QCC COURSE ASSESSMENT Date: Department:

advertisement
QCC COURSE ASSESSMENT
Date: September 3, 2013
Department: Foreign Languages and Literatures
Course: LS 221
Curriculum or Curricula: Liberal Arts
PART I. STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES
TABLE 1. EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT
LS-221 is the first course of the Heritage Spanish sequence of foreign language study. This
course partially fulfills the foreign language requirements for the Associate Degree in Liberal
Arts and Sciences. It fulfills the language requirements for the Associate Degree in Visual and
Performing Arts. It may also fulfill the Liberal Arts and Science and the Humanities elective
requirements for all other degree programs
TABLE 2. CURRICULAR OBJECTIVES
Curricular objectives addressed by this course:
N/A
TABLE 3. GENERAL EDUCATION OBJECTIVES
Gen Ed
General educational objectives addressed by this course: Select from
objective’ preceding list.
(1) Write, read, listen and speak clearly and effectively
s ID
(2) Use analytical reasoning skills
number
(3) Use information management skills effectively for academic research and
from list
lifelong learning
(1-10)
(4) Integrate knowledge and skills across disciplines
(5) Differentiate and make informed decisions about issues based on cultural
and political value systems.
(6) Use personal and collaborative skills
TABLE 4: COURSE OBJECTIVES AND STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
Course objectives
Learning outcomes
By the end of this course:
1) Students will possess the
necessary skills to read
comfortably in Spanish
either for personal,
academic or professional
reasons.
2) Students will be able to
implement the steps of the
writing process
(brainstorming, outlining,
preparing a draft, revising
and self-editing) when
writing reaction papers in
Spanish.
3) Students will be able to
apply new vocabulary to
their oral interactions and
written expression.
4) Students will use
analytical, inferential and
evaluative skills to sustain
informed oral and written
discussions on current
political, social and
cultural aspects affecting
the lives of Hispanics and
Latinos.
5) Students will have an
increased awareness of the
vast range of Spanish
varieties used throughout
the Spanish-speaking
world.
6) Students will have an
increased awareness of
formal and informal oral
and written registers.
7) Students will have
increased their confidence
in their bilingual language
strengths.
By the end of this course, students will be able to:
1) identify the gender of words; use definite and indefinite
articles according to gender
2) identify cognates in Spanish and provide the formal
terms for them
3) identify the subject pronoun in a sentence; use formal
and informal Spanish pronouns appropriately together
with their corresponding verbal forms
4) use and upper and lower case letters in Spanish
appropriately
5) use homonyms appropriately according to context
6) use present, preterit and imperfect tenses appropriately
(regular and irregular forms)
7) read, analyze and interpret short Spanish texts dealing
with cultural, social and political aspects of the
Hispanic world
8) write two reaction papers (1-page long) related to the
class topics.
PART II. ASSIGNMENT DESIGN: ALIGNING OUTCOMES, ACTIVITIES, AND
ASSESSMENT TOOLS
TABLE 5: OBJECTIVES ADDRESSED IN ASSESSMENT ASSIGNMENT
Course Objective(s) selected for assessment: (select from Table 4)
1) Students will possess the necessary skills to read comfortably in Spanish either for
personal, academic or professional reasons
2) Students will be able to implement the steps of the writing process (brainstorming,
outlining, preparing a draft, revising and self-editing) when writing reaction papers in
Spanish.
3) Students will be able to apply new vocabulary to their written expression.
4) Students will have an increased awareness of formal and informal written registers.
Curricular Objective(s) selected for assessment: (select from Table 2)
N/A
General Education Objective(s) addressed in this assessment: (select from Table 3)
1) Write, read, listen and speak clearly and effectively
TABLE 6: ASSIGNMENT, OUTCOMES, ACTIVITIES, AND ASSESSMENT TOOLS
The assessment tool is a comprehensive final exam that addresses the following course
objectives and skills:
1. reading comprehension of a text related to the topics discussed in class (Latinos in the
United States, language and identity, Latin American culture and society, etc.).
2. writing about one of the topics discussed in class,
3. grammar and orthography activities,
4. vocabulary activities.
(See Appendix 1 for a copy of the final exam)
Desired student learning
outcomes for the
assignment
Students will…
1) possess the necessary
skills to read comfortably
in Spanish either for
personal, academic or
professional reasons (Gen.
