Forecast Performance Assessment of a Kinematic and a Magnetohydrodynamic Solar Wind Model [Simulation meets Reality] 09 October 2012 Integrity Service Excellence Donald C. Norquist AFRL/RVBXS Kirtland AFB, NM Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 1 Presentation Outline •Motivation for this study •Models considered in this study •Data for model initialization and forecast verification •Method of forecast verification •Results of forecast verification •Conclusions reached from this study •Acknowledgements Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 2 Motivation •Comprehensive forecast verification informs forecasters who use the products as guidance •Provides feedback to model authors on performance strengths and weaknesses •Gives quantitative skill measures to modelers considering use of forecast products as forcing data – what to expect •Guides decision-makers in operational centers regarding incorporation or continuation of the model Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 3 Models •Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA) solar wind model – WSA corona model: potential field source surface model inputs photosphere Br maps, computes 2.5 Rs Br grid – Schatten Current Sheet model extends Br to 5 Rs – Vr specified from Br field at 5.0 Rs empirically – 1-D kinematic code propagates Vr, Br polarity (±1) to 1 AU •Enlil solar wind model – – – – 3-D magnetohydrodynamic model from NOAA/SWPC Computational domain: ± 60° latitude, 21.5 Rs to 1.1 AU Computational grid: 2° lat.-lon., 0.67 Rs radial 21.5 Rs inner boundary specification: radial components of mag. field Br from WSA corona model, also empirical Vr Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 4 Data •Model initialization – Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG) magnetogram Br maps from National Solar Observatory – 1° lat.-lon., daily at 0 UTC, 2007-2011 as available – Uncorrected (Unc) and zero-point corrected (Cor) maps – WSA corona model used to process maps to 5 Rs, 21.5 Rs •Forecast verification – Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) observations at L1 from ACE Science Center at Cal Tech – Bmag, Bx from MAG – used Level 2 (quality checked) for entire period – Proton speed from SWEPAM – used Level 2 through 10 Jun 11, Level 0 (unchecked) 11 Jun 11 – end of period Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 5 Method •Model / Init. Cond. Pairs: Enl-Unc, Enl-Cor, WSA-Unc, WSA-Cor •Forecast variables verified: – Vr (models) vs. proton speed (obs): “solar wind (SW) speed” – Interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) polarity (models) vs. sign of Bx (obs): “IMF polarity” •WSA forecast data used at 4.55 h output intervals (Δ tW) – Hourly ACE averaged to Δ tW centered at WSA output time •Nominal Enlil interval of 3.64 h rounded to 4 h interval (Δ tE) – Enlil 2.73 min interval output averaged to Δ tE – Hourly ACE averaged to Δ tE centered at Δ tE / 2 •ACE ave. polarity: if |Bx|/Bmag < .1, set to -999; ± 1 otherwise •24 h obs set to -999 starting interval prior to shock arrival at L1 •Seven-day forecasts verified separately by forecast days 1 - 7 Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 6 Number of Forecast Times Verified Daily forecasts by year: 2007 (363), 2008 (355), 2009 (357), 2010 (358), 2011 (355); 1788 X 2 (Unc, Cor) = 3576 in all Number of Forecast Times Verified by Forecast Day WSA/Enl Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 2007-SW 1871/2138 1888/2138 1869/2138 1879/2138 1878/2138 1877/1693 1858/2138 2007-IMF 1698/1915 1713/1915 1697/1917 1691/1917 1687/1917 1693/1917 