Program Review Data Packet Comp. Architectural & Industrial Design

advertisement
QUEENSBOROUGHCOMMUNITYCOLLEGE
ProgramReviewData
Packet
Comp.Architectural&IndustrialDesign
(DD‐A.A.S.)
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment 10/23/2013 Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) Table of Contents
A. Enrollment and Student Profile
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Student Profile & Headcount
Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE
Gender and Age
Ethnicity Imputed (IPEDS count)
Language Spoken at Home
Student Admit Type (e.g. first‐time freshmen, advanced transfer)
Freshman and Sophomore: Percent of Total Enrollment
College Discovery
Student Preparedness College Admission Average (CAA): High School GPA of First‐time Freshmen
SAT scores
Placement Test Results
B. Institutional Effectiveness
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Remedial vs Non Remedial
Remedial vs Non Remedial Enrollment
Remedial Course Grades Non Remedial Course Grades BE Courses: Number of students (Completed Course)
BE Course Grades: Percent Passed MA Remedial & Gateway Courses: Number of Students (Completed Course)
MA Remedial & Gateway Courses: Percent Passed
Graduation and Retention Rates
One‐Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Three‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Six‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Degrees Awarded
Transfer Rates and College Destinations
Page 1 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) Table of Contents (Cont'd)
C. Courses and Curriculum
1 Courses Taken by DD‐A.A.S. Students
2
3
4
5
Courses by Supporting Departments: Historical Trends 2007‐2012:
Mechanical Engineering Technology and Design (MT)
Mechanical Engineering Technology and Design Courses: Fall
Mechanical Engineering Technology and Design Courses: Spring
Mechanical Engineering Technology and Design Average Grades: Fall
Mechanical Engineering Technology and Design Average Grades: Spring
6
7
Grade Point Average
First Year GPA
Graduation GPA
D. Faculty and Staff
1
2
Staff categories and faculty profile (appointment status, gender, ethnicity and highest degree earned)
Faculty Members:
Engineering Technology
Source: CUNY IRDB
Page 2 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A. Enrollment and Student Profile
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Student Profile & Headcount
Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE
Gender and Age
Ethnicity Imputed (IPEDS count)
Language Spoken at Home
Student Admit Type (e.g. first‐time freshmen, advanced transfer)
Freshman and Sophomore: Percent of Total Enrollment
College Discovery
Student Preparedness College Admission Average (CAA): High School GPA of First‐time Freshmen
SAT scores
Placement Test Results
Page 3 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.1. Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE
Part‐time/Full‐time Status
Fall 2007
F‐TIME
P‐TIME
Total
69
28
97
71.1%
28.9%
100%
Spring 2008
56
47
103
54.4%
45.6%
100%
Fall 2008
60
46
106
56.6%
43.4%
100%
Spring 2009
53
36
89
59.6%
40.4%
100%
Fall 2009
62
32
94
66.0%
34.0%
100%
Spring 2010
62
36
98
63.3% 64
36.7% 32
100% 96
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
66.7% 49
33.3% 40
100% 89
Fall 2011
55.1% 51
44.9% 48
100% 99
Spring 2012
51.5% 56
48.5% 45
100% 101
Fall 2012
55.4% 61
44.6% 31
100% 92
66.3%
33.7%
100%
DD‐A.A.S.: Part‐time and Full‐time 28.9%
71.1%
Fall 07
45.6%
43.4%
40.4%
34.0%
36.7%
33.3%
54.4%
56.6%
59.6%
66.0%
63.3%
66.7%
Sp 08
Fall 08
Sp 09
Fall 09
Sp 10
Fall 10
FULL‐TIME
44.9%
48.5%
44.6%
55.1%
51.5%
55.4%
Sp 11
Fall 11
Sp 12
33.7%
66.3%
Fall 12
PART‐TIME
Page 4 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.1. Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE (Cont'd)
FTE* ( Full‐time Equivalency)
Fall 07 Sp 08
Total FTE 70
70
Fall 08 Sp 09 Fall 09 Sp 09
Fall 10 Sp 11 Fall 11 Sp 12
Fall 12
71
75
73
63
72
73
66
70
73
Full‐Time Equivalency (FTE*) Student Count
80
75
70
75
72
71
70
70
73
73
73
70
65
66
63
60
55
Fall 07
Sp 08
Fall 08
Sp 09
Fall 09
Sp 09
Fall 10
Sp 11
Fall 11
Sp 12
Fall 12
*Full‐time Equivalent:
Full‐time equivalent (FTE) is a standardized measure of enrollment equal to a full‐time load of credits. It is calculated by summing the total credits and equated credits associated with course enrollment and dividing by 15.
Page 5 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.2. Gender and Age
Gender
Fall 2007
Spring 2008
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Women
29
29.9% 28
27.2% 27
25.5% 21
23.6% 18
19.1% 19
19.4% 18
18.8% 21
23.6% 21
21.2% 20
19.8% 24
26.1%
Men
68
70.1% 75
72.8% 79
74.5% 68
76.4% 76
80.9% 79
80.6% 78
81.3% 68
76.4% 78
78.8% 81
80.2% 68
73.9%
Total
97
100% 103
100% 106
100% 89
100% 94
100% 98
100% 96
100% 89
100% 99
100% 101
100% 92
100%
Gender by Full‐time/Part‐time Status
Fall 2007
Spring 2008
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Full‐time
Women
Men
Total
22
47
69
31.9% 15
68.1% 41
100% 56
26.8% 15
73.2% 45
100% 60
25.0% 13
75.0% 40
100% 53
24.5% 13
75.5% 49
100% 62
21.0% 16
79.0% 46
100% 62
25.8% 14
74.2% 50
100% 64
21.9% 11
78.1% 38
100% 49
22.4% 11
77.6% 40
100% 51
21.6% 13
78.4% 43
100% 56
23.2% 16
76.8% 45
100% 61
26.2%
73.8%
100%
Part‐time
Women
Men
Total
7
21
28
25.0% 13
75.0% 34
100% 47
27.7% 12
72.3% 34
100% 46
26.1% 8
73.9% 28
100% 36
22.2% 5
77.8% 27
100% 32
15.6% 3
84.4% 33
100% 36
8.3% 4
91.7% 28
100% 32
12.5% 10
87.5% 30
100% 40
25.0% 10
75.0% 38
100% 48
20.8% 7
79.2% 38
100% 45
15.6% 8
84.4% 23
100% 31
25.8%
74.2%
100%
Age
Fall 2007
UNDER 19
19
20 ‐ 22
23 ‐ 24
25 ‐ 29
30 ‐ 44
45 & OVER
Total
9
14
39
12
15
7
1
97
9.3%
14.4%
40.2%
12.4%
15.5%
7.2%
1.0%
100%
Spring 2008
11
12
38
18
14
8
2
103
10.7%
11.7%
36.9%
17.5%
13.6%
7.8%
1.9%
100%
Fall 2008