Ed. Obj. 1 and 2)
Briefly describe the
What assessment tools will be
range of activities
used to measure how well students
student will engage in for have met each learning outcome?
this assignment.
1) Reading
comprehension
activities
1) Students answer questions about
a biographical text provided to
them in the exam.
2) be able to implement
the steps of the writing
process (brainstorming,
outlining, preparing a
draft, revising and selfediting) when writing
reaction papers in Spanish
(Gen. Ed. 1)
2) Writing activities
2) Students write responses to
questions about one of the class
topics (see grading rubrics in
Appendix 2).
3) be able to apply new
vocabulary to their oral
interactions and written
expression (Gen. Ed. Obj.
1)
3) Vocabulary activities
3) Students explained some of the
vocabulary learned in the course in
the context of sentences extracted
from the readings.
3) have an increased
awareness of formal and
informal oral and written
registers (Gen. Ed. Obj. 1)
4) Grammar, vocabulary
and orthography activities
4) Students answer questions related
to the use of definite articles,
uppercase letters, the use of written
accents, spelling, identification of
subject pronouns, the present tense,
preterit and imperfect tenses.
Students answer vocabulary
questions.
PART III. ASSESSMENT STANDARDS (RUBRICS)
TABLE 7: ASSESSMENT STANDARDS (RUBRICS)
The assessment tool is a comprehensive final exam that addresses the following course
objectives and skills:
1. reading comprehension of a text related to the topics discussed in class (Latinos in the
United States, language and identity, Latin American culture and society, etc.).
2. writing about one of the topics discussed in class,
3. grammar and orthography activities,
4. vocabulary activities.
(See Appendix 1 for a copy of the final exam)
Desired student
Assessment measures
Standards for student performance:
learning outcomes
for each learning
from the
outcome:
assignment:
Students will…
1) possess the
necessary skills to
read comfortably in
Spanish either for
personal, academic or
professional reasons
(Gen. Ed. Obj. 1 and
2)
1) Students answer
questions about a
biographical text
provided to them in
the exam.
1) Students’ reading comprehension ability
will be determined by calculating their
accuracy rates in their answers to reading
comprehension questions. 75% of the
students are expected to meet the course
standard.
2) be able to
implement the steps
of the writing process
(brainstorming,
outlining, preparing a
draft, revising and
self-editing) when
writing reaction
papers in Spanish
(Gen. Ed. 1)
2) Students write
responses to questions
about one of the class
topics (see grading
rubrics in Appendix 2).
2) The parameters used to measure
students’ writing abilities in their essay
will be determined by a written rubric (See
Appendix 2). 75% of the students are
expected to meet the course standard.
3) be able to apply
new vocabulary to
their oral interactions
and written
expression (Gen. Ed.
Obj. 1)
2) Students answer a
series of questions
about the vocabulary
learned during the
course.
4) have an increased
awareness of formal
and informal oral and
written registers
(Gen. Ed. Obj. 1)
4) Students answer
questions related to the
use of definite articles,
uppercase letters, the
use of written accents,
spelling, identification
of subject pronouns, the
present tense, preterit
and imperfect tenses.
Students answer
vocabulary questions.
2) Students’ vocabulary knowledge will be
determined by calculating their accuracy
rates in their answers to the vocabulary
questions. 75% of the students are expected
to meet the course standard.
4) Students’ grammar and ortography
knowledge will be determined by
calculating their accuracy rates in
providing the correct forms or structures.
75% of the students are expected to meet
the course standard. Students’ vocabulary
knowledge will be determined by
calculating their accuracy rates in their
answers to the vocabulary questions. 75%
of the students are expected to meet the
course standard.
PART IV. ASSESSMENT RESULTS
TABLE 8: SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Desired student learning
outcomes:
Students will…
1) possess the necessary skills
to read comfortably in Spanish
either for personal, academic or
professional reasons (Gen. Ed.
Obj. 1)
2) be able to implement the
steps of the writing process
(brainstorming, outlining,
preparing a draft, revising and
self-editing) when writing
reaction papers in Spanish (Gen.
Ed. 1)
3) be able to apply new
vocabulary to their oral
interactions and written
expression (Gen. Ed. Obj. 1)
4) have an increased awareness
of formal and informal oral and
written registers (Gen. Ed. Obj.
