B
Book of Trends
2007
The largest footprint in downtown Cleveland.
B
Book of Trends
Office of Planning, Assessment and Information Resource Management
Phone (216) 687-5324
Gitanjali Kaul
Vice Provost for PAIRM
Eric Brown
Senior Report Developer
Debra Sudy
Administrative Coordinator
Office of Institutional Research and Analysis
Phone (216) 687-4700
www.csuohio.edu/iraa
Jeffrey Chen
Director
James Geither
Research Analyst
Hasina Khanom
Research Associate, Book of Trends Coordinator
Gerald Moran
Senior Analyst and Systems Developer
Karen Radachy
Systems Developer
2007
Book of Trends 2007
http://www.csuohio.edu/iraa/bot/bookoftrends.html
The Book of Trends 2007 represents the continuing commitment of the Office of Institutional Research and
Analysis (IRAA) to present updated information about Cleveland State University (CSU). A variety of tables and
charts provide trend information over a five-year period as well as some key attributes and characteristics
of the University for the current academic year.
Two major procedural changes have been made in the Book of Trends 2007.
1. The Student information presented in the Book of Trends 2007 and Book of Trends 2006 is based on
the End of Semester files specified by the Ohio Board of Regents (OBOR) unless specifically noted from
a different data source. However, data presented in the Book of Trends 2005 were based on the 15th day
files (http://www.csuohio.edu/iraa/cfdef for detailed explanation). Therefore, the numbers reported in
Book of Trends 2005 might be different from Book of Trends 2006 and 2007.
2. Students exclusively enrolled in English as a Second Language, Study Abroad or other zero credit hour courses
are included in the Book of Trends 2006 and 2007. In the Book of Trends 2005, such students were excluded. Again, please note that the numbers published might be different between publication years.
The purpose of this publication is to provide the readers with frequently requested statistical information used
in planning, reporting, and assessment. In order to serve the campus community more effectively, we welcome suggestions and comments. Please direct questions and/or suggestions to 216-687-4700. The entire Book of Trends
is available on line via IRAA the website (http://www.csuohio.edu/iraa/bot/bookoftrends.html).
We would like to take this opportunity to thank all members of the campus community as well as our graduate
assistants for their support and contributions to this publication.
Office of Institutional Research and Analysis
TTable of Contents
Page
1
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5
University Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Board of Trustees 2006 – 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Distinguished Alumni Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
President’s Medal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS AND TRENDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-24
Table 2.1: Cleveland State University Enrollment by Level, Fall 1965 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table 2.2: Enrollment by College, Level and Load, Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Table 2.3: Full-Time Enrollment by Race and Gender, Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 2.4: Total Enrollment by Race and Gender, Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 2.5: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Entrance Status, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 2.6: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Entrance Status, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 2.7: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by Academic Load, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 2.8: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by Academic Load, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 2.9: New Fall Enrollment by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Table 2.10: Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 2.11: Total Enrollment, Fall Enrollment by Academic Level: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 2.12: FTE Generated Internally and Externally by College, Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 2.13: Fall Enrollment by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 2.14: Fall Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 2.15: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Table 2.16: Enrollment by Age Category Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Table 2.17: Enrollment by Level and Country of Residence Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 2.18: Enrollment by State Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 2.19: Enrollment by Ohio County Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Map of 2006 Enrollment by Ohio County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Table 2.20: Spring Enrollment by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table 2.21: Spring Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trends by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table 2.22: Summer Enrollment by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Table 2.23: Summer Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trends by College, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Table 2.24: Annualized Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Table 2.25: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions, Fall 2001 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Table 2.26: Main Campus Enrollment Select Ohio Four Year Institutions, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1a
3
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25-72
Table 3.1-10: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27-40
Table 3.1:
College of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27-28
Table 3.2:
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29-30
Table 3.3:
College of Education and Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31-32
Table 3.4:
College of Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33-34
Table 3.5:
College of Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35-36
Table 3.6:
College of Urban Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Table 3.7:
College of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Table 3.8:
Undergraduate Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Table 3.9:
Undergraduate Non-Degree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Table 3.10:
Graduate Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Table 3.11:
Dual Major Enrollment by College and Academic College Fall, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41-44
Table 3.12-19: Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45-52
Table 3.12:
College of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Table 3.13:
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Table 3.14:
College of Education and Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Table 3.15:
College of Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Table 3.16:
College of Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Table 3.17:
College of Urban Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Table 3.18:
College of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Table 3.19:
Undergraduate Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Table 3.20:
CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53-55
Table 3.21:
CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56-58
Table 3.22:
CSU Graduate and Law Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59-61
Table 3.23:
Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Load: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Table 3.24:
Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College and Load: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Table 3.25:
West Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Table 3.25a:
Annual West Center Historical Enrollment and Student Credit Hours Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Table 3.26:
East Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semester . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Table 3.26a:
Annual East Center Historical Enrollment and Student Credit Hours Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65-66
Table 3.27:
CSU Off-Campus Location in Cleveland: Fall Semester Student Credit Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Table 3.27a:
Annual Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends at Lorain County Community College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Table 3.28:
Annual Lakeland Community College Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Table 3.29:
Annual Web Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Table 3.30:
Annual Student Credit Hours Generated via Interactive Videos & Distance Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Division of Continuing Education, Enrollment by Program Area FY 2000 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70-72
Page
1b
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
4
RESEARCH
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73-91
Table 4.1:
Research Awards and Expenditures, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Table 4.2:
Research Awards by Source, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76-77
Table 4.3:
Research Expenditures by Source, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78-79
Table 4.4:
Research Expenditures Reported by OBOR at Ohio Public Universities, Fiscal Year 1989 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Table 4.5:
Total R&D Expenditures at Universities and Colleges ranked by Fiscal Year 2004
Total R&D Expenditures, Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Table 4.6:
Indirect Cost (IDC) Recovery and Total Research Expenditures by Year, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . 82
Table 4.7: Faculty Research Development Program Combined Investments and Awards, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . 83
Table 4.8: Fiscal Year 2006 Proposal Submission Awards by Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
Table 4.9: Proposal Submissions and Grants, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Table 4.10: Ohio Board of Regents Biennial Research Challenge Distributions, Fiscal Years 2000 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
Table 4.11: Intellectual Property: Patents and Disclosures, Fiscal Years 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Table 4.12: Cleveland State University Signature Research Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
Table 4.13: Percentage of Total Student Credit Hours Taken by Graduate Level Students at Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions-Main Campuses Only: Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Table 4.14: Cleveland State University Graduate Student Support from Externally Funded Research,
Fiscal Years 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Table 4.15: Cleveland State University Centers and Institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Table 4.16: Past Recipients of Distinguished Faculty Awards by Award Type 1986, 1993 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
5
RETENTION AND GRADUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92-108
Table 5.1:
Fall to Fall Student Return Rate, Enrolled Fall 2001 – 2005/Returned Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Table 5.2:
Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by Race and Gender, Enrolled Fall
2001 – 2005/Returned Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Table 5.3:
Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by College, Enrolled Fall
2001 – 2005/Returned Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Table 5.4:
Three-Year Mobility of Undergraduate Students Enrolled Spring Term 2005 by Institution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Table 5.5:
Attended, Graduated and Retained Fall to Fall Student Tracking (IPEDS Cohort) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Table 5.6:
Attended, Graduated and Retained Fall to Fall Student Tracking (Transfer Cohort) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Table 5.7:
Fall to Fall Undergraduate First-Year Full-Time Degree-Seeking Cohort Graduation
and Retention Rate Returning to CSU as Undergraduate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
Table 5.8:
Annual Degrees Awarded by Academic Level and Gender University Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Table 5.9-14: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101-106
Table 5.9:
College of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100-101
Table 5.10:
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
Table 5.11:
College of Education and Human Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Table 5.12:
College of Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
Table 5.13:
College of Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1c
6
Table 5.14:
College of Urban Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
Table 5.15:
College of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
Table 5.16:
Annual Degrees Awarded by Race and Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107-108
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: Academic and Administrative Programs . . . . . . . 109-128
Table 6.1:
Characteristics of New Honors Students, Fall 2004 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Table 6.2:
Scholarship Aid for Honors Students in Fiscal Year 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Table 6.3:
Average ACT Composite Score by College and Gender, 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
Table 6.4:
Average ACT Composite Score by College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
Table 6.5:
Undergraduate Cumulative GPA by College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
Table 6.6:
Top 15 Majors by Academic Level, Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
Table 6.7:
Top 15 Degree Seeking Programs with Highest Minority Student Enrollment by Academic Level, Fall 2006 . . . 114
Table 6.8:
Top 15 Degree Seeking Programs with Highest Female Student Enrollment by Academic Level, Fall 2006 . . . . 114
Table 6.9:
Delaware Study Benchmarks: Student Credit Hours and FTE Students Taught per FTE Faculty for
Tenured and Tenure-Track Full-Time Faculty, Fall 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115-116
Table 6.10: Fall Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117-118
Table 6.11: Spring Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119-120
Table 6.12: Summer Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121-122
Table 6.13: Fall Undergraduate Student FTE by College and Class Time: 5-Year Trend, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
Table 6.14: Fall Graduate and Law Student FTE by College and Class Time: 5-Year Trend, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . 123
Table 6.15: 5-Year Trends in Interactive Video and Telecourse Instructional Delivery:
Student Credit Hours Generated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
Table 6.16: 5-Year Trends in Web Based Instructional Delivery Student Credit Hours Generated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125-126
Table 6.17: Cleveland State University Main Library Collections 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
Table 6.18: Cleveland State University Main Library Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
Table 6.19: Cleveland State University Law Library Collections 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
Table 6.20: Cleveland State University Law Library Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
7
FACULTY AND STAFF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129-144
Table 7.1: Full-Time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Table 7.2: Full- Time Employee by Gender, Race and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6
(EEO6) Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132-133
Table 7.3: Full-Time Employee by Gender, Race, EE06, in percentage, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134-135
Table 7.4: Full-time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Table 7.5: Part-Time Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Table 7.6: Total Employee by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6), Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Table 7.7: Full-Time Faculty by Rank, Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Table 7.8: Full-Time Faculty by Gender, Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Table 7.9: Full-time Faculty by Highest Degree, Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Table 7.10: Full-time Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty by College/Department: 5-Year Trend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138-139
Table 7.11: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hours (SCH) Generated by Part-Time
Faculty, Fall 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140-142
1d
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Page
Table 7.12: Women and Minorities as a Percent of Tenured/Tenured-Track Faculty Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Table 7.13: Percentage of Full-Time Faculty to Full-Time Employees, Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions,
Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Table 7.14: Rate of Annual Student FTE to Number of Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty, Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
Table 7.15: Student FTE to Full-Time Staff Ratio Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions-Main Campuses only, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . 144
8
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS & OFFICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147-171
Admissions Office: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147-152
Table 8.1:
New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by College, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Table 8.2:
New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by College, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
Table 8.3:
New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by Race, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
Table 8.4:
New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by Race, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Table 8.5:
New Graduate and Law Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by College, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
Table 8.6:
New Graduate and Law Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students
by Race, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
Office of Advancement: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153-154
Table 8.7:
CSU Foundation: 5 Year Endowment Growth by College/Division . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153-154
Table 8.8:
CSU Foundation: Endowed Scholarship, Donors & Giving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
Athletics Department: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Table 8.9:
Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University Enrollment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Table 8.10: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University 4, 5 or 6 Year Graduation Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Finance: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156-160
Table 8.11: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Changes, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . 156-158
Table 8.12: Public Service Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures, Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Main Campuses Only, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
Table 8.13: Benefit Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Instructional Expenditures Selected
Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Main Campuses Only, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
Table 8.14: Scholarship and Fellowship Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Main Campuses Only, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . 160
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1e
Page
Financial Aid: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161-166
Table 8.15: Financial Aid Awards to Undergraduate Students by Full-Time/Part-Time Status:
Average Aid Package and Academic Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
Table 8.16: Financial Aid Awards Fall Cohort, Full-time, First-Time, Degree-Seeking
Undergraduate Students . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
Table 8.17: Financial Aid Awards to Fall Term Undergraduate Students . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
Table 8.18: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Full-Time/Part-Time Status
& Average Aid Package . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
Table 8.19: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . 163
Table 8.20: Law Student Financial Aid Awards by Full-Time/Part-Time Status and
Average Aid Package . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
Table 8.21: Law Students Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid, Fall 2002 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
Table 8.22: Undergraduate Cost of Attendance (COA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
Table 8.23: Annualized Full-Time Undergraduate Tuition and Fees for Selected
Main Campuses of Ohio, 4 Years Institutions, 2006 – 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
Table 8.24: Award of Financial Aid at Ohio’s Public and Private Title IV Postsecondary
Institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
Center for International Services and Programs (CISP): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167-171
Table 8.25: Enrollment by Country or Region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
Table 8.26: CSU Fulbright Scholar Awards 1973 – 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
Table 8.27: Cleveland State University International Academic Initiatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
Table 8.28: Study Abroad Student Enrollmentt by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring)
and Program Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
Table 8.29: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring)
and College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
Table 8.30: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring)
and Course Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
Table 8.31: Key International Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
Office of Space Management: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
Table 8.32: Cleveland State University Fall 2006 Building Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
Accreditations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
List of Acronyms & Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
1f
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
1
Introduction
I
Introduction
University Administration
Michael Schwartz
President
Mary Jane Saunders
Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs
John J. Boyle III
Vice President for Business Affairs and Finance
Michael Droney
Vice President for Administration
Ned Hill
Vice President for Economic Development
Njeri Nuru-Holm
Vice President for Institutional Diversity
Vacant
Sonali B. Wilson
Vice President for University Advancement and Executive Director of CSU Foundation, Inc.
University Legal Counsel
Mary Jane Saunders
Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs
Bahman Ghorashi
Interim Dean, Fenn College of Engineering
Barbara Hanniford
Dean, Division of Continuing Education
James McLoughlin
Dean, College of Education and Human Services
Geoffrey S. Mearns
Dean, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
Gregory M. Sadlek
Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Mark S. Rosentraub
Dean, Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
Bette Bonder
Dean, College of Science
Robert F. Scherer
Dean, Nance College of Business Administration
Gitanjali Kaul
Vice Provost for Planning, Assessment and Information Resource Management
Vijaya Konangi
Vice Provost for Academic Affairs and Faculty Relations
Leo W. Jeffres
Interim Vice Provost for Research and Interim Dean of Graduate Studies
Rosemary Sutton
Interim Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies
INTRODUCTION
3
Board of Trustees 2006 – 2007
Trustee
Term
Timothy J. Cosgrove
Chairman
October 1997 – May 2007
Ronald E. Weinberg
Vice Chairman
August 2001 – May 2014
Ernest L. Wilkerson,Jr.
Treasurer
December 2005 – May 2010
Dr. Peter Cavanagh
May 2006 – May 2015
Sally Florkiewicz
June 1998 – May 2012
Carl D. Glickman
June 1999 – May 2008
Alex Machaskee
June 2006 – May 2011
Samuel H. Miller
May 1999 – May 2013
Vir K. Sondhi
June 2000 – May 2009
Trevor O. Jones
Community Board Member
September 2006 – June 2008
Priscilla M. Luce
Community Board Member
November 2006 –
Sheldon Gelman
Faculty Representative
September 2005 – September 2008
Dr. Joyce Mastboom
Faculty Representative
July 2006 – June 2007
Huong Mai Nguyen
Student Representative
September 2006 – May 2008
Teresa M. Obrero
Student Representative
September 2006 – May 2007
Sonali B. Wilson
Secretary
Front Row (left to right): Community Board member Trevor O. Jones; Trustee Sally D. Florkiewicz; President Michael Schwartz; Chairman Timothy J.
Cosgrove, Esq.; Treasurer Ernest L. Wilkerson, Jr., Esq.; Trustee Samuel H. Miller; and Trustee Carl D. Glickman.
Back Row (left to right): Student Representative Teresa M. Obrero; Faculty Representative Joyce M. Mastboom. Ph.D.; Community Board
Member Priscilla M. Luce; Trustee Vir K. Sondhi; Trustee Peter R. Cavanagh, Ph.D.; Student Representative Huong Mai Nguyen; Board Secretary
Sonali B. Wilson, JD; and Faculty Representative Sheldon Gelman, LLM.
(Vice Chairman Ronald E. Weinberg and Trustee Alex Machaskee are not pictured)
4
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Distinguished Alumni Award
Annually, outstanding graduates of Cleveland State University are honored for their service, leadership and career
achievements with a Distinguished Alumni Award.
2005 Honorees
2006 Honorees
Mary Grimm
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Sheryl King Benford
George B. Davis Award
William J. Hunt
College of Science
Mayor Frank G. Jackson
Charlene Mancuso
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
Maxine Goodman Levin College
of Urban Affairs
Edward A. Bernetich
College of Education and Human Services
Cynthia Moore-Hardy
Nance College of Business Administration
James MacMillan
Fenn College of Engineering
Dr. Benjamin J. Kearney
College of Education and Human Services
Justice Terrence O’Donnell Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
James A. Thomas
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
Dr. Ralph DiFranco
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
P. Kelly Tompkins
George B. Davis Award for Service to University
Dr. Michael Centanni
College of Science
Edson R. “Ted” Arneault
Nance College of Business Administration
2007 Honorees
Charles R. Emrick, Jr.
George B. Davis Award
Stephen F. Kirk
Nance College of Business Administration
Anthony J. Coyne
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
Christopher W. Vasil
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
Lisa Suarez-Caraballo
College of Education and Human Services
Eugene P. Baxendale
Fenn College of Engineering
Danielle N. Ripich
College of Science
Elaine Richardson
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
President’s Medal
The most prestigious non-academic recognition that Cleveland State University can confer, the President’s Medal, is awarded
to individuals, groups or entities whose commitment and dedication to the University are beyond question. The medal is conferred
only when the honoree has made continuing and /or extraordinary contributions, or has provided exemplary and ongoing services that
have directly and tangibly advanced the best interests and mission of Cleveland State University. The first President’s Medal was presented in
November 2004.
Recipients
President’s Medal
2007
Art J. Falco
2006
Jamie Ireland
2005
Dr. Julian Earls
2004
Babs Glickman
Maria Miller
Delos M. (Toby) Cosgrove
INTRODUCTION
5
C
Campus Enrollment Characteristics & Trends
Campus Enrollment
Characteristics
& Trends
2
Table 2.1: Cleveland State University Enrollment by Level
Fall 1965 – 2006
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Total
Year
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Total
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
6,026
7,853
8,431
8,836
9,442
10,734
11,257
11,758
11,986
12,895
13,278
13,401
13,896
13,143
13,154
14,330
14,167
14,177
14,195
13,426
12,502
N/A
N/A
184
248
1,220
1,171
1,760
2,045
2,212
2,300
2,568
2,808
2,851
3,125
3,242
3,751
3,883
3,715
3,768
3,589
3,347
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
775
742
772
909
1,003
1,066
1,128
1,138
1,168
1,164
1,184
1,169
1,090
1,052
979
1,018
917
6,026
7,853
8,615
9,084
11,437
12,647
13,789
14,712
15,201
16,261
16,974
17,347
17,915
17,432
17,580
19,250
19,140
18,944
18,942
18,033
16,766
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
13,220
13,236
12,971
13,409
13,825
13,531
12,716
11,966
11,341
10,698
10,728
10,675
11,215
10,453
10,222
10,433
10,363
10,269
9,847
9,605
9,525
4,005
3,945
3,850
4,115
4,331
4,500
4,504
4,240
4,251
4,065
3,905
4,154
4,244
4,480
4,425
4,480
4,819
5,163
5,107
5,197
4,905
1,016
1,006
1,000
1,011
1,064
1,060
979
931
912
908
889
906
867
749
759
833
816
814
752
748
712
18,241
18,187
17,821
18,535
19,220
19,091
18,199
17,137
16,504
15,671
15,522
15,735
16,326
15,682
15,406
15,746
15,998
16,246
15,706
15,550
15,142
Highlights
■ Total CSU Enrollment was
highest between 1980–81
and 1990–91.
■ Undergraduate enrollment
peaked in 1980 and continued to drop except for
a slight increase between
1989 and 1991.
■ Graduate enrollment continued to grow until 2005
except for a slight decrease
in 1987, 1988, 1996 and
2006.
■ College of Law enrollment
has been capped in recent
years to decrease class size.
Note: CSU switched from quarter to semester terms in 1998.
Figure 2.1:
Cleveland State University Enrollment Trend
Fall 1965 – 2006
25,000
20,000
Enrollment
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Year
15,000
10,000
9
5,000
65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
10
Table 2.2: Enrollment by College, Level and Load
Fall 2006
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Undergraduate
College
Full-Time Part-Time
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Undergraduate Studies1
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other2
Total
Graduate & Law
Undergraduate Undergraduate
Total
% of Total
1,184
2,075
876
453
1,197
154
556
597
423
167
365
123
1,740
2,672
1,299
620
1,562
277
18%
28%
14%
7%
16%
3%
524
63
435
305
959
368
10%
4%
3
6,529
25
2,996
28
9,525
.3%
100%
Total
Full-Time
Part-Time
Graduate &
Law Total
Graduate &
Law % of Total
396
233
263
120
325
93
461
807
310
1,476
306
229
260
251
1,203
543
1,739
426
554
353
712
21%
10%
31%
8%
10%
6%
13%
2
85
87
2%
1,893
3,724
5,617
100%
Figure 2.2a: Enrollment by Level
Full-Time
Part-Time Total
1,580
2,308
1,139
573
1,522
247
461
524
63
2
3
8,422
1,363
907
1,899
473
594
383
251
435
305
85
25
6,720
Figure 2.2b: Enrollment by Load and Level
Fall 2006
Fall 2006
5%
25%
42%
32%
13%
63%
20%
Undergraduate
Graduate
Undergraduate Full-time
Graduate & Law Full-time
Law
Undergraduate Part-time
Graduate & Law Part-time
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007) unit was created in August 2007 to
replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
2
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second
Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
Note: Undergraduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 12 hours.
Graduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 9 hours.
Law full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 13 hours.
Highlights
■ Colleges with the highest enrollment are the CLASS 21%, the College of Education 20%, and the College of Business with 19%.
■ At the undergraduate level, CLASS (28%), College of Business (18%) and College of Science (16%) had the highest enrollment in Fall 2006.
■ At the graduate level, College of Education (31%) and College of Business (21%) had the highest enrollment in Fall 2006.
■ Full-time Students: 77% of the students were enrolled at the undergraduate level and 23% were at the graduate level.
■ Part-time Students: 45% of the students were enrolled at the undergraduate level and 55% were at the graduate level.
2,943
3,215
3,038
1,046
2,116
630
712
959
368
87
28
15,142
% of Total
19%
21%
20%
7%
14%
4%
5%
6%
2%
1%
.3%
100%
Table 2.3: Full-Time Enrollment by Race and Gender
Fall 2006
Full-Time Students
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Total Full-Time
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific
Islander
Native American
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
1,987
248
200
2,435
2,122
451
153
2,726
441
38
7
486
958
115
12
1,085
87
8
8
103
128
13
4
145
117
11
6
134
93
29
7
129
7
1
2
10
Female
10
2
12
Non-Resident
Alien
Unknown
Grand
Total
Total
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
92
205
2
299
66
142
4
212
195
76
29
300
226
93
27
346
2,926
587
254
3,767
3,603
845
207
4,655
6,529
1,432
461
8,422
Table 2.4: Total Enrollment by Race and Gender
Fall 2006
Total Students
White
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Grand Total
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific
Islander
Native American
Non-Resident
Alien
Total
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
2,820
994
295
4,109
3,079
1,698
240
5,017
589
144
20
753
1,403
585
30
2,018
118
22
12
152
171
57
7
235
146
41
10
197
139
65
12
216
10
4
2
16
18
5
2
25
133
453
3
589
89
244
5
338
393
249
38
680
417
344
36
797
4,209
1,907
380
6,496
5,316
2,998
332
8,646
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Figure 2.4a: Total Enrollment by Race
Figure 2.4b: Total Enrollment by Gender
Fall 2006
3%
(AS)
Unknown
0%
(NA)
6%
(NR)
Fall 2006
8%
(UK)
43%
Male
61%
(WH)
3%
(HIS)
19.0%
(BLK)
57%
Female
White (WH)
Asian or Pacific Islander (AS)
Black (BLK)
Native American (NA)
Hispanic (HIS)
Non-Resident Alien (NR)
Unknown (UK)
Male
Female
Note: Undergraduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 12 hours.
Graduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 9 hours.
Law full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 13 hours.
11
■ Black students have the highest percentage of females enrolled and Non-Resident Aliens have the highest percentage of males.
Grand
Total
9,525
4,905
712
15,142
12
Table 2.5: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Entrance Status: 5-Year Trend
Freshmen
Other Undergraduate
Transfers
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
2002
2003
2004 2005 2006
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
1
Undergraduate Studies
Undergraduate Non-Degree
183
377
75
46
22
9
300
1
173
373
62
65
26
12
279
174
246
74
55
197
19
221
170
243
106
54
200
6
221
164
214
100
92
181
5
230
276
567
115
61
43
29
42
237
562
115
62
58
32
30
225
333
125
56
194
20
13
215
266
180
52
190
29
73
1
224
326
176
56
196
46
69
1,013
990
986 1,000
986
1,133 1,096
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
13
79
61
8
9
351
11
Other 2
University
966 1,006 1,093
532
14 10
6 28
84 12 29 44
75 67 51 68
4
9
6
5
6 23 48 47
5
3
4
6
416 320 183 161
24 192 178 194
25 17
628 636 530 570
Total Percent Change
New Undergraduate Total
2005 2006
1 Year
5 Year
391 416
538 584
337 344
112 153
438 424
39
57
477 460
179 194
25
17
2,678 2,695 2,588 2,536 2,649
6%
9%
2%
37%
-3%
46%
-4%
8%
-32%
-12%
-43%
37%
43%
481%
21%
-34%
1517%
4%
-1%
2002
2003
2004
472 424
1,013 1,000
251 252
107 131
73
90
47
49
693 725
12
24
409
591
266
120
414
42
554
192
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 2.6: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College and Entrance Status: 5-Year Trend
Doctoral
Masters/Law
College
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2002
2003
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies*
Other 2
University
185
72
143
85
57
30
206
294
114
243
108
95
43
262
239
122
216
79
89
42
237
2
231
141
156
71
90
33
232
250
115
178
119
126
48
218
1
1
14
1
3
4
2
4
9
8
954 1,055
11
35
778 1,159 1,026
2004
Other Graduate
New Graduate and Law Total
Total Percent Change
2006
1 Year
5 Year
331 365
190 154
312 336
90 142
140 178
72
91
243 224
140
34
1
1,119 1,875 1,529 1,519 1,524
10%
-19%
8%
58%
27%
26%
-8%
-76%
47%
22%
20%
48%
174%
17%
6%
127%
.3%
36%
2005
2006
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
2002
2003
2004
5
5
1
8
13
3
3
5
15
1
4
7
13
2
249
126
279
96
65
78
211
15
471
233
544
128
106
92
276
25
372
161
406
103
140
94
244
9
25
29
31
63 163 133 95 110
54 119 39 49 39
135 297 189 153 154
8 11 16 14 16
4
3 38 35 39
46 49 49 38 41
5 14
7 11
6
15 25
7 140 33
1
330 681 478 536 438
2005
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997-2005).
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
Notes: *The significant increases in Fall 2005 in Graduate Studies enrollment includes 125 students in the graduate visiting (GSTVS) category.
2
Highlights
■ College of Engineering: New undergraduate freshmen enrollment increased by 70% in 2006. This significant increase in Fall 2006 was due to
increased enrollment in the academic plan called “Pre-Engineering” which experienced a 94% surge since 2005. At the graduate level, enrollment
increased by 66% when compared with 2005. Overall, new enrollment at the undergraduate level increased by 37% (1 year), 43% (5 year) and at the
graduate level 58% (1 year), 48% (5 year).
■ College of Urban Affairs: New enrollment at the undergraduate level increased by 46% in fall 2006. This increase in Fall 2006 was due to
increased enrollment in the new transfer students category in 2006. At the graduate level, the college also experienced a 26% (1 year) increase
in 2006.
■ College of Science: New graduate enrollment has increased by 27% (1 year) in fall 2006; masters level enrollment went up by 40%
■ Overall, new undergraduate enrollment increased by 4% (1 year) in fall 2006; graduate level enrollment remained the same.
Table 2.7: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by Academic Load: 5-Year Trend
% Change in
Full-Time
Full-Time
College
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Business
366
344
343
CLASS
797
821
514
Education
181
177
197
Engineering
89
107
95
Science
59
75
349
Urban Affairs
26
36
33
Undergraduate Studies1
383
361
237
Undergraduate Non-Degree
1
5
59
Other2
Total New Undergraduate 1,902 1,926 1,827
321
459
263
89
366
27
276
33
6
1,840
337
500
265
130
354
29
292
38
1,945
1-Year
% Change in
Part-Time
Part-Time
5-Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1-Year
5-Year
5%
-8%
9% -37%
1%
46%
46%
46%
-3% 500%
7%
12%
6% -24%
15% 3,700%
106
227
70
18
14
21
310
10
80
198
75
24
15
13
364
19
66
77
69
25
65
9
317
133
-25%
-63%
13%
28%
400%
33%
-46%
1460%
788
761
79
84
79
23
70
28
168
156
17
704
13%
6%
7%
776
70
79
74
23
72
12
201
146
19
696
6%
2%
-3%
133%
-16%
7%
-11%
1%
-9%
Table 2.8: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by Academic Load: 5-Year Trend
% Change in
Full-Time
Full-Time
College
% Change in
Part-Time
Part-Time
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1-Year
5-Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1-Year 5-Year
Business
98
CLASS
52
Education
62
Engineering
30
Science
47
Urban Affairs
14
Law
158
Graduate Studies*
3
Other2
Total New Graduate & Law 464
201
83
131
28
67
39
188
1
122
79
114
21
86
27
163
2
120
94
76
23
89
24
159
2
144
80
99
30
111
24
147
20%
-15%
30%
30%
25%
47%
54%
60%
-8%
136%
71%
-7%
151
74
217
66
18
64
53
12
270
150
413
100
39
53
88
24
250
82
292
82
54
67
81
7
221
74
237
112
67
67
77
34
5% 46%
-23%
.4%
9%
67% 70%
31% 272%
40%
5%
-8% 45%
-75% 183%
738
614
587
635
8%
37%
655
1,137
915
211
96
236
67
51
48
84
138
1
932
889
-5%
36%
Table 2.9: New Fall Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1-Year
5-Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Undergraduate Studies1
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies*
Other2
Total New Students
721
1150
530
203
138
125
211
693
11
15
895
1252
796
259
196
141
276
725
24
25
781
752
672
223
554
136
244
554
192
9
4,589
4,117
781
738
680
295
602
148
224
460
194
34
17
4,173
8%
1%
5%
46%
4%
33%
-8%
-4%
8%
-76%
-35%
3%
8%
-36%
28%
45%
336%
18%
6%
-34%
1,664%
127%
3,797
722
728
649
202
578
111
243
477
179
140
26
4,055
10%
Note: *The significant increase in Fall 2005 enrollment in College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science).
Undergraduate Non-Degree and Graduate Studies fluctuations are due to the reclassification of Academic Plan.
1
Undergraduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 12 hours.
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007) unit was created in August 2007
Graduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 9 hours.
to replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
2
Law full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 13 hours.
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second
language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
13
14
Table 2.10: Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 2.10a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
2002
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Law
Total
3,171
1,757
2,042
3,435
4,634
307
817
16,163
%
20%
11%
13%
21%
29%
2%
5%
100%
2003
%
2004
3,057
1,630
1,995
3,618
4,903
359
815
16,377
19%
10%
12%
22%
30%
2%
5%
100%
2,993
1,447
1,930
3,500
4,910
349
752
15,881
%
2005
19%
9%
12%
22%
31%
2%
5%
100%
2,751
1,438
1,810
3,606
4,836
361
748
15,550
%
18%
9%
12%
23%
31%
2%
5%
100%
2006
2,682
1,416
1,833
3,594
4,531
374
712
15,142
%
18%
9%
12%
24%
30%
2%
5%
100%
1 Year
5 Year
-3%
-2%
1%
-.3%
-6%
4%
-5%
-3%
-15%
-19%
-10%
5%
-2%
22%
-13%
-6%
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 2.10b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
2002
Developmental
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Law (500-900)
Total
4,189
73,704
47,439
28,881
2,250
10,910
167,373
%
3%
44%
28%
17%
1%
7%
100%
2003
%
2004
4,316
69,864
49,076
31,285
2,584
10,526
167,651
3%
42%
29%
19%
2%
6%
100%
4,174
66,045
48,380
31,915
2,188
9,466
162,168
Figure 2.10a: Enrollment by Class Standing
%
2005
3%
41%
30%
20%
1%
6%
100%
4,144
63,426
48,279
30,003
2,405
9,302
157,559
%
3%
40%
31%
19%
2%
6%
100%
2006
4,378
62,009
47,717
30,713
2,538
9,113
156,468
%
1 Year
5 Year
3%
49%
38%
20%
2%
7%
100%
6%
-2%
-1%
2%
6%
-2%
-1%
5%
-16%
1%
1%
13%
-16%
-7%
Figure 2.10b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
Table 2.11: Total Enrollment
Fall Enrollment by Academic Level: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Academic Level
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Bachelors
Masters
Doctoral
Law
University Total
10,405
4,636
305
817
16,163
10,300
4,903
359
815
16,377
9,870
4,910
349
752
15,881
9,605
4,836
361
748
15,550
9,525
4,531
374
712
15,142
-1%
-6%
4%
-5%
-3%
-8%
-2%
22%
-13%
-6%
Table 2.12: FTE Generated Internally and Externally by College
Fall 2006
College Offering Course
1
Student’s College
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Business
1,302.5
48.1
14.1
22.2
29.7
7.9
5.5
Undergraduate Studies1
24.6
Undergraduate Non-Degree
18.1
Graduate Studies
3.3
FTE Generated by College Offering Course 1,476.1
FTE Generated Internally
1,302.5
% Internal
88%
FTE Generated Externally
173.6
% External
12%
1
CLASS
Education
366.2
1,881.5
210.7
83.3
359.9
44.7
1.0
310.3
42.6
2.2
3,302.3
1,881.5
57%
1,420.9
43%
11.9
93.7
1,191.9
1.0
32.3
3.3
0.4
12.1
21.5
10.7
1,378.9
1,191.9
86%
186.9
14%
Engineering
2.9
1.9
460.1
9.6
0.1
4.0
2.9
0.3
481.9
460.1
95%
21.8
5%
Science Urban Affairs
191.1
406.1
219.7
122.1
1,153.5
30.5
0.7
139.7
65.7
1.7
2,330.7
1,153.5
49%
1,177.2
51%
39.5
66.8
18.4
9.5
33.7
276.7
11.8
18.8
3.9
1.3
480.3
276.7
58%
203.7
42%
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
Law
0.2
0.4
1.1
603.8
2.0
607.5
603.8
99%
3.7
.6%
Undergraduate
Studies
48.9
64.7
33.0
14.1
45.4
3.1
130.7
1.5
341.4
130.7
38%
210.7
62%
FTE by
Student
College
1,963.2
2,562.9
1,687.8
712.3
1,664.5
367.3
623.2
642.3
156.2
19.4
10,399.1
7,000.7
67%
3,398.4
33%
15
Table 2.13: Fall Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
2002
College
Enrollment
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Undergraduate Studies1
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other 2
Total Enrollment
2003
2004
%
Enrollment
%
3,286
4,333
3,107
1,038
1,035
670
817
1,529
88
260
20%
27%
19%
6%
6%
4%
5%
9%
1%
2%
3,226
4,315
3,387
1,101
1,148
639
815
1,512
78
156
20%
26%
21%
7%
7%
4%
5%
9%
16,163
100%
16,377
Enrollment
2005
%
1%
3,249
3,184
3,460
1,103
1,922
638
752
1,229
256
88
20%
20%
22%
7%
12%
4%
5%
8%
2%
1%
100%
15,881
100%
2006
Percent Change
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
2,975
3,257
3,289
1,044
2,044
588
748
998
370
207
30
15,550
19%
21%
21%
7%
13%
4%
5%
6%
2%
1%
2,943
3,215
3,038
1,046
2,116
630
712
959
368
87
28
15,142
19%
21%
20%
7%
14%
4%
5%
6%
2%
1%
.2%
100%
-1%
-1%
-8%
0%
4%
7%
-5%
-4%
-1%
-58%
-7%
-3%
-10%
-26%
-2%
1%
104%
-6%
-13%
-34%
318%
-67%
100%
-6%
Table 2.14: Fall Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend
2002
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Undergraduate Studies1
Graduate Studies
Honors
Other 2
Total SCH
2003
2004
2005
2006
Percent Change
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
SCH
%
1-Year
5-Year
23,926
55,541
21,681
7,480
34,339
7,421
10,910
5,783
6
14%
33%
13%
4%
21%
4%
7%
3%
22,807
54,759
23,636
7,611
34,802
7,438
10,526
5,841
3
14%
32%
14%
5%
21%
4%
6%
3%
22,352
51,340
24,560
7,812
34,016
6,668
9,466
5,619
3
40
292
162,168
14%
32%
15%
5%
21%
4%
6%
3%
21,415
51,001
22,149
7,791
34,034
6,548
9,302
4,823
4
110
382
157,559
14%
32%
14%
5%
22%
4%
6%
3%
22,141
49,535
20,683
7,228
34,961
7,205
9,113
5,121
11
96
374
156,468
14%
32%
13%
5%
22%
5%
6%
3%
3%
-3%
-7%
-7%
3%
10%
-2%
6%
175%
-13%
-2%
-1%
-7%
-11%
-5%
-3%
2%
-3%
-16%
-11%
83%
286
167,373
228
167,651
100%
100%
.2%
100%
.2%
100%
.2%
100%
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2005 and 2006 enrollment in College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science)
Undergraduate Non-Degree and Graduate Studies fluctuations are due to procedural changes.
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
2
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a second language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
Figure 2.13 & 2.14: Fall Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15) Trend
Fall 2002 – 2006
15,000
15,000
10,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
2002
2003
2004
Enrollment
2005
2006
FTE
Highlights
■ During the period 2002 – 2006 enrollment in the College of Science had grown significantly. However, increase in
Student Credit Hours remained less significant.
■ During the period 2005 – 2006 enrollment in the College of Urban Affairs has grown at 7% and SCH at 10%; College of
Business experienced a 1% negative growth in enrollment with a 3% positive growth in Student Credit Hours.