15
13
36
16
19
5
2
106
14.2%
12.3%
34.0%
15.1%
17.9%
4.7%
1.9%
100%
Spring 2009
5
15
32
17
17
2
1
89
5.6%
16.9%
36.0%
19.1%
19.1%
2.2%
1.1%
100%
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
20
11
28
12
19
4
21.3%
11.7%
29.8%
12.8%
20.2%
4.3%
19
15
30
9
15
10
94
100% 98
19.4%
15.3%
30.6%
9.2%
15.3%
10.2%
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
22
13
22.9% 12
13.5% 15
12
11
9
12.5% 12
11.5% 10
9.4% 8
13.5% 16
16.9% 19
33
13.5% 13
11.2% 11
9.0% 7
100% 67
100% 57
100% 99
Page 6 of 39
Fall 2011
16.2%
19.2%
33.3%
13.1%
11.1%
7.1%
Spring 2012
12
16
37
18
9
8
1
100% 101
11.9%
15.8%
36.6%
17.8%
8.9%
7.9%
1.0%
100%
Fall 2012
14
17
24
13
13
10
1
92
15.2%
18.5%
26.1%
14.1%
14.1%
10.9%
1.1%
100%
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.3. Ethnicity Imputed (IPEDS count)
Nonresident Alien
Fall 07
Spring 08
Fall 08
Spring 09
Fall 09
Spring 10
Fall 10
Spring 11
Fall 11
Spring 12
Fall 12
28
28
20
17
17
15
18
19
17
14
17
28.9%
27.2%
18.9%
19.1%
18.1%
15.3%
18.8%
21.3%
17.2%
13.9%
18.5%
American Indian or Native Alaskan
Black, Non‐Hispanic
15
13
14
11
11
15
14
17
15
14
14
15.5%
12.6%
13.2%
12.4%
11.7%
15.3%
14.6%
19.1%
15.2%
13.9%
15.2%
1
1.0%
1
0.9%
1
1.0%
Asian or Pacific Islander
13
21
22
19
21
16
14
14
16
18
15
13.4%
20.4%
20.8%
21.3%
22.3%
16.3%
14.6%
15.7%
16.2%
17.8%
16.3%
Hispanic
Total
White, Non‐Hispanic
23
26
32
28
27
32
31
26
32
37
34
23.7%
25.2%
30.2%
31.5%
28.7%
32.7%
32.3%
29.2%
32.3%
36.6%
37.0%
17
15
17
14
18
20
19
13
18
18
12
17.5%
14.6%
16.0%
15.7%
19.1%
20.4%
19.8%
14.6%
18.2%
17.8%
13.0%
14.6%
18.2%
17.8%
32.3%
36.6%
97
103
106
89
94
98
96
89
99
101
92
Ethnicity*
17.5%
14.6%
23.7%
25.2%
13.4%
20.4%
15.5%
28.9%
Fall 07
16.0%
15.7%
19.1%
20.4%
19.8%
30.2%
31.5%
28.7%
32.7%
32.3%
20.8%
21.3%
22.3%
16.3%
14.6%
12.6%
27.2%
Spring 08
29.2%
15.7%
16.2%
19.1%
17.8%
13.0%
37.0%
16.3%
13.2%
12.4%
11.7%
15.3%
14.6%
18.9%
19.1%
18.1%
15.3%
18.8%
21.3%
17.2%
13.9%
18.5%
Fall 08
Spring 09
Fall 09
Spring 10
Fall 10
Spring 11
Fall 11
Spring 12
Fall 12
Nonresident Alien
Black, Non‐Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
Hispanic
15.2%
13.9%
15.2%
White, Non‐Hispanic
* American Indian or Native Alaskan not shown in chart
Page 7 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.4. Language Spoken at Home
Fall 2007
Spring 2008
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010 Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
LANG. OTHER THAN ENGLISH
51
52.6% 58
56.3% 63
59.4%
56
62.9% 55
58.5% 51
52.0% 49
51.0% 53
59.6% 63
63.6% 57
56.4% 50
54.3%
ENGLISH ONLY
25
25.8% 25
24.3% 28
26.4%
23
25.8% 21
22.3% 25
25.5% 29
30.2% 18
20.2% 15
15.2% 16
15.8% 10
10.9%
19.4% 15
UNKNOWN
21
21.6% 20
14.2%
10
11.2% 18
19.1% 22
22.4% 18
18.8% 18
20.2% 21
21.2% 28
27.7% 32
34.8%
Total
97
100% 103 100% 106 100%
89
100% 94
100% 98
100% 96
100% 89
100% 99
100% 101 100% 92
100%
Percent Of Students Who Speak a Language Other Than English at Home
80.0%
60.0%
56.3%
59.4%
62.9%
52.6%
Fall 07
Sp 08
Fall 08
Sp 09
58.5%
52.0%
51.0%
Sp 10
Fall 10
59.6%
63.6%
Sp 11
Fall 11
56.4%
54.3%
Sp 12
Fall 12
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
Fall 09
Page 8 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.5. Student Admit Type
Fall 2007
First Time Freshmen
Advanced Transfer
Internal Transfer
Degree Readmit
Continuing Degree
Total
Spring 2008
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
16
16.5% 3
2.9%
22
20.8% 4
4.5%
25
26.6% 9
9.2%
23
24.0% 1
1.1%
21
21.2% 8
7.9%
17
18.5%
9
9.3%
6.8%
5
4.7%
6.7%
5
5.3%
2.0%
7
7.3%
3.4%
8
8.1%
4.0%
8
8.7%
1
1.0%
0.0%
1
0.9%
11
11.3%
10.7%
9
8.5%
7
11
6
0.0%
5
5.6%
2
0.0%
5
5.3%
0.0%
5
5.1%
3
0.0%
4
0.0%
8
4.2%
9.0%
4
0.0%
5
5.1%
0.0%
6
5.9%
0.0%
2
2.2%
60
61.9%
82
79.6%
69
65.1%
74
83.1%
59
62.8%
82
83.7%
62
64.6%
77
86.5%
65
65.7%
83
82.2%
65
70.7%
97
100%
103
100.0% 106
100%
89
100%
94
100%
98
100%
96
100%
89
100%
99
100%
101
100%
92
100%
New to Continuing Student Ratio (Fall) 100%
90%
16.5%
20.8%
80%
9.3%
4.7%
70%
26.6%
24.0%
21.2%
18.5%
7.3%
8.1%
8.7%
5.3%
60%
First‐time Freshmen
50%
40%
Advanced Standing Transfers
74.2%
74.5%
Fall 07
Fall 08
30%
68.1%
68.8%
70.7%
72.8%
Fall 09
Fall 10
Fall 11
Fall 12
Other
20%
10%
0%
Page 9 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.6. Freshman and Sophomore as a Percent of Total Enrollment
Fall 2007
Spring 2008
60 61.9% 60
SOPHOMORE 37 38.1% 43
FRESHMAN
Total
Fall 2008
58.3% 74
41.7% 32
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
69.8% 49 55.1% 62 66.0% 63 64.3% 63 65.6% 60 67.4% 65 65.7% 66
30.2% 40 44.9% 32 34.0% 35 35.7% 33 34.4% 29 32.6% 34 34.3% 35
Fall 2012
65.3% 62 67.4%
34.7% 30 32.6%
97 100% 103 100% 106 100% 89 100% 94 100% 98 100% 96 100% 89 100% 99 100% 101 100% 92 100%
Freshman and Sophomore: Percent of Total Enrollment
100.0%
80.0%
38.1%
41.7%
61.9%
58.3%
Fall 07
Sp 08
30.2%
44.9%
34.0%
35.7%
34.4%
32.6%
34.3%
34.7%
32.6%
66.0%
64.3%
65.6%
67.4%
65.7%
65.3%
67.4%
Fall 09
Sp 10
Fall 10
Sp 11
Fall 11
Sp 12
Fall 12
60.0%
40.0%
69.8%
20.0%
55.1%
0.0%
Fall 08
Sp 09
FRESHMAN
SOPHOMORE
Page 10 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.7. College Discovery
Fall '07
Regular
CD
Total
95
2
97
Spr '08 Fall '08
101
2
103
102
4
106
Spr '09
Fall '09
Spr '10
Fall '10
Spr '11
Fall '11
Spr '12
Fall '12
86
3
89
92
2
94
97
1
98
96
89
99
101
96
89
99
101
91
1
92
Page 11 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.8. College Admissions Average (CAA): High School GPA of First‐time Freshman
Students without scores
Avg Score
Students with scores
Fall 07
Spring 08
Fall 08
Spring 09
Fall 09
Spring 10
Fall 10
Spring 11
Fall 11
Spring 12
Fall 12
Median
8
8
76.18
76.75
10
1
20
7
22
1
18
4
15
12
3
5
2
1
0
3
4
2
69.93
72.30
74.59
75.67
72.92
68.70
73.66
83.50
74.99
68.40
72.30
74.70
70.60
72.15
68.70
69.45
81.30
74.90
There were no students with CAA Avg in Sp 08.
