/research.htm
http://www.csuohio.edu/music/cai
http://www.csuohio.edu/bioethics/
http://www.csuohio.edu/bahi/
http://academic.csuohio.edu/kneuendorf/crc/crc_web_page.htm
http://www.csuohio.edu/uored/dna/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/economicdevelopment/
http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/cei
http://www.csuohio.edu/ce/programs/cemergprep.html
http://csuw3.csuohio.edu/ei/
http://www.csuohio.edu/cba/global/index.html
http://urban.csuohio.edu/glefc/
http://www.csuohio.edu/coehs/gcedc/
http://www.csuohio.edu/bahi/chac/
http://www.csuohio.edu/bahi/che
http://urban.csuohio.edu/housing/research.shtml
http://www.csuohio.edu/internat/index.html
http://www.csuohio.edu/kinalwinik/
http://www.csuohio.edu/energyefficiency/
http://www.csuohio.edu/cba/edc/lmrc.html
http://www.ulib.csuohio.edu/services/labs.html#lclc
http://www.csuohio.edu/chemistry/msfacility.htm
*
N/A
1979
1970
2002
1962
2000
1982
1992
2006
2002
1986
N/A
N/A
1991
N/A
2000
N/A
N/A
http://urban.csuohio.edu/research/
http://www.csuohio.edu/mims/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/cnd/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/nonprofit/
http://www.csuohio.edu/energyefficiency/
http://www.csuohio.edu/poetrycenter/
http://www.csuohio.edu/cps/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/publicmanagement/index.htm
http://www.csuohio.edu/cba/industry/realestate.html
http://www.csuohio.edu/romadyc
http://urban.csuohio.edu/ruth_ratner_miller/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/sacredlandmarks
http://urban.csuohio.edu/ucrc/
http://www.csuohio.edu/uctl
http://urban.csuohio.edu/unger_croatia/
http://www.csuohio.edu/cusc/
http://www.csuohio.edu/writingcenter/
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
Notes: N/A Data unavailable
* See website http://urban.csuohio.edu/research/ for individual listing of each center/institute to obtain the date established and additional information.
84
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 4.16: Past Recipients of Distinguished Faculty Awards
by Award Type 1986, 1993-2006
Type of Award
Teaching
Year
Name
Service
Research
Department
Name
Department
Name
Department
1986 Albert N. Cousins
Joseph A. Troccolo
Sociology
Mathematics
Louis T. Milic
English
Allan Peskin
History
1993 Thomas F. Campbell
Jane L. McIntyre
History
Philosophy
Roger W. Binkley
Richard C. Stephens
Chemistry
Sociology
1994 Thomas W. Flechtner
Barbara B. Green
Chemistry
Political Science
Sidney Kraus
Surendra N. Tewari
Communication
Chemical Engineering
1995 Rosemary E. Sutton
Robert A. Wheeler
Curriculum & Foundations
History
Robert I. Abelman
Roger B. Manning
Communication
History
1996 Sherwood D. Silliman
Mathematics
Murali D. Nair
Social Work
Sarah Matthews
Sociology
1997 Ravindra R. Kamath
Finance
David F. Forte
Robert N. Sollod
Law
Psychology
Jose J. Labrador
Modern Languages
1998 William A. Beasley
Curriculum & Foundations
Valerie D. George
Majid Rashidi
Nursing
Mechanical Engineering
Richard Bingham
Edward W. Hill
Urban Studies
Urban Studies
1999 Sanda Kaufman
Urban Studies
Lynn Deering
John P. Wilson
HPERD
Psychology
Rama S. R. Gorla
Richard M. Perloff
Mechanical Engineering
Communication
Edward G. Thomas
Marketing
David Atkin
Michael J. Tevesz
Communication
Biology, Geology, & Environmental
Science
2000
RESEARCH
2001 Lee A. Makala
Heidi Meier
History
Accounting
Jill M. Black
Norman Krumholz
HPERD
Urban Studies
Thomas Donaldson
John Greppin
Art
English
2002 David W. Ball
Chemistry
Daniel D. Drake
CASAL
Mark Ashcraft
Carolyn Lin
Psychology
Communication
2003 Glenn Goodman
Ralph Mawdsley
Occupational Therapy
CASAL
Patricia Falk
Bhushan Wadhwa
Law
Mathematics
Bahman Ghorashi
Baochuan Guo
Chemical Engineering
Chemistry
2004 Rama S. R. Gorla
Elizabeth Welfel
Mechanical Engineering
CASAL
Susan E. Kogler Hill
Mieko K. Smith
Communication
Social Work
Andrew Rindfleisch
Jerzy T. Sawicki
Music
Mechanical Engineering
2005 Eric Ziolek
John P. Holcomb, Jr.
Music
Mathematics
Ravindra R. Kamath
Cheryl P. McCahon
Finance
Nursing
Michael Kalafatis
Catherine Hansman
Chemistry
CASAL
2006 Donald Ramos
Eileen Berlin Ray
History
Communication
Andrew Gross
Marketing
Leo W. Jeffres
Orhan Talu
Communication
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
85
Source: CSU Provost’s Office
R
Retention & Graduation
Retention &
Graduation
5
Table 5.1: Fall to Fall Student Return Rate
Enrolled Fall 2000 – 2004 / Returned Fall 2001 – 2005
Fall 2000 Cohort
Reg. Grad. Return
New Students
First Year Full-Time Only
Freshmen All (Degree Seeking)
Transfers (Degree Seeking)*
Other Undergrads/Non-degree
Masters
Doctoral
Law
Other Grads-Law/Non-degree
Sub-Total
Fall 00
Fall 01
934
992
910
680
546
40
260
653
4,081
613
639
619
218
363
30
226
282
2,377
4
2
2
5
13
Ret.
Rate
66%
64%
68%
32%
67%
75%
88%
44%
58%
Fall 2002 Cohort
Ret.
Reg. Grad. Return Rate
Fall 2003 Cohort
Ret.
Reg. Grad. Return Rate
Reg. Grad. Return
Fall 01
Fall 02
Fall 02
Fall 03
Fall 03
Fall 04
1,008
1,100
1,162
573
509
19
209
336
3,908
633
673
809
163
379
16
171
142
2,353
63%
946
61% 1,012
70% 1,130
28%
536
77%
571
84%
12
82%
206
42%
330
61% 3,797
561
593
4 768
174
5 415
10
157
122
9 2,239
59%
925
59%
989
68% 1,096
32%
627
73%
966
83%
37
76%
262
37%
612
59% 4,589
544
575
743
192
655
30
209
260
2,664
Fall 02
Fall 02
Fall 03
Fall 03
17
1
21
6
34
3
2
45
59%
58%
68%
31%
70%
81%
81%
43%
59%
Reg. Grad. Return
Fall 04
Fall 05
922
986
966
636
782
28
237
482
4,117
549
574
687
214
563
26
191
214
2,469
2
2
38
2
44
60%
58%
71%
34%
76%
93%
81%
44%
61%
1,087
3
611
1,336
3
949
1,561
8 1,129
2,888
971 1,166
802
21
381
1,964
587
837
291
33
204
491
200
268
1,179
102
513
11,599 1,928 6,058
56% 1,098
1 614
71% 1,307
933
73% 1,645
14 1,221
61% 2,965 1,074 1,154
49%
657
8 260
61% 2,633 823 1,187
79%
303
36 222
92%
618 215 363
48%
981
29 322
63% 12,207 2,200 6,276
56%
994
2 549 55%
993
1
521
71% 1,310
1 942 72% 1,211
845
75% 1,652
8 1,227 75% 1,617
7 1,242
61% 3,071 1,108 1,249 64% 3,363 1,193 1,345
40%
700
20 310 46%
402
3
167
66% 2,800
801 1,365 68% 2,782 865 1,238
83%
295
32 228 87%
324
38
249
90%
602
208 352 89%
539 242
271
34%
942
35 310 34%
557
17
223
63% 12,366 2,215 6,532 64% 11,788 2,366 6,101
53%
943
536 57%
70% 1,099
8
779 71%
77% 1,548
10 1,208 79%
62% 3,298 1,227 1,585 77%
42%
394
4
194 50%
65% 2,996 949 1,311 64%
87%
323
27
248 84%
91%
508 194
301 96%
41%
655
17
247 39%
65% 11,764 2,436 6,409 69%
15,680 1,941 8,435
61% 16,115 2,221 8,629
62% 16,163 2,224 8,771 63% 16,377 2,411 8,765
63% 15,881 2,480 8,878 66%
RETENTION & GRADUATION
12.4%
2001-02
13.8%
2002-03
13.8%
2003-04
14.7%
Fall 04
Ret.
Rate
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Other Undergrads/Non-degree
Masters
Doctoral
Law
Other Grads-Law/Non-degree
Sub-Total
2000-01
Fall 04
Ret.
Rate
Fall 00
% Graduating
Annually
Fall 01
3
Fall 2004 Cohort
Returning Students
Overall
Fall 01
Fall 2001 Cohort
2004-05
Notes: Cohort includes all degree-seeking students registered (Reg.) on the 15th day. “Grad.” or “Return” status is determined for each member of the Registered (Reg.) cohort on the 15th day of the following Fall Term.
“Other Undergrads/Non-degree” includes Admit Type: PST and VST and Non-Degree Students
*Academic Levels may have been coded incorrectly in the system due to a delay in the processing of transfer hours.
Fall 05
15.6%
89
90
Table 5.2: Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by Race and Gender
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
(New Degree-Seeking, Full-Time, First-Time First Year)
Enrolled Fall 2000 – 2004 / Returned Fall 2001 – 2005
Fall 2000 Cohort
Fall 00
Fall 01
Newly
Enrolled
Return
Female
265
Male
Fall 2001 Cohort
Fall 01
Fall 02
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
196
74%
264
296
198
67%
134
81
84
Female
Male
Fall 2002 Cohort
Fall 02
Fall 03
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
191
72%
255
350
224
64%
60%
154
86
47
56%
90
19
9
47%
19
9
Female
13
Male
Fall 2003 Cohort
Fall 03
Fall 04
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
158
62%
220
316
207
66%
56%
148
71
43
48%
91
22
14
64%
47%
16
8
9
69%
15
20
15
75%
Female
2
1
50%
Male
1
1
100%
Female
6
5
83%
4
2
Male
7
6
86%
6
Female
32
16
50%
Male
36
20
Female
471
Male
Fall 2004 Cohort
Fall 04
Fall 05
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
Ret.
Rate
148
67%
226
151
67%
310
201
65%
301
201
67%
48%
186
83
45%
161
76
47%
47
52%
86
32
37%
68
28
41%
20
10
50%
21
9
43%
17
7
41%
50%
14
6
43%
19
9
47%
14
5
36%
9
60%
17
12
71%
14
13
93%
9
4
44%
18
13
72%
17
10
59%
21
16
76%
15
13
87%
2
1
50%
1
0
0%
1
1
100%
1
1
50%
2
0
0
0%
8
32
22
69%
56%
35
20
317
67%
493
463
296
64%
934
613
66%
White
Black
|
Female
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Male
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
1
0
0%
0%
3
2
67%
6
4
67%
6
75%
7
5
71%
11
10
91%
20
13
65%
19
14
74%
44
23
52%
57%
36
20
56%
18
12
67%
49
26
53%
325
66%
463
264
57%
463
269
58%
464
266
57%
515
308
60%
483
297
61%
462
275
60%
458
283
62%
1,008
633
63%
946
561
59%
925
544
59%
922
549
60%
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
Total Male & Female
Table 5.3: Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort (New Degree-Seeking, Full-Time, First-Time First Year by College)
Enrolled Fall 2000 – 2004 / Returned Fall 2001 – 2005
Fall 2000 Cohort
Fall 00
Fall 01
Enrolled Returned
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Total
137
281
22
34
55
8
5
392
934
Fall 2001 Cohort
95
185
16
25
44
5
2
241
613
Fall 01
Fall 2002 Cohort
Fall 02
Fall 02
Ret.
Rate
Enrolled Returned
Ret.
Rate
69%
66%
73%
74%
80%
63%
40%
61%
66%
161
330
19
57
70
13
5
353
1,008
63%
65%
79%
70%
76%
85%
60%
56%
63%
101
214
15
40
53
11
3
196
633
Fall 03
Fall 03
Enrolled Returned
166
340
11
73
46
21
8
281
946
Fall 2003 Cohort
98
209
7
42
38
15
2
150
561
Ret.
Rate
59%
61%
64%
58%
83%
71%
25%
53%
59%
Fall 04
Enrolled Returned
165
329
19
60
62
26
12
252
925
Fall 2004 Cohort
105
201
12
38
54
18
8
108
544
Fall 04
Ret.
Rate
64%
61%
63%
63%
87%
69%
67%
43%
59%
Fall 05
Enrolled Returned
Ret.
Rate
165
232
106
140
64%
60%
71
55
188
17
194
922
49
42
120
10
82
549
69%
76%
64%
59%
42%
60%
Table 5.4: Three-Year Mobility of Undergraduate Students Enrolled
Spring Term 2004 by Institution
Institution
Undergraduate
Students
Mobile
Same
Institution
Different
Campus
Mobile
Different
Institution
Total
Mobility
22%
31%
16%
10%
22%
13%
14%
12%
18%
9%
24%
31%
30%
32%
29%
24%
20%
22%
18%
9%
Concurrent
Same Institution
Different
Campus
Concurrent
Different
Institution
Total
Concurrent
University Main Campuses
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
14,262
9,637
17,468
14,629
35,474
15,966
16,774
16,849
15,642
10,943
Source: Ohio Board of Regents, 7/7/05 Performance Consultation meeting
2%
14%
22%
7%
12%
7%
10%
4%
10%
1%
4%
2%
4%
1%
3%
1%
2%
1%
1%
2%
1%
2%
3%
5%
10%
3%
4%
3%
5%
2%
1%
91
Table 5.5: Attended, Graduated and Retained
Fall to Fall Student Tracking (IPEDS Cohort)
4 Year
5 Year
6 Year
7 Year
Fall
Fall 1998
Cohort
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
962
578
405
60.1%
42%
362
3
0%
38%
263
64
7%
29%
157
171
18%
20%
98
254
26%
14%
78
303
31%
12%
Attended
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
Figure 5.5: Fall 1998 IPEDS Cohort Attended, Graduated and Retained
1,000
900
4-yr.
5-yr.
grad rate grad rate
7%
18%
800
6-yr.
grad rate
26%
7-yr.
grad rate
31%
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Fall 98
Fall 99
Fall 00
Fall 01
Fall 02
Attended
Fall 03
Fall 04
Fall 05
Graduated
Table 5.6: Attended, Graduated and Retained
Fall to Fall Student Tracking (Transfer Cohort*)
4 Year
5 Year
6 Year
7 Year
Fall
Fall 1998
Transfer Cohort
Attended
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
800
771
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
533
366
70
9%
52%
222
210
27%
40%
141
317
41%
31%
95
374
49%
24%
68
419
54%
19%
53
439
57%
16%
69%
Figure 5.6: Fall 1998 Full-Time Transfer Cohort Attended & Graduated*
4-yr.
5-yr.
grad rate grad rate
41%
49%
700
600
6-yr.
grad rate
54%
7-yr.
grad rate
57%
500
400
300
200
100
0
Fall 98
Fall 99
Fall 00
Fall 01
Attended
Fall 02
Fall 03
Graduated
Notes: Cohorts are First-Time, Full-Time, Degree-Seeking Freshmen or Transfers students as of the 15th day of Fall Quarter, 1998.
“Attended” or “Graduated” status is determined from the 15th day records and graduation table for each term listed.
*Includes all New Transfer students.
