B
Book of Trends
2005
B
Book of Trends
Office of Planning, Assessment and Information Resource Management
Phone (216) 687-5324
Gitanjali Kaul
Vice Provost for PAIRM
Eric Brown
Senior Report Developer
Debra Sudy
Administrative Coordinator
Office of Institutional Research and Analysis
Phone (216) 687-4700
www.csuohio.edu/iraa
Jeffrey Chen
Director
Hasina Khanom
Research Analyst
Jean Mason
Research Analyst
Gerald Moran
Senior Analyst and Systems Developer
Sean Su
Programmer Analyst
2005
TTable of Contents
Page
1
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3
University Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Board of Trustees 2004 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Distinguished Alumni Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
President’s Medal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS AND TRENDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-15
Table 1: Cleveland State University Enrollment by Level, Fall 1965 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table 2: Enrollment by College, Level and Load, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Table 3: Full-Time Enrollment by Race and Gender, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Table 4: Total Enrollment by Race and Gender, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Table 5: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Entrance Status, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Table 6: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Entrance Status, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Table 7: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by Academic Load, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Table 8: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by Academic Load, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Table 9: New Fall Enrollment by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Table 10: Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Table 11: Total Enrollment, Fall Enrollment by Academic Level: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Table 12: FTE Generated Internally and Externally by College, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Table 13: Fall Enrollment Trend by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Table 14: Fall Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Table 15: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table 16: Enrollment by Age Category Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Table 17: Enrollment by Level and Country of Residence Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 18: Enrollment by State Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 19: Enrollment by Ohio County Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Map of 2004 Enrollment by Ohio County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 20: Spring Enrollment Trends by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 21: Spring Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trends by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 22: Summer Enrollment Trends by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 23: Summer Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trends by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 24: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions, Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 25: Main Campus Enrollment Select Ohio Four Year Institutions, Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1a
Page
3
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-40
Table 1-10 Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-16
Table 1:
College of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2
Table 2:
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4
Table 3:
College of Education and Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6
Table 4:
College of Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
Table 5:
College of Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-10
Table 6:
College of Urban Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 7:
College of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 8:
University Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 9:
Undergraduate Non-Degree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 10:
Graduate Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 11:
Dual Major Headcount Enrollment by College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15-16
Table 12-19 Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-24
4
1b
Table 12:
College of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Table 13:
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Table 14:
College of Education and Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 15:
College of Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Table 16:
College of Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table 17:
College of Urban Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Table 18:
College of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Table 19:
University Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Table 20:
CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25-27
Table 21:
CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28-30
Table 22:
CSU Graduate and Law Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31-33
Table 23:
Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Load: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Table 24:
Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College and Load: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Table 25:
West Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Table 26:
East Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Table 27:
CSU Off-Campus Location in Cleveland: Fall Semester Student Credit Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Division of Continuing Education, Enrollment by Program Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38-40
RESEARCH
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-17
Table 1:
Research Awards and Expenditures, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table 2:
Research Awards by Source, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3
Table 3:
Research Expenditures by Source, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Table 4:
Research Expenditures Reported by OBOR at Ohio Public Universities, Fiscal Year 1987 – 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Table 5:
Total R&D Expenditures at Universities and Colleges, Fiscal Year 1998 – 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Table 6:
Indirect Cost (IDC) Recovery and Total Research Expenditures by Year, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . 8
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Page
Table 7:
Established Full-Time Faculty Research Development Program, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table 8:
Fiscal Year 2004 Proposal Submission Awards by Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Table 9:
Proposal Submissions and Awards, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 10: Ohio Board of Regents Biennial Research Challenge Distributions, Fiscal Years 2000 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 11: Intellectual Property: Patents and Disclosures, Fiscal Years 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 12: Cleveland State University Signature Research Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 13: Total Student Credit Hours Taken by Graduate Level Students at Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions: Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 14: Cleveland State University Graduate Student Support from Externally Funded Research,
Fiscal Years 2001 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 15: Cleveland State University Centers and Institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 16: Past Recipients of Distinguished Faculty Awards by Award Type 1986 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5
RETENTION AND GRADUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-14
Table 1:
Fall to Fall Student Return Rate, Enrolled Fall 1999-2000/Returned Fall 2003 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table 2:
Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by Race and Gender, Enrolled Fall
1999 – 2003/Returned Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Table 3:
Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by College, Enrolled Fall
1999 – 2003/Returned Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Table 4:
Three-Year Mobility of Undergraduate Students Enrolled Spring Term 2004 by Institution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Table 5:
Attended, Graduated and Retained Fall to Fall Student Tracking (IPEDS Cohort) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Table 6:
Attended, Graduated and Retained Fall to Fall Student Tracking (Transfer Cohort) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Table 7:
Fall to Fall Undergraduate First-Year Full-Time Degree-Seeking Cohort Graduation
and Retention Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Table 8-15: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-14
Table 8:
University Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Table 9:
College of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7
Table 10:
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Table 11:
College of Education and Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table 12:
College of Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Table 13:
College of Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 14:
College of Urban Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 15: College of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 16: Annual Degrees Awarded by Race and Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-14
6
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-18
Table 1:
Characteristics of Inaugural Class of Honors Students, Fall 2004 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table 2:
Scholarship Aid for Honors Students in Fiscal Year 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table 3:
ACT Composite Score by College and Gender, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1c
Page
Table 4:
ACT Composite Score by College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Table 5:
Cumulative GPA by College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Table 6:
Top 15 Majors by Academic Level, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Table 7:
Top 15 Programs with Highest Minority Student Enrollment by Academic Level, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Table 8:
Top 15 Programs with Highest Female Student Enrollment by Academic Level, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Table 9:
Delaware Study Benchmarks: Student Credit Hours and FTE Students Taught per FTE Faculty for
Tenured and Tenure-Track Full-Time Faculty, Fall 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6
Table 10: Fall Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
Table 11: Spring Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-10
Table 12: Summer Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-12
Table 13: Fall Undergraduate Student FTE by College and Class Time, Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 14: Fall Graduate and Law Student FTE by College and Class Time, Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 15: 5-Year Trends in Interactive Video and Telecourse Instructional Delivery:
Student Credit Hours Generated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 16: 5-Year Trends in Web Based Instructional Delivery Student Credit Hours Generated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15-16
Table 17: Cleveland State University Main Library Collections 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Table 18: Cleveland State University Main Library Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Table 19: Cleveland State University Law Library Collections 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Table 20: Cleveland State University Law Library Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
7
FACULTY AND STAFF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-12
Table 1: Full-Time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table 2: Full- Time Employee by Gender, Race and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6
(EEO6) Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3
Table 3: Full-Time Employee by Gender, Race, Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Table 4: Full-time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Table 5: Part-Time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Table 6: Total Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Table 7: Full-Time Faculty by Rank, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Table 8: Full-Time Faculty by Gender, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Table 9: Full-time Faculty by Highest Degree, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Table 10: Women and Minorities as a Percent of Tenured/Tenured-Track Faculty Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Table 11: Percentage of Full-Time Faculty to Full-Time Employees, Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions,
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Table 12: Rate of Annual Student FTE to Number of Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty, Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table 13: Student FTE to Full-Time Staff Ratio Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table 14: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hours (SCH) Generated by Part-Time
Faculty, Fall 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-12
1d
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Page
8
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS & OFFICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-24
Admissions Office: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-6
Table 1:
New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by College, Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table 2:
New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by College, Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Table 3:
New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by Race, Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Table 4:
New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by Race, Fall 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Table 5:
New Graduate and Law Application Trends for New Degree-Seeking Students
by College, Fall 2001 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Table 6:
New Graduate and Law Application Trends for New Degree-Seeking Students
by Race, Fall 2001– 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Office of Advancement: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
Table 7:
CSU Foundation: 5 Year Giving History by College/Division . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
Table 8:
CSU Foundation: Endowed Scholarship, Donors & Giving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Athletes Department: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table 9:
Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University Enrollment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table 10: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University 4, 5 or 6 Year Graduation Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Finance: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-13
Table 11: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Changes, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . 10-11
Table 12: Public Service Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures, Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 13: Benefit Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Instructional Expenditures Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 14: Scholarship and Fellowship Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Financial Aid: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14-19
Table 15: Financial aid Awards to Undergraduate Students by Full-Time/Part-Time Status:
Average Aid Package and Academic Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 16: Financial Aid Awards Fall Cohort, Full-time, First-Time, Degree-Seeking
Undergraduate Students 15
Table 17: Financial Aid Awards to Fall Term Undergraduate Students . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 18: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Full-Time/Part-Time Status
& Average Aid Package . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1e
Page
Table 19: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid, Fall 2000 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 20: Law Student Financial Aid Awards by Full-Time/Part-Time Status and
Average Aid Package . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 21: Law Students Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid, Fall 2000 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 22: Undergraduate Cost of Attendance (COA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Table 23: Annualized Full-Time Undergraduate In-State Tuition and Fees for Selected
Main Campuses of Ohio, 4 Years Institutions, 2004-2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Table 24: Award of Financial Aid at Ohio’s Public and Private Title IV Postsecondary
Institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Table 25: Scholarship and Fellowship Expenditures as a Percentage to Total Expenditures,
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2000-2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Center for International Services and Programs (CISP): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-23
Table 26: Enrollment by Country or Region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Table 27: CSU Fulbright Scholar Awards 1973 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table 28: Cleveland State University International Academic Initiatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table 29: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring)
and Program Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Table 30: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring)
and College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Table 31: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring)
and Course Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Table 32: Key International Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Office of Space Management: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Table 33: Cleveland State University Fall 2004 Building Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Accreditations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
List of Acronyms & Abbreviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1f
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Introduction
1
*DIVIDER PAGES 9/11/05 3:57 PM Page 1
I
Introduction
University Administration
Michael Schwartz
President
Chin Y. Kuo
Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs
John J. Boyle III
Vice President for Business Affairs and Finance
Michael Droney
Vice President for Information Services
Ned Hill
Vice President for Economic Development
Njeri Nuru-Holm
Vice President for Student Affairs and Minority Affairs
William Spiker
Vice President for University Advancement and Executive Director, CSU Foundation
Sonali B. Wilson
University Legal Counsel
Chin Y. Kuo
Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs
Charles Alexander
Dean, Fenn College of Engineering
Barbara Hanniford
Dean, Continuing Education
James McLoughlin
Dean, College of Education and Human Services
Geoffrey S. Mearns
Dean, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
Gregory M. Sadlek
Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Mark S. Rosentraub
Dean, Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
Mary Jane Saunders
Dean, College of Science
Robert F. Scherer
Dean, Nance College of Business Administration
Gitanjali Kaul
Vice Provost for Planning, Assessment and Information Resource Management
Vijaya Konangi
Vice Provost for Academic Affairs and Faculty Relations
Edward Mills
Vice Provost for Enrollment Services
Mark A. Tumeo
Vice Provost for Research and Dean of Graduate Studies
INTRODUCTION
1
Board of Trustees 2004 – 2005
Trustee
Term
Timothy J. Cosgrove
Chairman
October 1997 – May 2007
Trevor O. Jones
Vice Chairman
February 2001 – May 2011
Ronald E. Weinberg
Treasurer
May 2005 – May 2014
Michael L. Climaco
January 1997 – May 2006
Sally Florkiewicz
June 1998 – May 2012
Carl D. Glickman
June 1999 – May 2008
David G. Hill
March 1996 – May 2010
Samuel H. Miller
May 1999 – May 2013
Vir K. Sondhi
June 2000 – May 2009
Vijaya K. Konangi
Faculty Representative
Term expires September 2006
Edward G. Thomas
Faculty Representative
July 2003 – June 2006
Katherine Cheng Li
Student Representative
May 2004 – May 2006
J. Gregory Young
Student Representative
May 2003 – May 2005
Sonali B. Wilson
Secretary
Standing: (left to right) Katherine Cheng Li (Student Rep), Sonali B. Wilson (Board Secretary), David G. Hill, Samuel H. Miller, Carl D. Glickman, Michael L.
Climaco, J. Gregory Young (Student Rep), Dr. Edward G. Thomas (Faculty Rep).
Seated: (left to right) Ronald E. Weinberg (Treasurer), Trevor O. Jones (Vice Chairman), Dr. Michael Schwartz (President), Timothy J. Cosgrove (Chairman),
Sally D. Florkiewicz, Dr. Vijaya K. Konangi (Faculty Rep).
Not pictured: Trustee Vir K. Sondhi
2
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Distinguished Alumni Award
Annually, outstanding graduates of Cleveland State University are honored for their service, leadership and career
achievements with a Distinguished Alumni Award.
2004 Honorees
2005 Honorees
Ronald Adrine
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
Mary Grimm
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Robert B. Jaquay
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
William J. Hunt
College of Science
Charlene Mancuso
Charles H. Joseph
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
Ronald R. Ledin, P.E.
George B. Davis Award for Service to the University
Cynthia Moore-Hardy
College of Business Administration
Dr. Kofi Lomotey
College of Education and Human Services
Dr. Benjamin J. Kearney
College of Education and Human Services
David Reines
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
College of Business Administration
James A. Thomas
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
P. Kelly Tompkins
George B. Davis Award for Service to the University
Dr. Catherine Rokicky
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
President’s Medal
The most prestigious non-academic recognition that Cleveland State University can confer, the President’s Medal, is awarded
to individuals, groups or entities whose commitment and dedication to the University are beyond question. The medal is
conferred only when the honoree has made continuing and /or extraordinary contributions, or has provided exemplary and
ongoing services that have directly and tangibly advanced the best interests and mission of Cleveland State University. The first
President's Medal was presented in November 2004.
Recipients
2004
Delos M. (Toby) Cosgrove
2005
Babs Glickman
Maria Miller
2006
Dr. Julian Earls
President’s Medal
INTRODUCTION
3
C
Campus Enrollment
Characteristics
& Trends
Campus Enrollment Characteristics & Trends
2
*DIVIDER PAGES 9/11/05 3:57 PM Page 2
Table 1: Cleveland State University Enrollment by Level
Fall 1965 – 2004
Year
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Total
Year
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Total
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
6,026
7,853
8,431
8,836
9,442
10,734
11,257
11,758
11,986
12,895
13,278
13,401
13,896
13,143
13,154
14,330
14,167
14,177
14,195
13,426
N/A
N/A
184
248
1,220
1,171
1,760
2,045
2,212
2,300
2,568
2,808
2,851
3,125
3,242
3,751
3,883
3,715
3,768
3,589
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
775
742
772
909
1,003
1,066
1,128
1,138
1,168
1,164
1,184
1,169
1,090
1,052
979
1,018
6,026
7,853
8,615
9,084
11,437
12,647
13,789
14,712
15,201
16,261
16,974
17,347
17,915
17,432
17,580
19,250
19,140
18,944
18,942
18,033
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
12,502
13,220
13,236
12,971
13,409
13,825
13,531
12,716
11,966
11,341
10,698
10,728
10,675
11,215
10,453
10,222
10,433
10,363
10,269
9,847
3,347
4,005
3,945
3,850
4,115
4,331
4,500
4,504
4,240
4,251
4,065
3,905
4,154
4,244
4,480
4,425
4,480
4,819
5,163
5,107
917
1,016
1,006
1,000
1,011
1,064
1,060
979
931
912
908
889
906
867
749
759
833
816
814
752
16,766
18,241
18,187
17,821
18,535
19,220
19,091
18,199
17,137
16,504
15,671
15,522
15,735
16,326
15,682
15,406
15,746
15,998
16,246
15,706
Highlights
■ Total CSU Enrollment was
highest between 1980–81
and 1990–91.
■ Undergraduate enrollment
was at its peak in 1980 and
continued to drop except
for a slight increase
between 1989 and 1991.
■ Graduate enrollment
continues to grow except
for a slight decrease in
1987, 1988 and 1996.
■ College of Law enrollment
has been capped in recent
years to decrease class size.
Figure 1:
Cleveland State University Enrollment Trend
Fall 1965 – 2004
25,000
20,000
Headcount
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Note: CSU switched from quarter to semester terms in 1998.
15,000
10,000
5,000
1
65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20
Table 2: Enrollment by College, Level and Load
2
Fall 2004
Undergraduate
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
Full-Time
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Total
1,368
2,005
54
974
459
1,048
163
–
570
66
–
6,707
Graduate & Law
Part-Time
Total
Undergraduate
% of Total
584
613
20
441
189
332
113
–
659
189
–
3,140
1,952
2,618
74
1,415
648
1,382
274
–
1,229
255
–
9,847
20%
27%
1%
14%
7%
14%
3%
0%
12%
3%
0%
100%
Full-Time
386
225
–
318
101
294
92
466
–
–
6
1,888
Figure 2.1: Enrollment by Level
Part-Time
886
253
–
1,608
352
237
269
286
–
–
80
3,971
Total
Graduate & Graduate &
Law Total Law % Total
1,272
478
–
1,926
453
531
361
752
–
–
86
5,859
22%
8%
0%
33%
8%
9%
6%
13%
0%
0%
1%
100%
Full-Time
Part-Time Total
1,754
2,230
54
1,292
560
1,342
255
466
570
66
6
8,595
1,470
866
20
2,049
541
569
382
286
659
189
80
7,111
Figure 2.2: Enrollment by Load and Level
Fall 2004
Fall 2004
5%
25%
43%
33%
12%
62%
20%
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Undergraduate Full-time
Graduate & Law Full-time
Undergraduate Part-time
Graduate & Law Part-time
Note: Undergraduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 12 hours.
Graduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 9 hours.
Law full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 13 hours.
Highlights
■ Colleges with the highest enrollment are the College of Business and the College of Education with 21% and CLASS with 20%.
■ At the undergraduate level, CLASS (27%) and College of Business (20%) had the highest enrollment in Fall 2004.
■ At the graduate level, College of Education (33%) and College of Business (22%) had the highest enrollment in Fall 2004.
■ Full-time Students: 78% of the students are enrolled at the undergraduate level and 22% are at the graduate level.
■ Part-time Students: 44% of the students are enrolled at the undergraduate level and 56% are at the graduate level.
3,224
3,096
74
3,341
1,101
1,913
635
752
1,229
255
86
15,706
% of Total
21%
20%
0%
21%
7%
12%
4%
5%
8%
2%
1%
100%
Table 3: Full-Time Enrollment by Race and Gender
Fall 2004
Full-Time Students
White
Male
2,066
302
228
2,596
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Total Full-Time
Female
2,150
481
155
2,786
Black
Male
414
37
9
460
Female
951
148
11
1,110
Hispanic
Male
85
8
8
101
Female
109
10
7
126
Asian or Pacific
Islander
Native American
Male
92
18
9
119
Male
4
–
1
5
Female
89
18
7
114
Female
7
2
–
9
Non-Resident
Alien
Male
111
170
–
281
Female
56
115
4
175
Unknown
Male
279
56
15
350
Female
294
57
12
363
Total
Male
3,051
591
270
3,912
Female
3,656
831
196
4,683
Grand
Total
6,707
1,422
466
8,595
Table 4: Total Enrollment by Race and Gender
Fall 2004
Total Students
White
Male
2,994
1,136
342
4,472
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Grand Total
Female
3,102
1,853
265
5,220
Black
Male
581
177
16
774
Female
1,371
575
32
1,978
Hispanic
Male
109
25
14
148
Female
164
47
10
221
Asian or Pacific
Islander
Native American
Male
133
46
14
193
Male
10
3
1
14
Female
129
58
13
200
Figure 4.1: Total Enrollment by Race
Female
15
5
1
21
Non-Resident
Alien
Male
119
446
4
569
Female
68
229
6
303
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
2.5%
5.6%
Male
508
224
20
752
Female
544
283
14
841
Total
Male
4,454
2,057
411
6,922
Figure 4.2: Total Enrollment by Gender
Fall 2004
0.2%
Unknown
Fall 2004
10.1%
44.1%
61.7%
2.3%
17.5%
55.9%
White
Asian or Pacific Islander
Black
Native American
Hispanic
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Male
Female
Note: Undergraduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 12 hours.
Graduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 9 hours.
Law full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 13 hours.
3
■ Black students have the highest percentage of females enrolled and Non-Resident Aliens have the highest percentage of males.
Female
5,393
3,050
341
8,784
Grand
Total
9,847
5,107
752
15,706
4
Table 5: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Entrance Status: 5-Year Trend
Freshmen
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
2000
2001
2002
|
Business
148 174 183
CLASS
305 362 367
First College
24
21
11
Education
36
61
73
Engineering
55
71
46
Science
8
13
22
Urban Affairs
5
6
9
Law
0
0
0
University Studies
421 382 300
Undergraduate Non-Degree
0
0
0
Graduate Studies
0
0
0
UNIVERSITY
1,002 1,090 1,011
Transfers
2003 2004
2000
2003
2004
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
172
353
19
62
65
26
12
0
278
0
0
987
302 250 274 228
494 540 561 544
11
9
4
7
104 150 115 113
78
59
61
60
14
63
43
56
28
45
29
30
0
0
0
0
36
56
42
29
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,0671,172 1,129 1,067
225
333
0
125
56
194
20
0
13
0
0
966
8 73 14
8 10
41 187 74 70 12
0
0
6
0
0
31 79 62 67 67
10 24
0
4
9
1
6
8
3 23
0
7
9
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
336 175 349 404 320
149 22 11 23 192
0
0
0
0
0
576 573 533 584 636
174
246
0
74
55
197
19
0
221
0
0
986
2001
2002
Other Undergraduate
Total Percent Change
New Undergraduate Total
2004
1 Year
5 Year
458 497 471 408 409
840 1,089 1,002 967 591
35
30
21
26
0
171 290 250 242 266
143 154 107 129 120
23
82
73
85 414
33
58
47
47
42
0
0
0
0
0
793 613 691 711 554
149
22
11
23 192
0
0
0
0
0
2,645 2,835 2,673 2,638 2,588
0%
-39%
-100%
10%
-7%
387%
-11%
-11%
-30%
-100%
56%
-16%
1700%
27%
-22%
735%
-30%
29%
-2%
-2%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 6: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Entrance Status: 5-Year Trend
Doctoral
Graduate
2002
2003
Other Graduate
College
2000
2001
2004
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies
UNIVERSITY
191
76
95
40
65
23
266
0
756
204 235 281 238
57 127 106 123
144 213 225 209
64
97 108
80
39
88
90
96
24
41
40
46
215 261 272 244
0
0
0
0
747 1,062 1,122 1,036
5
0
7
9
9
4
0
0
34
1
0
5
2
7
4
0
0
19
1
0
2
4
4
2
0
0
13
14
0
4
8
7
0
0
0
33
0
0
1
8
7
2
0
0
18
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
86 79 99
59 62 91
109 111 199
10
4 17
0
0
6
34 28 77
0
0
0
294 23 28
592 307 517
148 134
101 38
227 196
7 15
1 37
44 46
0
0
21
9
549 475
Total Percent Change
New Graduate Total
2004
1 Year
5 Year
282 284 335 443 372
135 119 218 207 161
211 260 414 456 406
59
70 118 123 103
74
46
98
98 140
61
56 120
84
94
266 215 261 272 244
294
23
28
21
9
1,382 1,073 1,592 1,704 1,529
-16%
-22%
-11%
-16%
43%
12%
-10%
-57%
-10%
32%
19%
92%
75%
89%
54%
-8%
-97%
11%
2000
2001
2002
2003
Table 7: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by Academic Load: 5-Year Trend
% Change is
Full-Time
Full-Time
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
Business
330
350
CLASS
621
793
First College
31
24
Education
129
196
Engineering
101
111
Science
20
64
Urban Affairs
16
25
University Studies
488
430
Undergraduate Non-Degree 41
2
Total New Undergraduate 1,777 1,995
366
776
20
181
89
59
26
383
1
1,901
338
781
24
172
107
74
35
355
5
1,891
2004
1-Year
% Change in
Part-Time
Part-Time
5-Year
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1-Year
5-Year
343
1%
4%
514 -34% -17%
– -100% -100%
196
14%
52%
95 -11%
-6%
348 372% 1645%
34
-6% 106%
237 -33% -51%
59 1080%
44%
1,826
-3%
3%
128
219
4
42
42
3
17
305
108
868
147
296
6
94
43
18
33
183
20
840
105
226
1
69
18
14
21
308
10
772
70
186
2
70
22
11
12
356
18
747
66
-6% -48%
77 -59% -65%
– -100% -100%
70
0%
67%
25
14% -40%
65 491% 2067%
9 -25% -47%
317 -11%
4%
133 639%
23%
762
2% -12%
Table 8: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by Academic Load: 5-Year Trend
% Change is
Full-Time
Full-Time
College
% Change in
Part-Time
Part-Time
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1-Year
5-Year
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1-Year
5-Year
Business
120
CLASS
40
Education
28
Engineering
31
Science
54
Urban Affairs
23
Law
157
Graduate Studies
36
Total New Graduate & Law 489
99
39
52
39
33
19
148
5
434
132
97
93
37
72
24
181
3
639
191
76
115
28
63
37
185
–
695
118
79
114
21
86
27
163
2
610
-38%
4%
-1%
-25%
37%
-27%
-12%
–
-12%
-2%
98%
307%
-32%
59%
17%
4%
-94%
25%
162
95
183
28
20
38
109
258
893
185
80
208
31
13
37
67
18
639
203
121
321
81
26
96
80
25
953
252
131
341
95
35
47
87
21
1009
254
82
292
82
54
67
81
7
919
1%
-37%
-14%
-14%
54%
43%
-7%
-67%
-9%
57%
-14%
60%
193%
170%
76%
-26%
-97%
3%
Table 9: New Fall Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
Pecent Change
College
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Total New Students
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1-Year
5-Year
740
975
35
382
202
97
94
266
793
149
294
4,027
781
1208
30
550
224
128
114
215
613
22
23
3,908
806
1220
21
664
225
171
167
261
691
11
28
4,265
851
1174
26
698
252
183
131
272
711
23
21
4,342
781
752
–
672
223
553
137
244
554
192
9
4,117
-8%
-36%
-100%
-4%
-12%
203%
4%
-10%
-22%
735%
-57%
-5%
6%
-23%
-100%
76%
10%
471%
45%
-8%
-30%
29%
-97%
2%
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in College of Science is due to introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science)
Undergraduate Non-Degree and Graduate Studies fluctuations are due to procedural changes.
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
5
6
Table 10: Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 10.1: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
2000
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Law
Total
3,366
1,788
1,941
3,127
4,098
327
759
15,406
%
22%
12%
13%
20%
27%
2%
5%
100%
2001
%
2002
3,472
1,734
2,011
3,216
4,161
318
834
15,746
22%
11%
13%
20%
26%
2%
5%
100%
3,159
1,752
2,032
3,420
4,512
307
816
15,998
%
2003
20%
11%
13%
21%
28%
2%
5%
100%
%
3,060
1,636
1,984
3,589
4,804
359
814
16,246
2004
19%
10%
12%
22%
30%
2%
5%
100%
3,009
1,461
1,913
3,464
4,766
341
752
15,706
%
1 Year
5 Year
19%
9%
12%
22%
30%
2%
5%
100%
-2%
-11%
-4%
-3%
-1%
-5%
-8%
-3%
-11%
-18%
-1%
11%
16%
4%
-1%
2%
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 10.2: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
2000
Developmental
Lower
Upper
Masters
Doctoral
Law
Total
3,996
70,738
45,381
24,824
2,166
9,917
157,022
%
3%
45%
29%
16%
1%
6%
100%
2001
%
2002
4,211
73,728
46,294
25,724
2,275
10,460
162,692
3%
45%
28%
16%
1%
6%
100%
4,153
73,585
47,400
28,638
2,250
10,907
166,933
%
2%
44%
28%
17%
1%
7%
100%
Figure 10.1: Student Enrollment by Class Standing
5,000
2003
%
4,246
69,778
49,003
30,838
2,584
10,523
166,972
2004
3%
42%
29%
18%
2%
6%
100%
4,030
66,012
48,214
31,514
2,188
9,466
161,424
%
1 Year
5 Year
2%
41%
30%
20%
1%
6%
100%
-5%
-5%
-2%
2%
-15%
-10%
-3%
1%
-7%
6%
27%
1%
-5%
3%
Figure 10.2: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
80,000
4,500
70,000
4,000
60,000
3,500
3,000
50,000
2,500
40,000
2,000
30,000
1,500
20,000
1,000
10,000
500
0
First Year
Sophomores
2000
Juniors
2001
Seniors
2002
Masters
2003
Doctoral
2004
Law
0
Developmental
Lower
2000
Upper
2001
Masters
2002
2003
Doctoral
2004
Law
Table 11: Total Enrollment
Fall Enrollment by Academic Level: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
10,222
10,433
10,363
10,269
9,847
-4%
-4%
Masters
4,095
4,159
4,506
4,804
4,759
-1%
16%
Doctoral
330
321
313
359
348
-3%
5%
Law
759
833
816
814
752
-8%
-1%
15,406
15,746
15,998
16,246
15,706
-3%
2%
Bachelors
University Total
Table 12: FTE Generated Internally and Externally by College
Fall 2004
College Offering Course
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Student’s College
Business
CLASS
Business
1,327.1
480.9
CLASS
36.9
Education
10.4
Engineering
21.4
Science
24.5
Urban Affairs
5.4
54.9
Law
5.6
2.5
35.6
374.7
3.1
33.2
Undergraduate Non-Degree
9.9
55.7
Graduate Studies
2.3
4.9
FTE Generated by College
Offering Course
1,482.3
3,421.5
FTE Generated Internally
1,327.1
1,781.7
University Studies
First College
% Internal
FTE Generated Externally
% External
90%
155.2
10%
Education
Engineering
Science Urban Affairs
LAW
University
Studies
FTE by
Student
College
12.7
3.5
249.9
35.3
0.0
55.4
2,164.7
1,781.7
108.4
2.3
412.9
45.1
0.0
95.3
2,482.7
218.9
1,406.8
0.0
229.6
13.3
0.2
18.7
1,897.8
80.9
3.1
494.2
128.9
8.8
0.4
1.6
739.3
333.3
40.4
10.6
977.9
25.8
0.2
52.3
1,465.1
2.1
0.0
25.4
275.0
1.5
7.7
372.1
0.9
0.0
0.3
12.2
625.6
0.0
647.1
13.9
6.7
173.7
17.9
3.1
140.5
766.0
0.6
0.2
19.7
2.9
0.0
1.1
60.8
6.8
2.3
41.7
6.8
0.0
1.7
124.9
16.4
0.7
2.1
0.8
0.0
0.3
27.5
1,612.1
520.5
2,262.1
443.9
631.0
374.6
10,748.0
1,406.8
494.2
977.9
275.0
625.6
140.5
7,028.8
52%
1,639.8
48%
87%
205.3
13%
95%
26.3
5%
43%
1,284.2
57%
62%
168.9
38%
99%
5.4
1%
37%
234.1
63%
65%
3,719.3
35%
7
Table 13: Fall Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
2000
College
Enrollment
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
TOTAL Headcount
3,141
3,397
166
2,070
924
974
436
759
1,653
590
1,296
15,406
2001
%
Enrollment
20%
22%
1%
13%
6%
6%
3%
5%
11%
4%
8%
100%
3,360
4,016
148
2,778
1,031
994
586
833
1,480
176
344
15,746
2002
2003
2004
Percent Change
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
21%
26%
1%
18%
7%
6%
4%
5%
9%
1%
2%
100%
3,265
4,148
157
3,048
1,036
1,029
669
816
1,522
87
221
15,998
20%
26%
1%
19%
6%
6%
4%
5%
10%
1%
1%
100%
3,208
4,149
143
3,320
1,098
1,146
637
814
1,508
77
146
16,246
20%
26%
1%
20%
7%
7%
4%
5%
9%
0%
1%
100%
3,224
3,096
74
3,341
1,101
1,913
635
752
1,229
255
86
15,706
21%
20%
0%
21%
7%
12%
4%
5%
8%
2%
1%
100%
1%
-25%
-48%
1%
0%
67%
0%
-8%
-19%
231%
-41%
-3%
3%
-9%
-55%
61%
19%
96%
46%
-1%
-26%
-57%
-93%
2%
Table 14: Fall Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend
2000
College
SCH
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Graduate Studies
Other (AF-CSC-MSC)
Other (Honors)
TOTAL SCH
24,606
52,183
1,209
18,084
6,474
32,262
6,116
9,917
5,963
0
208
0
157,022
2001
%
16%
33%
1%
12%
4%
21%
4%
6%
4%
0%
0%
0%
100%
SCH
24,395
53,691
580
19,769
7,411
33,334
6,991
10,460
5,784
0
277
0
162,692
2002
2003
2004
Percent Change
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
15%
33%
0%
12%
5%
20%
4%
6%
4%
0%
0%
0%
100%
23,834
54,455
1,030
21,542
7,480
34,247
7,405
10,907
5,783
0
250
0
166,933
14%
33%
1%
13%
4%
21%
4%
7%
3%
0%
0%
0%
100%
22,695
53,758
847
23,436
7,609
34,735
7,370
10,523
5,841
0
158
0
166,972
14%
32%
1%
14%
5%
21%
4%
6%
3%
0%
0%
0%
100%
22,235
51,330
0
24,182
7,807
33,936
6,658
9,466
5,620
2
148
40
161,424
14%
32%
0%
15%
5%
21%
4%
6%
3%
0%
0%
0%
100%
1-Year
5-Year
-2%
-5%
-10%
-2%
3%
3%
-2%
-10%
-10%
-4%
34%
21%
5%
9%
-5%
-6%
-6%
-29%
-3%
3%
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science)
Undergraduate Non-Degree and Graduate Studies fluctuations are due to procedural changes.
Figure 13 & 14: Fall Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15) Trend
Fall 2000 – 2004
Enrollment
FTE
15,000
15,000
10,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
2000
2001
2002
Enrollment
2003
2004
FTE
Highlights
■ Total enrollment and SCH have increased 2–3% in the past 5 years. However, both SCH and enrollment have declined 3%
in the past year.
■ During the period 2000 – 2004 enrollment and SCH in the College of Education have grown significantly.