Page 12 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.9. SAT Scores: First‐time Freshman
SAT Verbal Averages
DD2
Students with Score
Fall 07
Spring 08
Fall 08
Spring 09
Fall 09
Spring 10
Fall 10
Spring 11
Fall 11
Spring 12
Fall 12
Students without Score
5
1
3
11
2
19
4
14
7
9
1
11
7
11
2
14
10
1
10
360
420
436
377
415
392
404
410
7
SAT Math Averages
DD2
Students with Students without Score
Score
Fall 07
Spring 08
Fall 08
Spring 09
Fall 09
Spring 10
Fall 10
Spring 11
Fall 11
Spring 12
Fall 12
Avg Score
377
Avg Score
5
1
3
11
2
19
440
320
420
11
2
14
14
7
9
442
540
455
10
1
10
11
7
7
439
410
444
Page 13 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.10. Placement Test Results
DD‐A.A.S.
Reading Placement Test Result
2007
Fall Cohort
N
2008
%
N
2009
%
N
2010
%
N
2011
%
N
2012
%
N
Total
%
N
%
Exempt
3
19%
4
18.2% 7
28.0% 8
34.8%
9
42.9% 9
52.9%
40
32.3%
Passed
9
56%
6
27.3% 7
28.0% 7
30.4%
8
38.1% 5
29.4%
42
33.9%
Failed
4
25%
6
27.3% 10
40.0% 8
34.8%
2
9.5%
3
17.6%
33
26.6%
Not Tested
0
0%
6
27.3% 1
4.0%
0.0%
2
9.5%
0
0.0%
9
7.3%
Total (Tested or Exempt)
16
100%
16
73%
24
96.0% 23
100.0%
19
90%
17
100.0%
115
92.7%
Exempt or Passed*
12
75%
10
45%
14
56.0% 15
65.2%
17
81.0% 14
82.4%
82
66.1%
0
Writing Placement Test Result
Fall Cohort
2007
N
2008
%
N
2009
%
N
2010
%
N
2012
2011
%
N
%
N
Total
%
N
%
Exempt
3
18.8% 4
18.2% 7
28.0% 8
34.8%
9
42.9% 9
52.9%
40
32.3%
Passed
3
18.8% 2
9.1%
16.0% 4
17.4%
5
23.8% 6
35.3%
24
19.4%
Failed
8
50.0% 12
54.5% 13
52.0% 11
47.8%
5
23.8% 2
11.8%
51
41.1%
Not Tested
2
12.5% 4
18.2% 1
4.0%
0.0%
2
9.5%
0
0.0%
9
7.3%
Total (Tested or Exempt)
14
88%
81.8% 24
96.0% 23
100%
19
90%
17
100.0%
115
92.7%
Exempt or Passed*
6
37.5% 6
27.3% 11
44.0% 12
52.2%
14
66.7% 15
88.2%
64
51.6%
18
4
0
Math Placement Test Result
Fall Cohort
2007
N
Exempt
3
2008
%
18.8% 5
N
2009
%
22.7% 11
N
2010
%
N
44.0% 10
2011
%
43.5%
N
7
2012
%
N
33.3% 3
17.6%
N
39
%
31.5%
Passed
6
37.5% 5
22.7% 5
20.0% 6
26.1%
2
9.5%
17.6%
27
21.8%
Failed
5
31.3% 7
31.8% 8
32.0% 7
30.4%
11
52.4% 11
64.7%
49
39.5%
7.3%
0
3
Total
%
Not Tested
2
12.5% 5
22.7% 1
4.0%
0.0%
1
4.8%
0
0.0%
9
Total (Tested or Exempt)
14
87.5% 17
77.3% 24
96.0% 23
100.0%
20
95%
17
100.0%
115
92.7%
Exempt or Passed*
9
56.3% 10
45.5% 16
64.0% 16
69.6%
9
42.9% 6
35.3%
66
53.2%
* Exempt or passed is a percent of total tested or exempt.
Page 14 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) A.10. Placement Test Results (Cont'd)
Placement Test Result Trends:
(Percent of Students Exempt or Passed*)
100%
90%
80%
75%
67%
65%
60%
56%
40%
30%
82%
70%
64%
70%
50%
88%
81%
43%
56%
45%
52%
45%
35%
44%
38%
20%
27%
10%
0%
F2007
F2008
F2009
Reading
F2010
Writing
F2011
F2012
Math
* Exempt or passed is a percent of total tested or exempt.
Page 15 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B. Institutional Effectiveness
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Remedial vs Non Remedial
Remedial vs Non Remedial Enrollment
Remedial Course Grades Non Remedial Course Grades BE Courses: Number of students (Completed Course)
BE Course Grades: Percent Passed MA Remedial & Gateway Courses: Number of Students (Completed Course)
MA Remedial & Gateway Courses: Percent Passed
Graduation and Retention Rates
One‐Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Three‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Six‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Degrees Awarded
Transfer Rates and College Destinations
Page 16 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.1. Remedial vs. Non Remedial
Fall 2007
Not in remedial courses
N 76
In remedial courses
%
78.4%
Spring 2008
N 21
Total
Not in remedial courses
%
21.6%
N 97
83
68
72.3%
In remedial courses
N %
26
80
80.8%
27.7%
Not in remedial courses
%
19.4%
N 103
83
78.3%
Not in remedial courses
N %
94
68
69.4%
In remedial courses
N %
30
30.6%
19.2%
Total
Not in remedial courses
N %
99
78
77.2%
In remedial courses
N %
23
22.8%
Spring 2009
In remedial courses
%
N 23
Total
Not in remedial courses
%
21.7%
N 106
64
Total
Not in remedial courses
N %
98
68
70.8%
N 71.9%
25
Total
%
28.1%
89
Spring 2011
In remedial courses
N %
28
In remedial courses
%
Fall 2010
Spring 2012
In remedial courses
N %
19
20
Total
Fall 2011
Not in remedial courses
N %
N Total
Spring 2010
Fall 2009
Not in remedial courses
N %
In remedial courses
%
80.6%
Fall 2008
29.2%
Total
Not in remedial courses
N %
96
66
74.2%
In remedial courses
N %
23
25.8%
Total
89
Fall 2012
Total
Not in remedial courses
N %
101
70
76.1%
In remedial courses
N %
22
23.9%
Total
92
Percent of Students in Remedial 60%
40%
28.1%
21.6%
19.4%
21.7%
Fall 07
Sp 08
Fall 08
27.7%
30.6%
29.2%
25.8%
19.2%
22.8%
23.9%
Sp 12
Fall 12
20%
0%
Sp 09
Fall 09
Sp 10
Fall 10
Sp 11
Page 17 of 39
Fall 11
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.2. Remedial Course Grades Academic Literacy (BE)
Spring 2008
Fall 2007
P
5
9
NC
2
1
R
3
7
WU
4
2
Total non‐withdraw
14
Percent Passed 35.7%
Remedial Math
8
NC
1
R
5
WU
16
Spring 2010
Fall 2009
Spring 2011
Fall 2010
Spring 2012
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
10
18
12
12
8
8
4
5
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
3
9
9
3
2
1
1
1
4
2
4
19
20
18
23
28
24
16
11
8
10
47.4%
80.0%
55.6%
78.3%
42.9%
50.0%
50.0%
72.7%
50.0%
50.0%
Spring 2008
Fall 2007
P
Spring 2009
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2008
Spring 2010
Fall 2009
Spring 2011
Fall 2010
3
3
Spring 2012
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
7
5
2
5
6
8
6
4
6
10
5
3
7
7
3
5
2
6
4
3
1
1
5
8
1
1
3
1
Total non‐withdrawn
14
13
9
14
12
17
14
9
10
13
14
Percent Passed 57.1%
53.8%
55.6%
14.3%
41.7%
35.3%
57.1%
66.7%
40.0%
46.2%
71.4%