16
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
31%
-7%
Table 2.15: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level
Fall 2006
Registered Credit
Hours
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24+
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Enrollment Cumulative %
Enrollment Cumulative %
Enrollment Cumulative %
110
52
261
539
88
320
414
572
217
205
218
1,588
1,007
805
880
1,371
408
240
140
61
16
4
4
5
9,525
TOTAL
1%
2%
4%
10%
11%
14%
19%
25%
27%
29%
31%
48%
59%
67%
76%
91%
95%
98%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
330
136
592
546
99
770
343
657
559
171
87
232
113
44
92
122
6
3
3
7%
10%
22%
33%
35%
50%
57%
71%
82%
86%
87%
92%
94%
95%
97%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
2
1
9
2%
2%
2%
4%
5%
7%
21%
26%
30%
35%
41%
52%
84%
94%
98%
99%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
14
7
17
96
37
34
34
39
78
230
68
30
10
2
3
1
4,905
All
712
Enrollment Cumulative %
442
189
862
1,085
187
1,104
764
1,246
872
413
339
1,854
1,159
927
1,202
1,561
444
253
145
64
17
4
4
5
15,142
3%
4%
10%
17%
18%
26%
31%
39%
45%
47%
50%
62%
69%
76%
84%
94%
97%
98%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Figure 2.15: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level
Fall 2006
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0-3
4-7
8-11
Undergraduate
12-15
Graduate
16-19
20+
Law
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
17
Table 2.16: Enrollment by Age Category
Fall 2006
College
Gender
Business
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Undergraduate
Studies1
Undergraduate
Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other
2
University
Under 18
3
3
11
11
4
4
1
5
6
7
6
13
81
34
115
1
1
18-19
20-21
102
117
219
197
140
337
122
22
144
10
107
117
206
94
300
4
6
10
153
216
369
285
217
502
159
42
201
22
135
157
235
109
344
16
16
32
148
121
269
9
10
19
1
1
67
66
133
13
19
32
3
2
5
801
619
1,420
108
45
153
2
1
3
952
822
1,774
22-24
299
404
703
444
348
792
332
79
411
51
272
323
343
172
515
49
46
95
120
121
241
40
52
92
46
31
77
2
3
5
1
3
4
1,727
1,531
3,258
25-29
339
428
767
395
266
661
604
161
765
56
182
238
284
165
449
79
71
150
123
158
281
39
26
65
47
35
82
10
4
14
4
6
10
1,980
1,502
3,482
30-34
126
196
322
192
96
288
317
132
449
8
79
87
113
80
193
45
47
92
40
50
90
14
9
23
20
13
33
7
1
8
1
1
2
883
704
1,587
35-39
92
139
231
138
74
212
253
81
334
10
32
42
80
39
119
34
29
63
21
32
53
13
7
20
15
9
24
10
6
16
1
1
12
667
449
1,116
40-49
50-64
99
131
230
189
79
268
352
101
453
7
52
59
86
36
122
69
40
109
24
14
38
11
3
14
38
15
53
18
5
23
45
49
94
97
40
137
217
56
273
1
15
16
40
19
59
55
20
75
4
4
8
25
26
51
34
9
43
12
7
19
1
1
1
893
477
1,370
1
531
245
776
65 and
Over
Unknown Average
Age
2
1
3
4
2
6
2
2
2
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
84
83
167
2
2
4
1
2
8
10
1
1
167
97
90
187
10
7
12
19
1
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
2
Figure 2.16: Enrollment by Age Category Fall 2006
7%
(35-39)
Median Age
University:
Undergraduate:
Graduate:
Law:
26
23
31
26
9%
(40-49)
0.1%
1%
(unknown)
5% (65 and over)
1%
(50-64)
(under 18)
9%
(18-19)
12%
(20-21)
10%
(30-34)
22%
(22-24)
23%
(25-29)
Under 18
18
18-19
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
20-21
|
22-24
25-29
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
30-34
35-39
40-49
50-64
65 and Over
Unknown
28.0
28.0
28.0
28.4
26.7
27.7
32.3
32.8
32.4
25.8
25.9
25.8
26.3
26.5
26.4
35.3
32.4
34.0
28.0
28.3
28.0
31.3
33.7
26.4
34.1
29.8
32.4
40.9
39.8
40.6
26.4
26.5
26.4
29.7
28.4
29.2
Table 2.17: Enrollment by Level and Country of Residence
Fall 2006
Resident Type
Undergraduate
Undergraduate in %
Graduate
Graduate in %
Law
Law in %
Total
Ohio Resident
Non-Ohio Resident
Non-Resident Alien
9,114
189
222
96%
2%
2%
4,139
69
697
84%
1%
14%
636
68
8
89%
10%
1%
13,889
326
927
Total
9,525
100%
4,905
100%
712
100%
15,142
Table 2.18: Enrollment by State
Table 2.19: Enrollment by Ohio County
Fall 2006
State
Fall 2006
Number of
Students
County
Number of
Students
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
Ohio (Resident of Ohio excluding Non-Resident Alien) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,837
Cuyahoga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11,287
Ohio (Non-Ohio Resident) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,036
Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Lorain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 666
Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Medina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Summit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Geauga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Portage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Ashtabula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Erie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Georgia, Maryland, Tennessee, Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Trumbull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Arizona, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska
New MexicoOregon, South Carolina, Virginia, Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Mahoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Florida, Indiana, North Carolina, Alabama, District of Columbia
Huron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Stark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Franklin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Lucas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Non-Resident Alien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 927
Wayne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Total States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,142
Richland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Tuscarawas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Wood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Jefferson, Marion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Ashland, Butler, Columbiana, Hancock, Montgomery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Note: Comparisons by residence groupings may not match due to the criteria used to assign residency status
in CSU’s information systems.
Allen, Clermont, Defiance, Fairfield, Greene, Hamilton
Knox, Morgan, Ottawa, Ross, Sandusky, Warren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Other Unknown Counties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 704
19
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,142
Map of 2006 Enrollment by Ohio County:
Williams
Defiance
1
Lucas
5
Fulton
Ottawa
4
Putnam
Wyandot
Allen
1
Darke
1
Wayne
8
Union
Clark
Preble Montgomery
4
Warren
1
Greene
1
Fayette
Franklin
15
Pickaway
Muskingum
Fairfield
3
Pike
Brown
Adams
Vinton
Gallia
Lawrence
20
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Columbiana
2
Jefferson
5
Harrison
Guernsey
1
Washington
Athens
1
Meigs
Jackson
Scioto
1
Mahoning
40
Carroll
Morgan
1
Highland
Clermont
1
Stark
35
Noble
Perry
Hocking
Clinton
Ross
1
Portage
121
Coshocton
Delaware
2
Licking
1
Madison
Trumbull
33
Tuscarawas
6
Knox
1
Champaign
Summit
343
Holmes
Morrow
Logan
Miami
Hamilton
2
Crawford Richland Ashland
4
4
Marion
3
Auglaize
Shelby
1
Butler
4
Medina
358
Hancock
2
Hardin
Mercer
Lorain
666
Ashtabula
71
Geauga
285
Cuyahoga
11,287
Huron
22
Seneca
Paulding
Van Wert
Erie
55
Sandusky
1
Wood
5
Henry
1,036
Lake
Belmont
Monroe
Table 2.20: Spring Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
2003
College
2004
Enrollment
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Undergraduate Studies 1
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other 2
Total Enrollment
%
2005
Enrollment
%
1%
3,073
4,192
3,532
1,070
1,155
608
756
1,247
84
129
19%
26%
22%
7%
7%
4%
5%
8%
1%
1%
100%
15,846
100%
3,081
4,139
3,284
1,038
1,114
658
779
1,364
72
197
20%
26%
21%
7%
7%
4%
5%
9%
15,726
2006
Enrollment
3,090
3,286
3,772
1,064
1,918
631
714
1,025
327
121
14
15,962
2007
Percent Change
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
19%
21%
24%
7%
12%
4%
4%
6%
2%
1%
2,792
3,205
3,343
1,013
1,953
594
698
841
409
298
21
15,167
18%
21%
22%
7%
13%
4%
5%
6%
3%
2%
2,806
3,029
3,148
1,021
1,998
594
668
864
378
211
26
14,743
19%
21%
21%
7%
14%
4%
5%
6%
3%
1%
.2%
100%
1%
-5%
-6%
1%
2%
0%
-4%
3%
-8%
-29%
14%
-3%
-9%
-27%
-4%
-2%
79%
-10%
-14%
-37%
425%
7%
100%
100%
-6%
Table 2.21: Spring Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trend by College: 5-Year Trend
2003
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Undergraduate Studies 1
Graduate Studies
Honors
Other 2
Total SCH
2004
SCH
2005
SCH
%
%
22,587
55,276
22,854
7,500
32,132
6,962
10,079
3,411
14%
34%
14%
5%
20%
4%
6%
2%
22,718
53,177
24,539
7,767
32,441
6,577
9,418
3,293
6
14%
33%
15%
5%
20%
4%
6%
2%
334
161,135
.2%
100%
361
160,297
.2%
100%
SCH
21,642
50,487
25,202
7,782
31,835
7,215
8,805
2,718
5
43
488
156,222
2006
%
14%
32%
16%
5%
20%
5%
6%
2%
3%
100%
2007
SCH
20,690
48,745
22,875
7,462
32,076
7,083
8,786
2,379
12
105
431
150,644
%
14%
32%
15%
5%
21%
5%
6%
2%
.3%
100%
SCH
21,372
46,366
21,125
7,465
32,910
7,866
8,607
2,181
7
84
457
148,440
Percent Change
%
1-Year
5-Year
14%
31%
14%
5%
22%
5%
6%
1%
3%
-5%
-8%
0%
3%
11%
-2%
-8%
-42%
-20%
6%
-1%
-5%
-16%
-8%
0%
2%
13%
-15%
-36%
.1%
.3%
100%
37%
-8%
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
2
Figure 2.20 & 2.21: Spring Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15) Trends
15,000
15,000
10,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
2003
2004
2005
Enrollment
2006
2007
FTE
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
21
Table 2.22: Summer Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend
2002
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Undergraduate Studies 1
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Graduate Studies
Other 2
Total Enrollment
2003
2004
2005
2006
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
1,796
1,836
2,744
392
571
367
337
725
53
625
19%
19%
29%
4%
6%
4%
4%
8%
1%
7%
1,713
1,624
2,774
316
563
338
337
771
32
147
20%
19%
32%
4%
7%
4%
4%
9%
0%
2%
1,708
1,439
2,973
254
572
263
286
761
69
89
20%
17%
35%
3%
7%
3%
3%
9%
1%
1%
19%
15%
33%
3%
9%
3%
4%
2%
8%
3%
9,446
100%
8,615
100%
8,414
100%
1,591
1,243
2,702
269
767
287
290
177
652
264
14
8,256
1,612
1,157
2,225
305
817
260
276
207
660
233
18
7,770
100%
Percent Change
%
1 Year
21%
15%
29%
4%
11%
3%
4%
3%
8%
3%
.2%
100%
5 Year
1% -10%
-7% -37%
-18% -19%
13% -22%
7% 43%
-9% -29%
-5% -18%
17% -71%
1% 1145%
-12% -63%
29%
-6% -18%
Table 2.23: Summer Student Credit Hours (SCH) Trend by College: 5-Year Trend
2002
College
SCH
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Undergraduate Studies1
Graduate Studies
Other2
Total SCH
11,075
14,276
15,865
1,173
12,138
2,983
1,300
442
1
113
59,366
2003
%
SCH
19%
24%
27%
2%
20%
5%
2%
1%
11,102
12,966
15,128
896
10,080
2,734
1,298
373
2
58
54,637
.2%
100%
2004
%
SCH
20%
24%
28%
2%
18%
5%
2%
1%
.1%
100%
10,910
11,426
15,958
625
10,020
2,275
1,111
312
7
91
52,735
2005
%
21%
22%
30%
1%
19%
4%
2%
1%
.2%
100%
2006
SCH
9,816
11,705
14,639
575
10,258
2,487
1,130
316
6
88
51,020
%
19%
23%
29%
1%
20%
5%
2%
1%
100%
SCH
10,019
11,288
12,327
523
10,149
2,910
1,049
60
6
129
48,460
Percent Change
%
1-Year
21%
23%
25%
1%
21%
6%
2%
.1%
2%
-4%
-16%
-9%
-1%
17%
-7%
-81%
-10%
-21%
-22%
-55%
-16%
-2%
-19%
-86%
500%
47% 14%
-5% -18%
.3%
100%
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997-2005).
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
2
Figure 2.22 & 2. 23: Summer Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15) Trends
10,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
0
2002
0
2003
2004
Enrollment
22
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
2005
FTE (SCH/15)
5-Year
2006
Table 2.24: Annualized Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trends
2002–03
College
Business
CLASS
2003–04
SCH
%
57,588
15%
125,093
SCH
56,627
2004–05
2005–06
%
SCH
%
SCH
15%
54,904
15%
51,921
2006–07
%
SCH
14%
53,562
Percent Change
%
15%
1 Year
5 Year
3%
-7%
32% 120,902
32%
113,253
31%
111,451
31%
107,189
30%
-4%
-14%
15%
63,303
17%
65,720
18%
59,663
17%
54,135
15%
-9%
-10%
16,153
4%
16,274
4%
16,219
4%
15,828
4%
15,216
4%
-4%
-6%
78,609
20%
77,323
20%
75,871
20%
76,368
21%
78,020
22%
2%
-1%
Education
60,400
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
17,386
4%
16,749
4%
16,158
4%
16,118
4%
17,981
5%
12%
4%
Law
22,289
6%
21,242
6%
19,382
5%
19,218
5%
18,768
5%
-2%
-16%
9,636
2%
9,507
2%
8,649
2%
7,518
2%
7,362
2%
-2%
-24%
Undergraduate Studies1
Graduate Studies
Honors
Other2
7
733
11
.2%
15
22
24
-9% 243%
647
.2%
83
871
.2%
215
901
.3%
180
960
.1%
.3%
-16%
7%
31%
100%
371,125
100%
359,223
100%
353,367
100%
-2%
-9%
Total Annualized SCH
387,874
100% 382,585
Annualized FTE
(Annualized SCH/30)
12,929
12,753
12,371
11,974
11,779
-2%
-9%
Unduplicated Enrollment
22,447
21,979
21,901
21,141
20,371
-4%
-9%
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997-2005).
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
2
Figure 2.24: Annualized FTE (SCH/30) and Unduplicated Enrollment Trends
Unduplicated
Enrollment
Annualized FTE
25,000
25,000
15,000
15,000
5,000
5,000
2002–03
2003–04
2004–05
Unduplicated Enrollment
2005–06
2006–07
FTE
CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
23
Table 2.25: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions
Fall 2002 – 2006
Campus Type
Community College
Technical College
University Branch Campus
University Main Campus
Percent Change
1 Year
5 Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
69,106
25,092
45,322
252,650
70,742
25,775
46,567
254,529
72,279
26,723
46,343
254,281
71,531
27,417
45,851
253,225
71,636
28,811
44,498
237,060
0.1%
5.1%
-3.0%
-6.4%
3.7%
14.8%
-1.8%
-6.2%
Figure 2.25: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions
Fall 2002 – 2006
Table 2.26: Main Campus Enrollment
Select Ohio Four Year Institutions
Fall 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Institution
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
22,907
18,898
26,725
16,162
23,674
17,486
50,659
20,548
21,043
12,739
22,650
18,646
26,904
16,377
24,410
17,411
51,677
20,452
20,740
12,878
22,314
19,043
27,064
15,881
24,494
17,590
51,723
20,143
19,675
13,166
22,961
19,091
27,908
15,530
23,874
16,574
51,333
20,461
19,354
12,920
22,476
19,150
28,245
15,119
22,869
16,198
52,512
20,610
19,448
13,279
-2.2%
0.3%
1.2%
-2.7%
-4.4%
-2.3%
2.2%
0.7%
0.5%
2.7%
-1.9%
1.3%
5.4%
-6.9%
-3.5%
-8.0%
3.5%
0.3%
-8.2%
4.1%
Note: Enrollment includes all flexibly scheduled courses not as of the 15th day (census date).
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Student Enrollment query – run date: May 1, 2007
24
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Enrollment
Characteristics of
Students in
CSU Colleges
Enrollment Characteristics of Students in CSU Colleges
E
3
Table 3.1: College of Business: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Accounting
Computer & Information Science
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Other Business
Description
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Accounting
Computer and Information Science
Computer Science
Information Systems
Finance
Management
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Accelerated Bachelors of Business Administration
Business Certificate
Business Economics
Business Education
General Business
International Business
Pre-Business Administration
Undecided Business
Total
Masters
Accounting
AMBA
Business Administration
Computer & Information Science
EMBA
Finance
Health Care Administration
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Other Business
Total
Financial Accounting & Audit
Tax Program
Accelerated Business Administration
Business Administration
Computer and Information Science
Executive Business Administration
Finance
Urban Real Estate Development & Finance
Health Care Administration
MBA-Health Care
Public Health
Management & Labor Relations
Data-Driven Marketing Planning Certificate
Marketing
Graduate Business
Pre Accelerated MBA
Pre Accelerated MPH
Pre Executive MBA
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
108
108
24
74
93
1
87
108
27
147
90
22
73
94
127
83
15
49
96
165
85
23
52
98
260
93
49
61
179
58%
9%
113%
17%
83%
141%
-14%
104%
-18%
92%
84
97
22
75
69
18
96
98
30
2
130
159
40
14
35%
62%
33%
600%
49%
47%
48%
18
19
34
93
174%
1450%
1,431
2,068
1,283
1,930
2
140
1,266
1,959
13
119
977
1,792
2
52
73
535
1,740
300%
-39%
-45%
-3%
-63%
-16%
75
70
4
65
544
187
28
6
1
1
42
16
64
1
3
195
2
6
7
1,242
69
7
52
569
171
11
5
61
9
61
510
147
9
4
77
16
65
514
147
32
2
60
24
58
2
1
206
3
5
49
32
67
1
172
2
48
23
59
1
2
160
4
-7%
100%
6
1,130
2
1,152
-67%
2%
1
6
57
490
197
36
5
1
4
36
23
54
6
198
1,182
1,243
26%
78%
7%
1%
256%
-50%
-2%
-28%
-12%
3%
14%
5%
-25%
-11%
-60%
33%
9%
-67%
-19%
-3%
27
(Continued on next page)
28
Table 3.1: College of Business: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Department/Program
Doctoral
Business Administration
Description
2002
Accounting
Business Administration
Computer and Information Science
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
1
31
3
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
43
1
2
39
30
2
5
-17%
-33%
-3%
-33%
2
1
36
3
5
4
4
54
3,226
3
3
47
3,249
3
5
53
2,975
9
5
51
2,943
200%
1
|
Total
Total Business
2003
36
3,286
-4%
-1.1%
College of Business
BACHELORS DEGREES
■ The International Business major’s dramatic growth reflects the importance of global business in today’s economy and increasing job opportunities. The IB major
features language and study abroad as innovative dimensions of the program.
■ Other fast growing majors include finance, the second-largest in number of majors after accounting, business economics, computer science, and marketing.
■ Accounting remains the most popular major in terms of getting early job offers and placements.
■ Business economics has grown to 93 majors from 6 in 2002, possibly resulting from improved starting salaries for graduates, new faculty members, and interest in
further graduate study.
■ Enrollment has declined from 5 years ago due to very flexible articulation agreements with area community colleges. Enrollment has stabilized in the past two years
despite strong competition from many new proprietary colleges because of introduction of new majors and minors, online registration, and improved advising
services in the College.
MASTERS DEGREES
■ The MBA degree continues to be the most popular graduate business degree because of its versatility and suitability for careers in a wide range of professions.
■ The Executive MBA program’s enrollment has been restored following a year in which the program was suspended while the curriculum was revised. The program
continues to grow in popularity with mid-career professionals.
■ Enrollment in the Master of Accountancy’s tax and the financial accounting and audit tracks have grown, reflecting the continuing demand for accountants in industry,
government and the non-profit sectors.
■ Overall enrollment in master’s programs has held steady despite growing competition from many new entrants. Well-planned recruiting efforts and the offering of
graduate programs at off-site locations including corporate sites have contributed to the stability of enrollments in our business programs.
DOCTORAL DEGREES
■ Admission to the DBA program is currently restricted to four disciplines: marketing, finance, operations management, and information systems. New cohorts are
recruited every three years in order to provide full support for full-time students.
■ Enrollment has remained steady over the past four years with a mix of part-time and full-time students.
■ The Information Systems (CIS) major was re-introduced in 2005; Accounting and Management & Labor Relations departments are not accepting students for doctoral
study because of limited faculty resources.
42%
-10%
Table 3.2: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Economics
English
First College
History
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Interdisciplinary
Modern Languages
Music
Philosophy
Political Science/IR
Religious Studies
Social Work
Sociology
Other CLASS
29
Total
Description
Anthropology
Art
Computer Graphics
Graphic Design
Communication
Drama
Film and Digital Media
Journalism
Economics
English
First College
History
Social Studies
Classical and Medieval Studies
Liberal Studies
Linguistics
Women's Studies
French
Spanish
Music
Pre-Music
Philosophy
International Relations
Political Science
Religious Studies
Social Service
Social Work
Criminology
Social Science
Sociology
Pre-Education
Pre-Social Work
Undecided
Undecided CLASS
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
38
143
36
148
33
149
32
161
30
172
-6%
7%
-21%
20%
317
17
335
10
1
301
9
1
354
20
800%
0%
55%
12%
82%
29
125
160
70
27
1
64
5
2
3
16
44
29
130
144
92
34
68
4
1
5
20
52
23
148
75
70
33
1
42
6
2
6
15
75
11
43
72
7
17
43
77
17
18
43
73
10
28
164
41
89
27
1
27
5
4
12
24
84
5
24
50
89
14
9
354
31
55
78
31
184
20
100
31
4
44
8
12
12
34
96
12
18
49
93
21
126
135
172
167
9
147
12
158
10
142
241
2,336
3,812
2,175
3,742
1,003
2,701
4
172
142
27
57
877
2,702
200
61
14
137
58
38
107
559
2,672
11%
12%
-51%
12%
15%
300%
63%
60%
200%
0%
42%
14%
140%
-25%
-2%
4%
50%
7%
47%
-88%
43%
15%
300%
-31%
60%
500%
300%
113%
118%
64%
14%
29%
200%
20%
59%
250%
-20%
-59%
41%
88%
-36%
-1%
56%
-7%
-76%
-30%
(Continued on next page)
30
Table 3.2: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department/Program
Masters
Art
Communication
Economics
English
|
History
Modern Languages
Music
Philosophy
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Social Work
Sociology
Other CLASS
Total
CLASS TOTAL
Description
Art
Communication
Economics
English
Master of Fine Arts-Creative Writing
History
Spanish
Music
Advanced Study in Bioethics
Philosophy
Social Work
Sociology
Graduate CLASS
Undecided CLASS
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
3
30
12
66
8
22
12
69
7
29
15
64
31
11
46
-60%
-3%
15%
-7%
75%
-21%
8%
-17%
25
127
32
147
36
13
45
1
13
146
32
176
2
39
15
68
14
26
13
49
-33%
30%
25%
3%
33
12
34
16
167
29
5
40
13
73
8
33
12
59
1
16
183
32
24
200
28
50%
9%
-13%
-4%
57%
-13%
521
573
68
483
80
555
65
543
-19%
-2%
4%
4,333
4,315
3,184
3,257
3,215
-1%
-26%
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS
■ Undergraduate enrollments in almost all majors increased based on both 1-year and 5-year trends. Students with a declared major in CLASS increased by 262 over
a 1-year period, an increase of 12%.
■ Programs that experienced steady and significant growth in declared majors included Communication, History, English, Sociology and Social Work.
■ The College added three new undergraduate majors in 2006, which attracted 194 students: Film and Digital Media, Journalism, and Criminology.
■ Enrollment figures for the College as a whole are impacted by a significant drop in “undecided” students: from a total of 934 in 2005 to 668 in 2006, a decline
of 268 (-29.8%) students. Since the eventual program choice of these students cannot be determined, their inclusion in CLASS figures provides a distorted picture of
enrollment trends overall.
■ Other factors influencing overall trends in the College include the suspension of First College in 2004, leading to a steady decline through attrition as its students
graduate or enroll in other programs.
■ Pre-Education was introduced in 2004 and enrollment trends have not stabilized.
■ Decreased 1-year and 5-year enrollments in Sociology may stem from introduction of the popular Criminology major in 2006, resulting in a shift of some majors
into the new program.
■ Declines in Anthropology reflect shifts in program orientation and the departure of key faculty.
GRADUATE PROGRAMS
■ Enrollments in graduate programs in the College show a modest increase of 4% over a 5-year period.
■ The MA program in Social Work has experienced continuous and robust growth, with a 57% increase over 5 years.
■ Several programs experienced a short-term decrease in enrollments, but maintained consistent long-term growth. These included Communication, English, and Music.
■ The inclusion of undecided students, who have not been admitted to a degree-seeking program, impacts enrollment figures at the graduate level. College graduate
enrollments overall remained stable from 2005 to 2006, based on the number of students enrolled in degree programs (475 students and 477, respectively).
-21%
8%
44%
Table 3.3: College of Education & Human Services: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Health And Physical Education
Nursing
Teachers Education
Other Education
Description
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Physical Education
Nursing Basic
Nursing RN
Early Childhood Education
Elementary Education
Middle Childhood Education
Mild/Moderate Educational Need
Special Education
Education
Mathematics
Pre-Education
Pre-Educ & Human Serv (Educ)
Pre-Educ & Human Serv (Nurs)
Pre-Nursing
Teacher Certification
Undecided Education
Total
Masters
CASAL
Health And Physical Education
Nursing
Teachers Education
Adult Learning and Development
Community Agency Counseling
Counseling and Pupil Personnel Administration
Education Administration
Education Specialist
Educational Administration
School Counseling
Supervision
Community Health Education
Exercise Science
Health and Physical Education
Sports Management
Sports Management and Exercise Science
Nursing
Curriculum & Instruction
Middle Child Math Education
Middle Child Science Education
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
57
143
58
381
7
169
73
171
47
390
15
205
118
19
47
163
54
228
10
150
79
30
8
48
185
70
199
16
128
88
42
8
2%
13%
30%
-13%
60%
-15%
11%
40%
0%
-16%
29%
21%
-48%
129%
-24%
90
14
2
61
163
55
318
10
208
24
97
9
85
61
28
46
47
271
1,307
111
91
55
73
65
120
1,299
31%
49%
96%
59%
38%
-56%
-1%
-32%
-63%
-3%
97
46
1
12
3
88
92
8
21
18
97
57
1
12
3
73
88
16
30
17
0%
24%
0%
0%
0%
-17%
-4%
100%
43%
-6%
64%
-5%
-86%
33%
-77%
-24%
13%
60%
36%
-23%
31
4
12
709
3
32
9
18
659
6
10
3%
125%
50%
-7%
100%
19%
50%
200%
-2%
95
328
1,344
92
282
1,412
63
409
1,417
59
60
7
9
13
96
78
10
22
22
5
27
6
6
673
83
39
9
19
4
111
114
15
22
25
100
36
5
20
5
101
115
10
18
15
1
27
9
8
758
18
11
4
773
-53%
-43%
31
(Continued on next page)
32
Table 3.3: College of Education & Human Services: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Department/Program
Other Education
Description
Education
Graduate Education
Graduate Education Licensure
Total
Doctoral
|
2006 BOOK OF TRENDS
Total
Education Total
Ph.D. in Urban Education
Urban Ed: Administration
Counseling
Learning
Policy
2002
54
487
37
1,671
2003
22
531
77
1,877
2004
18
607
93
1,946
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
30
572
141
1,888
5
347
156
1,636
-83%
-39%
11%
-13%
-91%
-29%
322%
-2%
19%
-10%
13%
-10%
10%
-30%
-7%
69%
-18%
12%
-8%
-2%
27
28
26
11
92
22
26
38
12
98
21
27
37
12
97
16
29
39
10
94
5
19
26
44
9
103
3,107
3,387
3,460
3,289
3,038
College of Education and Human Services
BACHELORS DEGREE PROGRAMS
■ Failed levies and the downsizing of area schools that have had a negative impact on the local job market for teachers continue to account for enrollment declines in early and mid
dle childhood education programs.
■ Changes in special education enrollment would appear to be a function of changes in admission categories as opposed to actual changes in headcount which remains relatively
stable if students in special education and mild/moderate programs are combined.
■ The admission category for elementary education should be eliminated as the College has not had such a program for several years.
■ Observed increases in nursing programs may be linked to a critical nursing shortage that make these programs appealing with excellent prospects for employment.
MASTERS DEGREE PROGRAMS
■ The five-year increase in the Adult Learning and Development Program stems from creation of a weekend and evening program and increased marketing. As regional
demands for K-12 teachers have declined, it is also probable that students with an interest in teaching are exploring adult education as a viable alternative career path.
■ As local job openings for teachers, school administrators and school counselors dwindle, interest in these programs has also declined.
■ The recent enrollment increase in the Community Agency Counseling Program is likely a function of the waning job market for school counselors that has fueled a resurgence
of interest in non-school settings where employment prospects for counselors would seem to be better.
■ Gains in community health and sports management have resulted from intensified efforts to market these programs.
■ Development of an on-line program to serve out-of-state students’ needs has contributed to the observed increase in the MSN program as have changes in hospital accreditation standards that promote advanced education for nurses.
DOCTORAL PROGRAM
■ The addition of a counseling psychology track within the doctoral program has contributed to this program’s overall gain in enrollment in 2006.
Table 3.4: College of Engineering: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Other Engineering
Description
Chemical Engineering
Engineering Biotechnology
Civil Engineering
Computer Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Electronic Engineering Technology
Electronic Technology
Industrial Engineering Technology
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Pre-Engineering
Undecided Engineering
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Total
Masters
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Other Engineering
Total
Doctoral
Doctor of Engineering
Total
Engineering Total
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Engineering Mechanics
Environmental Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Software Engineering Certificate
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Graduate Engineering
Applied Biomedical Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Doctor of Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
54
51
53
50
16%
7%
68
50
186
29
1
1
30
31
176
79
58
161
29
1
2
42
26
147
79
58
143
21
85
75
132
24
58
1
76
55
123
23
-11%
-27%
-7%
-4%
12%
10%
-34%
-21%
2
35
21
132
28
19
147
1
16
20
160
-43%
5%
9%
-47%
-35%
-9%
9
33
668
24
50
670
33
73
650
32
45
637
62
25
620
94%
-44%
-3%
589%
-24%
-7%
51
20
4
14
87
57
32
4
16
148
1
33
64
35
390
40
36
2
14
138
1
34
51
26
342
35
25
1
11
164
11
38
61
18
364
-13%
-31%
-50%
-21%
19%
1000%
12%
20%
-31%
6%
-31%
25%
-75%
-21%
89%
45
63
21
305
58
23
3
17
143
2
33
63
17
359
-16%
-3%
-14%
19%
7
21
8
14
13
9
-13%
-25%
0%
200%
-71%
-13%
21
8
7
72
24
8
7
1
14
7
4
65
21
6
7
15
8
6
65
18
7
9
1
20
6
2
63
16
6
6
62
14%
-14%
50%
-5%
7%
-25%
1,038
1,101
1,103
1,044
1,046
.2%
1%
-5%
33
34
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Engineering
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
BACHELORS
■ Compared with 2005 data, departments that show a positive growth at the undergraduate level are: Chemical & Biomedical Engineering (16%), Mechanical
Engineering (9%), and Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering (5%).
■ Enrollment in the “Pre-Engineering” category also increased significantly (94%) in Fall 2006.
■ At the undergraduate level, the College of Engineering has experienced an overall 3% decline in enrollment when compared to 2005 data.
MASTERS AND DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
■ Most graduate programs showed a decline in enrollment in Fall 2006. However, at the masters level, the College of Engineering has experienced a positive growth
of 6% between 2005 and 2006 and 19% within the last 5 years.
■ The highest growths in enrollment at this level are in the departments of: Electrical & Computer Engineering (19%) and Mechanical Engineering (20%).
The Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering also experienced a healthy growth of 12% in 2006.
■ At the doctoral level Applied Biomedical Engineering enrollment has increased significantly (200%) when compared with 2002. Electrical & Computer
Engineering and Mechanical Engineering departments have also managed to increase their enrollment by more than 10% when compared with 2005.
Table 3.5: College of Science: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Other Science
Description
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Biology
Biology-Medical Technology
Environmental Science
Geological Science
Chemistry
Pre Pharmacy
Health Science
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Pre-Health Science
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Pre-Dentistry
Pre-Engineering
Pre-Medicine
Pre-Nursing
Pre-Physical Therapy
Pre-Veterinary Medicine
Undecided Science
Total
Masters
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Interdisciplinary
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Other Science
Total
35
Doctoral
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Chemistry
Total
Science Total
Biology
Environmental Science
Chemistry
Health Science
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Culture, Com and Health Care
Mathematics
Physics
Diversity Professional
Psychology
Psychology Specialist
Speech Pathology and Audiology
Undecided Science
Regulatory Biology
Clinical Bioanalytical-Chemistry
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
143
15
6
16
41
35
156
7
12
14
51
53
4
15
4
2
59
17
269
37
158
9
15
12
40
73
20
1
209
20
27
11
43
68
91
5
201
21
27
10
60
84
178
15
-4%
5%
0%
-9%
40%
24%
96%
200%
41%
40%
350%
-38%
46%
140%
2
61
14
239
27
6
65
14
335
32
2
57
9
66
3
67%
22%
21%
15%
75%
350%
-46%
433%
-55%
867%
900%
61%
21%
55%
75%
41
8
1
49
14
248
32
-63%
555
1,381
461
1,524
10
79
17
384
56
9
31
48
30
29
2
268
1,559
23
15
9
41
52
34
1
23
19
20
74
9
35
59
414
30
9
15
46
66
42
1
21
13
10
96
8
39
52
448
30%
-40%
67%
12%
27%
24%
0%
-9%
-32%
-50%
30%
-11%
11%
-12%
8%
50%
-18%
-42%
7%
725%
360
33
11
15
45
34
44
1
23
17
28
86
13
35
61
446
32
30
62
40
46
86
42
51
93
50
55
105
53
53
106
6%
-4%
1%
66%
77%
71%
1,034
1,146
1,920
2,043
2,113
3%
104%
74
81
649
700
20
11
26
43
8
42
1
14
9
27
78
15
29
22
9
17
52
22
43
323
19
10
32
87
10
37
-42%
2%
140%
0%
50%
44%
-63%
23%
-47%
34%
39%
36
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Science
GENERAL COMMENTS – GROWTH OF COLLEGE OF SCIENCE
The data in the table cannot be used to assess the college’s growth, given that undecided students in the College of Science were not identified prior to 2004
and given the university’s recent effort to identify a student's college and major earlier. A better indicator of trends is the total SCH for the college, which showed
decreases for years 2004 and 2005, but an increase in 2006 (+6.6% compared to year 2005). Increases are expected in the coming years given the new
programs initiated and the college's increased efforts in recruiting. This present and future growth is supported by the excellent job opportunities in healthrelated fields. Faster than average growth rates are projected through 2014 by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.bls.gov) for physical therapy, occupational
therapy, physicians assistants (Health Sciences Dept), psychologists (Psychology Dept.), medical technologists (Biology Dept.), pharmacists (pre-pharmacy
program in Chemistry), physicians (Biology, Chemistry, and Health Sciences), and medical scientists (graduate programs in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics).
Most all these health-related programs show positive 1 year and 5 year growth in majors.
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
HEALTH SCIENCES PROGRAMS
Undergraduate and graduate programs in Health Sciences have experienced steady double digit growth in SCH over the last several years, responsible for the
majority of growth in the College. The near doubling in the number of HSC majors from year 2005 to year 2006 is a result of the articulation agreement with
CCC (with 20 CCC health sciences programs feeding students into the undergraduate BSHS program) and a greater awareness of excellent employment
opportunities in the health science field. This growth in undergraduate enrollment is anticipated to continue, as an additional articulation agreement with
Lakeland Community College will be soon initiated. Substantial growth in graduate programs is anticipated with the initiation of several new programs including:
the CSU-CCC MSHS program with concentration in Physician Assisting Scientist (starting Summer 2007) and the Doctorate in Physical Therapy (DPT, approved
by OBOR in Spring 2007). The DPT will replace the two year Masters in Physical Therapy program, adding a third year. The Masters program in Occupational
Therapy will maintain a stable base of 50 to 60 students for its two year program.
OTHER GROWTH PROGRAMS
Besides the growth in Health Sciences programs, several other programs have shown growth. There has been steady 5-year growth in the pre-pharmacy
program, with continued growth anticipated resulting from the initiation of the NEOUCOP pre-pharmacy program, preparing students for admittance into the
NEOUCOP PharmD program (as well as others). Other programs showing verified growth (as measured by growth in both the number of majors and the total
SCH) include undergraduate programs in chemistry, environmental science, and speech and hearing. Graduate masters programs in biology, chemistry, and
physics have also shown growth. The growth indicated in the table for undergraduate psychology is not substantiated by SCH numbers and is probably a result
of identifying majors sooner (seen by a decrease in undecided students). Psychology has been flat in its enrollment.
DOCTORAL BIOLOGY, DOCTORAL CHEMISTRY AND MASTERS IN MEDICAL PHYSICS
These graduate programs in biology, chemistry, and physics are nationally/internationally visible programs that partner with the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
The previous year’s gains in enrollment for the doctoral chemistry and biology programs were maintained in year 2006, resulting from the continued success
of faculty in securing external funding to support graduate students. The high numbers of graduate students in these doctoral programs is also supported by
CCF faculty appointed in the programs, who support students through grants.
Table 3.6: College of Urban Affairs: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Urban Studies
Other Urban Affairs
Description
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Studies
Public Safety Management
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
Pre-Urban Affairs
Undecided Urban Affairs
Urban Affairs Certificate
Total
2002
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
2
16
20
44
97
2
9
36
49
102
1
12
28
43
109
68
57
1
256
84
1
9
35
42
88
2
69
2
14
45
55
121
1
42
100%
56%
29%
31%
38%
-50%
-39%
277
246
280
14%
13%
12
12
14
14
0%
-13%
3
154
1
6
138
2
1
6
135
3
1
10
114
3
2
67%
-16%
233%
-29%
100%
-50%
67
7
20
64
49%
250%
18%
-6%
97%
17%
-23%
-42%
301
3%
-18%
52
633
2%
7%
-12%
-6%
247
Masters
Urban Studies
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
2003
Other Urban Affairs
Environmental Studies
Environmental Studies and Law
Non-Profit Management
Public Administration (MPA)
Urban Economic Development
Urban Geographic Information Systems
Urban Planning & Law
Urban Planning and Design
Urban Real Estate Development & Finance
Urban Studies
Graduate Urban Affairs
Local Urban Management Cert
Total
Doctoral
Urban Studies
Urban Affairs Total
Urban Studies
16
1
3
160
4
4
34
6
26
111
4
53
8
19
82
54
6
19
76
365
336
314
45
2
17
68
1
292
59
671
49
641
49
640
51
589
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
■ The enrollment in the MUPDD program has doubled over the past five years. Graduates are working in a variety of fields related to urban planning, design and
development. The MUPDD program was re-accreditated by the Planning Accreditation Board in 2006.
■ Undergraduate majors in the Public Safety Management program have increased by 125%, indicating a strong interest in this major.
■ Majors in the undergraduate Urban Studies program have increased.
■ The Levin College is about to launch (after final OBOR approval) a new graduate degree in Nonprofit Administration and Leadership to meet demand in this field.
The new Levin Chair (Dr. Jeffrey Brudney) is a nationally-recognized expert in this field, particularly the use of volunteers by non-profit organizations.
■ The MPA program was re-accreditated by NASPAA in 2005.
■ The Levin College was again in 2005 ranked #2 in the graduate field of “City Management and Urban Policy” by U.S. News & World Report.
5 Year
-13%
125%
25%
25%
-38%
37
38
Table 3.7: College of Law: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department/Program
Law
Description
|
Law
JD/MBA
JD/MPA
JD/MSES
LAWCE
LAWVS
JD/MES Law and Environmental Studies
JD/MUP Law and Urban Planning
Master of Laws
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Law Total
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
778
18
11
772
23
7
710
24
8
698
19
11
1
667
16
12
2
-4%
-16%
9%
100%
-14%
-11%
9%
1
4
1
2
2
817
7
1
1
4
815
2
1
4
3
752
5
3
6
5
748
5
2
5
3
712
0%
-33%
-17%
-40%
-5%
25%
100%
150%
50%
-13%
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
■ The College of Law is engaged in a program that will result in smaller and academically stronger incoming classes. As a result of this effort, last year’s entering
class was the strongest in the history of the law school. Law School Admission Test scores and undergraduate grade point averages were higher than any other
year in the previous decade.
■ The College of Law library now has more than a half million volumes in its collection.
■ More than half of the law school’s faculty have advanced degrees in addition to their law degrees.
■ The law school conducts a faculty exchange program with Westminster University College of Law in London and co-sponsors a student summer law institute
in St. Petersburg, Russia.
■ Graduates of the law school practice in 49 states, three territories, the District of Columbia and in countries in Europe, Asia, Africa, and Central America.
■ In 2005 the American Bar Association Student Division gave The Gavel, Cleveland-Marshall's student newspaper, its award as the best law school newspaper
in the country.
