Faculty Responses Informed of LAC purposes Strongly agree Agree Neutral/Don't know Disagree Strongly disagree Total Frequency of teaching in LAC Frequency 66 Percent 35.5 Frequency 79 Percent 42.7 96 51.6 Occasionally teach 44 23.8 7 3.8 Never have taught but would like to 25 13.5 12 6.5 Never have taught and am not interested in doing do 35 18.9 5 2.7 Don't know if I've taught in the LAC 2 1.1 186 100.0 185 100.0 LAC should be important part of undergraduate education at UNI Frequency 129 Percent 69.4 Agree 41 22.0 Neutral/Don't know 10 Disagree Strongly disagree Strongly agree Total LAC content at UNI needs to be revisited and changed Percent 38.7 Agree 44 23.7 5.4 Neutral/Don't know 45 24.2 4 2.2 Disagree 17 9.1 2 1.1 Strongly disagree 8 4.3 186 100.0 186 100.0 Frequency 78 Percent 42.2 Confident 77 41.6 Not at all confident 30 16.2 185 100.0 Total Total Frequency 72 Confidence in understanding LAC purposes Very confident Regularly teach Strongly agree Total Faculty Responses Current management structure needs to be revisited and changed Length of LAC Too long Frequency 68 Percent 37.8 102 56.7 10 5.6 180 100.0 Just about right Too short Total System 6 Total Frequency 55 Percent 29.7 Agree 41 22.2 Neutral/Don't know 76 41.1 Disagree 11 5.9 2 1.1 185 100.0 Strongly agree Strongly disagree 186 Total Status College Frequency 130 Percent 70.7 CBA Frequency 12 Percent 6.5 Tenure track 30 16.3 COE 32 17.4 Term 11 6.0 CHFA 51 27.7 Temporary full time 5 2.7 CNS 36 19.6 Temporary part time 8 4.3 CSBS 48 26.1 184 100.0 Other 5 2.7 Total 184 100.0 Tenured Total