Page 18 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.3. Non Remedial Course Grades Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Number of Students
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Grade
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD2
Total
DD
Total
DD2
Total
DD
A
A‐
B+
B
B‐
C+
C
C‐
D+
D
D‐
F/WU
Grand Total
5,479
3,074
2,573
2,934
2,240
1,710
1,861
1,251
570
802
508
4,125
27,127
28
25
23
39
25
17
23
12
3
5
6
37
243
5,693
3,269
2,765
3,219
2,445
1,824
2,000
1,229
722
899
558
3,661
28,284
30
29
22
33
23
15
24
15
3
10
5
35
244
6,777
3,771
3,242
3,456
2,701
2,103
2,205
1,540
788
1,022
681
4,362
32,649
34
26
21
35
33
27
11
6
4
7
10
31
245
6,651
3,763
3,155
3,528
2,835
2,023
2,396
1,450
775
1,081
609
4,363
32,629
33
17
19
34
31
18
22
21
7,569
4,085
3,335
3,630
2,979
2,188
2,492
1,665
897
1,136
597
5,291
35,864
25
19
22
33
22
20
33
9
4
7
5
33
232
7,670
4,269
3,341
3,584
2,946
2,145
2,576
1,553
782
1,048
608
4,878
35,400
33
23
20
30
35
17
22
7
5
2
3
30
227
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
7
3
29
234
Percentage of Students
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Grade
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
A
A‐
B+
B
B‐
C+
C
C‐
D+
D
D‐
F/WU
20.2%
11.3%
9.5%
10.8%
8.3%
6.3%
6.9%
4.6%
2.1%
3.0%
1.9%
15.2%
11.5%
10.3%
9.5%
16.0%
10.3%
7.0%
9.5%
4.9%
1.2%
2.1%
2.5%
15.2%
20.1%
11.6%
9.8%
11.4%
8.6%
6.4%
7.1%
4.3%
2.6%
3.2%
2.0%
12.9%
12.3%
11.9%
9.0%
13.5%
9.4%
6.1%
9.8%
6.1%
1.2%
4.1%
2.0%
14.3%
20.8%
11.6%
9.9%
10.6%
8.3%
6.4%
6.8%
4.7%
2.4%
3.1%
2.1%
13.4%
13.9%
10.6%
8.6%
14.3%
13.5%
11.0%
4.5%
2.4%
1.6%
2.9%
4.1%
12.7%
20.4%
11.5%
9.7%
10.8%
8.7%
6.2%
7.3%
4.4%
2.4%
3.3%
1.9%
13.4%
14.1%
7.3%
8.1%
14.5%
13.2%
7.7%
9.4%
9.0%
0.0%
3.0%
1.3%
12.4%
21.1%
11.4%
9.3%
10.1%
8.3%
6.1%
6.9%
4.6%
2.5%
3.2%
1.7%
14.8%
10.8%
8.2%
9.5%
14.2%
9.5%
8.6%
14.2%
3.9%
1.7%
3.0%
2.2%
14.2%
21.7%
12.1%
9.4%
10.1%
8.3%
6.1%
7.3%
4.4%
2.2%
3.0%
1.7%
13.8%
14.5%
10.1%
8.8%
13.2%
15.4%
7.5%
9.7%
3.1%
2.2%
0.9%
1.3%
13.2%
Grand Total
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Page 19 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.4. BE Courses: Number of Students (Completed Course)
Fall 2007
Level
Non‐ESL Writing
Non‐ESL Reading
ESL‐
Writing
ESL‐
Reading
Total
Fall Term BE Courses
Course Dept #
Course Name
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
111
112
121
122
201
203
205
207
225
226
DEVL COMP SKILLS
COMP WORKSHOP
DEVL READNG SKILLS
COL RDNG & STDY SK
BEGIN COMP ESL
INTERMED COMP ESL
ADVANCED COMP ESL
ADVD RDNG/COMP ESL
BASIC RDNG SKL ESL
COL RD ST SKL ESL
Fall 2008
Level
Non‐ESL Writing
Non‐ESL Reading
ESL‐
Writing
ESL‐
Reading
Total
Number of Students
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
350
706
163
472
132
129
328
2
2
1
2
2
352
717
287
511
121
100
302
4
3
2
2
1
2
4
393
760
359
618
158
98
351
4
4
2
6
1
1
4
347
737
349
585
154
128
366
2
6
2
2
2
2
5
276
498
266
518
94
141
342
4
237
226
4
2,743 17
271
3
224
2
2,885 23
Spring 2008
Spring Term BE Courses
Dept Course # Course Name
BE
111
DEVL COMP SKILLS
BE
112
COMP WORKSHOP
BE
121
DEVL READNG SKILLS
BE
122
COL RDNG & STDY SK
BE
201
BEGIN COMP ESL
BE
203
INTERMED COMP ESL
BE
205
ADVANCED COMP ESL
BE
207
ADVD RDNG/COMP ESL
BE
225
BASIC RDNG SKL ESL
BE
226
COL RD ST SKL ESL
Fall 2009
282
2
289
3,308 24
Spring 2009
312
3
334
2
3,312 26
DD
4
1
1
2
230
3
312
2
2,687 13
Number of Students Spring 2010 Spring 2011
Fall 2012
Total
DD
Total
DD
208
305
193
424
66
122
301
17
146
282
2,064
1
1
1,926
3,723
1,617
3,128
725
718
1,990
17
1,478
1,667
16,999
13
20
8
14
6
8
20
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
240
589
161
328
85
138
306
2
5
1
5
235
627
195
431
104
103
304
3
4
311
666
255
535
125
108
344
5
5
1
6
2
2
2
164
529
230
458
67
164
327
2
1
158
366
174
344
39
143
339
3
230
1
247
2
2,324 19
1
5
196
304
4
2,499 18
Page 20 of 39
255
3
349
4
2,948 30
4
3
7
213
344
1
2,496 18
2
2
1
1
3
11
Spring 2012
Total
1
Grand Total
11
13
114
Grand Total
DD
Total
DD
1
1
1,108
2,777
1,015
2,096
12
16
3
16
1
5
656
1,620
7
22
153
1
313
2
2,029 11
1,047 5
1,557 13
12,296 96
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B5. BE Course Grades: Percent Passed
Fall 2007
Level
Dept
Non‐ESL Writing
Non‐ESL Reading
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
ESL‐
Writing
ESL‐
Reading
Total
% Passed
Fall Term BE Courses
Course # Course Name
111
DEVL COMP SKILLS
112
COMP WORKSHOP
121
DEVL READNG SKILLS
122
COL RDNG & STDY SK
201
BEGIN COMP ESL
203
INTERMED COMP ESL
205
ADVANCED COMP ESL
207
ADVD RDNG/COMP ESL
225
BASIC RDNG SKL ESL
226
COL RD ST SKL ESL
Fall 2008
# P
1
1
1
2
5
29.4%
Passed Academic Literacy Courses
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
# P
# P
# P
3
1
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
2
3
1
1
3
4
2
1
2
1
3
1
16
69.6%
1
2
17
70.8%
12
46.2%
Fall 2012
# P
# P
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
8
61.5%
2
5
45.5%
Spring 2008 Spring 2009 Spring 2010 Spring 2011 Spring 2012
Level
Dept
Non‐ESL Writing
Non‐ESL Reading
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
BE
ESL‐
Writing
ESL‐
Reading
Total
% Passed
Spring Term BE Courses
Course # Course Name
111
DEVL COMP SKILLS
112
COMP WORKSHOP
121
DEVL READNG SKILLS
122
COL RDNG & STDY SK
201
BEGIN COMP ESL
203
INTERMED COMP ESL
205
ADVANCED COMP ESL
207
ADVD RDNG/COMP ESL
225
BASIC RDNG SKL ESL
226
COL RD ST SKL ESL
# P
1
2
1
3
1
# P
1
1
# P
# P
2
1
1
1
3
1
9
47.4%
# P
2
9
50.0%
Page 21 of 39
4
2
2
1
1
12
40.0%
2
1
3
3
1
1
8
44.4%
4
36.4%
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.6.Math Remedial and Gateway Courses: Number of Students (Completed Course)
Number of Students
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Grand Total
Fall Term MA Remedial Courses
Dept Course # Course Name
MA
MA
MA
MA
5