Table 3.8: Undergraduate Studies1: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Bachelors
Collegiate Studies
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Undergraduate Studies Total
Description
University Studies
Pre-Business Administration
Pre-College of Engineering
Pre-Educ & Human Serv (Educ)
Pre-Educ & Human Serv (Nurs)
Pre-Liberal Arts & Social Sci
Pre-Music
Pre-Science
Pre-Social Work
Pre-Urban Affairs
Project 60
PSEOP
SYAP
Undergraduate Nondegree
Undergraduate Visiting
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
919
789
594
361
57
16
36
19
56
-55%
75%
94%
58%
74%
114%
-82%
33
6
3
244
166
1
164
100
31
57
33
120
3
77
2
7
225
139
1
133%
-67%
133%
-8%
-16%
24%
-25%
998
959
-4%
-37%
181
185
239
5
1,529
204
215
2
290
12
1,512
201
272
116
46
1,229
Undergraduate Studies1
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007): This new administrative unit came into existence in August 2007 and will assume most of the functions that were
covered under University Studies (1997 – 2005).
39
University Studies was the entry point for all newly admitted students who were admitted to Cleveland State University on a provisional basis. These
students did not meet the minimum requirement for admission to one of the degree-granting colleges based on high school GPA and ACT/SAT scores.
While in University Studies, these students received support services including academic advising, career exploration, and skill development and are enrolled
in courses that are tailored to fit their needs.
The Advising Center offered a user-friendly environment and a staff of professional advisors who provide ongoing assistance in the areas of academic
requirements and course selection, major and career exploration, petition assistance, graduation applications and a list of other services.
TRIO STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES
TRIO Student Support Services is a federally funded program that is staffed by a team of professional advisors who provide support in the areas of academic
advising, academic skills sessions, career planning, cultural enrichment opportunities, financial aid guidance, peer mentoring and tutorial services.
DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE INSTRUCTION (1997 – 2005)
The Department of Collegiate Instruction offered courses in the areas of English (ENG 085) and Mathematics (MTH 087, MTH 088). All courses were graded
on a pass/fail basis, but students received parenthetical letter grades; S(A), S(B), S(C), U(D), U(F). The letter grades in parentheses were not computed
in the student’s grade-point averages. These courses were not applied toward a degree, yet may have been prerequisites for some students to achieve
academic success.
UNDERGRADUATE MAJOR IN UNIVERSITY STUDIES
This was a catch-all category for non-degree or undecided students, and for student who are offered pre-major advising for admission to the colleges of
Science, Liberal Arts and Social Science, Education and Human Services, Engineering, Urban Affairs and Business Administration. These categories did not
denote acceptance in a program, only a desire on a student’s part to pursue a field. A decline in this category reflects improvement in campus admission
and advising procedures.
40
Table 3.9: Undergraduate Non-Degree: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department/Program
Description
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Other Non-Degree
Undergraduate Non-Degree Total
Cross Registration Undergraduate
Nondegree Post-baccalaureate
Transient
Nondegree
Visiting
2002
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
19
18
18
69
60
238
88
78
256
26
6
35
288
15
370
20
3
38
280
27
368
-23%
-50%
9%
-3%
80%
-1%
2005
2006
1 Year
4
77
126
207
11
52
24
87
5 Year
5%
306%
318%
|
2003
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 3.10: Graduate Studies: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Graduate Nondegree
Description
2002
2003
2004
Transient
Nondegree
Visiting
260
156
88
260
156
88
Graduate Studies Total
175%
-32%
-81%
-58%
5 Year
-80%
-67%
Table 3.10.a: Other1: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
Department/Program
Description
2002
2003
ESL Intensive Language Program
Undergraduate Special Degree
Graduate Special Degree
Other Total
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
21
8
1
30
27
1
29%
-88%
28
-7%
5 Year
Table 3.11: Dual Major Enrollment by College and Academic Level
Fall 2006
Department/Program
College of Business
Accounting
AMBA
Business Administration
Computer & Information Science
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
EMBA
Finance
Health Care Administration
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Other Business
Major
Accounting
Financial Accounting & Audit
Tax Program
Accelerated Business Administration
Business Administration
Computer & Information Science
Computer Science
Information Systems
Executive Business Administration
Finance
MBA-Health Care
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Business Economics
International Business
Total Business
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Anthropology
Art
Communication
English
History
Anthropology
Art
Graphic Design
Multimedia Advertising
Multimedia Advertising Cert
Certificate in Journalism
Communication
Drama
Film and Digital Media
Journalism
English
Prof. Writing Certificate
History
Social Studies
Undergraduate
Graduate
4
6
2
5
6
4
2
1
1
12
5
8
3
1
6
46
4
18
1
2
1
1
24
3
10
15
16
1
15
20
2
3
25
1
1
Total
4
6
2
5
6
4
2
1
1
12
2
8
8
3
1
6
71
4
18
1
2
1
1
24
3
10
15
17
1
16
20
(Continued on next page)
41
42
Table 3.11: Dual Major Enrollment by College and Academic Level
Fall 2006
(Continued from previous page)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Department/Program
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences (continued)
Interdisciplinary
Modern Languages
Music
Other CLASS
Philosophy
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Political Science/IR
Religious Studies
Social Work
Sociology
Major
Classical and Medieval Studies
Linguistics
Women’s Studies
French
Spanish
Music
First College
Advanced Study in Bioethics
Philosophy
International Relations
Political Science
Religious Studies
Social Work
Criminology
Sociology
Total CLASS
College of Education and Human Services
CASAL
Doctoral
Health And Physical Education
Nursing
Other Education
Teachers Education
Total College of Education and Human Services
Adult Learning and Development
Community Agency Counseling
Education Administration
Educational Administration
Supervision
Urban Education: Learning
Physical Education
Gerontological Studies
Nursing Basic
Nursing RN
Education
Curriculum & Instruction
Early Childhood Education
Middle Childhood Education
Mild/Moderate Educational Need
Undergraduate
Graduate
3
5
3
1
11
1
2
1
4
3
16
4
4
7
22
216
2
2
1
2
7
3
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
12
1
1
1
7
26
Total
3
5
3
1
11
1
2
1
4
3
16
4
5
7
24
223
3
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
12
1
1
1
33
(Continued on next page)
Table 3.11: Dual Major Enrollment by College and Academic Level
Fall 2006
(Continued from previous page)
Department/Program
College of Engineering
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Doctor of Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Total College of Engineering
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
College of Law
Law
Major
Applied Biomedical Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Computer Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Electronic Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Undergraduate
Graduate
4
1
1
5
1
4
1
1
1
15
2
1
10
Law
Law and Urban Planning
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Total College of Science
Biology
Geological Science
Regulatory Biology
Chemistry
Clinical Bioanalytical-Chemistry
Health Science
Mathematics
Physics
Diversity Professional
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Speech Pathology and Audiology
1
1
2
6
1
1
2
3
9
3
37
1
62
3
1
1
2
2
10
Total
4
1
3
1
5
1
4
1
3
2
25
3
Total College of Law
College of Science
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
Law
1
1
2
6
1
1
2
3
4
9
3
1
39
1
2
72
(Continued on next page)
43
44
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Table 3.11: Dual Major Enrollment by College and Academic Level
Fall 2006
(Continued from previous page)
Department/Program
College of Urban Affairs
Urban Studies
Major
|
Environmental Studies
Non-Profit Management
Public Administration
Urban Planning and Design
Urban Real Estate Development & Finance
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Total College of Urban Affairs
Other
University Total
ESL Intensive Language Program
Undergraduate
2
Graduate
Total
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
4
3
10
6
356
88
4
1
1
2
1
1
4
14
2
440
Table 3.12: College of Business
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.12a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
412
323
502
831
1,182
36
3,286
13%
10%
15%
25%
36%
1%
100%
360
290
469
811
1,242
54
3,226
11%
9%
15%
25%
38%
2%
100%
421
285
454
799
1,243
47
3,249
13%
9%
14%
25%
38%
1%
100%
355
295
388
754
1,130
53
2,975
12%
10%
13%
25%
38%
2%
100%
353
259
405
723
1,152
51
2,943
12%
9%
14%
25%
39%
2%
100%
-1%
-12%
4%
-4%
2%
-4%
-1%
-14%
-20%
-19%
-13%
-3%
42%
-10%
Table 3.12b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Course Level
2002
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
5,775
9,963
8,105
83
23,926
%
24%
42%
34%
0%
100%
2003
%
2004
4,693
9,600
8,318
196
22,807
21%
42%
36%
1%
100%
4,453
9,304
8,416
179
22,352
%
20%
42%
38%
1%
100%
Figure 3.12a: Enrollment by Class Standing
2005
4,190
9,090
7,953
182
21,415
%
20%
42%
37%
1%
100%
2006
4,359
9,325
8,257
200
22,141
%
1 Year
5 Year
20%
42%
37%
1%
100%
4%
3%
4%
10%
3%
-25%
-6%
2%
141%
-7%
Figure 3.12b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
1,400
12,000
1,200
10,000
1,000
8,000
800
6,000
600
4,000
400
2,000
200
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2002
Juniors
2003
Seniors
2004
Masters
2005
2006
Doctoral
Lower Division
(100-299)
Upper Division
(300-499)
45
2002
2003
Masters
(500-699)
2004
2005
Doctoral
(700-899)
2006
46
Table 3.13: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences (Excluding First College)
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Table 3.13a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Total
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
971
803
799
1,079
521
4,173
23%
19%
19%
26%
12%
100%
899
763
797
1,139
573
4,171
22%
18%
19%
27%
14%
100%
541
508
614
963
483
3,109
17%
16%
20%
31%
16%
100%
497
467
648
1,090
555
3,257
15%
14%
20%
33%
17%
100%
479
484
643
1,066
542
3,214
15%
15%
20%
33%
17%
100%
-4%
4%
-1%
-2%
-2%
-1%
-51%
-40%
-20%
-1%
4%
-23%
|
Table 3.13b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Percent Change
Course Level
2002
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
%
35,625
14,983
3,885
65%
27%
7%
54,493
100%
2003
%
2004
33,611
15,775
4,503
23
53,912
62%
29%
8%
32,241
14,693
4,402
4
51,340
100%
%
2005
63%
29%
9%
100%
Figure 3.13a: Enrollment by Class Standing
31,035
15,357
4,577
32
51,001
%
2006
61%
30%
9%
29,808
15,211
4,516
100%
49,535
%
1 Year
5 Year
66%
34%
9%
.4%
100%
-4%
-1%
-1%
-16%
2%
16%
-3%
-9%
Figure 3.13b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
40,000
1,200
35,000
1,000
30,000
800
25,000
20,000
600
15,000
400
10,000
200
5,000
0
0
First Year
Sophomore
2002
Juniors
2003
2004
Seniors
2005
Masters
2006
Lower Division
(100-299)
Masters
(500-699)
Upper Division
(300-499)
2002
2003
2004
2005
Doctoral
(700-899)
2006
Table 3.14: College of Education and Human Services
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.14a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
240
202
270
632
1,671
92
3,107
8%
7%
9%
20%
54%
3%
100%
219
193
278
722
1,877
98
3,387
6%
6%
8%
21%
55%
3%
100%
212
169
276
760
1,946
97
3,460
6%
5%
8%
22%
56%
3%
100%
234
172
213
688
1,894
88
3,289
7%
5%
6%
21%
58%
3%
100%
210
175
221
693
1,637
103
3,039
7%
6%
7%
23%
54%
3%
100%
-10%
2%
4%
1%
-14%
17%
-8%
-13%
-13%
-18%
10%
-2%
12%
-2%
Table 3.14b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
2002
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
2,388
9,195
9,360
738
21,681
%
11%
42%
43%
3%
100%
2003
%
2004
2,320
10,125
10,291
900
23,636
10%
43%
44%
4%
100%
2,194
10,960
10,765
641
24,560
%
2005
9%
45%
44%
3%
100%
Figure 3.14a: Enrollment by Class Standing
%
2,123
9,722
9,610
694
22,149
2006
10%
44%
43%
3%
100%
1,911
9,122
9,000
650
20,683
%
1 Year
5 Year
9%
44%
44%
3%
100%
-10%
-6%
-6%
-6%
-7%
-20%
-1%
-4%
-12%
-5%
Figure 3.14b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
2,500
12,000
2,000
10,000
8,000
1,500
6,000
1,000
4,000
500
2,000
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2002
Juniors
2003
Seniors
2004
Masters
2005
2006
Doctoral
Lower Division
(100-299)
Upper Division
(300-499)
2002
2003
Doctoral
(700-899)
Masters
(500-699)
2004
2005
2006
47
48
Table 3.15: College of Engineering
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.15a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
93
107
144
324
312
58
1,038
9%
10%
14%
31%
30%
6%
100%
102
90
145
333
359
72
1,101
9%
8%
13%
30%
33%
7%
100%
94
103
135
318
390
63
1,103
9%
9%
12%
29%
35%
6%
100%
96
81
132
328
343
64
1,044
9%
8%
13%
31%
33%
6%
100%
141
81
106
292
364
62
1,046
13%
8%
10%
28%
35%
6%
100%
47%
52%
-24%
-26%
-10%
17%
7%
1%
-20%
-11%
6%
-3%
.2%
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 3.15b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
1,234
3,773
2,057
416
7,480
16%
50%
28%
6%
100%
1,372
3,538
2,276
425
7,611
18%
46%
30%
6%
100%
1,414
3,805
2,197
396
7,812
18%
49%
28%
5%
100%
1,515
4,012
1,863
401
7,791
19%
51%
24%
5%
100%
1,355
3,195
2,249
429
7,228
19%
44%
31%
6%
100%
-11%
-20%
21%
7%
-7%
10%
-15%
9%
3%
-3%
Figure 3.15a: Enrollment by Class Standing
Figure 3.15b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
450
5,000
400
4,500
4,000
350
3,500
300
3,000
250
2,500
200
2,000
150
1,500
100
1,000
50
500
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2002
Juniors
2003
Seniors
2004
Masters
2005
2006
Doctoral
Lower Division
(100-299)
Upper Division
(300-499)
2002
2003
Masters
(500-699)
2004
2005
Doctoral
(700-899)
2006
Table 3.16: College of Science
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.16a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
47
78
164
361
325
60
1,035
5%
8%
16%
35%
31%
6%
100%
50
110
172
370
360
86
1,148
4%
10%
15%
32%
31%
7%
100%
379
230
337
437
447
92
1,922
20%
12%
18%
23%
23%
5%
100%
353
289
325
558
414
105
2,044
17%
14%
16%
27%
20%
5%
100%
353
267
335
607
448
106
2,116
17%
13%
16%
29%
21%
5%
100%
-8%
3%
9%
8%
1%
4%
651%
242%
104%
68%
38%
77%
104%
Table 3.16b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
2002
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-499)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
23,630
7,015
3,109
585
34,339
%
69%
20%
9%
2%
100%
2003
%
2004
23,005
7,493
3,620
684
34,802
66%
22%
10%
2%
100%
22,115
7,454
3,803
644
34,016
%
65%
22%
11%
2%
100%
Figure 3.16a: Enrollment by Class Standing
2005
%
21.482
8,162
3,600
790
34,034
2006
63%
24%
11%
2%
100%
21,298
8,665
4,205
793
34,961
%
1 Year
5 Year
61%
25%
12%
2%
100%
-1%
6%
17%
.4%
-3%
-10%
24%
35%
36%
-2%
Figure 3.16b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
25,000
700
600
20,000
500
15,000
400
300
10,000
200
5,000
100
0
First Year
Sophomores
2002
Juniors
2003
Seniors
2004
Masters
2005
2006
Doctoral
0
Lower
(100-299)
Upper
(300-499)
2002
2003
Masters
(500-699)
2004
49
* The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in the College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science)
2005
Doctoral
(700-899)
2006
50
Table 3.17: College of Urban Affairs
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.17a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Masters
Doctoral
Total
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
30
32
68
116
365
59
670
4%
5%
10%
17%
54%
9%
100%
26
27
73
128
336
49
639
4%
4%
11%
20%
53%
8%
100%
35
30
75
135
314
49
638
5%
5%
12%
21%
49%
8%
100%
26
35
64
120
292
51
588
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
4%
6%
11%
20%
50%
9%
100%
23
34
74
146
301
52
630
4%
5%
12%
23%
48%
8%
100%
-12%
-3%
16%
22%
3%
2%
7%
-23%
6%
9%
26%
-18%
-12%
-6%
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 3.17b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
Lower (100-299)
Upper (300-699)
Masters (500-699)
Doctoral (700-899)
Total
2002
%
2003
2,745
1,889
2,359
428
7,421
37%
25%
32%
6%
100%
2,810
1,998
2,274
356
7,438
38%
27%
31%
5%
100%
2004
%
2005
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
1,886
2,129
2,329
324
6,668
28%
32%
35%
5%
100%
1,985
1,909
2,348
306
6,548
30%
29%
36%
5%
100%
2,172
2,132
2,435
466
7,205
30%
30%
34%
6%
100%
9%
12%
4%
52%
-10%
-21%
13%
3%
9%
-3%
Figure 3.17a: Enrollment by Class Standing
Figure 3.17b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
400
3,000
350
2,500
300
2,000
250
200
1,500
150
1,000
100
500
50
0
0
First Year
Sophomores
2002
Juniors
2003
Seniors
2004
Masters
2005
2006
Doctoral
Lower
Upper
2002
2003
Masters
2004
2005
Doctoral
2006
Table 3.18: College of Law
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
Table 3.18a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
Law
Total
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
817
817
100%
100%
815
815
100%
100%
752
752
100%
100%
748
748
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
100%
100%
712
712
100%
100%
-5%
-5%
-13%
-13%
Table 3.18b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
Percent Change
Course Level
2002
Law
Total
10,910
10,910
%
100%
100%
2003
%
2004
%
2005
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
10,526
10,526
100%
100%
9,466
9,466
100%
100%
9,302
9,302
100%
100%
9,113
9,113
100%
100%
-2%
-2%
-16%
-16%
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Figure 3.18a: Enrollment by Class Standing
Figure 3.18b: Student Enrollment by Course Level
860
11,500
840
11,000
820
10,500
800
10,000
780
9,500
760
740
9,000
720
8,500
700
8,000
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Law
Note: The significant drop in Fall 2004 enrollment is due to new selective admission criteria introduced in Fall 2004
2002
2003
2004
Law
2005
2006
51
52
Table 3.19: Undergraduate Studies
1
Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Table 3.19 a: ENROLLMENT BY CLASS STANDING:
Percent Change
Class Standing
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Total
2002
%
2003
%
2004
%
1,280
169
37
43
1,529
84%
11%
2%
3%
100%
1,310
125
26
51
1,512
87%
8%
2%
3%
100%
1,072
99
23
35
1,229
87%
8%
2%
3%
100%
2005
853
83
29
33
998
%
2006
%
1 Year
5 Year
85%
8%
3%
3%
100%
789
97
40
33
959
82%
10%
4%
3%
100%
-8%
17%
38%
-38%
-43%
8%
-23%
-37%
-4%
|
Table 3.19b: STUDENT CREDIT HOURS BY COURSE LEVEL:
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Percent Change
Course Level
2002
%
2003
Developmental
Lower
Total
4,153
1,630
5,783
72%
28%
100%
4,246
1,595
5,841
%
73%
27%
100%
2004
%
2005
%
2006
%
4,030
1,589
5,619
72%
28%
100%
3,943
880
4,823
82%
18%
100%
4,218
903
5,121
82%
18%
100%
Figure 3.19a: Enrollment by Class Standing
4,500
1,400
4,000
7%
3%
6%
2%
-45%
-11%
3,500
1,200
3,000
1,000
2,500
800
2,000
600
1,500
400
1,000
200
500
0
First Year
Sophomores
2002
1
5 Year
Figure 3.19b: Student Credit Hours by Course Level
1,600
0
1 Year
2003
Juniors
2004
2005
Seniors
2006
Developmental
2002
Lower Division
2003
2004
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007): This new administrative unit came into existence in August 2007 and will assume most of the functions that were covered under University Studies (1997 – 2005).
Prior to Fall 2006, University Studies (1997 – 2005) enrollment includes students enrolled in Project 60, PSEOP, SYAP, Undecided Non-Degree and regular University Studies Students.
2005
2006
Table 3.20: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend
2002
College
Business
CLASS
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
First College
Education
Engineering
Race
Enrollment
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
1,950
423
64
174
10
382
283
3,286
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
2,612
878
125
86
8
55
409
4,173
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
2003
%
59%
13%
2%
5%
Enrollment
2004
%
2005
%
53
1,946
417
74
156
9
350
274
3,226
11%
8%
100%
1,985
440
74
129
6
336
279
3,249
1%
10%
100%
2,591
920
134
71
10
65
380
4,171
62%
22%
3%
2%
0%
2%
9%
100%
1,927
689
90
42
11
48
302
3,109
2%
10%
100%
92
40
2
2
1
58%
25%
1%
1%
1%
78
38
2
4
2
54%
26%
1%
3%
1%
36
28
1
3
1
48%
37%
1%
4%
1%
23
160
14%
100%
20
144
14%
100%
6
75
8%
100%
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
2,132
583
75
29
7
29
252
3,107
69%
19%
2%
1%
2,327
632
87
28
9
31
273
3,387
69%
19%
3%
1%
2,394
575
75
26
5
26
359
3,460
69%
17%
2%
1%
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
539
66
20
26
2
292
93
1,038
12%
9%
100%
63%
21%
3%
2%
1%
8%
100%
52%
6%
2%
3%
28%
9%
100%
572
71
17
38
1
321
81
1,101
60%
13%
2%
5%
Enrollment
1%
8%
100%
52%
6%
2%
3%
29%
7%
100%
568
63
15
47
1
325
84
1,103
61%
14%
2%
4%
10%
9%
100%
62%
22%
3%
1%
1%
10%
100%
51%
6%
1%
4%
29%
8%
100%
Enrollment
1,797
416
53
114
7
292
296
2,975
1,973
784
95
52
14
55
284
3,257
2,260
577
79
27
4
32
310
3,289
534
70
17
48
3
295
77
1,044
2006
%
60%
14%
2%
4%
10%
10%
100%
61%
24%
3%
2%
2%
9%
100%
69%
18%
2%
1%
1%
9%
100%
51%
7%
2%
5%
28%
7%
100%
Enrollment
1,718
449
54
112
3
318
289
2,943
1,957
752
105
50
11
65
275
3,215
2,007
577
69
38
8
34
305
3,038
510
65
17
56
3
327
68
1,046
Percent Change
%
58%
15%
2%
4%
11%
10%
100%
61%
23%
3%
2%
2%
9%
100%
66%
19%
2%
1%
1%
10%
100%
49%
6%
2%
5%
31%
7%
100%
1 Year
5 Year
-4%
8%
2%
-2%
-57%
9%
-2%
-1%
-12%
6%
-16%
-36%
-70%
-17%
2%
-10%
-1%
-4%
11%
-4%
-21%
18%
-3%
-1%
-25%
-14%
-16%
-42%
38%
18%
-33%
-23%
-11%
-6%
-1%
-8%
31%
14%
17%
21%
-2%
-13%
41%
100%
6%
-2%
-8%
-4%
-7%
17%
0%
11%
-12%
0%
-5%
-2%
-15%
115%
50%
12%
-27%
1%
(Continued on next page)
54
(Continued from previous page)
Table 3.20: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend
2002
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
Science
Urban Affairs
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Law
Undergraduate
Studies1
Undergraduate
Non-Degree
Race
Enrollment
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
682
133
24
30
2
71
93
1,035
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
2003
%
66%
13%
2%
3%
Enrollment
2004
%
7%
9%
100%
763
142
27
35
3
81
97
1,148
7%
8%
100%
362
210
20
7
54%
31%
3%
1%
359
182
17
6
56%
28%
3%
1%
16
55
670
2%
8%
100%
21
54
639
3%
8%
100%
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
693
48
22
21
2
9
22
817
85%
6%
3%
3%
704
44
20
22
2
9
14
815
86%
5%
2%
3%
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
733
462
58
59
2
9
206
1,529
1%
13%
100%
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
42
14
48%
16%
4
1
1
26
88
5%
1%
1%
30%
100%
1%
3%
100%
48%
30%
4%
4%
66%
12%
2%
3%
1%
2%
100%
708
450
48
47
3
9
247
1,512
47%
30%
3%
3%
1%
16%
100%
36
13
1
7
1
46%
17%
1%
9%
1%
20
78
26%
100%
Enrollment
1,205
330
46
72
1
98
170
1,922
354
189
11
5
1
20
58
638
607
48
24
27
2
10
34
752
2005
%
63%
17%
2%
4%
Enrollment
5%
9%
100%
1,322
338
58
85
5
99
137
2,044
55%
30%
2%
1%
2006
%
Enrollment
%
1 Year
5 Year
3%
2%
5%
2%
40%
13%
1%
4%
100%
159%
154%
190%
250%
58%
49%
104%
11%
-1%
-33%
-4%
-20%
-10%
-43%
6%
10%
100%
40%
3%
7%
119%
9%
-6%
535
50
19
22
4
8
74
712
75%
7%
3%
3%
1%
1%
10%
100%
-9%
11%
6%
-12%
0%
-33%
30%
-5%
-23%
4%
-14%
5%
100%
-11%
236%
-13%
415
310
34
20
4
2
174
959
43%
32%
4%
2%
18%
100%
-7%
17%
-44%
0%
100%
-3%
-4%
-43%
-33%
-41%
-66%
100%
-78%
-16%
-37%
61%
12%
2%
5%
-7%
33%
29%
33%
2%
17%
100%
20%
-9%
-1%
5%
7%
100%
1,366
344
61
87
7
112
139
2,116
5%
7%
100%
312
169
18
6
53%
29%
3%
1%
346
167
18
4
55%
27%
3%
1%
3%
9%
100%
25
58
588
4%
10%
100%
35
60
630
81%
6%
3%
4%
587
45
18
25
4
12
57
748
78%
6%
2%
3%
1%
2%
8%
100%
42%
33%
3%
4%
18%
100%
1%
5%
100%
41%
30%
2%
3%
1%
65%
17%
3%
4%
Percent Change
508
365
30
34
7
2
283
1,229
23%
100%
415
333
29
36
4
1
180
998
148
28
6
9
58%
11%
2%
4%
241
33
7
15
65%
9%
2%
4%
8
57
256
3%
22%
100%
5
69
370
1%
19%
100%
225
44
9
20
1
6
63
368
65%
16%
3%
4%
436%
214%
400%
0%
500%
142%
318%
(Continued on next page)
(Continued from previous page)
Table 3.20: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Race: 5-Year Trend
2002
College
Race
Graduate Studies White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
Other2
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
University
Enrollment
127
80
10
3
1
3
36
260
2003
%
Enrollment
2004
%
Enrollment
2005
%
Enrollment
2006
%
Enrollment
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
-47%
-55%
-50%
-64%
-84%
-90%
0%
49%
31%
4%
1%
79
44
4
1
51%
28%
3%
1%
52
21
3
2
59%
24%
3%
2%
86
29
2
3
42%
14%
1%
1%
46
13
1
3
53%
15%
1%
3%
1%
14%
100%
1
27
156
1%
17%
100%
1
9
88
1%
10%
100%
1
86
207
42%
100%
1
23
87
1%
26%
100%
-73%
-58%
White
5
17%
1
4%
-80%
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
3
10%
2
7%
1
4%
-50%
14
6
30
47%
20%
100%
19
7
28
68%
25%
100%
36%
17%
-7%
9,532
2,797
376
413
41
831
1,560
15,550
61%
18%
2%
3%
9,126
2,771
387
413
41
927
1,477
15,142
60%
18%
3%
3%
0%
6%
10%
100%
-4%
-1%
3%
White
9,964
Black
2,937
Hispanic
420
Asian or Pacific Islander
441
Native American
36
Non-Resident Alien
867
Unknown
1,498
Total
16,163
62%
18%
3%
3%
5%
9%
100%
10,163
2,953
431
415
40
888
1,487
16,377
62%
18%
3%
3%
5%
9%
100%
9,784
2,776
375
396
35
874
1,641
15,881
62%
17%
2%
2%
6%
10%
100%
5%
10%
100%
12%
-5%
-3%
-67%
-36%
-67%
-8%
-6%
-8%
-6%
14%
7%
-1%
-6%
5-Year Change Highlights
55
■ In the College of Business, Hispanic (2%), Black (1%) and Native American (17%) enrollment has increased between 2001 and 2005. Between 2004 and 2005 enrollment in all racial categories
decreased except for Native American.
■ In the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, Black (14%), Asian or Pacific Islander(24%)and Non-Resident Alien (15%) enrollment increased significantly between 2004 and 2005.
■ In COEHS enrollment in all racial categories increased or remained the same between 2001-2005 and 2004-2005 except Native American.
■ In the College of Engineering, Black (21%), Asian (55%) and Non-Resident Alien (44%)enrollment increased between 2001-2005. Between 2004 and 2005 almost all racial categories experienced a
healthy positive growth in enrollment except Non-resident Alien.
■ In the College of Science, the highest growth is in Asian, Hispanic and Black enrollment. Overall the enrollment has increased in every racial category. (*The significant increase in Fall 2004 and 2005
enrollment in the College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of Science), PENGR (Pre Engineering), PNUR (Pre Nursing), CSPBUND
(College of Science Undecided) and other new codes.
■ The College of Urban Affairs has experienced a significant growth in Non-Resident Alien and Asian enrollment between 2001-2005 and in Hispanic (64%) in the last year. Overall the College has experienced a (3%) negative growth.
■ In the College of Law, Asian (79%), Non-Resident Alien (20%) and Hispanic (6%) enrollment increased significantly between 2001 and 2004.
■ At the University level, enrollment has decreased between 2% to 5% except for Asian, Native American and Non-Resident Alien.
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
2
56
Table 3.21: CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
2002
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
Business
CLASS
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
First College
Education
Race
Enrollment
White
1,289
Black
304
Hispanic
45
Asian or Pacific Islander
124
Native American
7
Non-Resident Alien
103
Unknown
196
Total
2,068
White
2,276
Black
788
Hispanic
112
Asian or Pacific Islander
71
Native American
6
Non-Resident Alien
43
Unknown
356
Total
3,652
2003
%
62%
15%
2%
6%
5%
9%
100%
1,215
314
54
96
5
84
162
1,930
1%
10%
100%
2,222
816
121
63
8
46
322
3,598
92
40
2
2
1
58%
25%
1%
1%
1%
23
160
White
957
Black
196
Hispanic
37
Asian or Pacific Islander
17
Native American
4
Non-Resident Alien
10
Unknown
123
Total
1,344
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
62%
22%
3%
2%
Enrollment
2004
%
63%
16%
3%
5%
4%
8%
100%
1,264
347
56
72
3
81
136
1,959
2005
%
65%
18%
3%
4%
4%
7%
100%
1%
9%
100%
1,633
580
85
37
11
32
248
2,626
1%
9%
100%
78
38
2
4
2
54%
26%
1%
3%
1%
36
28
1
3
1
48%
37%
1%
4%
1%
14%
100%
20
144
14%
100%
6
75
8%
100%
71%
15%
3%
1%
1,023
216
31
16
2
13
111
1,412
72%
15%
2%
1%
1,046
194
38
15
1
14
109
1,417
74%
14%
3%
1%
1%
9%
100%
62%
23%
3%
2%
Enrollment
1%
8%
100%
62%
22%
3%
1%
1%
8%
100%
Enrollment
1,167
322
40
72
4
79
108
1,792
1,648
664
84
45
13
37
211
2,702
969
187
38
14
3
16
80
1,307
2006
%
65%
18%
2%
4%
4%
6%
100%
61%
25%
3%
2%
1%
8%
100%
74%
14%
3%
1%
1%
6%
100%
Enrollment
1,120
335
41
70
1
72
101
1,740
1,637
646
88
40
10
40
211
2,672
937
213
37
20
4
9
79
1,299
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
64%
19%
2%
4%
-4%
4%
3%
-3%
-75%
-9%
-6%
-3%
-13%
10%
-9%
-44%
-86%
-30%
-48%
-16%
-1%
-3%
5%
-11%
-23%
8%
0%
-1%
-28%
-18%
-21%
-44%
67%
-7%
-41%
-27%
-3%
14%
-3%
43%
33%
-44%
-1%
-1%
-2%
9%
4%
6%
100%
61%
24%
3%
1%
1%
8%
100%
72%
16%
3%
2%
1%
6%
100%
18%
-10%
-36%
-3%
(Continued on next page)
(Continued from previous page)
Table 3.21: CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
2002
College
Engineering
Science
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Urban Affairs
Undergraduate
Studies1
Race
Enrollment
2003
%
Enrollment
%
69%
9%
2%
3%
473
63
14
24
1
32
63
670
71%
9%
2%
4%
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
460
58
15
19
2
39
75
668
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
418
100
16
25
2
17
72
650
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
127
90
7
1
52%
37%
3%
140
80
7
1
21
246
9%
100%
733
462
58
59
2
9
206
1,529
48%
30%
4%
4%
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
2004
6%
11%
100%
64%
15%
2%
4%
3%
11%
100%
1%
13%
100%
467
103
18
26
2
17
69
702
5%
9%
100%
67%
15%
3%
4%
Enrollment
461
53
13
28
1
30
64
650
2005
%
71%
8%
2%
4%
5%
10%
100%
430
58
16
34
2
35
62
637
859
268
40
64
1
20
131
1,383
1%
9%
100%
989
285
50
72
4
22
103
1,525
55%
31%
3%
152
94
7
2
55%
34%
3%
1%
133
85
8
1
26
254
10%
100%
20
275
7%
100%
1
17
245
708
450
48
47
3
9
247
1,512
47%
30%
3%
3%
508
365
30
34
7
2
283
1,229
41%
30%
2%
3%
1%
2%
10%
100%
1%
16%
100%
62%
19%
3%
5%
Enrollment
23%
100%
415
333
29
36
4
1
180
998
2006
%
68%
9%
3%
5%
5%
10%
100%
65%
19%
3%
5%
Enrollment
403
55
17
43
2
45
55
620
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
65%
9%
3%
7%
-6%
-5%
6%
26%
0%
29%
-11%
-3%
-12%
-5%
13%
126%
0%
15%
-27%
-7%
141%
199%
244%
184%
200%
71%
32%
140%
7%
9%
100%
1%
7%
100%
1,007
299
55
71
6
29
95
1,562
2%
6%
100%
2%
5%
10%
-1%
50%
32%
-8%
2%
54%
35%
3%
154
90
8
56%
32%
3%
16%
6%
0%
21%
7%
100%
25
277
9%
100%
47%
13%
19%
13%
42%
33%
3%
4%
415
310
34
20
4
2
174
959
43%
32%
4%
2%
0%
0%
-7%
17%
-44%
0%
100%
-3%
-4%
-43%
-33%
-41%
-66%
100%
-78%
-16%
-37%
18%
100%
64%
19%
4%
5%
18%
100%
14%
(Continued on next page)
57
58
Table 3.21: CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
2002
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
Undergraduate
Non-Degree
|
Other 2
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
University
Race
Enrollment
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
2003
%
42
14
48%
16%
4
1
1
26
88
5%
1%
1%
30%
100%
Enrollment
36
13
1
7
1
20
78
2004
%
46%
17%
1%
9%
1%
26%
100%
Enrollment
2005
%
61%
20%
3%
3%
2%
11%
100%
6,362
2,093
296
284
24
201
1,040
10,300
62%
20%
3%
3%
2%
10%
100%
58%
11%
2%
4%
241
33
7
15
65%
9%
2%
4%
8
57
256
3%
22%
100%
5
69
370
1%
19%
100%
5
3
6,107
1,957
276
264
25
187
1,054
9,870
62%
20%
3%
3%
2%
11%
100%
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
2
Enrollment
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
225
44
9
20
1
6
63
368
61%
12%
2%
5%
-7%
33%
29%
33%
436%
214%
2%
17%
100%
20%
-9%
-1%
500%
142%
318%
17%
10%
1
4%
-80%
2
7%
1
4%
-50%
14
6
30
47%
20%
100%
19
7
28
68%
25%
100%
36%
17%
-7%
5,997
1,970
272
291
30
210
835
9,605
62%
21%
3%
3%
5,899
1,992
289
285
28
222
810
9,525
62%
21%
3%
3%
-2%
1%
6%
-2%
-7%
6%
-3%
-1%
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in the College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of
Science). Undergraduate Non-Degree fluctuations are due to reclassification of the Academic Plan.
1
%
148
28
6
9
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
White
6,394
Black
2,052
Hispanic
292
Asian or Pacific Islander
322
Native American
25
Non-Resident Alien
222
Unknown
1,098
Total
10,405
Enrollment
2006
2%
9%
100%
2%
9%
100%
400%
-8%
-3%
-1%
-11%
12%
0%
-26%
-8%
Table 3.22: CSU Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
2002
College
Business
CLASS
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
Education
Engineering
Race
Enrollment
White
661
Black
119
Hispanic
19
Asian or Pacific Islander
50
Native American
3
Non-Resident Alien
279
Unknown
87
Total
1,218
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
336
90
13
15
2
12
53
521
White
1,175
Black
387
Hispanic
38
Asian or Pacific Islander
12
Native American
3
Non-Resident Alien
19
Unknown
129
Total
1,763
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
2003
2004
2005
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
54%
10%
2%
4%
731
103
20
60
4
266
112
1,296
56%
8%
2%
5%
21%
9%
100%
721
93
18
57
3
255
143
1,290
20%
11%
100%
64%
18%
2%
1%
294
109
5
5
61%
23%
1%
1%
3%
10%
100%
16
54
483
3%
11%
100%
66%
21%
3%
1%
66%
19%
2%
1%
23%
7%
100%
64%
17%
2%
3%
2%
10%
100%
67%
22%
2%
1%
369
104
13
8
2
19
58
573
%
56%
7%
1%
4%
1%
7%
100%
1,304
416
56
12
7
18
162
1,975
1%
8%
100%
1,348
381
37
11
4
12
250
2,043
79
8
5
7
21%
2%
1%
2%
99
8
3
14
23%
2%
1%
3%
107
10
2
19
24%
2%
253
18
370
68%
5%
100%
289
18
431
67%
4%
100%
295
20
453
65%
4%
100%
1%
12%
100%
4%
2006
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
630
94
13
42
3
213
188
1,183
53%
8%
1%
4%
598
114
13
42
2
246
188
1,203
325
120
11
7
1
18
73
555
1,291
390
41
13
1
16
230
1,982
104
12
1
14
1
260
15
407
18%
16%
100%
59%
22%
2%
1%
3%
13%
100%
65%
20%
2%
1%
320
106
17
10
1
25
64
543
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
50%
9%
1%
3%
-5%
21%
0%
0%
-33%
15%
2%
-10%
-4%
-32%
-16%
-33%
-12%
116%
-1%
-2%
-12%
55%
43%
0%
39%
-12%
-2%
-5%
18%
31%
-33%
-50%
108%
21%
4%
-9%
-6%
-16%
50%
33%
32%
75%
-1%
20%
16%
100%
59%
20%
3%
2%
5%
12%
100%
1%
12%
100%
1,070
364
32
18
4
25
226
1,739
1%
13%
100%
-17%
-7%
-22%
38%
300%
56%
-2%
-12%
26%
3%
107
10
25%
2%
3%
-17%
35%
25%
3%
13
1
282
13
426
3%
-7%
0%
8%
-13%
5%
86%
64%
4%
100%
62%
21%
2%
1%
66%
3%
100%
11%
-28%
15%
(Continued on next page)
59
60
Table 3.22: CSU Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
2002
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
College
Race
Science
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
264
33
8
5
69%
9%
2%
1%
54
21
385
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
Urban Affairs
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Law
Graduate Studies
Enrollment
2003
%
Enrollment
2004
%
Enrollment
2005
%
66%
9%
2%
2%
346
62
6
8
64%
12%
1%
1%
14%
5%
100%
296
39
9
9
1
64
28
446
14%
6%
100%
78
39
539
235
120
13
6
55%
28%
3%
1%
219
102
10
5
57%
26%
3%
1%
16
34
424
4%
8%
100%
21
28
385
5%
7%
100%
202
95
4
3
1
20
38
363
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
693
48
22
21
2
9
22
817
85%
6%
3%
3%
86%
5%
2%
3%
1%
3%
100%
704
44
20
22
2
9
14
815
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Non-Resident Alien
Unknown
Total
127
80
10
3
1
3
36
260
49%
31%
4%
1%
1%
14%
100%
Enrollment
14%
7%
100%
333
53
8
13
1
77
34
519
56%
26%
1%
1%
2006
%
64%
10%
2%
3%
Enrollment
Percent Change
%
1 Year
5 Year
65%
8%
1%
3%
36%
36%
-25%
220%
54%
110%
44%
15%
7%
100%
359
45
6
16
1
83
44
554
15%
8%
100%
8%
-15%
-25%
23%
0%
8%
29%
7%
179
84
10
5
52%
24%
3%
1%
192
77
10
4
54%
22%
3%
1%
7%
-8%
0%
-20%
-18%
-36%
-23%
-33%
6%
10%
100%
24
41
343
7%
12%
100%
35
35
353
10%
10%
100%
46%
-15%
3%
119%
3%
-17%
81%
6%
3%
4%
78%
6%
2%
3%
1%
2%
8%
100%
535
50
19
22
4
8
74
712
75%
7%
3%
3%
1%
1%
10%
100%
-9%
11%
6%
-12%
-23%
4%
-14%
5%
100%
-11%
236%
-13%
1%
2%
100%
607
48
24
27
2
10
34
752
1%
5%
100%
587
45
18
25
4
12
57
748
79
44
4
1
51%
28%
3%
1%
52
21
3
2
59%
24%
3%
2%
86
29
2
3
41%
14%
1%
1%
46
13
1
3
53%
15%
1%
3%
-47%
-55%
-50%
-64%
-84%
-90%
0%
1
27
156
1%
17%
100%
1
9
88
1%
10%
100%
1
87
208
42%
100%
1
23
87
1%
26%
100%
0%
-74%
-58%
-67%
-36%
-67%
-33%
30%
-5%
(Continued on next page)
Table 3.22: CSU Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Race: 5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
2002
College
Graduate and
Law Total
Race
Enrollment
White
3,570
Black
885
Hispanic
128
Asian or Pacific Islander
119
Native American
11
Non-Resident Alien
645
Unknown
400
Total
5,758
2003
2004
2005
2006
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
%
Enrollment
62%
15%
2%
2%
0%
11%
7%
100%
3,801
860
135
131
16
687
447
6,077
63%
14%
2%
2%
0%
11%
7%
100%
3,677
819
99
132
10
687
587
6,011
61%
14%
2%
2%
0%
11%
10%
100%
3,535
827
104
122
11
621
725
5,945
59%
14%
2%
2%
0%
10%
12%
100%
3,227
779
98
128
13
705
667
5,617
Note: The significant increase in Fall 2004 enrollment in the College of Science is due to the introduction of a new academic plan called “UNDCS” (Undecided College of
Science). Graduate Non-Degree fluctuations are due to reclassification of the Academic Plan.
