Y Technical Report 608 J.V. Evans J.M. Holt Mills tone Hill Thomson Scatter Results for 1974 1 January 1982 Prepared for the National Science Foundation under NSF Grants No. ATM75-22193 and ATM79-09189 HAYSTACK OBSERVATORY MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY WESTFORD, MASSACHUSETTS I ABSTRACT During (42. 1973, 6“N, the 71. 5°W) temperature and one times or 200-900 This two km in observations cycle, are and believed was employed vertical ion per presents a set is of be measure in the The results of the in density, F-region over periods the of The observed terms understood. I ,’ I .. . 111 - of the reported diurnal, previously Hill and of 24 height about made behavior Millstone electron spanned resolution at measurements variations - radar electron a time diagrams. briefly scatter observations achieved disturbance largely to and contour discussed magnetic to the incoherent velocity month. approximately, report pulses vertically-directed Ion hours interval 30 minutes. using single during seasonal, and long these sunspot which now TABLE OF CONTENTS iii ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION II EQUIPMENT, PROCEDURES A. B. c. Ill. I Iv. I OBSERVING AND DATA-ANALYSIS 3 3 4 7 Equipment Observing Procedures Data Reduction RESULTS AND ION A. B. c. D. 1 FOR ELECTRON TEMPERATURES General Winter Behavior Summer Behavior Equinox Behavior CONCLUDING REMARKS DENSITY, ELECTRON AND VERTICAL VELOCITY 10 10 12 14 15 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 17 REFERENCES 18 MILLSTONE 1. 1963, electron This incoherent densities, Millstone Hill, paper results World in altitude FOR 1974 from and a ba%k of Additional pairs and presents the calendar year 1974. The years listed in paper km, Ti, 11). approximately have have in a been been on each once published and transmitted to was the to the made of spacing the by the E- and could radar Spectral obtained be Vz measurements of “the of density velocity The sweep length electron vertical computer. determined) were F-region and digital matched of approximately. pulses whose and are Te, long 1, hours, to Colorado. this are Table 24 1 at reports, earlier in conducted annual of for been F-region (Refs. periods returns pulses, of of 71.5°W) made measurements of series obtained have (42.6°N, were 200-900 filte’rs temperatures the Boulder, T. measurements during single the ion radar program in interval T a temperature transmitting which A, ion integrating ,, RESULTS this reported and in articles Center results electron I twelfth results the and Massachusetts in The Data The by the scetter electron reported month. the and gathered discussed 1 SCATTER (Thomson) Westford, is observations ,, THOMSON INTRODUCTION. Since a HILL and span were made time base information examining pulse Ne, (0.5 F-regions varied (from the or 1.0 by and outputs msec)21. transmitting the allowing echo ,, autocorrelation function to be determined in the computer. This approach ,, alsb allowed for the digital and has been subtraction of unwanted returns from distant 4 hillszz, ,, , ! E-region ion employed in number Other of temperature the papers observations observing (Atmospheric described study (e. g., using of tides Ref. Explorer) chosen detail this in pulse-pair the in to satellite 1974 lower that coincide or with Island. -1“,, elsewherezs. Results method in thermosphere gathered 1974 have for been and reported in here include short a 24). conducted periods in are not with the reported the launch overhead of a rocket pass from of the WalJops TABLE I I I I PUBLICATIONS (68-cm CONCERNING Wavelength) I THE THOMSON I MILLSTONE SCATTER HILL RESULTS I Year Months I UHF I I I Publication Covered / 1963 February 1963 to January 1964 March, July, August, September April, July, November Ref. Ref. Ref. 7 12 13 1964 January through December April, July, November Ref. Ref. 2 ?4 1965 January through December January, April, August June June, August, September Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. 3 15 16 17 1966 January January, through March, December July, September Ref. Ref. 4 18 1967 January February, through June, December October, Ref. Ref. 5 18 January October through December Ref. Ref. 6 19 January through December February, April, July September, October Ref. 7 Ref. 20 1970 January through December Ref. 8 1971 January through December Ref. 9 1972 January through December Ref. 10 1973 January through December Ref. 11 December I 1968 1969 I I -2.-.—- I Section I I describes During 1974, and these described temperature Il. in and The (68 described. antenna and Extensive 6) of velocity system hence can the over some effort to in altitudes 1974, some electron year and ion in Section III . PROCEDURES. incoherent timing of UHF receiver, unchanged. filter bank measurements electric fieldszs and of been bank 0.5 of system 1968 many filters been between the pLJ1.SeS), Te and developed was for has msec were Ti in replaced data 27]. -3- timing an by necessary and to range a L-band a When was assumed to winds of cm used for by the and the 30 MHz sampling as described number the the (23 25. rearrange E-region in using Laboratory) connected taking measure reported Ref. Ionosphere was conducted associated in the frequency to were radar in was used the measurements and the it were for in and match drift. for matched imperfect described the a wider of employed, observations that span have filter made measured procedures receiver (Actually, to an in the (located so banks ion problem. is L-band of be been diameter the were to msec) to the control the 2.0 antenna system component (especially scatter unit of correction steerable scatter vertical use or has 220-foot spectra introduced equipment vertically-directed made pulses this incoherent remained the radar procedures Owing obviated studies, the 21. 