92
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Fall 04
Fall 05
Table 5.7: Fall to Fall Undergraduate First-Year Full-Time Degree-Seeking
Cohort Graduation and Retention Rate
Graduated In
IPEDS
Cohort
Fall 95 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 96 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 97 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 98 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 99 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 00 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 01 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 02 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 03 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 04 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 05 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
1st
Year
2nd
Year
3rd
Year
4th
Year
5th
Year
6th
Year
7th
Year
8th
Year
9th
Year
40%
60%
58
7%
29%
64%
177
21%
17%
62%
233
27%
12%
61%
270
32%
9%
60%
288
34%
5%
61%
301
35%
4%
61%
37%
63%
67
8%
25%
67%
153
18%
16%
66%
206
24%
11%
65%
237
28%
7%
65%
258
31%
5%
64%
273
32%
4%
63%
40%
60%
62
7%
29%
65%
177
19%
18%
63%
250
27%
12%
61%
295
32%
8%
60%
313
34%
6%
60%
38%
62%
64
7%
27%
66%
171
18%
16%
66%
260
27%
10%
63%
315
33%
8%
59%
42%
58%
84
8%
32%
60%
231
22%
18%
60%
288
27%
12%
60%
42%
58%
78
8%
31%
61%
207
22%
18%
60%
78
8%
32%
60%
856
59%
41%
45%
55%
845
61%
39%
47%
53%
923
67%
33%
50%
50%
962
60%
40%
42%
58%
1,048
60%
40%
47%
53%
934
66%
34%
48%
52%
1,008
63%
37%
47%
53%
42%
58%
42%
58%
37%
63%
0%
100%
59%
41%
43%
57%
946
925
922
50%
50%
955
RETENTION & GRADUATION
93
94
Table 5.8: Annual Degrees Awarded by Academic Level and Gender
University Total
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Degree Level
Degree Totals
|
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters
Post-Masters Certificates
Doctoral Degrees
Law (Juris Doctor)
Master of Laws
Total Degrees Awarded
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
874
553
862
655
607
14
12
99
433
4
22
129
2
1,143
762
10
15
102
478
2
19
98
1,751
1,252
1,606
914
681
987
694
737
435
10
8
21
14
108
112
1
1,791 1,250
784
13
18
108
495
4
19
142
1
1,355
1,910
983
30
790
13
14
71
707
25
591
2
21
125
1,901
1,471
1 Year
5 Year
1%
18%
8%
-12%
-5%
-22%
-100%
3%
33%
-17%
3%
-14%
-100%
23%
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
Table 5.9: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Business
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Post-Bachelors
Major
Accounting
Business Economics
Business General
Computer and Information Science
Finance
Information Systems
International Business
Labor & Human Relations
Marketing
Operation Management and Business Statistics
Total
Health Care Administration
Total Quality Mgt/Cont Quality
Total
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
37
3
30
5
45
2
11
22
13
30
32
40
26
33
4
149
31
41
11
220
1 Year
5 Year
33
1
28
2
35
3
33
10
48
1
34
5
21%
-54%
22%
-25%
11
26
23
27
4
1
28
32
44
12
17
17
36
41
37
7
23
23
22
45
46
-24%
31%
-17%
31
31
10
208
42
35
4
161
40
42
16
242
36
25
5
157
24
43
10
233
24
43
32
3
35
36
13
225
7%
4%
-36%
25
26
8
166
7
28
12
2
26
32
4
160
2%
7%
-8%
13%
4%
13%
-1%
1
1
1
1
(Continued on next page)
Table 5.9: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Business
(Continued from previous page)
Percent Change
Degree Level
Masters Degree
Doctoral Degree
Total Business
Major
Accelerated Business Administration
Business Administration
Computer and Information Science
Executive Business Administration
Finance
Financial Audit
Labor & Human Relations
Marketing
Master of Business Administration
MBA-Health Care
Public Health
Tax Program
Total
Business Administration
Finance
Information Systems
Labor & Human Relations
Total
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters
Doctoral
Business Total
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
10
77
35
8
20
117
71
27
27
93
34
9
1
18
16
49
133
58
14
1
7
2
13
19
7
7
6
3
1
10
7
168
253
208
271
1
5
10
75
23
4
11
16
1
1
9
1
151
3
14
93
38
14
1
11
5
26
94
20
7
4
2
5
1
191
5
185
21
15
4
26
77
20
2
1 Year
5 Year
100%
7%
-33%
-50%
29
109
48
15
1
4
7
2
1
3
5
1
225
21
16
34
130
51
9
2
6
6
16
4
1
183
7
1
2
248
9%
2%
4%
-50%
100%
8%
0%
-100%
-100%
360%
-50%
50%
4%
1
1
2
200%
2
35%
-15%
156%
2%
-100%
1
1
5
149
220
166
208
168
1
318
253
5
478
208
271
3
482
3
374
4
0
1
1
2
200%
-50%
161
242
157
233
4%
185
4
431
191
225
1
459
225
1
248
2
476
-1%
151
160
1
183
1
345
4%
200%
2%
2%
-50%
3%
312
348
95
96
Table 5.10: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters Degree
Total CLASS
First College
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
Major
Anthropology
Art
Classical and Medieval Studies
Communication
Dramatic Arts
Economics
English
French
German
History
International Relations
Liberal Studies
Linguistics
Music
Philosophy
Political Science
Religious Studies
Social Science
Social Studies
Social Work
Sociology
Spanish
Women's Studies
Total
Art
Journalism
Latin Amer. Studies
Multimedia
Total
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Music
Philosophy
Social Work
Sociology
Spanish
Total
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters
CLASS Total
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
6
21
2
9
7
24
1
16
10
41
3
5
94
2
2
18
1
1
13
6
18
43
4
8
14
95
1
3
29
58
6
19
75
2
4
23
47
1
9
22
15
5
7
9
8
13
13
8
10
12
11
26
14
8
9
4
5
11
4
1
1
60
35
3
5
4
12
2
1
1
10
7
1
6
4
12
3
2
3
70
29
3
5
4
18
5
1
11
1
8
12
15
1
2
63
51
4
2
3
17
1
1
3
12
18
2
306
150
321
194
342
177
10
24
1
112
4
24
2
9
10
25
2
2
2
14
5
3
3
58
38
4
2
354
13
27
4
13
6%
11%
113%
33%
62
74
5
5
32
1
68
2
8
29
-18%
75%
63%
74%
4%
17%
30%
91%
17
11
12
15
2
7
2
8
4
9
2
3
7
7
18
3
28%
-32%
-47%
14%
18%
-24%
73%
29%
-26%
60%
40%
111%
-24%
2%
80%
-26%
33%
250%
400%
-20%
36%
125%
211
-3%
18%
-67%
40%
18%
-30%
100%
50%
11%
-56%
-44%
-82%
17%
8
11
1
16
9
11
2
9
5
9
2
7
16
18
1
205
11
5
8
6
4
3
49
39
6
1
329
1
2
27
150
8
1
9
5
6
2
31
6
1
69
321
4
3
10
7
4
4
2
2
1
37
194
7
1
13
5
3
1
23
7
4
64
342
8
3
6
4
8
6
8
1
2
46
177
4
2
8
11
5
1
38
8
7
84
354
2
3
3
9
1
1
15
1
2
37
205
53
359
27
177
69
390
37
231
64
406
46
223
84
438
37
242
14
6
13
4
15
6
19
8
16
4
3
2
5
5
1
6
1
5 Year
6
12
1
4
1
1
2
8
7
5
2
49
4
5
84
329
4
84
417
2
7
3
11
4
4
2
14
2
4
53
306
1 Year
3
1
1
5
1
1
5
5
7
7
1
10
56%
33%
37
211
5
37
253
-3%
195%
33%
25%
51%
18%
-1%
51%
25%
15
15%
55%
Table 5.11: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Education and Human Services
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Post-Bachelors
Masters Degree
Post-Masters
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Doctoral Degree
Major
Early Childhood Education
Elementary Education
Exercise/Fitness Specialist
Health and Physical Education
Middle Childhood Education
Mild/Moderate Educational Need
Nursing Basic
Nursing RN
Special Education
Total
Middle Child Math Education
Middle Child Science Education
Total
Adult Learning and Development
Community Agency Counseling
Community Health Education
School Counseling
Curriculum & Instruction
Education
Educational Administration
Exercise Science
Nursing
Physical Education-Professional
Sports & Exercise Management
Supervision
Total
Counseling and Pupil
Education Specialist
Educational Administration
Total
Urban Education:
Administration
Counseling
Learning
Policy
Total
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
35
66
3
17
57
42
5
14
99
2
4
1
99
3
97
6
12
3
6
2
4
12
12
2
3
22
10
9
3
33
19
7
30
17
17
180
5
1
34
41
10
21
187
8
1
6
48
25
19
17
187
5
1
5
35
52
20
24
231
10
2
5
46
3
5
1
5
40
24
12
17
16
247
3
2
1
5
1
3
40
12
3
26
2
6
30
13
7
22
229
1
25
9
1
8
24
4
10
4
3
60
3
3
6
7
2
1
8
83
15
3
21
16
13
18
249
1
35
3
1
7
29
21
76
15
9
254
7
8
15
36
7
10
31
241
9
5
4
359
8
6
371
12
20
13
14
12
176
2
27
5
5
3
277
2
81
1
5
46
2
14
9
81
97
1
2
3
2
2
1
1
3
3
1
5
3
2
5
10
4
3
6
2
1
12
180
34
187
48
187
277
3
3
463
81
1
5
121
359
3
10
559
81
2
4
135
371
3
12
573
1
3
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
18
3
83
1
2
3
5
4
345
1
2
3
6
5
62
1 Year
5 Year
1%
171%
-100%
-32%
33%
-17%
960%
39%
-14%
-59%
13%
146%
12%
-33%
47%
2%
-44%
57%
44%
11%
-100%
3%
87%
-50%
-27%
129%
50%
-100%
-7%
50%
-7%
100%
39%
13
3
1
18
9
21
3
1
5
9
5
366
4
1
131
1
3
4
2
30%
50%
11%
-100%
-25%
2
-25%
1
1
2
2
6
2
1
50%
100%
-50%
100%
13%
-50%
254
15
366
4
6
645
60
6
131
2
3
202
13%
47%
11%
-25%
13%
14%
39%
50%
13%
45%
104
2
2
1
1
3
1
6
1
1
35
231
46
83
3
345
6
6
588
104
2
2
154
2
3
200%
50%
13%
Total Education
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters
Post-Masters Certificates
Doctoral
Education Total
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
121
98
Table 5.12: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Engineering
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Masters Degree
Doctoral Degree
Total Engineering
Major
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Computer Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Electronic Engineering Technology
Electronic Technology
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Total
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Engineering Mechanics
Environmental Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Total
Applied Biomedical Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Total
Bachelors
Masters
Doctoral
Engineering Total
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
3
4
6
3
3
6
15
3
4
8
15
2
5
1
1
1
9
7
9
2
9
13
6
65
7
1
1
31
5
8
5
2
27
1
6
5
2
4
1
22
10
33
15
123
1
4
1
20
2
2
4
2
9
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
13
1
2
1
2
1
7
4
6
4
1
7
1
2
22
7
1
2
1
2
1
2
8
13
7
1
21
65
22
8
95
1
6
2
24
1
1
2
4
1
4
1
11
2
1
2
1
1
1
5
17
2
32
2
7
8
37
5
107
4
8
2
27
8
21
7
101
3
2
6
8
15
1
1
19
10
60
3
2
7
10
7
19
1
1
14
4
12
9
61
5
2
14
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
5 Year
6
8
10
2
16
9
14%
-59%
14%
50%
-95%
700%
13%
4
25
11
91
-42%
-7%
22%
-22%
-80%
100%
-10%
-100%
-42%
69%
57%
28%
21
3
39
100%
-44%
104%
-38%
1225%
8
18
18
107
100%
38%
122%
77%
900%
100%
1900%
359%
1
2
3
2
50%
-33%
3
1
1
1
9
100%
-17%
11%
9
26
1
36
91
107
9
207
-22%
77%
-17%
13%
28%
359%
11%
109%
0
8
3
2
7
3
2
3
1
9
22
7
123
24
8
155
20
11
3
34
107
60
7
174
27
14
3
44
101
61
9
171
29
1 Year
9
2
26
-100%
0%
Table 5.13: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Science
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Masters Degree
Major
Biology
Biology-Medical Technology
Chemistry
Environmental Sciences
Geological Sciences
Health Science
Mathematics
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Total
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
22
2
5
6
2
6
16
18
1
14
1
4
1
1
4
9
3
18
3
79
3
129
6
13
20
12
3
86
9
172
60
6
2
3
4
2
5
1
3
3
6
4
4
25
23
9
5
1
2
11
2
11
5
5
4
2
2
8
6
1
10
15
12
3
8
9
2
26
1
88
10
150
7
28
2
86
90
5
143
2
2
1
4
1
1
4
1
2
5
12
4
1
5
56
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Biology
Chemistry
Environmental Sciences
Health Science
Mathematics
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Total
21
24
58
16
29
12
52
Post-Masters
Psychology Specialist
11
3
7
Doctoral Degree
Biology
Clinical Bioanalytical Chemistry
Total
4
3
7
1
3
4
1
4
5
1
2
3
172
58
11
7
248
60
16
3
4
83
129
52
7
5
193
56
25
Total Science
Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters Certificates
Doctoral
Science Total
99
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
5
1
5
1
3
5
10
25
3
84
3
1
9
25
3
4
2
1
6
6
1 Year
5 Year
13
19%
5
3
1
2
11
-25%
150%
-60%
36%
-25%
-18%
-100%
9
27
66
2
99
18
166
2
3
1
1
6
1
3
5
7
2
29
12
5
11
13
1
21
15
80
21
22
65
23
2
3
1
9
6
5
17
1
24
13
81
7
5
7
2
9
3
1
4
2
2
3
3
6
1
3
4
150
65
7
4
226
86
23
5
2
116
143
81
7
6
237
66
29
2
4
101
3
26
64
1
2
8
1
7
2
5
-44%
7%
260%
10%
-75%
-67%
-100%
56%
8%
-50%
-23%
-100%
-100%
-29%
13%
100%
-1%
-89%
-67%
63%
-50%
-16%
26
-4%
3
1
4
2
2
4
25%
-50%
-20%
166
80
9
4
259
64
26
10%
-4%
4
94
-20%
4%
-38%
43%
-36%
-50%
-27%
-1%
43%
-36%
-27%
7%
100
Table 5.14: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Urban Affairs
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Post-Bachelors
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Masters Degree
Total Urban
Major
Environmental Science
Environmental Studies
Public Safety Management
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
Total
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
1
5
1
33
40
2
2
14
18
1
1
1
21
24
2
5
1
14
22
1
1
2
6
29
39
1
4
8
2
13
28
5
2
18
31
56
3
10
2
20
35
8
16
25
49
Geographic Information Systems
Local Urban Management Certificate
Non-Profit Management
Urban Economic Development
Urban Real Estate Dev & Finance
Total
2
13
5
21
41
6
3
1
Environmental Studies
Public Administration
Urban Planning and Design
Urban Planning and Law
Urban Studies
Total
1
28
8
20
7
53
10
27
9
3
60
3
3
52
7
9
75
2
20
11
1
4
38
7
69
2
21
10
2
4
39
7
44
7
34
4
67
4
40
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters
Doctoral
Urban Affairs Total
40
18
24
22
39
28
56
35
44
34
67
40
1
63
75
2
116
38
1
67
69
3
128
39
3
77
84
52
91
1 Year
-75%
75%
5%
-10%
-1%
5 Year
-100%
-71%
-2%
55%
9
1
10
2
1
13
2
36
10
3
21
15
3
51
3
42
49
10
51
2
112
41
13
42
3
99
-22%
47%
-100%
-45%
-14%
19%
67%
-57%
19%
-1%
55%
-14%
-17%
3%
19%
55%
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
Table 5.15: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender – College of Law
Percent Change
Degree Level
First Professional
Degrees
Major
Law (Juris Doctor)
Master of Laws
Law Total
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
99
99
129
2
131
102
98
102
98
108
1
109
112
108
112
108
142
1
143
71
125
71
125
1 Year
5 Year
-22%
-100%
-22%
-14%
-100%
-15%
Table 5.16: Annual Degrees Awarded by Race and Gender
2000 – 01
White
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
Black
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
Hispanic
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Asian or Pacific Islander
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
101
Native American
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
2001 – 02
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
Percent Change
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
1 Year
5 Year
579
388
558
439
574
450
641
462
19%
225
4
8
105
464
7
11
76
311
7
87
468
8
12
87
257
6
1
100
468
11
4
92
277
3
3
128
1
508
16
319
2
5
107
5%
368
13
6
71
647
13
495
8
7
51
9%
-29%
71%
-28%
37%
-41%
-14%
-10%
1,037
730
1,116
844
1,149
814
1,216
874
1,221
957
4%
23%
132
41
164
66
188
74
197
78
50%
38
26
2
133
1
8
7
11
37
2
1
5
146
1
5
4
44
1
2
6
5
-4%
150%
-57%
50%
24%
2
14
144
2
1
13
72
5
42
-6%
109
187
12
140
5
3
10
0%
-32%
257
88
324
101
332
119
353
131
357
124
-1%
39%
21
14
20
14
24
10
25
13
28
18%
29%
2
4
14
4
19
1
5
17
10
14
17
2
9
-15%
283%
3
2
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
26
21
36
20
46
17
46
29
45
31
1%
62%
31
20
25
19
28
31
26
25
26
24
-2%
-2%
16
17
9
8
11
5
25
11
17
9
-28%
-21%
1
4
2
2
1
3
1
3
2
1
3
5
60%
-67%
33%
52
41
35
27
42
37
54
38
47
38
-8%
-9%
2
1
3
2
1
1
2
200%
1
2
2
33%
2
1
2
-100%
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
2
0%
2
2
2
3
6
125%
200%
(Continued on next page)
102
Table 5.16: Annual Degrees Awarded by Race and Gender
(Continued from previous page)
2000 – 01
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Minority Total
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
University Total
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
Percent Change
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
1 Year
186
76
212
101
240
117
248
117
36%
59
17
47
2
3
6
190
1
7
9
66
1
4
12
1
14
-8%
150%
-55%
43%
26%
3
13
38
2
1
8
164
1
3
21
167
2
1
16
115
7
62
-2%
127
242
12
173
5
4
16
-17%
-12%
337
151
398
150
422
175
455
200
452
199
-1%
33%
12
30
6
33
23
35
19
32
19
18
-27%
-12%
60
112
78
87
56
99
81
115
69
163
18%
35%
2
2
3
11
7
12
3
2
13
1
-16%
87
131
4
1
1
85
8
2
76
8
3
2
155
144
107
159
93
195
8%
60%
-40%
-100%
25%
97
59
86
82
77
79
79
83
-10%
36
53
1
42
32
45
1
37
22%
-100%
3
8
10
3
49
1
5
3
66
2
47
-13%
52
1
1
5
75
5
53
2
4
7
2
2
2
3
-44%
14%
-100%
-50%
-62%
156
106
150
127
135
117
132
122
135
120
0%
-3%
874
553
862
655
914
681
987
694
18%
432
4
22
129
2
1,142
762
10
15
102
478
2
19
98
435
8
14
112
784
13
18
108
1,751
1,252
737
10
21
108
1
1,791
1,250
1,910
495
4
19
142
1
1,355
707
25
591
2
21
125
1%
607
14
12
99
983
30
790
13
14
71
1,901
1,471
8%
-12%
-5%
-22%
-100%
3%
33%
-17%
3%
-14%
-100%
23%
Non-Resident Alien
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
Unknown
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
2001 – 02
1,606
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
5 Year
S
Selected Strategic Indicators: Academic and Administrative Programs
Selected Strategic
Indicators: Academic
and Administrative
Programs
6
Cleveland State University
HHonors Program
inaugurated its new Honors Program in Fall 2004 with a class of 40 highly motivated,
academically talented first-year students. For Fall 2006, the enrollment in this program has grown to approximately 170 students.
All new students admitted to the program as freshmen receive scholarships covering their tuition, academic fees and books.
Honors students accept the challenge of participating in intensive and specialized versions of general education classes, and are
granted special consideration in several areas including preference in registration and extended university library borrowing privileges.
Honors students enroll in at least four honors core courses during their freshman and sophomore years at CSU. These courses
offer greater breadth or depth than standard university general education classes. Enrollment is limited to Honors students and
class sizes are small.