Percent Change
%
57%
14%
2%
2%
13%
12%
100%
1 Year
5 Year
-9%
-6%
-6%
5%
18%
14%
-8%
-6%
-10%
-12%
-23%
8%
18%
9%
67%
-2%
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
61
62
Table 3.23: Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Load: 5 Year Trend
UNDERGRADUATE FULL-TIME:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
College
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Undergraduate Studies1
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Other2
Total
1,410
2,744
936
435
456
131
874
14
1,313
2,777
953
437
505
154
794
14
1,371
2,065
977
459
1,051
162
570
66
6,947
6,721
1,184
2,075
876
453
1,197
154
524
63
3
6,529
-3%
1%
-2%
-1%
2%
12%
-1%
-22%
-50%
.3%
-16%
-24%
-6%
4%
163%
18%
-40%
350%
7,000
1,216
2,058
892
459
1,174
138
528
81
6
6,552
-7%
UNDERGRADUATE PART-TIME:
Percent Change
College
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Undergraduate Studies1
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Other2
Total
658
1,068
408
233
194
115
655
74
617
965
459
233
197
100
718
64
588
636
440
191
332
113
659
190
3,353
3,149
556
597
423
167
365
123
435
305
25
2,996
-3%
-7%
2%
-6%
4%
15%
-7%
6%
9%
-2%
-16%
-44%
4%
-28%
88%
7%
-34%
312%
3,405
576
644
415
178
351
107
470
289
23
3,053
-12%
(Continued on next page)
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997-2005).
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
2
Table 3.24: Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Load: 5 Year Trend
GRADUATE & LAW FULL-TIME:
Percent Change
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies
Total
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
370
186
276
137
229
94
508
13
1,813
433
205
308
123
254
100
497
4
1,924
395
225
318
101
294
92
466
6
1,897
356
239
240
100
276
79
436
2
1,728
396
233
263
120
325
93
461
2
1,893
11%
-3%
10%
20%
18%
18%
6%
0%
10%
7%
25%
-5%
-12%
42%
-1%
-9%
-85%
4%%
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
848
335
1,487
233
156
330
309
247
3,945
863
368
1,667
308
192
285
318
152
4,153
895
258
1,725
352
245
271
286
82
4,114
827
316
1,742
307
243
264
312
206
4,217
807
310
1,476
306
229
260
251
85
3,724
-2%
-2%
-15%
0%
-6%
-2%
-20%
-59%
-12%
-6%
-8%
-1%
31%
47%
-21%
-19%
-66%
-6%
GRADUATE & LAW PART-TIME:
Percent Change
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies
Total
Undergraduate Full-time Load: Student registered for a minimum of 12 hours
Graduate Full-time Load: Student registered for a minimum of 9 hours
Law Full-time Load: Student registered for a minimum of 13 hours
The definition of Full-time and Part-time load at the Graduate and Law level has been changed. Reports published prior to Fall 2005 will be affected.
63
EEast and West Centers
The opening of Cleveland State University West Center in August 2003 and East Center in August 2004 established
a suburban presence for the University’s thriving downtown campus. Both these Centers reach out to part-time students
with a special appeal to busy adults. Academic offerings include programs for educators (teachers and administrators),
business and public service professionals seeking to complete their university degree, and traditional college-age students and high school students in post-secondary educational option programs. Program offerings include a variety of
undergraduate courses and Masters degree programs. Continuing education courses include several professional certificate programs for health care professionals, public safety personnel and other professionals, as well as courses for noncredit students with a focus on job and career interests.
Table 3.25: West Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semesters
West Center
Undergraduate
College
Graduate/Law
Total
2003
2004
2005
2006
2003
2004
2005
2006
2003
132
269
197
276
18
306
374
24
351
414
57
195
120
616
27
562
87
708
18
546
540
351
81
409
4
67
148
98
405
558
852
920
28
986
94
1,469
4
1,090
8
849
327
389
616
27
4
28
1,391
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
2004
2005
2006
759
852
702
363
374
495
726
564
466
18
67
148
98
94
4
8
2,027 1,942 1,769
Table 3.25a: Annual West Center Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends
West Center
Enrollment
Summer
Fall
Spring
Total
Percent Change
SCH
Percent Change
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
1-Year
3-Year
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
1-Year
3-Year
411
506
612
1,529
437
486
507
1,430
445
469
459
1,373
2%
-3%
-9%
-4%
8%
-7%
-25%
-10%
1,607
2,074
2,487
6,168
1,681
1,942
2,025
5,648
1,660
1,769
1,693
5,122
-1%
-9%
-16%
-9%
3%
-15%
-32%
-17%
Figure 3.25a: Annual West Center Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends
Enrollment
Student Credit Hours
2,500
700
600
2,000
500
1,500
400
300
04
05
06
04
05
06
05
06
07
1,000
04
05
06
04
05
06
05
06
200
500
100
0
64
Summer
Spring
Fall
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
0
Summer
Fall
Spring
07
West Center Serves the Following Cleveland Suburbs:
■ Avon
■ Avon Lake
■ Bay Village
■ Berea
■ Brook Park
■ Elyria
■ Rocky River
■ Sheffield
■ Sheffield Lake
■ Sheffield Township
■ Westlake
■ Fairview Park
■ Lakewood
■ Lorain
■ North Olmsted
■ North Ridgeville
■ Olmsted Falls
West Center
■ This center was opened in Fall 2003 with the prospect of drawing in sufficient annual enrollment to generate 3,000 student
credit hours (SCH). This expectation was far exceeded. The West Center academic year credit hours include Summer, Fall,
and Spring have exceeded 5,000 SCH. This robust growth is indicative of CSU’s adopting entrepreneurial strategies in meeting
the educational needs of the Cleveland area residents.
Table 3.26: East Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semesters
East Center
Undergraduate
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
Graduate
Total
2004
2005
2006
2004
2005
2006
2004
2005
2006
48
164
177
192
153
116
11
4
38
32
354
195
237
420
530
8
203
69
452
243
164
420
414
192
530
8
55
20
1,219
356
185
463
4
38
60
1,106
121
333
55
12
436
121
615
8
783
28
752
948
Table 3.26a: Annual East Center Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends
East Center
Enrollment
Summer
Fall
Spring
Total
Percent Change
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
1-Year
626
431
1,057
332
349
337
1,018
227
275
267
769
-32%
-21%
-21%
-24%
3-Year
-56%
-38%
-27%
SCH
Percent Change
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
1-Year
3-Year
969
1,462
2,431
1,251
1,219
1,348
3,818
795
1,106
1,054
2,955
-36%
-9%
-22%
-23%
14%
-28%
22%
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
65
Figure 3.26a: Annual East Center Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends
Enrollment
Student Credit Hours
700
1,600
600
1,400
500
1,200
1,000
400
800
300
600
200
100
0
400
04
05
Summer
06
04
05
06
05
06
07
05
06
04
05
06
05
06
200
0
Spring
Fall
04
Summer
Fall
Spring
East Center Serves the Following Cleveland Suburbs:
■ Aurora
■ Bainbridge
■ Beachwood
■ Bedford
■ Chagrin Falls
■ Gates Mills
■ Hudson
■ Hunting Valley
■ Macedonia
■ Maple Heights
■ Mayfield Heights
■ Moreland Hills
■ North Randall
■ Northfield
■ Oakwood
■ Orange
■ Solon
■ Twinsburg
■ Warrensville Heights
■ Woodmere
East Center
■ Launching the CSU East Center in Fall 2004 included an assumption that the Center would generate 2,500 credit hours in an
academic year. The East Center academic year student credit hours (include Fall 04, Spring 05, and Summer 05) have
exceeded 3,500.
66
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
07
Table 3.27: CSU Off-Campus Locations in Cleveland: Fall Student Credit Hours
Other Locations*
Undergraduate
College
Graduate/Law
2002
2003
2004
337
80
132
521
196
49
67
263
32
28
240
164
220
128
271
367
459
164
171
258
12
27
20
837 1,466 2,244
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Law
Science
Urban Affairs
Other (AF-CSC-MSC)
Total
821 1,246
2005
2006
51
197
2
305
827 1,005
21
2002
Total
2003
2004
2005
2006
357
816
45
132
598 1,032
906
15
487
12
918
66
726
28
1,107
41
258
30
16
109
200
2
1,230 2,134 1,550 1,954 1,547
230
154
2002
2003
2004
357
948
382
653
678 1,228
49
240
394
130
2005
2006
973
969 1,304
278
68
346
519 1,553 1,263
40
49
220
282
271
367
489
294
187
367
12
227
22
2,387 3,420 3,791
2,051 3,380
Table 3.27a: Annual Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends at Lorain County Community College
Lorain County Community College
Enrollment
Percent Change
SCH
Percent Change
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
1-Year
3-Year
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
1-Year
3-Year
82
181
143
406
103
113
79
295
115
106
70
291
12%
-6%
-11%
-1%
40%
-41%
-51%
-28%
332
807
558
1,697
434
507
358
1,299
316
489
350
1,155
-27%
-4%
-2%
-11%
-5%
-39%
-37%
-32%
Summer
Fall
Spring
Total
Figure 3.27a: Annual Lorain County Community College Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends
Enrollment
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Student Credit Hours
900
800
700
600
500
400
04
05
06
04
05
06
05
06
300
200
07
04
05
06
04
05
06
05
06
07
100
Summer
Fall
0
Spring
Summer
Fall
Spring
*CSU Top 10 Off-Campus Locations in Greater Cleveland Area:
■ Cleveland Clinic Foundation
■ Lakeland Community College
■ Lorain County Community College
■
■
■
■
Magnificat High School
MetroHealth
Moen, Inc.
WVIZ
■ Orange High School
■ Progressive Insurance
■ St. Joseph Academy
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
67
Table 3.28: Annual Lakeland Community College Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends
Lakeland Community College
Enrollment
Percent Change
SCH
Percent Change
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
1-Year
3-Year
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
1-Year
3-Year
17
7
22
46
11
80
87
178
57
120
96
273
418%
50%
10%
53%
235%
1614%
336%
493%
83
28
142
253
60
335
353
748
210
504
353
1,067
250%
50%
0%
43%
153%
1700%
149%
322%
Summer
Fall
Spring
Total
Figure 3.28: Annual West Center Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends
Student Credit Hours
Enrollment
120
600
100
500
80
400
60
300
40
200
20
04
04
0
05
05
06
05
06
Summer
06
100
07
0
Spring
Fall
04
05
04
06
05
Summer
05
06
06
07
Spring
Fall
Table 3.29: Annual Web Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends
IVDL/Web
Enrollment
2003–04
Summer
Fall
Spring
Total
229
316
262
807
Percent Change
2004–05 2006–06
234
383
554
1,171
2006–07
1-Year
707
1,198
1,355
3,260
44%
82%
47%
57%
492
659
920
2,071
SCH
Percent Change
3-Year 2003–04 2004–05 2005–06 2006–07
209%
279%
417%
304%
834
1,069
802
2,705
816
1,325
1,805
3,946
1,759
2,322
3,490
7,571
2,973
4,260
5,257
12,490
1-Year
3-Year
69%
83%
51%
65%
256%
299%
555%
362%
Note: Web-Based courses are determined by the section number (501-509 and 530-539).
Figure 3.29: Annual West Center Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends
Enrollment
Student Credit Hours
1,400
6,000
1,200
5,000
1,000
4,000
800
3,000
600
2,000
400
200
0
68
03
04
05
Summer
06
03
04
05
06
04
06
07
1,000
Spring
Fall
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
05
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
03
0
04
05
Summer
06
03
04
Fall
05
06
04
05
06
Spring
07
Table 3.30: Annual Student Credit Hours Generated via Interactive Videos & Distance Learning
IVDL
Enrollment
2003–04
Summer
Fall
Spring
Total
Percent Change
2004–05 2006–06
61
191
222
474
43
235
225
503
2006–07
1-Year
46
199
215
460
-73%
-10%
-4%
-25%
170
220
223
613
3-Year
SCH
Percent Change
2003–04 2004–05 2005–06 2006–07
-25%
4%
-3%
-3%
282
1,589
1,341
3,212
227
1,719
1,580
3,526
580
1,489
1,420
3,489
1-Year
3-Year
-62%
-14%
-38%
-32%
-22%
-19%
-34%
-26%
221
1,282
880
2,383
Interactive Video and Telecourses are determined by the section number (701-709 and 780-789).
Figure 3.30: Annual Student Credit Hours Generated via Interactive Videos & Distance Learning
Enrollment
Enrollment
250
1,800
1,600
200
1,400
1,200
150
1,000
03
100
04
05
06
04
05
06
07
800
03
600
03
0
04
04
05
Summer
200
06
Fall
Spring
0
05
06
04
400
50
03
04
05
Summer
05
06
07
06
Fall
Spring
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
69
Division of Continuing Education:
DDivision of Continuing Education
The Division of Continuing Education is the major educational outreach arm of Cleveland State,
educating thousands of adults each year in this region and beyond. Many Division programs satisfy certification and
licensing requirements. Others enable professionals to increase their job skills, train for new technologies, and build
communication and leadership abilities. All of the Division's programs help individuals and organizations enhance their
abilities and improve productivity.
The Division offers noncredit seminars, workshops, and other noncredit programs in several major program areas.
■ Business and Management, including Test Preparation (GRE, GMAT, and LSAT)
■ Computers and Information Technology, including Engineering and Construction and Landscape Horticulture
■ Center for Emergency Preparedness, including Hazardous Materials
■ Nursing and Health/Human Services
■ English as a Second Language (shown in “other” category)
Enrollment trends, including total training hours, for the previous seven fiscal years (FY 2000-FY 2006) are shown below.
Figure 3.31: Division of Continuing Education
Enrollment by Program Area FY 2000 – 2006
12,000
127
10,000
8,000
86
1,182
6,000
3,556
1,442
4,000
0
2,801
2,622
261
2,099
2,255
4,139
4,459
3,531
1,555
1,634
2,427
2,106
19
5,400
5,085
2,266
2,105
1,348
1,887
1,698
1,272
1,168
1,104
1,501
8,794
FY 2000
10,290
FY 2001
10,588
FY 2002
8,458
FY 2003
9,439
FY 2004
9,578
FY 2005
11,289
FY 2006
Business & Management
70
79
1,468
1,473
4,033
2,000
177
71
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Computer/Engineering
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
HAZMAT
Nursing/Health Sciences
Other
Figure 3.32: Total Student Training Hours
Spring 2002 – Fall 2006
100,000
91,360
90,000
80,000
82,773
78,598
69,076
70,000
58,694
60,000
54,661
50,000
57,413
54,429
45,142
38,692
40,000
30,000
20,198
20,000
19,014
13,522
11,651
18,876
10,000
0
Spring
Summer
2002
2003
Fall
2004
2005
2006
The graph below displays the number of courses offered in FY 2002 – FY 2006. The Center for Emergency Preparedness
offered the greatest number, followed by Computer and Technical Programs, Nursing and Health/Human Services, and
Business and Management.
Figure 3.33: Courses Offered by Program Area
FY 2002 – FY 2006
500
450
431
400
372
350
250
200
306
291
300
259
259
285
223
211
163
150
164
140
165
159
197
169
127 134
117 117
100
50
0
Computer Technical
Business & Management
Emergency Preparedness
Nursing & Health Sciences
ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES
71
Division of Continuing Education
■ The Division continued its work as a Center for Public Health Preparedness, thanks to a major grant from the Centers for
Disease Control. This grant and ongoing grant funding is supporting training throughout Ohio on hazardous materials,
bioterrorism, and other public health and safety topics.
■ Programs offered at the East and West Centers attracted over 925 enrollments in FY 2006.
■ The English as a Second Language Program has continued to grow. The Intensive English Language Program, begun in
2004, attracted students from several countries, primarily in Asia and the Middle East.
■ The Division delivered 101 custom training programs for client organizations in FY 2006. The largest contract was a
continuing agreement with the City of Cleveland’s Department of Public Utilities, to administer its technology training
program.
■ In addition to serving as the site for hundreds of Divisional offerings, the Cole Center for Continuing Education hosted
over 150 other University and external functions in FY 2006.
■ The Division’s online programs are strong, as the graph below shows. The online Patient Advocacy Certificate Program
continues to draw participants from Hawaii to Maine.
■ In 2006, the Division assumed responsibility for the University’s e-learning initiative and formed the Center for eLearning.
This Center has the goals of increasing University enrollments and enhancing academic quality through providing
leadership and support for e-learning.
Figure 3.34: Total Distance Learning Students
Spring 2002 – Fall 2006
350
Total Students
300
303
250
200
200
150
116
112
100
60
83
73
50
0
69
39
22
Spring
2
Summer
2002
72
77
0
0
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
111
2003
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Fall
2004
2005
2006
4
Research
R
Research
RResearch
Cleveland State University
is a young, Doctoral Research urban institution which has seen an impressive
rise in research awards in recent years. In FY 2006, research awards totaled over $30 million, setting the stage for the
target of $50 million for the Research Extensive status in the future. The major drivers for this growth have been
Cleveland State University’s faculty and infrastructure, strategic location in the heart of Ohio’s bio-technology corridor,
and significant increases in graduate student enrollment. While CSU is not a research university, the current steady
growth in funded research on campus clearly demonstrates the institutional priorities of promoting an intellectual
university community engaged in discovery of knowledge and artistic works.
Table 4.1: Research Awards and Expenditures
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Source
2002
Awards
Expenditures
Economic Impact*
$25,104,137
$22,118,648
$30,081,361
2003
2004
$22,658,237
$19,117,358
$25,999,607
$35,758,804
$25,922,289
$35,254,313
2005
$31,202,726
$25,665,877
$34,905,592
2006
1 Year
$33,610,661
$26,425,253
$35,938,344
8%
3%
3%
5 Year
34%
19%
19%
Figure 4.1: Research Awards and Expenditures
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
$36M
$34M
$32M
Dollars
$30M
$28M
$26M
$24M
$22M
$20M
$18M
FY 2002
FY 2003
FY 2004
Awards
FY 2005
FY 2006
Expenditures
*Using CSU report of 1.36 per $ spent.
Highlights
■ Selected examples of projects that have been funded in recent years include the establishment of an Engineering Research Facility
funded by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration; a University Transportation Center focusing on
work zone safety funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation; and NASA and industrial funding focusing on power systems and
power electronics.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
RESEARCH
75
Table 4.2: Research Awards by Source
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Source
2002
Federal grants
State grants
Local grants
Private grants
State Appropriations
Advanced Manufacturing Center *
Total
$8,178,459
$3,179,255
$428,814
$3,746,149
$7,431,970
$2,139,490
$25,104,137
2003
$8,931,599
$4,385,077
$548,695
$3,861,248
$4,931,618
$22,658,237
2004
$20,715,659
$5,557,372
$2,024,769
$2,803,662
$4,657,342
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
$20,612,586
$3,809,529
$368,983
$2,170,075
$4,241,553
$22,998,055
$3,728,005
$243,971
$3,188,529
$3,452,101
12%
-2%
-34%
47%
-19%
181%
17%
-43%
-15%
-54%
$35,758,804 $31,202,726
$33,610,661
8%
34%
Figure 4.2a: Research Awards by Source Only
Fiscal Year 2006
State
Appropriations
10%
Private Grants
9%
Local Grants
1%
State Grants
11%
Federal Grants
69%
76
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Figure 4.2b: Research Awards by Source and Year
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
$25.1M
$20.1M
Dollars
$15.1M
$10.1M
$5.1M
$100K
FY 2002
FY 2003
Federal Grants
State Grants
FY 2004
Local Grants
FY 2005
Private Grants
FY 2006
State Appropriations
Notes:
Appropriation: An authorization granted by the General Assembly to make budgetary expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes.
Grant: A financial assistance mechanism whereby money and/or direct assistance is provided to carry out approved activities.
*The Advanced Manufacturing Center was formally dissolved at the end of FY 2002. Income is reported through the appropriate funding sources in subsequent fiscal years.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
Highlights
■ Competition for scarce research dollars within the State has increased in recent years as state research funding continues
to decline. However, Cleveland State University grant seekers have risen to the challenge. Despite the decrease in state
support, overall funding for the University remained constant in FY 06. Federal funding has increased by 12% in FY 06
as compaired with FY 05. Federal funding at CSU increased from $8 million in FY 02 to $23 million in 2006 (181% in
5 year).
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
RESEARCH
77
Table 4.3: Research Expenditures by Source
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Source
2002
Federal grants
State grants
Local grants
Private grants
State Appropriations
Advanced Manufacturing Center*
Total
$ 7,593,407
$ 4,369,507
$ 480,001
$ 1,804,745
$ 4,060,989
$ 3,810,000
$22,118,648
2003
$
$
$
$
$
8,289,995
4,136,851
543,423
2,567,685
3,579,404
N/A
$19,117,358
2004
2005
$15,510,461 $14,891,157
$ 3,270,587 $ 3,967,160
$ 380,215 $ 684,898
$ 3,901,735 $ 2,226,833
$ 2,859,291 $ 3,895,829
N/A
N/A
$25,922,289 $25,665,877
2006
1 Year
5 Year
$13,788,006
$ 6,090,677
$ 733,130
$ 2,663,791
$ 3,149,648
-7%
54%
7%
20%
-19%
82%
39%
53%
48%
-22%
$26,425,253
3%
19%
*The Advanced Manufacturing Center was formally dissolved at the end of FY 2002. Income is reported through the appropriate funding sources in subsequent fiscal years.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
Figure 4.3a: Fiscal Year 2006 Research
Expenditures by Source
State
Appropriations
12%
Private Grants
10%
Local Grants
3%
State Grants
23%
Federal Grants
52%
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
78
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Figure 4.3b: Research Expenditures by Source and Year
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
p
$16.5M
Dollars
$10.5M
$5.5M
$200K
FY 2002
FY 2003
Federal Grants
State Grants
FY 2004
Local Grants
FY 2005
Private Grants
FY 2006
State Appropriations
Notes: Appropriation: An authorization granted by the General Assembly to make budgetary expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes.
Grant: A financial assistance mechanism whereby money and/or direct assistance is provided to carry out approved activities.
*The Advanced Manufacturing Center was formally dissolved at the end of FY 2002. Income is reported through the appropriate funding sources in subsequent fiscal years.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
RESEARCH
79
Table 4.4: Research Expenditures Reported by OBOR*
at Ohio Public Universities
Fiscal Year 1989 – 2004
Total R&D Expenditures
Thousands of Constant 2004 Dollars
Institution
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
1989
1994
1999
2004
$5,148
$11,624
$8,497
$3,630
$266,382
$17,598
$14,937
$107,224
$7,062
$349
$4,930
$13,450
$14,394
$8,565
$293,325
$20,900
$21,356
$119,103
$10,235
$403
$3,906
$13,451
$12,534
$12,400
$365,086
$24,244
$18,411
$173,040
$13,367
$529
$8,271
$16,888
$12,712
$15.377
$518,088
$38,704
$27,488
$276,326
$27,708
$1,831
*Ohio Board of Regents
Highlights
■ Tracing Cleveland State University’s 5-year record of research awards and dollars in the context of other Ohio institutions is of
interest on two accounts. First, such trends provide an understanding of the overall scope of such activity on campus, and
second, they provide a comparative magnitude of growth in funding. Recent increases in sponsored research programs point to
a campus focused on supporting the core instructional mission of the University with research activities, and one that is making
significant contributions to the economic and social development of Cleveland and Northeast Ohio.
Source: Performance Report for Ohio’s Colleges and Universities, 2006: Institutional Outcomes Measures, Ohio Board of Regents.
http://regents.ohio.gov/perfrpt/2006/01.0%20research_2006.xls
80
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
National Science Foundation Rankings
N
of Cleveland State University and Other Selected Schools
NSF rankings are of primary significance for major research institutions. Cleveland State University, although not
designated as a major research institution continues to build a foundation in cross-disciplinary research, focusing on high
level support for graduate education, and a commitment to engaging the private sector in building research partnerships.
As a university emerging in the field of sponsored research, it seeks to strategically invest scarce research dollars and prized
faculty resources in targeted areas to maximize the impact for the university.
Table 4.5: Total R&D Expenditures at Universities and Colleges
Ranked by Fiscal Year 2004 Total R&D Expenditures:
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2004
(Dollars in Thousands)
Institution
University of Toledo
University of Akron
Portland State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
University of Missouri-St. Louis
Bowling Green State University
Ranking
203
205
215
233
253
255
283
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
$13,694
$19,495
$16,494
$10,214
$10,817
$9,898
$3,454e
$16,278
$22,266
$16,838
$12,986
$11,316
$10,084
$5,028
$24,825
$28,080
$17,683
$13,855
$12,868
$11,519
$5,327
$24,123
$27,953
$21,433
$14,112
$14,549
$12,819
$7,336
$27,708
$27,488
$21,433e
$16,888
$12,712
$12,429
$8,271
Note: eEstimated
Highlights
■ Cleveland State University is ranked among other academically rigorous universities within the state and across the country.
CSU expects to continually improve in rank based on continuing efforts to expand research development initiatives.
Source: National Science Foundation/Division of Science Resources Statistics, Survey of Research and Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges,
Fiscal Year 2004.
RESEARCH
81
IIndirect Cost Recovery
Indirect cost recovery is defined as the agreed upon revenue received from a sponsoring agency to pay a grant
or contract’s share to reimburse the university for the indirect costs it incurs. Indirect costs are real costs. Indirect cost
calculations are based upon such items as space, utilities, security, maintenance, custodial, payroll, purchasing, accounting,
personnel and many other expenses associated with project administration and implementation.
Indirect costs recovered at Cleveland State University (CSU) become part of the general fund budget for the entire university.
Half of all indirect costs returned on sponsored programs remain in the university’s general fund. This money is set aside
for covering administrative expenses for sponsored program administration. It is also used to cover costs of facilities,
depreciation on buildings and equipment, operation and maintenance of facilities, and library expenses. The other half
of the indirect costs recovered are distributed as follows: 5% to project director, 15% to project director’s department,
10% to relevant dean’s office, and 20% to the Vice Provost for Research.
Table 4.6: Indirect Cost (IDC) Recovery and Total Research Expenditures by Year
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Research Activities
Total Research Expenditures
Total Indirect Cost Recovered
Total CSU Income
% IDC of Total Research Expenditures
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
$14,247,660
$1,442,908
$15,690,568
10%
$19,117,358
$1,493,286
$20,610,644
8%
$25,922,289
$1,940,223
$27,862,512
8%
$25,665,877
$1,969,170
$27,635,047
8%
$26,425,253
$2,116,800
$28,542,053
8%
3%
7%
3%
85%
47%
82%
Highlights
■ At CSU, indirect costs recovered are used for internal incentive programs such as the Faculty Research Development Program
(FRD), and are used to stimulate and enhance research at all levels. As federal funding grows, so does the indirect cost recovery,
and federal government provides the bulk of the indirect costs recovered by CSU.
Source: CSU Controller’s Office and CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
82
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
to Promote Growth
LLeveraginginInvestments
Research Programs
The Faculty Research Development Program (FRD) is Cleveland State University’s program for
providing seed grant money to support key research areas. Grants under the FRD program are intended for high quality
projects leading to scholarship and creative expression that will likely increase the university’s ability to attract external funding.
FRD funds cannot be used for developing instructional materials or for supporting work leading to any academic degree for
the applicant. The University Research Council (URC) considers grants under the FRD Program as active investments in the
university’s faculty, students, and basic research effectiveness.
Table 4.7: Faculty Research Development Program
(FRD) Combined Investments and Awards
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Department
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
College of Science
College of Education and Human Services
Fenn College of Engineering
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs
Total
CSU
Investment
External
Funding
Attracted
Return on
Investment
per CSU $1.00
$22,740
$164,412
$22,021
$55,517
$16,734
$281,424
$22,500
$3,986,516
$172,500
$301,004
$49,000
$4,531,520
$0.99
$24.25
$7.83
$5.42
$2.93
$16.10
Highlights
■ This table demonstrates successful leveraging of internal funding to attract external funding. Seed funding investments in
key departments have yielded $16.10 for each $1 invested by the University. These strategic investments have also
allowed university signature programs to grow beyond their initial investments.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.
RESEARCH
83
EExpansion of Externally Funded Research
Several factors
have contributed to the expansion of externally funded research at Cleveland State University.
A university-wide hiring strategy has been implemented in recent years requiring most new faculty to pursue external
grants as a part of their regular workload. Additionally, many promotion and tenure committees across campus have
raised their research expectations and are placing considerable weight on grant funded projects. As faculty hires continue
to rise, particularly in the Colleges of Science, Education and Human Services, and Engineering, so too will the number of
scholars seeking and receiving external funding.
Table 4.8: Fiscal Year 2006 Proposal Submission Awards by Source
Awards
Proposals
Submitted
7/01/05 through 6/30/06
Award Sources
Government Sources
Federal
State
Local
Total Government Sources
Non-Government Sources
Corporate Contracts
Foundation and Non-Profit
Total Non-Government Sources
Sponsored Programs Total
Amount
Number
Number
Success
Rate*
$22,998,055
$3,728,005
$243,971
$26,970,031
113
35
15
163
146
39
21
206
77%
90%
71%
79%
$531,116
$2,657,413
$3,188,529
15
58
73
13
99
112
115%
59%
65%
$30,158,560
236
318
74%
Note: *Success rate is based on proposals submitted in FY 2006 and prior years.
84
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 4.9: Proposal Submission and Grant Awards
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Proposals and Grant Awards
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Proposals submitted
Grant awards
Success Rate*
361
236
65%
376
224
60%
358
261
73%
336
223
66%
318
236
74%
Figure 4.9: Proposal Submission and Grant Awards
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
400
300
200
100
0
FY 2002
FY 2003
FY 2004
Proposals Submitted
FY 2005
FY 2006
Grant Awards
Note: *Success rate is based on proposals submitted in FY 2006 and prior years.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
RESEARCH
85
OOhio Research Challenge
Since 1985 the Ohio Board of Regents has administered a program that directly rewards Ohio universities for their
success in securing external funding for research. The objectives of this program include improving the quality of basic
research programs at Ohio universities, increasing the state’s share of nationally contested research funds, and providing
seed money for the state’s economic growth. Institutional allocations are made annually by the Regents and the money is
used by campuses as unrestricted funds for research.
Table 4.10: Ohio Board of Regents Biennial Research Challenge Distributions
Fiscal Year 2000 – 2006
Percent Change
Institution
2000 & 2001
2002 & 2003
2004 & 2005
2006 & 2007
2 Year
4 Year
Bowling Green State University
Central State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio University
Ohio State University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Total
$539,869
$151,917
$746,199
$1,443,797
$746,078
$1,850,027
$17,139,839
$1,262,016
$7,612,135
$993,484
$138,659
$32,624,020
$501,849
$200,165
$650,417
$1,166,098
$632,476
$1,569,960
$16,202,541
$1,129,869
$6,584,391
$964,152
$153,982
$29,755,900
$498,016
$192,538
$509,906
$1,067,278
$578,209
$1,645,864
$14,455,250
$1,082,717
$6,147,083
$987,954
$196,425
$27,361,240
$570,077
$136,063
$601,125
$917,545
$612,310
$1,545,402
$15,463,372
$1,028,420
$6,268,441
$1,098,655
$192,619
$28,434,029
14%
-29%
18%
-14%
6%
-6%
7%
-5%
2%
11%
-2%
4%
6%
-10%
-19%
-36%
-18%
-16%
-10%
-19%
-18%
11%
39%
-13%
Highlights
■ Research Challenge is set on an incremental formula with a rolling average based on the percentage of the entire state’s external
funding. The mechanism for Cleveland State University (CSU) to increase its Research Challenge funding is to attract more
federal dollars. Based on a formula of rolling averages for allocation, CSU has increased the overall percentage of dollars
received from the Research Challenge program. The increase is small but significant in terms of the fact that the university is
moving its “margin” against such high research volume institutions as Ohio State and the University of Cincinnati.
■ The Research Challenge program does not take into account any Ohio institution’s awards or expenditures stemming from state,
local and foundation funding. CSU has successfully attracted awards from state and local agencies that have augmented the
size and scope of overall research activity on campus. While CSU research dollars raised from state and local sources are of no
consequence in attracting a higher proportion of the Ohio Research Challenge funds to campus, such extramural funding
does account for the increase in the university’s NSF rankings.
Source: Ohio Board of Regents, April 2006 Summary of Biennial Distributions at www.regents.state.oh.us/rsch/rschsupport.html#research
86
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
IIntellectual Property
Contemporary universities
committed to teaching, research, service, and dissemination of knowledge
increasingly find themselves in a position of having created knowledge or materials with commercial value. Creation
of such knowledge or materials, also referred to as intellectual property, is a much coveted outcome of any vibrant research
program. Activities that result in the creation of intellectual property raise the reputation of the university and involved
researchers. They also create rich educational opportunities for students participating in such programs. Universities may
gain significant revenue through commercialized trademarks.
Table 4.11: Intellectual Property: Patents and Disclosures
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Source
Disclosures
Patents Filed
Provisional Patent Applications Filed
Licenses Approved
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
9
4
1
7
2
12
3
11
12
2
19
17
1 Year
5 Year
9%
33%
-50%
1800%
12%
1
Notes: The following definitions are from the US Patent and Trademark Office (www.uspto.gov).
Disclosure: Description of an invention in a patent or patent application.
Patent: Granting of a property right to the inventor, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Licenses approved: The patent law provides for the transfer or sale of a patent, or of an application for patent, by an instrument in writing. Such an instrument is referred
to as an assignment of license.
Highlights
■ The development of intellectual property at Cleveland State University (CSU) is a very recent development. Trend information for
such activity in the past five years demonstrates the benefits of increased overall research activity on campus. The accumulation
of intellectual property on campus is expected to grow in future years. CSU has a small cadre of extremely productive research
faculty who have produced a respectable portfolio of patents. With the addition of CSU’s Technology Transfer Officer position in
2005, CSU looks forward to an increase in disclosures, licenses and spin-off companies in the future..
■ Currently, the primary generators of intellectual property at CSU include Dr. Majid Rashidi in Mechnical Engineering,
Dr. Zhiqiang Gao and his research team in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dr. Michael Kalafatis, Department of
Chemistry and Dr. Baochuan Guo, Department of Chemistry. New faculty hires in the FY 2006-2007 academic year hold
promise for the generation of additional intellectual property, as many of them have already-established research
agendas and many will bring federal research grants with them to CSU.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
RESEARCH
87
Table 4.12: Cleveland State University Signature Research Programs
Signature Programs
College
Departments
Project Description
Instruments, Controls and
Electronics (ICE)
Engineering
Electrical and
Computer
Engineering
Business
Computer and
Information Science
This high-tech growth area provides the support for many emerging
industries, from biotechnology to aeronautics. At Cleveland State,
a strong cadre of faculty has emerged as leaders in the ICE-area of
advanced controls and robotics. They have developed processes to fly
unmanned vehicles that have the ability to communicate and perform
tasks. They have also significantly advanced the field of digital controls
and communications, enabling distant control systems – such as those
found in space – to function at a highly reliable level. In the next two years,
the College of Engineering expects to increase the number of
faculty with expertise in ICE.
Urban
Urban Affairs
Business
Dean’s Office
Science
Biochemistry
Economic Development
Molecular Medicine
Faculty are involved in various research activities such as the Regional
Economic Indicators Project, identifying employment sub-centers highlighting occupational clusters, and examining Northeast Ohio migration
patterns. These activities are intended to help increase the standard of
living and wealth of Northeast Ohio and in the process make CSU an expert in
economic development, research, teaching, and service outreach.
Cleveland State was recently awarded a prestigious federal award from the
U.S. Department of Education. The “Graduate Assistantships in Areas of
National Need” program will respond to many needs in the life sciences
industry, helping to fill a shortage of appropriately trained scientists in
interdisciplinary areas.
Through various research efforts, faculty at Cleveland State are working on
topics such as the treatment and prevention of thrombosis that could lead
to stroke or heart attack; prospective therapy for autoimmune diseases
including, multiple sclerosis, lupus, type I diabetes, and Crohn’s disease;
and treatment for muscular dystrophies and atrophies, metabolic deficiencies, acute myocardial infarction, and chronic end-stage heart failure.
Biology
Electronic Power
Engineering
Industrial and
Cleveland State has built a strong cadre of experts and supporting
Manufacturing Engineering programs in power systems and power electronics. With NASA-Glenn
Research Center support, eleven research teams (four power researchers
and seven researchers in related technologies) have worked on electric
power issues in relation to space.
Dean’s Office
Chemical and Biomedical
Engineering,
Mechanical Engineering
Power Beaming: a use of high energy density photocells developed at
NASA Glenn to receive and convert laser power.
Advanced Distributed Power Systems: modify themselves to make sure
that the power supply is uninterrupted even though a device may be failing.
Stirling Engines: drive electrical generators through the use of nuclear
energy. Engineer in the Computer: help maintain power systems on long
distance space missions.