5M
10
13
MA 114
Total
Basic Mathematics and Problem Solving
Basic Mathematics and Problem Solving Module
Elementary Algebra
Elementary Algebra Express
Total
677
DD
4
1,049 5
366
5
College Algebra and Trigonometry for Tech Students 179
19
2,271 33
Total
861
DD
4
Total
815
DD
2
Total
DD
1,207 5
272
5
1,394 7
271
3
756
286
1,329
256
5
2
6
2
165
19
2,505 33
190
22
2,670 34
180
21
2,807 36
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
270
916
4
1,716 6
983
2
2,048 16
3,379
2,185
8,743
1,165
15
8
45
15
189
21
3,091 31
140
16
3,171 34
1,043 118
16,515 201
Number of Students
Spring 2008 Spring 2009 Spring 2010 Spring 2011 Spring 2012
Grand Total
Total
Total
Spring Term MA Remedial Courses
Dept Course # Course Name
MA
MA
MA
MA
5
5M
10
13
MA 114
Total
DD
Total
Basic Mathematics and Problem Solving
Basic Mathematics and Problem Solving Module
Elementary Algebra
Elementary Algebra Express
582
4
871
955
315
7
2
College Algebra and Trigonometry for Tech Students
114
17
1,966 30
DD
1
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
DD
845
1,111 11
212
3
4
2
1,421 10
233
1
762
2
171
1,334 6
214
1
762
171
5
1,334 10
214
3,822
342
6,155
1,188
128
13
2,322 28
177
17
2,676 34
149
15
2,630 24
149
22
2,630 37
717
84
12,224 153
Page 22 of 39
11
7
44
7
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.7.MA Remedial/Gateway Courses: Percent Passed
* Too small for percentages
Course # Course Name
5
5M
10
Basic Mathematics and Problem Solving
Basic Mathematics and Problem Solving Module
Elementary Algebra
13
Elementary Algebra Express
Fall 2007
47.0%
2*
46.5%
1*
42.6%
3*
51.1%
55.3%
73.4%
2*
4*
64.0%
87.3%
2*
1*
60.4%
81.5%
1*
1*
2
84.6%
69.7%
76.5%
2
2*
1
84.3%
77.6%
3*
1*
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2012
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
89.1%
73.2%
1*
56.3%
Fall 2012
% C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or better better better better better better better better better better better better of Total of DD of Total of DD of Total of DD of Total of DD of Total of DD of Total of DD
48.0%
42.1%
44.8%
21.1%
44.7%
36.4%
52.8%
Spring 2009
33.3%
Spring 2010
49.2%
33.3%
Spring 2011
58.5%
37.5%
Spring 2012
% P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
46.2%
1*
33.0%
5M
10
13
Elementary Algebra
Elementary Algebra Express
54.8%
71.9%
71.4%
1*
59.3%
74.5%
Spring 2008
Course # Course Name
College Algebra and Trigonometry for Tech Students
114
Fall 2011
2*
Basic Mathematics and Problem Solving
Basic Mathematics and Problem Solving Module
5
Fall 2010
44.8%
Spring 2008
Course # Course Name
Fall 2009
% P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of % P of Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Total
DD
Fall 2007
Course # Course Name
College Algebra and Trigonometry for Tech Students
114
Fall 2008
2*
37.6%
1*
38.3%
1*
49.7%
75.9%
2*
3*
1*
69.3%
71.9%
80.0%
3*
66.7%
1*
Spring 2009
Spring 2010
Spring 2011
82.5%
56.1%
1*
3*
Spring 2012
% C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or % C or better better better better better better better better better better of Total of DD of Total of DD of Total of DD of Total of DD of Total of DD
36.0%
47.1%
40.6%
15.4%
44.6%
Page 23 of 39
35.3%
50.3%
40.0%
36.8%
45.5%
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.8. One‐Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
DD‐A.A.S.
Total
#
13
20
18
22
15
Fall Cohort
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
QCC‐Wide
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued at QCC
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued at QCC
%
76.9%
55.0%
83.3%
81.8%
86.7%
#
10
11
15
18
13
%
69.5
70.7
71.5
72.1
69.2
One‐Year Retention Rates
(First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohorts)
83.3%
69.5%
76.9%
72.1%
71.5%
70.7%
86.7%
81.8%
69.2%
55.0%
Fall 07
Fall 08
Fall 09
QCC‐wide
Fall 10
Fall 11
DD‐A.A.S.
Page 24 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.9. Three‐Year Retention and Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
DD‐A.A.S.
Total
Fall Cohort
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
QCC‐wide
Earned Degree Pursued
#
27
14
17
16
11
13
20
18
#
3
2
3
5
2
2
1
2
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued
%
11.1%
14.3%
17.6%
31.3%
18.2%
15.4%
5.0%
11.1%
#
1
1
2
3
%
3.7%
7.1%
11.8%
18.8%
0.0%
15.4%
30.0%
22.2%
2
6
4
Earned Degree Pursued
%
14.4%
15.0%
12.8%
13.0%
12.8%
15.8%
13.8%
16.2%
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued
%
20.0%
20.7%
21.3%
22.6%
21.3%
21.4%
23.2%
21.5%
Three Year Graduation Rates
(First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohorts)
QCC‐Wide Earned Degree
50.0%
DD‐Earned Degree
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
31.3%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
17.6%
15.0%
14.4%
11.1%
14.3%
12.8%
18.2%
13.0%
12.8%
15.8%
15.4%
16.2%
13.8%
10.0%
11.1%
5.0%
5.0%
0.0%
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Page 25 of 39
2008
2009
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.10. Six‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
DD‐A.A.S.
Total
#
Fall Cohort
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
27
14
17
16
11
#
5
2
5
5
4
Earned Degree Pursued
%
18.5%
14.3%
29.4%
31.3%
36.4%
QCC‐wide
Earned Still Enrolled for Degree Degree Pursued
Pursued
#
%
%
26.2%
25.1%
1
5.9%
24.0%
25.2%
25.3%
Six‐Year Graduation Rates
(First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohorts)
50.0%
36.4%
40.0%
25.2%30.0%
26.2%
24.0%
25.1%
30.0%
20.0%
25.3%
17.6%
20.0%
10.0%
10.0%
0.0%
2002
2003
2004
QCC‐Wide Earned Degree
2005
2006
DD2‐Earned Degree
Page 26 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.11. Degrees Awarded
Graduation Year¹ Degree
DD2
A.A.S.