1688/1919 2008-SW 1852/2107 1840/2107 1867/2107 1848/2107 1851/2107 1846/2107 1813/2107 2008-IMF 1688/1937 1675/1941 1709/1941 1663/1938 1684/1941 1677/1942 1648/1931 2009-SW 1853/2104 1860/2104 1838/2104 1855/2106 1845/2104 1856/2104 1825/2104 2009-IMF 1631/1819 1634/1819 1622/1815 1612/1818 1610/1817 1634/1821 1599/1820 2010-SW 1806/2081 1833/2081 1834/2084 1827/2082 1827/2081 1829/2081 1822/2081 2010-IMF 1647/1924 1697/1921 1694/1922 1706/1924 1698/1928 1708/1938 1684/1929 2011-SW 1740/2000 1758/2004 1755/2001 1750/1995 1740/1995 1767/1995 1746/2005 2011-IMF 1599/1835 1623/1837 1632/1832 1615/1828 1618/1827 1628/1826 1600/1836 Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 7 Forecast Verification Metrics •Fcst – Obs Difference (i=fcst time index): •Mean: •Mean Square: •Standard Deviation: •Absolute Mean: X i = xFi − xOi 1 N X = ∑ Xi N i =1 1 N 2 2 X = ∑ Xi N i =1 σX = 1 X = N 1 N N 2 ( X − X ) ∑ i i =1 N ∑X i =1 i •Skill Score (Recurrence): SS R = 1 − X 2 R 2 ; Ri = xO i •Skill Score (Persistence): SS P = 1 − X 2 Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 0 −27 D − xOi P 2 ; Pi = xOi − xOi 0 8 Results Annual Statistics from ACE Observations 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Mean SW Speed (km/s) 441 450 365 406 422 Std Dev SW Speed (km/s, 4-h ave) 111 113 65 88 89 Mean IMF magnitude (nT) 4.50 4.25 3.94 4.75 5.29 No. of Shocks (24h pds removed) 6 3 4 5 21 No. of High Speed Events (HSEs)* 26 26 9 13 18 No. of IMF Polarity Changes (IPCs)* 58 48 69 71 47 *as determined from 1 h ACE observations using MacNeice (2009) algorithm Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 9 SW Speed Fcst – Obs Difference Mean (% of Obs Mean) SW Speed Fcst - Obs Difference Mean (% of Obs Mean) 30 Enl-Unc Enl-Cor WSA-Unc WSA-Cor 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 07: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 08: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 09: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year: Forecast Day Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 10 SW Speed Fcst – Obs Difference Absolute Mean (% of Obs Mean) 32 SW Speed Fcst - Obs Difference Absolute Mean (% of Obs Mean) Enl-Unc Enl-Cor WSA-Unc WSA-Cor 28 24 20 16 12 07: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 08: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 09: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year: Forecast Day Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 11 SW Speed Skill Score Based on Recurrence 1 SW Speed Skill Score Based on Recurrence 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 -2.5 Enl-Unc Enl-Cor WSA-Unc WSA-Cor -3 -3.5 07: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 08: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 09: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year: Forecast Day Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 12 SW Speed Fcst – Obs Difference Standard Deviation (km/s) 120 SW Speed Fcst - Obs Difference Standard Deviation (km/s) Enl-Unc Enl-Cor WSA-Unc WSA-Cor 110 100 90 80 70 07: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 08: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 09: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year: Forecast Day Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 13 Forecast and Observation Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlation •Means: 1 N 1 N xF = ∑ xF i , xO = ∑ xO i N i =1 N i =1 •Standard Deviations: σ x = F •Correlation: rxF xO = 1 N 1 N N ∑ (x i =1 Fi N ∑ ( xF i − xF ) , σ xO = 2 i =1 1 N N 2 ( x − x ) ∑ Oi O i =1 − xF )( xOi − xO ) σx σx F O •Alternatively, we compute correlation of day-average (DA) forecasts and observations Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 14 Forecast and Observation SW Speed Standard Deviation (km/s) Forecast and Observation SW Speed Standard Deviation (km/s) 120 Enl-Unc Enl-Cor WSA-Unc WSA-Cor Obs 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 07: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 08: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 09: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year: Forecast Day Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 15 Day-Average SW Speed Forecast-Observation Correlation Day-Average SW Speed Forecast-Observation Correlation 0.8 Enl-Unc Enl-Cor WSA-Unc WSA-Cor 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 07: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 08: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 09: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year: Forecast Day Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 16 Percentage of Correct IMF Polarity Forecast Intervals Percentage of Correct IMF Polarity Forecast Intervals 84 81 Enl-Unc Enl-Cor WSA-Unc WSA-Cor 78 75 72 69 66 07: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 08: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 09: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year: Forecast Day Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 17 Analysis of High Speed Events (HSEs) and IMF Polarity Changes (IPCs) •Owens et al. (2005) HSE criteria – A net solar wind increase of ≥ 100 km/s in ≤ 48 hours – HSEs within two days of each other considered one event •MacNeice (2009) HSE criteria – Identify pds of fcst intervals w/ 1-day increase of ≥ 50 km/s – A contiguous set is an HSE pd, pds < 18 h apart combined – Accept HSE pds w/ min Vsw ≤ 500 km/s, max Vsw ≥ 500 km/s – Accept HSE pds that maintain 50 km/s day-1 for ≥ 12 h – Accept HSE pds w/ max – min difference ≥ 200 km/s •MacNeice (2009) IPC criteria – Convert Bpol =1 to ϕ=-45°, Bpol =-1 to ϕ=135° – Apply 60-h running mean to each ϕ in 7-day fcst period – Set filtered ϕ to 135° if > 45°, to -45° otherwise – ID 1st, last fcst time, polarity of constant polarity pds (CPP) – Iteratively remove CPP of ≤τ=.1,.2,.3,.4,.5 days & separated from nearest CPP of like polarity by ≥ 3τ days Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 18 600 200 0 -1.1 2007051502 2007051506 2007051510 2007051514 2007051518 2007051522 2007051602 2007051606 2007051610 2007051614 2007051618 2007051622 2007051702 2007051706 2007051710 2007051714 2007051718 2007051722 2007051802 2007051806 2007051810 2007051814 2007051818 2007051822 2007051902 2007051906 2007051910 2007051914 2007051918 2007051922 2007052002 2007052006 2007052010 2007052014 2007052018 2007052022 2007052102 2007052106 2007052110 2007052114 2007052118 2007052122 SW Speed (km/s) 700 2007051502 2007051506 2007051510 2007051514 2007051518 2007051522 2007051602 2007051606 2007051610 2007051614 2007051618 2007051622 2007051702 2007051706 2007051710 2007051714 2007051718 2007051722 2007051802 2007051806 2007051810 2007051814 2007051818 2007051822 2007051902 2007051906 2007051910 2007051914 2007051918 2007051922 2007052002 2007052006 2007052010 2007052014 2007052018 2007052022 2007052102 2007052106 2007052110 2007052114 2007052118 2007052122 IPCs: 2007051510 2007051810 2007052018 1.1 IMF Polarity (+/-) Seven-Day Enlil Forecast Initialized 00 UTC 20070515 vs. ACE Obs Enlil-Unc SW Spd Enlil-Cor SW Spd ACE SW Spd 500 400 300 HSE Date/Time (YYYYMMDDHH) Enlil IMF Polarity ACE IMF