Flywheels: breakthroughs in glass fiber technology have led to high speed
flywheels; VIKSAT: an electric-powered satellite system that was developed
for space use.
Patents and Disclosures: On accompanying Excel spreadsheet.
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
Highlights
■ Over the last few years, the four areas of excellence described above, developed through faculty efforts, show promise of
moving Cleveland State University into the regional and national spotlight.
88
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
GGrowth in Graduate Education
Graduate Education at Cleveland State
has seen unprecedented growth in recent years. There were
approximately 5,000 students pursuing graduate and post-graduate programs at the University in 2006. Graduate student
credit hours have increased 13% between 2001-2005 and 7% between 2002-2007. Such growth in graduate programs has
implications for strengthening the quality of these offerings and seizing opportunities for supporting educational goals of
students by creating new and tailored program offerings. Further, growth in graduate programs at CSU points to numerous
future student and faculty research opportunities. Institutional investments in graduate education are closely linked with
strategies for promoting sponsored research, which lead to an increased opportunity for the contributions of graduate,
doctoral and post-doctoral students as well.
Table 4.13: Percentage of Total Student Credit Hours Taken by Graduate Level Students at
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only: Fall Terms 2002 – 2006
Institution
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Grad SCH
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
10%
19%
9%
5%
16%
10%
10%
17%
10%
5%
10%
21%
9%
5%
16%
9%
10%
18%
9%
5%
10%
21%
10%
5%
16%
9%
10%
18%
9%
5%
9%
21%
10%
5%
16%
9%
10%
16%
9%
5%
10%
27%
10%
5%
17%
10%
12%
18%
12%
5%
26,581
42,772
38,132
13,673
145,600
38,935
33,210
76,031
30,073
7,940
Note: Graduate students included the following ranks: DS (Doctoral student), MS (Masters student), ND, NG and NM (Non degree-seeking graduate students).
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Course Enrollment query – rundate: May 1, 2006.
Table 4.14: Cleveland State University Graduate Student Support
from Externally Funded Research, Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Source
Business
Education
Engineering
Liberal Arts/Social Science
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
2002
$0
$87,482
$429,134
$27,275
$41,798
$310,286
$895,976
2003
$38,411
$67,411
$507,650
$37,560
$85,052
$278,742
$1,014,826
2004
$34,471
$45,497
$492,153
$51,423
$110,152
$181,252
$914,948
2005
$22,932
$77,904
$527,754
$66,015
$267,146
$295,143
$1,256,894
2006
1 Year
5 Year
$28,761
$66,533
$244,660
$25,961
$164,780
$374,967
$905,663
25%
-15%
-54%
-61%
-38%
27%
-28%
---24%
-43%
-5%
294%
21%
1%
Note: Extramural support: Funding from any source external to Cleveland State University.
Highlights
■ For the past 5 years Cleveland State University has continued to offer the largest proportion of graduate student credit hours
of any Ohio institution. This trend continues to grow and clearly outlines CSU’s future priorities in response to the region’s
growing demands for graduate education. However, graduate student support from externally funded research has declined for
all colleges except college of Business & Urban Affairs as compared with 2005
Source: CSU College of Graduate Studies
RESEARCH
89
Table 4.15: Cleveland State University Centers and Institutions
Name
Established
Website
Advanced Control Technologies, Center for (CACT)
Advanced Engineering Research Laboratory
Advancement of Women in Public Service,
Ohio Center for the
African American Cultural Center, The Howard A. Mims
Arts and Innovation, Center for
Bioethics Center
Biomedical and Health Institute
Communication Research Center
DNA Analysis Facility
Economic Development, Center for
Election Integrity, Center for
Electronic and Aerospace Technology, Center for
Research in (“CREATE”)
Emergency Preparedness, Center for
Environmental Institute
Executive Development Center (EDC)
Global Business Center
Great Lakes Environmental Finance Center
Greater Cleveland Educational Development Center
Healing Across Cultures, Center for
Health Equity, The Center for
Housing Research & Policy, Center for
International Service and Programs, Center for (CISP)
K’inal Winik Cultural Center
Labor Management Relations Center
Library Computer Learning Center
Mass Spectrometry Facility, Cleveland State
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban
Affairs Research Centers
Modeling Integrated Metabolic Systems, Center for
Neighborhood Development, Center for
Nonprofit Policy and Practice, Center for
Ohio’s Energy Efficiency Practitioners Network
Planning Research and Practice, Center for
Poetry Center
Poverty Studies, Center for
Public Management, Center for
Real Estate Research Center
Rotating Machinery Dynamics and Control
Ruth Ratner Miller Center for Greater Cleveland’s Future
Sacred Landmarks, Center for
Transportation Center
Urban Child Research Center
University Center for Teaching Excellence
Unger International Center for Local Government Leadership
Urban School Collaboration, Center for
Wright Center for Sensor System Engineering (WCSSE)
Writing Center, The
1995
1999
http://cact.csuohio.edu/
http://academic.csuohio.edu/aerl
2001
N/A
2005
2002
2002
1976
2001
1986
2005
http://urban.csuohio.edu/womenscenter
http://www.csuohio.edu/blackstudies/afam.html
http://www.csuohio.edu/music/cai
http://www.csuohio.edu/bioethics/
http://www.csuohio.edu/bahi/
http://academic.csuohio.edu/crc/
http://www.csuohio.edu/uored/dna/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/economicdevelopment/
http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/cei
N/A
1995
N/A
N/A
2005
1982
2003
N/A
1978
N/A
1997
http://www.csuohio.edu/create/
http://www.csuohio.edu/ce/programs/ emergency-preparedness.htm
http://csuw3.csuohio.edu/ei/
http://www.csuohio.edu/cba/edc/outreach.html
http://www.csuohio.edu/cba/global/index.html
http://urban.csuohio.edu/glefc/
http://www.csuohio.edu/coehs/gcedc/
http://www.csuohio.edu/bahi/chac/
http://www.csuohio.edu/bahi/che
http://urban.csuohio.edu/housing/research.shtml
http://www.csuohio.edu/internat/index.html
http://www.csuohio.edu/kinalwinik/
http://www.csuohio.edu/cba/edc/lmrc.html
http://www.ulib.csuohio.edu/services/labs.html#lclc
http://www.csuohio.edu/chemistry/msfacility.htm
*
N/A
1979
1970
2002
2006
1962
2000
1982
1992
2006
2002
1986
N/A
1991
N/A
2000
N/A
2006
N/A
http://urban.csuohio.edu/research/
http://www.csuohio.edu/mims/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/cnd/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/nonprofit/
http://www.csuohio.edu/energyefficiency/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/planningcenter/
http://www.csuohio.edu/poetrycenter/
http://www.csuohio.edu/cps/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/publicmanagement/index.htm
http://www.csuohio.edu/cba/admin/realestate.html
http://www.csuohio.edu/romadyc
http://urban.csuohio.edu/ruth_ratner_miller/
http://urban.csuohio.edu/sacredlandmarks
http://www.csuohio.edu/utcl
http://urban.csuohio.edu/ucrc/
http://www.csuohio.edu/uctl
http://urban.csuohio.edu/unger_croatia/
http://www.csuohio.edu/cusc/
http://www.csuohio.edu/wcsse/
http://www.csuohio.edu/writingcenter/
N/A
1995
Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research
Notes: N/A Data unavailable
* See website http://urban.csuohio.edu/research/ for individual listing of each center/institute to obtain the date established and additional information.
90
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 4.16: Past Recipients of Distinguished Faculty Awards
by Award Type 1986, 1993-2006
Type of Award
Teaching
Year
Name
Service
Research
Department
Name
Department
Name
Department
1986 Albert N. Cousins
Joseph A. Troccolo
Sociology
Mathematics
Louis T. Milic
English
Allan Peskin
History
1993 Thomas F. Campbell
Jane L. McIntyre
History
Philosophy
Roger W. Binkley
Richard C. Stephens
Chemistry
Sociology
1994 Thomas W. Flechtner
Barbara B. Green
Chemistry
Political Science
Sidney Kraus
Surendra N. Tewari
Communication
Chemical Engineering
1995 Rosemary E. Sutton
Robert A. Wheeler
Curriculum & Foundations
History
Robert I. Abelman
Roger B. Manning
Communication
History
1996 Sherwood D. Silliman
Mathematics
Murali D. Nair
Social Work
Sarah Matthews
Sociology
1997 Ravindra R. Kamath
Finance
David F. Forte
Robert N. Sollod
Law
Psychology
Jose J. Labrador
Modern Languages
1998 William A. Beasley
Curriculum & Foundations
Valerie D. George
Majid Rashidi
Nursing
Mechanical Engineering
Richard Bingham
Edward W. Hill
Urban Studies
Urban Studies
1999 Sanda Kaufman
Urban Studies
Lynn Deering
John P. Wilson
HPERD
Psychology
Rama S. R. Gorla
Richard M. Perloff
Mechanical Engineering
Communication
Edward G. Thomas
Marketing
David Atkin
Michael J. Tevesz
Communication
Biology, Geology, & Environmental
Science
2000
RESEARCH
2001 Lee A. Makala
Heidi Meier
History
Accounting
Jill M. Black
Norman Krumholz
HPERD
Urban Studies
Thomas Donaldson
John Greppin
Art
English
2002 David W. Ball
Chemistry
Daniel D. Drake
CASAL
Mark Ashcraft
Carolyn Lin
Psychology
Communication
2003 Glenn Goodman
Ralph Mawdsley
Occupational Therapy
CASAL
Patricia Falk
Bhushan Wadhwa
Law
Mathematics
Bahman Ghorashi
Baochuan Guo
Chemical Engineering
Chemistry
2004 Rama S. R. Gorla
Elizabeth Welfel
Mechanical Engineering
CASAL
Susan E. Kogler Hill
Mieko K. Smith
Communication
Social Work
Andrew Rindfleisch
Jerzy T. Sawicki
Music
Mechanical Engineering
2005 Eric Ziolek
John P. Holcomb, Jr.
Music
Mathematics
Ravindra R. Kamath
Cheryl P. McCahon
Finance
Nursing
Michael Kalafatis
Catherine Hansman
Chemistry
CASAL
2006 Donald Ramos
Eileen Berlin Ray
History
Communication
Andrew Gross
Marketing
Leo W. Jeffres
Orhan Talu
Communication
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
91
Source: CSU Provost’s Office
R
Retention & Graduation
Retention &
Graduation
5
Table 5.1: Fall to Fall Student Return Rate
Enrolled Fall 2001 – 2005 / Returned Fall 2002 – 2006
Fall 2001 Cohort
Reg. Grad. Return
New Students
First Year Full-Time Only
Freshmen All (Degree Seeking)
Transfers (Degree Seeking)*
Other Undergrads/Non-degree
Masters
Doctoral
Law
Other Grads-Law/Non-degree
Sub-Total
Fall 01
Fall 02
1,008
1,100
1,162
573
509
19
209
336
3,908
633
673
809
163
379
16
171
142
2,353
3
17
1
21
Fall 2002 Cohort
Ret.
Rate
63%
61%
70%
29%
78%
84%
82%
42%
61%
Fall 02
Fall 2003 Cohort
Ret.
Reg. Grad. Return Rate
Fall 2004 Cohort
Ret.
Reg. Grad. Return Rate
Reg. Grad. Return
Fall 02
Fall 03
Fall 03
Fall 04
Fall 04
Fall 05
946
1,012
1,130
536
571
12
206
330
3,797
561
593
4 768
174
5 415
10
157
122
9 2,239
59%
925
59%
989
68% 1,096
32%
627
73%
966
83%
37
76%
262
37%
612
59% 4,589
544
575
743
192
655
30
209
260
2,664
59%
922
58%
986
68%
966
31%
636
70%
782
81%
28
81%
237
43%
482
59% 4,117
549
574
687
214
563
26
191
214
2,469
Fall 02
Fall 03
Fall 03
Fall 04
Fall 04
6
34
3
2
45
2
2
38
2
44
Fall 2005 Cohort
Ret.
Rate
60%
58%
71%
34%
76%
93%
81%
44%
61%
Fall 05
Fall 06
955
1,000
1,006
536
730
34
232
517
4,055
552
569
700
176
533
31
199
198
2,406
3
1
44
3
9
60
58%
57%
70%
33%
78%
91%
87%
39%
60%
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Fall 01
First Year
Sophomores
Juniors
Seniors
Other Undergrads/Non-degree
Masters
Doctoral
Law
Other Grads-Law/Non-degree
Sub-Total
1,098
1
614
1,307
933
1,645
14 1,221
2,965 1,074 1,154
657
8
260
2,633
823 1,187
303
36
222
618
215
363
981
29
322
12,207 2,200 6,276
56%
994
2 549
71% 1,310
1 942
75% 1,652
8 1,227
61% 3,071 1,108 1,249
40%
700
20 310
66% 2,800 801 1,365
83%
295
32 228
90%
602 208 352
34%
942
35 310
63% 12,366 2,215 6,532
55%
993
1 521 53%
943
536
72% 1,211
845 70% 1,099
8
779
75% 1,617
7 1,242 77% 1,548
10 1,208
64% 3,363 1,193 1,345 62% 3,298 1,227 1,585
46%
402
3 167 42%
394
4
194
68% 2,782
865 1,238 65% 2,996 949 1,311
87%
324
38 249 87%
323
27
248
89%
539
242 271 91%
508 194
301
34%
557
17 223 41%
655
17
247
64% 11,788 2,366 6,101 65% 11,764 2,436 6,409
57%
801
463 58%
71% 1,095
8
806 74%
79% 1,424
17 1,116 79%
77% 3,331 1,413 1,523 79%
50%
418
2
191 46%
64% 2,919 998 1,271 66%
84%
332
31
254 84%
96%
503 214
276 96%
39%
672
16
218 33%
69% 11,495 2,699 6,118 70%
Overall
16,115 2,221 8,629
62% 16,163 2,224 8,771
63% 16,377 2,411 8,765 63% 15,881 2,480 8,878
66% 15,550 2,759 8,524 67%
% Graduating
Annually
2001-02
2002-03
13.8%
2003-04
14.7%
2004-05
Fall 05
Ret.
Rate
Returning Students
13.8%
Fall 05
Reg. Grad. Return
15.6%
Fall 06
2005-06
Notes: Cohort includes all degree-seeking students registered (Reg.) on the 15th day. “Grad.” or “Return” status is determined for each member of the Registered (Reg.) cohort on the 15th day of the following Fall Term.
“Other Undergrads/Non-degree” includes Admit Type: PST and VST and Non-Degree Students
*Academic Levels may have been coded incorrectly in the system due to a delay in the processing of transfer hours.
17.7%
95
96
Table 5.2: Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by Race and Gender
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
(New Degree-Seeking, Full-Time, First-Time First Year)
Enrolled Fall 2001 – 2005 / Returned Fall 2002 – 2006
Fall 2001 Cohort
Fall 01
Fall 02
Newly
Enrolled
Return
Female
264
Male
Fall 2002 Cohort
Fall 02
Fall 03
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
191
72%
255
350
224
64%
154
86
90
Female
Male
Fall 2003 Cohort
Fall 03
Fall 04
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
158
62%
220
316
207
66%
56%
148
71
43
48%
91
22
14
64%
16
8
Female
15
Male
Fall 2004 Cohort
Fall 04
Fall 05
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
148
67%
226
310
201
65%
48%
186
83
47
52%
86
20
10
50%
50%
14
6
9
60%
17
18
13
72%
17
2
1
50%
1
Fall 2005 Cohort
Fall 05
Fall 06
Ret.
Rate
Newly
Enrolled
Return
Ret.
Rate
151
67%
262
166
63%
301
201
67%
291
187
64%
45%
161
76
47%
171
76
44%
32
37%
68
28
41%
88
31
35%
21
9
43%
17
7
41%
22
13
59%
43%
19
9
47%
14
5
36%
24
11
46%
12
71%
14
13
93%
9
4
44%
24
18
75%
10
59%
21
16
76%
15
13
87%
19
13
68%
1
1
100%
2
2
100%
1
1
100%
White
Black
|
Female
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Male
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Native American
Female
Male
1
1
100%
1
Non-Resident Alien
Female
4
2
50%
2
3
2
67%
6
4
67%
8
8
100%
Male
6
0
0%
8
6
75%
7
5
71%
11
10
91%
12
9
75%
Female
32
22
69%
20
13
65%
19
14
74%
44
23
52%
18
11
61%
Male
35
20
57%
36
20
56%
18
12
67%
49
26
53%
13
5
38%
Female
493
325
66%
463
264
57%
463
269
58%
464
266
57%
507
294
58%
Male
515
308
60%
483
297
61%
462
275
60%
458
283
62%
448
258
57%
1,008
633
63%
946
561
59%
925
544
59%
922
549
60%
955
552
58%
Unknown
Total
Total Male & Female
Table 5.3: Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort (New Degree-Seeking, Full-Time, First Year) by College
Enrolled Fall 2001 – 2005 / Returned Fall 2002 – 2006
Fall 2001 Cohort
Fall 01
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Undergraduate Studies1
Total
Fall 2002 Cohort
Fall 02
Fall 02
Enrolled Returned
Ret.
Rate
161
330
19
57
70
13
5
353
1,008
63%
65%
79%
70%
76%
85%
60%
56%
63%
101
214
15
40
53
11
3
196
633
Fall 03
Enrolled Returned
166
340
11
73
46
21
8
281
946
Fall 2003 Cohort
98
209
7
42
38
15
2
150
561
Fall 03
Ret.
Rate
59%
61%
64%
58%
83%
71%
25%
53%
59%
Fall 2004 Cohort
Fall 04
Fall 04
Enrolled Returned
165
329
19
60
62
26
12
252
925
105
201
12
38
54
18
8
108
544
Ret.
Rate
64%
61%
63%
63%
87%
69%
67%
43%
59%
Fall 2005 Cohort
Fall 05
Enrolled Returned
Fall 05
Ret.
Rate
Fall 06
Enrolled Returned
Ret.
Rate
165
232
106
140
64%
60%
160
231
98
153
61%
66%
71
55
188
17
194
922
49
42
120
10
82
549
69%
76%
64%
59%
42%
60%
102
49
199
6
208
955
53
34
133
4
77
552
52%
69%
67%
67%
37%
58%
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997-2005).
Table 5.4: Three-Year Mobility of Undergraduate Students Enrolled
Spring Term 2005 by Institution
Institution
Undergraduate
Students
Mobile
Same
Institution
Different
Campus
Mobile
Different
Institution
Total
Mobility
21%
31%
16%
10%
22%
12%
14%
11%
20%
9%
24%
31%
30%
31%
29%
23%
21%
23%
20%
9%
Concurrent
Same Institution
Different
Campus
Concurrent
Different
Institution
Total
Concurrent
University Main Campuses
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Bowling Green State University
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
14,755
9,354
17,380
14,608
35,055
15,704
16,479
17,183
14,837
10,976
97
Source: Ohio Board of Regents, 7/7/05 Performance Consultation meeting
3%
15%
21%
7%
11%
7%
12%
1%
5%
9%
1%
4%
2%
5%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
5%
9%
3%
4%
3%
5%
1%
Table 5.5: Attended, Graduated and Retained
Fall to Fall Student Tracking (IPEDS Cohort)
4 Year
5 Year
6 Year
7 Year
Fall
Fall 1999
Cohort
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1,048
631
493
435
5
60%
47%
42%
331
84
8%
34%
185
231
22%
23%
126
321
31%
17%
99
365
35%
14%
Attended
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
Figure 5.5: Fall 1999 IPEDS Cohort Attended, Graduated and Retained
1,000
900
4-yr.
5-yr.
grad rate grad rate
8%
22%
800
6-yr.
grad rate
31%
7-yr.
grad rate
35%
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Fall 99
Fall 00
Fall 01
Fall 02
Fall 03
Attended
Fall 04
Fall 05
Fall 06
Graduated
Table 5.6: Attended, Graduated and Retained
Fall to Fall Student Tracking (Transfer Cohort*)
4 Year
5 Year
6 Year
7 Year
Fall
Fall 1999
Transfer Cohort
Attended
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Retained
800
695
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
473
4
1%
68%
367
62
9%
58%
203
193
28%
40%
108
316
45%
28%
84
363
52%
25%
53
393
57%
18%
50
413
59%
18%
Figure 5.6: Fall 1999 Full-Time Transfer Cohort Attended & Graduated*
4-yr.
5-yr.
grad rate grad rate
45%
52%
700
600
6-yr.
grad rate
57%
7-yr.
grad rate
59%
500
400
300
200
100
0
Fall 99
Fall 00
Fall 01
Fall 02
Attended
Fall 03
Fall 04
Graduated
Notes: Cohorts are First-Time, Full-Time, Degree-Seeking Freshmen or Transfers students as of the 15th day of Fall Quarter, 1999.
“Attended” or “Graduated” status is determined from the 15th day records and graduation table for each term listed.
*Includes all New Transfer students.
98
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Fall 05
Fall 06
Table 5.7: Fall to Fall Undergraduate First-Year Full-Time Degree-Seeking
Cohort Graduation and Retention Rate Returning to CSU as Undergraduate
Graduated In
IPEDS
Cohort
Fall 98 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Still Enrolled1
% Total Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 99 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Still Enrolled1
% Total Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 00 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Still Enrolled1
% Total Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 01 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Still Enrolled1
% Total Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 02 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Still Enrolled1
% Total Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 03 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Still Enrolled1
% Total Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 04 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Still Enrolled1
% Total Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 05 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Still Enrolled1
% Total Retained
% Stopped-Out
Fall 06 Cohort
Graduated
% Graduated of Cohort
% Still Enrolled1
% Total Retained
% Stopped-Out
1
1st
Year
2nd
Year
3rd
Year
4th
Year
5th
Year
6th
Year
7th
Year
8th
Year
38%
38%
62%
64
7%
27%
34%
66%
171
18%
16%
32%
66%
260
27%
10%
37%
63%
315
33%
8%
41%
59%
339
35%
7%
42%
42%
42%
58%
84
8%
32%
40%
60%
231
22%
18%
40%
60%
310
30%
12%
42%
58%
354
34%
9%
43%
57%
34%
42%
66%
77
8%
29%
38%
62%
201
22%
14%
36%
64%
286
31%
9%
39%
61%
35%
35%
65%
84
8%
30%
39%
61%
242
24%
15%
39%
61%
73
8%
26%
26%
74%
9th
Year
962
60%
60%
40%
42%
42%
58%
1,048
60%
60%
40%
47%
47%
53%
934
64%
64%
36%
47%
48%
53%
1,008
62%
62%
38%
46%
46%
54%
946
59%
59%
41%
41%
41%
59%
36%
36%
64%
58%
58%
42%
42%
42%
58%
39%
39%
61%
60%
60%
40%
47%
47%
53%
925
922
955
60%
60%
40%
947
“Still Enrolled” are those enrolled in Fall semester and not graduated by the end of the academic year
RETENTION & GRADUATION
99
100
Table 5.8: Annual Degrees Awarded by Academic Level and Gender
University Total
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Degree Level
Degree Totals
|
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters
Post-Masters Certificates
Doctoral Degrees
Law (Juris Doctor)
Master of Laws
Total Degrees Awarded
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
862
655
914
681
987
762
10
15
102
478
2
19
98
435
8
14
112
784
13
18
108
1,751
1,252
737
10
21
108
1
1,791
1,250
694
495
4
19
142
1
1,910 1,355
983
30
790
13
14
71
707
25
591
2
21
125
1,901
1,471
1015
56
847
12
19
110
3
2,062
1 Year
5 Year
687
38
586
4
11
107
1%
71%
4%
7%
-14%
11%
12%
16%
33%
-12%
9%
1,433
4%
16%
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
Table 5.9: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Business
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Post-Bachelors
Major
Accounting
Business Economics
Business General
Computer and Information Science
Finance
Information Systems
International Business
Management and Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management and Business Statistics
Total
Data-Driven Marketing Planning
Health Care Administration
Total Quality Mgt/Cont Quality
Total
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
45
2
1 Year
5 Year
33
1
28
2
35
3
33
10
48
1
34
5
39
4
32
5
-13%
50%
-1%
50%
11
26
23
27
4
1
28
32
44
12
17
17
36
41
37
7
23
23
22
45
46
31
31
10
208
42
35
4
161
40
42
16
242
36
25
5
157
24
43
10
233
24
43
32
3
35
36
13
225
6
20
5
7
34
32
8
155
20
40
25
3
42
33
9
209
-16%
-15%
-32%
100%
25%
-4%
-33%
3%
-55%
25
26
8
166
7
28
12
2
26
32
4
160
-5%
36%
14%
-6%
-3%
1
1
1
1
1
1
-50%
(Continued on next page)
Table 5.9: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Business
(Continued from previous page)
Percent Change
Degree Level
Masters Degree
Major
Accelerated Business Administration
Business Administration
Computer and Information Science
Executive Business Administration
Finance
Financial Audit
Labor Relations and Human Resources
Marketing
Master of Business Administration
MBA-Health Care
Public Health
Tax Program
Total
Doctoral Degree
Business Administration – Doctoral
Total Business
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters
Doctoral
Business Total
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
27
93
34
9
1
18
16
49
133
58
14
1
7
2
10
7
208
271
10
75
23
4
11
16
1
1
9
1
151
3
14
93
38
14
1
11
5
4
5
185
26
94
20
7
21
15
2
5
1
191
4
29
109
48
15
1
4
7
2
1
3
5
1
225
21
16
34
130
51
9
2
6
6
13
16
29
149
41
1
2
6
5
16
4
1
183
7
1
2
248
8
4
1
160
10
3
2
248
1
1
2
2
1
160
1
183
1
345
225
1
248
2
476
155
1
160
2
318
209
166
208
161
242
157
233
208
271
3
482
151
185
4
431
191
225
1
459
374
312
348
26
77
20
2
17
89
12
248
1
458
1 Year
5 Year
-23%
15%
-25%
-91%
0%
-30%
-5%
-39%
5%
-42%
-96%
0%
-24%
17%
-22%
40%
0%
-5%
6%
-5%
-50%
-5%
0%
-5%
-15%
-3%
-15%
0%
-9%
RETENTION & GRADUATION
101
Table 5.10: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
102
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters Degree
Total CLASS
First College
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
Major
Anthropology
Art
Classical and Medieval Studies
Communication
Communication Management
Dramatic Arts
Economics
English
French
German
History
International Relations
Journalism & Promotional Comm
Liberal Studies
Linguistics
Music
Philosophy
Political Science
Religious Studies
Social Science
Social Studies
Social Work
Sociology
Spanish
Women's Studies
Total
African Diaspora
Art
Graphic Design
Journalism
Latin Amer. Studies
Multimedia
Prof. Writing Certificate
Total
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Music
Philosophy
Social Work
Sociology
Spanish
Total
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters
CLASS Total
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
7
24
1
16
10
41
3
5
95
58
75
47
1
3
29
6
19
2
4
23
1
9
22
9
8
13
8
12
11
13
10
6
4
12
3
2
3
70
29
3
321
10
24
1
112
6
12
13
27
4
13
9
27
62
74
68
24
2
8
11
1
5
5
32
1
2
8
29
14
8
9
10
16
9
17
11
15
2
26
9
5
1
11
1
8
12
15
1
2
63
51
4
2
3
17
1
1
3
12
18
2
11
2
9
5
9
12
5
4
18
7
2
8
4
9
2
3
7
7
18
3
194
342
177
25
2
2
2
14
5
3
3
58
38
4
2
354
66
3
3
6
43
1
1
14
8
12
9
2
6
3
16
7
3
5
55
57
3
1
360
1
1
12
1
4
2
7
16
18
1
205
11
5
8
6
4
3
49
39
6
1
329
211
1
2
1
8
1
9
5
6
2
31
6
1
69
321
4
3
10
7
4
4
2
2
1
37
194
7
1
13
5
3
1
23
7
4
64
342
8
3
6
4
8
6
8
1
2
46
177
4
2
8
11
5
1
38
8
7
84
354
2
3
3
9
1
1
15
1
2
37
205
69
390
37
231
64
406
46
223
84
438
37
242
4
1
1
2
8
7
5
2
49
4
5
84
329
4
84
417
13
4
15
6
19
8
16
3
1
1
3
14
1
58
7
9
3
1
24
13
4
3
1
8
8
21
5
2
6
9
14
1 Year
5 Year
-29%
3%
50%
3%
-13%
-19%
-57%
200%
44%
8%
-15%
300%
19%
62%
73%
31%
-37%
50%
-26%
22%
118%
50%
-29%
10%
14%
25%
-67%
-48%
214
6%
1
13
100%
27%
38%
23%
300%
67%
-22%
61%
11%
-80%
2
1
15
256%
37
211
5
37
253
17
2
14
4
12
9
10
1
54
12
6
124
360
17
124
501
2
2
3
4
7
3
9
2
1
33
214
15
33
262
700%
-14%
15%
-7%
42%
33%
7%
250%
40%
30%
6%
256%
30%
14%
33%
50%
-21%
8%
70%
-33%
91%
75%
250%
48%
11%
15
6
6
-61%
-29%
5
1
1
5
5
7
7
1
10
48%
23%
Table 5.11: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Education and Human Services
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Post-Bachelors
Masters Degree
Post-Masters
RETENTION & GRADUATION
Doctoral Degree
Major
Early Childhood Education
Elementary Education
Exercise/Fitness Specialist
Health and Physical Education
Middle Childhood Education
Mild/Moderate Educational Need
Moderate/Intensive Educational Needs
Nursing Basic
Nursing RN
Special Education
Sports Management
Total
Gerontological Studies
Middle Child Math Education
Middle Child Science Education
Total
Adult Learning and Development
Community Agency Counseling
Community Health Education
Counselor Education
Curr & Instruc-Literacy Dev
Curriculum & Instruction
Education
Educational Administration
Exercise Science
Nursing
Physical Education-Professional
School Counseling
Sports & Exercise Management
Supervision
Total
Counseling and Pupil
Education Specialist
Educational Administration
Total
Urban Education:
Administration
Counseling
Learning
Policy
Total
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
57
42
5
14
99
2
4
1
99
3
97
6
4
12
12
2
3
22
10
9
3
33
19
7
7
29
21
1
8
24
4
41
10
21
8
1
6
25
19
17
5
1
5
52
20
24
10
2
5
76
15
9
10
4
3
187
48
187
35
231
46
254
60
7
8
15
36
7
10
3
3
6
7
2
1
24
12
17
247
26
2
6
16
5
4
359
3
2
21
16
13
1
5
1
46
2
14
249
1
35
3
1
40
5
9
18
8
6
371
3
12
81
103
1
2
3
2
3
2
5
2
1
1
10
4
3
6
2
1
12
187
48
187
359
3
10
559
81
2
4
135
371
3
12
573
2
2
1
3
18
3
83
1
2
3
1 Year
5 Year
96
2
-5%
58%
7
11
4
1
12
-13%
-9%
8%
-19%
243%
0%
-58%
-75%
76%
-27%
-89%
-6%
26%
-27%
-10%
12%
11%
-64%
78%
-29%
-76%
64
1%
12%
229
1
25
9
62
241
83
6
37
23
5
74
8
3
1
253
1
8
7
16
38
6
4
25
2
263
13
3
1
18
9
21
3
1
28
2
2
22
5
28%
-42%
100%
25%
250%
-67%
22
5
4
345
1
2
3
6
5
5
31
9
5
366
8
4
1
131
8
10
38%
29%
124
1%
14%
1
3
4
2
378
1
1
3
5
1
1
2
-33%
33%
17%
-33%
100%
40%
1
1
2
2
6
2
1
0%
0%
50%
-22%
-33%
-67%
3
2
2
3
7
254
15
366
4
6
645
60
6
131
2
3
202
253
16
378
5
7
659
-6%
-10%
1%
17%
-22%
-2%
26%
30
13
7
12
3
104
2
2
1
1
3
1
6
1
1
35
231
46
83
3
345
6
6
588
104
2
2
154
2
2
5
42
2
1
3
10
4
9
-50%
Total Education
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters
Post-Masters Certificates
Doctoral
Education Total
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
121
42
3
124
2
171
14%
40%
-50%
20%
104
Table 5.12: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Engineering
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Masters Degree
Doctoral Degree
Total Engineering
Major
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Computer Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Electronic Engineering Technology
Electronic Technology
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Total
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Engineering Mechanics
Environmental Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Total
Applied Biomedical Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Total
Bachelors
Masters
Doctoral
Engineering Total
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
3
3
6
15
3
4
8
15
2
5
7
1
1
31
5
8
5
2
27
1
6
5
2
4
1
22
10
33
15
123
1
4
1
20
2
2
4
2
9
1
1
1
3
1
2
7
6
2
24
1
1
2
4
1
4
1
11
2
1
2
1
1
1
5
17
2
32
2
7
8
37
5
107
4
8
2
27
8
21
7
101
3
2
6
8
15
1
1
19
10
60
3
2
7
10
7
19
1
1
14
4
12
9
61
5
2
14
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
5 Year
6
8
10
2
16
9
4
3
15
18
9
138%
133%
-18%
111%
17%
7
32
7
144%
-22%
550%
-22%
4
25
11
91
2
4
1
21
3
20
13
117
-29%
-11%
27%
38%
-58%
-35%
-13%
-5%
21
3
39
3
4
13
-35%
200%
-2%
325%
275%
373%
8
18
18
107
3
5
1
29
14
11
39
1
8
8
10
91
10%
-28%
-45%
-10%
1000%
63%
450%
287%
1
2
3
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
9
2
9
26
1
36
91
107
9
207
21
29
2
52
0
8
3
2
7
3
2
3
1
9
22
7
123
24
8
155
20
11
3
34
107
60
7
174
27
14
3
44
101
61
9
171
29
1 Year
9
2
26
1
1
2
1
-67%
-50%
0%
50%
-75%
5
-30%
-13%
117
91
5
213
38%
-10%
-30%
9%
-5%
287%
-13%
44%
Table 5.13: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Science
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Masters Degree
Major
Biology
Biology-Medical Technology
Chemistry
Environmental Sciences
Geological Sciences
Health Science
Mathematics
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Total
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
16
18
1
14
1
4
1
1
23
9
5
1
2
11
2
11
5
5
4
2
2
8
3
18
6
1
10
15
12
3
8
9
3
79
3
129
2
26
56
1
88
10
150
7
28
2
86
90
5
143
2
1
5
2
2
1
4
2
3
1
3
1
4
1
1
2
5
12
4
1
5
6
RETENTION & GRADUATION
105
Biology
Chemistry
Diversity Professional
Environmental Sciences
Health Science
Mathematics
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Total
29
12
52
Post-Masters
Psychology Specialist
7
Doctoral Degree
Clinical Bioanalytical Chemistry
Regulatory Biology
Total
4
1
5
129
52
7
5
193
Total Science
Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters Certificates
Doctoral
Science Total
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
3
6
25
3
4
2
1
6
6
13
3
26
66
2
99
18
166
2
3
1
1
6
1
3
5
7
2
29
12
5
11
13
1
21
15
80
3
1
9
9
27
21
22
65
23
1
9
6
5
17
1
24
13
81
7
5
7
2
9
2
1
3
1
3
4
2
2
3
3
6
3
1
4
1
3
4
56
25
150
65
7
4
226
86
23
5
2
116
143
81
7
6
237
66
29
2
4
101
166
80
9
4
259
5
10
25
3
84
5
3
1
2
11
64
1
2
8
1
7
2
5
26
1 Year
5 Year
60%
400%
0%
300%
100%
39
4
5
1
2
16
8
9
1
5
3
2
6
13
26%
67%
11%
-20%
100%
175%
24%
133%
4
97
5
181
9
23
160%
-4%
-72%
10%
160%
14%
67%
36%
3
6
1
3
4
1
1
1
9
1
3
2
15
500%
400%
100%
100%
-29%
0%
42%
-5%
67%
38%
13%
28%
150%
44%
9
4
16
16
3
21
17
96
71
40
-8%
42%
77%
7
2
2
2
4
3
3
6
1
3
4
33%
20%
25%
-33%
200%
25%
64
26
181
96
7
6
290
71
40
2
4
117
10%
28%
0%
25%
15%
36%
77%
29%
25%
47%
4
94
29%
106
Table 5.14: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender
College of Urban Affairs
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Percent Change
Degree Level
Bachelors Degree
Post-Bachelors
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Masters Degree
Doctoral Degree
Total Urban
Major
Environmental Science
Environmental Studies
Public Safety Management
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
Total
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
1
1
1
21
24
2
5
1
14
22
1
1
2
6
29
39
1
4
8
2
13
28
5
2
18
31
56
3
10
2
20
35
Geographic Information Systems
Local Urban Management Certificate
Non-Profit Management
Urban Economic Development
Urban Geographic Information System
Urban Real Estate Dev & Finance
Total
Environmental Studies
Public Administration
Urban Planning and Design
Urban Planning and Law
Urban Studies
Total
Urban Studies
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors Certificates
Masters
Doctoral
Urban Affairs Total
2
13
5
21
41
8
16
25
49
6
53
10
27
9
3
60
3
4
67
4
40
24
67
91
3
52
7
9
75
2
20
11
1
4
38
7
69
2
21
10
2
4
39
1
22
2
39
1
28
3
56
3
35
40
1
63
75
2
116
38
1
67
69
3
128
39
3
77
4
15
20
39
9
1
1 Year
5 Year
3
7
3
15
28
50%
-48%
-14%
-24%
-26%
83%
800%
0%
46%
-47%
900%
167%
267%
3
1
2
4
6
5
7
10
1
13
22
4
4
3
4
2
3
20
2
36
10
3
21
15
3
51
3
42
1
42
2
9
6
60
4
30
1
12
3
50
2
49
10
51
2
112
3
41
13
42
3
99
2
39
22
60
2
123
1
28
20
50
1
99
200%
83%
26%
-88%
-10%
-84%
50%
18%
13%
3%
-40%
-26%
83%
18%
-40%
5%
200%
46%
3%
200%
44%
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
Table 5.15: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender – College of Law
Percent Change
Degree Level
First Professional
Degrees
Major
Law (Juris Doctor)
Master of Laws
Law Total
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
Female Male
102
98
102
98
108
1
109
112
108
112
108
142
1
143
71
125
71
125
110
3
113
1 Year
5 Year
107
11%
9%
107
12%
10%
Table 5.16: Annual Degrees Awarded by Race and Gender
2001 – 02
White
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
RETENTION & GRADUATION
107
Black
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
Hispanic
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
Asian or Pacific Islander
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
Native American
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
2005-06
Percent Change
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
1 Year
5 Year
558
439
574
450
641
462
311
7
87
468
8
12
87
257
6
1
100
468
11
4
92
688
37
556
8
10
96
489
30
344
3
6
92
2%
131%
11%
10%
33%
19%
16%
57%
-11%
15%
1,116
844
1,149
814
1,216
277
3
3
128
1
874
508
16
319
2
5
107
18%
464
7
11
76
647
13
495
8
7
51
1,221
957
1,395
964
8%
20%
164
66
188
74
197
78
26
2
133
11
146
1
5
4
44
1
2
6
5
180
10
142
4
1
6
64
2
34
7
37
2
1
5
72
5
42
4
-6%
-29%
-3%
-20%
-67%
-33%
6%
144
2
1
13
187
12
140
5
3
10
4%
0%
0%
-50%
324
101
332
119
353
131
357
124
343
104
-7%
5%
20
14
24
10
25
13
28
19
1
5
17
10
14
8
-4%
50%
9%
26%
4
29
3
17
14
14
17
2
9
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
0%
100%
36
20
46
17
46
29
45
31
52
25
1%
38%
25
19
28
31
26
25
26
24
25%
8
11
5
25
11
17
9
18
1
15
10%
9
37
1
12
4%
59%
3
1
3
2
1
3
5
3
2
-38%
400%
42
37
54
38
47
38
53
36
5%
44%
1
1
2
-33%
-60%
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
0%
6
5
-44%
1
35
27
3
2
2
1
2
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
39%
-75%
0%
(Continued on next page)
108
Table 5.16: Annual Degrees Awarded by Race and Gender
(Continued from previous page)
2001 – 02
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Minority Total
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
Non-Resident Alien
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
Unknown
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
University Total
Bachelors
Post-Bachelors
Masters
Post-Masters
Doctoral
Juris Doctor
Master of Laws
Total
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
2005-06
Percent Change
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
1 Year
212
101
240
117
248
117
167
2
1
16
38
2
1
8
164
1
190
1
7
9
66
1
4
12
115
7
62
1
14
248
15
172
4
2
12
96
3
57
17
47
2
3
6
242
12
173
5
4
16
9
-4%
-5%
-3%
-20%
-60%
-30%
12%
0%
0%
-13%
398
150
422
175
455
200
452
199
453
165
-5%
13%
6
33
23
35
19
32
19
18
56%
87
56
99
81
115
69
163
38
1
139
65%
78
23
1
63
-13%
22%
3
11
8
2
7
12
3
2
13
1
-31%
-21%
131
144
107
159
93
195
7
1
2
97
4
2
87
4
1
1
85
184
-2%
29%
86
82
77
79
79
83
32
45
1
37
7%
3
2
4
7
2
2
2
3
64
4
46
1
1
4
2%
10
49
1
5
3
56
3
56
-29%
42
66
2
47
-15%
53
1
75
5
53
150
127
135
117
132
122
135
120
120
-7%
-14%
862
655
914
681
987
694
478
2
19
98
435
8
14
112
784
13
18
108
1%
71%
4%
7%
-14%
11%
16%
33%
-12%
9%
1,252
1,250
1,910
495
4
19
142
1
1,355
687
38
586
4
11
107
1,751
737
10
21
108
1
1,791
707
25
591
2
21
125
12%
762
10
15
102
983
30
790
13
14
71
1,901
1,471
1,433
4%
16%
Note: Degrees awarded Summer through Spring
1
1
117
1,015
56
847
12
19
110
3
2,062
5 Year
10%
-50%
-62%
S
Selected Strategic Indicators: Academic and Administrative Programs
Selected Strategic
Indicators: Academic
and Administrative
Programs
6
Cleveland State University
HHonors Program
inaugurated its new Honors Program in Fall 2004 with a class of 40 highly motivated,
academically talented first-year students. For Fall 2007, the enrollment in this program has grown to more than 200 students.