As juniors and seniors, Honors students focus on their majors. Upper division Honors students have the opportunity to do
additional honors work under faculty supervision in established courses, enroll in graduate courses, participate in a faculty
member’s research project or laboratory, do an independent research project, a service learning project, and/or an internship, job,
or engage in a co-op experience. The specific program depends on the student’s major.
Beginning fall 2005, transfer students and current CSU students entering their junior year have been admitted.
The Honors Program first junior cohort was admitted Fall 2005. Over the past two years, 52 students have joined the program
with junior standing. At the end of academic year 2005-06, all students in this cohort are in good academic standing.
Major Features of the Honors Program
■ Enriched curriculum
■ Leadership development
■ Special seminars and colloquia
■ Strong peer community
■ Scholarship support
■ Faculty mentors
■ Honors residence living
Table 6.1: Characteristics of Inaugural Class of Honors Students
Fall 2004 – 2005
Total
Students in
Program*
New Enrollment
College
2004
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
In Top 10 % of High School Rank
3
9
3
8
17
–
40
58%
High School GPA
ACT Composite
SAT Composite
3.9
28
1,240
2005
11
17
7
14
19
3
71
62%
15
26
10
22
37
3
113
3.9
27
1,230
*Includes students admitted in both fall & spring semester of the prior year
Table 6.2: Scholarship Aid for Honors Students in Fiscal Year 2005
Type of Financial Aid
Enrollment
Total
Average
Need Based Tuition
Merit Based Tuition
Books
On-Campus Housing
Total
26
13
39
14
39
$165,968
$82,291
$37,000
$34,072
$319,331
$6,383
$6,330
$949
$2,434
$8,188
Source: Cleveland State University Financial Aid Office
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
105
Table 6.3: Average ACT Composite Score by College and Gender: 5-Year Trend
College
2001
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Average ACT Composite Score
2002
Male
Female
Male
Female
21.3
20.9
23.4
20.6
23.3
21.9
20.6
16.8
20.6
20.4
20.5
20.5
21.0
20.6
23.7
21.6
21.4
17.0
23.0
19.8
21.1
20.6
22.8
20.8
23.1
22.0
20.7
16.5
20.8
20.4
20.2
20.1
20.7
20.0
23.4
21.6
20.2
16.7
20.0
19.5
2003
2004
2005
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
21.0
20.7
20.9
20.3
22.6
21.5
21.7
16.5
27.0
20.3
21.0
21.2
19.6
21.1
22.7
21.3
21.0
17.8
22.2
20.8
21.1
21.3
19.5
19.8
20.8
23.1
21.4
21.7
17.2
21.5
20.9
20.4
24.8
20.2
20.2
16.7
19.5
19.6
19.9
20.0
20.1
19.7
23.0
21.2
19.0
16.5
19.4
19.5
20.0
18.7
19.9
24.3
20.1
19.4
16.6
17.8
19.5
Highlights
■ On the average, female students have slightly lower ACT Composite scores than male students.
Table 6.4: Average ACT Composite Score by College: 5-Year Trend
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
20.4
20.4
19.2
20.1
22.9
20.5
20.2
17.2
21.1
20.1
20.5
20.4
ACT Composite Score
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
University Average ACT Score
106
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
21.0
20.7
22.1
20.6
23.4
21.7
21.0
16.9
21.0
20.1
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
20.8
20.3
21.8
20.1
23.2
21.7
20.5
16.6
20.7
19.9
20.6
20.3
20.6
19.8
22.7
21.3
20.4
16.5
27.0
19.9
20.5
23.3
20.6
20.8
17.0
20.6
20.2
Table 6.5: Undergraduate Cumulative GPA by College: 5-Year Trend
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2.78
2.88
2.71
3.26
2.93
2.91
3.03
2.65
3.16
2.91
2.76
2.87
Cumulative Average GPA
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
University Average
2.76
2.82
2.92
3.21
2.92
2.92
3.09
2.47
2.81
2.84
2.81
2.83
2.90
3.21
2.93
2.93
3.11
2.61
2.97
2.87
2.80
2.81
2.86
3.24
2.92
2.97
3.08
2.62
3.05
2.88
3.22
2.92
2.93
3.00
2.49
3.20
2.90
Note: All figures are taken from census files. Students registered with zero credit hours are excluded.
Highlights
■ Students in the College of Education and Urban Affairs have higher Cumulative GPAs than those in other Colleges.
Table 6.6: Top 15 Majors by Academic Level
Fall 2005
UNDERGRADUATE:
Description
Communication
Psychology
Early Childhood Education
Biology
Sociology
Social Work
English
Art
Accounting
Middle Childhood Education
Pre-Education
Mechanical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Pre-Business Administration
Nursing Basic
Total Degree Seeking Undergraduate Students
GRADUATE EXCLUDING LAW:
Enrollment
350
332
228
198
172
162
161
158
156
143
142
141
130
119
99
8,821
Description
Curriculum & Instruction
Business Administration
Social Work
Computer and Information Science
Graduate Education Licensure
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Public Administration
Adult Learning and Development
School Counseling
Educational Administration
Psychology
English
Management & Labor Relations
Accelerated Business Administration
Music
Total Degree Seeking Graduate Students
Enrollment
709
510
183
147
141
138
135
93
92
88
74
72
67
61
59
4,015
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
107
108
Table 6.7: Top 15 Degree Seeking Programs with Highest Minority Students Enrollment by Academic Level
Fall 2005
UNDERGRADUATE
GRADUATE
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Major/Program
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Urban Services Administration
Pre-Nursing
Pre-Liberal Arts & Social Sciences
Social Work
Sociology
Pre-Education
Urban Studies
Pre-Business Administration
Psychology
Communication
Biology
Electrical Engineering
Accounting
English
Early Childhood Education
Minority
Enrollment
Total
Major
Enrollment
Minority as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
26
40
31
80
83
59
32
41
94
96
48
30
35
32
42
42
66
56
162
172
142
86
119
332
350
198
130
156
161
228
62%
61%
55%
49%
48%
42%
37%
34%
28%
27%
24%
23%
22%
20%
18%
Major/Program
Diversity Professional
Sociology
Social Work
Public Administration
Adult Learning and Development
Health Science
Educational Administration
Graduate Education Licensure
School Counseling
MBA-Health Care
Curriculum & Instruction
Urban Studies
Financial Accounting & Audit
Management & Labor Relations
Business Administration
Minority
Enrollment
Total
Major
Enrollment
Minority as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
12
14
71
47
31
11
23
30
19
10
144
10
10
11
57
20
32
183
135
93
41
88
141
92
49
709
51
57
67
510
60%
44%
39%
35%
33%
27%
26%
21%
21%
20%
20%
20%
18%
16%
11%
Table 6.8: Top 15 Degree Seeking Major with Highest Female Student Enrollment by Academic Level
Fall 2005
UNDERGRADUATE
Major/Program
Pre-Nursing
Early Childhood Education
Nursing Basic
Mild/Moderate Educational Need
Social Work
Psychology
Sociology
Pre-Education
Middle Childhood Education
English
Biology
Art
Communication
Pre-Business Administration
Accounting
GRADUATE
Female
Enrollment
Total
Major
Enrollment
Female as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
63
217
87
68
129
253
122
100
97
106
128
101
207
55
71
66
228
99
79
162
332
172
142
143
161
198
158
350
119
156
95%
95%
88%
86%
80%
76%
71%
70%
68%
66%
65%
64%
59%
46%
46%
Major/Program
Occupational Therapy
School Counseling
Social Work
Curriculum & Instruction
Adult Learning and Development
Graduate Education Licensure
Psychology
Educational Administration
Management & Labor Relations
English
Public Administration
Music
Business Administration
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Computer and Information Science
Female
Enrollment
Total
Major
Enrollment
Female as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
48
79
157
580
72
109
55
64
48
51
85
37
199
39
39
52
92
183
709
93
141
74
88
67
72
135
59
510
138
147
92%
86%
86%
82%
77%
77%
74%
73%
72%
71%
63%
63%
39%
28%
27%
Table 6.9: Delaware Study Benchmarks
Student Credit Hours (SCH) & FTE Students Taught Per FTE Faculty
for Tenured and Tenure-Track Full-Time Faculty, Fall 2004
IIntroduction
The Delaware Study
grew out of FIPSE and TIAA-CREF research grants in 1992 to support the development of
national data-sharing consortium on faculty teaching loads, direct instructional costs and student faculty ratios by discipline. Over
the years more than 400 institutions, both public and private, from all types of Carnegie institutions have participated in the
study. The study has focused on instructional costs and productivity at the level of analysis of academic disciplines. The concept
of creating benchmarks by discipline is accomplished by grouping faculty and the student credit hours (SCH) they produce
by CIP codes.
A complete discussion of the content, instruments, and methodology used in the Delaware Study can be found at
http://www.udel.edu/ir/cost, and a copy of report Instructional Cost and Productivity of Academic Departments at CSU:
Delaware Study Benchmarks 2004 can be obtained from the Office of Institutional Research at Cleveland State University.
Classification
of Instructional
Programs (CIP)
# of
Peers
with
(CIP)
Discipline
FTE Instructional
FTE Student/FTE
Total SCH/Faculty FTE
Faculty
Faculty
Difference
Difference
Difference
from
from
from
CSU Peer Peer % CSU
Peer Peer % CSU Peer Peer %
College of Business
11.01 Computer and Information Sciences, General
51.07 Health and Medical Administrative Services
52.03 Accounting and Related Services
52.08 Finance and Financial Management Services
52.10 Management Information Systems and Services
52.13 Marketing
52.14 Operations Management and Business Statistics
College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences
20
6
21
15
13.5
3.3
11.0
9.6
-1%
-70%
-20%
-48%
6
16
13.4
1.0
8.8
5.0
6.7
5.5
10.5
9.8
10.3
-44%
09.01 Communication and Media Studies
16.01 Linguistic, Comparative and Related Language
Studies & Servces
23.01 English Language and Literature, General
38.01 Philosophy
38.02 Religion/Religious Studies
44.07 Social Work
45.02 Anthropology
45.06 Economics
45.10 Political Science and Government
45.11 Sociology
50.07 Fine and Studio Art
50.09 Music
54.01 History
College of Science
26
27
10.4
7.6
10.7
13.7
32
30
9
24
17
18
31
27
28
25
32
9.0
5.4
2.0
12.0
3.5
4.3
5.2
5.5
6.9
7.0
9.7
26.01
27.01
40.05
40.08
42.01
51.02
51.23
31
30
33
33
33
17
11
15.8
18.0
10.8
7.8
18.9
3.5
9.5
Biology, General
Mathematics
Chemistry
Physics
Psychology, General
Speech and Hearing
Rehabilitation and Therapeutic Professions
(Health Science)
174.0
84.0
220.0
195.0
241.0
136.0
235.0
141.4
125.8
251.4
226.3
23%
-33%
-12%
-14%
15.2
9.3
18.0
18.3
23.0
12.3
20.6
11.3
10.2
18.7
17.2
35%
-8%
-3%
7%
237.7
276.4
-43%
17.5
19.9
-30%
-2%
-45%
264.0
213.0
207.2
169.6
27%
26%
18.7 14.4
14.8 11.8
30%
26%
23.9
9.4
13.8
8.7
8.7
11.6
10.8
11.3
14.1
23.4
16.4
-62%
-43%
-85%
38%
-60%
-63%
-52%
-51%
-51%
-70%
-41%
234.0
329.0
516.0
102.0
232.0
297.0
303.0
375.0
300.0
152.0
332.0
155.3
228.4
222.1
139.7
225.6
234.1
261.2
262.3
159.4
137.6
235.1
51%
44%
132%
-27%
3%
27%
16%
43%
88%
10%
41%
17.2
23.3
34.4
8.5
15.5
23.7
21.1
26.9
20.3
11.3
23.4
11.3
15.7
15.8
12.1
16.1
16.9
18.2
18.2
11.0
9.8
16.5
52%
48%
118%
-30%
-4%
40%
16%
48%
84%
15%
42%
19.2
18.3
12.5
10.0
16.9
5.6
8.0
-18%
-2%
-14%
-22%
12%
-38%
19%
312.0
284.0
169.0
211.0
192.0
164.0
129.0
221.4
201.2
255.7
225.2
236.3
165.5
178.4
41%
41%
-34%
-6%
-19%
-1%
-28%
22.9
19.6
13.3
14.9
14.5
12.9
12.6
16.0
14.1
17.9
15.6
17.1
14.4
16.0
43%
39%
-26%
-4%
-15%
-10%
-21%
(Continued on next page)
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
109
Table 6.9: Delaware Study Benchmarks
Student Credit Hours (SCH) & FTE Students Taught Per FTE Faculty,
for Tenured and Tenure-Track Full-Time Faculty, Fall 2002
(Continued from previous page)
Classification
of Instructional
Programs (CIP)
# of
Peers
with
(CIP)
Discipline
FTE Instructional
FTE Student/FTE
Total SCH/Faculty FTE
Faculty
Faculty
Difference
Difference
Difference
from
from
from
CSU Peer Peer % CSU
Peer Peer % CSU Peer Peer %
College of Education
13.01
13.03
13.04
31.05
51.16
Education, General
Curriculum and Instruction
Educational Administration and Supervision
Health and Physical Education/Fitness
Nursing
11
13
17
12
29
22.5
15.2
15.7
8.8
9.5
26.3
18.6
10.2
13.7
13.3
-14%
-18%
54%
-36%
-29%
150.0
128.0
108.0
141.0
109.0
152.4
153.3
121.1
182.1
151.8
-2%
-17%
-11%
-23%
-28%
12.5
11.8
11.8
12.5
7.4
13.0
13.1
12.1
13.3
11.4
-4%
-10%
-3%
-6%
-35%
8
14
16
15
5
9.1
6.7
13.8
11.3
7.0
5.0
29.0
16.7
8.2
10.9
12.3
11.5
13.7
11%
-39%
12%
-2%
-49%
127.5
131.9
153.7
152.9
136.0
-15%
-23%
-2%
-27%
-46%
-3%
-6%
12%
-21%
-36%
7%
237.4
-4%
9.1
9.1
13.2
8.8
7.0
7.3
25.2
15.7
9.3
9.7
11.8
11.2
10.9
27.0
108.0
101.0
150.0
112.0
74.0
110.0
227.0
161.0
25.8
-2%
College of Engineering
14.07
14.08
14.10
14.19
14.35
15.08
22.01
45.12
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Industrial Engineering
Engineering Technology
Law (LL.B., J.D.)
Urban Affairs
11
Delaware Study Notes
■ For a complete Delaware Study report contact Institutional Research at (216) 687-4700.
■ Peer comparisons are unavailable for CIP 52.10 Management Information Systems and Services, 15.08 Engineering Technology,
45.12 Urban Studies.
■ CIP code 52.12 (Management Information System has changed to 52.10 and 52.07 (Operation Management and Business Statistics
changed to 52.14.
■ Undergraduate FTE= undergrad student credit hours/15. Graduate or law FTE = graduate or law student credit hours/9.
■ FTE Instructional faculty excludes separately budgeted FTEs.
■ Outliers (two standard deviations above/below the initial mean) are excluded in calculatin of ratios. Process implemented
by Delaware Study.
■ Peers are Doctoral I and Doctoral II institutions.
Doctoral I institutions include: Adelphi University, Andrews University, Bowling Green State University, Catholic University of
America, Georgia State University, Loyola University of Chicago, Marquette University , Northern Arizona University, SUNY –
Binghamton University, University of Alabama – Tuscaloosa, University of Memphis, University of Missouri – Kansas City, University
of Missouri – Rolla, University of North Carolina – Greensboro, University of Southern Mississippi, Western Michigan University.
Doctoral II institutions include: Baylor University, Clarkson University, Cleveland State University, DePaul University, Duquesne
University, East Carolina University, Florida International University, Indiana State University, Middle Tennessee State University,
Montana State University – Bozeman, The University of Montana , University of Alabama – Huntsville, University of Colorado –
Denver, University of Louisiana – Lafayette, University of Maine, University of Missouri – St. Louis, University of New Hampshire,
University of San Francisco, Wright State University.
■ N/A not applicable
■ Regular tenured/tenure track faculty are full-time.
110
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 6.10: Fall Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Business
Business
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
99
148
42
289
32
24
20
26
99
143
36
278
30
25
23
27
91
131
38
260
32
26
21
27
92
149
32
273
30
24
19
26
89
141
33
263
30
23
23
25
-3%
-5%
3%
-4%
0%
-5%
22%
0%
-10%
-5%
-21%
-9%
-5%
-6%
17%
-3%
340
130
42
512
33
23
12
28
341
135
41
517
32
23
12
28
318
161
37
516
32
22
11
27
326
156
36
518
29
21
11
26
323
155
28
506
30
20
15
26
-1%
-1%
-22%
-2%
1%
-5%
38%
1%
-5%
19%
-33%
-1%
-9%
-12%
26%
-9%
145
181
41
367
21
20
17
19
121
192
30
343
18
19
16
20
131
193
8
332
21
20
17
21
144
201
23
368
20
19
19
19
150
190
50
390
19
17
12
17
4%
-5%
117%
6%
-1%
-9%
-35%
-9%
3%
5%
22%
6%
-7%
-18%
-31%
-7%
51
74
5
130
20
16
10
17
43
66
6
115
20
17
9
17
42
66
4
112
19
16
12
17
40
70
7
117
19
16
8
16
41
66
5
112
21
16
8
17
3%
-6%
-29%
-4%
14%
-3%
1%
5%
-20%
-11%
4%
-2%
-14%
-1%
182
64
12
258
43
31
16
39
179
71
17
267
42
29
16
37
166
65
16
247
44
29
19
39
170
73
20
263
41
28
16
36
163
74
21
258
43
25
15
36
-4%
1%
5%
-2%
5%
-10%
-5%
0%
-10%
16%
75%
0%
-1%
-20%
-2%
-9%
18
43
11
72
37
19
24
24
16
50
8
74
41
20
22
25
19
53
10
82
36
18
18
22
16
50
9
75
30
19
18
22
15
52
6
73
32
18
28
22
-6%
4%
-33%
-3%
6%
-7%
50%
0%
-17%
21%
-45%
1%
-14%
-6%
15%
-11%
CLASS
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Education
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Engineering
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Science
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Urban Affairs
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
111
(Continued on next page)
112
(Continued from previous page)
Table 6.10: Fall Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
2005
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Law
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
49
47
7
103
40
30
15
34
53
47
7
107
40
30
15
34
54
46
1
101
38
29
44
34
50
38
1
89
39
29
25
34
52
39
3
94
37
26
21
32
4%
3%
200%
6%
-4%
-9%
-15%
-7%
6%
-17%
-57%
-9%
-8%
-12%
41%
-5%
79
8
25
21
78
8
26
21
80
8
25
21
80
8
24
19
73
6
25
19
-9%
-25%
1%
4%
-8%
-25%
-1%
-9%
87
25
86
25
88
25
88
24
79
24
-10%
2%
-9%
-2%
2
20
5
22
150%
10%
2
20
5
22
150%
10%
-34%
8%
-100%
-10%
-5%
-11%
1%
-7%
University Studies
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Honors
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Career Services & Military Science
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
6
2
1
9
28
20
15
21
6
2
1
9
25
20
11
22
5
2
17
15
3
2
23
13
3
1
19
21
0%
-50%
-20%
62%
7
16
5
19
4
19
-20%
0%
-50%
-50%
-100%
-56%
969
697
161
1,827
32
22
16
27
936
714
146
1,796
32
23
16
27
906
725
114
1,745
32
23
17
27
923
747
128
1,798
30
21
16
25
914
724
146
1,784
30
20
16
25
-1%
-3%
14%
-1%
1%
-6%
4%
-2%
-6%
4%
-9%
-2%
University Total
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Notes: First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
CSU, Graduate Studies course, Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 5 enrolled are excluded.