1976, This output the 1.0 In diameter scatter power (0.5, empirical scatter to scheme these7’g. radar. IF This were incoherent 30 MHz echo of which 84 ft. wavelength) Ref. previous discussed -AN ALY51S data-taking the Ref. and only the lengths errors remedy smaller These and procedures. the density, presented DATA reduction employed electron a fixed measure spectra correlator During the and those incoherent to detail systematic of for AND employs allowed pulse some input gathering from are wavelength) This in and digital little Results OBSERVING cm the filters j vertical which described I 9. simultaneously. each I changed modifications heights I were data Equipment. UHF (Ref. equipment, Ref. EQUIPMENT, A. the IF procedure the in and papers elements Ref. 21. ) F-region [e. g., Observing B. During 1974, method and 24 we As were pulse II lists the with described the L-band data-taking and 345° 8 reins., taken the vertical the possible to to measure the components of solution 1974 18° (Table 11). These L-band dynamo or for that El, and 8 reins., 255° B drift magnetospheric to A-mode the the the Ill to Since the UHF the ions of is observations and be brought drift about component to measure the E-W steerable directions, This Measurements components then by an electric measured were conducted was C-mode in were and were 4 reins., primarily the only measured. sequence B-mode in F-region necessary (D-mode) The radar information employing drift for between determine N-S new computers. rapidly could three the a switch drift it between condition components. El. rapidly proper To velocity F-region -4- the By undertaken The Table with radar to magnetic 4 reins., origin. In every mode. measurements drift. 45° were of of secure L-band Az, the radars. orthogonal The observations E x drift long data. computer the heights, ion the single repeated each the thermosphere. in attempted Ill). from drift observations provided to switch capability E-region three 1977 from L-band the for accorded the was in reload component at of in and the for C for undertaken pulse these pulse month were employed B, long per been no single A, made this recover winds had single collected. data the in once automatically of (Vz) winds and/or D-mode the and vertical (Table Az, was was components ‘3-D’ observe’ provision least collected were advantage additional termed data transfers horizontal in when the which cycle being that fields conducted data equipment is a of established meridional for the which it allows times over transmitters F-region, two modes radar only radar operating UHF measures L-band months, altitudes using measurements several and of the the at two-pulse 9, 1974, electric observations operations, program the pulse Ref. operation about scheme in interface During pair in the 8 minutes dates As and and observations newer lists ‘regular’ 30 minutes at priority Table or long the measurements normal the single greater make pulse years, made. to newer the prior somewhat attempted the hours. several Procedures. D-mode 8 reins., attempt fields using to of the THE Mode Height Resolution (km) 100 15 B 500 75 DI D2 I “ONE-PULSE” A c I Pulse Length (psec) NORMAL D1 D2 1000 1000 1000 L-band L-band MODE SEQUENCE Sample Spacing (km) Altitude Coverage (km) 7.5 100-1000 Power Ne 30 150-1500 Power Ne 75 225- Power 30 300-2000 Power 75 450-1125 Power 30 105- 500 Power 75 105- 425 Power 30 215- 900 Power 75 215- 780 Power 150 60 110 observations observations TABLE II EXPERIMENT at at 18° 45° elevation. elevation. i -5- 675 Meaaured Deduced Direct Employed } Parameters spectrum Te, Ti, Vz Ti, V= Ne spectrum Ti, spectrum Vd spectrum Vd in 3-D experiments. TABLE SCATTER INCOHERENT Begin Date End c* EST Date C* Mean Ill OBSERVATIONS Mean EST KP Rz IMF .- 1974 Ohs+ Comment 12 Feb D 1330 14 Feb 0700 3+ 35 A 3-D 03 Apr D 1300 04 Apr 1330 5- 2? T+ A Reg. Ionosonde failed Very disturbed. 16 Apr QQ 0900 17 Apr QQ 1030 1+ 73 T 3-D Ionosonde 0230-0530. 13 May QQ 1700 15 May D 0730 3- 32 AT 3-Q TX off 05-08 on 14 May. Kp increase after 1300. No useful V= data obtained. 10 Jun 0830 11 Jun D 2130 4+ 47 TA Reg. TX off 1330-2100 on 10 June. SC late in day on 10 June. 15 Jul 1700 16 .Ju1 Q 2300 2+ 53 T 3-D TX off 0300-0630. Poor data thereafter. Disturbed. )2 0830 03 Ott 0900 4- 50 T Reg. Poor data 00-04. Kp > 4+ 13-22. 