All new students admitted to the program as freshmen receive scholarships covering their tuition, academic fees and books. Honors students
accept the challenge of participating in intensive and specialized versions of general education classes, and are granted special consideration
in several areas including preference in registration and extended university library borrowing privileges. During summer 2007, many Honors
students are engaged in paid on-campus undergraduate research experiences.
Honors students enroll in at least four honors core courses during their freshman and sophomore years at CSU. These courses offer greater
breadth or depth than standard university general education classes. Enrollment is limited to Honors students and class sizes are small.
As juniors and seniors, Honors students focus on their majors. Upper division Honors students have the opportunity to do additional honors
work under faculty supervision in established courses, enroll in graduate courses, participate in a faculty member’s research project or
laboratory, do an independent research project, a service learning project, and/or an internship, job, or engage in a co-op experience.
The specific program depends on the student's major.
Beginning Fall 2005, transfer students and current CSU students entering their junior year have been admitted.
First year students admitted in Fall 2004 were chosen from among applicants who were in the top 10% of their high school class or had a
composite ACT score of at least 27 (90th percentile). New first year admits for Fall 2007 must be in the top 10% of their high school class
or have at least a 30 on the ACT (97th percentile).
Major Features of the Honors Program
■ Enriched curriculum
■ Leadership development
■ Special seminars and colloquia
Table 6.1: Characteristics of New Honors Students
Fall 2004 – 2006
New Enrollment by Cohort Year
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total*
In Top 10% of High School Rank
High School GPA
Average ACT Composite
Average SAT Composite
One Year
2004
2005
2006
3
9
3
8
17
11
17
7
14
19
3
71
62%
3.9
27
1,230
11
23
40
58%
3.9
28
1,240
14
21
2
70
65%
3.9
28
1,267
Change
0%
35%
-100%
0%
11%
-33%
-1%
Cohort Year includes newly admitted students in both fall and spring, lower and upper levels.
High School ranking, GPA, ACT and SAT scores reported are for “active” and “lower level” students only.
Honor students are identified by the Honors Program Office.
*Total is not the sum of the colleges due to “dual” majors.
Table 6.2: Scholarship Aid for Honors Students in Fiscal Year 2006
Type of Financial Aid
Enrollment
Need Based Tuition
Merit Based Tuition
Books
On-Campus Housing
Total
112
13
125
20
125
Total
$ 982,801
$ 68,339
$ 118,750
$ 86,749
$1,256,639
Average
$ 8,775
$ 5,256
$ 950
$ 4,337
$19,318
Source: Cleveland State University Financial Aid Office
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
111
Table 6.3: Average ACT Composite Score by College and Gender: 5-Year Trend
College
2002
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Undergraduate Studies 1
Undergraduate Non-Degree
Average ACT Composite Score
2003
Male
Female
Male
Female
21.1
20.6
22.8
20.8
23.1
22.0
20.7
16.5
20.8
20.4
20.2
20.1
20.7
20.0
23.4
21.6
20.2
16.7
20.0
19.5
21.0
20.7
20.9
20.3
22.6
21.5
21.7
16.5
27.0
20.3
19.9
20.0
20.1
19.7
23.0
21.2
19.0
16.5
19.4
2004
2005
2006
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
21.0
21.2
19.6
21.1
22.7
21.3
21.0
17.8
22.2
20.8
21.1
21.3
19.5
19.8
20.9
21.5
19.8
20.7
20.8
23.1
21.4
21.7
17.2
21.5
20.9
20.4
24.8
20.2
20.2
16.7
19.5
19.6
20.9
22.9
21.7
20.2
18.2
23.8
21.1
20.2
24.3
20.5
19.5
16.8
23.9
19.9
19.5
20.0
18.7
19.9
24.3
20.1
19.4
16.6
17.8
19.5
Highlights
■ On the average, female students have slightly lower ACT Composite scores than male students.
Table 6.4: Average ACT Composite Score by College: 5-Year Trend
College
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
20.5
20.4
20.4
21.0
20.5
23.3
20.6
20.8
17.0
20.6
20.2
20.3
23.0
20.9
19.9
17.4
23.8
20.5
ACT Composite Score
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Undergraduate Studies 1
Undergraduate Non-Degree
University Average ACT Score
20.8
20.3
21.8
20.1
23.2
21.7
20.5
16.6
20.7
19.9
1
20.6
20.3
20.6
19.8
22.7
21.3
20.4
16.5
27.0
19.9
20.4
20.4
19.2
20.1
22.9
20.5
20.2
17.2
21.1
20.1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
112
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 6.5: Undergraduate Cumulative GPA by College: 5-Year Trend
College
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2.76
2.87
2.77
2.83
3.22
2.92
2.93
3.00
2.49
3.20
2.90
3.22
2.92
2.93
3.06
2.55
3.05
2.87
Cumulative Average GPA
Business
CLASS
First College
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Undergraduate Studies1
Undergraduate Non-Degree
University Average
2.81
2.83
2.90
3.21
2.93
2.93
3.11
2.61
2.97
2.87
2.80
2.81
2.86
3.24
2.92
2.97
3.08
2.62
3.05
2.88
2.78
2.88
2.71
3.26
2.93
2.91
3.03
2.65
3.16
2.91
Note:
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
All figures are taken from census files. Students registered with zero credit hours are excluded.
Highlights
■ Students in the College of Education and Urban Affairs have higher Cumulative GPAs than those in other Colleges.
Table 6.6: Top 15 Majors by Academic Level
Fall 2006
UNDERGRADUATE:
Description
Psychology
Communication
Accounting
Early Childhood Education
Social Work
Biology
English
Finance
Art
Health Science
Mechanical Engineering
Marketing
Sociology
Management and Labor Relations
Middle Childhood Education
Total Degree Seeking Undergraduate Students
GRADUATE EXCLUDING LAW:
Enrollment
369
332
236
199
195
185
179
174
169
164
158
156
135
130
125
8,763
Description
Enrollment
Curriculum and Instruction
Business Administration
Social Work
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Computer and Information Science
Public Administration
Psychology
Adult Learning and Development
School Counseling
Educational Administration
Financial Accounting and Audit
Urban Planning and Design
English
Occupational Therapy
Accelerated Business Administration
Total Degree Seeking Graduate Students
659
514
200
164
147
114
96
93
88
73
72
67
67
66
65
4,114
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
113
Table 6.7: Top 15 Degree Seeking Programs with Highest Minority Students Enrollment by Academic Level
114
Fall 2006
UNDERGRADUATE
GRADUATE
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Major/Program
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Urban Services Administration
Pre-Science
Social Work
Pre-Business Administration
Pre-Liberal Arts & Social Sci
Sociology
Urban Studies
Psychology
Communication
Finance
Biology
Health Science
Accounting
English
Early Childhood Education
Minority
Enrollment
Total
Major
Enrollment
Minority as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
36
40
101
51
56
54
38
109
84
44
44
39
53
40
41
52
77
195
100
120
135
116
369
332
174
185
164
236
179
199
69%
52%
52%
51%
47%
40%
33%
30%
25%
25%
24%
24%
22%
22%
21%
Major/Program
Minority
Enrollment
Adult Learning and Development
44
Community Health Education
12
Social Work
71
Public Administration
39
Educational Administration
20
Graduate Education Licensure
38
School Counseling
20
Financial Accounting & Audit
16
Management & Labor Relations
13
MBA-Health Care
10
Curriculum & Instruction
133
Accelerated Business Administration 13
Urban Planning and Design
13
Community Agency Counseling
11
Psychology
12
Total
Major
Enrollment
Minority as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
93
30
200
114
73
156
88
72
59
48
659
65
67
57
96
47%
40%
36%
34%
27%
24%
23%
22%
22%
21%
20%
20%
19%
19%
13%
Table 6.8: Top 15 Degree Seeking Major with Highest Female Student Enrollment by Academic Level
Fall 2006
UNDERGRADUATE
Major/Program
Early Childhood Education
Nursing Basic
Social Work
Mild/Moderate Educational Need
Psychology
Sociology
Health Science
Middle Childhood Education
English
Art
Biology
Pre-Liberal Arts & Social Sci
Communication
Marketing
Accounting
GRADUATE
Female
Enrollment
Total
Major
Enrollment
Female as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
188
111
165
71
273
97
117
88
114
107
116
66
175
79
119
199
124
195
88
369
135
164
125
179
169
185
120
332
156
236
94%
90%
85%
81%
74%
72%
71%
70%
64%
63%
63%
55%
53%
51%
50%
Major/Program
School Counseling
Curriculum & Instruction
Educational Administration
Management & Labor Relations
Social Work
Adult Learning and Development
English
Music
Public Administration
Occupational Therapy
Graduate Education Licensure
Psychology
Business Administration
Computer and Information Science
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Female
Enrollment
Total
Major
Enrollment
Female as a % of
Total Major
Enrollment
79
580
64
48
157
72
51
37
85
48
109
55
199
39
39
88
659
73
59
200
93
67
49
114
66
156
96
514
147
164
90%
88%
88%
81%
79%
77%
76%
76%
75%
73%
70%
57%
39%
27%
24%
Table 6.9: Delaware Study Benchmarks
Student Credit Hours (SCH) & FTE Students Taught Per FTE Faculty
for Tenured and Tenure-Track Full-Time Faculty, Fall 2005
IIntroduction
The Delaware Study
grew out of FIPSE and TIAA-CREF research grants in 1992 to support the development of
national data-sharing consortium on faculty teaching loads, direct instructional costs and student faculty ratios by discipline. Over
the years more than 400 institutions, both public and private, from all types of Carnegie institutions have participated in the
study. The study has focused on instructional costs and productivity at the level of analysis of academic disciplines. The concept
of creating benchmarks by discipline is accomplished by grouping faculty and the student credit hours (SCH) they produce
by CIP codes.
A complete discussion of the content, instruments, and methodology used in the Delaware Study can be found at
http://www.udel.edu/ir/cost, and a copy of report Instructional Cost and Productivity of Academic Departments at CSU:
Delaware Study Benchmarks 2005 can be obtained from the Office of Institutional Research at Cleveland State University.
Classification
of Instructional
Programs (CIP)
# of
Peers
with
(CIP)
Discipline
FTE Instructional
FTE Student/FTE
Total SCH/Faculty FTE
Faculty
Faculty
Difference
Difference
Difference
from
from
from
CSU Peer Peer % CSU
Peer Peer % CSU Peer Peer %
College of Business
11.01
51.07
52.03
52.08
52.10
52.13
52.14
Computer and Information Sciences, General
Health and Medical Administrative Services
Accounting and Related Services
Finance and Financial Management Services
Management Information Systems and Services
Operations Management & Business Statistics
Marketing
31
8
38
30
6
9
30
12.0
2.0
10.0
6.2
10.9
5.8
10.9
14.2
2.7
9.9
9.6
8.4
9.3
9.9
-18%
-33%
1%
-55%
23%
-61%
9%
154.0
191.0
206.0
211.0
262.0
147.0
217.0
131.7
149.3
237.8
217.9
225.8
203.7
246.7
14%
22%
-15%
-3%
14%
-39%
-14%
13.7
21.2
16.1
18.8
23.7
11.4
18.4
11.2
11.7
17.5
16.5
19.3
15.0
17.5
18%
45%
-9%
12%
19%
-32%
5%
39
13.7
10.6
23%
219.0
219.9
0%
15.6 15.3
2%
43
51
46
15
30
28
31
49
46
43
40
52
6.7
10.5
7.0
1.8
9.1
3.3
3.8
4.7
6.2
7.2
7.5
12.3
14.4
22.8
8.6
9.6
8.7
8.2
12.1
11.2
10.6
14.1
22.8
15.6
-115%
-117%
-23%
-427%
4%
-151%
-216%
-139%
-71%
-96%
-203%
-27%
191.0
232.0
207.0
314.0
238.0
272.0
276.0
281.0
366.0
256.0
123.0
333.0
162.0
151.9
207.4
210.9
136.8
244.6
224.4
233.2
266.7
178.2
122.3
248.3
15%
35%
0%
33%
43%
10%
19%
17%
27%
30%
1%
25%
13.5
16.9
15.1
21.0
22.1
18.1
20.2
19.6
26.2
17.6
9.2
22.9
10.9
11.2
14.0
14.8
12.1
17.1
16.1
16.5
18.6
12.4
8.9
17.3
19%
33%
7%
29%
45%
6%
20%
16%
29%
30%
3%
24%
51
49
52
51
53
22
15.9
18.2
9.6
8.3
13.7
3.0
18.6 -17%
20.5 -13%
13.1 -36%
10.9 -31%
17.5 -29%
6.3 -109%
287.0
272.0
158.0
214.0
204.0
162.0
207.2
188.1
229.0
207.9
232.5
160.7
28%
31%
-45%
3%
-14%
1%
20.9
18.8
12.7
15.0
16.2
12.9
14.8
13.3
16.5
14.3
16.8
13.6
29%
29%
-30%
5%
-4%
-5%
15
13.1
164.0
153.6
6%
15.1 15.6
3%
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
09.01 Communication and Media Studies
16.01 Linguistic, Comparative, & Related Language
Stud & Srvces
23.01 English Language and Literature, General
38.01 Philosophy
38.02 Religion/Religious Studies
44.07 Social Work
45.02 Anthropology
45.06 Economics
45.10 Political Science and Government
45.11 Sociology
50.07 Fine and Studio Art
50.09 Music
54.01 History
College of Science
26.01
27.01
40.05
40.08
42.01
51.02
51.23
Biology, General
Mathematics
Chemistry
Physics
Psychology, General
Speech and Hearing
Rehabilitation and Therapeutic Professions
(Health Science)
7.7
41%
(Continued on next page)
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
115
Table 6.9: Delaware Study Benchmarks
Student Credit Hours (SCH) & FTE Students Taught Per FTE Faculty,
for Tenured and Tenure-Track Full-Time Faculty, Fall 2005
(Continued from previous page)
Classification
of Instructional
Programs (CIP)
# of
Peers
with
(CIP)
Discipline
FTE Instructional
FTE Student/FTE
Total SCH/Faculty FTE
Faculty
Faculty
Difference
Difference
Difference
from
from
from
CSU Peer Peer % CSU
Peer Peer % CSU Peer Peer %
College of Education
13.01 Education, General
13.03 Curriculum and Instruction
13.04 Educational Administration and Supervision
31.05 Health and Physical Education/Fitness
51.16 Nursing
College of Engineering
14.07 Chemical Engineering
14.08 Civil Engineering
14.10 Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering
14.19 Mechanical Engineering
14.35 Industrial Engineering
15.08 Engineering Technology
18
19
19
24
38
30.2
17.5
13.5
11.7
14.5
30.5
18.0
11.2
11.0
13.6
-1%
-3%
17%
6%
6%
179.0
97.0
120.0
129.0
143.0
141.9
145.3
109.6
197.9
149.2
21%
-50%
9%
-53%
-4%
15.4
9.1
13.3
10.8
9.7
12.5
12.2
11.7
14.8
11.4
19%
-34%
12%
-37%
-17%
17
26
32
30
13
7.9
8.2
14.7
11.5
7.3
2.5
8.0
10.3
13.7
13.0
8.9
2.5
-1%
-25%
6%
-13%
-21%
0%
117.0
118.0
119.0
125.0
122.0
197.0
111.0
137.8
131.9
145.7
128.8
5%
-17%
-11%
-17%
-6%
10.1 8.4
9.4 9.9
10.4 10.1
9.7 10.9
9.8 10.9
13.1
17%
-5%
3%
-12%
-11%
4
30.0
25.8
14%
214.0
234.8
-10%
23.8 25.7
-8%
20.0
20.0
College of Law
22.01 Law (LL.B., J.D.)
College of Urban Studies
45.12 Urban Studies
156.0
14.0
Delaware Study Notes
■ For a complete Delaware Study report contact Institutional Research at (216) 687-4700.
■ Peer comparisons are unavailable for CIP 52.10 Management Information Systems and Services, 15.08 Engineering Technology, and
45.12 Urban Studies.
■ CIP code 52.12 (Management Information System) has changed to 52.10 and 52.07 (Operation Management and Business Statistics)
changed to 52.13.
■ Undergraduate FTE= undergrad student credit hours/15. Graduate or law FTE = graduate or law student credit hours/9.
■ FTE Instructional faculty excludes separately budgeted FTEs.
■ Outliers (two standard deviations above/below the initial mean) are excluded in calculation of ratios. Process implemented by
Delaware Study.
■ Peers are Doctoral I and Doctoral II institutions.
Research Universities – High Research Activity (RH): Baylor University, Bowling Green State University, Catholic University of
America, Clarkson University, Clemson University, Florida International University, Georgia State University, Kent State University, Loyola
University of Chicago, Marquette University, Mississippi State University, North Carolina A&T State University, Northeastern University,
Northern Arizona University, Northern Illinois University, SUNY – Binghamton University, Temple University, The University of Montana,
University of Alabama – Huntsville, University of Alabama – Tuscaloosa, University of Arkansas – Fayettesville, University of Central Florida,
University of Idaho, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, University of Louisville, University of Maine, University of Memphis, University
Mississippi, University of Missouri – Kansas City, University of Missouri – Rolla, University of Missouri – St. Louis, University of
New Hampshire, University of North Carolina – Greensboro, University of North Texas, University of Oregon, West Virginia University,
Wichita State University, Wright State University.
Doctoral/Research Universities (DR): Adelphi University, Central Michigan University, Cleveland State University, DePaul University,
Drew University, Duquesne University, East Carolina University, East Tennessee State University, Indiana State University, Oakland University,
Tennessee State University, University of North Carolina – Charlotte, University of San Francisco, University of West Florida,
Widener University.
116
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 6.10: Fall Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2002
2003
2004
2005
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
2006
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Business
Business
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
99
143
36
278
30
25
23
27
91
131
38
260
32
26
21
27
92
149
32
273
30
24
19
26
89
141
33
263
30
23
23
25
89
142
36
267
31
23
23
26
0%
1%
9%
2%
3%
0%
0%
1%
-10%
-1%
-4%
3%
-8%
2%
-3%
341
135
41
517
32
23
12
28
318
161
37
516
32
22
11
27
326
156
36
518
29
21
11
26
323
155
28
506
30
20
15
26
337
144
35
516
28
20
16
25
4%
-7%
25%
2%
-7%
2%
7%
-4%
-1%
7%
-15%
0%
-15%
-12%
38%
-12%
121
192
30
343
18
19
16
20
131
193
8
332
21
20
17
21
144
201
23
368
20
19
19
19
150
190
50
390
19
17
12
17
129
173
37
339
18
17
15
17
-14%
-9%
-26%
-13%
-7%
4%
27%
1%
7%
-10%
23%
-1%
-8%
-6%
-18%
-12%
43
66
6
115
20
17
9
17
42
66
4
112
19
16
12
17
40
70
7
117
19
16
8
16
41
66
5
112
21
16
8
17
41
55
2
98
19
17
11
18
0%
-17%
-60%
-13%
-10%
9%
31%
3%
-5%
-17%
-67%
-15%
-3%
2%
29%
2%
179
71
17
267
42
29
16
37
166
65
16
247
44
29
19
39
170
73
20
263
41
28
16
36
163
74
21
258
43
25
15
36
172
77
24
273
41
26
15
34
6%
4%
14%
6%
-5%
5%
-5%
-4%
-4%
8%
41%
2%
-3%
-9%
-10%
-7%
16
50
8
74
41
20
22
25
19
53
10
82
36
18
18
22
16
50
9
75
30
19
18
22
15
52
6
73
32
18
28
22
16
49
8
73
35
21
24
24
7%
-6%
33%
11%
14%
-14%
12%
0%
-2%
0%
-1%
-14%
4%
7%
-2%
CLASS
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Education
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Engineering
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Science
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Urban Affairs
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
117
(Continued on next page)
118
(Continued from previous page)
Table 6.10: Fall Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
2003
2004
2005
2006
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
Sections Avg. Size
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections
Avg.
0%
-28%
-57%
-16%
-11%
-12%
21%
-7%
Law
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
53
47
7
107
40
30
15
34
54
46
1
101
38
29
44
34
50
38
1
89
39
29
25
34
52
39
3
94
37
26
21
32
53
34
3
90
36
26
17
32
2%
-13%
-4%
-3%
1%
-19%
-1%
54
5
24
19
56
8
23
18
56
5
23
17
49
3
25
19
43
3
23
23
-12%
0%
5%
21%
-20%
-40%
3%
23%
59
25
64
25
61
24
52
24
46
23
-12%
-4%
-22%
-8%
2
20
5
22
5
17
0%
-24%
2
20
5
22
5
17
0%
-24%
896
742
128
1,766
30
21
16
25
877
720
146
1,753
30
20
16
25
885
677
145
1,707
29
21
18
25
.2%
-6%
-1%
-3%
-2%
4%
9%
1%
-2%
-5%
0%
-3%
-9%
-8%
9%
-8%
Undergraduate Studies1
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Honors
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
University Total
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
906
709
145
1,760
32
23
16
27
877
723
114
1,714
32
23
17
27
Notes:
First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997-2005).
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
*‘Other’ includes weekends and sections with no class time. Cross listed courses are counted once only.
Day, Evening and Weekends are determined by meeting time. Some web courses may be included due to available meeting time.
Day: Monday – Friday 7 am to 4 pm..
Evening: Monday – Thursday 4 pm to 12 am..
*Unknown includes sections with no classtime.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
118
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
2002
Table 6.11: Spring Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Business
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
80
139
42
261
34
25
19
27
71
140
38
249
35
26
23
28
79
151
35
265
30
24
20
25
72
140
30
242
32
24
23
26
77
141
33
251
32
23
23
26
7%
1%
10%
4%
-2%
-4%
2%
-2%
-4%
1%
-21%
-4%
-6%
-8%
19%
-4%
332
146
54
532
32
22
13
27
336
151
44
531
30
19
13
26
307
154
47
508
30
20
14
26
318
154
29
501
28
20
15
25
291
153
38
482
29
20
15
25
-8%
-1%
31%
-4%
1%
-2%
-1%
-12%
5%
-30%
-9%
-10%
-9%
16%
-9%
130
190
43
363
21
20
14
20
144
191
17
352
20
20
19
20
155
203
28
386
20
19
14
19
150
198
53
401
17
17
14
16
124
173
37
334
19
18
15
18
-17%
-13%
-30%
-17%
10%
8%
13%
10%
-5%
-9%
-14%
-8%
-7%
-5%
-13%
-10%
43
74
4
121
19
15
10
16
46
63
6
115
19
15
9
17
40
67
2
109
20
16
6
17
46
61
3
110
20
15
7
17
40
59
3
102
19
18
7
18
-13%
-3%
0%
-7%
-5%
18%
10%
6%
-7%
-20%
-2%
20%
-16%
10%
165
70
21
256
42
29
16
36
148
77
15
240
44
27
18
37
155
81
20
256
39
25
17
33
153
73
27
253
40
27
18
34
153
91
32
276
39
24
18
32
0%
25%
19%
9%
-1%
-10%
3%
-6%
-7%
30%
52%
8%
-7%
-17%
17%
-12%
12
53
14
79
49
17
19
22
13
50
12
75
39
17
18
21
15
51
13
79
36
18
24
23
14
55
9
78
38
16
33
22
14
54
13
81
39
18
28
23
0%
-2%
44%
4%
4%
15%
-17%
7%
17%
2%
-7%
3%
-19%
8%
43%
6%
CLASS
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Education
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Engineering
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Science
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Urban Affairs
119
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
(Continued on next page)
120
(Continued from previous page)
Table 6.11: Spring Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Law
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
55
47
13
115
36
26
17
29
49
47
6
102
35
27
19
30
49
45
5
99
35
24
19
29
54
38
6
98
37
22
24
31
54
44
6
104
34
22
23
28
0%
16%
0%
6%
-7%
-2%
-5%
-7%
-2%
-6%
-54%
-10%
4%
-19%
21%
-2%
33
5
22
20
33
5
22
16
33
4
18
17
25
4
20
17
32
4
18
14
28%
0%
-10%
-17%
-3%
-20%
-21%
-28%
38
22
38
21
37
18
29
19
36
17
24%
-10%
-5%
-21%
2
22
5
21
6
16
20%
-23%
2
22
5
21
6
16
100%
835
756
150
1,741
29
21
17
25
837
723
157
1,717
29
20
18
24
791
720
135
1676
29
20
19
24
-5%
0%
5%
-2%
-7%
-1%
-14%
-5%
-8%
-7%
16%
-7%
Undergraduate Studies1
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Honors
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
University Total
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
850
724
191
1,765
32
22
16
26
840
724
138
1,702
31
22
18
26
Notes:
First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997-2005).
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
*‘Other’ includes weekends and sections with no class time. Cross listed courses are counted once only.
Day, Evening and Weekends are determined by meeting time. Some web courses may be included due to available meeting time.
Day: Monday – Friday 7 am to 4 pm..
Evening: Monday – Thursday 4 pm to 12 am..
*Unknown includes sections with no classtime.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
1%
2%
5%
1%
Table 6.12: Summer Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
College
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Business
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
51
81
15
147
24
24
17
23
51
79
14
144
20
27
24
24
39
95
16
150
18
25
19
22
40
90
10
143
18
23
22
21
37
100
17
154
17
21
18
20
-8%
8%
70%
8%
-2%
-9%
-18%
-8%
-27%
23%
13%
5%
-27%
-16%
6%
-17%
111
47
21
179
23
19
11
21
106
41
17
164
21
19
14
20
103
44
19
166
19
17
10
18
105
51
10
166
19
17
13
18
109
44
12
165
17
19
16
17
4%
-14%
20%
-1%
-9%
7%
21%
-4%
-2%
-6%
-43%
8%
-26%
-4%
51%
-16%
110
97
30
237
23
20
15
23
106
107
15
228
20
21
39
21
112
111
21
244
23
20
15
21
159
121
12
292
16
17
14
16
94
120
16
230
19
16
11
17
-41%
-1%
33%
-21%
20%
-4%
-26%
4%
-15%
24%
-47%
-3%
-18%
-17%
-31%
-25%
5
12
1
18
16
16
5
15
3
9
1
13
16
15
11
15
3
5
1
9
19
15
5
15
1
6
32
19
1
4
30
21
0%
-33%
-6%
9%
-80%
-67%
88%
27%
7
21
5
22
-29%
8%
-72%
45%
95
22
19
136
25
24
18
24
97
18
8
123
22
22
20
22
101
20
13
134
21
18
18
20
86
21
23
130
24
16
15
21
70
18
31
119
25
20
17
22
-19%
-14%
35%
-8%
7%
28%
11%
7%
-26%
-18%
63%
-13%
2%
-16%
-6%
-5%
7
26
6
39
19
17
17
18
4
30
6
40
17
15
20
16
5
25
7
37
10
15
15
14
5
28
4
37
11
15
23
15
7
25
5
37
25
17
18
19
40%
-11%
25%
139%
14%
-22%
22%
0%
-4%
-17%
-5%
34%
-1%
6%
7%
CLASS
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Education
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Engineering
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Science
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Urban Affairs
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
121
(Continued on next page)
122
(Continued from previous page)
Table 6.12: Summer Section Enrollment by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend
Percent Change
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
College
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
1 Year
5 Year
Sections Avg. Size
Sections Avg. Size
Law
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
4
11
3
18
22
30
14
24
1
9
4
14
15
30
10
30
2
11
5
18
19
25
11
20
3
11
5
19
19
23
16
20
2
7
3
12
21
29
23
26
-33%
-36%
-40%
-37%
12%
28%
45%
29%
-50%
-36%
-33%
31%
-3%
127%
11%
Day
6
16
6
13
5
13
4
13
5
10
25%
-22%
-17%
-36%
Evening
1
20
1
19
1
14
2
14
1
15
-50%
7%
0%
-25%
7
16
7
14
6
14
6
13
6
11
0%
-18%
-14%
-33%
389
297
95
781
22
22
22
22
374
294
65
733
22
22
17
21
370
312
82
764
20
20
15
20
403
333
64
800
18
19
16
18
325
319
84
728
20
19
16
19
-19%
-4%
31%
-9%
6%
0%
-2%
1%
-16%
7%
-12%
-7%
-12%
-14%
-28%
-16%
Undergraduate Studies1
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Other*
Total
Honors
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
University Total
Day
Evening
Other*
Total
Notes:
First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997-2005).
*‘Other’ includes weekends and sections with no class time. Cross listed courses are counted once only.
Day, Evening and Weekends are determined by meeting time. Some web courses may be included due to available meeting time.
Days: Monday – Friday 7 a.m. to 4 p.m..
Evenings: Monday – Thursday 4 p.m. – 12 a.m.
Weekends: Classes start after Friday 4 p.m., Saturday and Sunday.
*Unknown includes sections with no classtime.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
Table 6.13: Fall Undergraduate Student FTE by College and Class Time: 5-Year Trend
Fall 2002 – 2006
College
Day
Evenings & Weekends
Percent Change
Percent Change
Unknown*
Percent Change
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
1 Year
5 Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Business
579 556 531 512 534
CLASS
2,647 2,485 2,385 2,381 2,308
First College
61
40
Education
446 483 521 495 440
Engineering
184 191 186 210 194
Science
1,599 1,617 1,533 1,567 1,554
Urban Affairs
174 177 126 130 149
Undergraduate Studies1 355 360 347 302 318
Honors
3
7
6
14
9
7
6
9
Other2
4%
-3%
-8%
-13%
358
625
350
591
-2%
-6%
-24%
-9%
17
70
15
86
29
103
87%
19%
256
158
409
134
27
218
154
381
126
19
201
104
416
134
2.3
-8%
-32%
9%
7%
19%
-14%
-29%
3%
2%
-24%
13
78
2
94
3
39
3
14
77
-1%
5%
-3%
-14%
-10%
384
731
16
239
134
378
140
29
369
673
-11%
-8%
-1%
14%
5%
-15%
63%
457
649
6
232
146
405
132
30
107
2
38
4
100
4
30
8
77
4
29
4
95
5
28
4
24%
31%
-3%
0%
129%
32%
-100%
1%
47%
-29%
17%
35%
3
2
2
2
2
-3%
-27%
-2%
-9%
2,061
2,053
2,028
1,883
1,821
-4%
-12%
233
242
1
230
1
216
12
275
752%
27%
18%
Total
6,059 5,917 5,639 5,611 5,511
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997-2005).
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special program and Study Abroad.
2
Table 6.14: Fall Graduate & Law Student FTE by College and Class Time: 5-Year Trend
Fall 2002 – 2006
College
Day
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Graduate Studies
Total
57
45
13
3
104
55
47
32
7
107
424
646
Evenings & Weekends
Percent Change
406
52
44
37
4
119
2
386
52
46
54
6
114
386
653
644
658
Percent Change
Unknown*
Percent Change
1 Year
5 Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
62
42
34
13
148
2
393
3
20%
-7%
-37%
112%
29%
733%
2%
9%
-7%
155%
294%
43%
-7%
470
172
616
122
67
170
284
497
206
658
129
86
154
274
503
198
680
126
92
162
224
464
210
577
112
92
162
220
477
198
541
130
94
178
203
3%
-6%
-6%
16%
2%
10%
-8%
1%
15%
-12%
7%
41%
5%
-29%
696
6%
8%
1,900
2,003
1,985
1,836
1,821
-1%
-4%
19
41
44
40
76
16
19
.4
256
16
49
56
45
94
21
22
.2
304
17
51
44
43
86
13
21
.2
276
27
52
57
33
86
14
14
.3
283
25
61
69
35
91
13
12
1
308
-5%
17%
22%
7%
6%
-7%
-15%
175%
9%
30%
47%
56%
-11%
20%
-16%
-37%
83%
20%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Notes:
First College is reported under College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences.
Independent study, lab, theses, student orientation courses, and courses with less than 6 enrolled are excluded.
Days: Monday – Friday 7 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Evenings: Monday – Thursday 4 p.m. – 12 a.m.
Weekends: Classes start after Friday 4 p.m., Saturday and Sunday.
*Unknown includes sections with no classtime.
Source: All figures are taken from census files.
123
Interactive Video and Telecourse
TTrends inInstructional
Delivery
Instructional Delivery
The rapid growth in distance delivered student credit hours illustrates the important
role distance learning plays at many institutions, including Cleveland State, today. New technology, equipment, growing
faculty interest, and support services at CSU have led to an increase in courses offered and students enrolled and to
smoother instructional delivery. Faculty development workshops and individual training and support in conducting interactive
video classes and in creating web-based classes have been instrumental. Interactive video hook-ups now link our extended
campuses and partner schools with the Main Campus, providing students the opportunity to take a class at another site
which might not have been possible in the past. Web-based courses provide even more scheduling flexibility.
Table 6.15: 5-Year Trends in Interactive Video and Telecourse Instructional Delivery
Student Credit Hours Generated
UNDERGRADUATE:
Interactive Video and
Telecourse*
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
Fall
2002
2003
2005
60
60
28
92
24
144
2004
Percent Change
68
68
120
2006
1 Year
4
32
44
36
80
84
120
5 Year
14%
133%
50%
250%
-17%
GRADUATE:
Interactive Video and
Telecourse*
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Urban Affairs
Total
Fall
2002
2003
107
1,398
56
68
175
16
1,470
2004
33
1,416
68
12
12
1,541
Percent Change
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
1,185
164
36
28
1,413
1,023
127
-89%
12
1,162
-57%
-18%
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
1,027
159
-87%
468%
96
1,282
50%
-14%
4%
302%
-82%
564%
TOTAL:
Interactive Video and
Telecourse*
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
124
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Fall
2002
2003
2004
28
107
1,398
56
93
1,476
68
12
92
92
319
84
1,538
12
1,661
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Percent Change
1,185
164
36
44
64
1,493
Table 6.16: 5-Year Trends in Web Based Instructional Delivery
Student Credit Hours Generated
UNDERGRADUATE:
Fall
Percent Change
Web-Based**
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Other1 (AF-CSC-MSC)
Total
117
28
32
22
260
108
64
42
10
244
196
111
84
70
10
120
620
120
276
32
345
292
91
188%
6%
184%
195%
943%
184%
117
1141
157
1,868
34%
64%
-40%
17
476
664
1,015
1,686
2,753
63%
478%
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
66
76
48
90
28
77
88
84
111
36
108
28
129
44
475
123
120
998
173%
110%
82%
1,213%
45%
89%
280
388
301
636
122%
404%
GRADUATE:
Fall
Web-Based**
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Total
Percent Change
117
170
96
1,411
TOTAL:
Fall
Percent Change
Web-Based**
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Other 1 (AF-CSC-MSC)
Total
117
94
108
70
350
136
141
130
94
355
196
111
120
178
38
249
620
120
320
507
468
412
1,089
290%
29%
115%
300%
338%
908%
234
1,141
327
1,964
40%
72%
-7%
1,052
1,316
2,322
4,260
83%
463%
17
756
Notes:
*Interactive video: courses delivered via interactive television at two or more sites simultaneously and determined by the section number (701-709 and 780-789).
*Telecourse: Courses involving home viewing of videotaped programs, use of reading materials and some class interaction with the instructor and determined by the section number (530-539).
**Web-based: Courses delivered primarily using the Internet and these courses are determined by the section number (501-509).
1
Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
125
5-Year Trends in Interactive Video and Web-Based
Instructional Delivery
■ The University has organized its resources for e-learning under the leadership of the Dean of Continuing Education, who reports
to the University Provost. A Center for eLearning was created in 2006, and a director was hired in 2007. This move is aimed at
providing an increased strategic focus on e-learning, enhanced faculty support, and greater student services, with the overall
goal of increasing program options and enrollments.
■ New technologically enhanced classrooms in Rhodes Tower will offer state-of-the-art transmission of interactive video courses.
■ CSU’s Bioethics certificate program, offered online through the Philosophy Department, has received nationwide recognition.
■ The Department of Social Work in partnership with the University of Akron has very successfully offered graduate social work
classes for many years through interactive video and other distance learning approaches.
■ The M.S. in Health Science degree program offers a 100% online option. The Master of Science in Nursing degree now offers
online options for the classroom component.
■ The Master of Education in Educational Technology now offers an online option.
■ Other online courses and degree programs are under development, including a Master's Degree in Philosophy, with a bioethics
emphasis.
■ Requests for specific online courses have come from all over Ohio, the United States, various correctional facilities, and
foreign countries.