Polarity Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release Date/Time (YYYYMMDDHH) 19 2007-2011 HSE Contingency Tables HSEs (Owens et al., 2005) HSEs (MacNeice, 2009) Predicted Predicted Values shown are % of all forecast periods Yes No Yes No O Yes 24 36 3 18 b No 10 30 3 76 s Yes 22 39 3 17 e No 8 31 2 78 r Yes 47 12 4 15 v No 25 16 9 72 e Yes 44 15 5 14 d No 22 19 6 75 Enl-Unc Enl-Cor WSA-Unc WSA-Cor Contingency Table Attributes HSEs (Owens, 2005) HSEs (MacNeice, 2009) CSI=a/(a+b+c) POD=a/(a+c) Bias=(a+b)/(a+c) CSI=a/(a+b+c) POD=a/(a+c) Bias=(a+b)/(a+c) Enl-Unc 0.34 0.40 (2/5) 0.57 0.13 0.14 (1/7) 0.29 Enl-Cor 0.32 0.36 0.49 0.13 0.15 0.25 WSA-Unc 0.56 0.80 (4/5) 1.22 0.14 0.21 (1/5) 0.68 WSA-Cor 0.54 0.75 1.12 0.20 0.26 0.58 a c b d Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 20 HSE Arrival Time and Peak Speed for 2007-2011 Y/Y Forecast Periods Owens, 2005 Model # Y/Y FPs ICs HSE Arrival Time Obs-Fcst (h) HSE Peak Speed Fcst-Obs (km/s) Mean Abs Mean RMS Mean Abs Mean RMS Enl-Unc 437 4 28 40 9 76 96 Enl-Cor 385 -2 30 41 -27 79 96 WSA-Unc 862 4 28 39 -7 81 101 WSA-Cor 794 1 28 38 -33 75 93 MacNeice, 2009 HSE Arrival Time Obs – Fcst (h) HSE Peak Speed Fcst – Obs (km/s) Model # Y/Y FPs ICs Mean Abs Mean RMS Mean Abs Mean RMS Enl-Unc 57 14 22 29 -28 48 62 Enl-Cor 59 6 19 24 -39 53 65 WSA-Unc 66 3 27 36 -13 56 66 WSA-Cor 84 1 21 28 -30 59 75 Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 21 2007-2011 IPC Contingency Tables IPCs (MacNeice, 2009) Predicted Values shown are % of all forecast periods Yes No O Yes 36/3 28 b No 9 24 s Yes 34/3 29 e No 7 27 r Yes 36/2 26 v No 8 28 e Yes 34/3 27 d No 7 29 Enl-Unc Enl-Cor WSA-Unc WSA-Cor Contingency Table Attributes a c b d IPCs (MacNeice, 2009) CSI=a/(a+b+c) POD=a/(a+c) Bias=(a+b)/(a+c) Enl-Unc 0.49 0.56 (5/9) 0.70 Enl-Cor 0.49 0.54 0.65 WSA-Unc 0.51 0.58 0.71 WSA-Cor 0.50 0.56 0.67 Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 22 Count and Average Duration of All CPPs Predicted and Observed in 2007-2011 No. Positive CPPs No. Negative CPPs Ave. Duration (h) Enl-Unc 446 453 69 Enl-Cor 411 406 67 Obs (4h) 811 838 56 WSA-Unc 441 444 66 WSA-Cor 409 435 67 Obs (4.55 h) 806 827 56 Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 23 Conclusions •COR magnetograms reduced small (except 2009) pos. F-O diff. •WSA Vsw fcsts had 2-3% smaller abs mean F-O diff. than Enlil •COR magnetograms reduced stnd dev of Vsw fcsts in years with greatest observed stnd dev •They increased fcst stnd dev when obs stnd dev was least •Smaller F-O diff. for smoothed fcsts, larger for amplified fcsts •F-O diff. were least at 3-5 days and increased greatly later •Vsw skill < recurrence in more variant years, > in less variance •Models/ICs: no significant difference in IMF polarity fcst skill •# FPs with predicted HSE / # FPs with obs HSE: in Owens, 2/5 (Enlil), 4/5 (WSA); in MacNeice, 1/7 (Enlil), 1/5 (WSA) •IPCs: ~ 5/9 (Enlil, WSA); 45-50% fewer CPPs predicted than obs; predicted CPPs average 10-12 h longer than obs Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 24 Acknowledgements •Nick Arge, David MacKenzie and Christina Lee of AFRL solar section for their assistance with the models •Sean McManus of National Solar Observatory for the corrected magnetograms •ACE Science Center at Cal Tech for the ACE Level 3 observations •DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program for computer processing time on Cray, IBM supercomputers •AFRL applied research program and the Space Weather Forecasting Laboratory for funding Place Proper A: DISTRIBUTION Here Distribution Approved forSTATEMENT Public Release 25