0930 27 NOV 0900 3- 24 T Reg. T Reg. Disturbed. T+ Reg. Kp Ott ?6 NOV 19 Dec D 1630 20 Dec D 1700 4- 41 ?6 Dec Q 1700 27 Dec D 1700 3+ 8 A * Condition QQ one of the Q D One One of of the the five tan five quietest days quietest days most disturbed in the month. in the month. days in the + Observations Reg 3-D = = Regular. L-band and UHF radar measurements. -6- month. at 03. off > 4+ 01-07. fixed 220-ft. reports has within been 16° (Vi, of and ) horizontal 11, diameter about magnetic field at ratio ever secured the low in poor. owing to to the drift was 45°, N-S the to measure a inferior by At a for this, rule, few sensitivity prevailing*. making at of at night. observations = 345°) B component, and the L-band were radar component 45° the elevation measurement E-W at The range of the The the magnetic (Az night good Vz to times considerable 9, to normal E x field Refs. plane this lies meridional contributions plane. these magnetic example, meridian at in the especially compensate then for drifts magnetic as the cause significant, but, greatly sampled the appeared To densities (see, and component compute possible intended F-region was increased electron horizontal undertaken were to which 88° This along analyses in quite the velocity fields of (Vz). neglects drifts) 18° elevation altitudes be of an drift many electric could because sometimes in B at drift F-region E x angle signal-to-noise was E-W these suffered the interpretation by elevation of at is ‘vertical’ used speed observations an but been (i. e., disturbance, the direction This brought L-band the wind antenna labeled has 28-31). UHF and of elevation the at 255° in real azimuth. c. As Data described time (i. e., the samples stored on pertinent run. of point it is echo magnetic power tape profile within monitored of where printer. no gathered) information A speed previouslyzl, as dependence be Reduction. such as echo power is frequency it was the of the mode each vs. type, was analyse too time of range start height spectrum, being be to integration of this time the allowed the and and along were with duration printed signal-to-noise the Instead, frequency corrected and data consuming. period (i. e., computed printout quality for out of tha -2 R the by ratio of other the a high at each data to gathered. *Good estimates of horizontal drifts became possible with the installation use with the UHF radar, in 1978. , , would end a made as functions range) with was this collected the Together while as at R each attempt -7- in the ionosphere of a fully-steerable at all 150-ft. times of antenna, day for ., . The first step F-region this, critical the the values two and half-hourly values Values for points the cards. combined converted to an and electron at present at to Te, Ti consumed and a the ?N max io, it, of electron sunspot accurate H+/Ne ion have communication, ratio amount from at each of such if any of value through the computer via of foF2 The A-, B- and by variations the C-mode This altitude at program profile”. have recovered was allowing in the correct the been 1976) altitude. computer analyses from ratio value the assumption sufficient render could the vs. This when to local of layer. present. km values to the the “power were minimum 900 (private of into all altitude curve peak the density of the Examples interpolation*. single temperature only below a power the ion Results previously *Actually, at considerable routinely. into (38”N), necessary drawn obtain with in reports4”. curves to For Including reason. entered linear made resultant the near Massa by backscatter the altitudes L. echo profile was More J. power and 0+ night unreliable. due of ( N Max)t that except run used Island scaling was the included Millstone. any of observation. in previous and and observation the electron stored to that smooth plot Also errors for of intervals of Wallops closest missing the A-mode normalizing for assuming of on density Values each absolute effects Te/Ti were and any a number a ionograms. interpolation from half-hour These cycle in construct days (45”N) revealed the to the operation were scaled measurements each the at Millstone routine included for Ottawa Millstone were of in for been the at guide been time usually to from plots mid-point runs stations foF2 on punched the have in has vs. from obtained served data foF2 stations these ionograms, plots the scaled values the from these 1 were were are analysing frequency values plots which 1 in is a good H+ which and may have be a program attempts hence one estimates using Unfortunately time ions temperature obtained spectra to recover this program was not been run presented az. the time chosen = 1.24 x 104 (foF2)2 = start el/cm3 time + 4 minutes. when foF2 is expressed in MHz. -8—-—.. m~ ... .=..... it has been C-mode data leads to foundzi tend the when must employed .in the the systematic that C-mode comparing values obtained Te/Ti (taken Ti of Beginning a in to The the data to influence on of the Ne in some times, to That in a more as the elaborate -9- believed Assuming scheme height temperatures a more differences in the using two years’ Ti and Te/Ti prevailing to and value a lesser A extent smooth (including of also continuous employed were on performed the the but to correct those presented corrected for the replaced by less analyser likely to cannot (I NSCAL) be has been height, variations of Te/Ti in the length approach bias seemed with written allowing and correction), ANALYSIS2* possible systematic analysed of Debye was introduce functions employed of to value). device height view applied on was km nominal for filters perfectly correction modes) spectrum be this (via Ne but bank Ti of two the less it Emery to altitudes. program Te, that B-mode temperature with filter new profile fashion. correction, at a allow subsequently believed Ne, variations self-consistent first-order and (to comparison electron with A. C-mode) this length analog B. made estimates. the at measurement were empirical only the evident 525 the spectra are C-mode, at be C-mode and for is in the from gathered recover not 19719 that an that particularly but B-mode the depend derived Debye for the the and This frequency attempts