8
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 15: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level
Fall 2004
Registered Credit
Hours
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24+
TOTAL
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Enrollment Cumulative %
Enrollment Cumulative %
Enrollment Cumulative %
47
45
230
661
121
286
402
622
235
246
245
1569
1030
939
943
1271
468
280
127
52
8
13
4
3
9,847
0%
1%
3%
10%
11%
14%
18%
25%
27%
29%
32%
48%
58%
68%
77%
90%
95%
98%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
282
155
725
646
141
744
315
677
566
170
132
208
100
44
133
56
6
2
3
2
6%
9%
23%
35%
38%
53%
59%
72%
83%
87%
89%
93%
95%
96%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
3
3
2
14
10
22
119
28
29
42
43
57
245
88
32
12
1
1
1
5,107
All
0%
1%
1%
3%
4%
7%
23%
27%
31%
36%
42%
49%
82%
94%
98%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
752
Enrollment Cumulative %
329
200
958
1310
264
1044
727
1321
920
444
406
1819
1173
1040
1321
1415
506
294
131
55
9
13
4
3
15,706
2%
3%
9%
18%
19%
26%
31%
39%
45%
48%
50%
62%
69%
76%
85%
94%
97%
99%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Figure 15: Registered Credit Hours by Level
Fall 2004
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0-3
4-7
8-11
Undergraduate
12-15
Graduate
16-19
20+
Law
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
9
Table 16: Enrollment by Age Category
Fall 2004
College
Gender
Business
Female
Male
Total
CLASS
Under 18
18-19
20-21
22-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-49
50-64
65 and
Over
Unknown Average
Age
4
4
8
117
179
296
164
251
415
333
507
840
316
408
724
170
228
398
99
138
237
104
131
235
29
40
69
0
1
1
0
1
1
27.6
27.2
27.4
Female
Male
Total
11
3
14
234
143
377
353
189
542
438
334
772
353
229
582
161
102
263
106
74
180
190
58
248
72
37
109
1
3
4
4
1
5
27.4
26.5
27.1
First College
Female
Male
Total
0
0
0
5
5
10
6
11
17
7
8
15
3
5
8
3
4
7
2
2
4
5
3
8
3
1
4
1
0
1
0
0
0
30.8
25.8
28.2
Education
Female
Male
Total
7
0
7
81
26
107
180
37
217
460
104
564
617
209
826
372
171
543
234
95
329
359
136
495
183
54
237
3
1
4
11
1
12
31.5
32.6
31.8
Engineering
Female
Male
Total
0
2
2
12
105
117
29
112
141
62
280
342
44
200
244
14
76
90
16
54
70
15
63
78
1
12
13
0
1
1
0
3
3
26.6
26.4
26.4
Science
Female
Male
Total
7
6
13
183
99
282
213
90
303
291
138
429
243
160
403
121
74
195
74
43
117
81
42
123
27
16
43
1
1
2
1
2
3
26.3
26.9
26.5
Urban Affairs
Female
Male
Total
1
0
1
14
10
24
11
14
25
49
59
108
63
50
113
47
43
90
58
28
86
85
44
129
28
24
52
2
0
2
5
0
5
34.6
32.4
33.6
Law
Female
Male
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
10
124
146
270
102
149
251
55
63
118
21
34
55
21
13
34
8
5
13
0
0
0
1
0
1
28.3
27.8
28.0
University Studies
Female
Male
Total
175
94
269
120
136
256
74
85
159
58
62
120
55
45
100
30
23
53
10
5
15
28
12
40
38
17
55
72
85
157
2
3
5
29.7
30.3
30.0
Undergraduate
Non-Degree
Female
Male
Total
0
0
0
7
16
23
17
22
39
25
27
52
24
21
45
13
13
26
15
9
24
16
9
25
8
7
15
1
0
1
1
4
5
30.8
27.7
29.3
Graduate Studies
Female
Male
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
6
3
9
10
10
20
11
6
17
18
5
23
8
7
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
39.1
38.9
39.0
UNIVERSITY
Female
Male
Total
205
109
314
773
719
1,492
1,056
812
1,868
1,849
1,665
3,514
1,826
1,479
3,305
996
807
1,803
646
488
1,134
922
516
1,438
405
220
625
81
92
173
25
15
40
29.1
28.1
28.7
Figure 16: Enrollment by Age Category
Fall 2004
9%
1%
4%
2%
9%
7%
Median Age
University:
Undergraduate:
Graduate:
Law:
25
23
30
26
12%
11%
22%
21%
Under 18
10
18-19
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
20-21
|
22-24
25-29
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
30-34
35-39
40-49
50-64
65 and Over
Table 17: Enrollment by Level and Country of Residence
Fall 2004
Resident Type
Undergraduate
Graduate
9,526
134
187
9,847
4,365
67
675
5,107
Ohio Resident
Non Ohio Resident
Non-Resident Alien
Total
Table 18: Enrollment by State
Total
693
49
10
752
14,584
250
872
15,706
Table 19: Enrollment by Ohio County
Fall 2004
State
Law
Fall 2004
Number of
Students
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Ohio (Resident of Ohio excluding
Non-Resident Aliens) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14,545
Ohio (Non-Ohio Resident) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155
Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Indiana, Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
New Jersey, Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Hawaii, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee, Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Colorado, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Minnesota, Montana,
Nevada, Oregon, West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
State Not Known . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Non-Resident Alien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .872
TOTAL ENROLLMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15,706
11
Note: Comparisons by residence groupings may not match due to the criteria used to assign residency status
in CSU’s information systems.
County
Number of
Students
Cuyahoga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,721
Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,083
Lorain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 699
Summit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
Medina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
Geauga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
Portage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Ashtabula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Erie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Trumbull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Mahoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Stark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Huron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Richland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Lucas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Tuscarawas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Columbiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Hancock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Sandusky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Allen, Butler, Defiance, Delaware, Hamilton, Montgomery, Morgan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Clermont, Guernsey, Jefferson, Knox, Marion, Ross, Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Counties Not Known . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,706
Map of 2004 Enrollment by Ohio County:
Williams
Defiance
2
1083
Lake
Lucas
7
Fulton
Ottawa
Putnam
Crawford Richland Ashland
13
Wyandot
Allen
2
Hardin
Mercer
Marion
1
Auglaize
Shelby
Union
Clark
Preble Montgomery
2
Madison
Fayette
Butler
2
Hamilton
2
Warren
1
Franklin
12
Muskingum
Fairfield
Greene
Hocking
Vinton
Highland
Pike
Scioto
Gallia
Lawrence
12
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Columbiana
4
Athens
Jefferson
1
Harrison
Guernsey
1
Washington
Meigs
Jackson
Brown
Adams
Mahoning
41
Carroll
Morgan
2
Clinton
Clermont
1
Stark
25
Noble
Perry
Pickaway
Ross
1
Portage
95
Coshocton
Delaware
2
Licking
Miami
Trumbull
42
Tuscarawas
6
Knox
1
Champaign
Wayne
4
Summit
328
Holmes
Morrow
Logan
Darke
Medina
318
Hancock
4
Geauga
298
Cuyahoga
11721
Lorain
699
Huron
16
Seneca
Paulding
Van Wert
Erie
58
Sandusky
4
Wood
3
Henry
Ashtabula
81
Belmont
Monroe
Table 20: Spring Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
2001
College
2002
Enrollment
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
TOTAL Headcount
2003
2004
Enrollment
2005
Enrollment
Percent Change
%
Enrollment
%
%
Enrollment
%
%
1 Year
5 Year
3,084
3,522
148
2,378
951
992
512
750
1,440
322
775
21%
24%
1%
16%
6%
7%
3%
5%
10%
2%
5%
3,256
4,147
158
2,886
1,033
1,005
634
783
1,417
145
385
21%
26%
1%
18%
7%
6%
4%
5%
9%
1%
2%
3,078
4,034
148
3,133
1,025
989
639
787
1,537
84
217
20%
26%
1%
20%
7%
6%
4%
5%
10%
1%
1%
3,054
4,054
124
3,392
1,065
1,151
602
755
1,247
84
112
20%
26%
1%
22%
7%
7%
4%
5%
8%
1%
1%
3,069
3,190
66
3,263
1,060
1,916
629
714
1,025
327
82
20%
21%
0%
21%
7%
12%
4%
5%
7%
2%
1%
0%
-21%
-47%
-4%
0%
66%
4%
-5%
-18%
289%
-27%
0%
-9%
-55%
37%
11%
93%
23%
-5%
-29%
2%
-89%
14,874
100%
15,849
100%
15,671
100%
15,640
100%
15,341
100%
-2%
3%
Table 21: Spring Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trends by College: 5-Year Trend
2001
College
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Graduate Studies
Other
Other (AF-CSC-MSC)
Other (Honors)
TOTAL
2002
2003
2004
2005
Percent Change
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
1-Year
5-Year
23,913
51,522
963
18,809
6,767
31,285
6,671
9,105
969
0
23
0
0
16%
34%
1%
13%
5%
21%
4%
6%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
23,806
55,685
1,240
20,863
7,765
33,554
7,138
9,798
951
0
13
0
0
15%
35%
1%
13%
5%
21%
4%
6%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
22,733
55,344
1,266
22,598
7,514
33,950
7,009
10,047
783
0
25
0
0
14%
34%
1%
14%
5%
21%
4%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
22,641
52,177
981
24,217
7,767
32,382
6,554
9,419
3,293
1
0
252
0
14%
33%
1%
15%
5%
20%
4%
6%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
21,489
50,457
0
24,231
7,782
31,797
7,191
8,805
2,438
2
0
216
43
14%
33%
0%
16%
5%
21%
5%
6%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
-5%
-3%
-10%
-2%
0%
0%
-2%
10%
-7%
-26%
29%
15%
2%
8%
-3%
152%
150,027
100%
160,813
100%
161,269
100%
159,684
100%
154,451
100%
-100%
Figure 20 & 21: Spring Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15) Trends
Spring 2001 – 2005
Enrollment
FTE
15,000
15,000
10,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
2001
2002
2003
Enrollment
2004
2005
FTE
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
13
Table 22: Summer Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
2000
College
2001
Enrollment
2002
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
2003
2004
Percent Change
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
1,680
1,249
54
1,458
326
579
228
288
333
842
1,963
19%
14%
1%
16%
4%
6%
3%
3%
4%
9%
22%
1,992
1,883
51
2,391
413
575
312
322
343
144
925
21%
20%
1%
26%
4%
6%
3%
3%
4%
2%
10%
1,794
1,757
74
2,738
380
570
366
337
724
53
625
19%
19%
1%
29%
4%
6%
4%
4%
8%
1%
7%
1,710
1,570
53
2,773
309
562
338
337
771
32
147
20%
18%
1%
32%
4%
7%
4%
4%
9%
0%
2%
1,706
1,393
34
2,972
245
571
263
286
761
68
89
20%
17%
0%
35%
3%
7%
3%
3%
9%
1%
1%
0%
-11%
-36%
7%
-21%
2%
-22%
-15%
-1%
113%
-39%
2%
12%
-37%
104%
-25%
-1%
15%
-1%
129%
-92%
-95%
TOTAL Headcount
9,000
100%
9,351
100%
9,418
100%
8,602
100%
8,388
100%
-2%
-7%
Table 23: Summer Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trends by College: 5-Year Trend
2000
College
2001
2002
2003
2004
Percent Change
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
1-Year
5-Year
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
University Studies
Graduate Studies
Other
11,534
13,025
78
13,957
1,034
10,676
2,066
1,161
95
0
0
22%
24%
0%
26%
2%
20%
4%
2%
0%
0%
0%
12,819
14,256
0
14,212
1,458
11,215
2,725
1,242
132
0
0
22%
25%
0%
24%
3%
19%
5%
2%
0%
0%
0%
11,075
14,225
193
15,865
1,173
12,438
2,983
1,300
37
1
6
19%
24%
0%
27%
2%
21%
5%
2%
0%
0%
0%
11,102
12,907
59
15,128
896
10,080
2,734
1,298
399
2
0
20%
24%
0%
28%
2%
18%
5%
2%
1%
0%
0%
10,910
11,402
24
15,958
625
10,020
2,275
1,111
342
7
0
21%
22%
0%
30%
1%
19%
4%
2%
1%
0%
0%
-2%
-12%
-59%
5%
-30%
-1%
-17%
-14%
-14%
250%
-5%
-12%
-69%
14%
-40%
-6%
10%
-4%
260%
TOTAL
53,626
100%
58,059
100%
59,296
100%
54,605
100%
52,674
100%
-4%
-2%
Figure 22 & 23: Summer Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15) Trends
Summer 2000 – 2004
Enrollment
10,000
FTE (SCH/15)
8,000
15,000
6,000
10,000
4,000
5,000
2,000
0
2000
2001
2002
Headcount
14
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
2003
FTE (SCH/15)
2004
Table 24: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions
Fall 2000 – 2004
Campus Type
Community College
Technical College
University Branch Campus
University Main Campus
2000
2001
60,585
22,216
42,200
241,646
64,161
23,861
43,075
247,843
00 – 01
% Change
6%
7%
2%
3%
2002
69,106
25,092
45,322
252,650
01 – 02
% Change
8%
5%
5%
2%
02 – 03
% Change
2003
70,742
25,775
46,567
254,529
2%
3%
3%
1%
2004
72,279
26,723
46,343
254,281
03 – 04
% Change
5 Year
% Change
2%
4%
0%
0%
19%
20%
10%
5%
Figure 24: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions
Fall 2000 – 2004
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
00 – 01
% Change
01 – 02
% Change
Community College
University Branch Campus
02 – 03
% Change
03 – 04
% Change
Technical College
University Main Campus
Table 25: Main Campus Enrollment
Select Ohio Four Year Institutions
Fall 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
Institution
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
21,631
18,214
27,227
15,686
22,084
16,179
48,823
19,920
19,797
11,808
22,718
18,900
27,132
16,107
23,026
16,754
49,285
20,288
20,201
12,341
22,907
18,898
26,725
16,162
23,674
17,486
50,659
20,548
21,043
12,739
22,650
18,646
26,904
16,377
24,410
17,411
51,677
20,452
20,740
12,878
22,314
19,043
27,064
15,881
24,494
17,590
51,723
20,143
19,675
13,166
-1.5%
2.1%
0.6%
-3.1%
0.3%
1.0%
0.1%
-1.5%
-5.4%
2.2%
3.1%
4.4%
-0.6%
1.2%
9.8%
8.0%
5.6%
1.1%
-0.6%
10.3%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Student Enrollment query – run date: June 10, 2005
Note: Enrollment includes all flexibly scheduled courses not as of the 15th day (census date).
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
15
E
Enrollment
Characteristics of
Students in
CSU Colleges
Enrollment Characteristics of Students in CSU Colleges
3
*DIVIDER PAGES 9/11/05 3:57 PM Page 3
Table 1: College of Business: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department
Bachelors
Accounting
Computer & Information Science
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Other Business
Description
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Accounting
Computer and Information Science
Computer Science
Information Systems
Finance
Management
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Business Certificate
Business Economics
Business Education
General Business
International Business
Pre-Business Administration
Undecided Business
Total
Masters
Accounting
AMBA
Business Administration
Computer & Information Science
EMBA
Finance
Health Care Administration
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Other Business
Total
Financial Audit
Tax Program
Accelerated Business Administration
Business Administration
Computer and Information Science
Executive Business Administration
Finance
Urban Real Estate Development & Finance
Health Care Administration
MBA-Health Care
Public Health
Management & Labor Relations
Data-Driven Marketing Planning Certificate
Marketing
Graduate Business
Pre Accelerated MBA
Pre Accelerated MPH
Pre Executive MBA
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
120
137
26
56
69
12
81
81
25
1
13
3
10
136
128
24
84
98
2
95
97
29
1
11
1
3
106
108
24
74
93
1
85
108
27
1
6
145
90
22
73
94
127
83
15
49
95
-12%
-8%
-32%
-33%
1%
6%
-39%
-42%
-13%
38%
83
97
22
75
68
18
-10%
-30%
-18%
-7%
-16%
-28%
18
19
6%
46%
2
139
1,262
1,952
-1%
2%
-9%
-4%
69
7
51
562
171
11
5
-1%
75%
-19%
3%
-8%
-61%
-17%
3%
59
21
58
2
1
201
3
4
40%
40%
-9%
100%
-67%
5%
200%
-33%
20%
91%
18%
1,225
-1%
19%
1,390
2,024
1,431
2,140
1,422
2,055
1,277
1,921
67
82
75
39
453
217
33
5
50
497
221
39
5
49
11
49
1
35
18
49
56
488
197
36
5
1
4
36
19
54
109
2
177
6
197
1,032
1,176
1,174
70
4
63
543
186
28
6
1
1
42
15
64
1
3
192
1
6
7
1,233
31%
24%
-21%
-67%
0%
84%
1
(Continued on next page)
2
Table 1: College of Business: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Department
Doctoral
Business Administration
|
Total
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Total Business
Description
2000
Accounting
Business Administration
Computer and Information Science
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
2
52
20
2
6
3
–
85
–
36
5
1
2
–
–
44
1
31
3
–
1
–
–
36
–
43
1
2
–
4
4
54
–
39
–
2
–
3
3
47
–
-9%
–
0%
–
-25%
-25%
-13%
–
-25%
–
0%
–
0%
–
-45%
3,141
3,360
3,265
3,208
3,224
0.5%
3%
College of Business
BACHELORS DEGREES
■ Enrollments for the bachelors degree programs in business administration have shown a modest decline because of increased competition from new entrants
in the metro area.
■ Accounting and finance have grown in popularity because of strong employment opportunities.
■ The slump in high tech industries and their slow recovery continues to negatively affect the hiring of CIS majors which, in turn, has hurt CIS enrollments.
MASTERS DEGREES
■ Graduate business enrollments continue to show healthy growth.
■ Accelerated MBA remains a popular option for students with undergraduate business degrees who want to complete the MBA in 11 months.
■ Enrollment growth in the two health care programs (MBA-HCA and the MPH) may be a response to the emergence of the health care industry as one of
the dominant components of the area’s economy.
■ The enrollment decline for the Executive MBA was a result of a decision to revise the curriculum and not recruit a new class in 2004 while curriculum
revisions were in progress.
■ Financial Accounting and Audit and the Tax Program are components of the Master of Accountancy degree program which shows a combined increase
of 3% from Fall 2003.
DOCTORAL DEGREES
■ DBA program enrollment has been steady since Fall 2001 when a policy was instituted to “clear the pipeline” by encouraging current students to complete
the program and graduate. Inactive students have been dismissed from the program.
■ The DBA program is accepting new students in only selected business disciplines because of limited faculty resources and growth of other programs
(e.g., AMBA; off-campus MBA; Master of Accountancy).
Table 2: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department
Bachelors
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Interdisciplinary
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Modern Languages
Music
Philosophy
Political Science/IR
Religious Studies
Social Work
Sociology
Other CLASS
Total
Description
Anthropology
Art
Computer Graphics
Graphic Design
Communication
Drama
Economics
English
History
Social Studies
Classical and Medieval Studies
Liberal Studies
Linguistics
Women's Studies
French
German
Spanish
Music
Philosophy
International Relations
Political Science
Religious Studies
Social Service
Social Work
Social Science
Sociology
Pre-Education
Undecided CLASS
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
33
114
32
153
1
1
332
18
27
120
70
27
1
66
38
143
35
148
33
148
-6%
0%
0%
30%
316
17
29
125
70
27
1
63
5
2
3
334
10
29
130
91
34
2
311
22
18
115
90
16
4
52
1
3
1
18
54
20
53
73
10
2
3
68
3
1
5
1
300
9
23
147
70
33
1
42
6
2
6
-38%
100%
100%
20%
-10%
-10%
-21%
13%
-23%
-3%
-50%
-4%
-59%
28%
28%
-22%
106%
-75%
-19%
500%
100%
16
43
10
43
72
7
20
52
17
42
77
17
14
75
18
43
73
10
-30%
44%
6%
2%
-5%
-41%
-22%
39%
-10%
-19%
0%
0%
147
8
113
15
51
19
50
77
8
1
163
8
141
126
9
147
134
12
157
28%
-17%
-10%
17%
25%
26%
1,796
3,074
2,185
3,571
2,329
3,641
2,172
3,588
172
10
142
240
1,000
2,618
-54%
-27%
-44%
-15%
(Continued on next page)
3
4
Table 2: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department
Description
First College
First College
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Masters
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Modern Languages
Music
Philosophy
Social Work
Sociology
Other CLASS
Total
CLASS TOTAL
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Spanish
Music
Advanced Study in Bioethics
Philosophy
Social Work
Sociology
Graduate CLASS
Undecided CLASS
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
166
148
157
143
74
-48%
-55%
27
7
53
35
9
31
1
33
7
66
31
6
25
3
30
12
66
33
12
34
13
67
18
63
21
100
24
131
25
127
27
138
8
22
12
69
36
13
45
1
13
146
31
165
7
29
15
64
30
11
46
-13%
32%
25%
-7%
-17%
-15%
2%
7%
114%
21%
-14%
22%
48%
16
167
28
23%
14%
-10%
23%
149%
56%
323
445
507
561
65
478
-15%
48%
3,563
4,164
4,305
4,292
3,170
-26%
-11%
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
1) In order to assess trends in the number of students majoring in CLASS programs, “undecided: and “pre-education” students should be excluded from the totals.
There is no basis for splitting A&S students without declared majors between the two colleges prior to 2004-2005. The “pre-education” category did not exist
before 2004-2005, and students admitted to A&S who intended to major in the business college appeared as A&S “undecided” prior to 2004 – 2005. According
to the data reported in this table, the number of majors in CLASS programs increased by 7.8% between fall 2000 and fall 2004.
2) While this table reports the aggregate headcount of students majoring in the college, it does not accurately report the number of majors in individual programs
since it counts students with a double major only once. To correct this, the number of majors reported in an individual program should be added to the
“secondary major headcount” for that program as reported later in this section. See table entitled “Secondary Major enrollment by College of Liberal Arts and
Social Sciences.”
3) In spite of the increase in the number of majors in the college over this period, undergraduate credit hour enrollment declined by 5.8% between fall 2000 and fall
2004. The discrepancy reflects the fact that undergraduate enrollment declines have been in the area of lower division coursework while upper division and graduate enrollments have remained strong.
4) The decline in liberal studies majors between fall 2003 and fall 2004 resulted from a college decision to temporarily suspend admissions of new majors to the
program pending completion of a review of the requirements. Admission to the program was reopened in spring 2005.
5) International Relations is administered by the department of Political Science; Social Studies is administered by the department of History. The total number of
majors for these departments (including double majors) in fall 2004 were 148 in History and 122 in Political Science.
Table 3: College of Education & Human Services: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department
Bachelors
Health And Physical Education
Nursing
Teachers Education
Other Education
Description
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Physical Education
Nursing Basic
Nursing Basic:Undeclared
Nursing RN
Nursing RN: Undeclared
Early Childhood Education
33
140
8
59
2
186
52
132
11
62
2
311
57
136
6
58
73
165
4
47
61
162
1
55
-16%
-2%
-75%
17%
85%
16%
-88%
-7%
381
390
317
-19%
70%
Elementary Education
Middle Childhood Education
Mild/Moderate Educational Need
Special Education
Education
Mathematics
Teacher Certification
Undecided Education
162
45
63
121
7
168
15
205
-33%
1%
-94%
362%
64
40
86
57
4
105
238
1,244
90
14
2
95
327
1,341
117
19
10
208
23
97
9
-17%
-53%
52%
-78%
92
282
1,409
63
409
1,415
-32%
45%
0.4%
-43%
57%
28%
46
55
4
62
14
11
86
14
25
59
60
7
78
9
13
96
10
22
83
39
9
114
18
4
110
15
22
100
36
5
115
19
5
100
9
18
20%
-8%
-44%
1%
6%
25%
-9%
-40%
-18%
257%
44%
0%
156%
-17%
1,439
15
1
27
9
8
751
17
501
93
1,829
-40%
869
22
5
27
6
6
672
54
432
37
1,615
25
249
237
165
17
1
37
4
8
596
105
354
Total
Masters
CASAL
Health And Physical Education
Nursing
Teachers Education
Other Education
Total
Adult Learning and Development
Community Agency & Counseling
Counseling and Pupil Personnel Administration
School Counseling
Education Administration
Education Specialist
Educational Administration
Supervision
Community Health Education
Exercise Science
Health and Physical Education
Sports Management
Sports Management and Exercise Science
Nursing
Curriculum & Instruction
Education
Graduate Education
Graduate Education Licensure
110
260
1,109
28
25
5
45
23
37
4
22
9
4
11
5
18
11
4
767
21
476
77
1,813
50%
-18%
100%
-2%
-19%
5%
21%
1%
170%
125%
-18%
67%
-75%
145%
80%
202%
-93%
204%
110%
5
(Continued on next page)
6
Table 3: College of Education & Human Services: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Department
Description
Doctoral
Urban Education: Administration
Counseling
Learning
Policy
Total
Education Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
29
29
22
12
92
31
28
24
12
95
27
28
26
11
92
22
26
38
12
98
21
27
37
12
97
-5%
4%
-3%
0%
-1%
-28%
-7%
68%
0%
5%
2,070
2,778
3,048
3,320
3,341
1%
61%
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
College of Education and Human Services
BACHELORS DEGREE PROGRAMS
■ Ohio Department of Education replaced teacher credentialing in grades 1-8 with early childhood or middle school licensure. This led to the 94% 5-year decline in
COEHS programs for elementary education and concomitant growth in early childhood and middle school programs.
■ The 1-year decline in early childhood is attributable to a cap placed on that program’s enrollment in AY 2003 – 04. In part, the cap was instituted to compensate
for the existing regional oversupply of early childhood teachers that has been further exacerbated by recent layoffs of practicing teachers.
■ Conversely, in response to increased market demands from local school districts and the Cleveland Clinic, specially tailored programs in special education and
nursing have been instituted to help alleviate critical shortages in these areas.
MASTERS DEGREE PROGRAMS
■ Targeted recruitment efforts have paid dividends as reflected by recent growth in the M.Ed. program in Adult Learning and Development.
■ Growth in the Educational Administration and the Educational Specialist program may be linked to the First Ring Leadership Academy which was developed to
recruit, and prepare, principals for urban schools. The Academy has received national recognition and was selected by the U.S. Department of Education as one of
six ‘best practices’ sites for leadership training in the country.
DOCTORAL DEGREE PROGRAMS
■ While interest in the various available tracks within the doctoral program has fluctuated over time, overall enrollment remains relatively flat due to a cap on admission.
Table 4: College of Engineering: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department
Bachelors
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Doctor of Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Other Engineering
Description
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Computer Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Electronic Engineering Technology
Electronic Technology
Industrial Engineering Technology
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Pre-Engineering
Undecided Engineering
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Total
Masters
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Other Engineering
Total
Doctoral
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Doctor of Engineering
Total
7
Engineering Total
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Engineering Mechanics
Environmental Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Software Engineering Certificate
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Graduate Engineering
Applied Biomedical Engineering
Applied Biomedical Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Doctor of Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
58
90
53
68
51
79
53
79
4%
0%
8%
18%
49
186
29
1
1
30
31
176
9
33
666
57
160
29
1
2
42
26
147
24
50
668
58
143
21
2%
-11%
-28%
-3%
-60%
33
34
151
39
131
708
36
220
33
1
1
38
46
199
7
38
767
2
34
21
131
33
73
648
0%
-19%
-19%
-11%
38%
46%
-3%
3%
-38%
-13%
-15%
-44%
-8%
27
21
1
8
34
35
20
1
8
46
51
20
4
14
87
25
31
14
161
44
28
22
204
45
63
21
305
58
23
3
17
143
2
32
63
17
358
57
32
4
16
148
1
33
64
35
390
-2%
39%
33%
-6%
3%
-50%
3%
2%
106%
9%
29%
-46%
0%
-70%
125%
-5%
-25%
-71%
-13%
82%
-54%
-50%
15%
0%
19%
49
67
1
148
53
2
111%
52%
300%
100%
335%
32%
106%
150%
142%
3
23
4
23
9
7
21
8
14
13
9
11
13
4
55
12
10
3
60
15
8
6
65
21
8
7
72
18
7
9
1
20
6
2
63
924
1,031
1,036
1,098
1,101
8
Fenn College of Engineering
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGINEERING
■ Major variations in the headcount in the College of Engineering are due to trends in two departments, namely: Electrical and Computer Engineering and
Mechanical Engineering.
■ Starting in 2001, Computer Engineering became a separate entity and data shows that the total headcount for the combined Electrical and Computer
Engineering program remained flat over this period. Viewed separately, there is a shift of student enrollment from Electrical Engineering to the
Computer Engineering program.
■ The trend for the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering program has declined during the 2001 – 04 period, which is primarily attributable to regional
demands for graduates in this program.
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
M.S. PROGRAM IN ENGINEERING
■ The M.S. programs show a positive trend in almost all areas with a sharp and substantial increase in the Electrical and Computer Engineering program.
Most of the students in these programs are international students. The availability of teaching and research assistantships attracts a large pool of qualified
students. Faculty research funding which has increased in recent years provides the needed support for these students.
DRE PROGRAM IN ENGINEERING
■ The Doctor of Engineering is a college-wide program with specialization in various areas. Electrical and Computer Engineering has experienced a sharp
increase, although it leveled off slightly in 2004.
■ Computer Engineering and Software Engineering are very much in demand globally and attract many international students. Notably, Biomedical
Engineering has experienced a healthy increase in students.
■ The availability of teaching and research assistantships and a partnership with the world-renowned Cleveland Clinic Foundation has attracted a large
pool of qualified students to the DRE program.
Table 5: College of Science: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department
Bachelors
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Other Science
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Total
Masters
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Interdisciplinary
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Other Science
Total
Doctoral
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Total
Science Total
Description
Biology
Biology-Medical Technology
Environmental Science
Geological Science
Chemistry
Pre Pharmacy
Health Science
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Pre-Health Science
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Pre-Engineering
Pre-Nursing
Undecided Science
Biology
Environmental Sciences
Chemistry
Clinical Bioanalytical Chemistry
Health Science
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Culture, Com and Health Care
Mathematics
Physics
Diversity Professional
Psychology
Psychology Specialist
Speech Pathology and Audiology
Undecided Science
Regulatory Biology
Clinical Bioanalytical Chemistry
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
156
9
151
13
6
14
39
21
143
14
6
16
41
35
73
55
2
47
14
263
29
64
15
2
46
14
261
23
41
8
1
49
14
248
32
155
7
12
14
51
53
4
15
4
2
59
17
269
37
158
9
15
12
40
73
20
1
2%
29%
25%
-14%
-22%
38%
400%
-93%
-99%
2
61
14
239
27
74
81
554
0%
3%
-18%
-11%
-27%
0%
30%
0%
-9%
-7%
710
669
648
699
1,380
97%
94%
18
4
26
16
4
27
1
29
22
9
17
33
11
16
50%
22%
-6%
83%
175%
-38%
52
22
43
-13%
55%
2%
221%
19
10
31
87
10
37
45
34
44
1
23
17
23
85
13
35
59
21%
70%
-26%
-2%
30%
-5%
92%
750%
1050%
-2%
160%
-17%
11
51
5 Year
1%
0%
9%
-22%
12
2
2
87
5
42
13
5
10
90
8
35
20
10
26
1
43
8
42
1
14
9
23
78
15
29
212
258
319
359
439
22%
107%
28
24
36
31
32
29
40
46
42
50
5%
9%
50%
108%
52
67
61
86
92
7%
77%
974
994
1,029
1,146
1,911
67%
96%
14
20
9
10
College of Science
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY AND PHYSICAL THERAPY MASTERS PROGRAMS
The Health Sciences masters programs in Occupational Therapy (OT) and Physical Therapy (PT) are expected to grow to a stable base of 50 to 60 students,
with an excellent employment outlook for their graduates. These graduate degrees replaced undergraduate degrees in OT and PT because of changes in
requirements for employment.
|
PRE-PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMS
Such programs in the College of Science include Pre-Pharmacy, Biology and Chemistry Pre-med programs (undergraduate), a new joint program of
Biology and Health Sciences in Pre-Podiatry (undergraduate), and the BS in Health Sciences program. Developing pre-professional health care programs
is a high priority of the College because of the large growth potential of these programs as evidenced by the substantial increase in pre-pharmacy programs
and a strong employment outlook for their graduates. This is being fostered by agreements with University of Toledo and NEOCOM pharmacy programs, the
Ohio College of Podiatry, a revamped student pre-med organization, and pending 2+2 agreements with community colleges. All these initiatives are fueling
a robust growth of the BSHS degree in Health Sciences.
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
DOCTORAL REGULATORY BIOLOGY, DOCTORAL CLINICAL-BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, AND MASTERS IN MEDICAL PHYSICS PROGRAMS
These solid growth graduate programs enjoy national and international visibility and are offered in partnership with the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES BS AND MS DEGREES
The new undergraduate and graduate degree programs are based on a multi-disciplinary scientific field incorporating biology, chemistry and geology.
This discipline has matured into an established field from its beginnings in the 1960s. The course offerings in BS and MS in Environmental Sciences are
expected to continue to grow at high rates.
UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE MATHEMATICS PROGRAMS
Recent steady growth in these programs is attributed to the Math department’s collaboration with the College of Education in delivering a program in
Math Education.
Table 6: College of Urban Affairs: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department
Bachelors
Urban Studies
Other Urban Affairs
Description
Environmental Science
Environmental Studies
Public Safety Management
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
Undecided Urban Affairs
Urban Affairs Certificate
Total
Masters
Urban Studies
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Other Urban Affairs
Environmental Studies
Environmental Studies and Law
Non-Profit Management
Public Administration (MPA)
Urban Economic Development
Urban Geographic Information Systems
Urban Planning & Law
Urban Planning, Design & Development
Urban Real Estate Development & Finance
Urban Studies
Graduate Urban Affairs
Total
Doctoral
Urban Studies
Urban Affairs Total
Urban Studies
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
10
18
4
4
85
67
4
17
20
29
97
71
2
16
20
44
96
68
2
9
36
49
102
57
1
1
12
28
43
108
84
-50%
33%
-22%
-12%
6%
47%
-90%
-34%
600%
975%
27%
25%
188
238
246
256
276
8%
47%
7
14
12
12
0%
71%
99
6
138
16
1
3
160
3
153
1
6
138
2
1
100%
-10%
100%
39%
1
29
39
39
8
27
60
4
4
34
6
26
111
4
53
8
18
82
53
6
18
76
0%
-25%
0%
-7%
-38%
95%
202
293
365
334
312
-7%
54%
46
436
55
586
59
670
49
639
49
637
0%
0%
7%
46%
28
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
11
■ Overall, the College’s enrollment increase for the 5-year period was 46%, compared to 2% for CSU.
■ The undergraduate program degrees in Public Safety Management and Urban Services Administration contributed to the overall 27% increase in undergrad enrollment.
■ Graduate enrollment increased by 54%(compared to CSU’s 16%), led by the MUPDD (89%) and MPA (39%) programs.
89%
12
Table 7: College of Law: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department
Description
Law
Law
Law and Environmental Studies
Law and Urban Planning
Master of Laws
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
755
832
4
759
1
833
811
1
2
2
816
808
1
1
4
814
744
1
4
3
752
-8%
0%
300%
-25%
-8%
Law Total
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
■ The College of Law has instituted a class-reduction program to decrease class sizes. In conjunction with the class reduction program, last year’s entering class was
the strongest in the history of the law school: Law School Admission Test scores and undergraduate grade point averages were higher than any other year in the
previous decade.
■ The College of Law now has over one-half million books in its collection.
■ More than half of the Colleges faculty have advanced degrees other than their law degrees.
■ The National Jurist named Cleveland-Marshall College of Law the 21st top law school in the country for use of technology.
■ The College conducts a faculty exchange program with Westminster University College of Law in London and co-sponsors a student summer law institute
in St. Petersburg, Russia.
■ Graduates of the College practice in 48 states, three territories, and the District of Columbia. They also practice in the countries of Europe, Asia, Africa,
and Central America.
■ Over the past six years the College of Law has held 22 symposia and conferences.
■ During the past academic year the College of Law hosted 12 public lectures.
5 Year
-1%
-25%
-1%
Table 8: University Studies: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department
Bachelors
University Studies
University Studies Total
Description
University Studies
Project 60
PSEOP
SYAP
Undergraduate Nondegree
Undergraduate Visiting
2000
2001
2002
1,081
164
158
1
249
1,078
184
154
914
179
185
64
1,653
1,480
239
5
1,522
2003
788
204
215
2
287
12
1,508
2004
1 Year
5 Year
594
201
272
-25%
-1%
27%
-45%
23%
72%
116
46
1,229
-60%
283%
-19%
-53%
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
University Studies
UNIVERSITY STUDIES
The University Studies is a classification assigned to students who do not meet minimum requirements for admission based on ACT/SAT scores and high school
rank in specific Cleveland State University colleges. Students in this category may be at-risk or in need of remedial education. A substantive decline in this
category is attributed to the publicity of new admission standards to begin in 2006. Some at-risk students may have chosen to attend other institutions.
PROJECT 60
This program enables any Ohio resident, age 60 or older, to enroll in classes at Cleveland State University on a tuition-free basis. An increase in this student
population may reflect the University’s expanded efforts at community out-reach. Current policies promote attracting senior citizens with rich life experiences to
campus in the hope that they will mentor younger students and contribute to the campus learning environment in numerous other ways.
POST-SECONDARY ENROLLMENT OPTIONS PROGRAM (PSEOP)
This state-funded program offers qualified high school sophomores, juniors and seniors the opportunity to gain valuable college life experience and earn credit
while supplementing their high school college preparatory curriculum. PSEOP student enrollment is increasing due to targeted recruitment and the pairing of the
PESOP program with the new Honors Program. The dramatic rise in the enrollment of PSEOP students bodes well for the presence of prepared prospective students
on campus.
UNDERGRADUATE MAJOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF UNIVERSITY STUDIES
This is a catch-all category for non-degree or undecided students, or for those with incomplete applications at the time of admission. A decline in this category
reflects improvement in campus admissions and advising procedures, as well as the offering of pre-professional major categories in the Colleges of Science,
Engineering and Business. These new categories do not denote acceptance in a program, only a desire on a student’s part to pursue a field.