2006‐2007 2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010 2010‐2011 2011‐2012
6
9
8
16
15
8
¹ Graduation year include summer, fall, and spring graduations. (E.g. 05/06 includes summer 2005, fall 2005, and spring 2006 graduations).
Degrees Awarded Trend Analysis
Degree
DD2
A.A.S.
06/07
6
11/12
8
Growth %
33.3%
Page 27 of 39
10/11
15
11/12
8
Growth %
‐46.7%
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) B.12. Transfer Rates¹ and College Destinations
Total Graduates
2007‐2008
2008‐2009
2009‐2010
2010‐2011
2011‐2012
9
8
16
15
8
DD‐A.A.S. Graduates
% CUNY % Outside CUNY Senior Senior College College Tranfer
Transfers
44.4%
11.1%
0.0%
0.0%
6.3%
12.5%
13.3%
26.7%
25.0%
50.0%
Total Transfer Rates by Graduation Year
Total Senior
College
Transfer Rate
55.6%
0.0%
18.8%
40.0%
75.0%
100.0%
75.0%
80.0%
60.0%
55.6%
40.0%
40.0%
18.8%
20.0%
0.0%
2007‐2008 2009‐2010 2010‐2011 2010‐2011
There were no graduates in the 07/08 academic year.
2011‐2012 CUNY College Destinations of 2011‐2012 DD‐A.A.S. Graduates¹
Number of CUNY Colleges
Graduates
City
Baruch
Hunter
Lehman
Brooklyn
Queens
Staten Island
NYC Tech
York
John Jay
1
1
¹ Graduates were counted as transferred if they were registered in any of the CUNY senior colleges (including the Graduate Center, the Law School, the School of Professional Studies, and the School of Journalism) in any or all semesters of the academic year following the graduation year.
Page 28 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) C. Courses and Curriculum
1 Courses Taken by DD‐A.A.S. Students
2
3
4
5
Courses by Supporting Departments: Historical Trends 2007‐2012:
Mechanical Engineering Technology and Design (MT)
Mechanical Engineering Technology and Design Courses: Fall
Mechanical Engineering Technology and Design Courses: Spring
Mechanical Engineering Technology and Design Average Grades: Fall
Mechanical Engineering Technology and Design Average Grades: Spring
6
7
Grade Point Average
First Year GPA
Graduation GPA
Page 29 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) C. 1. Courses Taken by Computerized Architectural & Industrial Design (DD‐A.A.S.) Students (excluding ST 100)
DD‐A.A.S. Students
Code Department
Fall 2010
MT
Mechanical Engineering Technology & Design Drafting
215
MA
Mathematics
PH
Physics
EN
English
27
Spring 2011
Fall 2012
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Grand Total
52.3%
182
50.7%
186
50.0%
180
47.1%
191
48.8%
954
49.8%
40
9.7%
32
8.9%
46
12.4%
49
12.8%
48
12.3%
215
11.2%
42
10.2%
40
11.1%
34
9.1%
50
13.1%
42
10.7%
208
10.9%
6.6%
27
7.5%
38
10.2%
43
11.3%
35
9.0%
170
8.9%
SS
Social Science
30
7.3%
25
7.0%
30
8.1%
28
7.3%
29
7.4%
142
7.4%
BE
Basic Education Skills
25
6.1%
18
5.0%
13
3.5%
11
2.9%
14
3.6%
81
4.2%
HI
History
6
1.5%
3
0.8%
7
PE
Physical Education
9
2.2%
9
2.5%
1.9%
5
1.3%
10
2.6%
31
1.6%
0.0%
1
0.3%
5
1.3%
24
1.3%
3
0.8%
4
AR
Art & Design
8
1.9%
1
0.3%
2
0.5%
BU
Business
2
0.5%
3
0.8%
4
1.1%
CH
Chemistry
1
CJ
Criminal Justice
0.2%
0.0%
BI
Biological Science
0.0%
HE
Health Educaton
0.0%
2
0.5%
4
1.0%
2
0.5%
9
0.5%
3
0.8%
1
0.3%
1
0.3%
9
0.5%
0.0%
1
0.3%
0.0%
5
1.3%
6
0.3%
1
0.3%
1
0.3%
2
0.5%
1
0.3%
5
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2
0.5%
5
0.3%
1
0.3%
0.0%
1
0.3%
5
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1
0.3%
5
0.3%
Foreign Languages & Literature ‐ Italian
2
0.5%
1
0.3%
1
0.2%
2
0.6%
SP
Speech Communication
1
0.2%
3
0.8%
CS
Computer Science
0.0%
2
0.6%
ET
Electrical & Computer Engineering Technology
0.0%
2
0.6%
MU
Music
LC
Foreign Languages & Literature ‐ Chinese
Grand Total
0.0%
2
2
0.0%
0.0%
4
0.2%
0.0%
0.5%
2
0.5%
0.0%
4
0.2%
0.5%
1
0.3%
0.0%
4
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
3
0.2%
0.5%
0.0%
3
0.2%
0.0%
1
0.1%
100.0%
1,915
100.0%
1
0.2%
1
0.2%
2
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1
0.3%
100.0%
359
100.0%
411
0.9%
0.5%
1.1%
Foreign Languages & Literature ‐ Spanish
Foreign Languages & Literature ‐ French
18
9
0.0%
LS
LF
1.0%
0.0%
4
LI
ASAP ASAP specific course
0.0%
2
0.0%
372
Page 30 of 39
100.0%
0.0%
382
100.0%
391
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) C.2. Mechanical Engineering Technology, Design Drafting, and Computer Graphics: Fall
Fall Term MT Courses
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Dept
Course # Course Name
Total DD
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
111
122
124
125
212
219
293
341
345
346
369
453
454
481
482
487
488
489
900
75
34
38
16
13
19
33
8
20
2
11
14
17
14
12
10
20
9
15
4
ARCHT DESIGN FUND
17
10
10
14
10
7
19
21
14
17
1
21
12
17
STRC DRAFT & DESIGN
ELEC‐MECH DR & TEC
COMP AID DESIGN DRAFT
ADVANCED CADD
COOP ED MT‐DSGN
27
35
18
9
16
16
14
5
43
15
19
13
MT
MT
MT
MT
Total
122 L
219 L
369 L
487 L
% DD‐A.A.S. Students
TECH DRAWING
MANUFACTURING PROC
MET & MAT
MET & MAT LAB
TECH GEOM & AUTOCAD
SURVEYING & LAYOUT
PARAMETRIC COMPUTER AIDED
APPLIED MECHANICS
STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
STRENGTH OF MAT LAB
COMP APP IN ENG TECH
PIPING SYSTEMS
FUND HVAC SYSTEMS
MANUFCTRNG PROC LB
SURVEY & LAYOUT LB
COM APP IN ET LAB
ELEC & MECH LAB
34
19
27
432
Total DD
Number of Students Enrolled
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Total DD
Regular MT Courses
74
33
90
24
4
27
36
28
29
7
2
16
15
12
21
18
22
23
14
7
16
21
16
11
39
16
11
Laboratory Courses
8
24
4
27
14
21
18
22
19
1
16
16
230 399 222 423
53.2%
55.6%
Fall 2012
Grand Total
Total DD
Total DD
Total DD
Total
DD
98
34
30
13
13
21
26
7
12
1
12
19
29
18
15
18
12
13
9
10
11
46
80
22
11
24
42
15
18
22
20
32
21
40
5
11
11
2
12
75
58
26
6
27
44
19
24
13
8
28
16
8
15
8
17
14
14
13
12
15
4
43
12
16
18
12
6
49
10
14
14
10
3
158
39
97
5
81
148
6
71
55
2
38
66
38
73
21
16
93
84
24
6
17
9
34
21
18
7
19
10
200
469
25
68
20
16
1244
30
6
11
17
8
12
9
20
15
9
47.3%