correct to be values 1976, pulse the B- believed B-mode gathered corrections to for program attempts results was the heights, observed assumed correlator ANALYSIS profile that the the B-mode changing in digital error. be in Subsequently, the the in to several of was in the those modes is the + 1.0. (B-mode) also derived employed of that reported the two employing found Salah 19707’s. height Finally, here). E. was it primarily It anal ysis2i, analyser are the data than Te/Ti principle, Since pulse in and scheme results effect this (again correction the and center Emery on data 1969 datae. times. J. pulses In the spectrum correct, smearing msec from when Ti. of narrow. such obtained summer for 0.5 during errors comparison effective are at in amount using smearing the night large Te/Ti of etimates transmitter was in the receiver that detailed . the to gathered ,i the suffer days7, the spectra matched four at introduced for accuracy by differ from the compensate estimates in stems signals night to differences discrepancy of that on in represents errors in the unwarranted. the which for the the Te a truly only B-mode a The next part electron and height and of ion the temperature time. and has for been in that time at which but is shifted pulse. Ti the the provide: of . the the was not is into included given INSCON, compensate simply “nominal” with account routinely by the by the height), delay in within the constructing for the a best introduced so-called power in as could altitude of that known is not the echo fitting, program vs. functions surfaca this pulse taken program used to produced obtain of height function of values to FOR the coefficients a be simple plots AND the in which the the of day were Te, ELECTRON drive the of fitted) (in be a single Boulder). program (RCVR) form other AND any can on by Ti INSCON variation Center a Te, addition, combined Data recovery to Ne, period machine-readable VERTICAL of In (within World DENSITY, tape diagrams from each FORTRAN obtained ELECTRON fit for plotting section. time to a contour next or transmitted with allOW userss. ION VELOCITY. General. Computer-drawn logloNe was a TEMPERATURES logloNe of polynomial RESULTS and Ill variation the together Table (i. e., of been described sampled coefficients has altitude the in tape A. Ti for given as which was are sets Ill. but which The numerical height INSCON recovered. These, and automatically These parameter Te by polynomial INSCON as density, 1970. plotter V of the profiles, subroutine Calcomp The are to effect to 8. electron estimates performs Ref. center echoes that the performed two-dimensional profiles owing density prior and the velocity was program in effective This electron The described distortion fact A data. a smoothing vertical operation sense, the involved and This least-mean-squares represents analysis in in contour time detail Figures (el/cm3) > 3.0. have in plots been Ref. 1 through and Regions of are well Ne, Te, generated 8); these 10. Ti in are the in above -?o steps hmax - Vz manner presented Contours drawn and of of F2 as outlined above for the are labeled Ne Ioglo sometimes Ne functions days = 0.2 are of (and listed in units wherever encountered in of where, owing altitude. to experimental These not considered of h real. set fnax ‘2 chiefly by At higher is the are at uncertainty of in the where is the be increasing but in greatest foF2 the - with case the are vicinity uncertainty (typically in uncertainty any in experimental uncertainty overall to plots, plots determining the to the appears from these line) however, the scheme but smoothed edited as a broken that Disturbances been density fO.2 MHz). incoherent especially at is scatter night when weakest. believed adequately, the accuracy contributes measurement The The altitudes, echoes It have (shown measurements the usually error, 30 minute allows the fluctuations (TIDs) time normal caused, with resolution diurnal for periods of and ion provided variations example, less than by by the to be Traveling followed Ionospheric 2 hours, about ‘regular’ are effectively out. results for 200” K and the electron IOO” K, plotted at ‘chirpt introduced respectively. intervals elevation of measured is of 88° the due not The 5 m/see by temperatures and contours have the precisely of been transmitter. south, are vertical, but vertical the for most for beam component as of isotherms velocity corrected Since drift presented the is plasma the ara frequency directed the purposes Vz at an that is distinction is unimportant. The year early in 1974 1975. observation of the was Zurich are sunspot throughout ~ 3 MHz Millstone At times, such could be Despite disturbed the mean the daily sunspot number is reflected which On then for the Kp and in in equatorward to activity, data remained -11- in peak the quite Table 5-7 occurred the The foF2 MHz days low of V?IIUP prevailing by day and as low as 2 MHz, probably of the midlatitude trough. very the which over of range side close 21 trend. values the became listed this low ratio cycle averaged reached sunspot index Rz the the set of confirm foF2 altitudes our Ill nights at in in of some mimimum numbers typically signal-to-noise only periods were lay decline values sunspot Table the secured the in night. because to included 1974, by close poor of the and 111. as results F-layer. incidence high useful of can Indeed, magnetically be only seen from the data for 16-17 April quietest in