-26%
13
14
Table 9: Undergraduate Non-Degree: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department
Description
Undergraduate Nondegree
Cross Registration Undergraduate
Undergraduate Nondegree
Undergraduate Non-Degree Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
35
555
590
20
156
176
19
68
87
18
59
77
18
237
255
0%
302%
231%
-49%
-57%
-57%
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 10: Graduate Studies: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department
Description
Graduate Nondegree
Graduate Nondegree
Graduate Visiting
Pre Accelerated MBA
Graduate Studies Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
1,296
342
2
221
144
86
-40%
-93%
1,296
344
221
2
146
86
-41%
-93%
Table 11: Dual Major Enrollment by College and Academic Level
Fall 2004
Department
Major
Undergraduate
Graduate
Total
College of Business
Accounting
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Other Business
Accounting
Financial Accounting & Audit
Tax Program
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Business Economics
International Business
Total Business
2
2
1
3
1
3
2
2
13
3
2
2
1
3
1
3
2
2
16
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Interdisciplinary
Modern Languages
Music
Philosophy
Political Science/IR
Religious Studies
Sociology
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Social Studies
Linguistics
Women's Studies
Spanish
Music
Philosophy
International Relations
Political Science
Religious Studies
Sociology
Social Science
Total CLASS
Total Undergraduate First College
Total CLASS & First College
First College
2
6
7
4
4
16
29
3
2
3
2
8
1
5
3
8
2
105
1
106
2
2
6
7
4
5
16
29
3
2
3
3
8
1
5
3
8
2
107
2
1
108
1
1
(Continued on next page)
15
16
Table 11: Dual Major Enrollment by College and Academic Level
Fall 2004
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department
Major
Undergraduate
Graduate
Total
College of Education and Human Services
Nursing
Teachers Education
Nursing Basic
Nursing RN
Middle Childhood Education
Special Education
Mild/Moderate Educational Need
1
1
1
1
1
5
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Computer Engineering
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
2
2
1
1
6
Total College of Education and Human Services
1
1
1
1
1
5
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
College of Engineering
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Total Engineering
3
3
5
2
1
1
9
College of Science
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Total Science
Chemistry
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
1
1
3
5
1
11
1
3
6
1
4
1
3
7
1
17
1
1
3
3
6
2
College of Urban Affairs
Urban Studies
Total Urban Affairs
University Total
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
3
2
5
161
Table 12: College of Business
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 12.1: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2000
%
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
397
378
480
769
1,032
85
3,141
13%
12%
15%
24%
33%
3%
100%
461
360
516
803
1,176
44
3,360
14%
11%
15%
24%
35%
1%
100%
409
322
499
825
1,174
36
3,265
13%
10%
15%
25%
36%
1%
100%
361
294
462
804
1,233
54
3,208
11%
9%
14%
25%
38%
2%
100%
421
291
449
791
1,225
47
3,224
13%
9%
14%
25%
38%
1%
100%
17%
-1%
-3%
-2%
-1%
-13%
0%
6%
-23%
-6%
3%
19%
-45%
3%
Table 12.2: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Course Level
2000
Lower (100–299)
Upper (300–499)
Masters (500–699)
Doctoral (700–899)
Total
5,599
9,767
9,042
198
24,606
%
23%
40%
37%
1%
100%
2001
%
2002
6,166
10,102
7,998
129
24,395
25%
41%
33%
1%
100%
5,760
9,953
8,038
83
23,834
%
24%
42%
34%
0%
100%
Figure 12.1: Student Enrollment by Class Standing
1,500
2003
4,687
9,585
8,227
196
22,695
%
2004
21%
42%
36%
1%
100%
4,450
9,301
8,305
179
22,235
%
1 Year
5 Year
20%
42%
37%
1%
100%
-5%
-3%
1%
-9%
-2%
-21%
-5%
-8%
-10%
-10%
Figure 12.2: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
10,000
8,000
1,000
6,000
4,000
500
2,000
0
First Year
Sophomores
2000
Juniors
2001
Seniors
2002
2003
Masters
2004
Doctoral
0
Lower division
(100-299)
Upper Division
(300-499)
17
2000
2001
Masters
(500-699)
2002
2003
Doctoral
(700-899)
2004
18
Table 13: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Table 13.1: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Total
2000
%
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
789
666
716
903
323
3,397
23%
20%
21%
27%
10%
100%
1,123
724
742
982
445
4,016
28%
18%
18%
24%
11%
100%
972
799
795
1,075
507
4,148
23%
19%
19%
26%
12%
100%
903
760
797
1,128
561
4,149
22%
18%
19%
27%
14%
100%
542
516
607
953
478
3,096
18%
17%
20%
31%
15%
100%
-40%
-32%
-24%
-16%
-15%
-25%
-31%
-23%
-15%
6%
48%
-9%
|
Table 13.2: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Percent Change
Course Level
2000
Lower (100 – 299)
Upper (300 – 499)
Masters (500 – 699)
Total
34,133
15,125
2,925
52,183
%
65%
29%
6%
100%
2001
%
2002
35,495
14,832
3,358
53,691
66%
28%
6%
100%
35,610
14,979
3,866
54,455
%
65%
28%
7%
100%
Figure 13.1: Student Enrollment by Class Standing
2003
%
33,605
15,761
4,369
53,758
2004
63%
29%
8%
100%
32,243
14,690
4,393
51,330
%
1 Year
5 Year
63%
29%
9%
100%
-4%
-7%
1%
-5%
-6%
-3%
50%
-2%
Figure 13.2: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
40,000
1,200
35,000
1,000
30,000
800
25,000
20,000
600
15,000
400
10,000
200
5,000
0
0
First Year
Sophomore
2000
Juniors
2001
2002
Seniors
2003
2004
Masters
Lower Division
(100-299)
2000
Upper Division
(300-499)
2001
2002
Masters
(500-699)
2003
2004
Table 14: College of Education and Human Services
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 14.1: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2000
%
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
183
187
232
507
872
89
2,070
9%
9%
11%
24%
42%
4%
100%
228
181
273
562
1,439
95
2,778
8%
7%
10%
20%
52%
3%
100%
239
202
269
631
1,615
92
3,048
8%
7%
9%
21%
53%
3%
100%
224
193
276
716
1,813
98
3,320
7%
6%
8%
22%
55%
3%
100%
219
171
273
752
1,829
97
3,341
7%
5%
8%
23%
55%
3%
100%
-2%
-11%
-1%
5%
1%
-1%
1%
20%
-9%
18%
48%
110%
9%
61%
Table 14.2: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
2000
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Lower (100 – 299)
Upper (300 – 499)
Masters (500 – 699)
Doctoral (700 – 899)
Total
2,141
7,821
7,307
815
18,084
%
12%
43%
40%
5%
100%
2001
%
2002
2,109
8,519
8,277
864
19,769
11%
43%
42%
4%
100%
2,371
9,192
9,241
738
21,542
%
2003
11%
43%
43%
3%
100%
Figure 14.1: Student Enrollment by Class Standing
%
2,310
10,087
10,139
900
23,436
2004
10%
43%
43%
4%
100%
2,193
10,805
10,543
641
24,182
%
1 Year
5 Year
9%
45%
44%
3%
100%
-5%
7%
4%
-29%
3%
2%
38%
44%
-21%
34%
Figure 14.2: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
12,500
2,000
10,000
1,500
7,500
1,000
5,000
500
2,500
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2000
Juniors
2001
Seniors
2002
2003
Masters
2004
Doctoral
Lower Division
(100-299)
Upper Division
(300-499)
2000
2001
Masters
(500-699)
2002
2003
Doctoral
(700-899)
2004
19
20
Table 15: College of Engineering
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 15.1: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2000
%
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
132
120
151
305
161
55
924
14%
13%
16%
33%
17%
6%
100%
146
119
146
356
206
57
1,030
14%
12%
14%
35%
20%
6%
100%
91
108
144
323
311
59
1,036
9%
10%
14%
31%
30%
6%
100%
102
92
143
331
358
72
1,098
9%
8%
13%
30%
33%
7%
100%
99
103
132
314
390
63
1,101
9%
9%
12%
29%
35%
6%
100%
-3%
12%
-8%
-5%
9%
-13%
0%
-25%
-14%
-13%
3%
142%
15%
19%
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 15.2: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
Lower (100 – 299)
Upper (300 – 499)
Masters (500 – 699)
Doctoral (700 – 899)
Total
2000
%
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
% of Total
1 Year
5 Year
1,502
3,692
990
290
6,474
23%
57%
15%
4%
100%
1,484
4,289
1,307
331
7,411
20%
58%
18%
4%
100%
1,234
3,773
2,057
416
7,480
16%
50%
28%
6%
100%
1,372
3,536
2,276
425
7,609
18%
46%
30%
6%
100%
1,414
3,800
2,197
396
7,807
18%
49%
28%
5%
100%
3%
7%
-3%
-7%
3%
-6%
3%
122%
37%
21%
Figure 15.1: Student Enrollment by Class Standing
Figure 15.2: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
5,000
450
4,500
400
4,000
350
3,500
300
3,000
250
2,500
200
2,000
150
1,500
100
1,000
50
500
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2000
Juniors
2001
Seniors
2002
2003
Masters
2004
Doctoral
Lower Division
(100-299)
Upper Division
(300-499)
2000
2001
Masters
(500-699)
2002
2003
Doctoral
(700-899)
2004
Table 16: College of Science
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 16.1: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2000
%
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
69
113
161
367
212
52
974
7%
12%
17%
38%
22%
5%
100%
44
98
188
339
258
67
994
4%
10%
19%
34%
26%
7%
100%
48
76
165
359
319
61
1,028
5%
7%
16%
35%
31%
6%
100%
49
111
172
367
359
86
1,144
4%
10%
15%
32%
31%
8%
100%
381
231
335
433
445
86
1,911
20%
12%
18%
23%
23%
4%
100%
678%
109%
94%
18%
24%
0%
67%
452%
105%
108%
18%
110%
65%
96%
Table 16.2: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
2000
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Lower (100 – 299)
Upper (300 – 499)
Masters (500 – 699)
Doctoral (700 – 899)
Total
22,330
7,246
2,212
474
32,262
%
69%
22%
7%
1%
100%
2001
%
2002
23,437
6,795
2,542
560
33,334
70%
20%
8%
2%
100%
23,570
7,015
3,077
585
34,247
%
69%
20%
9%
2%
100%
Figure 16.1: Student Enrollment by Class Standing
2003
%
22,953
7,454
3,605
684
34,735
2004
66%
22%
10%
2%
100%
22,085
7,454
3,753
644
33,936
%
1 Year
5 Year
65%
22%
11%
2%
100%
-4%
-1%
4%
-6%
-2%
-2%
3%
70%
36%
5%
Figure 16.2: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
25,000
500
450
20,000
400
350
15,000
300
250
10,000
200
150
5,000
100
50
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2000
Juniors
2001
Seniors
2002
2003
Masters
2004
Doctoral
Lower
(100-299)
Upper
(300-499)
2000
2001
Masters
(500-699)
2002
21
* The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in College of Science is due to introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science)
2003
Doctoral
(700-899)
2004
22
Table 17: College of Urban Affairs
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 17.1: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2000
%
2001
%
2002
%
2003
16
26
61
85
202
46
436
4%
6%
14%
19%
46%
11%
100%
34
30
85
89
293
55
586
6%
5%
15%
15%
50%
9%
100%
30
33
68
115
365
59
670
4%
5%
10%
17%
55%
9%
100%
27
27
74
128
334
49
639
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
4%
4%
11%
20%
52%
8%
100%
36
29
76
135
313
48
637
6%
4%
12%
21%
49%
8%
100%
33%
4%
4%
6%
-6%
-2%
0%
125%
8%
25%
58%
55%
4%
46%
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 17.2: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
Lower (100 – 299)
Upper (300 – 499)
Masters (500 – 699)
Doctoral (700 – 899)
Total
2000
%
2001
%
2002
2,031
1,348
2,348
389
6,116
33%
22%
38%
6%
100%
2,825
1,539
2,242
385
6,991
40%
22%
32%
6%
100%
2,733
1,885
2,359
428
7,405
37%
25%
32%
6%
100%
Figure 17.1: Student Enrollment by Class Standing
2003
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
2,798
1,994
2,222
356
7,370
38%
27%
30%
5%
100%
1,884
2,129
2,321
324
6,658
28%
32%
35%
5%
100%
-33%
7%
4%
-9%
-10%
-7%
58%
-1%
-17%
9%
Figure 17.2: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
3,000
400
2,500
350
300
2,000
250
1,500
200
150
1,000
100
500
50
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2000
Juniors
2001
Seniors
2002
2003
Masters
2004
Doctoral
Lower
(100-299)
Upper
(300-499)
2000
2001
Masters
(500-699)
2002
2003
Doctoral
(700-899)
2004
Table 18: College of Law
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 18.1: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
Law
2000
%
2001
%
2002
%
2003
759
100%
833
100%
816
100%
814
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
100%
752
100%
-8%
-1%
Table 18.2: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
2000
%
Law (500-900)
9,917
100%
2001
%
2002
10,460
100%
10,907
%
2003
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
100%
10,523
100%
9,466
100%
-10%
-5%
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Figure 18.1: Student Enrollment by Class Standing
Figure 18.2: Student Enrollment by Course Level
840
11,500
820
11,000
800
10,500
780
10,000
760
9,500
740
9,000
720
0
700
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Law
Note: The significant drop in Fall 2004 enrollment is due to new selective admission criteria introduced in Fall 2004
2000
2001
2002
Law (500-900)
2003
2004
23
24
Table 19: University Studies
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 19 .1: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Total
2000
%
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
1,374
178
62
39
1,653
83%
11%
4%
2%
100%
1,272
154
28
26
1,480
86%
10%
2%
2%
100%
1,273
169
37
43
1,522
84%
11%
2%
3%
100%
1,305
127
25
51
1,508
87%
8%
2%
3%
100%
1,074
97
25
33
1,229
87%
8%
2%
3%
100%
-18%
-24%
0%
-35%
-19%
-22%
-46%
-60%
-15%
-26%
|
Table 19.2: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Percent Change
Course Level
Developmental (050 – 099)
Lower (100 – 299)
Total
2000
%
2001
%
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
1 Year
5 Year
3,996
1,967
5,963
67%
33%
100%
4,211
1,573
5,784
73%
27%
100%
4,153
1,630
5,783
72%
28%
100%
4,246
1,595
5,841
73%
27%
100%
4,030
1,590
5,620
72%
28%
100%
-5%
-2%
-4%
0%
-10%
-5%
Figure 19.1: Student Enrollment by Class Standing
Figure 19.2: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
4,500
1,600
4,000
1,400
3,500
1,200
3,000
1,000
2,500
800
2,000
600
1,500
400
1,000
500
200
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2000
2001
Juniors
2002
2003
Seniors
2004
University Studies enrollment includes students enrolled in Project 60, PSEOP, SYAP, Undecided Non-Degree and regular University Studies Students.
Developmental (050-099)
2000
2001
Lower Division (100-299)
2002
2003
2004
Table 20: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend
2000
College
Business
CLASS
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
First College
Education
Engineering
Race
25
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
2001
2002
2003
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
1,837
361
50
129
5
417
342
3,141
2,121
657
87
69
9
73
381
3,397
87
47
4
0
2
2
24
166
1,414
387
43
22
8
15
181
2,070
570
55
20
37
3
149
90
924
58%
11%
2%
4%
0%
13%
11%
100%
62%
19%
3%
2%
0%
2%
11%
100%
52%
28%
2%
0%
1%
1%
14%
100%
68%
19%
2%
1%
0%
1%
9%
100.0%
62%
6%
2%
4%
0%
16%
10%
100%
1,995
407
52
153
6
425
322
3,360
2,509
792
111
81
12
71
440
4,016
90
39
1
2
1
0
15
148
1,912
515
67
24
7
26
227
2,778
601
58
25
31
1
203
112
1,031
59%
12%
2%
5%
0%
13%
10%
100%
62%
20%
3%
2%
0%
2%
11%
100%
61%
26%
1%
1%
1%
0%
10%
100%
69%
19%
2%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
58%
6%
2%
3%
0%
20%
11%
100%
1,932
414
64
173
10
382
290
3,265
2,591
873
125
86
8
58
407
4,148
91
38
2
2
1
0
23
157
2,084
574
74
27
7
30
252
3,048
537
64
20
26
2
293
94
1,036
59%
13%
2%
5%
0%
12%
9%
100%
62%
21%
3%
2%
0%
1%
10%
100%
58%
24%
1%
1%
1%
0%
15%
100%
68%
19%
2%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
52%
6%
2%
3%
0%
28%
9%
100.0%
1,935
415
74
156
9
346
273
3,208
2,577
917
133
71
10
65
376
4,149
78
37
2
4
2
0
20
143
2,286
623
86
26
9
31
259
3,320
571
70
17
38
1
320
81
1,098
2004
%
60%
13%
2%
5%
0%
11%
9%
100%
62%
22%
3%
2%
0%
2%
9%
100%
55%
26%
1%
3%
1%
0%
14%
100%
69%
19%
3%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
52%
6%
2%
3%
0%
29%
7%
100%
Enrollment
1,973
438
72
129
6
334
272
3,224
1,922
686
89
40
11
48
300
3,096
35
28
1
3
1
0
6
74
2,327
564
74
25
5
26
320
3,341
566
63
15
47
1
325
84
1,101
Percent Change
%
61%
14%
2%
4%
0%
10%
8%
100%
62%
22%
3%
1%
0%
2%
10%
100%
47%
38%
1%
4%
1%
0%
8%
100%
70%
17%
2%
1%
0%
1%
10%
100%
51%
6%
1%
4%
0%
30%
7%
100%
1 Year
5 Year
2%
6%
-3%
-17%
-33%
-3%
-0%
0%
-25%
-25%
-33%
-44%
10%
-26%
-20%
-25%
-55%
-24%
-50%
-25%
-50%
7%
21%
44%
0%
20%
-20%
-20%
3%
-9%
4%
2%
-42%
22%
-34%
-21%
-9%
-60%
-40%
-75%
-70%
-48%
2%
-9%
-14%
-4%
-44%
-16%
24%
1%
-1%
-10%
-12%
24%
0%
2%
4%
0%
-50%
-100%
-75%
-55%
65%
46%
72%
14%
-38%
73%
77%
61%
-1%
15%
-25%
27%
-67%
118%
-7%
19%
(Continued on next page)
26
(Continued from previous page)
Table 20: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend
2000
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
Science
Race
Enrollment
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
White
617
Black
139
Hispanic
22
Asian or Pacific Islander
30
Native American
4
Non-Resident Alien
60
Unknown
102
Total
974
Urban Affairs
White
221
Black
146
Hispanic
10
Asian or Pacific Islander
2
Native American
0
Non-Resident Alien
11
Unknown
46
Total
436
Law
White
619
Black
57
Hispanic
14
Asian or Pacific Islander
11
Native American
2
Non-Resident Alien
12
Unknown
44
Total
759
University Studies White
820
Black
467
Hispanic
51
Asian or Pacific Islander
61
Native American
11
Non-Resident Alien
11
Unknown
232
Total
1,653
2001
2002
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
63%
14%
2%
3%
0%
6%
10%
100%
51%
33%
2%
0%
0%
3%
11%
100.0%
82%
8%
2%
1%
0%
2%
6%
100%
50%
28%
3%
4%
1%
1%
14%
100%
651
141
20
26
3
59
94
994
308
182
17
4
2
13
60
586
704
55
17
14
1
10
32
833
711
464
58
52
4
7
184
1,480
65%
14%
2%
3%
0%
6%
9%
100%
53%
31%
3%
1%
0%
2%
10%
100%
85%
7%
2%
2%
0%
1%
4%
100%
48%
31%
4%
4%
0%
0%
12%
100%
676
129
24
30
2
72
95
1,028
362
210
20
8
0
15
55
670
692
48
22
21
2
9
22
816
730
458
57
57
2
9
209
1,522
2003
%
66%
13%
2%
3%
0%
7%
9%
100%
54%
31%
3%
1%
0%
2%
8%
100%
85%
6%
3%
3%
0%
1%
3%
100%
48%
30%
4%
4%
0%
1%
14%
100%
Enrollment
761
140
27
35
3
81
97
1,144
360
181
17
6
0
21
54
639
703
44
20
22
2
9
14
814
707
450
48
46
3
9
245
1,508
2004
%
67%
12%
2%
3%
0%
7%
8%
100%
56%
28%
3%
1%
0%
3%
8%
100%
86%
5%
2%
3%
0%
1%
2%
100%
47%
30%
3%
3%
0%
1%
16%
100%
Enrollment
1,201
324
45
72
1
98
170
1,911
355
187
11
5
1
20
58
637
607
48
24
27
2
10
34
752
508
365
30
34
7
2
283
1,229
Percent Change
%
1 Year
63%
17%
2%
4%
0%
5%
9%
100%
56%
29%
2%
1%
0%
3%
9%
100%
81%
6%
3%
4%
0%
1%
5%
100%
41%
30%
2%
3%
1%
0%
23%
100%
5 Year
58%
131%
67%
106%
-67%
21%
75%
67%
-1%
3%
-35%
-17%
95%
133%
105%
140%
-75%
63%
67%
96%
60%
28%
10%
150%
-5%
7%
-0%
-14%
9%
20%
23%
0%
11%
143%
-8%
-28%
-19%
-38%
-26%
133%
-78%
16%
-19%
82%
26%
46%
-2%
-16%
71%
145%
0%
-17%
-23%
-1%
-38%
-22%
-41%
-44%
-36%
-82%
22%
-26%
(Continued on next page)
(Continued from previous page)
Table 20: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend
2000
College
Undergraduate
Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
University
Race
Enrollment
2001
%
Enrollment
2002
%
Enrollment
2003
%
Enrollment
2004
%
Enrollment
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
White
352
Black
78
Hispanic
11
Asian or Pacific Islander
19
Native American
2
Non-Resident Alien
20
Unknown
108
Total
590
White
734
Black
283
Hispanic
32
Asian or Pacific Islander
31
Native American
2
Non-Resident Alien
31
Unknown
183
Total
1,296
60%
13%
2%
3%
0%
3%
18%
100%
57%
22%
2%
2%
0%
2%
14%
100%
112
19
1
4
1
4
35
176
180
99
11
2
0
6
46
344
64%
11%
1%
2%
1%
2%
20%
100%
52%
29%
3%
1%
0%
2%
13%
100%
42
14
0
4
1
1
25
87
101
75
10
3
1
3
28
221
48%
16%
0%
5%
1%
1%
29%
100%
46%
34%
5%
1%
0%
1%
13%
100%
35
13
1
7
1
0
20
77
75
41
4
1
0
1
24
146
45%
17%
1%
9%
1%
0%
26%
100%
51%
28%
3%
1%
0%
1%
16%
100%
147
28
6
9
0
8
57
255
51
21
2
2
0
1
9
86
58%
11%
2%
4%
0%
3%
22%
100%
59%
24%
2%
2%
0%
1%
10%
100%
320%
115%
500%
29%
-100%
0%
-63%
-41%
-58%
-64%
-45%
-53%
-100%
-60%
-47%
-57%
-93%
-93%
-94%
-94%
-100%
-97%
-95%
-93%
White
9,392
Black
2,677
Hispanic
344
Asian or Pacific Islander
411
Native American
48
Non-Resident Alien
801
Unknown
1,733
Total
15,406
61%
17%
2%
3%
0%
5%
11%
100%
9,773
2,771
380
393
38
824
1,567
15,746
62%
18%
2%
2%
0%
5%
10%
100%
9,838
2,897
418
437
36
872
1,500
15,998
61%
18%
3%
3%
0%
5%
9%
100%
10,088
2,931
429
412
40
883
1,463
16,246
62%
18%
3%
3%
0%
5%
9%
100%
9,692
2,752
369
393
35
872
1,593
15,706
62%
18%
2%
3%
0%
6%
10%
100%
-4%
-6%
-14%
-5%
-13%
-1%
9%
-3%
3%
3%
7%
-4%
-27%
9%
-8%
2%
185%
231%
-32%
-49%
-50%
100%
5-Year Change Highlights
■ In the College of Business, Black (21%) & Hispanic (44%) enrollment has increased significantly, whereas Non-Resident Alien dropped by 20%.
■ In COEHS enrollment in all races have increased significantly except Native American.
■ In the College of Engineering, Non-Resident Alient enrollment has increased by 118%. Asian (27%) & Black (15%) enrollment also increased.
■ In the College of Science, the highest growth is in Black, Asian & Hispanic enrollment. Overall the enrollment has increased in every category except Native American
(*The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in the College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science), PENGR (Pre
Engineering), PNUR (Pre Nursing), CSPBUND (College of Science Undecided) and other new codes.
■ In the College of Urban Affairs, the highest increase is in Asian enrollment. Overall the College has experienced a positive growth in every category.
■ In the College of Law, Asian and Hispanic enrollment increased significantly.
27
■ At the University level, enrollment has increased between 3% to 9% except for Native American and Asian.
28
Table 21: CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Race
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
2000
College
Business
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
CLASS
First College
Education
Race
Enrollment
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
1,263
289
40
80
3
94
255
2,024
1,901
624
81
65
6
51
346
3,074
87
47
4
0
2
2
24
166
767
179
31
16
7
5
104
1,109
2001
2002
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
62%
14%
2%
4%
0%
5%
13%
100%
62%
20%
3%
2%
0%
2%
11%
100%
52%
28%
2%
0%
1%
1%
14%
100%
69%
16%
3%
1%
1%
0%
9%
100%
1,330
302
41
107
4
121
235
2,140
2,238
708
101
74
9
58
383
3,571
90
39
1
2
1
0
15
148
859
197
37
15
5
12
119
1,244
62%
14%
2%
5%
0%
6%
11%
100%
63%
20%
3%
2%
0%
2%
11%
100%
61%
26%
1%
1%
1%
0%
10%
100%
69%
16%
3%
1%
0%
1%
10%
100%
1,275
296
45
122
7
106
204
2,055
2,267
786
112
71
6
44
355
3,641
91
38
2
2
1
0
23
157
952
196
37
17
4
12
123
1,341
2003
%
62%
14%
2%
6%
0%
5%
10%
100%
62%
22%
3%
2%
0%
1%
10%
100%
58%
24%
1%
1%
1%
0%
15%
100%
71%
15%
3%
1%
0%
1%
9%
100%
Enrollment
1,210
313
54
96
5
82
161
1,921
2,216
814
120
63
8
46
321
3,588
78
37
2
4
2
0
20
143
1,020
216
31
16
2
13
111
1,409
2004
%
63%
16%
3%
5%
0%
4%
8%
100%
62%
23%
3%
2%
0%
1%
9%
100%
55%
26%
1%
3%
1%
0%
14%
100%
72%
15%
2%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
Percent Change
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
1,261
345
55
72
3
81
135
1,952
1,630
579
84
35
11
32
247
2,618
35
28
1
3
1
0
6
74
1,045
194
37
15
1
14
109
1,415
65%
18%
3%
4%
0%
4%
7%
100%
62%
22%
3%
1%
0%
1%
9%
100%
47%
38%
1%
4%
1%
0%
8%
100%
74%
14%
3%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
4%
10%
2%
-25%
-40%
-1%
-16%
2%
-26%
-29%
-30%
-44%
38%
-30%
-23%
-27%
-55%
-24%
-50%
-25%
-50%
0%
-70%
-48%
2%
-10%
19%
-6%
-50%
8%
-2%
0%
-0%
19%
38%
-10%
0%
-14%
-47%
-4%
-14%
-7%
4%
-46%
83%
-37%
-29%
-15%
-60%
-40%
-75%
0%
-50%
-100%
-75%
-55%
36%
8%
19%
-6%
-86%
180%
5%
28%
(Continued on next page)
(Continued from previous page)
Table 21: CSU Fall Undergraduate Enrollment by College & Race
2000
College
Engineering
Race
Enrollment
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
White
499
Black
51
Hispanic
14
Asian or Pacific Islander
31
Native American
2
Non-Resident Alien
32
Unknown
79
Total
708
Science
White
443
Black
121
Hispanic
20
Asian or Pacific Islander
28
Native American
4
Non-Resident Alien
10
Unknown
84
Total
710
Urban Affairs
White
91
Black
64
Hispanic
3
Asian or Pacific Islander
0
Native American
0
Non-Resident Alien
1
Unknown
29
Total
188
University Studies White
820
Black
467
Hispanic
51
Asian or Pacific Islander
61
Native American
11
Non-Resident Alien
11
Unknown
232
Total
1,653
2001
2002
2003
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
70%
7%
2%
4%
0%
5%
11%
100%
62%
17%
3%
4%
1%
1%
12%
100%
48%
34%
2%
0%
0%
1%
15%
100%
50%
28%
3%
4%
1%
1%
14%
100%
529
50
21
26
1
47
93
767
423
119
16
24
3
11
73
669
124
77
6
1
1
0
29
238
711
464
58
52
4
7
184
1,480
69%
7%
3%
3%
0%
6%
12%
100%
63%
18%
2%
4%
0%
2%
111%
100%
52%
32%
3%
0%
0%
0%
12%
100%
48%
31%
4%
4%
0%
0%
12%
100%
458
56
15
19
2
39
77
666
413
100
16
25
2
17
75
649
127
90
7
1
0
0
21
246
730
458
57
57
2
9
209
1,522
69%
8%
2%
3%
0%
6%
12%
100%
64%
15%
2%
4%
0%
3%
12%
100%
51%
37%
3%
0%
0%
0%
9%
100%
48%
30%
4%
4%
0%
1%
14%
100%
Enrollment
472
62
14
24
1
32
63
668
465
102
18
26
2
17
69
699
142
80
7
1
0
0
26
256
707
450
48
46
3
9
245
1,508
2004
Percent Change
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
71%
9%
2%
4%
0%
5%
9%
100%
67%
15%
3%
4%
0%
2%
10%
100%
55%
31%
3%
0%
0%
0%
10%
100%
47%
30%
3%
3%
0%
1%
16%
100%
459
53
13
28
1
30
64
648
857
267
40
64
1
20
131
1,380
154
93
7
2
0
0
20
276
508
365
30
34
7
2
283
1,229
71%
8%
2%
4%
0%
5%
10%
100%
62%
19%
3%
5%
0%
1%
9%
100%
55%
34%
3%
1%
0%
0%
7%
100%
41%
30%
2%
3%
1%
0%
23%
100%
-3%
-15%
-7%
17%
0%
-6%
2%
-3%
84%
162%
122%
146%
-50%
18%
90%
97%
9%
16%
0%
100%
0%
0%
-23%
8%
-28%
-19%
-38%
-26%
133%
-78%
16%
-19%
-8%
4%
-7%
-10%
-50%
-6%
-19%
-8%
94%
121%
100%
129%
-75%
100%
56%
95%
67%
45%
133%
0%
0%
-100%
-31%
46%
-38%
-22%
-41%
-44%
-36%
-82%
22%
-26%
(Continued on next page)
29
30
Table 21: CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
2000
College
Race
Enrollment
2001
%
Enrollment
2002
%
Enrollment
2003
%
Enrollment
2004
%
Enrollment
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
352
78
11
19
2
20
108
590
60%
13%
2%
3%
0%
3%
18%
100%
112
19
1
4
1
4
35
176
64%
11%
1%
2%
1%
2%
20%
100%
42
14
0
4
1
1
25
87
48%
16%
0%
5%
1%
1%
29%
100%
35
13
1
7
1
0
20
77
45%
17%
1%
9%
1%
0%
26%
100%
147
28
6
9
0
8
57
255
58%
11%
2%
4%
0%
3%
22%
100%
320%
115%
500%
29%
-100%
0%
185%
231%
-58%
-64%
-45%
-53%
-100%
-60%
-47%
-57%
Undergraduate
Total
White
6,223
Black
1,920
Hispanic
255
Asian or Pacific Islander 300
Native American
37
Non-Resident Alien
226
Unknown
1,261
Total
10,222
61%
19%
2%
3%
0%
2%
12%
100%
6,416
1,975
282
305
29
260
1,166
10,433
61%
19%
3%
3%
0%
2%
11%
100%
6,355
2,034
291
318
25
228
1,112
10,363
61%
20%
3%
3%
0%
2%
11%
100%
6,345
2,087
295
283
24
199
1,036
10,269
62%
20%
3%
3%
0%
2%
10%
100%
6,096
1,952
273
262
25
187
1,052
9,847
62%
20%
3%
3%
0%
2%
11%
100%
-4%
-6%
-7%
-7%
4%
-6%
2%
-4%
-2%
2%
7%
-13%
-32%
-17%
-17%
-4%
|
Undergraduate
Non-Degree
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science). Undergraduate NonDegree fluctuations are due to procedural changes.
Table 22: CSU Graduate and Law Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
2000
College
Business
CLASS
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Education
Engineering
Race
Enrollment
White
574
Black
72
Hispanic
10
Asian or Pacific Islander
49
Native American
2
Non-Resident Alien
323
Unknown
87
Total
1,117
White
220
Black
33
Hispanic
6
Asian or Pacific Islander
4
Native American
3
Non-Resident Alien
22
Unknown
35
Total
323
White
647
Black
208
Hispanic
12
Asian or Pacific Islander
6
Native American
1
Non-Resident Alien
10
Unknown
77
Total
961
White
71
Black
4
Hispanic
6
Asian or Pacific Islander
6
Native American
1
Non-Resident Alien
117
Unknown
11
Total
216
2001
2002
2003
2004
Percent Change
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
51%
6%
1%
4%
0%
29%
8%
100%
68%
10%
2%
1%
1%
7%
11%
100%
67%
22%
1%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
33%
2%
3%
3%
0%
54%
5%
100%
665
105
11
46
2
304
87
1,220
271
84
10
7
3
13
57
445
1,053
318
30
9
2
14
108
1,534
72
8
4
5
0
156
19
264
55%
9%
1%
4%
0%
25%
7%
100%
61%
19%
2%
2%
1%
3%
13%
100%
69%
21%
2%
1%
0%
1%
7%
100%
27%
3%
2%
2%
0%
59%
7%
100%
657
118
19
51
3
276
86
1,210
324
87
13
15
2
14
52
507
1,132
378
37
10
3
18
129
1,707
79
8
5
7
0
254
17
370
54%
10%
2%
4%
0%
23%
7%
100%
64%
17%
3%
3%
0%
3%
10%
100%
66%
22%
2%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
21%
2%
1%
2%
0%
69%
5%
100%
725
102
20
60
4
264
112
1,287
361
103
13
8
2
19
55
561
1,266
407
55
10
7
18
148
1,911
99
8
3
14
0
288
18
430
56%
8%
2%
5%
0%
21%
9%
100%
64%
18%
2%
1%
0%
3%
10%
100%
66%
21%
3%
1%
0%
1%
8%
100%
23%
2%
1%
3%
0%
67%
4%
100%
712
93
17
57
3
253
137
1,272
292
107
5
5
0
16
53
478
1,282
370
37
10
4
12
211
1,926
107
10
2
19
0
295
20
453
56%
7%
1%
4%
0%
20%
11%
100%
61%
22%
1%
1%
0%
3%
11%
100%
67%
19%
2%
1%
0%
1%
11%
100%
24%
2%
0%
4%
0%
65%
4%
100%
-2%
-9%
-15%
-5%
-25%
-4%
22%
-1%
-19%
4%
-62%
-38%
-100%
-16%
-4%
-15%
1%
-9%
-33%
0%
-43%
-33%
43%
1%
8%
25%
-33%
36%
0%
2%
11%
5%
24%
29%
70%
16%
50%
-22%
57%
14%
33%
224%
-17%
25%
-100%
-27%
51%
48%
98%
78%
208%
67%
300%
20%
174%
100%
51%
150%
-67%
217%
-100%
152%
82%
110%
(Continued on next page)
31
32
Table 22: CSU Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
2000
College
Science
|
Urban Affairs
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Law
Graduate Studies
Race
Enrollment
White
174
Black
18
Hispanic
2
Asian or Pacific Islander
2
Native American
0
Non-Resident Alien
50
Unknown
18
Total
264
White
130
Black
82
Hispanic
7
Asian or Pacific Islander
2
Native American
0
Non-Resident Alien
10
Unknown
17
Total
248
White
619
Black
57
Hispanic
14
Asian or Pacific Islander
11
Native American
2
Non-Resident Alien
12
Unknown
44
Total
759
White
734
Black
283
Hispanic
32
Asian or Pacific Islander
31
Native American
2
Non-Resident Alien
31
Unknown
183
Total
1,296
2001
%
66%
7%
1%
1%
0%
19%
7%
100%
52%
33%
3%
1%
0%
4%
7%
100%
82%
8%
2%
1%
0%
2%
6%
100%
57%
22%
2%
2%
0%
2%
14%
100%
Enrollment
228
22
4
2
0
48
21
325
184
105
11
3
1
13
31
348
704
55
17
14
1
10
32
833
180
99
11
2
0
6
46
344
2002
%
70%
7%
1%
1%
0%
15%
6%
100%
53%
30%
3%
1%
0%
4%
9%
100%
85%
7%
2%
2%
0%
1%
4%
100%
52%
29%
3%
1%
0%
2%
13%
100%
Enrollment
263
29
8
5
0
55
20
380
235
120
13
7
0
15
34
424
692
48
22
21
2
9
22
816
101
75
10
3
1
3
28
221
2003
%
69%
8%
2%
1%
0%
14%
5%
100%
55%
28%
3%
2%
0%
4%
8%
100%
85%
6%
3%
3%
0%
1%
3%
100%
46%
34%
5%
1%
0%
1%
13%
100%
Enrollment
296
38
9
9
1
64
28
445
218
101
10
5
0
21
28
383
703
44
20
22
2
9
14
814
75
41
4
1
0
1
24
146
2004
%
67%
9%
2%
2%
0%
14%
6%
100%
57%
26%
3%
1%
0%
5%
7%
100%
86%
5%
2%
3%
0%
1%
2%
100%
51%
28%
3%
1%
0%
1%
16%
100%
Enrollment
344
57
5
8
0
78
39
531
201
94
4
3
1
20
38
361
607
48
24
27
2
10
34
752
51
21
2
2
0
1
9
86
Percent Change
%
65%
11%
1%
2%
0%
15%
7%
100%
56%
26%
1%
1%
0%
6%
11%
100%
81%
6%
3%
4%
0%
1%
5%
100.0%
59%
24%
2%
2%
0%
1%
10%
100%
1 Year
5 Year
16%
50%
-44%
-11%
-100%
22%
39%
19%
-8%
-7%
-60%
-40%
0%
-5%
36%
-6%
-14%
9%
20%
23%
0%
11%
143%
-8%
-32%
-49%
-50%
100%
0%
0%
-63%
-41%
98%
217%
150%
300%
0%
56%
117%
101%
55%
15%
-43%
50%
0%
100%
124%
46%
-2%
-16%
71%
145%
0%
-17%
-23%
-1%
-93%
-93%
-94%
-94%
-100%
-97%
-95%
-93%
(Continued on next page)
Table 22: CSU Graduate and Law Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
2000
College
Graduate and
Law Total
Race
Enrollment
White
3,169
Black
757
Hispanic
89
Asian or Pacific Islander
111
Native American
11
Non-Resident Alien
575
Unknown
472
Total
5,184
2001
2002
2003
2004
Percent Change
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
61%
15%
2%
2%
0%
11%
9%
100%
3,357
796
98
88
9
564
401
5,313
63%
15%
2%
2%
0%
11%
8%
100%
3,483
863
127
119
11
644
388
5,635
62%
15%
2%
2%
0%
11%
7%
100%
3,743
844
134
129
16
684
427
5,977
63%
14%
2%
2%
0%
11%
7%
100%
3,596
800
96
131
10
685
541
5,859
61%
14%
2%
2%
0%
12%
9%
100%
-4%
-5%
-28%
2%
-38%
0%
27%
-2%
13%
6%
8%
18%
-9%
19%
15%
13%
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science). Graduate Non-Degree fluctuations are due to
procedural changes.