126
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 6.17: Cleveland State University Main Library Collections 2006
Main Library
Total
Volumes/
Units
Total
Titles
Print Volumes:
Monographs
Classed Serials
Periodicals
Total Print Volumes
501,984
641,578
10,651
202,488
9,282
191,640
521,917
1,035,706
Other Print Collections
Annual Reports
19,319
Maps
61,292
Total Print Items
80,381
Electronic Access
E-books
69,411
E-Journals
29,288
Databases
140
Total Electronic Items
69,551
Digitized holdings
Text
54,237
Images
46,168
Total Digitized Holdings
100,405
Microformats
724,857
Audiovisual Materials
Cataloged
26,246
Art Slides
46,843
107,022
Total AV Materials
26,246
143,894
Number
Total
Linear
Feet
Archives
Active Periodicals
2,737
Active Other Serials
2,099
Total Active Serials
4,836
Archival Materials
364
Source: University Main and Law Libraries
2,990
(Continued on next page)
SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM
127
Table 6.18: Cleveland State University Main Library Statistics
Main Library
FY01
FY04
FY05
FY06
Number of books checked out
198,362
310,506
325,119
289,497
Hits and downloads of Electronic Course Reserves
249,578
534,725
921,998
406,383
Hits and downloads of Electronic Journals
87,053
116,913
309,557
535,557
Reference & Technical questions answered
22,133
71,099
53,507
46,190
202
259
564
463
Instructions sessions provided by the Library
LCLC( Library Computer Learning Center) walk-in users
23,121
32,626
27,724
16,151
561,897
647,449
348,806
601,044
6,447,507
16,151,251
17,050,582
20,782,140
24,773
59,095
61,908
69,551
38%
50%
58%
59%
Visitors to the Library
Visitors (hits) to the Library’s Website
Electronic Books, journals, and databases
Percent of materials budget spent on electronic resources
Table 6.19: Cleveland State University Law Library Collections 2006
Law Library
Total
Titles
Total
Volumes/
Units
Print Volumes:
Titles(Excluding non-book titles )
Other non-book title
82,119
1,188
Microformats
71,055
Number of active serial subscriptions
3,120
Number of active serial titles
2,683
Volumes (excluding microforms)
292,183
Volumes equivalent of microforms
233,085
Table 6.20: Cleveland State University Law Library Statistics 2006
Filled
Number of material requests were sent by Law library
3,719
3,698
Number of material requests received by Law library
3,873
3,480
Source: University Main and Law Libraries
128
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
7
Faculty & Staff
Faculty & Staff
F
Table 7.1: Full-Time Employees by Equal Employment
Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2006
Executive, Administrative
Faculty
Other Professionals
Clerical
Technical
Skilled Crafts
Service, Maintenance
Total Full-Time Employees
Count
% of Total
73
572
612
229
37
23
107
1,653
4%
35%
37%
14%
2%
1%
6%
Source: All figures are taken from the IPEDS files as of November 1, 2006
Figure 7.1: Full-Time Employees by EE06 Category
Fall 2006
Service, Maintenance 6%
Skilled Crafts 1%
Technical 2%
Executive, Administrative 4%
Faculty
35%
Clerical 14%
Other Professionals
37%
FACULTY & STAFF
131
Table 7.2: Full-Time Employees by Gender, Race
and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06)
Fall 2002 – 2006
EE06 Category/Race
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Percent Change
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
1 Year 5 Year
Executive, Administrative
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
39
8
8
6
1
1
39
7
5
10
8
1
1
18
50
271
17
9
52
146
24
7
14
187
1
350
241
75
3
7
326
3
50
16
White
269
Black
17
Hispanic
9
Asian/Pacific Islander
51
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
1
Total
347
145
19
8
14
1
40
8
38
7
5
9
6
1
2
40
6
6
10
8
1
1
6%
-13%
6
12
7
1
1
1
54
20
52
287
17
8
56
150
22
8
14
191
1
369
205
23
3
16
255
74
3
9
1
248
341
11%
-7%
20
52
21
1%
11%
286
18
8
54
167
20
5
16
1
279
15
8
57
168
18
4
21
1
-1%
-13%
-8%
11%
8%
-8%
-29%
20%
1
195
366
209
212
-1%
7%
207
25
2
22
268
75
5
8
204
29
2
21
2
358
1
257
271
77
5
9
2
2
366
1%
1%
3
259
262
74
6
7
2
1
352
50%
0%
10%
7%
33%
5%
100%
200%
10%
117
92
2
4
2
24
10
115
89
2
4
2
27
9
1
1
120
87
3
3
1
21
10
1
1
110
80
3
2
1
-11%
-6%
-6%
-8%
-25%
-40%
-50%
75%
Faculty
1
360
Other Professionals
White
189
Black
22
Hispanic
3
Asian/Pacific Islander
15
Native American/Alaskan Native
1
Unknown
1
Total
231
201
27
3
14
1
246
-18%
Clerical
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
21
9
118
89
4
4
2
23
9
31
217
33
217
35
212
38
214
33
196
-9%
-8%
25
5
1
1
6
4
24
5
2
1
5
4
24
4
2
1
5
3
21
4
3
5
4
20
3
3
6
4
-13%
-16%
-22%
200%
32
10
32
9
31
8
0%
-12%
1
1
1
Technical
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
1
28
9
26
11
(Continued on next page)
132
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 7.2: Full-Time Employees by Gender, Race
and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06), in Percentage
Fall 2002 – 2006
(Continued from previous page)
EE06 Category/Race
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Percent Change
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
Male Female
1 Year 5 Year
Skilled Crafts
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
14
7
2
1
14
7
2
13
7
2
13
6
1
15
6
2
15%
7%
-14%
100%
15%
-4%
24
0
23
0
22
0
20
0
23
26
45
3
1
2
30
3
23
46
3
1
1
26
2
26
42
3
1
1
27
3
26
40
3
1
1
28
3
28
42
3
1
1
1
28
3
7%
3%
4%
-7%
75
35
73
29
72
31
70
32
75
32
5%
-3%
White
583
520
600
533
619
549
616
565
604
568
-1%
6%
Black
113
223
115
226
112
224
113
221
109
214
-3%
-4%
Hispanic
18
19
19
15
17
19
18
18
20
16
Asian/Pacific Islander
73
26
76
29
86
27
83
27
79
34
3%
14%
Native American/Alaskan Native
1
3
0
2
0
2
0
4
1
4
25%
25%
Unknown
2
0
3
0
4
3
1
1
2
2
100%
100%
790
791
813
805
838
824
831
836
815
838
-1%
5%
Service, Maintenance
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Unknown
Total
Total Full-Time Employees
Total
-3%
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of November 1.
FACULTY & STAFF
133
Table 7.3: Full-Time Employees by Gender, Race
Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06), in Percentage
Fall 2002 – 2006
Women and Minorities as Percent of Total
Executive, Administrative
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
Faculty
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
24%
21%
2%
6%
25%
19%
1%
10%
29%
21%
1%
9%
28%
21%
1%
10%
29%
18%
1%
10%
29%
32%
31%
32%
29%
35%
7%
3%
12%
35%
8%
3%
12%
35%
7%
3%
12%
36%
7%
2%
12%
37%
6%
2%
14%
22%
23%
23%
21%
22%
Other Professionals
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
59%
17%
1%
4%
58%
16%
1%
4%
58%
16%
1%
5%
58%
17%
1%
5%
60%
17%
1%
4%
23%
22%
23%
23%
23%
Clerical
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
88%
40%
2%
2%
1%
44%
87%
40%
1%
2%
1%
44%
86%
40%
1%
2%
1%
44%
85%
38%
2%
2%
86%
39%
2%
1%
42%
43%
24%
21%
2%
2%
22%
22%
5%
2%
21%
18%
5%
3%
24%
22%
8%
0%
30%
19%
8%
3%
26%
29%
26%
30%
30%
29%
8%
4%
30%
9%
32%
9%
30%
5%
26%
9%
42%
39%
41%
35%
35%
Technical
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
Skilled Crafts
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
(Continued on next page)
134
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Table 7.3: Full-Time Employees by Gender, Race
and Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EE06), in Percentage
Fall 2002 – 2006
Women and Minorities as Percent of Total
(Continued from previous page)
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
32%
68%
5%
1%
28%
71%
5%
1%
30%
67%
6%
1%
31%
67%
6%
1%
75%
76%
74%
74%
30%
65%
6%
1%
1%
73%
Women
50%
50%
50%
50%
51%
Black
21%
21%
20%
20%
20%
Hispanic
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
Asian/Pacific Islander
6%
6%
7%
7%
7%
30%
30%
30%
29%
29%
Service, Maintenance
Women
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
Total Full-Time Employees
Native American/Alaskan Native
Minorities
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of November 1.
FACULTY & STAFF
135
Table 7.4: Full-Time Employees by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
EE06 Category Description
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Executive/Administrative
Faculty
Other Professional
Clerical
Tech/Paraprofessional
Skilled Crafts
Service/Maintenance
Total Full-time Employees
66
534
557
248
42
24
110
1,581
72
541
589
250
41
23
102
1,618
70
564
617
247
39
22
103
1,662
72
575
609
252
37
20
102
1,667
73
572
612
229
37
23
107
1,653
1%
-1%
11%
7%
10%
-8%
-12%
-4%
-3%
5%
-9%
15%
5%
-1%
Table 7.5: Part-Time Employees by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
EE06 Category Description
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Executive/Administrative
Faculty
Other Professional
Clerical
Tech/Paraprofessional
Skilled Crafts
Service/Maintenance
Total Part-time Employees
1
445
179
33
379
165
28
414
157
25
2
430
151
24
1
404
137
24
1
-6%
-9%
-9%
-23%
-27%
15
673
19
591
17
615
12
618
6
572
-50%
-7%
-60%
-15%
Table 7.6: Total Employees by Equal Employment Opportunity Category 6 (EEO6)
Fall 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
EE06 Category Description
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Executive/Administrative
Faculty
Other Professional
Clerical
Tech/Paraprofessional
Skilled Crafts
Service/Maintenance
Total Employees
67
979
736
281
42
24
125
2,254
72
920
754
278
41
23
121
2,209
70
978
774
272
41
22
120
2,277
72
1,005
760
276
38
20
114
2,285
73
976
749
253
38
23
113
2,225
1%
-3%
-1%
-8%
9%
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of November 1.
136
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
15%
-1%
-3%
2%
-10%
-10%
-4%
-10%
-1%
Table 7.7: Full-Time Faculty by Rank
Fall 2006
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
TOTAL
Professor
Associate
Professor
Assistant
Professor
Instructor
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
28
34
17
19
36
10
17
161
35%
21%
16%
34%
34%
45%
39%
28%
26
66
31
27
38
7
11
206
33%
42%
30%
48%
36%
32%
25%
36%
13
45
45
10
27
4
5
149
16%
28%
43%
18%
25%
18%
11%
26%
Term Faculty
Total
%
N
%
N
2
3
1%
3%
13
12
9
16%
8%
9%
1
1%
6
1%
4
1
11
50
4%
5%
25%
9%
80
159
105
56
106
22
44
572
Note: Includes only standard academic ranks.
Table 7.8: Full-Time Faculty by Gender
Fall 2006
Regular Faculty
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
TOTAL
Male
Term Faculty
Female
Male
Total
Female
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
55
94
34
50
73
11
22
339
69%
59%
32%
89%
69%
50%
50%
59%
12
53
62
6
29
10
11
183
15%
33%
59%
11%
27%
45%
25%
32%
9
4
1
11%
3%
1%
4
8
8
5%
5%
8%
9%
4%
1
1
7
29
5%
16%
5%
80
159
105
56
106
22
44
572
14%
28%
18%
10%
19%
4%
8%
100%
3
4
21
Table 7.9: Full-Time Faculty by Highest Degree
Fall 2006
College
Business
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
TOTAL
Degree
Bachelors
1%
0%
Masters
Doctorate
11%
16%
21%
7%
8%
14%
85%
83%
79%
93%
92%
86%
5%
79%
13%
Terminal
Professional
4%
1%
95%
8%
Total
Degree
14%
28%
18%
10%
19%
4%
8%
100%
89%
93%
88%
100%
94%
86%
100%
93%
Source: All figures are taken from the census files as of November 1.
FACULTY & STAFF
137
138
Table 7.10: Full-Time Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty by College/Department:
5-Year Trend
Fall
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
2002
College/Department
2003
Tenured Non
& Tenure Tenure Total
Track Track
2004
Tenured Non
& Tenure Tenure Total
Track
Track
2005
Tenured
Non
& Tenure Tenure Total
Track
Track
2006
Tenured
Non
Tenured
Non
& Tenure Tenure Total & Tenure Tenure
Track
Track
Track
Track
Percent Change
Total
1 Year 5 Year
Business
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Accounting
Computer & Information Science
Finance
Health Care Administration
Management & Labor Management
Marketing
Operation Management &
Business Statistics
Business Total
10
16
8
1
8
13
2
4
10
17
8
1
10
11
3
4
1
5
1
12
20
8
2
13
14
5
61
10
17
8
1
10
12
4
5
2
1
3
1
13
21
8
2
13
12
3
16
8
77
6
63
6
11
7
18
3
16
6
13
7
14
1
16
10
14
11
12
9
7
21
12
9
156
12
11
12
9
5
16
13
10
145
3
2
6
7
18
14
19
12
17
33
95
16
14
10
10
24
74
10
16
7
2
12
13
3
6
1
4
2
14
22
10
1
14
14
3
15
9
78
6
64
6
13
7
18
1
17
6
13
7
14
17
1
18
13
11
12
9
4
17
13
10
146
2
1
16
16
12
12
9
6
21
13
10
161
6
2
6
8
22
16
20
12
16
32
96
17
17
10
11
26
81
9
16
8
2
11
13
4
4
1
1
2
13
22
8
2
13
15
2
2
13
20
9
2
13
15
3
20
9
84
2
6
13
7
16
8%
6
66
3
16
9
82
6
65
2
15
8
80
-11%
-2%
6
13
6
15
1
1
7
14
6
17
5
13
7
16
1
6
13
7
18
-14%
-7%
17%
6%
-9%
13%
13%
7%
4%
Liberal Arts & Social Sciences
Anthropology
Art
Economics
English
First College
History
Liberal Studies
Modern Languages
Music
Philosophy
Political Science
Religious Studies
School of Communication
Social Work
Sociology
Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Total
6
11
7
17
3
15
11
11
12
9
5
18
12
9
146
1
1
3
2
3
4
1
4
1
1
5
1
13
15
12
12
9
5
22
13
11
159
18
1
11
12
11
8
4
18
13
10
146
1
4
3
10
9
27
18
21
13
21
35
108
16
20
11
16
27
90
1
5
2
2
5
1
1
15
18
1
14
12
11
9
4
23
14
11
161
12
12
10
8
2
19
12
10
144
1
5
2
2
15
14
12
10
8
3
24
14
12
159
1
3
2
7
7
20
17
23
13
23
34
110
17
20
12
17
31
97
1
1
1
4
2
9
18
21
13
21
33
106
3
1
18
18%
-100%
13%
18
-100%
2
-9%
-11%
-25%
4%
9%
-1%
9%
-17%
-11%
-57%
14%
17%
33%
2%
Education and Human Resources
CASAL
Curriculum & Foundations
Health And Physical Education
School of Nursing
Teachers Education
Education and Human Resources Total
14
16
10
11
26
77
6%
-9%
-9%
-3%
-4%
29%
11%
8%
24%
12%
(Continued on next page)
Table 7.10: Full-Time Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty by College/Department:
5-Year Trend
(Continued from previous page)
Fall
2002
College/Department
2003
Tenured Non
& Tenure Tenure Total
Track Track
2004
Tenured Non
& Tenure Tenure Total
Track
Track
2005
Tenured
Non
& Tenure Tenure Total
Track
Track
2006
Tenured
Non
& Tenure Tenure Toal
Track
Track
Tenured
Non
& Tenure Tenure
Track
Track
Percent Change
Total
1 Year 5 Year
Engineering
FACULTY & STAFF
Chemical Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing
Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Engineering Total
9
9
13
5
9
9
13
5
8
8
13
5
7
11
54
7
11
54
6
11
51
Law
36
37
36
Science
Biology, Geology &
Environmental Science
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Science Total
21
13
13
21
7
20
4
99
3
21
14
13
23
7
20
4
102
20
13
12
21
9
18
4
97
Urban Affairs
19
1
20
492
49
541
University Total
1
1
2
1
9
8
13
5
10
8
15
5
10
8
15
5
9
9
14
4
9
9
14
4
9
9
16
4
9
9
16
4
1
6
11
52
7
12
57
7
12
57
8
12
56
8
12
56
6
12
56
6
12
56
2
38
33
34
32
44
33
1
1
5
20
14
12
23
9
19
5
102
19
13
10
21
9
20
5
97
1
1
6
19
14
11
23
9
21
6
103
19
12
14
21
9
18
3
96
23
13
16
23
10
18
7
19
13
15
23
9
21
3
103
22
1
23
21
1
22
21
1
488
62
550
499
68
567
507
71
1
2
1
1
1
2
12
1
1
2
3
11
44
1
2
1
23
13
17
25
10
19
103
4
107
22
21
1
22
578
519
55
574
14%
23%
-20%
-25%
-14%
9%
4%
0%
19%
21%
13%
9%
11%
-10%
-100%
4%
10%
-7%
31%
9%
43%
-5%
-100%
5%
10%
-1%
6%
139
140
Table 7.11: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hours (SCH)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Generated by Part-Time Faculty
Fall 2006
Department
College of Business
Accounting
Computer & Information Science
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
Other Business
Business Total
College of Liberal Arts And Social Sciences
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Economics
English
History
Interdisciplinary
Modern Languages
Music
Philosophy
Political Science
Description
Accounting
Business Law
Computer and Information Science
Information Science
Finance
Management & Labor Relations
General Administration
Marketing
Operation Management & Business Statistics
International Business
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Drama
Economics
English
History
Classical and Medieval Studies
Linguistics
Women’s Studies
Arabic
Chinese
English Translations of Foreign Literatures
French
German
Greek
Italian
Japanese
Latin
Modern Languages
Spanish
Applied Music
Music
Philosophy
Political Science
SCH Generated
by Full-Time
Faculty
SCH Generated
by Part-Time
Faculty
2,006
333
762
1,066
1,048
1,380
171
1,866
1,288
16
9,936
636
99
12
836
670
345
597
140
330
1,080
1,774
4,992
495
1,061
2,111
3,888
1
4
198
176
8
250
95
12
230
3,665
188
1,124
1,744
78
1,291
4,438
2,056
16
56
165
93
105
52
100
94
16
695
33
468
1,218
1,574
935
275
1,915
652
784
Total SCH
Generated
% of SCH
Generated by
Part-Time
Faculty
2,642
432
774
1,902
1,718
1,725
768
2,006
1,618
16
13,601
24%
23%
2%
44%
39%
20%
78%
7%
20%
0%
27%
1,268
2,898
6,736
573
2,352
6,549
5,944
1
20
254
341
93
8
355
147
12
230
100
94
16
1,630
308
2,383
1,870
2,358
15%
39%
26%
14%
65%
68%
35%
0%
80%
22%
48%
100%
0%
30%
35%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
57%
89%
80%
35%
33%
(Continued on next page)
Table 7.11: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hours (SCH)
Generated by Part-Time Faculty
Fall 2006
(Continued from previous page)
Department
Description
Religious Studies
Social Work
Sociology
CLASS Total
Religious Studies
Social Work
Sociology
College of Education & Human Services
CASAL
Curriculum and Foundations
Health And Physical Education
Nursing
Other Education
Teachers Education
Coun, Admin, Super, Adult Learning
Education Specialist
Curriculum & Instruction
Dance
Health and Physical Education
Health Education
HPER-Core Curriculum
Physical Education-Service
Nursing RN
Professional Development
Early Childhood Education
Education-SIP
Middle Childhood Education
Special Education
Specialized Instructional/Teacher Education
Specialized Study & Field Experiences
Education Total
College of Engineering
Chemical & Biomedical Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
FACULTY & STAFF
Dean’s Office
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Engineering Technology
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Engineering Science
Civil Engineering
Engineering Science
Engineering Science
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Electronic Engineering Technology
General Engineering Technology
Math Technology
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Engineering Science
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
SCH Generated
by Full-Time
Faculty
723
1,111
3,132
25,345
3
148
1,126
66
716
183
101
2,240
3
441
180
232
296
453
1,606
7,794
155
186
313
99
297
922
118
8
32
57
84
188
SCH Generated
by Part-Time
Faculty
828
1,056
1,359
19,404
140
314
14
46
224
576
266
449
120
500
495
3,144
264
78
147
282
9
28
246
54
Total SCH
Generated
% of SCH
Generated by
Part-Time
Faculty
1,551
2,167
4,491
44,749
53%
49%
30%
43%
3
288
1,440
80
716
183
46
325
2,816
3
707
629
352
796
948
1,606
10,938
0%
49%
22%
18%
0%
0%
100%
69%
20%
0%
38%
71%
34%
63%
52%
0%
29%
155
450
391
246
297
1,204
118
17
32
85
330
242
59%
20%
60%
0%
23%
0%
53%
0%
33%
75%
22%
141
(Continued on next page)
142
Table 7.11: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hours (SCH)
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Generated by Part-Time Faculty
Fall 2006
(Continued from previous page)
Department
Description
Mechanical Engineering
Engineering Science
Mechanical Engineering
Engineering Total
College of Science
Biology, Geology & Environmental Science
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Chemistry
Health Sciences
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Science Total
College of Urban Affairs
Urban Studies
Biology
Environmental Sciences
Geological Sciences
Chemistry
Perfusion
Pre-Health Science
Mathematics
Physics
Psychology
Speech & Hearing
Environmental Studies
Public Administration
Public Safety Management
Urban Services Administration
Urban Studies
Urban Affairs Total
SCH Generated
by Full-Time
Faculty
% of SCH
Generated by
Part-Time
Faculty
SCH Generated
by Part-Time
Faculty
Total SCH
Generated
1,108
249
704
4,520
0%
0%
25%
1,296
196
346
1,086
34
402
2,577
1,133
2,691
1,191
10,952
4,025
293
926
3,381
34
1,623
8,626
2,319
6,838
1,672
29,737
32%
67%
37%
32%
100%
25%
30%
49%
39%
71%
37%
4
136
116
1,348
1,604
60
4
216
212
3,820
4,312
0%
100%
63%
55%
35%
37%
1,664
1,006
1,544
10
2,560
1,482
2,732
10
4,224
68%
57%
100%
61%
69,644
42,437
112,081
38%
249
704
3,412
2,729
97
580
2,295
1,221
6,046
1,186
4,147
481
18,785
60
80
96
2,472
2,708
Undergraduate Studies1
English
Mathematics
Military Science
Undergraduate Studies Total
Total SCH
476
1,188
Total SCH generated reported in this report may vary with other published reports. This report Includes the only SCH generated by instructors who have a valid I.D. available in the CSU employee database system.
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of Univesity Studies (1997-2005).
Table 7.12: Women and Minorities as a Percent of Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Institution
2002
2003
2004
2005
Women Minorities Women Minorities Women Minorities
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Total
38%
19%
16%
18%
25%
15%
14%
18%
14%
15%
13%
17%
30%
33%
38%
34%
28%
29%
30%
31%
31%
37%
37%
31%
34%
39%
35%
28%
30%
30%
32%
32%
19%
16%
19%
25%
16%
15%
19%
15%
16%
18%
18%
37%
37%
33%
33%
40%
36%
28%
30%
30%
33%
33%
20%
17%
20%
25%
17%
17%
19%
16%
18%
18%
19%
2006
Women Minorities Women Minorities
36%
37%
33%
32%
41%
36%
29%
32%
29%
34%
33%
20%
17%
20%
25%
17%
17%
19%
16%
18%
18%
19%
37%
40%
32%
34%
42%
37%
29%
35%
32%
35%
34%20%
20%
22%
20%
24%
19%
17%
22%
20%
19%
17%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Faculty Demographic (FD) query - rundate: April 26, 2006
Table 7.13: Percentage of Full-Time Faculty to Full-Time Employees
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions
Fall 2002 – 2006
Institution
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Total
35%
36%
35%
34%
29%
25%
19%
27%
37%
37%
27%
33%
38%
34%
33%
30%
26%
21%
28%
38%
38%
28%
32%
38%
35%
34%
31%
25%
21%
28%
38%
39%
28%
32%
36%
35%
34%
31%
25%
20%
29%
38%
38%
28%
32%
37%
36%
35%
31%
25%
21%
29%
41%
39%
28%
Note: Percentage is the total number of full-time faculty divided by the total number of full-time employees.
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI All Employee (AM) query - rundate: April 27, 2006
FACULTY & STAFF
143
Table 7.14: Rate of Annual Student FTE to Number of Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions
Fall 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Institution
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
26.5
30.6
17.8
25.6
28.7
28.7
16.8
24.9
27.3
28.7
27.4
30.0
17.4
26.1
31.5
28.5
18.9
25.2
28.2
29.7
27.5
30.5
16.8
25.5
34.2
28.2
19.5
24.8
28.0
29.8
27.8
32.1
17.5
25.3
33.0
27.8
19.4
24.2
27.7
29.3
26.0
30.7
12.9
24.2
33.2
27.0
13.7
19.5
26.8
29.0
-6.3%
-4.5%
-25.9%
-4.4%
0.6%
-3.0%
-29.6%
-19.4%
-3.2%
-0.9%
-1.7%
0.3%
-27.3%
-5.6%
15.4%
-6.1%
-18.8%
-21.6%
-1.8%
1.2%
Note: Ratio equals the annualized student FTE for the fiscal year divided by the number of tenured or tenure-track faculty.
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Faculty Demographics (FD) and Course Enrollment queries: run date: April 27, 2007
Table 7.15: Student FTE to Full-Time Staff Ratio
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fall 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Institution
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
11.5
11.5
5.8
10.5
9.8
7.0
3.7
8.0
11.7
15.2
11.1
11.7
5.8
10.4
10.5
6.9
3.6
8.5
12.1
15.7
10.9
11.8
5.7
9.8
10.5
6.6
3.5
8.5
11.5
15.6
10.5
10.6
5.7
9.6
10.5
6.3
3.3
8.7
11.4
14.9
11.8
12.0
7.5
9.6
10.5
6.3
3.3
8.7
15.1
15.7
12.5%
13.4%
28.7%
0.4%
35.8%
36.1%
14.7%
30.8%
33.2%
5.2%
2.0%
4.7%
27.4%
-8.3%
46.8%
23.0%
2.4%
42.3%
29.7%
3.2%
Note: Ratio equals the student FTE for the term divided by the number of non-faculty employees employed on November 1 of each year.
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI All Employees (AM) and Course Enrollment queries run date: May 24, 2007
144
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
S
Selected Administrative Centers, Departments & Offices
Selected Administrative
Centers, Departments
& Offices
8
Admissions Office:
Table 8.1: New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by College Fall 2002 – 2006
First Year
Percent Change
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Business
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
476
362
186
51.4%
531
380
176
46.3%
569
369
169
45.8%
573
414
176
42.5%
589
383
164
42.8%
3%
-7%
-7%
24%
6%
-12%
CLASS
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
978
804
388
48.3%
1,056
849
372
43.8%
997
748
236
31.6%
787
605
252
41.7%
730
493
214
43.4%
-7%
-19%
-15%
-25%
-39%
-45%
Education
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
261
159
77
48.4%
265
152
64
42.1%
357
203
67
33.0%
403
281
111
39.5%
485
299
100
33.4%
20%
6%
-10%
86%
88%
30%
Engineering
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
143
109
48
44.0%
185
132
68
51.5%
168
106
57
53.8%
218
153
59
38.6%
294
223
92
41.3%
35%
46%
56%
106%
105%
92%
Science
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
72
36
23
63.9%
106
51
37
72.5%
302
231
202
87.4%
595
510
214
42.0%
568
433
181
41.8%
-5%
-15%
-15%
689%
1103%
687%
Urban Affairs
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
27
22
11
50.0%
27
20
12
60.0%
40
28
19
67.9%
37
22
7
31.8%
21
17
5
29.4%
-43%
-23%
29%
-22%
-23%
-55%
Undergraduate Studies1
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Total
613
611
306
50.1%
590
589
281
47.7%
435
416
207
49.8%
532
529
223
42.2%
535
532
230
43.2%
1%
1%
3%
-13%
-13%
-25%
Applied
2,570
2,760
2,868
3,145
3,222
2%
25%
Admitted
2,103
2,173
2,101
2,514
2,380
-5%
13%
Enrolled
1,039
1,010
957
1,042
986
-5%
-5%
Yield
49.4%
46.5%
45.5%
41.4%
41.4%
Notes: Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
For Fall 2004 & 2005, significant increase in applied, admitted & enrolled in the College Science due to the creation of a new academic plan UNDCA and UNDCS. Consequently, number of students applied, admitted
and enrolled in Undergraduate Studies has decreased.
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006 – 2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997 – 2005).
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
147
Admissions Office:
Table 8.2: New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by College
Fall 2002 – 2006
Transfer
Percent Change
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
Business
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
614
459
319
69.5%
649
406
279
68.7%
663
375
225
60.0%
676
448
254
56.7%
683
452
225
49.8%
1%
1%
-11%
11%
-2%
-29%
CLASS
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
1,172
1,011
656
64.9%
1,284
966
631
65.3%
990
606
323
53.3%
772
528
335
63.4%
857
583
326
55.9%
11%
10%
-3%
-27%
-42%
-50%
Education
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
313
229
141
61.6%
396
227
141
62.1%
480
225
129
57.3%
574
395
213
53.9%
599
392
176
44.9%
4%
-1%
-17%
91%
71%
25%
Engineering
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
183
147
73
49.7%
174
113
81
71.7%
152
83
55
66.3%
151
97
64
66.0%
173
110
57
51.8%
15%
13%
-11%
-5%
-25%
-22%
Science
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
106
61
51
83.6%
161
81
71
87.7%
313
194
192
99.0%
479
340
225
66.2%
510
368
196
53.3%
6%
8%
-13%
381%
503%
284%
Urban Affairs
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
82
71
49
69.0%
85
60
46
76.7%
86
40
20
50.0%
73
56
40
71.4%
104
79
46
58.2%
42%
41%
15%
27%
11%
-6%
Undergraduate Studies1
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Total
103
100
61
61.%
123
77
51
66.2%
23
16
10
62.5%
139
132
87
65.9%
128
122
69
56.6%
-8%
-8%
-21%
24%
22%
13%
Applied
2,573
2,872
2,707
2,864
3.054
7%
19%
Admitted
2,078
1,930
1,539
1,996
2,106
6%
1%
Enrolled
1,350
1,300
954
1,218
1,095
-10%
-19%
Yield
65.0%
67.4%
62.0%
61.0%
52.0%
Notes: Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
For Fall 2004 & 2005, significant increase in applied, admitted & enrolled in the College Science due to the creation of a new academic plan UNDCA and UNDCS. Consequently, number of students applied, admitted
and enrolled in Undergraduate Studies has decreased.
1
Office of Undergraduate Studies (2006-2007) unit was created in August 2007 to replace the functions of University Studies (1997-2005).
148
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Admissions Office:
Table 8.3: New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by Race
Fall 2002 – 2006
First Year
Percent Change
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
White
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
1,384
1,248
632
50.6%
1,433
1,232
580
47.1%
1,445
1,205
551
45.7%
1,639
1,429
610
42.7%
1,562
1,340
579
43.2%
-5%
-6%
-5%
13%
7%
-8%
African-American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
806
569
263
46.2%
897
635
295
46.5%
909
538
235
43.7%
1,021
712
283
39.7%
1,087
629
241
38.3%
6%
-12%
-15%
35%
11%
-8%
Hispanic
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
103
81
37
45.7%
131
105
45
42.9%
122
91
34
37.4%
163
141
49
34.8%
152
119
46
38.7%
-7%
-16%
-6%
48%
47%
24%
Asian
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
67
63
37
58.7%
85
75
35
46.7%
87
74
26
35.1%
101
85
45
52.9%
102
77
31
40.3%
1%
-9%
-31%
52%
22%
-16%
Native American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
7
5
2
40.0%
10
3
0
0.0%
9
4
1
25.0%
13
8
4
50.0%
12
9
2
22.2%
-8%
13%
-50%
71%
80%
Total Minority
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
983
718
339
47.2%
1,123
818
375
45.8%
1,127
707
296
41.9%
1,298
946
381
40.3%
1,353
834
320
38.4%
4%
-12%
-16%
38%
16%
-6%
Race Unknown
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
130
98
58
59.2%
126
93
43
46.2%
201
147
94
63.9%
130
106
42
39.6%
219
160
65
40.6%
68%
51%
55%
68%
63%
12%
Non-Resident Alien
Applied
73
78
95
78
88
13%
21%
Admitted
39
30
42
33
46
39%
18%
144%
120%
Enrolled
10
12
16
9
22
Yield
25.6%
40.0%
38.1%
27.3%
47.8%
2,570
2,760
2,868
3,145
3,222
2%
25%
Total
Applied
Admitted
2,103
2,173
2,101
2,514
2,380
-5%
13%
Enrolled
1,039
1,010
957
1,042
986
-5%
-5%
Yield
49.4%
46.5%
45.5%
41.4%
41.4%
Note: Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
149
Admissions Office:
Table 8.4: New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by Race
Fall 2002 – 2006
Transfers
Percent Change
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
White
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
1,536
1,294
864
66.8%
1,713
1,240
844
68.1%
1,586
1,007
619
61.5%
1,723
1,320
827
62.7%
1,739
1,338
721
53.9%
1%
1%
-13%
13%
3%
-17%
African-American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
558
385
235
61.0%
687
355
235
66.2%
709
277
176
63.5%
777
406
229
56.4%
857
443
217
49.0%
10%
9%
-5%
54%
15%
-8%
Hispanic
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
80
65
43
66.2%
82
56
35
62.5%
75
44
28
63.6%
84
60
38
63.3%
100
74
32
43.2%
19%
23%
-16%
25%
14%
-26%
Asian
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
51
44
35
79.5%
61
41
28
68.3%
49
32
16
50.0%
75
64
36
56.3%
85
69
31
44.9%
13%
8%
-14%
67%
57%
-11%
6
5
0
0.0%
8
4
4
100.0%
10
6
4
66.7%
13
6
4
66.7%
14
12
6
50.0%
8%
100%
50%
133%
140%
Total Minority
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
695
499
313
62.7%
838
456
302
66.2%
843
359
224
62.4%
949
536
307
57.3%
1,056
598
286
47.8%
11%
12%
-7%
52%
20%
-9%
Race Unknown
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
245
218
131
60.1%
209
160
110
68.8%
214
137
87
63.5%
143
107
66
61.7%
191
126
59
46.8%
34%
18%
-11%
-22%
-42%
-55%
Non-Resident Alien
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Total
97
67
42
62.7%
112
74
44
59.5%
64
36
24
66.7%
49
33
18
54.5%
68
44
29
65.9%
39%
33%
61%
-30%
-34%
-31%
Applied
2,573
2,872
2,707
2,864
3,054
7%
19%
Admitted
2,078
1,930
1,539
1,996
2,106
6%
1%
-10%
-19%
Native American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Enrolled
1,350
1,300
954
1,218
1,095
Yield
65.0%
67.4%
62.0%
61.0%
52.0%
Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
150
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Admissions Office:
Table 8.5: New Graduate & Law Application Trends
for Degree-Seeking Students by College
Fall 2002 – 2006
Graduate & Law
Percent Change
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
967
603
318
52.7%
1,034
689
328
47.6%
911
517
236
45.6%
1,010
619
291
47.0%
978
608
250
41.1%
-3%
-2%
-14%
1%
1%
-21%
333
231
156
67.5%
330
220
133
60.5%
399
234
142
60.7%
370
266
169
63.5%
421
276
115
41.7%
14%
4%
-32%
26%
19%
-26%
635
482
404
83.8%
819
510
424
83.1%
792
323
211
65.3%
691
496
319
64.3%
610
470
178
37.9%
-12%
-5%
-44%
-4%
-2%
-56%
864
509
119
23.4%
1,021
603
123
20.4%
702
380
101
26.6%
691
377
91
24.1%
861
473
119
25.2%
25%
25%
31%
-7%
334
185
112
60.5%
360
197
118
59.9%
413
205
106
51.7%
402
217
127
58.5%
457
221
130
58.8%
14%
2%
2%
37%
19%
16%
182
132
83
62.9%
200
141
81
57.4%
200
113
62
54.9%
174
102
57
55.9%
182
118
48
40.7%
5%
16%
-16%
-11%
-42%
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Total
1,316
572
259
45.3%
1,555
581
263
45.3%
1,816
526
218
41.4%
1,744
535
232
43.4%
1,661
598
218
36.5%
-5%
12%
-6%
26%
5%
-16%
Applied
4,631
5,319
5,233
5,082
5,170
2%
12%
Admitted
2,714
2,941
2,298
2,612
2,764
6%
2%
Enrolled
1,451
1,470
1,076
1,286
1,058
-18%
-27%
Yield
53.5%
50.0%
46.8%
49.2%
38.3%
Business
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
CLASS
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Education
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Engineering
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Science
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Urban Affairs
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Law
Notes: Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
151
Admissions Office:
Table 8.6: New Graduate & Law Applications Trends
for New Degree-Seeking Students by Race
Fall 2002 – 2006
Graduate & Law
Percent Change
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
White
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
2,185
1,369
914
66.8%
2,600
1,436
958
66.7%
2,558
1,073
611
56.9%
2,365
1,210
744
61.5%
2,374
1,274
575
45.1%
5%
-23%
9%
-7%
-37%
African-American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
490
224
182
81.3%
546
227
164
72.2%
581
183
130
71.0%
567
259
173
66.8%
554
235
89
37.9%
-2%
-9%
-49%
13%
5%
-51%
Hispanic
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
95
56
34
60.7%
95
50
33
66.0%
107
29
12
41.4%
84
39
15
38.5%
95
50
16
32.0%
13%
28%
7%
-11%
-53%
Asian
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
90
59
34
57.6%
107
59
32
54.2%
146
54
27
50.0%
528
268
80
29.9%
625
331
22
6.6%
18%
24%
-73%
594%
461%
-35%
Native American
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
9
3
2
66.7%
11
7
5
71.4%
7
3
1
33.3%
19
9
5
55.6%
14
6
1
16.7%
-26%
-33%
-80%
56%
100%
-50%
Total Minority
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
684
342
252
73.7%
759
343
234
68.2%
841
269
170
63.2%
1,198
575
273
47.5%
1,288
622
128
20.6%
8%
8%
-53%
88%
82%
-49%
Race Unknown
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
147
100
75
75.0%
183
105
75
71.4%
480
190
111
58.4%
813
427
182
42.6%
753
416
136
32.7%
-7%
-3%
-25%
412%
316%
81%
Non-Resident Alien
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Yield
Total
1,615
903
210
23.3%
1,777
1,057
203
19.2%
1,354
766
184
24.0%
706
400
87
21.8%
755
452
219
48.5%
7%
13%
152%
-53%
-50%
4%
Applied
4,631
5,319
5,233
5,082
5,170
2%
12%
Admitted
2,714
2,941
2,298
2,612
2,764
6%
2%
Enrolled
1,451
1,470
1,076
1,286
1,058
-18%
-27%
Yield
53.5%
50.0%
46.8%
49.2%
38.3%
Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.
152
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Office of Advancement:
CCSU Foundation
Alumni, faculty, staff, friends, corporations and foundations support Cleveland State
University each year with philanthropic gifts. These gifts provide additional resources that are necessary for sustaining a
high quality educational experience for the University’s diverse student body. Various appeals and initiatives are conducted
through the Annual Giving Program, including direct mailings to all alumni, student phonathon drives, specialized mailings
from various departments within the University, an annual appeal among the faculty and staff of Cleveland State University,
and collaboration with multiple special events held both on and off campus.
Table 8.7: CSU Foundation: 5-Year Endowment Growth by College/Division
Endowment (Program Giving & Scholarship)
College/Division
Business
Arts & Sciences1
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Athletics
General University
Library
Office of the President
Total Endowment
2003
2004
2005
2006
2,165,665
1,840,350
2,669,591
2,013,076
2,899,291
3,388,980
122,348
226,085
456,422
1,526,333
3,780,387
3,180,440
955,066
1,666,517
676,382
281,994
$14,895,233
4,419,997
4,038,463
1,310,687
2,746,043
779,089
327,242
$20,286,943
1,710,087
1,377,706
1,563,151
300,489
4,488,599
4,433,144
1,353,712
3,265,074
791,845
302,066
$22,485,164
1,908,446
1,803,765
2,358,942
338,565
5,183,857
5,173,875
1,523,262
4,199,599
906,662
330,191
$27,116,142
Percent Change
2007
1 Year
5 Year
3,660,672
8%
69%
2,062,273
6,159,427
3,090,388
401,594
5,435,311
6,182,971
1,615,428
4,944,638
966,048
354,662
$34,873,412
8%
241%
31%
19%
5%
20%
6%
18%
7%
7%
29%
Program Giving2
College/Division
Business
Arts & Sciences1
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Athletics
General University
Library
Office of the President
Total Program
2003
2004
564,694
877,442
652,669
664,919
17,331
329,262
1,037,562
3,075,118
1,466,408
10,850
11,497
676,382
281,994
6,417,022
3,541,574
2,001,485
11,682
14,789
779,089
327,242
8,707,604
2005
4934%
1267%
44%
94%
69%
197%
43%
26%
134%
Percent Change
2006
2007
1 Year
5 Year
653,711
709,989
749,772
6%
33%
451,719
650,130
1,057,119
192,514
3,553,935
2,070,501
21,682
15,940
791,845
302,066
9,107,452
494,532
1,017,334
1,144,595
215,902
3,970,769
2,269,257
38,828
201,836
906,662
330,191
10,589,906
521,994
5,255,478
1,182,929
241,436
4,146,370
2,455,108
42,512
393,456
966,048
354,662
15,559,993
6%
417%
3%
12%
4%
8%
9%
95%
7%
7%
47%
30224%
35%
67%
292%
3322%
43%
26%
142%
Note: 1Prior to 2005 Arts & Sciences data includes combined data of the College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences and the College of Science.