*‘Other’ includes weekends and sections with no classs time. Cross listed courses are counted once only.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
Day: Monday -Friday 7:am to 4:pm
Evening: Monday -Thursday 4 Pm to 12 AM
Weekend: Claases starts after Friday 4 PM, Saturday and Sunday
Table 6.11: Spring Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Business
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
79
148
45
272
35
26
21
28
80
139
42
261
34
25
19
27
71
140
38
249
35
26
23
28
79
151
35
265
30
24
20
25
72
140
30
242
32
24
23
26
-9%
-7%
-14%
-9%
6%
2%
11%
5%
-9%
-5%
-33%
-11%
-6%
-7%
7%
-4%
339
149
46
534
32
22
14
28
332
146
54
532
32
22
13
27
336
151
44
531
30
19
13
26
307
154
47
508
30
20
14
26
318
154
29
501
28
20
15
25
4%
0%
-38%
-1%
-6%
-3%
12%
-3%
-6%
3%
-37%
-6%
-12%
-9%
13%
-10%
111
185
46
342
20
20
19
20
130
190
43
363
21
20
14
20
144
191
17
352
20
20
19
20
155
203
28
386
20
19
14
19
150
198
53
401
17
17
14
16
-3%
-2%
89%
4%
-16%
-12%
0%
-14%
35%
7%
15%
17%
-15%
-18%
-30%
-17%
42
69
3
114
22
16
9
18
43
74
4
121
19
15
10
16
46
63
6
115
19
15
9
17
40
67
2
109
20
16
6
17
46
61
3
110
20
15
7
17
15%
-9%
50%
1%
-4%
-3%
21%
-2%
10%
-12%
-11%
-3%
-4%
-6%
163
69
16
248
43
29
13
37
165
70
21
256
42
29
16
36
148
77
15
240
44
27
18
37
155
81
20
256
39
25
17
33
153
73
27
253
40
27
18
34
-1%
-10%
35%
-1%
1%
4%
5%
1%
-6%
6%
69%
2%
-8%
-10%
33%
-11%
11
47
17
75
56
17
20
24
12
53
14
79
49
17
19
22
13
50
12
75
39
17
18
21
15
51
13
79
36
18
24
23
14
55
9
78
38
16
33
22
-7%
8%
-31%
-1%
6%
-15%
38%
-4%
27%
17%
-47%
4%
-32%
-10%
63%
-9%
CLASS
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Education
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Engineering
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Science
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Urban Affairs
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
(Continued on next page)
113
114
(Continued from previous page)
Table 6.11: Spring Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Law
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
49
50
12
111
36
26
17
30
55
47
13
115
36
26
17
29
49
47
6
102
35
25
22
30
49
45
5
99
35
24
19
29
54
38
6
98
37
22
24
31
10%
-16%
20%
-1%
7%
-7%
25%
5%
10%
-24%
-50%
-12%
3%
-15%
45%
3%
44
5
23
22
43
6
23
21
43
6
22
17
41
5
18
17
33
5
21
18
-20%
12%
7%
-25%
-9%
-16%
49
23
49
23
49
21
46
18
38
20
-17%
11%
-22%
-10%
2
22
5
21
150%
-2%
2
22
5
21
150%
-2%
-20%
-17%
-3%
-100%
25%
University Studies
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Honors
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Career Services & Military Science
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
5
2
2
9
36
20
35
21
4
2
3
9
36
18
30
30
4
2
34
23
5
2
24
21
4
2
30
20
-20%
28%
-7%
6
30
7
23
6
27
-14%
17%
843
724
187
1,754
33
22
17
27
864
727
194
1,785
32
22
16
26
854
727
138
1,719
31
22
18
26
848
759
150
1,757
29
21
17
25
849
726
157
1,732
29
20
18
24
-4%
5%
-1%
-2%
-5%
7%
-2%
-100%
-33%
University Total
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Notes: First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
*‘Other’ includes weekends and sections with no classs time. Cross listed courses are counted once only.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
Day: Monday – Friday 7 am to 4 pm
Evening: Monday – Thursday 4 pm to 12 am
1%
-16%
-1%
-12%
-11%
7%
-10%
Table 6.12: Summer Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Business
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
49
73
25
147
25
26
17
24
46
69
15
130
24
24
17
23
46
72
14
132
21
26
24
24
34
85
16
135
19
25
19
23
32
80
10
122
19
23
22
22
-6%
-6%
-38%
-10%
0%
-10%
12%
-6%
-35%
10%
-60%
-17%
-26%
-13%
29%
-11%
94
36
26
156
22
19
12
20
95
34
21
150
23
20
11
21
88
31
17
136
21
18
14
20
87
32
19
138
20
15
10
17
89
38
10
137
19
16
13
18
2%
19%
-47%
-1%
-3%
1%
31%
2%
-5%
6%
-62%
-12%
-15%
-17%
8%
-11%
63
67
37
167
24
20
9
23
73
71
30
174
18
21
34
23
79
75
11
165
24
20
9
21
82
77
19
178
24
19
16
21
135
78
11
224
16
16
13
16
65%
1%
-42%
26%
-33%
-16%
-19%
-24%
114%
16%
-70%
34%
-35%
-19%
40%
-30%
5
9
3
17
20
20
22
21
5
10
1
16
16
17
5
16
3
9
1
13
16
15
11
15
3
4
1
8
19
16
5
16
1
5
–
6
32
17
–
20
-67%
25%
71%
7%
-80%
-44%
58%
-13%
-25%
26%
-65%
-3%
102
14
10
126
21
25
15
21
90
19
17
126
25
25
18
24
91
18
8
117
23
22
20
22
91
19
13
123
21
18
18
20
78
19
23
120
24
16
15
21
-14%
0%
77%
-2%
12%
-12%
-12%
3%
-24%
36%
130%
-5%
12%
-37%
4%
-1%
8
12
10
30
20
19
13
17
6
13
5
24
19
15
16
16
3
15
5
23
18
14
19
15
4
12
6
22
10
16
15
14
4
11
2
17
11
15
29
16
0%
-8%
-67%
-23%
15%
-1%
86%
10%
-50%
-8%
-80%
-43%
-44%
-18%
119%
-8%
CLASS
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Education
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Engineering
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Science
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Urban Affairs
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
115
(Continued on next page)
116
(Continued from previous page)
Table 6.12: Summer Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
2005
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Law
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
2
11
5
18
22
30
14
25
4
11
3
18
22
30
14
24
1
9
4
14
15
37
17
30
2
11
5
18
19
25
11
20
3
11
5
19
19
23
16
20
50%
-2%
-8%
44%
6%
-13%
-24%
10%
-18%
7
1
14
13
6
1
16
20
6
1
13
19
5
1
13
14
4
2
13
14
-20%
100%
-5%
-43%
100%
-7%
8%
8
14
7
16
7
14
6
14
6
13
0%
-2%
-25%
-3%
1
1
2
4
32
19
27
26
1
1
3
5
16
10
14
13
1
16
1
1
13
13
1
1
7
8
-46%
-38%
-42%
-100%
-50%
-78%
-58%
-100%
-71%
1
16
2
13
2
8
331
224
118
673
21
23
21
22
326
229
95
650
22
22
22
22
318
230
60
608
22
22
17
21
309
242
79
630
21
21
15
20
347
245
61
653
19
18
16
18
-10%
-11%
7%
-9%
5%
9%
-48%
-3%
-13%
-19%
-22%
-16%
6%
50%
University Studies
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Honors
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Career Services & Military Science
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
University Total
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Notes:
First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
Days: Monday – Friday 7 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Evenings: Monday – Thursday 4 p.m. – 12 a.m.
Weekends: Classes start after Friday 4 p.m., Saturday and Sunday.
*‘Other’ includes weekends and unknown (sections with no class time). Cross listed courses counted once only.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
12%
1%
-23%
4%
Table 6.13: Fall Undergraduate Student FTE by College and Class Time: 5-Year Trend
Fall 2001 – 2005
College
Day
Evenings & Weekends
Percent Change
Percent Change
Unknown*
Percent Change
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1 Year
5 Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Honors
Other1
605 579 556 531 512
2,680 2,647 2,485 2,385 2,381
35
61
40
410 446 483 521 495
199 184 191 186 210
1,603 1,599 1,617 1,533 1,567
179 174 177 126 130
355 355 360 347 302
3
7
16
14
9
7
6
-4%
464
600
457
649
6
232
146
405
132
30
384
731
16
239
134
378
140
29
369
673
358
625
-3%
-7%
-23%
4%
15
86
-10%
23%
218
154
381
126
19
-15%
-2%
-7%
-6%
-29%
9%
-16%
-3%
15%
-38%
13
78
2
94
3
39
3
17
70
256
158
409
134
27
17
88
5
105
2
26
4
14
77
-5%
13%
2%
4%
-12%
-15%
-11%
-100%
21%
6%
-2%
-27%
-15%
107
2
38
4
100
4
30
8
77
4
29
4
-23%
-18%
-3%
-56%
-10%
-2%
-100%
-27%
53%
12%
-5%
-23%
-56%
3
3
2
2
2
Total
6,083 6,059 5,917 5,639 5,611
-1%
-8%
1,986
2,061
2,053
2,028
1,883
246
233
242
1
230
1
216
91%
-6%
-12%
201
184
395
109
31
-26%
-7%
-5%
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a foreign language, Military Science, Special Program and Study Abroad.
Table 6.14: Fall Graduate & Law Student FTE by College and Class Time: 5-Year Trend
Fall 2001 – 2005
College
Day
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies
Total
75
37
1
2
92
57
45
13
3
104
55
47
32
7
107
398
424
606
646
Evenings & Weekends
Percent Change
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
52
46
54
6
114
406
52
44
37
4
119
2
386
653
644
658
Percent Change
Unknown*
Percent Change
1 Year
5 Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
-1%
3%
46%
69%
-4%
-91%
-31%
23%
3,555%
221%
24%
470
172
616
122
67
170
284
497
206
658
129
86
154
274
503
198
680
126
92
162
224
464
210
577
112
92
162
220
-8%
6%
-15%
-11%
2%
35%
1%
45%
65%
-22%
9%
1,762
1,900
2,003
1,985
1,836
-7%
4%
251
19
41
44
40
76
16
19
.4
256
16
49
56
45
94
21
22
.2
304
17
51
44
43
86
13
21
.2
276
27
52
57
33
86
14
14
.3
283
22%
48%
-15%
4%
40%
-10%
-2%
22
35
67
32
62
16
18
52%
1%
28%
-23%
1%
10%
-3%
454
155
574
77
56
162
284
3%
13%
386
2%
Notes:
First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
Days: Monday – Friday 7 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Evenings: Monday – Thursday 4 p.m. – 12 a.m.
Weekends: Classes start after Friday 4 p.m., Saturday and Sunday.
*Unknown includes sections with no classtime.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
117
Interactive Video and Telecourse
TTrends in Instructional
Delivery
The Rapid growth in distance delivered student credit hours
illustrates the important role
distance learning plays at many institutions, including Cleveland State, today. New technology, equipment, growing faculty
interest, and support services at CSU have led to an increase in courses offered and students enrolled and to smoother
instructional delivery. Faculty development workshops and individual training and support in conducting interactive video
classes and in creating web-based classes have been instrumental. Interactive video hook-ups now link our extended
campuses and partner schools with the Main Campus, providing students the opportunity to take a class at another site
which might not have been possible in the past. Web-based courses provide even more scheduling flexibility.
Table 6.15: 5-Year Trends in Interactive Video and Telecourse Instructional Delivery
STUDENT CREDIT HOURS GENERATED
UNDERGRADUATE:
Fall
Interactive Video and
Telecourse
2001
2002
Business
CLASS
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
63
148
28
239
28
92
24
144
2003
Percent Change
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
-33%
-70%
-29%
-67%
60
60
68
68
120
44
36
80
GRADUATE:
Interactive Video and
Telecourse
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Urban Affairs
Total
Fall
2001
2002
2003
Percent Change
2004
2005
1 Year
33
1,416
68
12
12
1,541
1,185
164
36
28
1,413
-16%
141%
200%
133%
-8%
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
1,185
164
36
44
64
1,493
-20%
141%
200%
1781%
128%
72
107
1,398
56
72
68
175
16
1,470
2001
2002
63
72
28
107
1,398
56
93
1,476
68
12
148
28
311
92
92
319
84
1,538
12
1,661
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
5 Year
128%
1863%
TOTAL:
Interactive Video and
Telecourse
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
118
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Fall
2003
Percent Change
433%
-10%
-70%
129%
380%
Table 6.16: 5-Year Trends in Web Based Instructional Delivery
Student Credit Hours Generated
UNDERGRADUATE:
Fall
Percent Change
Web-Based
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Other1
Total
147
36
12
108
64
42
10
244
196
111
84
70
10
120
620
120
276
32
117
1141
8%
229%
-54%
-100%
-3%
84%
-18%
667%
167%
15
117
28
32
22
260
210
17
476
664
1,015
1,686
66%
703%
Web-Based
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Total
52
76
82
61
271
66
76
48
90
280
28
77
88
84
111
388
36
108
28
129
301
44
475
22%
340%
-100%
-9%
111%
-15%
525%
-100%
92%
135%
680%
GRADUATE:
Fall
Percent Change
117
636
TOTAL:
Fall
Percent Change
Web-Based
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Other1
Total
147
88
88
82
76
117
94
108
70
350
136
141
130
94
355
196
111
120
178
38
249
620
120
320
507
234
1141
8%
167%
185%
-100%
-6%
84%
-18%
264%
476%
-100%
208%
481
17
756
1,052
1,316
2,322
76%
383%
Notes:
Interactive video: courses delivered via interactive television at two or more sites simultaneously.
Telecourse: Courses involving home viewing of videotaped programs, use of reading materials and some class interaction with the instructor.
Web-based: Courses delivered primarily using the Internet.
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a foreign language, Military Science, Special Program and Study Abroad.
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
119
5-Year Trends in Interactive Video and Web-Based
Instructional Delivery
■ New technologically enhanced classrooms in Rhodes Tower will offer state-of-the-art transmission of interactive
video courses.
■ CSU’s Bioethics certificate program, offered online through the Philosophy Department, has received nationwide
recognition.
■ The Department of Social Work in partnership with the University of Akron has very successfully offered graduate
social work classes for many years through interactive video and other distance learning approaches.
■ College of Engineering meets the needs of students at Ohio Aerospace Institute and NASA by offering on-site
interactive video courses.
■ The M.S. in Health Science degree program offers a 100% online option. The Master of Science in Nursing degree
now offers online options for the classroom component. Other online courses and degree programs are under
development, including the Master of Education in Educational Technology.
■ Requests for specific online courses have come from all over Ohio, the United States, various correctional facilities,
and foreign countries.
■ The University is organizing its resources for e-learning under the leadership of the Dean of Continuing Education,
who reports to the University Provost. This move is aimed at providing an increased strategic focus on e-learning,
enhanced faculty support, and greater student services, with the overall goal of increasing program options and
enrollments.