was the the ten quietest In two cases, month) 3-4 disturbance crossing in which for rise first 20 disturbed for the cases, the months parts In of (70:1 of to of 26-27 to the , among days the five which ranked (Figure 10), value followed as Bz. time ceases to be on 13-15 storm In reliable sudden was missed other cases, in May, 14 May) hours). a the The I I l). fluctuations On hours (78 a it and this the boundary Tabie but In from sector in afternoon, resulted 13 a have 111). southward the w;th (IMF (Table until of December field earl y have (i. e., but a and as a the the IMF was quiet then very a few other indication of December together characteristic a vary diminishes values seasonal and exhibits which daytime this exhibit density maximum) winter November usually electron sunspot values, February, October peak The daytime on associated problems balance and approached. and be during January, the near fell (i.e. conditions. Behavior. March winter, 2) appears per;ods Kp Winter 5. June hours mean days July magnetic appears to quiet 75-16 to occurred behavior gave for (Figure transmitter the The April that very month. 70-11 of disturbed that interplanetary on commencement on appears the disturbance and in the magnetic consequence gathered of large as Nmax variation also winter variation. diurnal sunspot also variation minimum excaed decreases with the is summer towards sunspot minimum. The at electron sunset. decays) tube. from the may night heat This the actually southward continues point increase after the turning winter of marked be remains midnight, the supplied warmed remains night increase temperature be (which usually of to to density a the sunset, continues conjugate maintenance the exhibits Following because flux At temperature again conduction the and escape (as from of decrease the the photo layer plasma electrons sunlit). constant until reaching a peak ionosphere nautral sunrise rises via by at has thermospheric -72-.—.. a little near generally wind before sunrise 03-04 hours. been attributed which serves or The to to lift the layer to altitudes elsewhereli H+ where argued from the that the the recombination increase protonosphere which rate is brought charge is much about exchanges reduced. by We have a downward with O to flux of produce 0+ via H+ The timing +O#H+O+ of variation in about 0300 (300 the drive LT with result (1 ) to Marked nocturnal as convection midnight layer the midnight, the complication is (the serve to lift the five is between 01 then were more night increase level of 13-14 and EST. (3+) when Kp of 19-20 occurred magnetic was December much activity diurnal minimum O at is at altitudes also at Both direction a effects that requires earlier ( Kp a so it 2+, seems to than reached with the that field did of which 26-27 is difficult normal and between to on it exhibit 01 and any as be 04 a clear of 2+ and Kp increases November may very is clear value increase draw also disturbances. a anomalous this which exhibit an after further that had to equatorwards magnetic exhibit prior A heatin9 not the while Millstone, does Kp that fact of by substorm penetrating strong auroral been 5- of for appears by field. by have It of westward nights night 10a). magnetic when other nights influenced latitude one winter is anticipated modified night the 9a, nights la) two 8a, eastward only previous five capable It to the greatly the is appear by move the the only also produced (Figure The of la, disturbed However, disturbed. of a the diurnal maximizes. in Together be set, and four lowered may can our on an surge’) February 04 by on trough in higher increase The nights shift then 36-39. behavior to of important then Millstone33-3s. be ‘midnight the is behavior lifted Iayeril, ‘normal’ increase was existence its abundance (Figures fields be the nights, 1974 of would the seen in latitude so-called disturbed were layer reaches abundance nocturnal would consequence right. electric the the balance to the winter a This that H observations to winds the equilibrium the as charge-exchange increases plasamsphere the where proceed that activity Of the km) have possible explained temperature. chemical we be exospheric reaction that can Conversely, the which event the < h < 1,000 mimimum. (1) dSO exhibits an conclusions. the related nocturnal to the EST). -13..—..-...- On three had of the winter insufficient data and Ti, but that this data appears May, June, October to very Figures of V2. the contouring above 400 from it with F2 Ne, seems previous associated h Max program km for However, Judging above a 3-6. Te unlikely studies, negative as would There is thought midday increased the is the be of reverses, increase. The electron temperature less rapidly, beginning is then to be a it (i. e., anticipated. In the rises in layer a the and is in the pre-sunset thermospheric the layer downward afternoon, the meridional and rapidly rises and by drives the April This density decrease and of behavior. caused rate. lifting portions electron poleward recombination wind with ‘summer’ Typically, peak. near together characteristic component somewhat for September, behavior which regions lOa), region are well exhibit pre-noon wind 9a, the reliable. increases August, This neutral handle contours altitudes to a 8a, Behavior. by increase. into at appear morning be July, exemplified properly noctu rna I Summer (Figures produced can drifts c. to has that downward) nights producing at sunrise