1)
Student achievement:
See Table 9.
TABLE 9. EVALUATION AND RESULTING ACTION PLAN
A. Analysis and interpretation of assessment results:
1. Written Final Examination
The data below correspond to the performance of 47 students in the final exam, which
was designed and used as the main assessment tool. The assessment included three
categories: vocabulary, grammar and orthography knowledge, reading comprehension,
and writing.
The results are as follows:
Table 1
Vocabulary,
grammar and
orthography
Range
Average
Score
# of
Students
Reading
comprehension
Writing
Total
0-50
37.44
0-10
9.18
0-20
15.1
47
47
47
0-80
61.78
(77.15%)
47
The total points a student could obtain (adding all three categories) was 80.
The Assessment Committee had defined the following performance scale: 0-48 points =
student performance does not meet expectations; 49–58.5 points = student performance
almost meets expectations; 59-71.2 points = student performance meets expectations;
71.2-80 = student performance exceeds expectations.
The students’ average score in this assessment (61.78%) is within the range of 59-71.2
(“student performance meets expectations”). This average score is equivalent to 77.15%
in a scale of 100.
Table 2
Range
0f 47 Students
Percentage
Percentage of Students in Each Proficiency Level
Does not meet
Almost meets
Meets
expectations
expectations
expectations
0-48
49-58.5
59-71.2
Exceeds
expectations
71.5-80
4
11
21
11
9%
23%
45%
23%
The overall student performance shows that a total of 68% of students met or exceeded
the expectations of this assessment process.
The results by percentage of students in each category are as follows:
Table 3
Range
# 0f 47 Students
Percentage
VOCABULARY, GRAMMAR AND ORTOGRAPHY.
Student performance …
Does not meet
Almost meets Meets
Exceeds
expectations
expectations
expectations expectations
0-29.5
29.5-36.4
36.5-44.5
44.5-50
4
16
22
5
8%
34%
47%
11%
Table 4
Range
# 0f 47 Students
Percentage
READING. Student performance …
Does not meet
Almost meets Meets
expectations
expectations
expectations
0-6
6,1-7,3
7,4-8,9
Exceeds
expectations
9-10
3
4
3
37
6%
9%
6%
79%
Table 6
Range
WRITING. Student performance …
Does not meet
Almost meets Meets
expectations
expectations
expectations
0-12
12,25-14,5
14,75-17,75
Exceeds
expectations
18-20
# 0f 47 Students
Percentage
11
23%
7
15%
10
21%
19
41%
B. Evaluation of the assessment process:
The percentage of students who meet or exceed expectations in vocabulary, grammar and
orthography is 58%.
The percentage of students who meet or exceed expectations in reading is 85%.
The percentage of students who meet or exceed expectations in writing is 62%.
When looking at the assessment results in relation to the Course Objectives and the
General Education objectives, we observe the following:
Course Objective 1: Students will possess the necessary skills to read
comfortably in Spanish either for personal, academic or professional reasons
(Gen. Ed. Obj. 1).
The assessment tool measured students’ Spanish reading skills by asking literal
questions about the reading provided. 85% of students met or exceeded expectations
in this assessment area –a percentage above the 75% that the assessment committee
considered acceptable.
Course Objective 2: Students will be able to implement the steps of the writing
process (brainstorming, outlining, preparing a draft, revising and self-editing)
when writing reaction papers in Spanish (Gen. Ed. 1).
The assessment tool measured students’ Spanish writing skills by asking them
questions related to a class reading (see rubrics for evaluating this task in Appendix
2). The performance level in this area (62%) is close to the performance level in the
grammar, orthography and vocabulary tasks (58%). Both percentages are below the
expected 75%, which suggests that students did not acquire the formal aspects of
Spanish writing (grammar, spelling) nor the more conceptual ones (adequate
vocabulary and elaborate ideas) at the level expected.
Course Objectives 3 and 4: Students will be able to apply new vocabulary to
their oral interactions and written expression (Gen. Ed. Obj. 1); students will
have an increased awareness of formal and informal oral and written registers
(Gen. Ed. Obj. 1)
The assessment tool measured students’ acquisition of new vocabulary and awareness
of formal and informal oral and written registers by: a) asking grammar and spelling
questions, and b) asking vocabulary questions. At 58%, the percentage of students
who meet or exceed expectations in the vocabulary, grammar and orthography
sections of the assessment is below the expected 75% defined by the assessment
committee.