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
33
34
Table 23: Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College, Load: 5 Year Trend
UNDERGRADUATE FULL-TIME:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
College
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
1,263
2,178
126
721
443
509
89
1,035
214
6,578
1,353
2,444
114
828
480
453
101
983
38
6,794
1,410
2,626
116
933
435
456
130
874
14
6,994
1,313
2,657
116
952
437
505
154
794
14
6,942
1,368
2,005
54
974
459
1,050
161
570
66
6,707
4%
-25%
-53%
2%
5%
108%
5%
-28%
371%
-3%
8%
-8%
-57%
35%
4%
106%
81%
-45%
-69%
2%
UNDERGRADUATE PART-TIME:
Percent Change
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Total
761
896
40
388
265
201
99
618
376
3,644
787
1,127
34
416
287
216
137
497
138
3,639
645
1,015
41
408
231
193
115
648
73
3,369
608
931
27
457
231
196
100
714
63
3,327
584
613
20
441
189
332
113
659
189
3,140
-4%
-34%
-26%
-4%
-18%
69%
13%
-8%
200%
-6%
-23%
-32%
-50%
14%
-29%
65%
14%
7%
-50%
-14%
(Continued on next page)
Table 24: Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College, Load: 5 Year Trend
GRADUATE & LAW FULL-TIME:
Percent Change
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies
Total
376
120
135
98
146
82
402
108
1,467
317
164
217
117
185
94
473
20
1,587
366
185
276
137
229
94
508
13
1,808
427
201
306
123
251
98
497
4
1,907
386
225
318
101
294
92
466
6
1,888
-10%
12%
4%
-18%
17%
-6%
-6%
50%
-1%
3%
88%
136%
3%
101%
12%
16%
-94%
29%
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
GRADUATE & LAW PART-TIME:
Percent Change
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies
Total
741
203
826
118
118
166
357
1,188
3,717
903
281
1,317
147
140
254
360
324
3,726
844
322
1,431
233
151
330
308
208
3,827
860
360
1,605
307
194
285
317
142
4,070
886
253
1,608
352
237
269
286
80
3,971
3%
-30%
0%
15%
22%
-6%
-10%
-44%
-2%
20%
25%
95%
198%
101%
62%
-20%
-93%
7%
Undergraduate Full-time Load: Student registered for a minimum of 12 hours
Graduate Full-time Load: Student registered for a minimum of 9 hours
Law Full-time Load: Student registered for a minimum of 13 hours
The definition of Full-time and Part-time load at the Graduate and Law level has been changed. Reports published prior to Fall 2005 will be affected.
35
EEast and West Centers
The opening of Cleveland State University West Center in August 2003 and East Center in August 2004 represents the
creation of new educational opportunities for Cleveland area residents. The institution responded to student needs by creating
a vision for the future in which CSU classes are offered in close proximity to prospective students. These Centers established a suburban presence for the University’s thriving downtown campus. Both these Centers reach out to part-time students with a special appeal to busy adults. Academic offerings include programs for educators (teachers and administrators),
business and public service professionals seeking to complete their university degree, traditional college-age students and
high school students in post-secondary educational option programs. Continuing education courses include several
professional certificate programs for health care professionals, public safety personnel and other professionals, as well as
courses for noncredit students with a focus on job and career interests. Program offerings include a variety of undergraduate
courses, Master’s degree programs, a Bachelor of Business Administration, a Graduate Certificate Program in Local
and Urban Management, Continuing Education courses in Business and Management, Computer Training, and Nursing
and Healthcare.
Table 25: West Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semesters
West Center
Undergraduate
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
Graduate/Law
Total
2003
2004
2003
2004
2003
2004
132
269
197
276
18
195
120
616
27
562
87
708
18
4
67
405
558
28
986
94
1,469
327
389
616
27
4
28
1,391
759
363
726
18
67
94
2,027
West Center Serves the Following Cleveland Suburbs:
■ Avon
■ Avon Lake
■ Bay Village
■ Berea
■ Brookpark
■ Elyria
■ Fairview Park
■ Lakewood
■ Lorain
■ North Olmsted
■ North Ridgeville
■ Olmsted Falls
■ Rocky River
■ Sheffield
■ Sheffield Lake
■ Sheffield Township
■ Westlake
West Center
■ This campus was opened in Fall 2003 with the prospect of drawing in sufficient annual enrollment to generate 3,000 student
credit hours (SCH). This expectation was far exceeded. The West Center academic year credit hours that include Fall, Spring,
and Summer (not shown here) have exceeded 5,000 SCH. This robust growth is indicative of CSU’s adopting entrepreneurial strategies in meeting the educational needs of the Cleveland area residents.
36
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 26: East Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semesters
East Center
Undergraduate
College
2004
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
48
164
Graduate/Law
Total
195
243
164
420
420
121
121
333
615
948
East Center Serves the Following Cleveland Suburbs:
■ Aurora
■ Bainbridge
■ Beachwood
■ Bedford
■ Chagrin Falls
■ Gates Mills
■ Hudson
■ Hunting Valley
■ Macedonia
■ Maple Heights
■ Mayfield Heights
■ Moreland Hills
■ North Randall
■ Northfield
■ Oakwood
■ Orange
■ Solon
■ Twinsburg
■ Warrensville Heights
■ Woodmere
East Center
■ Launching the CSU East Center in Fall 2004 included an assumption that the Center would generate 2,500 credit hours in
an academic year. The Fall 2004 semester, as shown above, met its expectation by generating 948 SCH. The following Spring
and Summer semesters contributed the remaining SCH needed to successfully meet the goal.
Table 27: CSU Off-Campus Locations in Cleveland: Fall Student Credit Hours
Other Locations*
Undergraduate
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Law
Science
Urban Affairs
Other (AF-CSC-MSC)
Total
Graduate/Law
2000
2001
2002
2003 2004
466
181
587
90
337
80
132
521
196
49
67
263
32
28
260
56
476
168
240
164
220
128
963
1,321
271
164
12
837
821 1,246
Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
48
329
36
460
357
45
598
816
132
1,032
906
15
487
12
270
140
230
154
130
749
965
425
6
1,230 2,134 1,550
2000
2001
48
329
466
623
606
550
6
0
0
0
260
476
326
308
0
0
1,712 2,286
2002
2003
2004
357
948
973
382
653
278
678 1,228
519
0
49
40
0
0
0
240 220
271
394 282
294
0
0
12
2,051 3,380 2,387
*CSU Top 10 Off-Campus Locations in Greater Cleveland Area:
■ Cleveland Clinic Foundation
■ Lakeland Community College
■ Lorain County Community College
■
■
■
■
Magnificat High School
MetroHealth
Moen, Inc.
WVIZ
■ Orange High School
■ Progressive Insurance
■ St. Joseph Academy
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
37
Division of Continuing Education:
DDivision of Continuing Education
The Division of Continuing Education is the major educational outreach arm of Cleveland State,
educating thousands of adults each year in this region and beyond. Many Division programs satisfy certification and
licensing requirements. Others enable professionals to increase their job skills, train for new technologies, and
build communication and leadership abilities.
All of the Division's programs help individuals and organizations enhance their abilities and improve productivity.
The Division offers noncredit seminars, workshops, and other noncredit programs in several major program areas.
Figure 20: Division of Continuing Education
Enrollment by Program Area FY 2000 – 2004
12,000
127
10,000
8,000
86
1,182
6,000
3,556
1,442
4,000
0
2,801
2,622
2,099
5,085
2,266
4,139
4,459
1,555
1,634
1,348
1,887
1,698
1,272
1,168
8,794
FY 2000
10,290
FY 2001
10,588
FY 2002
8,458
FY 2003
9,439
FY 2004
Business & Management
38
79
19
1,473
4,033
2,000
71
1,468
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Computer/Engineering
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
HAZMAT
Nursing/Health Sciences
Other
Figure 21: Total Student Training Hours
Spring 2002 – Fall 2004
90,000
78,598
80,000
69,076
70,000
58,694
60,000
54,661
50,000
57,413
45,142
40,000
30,000
20,198
20,000
19,014
13,522
10,000
0
Spring
Summer
2002
Fall
2003
2004
Figure 22: Courses Offered by Program Area
Summer 2001 – Spring 2004
350
306
300
285
259
250
223
211
200
163
164
159
150
117
127
117
134
100
50
0
Computer Technical
Business & Management
2002
Emergency Preparedness
2003
Nursing & Health Sciences
2004
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
39
Division of Continuing Education
■ Continuing Education programs expanded to West Center in Fall 2003 and served 338 students that academic year.
In Fall 2004, programs were added at the new East Center, and the Division served a total of 539 students at East and
West Centers that semester.
■ The Center for Emergency Preparedness celebrated its 20th anniversary in 2004. Its HAZMAT programs reach
thousands of first responders throughout Ohio.
■ The English as a Second Language Program began an Intensive English Language Program in Spring 2005, serving
15 students its first semester.
■ The Division delivered over 100 custom training programs in 2003 – 2004. The largest training contract was with the
City of Cleveland’s Department of Public Utilities, to administer its technology training program.
■ In addition to serving as the site for hundreds of Divisional offerings, the Cole Center for Continuing Education hosted
over 120 other University and external functions in FY 2004.
■ Distance learning programs were added to the Division’s offerings in 2002 and have grown quickly, as the graph below
shows. A new online program, the Patient Advocacy Certificate Program, has drawn participants from Hawaii to Maine.
Figure 23: Total Distance Learning Students
Spring 2002 – Fall 2004
140
116
Total Students
120
100
83
80
73
60
60
39
40
22
20
0
2
0
0
Spring
Summer
2002
40
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
2003
Fall
2004
Research
4
*DIVIDER PAGES 9/11/05 3:57 PM Page 4
R
Research
RResearch
Cleveland State University is a young, Research Intensive, urban institution which has seen an impressive
rise in research awards in recent years. In FY 2004 research awards crossed the $30 million dollar mark, setting the stage
for the target of $50 million for the Research Extensive status in the future. The major drivers for this growth have been
Cleveland State University’s faculty and infrastructure, strategic location in the heart of Ohio’s bio-technology corridor, and
significant increases in graduate student enrollment. While CSU is not a research university, the current steady growth
in funded research on campus clearly demonstrates the institutional priorities of promoting an intellectual university
community engaged in discovery of knowledge and artistic works.
Table 1: Research Awards and Expenditures
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
Source
2000
Awards
Expenditures
$24,813,386
$18,391,981
2001
2002
$22,824,701
$21,916,006
$25,104,137
$22,118,648
2003
$22,877,201
$19,117,358
2004
$35,409,250
$25,801,653
1 Year
5 Year
55%
35%
43%
40%
Figure 1: Research Awards and Expenditures
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
$36M
$34M
$32M
Dollars
$30M
$28M
$26M
$24M
$22M
$20M
$18M
FY 2000
FY 2001
FY 2002
Awards
FY 2003
FY 2004
Expenditures
Highlights
■ Selected examples of projects that have been funded in recent years include the Innovation in Instruments/Controls and Electronics
through NASA, and Advanced Materials and Manufacturing in the College of Engineering. Interdisciplinary research endeavors have
included those between the Colleges of Engineering and Liberal Arts and Social Sciences in manufacturing innovations involving an
ethics component. Another noteworthy program involves the College of Science and is entitled the Urbanization Impacts of
Stream Ecosystems.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
RESEARCH
1
Table 2: Research Awards by Source
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
Source
2000
Federal grants
State grants
Local grants
Private grants
State Appropriations
Advanced Manufacturing Center *
Total
$5,969,489
$3,777,118
$331,011
$1,671,492
$5,782,010
$7,282,266
$24,813,386
2001
$7,122,870
$4,022,408
$513,546
$1,868,017
$5,663,300
$3,634,560
$22,824,701
2002
2003
$8,178,459
$8,910,599
$3,179,255
$4,424,707
$428,814
$634,668
$3,746,149
$3,491,378
$7,431,970
$5,415,849
$2,139,490
N/A
$25,104,137 $22,877,201
2004
$22,355,833
$4,693,503
$2,024,769
$2,608,584
$3,726,561
N/A
$35,409,250
1 Year
5 Year
151%
6%
219%
-25%
-31%
–
55%
275%
24%
512%
56%
-36%
–
43%
Figure 2.1: Research Awards by Source Only
Fiscal Year 2004
State
Appropriations
11%
Private Grants
7%
Local Grants
6%
State Grants
13%
Federal Grants
63%
2
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Figure 2.2: Research Awards by Source and Year
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
$22.1M
Dollars
$15.1M
$10.1M
$5.1M
$100K
FY 2000
FY 2001
Federal Grants
State Grants
FY 2002
Local Grants
FY 2003
Private Grants
FY 2004
State Appropriations
Notes:
Appropriation: An authorization granted by the General Assembly to make budgetary expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes.
Grant: A financial assistance mechanism whereby money and/or direct assistance is provided to carry out approved activities.
*The Advanced Manufacturing Center was formally dissolved at the end of FY 2002. Income is reported through the appropriate funding sources in subsequent fiscal years.
Highlights
■ Competition for scarce research dollars within the state has increased in recent years as evidenced by the 31% decline in state
grant funding between FY 2003 and 2004. However, Cleveland State University grant seekers rose to the challenge. Despite
the decrease in state funding, overall funding for the University has increased since FY 2003. Federal funding posted a record
increase, which more than doubled the FY 2003 amount. Further, federal grant funding at CSU increased from $9 million in
FY 2003 to $22 million in 2004. FY 2005 funding appears to be strong and is expected to surpass FY 2004’s record of
$35 million.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
RESEARCH
3
Table 3: Research Expenditures by Source
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
Source
2000
Federal grants
State grants
Local grants
Private grants
State Appropriations
Advanced Manufacturing Center*
Total
$5,423,071
$3,197,294
$401,185
$1,479,398
$3,341,032
$4,550,000
$18,391,981
2001
$5,635,856
$4,787,633
$547,074
$1,671,457
$4,783,986
$4,490,000
$21,916,006
2002
2003
$7,593,407
$8,289,995
$4,369,507
$4,136,851
$480,001
$543,423
$1,804,745
$2,567,685
$4,060,989
$3,579,404
$3,810,000
N/A
$22,118,648 $19,117,358
2004
$15,510,461
$3,270,587
$380,215
$3,901,735
$2,738,655
N/A
$25,801,653
1 Year
5 Year
87%
-21%
-30%
52%
-23%
–
35%
186%
2%
-5%
164%
-18%
–
40%
Figure 3.1: Fiscal Year 2004 Research
Expenditures by Source
State
Appropriations
11%
Private Grants
15%
Local Grants
1%
State Grants
13%
Federal Grants
60%
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
4
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Figure 3.2: Research Expenditures by Source and Year
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
$15.5M
Dollars
$10.5M
$5.5M
$200K
FY 2000
FY 2001
Federal Grants
State Grants
FY 2002
Local Grants
FY 2003
Private Grants
FY 2004
State Appropriations
Notes: Appropriation: An authorization granted by the General Assembly to make budgetary expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes.
Grant: A financial assistance mechanism whereby money and/or direct assistance is provided to carry out approved activities.
*The Advanced Manufacturing Center was formally dissolved at the end of FY 2002. Income is reported through the appropriate funding sources in subsequent fiscal years.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
RESEARCH
5
Table 4: Research Expenditures Reported by OBOR*
at Ohio Public Universities
Fiscal Year 1987 – 2002
Total R&D Expenditures
Thousands of 2002 Dollars
Institution
1987
1992
1997
2002
$3,907
$4,423
$3,972
$5,327
$11,048
$14,105
$12,206
$13,855
Kent State University
$7,325
$15,028
$12,828
$12,868
Miami University
$3,242
$5,122
$10,815
$13,279
$197,414
$262,130
$324,215
$432,387
Ohio University
$13,692
$19,097
$23,560
$36,601
University of Akron
$11,517
$19,115
$20,185
$28,080
University of Cincinnati
$86,184
$116,409
$158,803
$217,739
$4,725
$9,395
$9,790
$24,825
$321
$243
$843
$1,259
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Ohio State University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
*Ohio Board of Regents
Highlights
■ Tracing Cleveland State University’s 5-year record of research awards and dollars in the context of other Ohio institutions is of
interest on two accounts. First, such trends provide an understanding of the overall scope of such activity on campus, and
second, they provide a comparative magnitude of growth in funding. Recent increases in sponsored research programs point to
a campus focused on supporting the core instructional mission of the University with research activities, and one that is
making significant contributions to the economic and social development of Cleveland.
Source: Performance Report for Ohio’s Colleges and Universities, 2004: Institutional Outcomes Measures, Ohio Board of Regents
6
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
National Science Foundation Rankings
N
of Cleveland State University and Other Selected Schools
NSF rankings are of primary significance for major research institutions. Cleveland State University, although not
designated as a major research institution continues to build a foundation in cross-disciplinary research, focusing on high
level support for graduate education, and a commitment to engaging the private sector in building research partnerships.
As a university emerging in the field of sponsored research, it seeks to strategically invest scarce research dollars and prized
faculty resources in targeted areas to maximize the impact for the university.
Table 5: Total R&D Expenditures at Universities and Colleges
Ranked by Fiscal Year 2002 Total R&D Expenditures:
Fiscal Year 1998 – 2002
(Dollars in Thousands)
Institution
University of Akron
University of Toledo
Portland State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
University of Missouri – St. Louis
Bowling Green State University
Ranking
186
197
217
232
241
246
307
1998
$16,326
$11,512
$10,507
$11,211e
$12,690
$9,462
$3,392
1999
$16,279
$11,819
$13,940
$11,893e
$11,083
$10,294
$3,454
2000
2001
2002
$19,495
$13,694
$16,494
$10,214
$10,817
$9,898
$3,454e
$22,266
$16,278
$16,838
$12,986
$11,316
$10,084
$5,028
$28,080
$24,825
$17,683
$13,855
$12,868
$11,519
$5,327
Note: eEstimated
Because of rounding, detail may not add to totals.
Highlights
■ Cleveland State University is ranked among other academically rigorous universities within the state and across the country.
CSU expects to continually improve in rank based on continuing efforts to expand research development initiatives.
Source: National Science Foundation/Division of Science Resources Statistics, Survey of Research and Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges,
Fiscal Year 2002.
RESEARCH
7
IIndirect Cost Recovery
Indirect cost recovery is defined as the agreed upon revenue received from a sponsoring agency to pay a grant
or contract’s share to reimburse the university for the indirect costs it incurs. Indirect costs are real costs. Indirect cost
calculations are based upon such items as space, utilities, security, maintenance, custodial, payroll, purchasing, accounting,
personnel and many other expenses associated with project administration and implementation.
Indirect costs recovered at Cleveland State University (CSU) become part of the general fund budget for the entire university.
Half of all indirect costs returned on sponsored programs remain in the university’s general fund. This money is set aside
for covering administrative expenses for sponsored program administration. It is also used to cover costs of facilities,
depreciation on buildings and equipment, operation and maintenance of facilities, and library expenses. The other half of
the indirect costs recovered are distributed as follows: 5% to project director, 15% to project director’s department, 10% to
relevant dean’s office, and 20% to the Vice Provost for Research.
Table 6: Indirect Cost (IDC) Recovery and Total Research Expenditures by Year
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
Research Activities
Total Research Expenditures
Total Indirect Cost Recovered
Total CSU Income
% IDC of Total Research Expenditures
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
$18,391,981
$1,367,359
$11,868,308
7.4%
$21,916,006
$1,425,100
$14,067,120
6.5%
$22,118,698
$1,442,908
$15,690,568
6.5%
$19,117,358
$1,493,286
$20,610,644
7.8%
$25,801,653
$1,940,223
$27,741,876
7.5%
35%
30%
35%
–
40%
42%
134%
–
Highlights
■ At CSU, indirect costs recovered are used for internal incentive programs such as the Established Full-time Faculty Research
Development Program (EFFRD), and are used to stimulate and enhance research at all levels. As federal funding grows, so does the
indirect cost recovery, and federal government provides the bulk of the indirect costs recovered by CSU.
Source: CSU Controller’s Office and CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
8
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
to Promote Growth
LLeveraginginInvestments
Research Programs
The Established Full-time Faculty Research Development Program (EFFRD) is Cleveland
State University’s program for providing seed grant money to support key research areas. Grants under the EFFRD program
are intended for high quality projects leading to scholarship and creative expression that will likely increase the university’s
ability to attract external funding. EFFRD funds cannot be used for developing instructional materials or for supporting work
leading to any academic degree for the applicant. The University Research Council (URC) considers grants under the
EFFRD Program as active investments in the university’s faculty, students, and basic research effectiveness.
Table 7: Established Full-Time Faculty Research Development Program
(EFFRD) Combined Investments and Awards
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2005
Department
CSU
Investment
External
Funding
Attracted
Return on
Investment
per CSU $1.00
Biology, Geology and Environmental Science (BGES)
Chemical and Biomedical Engineering (CHE)
Chemistry (CHEM)
Electrical an Computer Engineering (ECE)
Health Sciences (HSC)
Urban Studies (URB)
Total
$34,816
$69,400
$129,680
$22,743
$8,490
$6,143
$271,272
$753,791
$748,515
$3,428,135
$183,564
$254,406
$54,733
$5,423,144
$21.65
$10.79
$26.44
$8.07
$29.97
$8.91
$19.99
Highlights
■ This table demonstrates successful leveraging of internal funding to attract external funding. Seed funding investments in
key departments have yielded $20 for each $1 invested by the University. These strategic investments have also
allowed university signature programs to grow beyond their initial investments.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
RESEARCH
9
EExpansion of Externally Funded Research
Several factors
have contributed to the expansion of externally funded research at Cleveland State University.
A university-wide hiring strategy has been implemented in recent years requiring most new faculty to pursue external
grants as a part of their regular workload. Additionally, many promotion and tenure committees across campus have
raised their research expectations and are placing considerable weight on grant funded projects. As faculty hires continue
to rise, particularly in the Colleges of Science, Education and Human Services, and Engineering, so too will the number of
scholars seeking and receiving external funding.
Table 8: Fiscal Year 2004 Proposal Submission Awards by Source
Awards
Proposals
Submitted
7/01/03 through 6/30/04
Amount
Number
Number
Success
Rate*
Government Sources
Federal
State
Local
Total Government Sources
$18,427,168
$4,693,503
$2,024,769
$25,145,440
127
44
9
180
174
46
15
235
73%
96%
60%
77%
Non-Government Sources
Corporate Contracts
Foundation and Non-Profit
Total Non-Government Sources
Sponsored Programs Total
$1,552,727
$1,055,857
$2,608,584
$27,754,024
51
30
81
261
79
44
123
358
65%
68%
66%
73%
Award Sources
Note: *Success rate is based on proposals submitted in FY 2004 and prior years.
10
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 9: Proposal Submissions and Awards
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Proposals and Grant Awards
2000
Proposals submitted
Grant awards
Success Rate*
2001
330
155
47%
359
205
57%
2002
2003
361
236
65%
376
224
60%
2004
358
261
73%
Figure 9: Proposal Submission and Grant Awards
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
400
300
200
100
0
FY 2000
FY 2001
FY 2002
Propoals Submitted
FY 2003
FY 2004
Grant Awards
Note: *Success rate is based on proposals submitted in FY 2000 – 2004.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
RESEARCH
11
OOhio Research Challenge
Since 1985 the Ohio Board of Regents has administered a program that directly rewards Ohio universities for their
success in securing external funding for research. The objectives of this program include improving the quality of basic
research programs at Ohio universities, increasing the state’s share of nationally contested research funds, and providing
seed money for the state’s economic growth. Institutional allocations are made annually by the Regents and the money is
used by campuses as unrestricted funds for research.
Table 10: Ohio Board of Regents Biennial Research Challenge Distributions
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2005
Percent Change
Institution
2000 & 2001
2002 & 2003
2004 & 2005
2 Year
5 Year
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio University
Ohio State University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Total
$ 539,869
$ 151,917
$ 1,443,797
$ 746,078
$ 1,850,027
$ 17,139,839
$ 1,262,016
$ 7,612,135
$ 993,484
$ 138,659
$31,877,821
$
$ 498,016
$ 192,538
$ 1,067,278
$ 578,209
$ 1,645,864
$ 14,455,250
$ 1,082,717
$ 6,147,083
$ 987,954
$ 196,425
$26,851,334
-1%
-4%
-8%
-9%
5%
-11%
-4%
-7%
2%
28%
-8%
-8%
27%
-26%
-23%
-11%
-16%
-14%
-19%
-1%
42%
-16%
501,849
$200,165
$ 1,166,098
$ 632,476
$ 1,569,960
$ 16,202,541
$ 1,129,869
$ 6,584,391
$ 964,152
$ 153,982
$29,105,483
Highlights
■ Research Challenge is set on an incremental formula with a rolling average based on the percentage of the entire state’s external
funding. The mechanism for Cleveland State University (CSU) to increase its Research Challenge funding is to attract more
federal dollars. Based on a formula of rolling averages for allocation, CSU has increased the overall percentage of dollars
received from the Research Challenge program. The increase is small but significant in terms of the fact that the university is
moving its “margin” against such high research volume institutions as Ohio State and the University of Cincinnati.
■ The Research Challenge program does not take into account any Ohio institution’s awards or expenditures stemming from state,
local and foundation funding. CSU has successfully attracted awards from state and local agencies that have augmented the
size and scope of overall research activity on campus. While CSU research dollars raised from state and local sources are of no
consequence in attracting a higher proportion of the Ohio Research Challenge funds to campus, such extramural funding
does account for the increase in the university’s NSF rankings.
Source: Ohio Board of Regents, April 2005 Summary of Biennial Distributions at www.regents.state.oh.us/rsch/rschsupport.html#research
12
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
IIntellectual Property
Contemporary universities
committed to teaching, research, service, and dissemination of knowledge
increasingly find themselves in a position of having created knowledge or materials with commercial value. Creation
of such knowledge or materials, also referred to as intellectual property, is a much coveted outcome of any vibrant research
program. Activities that result in the creation of intellectual property raise the reputation of the university and involved
researchers. They also create rich educational opportunities for students participating in such programs. Universities may
gain significant revenue through commercialized trademarks.
Table 11: Intellectual Property: Patents and Disclosures
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
Source
Disclosures
Patents Filed
Licenses Approved
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
3
3
0
8
2
1
9
4
0
9
2
0
9
2
1
1 Year
5 Year
0%
0%
–
200%
-33%
–
Notes: The following definitions are from the US Patent and Trademark Office (www.uspto.gov).
Disclosure: Description of an invention in a patent or patent application.
Patent: Granting of a property right to the inventor, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Licenses approved: The patent law provides for the transfer or sale of a patent, or of an application for patent, by an instrument in writing. Such an instrument
is referred to as an assignment of license.
Highlights
■ The development of intellectual property at Cleveland State University (CSU) is a very recent development. Trend information for
such activity in the past five years demonstrates the benefits of increased overall research activity on campus. The accumulation
of intellectual property on campus is expected to grow in future years. CSU has a small cadre of extremely productive
research faculty who have produced a respectable portfolio of patents. With the addition of CSU’s Technology Transfer Officer
position in 2005, CSU looks forward to an increase in disclosures, licenses and spin-off companies in the future.
■ Currently, the primary generators of intellectual property at CSU include Zhiqiang Gao in Computer Engineering, Baochuan Guo
and Michael Kalafatis in Chemistry, and Paul Sung in Health Sciences.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
RESEARCH
13
Table 12: Cleveland State University Signature Research Programs
Signature Programs
College
Departments
Instruments, Controls and
Electronics (ICE)
Engineering
Electrical and
Computer
Engineering
Business
Computer and
Information Science
Urban
Urban Affairs
Business
Dean’s Office
Science
Biochemistry
Economic Development
Molecular Medicine
Project Description
This high-tech growth area provides the support for many emerging
industries, from biotechnology to aeronautics. At Cleveland State,
a strong cadre of faculty has emerged as leaders in the ICE-area of
advanced controls and robotics. They have developed processes to
fly unmanned vehicles that have the ability to communicate and
perform tasks. They have also significantly advanced the field of
digital controls and communications, enabling distant control
systems – such as those found in space – to function at a highly
reliable level. In the next two years, the College of Engineering
expects to increase the number of faculty with expertise in ICE.
Faculty are involved in various research activities such as the
Regional Economic Indicators Project, identifying employment
sub-centers highlighting occupational clusters, and examining
Northeast Ohio migration patterns. These activities are intended to
help increase the standard of living and wealth of Northeast Ohio and
in the process make CSU an expert in economic development,
research, teaching, and service outreach.
Molecular Medicine is an emerging sub-field in the biotechnology
realm in which researchers investigate the molecular approach to
understanding the mechanisms and causes of diseases. Instead of
treating symptoms, molecular medicine is moving toward understanding the fundamental molecular and genetic mechanisms of
diseases and the body’s response to them in order to address
prevention and ultimate cures. Through various research efforts,
faculty at Cleveland State are working on topics such as the treatment
and prevention of thrombosis that could lead to stroke or heart
attack; prospective therapy for autoimmune diseases including,
multiple sclerosis, lupus, type I diabetes, and Crohn’s disease;
and treatment for muscular dystrophies and atrophies, metabolic
deficiencies, acute myocardial infarction, and chronic end-stage
heart failure.
Biology
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
Highlights
■ Over the last few years, the three areas of excellence described above, developed through faculty efforts, show promise of
moving Cleveland State University into the regional and national spotlight.
14
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
GGrowth in Graduate Education
Graduate Education at Cleveland State
has seen unprecedented growth in recent years. There were
approximately 5,000 students pursuing graduate and post-graduate programs at the University in 2004. Graduate student
credit hours have increased 27% in the past five years. Such growth in graduate programs has implications for strengthening
the quality of these offerings and seizing opportunities for supporting educational goals of students by creating new and
tailored program offerings. Further, growth in graduate programs at CSU points to numerous future student and faculty
research opportunities. Institutional investments in graduate education are closely linked with strategies for promoting
sponsored research, which lead to an increased opportunity for the contributions of graduate, doctoral and post-doctoral
students as well.
Table 13: Percentage of Total Student Credit Hours Taken by Graduate Level Students at
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only: Fall Terms 2000 – 2004
Institution
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Grad SCH
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
9%
18%
9%
5%
15%
10%
11%
16%
12%
5%
9%
18%
9%
5%
15%
9%
10%
17%
10%
5%
10%
19%
9%
5%
16%
10%
10%
17%
10%
5%
10%
21%
9%
5%
16%
9%
10%
18%
9%
5%
10%
21%
10%
5%
16%
9%
10%
18%
9%
5%
27,246
34,321
40,818
15,175
130,083
34,838
26,981
69,993
20,785
8,100
Note: Graduate students included the following ranks: DS (Doctoral student), MS (Masters student), ND, NG and NM (Non degree-seeking graduate students).
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Course Enrollment query – rundate: May 23, 2005.
Table 14: Cleveland State University Graduate Student Support
from Externally Funded Research, Fiscal Year 2001 – 2005
Percent Change
Source
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1 Year
5 Year
Business
Education
Engineering
Liberal Arts/Social Science
Science
Urban Affairs
$0
$39,682
$276,448
$41,108
$56,170
$314,528
$0
$87,482
$429,134
$27,275
$41,798
$310,286
$38,411
$67,411
$507,650
$37,560
$85,052
$278,742
$34,471
$45,497
$492,153
$51,423
$110,152
$181,252
$22,932
$77,904
$527,754
$66,015
$267,146
$295,143
-33%
71%
7%
28%
143%
63%
–
96%
91%
61%
376%
-6%
Total
$727,936
$895,976
$1,014,826
$914,948
$1,256,894
37%
73%
Note: Extramural support: Funding from any source external to Cleveland State University.
Highlights
■ For the past 5 years Cleveland State University has continued to offer the largest proportion of graduate student credit hours
of any Ohio institution. This trend continues to grow and clearly outlines CSU’s future priorities in response to the region’s
growing demands for graduate education.
Source: CSU College of Graduate Studies
RESEARCH
15
Table 15: Cleveland State University Centers and Institutions
Name
Established
Website
Advanced Control Technologies, Center
for (CACT)
1995
http://cact.csuohio.edu/
Advanced Engineering Research Laboratory
1999
http://academic.csuohio.edu/aerl
Advancement of Women in Public Service,
Ohio Center for the
2001
Applied Control Research Laboratory
(see CACT)
1995
http://academic.csuohio.edu/cact/research.htm
Bioethics Center
2002
http://academic.csuohio.edu/cact/research.htm
Biomedical and Health Institute
2002
http://www.csuohio.edu/bahi/
Communication Research Center
1976
http://academic.csuohio.edu/kneuendorf/crc/crc_web_page.htm
DNA Analysis Facility
2002
http://www.csuohio.edu/uored/dna/
Economic Development, Center for
1986
http://urban.csuohio.edu/economicdevelopment/index.htm
Election Integrity Center
N/A
Environment Institute
1995
http://urban.csuohio.edu/cestp/
Great Lakes Environmental Finance Center
1995
http://urban.csuohio.edu/glefc/
Health Equity Center
2005
Housing Research & Policy, Center for
1982
http://urban.csuohio.edu/research/staff/bier_test.htm
http://urban.csuohio.edu/research/staff.shtml
International Business Center
2003
http://www.csuohio.edu/cba/international/
Ohio's Energy Efficiency Practitioners Network
2002
Labor-Management Relations Center
1978
http://www.csuohio.edu/hca/edres.html
Local Government Leadership, Unger Center for
2000
http://urban.csuohio.edu/unger_croatia/
Mass Spectrometry, Cleveland Center for
1997
http://www.csuohio.edu/gradcollege/gradbulletin/section01/1309
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs:
Research Centers
*
http://urban.csuohio.edu/research/
Modeling Integrated Metabolic Systems, Center for
N/A
http://www.csuohio.edu/mims/
Neighborhood Development, Center for
1979
http://urban.csuohio.edu/research/cnd/
Nonprofit Policy and Practice, Center for
1970
http://urban.csuohio.edu/nonprofit/
Ohio's Energy Efficiency Practitioners Network
2002
http://www.csuohio.edu/energyefficiency/
Poetry Center
1962
http://www.csuohio.edu/poetrycenter/
Poverty Studies, Center for
2000
http://www.csuohio.edu/cps/
Public Management, Center for
1982
http://urban.csuohio.edu/publicmanagement/index.htm
Real Estate Research Center
1992
http://www.csuohio.edu/cba/industry/realestate.html
Ruth Ratner Miller Center for Greater
Cleveland’s Future
2002
http://urban.csuohio.edu/ruth_ratner_miller/
Sacred Landmarks, Center for
1986
http://urban.csuohio.edu/sacredlandmarks/personnel.htm
Social Science Research Center
N/A
Transportation Center
N/A
Urban Child Research Center
1991
http://urban.csuohio.edu/ucrc/
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
Notes:
N/A: data unavailable
* See website www.csuohio.edu/mims for individual listing of each center/institute and additional information.