midafternoon the and when sunset decreases starts Ne to increase. On disturbed convection in days, electric lifting the of 12 June three and hmax km). A and the layer may be quiet day results the Following an very value critical low 14-15 (Figure as the frequency difficult to May normal anomalous may measure. (Figure large lifted 5a) 2 evening trough then and the than April increase, into drop to appears the in Nmax to electron observed increased scale as of and the on 14 May almost scale as a height order height, aid is quite by one by of 50%, is evident 3a). position density over than have usually is nighttime less density much one (Figure Millstone F2 as enhanced of was by the moves the Nmax half greatly latitude increase lifted less be storm increase 16-17 the when was by of of can to evening evening This 4a) day (Figure (60 from more penetrate second anomalously and increaae evening which The This 4a) factor fields layer. depressed. (Figure the Millstone. 2 MHz occurred temperature often and during became falls The a F-layer become the to quite night quite of lar9e 4b). -14—.——.—... . .. . ..— One of the days of of the characteristic but this is better D. Equinox There is each that above (and more regular, electron conform to 4 a.m. typically set. using start gathered our our decade, F-layer the modifying redistributing were 2a), the exhibit the the second day September/October summer samples by behavior the of 7), absence of variation behavior data in in they from density a magnetic is increases while depressed of described diurnal this (Figure and from cycle of that the appear midnight state that this and storm. resulting from very The the height the principal the causes season for to in the high and was vertically-pointing of F-region season measurements measurements examples further provides It day, of satellite of important clear. to good America; all, examine physical day described degree with antennal, hera of sunspot conducted reported the in 1963 ‘2, 13 near for 1974 were cycle. collected not to 220-ft. North if the series 21. measurements studies undertaken systematic end in became (Figure post-midnight October marred and days, nor incoherent-scatter have most, these good 2-3 April on behavior the own terms) for summer sunspot understanding as 3-4 newly-completed location April behavior REMARKS. its we density is 3-4 the evening for are then believe On have results first at nor the not The of winter midlatitudes in the March/April reports). do for reportsi-zo number. around neither vertical-incidence, variability weeks pattern, in at This day. neither The this occurs ionosphere storm. the depressed equinoctial earlier Those previous of the as an a few We CONCLUDING The We many to shows day exhibiting data to the of follows in clearly Behavior. density. current Iv. second classified a period year observation is (and that these the that for now recognized hence neutral the peak constituent is formed. -15- types of concomitant theoretical explaining In variations- role —.. most observations, a basis neutral of winds that these density (atomic (at behavior in winds of the oxygen at increase in our studies as well least particular, play seen in general during this controlling the are responsible layer) ) from as well as which it Disturbed behavior, thermospheric auroral winds electrojet and has been recognition adding a during 1977. the of observations a large global independent the co-ordinated localised the by to the improve to the UHF observations the other dynamical to radars behavior that heretofore. -16- A have and of of this scatter studies will satellites the was Millstone to much in of the toward effort thermosphere characterized exploited region an by accomplished increasingly in the of this have auroral be by consequence radar; the anomalous caused capabilities’ study thrust with high-latitudes the radar antenna future, with at associated precipitation. incoherent this thus heating particle our of For of about antenna 1978, is degree, effort steerable Millstcme. large energetic capability picture a brought Since scanning north to to gain place the of effort ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We S. are grateful Sawicki assisted I and in others Alice Freeman 1974, the incoherent who Preparation of Foundation under .,, at this Wandr the with at Foundation was —..-—.,-... ATM79-09189. =;..,,, the 4 L. Reid, Hill data as reduction. became Grant under by B. Hanson, Observatory here, Millstone supported -17-—. A. reported data work report W. Millstone helped scatter Science National H. the gathering Mrs. the R. to the who well as During supported by ATM74-08549. National Science REFERENCES 1. J. V. Technical DDC Report Technical “Millstone Report 430, “Millstone Report 474, AD-707501 Technical Report 481, 1970”, (22 January 1965)’, Scatter for 1964”, Laboratory, November 1967), Results M. 1.T. (15 Hill Thomson Scatter Laboratory, Results M. 1.T. (8 for 1965”, December 1969), Hill Thomson Results Scatter Laboratory, M. 1.T. (19 for 1966”, January 1971), ‘iMillstone Report 482, Hill Thomson Lincoln Scatter for 1967”, July 1971), for 1968”, January 1973), for 1969’!, Ju\y 1974), Results M. I.T. Laboratory, (22 J ‘tMillstone Report 499, Hill Scatter Thomson Lincoln Laboratory, Results (23 M. 1.T. AD-767251/2. Technical V. Thomson Lincoln , , “Millstone Report 513, 7. J. Hill”, AD-735727. Technical 8. Millstone . “Millstone 6. DDC M. 1. T. at AD-725742. Technical DDC Hil I Lincoln , 5. DDC Laboratory, Lincoln , 4. DDC Observations AD-668436. Technical DDC Lincoln , 3. ! 