C. Resulting action plan:
An in-depth examination of the assessment tool and results suggests the following:
1. 68% of the students met or exceeded the objectives, a result close to the 75%
expected. The averages of each individual category show that all the areas
assessed need to improve except for reading.
2. Although the course syllabus lists several objectives that contain higher-level
thinking skills (analytical, inferential and evaluative), the assessment tool does not
focus on any of them. Rather, it measures reading by asking literal comprehension
questions. The department should consider whether the course is indeed
addressing higher-thinking skills. If not, the department must decide whether
those skills should continue to be part of the course objectives. If the course is
addressing those skills, then one or two of them should be incorporated into the
next assessment.
3. Although the course syllabus lists a writing objective that emphasized knowledge
of the steps of the writing process, the assessment tool does not measure this
knowledge adequately, since it only asks memory questions about one of the
course readings. As in the case of the higher thinking skills, the department
should consider whether the course is indeed teaching the steps of the writing
process. If not, the department must decide whether those skills should continue
to be part of the course objectives.
4. The instructors preparing the assessment should pay attention to, and revise if
necessary, the progressive level of difficulty in the sequence of assessment tools.
The LS 221 reading and writing parts, for instance, appear to be
disproportionately easier than the corresponding tasks in LS 222 and 223.
Incorporating higher thinking skills to the assessment of LS 221 should improve
the continuity among the three levels of heritage classes.
5. It is possible that the reading part of the LS 221 assessment was not challenging
enough, which might account for the difference in scores between this part and
the rest of the sections. The level of difficulty among the different parts within the
assessment tool should be even.
Although the assessment committee will meet in the fall of 2013 for follow-up
discussions of the assessment tool and the results, a preliminary review of the assessment
process suggests the following:
1. The assessment should be repeated after the course objectives are revised and aligned
with those of 222 and 223.
2. The assessment tool needs to be revised for a more homogeneous difficulty level
among assessment sections and among course levels.
3. Although it is possible that the use of an imperfect assessment tool has distorted the
assessment results, the assessment committee should meet with the instructors of this
course and discuss ways to improve the writing skills of Spanish heritage speakers. Some
ideas include:






provide more guided writing time and activities for heritage students,
conduct analyses of good writing samples with heritage students,
invite students to share writing pieces with their peers,
edit and publish a volume with students’ writing,
coordinate and train tutors at the Student Learning Center to help with Spanish
heritage students’ writing,
begin conversations with English composition instructors to: a) compare
assessment tools and results, and b) share pedagogical strategies to improve
students’ writing.
LS 221 ASSESSMENT REPORT. APPENDIX 1.
QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
LS221 - FINAL EXAM (versión final)
Nombre del estudiante ___________________________________________ NOTA _________/100 puntos
A. Escribe una oración completa en español con las siguientes palabras. Se evaluará la traducción
correcta de la palabra. (5 puntos)
Inglés
Oración Completa en español
Efficient
Expression
Communication
Theory
Photography
B. Lee las siguientes palabras, ¿femeninas o masculinas? Escribe una oración completa usa al inicio de
la oración el artículo apropiado: la, el, las, los. (5 puntos)
1. Programa__________________________________________________________________________
2. Países_____________________________________________________________________________
3. Sofá______________________________________________________________________________
4. Pianista____________________________________________________________________________
5. Estudiante__________________________________________________________________________
1
LS 221 ASSESSMENT REPORT. APPENDIX 1.
QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
LS221 - FINAL EXAM (versión final)
C. PRONOMBRES PERSONALES. Lee las oraciones. Escribe a la par de cada oración el pronombre que
corresponde. Lee la oración y contesta quién hizo la acción. Ver el ejemplo (5 puntos)
Acción
¿Quién lo hizo?