120
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 6.17: Cleveland State University Main Library Collections 2005
Main Library
Total
Volumes/
Units
Total
Titles
Print Volumes:
Monographs
Classed Serials
Periodicals
Total Print Volumes
495,242
633,714
10,606
201,832
9,268
190,246
515,116
1,025,792
Other Print Collections
Annual Reports
19,285
Maps
61,287
Total Print Items
80,347
Electronic Access
E-books
61,820
E-Journals
23,914
Databases
88
Total Electronic Items
61,908
Digitized holdings
Text
43,880
Images
45,454
Total Digitized Holdings
89,334
Microformats
724,627
Audiovisual Materials
Cataloged
25,797
Art Slides
46,269
97,051
Total AV Materials
25,797
143,320
Number
Total
Linear
Feet
Archives
Active Periodicals
2,731
Active Other Serials
2,044
Total Active Serials
4,775
Archival Materials
361
Source: University Main and Law Libraries
2,990
(Continued on next page)
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
121
Table 6.18: Cleveland State University Main Library Statistics
Main Library
FY01
FY04
FY05
Number of books checked out
198,362
310,506
325,119
Hits and downloads of Electronic Course Reserves
249,578
534,725
921,998
Hits and downloads of Electronic Journals
87,053
116,913
309,557
Reference & Technical questions answered
22,133
71,099
53,507
202
259
564
Instructions sessions provided by the Library
LCLC( Library Computer Learning Center) walk-in users
Visitors to the Library
Visitors (hits) to the Library’s Website
Electronic Books, journals, and databases
Percent of materials budget spent on electronic resources
23,121
32,626
27,724
561,897
647,449
348,806
6,447,507
16,151,251
17,050,582
24,773
59,095
61,908
38%
50%
Table 6.19: Cleveland State University Law Library Collections 2005
Law Library
Total
Titles
Total
Volumes/
Units
Print Volumes:
Titles(Excluding non-book titles )
Other non-book title
78,959
578
Microformats
71,049
Number of active serial subscriptions
3,243
Number of active serial titles
2,911
Volumes (excluding microforms)
287,483
Volumes equivalent of microforms
231,693
Table 6.20: Cleveland State University Law Library Statistics 2005
Filled
Number of material requests were sent by Law library
3,465
3,450
Number of material requests received by Law library
3,433
3,020
Source: University Main and Law Libraries
122
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
7
Faculty & Staff
Faculty & Staff
F
Table 7.1: Full-Time Employees by Equal Employment
Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2005
Executive, Administrative
Faculty
Other Professionals
Clerical
Technical
Skilled Crafts
Service, Maintenance
Total Full-Time Employees
Count
% of Total
72
575
609
252
37
20
102
1,667
4%
35%
37%
15%
2%
1%
6%
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of November 1, 2005
Figure 7.1: Full-Time Employees by EE06 Category
Fall 2005
Service, Maintenance 6%
Skilled Crafts 1%
Technical 2%
Executive, Administrative 4%
Faculty
35%
Clerical 15%
Other Professionals
37%
FACULTY & STAFF
125
Table 7.2: Full-Time Employees by Gender, Race
and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06)
Fall 2001 – 2005
EE06 Category/Race
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Percent Change
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
1 Year 5 Year
Executive, Administrative
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
45
8
14
6
1
1
1
4
39
8
3
8
6
1
1
39
7
5
10
8
1
1
18
50
271
17
9
52
146
24
7
14
187
1
350
241
75
3
7
326
57
23
50
16
White
271
Black
16
Hispanic
7
Asian/Pacific Islander
48
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
342
140
19
8
15
269
17
9
51
145
19
8
14
1
1
183
1
347
230
70
3
7
1
189
22
3
15
1
1
231
40
8
38
7
5
9
6
1
2
6
10
8
1
1
2%
0%
0%
17%
-17%
7%
0%
40%
-100%
1
54
20
52
20
3%
-10%
287
17
8
56
150
22
8
14
286
18
8
54
167
20
5
16
1
4%
-3%
-19%
0%
10%
9%
-13%
11%
191
1
369
1
195
366
209
205
23
3
16
255
74
3
9
207
25
2
22
268
75
5
8
204
29
2
21
1
248
341
3
259
2
358
1
257
262
74
6
7
2
1
352
-60%
-1%
16%
117
92
2
4
2
24
10
115
89
2
4
2
27
9
1
1
120
87
3
3
1
6%
-3%
100%
-20%
-50%
7%
-5%
-0%
-20%
-50%
2%
1%
Faculty
-100% -100%
2%
10%
Other Professionals
White
174
Black
22
Hispanic
1
Asian/Pacific Islander
18
Native American/Alaskan Native
1
Unknown
Total
216
311
-2%
3%
14%
-7%
15%
12%
100%
12%
0%
Clerical
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
25
9
113
92
4
4
2
21
9
35
215
22
5
2
1
3
3
1
118
89
4
4
2
23
9
31
217
33
217
35
212
38
214
25
5
1
1
6
4
24
5
2
1
5
4
24
4
2
1
5
3
21
4
3
5
4
32
10
32
9
31
8
28
9
1
1
1
Technical
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
-10%
4%
14%
0%
50%
50%
-100% -100%
1
30
7
-5%
0%
(Continued on next page)
126
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 7.2: Full-Time Employees by Gender, Race
and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06), in Percentage
Fall 2001 – 2005
(Continued from previous page)
EE06 Category/Race
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Percent Change
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
1 Year 5 Year
Skilled Crafts
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
14
10
2
1
14
7
2
1
14
7
2
13
7
2
13
6
1
0%
-14%
-50%
-7%
-40%
-50%
-100%
27
0
24
0
23
0
22
0
20
0
-9%
-26%
24
43
4
1
2
33
3
26
45
3
1
2
30
3
23
46
3
1
1
26
2
26
42
3
1
1
27
3
26
40
3
1
1
28
3
0%
-1%
0%
0%
4%
-11%
-14%
0%
72
38
75
35
73
29
72
31
70
32
-1%
-7%
White
575
502
583
520
600
533
619
549
616
565
1%
10%
Black
113
223
113
223
115
226
112
224
113
221
-1%
-1%
Hispanic
16
19
18
19
19
15
17
19
18
18
0%
3%
Asian/Pacific Islander
74
27
73
26
76
29
86
27
83
27
-3%
9%
Native American/Alaskan Native
1
5
1
3
0
2
0
2
0
4
100%
-33%
Unknown
0
1
2
0
3
0
4
3
1
1
-71%
100%
779
777
790
791
813
805
838
824
831
836
0%
7%
Service, Maintenance
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
Total Full-Time Employees
Total
Note: Fall 2001 data may not exactly match with IPEDS faculty report
Fall 2002 -2004 data is same as IPEDS report
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of November 1, 2005
FACULTY & STAFF
127
Table 7.3: Full-Time Employees by
Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06), in Percentage
Fall 2001 – 2005
Women and Minorities as Percent of Total
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Executive, Administrative
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
29%
18%
1%
6%
1%
26%
24%
21%
2%
6%
0%
29%
25%
19%
1%
10%
0%
32%
29%
21%
1%
9%
0%
31%
28%
21%
1%
10%
0%
32%
Faculty
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
35%
7%
3%
12%
0%
22%
35%
7%
3%
12%
0%
22%
35%
8%
3%
12%
0%
23%
35%
7%
3%
12%
0%
23%
36%
7%
2%
12%
0%
21%
Other Professionals
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
59%
17%
1%
5%
0%
23%
59%
17%
1%
4%
0%
23%
58%
16%
1%
4%
0%
22%
58%
16%
1%
5%
0%
23%
58%
17%
1%
5%
0%
23%
Clerical
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
86%
40%
2%
2%
1%
45%
88%
40%
2%
2%
1%
44%
87%
40%
1%
2%
1%
44%
86%
40%
1%
2%
1%
44%
85%
38%
2%
2%
0%
42%
Technical
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
19%
22%
5%
3%
3%
32%
24%
21%
2%
2%
0%
26%
22%
22%
5%
2%
0%
29%
21%
18%
5%
3%
0%
26%
24%
22%
8%
0%
0%
30%
Skilled Crafts
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
0%
37%
7%
4%
0%
48%
0%
29%
8%
4%
0%
42%
0%
30%
9%
0%
0%
39%
0%
32%
9%
0%
0%
41%
0%
30%
5%
0%
0%
35%
(Continued on next page)
128
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 7.3: Full-Time Employees by Gender, Race
and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06), in Percentage
Fall 2001 – 2005
Women and Minorities as Percent of Total
(Continued from previous page)
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Service, Maintenance
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
Total Full-Time Employees
35%
69%
6%
1%
0%
76%
32%
68%
5%
1%
0%
75%
28%
71%
5%
1%
0%
76%
30%
67%
6%
1%
0%
74%
31%
67%
6%
1%
0%
74%
Women
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
Black
22%
21%
21%
20%
20%
Hispanic
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
Asian/Pacific Islander
6%
6%
6%
7%
7%
Native American/Alaskan Native
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
31%
30%
30%
30%
29%
Minorities
Note: Fall 2001 data may not exactly match with IPEDS faculty report
Fall 2002 -2005 data is same as IPEDS report
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of November 1, 2005
FACULTY & STAFF
129
Table 7.4: Full-Time Employees by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
EE06 Category Description
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Executive/Administrative
Faculty
Other Professional
Clerical
Tech/Paraprofessional
Skilled Crafts
Service/Maintenance
Total Full-time Employees
80
525
527
250
37
27
110
1,556
66
534
557
248
42
24
110
1,581
72
541
589
250
41
23
102
1,618
70
564
617
247
39
22
103
1,662
72
575
609
252
37
20
102
1,667
3%
2%
-1%
2%
-5%
-9%
-1%
0%
-10%
10%
16%
1%
0%
-26%
-7%
7%
Table 7.5: Part-Time Employees by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
EE06 Category Description
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Executive/Administrative
Faculty
Other Professional
Clerical
Tech/Paraprofessional
Skilled Crafts
Service/Maintenance
Total Part-time Employees
1
386
192
35
2
1
445
179
33
379
165
28
414
157
25
2
430
151
24
1
4%
-4%
-4%
11%
-21%
-31%
-50%
15
673
19
591
17
615
12
618
-29%
0%
616
0%
Table 7.6: Total Employees by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
EE06 Category Description
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Executive/Administrative
Faculty
Other Professional
Clerical
Tech/Paraprofessional
Skilled Crafts
Service/Maintenance
Total Employees
81
911
719
285
39
27
110
2,172
67
979
736
281
42
24
125
2,254
72
920
754
278
41
23
121
2,209
70
978
774
272
41
22
120
2,277
72
1,005
760
276
38
20
114
2,285
3%
3%
-2%
1%
-7%
-9%
-5%
0%
-11%
10%
6%
-3%
-3%
-26%
4%
5%
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of November 1, 2005
130
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 7.7: Full-Time Faculty by Rank
Fall 2005
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Total
Professor
Associate
Professor
Assistant
Professor
Instructor
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
29
36
16
20
40
10
18
169
35%
23%
15%
36%
39%
45%
55%
30%
26
70
30
27
36
6
11
206
32%
44%
28%
48%
35%
27%
33%
37%
12
40
45
9
21
5
4
136
15%
25%
41%
16%
21%
23%
12%
24%
4
2
6
5%
1%
6%
11
12
12
13%
8%
11%
2
2%
14
2%
3
1
11
50
3%
5%
25%
9%
82
160
109
56
102
22
44
575
Term Faculty
Total
Note: Includes only standard academic ranks.
Table 7.8: Full-Time Faculty by Gender
Fall 2005
Regular Faculty
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Total
Male
Term Faculty
Female
Male
Total
Female
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
57
98
36
51
70
12
21
345
70%
61%
33%
91%
69%
55%
48%
60%
14
50
61
5
29
9
12
180
17%
31%
56%
9%
28%
41%
27%
31%
10
4
12%
3%
1
8
12
1%
5%
11%
1
7
29
5%
16%
5%
82
160
109
56
102
22
44
575
14%
28%
19%
10%
18%
4%
8%
100%
3
4
21
9%
4%
Table 7.9: Full-Time Faculty by Highest Degree
Fall 2005
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Total
Degree
Bachelors
1%
Masters
Doctorate
13%
17%
25%
7%
8%
14%
83%
83%
75%
93%
91%
86%
5%
79%
14%
Terminal
Professional
4%
1%
95%
7%
Total
Degree
14%
28%
19%
10%
18%
4%
7%
100%
87%
93%
77%
93%
93%
86%
100%
89%
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of November 1, 2005
FACULTY & STAFF
131
Table 7.10: Women and Minorities as a Percent of Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Institution
2001
2002
2003
2004
Women Minorities Women Minorities Women Minorities
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Total
38%
35%
30%
30%
37%
32%
28%
30%
30%
31%
31%
19%
16%
18%
23%
14%
13%
17%
15%
16%
12%
17%
38%
36%
30%
33%
38%
34%
28%
29%
30%
31%
31%
19%
16%
18%
25%
15%
14%
18%
14%
15%
13%
17%
37%
37%
31%
34%
39%
35%
28%
30%
30%
32%
32%
19%
16%
19%
25%
16%
15%
19%
15%
16%
18%
18%
2005
Women Minorities Women Minorities
37%
37%
33%
33%
40%
36%
28%
30%
30%
33%
33%
20%
17%
20%
25%
17%
17%
19%
16%
18%
18%
19%
36%
37%
33%
32%
41%
36%
29%
32%
29%
34%
33%
20%
17%
20%
25%
17%
17%
19%
16%
18%
18%
19%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Faculty Demographic (FD) query - rundate: April 26, 2006
Table 7.11: Percentage of Full-Time Faculty to Full-Time Employees
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions
Fall 2001 – 2005
Institution
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Total
35%
36%
34%
34%
30%
26%
19%
27%
36%
38%
27%
35%
36%
35%
34%
29%
25%
19%
27%
37%
37%
27%
33%
38%
34%
33%
30%
26%
21%
28%
38%
38%
28%
32%
38%
35%
34%
31%
25%
21%
28%
38%
39%
28%
32%
36%
35%
34%
31%
25%
20%
29%
38%
38%
28%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI All Employee (AM) query - rundate: April 27, 2006
Note: Percentage is the total number of full-time faculty divided by the total number of full-time employees.
132
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 7.12: Rate of Annual Student FTE to Number of Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions
Fall 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Institution
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
26.0
30.9
16.2
24.0
28.0
27.5
16.7
25.8
27.4
25.6
26.5
30.6
17.8
25.6
28.7
28.7
16.8
24.9
27.3
28.7
27.4
30.0
17.4
26.1
31.5
28.5
18.9
25.2
28.2
29.7
27.5
30.5
16.8
25.5
34.2
28.2
19.5
24.8
28.0
29.8
27.8
32.1
17.5
25.3
33.0
27.8
19.4
24.2
27.7
29.3
1.0%
5.5%
4.0%
-0.7%
-3.6%
-1.3%
-0.7%
-2.6%
-1.3%
-1.7%
7.1%
3.9%
7.9%
5.5%
17.7%
1.0%
16.2%
-6.3%
1.0%
14.3%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Faculty Demographics (FD) and Course Enrollment queries: run date: April 27. 2006
Note: Ratio equals the annualized student FTE for the fiscal year divided by the number of tenured or tenure-track faculty.
Table 7.13: Student FTE to Full-Time Staff Ratio
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fall 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Institution
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
11.3
11.8
5.9
10.6
9.7
6.9
3.5
8.1
11.3
15.0
11.5
11.5
5.8
10.5
9.8
7.0
3.7
8.0
11.7
15.2
11.1
11.7
5.8
10.4
10.5
6.9
3.6
8.5
12.1
15.7
10.9
11.8
5.7
9.8
10.5
6.6
3.5
8.5
11.5
15.6
10.5
10.6
5.7
9.6
10.5
6.3
3.3
8.7
11.4
14.9
-4.2%
-10.3%
0.7%
-2.4%
0.1%
-4.7%
-5.2%
2.3%
-1.0%
-4.5%
-7.7%
-9.8%
-2.8%
-9.1%
9.1%
-7.8%
-6.7%
7.4%
0.5%
-0.7%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI All Employees (AM) and Course Enrollment queries
run date: May 24, 2005
Note: Ratio equals the student FTE for the term divided by the number of non-faculty employees
employed on November 1 of each year.
FACULTY & STAFF
133
134
Table 7.14: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hour (SCH)
Generated by Part-Time Faculty
Fall 2005
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department
College of Business
Accounting
Computer & Information Science
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Other Business
Description
Accounting
Business Law
Computer and Information Science
Information Science
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
General Administration
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
International Business
Special Topics
Business Total
College of Liberal Arts And Social Sciences
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Interdisciplinary
Modern Languages
Music
SCH Generated
by Full-Time
Faculty
SCH Generated
by Part-Time
Faculty
1,965
273
879
1,473
1,312
1,597
183
1,774
1,142
15
501
75
48
390
216
273
609
140
321
10,613
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Drama
Economics
English
History
Linguistics
Women's Studies
Arabic
Chinese
English Translations of Foreign Literatures
French
German
Greek
Italian
Japanese
Latin
Modern Languages
Spanish
Applied Music
Music
1,087
1,910
4,446
306
906
2,515
4,056
48
94
351
24
2,597
196
976
2,132
151
1,393
4,446
2,444
196
115
20
274
60
4
150
76
55
902
49
701
114
170
100
33
895
271
1,760
Total SCH
Generated
% of SCH
Generated by
Part-Time
Faculty
2,466
348
927
1,863
1,528
1,870
792
1,914
1,463
15
24
13,210
20%
22%
5%
21%
14%
15%
77%
7%
22%
0%
100%
20%
1,283
2,886
6,578
457
2,299
6,961
6,500
48
290
351
115
20
388
230
4
150
100
109
55
1,797
320
2,461
15%
34%
32%
33%
61%
64%
38%
0%
68%
0%
100%
0%
29%
74%
0%
0%
100%
30%
0%
50%
85%
72%
(Continued on next page)
Table 7.14: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hour (SCH)
Generated by Part-Time Faculty
Fall 2005
(Continued from previous page)
Department
Description
Philosophy
Political Science
Religious Studies
Social Work
Sociology
CLASS Total
Philosophy
Political Science
Religious Studies
Social Work
Sociology
College of Education & Human Services
CASAL
Curriculum and Foundations
Health And Physical Education
Nursing
Teachers Education
Education Specialist
Curriculum & Instruction
Dance
Health and Physical Education
Health Education
HPER-Core Curriculum
Physical Education-Service
Nursing RN
Early Childhood Education
Education-SIP
Middle Childhood Education
Special Education
Specialized Instructional/Teacher Education
Specialized Study & Field Experiences
Education Total
College of Engineering
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
FACULTY & STAFF
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Dean’s Office
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Engineering Science
Civil Engineering
Engineering Science
Engineering Science
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Engineering Science
SCH Generated
by Full-Time
Faculty
1,269
1,872
572
885
2,885
25,493
208
1,359
47
798
213
55
2,701
530
61
256
510
517
1,542
8,797
328
245
459
307
70
1,044
109
SCH Generated
by Part-Time
Faculty
958
844
760
1,358
1,587
20,899
321
29
50
276
215
409
667
404
600
2,971
168
38
110
374
Total SCH
Generated
% of SCH
Generated by
Part-Time
Faculty
2,227
2,716
1,332
2,243
4,472
46,392
43%
31%
57%
61%
35%
45%
208
1,680
76
798
213
50
331
2,916
939
728
256
914
1,117
1,542
11,768
0%
19%
38%
0%
0%
100%
83%
7%
44%
92%
0%
44%
54%
0%
25%
328
413
497
417
70
1,418
109
0%
41%
8%
26%
0%
26%
0%
(Continued on next page)
135
136
Table 7.14: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hour (SCH)
Generated by Part-Time Faculty
Fall 2005
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Department
Description
Engineering Technology
Electronic Engineering Technology
General Engineering Technology
Math Technology
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Engineering Science
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Engineering Science
Mechanical Engineering
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Science Total
College of Urban Affairs
Urban Studies
Total SCH
Generated
% of SCH
Generated by
Part-Time
Faculty
76
1,118
0%
0%
0%
86%
49%
16%
0%
10%
21%
3,192
157
685
2,650
1,025
6,899
1,637
3,790
385
20,420
1,110
192
388
489
290
1,817
812
2,856
1,015
8,969
4,302
349
1,073
3,139
1,315
8,716
2,449
6,646
1,400
29,389
26%
55%
36%
16%
22%
21%
33%
43%
73%
31%
Environmental Studies
Public Safety Management
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
4
96
120
1,718
1,938
64
84
56
1,728
1,932
68
180
176
3,446
3,870
94%
47%
32%
50%
50%
ASC
Business Freshman Orientation
English
Mathematics
767
113
372
1,372
2,624
979
1,220
2,199
767
113
1,351
2,592
4,823
0%
0%
72%
47%
46%
74,206
40,685
114,891
35%
Biology
Environmental Sciences
Geological Sciences
Chemistry
Pre-Health Science
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Urban Affairs Total
158
73
28
24
178
169
431
698
4,321
SCH Generated
by Part-Time
Faculty
158
73
28
169
352
202
431
774
5,439
Engineering Total
College of Science
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
SCH Generated
by Full-Time
Faculty
145
174
33
University Studies
University Studies Total
Total SCH
Total SCH generated reported in this report may vary with other published reports. This report Includes the only SCH generated by instructors who have a valid I.D. available in the CSU employee database system.