374, Backscatter AD-616607. 2. DDC II 10nO~phe~i~ Evans, Hill Thomson Scatter Laboratory, Lincoln Results (23 M. I.T. AD-AO0850S/O. Evans and Technical J. M. HoIt, Report 522, liMillstone Lincoln -18- Hill Thomson Laboratory, Scatter M. I-T. (11 Results May fOP 1976). 9. J. V. Evans, Scatter Results M. I.T. 10. J. Barbara (24 V. 1972”, for March Evans A. Emery 1971”, and J. M. Technical HoIt, Report “Millstone 528, Hill Lincoln Thomson Laboratory, 1978). and J. Technical ‘tMillstone M. HoIt, Report 530, Lincoln R. Babcock, Jr. Hill Thomson Laboratory, SCatter M. I.T. Results (18 for September 1978). ‘j ? 11. J. V. Evans, Thomson I J. V. Results Scatter Laboratory, 12. R. M. 1.T. Evans, (22 Planet. and for October Space 1973, J. M. Technical Report 13, 1031 (1965), DDC 13. , J. 14. , Planet. Space Sci. ‘l&, 1387 (1967). 1s. , Planet. Space Sci. I&, 1225 (1970), DDC 16. , ~, 1629 (1970), 17. / DDC J. J. AD-714447 and , 19. t 20. r Planet. J. V. Evans, Measurements Millstone (6 February DDC Planet. J. Terr. Geophys. 18. 21. Res. Atmos. Atmos. R. of Hillll, 1970), 7&, 1175 Phys. Res. Space Julian F-region Technical DDC-AD Lincoln 763 ~, 3&, 23, 1461 and Density Report DDC AD-614310. AD-716056 DDC AD-716057. 481 S and 4803 Phys. Sci. AD-616607. (1970), respectively. Sci. Terr. (1965), 75, AD-714446, Space 537, 1979). Sci. Geophys. Hill ‘lMillstone HoIt, W. A. (1973), 593 (1973), AD-772137/6. DDC AD-771877/8. (1975). Reid, Temperatures 477, DDC Lincoln 01I ncoherent and Vertical Laboratory, 706863. -19—— -------- Scatter Velocity M. I.T. at 22. G. W. Arm;stead, J. V. Evans and W. A. Reid, and J. Radio Sci. ~, 153 (1972). 23. W. L. Oliver, Scatter J. E. of Frequency Laboratory, J. Salah, Measurements Collision 24. E. at M. I.T. Salah, R. (23 R. E- H. and F-region Millstone V. Evans, Density, Hill”, February 1-1. Wand Wand “Incoherent Temperaturea, Technical Report and 531, Lincoln 1979). and R. Bernard, Ann. G60phys. 33, 95 (1977). 25. J. C. Technical 26. 27. Report J. V. at Millstone V. llMillstOne Ghiloni, W. Evans, J. 507, Hill Radar Lincoln Laboratory, “Measurements Hill, H. J. of Geophys. Kirchhoff Propagation and L. M. 1.T. Horizontal Res. A. ~ Study: Drifts 2341 instrumentation”, (20 September in the E and 1973). F Regions (1972). Carpenter, J. Geophys. Res. ~, 2737 Phys. ~, (1976). 28. 0. A. Anton 29. R. G. Roble, 503 30. B. iadis, A. Emery, , J. V. Planet. 33. T. 7&, Atmos. J. E. Salah J. Geophys. Terr. and Phys. B. A. 3&, 187 Emery, J. (1976). Atmos. Terr. (1977). 31. 32. J. E. 278 Evana and Space Van ibid. J. Sci. Zandt, 83, M. 26, V. Res. 5704 L. 5691 (1978). (7978). HoIt, 727 &, I, Nighttime proton Fluxes at Millstone Hill i’, J. Geophys. Res. (1978). Peterson and A. R. Laird, (1971). -20—..—— ... . . .. . ,, .m~ 34. C. G. Park, J. 35. C. G. Park and 36. H. F. Bates 37. P. B. Hays 38. D. W. Sipler 39. G. I-lernandez Geophys. C. and and T. R. and M. and Res. ~, 1. Meng, D. G. A. R. J. Roble, J. Biondi, G. Roble, J ., -21- (1971). Geophys. Roberts, i I I 4650 J. Atmos. Geophys. J. Res. 278 Terr. Res. Geophys. J. 76, Geophys. Res. (1971). Phys. 76, 64, Res. 39, 5316 (1971). 37 (1979). 81, 87 5173 (1977). (1976). WLLS7°K “[u 12- 1’4.FEE.,37* ‘ ,. Figure 1974. la. Contours of Log10 Ne VS. height and time for 12-14 February ,1 US1!31E “,U i2-ltl. FEB.197, -------. s& Figure 12-14 1 b. Contours February 1974. of L electron h ~G-—I. temperature L Te L vs. k height b and b L time b for b “[LL51 L%+ “ILL +2-lu. FEB.a979 TR-608 ( lC) I Figure 12-14 Ic. Contours February 1974. of ion temperature T Vs. height and time for N m Figure 12-14 Id. Contours February 1974. of vertical velocity v= vs. hei9ht and time for ** . M1LLST13NE HILL 3- 14,F+PR.1974 LCIG,ONE ,,” TR-6Q8...(??L ..0 “.0 em \v \ ~ -q 4.4 n !:: ,,, . (’ ..* P m ,= Figure 2a. Contours of Loglo N= vs. height and time for 3-4 April 1974. .LS1”CINEHILL -o~ . WR. 1974 . Kc TR-608 mym ““y: . v ,-----/ ////// la . contours Fiaure 2b. 3-; April 1974. of electron \\\\ (2b) ‘~’ temperature \ n----xi T- e vs. height and time for LLS113NEHILL -o~ . qPR, 1974 Figure 2C. Contours 3-4 April 1974. TR-608 of ion temperature Ti vs. height and time for (2C) .LSTCINE HILL .04, QPR,1974 Figure 3-4 TR-608 2d. April Contours 1974. of vertical velocity Vz VS. hei9ht and time for (2d) ?lILL5i0NE w. t![LL iE+17FW’R,1374 L13c,<, N< TR-608 (3a) *J’” w 0 ,/ I Figure 3a. Contours of Loglo N= vs. height and time for 16-17 April 1974. MILLST”6NE *’ lE-17, Tc HILL qPR,1974 TR-606 (3b) . . I m-l Figure 3b. 16-17 April Contours 1974. of electron temperature T= vs. height and time for LLS1ONE U ILL -17, FIPR,1974 TR-608 7/ \ \\\w cd N Figure 16-17 3C. April Contours 1974. of ion temperature Ti VS. height and time for (3C) M ILLS1ONE . H ILL 16-17, WR, 1974 v. mu . I Figure 16-17 3d. April Contours 1974. of vertical velocity Vz vs. hei9ht and time for TR-608 I- IS. VRY. 197* K ,ONE —— . . Em Figure 4a. Contours of Loglo Ne vs. height and time for 13-15 May 1974. (4a)” LLSIIXW HILL .. . . . . . . . ,Om w m L $, L L & k km L Ml Figure 13-15 4b. Contours May 1974. of electron k \, temperature {, !, Te L vs. h height b k and k time k for k [LLS1O!4EW.!3-15. M8Y. 197* Figure 1974. TR-608 4c. Contours of ion temperature Ti vs. height and time for 13-15 (4C) May 1 ILLSTONE HILL 1-12, JUN. 19714 mm 3C,0NZ TR-608 m .!. u u . .w7 Figure 5a. .Contou rs of Loglo Ne VS. height and time fer 11-12 June 1974. (5a ..