16
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 16: Past Recipients of Distinguished Faculty Awards
by Award Type 1986 – 2005
Type of Award
Teaching
Year
Name
Service
Research
Department
Name
Department
Name
Department
1986 Albert N. Cousins
Joseph A. Troccolo
Sociology
Mathematics
Louis T. Milic
English
Allan Peskin
History
1993 Thomas F. Campbell
Jane L. McIntyre
History
Philosophy
Roger W. Binkley
Richard C. Stephens
Chemistry
Sociology
1994 Thomas W. Flechtner
Barbara B. Green
Chemistry
Political Science
Sidney Kraus
Surendra N. Tewari
Communication
Chemical Engineering
1995 Rosemary E. Sutton
Robert A. Wheeler
Curriculum & Foundations
History
Robert I. Abelman
Roger B. Manning
Communication
History
1996 Sherwood D. Silliman
Mathematics
Murali D. Nair
Social Work
Sarah Matthews
Sociology
1997 Ravindra R. Kamath
Finance
David F. Forte
Robert N. Sollod
Law
Psychology
Jose J. Labrador
Modern Languages
1998 William A. Beasley
Curriculum & Foundations
Valerie D. George
Majid Rashidi
Nursing
Mechanical Engineering
Richard Bingham
Edward W. Hill
Urban Studies
Urban Studies
1999 Sanda Kaufman
Urban Studies
Lynn Deering
John P. Wilson
HPERD
Psychology
Rama S. R. Gorla
Richard M. Perloff
Mechanical Engineering
Communication
Edward G. Thomas
Marketing
David Atkin
Michael J. Tevesz
Communication
Biology, Geology, & Environmental
Science
2000
RESEARCH
2001 Lee A. Makala
Heidi Meier
History
Accounting
Jill M. Black
Norman Krumholz
HPERD
Urban Studies
Thomas Donaldson
John Greppin
Art
English
2002 David W. Ball
Chemistry
Daniel D. Drake
CASAL
Mark Ashcraft
Carolyn Lin
Psychology
Communication
2003 Glenn Goodman
Ralph Mawdsley
Occupational Therapy
CASAL
Patricia Falk
Bhushan Wadhwa
Law
Mathematics
Bahman Ghorashi
Baochuan Guo
Chemical Engineering
Chemistry
2004 Rama S. R. Gorla
Elizabeth Welfel
Mechanical Engineering
CASAL
Susan E. Kogler Hill
Mieko K. Smith
Communication
Social Work
Andrew Rindfleisch
Jerzy T. Sawicki
Music
Mechanical Engineering
2005 Eric Ziolek
Music
Ravindra R. Kamath
Finance
Michael Kalafatis
Chemistry
Mathematics
Cheryl P. McCahon
Nursing
Catherine Hansman
CASAL
John P. Holcomb, Jr.
Source: CSU Provost’s Office
17
R
Retention &
Graduation
Retention & Graduation
5
*DIVIDER PAGES 9/11/05 3:57 PM Page 5
Table 1: Fall to Fall Student Return Rate
Enrolled Fall 1999 – 2003/ Returned Fall 2000 – 2004
Fall 1999 Cohort
Reg. Grad. Return
New Students
Fall 2000 Cohort
Ret.
Rate
Fall 2001 Cohort
Ret.
Reg. Grad. Return Rate
Fall 2002 Cohort
Ret.
Reg. Grad. Return Rate
0
630
0
663
4
675
0
147
4
395
0
25
0
179
6
256
14 2,340
Returning Students
Fall 99
Fall 00
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Other Undergrads/Non-degree
Masters
Doctoral
Law
Other Grads-Law/Non-degree
Sub-Total
1,839
23 1,093
1,414
55
945
1,257
19
899
2,663
905 1,175
715
4
304
1,969
560
821
323
45
229
592
229
331
917
16
440
11,689 1,856 6,237
60% 1,069
2 605
70% 1,315
3 942
73% 1,540
9 1,123
67% 2,854 947 1,300
43%
799
20 402
58% 1,962 548 865
82%
293
32 206
91%
490 200 271
49% 1,057
95 482
63% 11,379 1,856 6,196
57% 1,070
1 600 56%
985
0
549
72% 1,295
0 919 71% 1,306
2
935
73% 1,641
14 1,234 76% 1,642
8 1,235
68% 2,946 1,056 1,284 68% 3,059 1,000 1,405
52%
646
2 291 45%
698
8
346
61% 2,572
767 1,173 65% 2,534 755 1,209
79%
299
32 219 82%
294
28
227
93%
617
207 386 94%
554 205
324
50%
752
10 305 41%
661
8
291
65% 11,838 2,089 6,411 66% 11,733 2,014 6,521
56% 1,011
0
537 53%
72% 1,231
0
854 69%
76% 1,629
9 1,252 77%
68% 3,354 1,179 1,531 70%
50%
406
1
185 46%
68% 2,849 858 1,286 65%
85%
326
35
250 86%
93%
542 241
274 91%
45%
556
10
239 44%
67% 11,904 2,334 6,408 67%
15,892 1,870 8,577
61% 15,406 1,869 8,578
63% 15,746 2,110 8,809 65% 15,998 2,039 9,111
65% 16,246 2,354 8,994 65%
RETENTION & GRADUATION
% Graduating
Annually
1999-00
11.8%
Fall 02
934
1,002
1,067
576
490
34
266
592
4,027
0 613
0 636
4 721
0 435
2 339
0
25
2 226
5
13 2,382
66% 1,008
63% 1,090
68% 1,172
76%
573
69%
532
74%
19
86%
215
307
59% 3,908
0 633
0 665
3 816
0 315
17 402
0
16
0 184
1
21 2,398
Fall 00
Fall 01
Fall 01
Fall 02
2000-01
12.1%
2001-02
13.4%
Fall 02
Fall 03
946
1,011
1,129
533
801
13
261
517
62% 4,265
0
561
0
592
4
768
0
419
18
594
0
11
0
206
3
25 2,590
Fall 02
Fall 03
63%
61%
70%
55%
78%
84%
86%
2002-03
12.7%
59%
59%
68%
79%
76%
85%
79%
61%
Fall 03
Fall 04
925
987
1,067
584
850
33
272
549
4,342
0
544
0
572
6
726
0
474
12
584
0
19
0
211
2
20 2,586
Fall 03
Fall 04
Ret.
Rate
1,048
1,145
1,067
556
537
32
211
655
4,203
Overall
Fall 01
Reg. Grad. Return
Fall 00
60%
58%
63%
26%
74%
78%
85%
39%
56%
Fall 01
Ret.
Rate
Fall 99
First Year Full-Time Only
First Year All (Degree Seeking)
Transfers (Degree Seeking)*
Other Undergrads/Non-degree
Masters
Doctoral
Law
Other Grads-Law/Non-degree
Sub-Total
Fall 00
Reg. Grad. Return
Fall 2003 Cohort
2003-04
Notes: Cohort includes all degree-seeking students registered on the 15th day. “Grad.” or “Return” status is determined for each member of the Registered (Reg.) cohort on the 15th day of the following Fall Term.
“Other Undergrads/Non-degree” includes Admit Type: PST and VST and Non-Degree Students.
*Academic levels may have been coded incorrectly in the CSU information system due to a delay in the processing of transfer hours.
14.5%
59%
58%
68%
81%
70%
58%
78%
60%
1
2
Table 2: Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by Race and Gender
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
(New Degree-Seeking, Full-Time, First-Time First Year)
Enrolled Fall 1999 – 2003 / Returned Fall 2000 – 2004
Fall 1999 Cohort
Fall 99
Fall 00
Newly
Enrolled
Return
Female
268
Male
Fall 2000 Cohort
Fall 00
Fall 01
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
184
69%
265
393
236
60%
130
63
77
Female
Male
Fall 2001 Cohort
Fall 01
Fall 02
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
196
74%
264
296
198
67%
48%
134
81
38
49%
84
32
13
41%
12
4
Female
13
Male
Fall 2002 Cohort
Fall 02
Fall 03
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
191
72%
255
350
224
64%
60%
154
86
47
56%
90
19
9
47%
33%
19
9
10
77%
13
16
11
69%
Female
1
1
Male
5
Fall 2003 Cohort
Fall 03
Fall 04
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
Ret.
Rate
158
62%
220
148
67%
316
207
66%
310
201
65%
56%
148
71
48%
186
83
45%
43
48%
91
47
52%
86
32
37%
22
14
64%
20
10
50%
21
9
43%
47%
16
8
50%
14
6
43%
19
9
47%
9
69%
15
9
60%
17
12
71%
14
13
93%
20
15
75%
18
13
72%
17
10
59%
21
16
76%
100%
2
1
50%
2
1
50%
1
0
0%
0
0
4
80%
1
1
100%
0
0
1
1
100%
1
0
0%
6
6
100%
6
5
83%
4
2
50%
2
0
0%
3
2
67%
12
7
58%
7
6
86%
6
0
0%
8
6
75%
7
5
71%
Female
44
28
64%
32
16
50%
32
22
69%
20
13
65%
19
14
74%
Male
39
25
64%
36
20
56%
35
20
57%
36
20
56%
18
12
67%
Female
494
305
62%
471
317
67%
493
325
66%
463
264
57%
463
269
58%
Male
554
325
59%
463
296
64%
515
308
60%
483
297
61%
462
275
60%
1,048
630
60%
934
613
66%
1,008
633
63%
946
561
59%
925
544
59%
White
Black
|
Female
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Male
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Female
Male
Unknown
Total
TOTAL Male & Female
Table 3: Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort (New Degree-Seeking, Full-Time, First-Time First Year)
Enrolled Fall 1999 – 2003 / Returned Fall 2000 – 2004
Fall 1999 Cohort
Fall 99
Fall 00
Enrolled Returned
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
TOTAL
171
241
17
57
77
70
5
410
1,048
Fall 2000 Cohort
105
159
7
38
53
49
3
216
630
Fall 00
Ret.
Rate
61%
66%
41%
67%
69%
70%
60%
53%
60%
Fall 2001 Cohort
Fall 01
Enrolled Returned
137
281
22
34
55
8
5
392
934
95
185
16
25
44
5
2
241
613
Fall 01
Ret.
Rate
69%
66%
73%
74%
80%
63%
40%
61%
66%
Fall 02
Enrolled Returned
161
330
19
57
70
13
5
353
1,008
Fall 2002 Cohort
101
214
15
40
53
11
3
196
633
Fall 02
Ret.
Rate
63%
65%
79%
70%
76%
85%
60%
56%
63%
Fall 2003 Cohort
Fall 03
Enrolled Returned
166
340
11
73
46
21
8
281
946
98
209
7
42
38
15
2
150
561
Fall 03
Ret.
Rate
59%
61%
64%
58%
83%
71%
25%
53%
59%
Fall 04
Enrolled Returned
165
329
19
60
62
26
12
252
925
Ret.
Rate
105
201
12
38
54
18
8
108
544
64%
61%
63%
63%
87%
69%
67%
43%
59%
Table 4: Three-Year Mobility of Undergraduate Students Enrolled
Spring Term 2004 by Institution
Institution
Undergraduate
Students
Mobile
Same
Institution
Different
Campus
Mobile
Different
Institution
14,262
9,637
17,468
14,629
35,474
15,966
16,774
16,849
15,642
10,943
2%
0%
14%
22%
7%
12%
7%
10%
0%
0%
22%
31%
16%
10%
22%
13%
14%
12%
18%
9%
Total
Mobility
Concurrent
Same Institution
Different
Campus
Concurrent
Different
Institution
Total
Concurrent
24%
31%
30%
32%
29%
24%
20%
22%
18%
9%
0%
0%
4%
10%
1%
4%
2%
4%
0%
0%
1%
3%
1%
0%
2%
0%
1%
1%
2%
1%
2%
3%
5%
10%
3%
4%
3%
5%
2%
1%
University Main Campuses
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
3
Source: Ohio Board of Regents, 7/7/05 Performance Consultation
Table 5: Attended, Graduated and Retained
Fall to Fall Student Tracking (IPEDS Cohort)
4 Year
5 Year
6 Year
7 Year
Fall
Fall 1997
Cohort
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
923
614
461
0
0%
50%
368
5
1%
40%
265
62
7%
31%
168
177
19%
23%
107
250
27%
16%
73
295
32%
12%
Attended
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
67%
Figure 5: Fall 1997 IPEDS Cohort Attended, Graduated and Retained
900
4-yr.
5-yr.
grad rate grad rate
7%
19%
750
6-yr.
grad rate
27%
7-yr.
grad rate
32%
600
450
300
150
0
Fall 97
Fall 98
Fall 99
Fall 00
Fall 01
Attended
Fall 02
Fall 03
Fall 04
Graduated
Table 6: Attended, Graduated and Retained
Fall to Fall Student Tracking (Transfer Cohort*)
4 Year
5 Year
6 Year
7 Year
Fall
Fall 1997
Transfer Cohort
Attended
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
800
750
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
541
77
10%
80%
358
116
15%
56%
203
248
33%
40%
102
341
45%
25%
87
397
53%
25%
72
430
57%
23%
56
450
60%
19%
Figure 6: Fall 1997 Full-Time Transfer Cohort Attended & Graduated*
4-yr.
5-yr.
grad rate grad rate
45%
53%
700
600
6-yr.
grad rate
57%
7-yr.
grad rate
60%
500
400
300
200
100
0
Fall 97
Fall 98
Fall 99
Fall 00
Attended
Fall 01
Fall 02
Graduated
Notes:
Cohorts are First-Time, Full-Time, Degree-Seeking Freshmen or Transfers students as of the 15th day of Fall Quarter, 1997.
“Attended” or “Graduated” status is determined from the 15th day records and graduation table for each term listed.
*Includes all New Transfer students.
4
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Fall 03
Fall 04
Table 7: Fall to Fall Undergraduate First-Year Full-Time Degree-Seeking
Cohort Graduation and Retention Rate
Graduated In
IPEDS
Cohort
Fall 94 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 95 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 96 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 97 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 98 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 99 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 00 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 01 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 02 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 03 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 04 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated
% Retained
% Stopped-Out
1st
Year
2nd
Year
3rd
Year
4th
Year
5th
Year
6th
Year
7th
Year
8th
Year
9th
Year
39%
61%
61
7%
33%
60%
188
22%
17%
61%
238
27%
13%
60%
272
31%
10%
59%
295
33%
8%
59%
318
36%
6%
58%
40%
60%
58
7%
29%
64%
177
21%
17%
62%
233
27%
12%
61%
270
32%
9%
60%
288
34%
5%
61%
301
35%
4%
61%
37%
63%
67
8%
25%
67%
153
18%
16%
66%
206
24%
11%
65%
237
28%
7%
65%
227
27%
5%
68%
40%
60%
62
7%
29%
65%
177
19%
18%
63%
250
27%
12%
61%
295
32%
5%
60%
38%
63%
64
7%
27%
66%
171
18%
16%
66%
260
27%
10%
63%
231
22%
18%
60%
885
59%
41%
47%
53%
856
59%
42%
45%
55%
845
61%
39%
47%
53%
923
67%
34%
50%
50%
962
60%
40%
42%
58%
1,048
60%
40%
47%
53%
41%
59%
84
8%
32%
60%
66%
34%
48%
52%
42%
58%
31%
70%
63%
37%
47%
53%
42%
58%
59%
41%
42%
58%
934
1,008
946
925
59%
41%
922
RETENTION & GRADUATION
5
6
Table 8: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
University Total
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Degree Level
Degree Totals
Major
Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters Certificates
Doctoral Degrees
Law (Juris Doctor)
Master of Laws
ALL
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
799
524
10
14
102
0
1,449
874
608
14
12
98
0
1,606
862
655
764
478
10
2
15
19
100
98
0
0
1,751 1,252
914
742
10
21
103
1
1,791
987
784
13
18
108
0
1,910
605
385
4
18
129
1
1,142
553
432
4
22
129
2
1,142
681
439
8
14
108
0
1,250
694
495
4
19
142
1
1,355
1 Year
5 Year
5%
8%
-6%
6%
18%
0%
7%
20%
41%
21%
21%
8%
0%
26%
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 9: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Business
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Major
Accounting
Business Economics
Business General
Computer and Information Science
Finance
Information Systems
Labor & Human Relations
Management
Marketing
Operation Management and Business Statistics
Total
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
36
3
0
8
20
8
21
1
29
9
135
35
7
0
35
31
17
23
0
43
12
203
37
3
0
11
22
13
26
0
33
4
149
30
5
0
30
32
40
31
0
41
11
220
45
2
0
11
26
23
25
0
26
8
166
27
4
1
28
32
44
31
0
31
10
208
33
1
0
12
17
17
42
0
35
4
161
28
2
0
36
41
37
40
0
42
16
242
35
3
0
7
23
23
36
0
25
5
157
33
10
0
22
45
46
24
0
43
10
233
1 Year
5 Year
11%
333%
0%
-40%
17%
28%
-27%
0%
-12%
-25%
-3%
-4%
30%
-33%
33%
176%
36%
-100%
-6%
-29%
15%
(Continued on next page)
Table 9: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Business
(Continued from previous page)
Percent Change
Degree Level
Masters Degree
Major
Accelerated Business Administration
Business Administration
Computer and Information Science
Executive Business Administration
Finance
Financial Audit
JD/MBA
Labor & Human Relations
Marketing
Master of Business Administration
MBA-Health Care
Public Health
Tax Program
Total
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Doctoral Degree
Business Administration-Doctoral
Finance
Information Systems
Labor & Human Relations
Total
Total Business
Bachelors
Masters
Doctoral
ALL
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
8
70
26
0
0
10
0
11
0
0
5
0
0
130
10
130
51
0
0
9
0
6
0
0
4
0
0
210
10
77
35
8
0
13
0
19
0
0
6
0
0
168
20
117
71
27
0
7
0
7
0
0
3
1
0
253
27
91
34
9
1
18
2
16
0
2
10
0
0
208
49
133
58
14
1
7
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
3
3
1
1
0
5
0
0
0
1
1
3
0
2
0
5
135
130
3
268
203
210
5
418
149
168
1
318
220
253
5
478
1 Year
5 Year
14
93
38
14
1
11
1
5
0
0
4
0
5
185
26
94
20
7
0
21
0
15
0
0
2
5
1
191
29
109
48
15
1
4
0
7
2
1
3
5
1
225
129%
21%
11%
22%
0%
14%
-100%
5%
100%
0%
-62%
900%
-60%
24%
206%
2%
-12%
0%
0%
32%
0%
29%
7
0
0
271
10
75
23
4
0
11
4
16
1
1
9
1
0
151
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
-75%
0%
0%
0%
-75%
-75%
-100%
-100%
0%
-88%
166
208
208
271
3
482
161
151
0
312
242
185
4
431
157
191
0
348
233
225
1
459
-3%
24%
-75%
9%
15%
22%
-88%
18%
374
-44%
22%
7
Table 10: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
8
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Masters Degree
Major
Anthropology
Art
Classical and Midieval Studies
Communication
Dramatic Arts
Economics
English
French
German
History
International Relations
Liberal Studies
Linguistics
Multimedia
Music
Philosophy
Political Science
Religious Studies
Social Science
Social Studies
Social Work
Sociology
Spanish
Women's Studies
Total
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Music
Philosophy
Social Work
Sociology
Spanish
Total
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
9
17
1
60
3
3
20
3
6
6
21
2
9
7
24
1
16
10
41
3
5
52
2
9
14
1
94
2
2
18
1
1
13
6
18
43
4
8
14
95
1
3
29
58
6
19
75
2
4
23
47
1
9
22
15
5
7
9
8
13
13
8
10
12
11
26
4
5
11
4
1
1
60
35
3
5
4
12
2
1
1
10
7
1
6
4
12
3
2
3
70
29
3
5
4
18
5
1
11
76
20
1
3
7
13
2
1
3
17
13
3
1
8
12
15
267
179
306
150
321
7
5
9
6
4
1
14
4
5
55
8
2
5
9
4
3
5
3
3
2
5
5
1
6
1
11
4
18
1
1
4
3
10
2
3
17
4
8
1
1
37
2
7
3
11
4
4
2
14
2
4
53
26
8
1
9
5
6
2
31
6
1
69
10
24
1
112
4
1 Year
5 Year
6
12
23%
-22%
62
43%
33%
-39%
-22%
33%
57%
0%
55%
-20%
-33%
3%
200%
24
2
8
11
1
14
8
9
9
10
25
2
16
9
11
2
-4%
0%
3%
2
7
16
18
1
57%
75%
-18%
400%
150%
100%
-1%
-19%
-17%
194
342
177
2
2
14
5
3
3
58
38
4
2
354
9
5
9
1
2
63
51
4
2
3
17
1
1
3
12
18
2
-11%
138%
39%
100%
-100%
57%
-30%
0%
25%
25%
233%
-20%
70%
25%
205
8%
25%
4
3
10
7
4
4
2
2
1
37
7
1
13
5
3
1
23
7
4
64
8
3
6
4
8
6
8
1
2
46
4
2
8
11
5
1
38
8
7
84
2
3
3
9
1
1
15
1
2
37
-60%
25%
-42%
122%
-46%
-71%
71%
13%
50%
10%
-60%
-29%
-21%
33%
-25%
-50%
179%
125%
50%
32%
Total CLASS
Bachelors
Masters
ALL
267
55
322
179
37
216
306
53
359
150
26
176
321
69
390
194
37
231
342
64
406
177
46
223
354
84
438
205
37
242
8%
10%
8%
25%
32%
26%
Total First College
Bachelors
14
8
14
6
13
4
15
6
19
8
29%
23%
Table 11: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Education and Human Services
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Masters Degree
Major
Early Childhood Education
Elementary Education
Health and Physical Education
Middle Childhood Education
Nursing Basic
Nursing RN
Special Education
Sports Management
Total
Adult Learning and Development
Community Agency Counseling
Community Health Education
School Counseling
Curriculum & Instruction
Education
Educational Administration
Exercise Science
Nursing
Physical Education-Professional
Sports & Exercise Management
Supervision
Total
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
1 Year
5 Year
-1%
-100%
54%
29%
107%
10%
32%
629%
-100%
54%
1233%
68%
57%
123%
25%
36%
13
96
7
3
34
14
13
1
14
6
0
3
0
0
35
66
12
3
30
17
17
3
17
6
2
5
0
1
57
42
4
12
41
10
21
5
14
12
2
8
1
6
99
2
3
22
25
19
17
4
1
10
9
5
1
5
99
0
3
33
52
20
24
180
24
180
34
187
48
187
35
231
3
0
19
7
10
2
5
2
46
24
19
6
16
130
3
23
8
0
4
2
2
2
33
20
13
14
12
176
2
27
5
0
3
5
1
5
40
0
15
3
0
24
12
17
16
247
0
26
2
6
3
2
5
46
2
14
0
0
21
16
13
18
249
1
35
3
1
1
5
1
3
40
0
18
3
0
30
13
7
22
229
1
25
9
0
12
3
0
5
62
0
13
3
1
91%
-24%
-50%
29%
1%
0%
-28%
100%
0%
5
3
277
9
0
81
5
4
359
9
0
81
8
6
371
12
0
83
5
4
345
5
0
104
-50%
-33%
35%
50%
-24%
-13%
50%
79%
-67%
0%
33%
0%
-100%
-23%
100%
86%
10
2
241
15
1
0
1
3
0
63
RETENTION & GRADUATION
9
Post-Masters
Counseling and Pupil
Education Specialist
Educational Administration
Total
0
0
3
3
0
0
2
2
2
0
1
3
0
1
0
1
0
1
2
3
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
3
1
2
0
3
1
2
3
6
0
2
0
2
0%
0%
200%
33%
0%
0%
-40%
60%
Doctoral Degree
Urban Education:
Administration
Counseling
Learning
Policy
Total
0
6
3
0
9
0
1
2
0
3
0
2
1
0
3
1
0
3
1
5
3
2
5
0
10
2
1
1
0
4
3
6
2
1
12
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
1
6
1
0
1
0
2
-33%
-83%
100%
0%
-33%
0%
-86%
-20%
0%
-33%
180
241
3
9
433
24
63
2
3
92
180
277
3
3
463
34
81
1
5
121
187
359
3
10
559
48
81
2
4
135
187
371
3
12
573
35
83
3
231
345
6
6
588
46
104
2
2
154
25%
-1%
33%
-33%
7%
36%
48%
60%
-33%
41%
Total College of
Education and
Human Services
Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
ALL
121
10
Table 12: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Engineering
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Masters Degree
Doctoral Degree
Total Engineering
Major
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Computer Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Electronic Engineering Technology
Electronic Technology
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Total
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Engineering Mechanics
Environmental Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Total
Applied Biomedical Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Total
Bachelors
Masters
Doctoral
ALL
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
1 Year
5 Year
-36%
16%
-68%
10%
16%
-33%
33%
7
6
15
14
3
4
6
3
3
6
15
3
4
8
15
2
5
2
14
8
10
1
6
24
10
102
1
1
1
9
7
9
2
9
13
6
65
7
1
1
31
5
8
5
2
27
1
6
5
1
5
17
2
32
2
7
2
4
1
22
10
33
15
123
1
4
1
20
8
37
5
107
4
8
2
27
8
21
7
101
33%
-29%
50%
1%
131%
-75%
-27%
-100%
71%
0%
-10%
3%
2
2
4
2
9
1
1
1
3
6
8
15
1
1
19
10
60
3
2
7
10
7
19
1
1
14
4
12
9
61
86%
0%
44%
-100%
150%
-44%
-18%
6%
200%
117%
-100%
400%
30%
29%
121%
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
-60%
200%
-100%
200%
-100%
0%
-50%
20%
-50%
71%
1%
6%
20%
3%
3%
121%
71%
30%
1
1
5
22
1
1
2
1
5
2
11
1
1
8
6
29
3
3
1
13
1
2
1
2
1
7
4
6
4
1
7
1
2
22
7
1
3
1
1
2
6
1
2
1
2
1
2
8
22
5
1
28
102
29
6
137
13
7
1
21
65
22
8
95
1
6
2
24
1
1
2
4
1
4
1
11
2
1
3
0
8
3
2
7
3
2
3
1
9
22
7
123
24
8
155
20
11
3
34
107
60
7
174
27
14
3
44
101
61
9
171
29
Table 13: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Science
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Masters Degree
Major
Biology
Biology-Medical Technology
Chemistry
Environmental Sciences
Geological Sciences
Health Science
Mathematics
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Total
Biology
Chemistry
Environmental Sciences
Health Science
Mathematics
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Physics
Psychology
Psychology Specialist
Speech & Hearing
Total
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
23
0
4
2
2
0
8
9
0
1 Year
5 Year
10%
-100%
-25%
-67%
-29%
-27%
-100%
71%
66
-23%
-50%
0%
13%
1%
-58%
-11%
21%
125%
-100%
200%
-6%
-44%
-9%
26
2
3
0
5
0
5
3
8
2
98
9
161
18
0
4
0
5
0
9
1
4
1
26
0
68
22
2
5
0
0
0
13
20
12
3
86
9
172
6
2
6
0
4
0
9
0
4
4
25
0
60
16
0
6
0
1
0
3
18
0
3
79
3
129
14
1
4
1
1
0
6
1
0
2
26
0
56
18
0
5
1
2
0
10
15
0
1
88
10
150
11
2
11
5
5
0
12
3
0
7
28
2
86
9
0
8
0
3
1
9
0
0
9
27
90
5
143
3
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
30
2
4
0
0
1
0
0
2
6
6
2
0
0
5
0
0
0
21
3
4
0
1
3
0
0
0
5
1
5
0
1
3
0
0
5
10
2
2
1
4
1
0
12
21
1
4
1
2
5
0
4
1
5
2
3
1
9
6
5
17
1
24
2
3
0
0
6
1
3
5
7
33%
0%
-50%
50%
100%
0%
25%
500%
19%
-20%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
200%
-14%
16
54
15
24
58
16
2
0
0
3
6
0
0
0
29
7
12
59
25
22
65
23
13
81
2
29
-32%
25%
-6%
59%
-50%
RETENTION & GRADUATION
11
Post-Masters
Psychology Specialist
7
2
11
3
0
0
7
5
7
2
-25%
0%
Doctoral Degree
Biology
Clinical Bioanalytical Chemistry
Total
1
0
1
0
4
4
4
3
7
1
3
4
1
4
5
1
2
3
3
1
4
2
0
2
3
3
6
1
3
4
-20%
500%
67%
300%
50%
100%
Specialist
Psychology Specialist
Total
7
7
2
2
11
11
3
3
0
0
7
7
5
5
7
7
2
2
-25%
-25%
0%
0%
161
54
1
223
68
15
4
89
172
58
7
248
60
16
4
83
129
59
5
193
56
25
3
84
150
65
4
226
86
23
2
116
143
81
6
237
66
29
4
101
-11%
25%
67%
-1%
-9%
59%
100%
8%
Total Science
Bachelors
Masters
Doctoral
ALL
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
12
Table 14: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Urban Affairs
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
|
Masters Degree
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Doctoral Degree
Total Urban
Major
Environmental Science
Environmental Studies
Public Safety Management
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
Total
Environmental Studies
JD/MPA
Public Administration
Urban Planning and Design
Urban Planning and Law
Urban Studies
Total
Urban Studies
Total
Bachelors
Masters
Doctoral
ALL
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
1
3
1
4
1
5
2
2
2
5
1
14
22
1
1
2
6
29
39
1
4
8
2
13
28
16
20
16
21
1
33
40
14
18
30
1
19
7
1
1
28
8
1
19
7
53
10
27
9
3
1
60
3
7
34
4
67
4
40
9
76
2
3
21
10
1
4
41
8
39
5
31
7
45
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
20
39
21
31
40
44
18
34
24
67
52
84
52
91
22
40
1
63
39
75
2
116
59
1
1
1
21
24
1 Year
5 Year
-100%
14%
5
2
18
31
56
3
10
2
20
35
-100%
60%
20%
150%
21%
36%
3
2
0%
52
7
7
69
23
8
2
4
39
-7%
15%
100%
-15%
-4%
1
1
3
3
3
3
100%
100%
28
38
1
67
56
69
3
128
35
39
3
77
36%
-4%
100%
12%
59%
122%
53%
88%
-15%
54%
122%
54%
85%
Table 15: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender – College of Law
Percent Change
Degree Level
Major
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
1 Year
5 Year
First Professional Degrees
Law (Juris Doctor)
Master of Laws
102
0
129
1
98
0
129
2
100
0
98
0
103
1
108
0
108
0
142
1
18%
0%
8%
0%
Total Law
102
130
98
131
100
98
104
108
108
143
18%
8%
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
Table 16: Annual Degrees Awarded by Race and Gender
1999 – 00
2000 – 01
Female
Male
527
303
6
10
82
0
928
2001 – 02
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
435
205
3
7
117
0
767
580
369
13
6
70
0
1,038
393
226
4
8
106
2
739
558
469
7
11
74
0
1,119
443
314
0
8
87
0
852
578
475
8
12
82
1
1,156
154
95
3
1
12
265
58
32
1
0
6
97
133
111
0
2
14
260
41
38
0
1
8
88
164
144
2
1
13
324
66
27
2
0
7
102
17
12
0
0
2
31
15
2
0
0
3
20
21
2
0
2
3
28
14
4
0
1
3
22
20
14
0
1
2
37
24
12
0
3
39
20
25
2
3
50
32
19
1
5
57
23
24
5
4
56
1
0
0
1
1
5
0
6
2
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
Percent Change
Female
Male
1 Year
5 Year
456
265
6
1
96
0
824
644
473
11
4
92
0
1,224
468
279
3
4
128
1
883
8%
2%
0%
-38%
24%
16%
48%
56%
-53%
11%
6%
24%
188
135
0
0
11
334
74
37
2
1
5
119
197
147
1
5
4
354
78
45
1
2
6
132
5%
12%
0%
600%
-38%
7%
30%
51%
-50%
600%
-44%
34%
15
4
0
1
1
21
24
19
1
0
2
46
11
5
0
2
0
18
25
19
0
2
2
48
14
11
0
2
4
31
11%
25%
22%
114%
100%
200%
23%
20%
55%
27
14
0
1
42
22
10
1
0
33
34
17
1
4
56
36
16
1
1
54
27
45
2
3
77
29
31
1
2
63
-20%
130%
50%
0%
27%
27%
105%
50%
-17%
57%
3
0
0
3
2
0
0
2
0
1
1
2
2
0
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
1
0
2
-50%
-50%
-40%
0%
-43%
White
Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
ALL
Black
Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
ALL
Hispanic
Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
ALL
Asian or Pacific Islander
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Bachelors
Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
ALL
Native American
Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
ALL
13
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
(Continued on next page)
14
Table 16: Annual Degrees Awarded by Race and Gender
(Continued from previous page)
1999 – 00
2000 – 01
2001 – 02
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
1 Year
5 Year
196
119
3
1
17
336
94
64
1
2
12
173
188
132
0
5
22
347
79
66
0
7
15
167
214
172
2
2
16
406
105
41
2
2
8
158
246
172
1
1
18
438
123
58
2
4
6
193
249
213
1
9
9
481
122
88
1
5
12
228
1%
31%
-33%
180%
-13%
12%
28%
64%
-50%
367%
-28%
39%
76
102
1
3
3
0
185
76
116
0
9
0
1
202
106
107
1
1
6
0
221
81
140
0
7
8
0
236
90
123
1
2
10
0
226
107
123
0
9
3
0
242
90
95
1
8
3
0
197
107
116
0
9
6
0
233
94
98
1
5
7
0
205
104
128
0
10
2
0
244
3%
7%
0%
-12%
0%
4%
30%
4%
0%
25%
200%
-100%
16%
799
524
10
14
102
0
1,449
605
385
4
18
129
1
1,142
874
608
14
12
98
0
1,606
553
432
4
22
129
2
1,142
862
764
10
15
100
0
1,751
655
478
2
19
98
0
1,252
914
742
10
21
103
1
1,791
681
439
8
14
108
0
1,250
987
784
13
18
108
0
1,910
694
495
4
19
142
1
1,355
5%
8%
-6%
6%
18%
0%
7%
20%
41%
21%
16%
8%
0%
26%
Minority Total
Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
ALL
Unknown
Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
ALL
University Total
Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
ALL
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
S
Selected Strategic
Indicators: Academic
and Administrative
Programs
Selected Strategic Indicators: Academic and Administrative Programs
6
*DIVIDER PAGES 9/11/05 3:57 PM Page 6
Cleveland State University
HHonors Program
inaugurated its new Honors Program in fall 2004 with a class of 40 highly motivated,
academically talented first-year students. In Fall 2005, the enrollment in this program has grown to 113 students, which
includes 71 new students.
All new students admitted to the program as freshmen receive scholarships covering their tuition, academic fees and books.
Honors students accept the challenge of participating in intensive and specialized versions of general education classes,
and are granted special consideration in several areas including preference in registration and extended university library
borrowing privileges.
Honors students enroll in at least four honors core courses during their freshman and sophomore years at CSU. These
courses offer greater breadth or depth than standard university general education classes. Enrollment is limited to Honors
students and class sizes are small.
As juniors and seniors, Honors students focus on their majors. Upper division Honors students have the opportunity to do
additional honors work under faculty supervision in established courses, enroll in graduate courses, participate in a faculty
member's research project or laboratory, do an independent research project, a service learning project, and/or an internship,
job, or engage in a co-op experience. The specific program depends on the student’s major.
Beginning fall 2005, transfer students and current CSU students entering their junior year have been admitted.