S
Selected Administrative Centers, Departments & Offices
Selected Administrative
Centers, Departments
& Offices
8
Admissions Office:
Table 8.1: New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by College Fall 2001 – 2005
First Year
Percent Change
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Business
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
428
339
174
51.3%
476
362
186
51.4%
531
380
176
46.3%
569
369
169
45.8%
573
414
176
42.5%
1%
12%
4%
34%
22%
1%
CLASS
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
879
727
362
49.8%
978
804
388
48.3%
1,056
849
372
43.8%
997
748
236
31.6%
787
605
252
41.7%
-21%
-19%
7%
-10%
-17%
-30%
Education
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
160
117
62
53.0%
261
159
77
48.4%
265
152
64
42.1%
357
203
67
33.0%
403
281
111
39.5%
13%
38%
66%
152%
140%
79%
Engineering
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
147
123
73
59.3%
143
109
48
44.0%
185
132
68
51.5%
168
106
57
53.8%
218
153
59
38.6%
30%
44%
4%
48%
24%
-19%
Science
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
28
20
15
75.0%
72
36
23
63.9%
106
51
37
72.5%
302
231
202
87.4%
595
510
214
42.0%
97%
121%
6%
2025%
2450%
1327%
Urban Affairs
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
13
12
6
50.0%
27
22
11
50.0%
27
20
12
60.0%
40
28
19
67.9%
37
22
7
31.8%
-8%
-21%
-63%
185%
83%
17%
University Studies
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Total
662
660
375
56.8%
613
611
306
50.1%
590
589
281
47.7%
435
416
207
49.8%
532
529
223
42.2%
22%
27%
8%
-20%
-20%
-41%
Applied
2,317
2,570
2,760
2,868
3,145
10%
36%
Admitted
1,998
2,103
2,173
2,101
2,514
20%
26%
Enrolled
1,067
1,039
1,010
957
1,042
9%
-2%
Yield
53.4%
49.4%
46.5%
45.5%
41.4%
Notes:
Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
There are significant percentage changes in applications, admitted and enrolled numbers by college when comparing the Fall 2004 and Fall 2005 semesters. These
fluctuations are due to a major change in processing undergraduate admissions applications. Instead of placing a large number of students who might not immediately
qualify for their direct major into an undecided category (in CLASS), new academic pre-majors were created (i.e. pre nursing, pre pharmacy, pre engineering).
This allows the students area of interest to be tracked from the time of initial admission.
This fluctuation will also be seen in College level comparisons for Fall 2005 to Fall 2006. After that year, the comparisons should become stable again. The overall
increase for applications and admitted students (across all colleges) is correct.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
139
Admissions Office:
Table 8.2: New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by College
Fall 2001 – 2005
Transfer
Percent Change
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Business
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
555
444
275
61.9%
614
459
319
69.5%
649
406
279
68.7%
663
375
225
60.0%
676
448
254
56.7%
2%
19%
13%
22%
1%
-8%
CLASS
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
992
868
578
66.6%
1,172
1,011
656
64.9%
1,284
966
631
65.3%
990
606
323
53.3%
772
528
335
63.4%
-22%
-13%
4%
-22%
-39%
-42%
Education
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
270
228
154
67.5%
313
229
141
61.6%
396
227
141
62.1%
480
225
129
57.3%
574
395
213
53.9%
20%
76%
65%
113%
73%
38%
Engineering
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
113
85
64
75.3%
183
147
73
49.7%
174
113
81
71.7%
152
83
55
66.3%
151
97
64
66.0%
-1%
17%
16%
34%
14%
0%
Science
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
81
66
61
92.4%
106
61
51
83.6%
161
81
71
87.7%
313
194
192
99.0%
479
340
225
66.2%
53%
75%
17%
491%
415%
269%
Urban Affairs
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
71
64
55
85.9%
82
71
49
69.0%
85
60
46
76.7%
86
40
20
50.0%
73
56
40
71.4%
-15%
40%
100%
3%
-13%
-27%
University Studies
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Total
71
70
53
75.7%
103
100
61
61.%
123
77
51
66.2%
23
16
10
62.5%
139
132
87
65.9%
504%
725%
770%
96%
89%
64%
Applied
2,153
2,573
2,872
2,707
2,864
6%
33%
Admitted
1,825
2,078
1,930
1,539
1,996
30%
9%
28%
-2%
Enrolled
1,240
1,350
1,300
954
1,218
Yield
67.9%
65.0%
67.4%
62.0%
61.0%
Notes:
Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
For Fall 2004 & 2005, significant increase in applied, admitted & enrolled of College Science due to creation of a new academic plan UNDCA and UNDCS.
Consequently, number of students applied, admitted and enrolled in University Studies has decreased.
140
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Admissions Office:
Table 8.3: New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by Race
Fall 2001 – 2005
First Year
Percent Change
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
White
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
1,297
1,195
658
55.1%
1,384
1,248
632
50.6%
1,433
1,232
580
47.1%
1,445
1,205
551
45.7%
1,639
1,429
610
42.7%
13%
19%
11%
26%
20%
-7%
African-American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
645
506
259
51.2%
806
569
263
46.2%
897
635
295
46.5%
909
538
235
43.7%
1,021
712
283
39.7%
12%
32%
20%
58%
41%
9%
Hispanic
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
85
70
39
55.7%
103
81
37
45.7%
131
105
45
42.9%
122
91
34
37.4%
163
141
49
34.8%
34%
55%
44%
92%
101%
26%
Asian
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
71
63
32
50.8%
67
63
37
58.7%
85
75
35
46.7%
87
74
26
35.1%
101
85
45
52.9%
16%
15%
73%
42%
35%
41%
Native American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
10
8
3
37.5%
7
5
2
40.0%
10
3
0
0.0%
9
4
1
25.0%
13
8
4
50.0%
44%
100%
300%
30%
0%
33%
Total Minority
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
811
647
333
51.5%
983
718
339
47.2%
1,123
818
375
45.8%
1,127
707
296
41.9%
1,298
946
381
40.3%
15%
34%
29%
60%
46%
14%
Race Unknown
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
134
116
68
58.6%
130
98
58
59.2%
126
93
43
46.2%
201
147
94
63.9%
130
106
42
39.6%
-35%
-28%
-55%
-3%
-9%
-38%
Applied
75
73
78
95
78
-18%
4%
Admitted
40
39
30
42
33
-21%
-18%
-44%
13%
Non-Resident Alien
Enrolled
8
10
12
16
9
Yield
20.0%
25.6%
40.0%
38.1%
27.3%
2,317
2,570
2,760
2,868
3,145
10%
36%
Total
Applied
Admitted
1,998
2,103
2,173
2,101
2,514
20%
26%
Enrolled
1,067
1,039
1,010
957
1,042
9%
-2%
Yield
53.4%
49.4%
46.5%
45.5%
41.4%
Note: Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
141
Admissions Office:
Table 8.4: New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by Race
Fall 2001 – 2005
Transfers
Percent Change
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
White
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
1,243
1,098
756
68.9%
1,536
1,294
864
66.8%
1,713
1,240
844
68.1%
1,586
1,007
619
61.5%
1,723
1,320
827
62.7%
9%
31%
34%
39%
20%
9%
African-American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
434
333
220
66.1%
558
385
235
61.0%
687
355
235
66.2%
709
277
176
63.5%
777
406
229
56.4%
10%
47%
30%
79%
22%
4%
Hispanic
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
78
66
41
62.1%
80
65
43
66.2%
82
56
35
62.5%
75
44
28
63.6%
84
60
38
63.3%
12%
36%
36%
8%
-9%
-7%
Asian
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
53
44
33
75.0%
51
44
35
79.5%
61
41
28
68.3%
49
32
16
50.0%
75
64
36
56.3%
53%
100%
125%
42%
45%
9%
Native American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
8
5
3
60.0%
6
5
0
0.0%
8
4
4
100.0%
10
6
4
66.7%
13
6
4
66.7%
30%
0%
0%
63%
20%
33%
Total Minority
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
573
448
297
66.3%
695
499
313
62.7%
838
456
302
66.2%
843
359
224
62.4%
949
536
307
57.3%
13%
49%
37%
66%
20%
3%
Race Unknown
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
240
216
149
69.0%
245
218
131
60.1%
209
160
110
68.8%
214
137
87
63.5%
143
107
66
61.7%
-33%
-22%
-24%
-40%
-50%
-56%
Non-Resident Alien
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Total
97
63
38
60.3%
97
67
42
62.7%
112
74
44
59.5%
64
36
24
66.7%
49
33
18
54.5%
-23%
-8%
-25%
-49%
-48%
-53%
Applied
2,153
2,573
2,872
2,707
2,864
6%
33%
Admitted
1,825
2,078
1,930
1,539
1,996
30%
9%
28%
-2%
Enrolled
1,240
1,350
1,300
954
1,218
Yield
67.9%
65.0%
67.4%
62.0%
61.0%
Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
142
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Admissions Office:
Table 8.5: New Graduate & Law Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by College
Fall 2001 – 2005
Graduate & Law
Percent Change
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
621
388
216
55.7%
967
603
318
52.7%
1,034
689
328
47.6%
911
517
236
45.6%
1,010
619
291
47.0%
11%
20%
23%
63%
60%
35%
238
164
106
64.6%
333
231
156
67.5%
330
220
133
60.5%
399
234
142
60.7%
370
266
169
63.5%
-7%
14%
19%
55%
62%
59%
383
302
225
74.5%
635
482
404
83.8%
819
510
424
83.1%
792
323
211
65.3%
691
496
319
64.3%
-13%
54%
51%
80%
64%
42%
564
319
74
23.2%
864
509
119
23.4%
1,021
603
123
20.4%
702
380
101
26.6%
691
377
91
24.1%
-2%
-1%
-10%
23%
18%
23%
256
150
80
53.3%
334
185
112
60.5%
360
197
118
59.9%
413
205
106
51.7%
402
217
127
58.5%
-3%
6%
20%
57%
45%
59%
153
122
78
63.9%
182
132
83
62.9%
200
141
81
57.4%
200
113
62
54.9%
174
102
57
55.9%
-13%
-10%
-8%
14%
-16%
-27%
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Total
1,181
607
271
44.6%
1,316
572
259
45.3%
1,555
581
263
45.3%
1,816
526
218
41.4%
1,744
535
232
43.4%
-4%
2%
6%
48%
-12%
-14%
Applied
3,396
4,631
5,319
5,233
5,082
-3%
50%
Admitted
2,052
2,714
2,941
2,298
2,612
14%
27%
Enrolled
1,050
1,451
1,470
1,076
1,286
20%
22%
Yield
51.2%
53.5%
50.0%
46.8%
49.2%
Business
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
CLASS
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Education
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Engineering
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Science
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Urban Affairs
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Law
Notes: Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
143
Admissions Office:
Table 8.6: New Graduate & Law Applications Trends
for New Degree-Seeking Students by Race
Fall 2001 – 2005
Graduate & Law
Percent Change
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
White
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
1,693
1,144
687
60.1%
2,185
1,369
914
66.8%
2,600
1,436
958
66.7%
2,558
1,073
611
56.9%
2,365
1,210
744
61.5%
-8%
13%
22%
40%
6%
8%
African-American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
363
163
122
74.8%
490
224
182
81.3%
546
227
164
72.2%
581
183
130
71.0%
567
259
173
66.8%
-2%
42%
33%
56%
59%
42%
Hispanic
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
72
37
21
56.8%
95
56
34
60.7%
95
50
33
66.0%
107
29
12
41.4%
84
39
15
38.5%
-21%
34%
25%
17%
5%
-29%
Asian
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
64
38
20
52.6%
90
59
34
57.6%
107
59
32
54.2%
146
54
27
50.0%
528
268
80
29.9%
262%
396%
196%
725%
605%
300%
Native American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
7
5
1
20.0%
9
3
2
66.7%
11
7
5
71.4%
7
3
1
33.3%
19
9
5
55.6%
171%
200%
400%
171%
80%
400%
Total Minority
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
506
243
164
67.5%
684
342
252
73.7%
759
343
234
68.2%
841
269
170
63.2%
1,198
575
273
47.5%
42%
114%
61%
137%
137%
66%
Race Unknown
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
118
87
59
67.8%
147
100
75
75.0%
183
105
75
71.4%
480
190
111
58.4%
813
427
182
42.6%
69%
125%
64%
589%
391%
208%
Non-Resident Alien
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Total
1,079
578
140
24.2%
1,615
903
210
23.3%
1,777
1,057
203
19.2%
1,354
766
184
24.0%
706
400
87
21.8%
-48%
-48%
-53%
-35%
-31%
-38%
Applied
3,396
4,631
5,319
5,233
5,082
-3%
50%
Admitted
2,052
2,714
2,941
2,298
2,612
14%
27%
Enrolled
1,050
1,451
1,470
1,076
1,286
20%
22%
Yield
51.2%
53.5%
50.0%
46.8%
49.2%
Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
144
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Office of Advancement:
CCSU Foundation
Alumni, faculty, staff, friends, corporations and foundations support Cleveland State
University each year with philanthropic gifts. These gifts provide additional resources that are necessary for sustaining a
high quality educational experience for the University’s diverse student body. Various appeals and initiatives are conducted
through the Annual Giving Program, including direct mailings to all alumni, student phonathon drives, specialized mailings
from various departments within the University, an annual appeal among the faculty and staff of Cleveland State University,
and collaboration with multiple special events held both on and off campus.
Table 8.7: CSU Foundation: 5-Year Giving History by College/Division
Endowment (Program Giving & Scholarship)
College/Division
Business
Arts & Sciences1
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affiars
Law
Athletics
General University
Library
Office of the President
Total Endowment
2002
2003
2004
2005
2,072,113
2,112,372
2,165,665
1,840,350
2,669,591
2,013,076
2,899,291
128,617
183,554
122,348
226,085
456,422
1,526,333
3,149,705
2,975,492
904,559
1,015,013
7,499,485
377,839
$20,418,749
3,780,387
3,180,440
955,066
1,666,517
8,591,902
281,994
$22,810,753
4,419,997
4,038,463
1,310,687
2,746,043
11,707,763
327,242
$31,215,616
1,710,087
1,377,706
1,563,151
300,489
4,488,599
4,433,144
1,353,712
3,265,074
13,517,851
302,066
$35,211,170
Percent Change
2006
1 Year
5 Year
3,388,980
17%
64%
-100%
1,908,446
1,803,765
2,358,942
338,565
5,183,857
5,173,875
1,523,262
4,199,599
16,724,915
330,191
$42,934,396
12%
31%
51%
13%
15%
17%
13%
29%
24%
9%
22%
Program Giving2
College/Division
Business
Arts & Sciences1
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affiars
Law
Athletics
General University
Library
Office of the President
Total Program
2002
584,365
1,176,693
2003
564,694
877,442
2004
652,669
664,919
17,894
17,331
329,262
1,037,562
2,476,212
1,468,406
1,700
11,156
692,486
377,839
6,222,387
3,075,118
1,466,408
10,850
11,497
676,382
281,994
6,417,022
3,541,574
2,001,485
11,682
14,789
779,089
327,242
8,707,604
1302%
1185%
65%
74%
68%
314%
123%
-13%
110%
Percent Change
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
653,711
709,989
9%
21%
-100%
451,719
650,130
1,057,119
192,514
3,553,935
2,070,501
21,682
15,940
791,845
302,066
9,107,452
494,532
1,017,334
1,144,595
215,902
3,970,769
2,269,257
38,828
201,836
906,662
330,191
10,589,906
9%
56%
8%
12%
12%
10%
79%
1166%
14%
9%
16%
5585%
60%
55%
1709%
31%
-13%
70%
Note: 1Arts & Sciences data for 2005 includes combined data of the College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences and the College of Science.
2
Program giving includes gifts for academic programs, support for colleges, faculty and staff development, technological upgrades and facilities and equipment.