Page 31 of 39
215
45.8%
436
13
6
11
186
42.7%
1
11
1
11
19
22
13
14
20
6
458
257
181
69
92
169
34
131
90
50
113
71
41
82
22
27
228
93
63
191
119
83
53
27
2,553
394
23
8
15
25
40
1
12
9
6
48.5%
48.7%
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) C.3. Mechanical Engineering Technology, Design Drafting, and Computer Graphics: Spring
Spring Term MT Courses
Number of Students Enrolled
Spring 2008 Spring 2009 Spring 2010 Spring 2011 Spring 2012 Spring 2013
Dept
Course # Course Name
Total DD
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
111
122
124
125
161
212
219
293
341
345
346
453
454
481
482
484
487
488
489
492
513
514
900
TECH DRAWING
MANUFACTURING PROC
MET & MAT
MET & MAT LAB
FUND OF C N C
TECH GEOM & AUTOCAD
SURVEYING & LAYOUT
PARAMETRIC COMPUTER AIDED
APPLIED MECHANICS
STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
STRENGTH OF MAT LAB
PIPING SYSTEMS
FUND HVAC SYSTEMS
ARCHT DESIGN FUND
STRC DRAFT & DESIGN
CONSTRUCT METHODS
ELEC‐MECH DR & TEC
COMP AID DESIGN DRAFT
ADVANCED CADD
VIRTUAL AUTOMATION
THERMO‐FLUID SYSTEMS
THERMO‐FLUID SYS ‐ LAB
COOP ED MT‐DSGN
59
18
23
10
20
14
23
Regular MT Courses
57
16
67
37
7
31
32
13
32
23
3
19
19
20
12
21
21
27
18
16
12
14
13
15
8
6
10
1
15
14
11
11
18
22
25
19
11
43
17
14
20
21
18
8
21
9
8
14
11
19
7
14
11
17
MT
MT
MT
Total
122 L
219 L
487 L
MANUFCTRNG PROC LB
SURVEY & LAYOUT LB
ELEC & MECH LAB
% DD‐A.A.S. Students
14
18
23
11
424
Total DD
Total DD
19
3
15
1
18
16
13
12
14
70
17
72
13
10
12
16
14
13
1
9
14
1
9
7
15
12
16
Laboratory Courses
3
37
7
31
18
16
12
14
8
232 480 203 460
54.7%
42.3%
26
6
15
3
23
12
10
8
12
12
14
17
12
8
Total DD
Total DD
Total DD
Total
DD
70
36
30
16
40
19
6
15
1
61
36
24
11
36
19
2
10
47
60
32
20
40
4
40
19
29
17
32
1
16
6
38
30
32
24
12
13
22
13
8
9
25
20
23
16
25
20
1
21
20
21
21
19
18
23
22
34
21
20
12
18
18
22
22
21
21
64
11
32
12
13
16
14
9
21
2
38
13
12
7
11
1
34
11
10
12
12
6
9
10
2
3
3
3
361
218
173
99
175
62
163
19
122
95
9
44
93
124
48
113
11
304
66
110
59
60
74
116
34
75
8
4
56
128
1
63
57
1
42
83
92
44
110
8
89
51
2
4
4
38
183
86
53
11
2,752
16
42
8
1,176
6
2
17
10
7
6
12
196
42.6%
Page 32 of 39
Grand Total
508
182
35.8%
429
180
42.0%
451
40.6%
42.7%
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) C.4. Mechanical Engineering Technology, Design Drafting, and Computer Graphics: Fall ‐‐ Average Grades
A minimum of 5 students in required to report averages
Fall Term MT Courses
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Dept
Course # Course Name
Total DD
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
Total
111
122
124
125
212
219
293
341
345
346
369
453
454
481
482
487
488
489
2.40
1.91
2.35
1.97
2.60
3.05
2.43
2.12
2.44
‐‐
2.77
3.28
2.35
2.65
2.73
2.47
2.71
3.39
2.87
‐‐
2.13
1.90
1.86
2.55
1.90
2.33
2.02
2.63
2.69
2.27
2.94
2.34
2.63
2.36
3.23
2.50
2.64
2.58
2.04
2.48
2.57
TECH DRAWING
MANUFACTURING PROC
MET & MAT
MET & MAT LAB
TECH GEOM & AUTOCAD
SURVEYING & LAYOUT
PARAMETRIC COMPUTER AIDED
APPLIED MECHANICS
STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
STRENGTH OF MAT LAB
COMP APP IN ENG TECH
PIPING SYSTEMS
FUND HVAC SYSTEMS
ARCHT DESIGN FUND
STRC DRAFT & DESIGN
ELEC‐MECH DR & TEC
COMP AID DESIGN DRAFT
ADVANCED CADD
Total DD
Average Grades
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Total DD
Regular MT Courses
2.50 2.45 2.46
2.52 ‐‐
2.67
3.10 3.19 2.25
2.75 ‐‐
2.95
2.45 2.25
2.89 3.41 3.19
2.35
3.24
2.46
3.17
‐‐
2.63
2.61
2.27
2.40
2.74
4.00
2.49
3.25
2.79
2.97
2.83
2.60
2.82
3.25
2.76
3.02
2.44
2.44
2.69
2.48
2.94
2.86
2.40
2.86
2.72
Page 33 of 39
Fall 2012
Grand Total
Total DD
Total DD
Total DD
Total
DD
2.50
2.79
2.27
3.31
2.81
2.88
2.78
2.57
2.20
‐‐
3.06
2.88
2.20
2.79
3.52
2.79
3.04
1.71
2.60
2.91
3.04
2.25
2.34
2.63
3.64
2.36
2.67
3.33
2.18
2.68
3.61
2.67
2.57
2.82
2.77
2.19
2.66
‐‐
3.20
2.37
2.93
2.57
3.94
2.50
2.41
3.31
1.86
3.12
3.81
2.73
2.98
2.80
2.98
2.80
2.18
2.54
2.61
2.53
3.05
2.34
2.80
3.20
2.34
2.76
3.18
3.00
2.73
3.31
3.00
2.75
2.41
2.53
2.53
3.09
2.12
2.85
3.32
2.28
2.90
3.74
2.54
2.76
2.46
2.51
2.67
2.94
2.74
2.69
2.70
2.628
2.68
2.618
2.233
2.638
3.023
3.035
2.423
2.70
‐‐
2.93
2.87
2.42
2.668
2.665
3.23
2.88
2.67
2.707
3.15
2.00
2.73
2.61
3.47
2.69
2.54
2.58
‐‐
2.21
3.19
2.77
‐‐
2.80
‐‐
2.80
3.32
2.75
2.86
3.43
2.74
2.74
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) C.5. Mechanical Engineering Technology, Design Drafting, and Computer Graphics: Spring ‐‐ Average Grades
A minimum of 5 students in required to report averages
Spring Term MT Courses
Average Grades
Spring 2008 Spring 2009 Spring 2010 Spring 2011 Spring 2012 Spring 2013
Dept
Course # Course Name
Total DD
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
Total
111
122
124
125
161
212
219
293
341
345
346
453
454
481
482
484
487
488
489
492
513
514
2.15
1.61
2.03
1.86
2.42
2.26
2.71
2.67
‐‐
2.32
‐‐
2.37
2.39
3.43
2.40
2.18
‐‐
2.74
2.19
2.93
2.03
2.23
2.66
2.78
2.67
3.03
2.67
2.98
2.36
2.59
2.77
2.71
3.41
2.77
2.74
1.71
2.76
2.59
2.50
1.50
2.76
2.59
2.44
2.72
1.85
2.91
2.93
3.35
2.56
2.24
1.47
TECH DRAWING
MANUFACTURING PROC
MET & MAT
MET & MAT LAB
FUND OF C N C
TECH GEOM & AUTOCAD
SURVEYING & LAYOUT
PARAMETRIC COMPUTER AIDED
APPLIED MECHANICS
STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
STRENGTH OF MAT LAB
PIPING SYSTEMS
FUND HVAC SYSTEMS
ARCHT DESIGN FUND
STRC DRAFT & DESIGN
CONSTRUCT METHODS
ELEC‐MECH DR & TEC
COMP AID DESIGN DRAFT
ADVANCED CADD
VIRTUAL AUTOMATION
THERMO‐FLUID SYSTEMS
THERMO‐FLUID SYS ‐ LAB
2.47
Total DD
Total DD
Regular MT Courses
2.38 2.54 2.45
3.08 2.34 2.74
2.88 2.96 3.11
2.92 ‐‐
3.66
2.06
2.18
2.08 2.09 2.09 2.16
2.75 2.13 2.34 2.29
2.57
‐‐
‐‐
2.29
2.45
2.75
2.57
2.25
2.98
‐‐
2.15
2.10
2.59
3.06
2.86
3.26
3.09
2.86
3.26
3.09
2.72
2.87
2.63
2.77
3.27
2.76
2.97
2.87
2.68
Page 34 of 39
Grand Total
Total DD