Major Features of the Honors Program
■ Enriched curriculum
■ Leadership development
■ Special seminars and colloquia
■ Strong peer community
■ Scholarship support
■ Faculty mentors
■ Honors residence living
Table 1: Characteristics of Inaugural Class of Honors Students
Fall 2004 – 2005
Total
Students in
Program*
New Enrollment
College
2004
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
In top 10 % of High School Rank
3
9
3
8
17
–
40
58%
High School GPA
ACT Composite
SAT Composite
3.9
28
1,240
2005
11
17
7
14
19
3
71
62%
15
26
10
22
37
3
113
3.9
27
1,230
*Includes students admitted in both fall & spring semester of the prior year
Table 2: Scholarship Aid for Honors Students in Fiscal Year 2005
Type of Financial Aid
Enrollment
Total
Average
Need Based Tuition
Merit Based Tuition
Books
On-Campus Housing
Total
26
13
39
14
39
$165,968
$82,291
$37,000
$34,072
$319,331
$6,383
$6,330
$949
$2,434
$8,188
Source: Cleveland State University Financial Aid Office
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
1
Table 3: ACT Composite Score by College and Gender: 5-Year Trend
College
2000
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Average ACT Composite Score
2001
Male
Female
Male
Female
21.1
21.3
22.1
20.6
23.6
22.6
19.7
16.9
20.5
20.4
20.8
20.4
20.9
20.1
23.2
21.6
18.8
16.5
20.9
19.5
21.3
20.9
23.4
20.6
23.3
21.9
20.6
16.8
20.6
20.4
20.5
20.5
21.0
20.6
23.7
21.6
21.4
17.0
23.0
19.8
2002
2003
2004
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
21.1
20.6
22.8
20.8
23.1
22.0
20.7
16.5
20.8
20.4
21.0
20.7
20.9
20.3
22.6
21.5
21.7
16.5
27.0
20.3
21.0
21.2
19.7
21.1
22.7
21.3
21.0
17.8
22.2
20.8
20.2
20.0
20.7
20.0
23.4
21.6
20.2
16.7
20.0
19.5
19.9
20.0
20.1
19.7
23.0
21.2
19.0
16.5
19.4
19.5
20.0
18.7
19.9
24.3
20.1
19.4
16.6
17.8
19.5
Highlights
■ On the average, female students have slightly lower ACT Composite scores than male students.
Table 4: ACT Composite Score by College: 5-Year Trend
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
20.6
20.3
20.6
19.8
22.7
21.3
20.4
16.5
27.0
19.9
20.5
20.5
19.3
20.1
22.9
20.5
20.2
17.2
21.1
20.1
ACT Composite Score
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
University Average ACT Score
21.0
20.7
21.4
20.2
23.5
21.9
19.1
16.7
20.6
20.0
21.0
20.7
22.1
20.6
23.4
21.7
21.0
16.9
21.0
20.1
20.8
20.3
21.8
20.1
23.2
21.7
20.5
16.6
20.7
19.9
(Continued on next page)
Highlights
■ Students in the College of Education and Urban Affairs have higher Cumulative GPAs than those in other Colleges.
2
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 5: Cumulative GPA by College: 5-Year Trend
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2.77
2.79
2.84
3.23
2.90
2.95
3.07
2.58
3.05
2.62
2.75
2.87
2.69
3.25
2.91
2.89
3.01
2.62
3.16
2.64
Cumulative Average GPA
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
University Average
2.73
2.78
2.78
3.20
2.87
2.95
2.97
2.46
2.91
2.56
2.75
2.81
2.92
3.21
2.90
2.92
3.08
2.44
2.82
2.55
2.79
2.80
2.86
3.20
2.90
2.92
3.09
2.56
2.94
2.60
Note: All figures are taken from census files (registered as of the 15th day). Students registered with zero credit hours are excluded.
Table 6: Top 15 Majors by Academic Level
Fall 2004
UNDERGRADUATE:
Description
Early Childhood Education
Communication
Pre-Education
Psychology
Middle Childhood Education
Social Work
Nursing Basic
Biology
Art
English
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Sociology
Pre-Business Administration
Mechanical Engineering
Accounting
Total Degree Seeking Undergraduate Students
GRADUATE EXCLUDING LAW:
Enrollment
317
300
240
239
208
172
162
158
148
147
143
142
139
131
127
8,953
Description
Curriculum & Instruction
Business Administration
Graduate Education
Graduate Business
Computer and Information Science
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Social Work
Public Administration
School Counseling
Adult Learning and Development
Educational Administration
Graduate Education Licensure
Psychology
Graduate Urban Affairs
Financial Accounting & Audit
Total Degree Seeking Graduate Students
Enrollment
751
601
501
201
171
168
167
138
115
100
100
93
85
76
69
6,097
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
3
4
Table 7: Top 15 Programs with Highest Minority Students Enrollment by Academic Level
Fall 2004
UNDERGRADUATE
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Major
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Urban Services Administration
Pre-Nursing
Social Work
Urban Studies
Pre-Education
Psychology
Sociology
Pre-Engineering
Communication
Pre-Business Administration
Accounting
Biology
Art
English
Early Childhood Education
GRADUATE
Minority
Enrollment
Total
Major
Enrollment
Minority as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
26
47
76
44
93
72
42
31
82
38
30
34
27
26
51
43
81
169
106
240
236
141
107
298
139
122
158
145
147
317
60%
58%
45%
42%
39%
31%
30%
29%
28%
27%
25%
22%
19%
18%
16%
Major
Minority
Enrollment
Sociology
11
Adult Learning and Development
35
Social Work
55
Public Administration
40
Accelerated Business Administration 15
Health Science
13
Educational Administration
26
MBA-Health Care
13
Urban Studies
12
Curriculum & Instruction
137
Management & Labor Relations
10
Counselor Education
17
Graduate Education Licensure
13
Business Administration
56
Computer and Information Science
12
Total
Major
Enrollment
Minority as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
28
96
167
136
51
45
100
59
59
751
58
115
93
561
171
39%
36%
33%
29%
29%
29%
26%
22%
20%
18%
17%
15%
14%
10%
7%
Table 8: Top 15 Major with Highest Female Student Enrollment by Academic Level
Fall 2004
UNDERGRADUATE
Major
Nursing Basic
Pre-Nursing
Social Work
Special Education
Early Childhood Education
Psychology
Sociology
Pre-Education
English
Biology
Middle Childhood Education
Art
Urban Studies
Communication
Accounting
GRADUATE
Female
Enrollment
Total
Major
Enrollment
Female as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
94
73
145
76
300
182
102
169
102
102
131
89
62
169
69
100
81
169
90
371
236
141
240
147
150
198
140
106
298
122
94%
90%
86%
84%
81%
77%
72%
70%
69%
68%
66%
64%
58%
57%
57%
Major
Speech Pathology and Audiology
Social Work
Counselor Education
Adult Learning and Development
Curriculum & Instruction
Health Science
Graduate Education Licensure
Management & Labor Relations
Psychology
English
Public Administration
Educational Administration
Business Administration
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Computer and Information Science
Female
Enrollment
Total
Major
Enrollment
Female as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
35
143
97
80
601
35
70
43
59
44
88
55
204
43
45
35
167
115
96
751
45
93
58
85
64
138
100
561
148
171
100%
86%
84%
83%
80%
78%
75%
74%
69%
69%
64%
55%
36%
29%
26%
Table 9: Delaware Study Benchmarks
Student Credit Hours (SCH) & FTE Students Taught Per FTE Faculty
for Tenured and Tenure-Track Full-Time Faculty, Fall 2002
IIntroduction
The Delaware Study grew out of FIPSE and TIAA-CREF research grants in 1992 to support the development of national datasharing consortium on faculty teaching loads, direct instructional costs and student faculty ratios by discipline. Over the years
more than 400 institutions, both public and private, from all types of Carnegie institutions have participated in the study. The
study has focused on instructional costs and productivity at the level of analysis of academic disciplines. The concept of creating
benchmarks by discipline is accomplished by grouping faculty and the student credit hours (SCH) they produce by CIP codes.
A complete discussion of the content, instruments, and methodology used in the Delaware Study can be found at
http://www.udel.edu/ir/cost, and a copy of report Instructional Cost and Productivity of Academic Departments at CSU:
Delaware Study Benchmarks 2004 can be obtained from the Office of Institutional Research at Cleveland State University.
Classification
of Instructional
Programs (CIP)
# of
Peers
with
(CIP)
Discipline
College of Business
11.01 Computer and Information Sciences, General
51.07 Health and Medical Administrative Services
52.03 Accounting and Related Services
52.08 Finance and Financial Management Services
52.12 Management Information Systems and Services
52.14 Marketing
52.07 Operations Management and Business Statistics
College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences
09.01 Communication and Media Studies
16.01 Linguistic, Comparative, & Related Language Stud
& Services
23.01 English Language and Literature, General
38.01 Philosophy
38.02 Religion/Religious Studies
44.07 Social Work
45.02 Anthropology
45.06 Economics
45.10 Political Science and Government
45.11 Sociology
50.07 Fine and Studio Art
50.09 Music
54.01 History
College of Science
26.01 Biology, General
27.01 Mathematics
40.05 Chemistry
40.08 Physics
42.01 Psychology, General
51.02 Speech and Hearing
51.23 Rehabilitation and Therapeutic Professions
(Health Science)
FTE Instructional
FTE Student/FTE
Total SCH/Faculty FTE
Faculty
Faculty
Difference
Difference
Difference
from
from
from
CSU Peer Peer % CSU
Peer Peer % CSU Peer Peer %
19
8
25
19
18
19
15.5
0.7
8.5
7.0
7.0
12.2
3.5
14.9
3.3
10.3
9.5
9.5
10.1
4%
-79%
-18%
-26%
-26%
22%
193.7
85.1
198.6
254.3
207.0
206.5
232.7
173.0
170.1
270.5
262.1
277.8
275.7
12%
-50%
-27%
-3%
-25%
-25%
16.6
9.5
17.9
21.7
17.7
18.5
19.3
13.8
13.1
19.8
19.9
20.8
20.2
20%
-28%
-10%
9%
-15%
-9%
28
14.0
12.3
14%
185.5
233.1
-20%
13.1 16.3
-19%
30
36
32
12
25
19
19
33
31
31
30
35
8.5
12.6
10.3
3.5
10.2
5.0
6.5
7.4
7.5
10.5
10.0
12.3
12.6
23.5
8.2
11.4
8.5
7.5
10.1
10.4
10.3
14.8
22.7
15.5
-32%
-46%
26%
-69%
20%
-34%
-36%
-29%
-28%
-29%
-56%
-21%
131.4
175.2
192.0
247.0
89.1
245.6
297.7
295.7
276.2
163.5
95.7
323.7
148.3
165.6
236.8
183.3
145.2
237.1
262.2
262.2
281.0
168.3
121.0
282.1
-11%
6%
-19%
35%
-39%
4%
14%
13%
-2%
-3%
-21%
15%
9.4
13.1
13.9
16.5
7.1
16.4
20.6
20.2
19.9
11.2
7.1
22.6
10.2
11.9
16.3
13.1
12.0
16.6
18.8
18.3
19.2
11.6
8.7
19.5
-9%
10%
-15%
25%
-41%
-1%
9%
10%
4%
-3%
-18%
16%
35
36
36
36
37
16
19.3
19.3
10.9
5.0
17.7
3.5
17.6
19.0
12.0
9.5
16.8
6.1
10%
1%
-10%
-47%
6%
-43%
280.2
304.9
152.5
238.4
234.8
96.8
232.2
211.8
252.7
220.2
238.2
151.6
21%
44%
-40%
8%
-1%
-36%
19.5
20.7
12.1
16.5
18.3
8.4
16.5
14.9
17.8
15.1
17.5
12.4
18%
39%
-32%
9%
4%
-32%
11
10.2
6.3
62%
141.0
133.5
6%
12.3 12.7
-3%
(Continued on next page)
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
5
Table 9: Delaware Study Benchmarks
Student Credit Hours (SCH) & FTE Students Taught Per FTE Faculty,
for Tenured and Tenure-Track Full-Time Faculty, Fall 2002
(Continued from previous page)
Classification
of Instructional
Programs (CIP)
# of
Peers
with
(CIP)
Discipline
FTE Instructional
FTE Student/FTE
Total SCH/Faculty FTE
Faculty
Faculty
Difference
Difference
Difference
from
from
from
CSU Peer Peer % CSU
Peer Peer % CSU Peer Peer %
College of Education
13.01
13.03
13.04
31.05
51.16
Education, General
Curriculum and Instruction
Educational Administration and Supervision
Health and Physical Education/Fitness
Nursing
15
17
16
14
30
24.2
13.0
12.5
9.5
9.5
31.2
18.2
11.3
14.2
14.5
-22%
-28%
10%
-33%
-34%
166.8
155.3
149.2
161.4
83.0
146.6
184.1
160.1
198.2
128.1
14%
-16%
-7%
-19%
-35%
14.8
14.8
16.5
14.0
5.7
12.4
15.1
15.7
14.9
9.7
20%
-2%
5%
-6%
-42%
9
18
7.6
8.2
8.2
9.3
-7%
-12%
142.8
103.0
160.7
123.9
-11%
-17%
11.8 11.9
8.3 9.4
-1%
-11%
19
19
4
12.3
10.5
4.9
5.0
31.0
16.4
11.0
10.2
10.7
12%
3%
-54%
164.6
163.8
209.5
-12%
-15%
-13%
-6%
-10%
-6%
21%
248.6
2%
12.2
11.2
15.7
6.2
28.2
15.4
12.9
12.5
16.7
25.6
144.2
139.8
181.7
93.0
254.0
168.7
26.6
6%
College of Engineering
14.07 Chemical Engineering
14.08 Civil Engineering
14.10 Electrical, Electronics and Communications
Engineering
14.19 Mechanical Engineering
14.35 Industrial Engineering
15.08 Engineering Technology
22.01 Law (LL.B., J.D.)
45.12 Urban Affairs
12
Delaware Study Notes
■ For a complete Delaware Study report contact Institutional Research at (216) 687-4700.
■ Peer comparisons are unavailable for CIP 14.35 Industrial Engineering, 15.08 Engineering Technology, 45.12 Urban Studies, and
52.07 Operations Management and Business Statistics.
■ Undergraduate FTE= undergrad student credit hours/15. Graduate or law FTE = graduate or law student credit hours/9.
■ FTE Instructional faculty excludes separately budgeted FTEs.
■ Peers are Doctoral I and Doctoral II institutions.
Doctoral I institutions include: Bowling Green State University, Catholic University of America, Georgia State University, Loyola
University of Chicago, Northern Arizona University, Old Dominion University, Southern Methodist University, University of Akron,
University of Alabama – Tuscaloosa, University of Memphis, University of Missouri – Kansas City, University of Missouri – Rolla,
University of North Carolina – Greensboro, Western Michigan University.
Doctoral II institutions include: Baylor University, Clarkson University, DePaul University, East Carolina University, Florida
International University, Indiana State University, Indiana Univ – Purdue Univ at Indianapolis, Louisiana Tech University, Middle
Tennessee State University, Montana State University-Bozeman, Seton Hall University, Tennessee State University, University of
Central Florida, University of Colorado – Denver, University of Louisiana – Lafayette, University of Maine, University of Missouri –
St. Louis, University of Montana – Missoula, University of New Hampshire, University of San Francisco, University of South Dakota,
Wichita State University, Wright State University.
■ N/A not applicable
■ Regular tenured/tenure track faculty are full-time.
6
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 10: Fall Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Business
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
89
151
34
274
32
25
22
27
97
139
36
272
32
23
2
26
95
136
34
265
30
23
23
26
88
121
37
246
31
24
22
26
91
144
37
272
30
24
18
25
3%
19%
0%
11%
-5%
1%
-16%
-4%
2%
-5%
9%
-1%
-7%
-5%
-18%
-7%
343
123
36
502
30
21
19
26
302
116
37
455
33
22
12
29
300
124
33
457
34
23
13
29
288
144
27
459
33
22
14
28
296
137
26
459
30
21
13
26
3%
-5%
-4%
0%
-9%
-5%
-5%
-6%
-14%
11%
-28%
-9%
2%
0%
-29%
1%
145
157
29
331
21
17
15
17
141
160
30
331
17
17
17
18
115
180
27
322
21
17
15
19
125
185
7
317
21
18
19
19
134
188
23
345
20
16
17
18
7%
2%
229%
9%
-6%
-8%
-11%
-7%
-8%
20%
-21%
4%
-6%
-6%
11%
5%
47
65
0
112
18
14
–
16
49
62
4
115
21
16
10
18
40
50
5
95
20
17
8
18
41
52
3
96
19
16
15
18
34
63
5
102
20
16
10
17
-17%
21%
67%
6%
5%
-3%
-29%
-3%
-28%
-3%
11%
9%
-9%
6%
204
60
13
277
36
30
13
33
176
54
10
240
37
28
16
34
177
61
15
253
42
30
17
37
164
62
16
242
43
28
19
38
175
69
24
268
43
27
15
36
7%
11%
50%
11%
-1%
-1%
-22%
-4%
-14%
15%
85%
-3%
21%
-9%
13%
9%
13
34
8
55
38
15
22
22
17
29
8
54
38
16
26
24
16
37
7
60
39
17
21
23
18
35
7
60
35
15
16
21
16
34
6
56
28
17
17
20
-11%
-3%
-14%
-7%
-22%
7%
6%
-8%
23%
0%
-25%
2%
-28%
9%
-23%
-9%
CLASS
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Education
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Engineering
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Science
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Urban Affairs
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
7
(Continued on next page)
8
Table 10: Fall Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Law
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
University Studies
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
53
43
12
34
29
17
50
43
8
34
29
17
53
46
7
40
30
14
53
46
1
38
29
43
51
38
1
37
28
25
-4%
-17%
0%
-2%
-2%
-42%
-4%
-12%
-92%
10%
-3%
46%
108
30
101
34
106
34
100
34
90
33
-10%
-2%
-17%
10%
81
7
0
25
21
–
79
8
0
25
21
–
78
8
0
26
21
–
80
8
0
25
21
–
80
8
0
24
18
–
0%
0%
-3%
-12%
-1%
14%
-4%
-14%
88
25
87
24
86
25
88
25
88
24
0%
-4%
0%
-5%
4
2
3
9
29
11
26
21
6
2
1
9
25
16
14
22
6
3
1
10
23
13
10
19
4
2
0
6
19
12
–
17
3
2
0
5
23
13
–
19
-25%
0%
21%
4%
-17%
13%
-25%
0%
-100%
-44%
-21%
18%
-100%
-10%
979
642
135
28
21
19
917
613
134
30
22
17
880
645
129
32
22
17
861
655
98
32
21
18
882
683
122
30
21
16
2%
4%
24%
-4%
-3%
-14%
-10%
6%
-10%
7%
-3%
-16%
1,756
25
1,664
26
1,654
27
1,614
27
1,687
25
5%
-5%
-4%
1%
CAR SVC / MIL SCI
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
University Total
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Notes:
First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
Days: Monday – Friday 7 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Evenings: Monday – Thursday 4 p.m. – 12 a.m.
Weekends: Classes start after Friday 4 p.m., Saturday and Sunday.
*‘Other’ includes weekends and unknown (sections with no class time) sections. Cross listed courses counted once only.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
Table 11: Spring Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Business
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
81
143
39
263
33
26
19
27
78
140
37
255
34
25
22.
27
77
147
37
261
33
24
22
27
71
132
41
244
34
24
22
27
77
145
37
259
31
23
21
25
8%
10%
-10%
6%
-11%
-6%
-7%
-7%
-5%
1%
-5%
-2%
-7%
-11%
6%
-8%
287
120
45
452
32
22
14
28
300
134
38
472
33
21
14
28
291
133
43
467
33
22
13
28
302
131
38
471
30
20
14
26
284
137
36
457
30
20
15
26
-6%
5%
-5%
-3%
0%
2%
3%
0%
-1%
14%
-20%
1%
-6%
-7%
5%
-5%
137
152
48
337
21
18
16
17
105
166
33
304
17
18
14
19
122
201
33
356
21
18
16
19
132
180
17
329
20
19
18
19
135
188
21
344
18
17
16
18
2%
4%
24%
5%
-9%
-7%
-7%
-8%
-1%
24%
-56%
2%
-13%
-3%
3%
4%
52
54
2
108
18
16
14
17
41
57
2
100
22
15
11
18
41
67
1
109
19
14
17
16
40
52
5
97
20
14
10
16
37
53
1
91
20
14
6
17
-8%
2%
-80%
-6%
0%
0%
-40%
1%
-29%
-2%
10%
-11%
-16%
-3%
181
55
20
256
33
26
12
30
156
59
13
228
36
26
13
32
165
66
15
246
47
31
18
41
140
69
15
224
45
27
17
38
151
78
20
249
42
26
17
35
8%
13%
33%
11%
-7%
-3%
-1%
-7%
-17%
42%
0%
-3%
28%
1%
40%
18%
11
33
16
60
54
15
18
23
11
34
14
59
55
15
21
24
11
36
12
59
50
16
20
23
12
34
9
55
39
15
18
21
12
33
11
56
37
16
25
22
0%
-3%
22%
2%
-7%
7%
39%
7%
9%
0%
-31%
-7%
-32%
8%
42%
-2%
CLASS
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Education
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Engineering
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Science
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Urban Affairs
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
9
(Continued on next page)
10
(Continued from previous page)
Table 11: Spring Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Law
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
University Studies
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
50
46
15
31
28
25
49
49
10
31
28
25
54
51
15
35
27
20
49
47
5
35
25
25
48
45
5
35
24
19
-2%
-4%
0%
1%
-6%
-22%
-4%
-2%
-67%
12%
-16%
-21%
111
29
108
30
120
30
101
30
98
29
-3%
-3%
-12%
0%
44
6
0
20
18
–
43
5
0
23
22
–
43
6
0
23
21
–
42
5
0
22
20
–
47
5
0
17
17
–
12%
0%
-23%
-14%
7%
-17%
-14%
-6%
50
20
48
23
49
23
47
22
52
17
11%
-22%
4%
-13%
6
2
2
10
37
20
28
21
6
2
2
10
30
18
33
28
4
2
3
9
35
15
29
28
4
2
0
6
33
20
–
29
4
1
0
5
28
37
–
30
0%
-50%
-16%
80%
-17%
3%
-33%
-50%
-100%
-50%
-24%
80%
-100%
41%
849
611
187
1,647
29
22
16
25
789
646
149
1,584
32
21
17
26
808
709
159
1,676
33
22
18
27
792
652
130
1,574
31
21
18
27
797
685
131
1,613
30
20
18
25
1%
5%
1%
2%
-5%
-3%
0%
-5%
-6%
12%
-30%
-2%
3%
-7%
11%
1%
Career Services & Military Science
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
University Total
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Notes:
First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
Days: Monday – Friday 7 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Evenings: Monday – Thursday 4 p.m. – 12 a.m.
Weekends: Classes start after Friday 4 p.m., Saturday and Sunday.
*‘Other’ includes weekends and unknown (sections with no class time). Cross listed courses counted once only.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
Table 12: Summer Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Business
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
46
87
12
145
24
23
22
23
52
80
21
153
25
26
18
24
49
78
10
137
24
24
22
23
46
78
14
138
21
25
24
23
34
94
14
142
19
25
21
23
-26%
21%
0%
3%
-10%
1%
-10%
-1%
-26%
8%
17%
-2%
-22%
-9%
-2%
0%
92
45
22
159
19
17
12
17
102
39
20
161
22
18
12
19
95
34
18
147
23
20
12
21
90
32
15
137
21
18
15
20
83
34
17
134
20
15
12
18
-8%
6%
13%
-2%
-5%
-14%
-19%
-9%
-10%
-24%
23%
-16%
6%
-9%
-2%
3%
91
83
21
195
18
21
44
22
72
82
38
192
27
18
15
21
82
80
26
188
18
21
44
23
93
89
10
192
22
19
12
20
89
91
19
199
17
18
42
20
-4%
2%
90%
4%
-23%
-6%
263%
-2%
-2%
10%
-10%
2%
-1%
-12%
-5%
-9%
7
5
1
13
13
19
14
15
5
9
3
17
20
20
17
19
5
10
0
15
16
17
–
16
3
9
1
13
16
15
11
15
3
4
0
7
19
16
–
17
0%
-56%
-100%
-46%
19%
5%
-100%
14%
-57%
-20%
41%
-14%
-46%
12%
98
16
10
124
20
23
14
20
103
16
10
129
21
24
17
21
88
20
18
126
26
24
17
24
96
18
8
122
22
21
20
22
95
19
13
127
21
18
18
20
-1%
6%
63%
4%
-7%
-15%
-11%
-9%
-3%
19%
30%
2%
3%
-22%
29%
0%
7
16
7
30
21
17
11
16
8
16
8
32
20
17
11
16
6
15
4
25
18
14
18
16
3
16
5
24
18
14
19
15
4
11
5
20
10
16
17
15
33%
-31%
0%
-17%
-45%
19%
-8%
0%
-43%
-31%
-29%
-33%
-53%
-3%
63%
-7%
CLASS
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Education
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Engineering
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Science
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
Urban Affairs
Day
Evening
Other*
TOTAL
11
(Continued on next page)
12
(Continued from previous page)
Table 12: Summer Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
College
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Law
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
5
10
5
20
20
30
9
22
2
11
5
18
20
30
9
25
5
11
2
18
19
30
12
25
1
9
4
14
15
37
17
30
2
11
5
18
19
25
11
20
100%
22%
25%
29%
27%
-32%
-36%
-31%
-60%
10%
0%
-10%
-7%
-16%
23%
-8%
7
1
0
8
12
15
–
13
7
1
0
8
14
13
–
14
6
1
0
7
16
20
–
16
5
1
0
6
14
19
–
15
5
1
0
6
13
14
–
13
0%
0%
-7%
-26%
-29%
0%
8%
-7%
0%
-11%
-25%
6%
1
1
3
5
18
22
50
21
1
1
2
4
32
19
27
26
2
1
3
6
16
10
14
14
1
0
0
1
16
–
–
16
1
1
0
2
13
13
–
13
0%
-19%
100%
-19%
0%
0%
-100%
-60%
-28%
-41%
-100%
-39%
354
264
81
699
22
20
16
21
352
255
107
714
21
22
23
22
338
250
81
669
22
22
25
22
338
252
57
647
22
21
18
21
316
266
73
655
19
20
23
20
-7%
6%
28%
1%
-11%
-3%
30%
-5%
-11%
1%
-10%
-6%
-13%
0%
46%
-2%
University Studies
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
CAR SVC / MIL SCI
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
University Total
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Notes:
First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
Days: Monday – Friday 7 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Evenings: Monday – Thursday 4 p.m. – 12 a.m.
Weekends: Classes start after Friday 4 p.m., Saturday and Sunday.
*‘Other’ includes weekends and unknown (sections with no class time). Cross listed courses counted once only.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
Table 13: Fall Undergraduate Student FTE by College and Class Time: 5-Year Trend
Fall 2000 – 2004
College
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Other (Honors)
Other (AF-CSC-MSC)
TOTAL
Day
Evenings & Weekends
Percent Change
Percent Change
Unknown*
Percent Change
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
1 Year
5 Year
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
571 605 579 556 531
2,508 2,674 2,647 2,485 2,386
79
35
61
40
0
381 407 444 481 515
182 199 184 191 186
1,592 1,597 1,596 1,616 1,531
136 178 174 177 126
371 354 355 360 347
0
0
0
0
3
10
16
14
9
7
5,831 6,066 6,055 5,913 5,632
-4%
-4%
-100%
7%
-3%
-5%
-29%
-4%
-7%
-5%
-100%
35%
2%
-4%
-8%
-6%
456
647
5
232
146
404
131
30
0
3
2,055
382
729
16
250
134
378
139
29
0
2
2,059
369
673
0
252
157
408
134
27
0
2
2,022
-16%
9%
21%
8%
16
83
3
101
2
25
4
0
0
0
234
13
78
2
94
3
39
3
0
0
0
233
14
77
0
96
2
36
4
0
0
0
229
17
70
0
100
4
30
8
0
0
1
230
178%
-56%
-100%
9%
205%
318%
-5%
0%
-2%
6
158
1
91
1
7
9
0
0
2
276
25%
-9%
-100%
4%
91%
-18%
117%
-28%
-3%
463
598
0
200
184
394
109
31
0
3
1,983
-4%
-8%
-100%
1%
18%
8%
-4%
-6%
-16%
-5%
436
616
0
180
158
369
80
26
0
2
1,867
0%
-17%
40%
0%
11%
67%
3%
Table 14: Fall Graduate & Law Student FTE by College and Class Time: 5-Year Trend
Fall 2000 – 2004
College
Day
Percent Change
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies
TOTAL
72
28
12
3
68
4
375
0.0
561
74
37
1
2
92
0
398
0.0
605
57
45
11
3
104
0
424
0.0
644
55
44
21
7
107
0
406
0.0
640
52
44
27
4
119
2
386
0.0
634
Evenings & Weekends
Percent Change
Unknown*
Percent Change
1 Year
5 Year
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
-5%
0%
26%
-47%
11%
433%
-5%
-27%
59%
128%
31%
75%
-43%
3%
465
171
615
122
67
170
284
0.0
1,894
491
202
666
129
86
158
274
0.0
2,006
496
197
675
126
92
161
224
0.0
1,971
-7%
42%
34%
98%
39%
0%
-17%
14%
16
32
50
31
59
15
16
0.0
220
19
41
39
40
74
16
19
0.0
248
16
46
49
44
93
13
21
0.0
283
17
51
44
43
82
13
21
0.1
272
-25%
68%
17%
79%
69%
-25%
28%
-2%
23
31
38
24
49
17
16
0.0
198
12%
11%
-10%
-3%
-12%
-2%
-3%
13%
451
155
558
77
56
160
283
0.0
1,740
1%
-2%
1%
-2%
7%
2%
-18%
-1%
532
139
503
64
66
162
270
0.0
1,735
-4%
37%
13
Notes:
First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
Days: Monday – Friday 7 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Evenings: Monday – Thursday 4 p.m. – 12 a.m.
Weekends: Classes start after Friday 4 p.m., Saturday and Sunday.
*Unknown includes sections with no classtime.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
Interactive Video and Telecourse
TTrends inInstructional
Delivery
Rapid growth of distance delivered student credit hours
are attributable to new technology,
equipment, and service at CSU which have led to smoother instructional delivery in this area. Faculty development through
a series of workshops has enabled faculty to feel comfortable in handling minor technical problems. Interactive Video hook-ups
now link our extended campuses and partner schools with the Main Campus, providing students the opportunity to take a
class at another site which might not have been possible in the past.
Table 15: 5-Year Trends in Interactive Video and Telecourse Instructional Delivery
STUDENT CREDIT HOURS GENERATED
UNDERGRADUATE:
Interactive Video and
Telecourse
Business
CLASS
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
Fall
2000
2001
2002
52
63
148
28
239
28
92
24
144
52
Percent Change
2003
68
68
2004
1 Year
5 Year
60
60
–
–
–
-100%
76%
–
15%
–
–
131%
120
GRADUATE:
Interactive Video and
Telecourse
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Urban Affairs
Total
Fall
2000
2001
Percent Change
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
–
1%
21%
–
-25%
5%
–
–
-47%
–
–
1104%
128
72
107
1,398
56
128
72
68
175
16
1,470
33
1,416
68
12
12
1,541
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
52
128
63
72
28
107
1,398
56
93
1,476
68
12
180
148
28
311
92
92
319
84
1,538
12
1,661
–
6%
21%
–
–
-86%
8%
–
2738%
-47%
–
–
–
823%
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
TOTAL:
Interactive Video and
Telecourse
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
14
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Fall
Percent Change
Table 16: 5-Year Trends in Web Based Instructional Delivery
Student Credit Hours Generated
UNDERGRADUATE:
Fall
Web-Based
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Other (AF-CSC-MSC)
Total
Percent Change
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
56
4
147
36
12
15
117
28
32
22
260
108
64
42
10
244
196
111
84
70
10
120
620
140
210
17
476
664
1,015
3%
31%
67%
0%
-51%
216%
–
–
53%
–
50%
1650%
–
–
–
–
–
625%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
52
92
52
76
82
61
271
66
76
48
90
280
28
77
88
84
111
388
36
108
28
129
301
–
-53%
23%
-67%
16%
-22%
–
-31%
17%
–
330%
73%
80
GRADUATE:
Fall
Web-Based
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Total
30
174
Percent Change
TOTAL:
Fall
Web-Based
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
University Studies
Other (AF-CSC-MSC)
Total
2000
108
96
30
Percent Change
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
147
88
88
82
76
117
94
108
70
350
136
141
130
94
355
196
111
120
178
38
249
620
481
17
756
1,052
1,316
-18%
-15%
37%
-60%
-30%
216%
–
–
25%
–
11%
85%
–
730%
–
–
–
319%
80
314
Notes:
Interactive video: courses delivered via interactive television at two or more sites simultaneously.
Telecourse: Courses involving home viewing of videotaped programs, use of reading materials and some class interaction with the instructor.
Web-based: Courses delivered primarily using the Internet.
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
15
5-Year Trends in Interactive Video and Telecourse
Instructional Delivery
■ New technologically enhanced classrooms in Rhodes Tower will offer state-of-the-art transmission of distance
learning courses.
■ CSU’s Bioethics program, offered on-line through the Philosophy Department, has received nationwide recognition.
■ The Department of Social Work in partnership with the University of Akron has very successfully offered graduate social work
classes for many years through interactive video and other distance learning approaches.
■ College of Engineering meets the needs of students at Ohio Aerospace Institute and NASA by offering on-site interactive
video courses.
■ Requests for specific online courses have come from all over Ohio, the United States, various correctional facilities, and
foreign countries.
■ The CSU E-Learning committee is currently discussing plans to increase the number of online classes, provide incentives for
faculty to use non-traditional instructional delivery formats, and to consider issues around using a “flat” fee to attract more
out-of-state students, to consider eLearning courses for general education requirements as well as specific courses leading to
a major. Preliminary recommendations of this committee include managing a university repository of reusable eLearning units
to reduce redundant development of courses; acquiring portions of a university's eLearning content via external organizations
and from consortia partnerships; providing full degrees and credential programs; and moving towards hybrid web / classroom
models as well as 100% anytime, anywhere eLearning models. Evidence of the future role of distance delivery can often be found
in universities negotiating contracts for faculty encouraging teaching and designing of new distance learning classes as part of their
regular work-load.
16
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 17: Cleveland State University Main Library Collections 2004
Main Library
Total
Titles
Total
Volumes/
Units
Print Volumes:
Monographs
Classed Serials
Periodicals
Total Print Volumes
484,787
621,570
10,536
201,060
9,242
188,841
504,565
1,011,471
Other Print Collections
Annual Reports
19,022
Maps
61,287
Total Print Items
80,309
Electronic Access
E-books
34,263
E-Journals
24,753
Databases
79
Total Electronic Items
59,095
Digitized holdings
Text
4,778
Images
43,350
Total Digitized Holdings
48,128
Microformats
724,365
Audiovisual materials
Cataloged
24,643
44,737
24,643
140,909
Number
Total
Linear
Feet
Art Slides
96,172
Total AV Materials
Archives
Active Periodicals
Active other serials
Total active serials
2,550
1,719
4,269
Archival Materials
355
Source: University Main and Law Libraries
2,971
(Continued on next page)
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
17
Table 18: Cleveland State University Main Library Statistics
Main Library
Number of books checked out
Hits and downloads of Electronic Course Reserves
Hits and downloads of Electronic Journals
Reference & Technical questions answered
Instructions sessions provided by the Library
LCLC (Library Computer Learning Center) walk-in users
Visitors to the Library
Visitors (hits) to the Library’s Website
Electronic books, journals, and databases
Percent of materials budget spent on electronic resources
FY01
FY04
198,362
249,578
87,053
22,133
202
23,121
561,897
6,447,507
24,773
38%
310,506
534,725
116,913
71,099
259
32,626
647,449
16,151,251
59,095
50%
Table 19: Cleveland State University Law Library Collections 2004
Law Library
Total
Titles
Total
Volumes/
Units
Print Volumes:
Titles(Excluding non-book titles )
Other non-book title
76,619
519
Microformats
70,925
Number of active serial subscriptions
3,299
Number of active serial titles
2,691
Volumes (excluding microforms)
283,818
Volumes equivalent of microforms
231,346
Table 20: Cleveland State University Law Library Statistics 2004
Filled
Number of material request were sent by Law Library
3,184
3,180
Number of material request were received by Law Library
3,080
2,593
Source: University Main and Law Libraries
18
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
F
Faculty & Staff
Faculty & Staff
7
*DIVIDER PAGES 9/11/05 3:57 PM Page 7
Table 1: Full-Time Employee by Equal Employment
Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2004
Executive, Administrative
Faculty
Other Professionals
Clerical
Technical
Skilled Crafts
Service, Maintenance
Total Full-Time Employees
Count
% of Total
70
564
617
247
39
22
103
1,662
4%
34%
37%
15%
2%
1%
6%
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of October 31, 2004.