Source: CSU Office of Advancement
(Continued on next page)
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
145
Office of Advancement:
(Continued from previous page)
Table 8.7: CSU Foundation:
5-Year Giving History by College/Division
Scholarship
College/Division
2002
Percent Change
2003
2004
2005
1,487,748
935,679
1,600,971
962,908
2,016,922
1,348,157
2,245,580
Business
Arts & Sciences1
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affiars
Law
Athletics
General University
Total Scholarships
110,723
183,554
105,017
226,085
127,160
488,770
673,493
1,507,086
902,859
1,003,857
6,806,999
705,269
1,714,032
944,216
1,655,020
7,915,520
878,423
2,036,978
1,299,004
2,731,254
10,928,674
1,258,368
727,576
506,032
107,975
934,664
2,362,642
1,332,031
3,249,133
12,726,006
Total Endowments
$13,029,387
$14,332,542
$19,636,278
$21,833,458
2006
1 Year
5 Year
2,678,991
19%
80%
1,413,915
786,431
1,214,346
122,662
1,213,087
2,904,619
1,484,434
3,997,762
15,818,253
12%
8%
140%
14%
30%
23%
11%
23%
24%
80%
93%
64%
298%
132%
$26,408,159
21%
103%
610%
562%
1
Note: Arts & Sciences data for 2005 includes combined data of the College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences and the College of Science.
2
Program giving includes gifts for academic programs, support for colleges, faculty and staff development, technological upgrades and facilities and equipment.
Table 8.8: CSU Foundation: Endowed Scholarship, Donors & Giving
Endowed:
Percent
Increase
Average
Increase
FY2002
FY2006
1 Year
Per Year
2
111
4
172
100%
74%
20%
15%
Donors:
Alumni
Total
4,520
6,930
5,118
7,890
13%
14%
3%
3%
Giving:
Alumni
Total
$812,608
$4,510,831
$2,136,488
$6,707,266
163%
49%
33%
10%
Chairs
Scholarships
Philanthropic Highlights: 2005 – 2006
■ Iris S. Wolstein, in loving memory of her husband, Bert L. Wolstein, a distinguished 1953 graduate of Cleveland State’s
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, created the Bert L. Wolstein Building Fund and the Bert L. and Iris S. Wolstein
Endowed Scholarship Fund at the Cleveland State University Foundation with a commitment of $6.25 million.
The Wolstein Building Fund and Wolstein Scholarship Fund are being created with a $5 million gift to support the Law
Building upgrade project and a $1.25 million challenge-pledge to support the creation of an endowed scholarship fund,
the Bert L. and Iris S. Wolstein Endowed Scholarship Fund.
■ Parker Hannifin Corporation has made a $4 million philanthropic gift commitment to the University in support of student
scholarships and building improvements. The gift is the largest corporate endowment the University has ever received,
as well as the largest gift ever made by the Parker Hannifin Foundation. Parker Hannifin has directed $3 million to
the creation of an endowment fund for undergraduate and graduate scholarships in Cleveland State’s Fenn College of
Engineering. In addition, $1 million will be directed to the creation of an endowment fund for building improvements
for the Cleveland State University Administration Center and the structure formerly known as Howe Mansion.
146
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Athletics Department:
Table 8.9: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University
Enrollment
Men’s
Baseball
Basketball
Fencing
Golf
Soccer
Swimming & Diving
Tennis
Wrestling
Total Men
Cumulative GPA Males
2000 – 2001
Enrollment %
33
12
11
10
14
17
7
23
127
2001 – 2002
Enrollment %
26%
9%
9%
8%
11%
13%
6%
18%
100%
2.76
27
13
9
7
12
15
9
21
113
2002 – 2003
Enrollment %
24%
12%
8%
6%
11%
13%
8%
19%
100%
2.82
2003 – 2004
Enrollment %
43 25%
17 10%
12
7%
12
7%
21 12%
25 15%
8
5%
33 19%
171 100%
38
15
9
12
22
21
8
32
157
N/A
N/A
2004 – 2005
Enrollment %
24%
10%
6%
8%
14%
13%
5%
20%
100%
39
18
12
10
22
27
9
24
161
24%
11%
7%
6%
14%
17%
6%
15%
100%
2.80
2005 – 2006
Enrollment %
32
13
7
7
12
24
5
19
119
27%
11%
6%
6%
10%
20%
4%
16%
100%
2.80
Women’s
Basketball
Cross Country
Fencing
Golf
Soccer
Softball
Swimming & Diving
Tennis
Volleyball
Total Women
Cumulative GPA Females
14
19%
13%
4%
14
12
4
4
17%
15%
5%
5%
10
3
15
16
6
11
75
20%
21%
8%
15%
100%
17
13
7
10
81
21%
16%
9%
12%
100%
14
11
8
8
14%
11%
8%
8%
21 21%
18 18%
9
9%
13 13%
102 100%
16
10
12
6
11
16
16
5
14
106
15%
9%
11%
6%
10%
15%
15%
5%
13%
100%
16
6
10
8
20
14
13
7
13
107
15%
6%
9%
7%
19%
13%
12%
7%
12%
100%
18
4
2
9
15
20
18
7
12
105
3.07
3.04
N/A
N/A
3.2
3.27
202
194
273
263
268
224
Cumulative GPA, All Athletes2.87
2.90
N/A
2.97
2.98
3.03
Total All Athletes
17%
4%
2%
9%
14%
19%
17%
7%
11%
100%
Note: Enrollment reflects students who received athletic financial aid. GPA reflects fall term.
Source: CSU Athletics Department
N/A: data not available
Table 8.10: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University
4, 5, or 6 Year Graduation Rate
Fall
New Undergraduate First-Time,
Full-Time Degree-Seeking,
First Year Athletes
1995
Enrollment
Total Athletes
Athletes Graduated in 4 years
Athletes Graduated in 5 years
Athletes Graduated in 6 years
Total Graduated within 6 years
35
3
16
1
20
%
9%
46%
3%
57%
1996
Enrollment
34
5
4
3
12
%
15%
12%
9%
35%
1997
Enrollment
45
7
10
1
18
%
16%
22%
2%
40%
1998
Enrollment
42
4
9
4
17
%
10%
21%
10%
40%
1999
Enrollment
50
10
11
2
23
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
%
20%
22%
4%
46%
147
Finance:
Table 8.11: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Changes
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2005
2002
$ Amount
2003
%
$ Amount
2004
%
$ Amount
2005
%
$ Amount
Percent Change
%
1 Year 4 Year
Operating Revenues
Student Tuition and Fees, Net
75,005,194 70%
87,476,820 73%
94,218,733 70%
Federal Grants & Contracts
8,715,781
8%
9,573,688
8%
16,855,658 13%
State Grants & Contracts
5,795,513
5%
4,950,773
4%
4,917,905
4%
Local Grants & Contracts
666,628
1%
412,511
7%
454,970
Private Gifts, Grants & Contracts 3,743,207
4%
3,271,610
3%
3,650,183
3%
Sales & Services
3,051,843
3%
3,524,384
3%
3,740,626
3%
Auxiliary Enterprises
9,373,135
9%
9,737,716
8%
10,086,036
8%
Other Sources
562,050
1%
440,062
440,350
Total Operating Revenues
106,913,351 100% 119,387,564 100% 134,364,461 100%
101,993,591 71%
17,523,555 12%
6,239,897
4%
1,005,353
1%
2,357,913
2%
4,267,629
3%
10,400,368
7%
529,133
144,317,439 100%
8%
4%
27%
121%
-35%
14%
3%
20%
7%
36%
101%
8%
51%
-37%
40%
11%
-6%
35%
84,586,586 59%
14,415,812 10%
15,772,621 11%
21,497,685 15%
17,882,807 12%
24,366,609 17%
15,973,865 108%
11,116,158
8%
14,819,276 10%
15,051,884 10%
235,483,303 163%
5%
-4%
32%
6%
-1%
4%
17%
5%
103%
23%
22%
10%
11%
11%
24%
-4%
18%
Operating Expenses
Instruction
72,191,351 36%
77,629,017 37%
80,475,402 36%
Research
13,677,414
7%
13,493,627
6%
15,036,515
7%
Public Service
7,780,852
4%
7,842,716
4%
11,982,936
5%
Academic Support
17,544,043
9%
15,459,491
7%
20,344,432
9%
Student Services
14,604,875
7%
16,051,512
8%
18,006,608
8%
Institutional Support
22,225,254 11%
22,115,999 11%
23,513,279 10%
Operation & Maintenance of Plant 14,327,574
7%
16,886,095
8%
16,017,335
7%
Scholarships and Fellowships
10,046,991
5%
11,003,580
5%
10,580,518
5%
Auxiliary Enterprises
11,965,027
6%
13,081,920
6%
14,939,356
7%
Depreciation and Amortization
15,668,985
8%
15,166,745
7%
15,045,070
7%
Total Operating Expenses
200,032,366 100% 208,730,702 100% 225,941,451 100%
5%
-1%
4%
Non-Operating Items
State Appropriations
Federal Grants and Contracts
State Grants and Contracts
Gifts
Investment Income
Interest on Debt
State Capital Appropriations
Capital Gifts
Other Nonoperating Items
Total Non-Operating Items
74,131,715
10,283,740
3,376,991
3,389,263
2,839,644
581,163
6,007,809
20,500
75%
10%
3%
3%
3%
-1%
6%
72,246,181 72%
10,622,713 11%
3,429,428
3%
4,281,426
4%
1,893,283
2%
685,952
-1%
6,185,883
6%
526,463
1%
2,217,110
2%
99,468,499 100% 100,716,535 100%
71,982,028
10,837,343
3,557,298
3,942,821
1,342,775
445,808
4,459,787
133,659
75%
11%
4%
4%
1%
5%
95,809,903 100%
70,512,253
10,486,828
3,625,749
3,740,658
2,246,285
404,415
1,298,863
337,160
4,250,000
96,093,381
49%
7%
3%
3%
2%
31%
0%
3%
67%
-2%
-5%
-3%
2%
2%
7%
-5%
10%
67% -21%
-9% -30%
-71% -78%
152% 1,545%
-3%
Net Assets
Increase in Net Assets
6,349,484
2%
11,373,397
4%
4,232,913
1%
Net Assets at Beginning of Year 279,910,245 98% 286,259,729 96% 297,633,126 99%
Net Assets at End of Year
286,259,729 100% 297,633,126 100% 301,866,039 100%
Source: Controllers Office
148
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
4,927,517
3%
301,866,039 209%
306,793,556 213%
16%
1%
2%
-22%
8%
7%
Finance:
Figure 8.11a: Total Revenues
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2005
120,000,000
100,000,000
80,000,000
60,000,000
40,000,000
20,000,000
0
2002
2003
Tuition & Fees
2004
State Subsidy
2005
Other
Figure 8.11b: Operating Expenses
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2005
120,000,000
100,000,000
80,000,000
60,000,000
40,000,000
20,000,000
0
2002
2003
Instruction & Dept. Research
Academic Support
Non-Instructional Expenditure
2004
Institutional Support
Student Services
2005
Operation & Maintenance of Plant
Other
Source: Controllers Office
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
149
Finance:
Table 8.12: Public Service Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Institution
Cleveland State University
University of Cincinnati
Youngstown State University
University of Akron
Ohio University
Kent State University
Ohio State University
Bowling Green State University
University of Toledo
Miami University
Total
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
4%
7%
4%
4%
3%
4%
5%
4%
2%
1%
4%
4%
6%
4%
4%
3%
4%
5%
3%
2%
1%
4%
4%
6%
5%
4%
3%
4%
5%
3%
2%
1%
4%
5%
6%
5%
5%
4%
3%
4%
3%
1%
7%
6%
5%
4%
4%
3%
3%
3%
2%
4%
4%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Current Fund Expenditures (CF) queries: run date: April 27, 2006
Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for public service for the fiscal year divided by the total expenditures.
■ In proportion to total spending, Cleveland State University’s Public Service expenditures have consistently remained among the
highest in the state of Ohio.
Table 8.13: Benefit Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Institution
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Ohio State University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Miami University
University of Cincinnati
Ohio University
University of Akron
Cleveland State University
Bowling Green State University
Kent State University
Total
9%
17%
17%
14%
15%
16%
13%
14%
11%
15%
13%
13%
19%
18%
14%
16%
12%
12%
14%
12%
12%
14%
15%
20%
18%
15%
16%
15%
15%
17%
12%
12%
15%
25%
22%
20%
15%
16%
17%
15%
17%
13%
13%
19%
26%
21%
19%
17%
16%
15%
15%
15%
13%
13%
19%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Funding Unit Expenditures (FX) queries. Rundate: May 1, 2006
Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for benefits for the fiscal year divided by total expenditure
150
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Finance:
Table 8.14: Scholarship and Fellowship Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Institution
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
7%
12%
9%
8%
9%
7%
5%
7%
10%
15%
8%
14%
10%
9%
10%
8%
5%
10%
11%
16%
9%
15%
10%
9%
11%
9%
5%
9%
11%
17%
9%
16%
11%
9%
12%
9%
5%
9%
11%
16%
9%
18%
11%
9%
11%
8%
5%
10%
11%
16%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Current Fund Expenditures (CF) queries
Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for scholarships and fellowships divided by total expenditures.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
151
Financial Aid Office:
CCleveland State University’s Financial Aid Programs
Cleveland State University’s
financial aid programs are of help to students who might otherwise be unable to
attend the University. Over two-thirds of CSU students receive some form of financial assistance. The University participates
in all of the major federal and state grant and loan programs. In addition, CSU provides university grants and scholarships
to many of our students. Our goal is to reduce the difference between educational costs related to attendance and the
amount that parents and students can reasonably be expected to contribute towards the student’s education.
Table 8.15: Financial Aid Awards to Undergraduate Students by Full-Time/Part-Time Status
Average Aid Package and Academic Year
Percent Change
2001 – 02
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
2005 – 06
1 Year
5 Year
Full-time Students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
2,957
$5,526
4,256
$6,557
4,660
$6,893
4,779
$7,070
4,656
$7,247
-3%
3%
57%
31%
Part-time Students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
2,294
$6,006
872
$5,487
925
$5,942
768
$6,351
969
$5,788
26%
-9%
-58%
-4%
Source: Common Data Set, H2-row D and row J
152
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Financial Aid Office:
Table 8.16: Financial Aid Awards Fall Cohort, Full-Time, First-Time,
Degree-Seeking Undergraduate Students
Percent Change
Federal Grants:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
State Grants:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
Scholarships/Institutional Grants:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
Federal Student Loans:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
Total Cohort
2000 – 2001
2001 – 2002
2002 – 2003
2003 – 2004
2004 – 2005
1 Year
5 Year
342
$2,455
407
$3,058
443
$3,131
450
$3,029
428
$3,187
-5%
5%
25%
30%
465
$1,107
573
$1,167
354
$1,449
352
$1,276
359
$1,700
2%
33%
-23%
54%
320
$2,687
339
$2,960
281
$2,583
329
$3,064
337
$4,209
2%
37%
5%
57%
325
$3,108
N=934
375
$3,473
N=1,008
434
$4,176
N=946
523
$4,109
N=925
582
$3,759
N=922
11%
-9%
79%
21%
Source: IPEDS Financial Aid Survey (http://www.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/pdf/webbase2005/sfa_public_form.pdf)
Table 8.17: Financial Aid Awards to Fall Term Undergraduate Students
Percent Change
Types of Financial Aid
2001 – 02
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
2005 – 06
1 Year
5 Year
Federal Grants
State Grants
Institutional Grants/Scholarships
Athletic Grants
Non-Institutional Assistance
Federal Student Loans and
Federal Work Study (FWS)
Total
$8,016,614
$3,045,818
$1,809,095
$1,155,681
$1,350,179
$9,975,480
$3,253,147
$1,816,869
$1,437,017
$1,370,441
$10,796,340
$3,466,864
$1,922,391
$1,604,388
$1,105,335
$10,510,202
$3,669,003
$2,645,487
$1,778,844
$1,576,205
$10,740,865
$3,639,726
$3,809,689
$1,965,892
2%
-1%
44%
11%
-100%
34%
19%
111%
70%
-100%
$27,408,603
$42,785,990
$29,622,729
$47,475,683
$35,005,307
$53,900,625
$36,724,673
$56,904,414
$37,992,769
$58,148,941
3%
2%
39%
36%
Source: Common Data Set, H1
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
153
Financial Aid Office:
Table 8.18: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards
by Full-Time/Part-Time Status and Average Aid Package
Percent Change
2001
Full-time Students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
386
Average Aid Package
$11,390
Part-time students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
919
Average Aid Package
$9,499
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
429
$12,872
464
$13,352
422
$14,287
420
$14,440
-1%
1%
9%
27%
1241
$10,246
1509
$10,918
1530
$11,500
1516
$11,680
-1%
2%
65%
23%
Source: CSU Financial Aid Office
Table 8.19: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid
Fall 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Types of Financial Aid
State Fellowship
Scholarships/Institutional Grants
Non-Institutional Assistance
Federal Student Loans and
Federal Work Study (FWS)
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
$7,000
$3,942,474
$431,916
$5,250
$4,403,008
$707,433
$7,000
$4,646,633
$862,866
$5,250
$4,167,408
$598,666
$5,250
$4,155,637
$586,742
-1%
-2%
-25%
5%
36%
$8,766,965
$13,150,877
$17,187,052
$18,842,082
$18,658,326
-1%
113%
Table 8.20: Law Student Financial Aid Awards
Full-Time/Part-Time Status and Average Aid Package
Percent Change
2001
Full-time Students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
449
Average Aid Package
$15,632
Part-time students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
219
Average Aid Package
$13,246
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
504
$17,104
513
$17,779
473
$19,763
474
$19,728
1%
-1%
5.6%
26%
201
$14,146
191
$15,023
180
$15,548
181
$15,452
1%
-1%
-17%
17%
Source: CSU Financial Aid Office
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
Table 8.21: Law Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid
Fall 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Types of Financial Aid
State Fellowship
Scholarships/Institutional Grants
Non-Institutional Assistance
Federal Student Loans and
Federal Work Study (FWS)
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
$3,500
$844,262
$194,302
$3,500
$914,408
$351,311
$7,000
$868,253
$302,052
$10,500
$1,088,141
$295,451
$8,877,575
$10,194,602
$10,812,678
$10,746,545
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
154
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
1 Year
5 Year
$10,500
$1,092,137
$297,851
1%
1%
200%
29%
53%
$10,191,028
-5%
15%
Financial Aid Office:
Table 8.22: Undergraduate Cost of Attendance (COA)
Academic Year
Tuition/Fees
Books and Supplies
Room/Board
Personal/Miscellaneous
Transportation
Loan Fees
Total
2000 – 01
2001 – 02
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
2005 – 2006
$4,110
$700
$5,200
$850
$1,260
$360
$12,480
$4,464
$800
$5,550
$1,824
$852
$360
$13,850
$5,184
$800
$5,880
$2,376
$1,400
$360
$16,000
$6,040
$800
$6,236
$2,376
$1,400
$360
$17,212
$6,820
$800
$6,392
$2,376
$1,400
$360
$18,148
$7,344
$800
$6,809
$2,376
$1,400
$360
$19,089
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
Table 8.23: Annualized Full-Time Undergraduate Tuition and Fees
for Selected Main Campuses of Ohio 4-Year Institutions
2005 – 2006
Undergraduate
University Main Campuses
In-State Fees
Out-Of-State
Bowling Green State
Bowling Green State University(B)
Cleveland State University(A)
$8,248
$8,560
$7,022
$15,556
$15,868
$9,456
Cleveland State University(B)
$7,394
$9,976
$7,573
$7,958
$7,954
$7,848
$8,235
$21,410
$7,323
$7.980
$8,082
$8,877
$7,478
$6,333
$16,298
$16,682
$15,386
$15,840
$17,199
$21,430
$18,546
$19,203
$19,305
$22,629
$16,290
$11,541
University(A)
Akron(A)
University of
University of Akron(B)
Kent State University
Ohio University(A)
Ohio University(B)
Miami University(1)
Ohio State University(A)
Ohio State University(B)
Ohio State University(C)
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
(A) Denotes fees charged to continuing students who enrolled before the 2002 summer term
(B) Denotes fees charged to continuing students who enrolled after the 2002 summer term
(C) Denotes fees charged to new students entering autumn term 2003, if different than fees charged to
continuing students
(1) Miami’s in-state students receive an Ohio Resident Scholarship and an Ohio Leader Scholarship. These scholarships reduce Miami’s resident undergraduate tuition
to an average of $9,542 per year. Data from OBOR
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
155
Financial Aid Office:
Table 8.24: Award of Financial Aid at Ohio’s Public
Title IV Postsecondary Institutions
Percent of First-Time, Full-Time, Degree-Seeking First Year Student Receiving Aid
Average Award Amounts, Academic Year 2004 – 2005
Federal Grants
Institution
State Grants
Any Aid %
%
Avg. Grant $
%
Avg. Grant $
University Main Campuses
Institution Grants
%
Avg. Grant $
Federal Loans
% Avg. Grant $
79
26
2,940
20
1,560
40
3,811
53
4,166
Bowling Green State University
84
23
2,770
19
2,546
35
5,238
68
5,005
Cleveland State University
80
49
3,029
38
1,276
36
3,064
57
4,109
Kent State University
82
37
2,907
22
1,918
39
3,935
62
4,236
Miami University
64
8
3,288
7
1,612
30
4,108
47
5,404
Ohio State University
87
20
2,844
16
1,780
77
3,907
44
4,047
Ohio University
69
16
2,802
12
1,515
32
3,955
48
4,018
University of Akron
87
39
3,014
31
1,292
23
3,269
61
3,825
University of Cincinnati
87
27
3,302
20
1,358
34
4,189
61
3,241
University of Toledo
74
24
3,018
19
1,315
36
2,931
53
4,622
Youngstown State University
87
44
3,003
44
1,416
31
2,874
55
3,938
Source: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) as reported by Ohio Board of Regents
156
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Financial Aid Office:
The undergraduate financial aid
NNotes
reported reflects awards to undergraduate students enrolled
in the fall semester of the academic year. The university awards financial aid on a continuous basis
throughout the academic year. However, this data reflects a specific point and time as defined by IPEDS
(http://www.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/pdf/webbase2003/sfa_public_form.pdf) and the Common Data Set
(www.commondataset.org), generally accepted as the 15th day of fall semester.