Escuchamos música ayer
Nosotros
1. Caminé por el parque.
2. Juan y Pedro fueron al cine.
3. Willie sale del carro.
4. Estudió en su casa.
5. Compras un libro en la tienda.
6. María, Fernando y yo Bailamos salsa.
7. Comemos en la cafetería.
8. Copiaban la tarea.
9. Oí la historia de Mariel en clase.
10. Juana cocinaba arroz con habichuelas.
D. Mayúsculas y minúsculas. Corrige los errores de mayúsculas y minúsculas en cada una de las
oraciones. (5 puntos)
1. la casa de mi abuelita era de una familia de Mexicanos.
2. En semana santa iré a la Habana, Cuba. Allí se habla Español.
3. estimada sra. Álvarez. le escribo para decirle que tengo lista la composición, hoy Jueves.
4. En Invierno hace frío. En Verano me iré a el Salvador de paseo o quizá a la Paz, Bolivia.
5. En nueva york existen diferentes religiones: Católicos, Musulmanes, Hindús, Judíos.
E. Uso de la b, v, s, c, z. Encierra la palabra correcta. (5 puntos)
1. Ayer tuvimos una cena/sena en mi casa.
2. El cuadro de Monet es vello/bello.
3. Mucha gente no sabe cocer/coser un calcetín roto.
2
LS 221 ASSESSMENT REPORT. APPENDIX 1.
QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
LS221 - FINAL EXAM (versión final)
4. Me gustan las zanahorias/sanahorias en la ensalada.
5. Fui al doctor y me dijo que tenía un bacilo/vacilo en el estómago.
F. Completa las oraciones usando el PRESENTE (Ej. jugar/juego) (5 puntos)
1. Mi hermano (tener) ____________________ muchos amigos en la escuela.
2. Ella nunca me (oír) _____________________ cuando le hablo.
3. Yo no (conocer) _______________________ a tus padres.
4. Carmen (querer)
5. Tú siempre (decir)
____________________ viajar a España.
____________________ la verdad.
G. Completa las siguientes oraciones usando el PRETERITO/PASADO SIMPLE
(Ej. Bailar/Bailé) 5 puntos.
1. Ellos (estar) ____________________ en el parque.
2. Yo no (querer) ____________________ ir contigo al cine.
3. Tú (llegar) ____________________ a las ocho de la mañana a trabajar.
4. Nosotros (tocar) ____________________ el piano.
5. Ella (ir) _____________________ a la fiesta pero María no.
H. Completa la siguiente historia con la forma apropiada del PRETÉRITO/PASADO SIMPLE (Ej.
Comer/comí) O EL PRETÉRITO IMPERFECTO (Ej. Comer/comía). (10 puntos)
La estudiante (llegar)________________ a la clase. La maestra (haber)___________________
comenzado la lección. _____________(estar) leyendo acerca de los cubanos y cubanoamericanos. En esa
clase, nosotros (aprender)_________________acerca del éxodo de los cubanos en 1980. Ellos
3
LS 221 ASSESSMENT REPORT. APPENDIX 1.
QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
LS221 - FINAL EXAM (versión final)
(salir)___________del Puerto de Mariel en un barco. __________(haber) muchas personas profesionales
que (dejar)___________ a sus familias en Cuba. Antes de salir de Cuba, algunos se
(refugiar)______________ en la Embajada de Perú. Durante muchos días (pasar)______________ mucha
hambre y sed. Al final, Fidel Castro, los (dejar) _______________ salir hacia Estados Unidos.
1) Acentuación (homónimos). Encierra en un círculo la palabra apropiada (5 puntos):
1. (Se/Sé) me olvidó que tenía un examen a las doce.
2. Siempre compro (te/té) sin cafeína.
3. Debes confiar en (mi/mí).
4. No tienes que preocuparte por (el/él). Seguro que está bien.
5. No tengo nada (más/mas) que darte, puedes regresar la otra semana.
Lecturas
Vocabulario. De las lecturas: Los cubanos y cubanoamericanos y Mariel. Explica lo que significan las
palabras marcadas y subrayadas en la oración. (10 puntos)
1. Todos los pasajeros del autobús solicitaron asilo político.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2. El éxodo masivo de cubanos sucedió en abril de 1980.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
4
LS 221 ASSESSMENT REPORT. APPENDIX 1.
QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
LS221 - FINAL EXAM (versión final)
3. Fidel Castro retiró la escolta pero se dio cuenta que cometió un error.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
4. Los cubanos se refugiaron en la embajada de Perú.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
5. los cubanos que emigraron mantuvieron sus raíces y cultura al llegar a Miami.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
En la lectura Introducción. El Fin ¿De quién habla la historia? ¿Qué enfermedad tiene? ¿A qué se
dedicaba mientras estaba en el hospital? ¿Cómo termina la historia? Escribe 5 oraciones completas
(10 puntos)
1.___________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
2.___________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
3.___________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
5
LS 221 ASSESSMENT REPORT. APPENDIX 1.
QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
LS221 - FINAL EXAM (versión final)
4.___________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
5.___________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
I. Lee el siguiente texto de Reinaldo Arenas y contesta las preguntas. (10 puntos)
LA COSECHA
Otra ceremonia, otra plenitud que marco mi infancia, fue la recogida de la cosecha. Mi abuelo cosechaba, sobre
todo, maíz. Para la recolección había que convocar a casi todo el vecindario. Desde luego, mi abuela, mis tías, mi
madre y yo, también trabajábamos en la recogida de maíz. Después había que trasladar las mazorcas en carretas
hasta la despensa (o prensa, como le decíamos) que era un rancho detrás de la casa. Una noche se invitaba al
vecindario para el deshoje y desgrane del maíz; era otra fiesta. Enormes telones cubrían el piso; yo me revolcaba en
ellos como si estuviera en la playa, que por entonces aún no había visitado. Mi abuela, esas noches, hacía un turrón
de coco, hecho con azúcar prieta y coco rallado, que olía como jamás he vuelto a oler un dulce. Se repartía el dulce
a media noche, mientras las lonas seguían siendo llenadas de granos y yo me revolcaba en ellas.
NOTA: No se darán puntos a las respuestas copiadas EXACTAMENTE de la lectura. Debes expresar las
respuestas con tus propias palabras, demostrando comprensión de lo leído.
1. ¿De qué se trataba la ceremonia?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
2. ¿Quiénes participaban en la ceremonia?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Cuando Reinaldo se revolcaba en el maíz, ¿a qué le recordaba?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
6
LS 221 ASSESSMENT REPORT. APPENDIX 1.
QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
LS221 - FINAL EXAM (versión final)
4. ¿Cómo preparaba el dulce la abuela de Reinaldo?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
5. ¿Cuándo se repartía el dulce?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
7
LS221 ASSESSMENT REPORT. APPENDIX 2 Task Completion Performance exceeds expectations Superior completion of the task. Student fully addresses the information requested, and provides additional details 4 POINTS Completion of task. Student fully addresses the information provided, but does not provide additional details 3 POINTS Partial completion of task. Student completes no more than 60% of the information requested 2 POINTS Minimal completion of task. Student completes less than 40% of the information requested and/or writes the essay in English 1 POINT Performance meets expectations Performance almost meets expectations Performance does not meet expectations Level of Discourse Sentences are fully developed and interconnected with cohesive devices 4 POINTS Sentences are fully developed. Cohesive devices are sporadically used 3 POINTS Sentences are somewhat complete. Rare use of cohesive devices 2 POINTS Vocab.
Spelling
Grammar Rich use of vocabulary 4 POINTS Accuracy level 90% ‐ 100% 4 POINTS Adequate and accurate use of vocabulary 3 POINTS Somewhat inadequate and/or inaccurate use of vocabulary 2 POINTS Accuracy level 79% ‐ 89% 3 POINTS Accuracy level 61% ‐ 78% 2 POINTS Perfect or near perfect control of the syntactic structures required. Minimal English interference or none at all (Accuracy level 90% ‐ 100%) 4 POINTS Adequate control of the syntactic structures. Some grammatical errors. Some English interference and occasional anglicisms (Accuracy level 79% ‐ 89%) 3 POINTS Insufficient control of the syntactic structures. Several grammatical errors. English interferes often and student often recurs to anglicisms (Accuracy level 61% ‐ 78%) 2 POINTS Sentences are mostly incomplete. No use of cohesive devices 1 POINT Inadequate and/or inaccurate use of vocabulary 1 POINT Accuracy level 0%‐ 60% 1 POINT Minimal control of the syntactic structures. Numerous grammatical errors. Student resorts to English most of the time. (Accuracy level 0%‐ 60%) 1 POINT 
Download