-.. ”..7 LL3 I UNt ,.. H 1 LL -12, JUN, i97k TR-608 ( 5b) w 03 !?4 Figure 5b. 11-12 June L k . . Contours 1974. of k electron L \ \ I \? ., !’1 E51”% temperature Te VS. he.wht and time for LLST13NEHILL -12, JUN. 1974 TR-608 (5C) / . . Km . 4s Figure 11-12 LLLL 5c. June Contours 1974. In EN of ion temperature i’ L T. 1 L vs. height h ‘6 and time L for TR-608 . -w . b bk ES? Figure 11-12 5d. June Contours 1974. of vertical velocity ‘i, i, Vz i, vs. \7 height \, and time $, for (5d TR-608 ?.7- (6a) h:: /.-+.2 c’”’ /------’” -.-l; .-.–.....ll-—.-T---- .[;.--.-. T--k EST Figure 6a. Contours of Loglo Ne vs. fj~,z: .. , k height b9 and L time for s s 15-16 July 1974. ,7 MILLS1ONEHILL ~5-16, JUL> 197Ll TR-608 XT.” , k , Figure 15-16 6b. July L 4! , k L k b L i? s EST Contours 1974. of electron temperature Te vs. height and time for (6b) MI LLS113NE HILL 15-16, JUL.197LI T, I TD-KI)Q , ,, 2$ , n t,: $, u ES? Figure 1974. 6c. Contours of ion temperature m Ti vs. b height is i, “ and time for 1S-16 July Ic. MILLSTONE ~5-16, HILL JUL. 1974 , ~z $3 Figure 6d. 15-16 JUIY ‘a b. Contours 1974. k. ,“- m ES? of m-””” vertical velocity m M V= vs. “ height “ and “= time ‘r for , MILLSTONE HILL 02-03, OCT. 1974 L13C ,ONC TR-608 Om. (7a) I $8 -P m L L \. \* b !@ L h b L b 16 EST Figure 7a. Contours of Loglo Ne vs. height and time for 2-3 October 1974. m MILLST13NE HILL ~2-03, 13CT,1974 E TR-608 6X ,= m 2 ~ .P m $ I 4?=’ . _iEm .&x Figure 7b. 2-3 October Contours 1974. of electron temperature Te vs. height and time for (7b) LLSTONE HILL -03, OCT. 1974 TR-608 am ml / m Em .WC xc m ifa Figure 7C. 2-3 October Contours 1974. of ion temperature T. Vs . height and time for ( LL!3T6NE !-03.IIC1”, HILL 1974 TR-608 — (w dl ‘ I ,0 Figure 7d. 2-3 October Contours 1974. of vertical velocity Vz vs. height and time for (7d’ MILLSTGNE HILL ;$i-2~~-N6V .1974 -. .“ ,. I ... r.–””” \-- ,.0 m 1, J . \, Figure 1974. h 8a. b \, Contours of b Log10 b h h m m ES? Ne VS. height and time for 26-27 November m / 8 ~ # 1 i 1 1 ? Figure 26-27 8b. Contours November 1974. of electron temperature Te vs. height and time for u! 1 I Figure 26-27 8c. Contours November 1974. of ion temperature Ti vs. height and time for TUNE HILL , WV> 1974 L Figure 26-27 TR-608 \3 is 8d. Contours November 1974. 7 of la vertical L L 43 In EST velocity k b b ,. .L V= vs. height and time for (8d) a. MILLS1 CNE 19-2u. wc. L(K \cNE H ILL 1374 TR-608 .— — . u! w . .. Ls Figure 1974. 9a. Contours of Loglo Ne I vs. height and time for 19-20 December (9a) MILM1 CM H ILL 13-20. DEC., 1!J74 w +–__. -....-.. ._._.....__._ TR-608 “~ i Figure 19-20 9b. Contours December 1974. of electron temperature Te vs. height and time for ( 9b) LLSI ONE H [M 1-20. Kc. 1374 TR-608 . (9C ) . ... ._..T._._._L....._._.r ....._~ _r -. ...2---....–.r..- ..L-..-.. . E5i Figure 9c. Contours 19-20 December 1974. of ion temperature ,0 Ti VS. ~ height * and , time , for w II ILLSTONE H [ LL 26-27, WC, 1’37q Tf TR-608 (lot m, m: . * ~: xT- I Figure 26-27 10b. Contours December 1974. of electron temperature Te vs. height and time for . MI LLST13NE HILL :6-27, OEC, 1971J TR-608 KC.’ ( 10C) 1 I I In w Figure 26-27 Contours IOC. December 1974. of ion temperature Ti vs. hei9ht and time for d MI LLS1 ONE H 1LL ~:-27. DEC. 19714 10d TR-608 = —— m 0 m WI b , Figure 26-27 L 43 10d. Contours December L h of vertical k EST velocity L k b Vz vs. height , s and 1974. ● time , fOr F;UyGRAPHIC DATA 1. Report No. 4 . Title and Subtitla FIIillstone Hill Thomson Scatter Results for 1974 2. 3. Racipiants’r Accession No. 5. Rapnrt Date 1 January 1982 6. Author(s) I.\‘. Evans, J.M. Halt 8. Performing Organization Rapt. No. Technical Report 608 Performing Organization Nams and Addrass 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Haystack Observator) MassachusettsInstitute of Technolog) Bestford, Massachusetts 11. Contract/Grant No. ATM75-22193 ATM79-09189 13. Typs of Report & Period Cowered 1:!. Sponsoring Organization Nama and Address Technical Report IVational Science Foundation 1 4tmospheric Science Section Washington, DC 20550 14. l!i. Supplementary Notes IIE. Abstracts During 1973, the vertically-directed incoherent scatter radar at Millstone Hill (42.6’N, 71.5” W) was emploved to measure electron density, electron and ion temperature and vertical ion velocity in the F-t-e&on over periods of 24 hours one or two times per month. The observations spanned the height interval 200-900 km approximately, and achieved a time resolution of about 30 minutes. This report presents the results of the measurements made using single long pulses in a set of contour diagrams. The behavior observed during these observations is discussed briefly in terms of the diurnal, seasonal, sunspot cycle, and magnetic disturbance variations reported previously and which now are believed to be largely understood. 1. Ksy Words and Documant Analysis. Millstone radar F-region Diurnal variations Electron density Ionospheric scatter reasonal variations temperature effects magnetosphere proton flux 17~. Descriptors 7b. Identifiers/Open-Endod Terms I 7~. COSATI Field/Group 1 8. Availability Statement FORM NTIS-35 (REV. 10-73) ENDORSED BY ANSI AND UNESCO. 19. Security Class (This Report) UNCLASSIFIED 20. Sacurity Class (This Page) ( UNCLASSIFIED ~- ------..--THIS FORM MAY BEREPAODUCEU 21. No. of Pages 64 22. Price USCOMM-DC 8265P74