Figure 1: Full-Time Employees by EE06 Category
Fall 2004
Service, Maintenance 6%
Skilled Crafts 1%
Technical 2%
Executive, Administrative 4%
Faculty
34%
Clerical 15%
Other Professionals
37%
FACULTY & STAFF
1
Table 2: Full-Time Employee by Gender, Race
and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06)
Fall 2000 – 2004
EE06 Category/Race
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Percent Change
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
1 Year 5 Year
Executive, Administrative
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
47
12
0
2
0
17
6
1
1
1
45
8
4
14
6
1
1
1
39
8
3
8
6
1
1
40
8
0
5
9
6
1
2
38
7
0
5
10
8
1
1
-2%
7%
0%
-14%
-25%
-17%
0%
100%
-100%
1
54
18
50
20
-3%
-20%
271
17
9
52
146
24
7
14
287
17
8
56
150
22
8
14
5%
-5%
0%
6%
4%
8%
0%
13%
1
351
191
1
369
1
195
100%
4%
5%
205
23
3
16
255
74
3
9
207
25
2
22
268
75
5
8
3%
3%
17%
20%
1
248
341
3
259
2
358
400%
5%
19%
117
92
3
4
2
24
10
115
89
2
4
2
-1%
-2%
-0%
0%
0%
1%
-4%
-33%
67%
100%
61
26
57
23
50
16
White
277
Black
17
Hispanic
8
Asian/Pacific Islander
50
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
0
Total
352
143
19
8
12
271
16
7
48
140
19
8
15
269
17
9
51
145
19
8
14
1
0
182
342
1
183
1
347
220
73
3
8
1
174
22
1
18
1
230
70
3
7
1
305
216
311
189
22
3
15
1
1
231
117
95
3
2
1
25
9
113
92
4
4
2
21
9
29
218
35
215
24
7
1
1
3
5
22
5
2
1
3
3
Faculty
187
Other Professionals
White
172
Black
22
Hispanic
2
Asian/Pacific Islander
17
Native American/Alaskan Native
1
Unknown
Total
214
241
75
3
7
1
326
21%
5%
40%
20%
-100%
Clerical
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
20
8
1
1
118
89
4
4
2
23
9
31
217
33
217
35
212
-1%
0%
25
5
1
1
6
4
24
5
2
1
5
4
24
4
2
1
5
3
0%
-22%
0%
0%
7%
-42%
100%
0%
32
10
32
9
31
8
-5%
-5%
1
1
1
Technical
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
1
33
8
30
7
(Continued on next page)
2
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 2: Full-Time Employee by Gender, Race
and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06), in Percentage
Fall 2000 – 2004
(Continued from previous page)
EE06 Category/Race
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Percent Change
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
1 Year 5 Year
Skilled Crafts
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Not Applicable
Total
15
10
2
1
0
0
28
14
10
2
1
14
7
2
1
14
7
2
13
7
2
-7%
0%
0%
-13%
-30%
0%
-100%
0
27
0
24
0
23
0
22
0
-4%
-21%
24
40
4
1
2
37
3
24
43
4
1
2
33
3
26
45
3
1
2
29
3
23
46
3
1
1
26
2
26
42
3
1
1
27
3
13%
-4%
20%
0%
4%
-10%
-14%
0%
69
42
72
38
75
34
73
29
72
31
1%
-7%
White
579
502
575
502
583
520
600
533
619
549
3%
8%
Black
116
235
113
223
113
223
115
226
112
224
-1%
-4%
Hispanic
17
18
16
19
18
19
19
15
17
19
6%
3%
Asian/Pacific Islander
73
23
74
27
73
26
76
29
86
27
8%
18%
Native American/Alaskan Native
1
3
1
5
1
3
0
2
0
2
0%
-50%
Not Applicable
0
0
0
1
2
0
3
0
4
3
133%
786
781
779
777
790
791
813
805
838
824
2%
Service, Maintenance
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Not Applicable
Total
Total Full-Time Employees
Total
FACULTY & STAFF
6%
3
Table 3: Full-Time Employee by Gender, Race
and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06), in Percentage
Fall 2000 – 2004
Women and Minorities as Percent of Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Executive, Administrative
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Native American
Minorities
30%
21%
1%
3%
1%
26%
29%
17%
1%
6%
1%
26%
25%
21%
1%
6%
0%
28%
25%
20%
1%
10%
0%
31%
29%
21%
1%
9%
0%
31%
Faculty
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Native American
Minorities
34%
7%
3%
12%
0%
21%
35%
7%
3%
12%
0%
22%
35%
7%
3%
12%
0%
22%
35%
8%
3%
12%
0%
23%
34%
7%
3%
12%
0%
22%
Other Professionals
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Native American
Minorities
59%
18%
1%
5%
0%
24%
59%
17%
1%
5%
0%
23%
59%
17%
1%
4%
0%
23%
58%
16%
1%
4%
0%
22%
58%
16%
1%
5%
0%
23%
Clerical
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Native American
Minorities
88%
42%
1%
1%
0%
44%
86%
40%
2%
2%
1%
45%
87%
40%
2%
2%
1%
44%
87%
40%
1%
2%
1%
44%
86%
40%
1%
2%
1%
44%
Technical
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Native American
Minorities
19%
29%
2%
2%
0%
34%
19%
22%
5%
3%
3%
32%
24%
21%
2%
2%
0%
26%
24%
21%
5%
2%
0%
29%
20%
18%
5%
3%
0%
26%
Skilled Crafts
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Native American
Minorities
0%
36%
7%
4%
0%
46%
0%
37%
7%
4%
0%
48%
0%
29%
8%
4%
0%
42%
0%
30%
9%
0%
0%
39%
0%
32%
9%
0%
0%
41%
(Continued on next page)
4
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 3: Full-Time Employee by Gender, Race
and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06), in Percentage
Fall 2000 – 2004
Women and Minorities as Percent of Total
(Continued from previous page)
2000
2001
39%
69%
6%
1%
0%
77%
34%
69%
6%
1%
0%
76%
31%
68%
5%
1%
0%
74%
28%
71%
5%
1%
0%
76%
30%
67%
6%
1%
0%
74%
Women
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
Blacks
22%
22%
21%
21%
20%
Hispanics
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
Asian
6%
6%
6%
7%
7%
Native American
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
31%
31%
30%
30%
30%
Service, Maintenance
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Native American
Minorities
2002
2003
2004
Total Full-Time Employees
Minorities
Notes: Fall 2000 & 2001 date may not exactly match with IPEDS faculty report.
Fall 2002 – 2004 date is same as IPEDS report.
Source: All figures are taken from census files as of October 31, 2004.
FACULTY & STAFF
5
Table 4: Full-Time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
EE06 Category Description
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Executive/Administrative
Faculty
Other Professional
Clerical
Tech/Paraprofessional
Skilled Crafts
Service/Maintenance
Total Full-Time Employee
87
534
519
247
41
28
111
1,567
80
525
527
250
37
27
110
1,556
66
534
557
248
42
24
110
1,581
72
541
589
250
41
23
102
1,618
70
564
617
247
39
22
103
1,662
-3%
4%
5%
-1%
-5%
-4%
1%
3%
-20%
6%
19%
0%
-5%
-21%
-7%
6%
Table 5: Part-Time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
EE06 Category Description
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
376
199
32
1
1
386
192
35
2
1
445
179
33
379
165
28
414
157
25
2
9%
-5%
-11%
10%
-21%
-22%
100%
15
673
19
591
17
615
-11%
4%
-35%
-3%
Executive/Administrative
Faculty
Other Professional
Clerical
Tech/Paraprofessional
Skilled Crafts
Service/Maintenance
Total Part-Time Employee
26
634
616
Table 6: Total Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
EE06 Category Description
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Executive/Administrative
Faculty
Other Professional
Clerical
Tech/Paraprofessional
Skilled Crafts
Service/Maintenance
Total Employee
87
910
718
279
42
28
137
2,201
81
911
719
285
39
27
110
2,172
67
979
743
283
42
24
125
2,263
72
920
754
278
41
23
121
2,209
70
978
774
272
41
22
120
2,277
-3%
6%
3%
-2%
0%
-4%
-1%
3%
-20%
7%
8%
-3%
-2%
-21%
-12%
3%
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of October 31, 2004.
6
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 7: Full-Time Faculty by Rank
Fall 2004
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
TOTAL
Professor
Associate
Professor
Assistant
Professor
Instructor
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
28
34
15
23
44
12
17
173
33%
22%
14%
40%
43%
55%
50%
31%
27
69
26
24
33
5
13
197
32%
44%
25%
42%
32%
23%
38%
35%
14
45
42
10
20
4
4
139
17%
28%
39%
18%
20%
18%
12%
25%
2
2%
0%
8%
0%
1%
0%
0%
2%
13
10
16
15%
6%
15%
0%
4%
5%
0%
8%
84
158
107
57
102
22
34
564
8
1
11
Term Faculty
4
1
44
Total
Note: Includes only standard academic ranks.
Table 8: Full-Time Faculty by Gender
Fall 2004
Regular Faculty
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
TOTAL
Male
Term Faculty
Female
Male
Total
Female
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
53
93
31
54
73
11
21
336
63%
59%
29%
95%
11
52
49
3
23
10
12
160
13%
33%
46%
5%
0%
45%
32%
28%
18
6
5
21%
4%
5%
2
7
22
2%
4%
21%
0%
4
33
0%
11%
6%
2
1
1
35
84
158
107
57
98
22
38
564
15%
28%
19%
10%
17%
4%
7%
100%
50%
55%
60%
5%
3%
6%
Table 9: Full-Time Faculty by Highest Degree
Fall 2004
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
TOTAL
Degree
Bachelors
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Terminal
Masters
Doctorate
Professional
Degree
12%
15%
26%
7%
8%
14%
0%
13%
85%
84%
74%
93%
91%
86%
9%
80%
4%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
91%
6%
88%
94%
75%
93%
93%
86%
100%
89%
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of October 31, 2004.
FACULTY & STAFF
7
Table 10: Women and Minorities as a Percent of Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Institution
2000
2001
2002
2003
Women Minorities Women Minorities Women Minorities
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Total
37%
34%
28%
31%
37%
33%
27%
31%
28%
31%
30%
18%
16%
17%
22%
15%
12%
16%
14%
16%
11%
16%
38%
35%
30%
30%
37%
32%
28%
30%
30%
31%
31%
19%
16%
18%
23%
14%
13%
17%
15%
16%
12%
17%
38%
36%
30%
33%
38%
34%
28%
29%
30%
31%
31%
19%
16%
18%
25%
15%
14%
18%
14%
15%
13%
17%
2004
Women Minorities Women Minorities
37%
37%
31%
34%
39%
35%
28%
30%
30%
32%
32%
19%
16%
19%
25%
16%
15%
19%
15%
16%
18%
18%
37%
37%
33%
33%
40%
36%
28%
30%
30%
33%
33%
20%
17%
20%
25%
17%
17%
19%
16%
18%
18%
19%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Faculty Demographic (FD) query – rundate: June 16, 2005
Table 11: Percentage of Full-Time Faculty to Full-Time Employees
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions
Fall 2000 – 2004
Institution
Youngstown State University
Bowling Green State University
University of Toledo
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
University of Akron
Kent State University
Ohio University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
39%
35%
38%
35%
34%
36%
29%
27%
26%
19%
28%
38%
36%
36%
34%
34%
35%
30%
27%
26%
19%
27%
37%
36%
37%
35%
34%
35%
29%
27%
25%
19%
27%
38%
38%
38%
34%
33%
33%
30%
28%
26%
21%
28%
Notes: Percentage is the total number of full-time faculty divided by the total number of full-time employees.
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI All Employee (AM) query – rundate: May 25, 2005
8
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
2004
39%
38%
38%
35%
34%
32%
31%
28%
25%
21%
28%
Table 12: Rate of Annual Student FTE to Number of Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions
Fall 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
Institution
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
University of Cincinnati
Ohio State University
Ohio University
Cleveland State University
University of Akron
University of Toledo
Miami University
Youngstown State University
Bowling Green State University
Kent State University
16.4
16.1
28.5
24.5
25.0
28.0
28.0
25.7
31.6
27.3
16.2
16.7
25.8
24.0
26.0
27.4
27.5
25.6
30.9
28.0
17.8
16.8
24.9
25.6
26.5
27.3
28.7
28.7
30.6
28.7
17.4
18.9
25.2
26.1
27.4
28.2
28.5
29.7
30.0
31.5
16.8
19.5
24.8
25.5
27.5
28.0
28.2
29.8
30.5
34.2
-3.6%
3.2%
-1.5%
-2.3%
0.4%
-0.7%
-1.1%
0.3%
1.6%
8.6%
2.6%
21.5%
-13.0%
3.8%
9.9%
0.2%
0.6%
15.7%
-3.5%
25.3%
Note: Ratio equals the annualized student FTE for the fiscal year divided by the number of tenured or tenure-track faculty.
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Faculty Demographics (FD) and Course Enrollment queries – rundate: May 24, 2005.
Table 13: Student FTE to Full-Time Staff Ratio
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fall 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
Institution
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Ohio State University
University of Cincinnati
Miami University
Ohio University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
University of Akron
University of Toledo
Bowling Green State University
Youngstown State University
3.5
5.9
7.0
8.1
10.2
9.7
11.6
12.0
11.4
14.4
3.5
5.9
6.9
8.1
10.6
9.7
11.3
11.3
11.8
15.0
3.7
5.8
7.0
8.0
10.5
9.8
11.5
11.7
11.5
15.2
3.6
5.8
6.9
8.5
10.4
10.5
11.1
12.1
11.7
15.7
3.5
5.7
6.6
8.5
9.8
10.5
10.9
11.5
11.8
15.6
-3.2%
-1.3%
-4.0%
-0.3%
-5.1%
0.7%
-1.9%
-5.0%
1.6%
-0.2%
-1.9%
-4.4%
-5.4%
5.0%
-4.1%
7.5%
-6.5%
-4.6%
4.1%
7.9%
Note: Ratio equals the annualized student FTE for the term divided by the number of non-faculty employees employed on November 1 of each year.
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI All Employees (AM) and Course Enrollment queries – rundate: May 24, 2005
FACULTY & STAFF
9
10
Table 14: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hour (SCH)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Generated by Part-Time Faculty
Fall 2004
Department
Business
Accounting
Computer & Information Science
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Business Total
CLASS
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Interdisciplinary
Modern Languages
Music
Philosophy
Description
Accounting
Business Law
Computer and Information Science
Information Science
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
General Administration
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Drama
Economics
English
History
Linguistics
National Student Exchange
Women’s Studies
Arabic
English Translations of Foreign Literatures
French
German
Greek
Italian
Japanese
Latin
Modern Languages
Spanish
Applied Music
Music
Philosophy
SCH Generated
by Part-Time
Faculty
Total SCH
Generated
% of SCH
Generated by
Part-Time
Faculty
2,268
252
925
1,442
1,034
1,434
–
1,595
1,380
10,330
405
87
172
729
465
381
711
224
237
3,411
2,673
339
1,097
2,171
1,499
1,815
711
1,819
1,617
13,741
15%
26%
16%
34%
31%
21%
100%
12%
15%
25%
812
2,032
4,346
218
1,213
2,380
3,842
16
–
100
55
16
411
68
168
1,001
2,116
277
1,195
5,362
2,684
4
15
92
90
–
10
155
–
135
169
68
20
485
280
1,567
379
980
3,033
6,462
495
2,408
7,742
6,526
20
15
192
145
16
421
223
8
135
169
132
20
1,708
339
2,576
2,001
17%
33%
33%
56%
50%
69%
41%
20%
100%
48%
62%
0%
2%
70%
0%
100%
100%
52%
100%
28%
83%
61%
19%
SCH Generated
by Full-Time
Faculty
–
–
64
–
1,223
59
1,009
1,622
(Continued on next page)
Table 14: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hour (SCH)
Generated by Part-Time Faculty
Fall 2004
(Continued from previous page)
Department
Description
Political Science/IR
Religious Studies
Social Work
Sociology
CLASS Total
Political Science
Religious Studies
Social Work
Sociology
Education
CASAL
Curriculum and Foundations
Health And Physical Education
Nursing
Teachers Education
Civil & Environmental Engineering
FACULTY & STAFF
Dean's Office
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Engineering Technology
11
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
SCH Generated
by Part-Time
Faculty
Total SCH
Generated
% of SCH
Generated by
Part-Time
Faculty
1,555
1,338
1,078
2,382
25,847
1,440
624
1,087
1,665
21,088
2,995
1,962
2,165
4,047
46,935
48%
32%
50%
41%
45%
Education Specialist
Curriculum & Instruction
Dance
Health and Physical Education
Health Education
HPER-Core Curriculum
Physical Education-Service
Nursing RN
Early Childhood Education
Education-SIP
Middle Childhood Education
Special Education
Specialized Instructional/Teacher Education
Specialized Study & Field Experience
140
1,018
55
838
235
32
66
2,273
757
72
388
613
924
1,843
9,254
128
1231
31
19
–
28
277
332
389
628
52
182
402
27
3,726
268
2,249
86
857
235
60
343
2,605
1,146
700
440
795
1,326
1,870
12,980
48%
55%
36%
2%
0%
47%
81%
13%
34%
90%
12%
23%
30%
1%
29%
Chemical Engineering
Engineering Science
Civil Engineering
Engineering Science
Engineering Science
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Engineering Science
Electronic Engineering Technology
General Engineering Technology
Math Technology
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
255
321
271
147
305
1,082
33
116
81
60
133
188
–
–
148
98
–
326
–
–
–
–
148
12
255
321
419
245
305
1,408
33
116
81
60
281
200
0%
0%
35%
40%
0%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
53%
6%
Education Total
Engineering
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
SCH Generated
by Full-Time
Faculty
(Continued on next page)
12
Table 14: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hour (SCH)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Generated by Part-Time Faculty
Fall 2004
(Continued from previous page)
SCH Generated
by Full-Time
Faculty
SCH Generated
by Part-Time
Faculty
Total SCH
Generated
% of SCH
Generated by
Part-Time
Faculty
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Department
Description
Mechanical Engineering
Engineering Science
Mechanical Engineering
Engineering Science
102
635
297
4,026
360
96
1,188
462
731
297
5,214
78%
13%
0%
23%
Biology
Environmental Sciences
Geological Sciences
Chemistry
Pre-Health Science
Perfusion
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
3,350
197
776
2,811
303
63
6,070
1,505
3,797
524
19,396
1,340
184
388
375
536
3,279
878
2,315
848
10,143
4,690
381
1,164
3,186
839
63
9,349
2,383
6,112
1,372
29,539
29%
48%
33%
12%
64%
0%
35%
37%
38%
62%
34%
Environmental Studies
Public Safety Management
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
–
32
56
1,420
1,508
56
140
220
2,089
2,505
56
172
276
3,509
4,013
100%
81%
80%
60%
62%
ASC
Business Freshman Orientation
Curriculum & Instruction
English
Mathematics
–
–
–
–
–
–
742
116
732
1,406
2,624
5,620
742
116
732
1,406
2,624
5,620
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
70,361
47,681
118,042
40%
Engineering Total
Science
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Science Total
Urban Affairs
Urban Studies
Urban Affairs Total
University Studies
University Studies Total
Total SCH
Total SCH generated in this report may vary with other published reports.
This report includes the only SCH, generated by instructors who have a valid I.D. available in the CSU employee database system.
S
Selected Administrative
Centers, Departments
& Offices
Selected Administrative Centers, Departments & Offices
8
*DIVIDER PAGES 9/11/05 3:57 PM Page 8
Admissions Office:
Table 1: New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by College
Fall 2000 – 2004
First Year
Percent Change
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
435
314
156
49.7%
428
339
173
51.0%
476
362
186
51.4%
531
380
175
46.1%
569
369
169
45.8%
7%
-3%
-3%
31%
18%
8%
CLASS
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
825
667
334
50.1%
932
768
377
49.1%
1,018
831
400
48.1%
1,105
881
391
44.4%
997
748
236
31.6%
-10%
-15%
-40%
21%
12%
-29%
Education
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
121
90
38
42.2%
160
117
61
52.1%
261
159
76
47.8%
265
152
64
42.1%
357
203
67
33.0%
35%
34%
5%
195%
126%
76%
Engineering
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
155
123
72
58.5%
147
123
73
59.3%
143
109
48
44.0%
185
132
68
51.5%
168
106
57
53.8%
-9%
-20%
-16%
8%
-14%
-21%
Science
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
30
24
10
41.7%
28
20
15
75.0%
72
36
23
63.9%
106
51
37
72.5%
302
231
202
87.4%
185%
353%
446%
907%
863%
1920%
Urban Affairs
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
7
7
5
71.4%
13
12
6
50.0%
27
22
11
50.0%
27
20
12
60.0%
40
28
19
67.9%
48%
40%
58%
471%
300%
280%
University Studies
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
819
819
421
51.4%
661
660
371
56.2%
612
611
306
50.1%
588
588
280
47.6%
435
416
207
49.8%
-26%
-29%
-26%
-47%
-49%
-51%
2,392
2,044
1,036
50.7%
2,369
2,039
1,076
52.8%
2,609
2,130
1,050
49.3%
2,807
2,204
1,027
46.6%
2,868
2,101
957
45.5%
2%
-5%
-7%
20%
3%
-8%
Business
TOTAL
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Notes:
Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
Fall 2004 showed a significant increase in the applied, admitted & enrolled in the College Science due to the creation of new academic plans UNDCA
and UNDCS. Consequently, number of students applied, admitted and enrolled in University Studies has decreased.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
1
Admissions Office:
Table 2: New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by College
Fall 2000 – 2004
Transfer
Percent Change
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Business
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
635
489
313
64.0%
542
432
266
61.6%
613
458
317
69.2%
648
406
277
68.2%
663
375
225
60.0%
2%
-8%
-19%
4%
-23%
-28%
CLASS
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
1,100
911
571
62.7%
997
870
573
65.9%
1,179
1,017
661
65.0%
1,297
977
635
65.0%
990
606
323
53.3%
-24%
-38%
-49%
-10%
-33%
-43%
Education
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
290
222
147
66.2%
264
223
151
67.7%
311
228
141
61.8%
396
227
141
62.1%
480
225
129
57.3%
21%
-1%
-9%
66%
1%
-12%
Engineering
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
170
127
92
72.4%
112
84
63
75.0%
183
147
73
49.7%
174
113
81
71.7%
152
83
55
66.3%
-13%
-27%
-32%
-11%
-35%
-40%
Science
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
56
49
39
79.6%
81
66
61
92.4%
106
61
51
83.6%
161
81
71
87.7%
313
194
192
99.0%
94%
140%
170%
459%
296%
392%
Urban Affairs
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
57
69
38
55.1%
71
69
52
75.4%
81
73
44
60.3%
85
44
30
68.2%
86
16
10
62.5%
1%
-64%
-67%
51%
-77%
-74%
University Studies
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
74
51
34
66.7%
70
64
55
85.9%
75
70
48
68.6%
49
60
46
76.7%
22
40
20
50.0%
-55%
-33%
-57%
-70%
-22%
-41%
2,382
1,918
1,234
64.3%
2,137
1,808
1,221
67.5%
2,548
2,054
1,335
65.0%
2,810
1,908
1,281
67.1%
2,706
1,539
954
62.0%
-4%
-19%
-26%
14%
-20%
-23%
TOTAL
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Notes:
Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
Fall 2004 showed significant increases in the Colleges of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences and Science due to the creation of new academic plans UNDCA and UNDCS.
Consequently, the number of students applied, admitted and enrolled in University Studies has decreased.
2
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Admissions Office:
Table 3: New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by Race
Fall 2000 – 2004
First Year
Percent Change
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
White
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
1,370
1,253
629
50.2%
1,324
1,219
662
54.3%
1,404
1,266
640
50.6%
1,461
1,255
593
47.3%
1,445
1,205
551
45.7%
-1%
-4%
-7%
5%
-4%
-12%
African-American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
635
498
251
50.4%
658
514
259
50.4%
819
574
264
46.0%
910
638
296
46.4%
909
538
235
43.7%
0%
-16%
-21%
43%
8%
-6%
Hispanic
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
96
76
42
55.3%
86
71
39
54.9%
103
81
37
45.7%
132
106
46
43.4%
122
91
34
37.4%
-8%
-14%
-26%
27%
20%
-19%
Asian
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
74
69
39
56.5%
73
65
33
50.8%
67
63
37
58.7%
87
77
36
46.8%
87
74
26
35.1%
0%
-4%
-28%
18%
7%
-33%
Native American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
10
7
4
57.1%
12
9
3
33.3%
7
5
2
40.0%
11
4
1
25.0%
9
4
1
25.0%
-18%
0%
0%
-10%
-43%
-75%
Total Minority
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
815
650
336
51.7%
829
659
334
50.7%
996
723
340
47.0%
1,140
825
379
45.9%
1,127
707
296
41.9%
-1%
-14%
-22%
38%
9%
-12%
Race Unknown
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
131
108
60
55.6%
141
121
72
59.5%
136
102
60
58.8%
128
94
43
45.7%
201
147
94
63.9%
57%
56%
119%
53%
36%
57%
Non-Resident Alien
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
76
33
11
33.3%
75
40
8
20.0%
73
39
10
25.6%
78
30
12
40.0%
95
42
16
38.1%
22%
40%
33%
25%
27%
45%
2,392
2,044
1,036
50.7%
2,369
2,039
1,076
52.8%
2,609
2,130
1,050
49.3%
2,807
2,204
1,027
46.6%
2,868
2,101
957
45.5%
2%
-5%
-7%
20%
3%
-8%
TOTAL
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Note: Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
3
Admissions Office:
Table 4: New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by Race
Fall 2000 – 2004
Transfers
Percent Change
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
White
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
1,389
1,178
775
65.8%
1,228
1,082
741
68.5%
1,521
1,280
855
66.8%
1,671
1,223
827
67.6%
1,586
1,007
619
61.5%
-5%
-18%
-25%
-9%
14%
-15%
-20%
-7%
African-American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
531
381
231
60.6%
435
334
222
66.5%
549
376
231
61.4%
677
352
234
66.5%
708
277
176
63.5%
5%
-21%
-25%
-4%
33%
-27%
-24%
5%
Hispanic
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
57
49
29
59.2%
77
65
40
61.5%
81
66
44
66.7%
82
56
35
62.5%
75
44
28
63.6%
-9%
-21%
-20%
2%
32%
-10%
-3%
8%
Asian
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
72
66
49
74.2%
53
44
33
75.0%
50
43
34
79.1%
56
40
28
70.0%
49
32
16
50.0%
-13%
-20%
-43%
-29%
-32%
-52%
-67%
-33%
Native American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
12
10
8
80.0%
9
6
3
50.0%
6
5
0
0.0%
8
4
4
100.0%
10
6
4
66.7%
25%
50%
0%
-33%
-17%
-40%
-50%
-17%
Total Minority
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
672
506
317
62.6%
574
449
298
66.4%
686
490
309
63.1%
823
452
301
66.6%
842
359
224
62.4%
2%
-21%
-26%
-6%
25%
-29%
-29%
0%
Race Unknown
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
205
168
110
65.5%
240
214
144
67.3%
245
218
130
59.6%
204
159
110
69.2%
214
137
87
63.5%
5%
-14%
-21%
-8%
4%
-18%
-21%
-3%
Non-Resident Alien
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
116
66
32
48.5%
95
63
38
60.3%
96
66
41
62.1%
112
74
43
58.1%
64
36
24
66.7%
-43%
-51%
-44%
15%
-45%
-45%
-25%
38%
2,382
1,918
1,234
64.3%
2,137
1,808
1,221
67.5%
2,548
2,054
1,335
65.0%
2,810
1,908
1,281
67.1%
2,706
1,539
954
62.0%
-4%
-19%
-26%
14%
-20%
-23%
TOTAL
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Note: Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
4
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Admissions Office:
Table 5: New Graduate & Law Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by College
Fall 2001 – 2004
Graduate and Law
Percent Change
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
4 Year
619
387
214
55.3%
934
601
315
52.4%
975
666
316
47.4%
867
517
232
44.9%
-11%
-22%
-27%
40%
34%
8%
238
164
106
64.6%
333
231
155
67.1%
330
220
133
60.5%
399
234
142
60.7%
21%
6%
7%
68%
43%
34%
356
287
211
73.5
600
470
394
83.8
782
491
405
82.5
763
314
206
65.6
-2%
-36%
-49%
114%
9%
-2%
560
315
71
22.5%
825
487
113
23.2%
950
554
114
20.6%
643
341
90
26.4%
-32%
-38%
-21%
15%
8%
27%
250
146
76
52.1%
307
172
104
60.5%
323
179
108
60.3%
376
181
91
50.3%
16%
1%
-16%
50%
24%
20%
150
119
75
63.0%
157
121
77
63.6%
182
135
78
57.8%
167
102
58
56.9%
-8%
-24%
-26%
11%
-14%
-23%
1,181
607
271
44.6%
1,316
572
259
45.3%
1,555
581
263
45.3%
1,816
526
218
41.4%
17%
-9%
-17%
54%
-13%
-20%
3,354
2,025
1,024
50.6%
4,472
2,654
1,417
53.4%
5,097
2,826
1,417
50.1%
5,031
2,215
1,037
46.8%
-1%
-22%
-27%
50%
9%
1%
Business
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
CLASS
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Education
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Engineering
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Science
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Urban Affairs
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Law
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
TOTAL
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
5
Admissions Office:
Table 6: New Graduate & Law Applications Trends
for New Degree-Seeking Students by Race
Fall 2001 – 2004
Graduate and Law
Percent Change
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
4 Year
White
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
792
607
427
70.3%
1,162
884
684
77.4%
1,340
906
692
76.4%
1,326
663
429
64.7%
-1%
-27%
-38%
-15%
67%
9%
0%
-8%
African-American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
208
136
110
80.9%
298
194
160
82.5%
338
194
149
76.8%
344
154
118
76.6%
2%
-21%
-21%
0%
65%
13%
7%
-5%
Hispanic
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
27
19
14
73.7%
49
33
23
69.7%
48
33
27
81.8%
38
13
4
30.8%
-21%
-61%
-85%
-62%
41%
-32%
-71%
-58%
Asian
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
28
23
15
65.2%
40
28
22
78.6%
52
37
26
70.3%
58
30
17
56.7%
12%
-19%
-35%
-19%
107%
30%
13%
-13%
Native American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
4
4
1
25.0%
3
1
1
100.0%
5
4
3
75.0%
4
2
1
50.0%
-20%
-50%
-67%
-33%
0%
-50%
0%
100%
Total Minority
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
267
182
140
76.9%
390
256
206
80.5%
443
268
205
76.5%
444
199
140
70.4%
0%
-26%
-32%
-8%
66%
9%
0%
-9%
Race Unknown
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
97
76
52
68.4%
115
86
69
80.2%
140
91
68
74.7%
257
130
88
67.7%
84%
43%
29%
-9%
165%
71%
69%
-1%
Non-Resident Alien
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
1,017
553
134
24.2%
1,489
856
199
23.2%
1,619
980
189
19.3%
1,188
697
162
23.2%
-27%
-29%
-14%
21%
17%
26%
21%
-4%
2,173
1,418
753
53.1%
3,156
2,082
1,158
55.6%
3,542
2,245
1,154
51.4%
3,215
1,689
819
48.5%
-9%
-25%
-29%
48%
19%
9%
TOTAL
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Note: Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
6
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Office of Advancement:
CCSU Foundation
Alumni, faculty, staff, friends, corporations and foundations support Cleveland State
University each year with philanthropic gifts. These gifts provide additional resources that are necessary for sustaining a
high quality educational experience for the University’s diverse student body. Various appeals and initiatives are conducted
through the Annual Giving Program, including direct mailings to all alumni, student phonathon drives, specialized mailings
from various departments within the University, an annual appeal among the faculty and staff of Cleveland State University,
and collaboration with multiple special events held both on and off campus.
Table 7: CSU Foundation: 5-Year Giving History by College/Division
Endowment (Program Giving & Scholarship)
College/Division
Business
Arts & Sciences1
Education
Engineering
Urban Affairs
Law
Athletics
General University
Library
Office of the President
Total Endowment
2001
2,170,734
2,612,883
150,665
216,215
3,630,094
3,273,745
1,012,931
992,483
8,109,673
548,233
$ 15,415,923
2002
2,072,113
2,112,372
128,617
183,554
3,149,705
2,975,492
904,559
1,015,013
7,497,483
377,839
$ 13,611,750
2003
2,165,665
1,840,350
122,348
226,085
3,780,387
3,180,440
955,066
1,666,517
8,589,899
281,994
$14,895,233
2004
2,669,591
2,013,076
456,422
1,526,333
4,419,997
4,038,463
1,310,687
2,746,043
11,705,759
327,242
$20,286,943
Percent Change
2005
2,899,291
2,010,577
1,377,706
1,563,151
4,488,599
4,433,144
1,353,712
3,265,074
13,515,846
302,066
$22,485,164
Program Giving2
College/Division
Business
Arts & Sciences1
Education
Engineering
Urban Affairs
Law
Athletics
General University
Library
Office of the President
Total Program
2001
672,973
1,552,970
21,032
–
2,877,934
1,621,896
–
11,212
807,940
548,233
$8,114,190
2002
584,365
1,176,693
17,894
–
2,476,212
1,468,406
1,700
11,156
692,486
377,839
$6,806,753
2003
564,694
877,442
17,331
–
3,075,118
1,466,408
10,850
11,497
676,382
281,994
$6,981,716
1 Year
5 Year
9%
0%
202%
2%
2%
10%
3%
19%
15%
-8%
11%
34%
-23%
814%
623%
24%
35%
34%
229%
67%
-45%
46%
Percent Change
2004
652,669
664,919
329,262
1,037,562
3,541,574
2,001,485
11,682
14,789
779,089
327,242
$9,360,273
2005
653,711
644,234
650,130
1,057,119
3,553,935
2,070,501
21,682
15,940
791,845
302,066
$9,761,163
1 Year
5 Year
0%
-3%
97%
2%
0%
3%
86%
8%
2%
-8%
4%
-3%
-59%
2991%
–
23%
28%
–
42%
-2%
-45%
20%
Note: 1Arts & Sciences data for 2005 includes combined data of the College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences and the College of Science.
2
Program giving includes gifts for academic programs, support for colleges, faculty and staff development, technological upgrades and facilities and equipment.
Source: CSU Office of Advancement
(Continued on next page)
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
7
Office of Advancement:
(Continued from previous page)
Table 7: CSU Foundation:
5-Year Giving History by College/Division
Scholarship
College/Division
Business
Arts & Sciences1
Education
Engineering
Urban Affairs
Law
Athletics
General University
Total Scholarships
2001
2002
1,497,761
1,059,913
129,633
216,215
752,160
1,651,849
1,012,931
981,271
$ 7,301,733
1,487,748
935,679
110,723
183,554
673,493
1,507,086
902,859
1,003,857
$6,804,997
2003
Percent Change
2004
1,600,971
962,908
105,017
226,085
705,269
1,714,032
944,216
1,655,020
$ 7,913,517
2,016,922
1,348,157
127,160
488,770
878,423
2,036,978
1,299,004
2,731,254
$10,926,670
2005
2,245,580
1,366,343
727,576
506,032
934,664
2,362,642
1,332,031
3,249,133
$ 12,724,001
1 Year
5 Year
11%
1%
472%
4%
6%
16%
3%
19%
16%
50%
29%
461%
134%
24%
43%
32%
231%
74%
Note: 1Arts & Sciences data for 2005 includes combined data of the College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences and the College of Science.
2
Program giving includes gifts for academic programs, support for colleges, faculty and staff development, technological upgrades and facilities and equipment.