2
Program giving includes gifts for academic programs, support for colleges, faculty and staff development, technological upgrades and facilities and equipment.
Source: CSU Office of Advancement
(Continued on next page)
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
153
Office of Advancement:
(Continued from previous page)
Table 8.7: CSU Foundation:
5-Year Endowment Growth by College/Division
Scholarship
College/Division
Business
Arts & Sciences1
CLASS
Education
Engineering
Science
Urban Affairs
Law
Athletics
General University
Total Scholarships
TOTAL ENDOWMENTS
2002
Percent Change
2003
2004
2005
1,600,971
962,908
2,016,922
1,348,157
2,245,580
2,678,991
105,017
226,085
127,160
488,770
705,269
1,714,032
944,216
1,655,020
7,915,520
$14,332,542
878,423
2,036,978
1,299,004
2,731,254
10,928,674
$19,636,278
1,258,368
727,576
506,032
107,975
934,664
2,362,642
1,332,031
3,249,133
12,726,006
$21,833,458
1,413,915
786,431
1,214,346
122,662
1,213,087
2,904,619
1,484,434
3,997,762
15,818,253
$26,408,159
2006
1 Year
5 Year
2,910,900
9%
82%
1,540,279
903,949
1,907,459
160,157
1,288,941
3,727,863
1,572,916
4,551,183
18,565,654
$34,125,647
9%
15%
57%
31%
6%
28%
6%
14%
17%
29%
761%
744%
83%
117%
67%
175%
135%
138%
Note: 1Prior to 2005 Arts & Sciences data includes combined data of the College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences and the College of Science.
2
Program giving includes gifts for academic programs, support for colleges, faculty and staff development, technological upgrades and facilities and equipment.
Table 8.8: CSU Foundation: Endowed Scholarship, Donors & Giving
Percent
Increase
Endowed:
FY2002
Chairs
Scholarships
Donors:
Alumni
Total
Giving:
Alumni
Total
FY2003
FY2004
2
111
FY2005
FY2006
FY2007
1 Year
4
157
4
172
4
180
100%
74%
4,520
6,930
4265
6826
4351
6761
4,724
6,976
5,263
7,883
4214
6817
16%
14%
$812,608
$4,510,831
$750,846
$4,956,261
$1,279,657
$8,357,423
$924,859
$7,145,421
$1,165,048
$6,710,078
$928,413
$8,130,961
43%
49%
Philanthropic Highlights: 2006 – 2007
■ Iris S. Wolstein, in loving memory of her husband, Bert L. Wolstein, a distinguished 1953 graduate of Cleveland State’s
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, created the Bert L. Wolstein Building Fund and the Bert L. and Iris S. Wolstein
Endowed Scholarship Fund at the Cleveland State University Foundation with a commitment of $6.25 million.
The Wolstein Building Fund and Wolstein Scholarship Fund are being created with a $5 million gift to support the Law
Building upgrade project and a $1.25 million challenge-pledge to support the creation of an endowed scholarship fund,
the Bert L. and Iris S. Wolstein Endowed Scholarship Fund.
■ Parker Hannifin Corporation has made a $4 million philanthropic gift commitment to the University in support of student
scholarships and building improvements. The gift is the largest corporate endowment the University has ever received,
as well as the largest gift ever made by the Parker Hannifin Foundation. Parker Hannifin has directed $3 million to
the creation of an endowment fund for undergraduate and graduate scholarships in Cleveland State’s Fenn College of
Engineering. In addition, $1 million will be directed to the creation of an endowment fund for building improvements
for the Cleveland State University Administration Center and the structure formerly known as Howe Mansion.
154
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Athletics Department:
Table 8.9: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University
Enrollment
Men’s
2001 – 2002
Enrollment
%
Baseball
Basketball
Fencing
Golf
Soccer
Swimming & Diving
Tennis
Wrestling
Total Men
Cumulative GPA Males
27
13
9
7
12
15
9
21
113
24%
12%
8%
6%
11%
13%
8%
19%
100%
2.82
2002 – 2003
Enrollment %
43
17
12
12
21
25
8
33
171
2003 – 2004
Enrollment %
25%
10%
7%
7%
12%
15%
5%
19%
100%
2004 – 2005
Enrollment %
38 24%
15 10%
9
6%
12
8%
22 14%
21 13%
8
5%
32 20%
157 100%
N/A
39
18
12
10
22
27
9
24
161
N/A
2005 – 2006
Enrollment %
24%
11%
7%
6%
14%
17%
6%
15%
100%
32
13
7
7
12
24
5
19
119
2.80
27%
11%
6%
6%
10%
20%
4%
16%
100%
2.80
2006 – 2007
Enrollment %
33
13
8
7
11
24
5
19
120
28%
11%
7%
6%
9%
20%
4%
16%
100%
2.70
Women’s
Basketball
Cross Country
Fencing
Golf
Soccer
Softball
Swimming & Diving
Tennis
Volleyball
Total Women
Cumulative GPA Females
14
12
4
4
17%
15%
5%
5%
14
11
8
8
14%
11%
8%
8%
17
13
7
10
81
21%
16%
9%
12%
100%
21
18
9
13
102
21%
18%
9%
13%
100%
16 15%
10
9%
12 11%
6
6%
11 10%
16 15%
16 15%
5
5%
14 13%
106 100%
16
6
10
8
20
14
13
7
13
107
15%
6%
9%
7%
19%
13%
12%
7%
12%
100%
18
4
2
9
15
20
18
7
12
105
17%
4%
2%
9%
14%
19%
17%
7%
11%
100%
18
6
2
9
15
19
17
8
11
105
3.04
N/A
N/A
3.2
3.27
3.16
194
273
263
268
224
225
Cumulative GPA, All Athletes 2.90
N/A
2.97
2.98
3.03
2.91
Total All Athletes
17%
6%
2%
9%
14%
18%
16%
8%
10%
100%
Note: Enrollment reflects students who received athletic financial aid. GPA reflects fall term.
Source: CSU Athletics Department
N/A: data not available
Table 8.10: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University
4, 5, or 6 Year Graduation Rate
Fall
New Undergraduate First-Time,
Full-Time Degree-Seeking,
First Year Athletes
1996
Enrollment
Total Athletes
Athletes Graduated in 4 years
Athletes Graduated in 5 years
Athletes Graduated in 6 years
Total Graduated within 6 years
34
5
4
3
12
%
15%
12%
9%
35%
1997
Enrollment
45
7
10
1
18
%
16%
22%
2%
40%
1998
Enrollment
42
4
9
4
17
%
10%
21%
10%
40%
1999
Enrollment
50
10
11
2
23
%
20%
22%
4%
46%
2000
Enrollment
45
7
13
2
22
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
%
16%
29%
4%
49%
155
156
Finance:
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
Table 8.11: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Changes
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Percent Change
$ Amount
%
$ Amount
%
$ Amount
%
$ Amount
%
$ Amount
%
1 Year
5 Year
Operating Revenues
Student Tuition and Fees, Net
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
75,005,194
70%
87,476,820
73%
94,218,733
70%
101,993,591
71%
105,435,745
71%
3%
41%
Federal Grants & Contracts
8,715,781
8%
9,573,688
8%
16,855,658
13%
17,523,555
12%
16,166,211
11%
-8%
85%
State Grants & Contracts
5,795,513
5%
4,950,773
4%
4,917,905
4%
6,239,897
4%
6,444,889
4%
Local Grants & Contracts
666,628
1%
412,511
7%
454,970
1,005,353
1%
565,416
Private Gifts, Grants & Contracts
3,743,207
4%
3,271,610
3%
3,650,183
3%
2,357,913
2%
2,793,000
Sales & Services
3,051,843
3%
3,524,384
3%
3,740,626
3%
4,267,629
3%
4,412,667
Auxiliary Enterprises
9,373,135
9%
9,737,716
8%
10,086,036
8%
10,400,368
7%
11,510,285
562,050
1%
440,062
106,913,351 100%
119,387,564
Other Sources
Total Operating Revenues
440,350
529,133
100% 134,364,461 100%
3%
11%
-44%
-15%
2%
18%
-25%
3%
3%
45%
8%
11%
23%
13%
7%
3%
38%
600,354
144,317,439 100%
147,928,567
100%
Operating Expenses
Instruction
72,191,351
36%
77,629,017
37%
80,475,402
36%
84,586,586
36%
86,756,552
36%
3%
20%
Research
13,677,414
7%
13,493,627
6%
15,036,515
7%
14,415,812
6%
12,480,204
5%
-13%
-9%
Public Service
7,780,852
4%
7,842,716
4%
11,982,936
5%
15,772,621
7%
16,974,128
7%
8%
118%
Academic Support
17,544,043
9%
15,459,491
7%
20,344,432
9%
21,497,685
9%
23,082,980
10%
7%
32%
Student Services
14,604,875
7%
16,051,512
8%
18,006,608
8%
17,882,807
8%
18,452,112
8%
3%
26%
Institutional Support
22,225,254
11%
22,115,999
11%
23,513,279
10%
24,366,609
10%
24,588,976
10%
1%
11%
Operation & Maintenance of Plant 14,327,574
7%
16,886,095
8%
16,017,335
7%
15,973,865
7%
16,795,203
7%
5%
17%
Scholarships and Fellowships
5%
11,003,580
5%
10,580,518
5%
11,116,158
5%
11,765,722
5%
6%
17%
10,046,991
Auxiliary Enterprises
11,965,027
6%
13,081,920
6%
14,939,356
7%
14,819,276
6%
15,581,267
6%
5%
30%
Depreciation and Amortization
15,668,985
8%
15,166,745
7%
15,045,070
7%
15,051,884
6%
15,102,608
6%
.3%
-4%
200,032,366 100%
208,730,702
235,483,303 100%
241,579,752
100%
3%
21%
Total Operating Expenses
100% 225,941,451 100%
(Continued on next page)
Finance:
Table 8.11: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Changes
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
(Continued from previous page)
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Percent Change
$ Amount
%
$ Amount
%
$ Amount
%
$ Amount
%
$ Amount
%
1 Year
4 Year
State Appropriations
74,131,715
75%
72,246,181
72%
71,982,028
75%
70,512,253
73%
69,978,333
72%
-1%
-6%
Federal Grants and Contracts
10,283,740
10%
10,622,713
11%
10,837,343
11%
10,486,828
11%
10,579,828
11%
1%
3%
State Grants and Contracts
3,376,991
3%
3,429,428
3%
3,557,298
4%
3,625,749
4%
3,796,202
4%
5%
12%
Gifts
3,389,263
3%
4,281,426
4%
3,942,821
4%
3,740,658
4%
3,797,905
4%
2%
12%
Investment Income
2,839,644
3%
1,893,283
2%
1,342,775
1%
2,246,285
2%
3,456,712
4%
581,163
-1%
685,952
-1%
445,808
6,007,809
6%
6,185,883
6%
4,459,787
526,463
1%
133,659
Non-Operating Revenues
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
Interest on Debt
State Capital Appropriations
Capital Gifts
20,500
Other Nonoperating Items
Total Non-Operating Items
99,468,499 100%
404,415
5%
1,298,863
365,059
1%
337,160
2,217,110
2%
100,716,535
100%
4,250,000
11,373,397
4%
4,232,913
1%
96%
297,633,126
99%
95,809,903 100%
6,525,659
7%
38,210
54%
22%
-10%
-37%
402%
9%
-89%
86%
4%
96,093,381 100%
97,807,790
100%
2%
-2%
4,156,605
1%
-16%
-35%
Net Assets
Increase in Net Assets
6,349,484
2%
Net Assets at Beginning of Year 279,910,245
98%
286,259,729
286,259,729 100%
297,633,126
Net Assets at End of Year
Source: Controllers Office
100% 301,866,039 100%
4,927,517
2%
301,866,039
98%
306,793,556
99%
2%
10%
306,793,556 100%
310,950,161
100%
1%
9%
157
Finance:
Figure 8.11a: Total Revenues
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
120,000,000
100,000,000
80,000,000
60,000,000
40,000,000
20,000,000
0
2002
2003
2004
Tuition & Fees
2005
State Subsidy
2006
Other
Figure 8.11b: Operating Expenses
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
120,000,000
100,000,000
80,000,000
60,000,000
40,000,000
20,000,000
0
2002
2003
Instruction & Dept. Research
Academic Support
Non-Instructional Expenditure
2004
Institutional Support
Student Services
Source: Controllers Office
158
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
2005
2006
Operation & Maintenance of Plant
Other
Finance:
Table 8.12: Public Service Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Institution
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Totals
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
4%
3%
6%
4%
4%
1%
5%
3%
2%
4%
4%
4%
3%
6%
4%
4%
1%
5%
3%
2%
5%
4%
5%
3%
6%
5%
3%
0%
4%
4%
1%
5%
4%
4%
3%
6%
7%
3%
0%
3%
4%
2%
5%
4%
5%
3%
6%
7%
3%
1%
4%
4%
1%
3%
4%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Current Fund Expenditures (CF) queries: run date: May 16, 2007
Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for public service for the fiscal year divided by the total expenditures.
■ In proportion to total spending, Cleveland State University’s Public Service expenditures have consistently remained among the
highest in the state of Ohio.
Table 8.13: Benefit Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Instructional Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Institution
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
University of Akron
Bowling Green State University
University of Cincinnati
Cleveland State University
Kent State University
Miami University
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
Totals
12%
12%
16%
14%
12%
14%
13%
12%
19%
18%
14%
15%
12%
16%
17%
12%
15%
15%
15%
20%
18%
15%
15%
13%
16%
17%
13%
15%
25%
17%
22%
20%
19%
15%
13%
16%
15%
13%
17%
26%
15%
21%
19%
19%
15%
11%
15%
15%
13%
16%
26%
15%
20%
19%
19%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Funding Unit Expenditures (FX) queries. Rundate: May 16, 2007
Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for benefits for the fiscal year divided by total expenditure
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
159
Finance:
Table 8.14: Scholarship and Fellowship Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures
Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions – Main Campuses Only
Fiscal Year 2002 – 2006
Institution
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
University of Akron
8%
9%
Bowling Green State University
14%
15%
University of Cincinnati
10%
10%
Cleveland State University
9%
9%
Kent State University
10%
11%
Miami University
8%
9%
Ohio State University
5%
5%
Ohio University
10%
9%
University of Toledo
11%
11%
Youngstown State University
16%
17%
Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Current Fund Expenditures (CF) queries
9%
16%
11%
9%
12%
9%
5%
9%
11%
16%
9%
18%
11%
9%
11%
8%
5%
10%
11%
16%
9%
19%
11%
10%
11%
8%
5%
10%
12%
16%
Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for scholarships and fellowships divided by total expenditures.
160
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Financial Aid Office:
CCleveland State University’s Financial Aid Programs
Cleveland State University’s
financial aid programs are of help to students who might otherwise be unable to
attend the University. Over two-thirds of CSU students receive some form of financial assistance. The University participates
in all of the major federal and state grant and loan programs. In addition, CSU provides university grants and scholarships
to many of our students. Our goal is to reduce the difference between educational costs related to attendance and the
amount that parents and students can reasonably be expected to contribute towards the student’s education.
Table 8.15: Financial Aid Awards to Undergraduate Students by Full-Time/Part-Time Status
Average Aid Package and Academic Year
Percent Change
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
Full-time Students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
4,256
$6,557
4,660
$6,893
Part-time Students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
872
$5,487
925
$5,942
2004 – 05
2005 – 06
2006–07
1 Year
5 Year
4,779
$7,070
4,656
$7,247
4,729
$7,803
2%
8%
11%
19%
768
$6,351
969
$5,788
900
$6,272
-7%
8%
3%
14%
Source: Common Data Set, H2-row D and row J
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
161
Financial Aid Office:
Table 8.16: Financial Aid Awards Fall Cohort, Full-Time, First-Time,
Degree-Seeking Undergraduate Students
Percent Change
Federal Grants:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
State Grants:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
Scholarships/Institutional Grants:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
Federal Student Loans:
Enrollment
Average Aid Package
Prior Year Cohort
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
2005 – 06
2006 – 07
1 Year
5 Year
407
$3,058
443
$3,131
450
$3,029
428
$3,187
461
$3,171
8%
-1%
13%
4%
573
$1,167
354
$1,449
352
$1,276
359
$1,700
347
$1,457
-3%
-14%
-39%
25%
339
$2,960
281
$2,583
329
$3,064
337
$4,209
384
$4,507
14%
7%
13%
52%
375
$3,473
N=1,008
434
$4,176
N=946
523
$4,109
N=925
582
$3,759
N=922
589
$4,126
N=955
1%
10%
57%
19%
Source: IPEDS Financial Aid Survey (http://www.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/pdf/webbase2006/sfa_public_form.pdf).
Table 8.17: Financial Aid Awards to Fall Term Undergraduate Students
Percent Change
Types of Financial Aid
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
2005 – 06
2006 – 07
Federal Grants
State Grants
Institutional Grants/Scholarships
Athletic Grants
Non-Institutional Assistance
Federal Student Loans and
Federal Work Study (FWS)
Total
$9,975,480
$3,253,147
$1,816,869
$1,437,017
$1,370,441
$10,796,340
$3,466,864
$1,922,391
$1,604,388
$1,105,335
$10,510,202
$3,669,003
$2,645,487
$1,778,844
$1,576,205
$10,740,865
$3,639,726
$3,809,689
$1,965,892
$29,622,729
$47,475,683
$35,005,307
$53,900,625
$36,724,673
$56,904,414
$37,992,769
$58,148,941
Source: Common Data Set, H1
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
162
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
1 Year
5 Year
$11,317,432
$3,775,648
$4,840,485
$2,036,686
5%
4%
27%
4%
13%
16%
166%
42%
$40,824,290
$62,794,541
7%
8%
38%
32%
Financial Aid Office:
Table 8.18: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards
by Full-Time/Part-Time Status and Average Aid Package
Percent Change
2002
Full-time Students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
429
Average Aid Package
$12,872
Part-time students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
1241
Average Aid Package
$10,246
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
464
$13,352
422
$14,287
420
$14,440
391
$14,294
-6.9%
-1.0%
-8.9%
11.0%
1509
$10,918
1530
$11,500
1516
$11,680
1448
$12,171
-4.5%
4.2%
16.7%
18.8%
Source: CSU Financial Aid Office
Table 8.19: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid
Fall 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Types of Financial Aid
State Fellowship
Scholarships/Institutional Grants
Non-Institutional Assistance
Federal Student Loans and
Federal Work Study (FWS)
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
$5,250
$4,403,008
$707,433
$7,000
$4,646,633
$862,866
$5,250
$4,167,408
$598,666
$5,250
$4,155,637
$586,742
$7,000
$3,501,710
$345,682
33.3%
-15.7%
-41.1%
33.3%
-20.5%
-51.1%
$13,150,877
$17,187,052
$18,842,082
$18,658,326
$19,357,639
3.7%
47.2%
Table 8.20: Law Student Financial Aid Awards
Full-Time/Part-Time Status and Average Aid Package
Percent Change
2002
Full-time Students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
504
Average Aid Package
$17,104
Part-time students with Financial Aid:
Enrollment
201
Average Aid Package
$14,146
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
513
$17,779
473
$19,763
474
$19,728
455
$19,407
-4.0%
-1.6%
-9.7%
13.5%
191
$15,023
180
$15,548
181
$15,452
186
$16,273
2.8%
5.3%
-7.5%
15.0%
Source: CSU Financial Aid Office
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
Table 8.21: Law Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid
Fall 2002 – 2006
Percent Change
Types of Financial Aid
State Fellowship
Scholarships/Institutional Grants
Non-Institutional Assistance
Federal Student Loans and
Federal Work Study (FWS)
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1 Year
5 Year
$3,500
$914,408
$351,311
$7,000
$868,253
$302,052
$10,500
$1,088,141
$295,451
$10,500
$1,092,137
$297,851
$1,750
$1,315,029
$230,760
-83.3%
20.4%
-22.5%
-50.0%
43.8%
-34.3%
$10,194,602
$10,812,678
$10,746,545
$10,191,028
$10,309,593
1.2%
1.1%
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
163
Financial Aid Office:
Table 8.22: Undergraduate Cost of Attendance (COA)
Academic Year
Tuition/Fees
Books and Supplies
Room/Board
Personal/Miscellaneous
Transportation
Loan Fees
Total
2001 – 02
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
2005 – 06
2006 – 07
$4,464
$800
$5,550
$1,824
$852
$360
$13,850
$5,184
$800
$5,880
$2,376
$1,400
$360
$16,000
$6,040
$800
$6,236
$2,376
$1,400
$360
$17,212
$6,820
$800
$6,392
$2,376
$1,400
$360
$18,148
$7,344
$800
$6,809
$2,376
$1,400
$360
$19,089
$7,920
$800
$7,800
$2,376
$1,400
$360
$20,656
See notes at the end of Financial Aid section
Table 8.23: Annualized Full-Time Undergraduate Tuition and Fees
for Selected Main Campuses of Ohio 4-Year Institutions
2006 – 2007
Undergraduate
University Main Campuses
University(A)
Bowling Green State
Bowling Green State University(B)
Cleveland State University(A)
Cleveland State University(B)
University of Akron(A)
University of Akron(B)
Kent State University
Ohio University(A)
Ohio University(B)
Miami University(1)
Ohio State University(A)
Ohio State University(B)
Ohio State University(C)
University of Cincinnati
University of Toledo
Youngstown State University
In-State Fees
Out-Of-State
$8,746
$9,060
$7,524
$16,054
$16,368
$10,109
$7,920
$7,976
$8,383
$8,430
$8,436
$8,847
$22,523
$7,860
$8,559
$8,667
$9,399
$7,927
$6,697
$10,663
$17,224
$17,631
$15,862
$16,428
$17,811
$22,534
$19,755
$20,454
$20,562
$23,922
$16,738
$12,204
(A) Denotes fees charged to continuing students who enrolled before the 2002 summer term
(B) Denotes fees charged to continuing students who enrolled after the 2002 summer term
(C) Denotes fees charged to new students entering autumn term 2003, if different than fees charged to continuing students
(1) Miami’s in-state students receive an Ohio Resident Scholarship and an Ohio Leader Scholarship. These scholarships reduce Miami’s resident undergraduate tuition
to an average of $10,042 per year. Data from OBOR
Source: http://regents.ohio.gov/financial/tuition/Tuition_07.pdf
164
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Financial Aid Office:
Table 8.24: Award of Financial Aid at Ohio’s Public
Title IV Postsecondary Institutions
Percent of First-Time, Full-Time, Degree-Seeking First Year Student Receiving Aid
Average Award Amounts, Academic Year 2004 – 2005
Federal Grants
Institution
State Grants
Institution Grants
Federal Loans
Any Aid %
%
Avg. Grant $
%
Avg. Grant $
%
Avg. Grant $
81
26
3,074
21
1,595
46
5,219
54
Bowling Green State University
83
23
2,932
19
2,265
44
5,346
51
5,779
Cleveland State University
83
46
3,178
39
1,709
37
3,209
63
3,759
Kent State University
85
28
2,909
23
1,953
41
3,800
63
4,785
Miami University
86
8
3,321
7
1,496
77
11,180
52
5,582
University Main Campuses
% Avg. Grant $
4,966
Ohio State University
88
19
3,205
15
1,897
77
3,943
44
4,596
Ohio University
72
17
2,772
13
1,525
33
4,287
53
4,855
University of Akron
85
44
3,051
31
1,316
29
3,717
64
3,928
University of Cincinnati
57
26
4,119
18
1,335
34
4,763
40
3,775
University of Toledo
94
28
3,113
22
1,395
31
4,026
58
5,371
Youngstown State University
84
42
3,030
47
1,451
22
3,985
57
4,401
Source: Ohio Board of Regents, http://regents.ohio.gov.perfrpt/2006, Financial Aid
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
165
Financial Aid Office:
The undergraduate financial aid
NNotes
reported reflects awards to undergraduate students enrolled
in the fall semester of the academic year. The university awards financial aid on a continuous basis
throughout the academic year. However, this data reflects a specific point and time as defined by IPEDS
(http://www.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/pdf/webbase2003/sfa_public_form.pdf) and the Common Data Set
(www.commondataset.org), generally accepted as the 15th day of fall semester.
Full-time undergraduate, graduate and law students are those enrolled for 12 or more credit hours. Part-time
undergraduate students are enrolled for 11 or fewer credit hours. Part-time graduate and law student enrollment
ranges from 6 to 11 credit hours.
The “Cost of Attendance” tables reflect the estimated average cost of attendance for a full-time, in-state student
attending CSU for two (2) semesters during the academic year, and includes estimated tuition and fee charges,
books, allowances for room and board, transportation and loan fees.
Types of Financial Aid
Federal Grants: Pell Grant, Supplemental Opportunity Educational Grant (SEOG).
State Grants for Undergraduates: Ohio Instructional Grant, Part-Time Instructional G0rant, Other State tuition
grant programs.
State Aid for Graduate/Law Students: Graduate and Professional Fellowship
Scholarship/Institutional Grants for Undergraduates: Refer to http://www.csuohio.edu/fao/scholarships.htm
for listing.
Scholarship/Institutional Grants for Graduate/Law Students: Includes Graduate Assistantships, Tuition Waiver
and Scholarships.
Non-Institutional Aid: Assistance awarded from external agencies.
Federal Student Loans: Stafford subsidized /unsubsidized and Federal Perkins loans.
FWS: A federally-funded student employment program established to assist students through part-time,
on-campus positions or off-campus community service positions.
166
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Center for International Services & Programs:
IInternational Services
“The Center for International Services & Programs
(CISP) seeks to build a globally oriented,
metropolitan university where students, faculty and staff gain international knowledge and experience. Established in 1996
as a separate department, CISP provides international students and visitors with a wide array of support services to help
them achieve a positive learning experience while in the U.S. CISP is designed to help international students and visitors
transition into the campus both academically and personally. Support services range from admissions advising, immigration
advising, individualized counseling, study abroad programs, faculty exchanges, Fulbright Scholar advising, and various
international academic initiatives. A full description of services can be found at: http://www.csuohio.edu/internat/
Table 8.25: Enrollment by Country or Region
Fall 2006
Country
Number of
Students
India . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389
Taiwan, Republic of China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Korea, Republic of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Saudi Arabia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
Turkey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Lebanon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Country
Number of
Students
Russian Federation, Sweden, Nepal, Sri Lanka,
Ghana, Viet Nam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
South Africa, Japan, Indonesia, Mexico, Ukraine,
Venezuela . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Servia and Montenegro, Kuwait, France, Albania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Bangladesh, Bulgaria, Bermuda, Chile, Egypt,
United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Hungary, Jamaica,
Israel, Senegal, Kenya, Malawi, Norway, Palastine, Peru . . . . . . . . 2
Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Poland, Korea, Democratic People’s Republic,
Panama, New Zealand, Malaysia, Myanmar, Mongolia,
Lithuania, Morocco, St. Vincent and the Grenadines,
El Salvador, Togo, Italy, Kazakhstan, Ireland,
Iran (Islamic Republic Of), Georgia, Greece, Ethiopia,
Czech Republic, Germany, Denmark, Botswana,
Bosnia and Herzegovina, United Arab Emirates,
Austrania, Burkina Faso, Zambia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Jordan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Total
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Thailand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Nigeria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Pakistan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Romania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
804
Tanzania, United Republic of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
167
Center for International Services & Programs:
Table 8.26: CSU Fulbright Scholar Awards 1973 – 2007
Year
Scholar
1973 – 1974 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1978 – 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1983 – 1984 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1985 – 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1986 – 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1987 – 1988 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1988 – 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1990 – 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1992 – 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1993 – 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1994 – 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1995 – 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1997 – 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1998 – 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1999 – 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2000 – 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2001 – 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2002 – 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2003 – 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2004 – 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2005 – 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2006 – 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
2007 – 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Countries/Regions Visited
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ivory Coast
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands, Belgium
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Philippines, France, England
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China, India
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brazil, Greece
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Greece
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hungary, Korea, Botswana, Yugoslavia, India
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Portugal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hungary, Czechoslovakia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . India, Ethiopia, China
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . El Salvador, Ethiopia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kenya, Nigeria, Japan, Lithuania
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kenya, Nigeria, Russia, Germany, Norway
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kyrgyzstan, India, Germany
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sri Lanka, Germany, Brazil
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Israel
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Botswana, Zambia, Uganda, India, Nepal, Russia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Croatia, Guatemala, South Africa
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bulgaria, United Arab Emirates
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Morocco, South Africa, Zambia, Latvia, Taiwan
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Krygzystan
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Nepal, Sri Lanka
Table 8.27: Cleveland State University International Academic Initiatives
College
Academic Initiatives
Activities
Middle Eastern
Studies Program
Title VI Grant: $139,754 to establish a minor and courses in Middle Eastern Studies;
teach Arabic language and culture; promote international understanding and
diplomacy; Support security and military requirements.
International
Relations Major (BA)
This major is designed to give students the opportunity to engage in a multi-disciplinary
study of the variety of subjects related to international affairs. International relations
majors will concentrate in an in-depth study of one of the following areas: International
Business and Economics, Asia Studies, Central and Post-Soviet States, Africa and the
Middle East, or Latin America and the Caribbean.
Modern Languages
Arabic courses, Chinese courses, English Translations of Foreign Literature (ENF)
courses, French (B.A.), German (B.A. – suspended) minor, Greek courses, Italian
courses, Japanese courses, Latin courses, Modern Language (culture; or languages such
as Portuguese, Russian, or Quechua) courses, Spanish (B.A.)
College of
Business
Expand International
Business Education and
Outreach Services in
Northeast Ohio
Title VI Grant: $200,857 to create the Great Lakes Regional Consortium and expand
existing partnerships; Add a “Global Trade Scholar” program; provide market research,
international trade and investment assistance; improve credit transfer between
community colleges and CSU for international business degree programs
Business & CLASS
Faculty Led Short
Programs
Language and Culture in Mexico
Contemporary Social Issues in India
Language and Culture in Spain
A Changing Political Landscape in China
International Marketing and Business Research in England
College of
Liberal Arts and
Social Sciences
168
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Center for International Services & Programs:
Table 8.28: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year
(Summer, Fall & Spring) and Program Type
Percent Change
Program Type
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
Faculty Led
Exchange
Internship
Independent
Law Institute
Total
75
4
5
12
11
107
64
2
60
4
4
35
12
115
10
17
93
2005 – 06
73
4
2
36
22
137
2006 – 07
94
3
31
128
1 Year
5 Year
29%
-25%
-100%
-14%
-100%
-7%
25%
-25%
-100%
158%
-100%
20%
Table 8.29: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year
(Summer, Fall & Spring) and College
Percent Change
College
Business
CLASS
Science
Education
Engineering
Urban
Law
Total
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
2005 – 06
2006 – 07
13
46
2
31
1
3
11
107
16
43
33
58
1
6
2
3
12
115
18
66
7
4
1
5
36
137
53
52
7
5
1
6
4
128
10
6
18
93
1 Year
5 Year
194%
-21%
25%
308%
13%
250%
-84%
20%
-89%
-7%
100%
-64%
20%
Table 8.30: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year
(Summer, Fall & Spring) and Course Level
Percent Change
Course Level
2002 – 03
2003 – 04
2004 – 05
2005 – 06
2006 – 07
Undergraduate
Graduate
Law
Total
64
32
11
107
46
30
17
93
84
19
12
115
81
20
36
137
71
53
4
128
1 Year
5 Year
-12%
165%
-89%
-7%
11%
66%
-64%
20%
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
169
Center for International Services & Programs:
Table 8.31: Key International Links
Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Institution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Year Introduced
GERMANY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Weingarten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1976
UNITED KINGDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Buckinghamshire College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1978
GERMANY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Berufsakadamie Heidenheim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1980
(www.ba-heidenheim.de)
RUSSIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .St. Petersburg State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1983
(www.spbu.ru/e/)
BOTSWANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .University of BOTSWANA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1985
http://www.ub.bw/
TAIWAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Chung Yuan Christian University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1986
(www.cycu.edu.tw)
FRANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Clermont-Ferrand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994
(www.univ-bpclermont.fr)
KOREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Chung Ang University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1997
(www.cau.ac.kr)
INDIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Loyola University Kerala State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1998
UNITED KINGDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sunderland University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1998
(www.sunderland.ac.uk)
ZAMBIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Copperbelt University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1998
NIGERIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Bayero University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1999
CROATIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .University of Rijeka
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2000
EASTERN EUROPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .International Research and Exchange Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2000
(http://www.irex.org)
KYRGYZSTAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .University of Peoples Friendship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2001
Jalalabat Commercial Institute
Osh state University
MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Center for Bilingual Multicultural Studies: Cuernavaca . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2001
CHILE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Universidad de Concepcion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2002
CHINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jiangxi Shifan University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2002
CHINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dalian Institute of Foreign Languages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003
FRANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Groupe ESSCA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003
GUATEMALA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Universidad de Rafael Landivar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003
SWEDEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .UMES University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003
CHINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .East China Normal University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2005
CHINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Tsinghua University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2007
INDIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .International Institute of Info Tech Pune . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2007
Source: CISP Center for International Services and Programs.
170
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
Office of Space Management:
Table 8.32: Cleveland State University
Fall 2006 Building Inventory
Notes
[2]
[2]
[4]
[5] [6]
[2]
[3]
[2] [6]
[3]
[4]
[2]
[1]
[6]
[3]
[4]
Building Code
AA
AB
AC
AM
BB
BS
BU
CB
CE
CL
CM
DE
EG
EST
FL
FS
FT
HH
HS
KB
KI
LB
LL
MC
MM
MU
PA
PE
PF
PR
PS
RC
RT
RW
SH
SI
SR
TA
UC
UR
VH
WG
WO
WST
SE
Building
Advance Manufacturing Annex
Art Building
Parker Hannifin Administration Center
Advanced Manufacturing Center
Bakers Building
Bookstore
Business College
Chester Building
Cole Center for Continuing Education
Corlett
CAMP Building
Doan Electric
East Garage
East Campus Extension
Field Locker Building
Field Service Building
Fenn Tower
Parker Hannefin Administration Center
Health Sciences
Keith Building
Kinko Building
Law Building
Law Library
Main Classroom Building
Mather Mansion
Music & Communication Building
Plant Annex Building
Physical Education
University Parking Facilities
Presidents Residence
Plant Services
Recreation Center
Rhodes Tower
Rhodes West
Stilwell Hall
Science Building
Science and Research Center
Theater Arts Building
University Center
Urban College
Viking Hall
University West Garage
Wolstein Center
West Center Campus Extension
SEIU Building
Grand Total
Year
Acquired
Total Gross
Square Feet
1993
1973
2006
1984
2004
1966
1998
1970
1990
1974
1994
2002
2006
2004
1985
1985
1964
1984
1998
2003
1997
1977
1997
1970
1967
1988
1985
1973
1979
2002
1970
2006
1971
9,800
41,163
37,500
23,005
24,840
17,735
126,245
109,728
56,653
53,050
82,470
58,510
124,300
12,695
2,194
1,305
188,746
27,600
23,654
32,369
15,912
113,738
111,870
326,342
43,938
151,533
8,579
201,860
269,594
4,400
134,590
135,167
493,968
1964
1969
1978
1967
1974
2000
1986
1996
1989
2003
2006
195,779
171,242
142,479
22,416
199,484
87,792
172,091
199,599
289,000
12,068
13,794
4,570,837
Notes:
[1] Non assignable square footage includes recorded circulation, mechanical, and structural spaces
[2] Currently being renovated
[3] Leased spaces
[4] Plan for demolition
[5] Non-Institutional Use
[6] Currently being renovated
SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS, DIVISIONS & OFFICES
171
A
Accreditation
Cleveland State University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, a commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and
Schools (NCA).
College
Degree Program
Accreditation
Business
Bachelor of Business Administration
Master of Business Administration
Doctor of Business Administration
Accounting
AACSB International,
The Association to Advance Collegiate
Schools of Business
AACSB International,
The Association to Advance Collegiate
Schools of Business
Accrediting Commission of
Education for Health Services
Administration (ACEHSA)
Health Care Administration
Liberal Arts and
Social Sciences
Music
National Association of Schools of Music
Social Work
Council of Social Work Education (CSWE)
Music
National Association of Schools of Music
Social Sciences
Science
Social Work
Council of Social Work Education (CSWE)
Chemistry (undergraduate)
American Chemical Society
Clinical Chemistry (graduate)
Commission on Accreditation in
Clinical Chemistry (ComACC)
Accreditation Council for
Occupational Therapy Education
Commission on Accreditation in
Physical Therapy Education
National Association of School Psychologist
Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE)
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Psychology
(NASP) and National Council for the
Academic and clinical programs in
Speech-Language Pathology
Academic Program
Clinical Program
Education and
Human Services
American Speech-Language and
Hearing Association (ASHA)
ASHA Council on
Academic Accreditation (CAA)
Professional Services Board (PSB)
Ohio Department of Education and The
National Council for the Accreditation of
Teacher Education (NCATE)
Community Agency Counseling and
School Counseling
Council for Accreditation of
Counseling and Related Educational
Programs (CACREP)
Psychology Specialist (School Psychology)
National Association of School
Psychologists (NASP) and NCATE
Commission on Collegiate Nursing
Education (CCNE) and Ohio Board of Nursing
Commission on Collegiate Nursing
Education (CCNE)
Nursing (undergraduate)
Nursing (graduate)
Engineering
Chemical, Civil, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, and Engineering Accreditation Commission
Mechanical Engineering (undergraduate)
of the Accreditation Board for Engineering
and Technology (EAC/ABET)
Electronic Engineering Technology
Technology Accreditation Commission
of the Accreditation Board for Engineering
and Technology (TAC/ABET)
Law
Law
American Bar Association and member
of the Association of American Law Schools
Urban
Master of Public Administration
National Association of Schools of Public
Affairs and Administration (NASPAA)
Planning Accreditation Board
Master of Urban Planning, Design,
and Development
i
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
|
2007 BOOK OF TRENDS
L
List of College Acronyms and Abbreviations
Nance College of Business Administration: College of Business, Business
College of Education and Human Services: COEHS, College of Education, Education
Fenn College of Engineering: College of Engineering, Engineering
College of Graduate Studies: Graduate Studies
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law: Law
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences: CLASS
College of Science: COS, Science
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs: College of Urban Affairs, Urban Affairs
O
Other Acronyms and Abbreviations
CIP: Classification of Instructional Program
EEO6: Equal Employment Opportunity
FTE: Full-Time Equivalent (Student Credit Hour/15)
GPA: Grade Point Average
IPEDS: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
N/A: Not applicable or Not available
OBOR: Ohio Board of Regents
SCH: Student Credit Hour
ii
AAffirmative Action Statement
Cleveland State University is committed
to the principle of equal opportunity in employment
and education. No person at the university
will be denied opportunity for employment or
education or be subject to discrimination in any
project, program, or activity because of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation,
handicap or disability, disabled Veteran, Vietnam-era
veteran or other protected veteran status.
BA07-CS-952
| /.75
© Cleveland State University