Total DD
Total DD
Total
DD
2.38
2.36
2.62
2.89
2.11
2.94
2.13
2.86
‐‐
2.15
1.71
2.45
3.61
2.13
1.96
‐‐
2.79
2.65
1.92
2.95
3.45
2.07
2.87
2.00
3.01
2.90
2.66
2.85
3.41
2.86
‐‐
2.57
3.26
2.42
2.54
2.28
2.27
2.77
2.70
2.79
2.33
2.83
2.44
1.90
2.31
1.77
2.08
2.68
2.59
‐‐
3.22
1.73
2.23
3.22
1.82
2.48
2.97
2.37
2.95
3.11
2.37
2.70
2.41
2.41
2.71
2.71
2.36
2.36
2.87
2.89
2.47
3.20
3.70
2.71
2.92
2.81
2.81
‐‐
2.09
2.58
3.53
2.56
2.69
‐‐
3.33
3.44
3.34
3.68
3.77
2.77
3.74
3.44
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
2.75
2.36
2.24
2.67
3.07
2.16
2.17
2.46
2.66
2.64
2.61
3.43
3.09
1.99
2.63
2.88
2.62
3.03
2.85
2.81
2.69
3.03
3.52
2.64
2.592
2.907
2.82
‐‐
‐‐
2.107
2.477
‐‐
2.682
2.612
‐‐
3.165
1.964
2.578
2.873
2.62
3.41
2.888
2.666
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
2.56
2.52
2.54
‐‐
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) C.10. First‐Year GPA (Attended at Least Two Semesters)
Freshmen and Transfer Students
Entering Fall:
Average
Fall 2006
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
2.17
2.30
2.22
2.26
2.29
2.00
25th Percentile
Median
75th Percentile
1.57
1.41
1.32
1.91
1.68
1.01
1.98
2.50
2.31
2.20
2.51
2.07
2.99
2.93
2.91
2.84
2.93
3.01
Minimum
Maximum
.17
.17
.55
.36
0.00
0.00
3.66
3.66
3.94
3.81
4.00
3.91
19
21
23
28
26
Total Graduates 12
First Year GPA 2.40
2.30
2.29
2.17
2.20
2.22
2.30
2.26
2.10
2.00
2.00
1.90
1.80
Fall 06
Fall 07
Fall 08
Fall 09
Fall 10
Page 35 of 39
Fall 11
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) C.11. Graduation GPA
2006‐2007 2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010 2010‐2011 2011‐2012
Average
3.03
2.99
2.69
2.91
2.92
2.83
25th Percentile
Median
75th Percentile
2.43
2.71
2.22
2.64
2.65
2.32
3.21
2.99
2.53
2.76
2.98
2.79
3.50
3.28
3.09
3.32
3.23
3.15
Minimum
Maximum
2.26
2.49
2.07
2.41
2.08
2.17
3.55
3.49
3.91
3.65
3.66
3.79
Total Graduates
6
9
8
16
15
8
Graduation GPA 3.10
3.03
3.00
2.92
2.90
2.99
2.91
2.80
2.69
2.83
2.70
2.60
2.50
Fall 07
Fall 08
Fall 09
Fall 10
Page 36 of 39
Fall 11
Fall 12
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) D. Faculty and Staff
1
2
Staff categories and faculty profile (appointment status, gender, ethnicity and highest degree earned)
Faculty Members:
Engineering Technology
Page 37 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) D.1. Staff categories and faculty profile As of Fall 2012
Staff Categories
Departments
Engineering Technology
Clerical/Secr
Exec/Admin
etarial/Colle
/Mgr
ge Assistants
18
7
Technical/
Other Paraprofes
Professional
sional
Faculty
52
3
18
Total
98
Faculty Appointment Status
Departments
Engineering Technology
Part‐time Faculty
32
Associate Professor
Professor
6
Assistant Professor
5
8
18
Male
90%
Instructor Lecturer Total
1
0
52
Gender of Full‐time Faculty
Departments
Engineering Technology
2
Female
10%
Total
20
Ethnicity of Full‐time Faculty
Hispanic/ Latino
Asian
Black/ African American
White
Total
Engineering Technology
0
0%
3
15%
1
5%
16
80%
20
100%
Highest Degree Earned of Full‐time Faculty
Departments
Engineering Technology
Bachelor's Level Degree
2
Master's Level Degree
10
Doctorate Doctorate (Academic) (Professional) Unknown
7
0
Page 38 of 39
1
Total
20
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Program Review Data Packet
Comp Arch/ Industrial Design (DD: A.A.S.) D.3. Engineering Technology Faculty
As of Fall 2012
Sorted by alphabetical order of last name within time status
First Name
Stuart
Belle
Edward
John
Nathan
Edward
Nicholas
Merlinda
Marvin
Joseph
Robert
Danny
Mike
Hamid
Kee
Jeffrey
Peter
Vincent
Craig
Richard
Brian
Fred
Renne
Bing‐Chuan
Brian
John
Pericles
Michael
Walter
Wayne
Mikhail
Michael
Moshe
Ephraim
John
Lin
Edward
Robert
Louis
Rouzbeh
Peter
Vaughn
Peter
Norton
Jerry
Joann
Andrei
Brian
Steven
Richard
Huixin
Michael
Last Name
Asser
Birchfield
Brumgnach
Buoncora
Chao
Davis
Dizinno
Drini
Gayle
Goldenberg
Kueper
Mangra
Metaxas
Namdar
Park
Schwartz
Stark
Stigliano
Weber
Yuster
Banho
Bassali
Castro
Chiu
Clark
Ducroiset
Emanuel
Goldblatt
Heinz
Kennedy
Kneller
Kozma
Lachter
Laifer
Leccese
Lu
Marcinek
Mazzella
Nashelsky
Nazari
Novak
Nystrom
Paolino
Reid
Sitbon
Sun
Szabo
Toyota
Trowbridge
Victolo
Wu
Zohrabian
Department Name
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Faculty Type
Time Status
Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Instructor
Full‐time Faculty
Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Asst Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Asst Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Asst Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Assc Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Assc Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Asst Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Asst Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Asst Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Assc Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Asst Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Asst Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Assc Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Assc Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Professor
Full‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Professor
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Associate Profes Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Assistant ProfessPart‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Professor
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Assistant ProfessPart‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Professor
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Lecturer
Part‐time Faculty
Adjunct Associate Profes Part‐time Faculty
Page 39 of 39
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Download