Table 8: CSU Foundation: Endowed Scholarship, Donors & Giving
Endowed:
Percent
Increase
Average
Increase
FY2001
FY2005
1 Year
Per Year
2
99
4
157
–
59%
–
12%
Donors:
Alumni
Total
3,956
6,233
4,635
6,966
17%
12%
3%
2%
Giving:
Alumni
Total
$782,189
$4,753,339
$998,107
$7,077,741
28%
49%
6%
10%
Chairs
Scholarships
Philanthropic Highlights: 2004 – 2005
■ Iris S. Wolstein, in loving memory of her husband, Bert L. Wolstein, a distinguished 1953 graduate of Cleveland State’s
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, created the Bert L. Wolstein Building Fund and the Bert L. and Iris S. Wolstein
Endowed Scholarship Fund at the Cleveland State University Foundation with a commitment of $6.25 million.
The Wolstein Building Fund and Wolstein Scholarship Fund are being created with a $5 million gift to support the Law
Building upgrade project and a $1.25 million challenge-pledge to support the creation of an endowed scholarship fund,
the Bert L. and Iris S. Wolstein Endowed Scholarship Fund.
■ Parker Hannifin Corporation has made a $4 million philanthropic gift commitment to the University in support of student
scholarships and building improvements. The gift is the largest corporate endowment the University has ever received,
as well as the largest gift ever made by the Parker Hannifin Foundation. Parker Hannifin has directed $3 million to
the creation of an endowment fund for undergraduate and graduate scholarships in Cleveland State’s Fenn College of
Engineering. In addition, $1 million will be directed to the creation of an endowment fund for building improvements
for the Cleveland State University Administration Center and the structure formerly known as Howe Mansion.
8
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Athletics Department:
Table 9: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University
Enrollment
Men’s
Baseball
Basketball
Fencing
Golf
Soccer
Swimming & Diving
Tennis
Wrestling
Total Male
Cumulative GPA, Males
2000 – 2001
Enrollment
%
2001 – 2002
Enrollment
%
2002 – 2003
Enrollment
%
2003 – 2004
Enrollment
%
2004 – 2005
Enrollment
%
33
12
11
10
14
17
7
23
127
2.76
26%
9%
9%
8%
11%
13%
6%
18%
100%
27
13
9
7
12
15
9
21
113
2.82
24%
12%
8%
6%
11%
13%
8%
19%
100%
43
17
12
12
21
25
8
33
171
N/A
25%
10%
7%
7%
12%
15%
5%
19%
100%
38
15
9
12
22
21
8
32
157
N/A
24%
10%
6%
8%
14%
13%
5%
20%
100%
39
18
12
10
22
27
9
24
161
2.80
24%
11%
7%
6%
14%
17%
6%
15%
100%
14
0
10
3
0
15
16
6
11
75
3.07
202
2.87
19%
0%
13%
4%
0%
20%
21%
8%
15%
100%
14
12
4
4
0
17
13
7
10
81
3.04
194
2.90
17%
15%
5%
5%
0%
21%
16%
9%
12%
100%
14
11
8
8
0
21
18
9
13
102
N/A
273
N/A
14%
11%
8%
8%
0%
21%
18%
9%
13%
100%
16
10
12
6
11
16
16
5
14
106
N/A
263
2.97
15%
9%
11%
6%
10%
15%
15%
5%
13%
100%
16
6
10
8
20
14
13
7
13
107
3.20
268
2.98
15%
6%
9%
7%
19%
13%
12%
7%
12%
100%
Women’s
Basketball
Cross Country
Fencing
Golf
Soccer
Softball
Swimming & Diving
Tennis
Volleyball
Total Female
Cumulative GPA, Females
Total All Athletes
Cumulative GPA, All Athletes
Note: Enrollment reflects students who received athletic financial aid. GPA reflects fall term.
Source: CSU Athletics Department
N/A: data not available
Table 10: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University
4, 5, or 6 Year Graduation Rate
Fall
New Undergraduate First-Time,
Full-Time Degree-Seeking,
First Year Athletes
Total Athletes
Athletes Graduated in 4 years
Athletes Graduated in 5 years
Athletes Graduated in 6 years
Total Graduated within 6 years
1994
Enrollment
54
8
15
5
28
%
15%
28%
9%
52%
1995
Enrollment
35
3
16
1
20
%
9%
46%
3%
57%
1996
Enrollment
34
5
4
3
12
%
15%
12%
9%
35%
1997
Enrollment
45
7
10
1
18
%
16%
22%
2%
40%
1998
Enrollment
42
4
9
4
17
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
%
10%
21%
10%
40%
9
Finance:
Table 11: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Changes
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2004
2002
Amount
2003
%
Amount
2004
%
Amount
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
Operating Revenues
Student Tuition and Fees, Net
Federal Grants & Contracts
State Grants & Contracts
Local Grants & Contracts
Private Gifts, Grants & Contracts
Sales & Services
Auxiliary Enterprises
Other Sources
Total Operating Revenues
75,005,194 70%
8,715,781
8%
5,795,513
5%
666,628
1%
3,743,207
4%
3,051,843
3%
9,373,135
9%
562,050
1%
$106,913,351 100%
87,476,820
9,573,688
4,950,773
412,511
3,271,610
3,524,384
9,737,716
440,062
119,387,564
73%
8%
4%
7%
3%
3%
8%
0%
100%
94,218,733 70%
16,855,658 13%
4,917,905
4%
454,970
0%
3,650,183
3%
3,740,626
3%
10,086,036
8%
440,350
0%
134,364,461 100%
8%
76%
-1%
10%
12%
6%
4%
0%
13%
26%
93%
-15%
-32%
-2%
23%
8%
-22%
26%
72,191,351 36%
13,677,414
7%
7,780,852
4%
17,544,043
9%
14,604,875
7%
22,225,254 11%
14,327,574
7%
10,046,991
5%
11,965,027
6%
15,668,985
8%
$200,032,366 100%
77,629,017
13,493,627
7,842,716
15,459,491
16,051,512
22,115,999
16,886,095
11,003,580
13,081,920
15,166,745
208,730,702
37%
6%
4%
7%
8%
11%
8%
5%
6%
7%
100%
80,475,402 36%
15,036,515
7%
11,982,936
5%
20,344,432
9%
18,006,608
8%
23,513,279 10%
16,017,335
7%
10,580,518
5%
14,939,356
7%
15,045,070
7%
225,941,451 100%
4%
11%
53%
32%
12%
6%
-5%
-4%
14%
-1%
8%
11%
10%
54%
16%
23%
6%
12%
5%
25%
-4%
13%
74,131,715 75%
10,283,740 10%
3,376,991
3%
3,389,263
3%
2,839,644
3%
[581,163]
-1%
6,007,809
6%
20,500
0%
0
0%
$99,468,499 100%
72,246,181
10,622,713
3,429,428
4,281,426
1,893,283
[685,952]
6,185,883
526,463
2,217,110
100,716,535
72%
11%
3%
4%
2%
-1%
6%
1%
2%
100%
71,982,028 75%
10,837,343 11%
3,557,298
4%
3,942,821
4%
1,342,775
1%
[445,808]
0%
4,459,787
5%
133,659
0%
0
0%
95,809,903 100%
0%
2%
4%
-8%
-29%
-35%
-28%
-75%
-100%
-5%
-3%
5%
5%
16%
-53%
-23%
-26%
552%
0%
-4%
6,349,484
2%
279,910,245 98%
$286,259,729 100%
11,373,397
286,259,729
297,633,126
4%
96%
100%
4,232,913
1%
297,633,126 99%
301,866,039 100%
-63%
4%
1%
-33%
6%
5%
Operating Expenses
Instruction
Research
Public Service
Academic Support
Student Services
Institutional Support
Operation & Maintenance of Plant
Scholarships and Fellowships
Auxiliary Enterprises
Depreciation and Amortization
Total Operating Expenses
Non-Operating Items
State Appropriations
Federal Grants and Contracts
State Grants and Contracts
Gifts
Investment Income
Interest on Debt
State Capital Appropriations
Capital Gifts
Workers Compensation Adjustment
Total Non-Operating Items
Net Assets
Increase in Net Assets
Net Assets at Beginning of Year
Net Assets at End of Year
Source: Controllers Office
10
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Finance:
Figure 11.1: Statement of Operating Revenues
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2004
100,000,000
90,000,000
80,000,000
70,000,000
60,000,000
50,000,000
40,000,000
30,000,000
20,000,000
10,000,000
0
2002
2003
Tuition & Fees
State Subsidy
2004
Other
Figure 11.2: Statement of Operating Expenses
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2004
120,000,000
100,000,000
80,000,000
60,000,000
40,000,000
20,000,000
0
2002
2003
Instruction & Dept. Research
Academic Support
Non-Instructional Expenditure
Institutional Support
Student Services
2004
Operation & Maintenance of Plant
Other
Source: Controllers Office
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
11
Finance:
Table 12: Public Service Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Institution
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Youngstown State University
University of Akron
Ohio State University
Ohio University
Kent State University
Bowling Green State University
University of Toledo
Miami University
Totals
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
7%
3%
4%
4%
5%
3%
4%
4%
2%
1%
4%
7%
4%
4%
4%
5%
3%
4%
4%
2%
1%
4%
6%
4%
4%
4%
5%
3%
4%
3%
2%
1%
4%
6%
4%
5%
4%
5%
3%
4%
3%
2%
1%
4%
6%
5%
5%
5%
4%
4%
3%
3%
1%
0%
4%
Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for public service for the fiscal year divided by the total expenditures.
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Current Fund Expenditures (CF) queries rundate: June 14, 2005.
■ In proportion to total spending, Cleveland State University’s Public Service expenditures have consistently remained among the
highest in the state of Ohio.
Table 13: Benefit Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Institution
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Ohio State University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Cleveland State University
Ohio University
University of Cincinnati
University of Akron
Miami University
Bowling Green State University
Kent State University
Totals
9%
20%
17%
25%
15%
17%
12%
14%
10%
15%
13%
9%
17%
17%
14%
16%
15%
13%
14%
11%
15%
13%
13%
19%
18%
14%
12%
16%
12%
14%
12%
12%
14%
15%
20%
18%
17%
15%
16%
15%
15%
12%
12%
15%
25%
22%
20%
17%
17%
16%
15%
15%
13%
13%
19%
Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for benefits for the fiscal year divided by the total expenditures (salary and other) for instructional units as defined by the Ohio Board of Regents.
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Funding Unit Expenditures (FX) queries – run date: June 14, 2005.
12
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Finance:
Table 14: Scholarship and Fellowship Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Institution
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
12%
8%
12%
8%
14%
9%
15%
9%
16%
9%
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
8%
7%
4%
7%
7%
9%
9%
15%
9%
7%
5%
7%
7%
9%
10%
15%
10%
8%
5%
10%
8%
10%
11%
16%
11%
9%
5%
9%
9%
10%
11%
17%
12%
9%
5%
9%
9%
11%
11%
16%
Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for scholarships and fellowships divided by total expenditures.
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Current Fund Expenditures (CF) queries – rundate: June 14, 2005.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
13
Financial Aid Office:
CCleveland State University’s Financial Aid Programs
Cleveland State University’s financial aid programs are of help to students who might otherwise be unable to
attend the University. Over two-thirds of CSU students receive some form of financial assistance. The University participates
in all of the major federal and state grant and loan programs. In addition, CSU provides university grants and scholarships
to many of our students. Our goal is to reduce the difference between educational costs related to attendance and the
amount that parents and students can reasonably be expected to contribute towards the student’s education.
Table 15: Financial Aid Awards to Undergraduate Students by Full-Time/Part-Time Status
Average Aid Package and Academic Year
Percent Change
2000 – 01
2001 – 02
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
Full-time Students with Financial Aid:
Headcount
Average Aid Package
4,233
$6,029
2,957
$5,526
4,256
$6,557
4,660
$6,893
Part-time Students with Financial Aid:
Headcount
Average Aid Package
1,639
$5,934
2,294
$6,006
872
$5,487
925
$5,942
Source: Common Data Set, H2 – row D and row J
14
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
1 Year
5 Year
4,779
$7,070
3%
3%
13%
17%
768
$6,351
-17%
7%
-53%
7%
Financial Aid Office:
Table 16: Financial Aid Awards Fall Cohort, Full-Time, First-Time,
Degree-Seeking Undergraduate Students
Percent Change
2000 – 2001
2001 – 2002
2002 – 2003
2003 – 2004
2004 – 2005
1 Year
5 Year
Federal Grants:
Headcount
Average Aid Package
342
$2,455
407
$3,058
443
$3,131
450
$3,029
428
$3,187
-5%
5%
25%
30%
State Grants:
Headcount
Average Aid Package
465
$1,107
573
$1,167
354
$1,449
352
$1,276
359
$1,700
2%
33%
-23%
54%
Scholarships/Institutional Grants:
Headcount
Average Aid Package
320
$2,687
339
$2,960
281
$2,583
329
$3,064
337
$4,209
2%
37%
5%
57%
Federal Student Loans:
Headcount
Average Aid Package
325
$3,108
375
$3,473
434
$4,176
523
$4,109
582
$3,759
11%
-9%
79%
21%
Total Cohort
N=934
N=1,008
N=946
N=925
N=922
Source: IPEDS Financial Aid Survey (http://www.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/pdf/webbase2003/sfa_public_form.pdf)
Table 17: Financial Aid Awards to Fall Term Undergraduate Students
Percent Change
Types of Financial Aid
Federal Grants
State Grants
Institutional Grants /
Scholarships
Athletic Grants
Non-Institutional Assistance
Federal Student Loans and
Federal Work Study (FWS)
Total
2000 – 01
2001 – 02
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
1 Year
5 Year
$ 6,713,194
$ 2,551,510
$ 8,016,614
$ 3,045,818
$ 9,975,480
$ 3,253,147
$ 10,796,340
$ 3,466,864
$ 10,510,202
$ 3,669,003
-3%
6%
57%
44%
$ 952,432
$ 948,315
$ 1,310,356
$ 1,809,095
$ 1,155,681
$ 1,350,179
$ 1,816,869
$ 1,437,017
$ 1,370,441
$ 1,922,391
$ 1,604,388
$ 1,105,335
$ 2,645,487
$ 1,778,844
$ 1,576,205
38%
11%
43%
178%
88%
20%
$ 19,717,703
$32,193,510
$ 27,408,603
$42,785,990
$ 29,622,729
$47,475,683
$ 35,005,307
$53,900,625
$ 36,724,673
$56,904,414
5%
6%
86%
77%
Source: Common data Set, H1
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
15
Financial Aid Office:
Table 18: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards
by Full-Time/Part-Time Status and Average Aid Package
Percent Change
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Full-time Students with Financial Aid:
Headcount
Average Aid Package
353
$10,032
386
$11,390
429
$12,872
464
$13,352
422
$14,287
-9%
7%
20%
42%
Part-time Students with Financial Aid:
Headcount
Average Aid Package
891
$ 7,383
919
$ 9,499
1,241
$10,246
1,509
$10,918
1,530
$11,500
1%
5%
72%
56%
Source: CSU Financial Aid Office
Table 19: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid
Fall 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
Types of Financial Aid
2000
14,150
2001
$
7,000
2002
$
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
State Fellowship
$
5,250
$7,000
$5,250
-25%
-63%
Scholarships/Institutional Grants
$3,175,358
$3,942,474
$ 4,403,008
$ 4,646,633
$ 4,167,408
-10%
31%
Non-Institutional Assistance
$ 407,814
$ 431,916
$
$
$
598,666
-31%
47%
Federal Student Loans and
Federal Work Study (FWS)
$6,110,892
$8,766,965
$13,150,877
$18,842,082
10%
208%
707,433
862,866
$17,187,052
Table 20: Law Student Financial Aid Awards
Full-Time/Part-Time Status and Average Aid Package
Percent Change
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
1 Year
5 Year
Full-time Students with Financial Aid:
Headcount
Average Aid Package
435
$14,495
449
$15,632
504
$17,104
513
$17,779
473
$19,763
-8%
11%
9%
36%
Part-time Students with Financial Aid:
Headcount
Average Aid Package
218
$11,704
219
$13,246
201
$14,146
191
$15,023
180
$15,548
-6%
3%
-17%
33%
Source: CSU Financial Aid Office
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
Table 21: Law Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid
Fall 2000 – 2004
Percent Change
Types of Financial Aid
2000
State Fellowship
$
Scholarships/Institutional Grants
Non-Institutional Assistance
Federal Student Loans and
Federal Work Study (FWS)
5,250
2001
$
2002
16
10,500
50%
100%
$ 844,262
$
914,408
$
868,253
$ 1,088,141
25%
32%
$ 115,951
$ 194,302
$
351,311
$
302,052
$
295,451
-2%
155%
$7,908,791
$8,877,575
$10,194,602
$10,746,545
-1%
36%
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
$10,812,678
$
5 Year
$ 826,705
|
7,000
1 Year
$
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
$
2004
3,500
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
3,500
2003
Financial Aid Office:
Table 22: Undergraduate Cost of Attendance (COA)
Academic Year
Tuition/Fees
Books and Supplies
Room/Board
Personal/Miscellaneous
Transportation
Loan Fees
Total
2000 – 01
2001 – 02
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
$ 4,110
$ 700
$ 5,200
$ 850
$ 1,260
$ 360
$12,480
$ 4,464
$ 800
$ 5,550
$ 1,824
$ 852
$ 360
$13,850
$ 5,184
$ 800
$ 5,880
$ 2,376
$ 1,400
$ 360
$16,000
$ 6,040
$ 800
$ 6,236
$ 2,376
$ 1,400
$ 360
$17,212
$ 6,820
$ 800
$ 6,392
$ 2,376
$ 1,400
$ 360
$18,148
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
Table 23: Annualized Full-Time Undergraduate In-State Tuition and Fees
for Selected Main Campuses of Ohio 4-Year Institutions
2004 – 2005
Undergraduate
University Main Campuses
University(A)
Bowling Green State
Bowling Green State University (B)
Cleveland State University(A)
Cleveland State University(B)
University of Akron(A)
University of Akron(B)
Kent State University
Ohio University(A)
Ohio University(B)
Miami University(1)
Ohio State University(A)
Ohio State University(B)
Ohio State University(C)
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
In-State Fees
Out-Of-State
$7,784
$8,072
$6,474
$6,822
$15,092
$15,380
$17,910
$18,942
$7,147
$7,510
$7,504
$7,404
$7,770
$19,642
$6,828
$7,446
$7,542
$8,379
$7,054
$5,884
$15,378
$15,741
$14,516
$15,396
$16,734
$19,662
$17,415
$18,033
$18,129
$21,351
$15,865
$11,092
(A) Denotes fees charged to continuing students who enrolled before the 2002 summer term
(B) Denotes fees charged to continuing students who enrolled After the 2002 summer term
(C) Denotes fees charged to new students entering autumn term 2003, if different than fees charged to
continuing students
(1) Miami's in-state students receive an Ohio Resident Scholarship and an Ohio Leader Scholarship. These scholarships reduce Miami's resident undergraduate tuition to an average
of $9,042 per year Numbers from OBOR
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
17
Financial Aid Office:
Table 24: Award of Financial Aid at Ohio’s Public and Private
Title IV Postsecondary Institutions
Percent of First-Time, Full-Time, Degree-Seeking First Year Student Receiving Aid
Average Award Amounts, Academic Year 2003 – 2004
Federal Grants
Institution
State Grants
Institution Grants
Federal Loans
% Avg. Grant $
% Avg. Grant $
% Avg. Grant $
Any Aid %
%
Avg. Grant $
79
26
2,940
20
1,560
40
3,811
53
4,166
Bowling Green State University
84
23
2,770
19
2,546
35
5,238
68
5,005
Cleveland State University
80
49
3,029
38
1,276
36
3,064
57
4,109
Kent State University
82
27
2,907
22
1,813
39
3,935
62
4,236
Miami University
64
8
3,288
7
1,612
30
4,108
47
5,404
Ohio State University
87
20
2,844
16
1,780
77
3,907
44
4,047
Ohio University
69
16
2,802
12
1,515
32
3,955
48
4,018
University of Akron
87
39
3,014
31
1,292
23
3,269
61
3,825
University of Cincinnati
87
27
3,302
20
1,358
34
4,189
61
3,241
University of Toledo
74
24
3,018
19
1,315
36
2,931
53
4,622
Youngstown State University
87
44
3,003
44
1,416
31
2,874
55
3,938
University Main Campuses
Source: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data system (IPEDS) as reported by Ohio Board of Regents
Table 25: Scholarship & Fellowship Expenditures as a
Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
Institution
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Youngstown State University
Bowling Green State University
Kent State University
University of Toledo
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Ohio University
University of Akron
Miami University
Ohio State University
Totals
15%
12%
8%
9%
9%
8%
7%
7%
7%
4%
7%
15%
12%
9%
10%
9%
8%
7%
7%
7%
5%
7%
16%
14%
10%
11%
10%
9%
10%
8%
8%
5%
8%
17%
15%
11%
11%
10%
9%
9%
9%
9%
5%
8%
16%
16%
12%
11%
11%
9%
9%
9%
9%
5%
9%
Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for scholarships and fellowships divided by total expenditures.
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Current Fund Expenditures (CF) queries – run date: June 14, 2005
18
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Financial Aid Office:
The undergraduate financial aid
NNotes
reported reflects awards to undergraduate students enrolled
in the fall semester of the academic year. The university awards financial aid on a continuous basis
throughout the academic year. However, this data reflects a specific point and time as defined by IPEDS
(http://www.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/pdf/webbase2003/sfa_public_form.pdf) and the Common Data Set
(www.commondataset.org), generally accepted as the 15th day of fall semester.
Full-time undergraduate, graduate and law students are those enrolled for 12 or more credit hours. Part-time
undergraduate students are enrolled for 11 or fewer credit hours. Part-time graduate and law student enrollment
ranges from 6 to 11 credit hours.
The “Cost of Attendance” tables reflect the estimated average cost of attendance for a full-time, in-state student
attending CSU for two (2) semesters during the academic year, and includes estimated tuition and fee charges,
books, allowances for room and board, transportation and loan fees.
Types of Financial Aid
Federal Grants: Pell Grant, Supplemental Opportunity Educational Grant (SEOG).
State Grants for Undergraduates: Ohio Instructional Grant, Part-Time Instructional Grant, Other State tuition
grant programs.
State Aid for Graduate/Law Students: Graduate and Professional Fellowship
Scholarship/Institutional Grants for Undergraduates: Refer to http://www.csuohio.edu/fao/scholarships.htm
for listing.
Scholarship/Institutional Grants for Graduate/Law Students: Includes Graduate Assistantships, Tuition Waiver
and Scholarships.
Non-Institutional Aid: Assistance awarded from external agencies.
Federal Student Loans: Stafford subsidized /unsubsidized and Federal Perkins loans.
FWS: A federally-funded student employment program established to assist students through part-time,
on-campus positions or off-campus community service positions.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
19
Center for International Services & Programs:
IInternational Services
“The Center for International Services & Programs
(CISP) seeks to build a globally oriented,
metropolitan university where students, faculty and staff gain international knowledge and experience. Established in 1996
as a separate department, CISP provides international students and visitors with a wide array of support services to help
them achieve a positive learning experience while in the U.S. CISP is designed to help international students and visitors
transition into the campus both academically and personally. Support services range from admissions advising, immigration
advising, individualized counseling, study abroad programs, faculty exchanges, Fulbright Scholar advising, and various
international academic initiatives. A full description of services can be found at: http://www.csuohio.edu/internat/
The university international enrollment remains steady over the past 5 years despite the tightened visa approval process
after September 11th, and the SARS epidemic in 2004. CSU currently has approximately 800 international students from
over 80 different countries.”
Table 26: Enrollment by Country or Region
Fall 2004
Number of
Students
Country
India . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
Taiwan, Republic of China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Republic of Korea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Turkey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Lebanon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Indonesia, Kenya . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Romania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Thailand, Nigeria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Pakistan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Russian Federation, Senegal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Bulgaria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
United Republic of Tanzania, Sweden, Zambia . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
United Kingdom, Philippines, Botswana, Albania, . . . . . . . . . . 4
Colombia, Ireland, Jamaica, France
Japan, Jordan, Egypt, Mexico, Peru, Ukraine, Syrian . . . . . . . 3
Arab Republic, Sri Lanka, Venezuela, Viet Nam
Countries not known . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
20
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Country
Number of
Students
Yugoslavia, Nepal, New Zealand, Malawi, Malaysia, . . . . . . . . 2
Poland, Qatar, Norway, Australia, Brazil, Belarus,
Israel, Italy, Georgia, Germany
Ghana, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Islamic . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Republic of Iran, Chile, Democratic People’s Republic
of Korea, Kazakhstan, Bahamas, Bangladesh,
Ethiopia, Finland, Fmr Yugoslav Rep of Macedonia,
The Democratic Republic of Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia,
Czech Republic, Palastine, Panama, Kuwait, Morocco,
Singapore, United Arab Emirates, Trinidad and
Tobago, Uzbekistan, Yemen
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .872
Center for International Services & Programs:
Table 27: CSU Fulbright Scholar Awards 1973 – 2006
Year
Scholar
1973 – 1974 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1978 – 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1983 – 1984 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1985 – 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1986 – 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1987 – 1988 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1988 – 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1990 – 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1992 – 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1993 – 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1994 – 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1995 – 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1997 – 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1998 – 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1999 – 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2000 – 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2001 – 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2002 – 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2003 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2004 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2005 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Countries/Regions Visited
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ivory Coast
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands, Belgium
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Philippines, France, England
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China, India
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brazil, Greece
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Greece
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hungary, Korea, Botswana, Yugoslavia, India
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Portugal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hungary, Czechoslovakia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . India, Ethiopia, China
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . El Salvador, Ethiopia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kenya, Nigeria, Japan, Lithuania
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kenya, Nigeria, Russia, Germany, Norway
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kyrgyzstan, India, Germany
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sri Lanka, Germany, Brazil
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Israel
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Botswana, Zambia, Uganda, India, Nepal, Russia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Croatia, Guatemala, South Africa
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bulgaria, United Arab Emirates
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Morocco, South Africa, Zambia, Latvia, Taiwan
Table 28: Cleveland State University International Academic Initiatives
College
Academic Initiatives
Activities
College of
Business
Expand International
Business Education and
Outreach Services in
Northeast Ohio
Title VI Grant: $200,857 to create the Great Lakes Regional Consortium and expand
existing partnerships; add a “Global Trade Scholar” program; Provide market research,
international trade and investment assistance; improve credit transfer between
community colleges and CSU for international business degree programs
College of
Liberal Arts and
Social Sciences
Middle Eastern
Studies Program
Title VI Grant: $139,754 to establish a minor and courses in Middle Eastern Studies;
Teach Arabic language and culture; Promote international understanding and
diplomacy; Support security and military requirements.
International
Relations Major (BA)
This major is designed to give students the opportunity to engage in a multi-disciplinary
study of the variety of subjects related to international affairs. International relations
majors will concentrate in an in-depth study of one of the following areas: International
Business and Economics, Asia Studies, Central and Post-Soviet States, Africa and the
Middle East, or Latin America and the Caribbean.
Modern Languages
Arabic courses, Chinese courses, English Translations of Foreign Literature (ENF)
courses, French (B.A.), German (B.A. – suspended) minor, Greek courses, Italian
courses, Japanese courses, Latin courses, Modern Language (culture; or languages such
as Portuguese, Russian, or Quechua) courses, Spanish (B.A.)
Faculty Led Short
Programs
Language and Culture in Mexico
Contemporary Social Issues in India
Language and Culture in Spain
A Changing Political Landscape in China
International Marketing and Business Research in England
Business & CLASS
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
21
Center for International Services & Programs:
Table 29: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year
(Summer, Fall & Spring) and Program Type
Percent Change
Program Type
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
Faculty Led
Exchange
Internship
Independent
Law Institute
TOTAL
75
4
5
12
11
107
64
2
0
10
17
93
60
4
4
35
12
115
1 Year
3 Year
-6%
100%
-20%
0%
-20%
192%
9%
7%
250%
-29%
24%
Table 30: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year
(Summer, Fall & Spring) and College
Percent Change
Program Type
Business
CLASS
COS
Education
Engineering
Urban
Law
TOTAL
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
13
46
2
31
1
3
11
107
16
43
0
10
0
6
18
93
33
58
1
6
2
3
12
115
1 Year
3 Year
106%
35%
154%
26%
-50%
-81%
100%
0%
9%
7%
-40%
-50%
-33%
24%
Table 31: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year
(Summer, Fall & Spring) and Course Level
Percent Change
Program Type
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
TOTAL
64
32
11
107
46
30
17
93
84
19
12
115
22
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
1 Year
3 Year
83%
-37%
-29%
24%
31%
-41%
9%
7%
Center for International Services & Programs:
Table 32: Key International Links
Country
Institution
Year Introduced
Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Berufsakadamie Heidenheim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1980
(www.ba-heidenheim.de)
Russia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .St. Petersburg State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1983
(www.spbu.ru/e/)
Botswana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .University of Botswana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1985
http://www.ub.bw/"
Taiwan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Chung Yuan Christian University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1986
(www.cycu.edu.tw)
France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Clermont-Ferrand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994
(www.univ-bpclermont.fr)
Korea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Chung Ang University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1997
(www.cau.ac.kr)
India . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Loyola University Kerala State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1998
United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sunderland University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1998
(www.sunderland.ac.uk)
Zambia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Copperbelt University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1998
Croatia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .University of Rijeka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2000
Eastern Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .International Research and Exchange Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2000
(http://www.irex.org)
Kyrgyzstan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .University of Peoples Friendship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2001
Jalalabat Commercial Institute
Osh State University
Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Center for Bilingual Multicultural Studies: Cuernavaca . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2001
Chile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Universidad de Concepcion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2002
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jiangxi Shifan University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2002
France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Groupe ESSCA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003
Guatemala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Universidad de Rafael Landivar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003
Source: CISP Center for International Services and Programs.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
23
Office of Space Management:
Table 33: Cleveland State University
Fall 2004 Building Inventory
Building Code
AM
AA
AB
AX
BB
BS
BU
CB
CE
CC
CL
DE
EST
FC
FT
FL
FS
HS
IS
KB
KI
LB
LL
MC
MM
UA
MU
PE
PA
PS
PF
PR
RT
SI
SR
SH
TA
UC
UR
VH
WST
WG
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
24
Building
Advanced Manufacturing Center
Advance Manufacturing Annex
Art Building
Advance Manufacturing Extension – CAMP [5]
Bakers Building [2] [5]
Bookstore
Business College
Chester Building
Cole Center for Continuing Education
Convocation Center
Corlett [4] [5]
Doan Electric [6]
East Campus Extension [3]
Faculty Club Building [2]
Fenn Tower
Field Locker Building
Field Service Building
Health Sciences
Intramural Sports Center [4]
Keith Building [3]
Kinko Building
Law Building [2]
Law Library
Main Classroom Building
Mather Mansion
University Annex [4]
Music & Communication Building
Physical Education
Plant Annex Building
Plant Services
University Parking Facilities
Presidents Residence
James A. Rhodes Tower & West
Science Building
Science and Research Center
Stilwell Hall
Theater Arts Building
University Center
Urban College
Viking Hall
West Center Campus Extension [3]
University West Garage
Grand Total
Year
Acquired
1984
1993
1973
1928
1946
1966
1998
1970
1990
1989
1920
1912
2004
1984
1964
1985
1985
1998
1970
2003
1997
1977
1997
1970
1967
1966
1988
1973
1985
1970
1979
1995
1971
1969
1978
1964
1967
1974
2000
1986
2003
1996
Non assignable square footage includes recorded circulation, mechanical, and structural spaces
Currently being renovated.
Leased spaces
Plan for demolition
Non-Institutional Use
Currently being renovated
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
Assignable
16,909
9,400
29,554
80,070
19,834
16,349
72,680
67,930
34,167
213,548
30,563
55,100
9,717
17,293
94,330
1,554
684
13,626
23,829
23,080
14,414
74,061
80,128
163,776
21,641
21,640
76,447
123,867
5,384
107,101
192,939
3,470
311,915
107,722
80,868
127,373
16,330
111,232
52,901
120,695
9,378
197,015
2,850,514
[1] NonAssignable
6,096
400
11,609
2,400
5,003
1,386
53,565
41,798
22,486
75,452
22,487
6,259
2,978
3,787
94,416
640
621
10,028
8,094
4,734
1,498
39,677
31,742
162,566
22,297
7,629
75,086
77,993
3,195
27,489
76,655
1,663
182,053
63,520
61,611
68,406
6,086
88,252
34,891
51,396
2,690
2,584
1,463,218
Total Gross
Square Feet
23,005
9,800
41,163
82,470
24,837
17,735
126,245
109,728
56,653
289,000
53,050
61,359
12,695
21,080
188,746
2,194
1,305
23,654
31,923
27,814
15,912
113,738
111,870
326,342
43,938
29,269
151,533
201,860
8,579
134,590
269,594
5,133
493,968
171,242
142,479
195,779
22,416
199,484
87,792
172,091
12,068
199,599
4,313,732
9_BACK OF BOOK
9/13/05
1:03 AM
Page i
A
Accreditation
Cleveland State University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, a commission of the North Central
Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA).
College
Degree Program
Accreditation
Business
Bachelor of Business Administration
Master of Business Administration
AACSB International,
The Association to Advance Collegiate
Schools of Business
AACSB International,
The Association to Advance Collegiate
Schools of Business
Accrediting Commission of
Education for Health Services
Administration (ACEHSA)
Accounting
Health Care Administration
Science
Chemistry (undergraduate)
Clinical Chemistry (graduate)
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Academic and clinical programs in
Speech-Language Pathology
Academic Program
Clinical Program
College of Education and
Human Services
Education and
Human
Services
Ohio Department of Education and The
National Council for the Accreditation of
Teacher Education (NCATE)
Community Agency Counseling and
School Counseling
Psychology Specialist (School Psychology)
Nursing (undergraduate)
Nursing (graduate)
Engineering
American Chemical Society
Commission on Accreditation in
Clinical Chemistry (ComACC)
Accreditation Council for
Occupational Therapy Education
Commission on Accreditation in
Physical Therapy Education
American Speech-Language and
Hearing Association (ASHA)
ASHA Council on
Academic Accreditation (CAA)
Professional Services Board (PSB)
Chemical, Civil, Electrical, Industrial, and
Mechanical Engineering (undergraduate)
Electronic Engineering Technology
Council for Accreditation of
Counseling and Related Educational
Programs (CACREP)
National Association of School
Psychologists (NASP) and NCATE
National League for Nursing
Accreditation Commission (NLN-AC)
and Ohio Board of Nursing
Commission on Collegiate Nursing
Education (CCNE)
Engineering Accreditation Commission
of the Accreditation Board for Engineering
and Technology (EAC/ABET)
Technology Accreditation Commission
of the Accreditation Board for Engineering
and Technology (TAC/ABET)
College
Degree Program
Accreditation
Law
Law
American Bar Association and member
of the Association of American Law Schools
Liberal Arts and
Social Sciences
Music
National Association of Schools of Music
Urban
Social Work
Council of Social Work Education (CSWE)
Master of Public Administration
National Association of Schools of Public
Affairs and Administration (NASPAA)
Planning Accreditation Board
Master of Urban Planning, Design,
and Development
i
9_BACK OF BOOK
9/13/05
L
1:03 AM
Page ii
List of College Acronyms and Abbreviations
Nance College of Business Administration: College of Business, Business
College of Education and Human Services: COEHS, College of Education, Education
Fenn College of Engineering: College of Engineering, Engineering
College of Graduate Studies: Graduate Studies
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law: Law
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences: CLASS
College of Science: COS, Science
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs: College of Urban Affairs, Urban Affairs
O
Other Acronyms and Abbreviations
CIP: Classification of Instructional Program
EEO6: Equal Employment Opportunity
FTE: Full-Time Equivalent (Student Credit Hour/15)
GPA: Grade Point Average
IPEDS: Integrated Post Secondary Education Data System
N/A: Not applicable or Not available
OBOR: Ohio Board of Regents
SCH: Student Credit Hour
ii
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2005 BOOK OF TRENDS
*COVER_#1
9/12/05
2:00 PM
Page 1
AAffirmative Action Statement
Cleveland State University
is committed to the principle of equal opportunity
in employment and education. No person at the university will be denied opportunity for
employment or education or be subject to discrimination in any project, program, or activity
because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation, handicap or
disability, disabled Veteran, Vietnam-era veteran or other protected veteran status.
Cleveland State University is an AA/EOE committed to nondiscrimination. M/F/H/V
05-00128/.75M © Cleveland State University Department of Marketing and Public Affairs