Full-time undergraduate, graduate and law students are those enrolled for 12 or more credit hours. Part-time
undergraduate students are enrolled for 11 or fewer credit hours. Part-time graduate and law student enrollment
ranges from 6 to 11 credit hours.
The “Cost of Attendance” tables reflect the estimated average cost of attendance for a full-time, in-state student
attending CSU for two (2) semesters during the academic year, and includes estimated tuition and fee charges,
books, allowances for room and board, transportation and loan fees.
Types of Financial Aid
Federal Grants: Pell Grant, Supplemental Opportunity Educational Grant (SEOG).
State Grants for Undergraduates: Ohio Instructional Grant, Part-Time Instructional Grant, Other State tuition
grant programs.
State Aid for Graduate/Law Students: Graduate and Professional Fellowship
Scholarship/Institutional Grants for Undergraduates: Refer to http://www.csuohio.edu/fao/scholarships.htm
for listing.
Scholarship/Institutional Grants for Graduate/Law Students: Includes Graduate Assistantships, Tuition Waiver
and Scholarships.
Non-Institutional Aid: Assistance awarded from external agencies.
Federal Student Loans: Stafford subsidized /unsubsidized and Federal Perkins loans.
FWS: A federally-funded student employment program established to assist students through part-time,
on-campus positions or off-campus community service positions.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
157
Center for International Services & Programs:
IInternational Services
“The Center for International Services & Programs
(CISP) seeks to build a globally oriented,
metropolitan university where students, faculty and staff gain international knowledge and experience. Established in 1996
as a separate department, CISP provides international students and visitors with a wide array of support services to help
them achieve a positive learning experience while in the U.S. CISP is designed to help international students and visitors
transition into the campus both academically and personally. Support services range from admissions advising, immigration
advising, individualized counseling, study abroad programs, faculty exchanges, Fulbright Scholar advising, and various
international academic initiatives. A full description of services can be found at: http://www.csuohio.edu/internat/
Table 8.25: Enrollment by Country or Region
Fall 2005
Number of
Students
Country
India . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Taiwan, Republic of China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Korea, Republic of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Turkey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Lebanon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Thailand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Romania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Pakistan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Russian Federation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Nigeria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Senegal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Kenya . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Indonesia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Israel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Bulgaria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Jordan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
158
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Country
Number of
Students
South Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Nepal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Tanzania, United Republic of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Saudi Arabia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Japan, Zambia, Viet Nam, Venezuela, Ukraine, Peru,
Chile. Sri Lanka, Colombia. United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Ireland, Kuwait, Egypt, Botswana, Jamaica,
Mexico, Poland, Philippines, Hong King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Italy, Bangladesh, France, Norway, Latvia,
Syrian Arab Republic, Albania, Malawi, Yugoslavia
Singapore, United Arab Emirates, Palestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Switzerland, Trinidad and Tobago, Uzbekistan
Czech Republic, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Georgia, Belarus, Bahamas, Australia, Argentina
Yemen, Ecuador, Malaysia, Spain
Korea, Democratic Peoples Republic, Panama,
Greece, Hungary, New Zealand, Netherlands, Morocco
Mongolia, Madagascar, Kazakhstan, St. Vincent
and the Grenadines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Total
831
Center for International Services & Programs:
Table 8.26: CSU Fulbright Scholar Awards 1973 – 2006
Year
Scholar
1973 – 1974 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1978 – 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1983 – 1984 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1985 – 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1986 – 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1987 – 1988 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1988 – 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1990 – 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1992 – 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1993 – 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1994 – 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1995 – 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1997 – 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1998 – 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1999 – 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2000 – 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2001 – 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2002 – 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2003 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2004 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2005 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2006 – 2007
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Countries/Regions Visited
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ivory Coast
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands, Belgium
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Philippines, France, England
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China, India
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brazil, Greece
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Greece
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hungary, Korea, Botswana, Yugoslavia, India
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Portugal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hungary, Czechoslovakia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . India, Ethiopia, China
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . El Salvador, Ethiopia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kenya, Nigeria, Japan, Lithuania
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kenya, Nigeria, Russia, Germany, Norway
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kyrgyzstan, India, Germany
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sri Lanka, Germany, Brazil
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Israel
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Botswana, Zambia, Uganda, India, Nepal, Russia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Croatia, Guatemala, South Africa
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bulgaria, United Arab Emirates
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Morocco, South Africa, Zambia, Latvia, Taiwan
Table 8.27: Cleveland State University International Academic Initiatives
College
Academic Initiatives
Activities
College of
Business
Expand International
Business Education and
Outreach Services in
Northeast Ohio
Title VI Grant: $200,857 to create the Great Lakes Regional Consortium and expand
existing partnerships; Add a “Global Trade Scholar” program; Provide market research,
international trade and investment assistance; Improve credit transfer between
community colleges and CSU for international business degree programs
College of
Liberal Arts and
Social Sciences
Middle Eastern
Studies Program
Title VI Grant: $139,754 to establish a minor and courses in Middle Eastern Studies;
Teach Arabic language and culture; Promote international understanding and
diplomacy; Support security and military requirements.
International
Relations Major (BA)
This major is designed to give students the opportunity to engage in a multi-disciplinary
study of the variety of subjects related to international affairs. International relations
majors will concentrate in an in-depth study of one of the following areas: International
Business and Economics, Asia Studies, Central and Post-Soviet States, Africa and the
Middle East, or Latin America and the Caribbean.
Modern Languages
Arabic courses, Chinese courses, English Translations of Foreign Literature (ENF)
courses, French (B.A.), German (B.A. – suspended) minor, Greek courses, Italian
courses, Japanese courses, Latin courses, Modern Language (culture; or languages such
as Portuguese, Russian, or Quechua) courses, Spanish (B.A.)
Faculty Led Short
Programs
Language and Culture in Mexico
Contemporary Social Issues in India
Language and Culture in Spain
A Changing Political Landscape in China
International Marketing and Business Research in England
Business & CLASS
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
159
Center for International Services & Programs:
Table 8.28: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year
(Summer, Fall & Spring) and Program Type
Percent Change
Program Type
2002 – 03
Faculty Led
Exchange
Internship
Independent
Law Institute
Total
75
4
5
12
11
107
2003 – 04
64
2
10
17
93
2004 – 05
60
4
4
35
12
115
2005 – 2006
73
4
2
36
22
137
1 Year
4 Year
22%
-3%
-50%
3%
83%
19%
-60%
200%
100%
28%
Table 8.29: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year
(Summer, Fall & Spring) and College
Percent Change
College
2002 – 03
Business
CLASS
COS
Education
Engineering
Urban
Law
Total
2003 – 04
13
46
2
31
1
3
11
107
16
43
10
6
18
93
2004 – 05
33
58
1
6
2
3
12
115
2005 – 2006
18
66
7
4
1
5
36
137
1 Year
4 Year
-46%
14%
600%
-33%
-50%
67%
200%
19%
39%
44%
250%
-87%
67%
227%
28%
Table 8.30: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year
(Summer, Fall & Spring) and Course Level
Percent Change
Academic Level
2002 – 03
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Total
64
32
11
107
160
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
2003 – 04
46
30
17
93
|
2004 – 05
84
19
12
115
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
2005 – 2006
81
20
36
137
1 Year
4 Year
-4%
5%
200%
19%
27%
-38%
227%
28%
Center for International Services & Programs:
Table 8.31: Key International Links
Country
Institution
Year Introduced
GERMANY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weingarten Hoschule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1976
UNITED KINGDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buckinghamshire College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1978
RUSSIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . St. Petersburg State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1983
(www.spbu.ru/e/)
BOTSWANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . University of BOTSWANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1985
http://www.ub.bw/
TAIWAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chung Yuan Christian University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1986
(www.cycu.edu.tw)
FRANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clermont-Ferrand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994
(www.univ-bpclermont.fr)
GERMANY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Berufsakadamie Heidenheim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1996
(www.ba-heidenheim.de)
KOREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chung Ang University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1997
(www.cau.ac.kr)
INDIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loyola University Kerala State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1998
UNITED KINGDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sunderland University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1998
(www.sunderland.ac.uk)
ZAMBIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Copperbelt University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1998
NIGERIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bayero University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1999
CROATIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . University of Rijeka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2000
EASTERN EUROPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Research and Exchange Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2000
(http://www.irex.org)
KYRGYZSTAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . University of Peoples Friendship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2001
Jalalabat Commercial Institute
Osh State University
MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Center for Bilingual Multicultural Studies: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2001
Cuernavaca
CHILE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Universidad de Concepcion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2002
CHINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jiangxi Shifan University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2002
CHINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dalian Institute of Foreign Languages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003
FRANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Groupe ESSCA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003
GUATEMALA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Universidad de Rafael Landivar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003
SWEDEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UMEA University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003
CHINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . East China Normal University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2005
Source: CISP Center for International Services and Programs.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
161
Office of Space Management:
Table 8.32: Cleveland State University
Fall 2005 Building Inventory
Notes
[4] [5]
[5] [6]
[2]
[3]
[2]
[2] [6]
[3]
[4]
[2]
[1]
[6]
[3]
Building Code
AA
AB
AM
BB
BS
BU
CB
CE
CL
CM
DE
EST
FL
FS
FT
HH
HS
KB
KI
LB
LL
MC
MM
MU
PA
PE
PF
PR
PS
RT
RW
SH
SI
SR
TA
UC
UR
VH
WG
WO
WST
Building
Advance Manufacturing Annex
Art Building
Advanced Manufacturing Center
Bakers Building
Bookstore
Business College
Chester Building
Cole Center for Continuing Education
Corlett
CAMP Building
Doan Electric
East Campus Extension
Field Locker Building
Field Service Building
Fenn Tower
Parker Hannifin Hall
Health Sciences
Keith Building
Kinko Building
Law Building
Law Library
Main Classroom Building
Mather Mansion
Music & Communication Building
Plant Annex Building
Physical Education
University Parking Facilities
Presidents Residence
Plant Services
Rhodes Tower
Rhodes West
Stilwell Hall
Science Building
Science and Research Center
Theater Arts Building
University Center
Urban College
Viking Hall
University West Garage
Wolstein Center
West Center Campus Extension
Grand Total
Notes:
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
162
Non assignable square footage includes recorded circulation, mechanical, and structural spaces
Currently being renovated.
Leased spaces
Plan for demolition
Non-Institutional Use
Currently being renovated
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Year
Acquired
Total Gross
Square Feet
1993
1973
1984
2003
1966
1998
1970
1990
1974
1994
2002
2004
1985
1985
1964
1984
1998
2003
1997
1977
1997
1970
1967
1988
1985
1973
1979
1995
1970
1971
9,800
41,163
23,005
24,837
17,735
126,245
109,728
56,653
53,050
82,470
61,359
12,695
2,194
1,305
188,746
27,600
23,654
32,369
15,912
113,738
111,870
326,342
43,938
151,533
8,579
201,860
269,594
5,133
134,590
493,968
1964
1969
1978
1967
1974
2000
1986
1996
1989
2003
195,779
171,242
142,479
22,416
199,484
87,792
172,091
199,599
289,000
12,068
4,263,615
A
Accreditation
Cleveland State University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, a commission of the North Central
Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA).
College
Degree Program
Accreditation
Business
Bachelor of Business Administration
Master of Business Administration
AACSB International,
The Association to Advance Collegiate
Schools of Business
AACSB International,
The Association to Advance Collegiate
Schools of Business
Accrediting Commission of
Education for Health Services
Administration (ACEHSA)
Accounting
Health Care Administration
Science
Chemistry (undergraduate)
Clinical Chemistry (graduate)
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Academic and clinical programs in
Speech-Language Pathology
Academic Program
Clinical Program
College of Education and
Human Services
Ohio Department of Education and The
National Council for the Accreditation of
Teacher Education (NCATE)
Community Agency Counseling and
School Counseling
Council for Accreditation of
Counseling and Related Educational
Programs (CACREP)
Psychology Specialist (School Psychology)
National Association of School
Psychologists (NASP) and NCATE
National League for Nursing
Accreditation Commission (NLN-AC)
and Ohio Board of Nursing
Commission on Collegiate Nursing
Education (CCNE)
Nursing (undergraduate)
Nursing (graduate)
Engineering
American Chemical Society
Commission on Accreditation in
Clinical Chemistry (ComACC)
Accreditation Council for
Occupational Therapy Education
Commission on Accreditation in
Physical Therapy Education
American Speech-Language and
Hearing Association (ASHA)
ASHA Council on
Academic Accreditation (CAA)
Professional Services Board (PSB)
Chemical, Civil, Electrical, Industrial, and
Mechanical Engineering (undergraduate)
Electronic Engineering Technology
Engineering Accreditation Commission
of the Accreditation Board for Engineering
and Technology (EAC/ABET)
Technology Accreditation Commission
of the Accreditation Board for Engineering
and Technology (TAC/ABET)
Law
Law
American Bar Association and member
of the Association of American Law Schools
Liberal Arts and
Social Sciences
Music
National Association of Schools of Music
Social Work
Council of Social Work Education (CSWE)
Master of Public Administration
National Association of Schools of Public
Affairs and Administration (NASPAA)
Planning Accreditation Board
Urban
Master of Urban Planning, Design,
and Development
i
L
List of College Acronyms and Abbreviations
Nance College of Business Administration: College of Business, Business
College of Education and Human Services: COEHS, College of Education, Education
Fenn College of Engineering: College of Engineering, Engineering
College of Graduate Studies: Graduate Studies
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law: Law
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences: CLASS
College of Science: COS, Science
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs: College of Urban Affairs, Urban Affairs
O
Other Acronyms and Abbreviations
CIP: Classification of Instructional Program
EEO6: Equal Employment Opportunity
FTE: Full-Time Equivalent (Student Credit Hour/15)
GPA: Grade Point Average
IPEDS: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
N/A: Not applicable or Not available
OBOR: Ohio Board of Regents
SCH: Student Credit Hour
ii
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Affirmative Action Statement
A
Cleveland State University
is committed to the principle of equal opportunity in employment and
education. No person at the university will be denied opportunity for employment or education or be subject to
discrimination in any project, program, or activity because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, sexual
orientation, handicap or disability, disabled Veteran, Vietnam-era veteran or other protected veteran status.
06-00502 /.75M © Cleveland State University Department of Marketing and Public Affairs